TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @066_mit
@066_mit - Tatyana MIT👩🎓Alumni 🙏Renaissance🇫🇷🇷🇺
Pour ceux qui croient encore en la version officielle: Le secgen de l’OTANadmet que l’expansion de l’Alliance à l’Est a provoqué le conflit actuel Pour être plus objective, le démantèlement deet le VOL de ses ressources étaient une aubaine pour l’hégémoniedans sa guerre hybride contre la
Video Transcript AI Summary
NATO was warned that expanding would lead to a Ukrainian invasion, but they proceeded anyway. In 2021, President Putin sent a treaty to NATO, asking them to promise no more enlargement to avoid invading Ukraine. NATO didn't sign, and the opposite occurred. The ongoing war in Ukraine has resulted in a significant number of casualties, yet the media fails to mention that NATO acknowledged the warning and still expanded. The advantage of NATO expansion is not addressed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: NATO just admitted that they were warned that continued expansion would lead to Ukrainian invasion. They did it anyway.
Speaker 1: President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and actually sent a a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. The opposite happened.
Speaker 0: So it seems that had they been willing to sign a treaty to not expand NATO, this war could have been Avoided. So what is the advantage of expanding NATO? And most importantly, why are the legacy media, when reporting on the subject of this ongoing war, This decimation of Ukraine, half a 1000000 people dead so far, why are they not saying, well, of course, NATO have now acknowledged that they were warned that if they continue to spanned, then Putin would invade, and they did it anyway.