Reporter: Can you correct this statement it [condoms] wasnโt sent to Hamas, they were sent to Mozambique?
Musk: We will make mistakes, but will act quickly to correct any mistakesโฆ Iโm not sure we should be sending 50 MILLION worth of condoms anywhere https://t.co/ZV9QwX7rIh
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was corrected on a statement I made about $50,000,000 in condoms being sent to Gaza. The condoms were actually sent to Mozambique for an HIV prevention program. I admit to making mistakes; it's impossible to be perfectly accurate all the time. I will correct errors quickly. However, I question whether sending that many condoms anywhere is a good use of funds, and I doubt it's something most Americans would support. The sheer volume is significant.
Speaker 0: You said on x that an example of the fraud, that you have cited was $50,000,000 of condoms was sent to Gaza. But after fact check this, apparently, Gaza in Mozambique, and the program was to protect them against HIV. So can you correct the statements? It wasn't sent to Hamas, actually. It was sent to Mozambique, which makes sense why condoms was sent there.
Yeah. And how can we make sure that all the statements that you said were, correct so we can trust what you say?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, some of the things that I say will be incorrect and and should be corrected. So nobody's gonna bat a thousand. I mean, any you know, we're gonna we will make mistakes, but we'll act quickly to correct any mistakes. So, if the I'm not sure we should be sending 50,000,000 bells worth of condoms to anywhere, frankly. I'm not sure that's something Americans would be really excited about.
And that's really an enormous number of condoms, if you think about it.
@RT_com - RT
โIf the bureaucracy is in charge, then what meaning does democracy actually haveโ https://t.co/O3CmGwPm5Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
Is this truly a democracy? A functioning democracy requires a strong feedback loop between the people and their government. Without it, if unelected bureaucrats hold the power, the meaning of democracy is lost. The weight of leadership can be challenging, but open communication is essential for a government to represent its citizens effectively. A government without responsiveness to its people isn't truly democratic.
Speaker 0: Democracy. This may seem seem like, well, are we in a democracy? Well, if you don't have a feedback loop, FX, we'd have to if you if you sorry. So I'll tell you gravitas can be difficult sometimes. So, if if there's not a good feedback loop from the people to to to the government, and if if you have rule of the the bureaucrat if the bureaucracy is in charge, and then then what meaning does democracy actually have?