reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @45johnmac
@45johnmac - Gordon Master
Enslavement is what social security actually brings to the masses. People who don't reach pension entitlement their money evaporates in the system. https://t.co/zEJB8MOLzW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains Social Security in terms of deductions, retirement timing, and the perceived value of benefits. They state that about $25,000 is taken from each paycheck annually as a non-optional contribution for retirement. This deduction continues for roughly fifty-two years, assuming continued employment. By the time a person reaches retirement age, which the speaker notes “keeps getting pushed back,” the total contributions appear to amount to about $1,300,000 of the individual’s own money.
The speaker then describes the retirement period, using an example where retirement occurs at age 65. They claim that after contributing more than a million dollars over a working lifetime, the retiree is given about $1,600 each month in Social Security benefits, which the speaker converts to roughly $19,000 per year. They extend the scenario to cover fifteen more years of life, around age 80, stating that during that entire span Social Security would have paid back roughly $288,000 of the $1,300,000 that was taken.
From these numbers, the essential question the speaker raises is: where did the other million dollars go? They argue that the family does not receive it, it is not passed down, and it does not return to the retiree in any other form. Instead, the speaker asserts that the money “disappears into the system.” The claimed mechanism is that Social Security finances are “spread the taking across a lifetime so you never feel robbed,” while the benefits received are labeled as a “benefit,” or a favor, rather than a direct repayment of the contributions.
The speaker emphasizes that, per person, the missing money accumulates quickly, and once the math is examined instead of the promise, it becomes difficult to view the program as primarily about helping someone retire. The presentation concludes with a caveat that this is a theory, not a fact, signaling that the statements are presented as a perspective rather than an established truth.
Key figures highlighted include: $25,000 annual payroll deduction; approximately $1,300,000 contributed over about 52 years; retirement benefits of about $1,600 per month ($19,000 per year); total benefits over 15 additional years totaling around $288,000; and the assertion that roughly $1,000,000 of the contributed funds do not get returned to the individual or their family. The overarching claim is that the apparent discrepancy between contributions and received benefits calls into question the nature of Social Security as a retirement program, described here as a theory rather than a fact.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is how Social Security actually works. They take about $25,000 a year out of your pay. Not optional, not a choice. They say it's for your retirement. You do that for roughly fifty two years if you're lucky enough to keep working.
And by the time you hit retirement age, which keeps getting pushed back by the way, that adds up to about $1,300,000 of your own money. You used to retire earlier, then it was 65, now they're talking 70. The goalposts keep moving. But let's say you finally retire at 65. After taking over 1,000,000 from you, they give you about $1,600 a month.
That's it. Call it 19,000 a year if we're being generous. Now, let's say you live another fifteen years and by around 80. Over that whole time, they've paid you back roughly $288,000 out of the 1,300,000.0 they took. So here's the only question that matters.
Where did the other million go? Because your family doesn't get it. It doesn't get passed down. It doesn't come back to you in any other form. It just disappears into system.
That's the trick. They spread the taking across a lifetime so you never feel robbed. Then they call what you get back a benefit, like it's a favor. Per person, that missing money adds up fast. And once you look at the math instead of the promise, it's hard to pretend this is about helping you retire.
This is just a theory, not a fact.
@45johnmac - Gordon Master
Shocking news if there is any truth in this video from a hotelier. https://t.co/ZJDW9pkjaH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Whistleblower, owner of a small B&B between London and Bristol, says he was "commandeered by the office of 10 Downing Street to rehearn refugee families." The first refugees reportedly included "no women" or children; "the people that turned up were men from the age of 19 to 30." He says the property can hold about 250; he "currently house a 150 immigrants." He "did receive quite a large sum of money" but was told to "fire all my staff" and that they will "supply security guards for the Britain breakfast." Two weeks ago a "large parcel" arrived; at 02:30 a.m. crates were loaded—"roughly between sixty and seventy really big crates"—whose contents he was not allowed to know. A letter with "names and numbers" identified refugees; a small parcel contained "a series of keys with numbers on them." Crates included "AK 47 machine guns" and "a number of hanging eights," with enough ammunition to wipe out his village. He plans to move the crates to a secure garage, saying, "it's obvious to me now that this is their plan."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, first of all, I want to apologize because I feel I betrayed you. This is gonna be very hard for me to do, but it needs to be told. I'm not going to tell you my name. You could just call me the whistleblower because this needs to be told. I own a small bread and breakfast slash hotel on the outskirts between London and Bristol.
Exactly where, I won't say. I was commandeered by the office of 10 Downing Street to rehearn refugee families. In the first lot of refugees came, there was not one woman. There was not one child. The people that turned up were men from the age of 19 to 30, I would say.
I have enough room for about 250 residents. I currently house a 150 immigrants. Yes. I did receive quite a large sum of money for doing so. On doing so, the government told me that I had to fire all my staff, and they will supply supply their their own.
Own. And also that they will supply security guards for the Britain breakfast. Well, about two weeks ago, I received a phone call to say that a large parcel will be arriving sometime this evening. Around about 02:30 in the morning, I received another phone call to say that the parcel has arrived, and can I open up the rear serving entrance at the back of the B and B, which I went down and met some army personnel, which kind of surprised me very, very much? The person in charge, I don't know who he was, colonel or whatnot, asked me to show him to a secure room within the B and B, which I did.
On doing so, they loaded in roughly between sixty and seventy really big crates. I asked what was in the crates, and I was told that I was not permitted to know. He then handed me a smaller parcel and told me that I will receive a phone call to give me further instructions on what to do and when to open this parcel, which was very strange. So I've had this person now for about a week in my office, and I started talking to a friend of mine, and he said, well, you know what? You don't know what's inside these parcels.
It could be anything. It's your property. Whatever's inside your property, you're in the right state open, and I should have a look what it was. And I was debating about it for a little while, and I thought, you know what? You are kind of right.
If it's in my property, I wanna know what it is. So I opened the small parcel up, and inside was a letter with a list of names and numbers written next to name. On realizing that each name on the letter was one of the refugees, then there was a smaller box inside the the parcel. I opened that and there was a series of keys with numbers on them. So I went down to the secure lock where these crates were and noticed that each crate had a number on it and each key had a number on it.
So I took two keys for two of the crates and I opened up the crates. Crate one. There was a load of AK 47 machine guns. Great two were a number of hanging eights. Now when I say this, I'm saying this as you could start a new war off with what I was looking at.
There was enough ammunition inside one of the crates to easy wipe out my little village. Boom. Gunk. Easy. Now I'm a bit stuck because I don't want these refugees here anymore, but I'm contracted to house them for a period of time.
I don't know if I can give the government their money back and tell them to sweep off or not. I don't know. All I do know is in good faith, I cannot I cannot allow these men to have these crates. I am gonna move them away from my property to a secure garage that I have not too far because I'm not gonna be responsible for allowing our government to kill us, the innocent people. Because it's obvious to me now that this is their plan.
@45johnmac - Gordon Master
Single decker bus approximately 50 if a double decker 80 people SMH. https://t.co/XLrrZtinpU
@45johnmac - Gordon Master
This is how to deal with a crazie on a plane well done 👏👏👏 https://t.co/Cgp0VXyEiF
@45johnmac - Gordon Master
Education minister for Italy has taken a stance on the gender ideology going on in school's. Other countries need to do the same and put this cohesing of our children's gender to bed. https://t.co/A07EzjWYiX
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Italy's Education Ministry just banned “gender-neutral” symbols in schools and instructed schools they can no longer use these confusing terms. https://t.co/OYuYOZ9AwP
@45johnmac - Gordon Master
Orwell 1984 is creeping closer with these cretins pushing 🆔 cards for total control of the all citizens. Kill Bill needs to be investigated for a multitude of crime's against humanity across the globe. https://t.co/HDsNohg3Tg