reSee.it
Token #91030
Subscribe To The Free @reSeeIt Newsletter
Details
| Token ID | reSee.it #91030 |
| đ Link | https://x.com/_/status/1888694455252963615 |
| Token URI | ipfs://bafybeiga4afnxyygh6tebbod4q4rzhha37dvuzxejht75iek5mtb4qcr34 |
| Saved Media | ipfs://bafybeiblv77kxbdtaaxyl6v7jnrhbktlirvrez4mdmjnziyjnnnflgl23i |
| Conversation ID | 1888694455252963615 |
| Posts In Thread | 17 |
| Thread Post IDs |
1888694455252963615, 1888694741849747897, 1888694932942291003, 1888695229995450819, 1888695429883187543, 1888695604626481201, 1888695752047608020, 1888695929319936210, 1888696223286079847, 1888696612794568821, 1888697291290112425, 1888697362706493687, 1888697420105543791, 1888697486279155874, 1888697546064670920, 1888698148958167239, 1888698402902270241
|
| Tweet Created | |
| Author | @VigilantFox |
| Author Name | The Vigilant Fox đŠ |
| Author Profile | https://x.com/VigilantFox |
| Chain | Base |
| Tweet Saved | |
| First Archiver | @kprigel |
| Contract Address | 0xa1a1a1a6EaBEAF37837ccdB47A2aC98603302DAe |
Post Media
Video
Video
Video
Video
Video
Photo
Video
Video
Video
Video
Video
reSee.it
Token #91030
Subscribe To The Free @reSeeIt Newsletter
reSee.it AI Summary
This week, I discussed ten significant stories that the media overlooked. Notably, several U.S. states are drafting bills to ban mRNA COVID-19 injections, driven by concerns from over 81,000 medical professionals and evidence of harm. I highlighted Bill Maher's critique of the NFL's "End Racism" message, Elon Musk's findings on Medicare waste, and Joe Rogan's blunt remarks on vaccine advocates. Additionally, I covered political tensions within the Democratic Party and Australia's controversial anti-free speech law. Stay tuned for more updates next Sunday.
Thread Text
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Legislative efforts to BAN mRNA COVID-19 injections are now underway in several U.S. states. âThis platform continuously shows failureâshows harm.â Bills to ban the shots are being drafted and considered in Florida, Texas, South Carolina, Tennessee, Iowa, Idaho, Montana, and Washington State. âThe evidence is clearâover 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for the IMMEDIATE removal of COVID-19 âvaccinesâ from the market. Failure to do so constitutes mass negligent homicide,â Epidemiologist @NicHulscher says. Hulscher will be âdirectly involved in three of these [ban the shot] initiatives within the next few weeks here, and [he] will be providing undeniable evidence for market withdrawal, including but not limited to the negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality data to these lawmakers.â He predicts, âI think these bills eventuallyâand all these initiativesâwill end up reaching a critical mass. And what that means is itâll reach a certain point where the federal government will have to respond. They will have to follow suit with the states and finally get these off the market.â Get the full breakdown in our exclusive interview. Follow @NicHulscher for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have great news! Legislative efforts are underway in multiple US states to ban dangerous mRNA COVID-19 injections. Washington, Montana, Idaho, Iowa, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida, and Texas are among the states considering bans at various government levels. A peer-reviewed study, supported by over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, provides irrefutable evidence for immediate market withdrawal due to negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality. This momentum, fueled by persistent truth-seekers, may force federal action. We believe all mRNA gene therapy injections should be banned, given their demonstrated failures and harm, such as in the failed RSV trials. The evidence is clear, and we're optimistic about achieving market removal, starting at the state level and moving to the federal level. Follow updates on my X account (@NickHolscher) and the McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) for more information.
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another jam packed week of media blackout and let me tell you ladies and gentlemen, we have some very good news for you this week. Legislative efforts to ban the dangerous COVID-nineteen mRNA injections are now underway across multiple US states with bills being considered, drafted, and supported at various levels of government. Nicholas Hoelscher and Courageous Discourse report to US states with legislative efforts to ban mRNA injections as of 02/06/2025. You can see which states are considering it already with Washington, Montana, Idaho, Iowa, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida, and Texas. Nicholas Hoelscher says a critical mass will soon be reached forcing the federal government to follow suit.
If you're aware of any states that are missing from this figure, please let me know in the comments. Nicholas Hoelscher also makes reference to this recent peer reviewed study which found irrefutable evidence supporting immediate market withdrawal of the COVID nineteen quote unquote vaccines and you can see over 81,000 physicians, scientists and concerned citizens, two forty elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for urgent action. And so we have the McCullough Foundation study which was authored by epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, doctor Mary Talley Bowden, doctor Peter McCullough, titled review of calls for market withdrawal of COVID nineteen vaccines intensify risks far outweigh theoretical benefits, and we encourage everyone to read that in full. We also have new study finds COVID vaccinated are sicker than unvaccinated people. Four studies confirm serious health risks associated with childhood vaccination.
So the pressure is clearly mounting and we wanna take a moment to thank all of you, all of our listeners who haven't wavered in the face of adversity and have persisted in their pursuit of the truth, demanding answers where the authorities shamed us. It's because of all of you and the real experts that have continued in this battle that we are now at this point. Nicholas Hoelscher joins us now with more details on what we can expect next. Nicholas Hoelscher, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: Well, this is wonderful news, and many of us have been sort of holding our breath for years waiting for states to have the courage to do this, and now many of them are. Talk to us a little bit about how this all came about.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So, actually, in the past few years, there have been multiple initiatives, multiple bills, multiple committee hearings, and all of this stuff is is actively and has in the past few years been drafted up. It's being considered now by eight states. And within these eight states, like I said, it it this this situation, this this consideration of banning the mRNA injections is being considered at various levels of government, including county level and at the state level. So, for example, Washington state, like, we know they're they're very blue state.
They had 98% vaccine uptake. It's not being considered there at the state level right now, but there are initiatives at the county level. And I wanna say that, personally, I will be directly involved in three of these initiatives, within the next few weeks here, and I will be providing, undeniable evidence for market withdrawal, including but not limited to the negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality data, to these lawmakers.
Speaker 0: Well, we have the recent, and we just sort of brushed over this, the recent peer reviewed study that found irrefutable evidence supporting immediate market withdrawal of the COVID nineteen, quote, unquote, vaccines. And there's just again, I'll just say it again over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, two forty elected officials, 17 professional organizations based on excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination, calling for urgent action. And so I have to say, Nicholas, and I've I've I've said this on a recent broadcast. This is absolutely, very much thanks to the work of you, doctor Peter McCullough, and many others out there who haven't given up this fight because really it was the biggest crime I think recorded, you know, even though it hasn't officially been declared a crime, the biggest crime against humanity that we've seen in our lifetimes, perhaps in all of history, and to to mandate an experimental product like this, where it is going to actually cause harm, there's evidence of the harm, death, destruction, disability. It should have been recalled a very long time ago.
What do you think will happen now with mRNA in general once this starts to, really topple the COVID narrative?
Speaker 1: Alright. Well, I think these bills eventually and all these initiatives will end up reaching a critical mass. And what that means is it'll reach a certain point to where the federal government will have to respond. They will have to follow suit with the states and finally get these off the market, if they if the federal government doesn't beforehand before the states. And, hopefully, they do before the states, but, you know, that remains to be seen.
And I think that I think all mRNA technology, should be banned, and some of these bills are actually for all mRNA gene therapy injections, for any infectious disease. And, you know, we know from the mRNA RSV trials, those failed as well. They gave those to little babies, and it increased their risk of RSV. And so this platform continuously continuously shows failure, shows harm, and I think it should be totally banned.
Speaker 0: I absolutely agree with you, and many, many people do. And we genuinely hope to see that this is gonna be the way forward, for for America and for the whole world. I'm, that was actually gonna be one of my questions to you is adjust the COVID mRNA or all mRNA. To hear that is very, very refreshing. I know that there was, there were lawmakers in the state of Tennessee that, required the vaccine lettuce to be listed, not, you know, to have specific listings and ban it actually.
There are other states that have said, well, we need to list if a food has mRNA in it, we need to list it as a drug rather than a food. It should be banned altogether and especially because of the shedding aspect, Nicholas, that's the other thing I've made the point several times that it's not actually about choice because we don't have choice. We can't control who we come into contact with. And so if your choice is removed, you can't possibly have that in circulation. Your final words on that, and please let us know where people can follow your fantastic work.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, first, I I I'm hoping that these state level initiatives will finally lead to market removal in at least some of these states, and it will trickle up up to the top level at the federal government. And I'm very I'm very, excited, and I'm very optimistic about this simply because we do have all the evidence. It's all there, and it's and it's clear as day. And you can follow any updates on this on my personal x account at Nick Holscher or on the McCullough Foundation x account at McCullough Fund.
And also please follow us on courageous discourse substack.
Speaker 0: Fantastic. I just wanna bring up your x account at Nick Holscher. Highly recommend people follow Nick, and and also, the McCullough Foundation, just doing incredible work, incredible work. And, of course, that courageous discourse substack, you can also find it at peter mccullough m d dot substack dot com, and and and keep track of this because we can't allow ourselves to lose the momentum around this. I understand that there are a lot of positive things happening around the country, but if we don't stop this very, very dangerous thing that's in circulation, you know, how how can you really fight any battle if you're sick or if you're not here anymore?
And that's what these this, that's what this technology does. And so it has to be banned. And, and we're just very grateful for you. Thank you so much, Nicholas Holcher. Really appreciate your time today.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: The American food supply is loaded with over 1,000 toxic ingredients banned in Europe. It's no wonder Americans are more overweight and sicker than ever. When you can't trust what's in your food, the solution is simple. Go straight to the source. Good Ranchers works with over 100 American family farms to bring transparently good meat and seafood to your table.
Why is Good Ranchers meat better? The answer can be perfectly summed up in three important points. One, no antibiotics, hormones or seed oils. Because it's local, you can trust the American process. Two, steakhouse quality.
The meat truly tastes better and you won't want to go back. Three, save time and money. All the cuts are pre trimmed, individually packaged and vacuum sealed, which makes meal prep easier than ever. If you're tired of wondering what's in your food, it is time to make the switch. Good Ranchers makes it easy to trust your food again with their high quality, great tasting meat delivered straight to your door.
Subscribe to any box at goodranchers.com/vnn and use promo code vnn to get $25 off and a free gift of chicken breasts, bacon, salmon or ground beef with every order for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference for yourself at goodranchers.com/vnn.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#9 - Bill Maher Destroys NFLâs âEnd Racismâ Message in One Brutal Takedown
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democratic partyâs problem isnât its messaging; itâs the message itself. People dislike the message, not the delivery. The Department of Educationâs effectiveness is questionable; reading and math scores are lower now than in 1977 when it was created. A Michigan teachersâ union contract allows teachers to be caught drunk four times before facing consequences, and selling drugs once before firing. The NFLâs âEnd Racismâ end zone messages are pointless virtue signaling. These messages don't deter racism and may even antagonize racists. Instead of focusing on race and gender, addressing real issues is key. Virtue signaling, in fact, perpetuates racism.
Speaker 0: Bill Maher destroys NFL's end racism message in one brutal takedown. Comedian and political commentator Bill Maher just unleashed three brutal truth bombs on the Democratic party in his latest episode of Real Time. Despite his frequent bursts of Trump derangement syndrome, Maher didn't hold back on his party's flaws. The first truth bomb dropped when Maher told MSNBC's Chris Hayes that the Democratic party's problem this election cycle wasn't getting its message out, It was the message itself. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: What happens in the end of an election is everyone sits through the data and they come up with their perfect you know, their plan based on, well, this worked and with this group, and we got attack here and there. And And what politics about is a certain point is, like, innovation and communication. You gotta come up with new stories and agreements
Speaker 2: and timelines. Ken Martin guy, he said, something I've heard Democrats say a lot. We didn't get our message out. Maybe I'm paraphrasing, but that's it. And I've said this before to Democrats.
No. You did. That's the problem.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You did get your message out, and people don't like the message.
Speaker 0: Maher also conceded that Trump is probably right about scrapping the Department of Education, taking notice that it's not like the kids are getting smarter. Take a listen.
Speaker 3: The public is aware of the mismanagement of the improper payments.
Speaker 2: What about the the Department of Education? Now, I I don't know that much about it, but I've never read good things. Rahm Emanuel, who I agree with on almost everything, here was a quote. He said, a third of eighth graders can't read, and now he wants to close the department. And I thought, that's probably why they can't read.
Or at least partly.
Speaker 1: I mean, it keep the the numbers keep getting worse and worse and worse.
Speaker 2: And I don't know if the Department of Education is anything, but I mean, it doesn't really I don't know what it does, except take money. It's sort of a middleman. It doesn't, like, run classrooms or do stuff like that. I don't think it makes policy. So where are you on something like that?
Speaker 3: I think that the the Department of Education has to essentially be closed. A lot of the authorities gotta get sent back to the states. The dollars we appropriate actually need to go directly into the hands of parents so that they can use those resources in their states and in their communities to find the best outcome for their children. When the Department of Ed was created in 1977, our reading scores and math scores for kids fourth and eighth grade were higher than they are today. No.
So it's not worked.
Speaker 2: I mean, I read this. I'm stealing this from Neli Bowles column, but in the the Michigan, the the contract from the teachers union says, you cannot be fired for getting caught drunk as a teacher until you do it for a fifth time.
Speaker 1: What?
Speaker 2: Yeah. The first four times, you're good.
Speaker 1: They didn't take the pee heads up now.
Speaker 2: Counseling.
Speaker 1: I will stop drinking when I start the job.
Speaker 2: And also Also, if you're caught selling drugs, twice, that's when we fire you. The first time, you're good.
Speaker 1: That's insane.
Speaker 2: I mean, it is it is insane.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It is. So it's not like
Speaker 2: there isn't insanity that has to be addressed, and it's not like the kids are getting smarter.
Speaker 0: Congressman Byron Donald Florida added, when the Department of Ed was created in 1977, our reading scores and math scores for kids in fourth and eighth grade were higher than they are today. Ma then cited a stunning fact from a Neli Bowles column revealing that in Michigan, one teachers union contract states a teacher cannot be fired for being caught drunk on the job until it happens a fifth time. Yeah. The first four times you're good, Ma responded with disgust. He added also if you're caught selling drugs twice, that's when we fire you.
The first time you're good, Ma quipped, shaking his head, it's insane and it is insane. The moment of the night dropped when Ma stunned Puck News reporter Tara Palmeri telling her the quote, end racism messages in NFL end zones, which are being removed for the Super Bowl, do nothing to end racism. Palmeri caught off guard scrambled for a coherent counter argument, but it fell flat when Maher delivered a reality check on what the end racism messages actually accomplish. Take a look.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I noticed that at the Super Bowl, they're for the first time in, I think, four years now, the Trump administration is making them take away end racism, which they had written in the end zone. Right?
Speaker 1: And when
Speaker 2: I Why?
Speaker 1: It just seems silly.
Speaker 2: I mean To do it or not to do it?
Speaker 1: Why get rid of it?
Speaker 2: Oh, I could tell you why.
Speaker 1: I know, but it's just like
Speaker 2: because it was stupid to begin with. Yeah.
Speaker 1: But it
Speaker 2: Let me ask you, who's it for? And if you if you're a racist and you see end racism in the end zone, you're gonna stop being a racist? I'm
Speaker 1: sorry. But the sentiment is basically, like, don't be an asshole.
Speaker 2: But but but I think it's an asshole to nag us during a football game about something that doesn't change anything or any if I'm not a racist and I see it, it doesn't matter. And if I am a racist, it can make me more of a racist.
Speaker 3: Look. I think if you write don't be an asshole in the end zone, everybody will agree with that.
Speaker 1: The problem is we all think the other guys have asked. No. And no one thinks they're a risk.
Speaker 0: Well, this moment shattered the party's playbook of turning everything into a race or gender issue to claim the moral high ground. But Maher tore it apart exposing the ugly truth. Virtue signaling doesn't end racism. If anything, it makes it worse. Ex user Jordan M Thomas said it best, virtue signalling doesn't end racism, it perpetuates it.
Few statements ring true than that.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#8 - Elon Musk Says His DOGE Team Uncovered $100 BILLION in Medicare and Medicaid Waste After Gaining Access to the System
Video Transcript AI Summary
My team at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) uncovered $100 billion in wasted Medicare and Medicaid funds. Working with two senior CMS veterans, we had read-only access to their payment and contracting systems. Our mission was to find ways to use resources more effectively, but we discovered massive waste and potential fraud. CMS processes over a billion Medicare claims annually and manages billions in Medicaid funds. They recently suspended 850 agents for suspected fraud. The Department of Justice has also been prosecuting healthcare fraud cases, with billions of dollars in losses. This discovery highlights a massive scandal, potentially the biggest in US history, and is prompting calls for similar transparency initiatives in other countries. We need major reform, absolute transparency over tax spending, and human oversight to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Speaker 0: Musk says his Doge team uncovered 100,000,000,000 in Medicare and Medicaid waste after gaining access to the system. In a bombshell revelation that could shake the foundations of American health care, Elon Musk leading the charge under president Trump's newly minted Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE, has uncovered what he describes as a staggering 100,000,000,000 of taxpayer money wasted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or CMS. On Wednesday, Musk's team, along with two senior veterans from the agency, has been meticulously reviewing the CMS's payment and contracting systems, which are crucial for managing health insurance for approximately one in every four Americans, according to Far Left USA Today. CMS has two senior agency veterans, one focused on policy and one focused on operations, who were leading the collaboration with Doge, including ensuring appropriate access to CMS systems and technology, the agency said in a statement to Reuters. The Doge team was granted read only access to the system.
Their mission, as outlined by Andrew G Nixon, the HHS Director of Communications, is to identify, quote, opportunities for more effective and efficient use of resources in alignment with President Trump's efficiency agenda. However, the narrative has quickly escalated from efficiency to accusations of rampant waste and potential fraud. This is where the big money fraud is happening, Musk tweeted on Wednesday in response to a post suggesting that aids using Doge are searching the Medicare agency payment systems for fraud. However, the most explosive claim came later on Thursday night when Musk tweeted, quote, they wasted $100,000,000,000 of taxpayer money. What was he talking about?
Well, this revelation comes as CMS processes over 1,000,000,000 Medicare claims annually, oversees health care quality through hospital and nursing home inspections, and disperses billions in matching funds to states for Medicaid programs. Now Medicare covers currently about 68,000,000 Americans, primarily those 65 and individuals with disabilities, while Medicaid serves approximately 73,000,000 low income citizens. According to the CMS, from June 24 through October 24, CMS suspended 850 agents and brokers marketplace agreements for reasonable suspicion of fraudulent or abusive conduct related to unauthorized enrollments or unauthorized plan switches. These agents and brokers are now prohibited from participating in marketplace enrollment, including receiving related commissions. The Department of Justice has also been active in combating health care fraud.
In recent years, the average loss associated with the schemes prosecuted by the Health Care Fraud Unit has steadily risen. In June of twenty four, the Department of Justice announced charges against 193 defendants, including 76 medical professionals for their alleged involvement in fraudulent schemes amounting to approximately 2,750,000,000.00 in false claims. Since 02/2007, the Healthcare Fraud Unit has charged more than 5,400 defendants with fraudulently billing Medicare, Medicaid and private health insurers more than ÂŁ27,000,000,000 Doge from its inception was hyped to come in and decimate the scandalous spending and total misappropriation of taxpayer funds and Elon Musk and his team have come in and lived up to all of those expectations and in many ways far exceeded them. Now, while some may be questioning the tactics employed, the results really cannot be questioned. What we've seen in the initial period of the Trump administration and the newly formed Doge department is nothing short of mind boggling.
The absolute web of NGOs initiatives that do not benefit Americans or anyone really could only be described as the biggest scandal potentially in US history. The evidence of complete theft committed against the American people is on display for the world to see. And what this is achieving as a byproduct is other countries asking for the same transparency. In fact, the opposition leader in Australia, Peter Dutton, running for prime minister this year, has put a similar initiative on the table. Now, while Australia has its own problems and we'll get into that a bit later in the broadcast and certainly Peter Dutton is one of those problems, there is no doubt in anyone's mind that a department the likes of Doge is long overdue.
When reflecting on the amount of taxes that populations pay versus population numbers in the workforce, versus taxes upon taxes on products and services, it's absolutely endless and countries like The US, Australia, Canada, The UK should be in a position where virtually every citizen is wealthy and the country is absolutely immaculate in its entirety. Doge has uncovered why it is not. The one thing we should expect now is major reform, absolute transparency over tax and total reform around it, and you can be sure that there will be a microscope on every tax dollar spent and government initiative going forward. The most important aspect to this reform, however, needs to be a populist that is completely informed about the way forward and about the systems and processes being implemented, and ultimately, the people need to have assurance that all of this will have total and absolute human oversight.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#7 - Democrat Whoâs Already Trying to Impeach Trump Gets ROASTED on Live TV by C-SPAN Caller
Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Al Green's push to impeach President Trump again is facing criticism. Some believe his actions are merely a fundraising ploy to garner far-left support. A C-SPAN caller lambasted Green and the Democrats, citing hypocrisy regarding Elon Musk, USAID, and alleged Democrat corruption. The caller stated that Democrats only focus on impeachment, race, and gender issues, neglecting the needs of the American people.
I acknowledge concerns about rapid societal changes and lack of transparency, but these issues don't justify resorting to the same tactics employed by those in power. We must maintain integrity and fairness, even when dealing with corrupt systems. While protests and discussions are valid forms of dissent, itâs crucial to evaluate arguments critically. America's current period of change requires careful consideration and a commitment to fairness.
Speaker 0: Democrat who's already trying to impeach Trump gets roasted on live TV by a C SPAN caller. The article says rep Al Green is the Texas Democrat who's already trying to impeach Trump again. There is a distinct possibility that Green is not even serious about this. He may just be trying to increase support from the far left for fundraising purposes. Either way, it's completely stupid and the public is sick of this.
Green appeared on C SPAN this morning and a caller made a total fall out of him on live television. The caller also got into the Democrat hypocrisy over Elon Musk, Doge and USAID. We're gonna play this clip so you get a bit of context as well as the caller's words. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: And I would add this. The president should be impeached. I said that on the floor of the house. He should be impeached, but I'm not saying that it would be necessarily for what happened in Gaza. There's a target rich environment.
There are many things that may be, placed in this or these articles of impeachment, but he it should be because he's unfit to be president. Unfit. And when these impeachment signs start going up around the country, when people see these signs, I assure you the pressure pressure is gonna be on Congress to do something. Impeachment doesn't mean that he will be removed from office, but it will say to the country that we this is what we stand for. There's it's been said that, the protests don't have a plan.
Well, the plan is here. This is the plan. Protest, complain now, impeach later.
Speaker 0: Let's get to calls because the lines have lit up. Richard in Savannah, Georgia, Republican. You're up first, Richard.
Speaker 2: Thank you. I watched you yesterday with the Democrat party out, protesting everything that Elon Musk is trying to do for the American people. The the USAD is a 100% of money laundering scheme around the world kickbacks back to the Democrat party, whether it's, through the Clinton Foundation in Haiti, Four Point Four Billion And Eighty Four Million Dollars went to her daughter, Chelsea Clinton. All y'all have is, impeachment and race and gender, etcetera, and you actually do nothing for the people of America today. I think the Democrats should sit back and let America see what it's like to reduce the people in government to wasteful spending.
And all y'all can do is is just complain and be negative, and we're sick of it. And also
Speaker 0: Richard, let's let's let's have the congressman The article finishes with quote, Democrats have nothing left but rage. This move by Green is ridiculous and completely ignores the outcome of the twenty twenty four election. Every time you think Democrats might have learned a lesson, they prove they haven't. End quote. Now, this is what I'll say on this and don't shoot me for being balanced, because I do see the fear of change and some of the points some people on the left are making.
There are many rapid changes occurring that in many cases have not afforded the people with complete transparency. Locking people out of systems, locking people out of buildings, whilst may be justified due to an ongoing investigation, can all be very distressing and not all of the affected workers are bad people. They're essentially cogs inside an extremely corrupt machine. Sometimes, those extremely corrupt machines require an extreme approach. Now, whilst they may claim this is evidence of a dictatorship, the fact that they're still able to have these discussions, protests, movements is evidence that the dictatorship they were so afraid of is in fact still the quote unquote democracy they were afraid of losing.
They have the right to challenge power and we all have the right to point out which of their arguments have merit or sound ridiculous. America is in a period of change and I don't think we should behave like the left does in cancelling anyone's opinions that are contrary to those in power. We need to be cautious to not implement the same tactics they used against us against them. If we do, we become hypocrites. They may have set a precedent.
However, in all things going forward, absolute and total integrity and fairness, albeit applied ruthlessly, must be the charter. This is after all what conservatives actually stand for. How well do you sleep at night? Real peace of mind comes from knowing your family is prepared for tough times. My Patriot Supply, America's most trusted name in emergency preparedness, is offering a limited time discount on their supersized mega three month emergency food kit.
This isn't your typical survival food. Each kit provides over 2,500 calories daily for ninety days with delicious meals and extras including chicken, beef, fruits and veggies. We're talking quality meals that last up to twenty five years in storage and still taste like home cooked. The pandemic taught us how quickly store shelves can empty. Don't wait for the next crisis.
Your Mega Emergency Food Kit includes free shipping, a disaster replacement warranty, and 20 fourseven USA based support. This special discount is available for this week only, so visit preparewithvnn.com now to secure your family's future with a $250 discount. If you order by 3PM, they'll ship your order the same day, so you have peace of mind right away. Go to preparewithvnn.com.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#6 - Bill Gates Issues Chilling New Threat to Trump, Musk & America
Video Transcript AI Summary
On *The View*, I expressed concern about the Trump administration's impact on USAID, a partner of my foundation in crucial health initiatives like vaccine distribution and nutrition programs. I emphasized the importance of this work, highlighting the potential for millions of deaths if disrupted. I also voiced worry regarding Elon Musk's political influence, noting a lack of understanding of existing programs among some private sector individuals entering government. My comments regarding a future pandemic, suggesting a 10% chance within four years, stemmed from monitoring concerning pathogens. The suggestion that this was a threat to the Trump administration is inaccurate; my focus remains on effective global health initiatives.
Speaker 0: Bill Gates issues a chilling new threat to Trump, Musk, and America. Billionaire Globalist Bill Gates joined The View on Tuesday to cry about the Trump administration's doge exposing corruption within the United States Agency for International Development or USAID and to fear monger about the threat of a new pandemic far more severe than COVID. Gates, who has enjoyed massive worldwide political influence over the past several decades, complained that Elon Musk's position in the Trump White House is insane and admitted he's a little worried particularly with the MAGA movement taking down USAID. Let's take a listen.
Speaker 1: Mister Gates, you also called Elon Musk's political influence abroad, quote, insane, along with another word we can't repeat here. But what's your take on his political access and influence here in America right now?
Speaker 2: Well, Elon, his private sector work, you know, has been very innovative, really fantastic. A lot of private sector people, when they get into government, they don't take the time necessarily to see what the good work is or why it's structured the way it is. So I I'm a little worried, particularly with this USAID stuff. Mhmm. My foundation partners with USAID on nutrition and, getting vaccines out.
You know, there's incredible people. You know, they're not actually worms, that work there. Yeah. So, you know, hopefully, we'll get some of that work back in shape. In fact, if we don't, you know, you could have, literally millions of deaths.
So Yeah. You know, with the aid, people think, you know, wow. How much do we give these countries? As you said, it's it's less than a percent. People think it's 5%, and it should be 2%, but it's actually under 1%.
Speaker 0: Wow. Well, Billy Boy, the fact that your organization partners with USAID to deliver vaccines, which by the way have caused infertility in Africa and outbreaks all over the place because they're not actually vaccines, they're weapons, tells us everything that we need to know. And again, referring to a hypothetical impending global pandemic, Gates told the show host, oh certainly, we'll have one in the next twenty five years. There's even some pathogens out there that we're watching over right now. So maybe ten percent chance in the next four years.
With it now being public knowledge that USAID and Gates were directly involved in engineering the COVID-nineteen bioweapon released from the infamous Wuhan China BioLab, it appears as if the Microsoft co founder just issued a threat to the Trump administration by suggesting another deadly pandemic will soon take place if his operations are blocked from receiving hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. During another portion of his View appearance, Gates expressed hope that the transition into the Trump administration doesn't interrupt his work on global health. The The article says this interview signals a last ditch effort to propagandize Americans ahead of the next globalist scheme to sabotage the Trump administration. And perhaps, Bill Gates meeting with Trump wasn't exactly what Gates told us it was.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
While youâre here, donât forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell đ for more weekly news roundups.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#5 - Insider: Level of Democrat Panic Over Musk Freezing USAID âUnlike Anything Ever Seenâ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Democratic Party insider revealed extreme panic within the party regarding President Trump and Elon Musk's actions freezing USAID spending. This is described as a "killing blow" to the "deep state," impacting the Democrats' political influence and funding schemes. The insider stated that dismantling USAID is Trump's biggest political victory, crippling their "golden goose." Democrats plan to hide partisan funding under seemingly legitimate initiatives and utilize NGOs as intermediaries to circumvent oversight. To truly succeed, Trump and Musk need to completely shut down USAID or fire its staff, as the agency is overwhelmingly comprised of Democrats. The public outcry highlights the Democrats' concern about exposure of their spending. One Congressman even called for Musk's firing.
Speaker 0: An insider says level of Democrat panic over Musk freezing USAID is unlike anything ever seen. Very interesting. A Democratic Party insider says that the level of panic over President Trump and Elon Musk's Musk's Doge freezing all USAID spending is unlike anything he's ever seen. The source described the development as a killing blow to the heart of the deep state. Let's go to the thread.
From Aesthetica on x 30,000,000 views on this ladies and gentlemen. Talked to a friend who has connections within the Democratic Party and he said the level of panic over Trump and Elon shutting down USAID is unlike anything he's ever seen. By following the money, Doge has struck a killing blow to the heart of the Democrat Deep State Machine. It goes on with a direct quote, this is worse than nineeleven for Democrats. USAID is the primary vessel they use to achieve their political agenda.
USAID is and always has been the primary source of funding for their influence peddling schemes and for their indirect sources of income and we've certainly seen that revealed over the past week. Another text quote, based on the reactions from within the party, it seems to me that dismantling USAID is Trump's biggest political victory to date. It was his enemy's golden goose. Same source who told me during the campaign, well before it was made public, that Kamala's internal polling had her behind Trump. So his information is good, Esthetica says.
Another important addition, he said initial plans by the Democrats is to have their people at USAID hide the partisan funding under the, unimpeachable initiatives. They will push back really hard on certain line items that on their face look like reasonable USAID expenditures and hide their political spending under these programs. Elon Musk looks like the whole thing needs to be thrown out to avoid this from happening. Furthermore, another likely solution for Democrats, which they already use to reward VIPs, is to use NGOs as an intermediary to direct funds where they want them to go. So basically USAID allocates funds for certain initiative or, for a certain initiative rather that looks reasonable.
Democrat friendly NGO is contracted to carry out initiative. NGO number one subcontracts VIP, which is another NGO owned or operated by a political ally or Democrat politician, and eventually the funds reach the secret intended target, and the original problem is not solved. This means they can continue to rinse and repeat this grift. The final text is quoted as if Trump slash Elon want this to stick, they need to completely shut down USAID or fire the entire staff. The party has instructed their allies to not make waves and blend in.
USAID is 99% Democrats. They will not be able to save it without risking internal sabotage. So just a few comments from people on x. Democrats are positively apoplectic about Trump authorizing Musk and Doge to investigate where on earth all this USAID money is going. They keep on coming out of the woodwork.
Congressman Greg Casar says, fire Elon Musk. Use every legislative, judicial, and public pressure tactic at our disposal until we get it done. Someone responds, Democrats are really panicking at the thought of the public finding out where their money has been going. Another person responds to him saying, I thought you were against firing government workers. Why are they so worried about wasteful spending being rectified?
Someone says, why don't you wanna cut out useless spending like funding Sesame Street in Iran? Mind you, I think it was Iraq, but either way, why would you not wanna stop that? Because, Raw egg Nationalist says USAID turns out to be the greatest slush fund the world has ever seen. We're talking about subversion on a global scale, the global homo war chest.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#4 - Joe Rogan Issues Blunt Message to COVID Jab Pushers
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm sharing a blunt message for those who pushed COVID shots and haven't admitted mistakes. A doctor I know almost lost their license for prescribing ivermectin. It's concerning when doctors still recommend COVID shots without acknowledging changing perspectives. This applies to social media influencers tooâthose who haven't publicly corrected their stance lack integrity. Even if they *have* admitted being wrong, skepticism remains warranted; being fooled once means you're susceptible again. Critical thinking is key.
This also relates to a serious issue: home title theft. Criminals can steal your home title, leaving you financially ruined. Protect yourself with HomeTitleLock.com/vnn. Use promo code VNN for a free title scan and 30 days of free triple lock protectionâ24/7 monitoring, alerts, and title restoration. Secure your most valuable asset today.
Speaker 0: Joe Rogan issues a blunt message to COVID jab pushers. He actually goes there, issuing a blunt message for those who push the COVID shots and won't own their mistakes. Let's take a listen.
Speaker 1: My doctor, that I know out here won a case, but they were about to lose their license. Yeah. So that's and just for prescribing ivermectin.
Speaker 2: No. That should that should be your first question, doc, is how did you do over COVID? Yeah. And, if they have nothing interesting to say, I would just turn around and walk out the door.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Imagine going to a doctor right now, and they're telling you you should get your COVID shots. You should stay up to date.
Speaker 2: Imagine. Well, I find that bad, but at least I know how to interpret that. What I don't understand is what I'm supposed to do with the doctor who did recommend the shots has stopped recommending them and has not Talked about it. Said something about the change in their perspective.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I have a problem with that with social media influencers too.
Speaker 2: %.
Speaker 1: People that were pushing it and then have not publicly correct the course have not said I was wrong, and this is why I was wrong. Like, I can't fuck with you anymore. If you if you can't say that you were wrong about that, then I don't I just can't.
Speaker 0: We've linked that full Rogan episode on the Vigilant News Network article for anyone who'd like to see it. Now, ultimately, if people haven't owned their mistakes, this is essentially where cancel culture has organically applied because the public decided these people don't have any integrity. If they have owned their mistakes, I think we should still be skeptical if I'm honest. Learning you were fooled too late means you could be fooled again. You are a person who is susceptible to propaganda.
Until you prove that you are fully aware of how this game works and employ critical thinking tactics at every stage, you still have a question mark over your head. Now, the FBI calls it house stealing and you've probably heard about this devastating crime on the news, because it is a big problem. Scammers can transfer your home title, take out loans in your name, and leave you with nothing but a financial and emotional disaster. If you own a home or any real estate, it is crucial you protect your property and equity from these criminals, and there's no better way I know of than hometitlelock.com/vnn. If you haven't checked it out before, now is the time.
We've arranged for our listeners to get a free title scan to check if your home is still in your name, plus thirty days of free home title locks triple lock protection. That's twenty four seven monitoring of your title, urgent alerts if anything has changed, and most importantly, restoration of your title. If there's ever any fraud, you will immediately be protected and will get thirty days free when you use the promo code v n n at sign up. Protect your home, your equity, and your peace of mind today at hometitlelock.com/vnn with promo code VNN. There's no better time to secure your most valuable asset.
Visit hometitlelock.com/vnn today.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#3 - John Fetterman admits the Democratic party has a serious white male problem. If heâs right that the damage is beyond repair, then the Democratic party is officially on the brink of collapse.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator John Fetterman discussed the Democratic Party's struggles in a recent interview. He acknowledged Attorney General Pam Bondi's qualifications, despite disagreeing with her politically, highlighting the need for pragmatism over ideological purity. He commented on Trump's Gaza proposal, calling it provocative but prompting necessary conversations about the humanitarian crisis resulting from the destruction.
Fetterman attributed the party's declining popularity to its tactics of shaming and scolding voters, particularly calling Trump supporters names like "fascists" and "dopes." He expressed deep concern over the alienation of white men, stating that repairing that fractured relationship may be impossible. He noted this demographic's significant electoral weight and the concerning trend of young men switching to the Republican party. He warned that unless the Democrats change course, they face a prolonged period out of power.
Speaker 0: John Fetterman admits what no Democrat wants to say. Senator John Fetterman just opened up about the Democratic party's woes in a thirteen minute conversation with Puck News Tara Palmeri, detailing its self inflicted wounds and warning that the damage may be beyond repair. The conversation started with the confirmation of attorney general Pam Bondi to which Fetterman admitted she was qualified for the job as the only Democrat who voted for her in the process. Quote, she was the attorney general of the third largest state, Florida, in the nation, and she was a DA for seventeen, eighteen years. So in terms of qualifications, she absolutely was a serious person.
He says, and in her politics and other issues, I wouldn't agree with those things. So if everything is a no or everything is a freak out, if you refuse or demand purity in every interaction, then you're never gonna get anything done, Fetterman said. Again, very balanced approach, very surprising from Fetterman. The discussion then shifted to Trump and his plans for Gaza, which Fetterman admitted might not be such a crazy proposal after all. Fetterman called Trump's idea provocative, but said it forces a very more honest conversation of Gaza.
With 90% of the housing destroyed or severely damaged, he asked, where are you gonna live? What are folks gonna do? He pointed out that Gaza has no utilities, no water, no kinds of structures. Just add here that a lot of people were canceled for saying this previously, because the claim was that they still had all their utilities, but I digress. How can you live in just a destroyed war zone?
Fetterman asked. Where are you gonna live, and if you don't have electricity, what about sanitation and those kinds of things and other basic services? As for claims that Trump's plan is a real estate grab, Fetterman shut that down. He said, I don't personally believe that they're gonna turn Gaza into a Trump Plaza kind of situation. Next came the burning question.
Why are voters abandoning the Democratic party? Fetterman blamed the party's shaming and scolding, including calling Trump supporters fascists and dopes. He argued that this name calling has caused them to lose the argument and more importantly voters. Let's take a listen to this clip. Why is the Democratic party viewed as toxic by so many?
Like, even people inside the party acknowledge that.
Speaker 1: I think their their primary currency was shaming and scolding and and and talking down to people and telling them, hey. I know better than you, or you're dopes, or you're a bro, or you're ignorant, or, you know, don't don't you you know, how can you be this dumb? I can't imagine it. Like, and then, by the way, they're they're fascists. How can you vote for that?
And, you know, when you're in a state like Pennsylvania, like, I know and I love people that voted for Trump, and they're not fascists. You know, they they they don't support, insurrection and those things. And, and, you know, if you go to an extreme and you become a boutique kind of a, of a proposition, then you're you're gonna lose the you're gonna lose the argument, and and then we have done that.
Speaker 0: Then the bombshell dropped when Fetterman admitted the Democratic party had fractured its relationship with white men so severely that he's not sure if it's possible that it can be repaired. Take a listen. How do Democrats win back white men like yourself?
Speaker 1: I don't know. And and, truthfully, I'm not sure I'm not sure if that's possible, to be honest. I I think that's been seriously eroding for for a while, and and in some cases, in in the conversations I've had, a lot of people, they don't even wanna say it publicly, but they just feel like, you know, the other side seems like it's it's like men, well, that men's the problem. Men are to blame, or their their masculinity is toxic, or if unless you're able to conform to our very strict kinds of definition of what we think's appropriate, well, then, hey. I'm just I'm gonna find an alternative, and they've they've done that.
That's that's that's absolutely true. And and once we've kind of turned their back on that demographic, it's gonna be difficult to to rebuild and replace that with with, with those voters because I think that migration has been ongoing, phenomenon for for several years, and that was been in front and center, you know, in part of the election in in '24.
Speaker 0: The article goes on to say this is actually devastating because white men comprise 34% of the total electorate in the twenty twenty four US presidential election. And when you account for the fact that a large chunk of young men aged between 18 to 29 flipped from Democrat to Republican in just one election cycle, the situation looks even more bleak for the Democrats. If they stay on the path of alienating men, the trend of young men flipping sides will continue keeping the Democratic Party out of the White House for years to come. You can see here that Americans under the age of 30 voted for Harris by four points, 50% Harris, forty six % Trump. Though young men and women diverged dramatically with men 30 voting for Trump by 16 points, 41% Harris, fifty seven % Trump, and women 30 voting for Harris by 24 points, 59% Harris and 35% Trump.
Now, instead of heeding Fetterman's warning, Democrats have doubled down blaming racism and misogyny for their crushing defeat and really it's just not a winning strategy and everyone can see it and they really need to, wake up to themselves. You can see the full conversation link there below.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#2 - Australiaâs political establishment rams through the most dangerous anti-free speech law in the nationâs history.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Australia recently passed a sweeping hate speech law with minimal debate, sparking widespread concerns about free speech. The law's justification centers on combating antisemitism, despite a lack of concrete evidence linking alleged attacks to perpetrators or clear motives. Critics argue the law is overly broad, potentially criminalizing religious teachings and silencing dissent. The shift from requiring intent to incite violence to merely being "reckless" raises serious concerns about potential misuse and arbitrary enforcement. The law carries mandatory jail sentences, even for unintentional breaches. This rapid passage and its implications for free speech are alarming, and similar legislation based on the IHRA definition of antisemitism is being considered globally, raising concerns about the erosion of fundamental rights in other countries, including the US. We urge you to pay attention to this pattern of events.
Speaker 0: Now, our next story about what just happened in Australia is important for the whole world to understand, including America, because the reasons or justification for why it was done are being discussed in many countries. Let me explain. Australia has just passed a hate speech law that has sent a chilling effect across the nation. Many Australians are now reporting a fear of posting absolutely any opinions online because they could be put in prison for doing so. This bill is actually worse than what we saw in recent times in The UK.
This anti free speech bill was introduced under the guise of stopping quote anti Semitism. It is important to note that Australia has experienced some alleged attacks on Jewish establishments and buildings and I say alleged only because, and this is very important to note, to the best of our research, barely any perpetrators despite millions of dollars to police task forces and grants to the Jewish community have actually been identified. Many feel absolute clarity over motives and evidence have not been provided. What we have seen is a lot of conjecture from the media, politicians, and police. However, much of the evidence that has been reported has left a lot to be desired.
They claimed they may be foreign influence groups contributing to this. Again, no sound evidence, but this could be attributed to ongoing investigations, of course. One pertinent example is from the 12/06/2024. The Adas Israel Synagogue of Melbourne experienced a fire. With minimal investigation having taken place, the government almost immediately declared it a terrorist attack.
Two people were reportedly seen on camera, however, no terrorist has been found. To this day, by the way, as at the time of this recording, and we'll show you on Google, that the investigation is still ongoing. No concrete evidence has been given to justify that this was a terrorist attack, but there was a strange interview that emerged with a reported attendee of the synagogue who reportedly called the police, ran away from them when they arrived at the scene, very odd behavior given usually the person who calls the police is generally grateful to see them and eager to work with them, and had burn marks on his hands which he said were a result of the police apparently letting him run into the burning building to retrieve his cell phone while it was on fire. The government immediately at the time used this as an opportunity to introduce the idea of sweeping speech laws which they said were needed due to anti Semitism and terrorism regardless of the fact that investigations were still open and the Australian people were not given any evidence to support that their speech now needed to be restricted due to terrorism where a terrorist has yet to be identified and have been provided no certainty as to why their freedoms must be infringed upon.
Let me repeat. At that time, and now to the best of our knowledge and research, no perpetrator court, no charges laid, no court case, no conviction. Now we're not saying these attacks were not anti semitic in nature, but that's because we don't know, and that is the exact point, we just don't know. The people need evidence of perpetrators, motives, plans, etc, and even if they were anti semitic, there are already laws in place to protect people from crimes of this nature. The reality is, these laws appear to be simply about restricting speech.
So George Christensen, former politician, writes the war on free speech has begun. Some may say it's an absolute death blow to free speech. They did it in just a matter of days without scrutiny, without real debate, and without a single care for the consequences, Australia's political establishment has rammed through the most dangerous anti free speech law in our nation's history. He says, make no mistake, this is not about stopping terrorism. It's not about protecting people from violence.
This is about silencing dissent, crushing conservative and Christian voices, and weaponizing the law against anyone who dares to challenge the establishment's agenda. The summary says the Australian government swiftly passed a controversial hate speech law ignoring warnings from legal and religious groups. By the way, it was done with no debate and received assent within one day. This is unheard of how quickly it was implemented. The law shifts from requiring intent to incite violence to merely being quote unquote reckless raising concerns over its potential misuse.
Christian schools fear religious teachings could be criminalized, while critics argue the law will silence conservative voices. The bill was backed by both major parties with conservatives accused of enabling its harsh provisions and free speech advocates are warning of increasing authoritarianism and urge Australians to resist and push for the law's repeal. So a particular Sky News commentator actually called out just how extreme the law is under the new legislation. A person can face jail time for simply being reckless with their words. Who defines reckless?
No one really knows. Previously, incitement laws required intent. You had to actually mean to cause harm but not anymore. The law has changed now from intentionally urges to merely advocates violence and intent has been replaced with recklessness, meaning that you don't even have to mean it, you just have to be careless enough that someone thinks it could, maybe, potentially, somewhat could be leading to violence. You could say something perhaps jokingly, not meaning that it will happen, but if you are reckless to the fact that it could happen, you could, you now have by the law incited violence.
A Senator Gerard Renick who we've had on this broadcast before condemned the bill as a direct attack on free speech warning that it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive and he pointed out that such laws are always applied selectively, noting that instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. On the impact of Christian schools, Vanessa Chang from the Australian Association of Christian Schools says, there is a real risk that the broad definitions and expanded list of attributes could criminalize religious teachings on sex or gender which could be considered hateful or harmful by some people. Consider that. Christian schools going to prison, teachers, students. I don't know how far does this spread.
Christian Schools Australia raised similar concerns saying CSA calls on the parliament to consider the unintended consequences of this bill, specifically, the possible criminalization of religious speech such as our Biblical teachings on sex and gender within our schools. This should terrify anyone who values religious freedom, the LGBT agenda is now legally protected, and Christianity is specifically not. Former politician Craig Kelly points out that this is another Trojan horse to suppress free speech, and he's gonna go into some arguments here, but just note that the penalty that they're talking about here for things including political opinions is imprisonment for seven years. Now, listen to how this works. Firstly, it lowers the bar from threatening to use violence to that of threatening to use force.
Secondly, it includes special protections for groups distinguished by political opinions, and thirdly, it removes the good faith defense. So if you engage in commentary about matters of public interest in an honest attempt to point out what you believe are errors in government policy or to try and achieve democratic changes in law, that's no longer a lawful exception. No. In fact, it can land you in prison, and fourthly, it makes a jail sentence mandatory. So even in the most innocent of cases where it's a mere technical breach of the law, the courts can't give you warning, they must sentence you to jail.
He's given a very important example here. So if you now say something like, quote, we must fight against the totalitarian aims of the Marxists that have infiltrated our bureaucracies and want to sense a free speech, sell us out to the globalists, and force Australians to undergo compulsory medical interventions, end quote. He says, by saying we must fight, it could easily be deemed as threatening force and as Marxists are a group distinguished by political opinion and because you could then argue that by allowing free speech threatens the peace, order and good government, exactly the argument they successfully used during COVID, he says, I'd then be guilty of an offence under this act for engaging in hate speech and the courts would be forced to jail me for seven years. George Christensen in his article says, quote, if you thought this was just about stopping terrorism, think again. Teal MP Allegra Spender backed the bill on the basis that we needed to criminalize banners that read, quote, destroy pedo freaks, end quote.
Yes, really. She argued that people who hold up signs opposing pedophiles should be punished under hate speech laws. What does that tell you? Who exactly are they trying to protect here? This is the same political class that calls conservatives extremists for defending traditional values, yet wants to make it illegal to call out pedophiles.
That's from George there. Now, by the definition of this bill, the government could pretend that this very report presenting you with mere facts is hateful by God knows what definition. I suppose the one that seeks to protect pedophiles. Now going back to what I said at the start of this segment, it is very important for people to understand the process of how tyrannical laws pass. An event happens, it shocks the country or the world, then you have people starting to ask questions about the event.
The government says you can't ask questions and furthermore, because you're asking questions, we're going to make asking questions illegal and even better, we're gonna remove your rights in the process including your physical self from society. No dissent on any level will be tolerated and somehow, someway, they always find a way to ensure Christians' rights are affected in the process. The Australian government and governments around the world, including The US, are adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Association or IHRA definition of antisemitism. Within the IHRA's definition, claiming that Jews killed Jesus is an implied crime. Even though our holy book says this, the IHRA's definition seems to be weaving its way into every country.
The reason why this story matters to every country is because every single government, including The US, is utilizing this definition of antisemitism and looking to enact similar laws and punishments. We call on all political leaders to please take notice of what's at stake here in Australia and when it comes to The US, what does all of this entail for the First Amendment? Presently, this story has received minimal attention in The US and furthermore, X has censored a post on the matter. There was a very detailed post posted by CitizenGo on how Australia's hate speech laws are de facto censorship laws and it was taken down by X. I can attest to the fact that there was nothing quote unquote illegal in the post and it was before the official passing of the law and yet X censored it.
Obviously, this is all very breaking, very new, very convoluted, and we will be bringing you more on this, but I'd love to leave people with this. Pay attention to the pattern of events that occurred in Australia to get such a heinous law passed. Scrutinize them in detail and leave no stone unturned as events like this are what politicians, governments, and activist groups will always use to take the opportunity to crush your freedoms. The evidence is in Australia today. It is a new day in America and a new administration in Washington DC.
There is a lot of excitement and optimism about the future, but the reality is there is a lot of work to do, especially when it comes to fixing our broken health care system. The truth is that the forces that are responsible for breaking our health care system aren't going to simply go away. The challenges our system faces won't disappear overnight. Now more than ever, you need to be prepared. That's where the wellness company comes in.
Their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust, and their line of prescription medical kits are the gold standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy. Whether it is the medical emergency kit, the contagion kit, or the first aid kit, or the travel kit, these prescription kits contain an assortment of life saving medications and guidebooks to assist in the proper use of these medications. From the flu to strep throat, from COVID to the bird flu, from a trip to the beach to a trip overseas, the Wellness Company has a prescription kit designed to keep you and your family safe. Make America Healthy Again starts at home. Do your part and protect the health of you and your family.
Go to twc.health/blackout today and order. That's twc.health/blackout and use the promo code blackout to save 10%.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
#1 - Trumpâs Gaza Proposal Sparks Fierce Debate: Could It Actually Work? Journalist @RyanMattaMedia joins to discuss.
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's proposal to transform Gaza into a "Middle East Riviera" and relocate its inhabitants has sparked international outrage. Many countries, including Russia, China, Germany, and France, condemn the plan as a violation of international law and a form of ethnic cleansing. Supporters, however, see it as a potential solution for lasting peace in the region. My guest, Ryan Mata, calls the situation an atrocity, citing horrific accounts of civilian casualties and the destruction of Gaza. He also discusses the alleged misuse of USAID funds and its role in undermining third-world governments, highlighting the disappearance of thousands of Guatemalan children. This conflict, presented with significant bias, demands open discussion and the consideration of all perspectives. We must remember the humanity of those affected and their right to self-determination.
Speaker 0: Now, we're going to get into another controversial topic and it is controversial, rightly so. This is an article from the New York Post, Trump's Plan to Take Over Gaza, Letters to the Editor Feb seven twenty twenty five. Now, I'm gonna read you what the New York Post says about this. The issue, President Trump proposing The United States transform Gaza into a Middle East Riviera. President Trump's proposal to take over Gaza and transfer its people to Egypt and Jordan cannot be taken seriously.
Not only do Gazans reject it, but securing the strip would require US Soldiers to battle Hamas terrorists in Gaza's underground tunnels. Our focus should be on bringing home Israeli hostages, including six drawl American citizens, American Israeli citizens rather, preventing Hamas from playing any role in post war Gaza and stopping Iran's nuclear weapons program. We also must demand that the world unequivocally condemned the murder, rape, kidnapping, and unbridled barbarity inflicted on Israel on October 7. Now, very important to note that there are many conflicting reports about the official government narrative surrounding that, but we'll discuss that with our upcoming guest and stop vilifying Israel for defending itself against this violence. So I'm gonna read you some of what some people are saying.
Steven Silver says, with four simple words, 'we'll take over Gaza', Trump made the world a safer place deflating the threat of World War three. He says his stunning statement shifted the global discussion of the Israel Gaza conflict from destruction to revitalization. Then we have Carol Campolo. The president's plans call for the removal of Gaza's inhabitants who owe their predicament solely to Hamas. The unintended consequences of October 7 are still unfolding.
Above all, Hamas must not be allowed to return and prepare for another attempt to destroy Israel. Another person says here, Samuel Fraser, President Trump is certainly in his element when it comes to construction, but the politics of rebuilding Gaza after Hamas is defeated are far more complex. Any rebuilding effort must consider the Israelis who were removed from Gaza by their government in 02/2005 and only Gazans who pledged to live in peace with Israel should be allowed to return. Now, what is largely being ignored in a lot of conservative media is that the international community widely condemns Trump's Gaza takeover plan. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov reaffirmed Russia's support for a two state solution.
China condemned the forced displacement, emphasizing that Palestinians governing Palestine is fundamental for post conflict stability. German foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, labeled the proposal a breach of international law, stressing that Gaza belongs to the Palestinians. France reiterated its opposition to any forced displacement calling it a serious violation of international law. Other opposition includes UK, Keir Starmer surprisingly, Denmark, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Slovenia, Belgium, Canada, Turkey, Iran, Brazil, and Palestine. US Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen condemned it as ethnic cleansing by another name.
No doubt, it's clear this idea has sparked intense reactions from all sides. Some view it as a bold revolutionary move, one that could shift the region's fate and offer hope for lasting peace. However, many critics argue that such a plan is more of a fantasy than a feasible solution. The logistics of relocating millions of people are incredibly complex and many would argue nobody has the right to do so. The reality is not all Palestinians are Hamas.
In fact, the overwhelming amount are not and not all is as it seems surrounding October 7. That's why, if you live in Israel, if you challenge the official government narrative around it, you can go to prison. Nonetheless, Trump has promised peace. Is this wild proposal simply the beginning of negotiations for peace in the region? Trump is known for throwing his weight around to achieve good outcomes in very difficult negotiation situations.
Time will tell, but what is evident is that Gaza is, in its current state, virtually total rubble and uninhabitable. It will need rebuilding and Trump's plan, at least at face value, offers that, but what's important is that we hear all sides of the story and one that really isn't being considered is how this affects the native people of the land who didn't ask for this. Journalist Ryan Mata joins us to discuss. Ryan Mata, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here.
Speaker 1: It's an honor to be here, Maria. Thank you so much for having me.
Speaker 0: It's great to have you. Well, we have a few things we need to discuss today, including your new documentary, which is linked to the USAID exposure. We wanna talk about that or USAID. But first and foremost, I wanted to get your take on this, on Trump's Gaza deal. It's drawn a lot of criticism from people worldwide, many countries condemning the idea.
What are your thoughts on this?
Speaker 1: I think it's an absolute atrocity. I think it's super sad seeing what was done to these people in Gaza. I mean, I had a friend that was part of the UAE military and he was showing me personally, this man, because of the relationship that The UAE has with Israel, they were the only ones that Israel was actually allowing to go in and deliver aid over in Gaza. And he was showing me videos of these, these military soldiers who were carrying in packages of of aid into this, like, halfway blown up building. It was, like, one of the only buildings in the area where they could kinda set up a shop and deliver aid to some of the people in Gaza.
And there was a video of these three little children. One of the girls was four years old, I think, and there was two boys. One of the boys was five. The other boys was seven. The girl was playing with a little make, Barbie that looked like it was from some more like the, the apocalyptic movies.
The barbie was kinda like charred. There was dirt on it. There were dirt on the kids toys. One of them was playing with a Tonka truck and just digging in the sand. They were kind of just being kids, you know?
And then the the next photos I've seen of these kids, the girl had her head blown off. The kid had his head the girl's face was blown half her face was blown off. The one kid's head was completely blown off, and the other kid had, like, a chunk out of his face missing. And the the Israeli soldiers, for no reason whatsoever, at one point decided that they just needed to eliminate those children from the face of the earth. And that's the type of crimes that that we're talking about that's happening over here in Gaza.
And that's the stuff that you're not seeing on the Internet. I saw that personally on this gentleman's cell phone. Now, obviously, he wasn't gonna be able to post it because he's part of the UAE military, but, that's some of the atrocities that are taking place over there that I think the American people should be very well aware of. And, you know, we're we're running these people out of their homeland, for no reason whatsoever just to make this greater Israel project, if you will. And I think it's it's a shame, and I think the history books are gonna write volumes about it.
I think it's unacceptable. And as Americans, we can't let it take place.
Speaker 0: For people who aren't aware of the greater Israel project, this is something that Netanyahu proudly boasted about inside the United Nations prior to, October 7. We also have so many things. I I don't know if people know this, but now in Israel, they've introduced legislation that if you question the official narrative that the government has presented about October 7, you end up in prison. And so whenever laws like that are introduced, and, of course, you know, Americans probably don't know about this, but there were many, many Israelis, including a a very good friend of mine who came on a broadcast with me after October 7 that said this doesn't add up. We have evidence of a military stand down.
I mean, there were clear questions that needed to be asked the Hannibal directive. Israel openly admitting that their Apache helicopters, for goodness sake, took down so many people on October 7. They killed their own people and so and people get really upset when you bring up those facts and now it's illegal to even bring them up in Israel. That really shows you something when something is illegal to discuss, that generally means there's something to hide. And so now we're at the point where, you know, all these, the the worldwide community was talking about the the amount of women and children that were being killed in this quote unquote war, which was really just an all all out assault.
The place is a parking lot. President Trump is right, when he says, you know, there's there's nothing left. I'm glad that we're allowed to say that now, but to tell these people that after they their homes have been destroyed, that their all all their families have been slaughtered, that they just have no choice as to where they live now? I mean, this is unbelievable to me.
Speaker 1: They're war crimes. It's a genocide. It's an ethnic cleansing. Benjamin Netanyahu was bragging about how he needed just to basically turn Gaza into a parking lot, and this was prior to October 7 so that they had nowhere to go home to. This wasn't to this wasn't to save hostages.
This wasn't to, ensure the safety of Israel. This was part of an agenda. This was part of a plan, and it was a plan from before October 7 that it was gonna happen no matter what, obviously. Benjamin Netanyahu was hell bent on it.
Speaker 0: Well, there's also the matter of for for one year before October 7, he was advised, warned that this attack was coming and and nothing was really done to stop it. In fact, there was a military stand down on the day. So seven hours, no response. I mean, there are so many questions surrounding this and questions that really the international community has been condemned for asking. It's it's really, amazing to me the argument that commonly comes up is that Israel has a right to defend itself.
Of of course it does, but what's what's the line of self defense and was it actually self defense? Why can't we even discuss these things? I haven't seen this much censorship and condemnation around any war. Just looking at Ukraine, Russia, you know, people haven't had their entire lives canceled for just giving commentary, but it certainly has happened in the instance of this war. And so I I I'm very, very concerned, Ryan.
I I think that, you know, that there have been multiple countries that have condemned this, including, I think Jordan has even threatened to go to war with Israel, for goodness sake. I mean, this is really now escalating, and we've even had, Italy, I mean, Spain, multiple countries actually saying this is this is absolutely unacceptable. So it'll be interesting to see. Do you think that perhaps president Trump through this, sees this as the only way to achieve peace in that area? Because I've heard that argument made.
Speaker 1: I I honestly don't think so. I think that there has never been a point in time in history where anybody that was trying to censor the other party or the other half of an argument was right. Anytime that anybody's been trying to censor you or prevent you from talking about something, it is because they are in the wrong, and they can't defend themselves off of merit. The only way that they can win an argument is by silencing you. And Israel is on the wrong side of this argument.
And I think that the world's really starting to wake up to it. And if Israel did not have the support of the of The USA, The United States right now, and our military, and the threat of what Trump might do to them, I think they would be in very, very big trouble.
Speaker 0: Well, I found the golden pager to be a very interesting I mean, I don't I don't know. Was that a was that a threat to president Trump? You know, I've I've heard very little from the conservative side really discussing what this golden pager was all about. What a bizarre gift to give someone that pager was, you know, if everyone remembers that attack, these pages were essentially, you know, hacked in advance, or fitted with explosives in advance. And then, you know, even though there's claims that terrorists were taken out by this, so were innocent civilians.
And it was, again, something that was widely condemned by many in the international community, presented as something good, of course, on a lot of conservative media. Linda Yaccarino was very happy about it, actually. And, and, you know, why would you give someone a a pager? That's to me, that looks like a threat.
Speaker 1: Why would you frame a syringe from the COVID nineteen vaccine and put it on your desk? The level of just demonicness that you would have to have to to frame a pager a pager or or give somebody a golden pager that represents such a demonic part of history, something that was so evil and cynical. When innocent people are dying, that is not a good thing. And president Trump was very clear when he gave his speech. I think it was at the World Economic Forum in 2020 when he talks about terrorists.
And when when innocent people are getting killed, it's not because you're defending religion. You are a terrorist. There is God wants nothing to do with slaughtering innocent women and children. And that's exactly what Benjamin Netanyahu has done here. I I don't think how anybody can see this as anything but a genocide.
And now it's going to be illegal to talk about. I think that's how you know that we're on the right side of history.
Speaker 0: Yes. Very, very, telling. When when things become illegal to talk about, that is a clear indication that something that the people are being lied to, and, and and we see more and more people laws being enacted to to stifle any criticism of this nation and yet, more and more people are are sort of talking about it, which I think they have every right to do. Ryan, I briefly wanna speak to you about USAID where we got a couple of minutes here. We have a lot of panic from, Democrats and, I think that what's been uncovered is really fantastic, although I am sort of, raising questions about some of the characters involved in this project of Doge.
But, this is very intricately linked to your work actually because of the fact that US Aid has been used for very nefarious purposes. Talk to us about this briefly.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So USAID, I always call it USAID and I know people are like, you know, don't do it. Don't call it USAID because it gives it the wrong, like, pretext in people's mind. But USAID is literally the money laundering arm of the CIA. They are the linchpin that connects the Department of Defense, the CIA, and the State Department.
Their budget is $50,000,000,000 a year. It is two it is double that of the CIA and the State Department combined. That's how much money USAID has, and they have this black ops budget that's basically unauditable. So how this works is USAID will go into these third world countries, and they'll set up an NGO network like you would set up an offshore bank account. So you go from country to country to country to country to country.
So it's almost impossible to trace the money back to its origin. When they set up these NGO networks, they set up an NGO that funds an NGO that funds an NGO that commits the crime. Right? So trying to connect the NGO that committed the crime back to USAID is literally next to impossible. And when they go into these third world countries, what they'll do and this got a this is big picture.
This is a five, ten, twenty. Some of these times, it's even a sixty year operation like what was happening in El Salvador, and they turned El Salvador into the deadliest country in the world. What we're seeing in in our in, Guatemala and why I've been so laser focused on Guatemala is because we haven't caught debts to rights. They were caught in the act of staging this last coup, trying to remove this attorney general from power, and it has failed miserably. But in the process, they've installed politicians.
When they go into the country originally, the first thing that they'll do is they'll normally bring, the National Endowment for Democracy with them. And the National Endowment for Democracy acts almost like the recruiting arm or the staffing agency for USAID or the or the CIA. And they'll create job postings for Guatemalan National, for example, that fits all of this criteria. Well educated, articulate, comes from a family with money, popular on social media, blah blah blah blah blah. And then once they basically recruit this person, they either bribe them, blackmail them, or they just offer them power.
And a lot of people would just do it for the power. And then they take that person. They look for media outlets that are failing in their country, and they'll go to the media outlet, and they'll say, hey. We're willing to make a $10,000 a month, a $50,000 a month, a hundred thousand dollar a month donation in exchange for you allowing us to pick the person that's gonna do the 4PM show, the 5PM show, the 6PM show. And then once they basically take over these media outlets in these third world countries, they use those media outlets to amplify the politicians that will do their bidding, and they use it to demonize the politicians that won't.
And over a five, ten, or fifteen period, like in Guatemala, they've taken over the entire electoral college, they've taken over the Supreme Court, they've taken over majority of the legislative over 50% so they can pass any laws that they'd like. And now just recently in 2023, they rigged the twenty twenty three election. So now the last person staying in the way of you but you've covered this this story many times is the attorney general in Guatemala. So to put that into context, it's not just USAID that our government needs to be looking into. USAID is how the money moves and how they set up all these enforce that without any power?
They do that with the state department. So in Guatemala right now, USAID and AID in the last four years has funneled in $797,000,000 into Guatemala. That money is completely unaudible. Where did it go? What did it do?
What does Guatemala have to show for it? Oh, Guatemala is becoming the child kidnapping capital of the world. A 90,052 migrant children ages zero to 17 have been kidnapped and trafficked out of Guatemala in the last four years and processed more migratorily where our government has taken physical custody of these children, vetted a sponsor, and then authorized even these delivery of these children to a sponsor in America, and now they can't find roughly 75% of them. And Mark Rubio was just there two days ago, and we heard not one word about this, not one word of a 90,000 missing children. How is that possible, Maria?
Speaker 0: It's a very good question. I, really, really wanna encourage people to go to your ex account at Ryan Mata Media and watch the latest documentary about this. Ryan says, America, are you ready to learn the truth about USAID and the over 190,000 missing Guatemalan children? He's tagged Pam Pam Bondi in this. And, I think that more than anything, yes, of course, the dollars that have gone missing, absolutely matter.
And the the, you know, the the absolute theft of the American taxpayer absolutely matters. But what is behind this theft? Well, it's more than just 30,000,000 for Sesame Street. We're talking about child trafficking. We're talking about depopulation programs, and and so much evil and that needs to stop.
So really encourage everyone again at Ryan Mata Media. Watch that documentary. Share it. Ryan, we really appreciate your, your takes today and your time. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: God bless you, Maria. Thank you.
Speaker 0: God bless. Now, whether you agree with the analysis of our guest or not, the fact is that this particular conflict has been presented in a very biased fashion across the world. It is only possible to achieve the best outcome if we hear from all sides and have honest discussions without the labels of terrorist sympathizer or extremist or whatever other childish name calling people want to throw at it. We're talking about tens of thousands of dead innocent women and children, and people who've survived in some cases the death of their entire families and their homeland in the process. These people are not animals as some of the media would like to paint them.
They are human beings and they have a right to self determination just like anyone else. We will continue to keep you informed as this deal progresses nonetheless. And that's all that we have time for this evening folks. Please make sure to go and follow us on free speech platform Rumble and let everyone else know to do the same. Please also make sure to like, give us your thoughts in the comments and share this broadcast widely and remember to bookmark the post on x.
It really helped your favorite accounts increase their visibility, so you can help them and us by bookmarking posts. Follow Vigilant News and Vigilant Fox on X. Visit the Vigilant News Network website for regular updates and find me on x also at z_media. That's ztriplee_media. We'll be back next Sunday at 6PM Eastern with the truth the mainstream media desperately does not want you to know, but you can be sure we will be here to tell you all about it.
Until then, stay informed, stay vigilant. Good night.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #1 - BUSTED: USAID Caught Funding Massive âNewsâ Platform to Expand Censorship Worldwide https://vigilantnews.com/post/busted-usaid-caught-funding-massive-news-platform-to-expand-censorship-worldwide/
BUSTED: USAID Caught Funding Massive âNewsâ Platform to Expand Censorship Worldwide
WikiLeaks just dropped a new bombshell.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #2 - The Meat Upgrade You Didnât Know You Needed https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-meat-upgrade-you-didnt-know-you-needed/
The Meat Upgrade You Didnât Know You Needed
When it comes to meat, not all are created equal.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #3 - Dismantling the Common Lies Used to Push Vaccines https://vigilantnews.com/post/dismantling-the-common-lies-used-to-push-vaccines/
Dismantling the Common Lies Used to Push Vaccines
This changes everything.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #4 - How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/
How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More
While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #5 - Trump Reveals the Next Eight People He is Revoking Security Clearances From After Stripping Bidenâs https://vigilantnews.com/post/trump-reveals-the-next-eight-people-he-is-revoking-security-clearances-from-after-stripping-bidens/
Trump Reveals the Next Eight People He is Revoking Security Clearances From After Stripping Bidenâs
He also identified the top target on his list.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
@RyanMattaMedia Thanks for watching! Weâll be back next Sunday at 6 PM Eastern with another hard-hitting episode. In the meantime, follow these accounts and our guests to stay informed: @NicHulscher @RyanMattaMedia @zeee_media@VigilantNews See you next Sunday. https://t.co/Tv47thCylW
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox đŠ
10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Legislative efforts to BAN mRNA COVID-19 injections are now underway in several U.S. states. âThis platform continuously shows failureâshows harm.â Bills to ban the shots are being drafted and considered in Florida, Texas, South Carolina, Tennessee, Iowa, Idaho, Montana, and Washington State. âThe evidence is clearâover 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for the IMMEDIATE removal of COVID-19 âvaccinesâ from the market. Failure to do so constitutes mass negligent homicide,â Epidemiologist @NicHulscher says. Hulscher will be âdirectly involved in three of these [ban the shot] initiatives within the next few weeks here, and [he] will be providing undeniable evidence for market withdrawal, including but not limited to the negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality data to these lawmakers.â He predicts, âI think these bills eventuallyâand all these initiativesâwill end up reaching a critical mass. And what that means is itâll reach a certain point where the federal government will have to respond. They will have to follow suit with the states and finally get these off the market.â Get the full breakdown in our exclusive interview. Follow @NicHulscher for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good news: Legislative efforts to ban dangerous COVID-19 mRNA injections are underway in multiple US states. Washington, Montana, Idaho, Iowa, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida, and Texas are considering bans at various government levels. A peer-reviewed study with over 81,000 signatories calls for immediate market withdrawal due to negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality. This momentum, fueled by persistent public demand, may force federal action. The goal is to ban all mRNA gene therapy injections, not just those for COVID-19. The evidence is clear and compelling, highlighting the harm caused by this technology, and the hope is that state-level initiatives will lead to federal bans, ultimately removing these dangerous products from the market. Follow Nick Höltscher (@NickHolscher) and the McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) for updates.
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another jam packed week of media blackout and let me tell you ladies and gentlemen, we have some very good news for you this week. Legislative efforts to ban the dangerous COVID-nineteen mRNA injections are now underway across multiple US states with bills being considered, drafted, and supported at various levels of government. Nicholas Hoelscher and Courageous Discourse report to US states with legislative efforts to ban mRNA injections as of 02/06/2025. You can see which states are considering it already with Washington, Montana, Idaho, Iowa, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida, and Texas. Nicholas Hoelscher says a critical mass will soon be reached forcing the federal government to follow suit.
If you're aware of any states that are missing from this figure, please let me know in the comments. Nicholas Hoelscher also makes reference to this recent peer reviewed study which found irrefutable evidence supporting immediate market withdrawal of the COVID nineteen quote unquote vaccines and you can see over 81,000 physicians, scientists and concerned citizens, two forty elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for urgent action. And so we have the McCullough Foundation study which was authored by epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, doctor Mary Talley Bowden, doctor Peter McCullough, titled review of calls for market withdrawal of COVID nineteen vaccines intensify risks far outweigh theoretical benefits, and we encourage everyone to read that in full. We also have new study finds COVID vaccinated are sicker than unvaccinated people. Four studies confirm serious health risks associated with childhood vaccination.
So the pressure is clearly mounting and we wanna take a moment to thank all of you, all of our listeners who haven't wavered in the face of adversity and have persisted in their pursuit of the truth, demanding answers where the authorities shamed us. It's because of all of you and the real experts that have continued in this battle that we are now at this point. Nicholas Hoelscher joins us now with more details on what we can expect next. Nicholas Hoelscher, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: Well, this is wonderful news, and many of us have been sort of holding our breath for years waiting for states to have the courage to do this, and now many of them are. Talk to us a little bit about how this all came about.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So, actually, in the past few years, there have been multiple initiatives, multiple bills, multiple committee hearings, and all of this stuff is is actively and has in the past few years been drafted up. It's being considered now by eight states. And within these eight states, like I said, it it this this situation, this this consideration of banning the mRNA injections is being considered at various levels of government, including county level and at the state level. So, for example, Washington state, like, we know they're they're very blue state.
They had 98% vaccine uptake. It's not being considered there at the state level right now, but there are initiatives at the county level. And I wanna say that, personally, I will be directly involved in three of these initiatives, within the next few weeks here, and I will be providing, undeniable evidence for market withdrawal, including but not limited to the negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality data, to these lawmakers.
Speaker 0: Well, we have the recent, and we just sort of brushed over this, the recent peer reviewed study that found irrefutable evidence supporting immediate market withdrawal of the COVID nineteen, quote, unquote, vaccines. And there's just again, I'll just say it again over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, two forty elected officials, 17 professional organizations based on excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination, calling for urgent action. And so I have to say, Nicholas, and I've I've I've said this on a recent broadcast. This is absolutely, very much thanks to the work of you, doctor Peter McCullough, and many others out there who haven't given up this fight because really it was the biggest crime I think recorded, you know, even though it hasn't officially been declared a crime, the biggest crime against humanity that we've seen in our lifetimes, perhaps in all of history, and to to mandate an experimental product like this, where it is going to actually cause harm, there's evidence of the harm, death, destruction, disability. It should have been recalled a very long time ago.
What do you think will happen now with mRNA in general once this starts to, really topple the COVID narrative?
Speaker 1: Alright. Well, I think these bills eventually and all these initiatives will end up reaching a critical mass. And what that means is it'll reach a certain point to where the federal government will have to respond. They will have to follow suit with the states and finally get these off the market, if they if the federal government doesn't beforehand before the states. And, hopefully, they do before the states, but, you know, that remains to be seen.
And I think that I think all mRNA technology, should be banned, and some of these bills are actually for all mRNA gene therapy injections, for any infectious disease. And, you know, we know from the mRNA RSV trials, those failed as well. They gave those to little babies, and it increased their risk of RSV. And so this platform continuously continuously shows failure, shows harm, and I think it should be totally banned.
Speaker 0: I absolutely agree with you, and many, many people do. And we genuinely hope to see that this is gonna be the way forward, for for America and for the whole world. I'm, that was actually gonna be one of my questions to you is adjust the COVID mRNA or all mRNA. To hear that is very, very refreshing. I know that there was, there were lawmakers in the state of Tennessee that, required the vaccine lettuce to be listed, not, you know, to have specific listings and ban it actually.
There are other states that have said, well, we need to list if a food has mRNA in it, we need to list it as a drug rather than a food. It should be banned altogether and especially because of the shedding aspect, Nicholas, that's the other thing I've made the point several times that it's not actually about choice because we don't have choice. We can't control who we come into contact with. And so if your choice is removed, you can't possibly have that in circulation. Your final words on that, and please let us know where people can follow your fantastic work.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, first, I I I'm hoping that these state level initiatives will finally lead to market removal in at least some of these states, and it will trickle up up to the top level at the federal government. And I'm very I'm very, excited, and I'm very optimistic about this simply because we do have all the evidence. It's all there, and it's and it's clear as day. And you can follow any updates on this on my personal x account at Nick Holscher or on the McCullough Foundation x account at McCullough Fund.
And also please follow us on courageous discourse substack.
Speaker 0: Fantastic. I just wanna bring up your x account at Nick Holscher. Highly recommend people follow Nick, and and also, the McCullough Foundation, just doing incredible work, incredible work. And, of course, that courageous discourse substack, you can also find it at peter mccullough m d dot substack dot com, and and and keep track of this because we can't allow ourselves to lose the momentum around this. I understand that there are a lot of positive things happening around the country, but if we don't stop this very, very dangerous thing that's in circulation, you know, how how can you really fight any battle if you're sick or if you're not here anymore?
And that's what these this, that's what this technology does. And so it has to be banned. And, and we're just very grateful for you. Thank you so much, Nicholas Holcher. Really appreciate your time today.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: The American food supply is loaded with over 1,000 toxic ingredients banned in Europe. It's no wonder Americans are more overweight and sicker than ever. When you can't trust what's in your food, the solution is simple. Go straight to the source. Good Ranchers works with over 100 American family farms to bring transparently good meat and seafood to your table.
Why is Good Ranchers meat better? The answer can be perfectly summed up in three important points. One, no antibiotics, hormones or seed oils. Because it's local, you can trust the American process. Two, steakhouse quality.
The meat truly tastes better and you won't want to go back. Three, save time and money. All the cuts are pre trimmed, individually packaged and vacuum sealed, which makes meal prep easier than ever. If you're tired of wondering what's in your food, it is time to make the switch. Good Ranchers makes it easy to trust your food again with their high quality, great tasting meat delivered straight to your door.
Subscribe to any box at goodranchers.com/vnn and use promo code vnn to get $25 off and a free gift of chicken breasts, bacon, salmon or ground beef with every order for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference for yourself at goodranchers.com/vnn.
Post Media
Video
Video
Video
Video
Video
Photo
Video
Video
Video
Video
Video
Details
| Token ID | reSee.it #91030 |
| đ Link | https://x.com/_/status/1888694455252963615 |
| Token URI | ipfs://bafybeiga4afnxyygh6tebbod4q4rzhha37dvuzxejht75iek5mtb4qcr34 |
| Saved Media | ipfs://bafybeiblv77kxbdtaaxyl6v7jnrhbktlirvrez4mdmjnziyjnnnflgl23i |
| Conversation ID | 1888694455252963615 |
| Posts In Thread | 17 |
| Thread Post IDs |
1888694455252963615, 1888694741849747897, 1888694932942291003, 1888695229995450819, 1888695429883187543, 1888695604626481201, 1888695752047608020, 1888695929319936210, 1888696223286079847, 1888696612794568821, 1888697291290112425, 1888697362706493687, 1888697420105543791, 1888697486279155874, 1888697546064670920, 1888698148958167239, 1888698402902270241
|
| đ Post Created | |
| Author | @VigilantFox |
| Author Name | The Vigilant Fox đŠ |
| Author Profile | https://x.com/VigilantFox |
| Chain | Base |
| đ Post Saved | |
| First Archiver | @kprigel |
| Contract Address | 0xa1a1a1a6EaBEAF37837ccdB47A2aC98603302DAe |