TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @1Nicdar

Posted - March 6, 2026 at 8:23 PM

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 4:22 AM

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

🚨JUST IN: In a new jaw-dropping revelation, 'new emails' prove Attorney General Merrick Garland LIED when he said that the decision to RAID 'Mar-a-Lago' was his and his alone. The raid was, in fact, ORCHESTRATED and ORDERED by President Joe Biden’s White House. https://t.co/XCcICioEru

@1Nicdar — DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Posted - February 18, 2026 at 12:28 PM

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 12:46 PM

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Graham Platner, AOC, Bernie Sanders, You progressives speak great about taxing the rich but this socialism idea will always end this way. https://t.co/NTJonU0Mdx

@1Nicdar — DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Posted - February 13, 2026 at 2:00 PM

Saved - February 14, 2026 at 1:52 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m told the DOJ gave Congress unredacted Epstein files with individual logins, logging every search and download. Critics call it spying; the post argues it’s a trap to expose who’s protecting whom. It claims Trump released the files on monitored computers, letting him see who’s investigating and who’s covering up. DHS funding is blocked, a shutdown follows—five days of pattern, proving Trump has everything and more to come.

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

🔺THE TRUMP TEAM JUST EXECUTED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY. And Congress walked right into it. This week, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions. Then she pulled out a document. Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History." The room went SILENT. ⚠️ HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED The DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session. What Congress didn't know? The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH. Every name they looked up. Every document they opened. Every file they downloaded. ALL OF IT. LOGGED. And then brought the receipts to the hearing. 🔺 THE PANIC WAS INSTANT Rep. Jayapal called it "spying on members of Congress." Rep. Raskin accused Bondi of "blatant abuse of power." Rep. Moskowitz said it was "suspicious and inappropriate." They're FURIOUS. But here's the question nobody in the media is asking: Why are they so SCARED of their search history? If you're searching for evidence of crimes against children, you'd be PROUD of that search history. Unless you're not searching for evidence. Unless you're searching for YOUR OWN NAME. ⚡ THE GENIUS OF THE TRAP Think about it. The Trump team didn't just release the files. They released them on MONITORED COMPUTERS. Every Congress member who rushed to search the files just told the DOJ exactly: • WHO they're trying to protect. • WHAT names they're worried about. • WHICH connections they're trying to verify. The ones searching for "flights to the island" = investigators. The ones searching for SPECIFIC NAMES = protectors. Trump now knows who's investigating and who's COVERING UP. And the Bondi showed them she knows. In front of cameras. With a smile. 🔺 THE DHS SHUTDOWN — PERFECT TIMING While Congress panics about their search history, DHS is shutting down tomorrow. democrats blocked the funding bill. House members already left Washington. The same week Congress gets caught searching Epstein files — they REFUSE to fund the department that investigates trafficking? They're not defunding DHS to save money. They're defunding it to STOP INVESTIGATIONS. ⚡ CONNECT THE DOTS Monday: Congress gets Epstein file access. Tuesday: Members frantically search for names. Wednesday: It is revealed every keystroke was tracked, everything. Thursday: Democrats block DHS funding. Friday: Government shutdown begins. Five days. One pattern. PANIC. They walked into the hearing thinking they were in control. They walked out knowing Trump has EVERYTHING. Every search. Every name. Every cover-up attempt. Logged. Documented. WEAPONIZED. The hunter became the hunted, and they did it to themselves. Trump is owning the Left, and he isn’t done. Told you there was more to come, and just imagine what else it coming? - NOTE: Sent to me in DMs. Too good not to share. 100% True.

@1Nicdar — DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Posted - August 17, 2025 at 9:19 AM

Saved - August 17, 2025 at 7:47 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared that Ilhan Omar married her brother to help him with immigration, stating she would “do what she had to do.” There are various documents supporting this claim, including affidavits and a marriage certificate. Rep. Steve Drazkowski provided a letter and some materials on the matter.

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Ilhan Omar married her brother and admitted she would “do what she had to do” to get him papers to stay in the U.S. He has the receipts: witnesses, sworn affidavits, eviction notices, marriage certificate, DNA, and other documents. Rep. Steve Drazkowski: “I am presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

“I’m asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida.” “Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence.” “The endgame is to find answers.” “The endgame is for us to bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that representative Omar has with or had with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 2009 to 02/2017.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Omar on the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'm also asking congresswoman Craig to initiate an ethics investigation into congresswoman Omar because of questions about federal tax fraud, federal immigration fraud, federal student loan fraud, and state violations of perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and acts of campaign fraud abuse in Boston, Washington, New York, Chicago, and Florida. There are also violations of state ethics or of the Minnesota House ethics rules regarding colleges for speeches she gave while she was in partial control of their budgets as a member of the House Higher Education Finance Committee in both 2017 and 2018. She was found guilty of the violations by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board three weeks ago in order to return those funds on June 6. Miss Omar appears to be a serial career criminal and should not have access to our nation's highest secrets and intelligence. That is why I'm calling on our congresswoman Angie Craig to protect both our national security and our respect of the rule of law. Tax fraud, immigration fraud, student loan fraud, perjury, bigamy, kickbacks, and campaign abuse fraud from the East Coast to the Mississippi River. If those charges have been brought against congresswoman Michelle Bachman, the Star Tribune would not have said on Sunday that she was attempting to, quote, skirt the law, and then followed up with a front page story the next day on a pie in the sky proposal that had zero chances of becoming law. Minnesota deserves better. America demands more. I'm presenting you with a copy of my letter and just a sampling of the materials available to you on these topics, and we'll take your questions. Here's the sampling of materials that I, have offered you today. Anybody who would like them, there's many more than this available, all over social media and, in printed, publicity and elsewhere. So, with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll take your questions. Speaker 1: Yes, representative. Why are you asking Angie Craig, congresswoman Craig, to open this ethics investigation? Unless I'm missing something. I think she's on the transportation and agriculture committee. Speaker 0: Yeah. She's my congresswoman. I'm from the Second District. That seems to me to be the best place to ask your elected representative to, represent you in forming an ethics investigation. Speaker 1: Oh, so are you doing this as as an individual citizen of Minnesota, or are you doing this as representative? Speaker 0: Well, I'm doing it as both. I'm a constituent of hers, and I am asking her as a constituent, and presenting it here today as a state representative, but asking her as a constituent to bring forward an ethics investigation. I could ask Nancy Pelosi, but she doesn't represent me. Congresswoman Craig does. Speaker 2: Are you only allowed to to ask someone who represents you? The reason I'm asking is, I mean, you know, party of the congresswoman, and I would assume the chances of it happening pretty slim. Why not ask the Republican congress congressperson? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, you could ask any member of congress. Angie Craig is my US House of Representatives, my US Congresswoman, and because of that, she is the one that made most sense to me to ask to represent me and represent this pursuit of justice and and respect for the rule of law. Speaker 2: And analysts would say this is just an attempt to embarrass her, put her in a tough position as opposed to just getting the job done by going and asking a Republican congressperson to to Speaker 1: pursue what Speaker 0: you want to do. How would you respond? Well, this is not about congresswoman Craig. It's not about about Republican or Democrat. It's about an avenue for me to, bring forward these questions and get it in front of the US House of Representatives. Speaker 2: What's the history of these sorts of requests for investigations? Speaker 0: Has Congress responded them? I I believe some of them may do. Some may find it superficial and don't. I haven't really dug into that myself, but I I expect and have heard that they receive a lot of requests. Certainly, I don't know that many of them or all of them contain, the level of importance, or the level of detail and information available that this already does. Speaker 2: Are you expecting more information to come out Speaker 0: I am. As a matter of fact, I talked to one of the people, David Steinberg, who has done a lot of the work. You will see his blog posts in here that have the social media that some of you in the Minnesota media here have referred to. And, if I can be critical, somewhat dismissed because it wasn't something that you found, but something that he found. Incidentally, as soon as David and Scott Johnson and Preah, did their work, and I know this for sure with David, he he took the screen captures of these social media accounts, and then formed a blog post, offered representative Omar comment before he published the blog post, heard nothing back from her, published the post, and shortly after the post was published, either depending on the situation, either her image on social media or Ahmed Elmi's image was removed from their respective social media accounts. And I think that's important for you and the media to note, as you try to discern, what motives are and where the truth lies. Speaker 2: What's the what's the endgame here? Speaker 0: Well, I think the endgame is to find answers. The answers, have not been, pursued. We're starting to see them be pursued. The national media is really starting to kick it the gear. I think the Star Tribune for their effort recently, although it was, it was not, the the level of of, inquiry that many people wanted and expected. It was a great start. And so I think the endgame is for us to bring about bring about visibility to this in a way that the people of Minnesota and the people of America can find answers to what appears to be a sham marriage that representative Omar has with or had with Omar Ahmed Elmi from 2009 to 02/2017. Speaker 2: Should Congresswoman, Craig dismiss or ignore your, your letter? What's your next, step from there? What would mean? Any other plans, any other attempts to maybe refer this onto other agencies or officials? Speaker 0: Well, one idea that, that I heard was actually from the Democrat. And by the way, I've heard from Democrat colleagues in the house, that are thanking me for my efforts to pursue this because they have the same concerns I do. I want you to know that. I'm not gonna name names, but one of those Democrats, offered to me that, what represent then representative Ellison did when he was running for office last year, and there was questions about his situation with his wife as he offered, you know what? I will ask for an ethics investigation upon myself. And I think maybe a call from the media, a call from me, or a call from someone to say, representative Omar, if you don't think this that these things, that there's there's problems here, do as your predecessor did. Ask for an investigation of yourself and clear your name. I think that would be a great inquiry. Speaker 2: The the theory is that the Shan Marriage was needed to help him or her? Speaker 0: We're not completely sure. You know, there's a there's a bunch of I mean, you look at the tax fraud probable cause that exists from the June 6, campaign finance stuff. I mean, probable cause is right there for tax fraud, federal and state. You can't deny that. But I think you need to go and and first of all, find out more about the marriage and start to get more people involved in digging through this stuff. The questions about people brought up questions about immigration. Did it somehow help Ahmed Elmi or someone come here illegally or easier or get special preference. There's questions about FAFSA. Incidentally, the marriage between Ahmed Elmi and representative Omar occurred in 02/2009. As I understand, that was the first year that they both attended North Dakota State together. And during that two or or three or four years at North Dakota State, there were at least two instances at two different addresses that represent Omar, Ahmad Hersey, and Ahmad Elmi all lived at the same address. Was that I think that should be interesting. Is that a real address or a post box? No. I can't recall. There were two different ones, in two different points in time. So evidently, may have moved to a different street address or something. Speaker 1: Representative, does, have you contacted representative Craig to let her know that this was coming or she Speaker 0: just I have not. And I haven't talked to representative Omar about it either. I know that was a question last year when I brought up the fact that representative Omar was taking money from three different house three different state higher education institutions directly in in conflict with Minnesota House rules, which she eventually then returned those thousands of dollars to them realizing, that she was wrong in doing that. But they I was asked by the media last year that very same question. Speaker 1: Let me ask you. You know, I know that, at one point, the the then US attorney Andy Luger made it clear in a statement that he he was not investing the federal government was not investigating Ilhan Omar. Also, I believe that the state campaign finance board has the ability to refer items to promote jurisdictions. Obviously, the investigators, the IRS, the federal government, they're pretty aggressive and they're pretty good. It doesn't appear that they're on this at all. Does that say anything to you? Speaker 0: Well, the Campaign Finance Board does do criminal referrals about campaign finance related items. And if you'll read the campaign finance board's findings and orders from June 6, you'll realize as they form their context outboard that they limited their approach to items that concern campaign finance and didn't as a matter of fact, they didn't even see the tax forms. Speaker 1: Right. But they didn't feel that the the campaign finance portion of this reached a criminal element in their opinion. Speaker 0: Well, she broke the law and she's paying the money Speaker 1: back. Right? Speaker 0: It's she broke. She broke the law. Speaker 1: Right, right. But I guess I'm I'm just wondering if it it it appears that people who do have access. Obviously, US attorney, the campaign finance board regulate camera for items to criminal entities or criminal investigators. They've had access to this and they haven't done that yet. I mean, are they remiss in their actions? Speaker 0: I think I think we I think we all are. I think they are. I think you are. I think I am. I think we all need to pursue justice and truth here, and that's why I'm here today. Another exhibit is in your packet. The question of perjury. This isn't the best copy, but this is representative Omar's I'll just call it because it's called application for an order for service by alternate means. So as I understand it, representative Omar, approached the court and tried to get the divorce in 2017 from Ahmed Elmi without actually having him there. And in order to do that, she testified under perjury twice in here that she hadn't seen or heard of Ahmed Elmi since 02/2011. And you'll find in your packet too, and pray up Samsador Samsador I think I still struggle with their last name. Had this, brought forward as I understand 02/2016. This is the affidavit of service of the eviction notice for Ahmed Noor Saeed Elmi in 02/2012, a year after she said she had last heard from him. Less than 10 blocks from where she lived in Minneapolis. Speaker 2: Representative, you say that our national security is Speaker 0: at stake. Speaker 2: Would you outline for Minnesotans? And you're making some some allegations in other areas, but specifically, how is our national security at stake here? Speaker 0: If you interview the if you talk to the police, they will tell you that a person's past behavior is the best indicator of their future behavior. Best predictor of the future behavior is our past behavior. I have laid out for you represent Omar's past behavior. And

@1Nicdar — DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Posted - July 13, 2025 at 3:14 PM

Saved - July 13, 2025 at 11:29 PM

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Do you think the assassination attempt one year ago today on President Trump was an inside job? Yes or No? https://t.co/zkmnmMbqTb

@1Nicdar — DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

Posted - October 14, 2023 at 2:54 PM

Saved - October 16, 2023 at 9:25 PM

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

That Would Be Me!