@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
CT Trustees Robbing people with the protection of the CT State Police and CT Judges.
They are all compromised. https://t.co/rt94IwJui9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses various legal proceedings and allegations of fraud in a conversation with another person. They mention the involvement of different individuals, including lawyers, judges, and government officials. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of action and accountability in their case. They also mention a private investigator who tried to help but faced obstacles. The conversation touches on corruption and the speaker's belief that those in positions of power are part of a larger network of criminals.
Speaker 0: Jeff Hellman and Ron Georges, this is after the deposition, so Jeff Hellman is now the enemy. Before the deposition, Jeff Hellman was my pal. But after the deposition where Ron cut him into it. Okay? They take my friend, and the first thing they do is they go it over to court, they tried to convince Manning that Corey's getting enormous sums of money, 1,000 of dollars from a guy.
Okay? It, and we have no idea if Corey dumped money with him before he filed his bankruptcy. Now it. Remember, there's been, like, 500 charges that I didn't even file bankruptcy that they did. Right?
Speaker 1: Listen. Ellery puts in writing that there's 500 crimes here. It. I mean, he's saying there's every type of fraud there is, insurance fraud.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Well, as you notice, it, as 18 goes on, Ellery and Ellery keeps sharpening his pencil because Ellery becomes more and more convinced that he's gonna be out, and his door's gonna get kicked down by the FBI. You understand?
Speaker 1: Okay. So this is a $110,000,000 fraud or a $100,000,000 fraud?
Speaker 0: 110 it minimum. That's like that's like what it's worth that day at my cell bill.
Speaker 1: You had it. Okay. What is the three forty one meeting on December 4th in December 14th? What is the 3
Speaker 0: Anytime you are put into a bankruptcy, either voluntarily or him see either voluntarily or Oh, I got you.
Speaker 1: I got you. This is an evidentiary hearing. Okay.
Speaker 0: No. No. It's not. It's not evidentiary. No.
Okay. What it is it is the trustee who's gonna be the trustee of the case. Right?
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Holds a hearing where everyone in the hearing room is under oath. And a general description of of your assets, what you did, why you're there, up gets stated into the court. Right?
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: And if you look at what Elrey wrote, Elrey wrote, he attended so when I went from a chapter 11 to chapter 7. Right.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: I had to have a 3 40 1 meeting.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: So I had a 3 40 1 meeting, And I can remember how sick I was. I mean, I was really ill.
Speaker 1: Okay. So focus on focus on easily proven assets it. It's like what the hedge fund owned.
Speaker 0: Well, by the way, I have the transcript on the three forty one. I'll get it and give it to you. Okay? It's his name, but the most fascinating thing about it is, Ellery, in your one that you're reading, says he was at the three forty one meeting even though he resigned as my lawyer. Error, right, he resigned the morning of me being converted.
So I got converted without a lawyer. It.
Speaker 1: Right. So here we go. 80,000,000 in assets, they describe as minuscule.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. It up. Okay. How about that's that's why first thing Manning says in the first hearing 5 years later. Right?
Well, actually, from
Speaker 2: him in, it's only 2 years later.
Speaker 0: But 5 years from when I was filed into bankruptcy, Manning, first thing estates is, I would like the trustees to explain to me how a person could go from $77,000,000 Well, how
Speaker 1: do you how do
Speaker 0: you lose liquid assets, not even assets like your house.
Speaker 1: What happens to the $200,000,000 or the $20,000,000 insurance claim? It over. What happened
Speaker 2: to that?
Speaker 0: What insurance claim? You mean the house or the bond? The house
Speaker 1: or the bond. No. The bond's even bigger. That was Yeah. It That was material fraud.
Speaker 0: But it should be, like, 500,000,000. But good.
Speaker 1: Right. That is material fraud.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's also it's also conspiracy after the fact? Tossed obstruction of justice.
Speaker 1: So why didn't the judge, address it?
Speaker 0: Well, that's the big question throughout all of this. That's it to the number 1 question, which is why did the judge continue to threaten it and then come back the
Speaker 2: next time and not even mention it.
Speaker 1: Well, we get back to this question about eruption. Well, how does the CIA, how does the FBI how do all these throw
Speaker 0: when you throw a ball and it to the ceiling instead of the floor, you know, something's fucked up. So forensic tells you that when you have and that's why Paul outlined line the thing in the in the one before this. When Paul outlined it in yellow, he's like, just right here. Nothing else. Forget everything everything else.
Forget everything else.
Speaker 1: Capital management. Did you ever go after him?
Speaker 0: Go after I even go after it.
Speaker 1: Double eagle 2.
Speaker 0: What I've been doing is I actually did what Heather first said to me when she first met me.
Speaker 1: Time's up. Okay.
Speaker 0: No. She fucking first at me and said, you know, you have to stay alive or none of this matters. So what I've been doing, I've been trying to a
Speaker 1: die. Yeah. But now all the property in Martha's Vineyards it. Been developed. You can't go back and get it.
Speaker 0: You're so wrong. You gotta get the law. If you're gonna make statements, you're not into the law. Okay? At, that bankruptcy was filed premeditatedly, fraudulently.
Meaning, it, that has to be reversed. And when it's reversed, everything I owned it back then, it comes mine again.
Speaker 1: You might think so, but
Speaker 0: No. Him out. That is the law.
Speaker 1: It's owned by the president of the United States now.
Speaker 0: I don't give a shit about that. I'm telling you what the law is right it now. The law right now states everything has to return back. In addition to that, my friend, when it They took that land. It was 100% titled, which no one ever has, and 100% insured, it forward, which no one has.
Okay?
Speaker 1: Who's the char who who's the Chartist property casualty it. Company.
Speaker 0: Tardis AIG.
Speaker 1: They're done. They're out of business.
Speaker 0: AIG?
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I don't cut it. I don't think they're out of business.
Speaker 1: AIG was a part of that 2008 fraud.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Right. And they didn't and get one charge against them. The CIA came in and protected them and everything.
All the vice presidents, they sold a whole into policies to these people that were no good. They were wiped out. Mine wasn't one one of them because I caught my policy under Chartis, which is a subsidiary of AIG.
Speaker 1: So when Greenwich Ballistics wrote articles, letters, it And signed it Corey Cooper Smith.
Speaker 0: That that wasn't my signature. Now we have fraudulent conveyance to federal documents of off high security and national security.
Speaker 1: So how does this get covered by the ATF?
Speaker 0: Invoice his firearms?
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 0: Okay. And I have multiple emails from the ATF in inappropriate emails swapping my guns illegally, emails stating you need to get rid of this gun or you're gonna it. I never see a day of light again stating other things. And I'm on the phone with the actual senior agent, and he's telling me, oh, he doesn't get involved in any of this type of stuff with, like, companies or
Speaker 1: That's what the state police said when I tried to file a complaint.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But I'm looking at his fucking an email, got
Speaker 1: it. Yeah. I understand. But the truth
Speaker 0: hidden from me for 3 years.
Speaker 1: I know. But no one it. No one currently will invest
Speaker 0: last year.
Speaker 1: I know, but they won't investigate this.
Speaker 0: Well, it off? Again, they may not have to because if it goes public, right, okay, a there's gonna be a demanding investigation. Are they gonna investigate if you ask them to? Of course not. If there are if there are pathways that forced them to investigate?
That's what you do. Like, you go to internal affairs with the cop. I don't know there of any internal affairs for FBI agents or CIA against
Speaker 1: Internal Affairs in Norwalk, I've I've talked to a 100 times they will not meet with me. I've I've given them so many cases. It's not it,
Speaker 0: and guess what? Okay? There is no ramifications for them not meeting with you. There's no oversight. It.
Follow?
Speaker 1: I follow.
Speaker 0: So that's the problem with all this?
Speaker 2: It?
Speaker 1: Well, it's got to be it's got to in to implicate the judge at this point.
Speaker 0: Out of everyone involved up in my case, the judge is the most guilty. And I could tell you, clearly someone influenced her. I can tell you a whole bunch remember I told you they went after my friend who owned that fund, okay, because he lent me money for a her Yeah. So I could survive? Yeah.
Well, okay. He, Jeff Hellman in court said, your honor, we discovered didn't discover anything. It's in my exposed bankruptcy account. You understand? I have one account.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: It's listed with that court, and in, they have open access to it 247. You understand?
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 0: So they didn't discover anything. They're all right there. And he brings in all the checks. He's like, look at all these checks. And so I said, your honor, I'm
Speaker 1: I know. But I know. But the the the it. The owner the owner this this all comes back to waiting. I mean, you can't you you gotta move the ball forward.
Speaker 0: You know what Manning says to his accusations that I might have given him $1,000,000 to have him give it after me
Speaker 1: or you know, it's just trying
Speaker 0: to think of a scheme. He's trying to think of a scheme where it's illegal. Right?
Speaker 1: If the judge in twenty it. 18 had this document. What the hell are you waiting for?
Speaker 0: What about the 3 before it, they weren't bad enough? See, that's the problem with my whole case, which is I kept searching for something bigger, badder, and meaner.
Speaker 1: Then you
Speaker 2: need to
Speaker 1: then you need
Speaker 0: to did anything more than the first thing I ever filed?
Speaker 1: Then you need to then you need to go into the case, sign the thing, it peer, force the judge to get you counsel because having your lawyers it Get murdered one after the
Speaker 0: get called to write the 1 page thing that retort Andre and either forces them to make Andre work. Right?
Speaker 2: Him apart.
Speaker 1: Andre is not trustworthy.
Speaker 0: It doesn't none other lawyers are trustworthy, and it doesn't matter. My point being is, okay, if Andre is ordered to work, work. He's also gonna have you held accountable, okay, for filings. Do you follow me? He won't be he won't be ordered to work and then do nothing like it, he did for 2 years.
Right? But I don't really care because I really know what needs to be there now anyway, and there's very little a lawyer is gonna do because it's never gonna
Speaker 2: be a case you're gonna do in front of a trial.
Speaker 1: No no lawyer is gonna take this case.
Speaker 0: Of course not. That's why it. Saying force Andre.
Speaker 2: Do you
Speaker 0: understand how bad my life was?
Speaker 1: He said he said I'm not Hillary. Hold on. He said he wouldn't see the bullet coming.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Who who compromised your attorney?
Speaker 0: It, he wouldn't tell me.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have to do this. You you're gonna have to do this this you're gonna it. This for yourself.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But in fact, after you realized okay? After he realized what he had actually he texted me. Right?
Speaker 2: In other
Speaker 0: words, he was still emotional when he texted me because I was coming to his office that morning. Mhmm. So he texted to me an hour before I was leaving. Okay? So someone talked to him over the weekend.
Speaker 1: You gotta document all this shit, bro.
Speaker 0: I don't. It's already there. It's it's filed at the court.
Speaker 1: No. No. This transcript's filed with the court, but nothing else.
Speaker 0: So you're saying I need to report Andre's filing. Right?
Speaker 1: You need to have Andre come clean.
Speaker 0: Andre's not gonna come clean unless I push us him deeper into the rabbit hole. He only came do you understand he went five and a half years, 6 years, never once mentioning money, never once mentioning anything? He only is forced now to mention us? Because I filed a motion against him. He's not zealously fucking defending me.
That's why he had to respond like this. He what? You think it. Something new this last hour? Hey.
Hey.
Speaker 1: Hey. Hey. Don't take it out on me.
Speaker 0: For, like, 7 years.
Speaker 1: Don't take it out on me. I'm trying to
Speaker 0: I'm not I'm trying to
Speaker 1: get you to drink.
Speaker 0: No. This is not now. No. Stop it. Has nothing to do with you.
Speaker 1: Hold on. I dragged the horse to water, and I can't make him drink.
Speaker 0: What are you talking about? You it.
Speaker 1: You can lead a horse to water, but you can make him drink.
Speaker 0: Yes. But you can make them drink. Okay? You just stick them around with a bunch of salt, but, it, okay, and turn up the heat. So that's what I'm doing.
When I filed that, I need to file a 1 page response that shows that he lied. Do you know that last year, okay, it. When I brought up all this evidence and stuff, he was like, yeah. Let's go get them. Right?
And he goes, alright. Sign this. Okay? And it. Says is out of the first $100,000 I received back, right, I will give him 25 into that, which I'm happy to do, by the way.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Because this whole case is about just cracking the wall. It off. Once you crack it, everyone's gonna run. Who in the world could stand up behind this and hold their head high? This is a map to show you every corrupt person that's low hanging in our area.
So
Speaker 2: let me just
Speaker 0: tell you this part about Manning. So Jeff Bell then goes into court and starts talking about my friend. Right?
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 0: And and she goes he goes, well, Corey it dump money with this guy. And she goes, so what? Corey has tons of friends that are very, very wealthy. Corey is very wealthy. Yeah.
But but he could've it like, premeditated this, and he could just be getting his own money back. And she repeats, so what? How does it it have
Speaker 2: any bearing to do with this.
Speaker 0: And he went on and on 7 times, and she said, so what? Seven it. Okay? Now I'm gonna tell you in 10 years, the only investigation, the only deposition besides Ellery's it? In 2018, they did.
And I believe it was illegal when they took Ellery in for a deposition because under whose authority is Ron Georges working because his boss it was removed and fired 2 months earlier. Follow me?
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: So if if the US trustee who's there was going in to take him under his wing and reestablish his power. Right? Because he only has the power of the trustees because it because the trustees hired him. You follow me?
Speaker 1: You're what you're saying is the US trustee is responsible for national it? Interest violations.
Speaker 2: I
Speaker 0: didn't get to national security, but what I can tell you is the US trustee is responsible for all of this because the US trustee, okay, literally, joined in it with Ron Georges and Jeff Hellman
Speaker 1: So the US trustee got a piece of this.
Speaker 0: Well, no. I heard this us through the grapevine. And as I said to you, the things I heard through the grapevine, they've all 99% have come out to be true. But I heard that she it. What is the actual whistleblower?
I don't know. Can you hear me if I talk like this?
Speaker 1: The actual whistleblower it Who removed Ron Chorches knows about your case and left you high and dry. Yep. And personally
Speaker 0: it Yeah. But they'll they'll do it separately. They they won't say personally benefited. They'll say, she got what she's promised as a whistleblower.
Speaker 1: What did she get? Who paid her?
Speaker 0: Well, okay, that falls under the it to the justice department. Right? Right. And the thing about it is here's where it gets really weird.
Speaker 1: USC it 28 USC 586.
Speaker 0: K. I don't know what that is, but I'll tell you what's really weird. Okay? What's really weird into this is the fact that I heard, like, she might be getting, like, indicted it because of Ron Georges and that whole
Speaker 1: Who's Tara Toomey?
Speaker 0: The Bridgeport Waterfront deal were a100 $1, they think he took and went offshore with
Speaker 1: it. You think that you think you think the trustees it. Off with part of that Bridgeport reconstruction thing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's like 12,000,000,000. And it in 2008, they all filed bankruptcy. And it went to, like, 6 mobsters, the 12,000,000,000. Who?
It's got, like, 2,000,000 each. Who? I don't know. It You can look it up. But my my the private investigator, Joe Mercio, is huge Italian.
Okay? He's for the government. He's protected for mafia witnesses for testimony. Right?
Speaker 1: What's his name?
Speaker 0: It. Joe Marchio, m a r c h I o, like Marsh, the month March, and then IO.
Speaker 1: It. Division manager of Filippo Construction. It. I'm looking at his picture. He's young.
Speaker 0: Send me the picture. May not be him because Joe's about 55.
Speaker 1: It Oh, maybe it's an old picture.
Speaker 0: No. He's, like, 55.
Speaker 1: He's on LinkedIn.
Speaker 0: He's, like, 220. Is it Paul? He was a he's an a Army, Ranger.
Speaker 1: Football Construction.
Speaker 0: Well, no. Here's with the here's his whip It's
Speaker 1: saying Maryland.
Speaker 0: 20 years.
Speaker 1: It's saying 500 employees, Maryland. Anchor Construction, Fort Myers Construction.
Speaker 0: Him back. You got the wrong guy. Do you want do you want his address? It. He moved to Florida, so I don't have his Florida address.
Speaker 1: Board of trustee and state, staff of Cape Symphony Orchestra. There you him.
Speaker 0: No. It's at him, he's he looks like an Italian mobster.
Speaker 1: Chatham, Massachusetts. It. He was in Connecticut. Right?
Speaker 0: Yes. He was in, NC 27 up, up to River Bay. No further for someone like that?
Speaker 2: It. That's
Speaker 0: Bridgeport. Yeah. I know. But it wasn't Bridgeport. It was up it was, like, for about 10 or something.
Okay?
Speaker 1: So it Oh, that's that's
Speaker 0: His phone number. You want his phone number?
Speaker 1: Not necessarily. I wanna know what he did. Yeah. What's his phone it
Speaker 0: What number? Well, I could tell you what he did. He worked for 21 years at the state police right there in Barrick's right by the Bridgeport. Oh, nice. Over the.
Speaker 1: That'll do it.
Speaker 0: Okay. He worked there. And in there, he had a special, like, one of a kind job. Off, he was the liaison between the DEA and the ATF. Here we go.
He's the number one guy
Speaker 1: Licensed Florida realtor. Hold on. Connecticut
Speaker 2: a State
Speaker 1: police, member of the US military, sergeant, skills, private investigations
Speaker 0: That's it. That's him.
Speaker 1: Police and attorneys through the East Coast. So what are you saying? Surveillance camera, fire it Fire and burglar alarm systems, investing in business products of high net worth.
Speaker 0: I met with them for a year straight, I brought every box, everything I had.
Speaker 1: And what happened?
Speaker 0: Oh, he came back and said, it's just unbelievable. He actually went and tried to talk to 2 ex, a, superior court justices of Connecticut that he knew.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: And he said in, one of them went batshit that something like this could happen in his state.
Speaker 1: And who is that?
Speaker 0: He wouldn't tell me.
Speaker 1: Okay. One
Speaker 0: of the one of the deals we had was I a promise not to reveal, you know, ask his sources. You know what I mean?
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: So, you know, if
Speaker 1: you So you don't remember either of the judges?
Speaker 0: It? No. But I can find out.
Speaker 1: I suggest you do.
Speaker 0: Went through everything. We went through every single fucking thing, and I produced every single thing, and he's like he's like, this is just beyond belief. So he lined up. Okay? It took him, like, a month and a half, it in, we met all the time, and he said, Corey, I don't get it.
I don't get it. Who's out for you? Someone's out for you big time. He says, I don't get it because, literally, I can't get anyone to even listen to me. It's like you're a fucking like, it's like you're a leopard.
He goes so he goes out and out. He keeps trying, in, and he goes into the city, and he finds this Chinese guy that hates corruption, hates government corruption. He's opening up his own business, his own firm in Connecticut, and and he's gonna take my case first.
Speaker 1: Right? He was just he was in the Connecticut State Police during the Madoff problem.
Speaker 0: Of course. I mean, it. He he told me about what he did for a novel thing.
Speaker 1: What do you do?
Speaker 0: I can't if someone describe something that way to you on the phone. Okay? Sort of, like, taking a hammer through the phone and hit me on the head and saying, hello? Hello, big fly.
Speaker 1: I Excuse me. Excuse me.
Speaker 0: Of that.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: You I just woke you up. Okay. Good.
Speaker 1: No. They tried to kill you, bro. And,
Speaker 0: Yeah. Off.
Speaker 1: And all these people that you mentioned
Speaker 0: are in the killing business. Yeah. Yeah. I a note. I know lots of people in that business.
Speaker 1: Well, the problem here That he's the state police. You went to him. He did nothing.
Speaker 0: No. That's not true.
Speaker 1: What did he do?
Speaker 0: It? I'm trying to tell you, but you broke in with your don't you know who these people are? Okay. So he finally rounds up 4 major players in legal in Connecticut that, are gonna meet with me the following week and are gonna take different parts of the case together. So the whole case is gonna be covered.
Right? It Mhmm. And so that was, like, a Tuesday or Wednesday, and then he calls me on Thursday and says, Corey, I got ad news. I said, what? He said, you know the 4 groups we're meeting with next week?
You're all set? He goes, yep. He goes, every single firm him called me today and told me, they're sorry, but they have a conflict of interest, and they can't take the case. It, I I said, which part do you find strange? The fact that they all called on the same day?
Speaker 1: So so
Speaker 0: or the fact or
Speaker 2: the fact
Speaker 1: that he was He was in Middleton.
Speaker 0: Law arms, who the fuck knew that he was calling these law firms? So everyone's phone's being fucking taped.
Speaker 1: Okay. So listen listen it. Listen. If, for example, I went to them in 2000 about Bernie Madoff and it Money laundering. And then I went to him every year with something else till now where in 2022, I went to him with fraud.
This is like serial mishandling of organized it Prime complaints.
Speaker 0: No. You're almost correct. You know what it is?
Speaker 1: No. Tell me.
Speaker 0: It's its periodic exposure of government corruption. That's what it it is, you're mislabeling it. You're labeling it like it should be labeled, but that's not what's going on. You don't have criminals outside the government doing this, you have criminals inside the government that have been approached by criminals outside. So now they're one team a of criminals.
Half of them work outside the government. The other half work inside the government. I I have come to the conclusion late this year. There is no one in this country that holds a significant office, congressman, Cutter, president, etcetera, etcetera. Okay?
Yep. There is no person that holds a high rank in the military. Let's say, colonel and above. Okay? Yep.
All of that is what I call fraternity it easy to get there. Meaning, they're gonna haze you until they're still they're sure you're one of the gang and will be working for their aside, not their job description side.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'll buy that.
Speaker 0: So all I'm trying to do, Johnny, is give you a little bit it of a window into my world.
Speaker 1: Okay. So so we Did you realize a second. We have the judges. We have the trustees working with the state police.
Speaker 0: No. No. The state police. The trustees, okay, it, work with the judges. Okay?
The judges won't go against FBI, the off these or the judges either because they're all getting the same paycheck from the us this department. They all fall under the same value in it. So if you go to an FBI agent and you out a big bitch about a judge. You might as well stick your own thumb up your ass and walk out the door. I don't know out why you would do that, but that's what came to mind.
So I really think you would benefit, John, on, if you and I had a fucking couple dinners and we were talking back and forth, and I was able to educate you on areas that you have away of ever knowing unless someone told you. And the reason why you can be very, very confident that I know a shitload of people that pulled through to this is because you never hear her, and come out of my mouth.
