TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @911Revisionist
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
Geraldo Rivera interviews Benjamin Netanyahu hours after the 2001 September 11th attacks. Source: https://youtu.be/iAxiuNEcgAs And this is where the b/s narrative of nukes and bombs in the buildings comes from. So, if you've fallen for the bomb drivel, you're helping Nettie with the cover-up.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on the nature, aims, and future threat of Islamic militant terrorism and the states believed to support it. The interviewer asks why the United States was hit so savagely and what the terrorists’ objective is. The Prime Minister responds that the attacks are terrorist actions launched by Islamic militants who enjoy support from radical Middle Eastern states. He says militant Islam perverts and distorts one of the world’s great religions and seeks to reverse a thousand years of history in which Islam receded in the West and democracy became dominant. To undo this, he explains, they must strike at the main bastion of Western democracy—the United States—and will likely strike again to crush its will, not merely to damage it. He links this effort to inspiration from Islamic militant teachings and, specifically, from the Islamic Republic of Iran, stating that they view the United States as the “great Satan” and Israel as the “little Satan.” He adds that if Belgium were in the Middle East, it would also be a “little Satan,” underscoring the pattern of targeting the United States.
The Prime Minister emphasizes that the United States’ awakening is a wake-up call from hell, noting that these groups are continually improving their technical capabilities and that radical regimes–notably Iran and Iraq–are developing weapons of mass destruction. He warns that the next attack could involve millions dying, should Islamic militants acquire nuclear weapons, and asserts that if action is not taken to dismantle the terror network and the terrorist states behind it, the future of freedom and democracy is in doubt. He argues that the United States has the power today to crush them and must demonstrate the will to do so.
In responding to a question from five years earlier about the potential for a nuclear or Armageddon-like attack, the Prime Minister asserts that terrorists already used a 350-ton conventional bomb and that this network operates through states and territories. He argues that no group acts without states, and that the terrorists require places to be launched from and coordinated. He identifies a network including Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, certain Arab states, and Arafat’s Palestinian domain, describing Arafat’s camps in Gaza where Hamas and Islamic Jihad allegedly train children to become suicide bombers, preparing “the kamikaze pilots” of today and tomorrow. He contends that the network has the capacity to develop atomic weapons and already possesses ballistic missiles and chemical/biological capabilities, bringing the history of conflict into a new era driven by Islamic militancy allied with Arab terrorist groups seeking to destroy the West.
The Prime Minister concludes that terrorism is an indivisible evil and that success by terrorists in one region emboldens others, requiring a unified, determined response—akin to historical coalitions against piracy or Nazism. He endorses President Bush’s call for a global war of democracies against terrorism, asserting that this is necessary for the future of civilization. The interviewer closes by thanking the Prime Minister.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister prime minister, welcome. Why was The United States hit so savagely? What was the objective of these terrorists?
Speaker 1: What we're dealing with are terrorist attacks launched by Islamic militants who enjoy the support of radical states in the Middle East. This this militant Islam, I think, perverts and distorts one of the world's great religions. They want to reverse history. They really don't accept the last one thousand years of history in which Islam receded in the West and West and democracy became the primary force in the world. And so they want to roll back time.
And in order to do that, they're they have to strike at the main, bastion of the western democracy, and that's The United States. And so they'll hit you they hit you now, and they'll hit you again because their objective is literally to destroy The United States. If they can't destroy it, they can hit it and strike it and at least crush its will, and bring it to to its knees. This is, this may sound fantastic, but that's exactly what they think. And this is inspired again and again by, Islamic militant teachings and, of course, by the Islamic Republic Of Iran.
This is what the Ayatollah Khomeini was all about. So they see The United States as the great Satan. We in Israel, by the way, are the little Satan. If Belgium was in our place right here in the Middle East, it would also be a little Satan. And and they go after The United States, and they'll go after it again.
Speaker 0: Awaken the sleeping giant. Don't you agree?
Speaker 1: Yes. But I think this is a wake up call from hell because they don't intend to stay where they are. They're constantly developing greater technical proficiency. And the radical regimes, specifically Iran and Iraq, are that are part of their this terror network are developing weapons of mass destruction. So the next time, as horrific as this attack was, as horrible and and agonizing and loss of life, the next time you will see not thousands or 10,000 people die in New York, but millions.
In other words, once this Islamic militancy acquires nuclear weapons, they might change history. They might destroy our civilization, our freedoms, our democracy that they hate so much. And therefore, we this wake up call that we've received is a summons to action. It says that unless we act now to dismantle this terror network of terrorist states manipulating terrorist groups in The Middle East and beyond, then our future is in doubt. They have the will to destroy us.
They don't have the power today. We have the power today to crush them. We now must show that we have the will to do so.
Speaker 0: You wrote in your book, five years ago, Fighting Terrorism, How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorism. Will quote, in the worst scenario, the consequences could not be a car bomb, but a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center. You know, you you got the location right, the weapon wrong, but they didn't even need a nuclear weapon. Do you really envision the obtaining of weapons of mass destruction by these very same personalities or people like them and that they would have the will to deliver even an Armageddon kind of blow to The United States?
Speaker 1: Do you have any doubt? I mean, okay. They didn't use nuclear bombs because they don't have them, but they used a a 350 ton conventional bomb. 350 tons of conventional bombs with all that fuel and that that is far more powerful than anything an f 16 that could launch in terms of conventional weapons. So they're well underway.
But it is important to understand that none of these groups, not Bin Laden, not the Hamas and Hezbollah and the Fatah groups, Arafat's own group that formed this network of terror, none of them could act without states, without terrorist regimes. It's important to understand that. These terrorists don't float in the air. They need territory. They need a place to be launched from, to come back to, to coordinate.
That is those who don't commit suicide. Those who orchestrate, plan, execute, arm, dispatch these terrorists, they need a place to be. And that place to be is a handful of states in the Middle East Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, a few Arab states, and indeed this complex that includes also Arafat's own Palestinian domain, has become, in fact, the factory of suicide bombs. Arafat has summer camps. Hiraldo, he has summer camps in Gaza where Hamas and Islamic Jihad teach Palestinian children to become suicide bombers.
He's preparing the kamikaze pilots not only of today, but of tomorrow. So this network that, whose various parts support one another, helping each other in material, help each other in political support in these abominable resolutions they passed in Durban the other day. This network itself has to be dismantled because if it's not dismantled, the answer is yes. They will develop atomic weapons. They already have ballistic missiles, two of these states.
They already have chemical biological weapons. They're well on their way to developing atomic bombs. And if they do, then history will change. History has not ended, unlike what Francis Fukuyama wrote, with the triumph of capitalism and democracy over communism. In fact, is a new conflict, and this is the threat of this Islamic militancy coupled with affiliated Arab terrorist groups who seek to destroy the West.
Nothing short of that. What we have to make clear is that terrorism is an indivisible evil. It is evil everywhere. And the success of terrorists in one part of the world emboldens terrorists elsewhere. So we have to adopt the same kind of attitude that the civilized powers adopted against piracy in the nineteenth century, against Nazism in the twentieth century, we now have to adopt against terrorism in the twenty first century.
It is a crime against humanity. It is evil at all times. It is unpardonable. There are no excuses and no concession to terrorism. And the terrorists and those who support them are enemies of mankind.
We will fight them resolutely. I think this attitude will produce the the necessary action, and I think that president Bush has been wise to call a global war of the democracies against terrorism.
Speaker 0: Mister prime minister, Shalom, thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
In the late 1980s, I learned about Stanley Meyer, who developed a car that ran on water by splitting water atoms to create energy from hydrogen, releasing only oxygen. He claimed it could travel 112 miles on just 4 liters of water, promising incredible efficiency. However, his invention attracted trouble, as he reported threats from oil companies. His mysterious death raised questions about whether it was linked to his groundbreaking technology. The implications of his work and the circumstances surrounding his death leave much to ponder.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
In the late 1980's Stanley Meyer created a car that runs on water based on the principle of splitting water atoms into its elemental form, burning hydrogen to create energy and releasing oxygen generating no emissions. Meyer claimed his vehicle was able to travel 112 miles with just 4 litres of water and nothing else. This car could easily go 1000+ miles per tank on something that costs hardly anything which must have sounded truly magical and that’s exactly when his troubles started. Stanley had previously stated that he had been threatened many times by representatives from oil companies from around the world and then he mysteriously died.. Did Stanley die because he knew how to turn water into fuel? It's up to you to decide
Video Transcript AI Summary
Number three: The Water Fuel Cell. Stanley Meyer, an Ohio inventor, introduced the water fuel cell in the 1980s. "I don't care if you use rainwater, well water, city water, ocean water. If you don't have any fresh water, go ahead and use snow. If you don't have any snow available to you, then use salt water because there's no adverse effect to the fuel cell." Meyer's cell was said to use resonant frequencies to break water bonds with minimal electrical input and allegedly powered a dune buggy he claimed was powered entirely by his water fuel cell. The invention drew news attention and overseas interest. In 1998 Meyer died of cerebral aneurysm, fueling conspiracy theories about poisoning. Despite attempts, no one has demonstrated a working model. The water fuel cell remains a symbol of hope for some and skepticism for others, a vital part of the quest for clean energy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Number three: The Water Fuel Cell. In the realm of alternative energy, few stories are as compelling and enigmatic as that of Stanley Meyer and his water fuel cell. Stanley Meyer, an inventor from Ohio, introduced the water fuel cell in the 1980s.
Speaker 1: I don't care if you use rainwater, well water, city water, ocean water. If you don't have any fresh water, go ahead and use snow. If you don't have any snow available to you, then use salt water because there's no adverse effect to the fuel cell.
Speaker 0: Meyer's cell was not just an electrolysis device. He claimed it used a unique process involving resonant frequencies to break the bonds of water molecules with minimal electrical input. Meyer demonstrated his invention in a dune buggy he claimed was powered entirely by his water fuel cell. According to him, the vehicle could use water as fuel, converting it into hydrogen and oxygen gases, which were then used to generate combustion. This concept was revolutionary, promising an abundant, cheap, and environmentally friendly fuel source.
It attracted significant attention, with Meijer even being featured in local news and gaining interest from overseas.
Speaker 2: This year at 06:00, an age old dream becoming a reality. A local inventor has discovered a way, hear this, to use water to run your car.
Speaker 0: Despite the initial excitement, Myers' claims were met with skepticism from the scientific community. His story took a dramatic turn on 03/20/1998. Meijer, who was dining at a restaurant, suddenly ran outside, clutching his throat. Suddenly, he fell to the ground and died shortly thereafter. The official cause of death was ruled a cerebral aneurysm, but this did not stop the emergence of numerous conspiracy theories.
Supporters of Meyer's work speculated that he might have been poisoned or otherwise targeted due to the threat his invention posed to the global oil industry. Following Meyer's death, interest in his water fuel cell persisted, with various individuals and groups attempting to replicate his work. However, no one has successfully demonstrated a working model of Meyer's device that clearly shows the production of energy in a manner consistent with his claims. While Meyer's invention promised a world free from the shackles of fossil fuels, his mysterious death left many unanswered questions. The water fuel cell remains a symbol of hope for some and a subject of skepticism for others, a vital part of the quest for clean, unlimited energy.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
We were led to believe that the fires were too intense on 9/11 for the buildings. But were they?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Eyewitness: "I live on the 40 Third Floor of a building, which is five blocks from the World Trade Center itself. I witnessed the entire thing from beginning to end." I saw the plane come out of nowhere and ream right into the side of the twin tower, exploding through the other side. I witnessed both towers collapse, one first and then the second. "The upper section, which appeared to be nothing but steel and dust, fell freely in each case." "The fires could not have melted the steel structure." "The melting point of steel is about 1,500 degrees Celsius." "In other words, diffuse hydrocarbon fires cannot produce temperatures high enough to melt steel." "The pancake theory ... has no longer been viable since 02/2004." "Underwriters lab ... signed off a report saying that fire did it. That's fraud." "Towers appeared to have exploded starting at the top and then going all the way down." "The tipping top falsifies the claims by NIST that it was an inevitable collapse."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Down. We wanna bring in Mark Walsh who's a a a freelancer for Fox. You live just a few blocks away and witnessed
Speaker 1: Dude, I was I was I live on the 40 Third Floor of a building, which is five blocks from the World Trade Center itself. I witnessed the entire thing from beginning to end.
Speaker 0: People talk about how it looked like a movie. I know when I came walking down here early this morning and saw both towers on fire and people on every street corner, it was it was it was like a movie, but you watch the planes hit the towers.
Speaker 1: I was watching with my roommate. It was approximately several minutes after the first plane had hit. I saw this plane come out of nowhere and just ream right into the side of the twin tower, exploding through the other side. And then I witnessed both towers collapse, one first and then the second, mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense.
Speaker 2: But the upper section, which appeared to be nothing but steel and dust, fell freely in each case. We also agree that the fires in the building in the buildings, whether driven by jet fuel or office furnishings, could not have melted the steel structure. NIST made the point that in no instance did they report that steel in the World Trade Center Towers melted due to the fires. The melting point of steel is about 1,500 degrees Celsius. Normal building fires and hydrocarbon fires generate temperatures much lower than that.
In other words, diffuse hydrocarbon fires such as these cannot produce temperatures high enough to melt steel. Each tower had 236 super strength steel box columns making up the perimeter wall, and this was built around a core of 47 massive steel columns. The floor decking ran between in a staggered arrangement. To reduce the effects of fire, all of this steel structure was coated with a spray applied fireproofing material before the buildings were occupied. And in the aircraft impact zones, this fireproofing was upgraded in just the few years before nine eleven.
The theory that was claimed to be the most probable root cause for many years called the pancake theory, in which the floors pancake down upon each other is no longer supported by NIST. It's really no longer supported by anyone. And since 02/2004, when my former company did test models of the floor assemblies, the pancake theory has no longer been viable.
Speaker 3: Underwriters lab who made two half scale models and two full scale models of entire floor spans. They set them on fire, cooked them for twice as long at twice the temperature Fahrenheit and none of them failed to support load. Yet, they signed off a report saying that fire did it. That's fraud.
Speaker 2: I've got a shortened version of my talk, why the NIST World Trade Center reports are false. Basically, it's about why they're false and unscientific. So today, I will discuss evidence related to the official investigations conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST, whose reports comprise the final official explanation for what happened at the World Trade Center on 09/11/2001. Before we get to the reports, however, let me mention that the first pertinent point to consider is the low probability that the only three instances of a skyscraper suffering global collapse due to fire occurred all in the same day in the same place. There have been many raging building fires, much worse than existed in any of the World Trade Center buildings, but no global collapse has ever resulted from those fires.
We can see from these photos that the towers appeared to have exploded starting at the top and then going all the way down. At the top of each tower, the debris appeared to shoot upward and outward as much of the solid structure turned to dust. This is counterintuitive to the idea that the building was being crushed downward. Many of us have asked ourselves, is this what it looks like when a building is softened or weakened from fire?
Speaker 4: At the beginning of its final destruction, World Trade Center 2 tips or twists to the east, but turns to dust before hitting the ground. The tipping top falsifies the claims by NIST that it was an inevitable collapse. If the leaning top had fallen as a rigid block, it would have landed on World Trade Center 4. When we look, it is not there. Not only is it not there, but neither is the main body of World Trade Center 4 itself.
Speaker 3: That was a big moment for me about the tipping top. It looks like it stops tipping and looks like it goes straight down. Well, if you look at angular momentum you're going to obey the laws of physics. It does. But, what it does is prove that the building is no longer a rigid body.
The whole thing tipping has angular momentum. But if suddenly all that top portion turns into little itty bitty specks of dust, each one can keep rotating. So the whole thing doesn't continue rotating as a rigid body, but each of those specks rotates. And that way, it it conserves angular momentum and doesn't violate the laws of physics. So that's a way of proving that the top turned to dust.
Speaker 4: In this video, we can see that some of the core columns survive the rest of the building being peeled away from it like a banana. But then these core columns themselves turn to dust before our eyes.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
Weaponized Breakthrough Energy has been deployed, but no one wants to talk about it @solari_the @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork https://t.co/8e2nA9hQn1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 frames post-9/11 geopolitics as: 'the primary form of conflict now is not between different nation states and different ruling classes. It's between the ruling classes united and coordinated through their transnational deep state and us, the rest of humanity.' He argues the technology deployed on nine eleven serves little in this conflict and that 'they want to keep it hidden.' He cites Doctor Judy Wood's claim of 'a method for the molecular dissociation of man. A technology which can cause things and people to come apart at the molecular level,' noting that 'over a thousand victims of that attack on 09/11, the remains were never found. Never not even a fingerprint or a hair or anything for over a thousand people, over a third of the victims.' He says 'the airplanes and the fire couldn't have done to the buildings what they did to the buildings.' He adds: 'the techniques of perception management were so strong' and that 'any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.' He concludes: 'it requires someone like Judy Wood to expose this, and then it requires other researchers to actually back her up,' and that 'we've been fighting this battle for almost a quarter of a century now.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The interesting question then, when we start thinking about this new technology that was deployed on nine eleven, what does that mean geopolitically? I'm not sure it means very much paradoxically because, as I say, that you've got to get away from the the kind of horizontal chessboard model of just thinking about states versus states. My whole concept of the omni war revolves around the idea that the primary form of conflict now is not between different nation states and different ruling classes. It's between the ruling classes united and coordinated through their transnational deep state and us, the rest of humanity. So in that context I'm not sure what you can really do with the kind of technology that was deployed on nineeleven that would serve any real helpful purpose in that war.
In fact quite the opposite, as I've said a few times now. They want to keep it hidden. Towards the end of her book Doctor Wood talks about- she says they've now developed a method for the molecular dissociation of man. A technology which can cause things and people to come apart at the molecular level. I just think how horrifying that is, and keep in mind that over a thousand victims of that attack on 09/11, the remains were never found.
Never not even a fingerprint or a hair or anything for over a thousand people, over a third of the victims. No trace whatsoever. So this is the horrifying nature of what we're looking at. Now, again, it's very important from the perpetrator's point of view that we don't understand this because the level of anger and rage that would would come from a true understanding. So I don't think that they have any strategic interest actually in using this technology for anything other than the kind of thing it was used for in nineeleven to drive fear.
Speaker 1: But if if you wanna keep this technology hidden, then you wouldn't use it to blow up or, well, it's not blowing up, justify these towers, then then the airplanes and the fire would have been sufficient.
Speaker 0: Well, the airplanes and the fire couldn't have done to the buildings what they did to the buildings. There would not have been a spectacular event. What they didn't bank on, what they didn't reckon on, was Doctor Judy Wood coming along a decade later and publishing her book and blowing this whole thing wide open. Because the techniques of perception management were so strong that not only was there this massive level of propaganda in favor of the official narrative, and not only was there the mainstream alternative narrative being used to to control, perception, but the very nature of black technology itself means that billions and billions of views and downloads of this event have taken place on YouTube and other platforms. Everyone has seen these buildings going down, you know, hundreds of times probably.
Mhmm. Does anyone really know what they're looking at though? Does anybody really understand what that is? And this is part of the beauty, well, it's the wrong word, the ugliness of perception management through black technology. That if you deploy classified technology against the public it won't understand what's happened.
Think about the Arthur C Clarke dictum that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Speaker 1: Exactly.
Speaker 0: It just seems like magic. If you say that two one hundred and ten storey buildings would just turn to powder, poof, who's going to believe that? So actually I think they were very, very confident that they would get away with using that technology and the public would never really understand what had happened. It requires someone like Judy Wood to expose this, and then it requires other researchers to actually back her up, in order for this awareness to spread. But as we've seen, you know, we've been fighting this battle for almost a quarter of a century now trying to to to get to the bottom of this.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
In 2012 @RealAlexJones had a 9/11 discussion with Jesse Ventura. Some rather, dare I say, explosive arguments made?
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have the video tapes. The firefighters report reporting molten metal like a slurry or a steel mill or a volcano. Those are quotes, giant pools. What about the pictures of them dragging oxygen hoses all over the steaming supposed hot metal? If it were that hot, you wouldn't dare do that, would you? Well, you have the infrared photos of the molten metal. Well, again, what what melted the metal? Was it heat? During the cleanup, nobody reported seeing melted steel in these core columns. So we don't know when and where the they were actually destroyed. There are about 10,000 file cabinets that are missing. There's about 20,000 floor trusses and two twenty acres of metal decking that's missing. The question is, where did it go? Within seconds, the fiery concoction eats through the bonnet, spraying molten thermite into the engine beneath.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have the video tapes. The firefighters report reporting molten metal like a slurry or a steel mill or a volcano. Those are quotes,
Speaker 1: giant pools. What about the pictures of them dragging oxygen hoses all over the steaming supposed hot metal? If it were that hot, you wouldn't dare do that, would you?
Speaker 0: Well, you have the infrared photos of the molten metal.
Speaker 1: Well, again, what what melted the metal? Was it heat?
Speaker 2: That's a very good question. It's also one of the first times I've heard Alex Jones speechless.
Speaker 3: But if you go through the photographs of people taking the towers apart during the cleanup, I know Richard's got the big book. God. I can't remember his name. The big coffee table book with a hot thousand a thousand pictures, 500 pictures. But, anyway, Richard, thanks for showing that.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: You're welcome.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 3: During the cleanup, nobody reported seeing melted steel in these core columns. So we don't know when and where the they were actually destroyed. And, you know, just like we don't know where the flight data recorders went to that they were reported, you know, maybe some things disappeared. And if so, we'll never know where those steel pieces might have might have been and what could have brought the core down.
Speaker 2: There goes the second tower. Unfucking labeling. There's a whole lot of evidence and very weird things that happen in at the World Trade Center. Okay? There are about 10,000 file cabinets that are missing.
There's about 20,000 floor trusses and two twenty acres of metal decking that's missing. The question is, where did it go?
Speaker 4: Within seconds, the fiery concoction eats through the bonnet, spraying molten thermite into the engine beneath. People talk glibly about science. What is science? People coming out of a university with a master's degree or a PhD, you take them into the field and they they literally don't believe anything and this is a peer reviewed paper. It's the only thing they accept.
And you say to them, but let's observe, let's think, let's discuss, they don't do it. Just, is it in a pay peer reviewed paper or not? That's their view of science. I think it's pathetic. Gone into universities as bright young people, they come out of them brain dead, not even knowing what science means.
They think it means peer reviewed papers, etcetera. No. That's academia. And if a paper is peer reviewed, it means everybody thought the same, therefore they approved it. An unintended consequence is that when new knowledge emerges, new scientific insights, they can never ever be peer reviewed.
So we're blocking all new advances in science that are big advances. If you look at the breakthroughs in science, almost always they don't come from the center of that profession. They come from the fringe. The finest candle makers in the world couldn't even think of electric lights. They don't come from within.
They often come from outside the brakes. We're going to kill ourselves because of stupidity.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
CARL SAGAN's WARNING: A Prophetic last interview over 20 years ago
Video Transcript AI Summary
"My my feeling, Charlie, is that it's it's not that pseudoscience and superstition and new age so called beliefs and fundamentalist zealotry are something new. They've been with us for as long as we've been"
"But we live in an age based on science and technology with formidable technological powers."
"Science and technology are propelling us forward at accelerating rates."
"And if we don't understand it, by we, I mean the general public."
"And the Republican Congress has just abolished its own office of technology assessment, the organization that gave them bipartisan and competent advice on science and technology."
"They say, we don't want to know. Don't tell us about science"
"There's two kinds of dangers."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My my feeling, Charlie, is that it's it's not that pseudoscience and superstition and new age so called beliefs and fundamentalist zealotry are something new. They've been with us for as long as we've been But we live in an age based on science and technology with formidable technological powers.
Speaker 1: Science and technology are propelling us forward at accelerating rates.
Speaker 0: That's right. And if we don't understand it, by we, I mean the general public. If it's something that, oh, I'm not good at that, I don't know anything about it, then who is making all the decisions about science and technology that are gonna determine what kind of future our children live in? Just some members of congress? But there's no more than a handful of members of Congress with any background in science at all.
And the Republican Congress has just abolished its own office of technology assessment, the organization that gave them bipartisan and competent advice on science and technology. They say, we don't want to know. Don't tell us about science
Speaker 1: and Surprising. What's the danger of all this? I mean, you know, this is not the thing that
Speaker 0: There's two kinds of dangers. One is what I just talked about, that we've arranged a society based on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power, sooner or later, is gonna blow up in our faces. I mean, who is running the science and technology in a democracy if the people don't know anything about it? And the second reason that I'm worried about this is that science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility.
If if we are not able to ask skeptical question to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then we're up for grabs for the next charlatan political or religious who comes ambling along. It it's a thing that Jefferson lay great stress on. It wasn't enough, he said, to enshrine some rights in a in a constitution or a bill of rights. The people had to be educated and they had to practice their skepticism and their education. Otherwise, we don't run the government.
The government runs us.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
September 11, 2001 - Before and After 😱 Take all the time you need.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Stefanopoulos is down in Lower Manhattan today, George. There is surprisingly so little rubble where the towers stood. A volunteer, Robert Karlinski, explained to me the reason there's so little rubble: "the reason there's so little rubble is that all of it simply fell down into the ground and was pulverized, evaporated." Graphics show World Trade Center 1 rubble, and in the background, we can see Building 7 still frothing up into dust. "So we know it was before 05:20PM that day." The story that they shipped all that steel off to China just doesn't make sense. They were doing a bucket brigade for a while there, just moving stuff with buckets because they didn't wanna, you know, hurt any of the potential survivors under the rubble. In the book report from Ground 0, assistant chief firefighter Harry Myers says, "I never saw a file cabinet, never saw a desk, never saw a chair, never saw any type of office furniture. There is no glass. It just disappeared and has become part of this fluffy white or gray dust."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stefanopoulos is down in Lower Manhattan today, George. I don't know if you heard a little earlier me raise this question, which was asked actually raised by ABC's Jackie Judd as we look at these areas down below. When you look at where the towers used to stand, there is surprisingly so little rubble. Where did all the rubble go?
Speaker 1: It's a very good question, Peter, and I have asked some people who've been doing some of the rescue and recovery work this morning. If you look behind me, you can see the very remains, the skeletal remains of the World Trade Center. And one volunteer, Robert Karlinski, explained to me the reason there's so little rubble is that all of it simply fell down into the ground and was pulverized, evaporated.
Speaker 2: I love these graphics created by Adam Dwyer because they give you a real sense of how much of the building actually went missing. Here's a shot of World Trade Center 1 rubble. And in the background, we can see Building 7 still frothing up into dust. So we know it was before 05:20PM that day. So the story that they shipped all that steel off to China just doesn't make sense.
They were doing a bucket brigade for a while there, just moving stuff with buckets because they didn't wanna, you know, hurt any of the potential survivors under the rubble. In the book report from Ground 0, assistant chief firefighter Harry Myers says, I never saw a file cabinet, never saw a desk, a chair, never saw a telephone, never saw any type of office furniture. There is no glass. It just disappeared and has become part of this fluffy white or gray dust.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m revisiting 2006 research on Flight 175 and highlighting Professor Morgan Reynolds' 2007 Qui-Tam case against NIST for alleged science fraud regarding the 9/11 plane impact studies. Experts, including aeronautical engineers and a seasoned airline captain, argue that the planes couldn’t reach the reported speeds due to various physical limitations. I discuss air pressure, drag, and the questionable NIST reports, suggesting fraudulent practices in the analysis of the impacts at the WTC. Links to court filings and a documentary are included for further exploration.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
@C__Herridge Let me introduce you to 2006 research. Revisiting Flight 175 – Let’s listen to what Professor Morgan Reynolds’ 2007 Qui-Tam case against NIST for SCIENCE FRAUD on the 9/11 plane impact studies was about. Let’s also listen to aeronautical experts that argue that the 9/11 planes couldn't reach the reported 540+ mph at sea level, due to thrust, drag, and structural limits. Ben Eadie – Aeronautical Engineer, Dr Willem AJ Anemaat – PhD Aeronautical Engineering, Capt Gordon Wilson – Aeronautical Engineer / Aviation Consultant, John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966. He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor. He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011. In short - He knows WTF he's talking about. Discussing air pressure, drag, aerodynamics and then let’s also look at the fraudulent NIST aeroplane impact report as well as the planted aeroplane fuselage and debris at the WTC complex… And by the end of the video, SAIC and their “specialisation in impacts and explosions” and you’ll see they gave NIST fraudulent impact reports pertaining to the “planes” that supposedly hit the towers. 2007 Court filings by Dr Morgan Reynolds against NIST: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/ Full documentary here: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Morgan Reynolds filed a 40-page court suit with a signed affidavit from ex-CIA pilot John Lear. "I filed an affidavit 2008 this year in support of the complaint and in opposition to the motion to dismiss." Testimony argues Flight 175's speed: "583 miles an hour" and "120 knots over the maximum safe speed of the airplane, which is 360 knots. It's totally impossible." "It is physically impossible to control an aircraft of that size and speed at such a low altitude." The case cites NIST's 2005 report "purporting to model and explain the air aircraft impacts in both towers." Critics claim "no wreckage" and that "the video evidence clearly shows no signs of crumbling, or any collision with the building." Reynolds' case cites the same defendants as doctor Judy Wood. "These corporations know damn well that an airplane wing cannot penetrate a building."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a Morgan Reynolds court case.
Speaker 1: Morgan filed this suit, and it's 40 pages, and he outlines everything that they got wrong.
Speaker 2: Professor Morgan Reynolds filed his court case with a signed affidavit from ex CIA pilot, John Lear.
Speaker 1: I filed an affidavit 2008 this year in support of the complaint and in opposition to the motion to dismiss. And basically, what I testified is number one, why the airplanes couldn't have traveled as fast they did.
Speaker 3: The first problem we have with flight 175 is the speed. As its nose passes this red line, it is two point nine seven seconds from the service of the towers, and that is measured in the three d model as 2,540 feet. That comes out at a speed of 583 miles an hour.
Speaker 4: Which is a 120 knots over the maximum safe speed of the airplane, which is 360 knots. It's totally impossible. It cannot happen.
Speaker 3: The official speed is round about 583 miles an hour, and I've independently checked that. Roughly 560
Speaker 4: miles an hour at sea level. No. That's impossible. That's impossible. That's impossible.
Like 100% impulse. 100% impulse. Again, you need so much power to push yourself through that air, through that density there. You've got an aircraft that's optimized. So the engines have the right amount of horsepower for cruising at 3,000 feet at 500 plus miles an hour.
To do that at ground level, you need six times that amount of power. So those engines can't put out six times more power. So they cannot. Cannot. Cannot.
Cannot. Not. No. No. No.
Under under all circumstances, I'd say absolutely resounding no.
Speaker 2: It's physically impossible to control an aircraft of that size and speed at such a low altitude.
Speaker 4: Yeah. The engine, I'll probably not be able to generate that much trust at at sea level level. Because if you think of the molecules of air that are further apart. When an aircraft descends, air pressure increases rapidly, directly increasing air density. Okay.
This is drag involved here. Drag involved involved involved. Air pressure air pressure is rapidly rapidly. Molecules are there. They're they're further apart.
Part. Part.
Speaker 3: People will try and argue, oh, well, the plane was in a dive. That's why. No way.
Speaker 2: This is not diving. It is in the descent.
Speaker 4: There there comes a point where there's a the the drag of the air overcomes the aerodynamics of the airplane. So there's no way that could be going 500 miles an hour at 700 feet altitude then? No. That's it. It So there's no way, no way, no way.
Speaker 5: NIST, which issued a report in September, October 2005, purporting to model and explain the air aircraft impacts in both towers.
Speaker 1: Each airplane, American Airlines, the North Tower and United Airlines, the South Tower hit. It was two fifths of a second while they disappeared.
Speaker 3: In my opinion, we are not seeing a seven six seven with fragile aluminum wings impacting on solid steel columns.
Speaker 2: We also have the lack of any crash evidence in the footage.
Speaker 5: Go to airdisaster.com and look at what plane crashes are really like.
Speaker 1: And why there, you know, there was no wreckage wreckage wreckage wreckage wreckage Wreckage. Wreckage wreckage wreckage
Speaker 2: here's the thing about the wreckage. The video evidence clearly shows no signs of crumbling, braking, or any collision with the building. We don't see any pieces coming off. We clearly see a building swallowing an airplane.
Speaker 1: There was a panel of a fuselage that you see with five window shades.
Speaker 2: Now tell me, how is it possible this fuselage survived and made it all the way over here when we clearly see it disappearing into a building in all of the videos?
Speaker 3: The fuselage is a hollow aluminum tube and it's being completely swallowed by this steel building.
Speaker 0: Suppose the fuselage, this was a picture taken on the 10/25/2001, should say. It's actually not on this picture that was taken on the thirteenth. You If look at these pieces you can actually match them up. This one ain't there. So it looks like that piece of fuselage has been planted on top of the building.
Speaker 2: I hate to say evidence has been planted without proof, but we clearly see in this video the entire air being swallowed by the building, and later these buildings disappeared. So how do we get this fuselage? Just like all the other sites, we have a tiny fuselage with window shades. Professor Reynolds' court case had basically the same defendants as doctor Judy Wood.
Speaker 1: And we're talking about major companies here. Science Applications International Corporation, Applied Research.
Speaker 2: I contacted Morgan who allowed me to use his court case in this film.
Speaker 1: All these companies right here are being sued, and what they're being sued for is accepting money for private providing a government agency with fraudulent information.
Speaker 2: And you can bet your ass the information is fraudulent. These corporations know damn well that an airplane wing cannot penetrate a building.
Speaker 6: This is the impact and explosion effects branch, and we look at projectiles as they impact structures. We look at material properties and how they respond.
Speaker 2: Why would they spend so much money on projectiles that actually can penetrate steel if all they needed to do was go down to the scrap yard and get them some aluminum? The reason is this type of material does not penetrate steel.
Legal Filings Available for Download
Affidavit by John Lear Click here to download (Adobe Reader required) Affidavit by Morgan Reynolds Click here to download Request for Correction by NIST for its Invalid WTC Jetliner Animations and Analyses Mailed to the National Institute of Standards and Technology on March 8, 2007. Click here to download (Adobe Reader required) Supplement to Request…
nomoregames.net
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared footage of Flight 175 hitting the South Tower on 9/11, emphasizing how it seems to defy the laws of physics. I believe this aspect is often overlooked by those in the 9/11 "truth" movement. I encourage an open-minded approach to the video I linked for more insight.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
Flight 175 - The South Tower on 9/11 🧐 The footage you see is real, but it defies the laws of physics. Really, it does break the laws of physics and that’s why no-one in the 9/11 “truth” movement or the “truther” talking heads really want to talk about the alleged WTC planes. The following video will help you get up to speed, that is if you’re open minded enough…
Video Transcript AI Summary
An amateur video from the Beakman Towers reportedly shows the second plane 'practically flying through World Trade Tower Number 2.' Dr. Judy Wood argues the damage can't be explained by wing penetration: 'the wing tip isn't even strong enough to hold fuel in it' and 'there was a five inch deep slot cut into the building.' 'Right. So the end sections of the wings would not penetrate a section steel girdle.' 'the wing is delicate in places.' The clip is used to claim the damage occurred after impact, creating a Roadrunner effect. Wood's research claims a 'directed energy weapon' was used, citing 'variations in the earth's magnetic field' and 'lack of reflecting light glinting off the plane surfaces.' NASA/FAA allegedly 'staged an intentional disaster,' describing a remote-controlled unmanned plane and runway tests. The program also asserts there were no planes on nine eleven, no wreckage, remote-controlled planes, and magnetic-field spikes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This amateur video taken from the Twentieth Floor of Beakman Towers shows the second plane practically flying through World Trade Tower Number 2.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. The
Speaker 2: fire first building there, the plane on the lower left side of your screen. And it looks to me, and I'll confess I don't have the greatest monitor here, that you could almost see the nose of that plane coming through the other side of the building. That may have been an illusion as we looked at it here, but that's how it looked to us.
Speaker 3: Here is Doctor Judy Wood, former professor of engineering mechanics, explaining her reaction to seeing the damage to the towers on television.
Speaker 4: Well, on airplanes, the wing tip isn't even strong enough to hold fuel in it. The fuel is held further closer to the body. What got to me was that upper wing tip slot. There was a five inch deep slot cut into the building. Mhmm.
This can hold the lights on the end. Mhmm. But it it it can't slice a, you know, steel column.
Speaker 3: Right. So the end sections of the wings would not penetrate a section steel girdle.
Speaker 4: As a matter of fact, if you've been on the plane, you look out the window and read on the wing, it says no step, no step here because the wing is delicate in places.
Speaker 3: In this clip, a plane lands too heavily illustrating just how light and fragile a plane structure is. You might ask how did the buildings get holes that are shaped like planes if the planes could not penetrate the steel columns? The Nordet clip of the North Tower sheds light on how this may have been done. Watch carefully. The alleged plane is seen to penetrate the building and several seconds later, something happens on the surface of the tower.
I've stopped the action here. If we compare it with the three d model, we can see this damage is in the position of the supposed wing hole and was created well after the alleged impact, thus creating the desired Roadrunner effect. Doctor Judy Wood, whose research concludes a directed energy weapon was used to disintegrate the towers, has looked at magnetometer data, which measures variations in the earth's magnetic field from monitoring stations based in Alaska. This data shows at the time the first hole appears, the earth's magnetic field fluctuates, suggesting a directed energy weapon was used to create the hole in Tower 1. Another observation I made when editing these videos was the lack of reflecting light glinting off the plane surfaces.
It was a sunny day and the images show very little reflection effects.
Speaker 5: But NASA and the FAA believe in order to prevent an accidental disaster, you have to create an intentional one. In the name of science, the two agencies teamed up to demolish a Boeing seven twenty. The goal is to gather crucial information that will lead to safer air travel. To make sure that the test is comprehensive as possible, they set up a runway to ensure total devastation. Railroad trap rocks cover the landing pad so the sparks will fly when the plane's belly skids across the tarmac.
Next, jagged barriers are cemented into the runway in an effort to shear off the wings, cut fuel lines, and tear through engines. Lastly, Lastly, the fuel tanks are filled to capacity. Pilots via remote control take the unmanned plane up to 2,300 feet and then bring it in for a crash landing. A second angle shows the wing cutter ripping through one of the engines and igniting the jet fuel. The flames are so intense, the camera mounted on the tail section fries.
When the smoke finally clears, scientists gather vital information that will be used for generations. It's because of studies like these that air travel today is one of the safest forms of transportation.
Speaker 6: Joe, I got to say, this is so elegant and so beautiful that I consider this to be the decisive argument. Newton's third law for every action is an equal and opposite reaction, which of course means we could treat the plane as stationary and the building is hitting it as five sixty miles an hour or the building stationary and the plane impacted at five sixty miles an hour. And you're going to have a similar effect. The plane in terms of its impact on the building simply is showing again physically impossible features. You don't see the gases in the building that the plane purportedly is making as it passes through the building.
Speaker 7: Yeah. And here's something even more preposterous. The plane is weaker than the building. The plane the structure of the plane is made out of metals that are weaker than the steel structure steel of the building. So, therefore, you should see the building cutting into the plane's wings every every, 39 inches on center, which is what the the box beams horizontal box beams are on the building.
Yeah. You don't see that. You just see the plane melding into the building. So anyway, when I'm watching 09:11 and I see a plane melt into a building like a hot knife cutting butter, I mean, away, I mean, it was brought to my attention.
Speaker 1: First of all, we're going to talk about flight eleven and seventy seven didn't exist in the beginning. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics has no record of them taking off, has no you know, so let's forget about them because they did not exist. So now we're just talking about 01/1975 and and Flight93.
Speaker 8: It's an interesting postscript that Flight93 was spotted on 04/10/2003 at Chicago's O'Hare Airport by David Friedman, a United Airlines employee who records all of his flights. The tail number, N591UA, was spotted on Flight1111, a United Airlines seven fifty seven. And according to the FAA, both N591UA and N612UA, Flights 93 and 175, are still valid but Flights eleven and seventy seven are listed as destroyed. Not to mention that they were not even scheduled to fly on September 11.
Speaker 1: There were no planes on nine eleven. There was no plane at
Speaker 4: the
Speaker 1: Pentagon. There was no airplane at the World Trade Center.
Speaker 9: We have a credible witness who says that the planes weren't piloted, but they were remotely controlled like unmanned vehicles.
Speaker 1: What the heck is that? Is that what it looks like?
Speaker 2: I think it is what it looks like. But there's what? Like, modem protocol.
Speaker 1: Remote access. Somebody on the ground is flying your plane.
Speaker 9: Bogey, sir. Keep your course.
Speaker 2: Washington. Going that happened. World Trade Center.
Speaker 9: Going to crash the plane into the World Trade Center.
Speaker 1: No airplane crashed in the World Trade Center. First of all, remote controlling an airplane that size is very difficult and so I don't believe you could remote control an airplane the size of a seven sixty seven-two 100 anyway, particularly to hit dead center the World Trade Center. But the fact is there was no wreckage from any airplane in the World Trade Center. And by no wreckage I mean nothing was found of any size anywhere around. Now there was a panel of a fuselage that you see with five window shades but when each airplane American Airlines the North Tower and United Airlines and South Tower hit it was two fifths of a second while they disappeared in the airplane.
So in two fifths of a second, you're not going to have a panel about seven feet long drift down, you know, and just be lying there in almost perfect condition unless it was accompanied by Mohammed Ada's passport. The only other thing that was found was the engine on Murray Street. And the engine on Murray Street has been identified as either a CFM56, CFM stands for SYNECMA, or the CF6 which was a seven sixty seven engine which was developed out of the CFM 56. But whichever one it was the CF6 or the CFM 56 it had to be General Electric and unfortunately or fortunately United Airlines used strictly Pratt and Whitney.
Speaker 10: Perhaps the most blatant instance of the suppression of important evidence is the fact that what was almost certainly the core of the right engine of the plane that hit the South Tower was buried in a landfill on Staten Island. Over a year before the commission began its deliberations. Since then, independent researchers have determined that this engine core almost certainly did not come from a United Airlines Boeing seven six seven. This research seems to indicate that this component called a high pressure turbine cooling duct is from a Pratt and Whitney j t nine d seven series engine as used on the Boeing seven four seven. Whereas this is the HPT cooling duct for the j t nine d dash seven r four d series of engines, which are used by United Airlines on all of their Boeing seven six sevens.
But the engine found in Murray Street had this kind of cooling duct, so could not have come from a United Airlines Boeing seven six seven.
Speaker 1: So that engine that you see flying off and that engine they say is from 175 isn't from 175 because the guy's whose job was to dump it off there, you know, in a smoking smoldering thing dumped off the wrong engine. Was a lot of things that the perps did that were suspect here. The hell was that?
Speaker 9: There was a spike in the earth's magnetic field for every event on 09/11.
Speaker 4: The first one is WTC one getting an airplane shaped hole.
Speaker 9: It seems this would include the Pentagon event and Shanksville.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that the Oklahoma City bombing is often mischaracterized as the deadliest domestic terror attack, overshadowed by 9/11, which I see as an act of war involving Directed Energy Weapons against the American people. The damage to the Murray building resembles that of WTC 6, suggesting a deeper narrative. I urge others to explore the work of Dr. Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, and Dr. Morgan Reynolds, who have challenged the official accounts. Ignoring their findings is a disservice to truth, as highlighted by Einstein and Martin Luther King.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
@TuckerCarlson No. OKC was NOT the deadliest domestic terror attack. 9/11 was. 9/11 was a Directed Energy Weapon act of war, by the UNITED STATES against We the People. The description of the Murray bldg being scooped out is noteworthy. Bomb explosions leave spherical explosion footprints. The Murray was cleaved off vertically from ground to roof. Her description fits the scooped out WTC 6 damage signature. Show you have integrity, by interviewing Dr. Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson and Dr. Morgan Reynolds. A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented. The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Have a listen and read their court filings. Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/ Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/ Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein. A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses legal challenges and submitting a request for correction to NIST, leading to a whistleblower status. Speaker 2 suggests that NIST should contract companies specializing in SIOPs and directed energy weapons for building destruction investigations.
Speaker 3 questions why organizations haven't filed anything about nanothermite in court. Speaker 0 suggests reasons for this avoidance, including fear of defrauding the government or committing treason.
Speaker 5 recounts questioning 9/11 after concerns about the wars, initially supporting Obama for his peace rhetoric, but later discovering alleged lies. Exposure to Dr. Judy Wood's website, detailing facts inconsistent with bombs, led to a focus on directed energy weapons. Attempts to share this information with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth resulted in being banned from their website. Wikipedia was also allegedly censoring information about Dr. Wood, with a moderator admitting her name is on a block list.
Speaker 1 references Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex and its power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And being there was an ongoing court case, I couldn't advertise. I couldn't talk about it. Yeah. The court of appeals, said, yeah. The law applies to this case, but we're ignoring the law in order to, dismiss the case.
We went to the the Supreme Court so we can say we did it all. The Supreme Court doesn't have to hear the case, only if they feel like it. So I first submitted the, request for correction that qualified me to file the Ketam case.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And then I was able to file the Ketam case. Okay. Well, that was cooking, then I started working on the book.
Speaker 2: NIST, like most governmental agencies, relies upon contractors to do certain of its work. Who should be a prime contractor for doing an investigation of the destruction of a building? Well, that's an easy answer. You go to the companies that specialize in SIOPs and in the development of directed energy weapons because that is who they use. They use they use use
Speaker 3: I have an important question to ask you. Is there a reason why AE nine eleven truce or or the nine eleven scholars or all these other, you know, grand poobah organizations, is there a reason why they haven't filed in the court system anything about nanothermite?
Speaker 0: Well, it comes down to several things. Remember, I said that I filed a request for correction to NIST and became a whistleblower in doing that.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 0: Because I submitted my evidence to a government agency and right after that, was when the AE about three and half weeks after that was when the AE nine Truth website first went up. After I submitted that request for correction in NIST and then they submitted theirs, but theirs didn't have anything about thermite in it. This is a submission to a government agency and at the time, they were whining that I was an op and so forth and the evidence shows the reverse because, you know, if you it's a felony to defraud the government. But you wonder, okay, what are all the reasons you can think of why they wouldn't have anything about thermite in their request for correction in this? They basically were saying, you have great data, just need a bit more of it.
It was pretty benign. It was just a bunch of mumbo jumbo. So why wouldn't they have put thermite in there or molten metal? They are the two hallmark things that they talk about. And I can only think of three reasons: one.
They really don't think it's important two. They know it's a crime to defy the government three, they know it's treason if done so by someone who works for another government agency because that's doing SIOPs on a government agency. That's attacking the government.
Speaker 3: Right. So there's a good reason why they don't do this.
Speaker 0: Can you think of another reason?
Speaker 3: No. I certainly can.
Speaker 4: How is it that you came to begin questioning the nine eleven events?
Speaker 5: The first real incident that I remember that led me to question nine eleven was becoming very concerned with the wars and repeatedly hearing on television that the wars were happening because of nine eleven. And this was around two thousand eight when I was peaking towards the end of studying biology at the University of Iowa in undergraduate college. Our country was on this trajectory to cause all this harm and to drop all these bombs when there's so many people here at home that really need our help and so many things could be improved. And so it's really just my concern for for peace and wanting to promote peace that led me to become very concerned. That's And what led me to actually, you know, unfortunately, I'm much wiser now, actually, but unfortunately at the time, that led me to become a supporter of Barack Obama, unfortunately, back in 02/2008.
I didn't think that all the things he was saying were going to turn out to be lies and false promises, but at least at the time, they sounded very good and it sounded like someone who wanted to promote peace and wanted to end these wars and wanted to close Guantanamo Bay. And one of my wiser friends kind of called me out at the time and Adam said, know, he's a liar. He's not gonna change anything. You need to look deeper into these topics. And one of the topics she mentioned was actually nine eleven.
And she referred me to some websites that helped me to be exposed to some information that made me feel very confident in my understanding that we had been lied to, that the nine eleven official story known as the nine eleven commission report was filled with lies and inaccuracies and omitted testimonies. And and I became very concerned that we had been lied to and that we were going to war with these countries based on lies, and that was very unsettling for me. So I naturally started searching more for the truth within nine eleven, starting support organizations like Alex Jones and Architects and Engineers for nine eleven Truth. And that that felt like to be the right solution for me was to support those organizations that appeared to be doing something about it. One of the places I shared it with, I encountered this other PhD professor, really a smart person who was concerned and was listening to what I had to say.
And then she even went further and shared some information with me and said, you know what? Bombs don't explain what happened. They don't even come close to explaining what happened. And so you should check out all this other set of facts aimed that you have not seen before. And she referred me to doctor Judy Wood's website.
She's also a PhD professor and an engineer and a very well qualified individual. What I found at her website was just it just blew me away. There was this collection of facts that were so well documented, so well referenced, with almost all of the sources provided, things that just could not be ignored and could not be dismissed that showed conclusively that bombs do not explain what happened. In fact, the only thing that really explains what happened is is the fact that those buildings were turned to fine dust in midair. And the only thing that really can do that that is consistent with the evidence is a general type of weapon known as a directed energy weapon.
And it sounds very difficult to swallow when you hear that being said without first seeing the facts. And then I went back to these other truth groups to see if perhaps any of this information was on their websites, and it was not. None of these very important facts were on the Architects and Engineers for nine eleven Truth site or on Alex Jones' website. I'm just baffled as to why these people who claim to be searching for the truth, why they were not sharing all of these truthful, factual, very important pieces of evidence. And it just didn't seem right to me.
I actually ended up messaging Richard Gage, sent him an email asking him if he knew about these facts on Doctor. Judy Wood's website, and if he did know about them, why they're not on his website. Rather than getting a reply back from him, I actually got banned from the website. It turns out that my account and profile had been completely deleted. All they had done was sent him a private email.
Speaker 4: And And there was no response, no message to you?
Speaker 5: No. Not at that time. So I was very concerned by that. It felt very unprofessional and very suspicious, especially considering that I was a donor and supporter of them for over a year. I was going to other truth forums and I would ask other people if they had experiences with the nineeleven truths, and I would tell them about what happened to me and tell them what information I had sent them that led to that action.
And I was really turning people on to Doctor. Judy Wood's website and the facts that are presented there. Is when I ended up getting contacted by not Richard Gage, but by this volunteer coordinator named Mark Graham. And he basically tried to soften my concerns and say that he was sorry, you know, that they did that, that they felt that because I had come across all this information. There was a potential that I could put that into my Architects and Engineers for nine eleven troop profile, or I could use that information to contact other people's profiles and send it to them, and they didn't want that to be happening.
What he said was, it's not within the scope of our mission. You know, when someone's just sharing facts, it's amazing that they would delete someone's account completely to prevent them from sharing facts. We took lots of screenshots of that and documented it, and he ultimately ended up offering to refund my donations, you know, to if I would stop telling people what happened, if I would be quiet, and I I didn't accept that offer from them because I felt it was more important to tell people what happened and tell people the truth than to just get my little $80 back.
Speaker 1: In the normal sort of regular thermite, it's act
Speaker 5: Part of my story that I'd like to really emphasize is involvement of Wikipedia in the censorship of this evidence and what is going on. Not only are they not sharing the evidence, but they're actually actively preventing it from being shared on Wikipedia, despite the fact that it is a public forum and a public place for discussion. I signed up for an account on Wikipedia so that I could edit it, because it's available to be edited by the public. And I created a page devoted to Doctor. Judy Wood.
Talked about her academic credentials, talked about all of her peer reviewed publications, major engineering journals. Her efforts as an academic professor, as a scientist, as a researcher, they are just unbelievably powerful in and of themselves, aside from all of this nine eleven effort that she has also put forth. So I thought that she is well deserving of a Wikipedia page. And so I created a page, put a lot of her information on there, and in one small section of the page, I mentioned her efforts in the nine eleven truth community. She has assembled a lot of facts.
I have mentioned that she has taken these facts and actually sued the private corporations that were involved in the phony nine eleven investigations and the science fraud that occurred during those investigations. She actually sued them based on scientific merit, based on the data quality act, trying to hold them accountable for the science fraud that they have put forth continues to affect the world till this day. And I put some documents from her court case on there, and it was just amazing because within a few hours of creating that Wikipedia page, someone had already deleted it. Some moderator with higher powers had already deleted the page. I tried to recreate it, and, the moderator would not allow that to be done, no matter what reasons I gave.
My next step was, to try and insert her name and website into the Wikipedia page called nine eleven truth movement. They even have a page called the nine eleven truth movement on Wikipedia. So I thought, well, if I can't have her own page, then of course I can stick it in there. And I'll stick a link to her websites and mention her court case there. It'll bring more attention to the facts that she has discovered and assembled for us.
Unfortunately, someone was even moderating that page very, very closely because within a matter of minutes of inserting one or two sentences about her into one of the paragraphs and inserting a link to her website at the bottom of the page, someone had detected that and had deleted out those sentences I had added and deleted out the link to her website that I had added.
Speaker 4: It seems like her It's
Speaker 5: very alarming.
Speaker 4: It seems like her name might be flagged on Wikipedia.
Speaker 5: Yeah. The actual proof came during the appeal. The public policy Wikipedia, I believe, is that public appeal discussions are meant to stay open for several days. I believe it's, like, five to seven days so that enough public moderators can log in, look at the weigh in, give their vote, and then a decision is made after several days. Within something just like twelve hours, my appeal discussion was closed and locked down so that no one else could comment on it or edit it.
And so that was a violation of Wikipedia's own policy in the way that this was addressed. I started actually individually messaging the moderators and saying, look, you have violated this website's policy. You know? Could try and censor this information that is completely appropriate for this page and more important than anything that's currently on this page. That is when two very, very important things happen.
One is that my account was banned. So they completely banned my account because I was pointing out that they had broken the rules of the website to try and censor the information that I had put on there about doctor D. D. Wood. And then number two, that's when I got a message from one of the moderators.
His user account was named hooper bloob. Ultimately, it's what he said that is the second and most important thing of what happened with the Wikipedia exchange. Literally said to me he said, I would give give give up on this topic. I would give it a rest. It's a waste of your time because even if you came up with good reasons that she should be mentioned on this page, they wouldn't let you anyway because she is on a block list.
Her name is blocked. And so he admitted to me that there is a block list that Wikipedia has and her name is on it. And so moderators are instructed to reflexively just block any mentioning of her or the material that comes with her name.
Speaker 4: Wow. Have a special flagging specifically for doctor Judy Wood. That's amazing. Wikipedia censors doctor Judy Wood.
Speaker 5: Yeah. And on the other side of things, there's full fledged discussion about Richard Gage and Thermite and Alex Jones and Dmitry Kalazov, but no mention of doctor Judy Wood. So it's okay to talk about everything else, Thermite, bombs, explosives, nukes, jet fuel, whatever. But don't you dare talk about doctor Judy Wood. Otherwise, they're gonna freaking block that, and they're gonna ban you.
It's just amazing. And it's all documented and screenshot screenshots and actual snapshots of what actually happened so you can read the exchange for yourself. You don't have to take my word for it or anything.
Speaker 1: President Eisenhower, you know, going back to what he said in 1961, he said that a government contract has become a substitute for intellectual curiosity, you know, and and that I I don't think anybody could have said it better than that. Some people don't think Eisenhower was an honest person, and maybe he wasn't because he was he he had to be a president. But at least in his leaving speech, I think he gave a few clues as to what was going on behind the scenes. And he
Speaker 0: I'm amazed that he had that figured out.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I think because there he was party to a lot of stuff, and he obviously he was in the army too. He was a, you know, he was a general in the in the US army. So he'd been in the war, and he he saw the way that that worked, and he wasn't stupid. So and he saw it, and he he says this in his speech, he saw how the the military industrial complex had grown from this sort of fairly sort of basic thing into this huge monstrosity, which sucked in enormous funds and had enormous power, not only, of course, political power, but actual physical power in terms of weaponry.
Legal Filings Available for Download
Affidavit by John Lear Click here to download (Adobe Reader required) Affidavit by Morgan Reynolds Click here to download Request for Correction by NIST for its Invalid WTC Jetliner Animations and Analyses Mailed to the National Institute of Standards and Technology on March 8, 2007. Click here to download (Adobe Reader required) Supplement to Request…
nomoregames.net
Court Case (Qui Tam) – Dr Judy Wood
drjudywood.com
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
@WallStreetApes @WallStreetApes The Notorious Banned Fox News Israeli, Mossad 9/11 Connection Segment aired in 2001. https://t.co/OcN6QFctvb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since 9/11, over 60 Israelis have been detained under the Patriot Act or for immigration violations, some failing polygraph tests about alleged US surveillance. Investigators suspect Israelis gathered intelligence about the 9/11 attacks in advance but didn't share it, though evidence is classified. Prior to 9/11, 140 Israelis were detained in a suspected espionage investigation, targeting government facilities under the guise of art students or mall toy vendors.
A General Accounting Office report stated that Israel conducts the most aggressive espionage against the US of any ally, motivated by survival instincts to collect military and industrial technology. The Israeli embassy denies these allegations.
Investigators fear 9/11 suspects stayed ahead by knowing who investigators were calling, through Amdocs, an Israeli-based company handling call records for major US phone companies. A top-secret report warned that US call records were getting into Israeli hands. The NSA warned the FBI and CIA about potential misuse of Amdocs' data.
Comverse Infosys, an Israeli-run company, provides wiretapping equipment for US law enforcement, creating a backdoor for unauthorized interception of wiretaps. Despite concerns and warnings, the FBI continued to award contracts to Converse. A 1997 drug case revealed Israeli organized crime had compromised law enforcement communications, accessing databases for personal information. Since 9/11, nearly 200 Israeli citizens have been arrested or detained, suspected of organized intelligence gathering.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It has been more than sixteen years since a civilian working for the navy was charged with passing secrets to Israel. Jonathan Pollard pled guilty to conspiracy to commit espionage and is serving a life sentence. At first, Israeli leaders claimed Pollard was part of a rogue operation, but later took responsibility for his work. Now Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on The US, who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11. Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron has details in the first of a four part series.
Speaker 1: Since September 11, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained either under the new Patriot anti terrorism law or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained according to investigators who say some of the detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in The United States. There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the nine eleven attacks, but investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are, quote, tie ins. But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them saying, quote, evidence linking these Israelis to nine one one is classified.
I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information. Fox News has learned that one group of Israelis spotted in North Carolina recently is suspected of keeping an apartment in California to spy on a group of Arabs who The United States is also investigating for links to terrorism. Numerous classified documents obtained by Fox News indicate that even prior to September 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested in a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in The United States. Investigators from numerous government agencies are part of a working group that's been compiling evidence since the mid nineties.
These documents detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the country that investigators say, quote, may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity. The first part of the investigation focuses on Israelis who say they are art students from the University of Jerusalem and Basalil Academy. They repeatedly made contact with US Government Personnel, the report says, by saying they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork. Documents say they, quote, targeted and penetrated military bases, the DEA, FBI, and dozens of other government facilities, and even secret offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel. The majority of those questioned, quote, stated they served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept, and or explosive ordinance units.
Another part of the investigation has resulted in the detention and arrests of dozens of Israelis at American mall kiosks where they've been selling toys called Puzzle Car and Zoom Copter. Investigators suspect a front. Shortly after the New York Times and Washington Post reported the Israeli detentions last month, the carts began vanishing. Zoom Copter's web page says, we are aware of the situation caused by thousands of mall being closed at the last minute. This in no way reflects the quality of the toy or its salability.
The problem lies in the operator's business policies. Why would Israelis spy in and on The US? A general accounting office investigation referred to Israel as country a and said, quote, according to a US intelligence agency, the government of country a conducts the most aggressive espionage operation against The US of any US ally. A defense intelligence report said Israel has a voracious appetite for information and quote, the Israelis are motivated by strong survival instincts which dictate every facet of their political and economic policies. It aggressively collects military and industrial technology, and The US is a high priority target.
The document concludes, quote, Israel possesses the resources and technical capability to achieve its collection objectives. A spokesman for The US excuse me, the Israeli embassy here in Washington issued categorical denial saying any suggestion that Israelis are spying in or on The US is, quote, simply not true. There are other things to consider. And in the days ahead, we will take a look at The US phone system and law enforcement's methods for wiretaps and an investigation into the possibility that both have been compromised by our friends and allies overseas. Brett?
Speaker 0: Carl, what about this question of advanced knowledge of what was gonna happen on nine eleven? How clear are investigators that some Israeli agents may have known something?
Speaker 1: Well, it's very explosive information, obviously, and there's a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected. None of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. A bigger question they say is, how could they not have known? Almost a direct quote, Brent.
Speaker 0: And this going to the fact that they were spying on some Arabs. Right? Correct. Alright, Carl. Thanks very much.
We reported on the approximately 60 Israelis who had been detained in connection with the September 11 terrorism investigation. Cameron reported that US investigators suspected some of these Israelis were spying on Arabs in this country and may have turned up information on the planned terrorist attacks back in September that was not passed on. Tonight, in the second of four reports on spying by Israelis in The US, we learn about an Israel Israeli based private communications company for whom a half dozen of those 60 detained suspects worked. American investigators fear information generated by this firm may have fallen into the wrong hands and had the effect of impeding the September eleventh terror inquiry. Here's Carl Cameron's second report.
Speaker 1: Fox News has learned that some American terrorism investigators fear certain suspects in the September eleventh attacks may have managed to stay ahead of them by knowing who and when investigators are calling on the telephone. How? By obtaining and analyzing data that's generated every time someone in The US makes a phone call. One sitting and safe, please. Here's how the system works.
Most directory assistance calls and virtually all call records and billing in The US are done for the phone companies by Amdocs Limited, an Israeli based private telecommunications company. Amdocs has contracts with the 25 biggest phone companies in America and more worldwide. The White House and other secure government phone lines are protected, but it is virtually impossible to make a call on normal phones without generating an Amdocs record of it. In recent years, the FBI and other government agencies have investigated Amdocs more than once. The firm has repeatedly and adamantly denied any security breaches or wrongdoing.
But sources tell Fox News that in 1999, the super secret Security Agency, headquartered in Northern Maryland, issued what's called a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information report, TSSCI, warning that records of calls in The United States were getting into foreign hands, in Israel in particular. Investigators do not believe calls are being listened to, but the data about who's calling whom and when is plenty valuable in itself. An internal Amdocs memo to senior company executives suggests just how Amdocs generated call records could be used. Quote, widespread data mining techniques and algorithms combining both the properties of the customer, like credit rating, and properties of the specific behavior. Specific behavior such as whom the customers are calling.
The Amdocs memo says the system should be used to prevent phone fraud, but US counterintelligence analysts say it could also be used to spy through the phone system. Fox News has learned that the NSA has held numerous classified conferences to warn the FBI and CIA how Amdoc's records could be used. At one NSA briefing, a diagram by the Argonne National Lab was used to show that if the phone records are not secure, major security breaches are possible. Another briefing document said, quote, it has become increasingly apparent that systems and networks are vulnerable. Such crimes always involve unauthorized persons or persons who exceed their authorization acting on exploitable vulnerabilities.
Those vulnerabilities are growing because according to another briefing, The US relies too much on foreign companies like Amdocs for high-tech equipment and software. Quote, many many factors have led to increased dependence on code developed overseas. We buy rather than train or develop solutions. US intelligence does not believe the Israeli government is involved in a misuse of Amdocs information, and Amdocs insist that its data is secure. What US government officials are worried about, however, is the possibility that Amdoc's data could get into the wrong hands, particularly organized crime, and that would not be the first time that such a thing has happened.
Fox News has documents of a 1997 drug trafficking case in Los Angeles in which telephone information, the types that Amdocs collects, was used to, quote, completely compromise the communications of the FBI, the secret service, the DEA, and the LAPD. And we'll have that and a lot more in the days ahead, Brett.
Speaker 0: Carl, I wanna take you back to your report last night on those 60 people who are Israelis who were detained in the anti terror investigation and the suspicion that some investigators have that they may have picked up information on the nine eleven attacks ahead of time, not passed it on. There was a report you'll recall that the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, did indeed send representatives to The US to warn just before nine eleven that a major terrorist attack was imminent. Why does that not how does that leave room for the lack of a warning?
Speaker 1: Well, I remember the report, Britt. We did it first internationally right here on your show on the fourteenth. What investigators are saying is that that warning from the Mossad was nonspecific and general, and they believe that it may have had something to do with the desire to protect what are called sources and methods in the intelligence community. The suspicion being perhaps those sources and methods were taking place right here in The United States. The question came up in the Select Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill today.
They intend to look into what we reported last night and specifically that possibility. Brett?
Speaker 0: So in other words, the problem wasn't lack of a warning. The problem was lack of the of useful details. Quantity of information. Alright, Carl. Thanks very much.
Coming up next. Israeli based company called Amdocs that generates computerized records and billing data for nearly every phone call made in America. As Carl Cameron reported, US investigators digging into the nine eleven terrorist attacks fear that suspects may have been tipped off to what they were doing by information leaking out of Amdocs. In tonight's report, we learned that the concern about phone security extends to another company founded in Israel that provides a technology that the US government uses for electronic eavesdropping. Here is Carl Cameron's third report.
Speaker 1: The company Comverse Infosys, a subsidiary of an Israeli run private telecommunications firm with offices throughout The US. It provides wiretapping equipment for law enforcement. Here's how wiretapping works in The US. Every time you make a call, it passes through the nation's elaborate network of switchers and routers run by the phone companies. Custom computers and software made by companies like Converse are tied into that network to intercept, record, and store the wiretapped calls, and at the same time, transmit them to investigators.
The manufacturers have continuing access to the computers so they can service them and keep them free of glitches. This process was authorized by the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act or CALEA. Senior government officials have now told Fox News that while CALEA made wiretapping easier, it has led to a system that is seriously vulnerable to compromise and may have undermined the whole wiretapping wiretapping system. Indeed, Fox News has learned that attorney general John Ashcroft and FBI director Robert Mueller were both warned October 18 in a hand delivered letter from 15 local, state, and federal law enforcement officials who complained that, quote, law enforcement's current electronic surveillance capabilities are less effective today than they were at the time CALEA was enacted. Converse insists the equipment it installs is secure, but the complaint about this system is that the wiretap computer programs made by Converse have in effect a backdoor through which wiretaps themselves can be intercepted by unauthorized parties.
Adding to the suspicions is the fact that in Israel, Converse works closely with the Israeli government and under special programs gets reimbursed for up to 50% of its research and development costs by the Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade. But investigators within the DEA, INS, and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying through Converse is considered career suicide. And sources say that while various FBI inquiries into Converse have been conducted over the years, they've been halted before the actual equipment has ever been thoroughly tested for leaks. A 1999 FCC document indicates several government agencies expressed deep concerns that too many unauthorized, non law enforcement personnel can access the wiretap system. And the FBI's own nondescript office in Chantilly, Virginia that actually oversees the CALIA wiretapping program is among the most agitated about the threat.
But there is a bitter turf war internally at FBI. It is the FBI's office in Quantico, Virginia that has jurisdiction over awarding contracts and buying intercept equipment. And for years, they've thrown much of the business to Converse. A handful of former US law enforcement officials involved in awarding Converse government contracts over the years now work for the company. Numerous sources say some of those individuals were asked to leave government service under what knowledgeable sources call troublesome circumstances that remain under administrative review within the justice department.
And what troubles investigators most, particularly in New York in the counter terrorism investigation of the world terror World Trade Center attack, is that on a number of cases, suspects that they had sought to wiretap and surveil immediately changed their telecommunications processes. They started acting much differently as soon as those supposedly secret wiretaps went into place. Brett?
Speaker 0: Carl, is there any reason to suspect in this instance that the Israeli government is involved?
Speaker 1: No. There's not. But there are growing instincts and an awful lot of law enforcement officials in a variety of agencies who suspect that and have begun compiling evidence and a highly classified investigation into precisely that possibility. Brett?
Speaker 0: Alright, Carl. Thanks very much.
Speaker 2: On a long standing government espionage investigation, federal officials this year have arrested or detained nearly 200 Israeli citizens suspected of belonging to a, quote, organized intelligence gathering operation. The Bush administration has deported most those arrested after September 11, although some are in custody under the new anti terrorism law. Cameron also described an investigation into the possibility that an Israeli firm generated billing data that could be used for intelligence purposes and described concerns that the federal government's own wiretapping system may be vulnerable. Tonight in part four of the series, we'll learn about the improbable roots of the probe, a drug case that went bad four years ago in LA.
Speaker 1: Los Angeles, 1997, a major local, state, and federal drug investigation sours. The suspects? Israeli organized crime with operations in New York, Miami, Las Vegas, Canada, Israel, and Egypt. The allegations? Cocaine and ecstasy trafficking, and sophisticated white collar credit card and computer fraud.
The problem, according to classified law enforcement documents obtained by Fox News, the bad guys had the cops beepers, cell phones, even home phones under surveillance. Some who did get caught admitted to having hundreds of numbers and using them to avoid arrest. Quote, this compromised law enforcement communications between LAPD detectives and other assigned law enforcement officers working various aspects of the case. The organization discovered communications between organized crime intelligence division detectives, the FBI, and the Secret Service. Shock spread from the DEA to the FBI in Washington and then the CIA.
An investigation of the problem according to law enforcement documents concluded, quote, the organization has apparent extensive access to database systems to identify pertinent personal and biographical information. When investigators tried to find out where the information might have come from, they looked at Amdocs, a publicly traded firm based in Israel. Amdocs generates billing data for virtually every call in America, and they do credit checks. The company denies any leaks, but investigators still fear that the firm's data is getting into the wrong hands. When investigators checked their own wiretapping system for leaks, they grew concerned about potential vulnerabilities in the computers that intercept, record, and store the wiretapped calls.
A main contractor is Converse Infosys, which works closely with Israeli government and under a special grant program is reimbursed for up to 50% of its research and development costs by Israel's Ministry of Industry and Trade. Asked this week about another sprawling investigation and the detention of 60 Israelis since September 11, the Bush administration treated the questions like hot potatoes. I would just refer you to the Department of Justice with it. I'm not familiar with the report.
Speaker 3: I'm aware that some Israeli citizens have been detained. With respect to why they are being retained detained and the other aspects of of your question, whether it's because they are in intelligence services or what they were doing, I will, defer to the Department of Justice and the FBI to answer that.
Speaker 1: Beyond the 60 apprehended or detained and many deported since September 11, another group of a 140 Israeli individuals have been arrested and detained in this year in what government documents describe as, quote, an organized intelligence gathering operation designed to quote penetrate government facilities. Most of those individuals said they had served in the Israeli military, which is compulsory there, but they also had, most of them, intelligence expertise and either worked for Amdocs or other companies in Israel that specialize in wiretapping. Earlier this week, the Israeli embassy here in Washington denied any spying against or in The United States. Tony?
Speaker 2: Carl, we've heard the comments from Ari Fleisher and Colin Powell. What are officials saying behind the scenes?
Speaker 1: Well, there's real pandemonium described at both the FBI, the DEA, and the INS. A lot of these problems have been well known to some investigators, many of whom have contributed to the reporting on the story. And what is what they say is happening is supervisor and management are now going back and collecting much of the information because there's tremendous pressure from top levels of all of those agencies to find out exactly what's going on. At the DEA and the FBI already, a variety of administrative reviews are underway addition to the investigation of the phenomenon. They wanna find out how it is that all this has come out as well as be very careful because of the explosive nature and very political ramifications of the story itself.
Tony?
Speaker 2: Alright, Carl. Thanks.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
@iluminatibot 9/11 Prediction War - Alex Jones vs Bill Cooper 🧐 https://t.co/CjyrQoFjk3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss a conspiracy theory surrounding the 9/11 attacks and the possibility of a cover-up. They mention the work of Dr. Judy Wood and her book "Where Did the Towers Go," which questions the official explanation of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. They also discuss evidence of molten metal and missing materials from the site. The conversation touches on the role of the government and media in shaping public perception of the events. Overall, they suggest that there is more to the story of 9/11 than what has been officially presented.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let him in before somebody sees him. Congrats on not being dead. Oh, the day is young. Byers, you wanna clue us in? We got a plane to catch.
See anyone you recognize? No. But that doesn't mean they're not around. Okay. Let's board.
Check the cabin for free hydrocarbons. Try to pinpoint that bomb. This is your plan? I still think we should call in a bomb threat. Let the FBI deal with this.
And yourself are doing all the full extent of this conspiracy. We can't trust any government official. Only hope is to get on that plane. They're boarding. The next two problems solved.
Find anything? Well, luggage holds clear if this thing can be trusted. Would you do make it with your erector, sir? I'm absolutely sure that this is the targeted flight. This flight was chosen primarily for its visibility.
It's scheduled to pass over Manhattan on its way to Boston. You said they intend to bring us down in the middle of New York City? What if there is no bomb? What do you mean no bomb? Magna, I need you to hack into the aircraft's onboard navigation system.
We need to know where we're headed. Okay. Go into headsets. I'll call on the air phone's carrier. Make them think we're sending a ground air fax.
That's one twisted. Star 69. Well, just get ready to ride the plane, you can borrow it. Just get me on that plane, and I'll get you autopilot access. How are you gonna do that?
Airline telemetry systems use processes similar to those found in CB radios. I'm in. We got ourselves a convoy. What's your progress? I've hacked into the flight control system output.
Speaker 1: I'm mapping the data now.
Speaker 0: Buyers. Your flight's gonna make an unscheduled stop in exactly 22 minutes. Corner of Liberty and Washington. How long that happened? World Trade Center.
Gonna crash the plane into the World Trade Center. I'll tell the flight crew. Land link.
Speaker 2: Can you
Speaker 0: override the flight control system? I'm working on it. What is this? My name is Bert Friars. I work for the government.
I believe this plan has been commandeered. Sir, passengers are
Speaker 3: not allowed in the cockpit.
Speaker 0: I need you to return to your seat now. You don't have control of this plane, and I don't know if we can get it back. Turn off your autopilot. There may be a chance that we can override it. Sir, I'll be happy to contact your superiors and the government to con Sir, damn it.
He's right.
Speaker 2: Alright. Try cutting electrical power.
Speaker 0: Good thought of that. You've thought of everything. Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We're experiencing some technical difficulties up here. At this time, we'd like you all to return your seats.
And kiss your asses goodbye. Finally, we're getting close. I know. I know. Damn it.
New York Center. This is a lack. National flight 265 heading. We're declaring an emergency. We have 110 souls on board, £16,000 of fuel, and no dangerous goods or cargo to report.
Come on, bro, Hickey. The funds have failed, haven't they? There's still hope. Hope my next straddles as nice as my last. We've got manual override.
We can't get to the FBI. We'll go public. With your testimony, we can break this conspiracy wide open. Bring down the whole operation.
Speaker 3: Dad,
Speaker 0: What is it? You're a brave man, John. You're not going to testify. You're gonna let them cover this up. They almost killed me twice.
They won't fail a third time. My silence will keep me alive. And you? I know you and your friends are fighting for the American dream. Just don't expect to win.
Speaker 4: For 20 years, people on the conspiracy theory world have been accusing Alex Jones of plagiarizing the 911 prediction from Bill Cooper. But in March 6, 2001, months before Cooper's Osama Bin Laden time of the hour episode, Alex Jones literally said they're gonna fly a plane into the World Trade Center.
Speaker 0: March 6, 2001, Alex Jones first predicted the September 11th attack on the World Trade Center.
Speaker 2: You've got an element of the FBI and these war game scenarios where they can remote control a 747, and they're gonna crash it into the World Trade Center.
Speaker 0: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Speaker 5: But then
Speaker 4: if we find this clip from March of the year where he said they were gonna fly a plane into the World Trade Center, it doesn't get more accurate than that.
Speaker 2: We know the joint chiefs of staff wanted to blow up airliners, Baltimore Sun, or if you let some terrorist group drew it like the World Trade Center, we know who to blame. And if there was an outside threat like a bin Laden who was a known CIA asset in the eighties, he's the boogeyman they need.
Speaker 3: You believe what you have been seeing on CNN today, ladies and gentlemen? Can you believe it? Supposedly, a CNN reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television camera crew with him, went into Osama bin Laden hideout, interviewed him and his top leadership, his top lieutenants and colonels and generals in their hideout. This is a CNN reporter with a camera crew, and he came out and told everybody within 3 weeks, Osama bin Laden is gonna attack the United States and Israel. Now don't you think that's kind of strange, folks?
You see? Because the largest intelligence apparatus in the world with the biggest budget in the history of the world have been looking for Osama bin Laden for years years years and can't find him. The FBI also, under the leadership of Louis Freeh, has been looking for Osama bin Laden for years years years years and many years and can't find him. Some doofus jerk off reporter with a camera crew bosses right into his hideout and interviews it. And you know what
Speaker 0: his budget
Speaker 3: is? Zip, zilch, nothing. Now that tells us 2 things. Either everyone in the intelligence community and all of the intelligence agencies of the United States government are blithering idiot and incompetent fool, including the entire apparatus of the incompetent fool, including the entire apparatus of the FBI and all of their personnel. Are they're lying to us.
They're not looking for him at all. And the second is the truth. You see, the CIA created Osama bin Laden. They recruited him. They trained him.
They found his leadership. They brought them all together. They showed him them how to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. And when that was over, they still continued to fund him and train him, and they're now using him to help bring about world government by making him the big boogeyman because they can't use Saddam Hussein anymore because they needed a new boogeyman, A reporter from CNN and his little camera crew got in to Osama bin Laden's secret hideout and conducted an interview. If you don't believe me, tune in to CNN.
They're probably running it right now as I'm speaking. And if you believe it, you are one of the stupidest jerks that ever lived on the face of this earth. And whatever is gonna happen that they're gonna blame on Osama bin Laden, don't you even believe it?
Speaker 6: I have to clear up a little discrepancy here. Apparently the other night or within the last week because I've been getting a lot of e mail about this and even received one telephone call. Apparently, somebody called the Alex Jones broadcast and asked them asked him why he didn't have me on the air or asked him something about me. Alex Jones said he had had me on the air once before several years ago and had to cut me off the air because of the foul language that I used. So, on the air tonight, I'm going to tell you, Alex Jones, you are a bold faced miserable stinking little coward liar.
Now, let me say that again, so there is no mistake about it. You can all tell Alex Jones that I said this and I suspect he is listening because he does. Alex Jones, you are a bold faced stinking rotten little coward liar. I was only on the Alex Jones Show one time, was years ago when I didn't know who he was, when I didn't realize what a liar and a coward and a sensationalist bullshit artist that he is. He was on one little FM station down in Texas.
He wasn't on all the stuff that he's on now. And I agreed to be on his broadcast. That's when I was doing guest appearances on broadcast years ago. I was not cut off. I did not use any kind of foul language whatsoever.
He treated me very well and I stayed on for the whole show. Some of you in Texas know that that's true because you heard the broadcast and you take it. Later when I found out who Alex Jones was and what he was doing to the truth and how what a cowardly liar and sensationalist he really is. Every time he called me after that, I have always refused to appear on his broadcast, absolutely refused to lend him any credibility whatsoever by appearing on his broadcast and that made him very angry. I've also revealed him for the lying sensationalist bullshit artist that he is by every once in a while bringing to your attention the lies and the defeat and the rumors that he spreads over the airwaves that are not good for any of us and they're not good for the nation.
They are especially not good for militia and patriots. The most disgusting broadcast he ever did was on New Year's Eve, the year 2000, the New Year's Eve 1999 bringing in the year 2000 and which he went completely out of his mind and claimed that Russia had launched intercontinental ballistic missiles with multiple warheads at the United States of America and actually panicked millions of people who were putting their children and their belongings in their cars and heading for the hills. Now, there's lots of things that can be said about me. Nobody needs to lie about me. Sometimes I am irritating.
Sometimes I absolutely will not suffer fools and I'm just as rude as I can be. Nobody has to lie about me, Alex Jones.
Speaker 3: So I suggest
Speaker 6: that the next time somebody calls your broadcast and ask them about me, you tell the truth. There's lots of truth that you can tell about me. But don't ever lie on me, buddy, because I'll chop you off at your ankles. I will chew you up. I will spit you out for the lying stinking rotten little coward that you are.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is all I have to say about Mr. Sensationalist lying rumor mongering bullshit artist, Alex Jones. Good evening. You're on the air.
Speaker 7: Yes. Hi, Mr. Cooper. Hi. Listen, that Alex Jones interview was directly after you published the Veritas June 26, 1998 issue about the Cooper family being targeted by the Feds.
Yeah. I heard it.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Back in 1990s, did he kick me off here?
Speaker 7: No. He's a liar and you pointed it out and I heard that interview and you were nothing but cordial.
Speaker 6: Yes. Well, that's the truth.
Speaker 7: That's the truth. Thank you.
Speaker 6: Thank you, Virginia.
Speaker 7: Bye bye.
Speaker 6: Alex Jones is a miserable rotten little stinking cowardly boldface liar. Boy, all of these people ought to know better than the mess with me, because I don't take any crap from anybody. And if I'm not afraid of the whole machinations of the entire government gestapo, what in the hell makes Alex Jones think that I would ever be afraid of his cowardly little rotten butt? Good evening. You on the air?
Speaker 3: Yes. Bill, I
Speaker 0: just wanted to let you know, verify what you said about that Alex Jones interview. They had it archived on the Internet at one time and I did hear that interview And there's nothing wrong with what you did.
Speaker 6: And I wasn't thrown off the air, was it?
Speaker 0: Not a bit.
Speaker 6: No. And that's the only interview I ever did with Alex Jones. As soon as I found out what he was doing and who he really was, I he's called me back at least a 100 times since then and I've always told him to take a hike.
Speaker 5: I believe today it was not a controlled demolition. It was not nanothermite, and it certainly was not the pancake effect of 2 planes hitting a building. There was something else in play there, Alex. There was a weapon in play that day that I don't even know what it is, but it's I can equate it to being with the microwave. You know how you can take a piece of chicken and put it on a paper plate and stick it in the microwave and the chicken will burn, but the paper plate won't?
Yes. Well, something happened that day equivalent to a microwave. And by capturing Bin Laden, maybe we could find out what weapon he truly has because I just learned there were 1400 cars toasted that day all over the streets of Manhattan.
Speaker 2: No. No. That's right. The cars that didn't have anything fall on them were were completely fried but expanding just like a secret helicopter reportedly crashed. We know they're 30 years advanced what they really have, but there's another area that if you look at it, British physicist and others.
And it turns out the government did measure this. You can confirm it. Radioactive isotopes used in small nukes were picked up in levels off the charts in and around the towers. No.
Speaker 5: I don't buy that. I don't buy that. Now when Nukes were not used. Well, the
Speaker 2: radiation was picked up now. So
Speaker 5: I don't buy it because when when those towers went down, there was less impact than when they brought down the Superdome in Seattle. And there should have been way more. Those towers literally disintegrated. They went into dust and nukes don't do that, not at that level. They would radiation would have been extremely high.
Speaker 2: Well, I'll tell you, tower 1 and 2 are very suspicious. When you look at 7, that's a conventional control demolition.
Speaker 5: No. It isn't. No. It was not either because you you gotta read the book, Where Did the Towers Go by doctor Judy Wood, the BS, MS, and P.
Speaker 2: No. I know who she is. I know who she is.
Speaker 5: I just finished her book. It's very remarkable. Mhmm.
Speaker 2: Well, I agree with you that tower 1 and 2, which floated into pyrotechnic, dust and, you know, things were being injected long distances. But 7, you can see the boom boom boom boom boom and the and the symmetrical collapse into its own footprint.
Speaker 5: Yeah. But you also see it lathering up a half hour soon where smoke started coming out of one side of the building and one side of the building only. You had cases the dust was everywhere with paper. Always remember, there's a simple thing. When metal is is when when when something is hot, it will glow, but it doesn't have to go to be hot to glow.
Speaker 0: Not everything that glows is hot.
Speaker 2: Well, I know this. They do have a lot of
Speaker 5: weapon used that day, Alex, but it's a weapon that's beyond anything that I know about. Inside job. 911 was an inside job. 911 was an inside job.
Speaker 2: Tony in Florida, you have a question on Rand Paul. Welcome. Thank you for holding, sir.
Speaker 8: Hi, Alex. Long time supporter and, listener. The that wasn't my question, actually, but, I have a question. I'll make it brief, and I'll take Okay.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry. Because because we don't usually screen calls. People have been volunteering what their question is. It says Rand Paul up there.
Speaker 8: No. That's a mistake.
Speaker 2: Okay. Okay. Well, I'll go ahead and ask your question.
Speaker 8: Yeah. I'll take the answer off there. I've been a long time supporter of architects and engineers for 911 Truth. And in 2011, I came across the work of an engineer, with evidence to the contrary. I assumed at first glance that, she was either a kook or comentelpro.
Speaker 2: Hey. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. John Harmon just came on and said you said you wanted to talk about Rand Paul. Sir, we are not screening your calls.
You didn't have to give us a fake story to get on and then come on and say I'm wrong. Did you or did you not tell him that you wanted to talk about Rand Paul?
Speaker 8: Yeah. I didn't say you're wrong. I said it was a mistake. I I figured I'd get the phone hung up on me. I was just calling to recommend the an interview with doctor Sir,
Speaker 3: hold on.
Speaker 2: Hold on just a minute. Hold on a minute. Sir, we don't screen calls unless I say, I want people to call in who are in this town that's on fire or something, or there's a mass shooting on a university. You know, will you call us? That's the only time.
Do you not believe me that that that we don't screen people's phone calls?
Speaker 8: No, sir. And, I'll I'll respect that. And
Speaker 2: No. No. I don't care. It just sounds weird. I mean, you know, it says, okay, Rand Paul.
If you volunteer it, I'll bring it up. Now now start over with what you wanted to say. Go ahead.
Speaker 8: Yeah. I'll make it quick, and I'll take the answer off the air. Thanks for your time.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 8: I was a support of architects, engineers, and I live in truth for a long time. Mhmm. Came across came across the work of doctor Judy Wood in her book, Where Do the Towers Go, first by hearing Jessie Ventura on your show, I believe, in 2011 mention her name. Her work is astounding and the evidence shows that thermal and kinetic means were not employed in the destruction of the World Trade Center complex. Richter scale data is enough itself.
It shows that the there were no
Speaker 2: Sure. So what's your question?
Speaker 8: If you would have her on and, regardless of your where you stand, if you'd have her on and and have yourself on
Speaker 3: Sure.
Speaker 2: Sure. Sure. Let me answer that question, and I appreciate your call. I am the founder of questioning 911. I mean, there was NORAD stand down.
The hijackers were trained at US bases. That's Sacramento Bee, Associated Press. That means I question there needs to be a real investigation. You know, Bush and Cheney weren't under oath blah blah blah. They then turn that into Alex says like Wiley Code, Bush blew up the towers.
So then again, they misrepresent. I say, hey. They've got weather weapons. It's on History Channel. That turns into I say Obama sent a tornado.
So they build straw men around what I've really said about 911. I wanna go with, hey. They said they blew up building 7. We have scores of newscasts saying they blew it up, then they say, don't say that. It's a conspiracy theory when I have BBC, CNN, you name it, saying it.
So I wanted to stick with that. People can debate and argue all day at 911 truth what they think happened. Not Judy Wood, and I've let Ventura come on and promote her. I mean, that's fine. I didn't say anything when he brought it up.
I don't know her. I know some of the people associated with her got really vicious towards Steven Jones, professor, and other people, and then I got attacked by people saying I was covering up what happened, and I better have people on. So when I'm approached like that, I immediately just go, wow. This is like a weird academic fight, like different schools of Darwinism or something fighting with each other. I've just stayed out of it.
Okay? And that's basically the end of it. And then I'm attacked everywhere for just sticking to what I think is the most important evidence of prior knowledge and involvement. There's your answer.
Speaker 9: When people think you make them think, they will like you. When you really make them think, they will hate you. And so I'm thinking of why were people attracted to this truth movement. First of all, do you think that those who plan 911 just forgot to plan a cover up? They're going to leave a paper trail to the front door?
And why are people so easy to manage? And I came to the conclusion, I've also got the idea from a particular blog by Jack Pelham. Yeah. It was a beautiful concept. You're using that that same quote.
That people who recognize that something wasn't right on 911, they thought they're clever. And so they joined the truth movement, and they're getting passed in the back. Yeah. You're clever. You figured out the official story is wrong.
Aren't you wonderful? But they don't go beyond that because they're they think they're thinking.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 9: They're not really thinking.
Speaker 2: We have the videotapes of the firefighters report reporting molten metal like a slurry or a steel mill or a volcano. Those are quotes for giant pools.
Speaker 5: What about the pictures of them dragging dragging oxygen hoses all over the steaming supposed hot metal?
Speaker 0: If it were that hot, you wouldn't dare do that, would you?
Speaker 2: Well, you have the infrared, photos of the, molten metal.
Speaker 0: Well, again, what what melted the metal? Was it heat?
Speaker 9: That's a very good question. It's also one of the first times they've heard Alex Jones speechless.
Speaker 1: But if you go through the photographs of people taking the towers apart, doing the cleanup, I know Richard's got the big book, god. I can't remember his name. The big coffee table book was a hot thousand a 1000 pictures, 500 pictures. But, anyway, Richard, thanks for showing that.
Speaker 5: Okay.
Speaker 0: You're welcome. Okay.
Speaker 1: During the cleanup, nobody reported, seeing melted steel, in these core columns. So we don't know when and where the they were actually destroyed, and, you know, just like we don't know where the flight data recorders went to that they were reported. You know, maybe some things disappeared. And if so, we'll never know, where those, steel pieces might have might have been and what could have brought the core down.
Speaker 3: Labeler.
Speaker 0: There's a whole lot of evidence and very weird things that happen, in at the World Trade Center. Okay? There are about 10,000 file cabinets that are missing. There's about 20,000 floor trusses and and, 22 120 acres of metal decking that's missing. The question is, where did it go?
Within seconds, the fiery concoction eats through the bonnet, spraying molten thermite into the engine beneath.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
Didn't they cancel the series after this episode?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that every time a baby is born, the Federal Reserve issues a birth certificate printed by a company called the American Bank. This allows the government to use people as currency to back their debt with the World Economic Forum. The speaker also suggests that the Council on Foreign Relations orchestrated the 9/11 attacks as a pretext to invade Iraq and install a fast food chain. They believe that reptilian aliens are involved and that world leaders have been replaced to create a nuclear holocaust for a global warming takeover. The speaker also mentions the moon landing being faked and mind control through satellite waves, contrails, and vaccines. They conclude by mentioning the Federal Reserve and the world monarch as the real puppet masters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Done. I win. Cheryl, it's not a race. That's what losers say. What is that?
The truth. Every time a new baby is born the Federal Reserve issues a single birth certificate printed by a company called the American Bank. That way the government can use People as currency to back the debt they have with the World Economic Forum, which owns the central banks of every nation on Earth. But the WEF is just a front for the Council On foreign relations, which masterminds the 911 attacks as a pretext to invade Iraq, take the oil, and install a fast food chain to make people slow, fat, and easily abductable by the shape shifting reptilian aliens it works with. Now, back in the thirties, FDR made a deal with these reptilians to exchange people for technology.
That was the basis of the New Deal. But ever since, they've been slowly replacing all the world leaders to create a nuclear holocaust to make global warming real for their takeover. That's how they made up the Cold War by sending Leica to space to bite Neil Armstrong while Kubrick was faking the moon landing. Now they're using satellite waves, Contrails and measles vaccines is mind control and fluoridating the water to keep people's gold fillings intact so they can be sent back to, you guessed it, the Federal Reserve, where All the gold and birth certificates are stored by the real puppet master, the world monarch, who is himself only the servant of the all seeing eye who controls everything in in the world. I was wrong.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
And Shanksville?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Deborah Potta visited the crash site in Ethiopia this morning. The plane nose-dived into the ground, creating a massive crater. Mangled wreckage and charred personal belongings are scattered everywhere, serving as a reminder of the lives lost in the crash. Many of the passengers were young individuals with aspirations to make a difference in the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Deborah Potta Visited the crash site in Ethiopia this morning. Good morning. Behind me, huge piles of dirt obscure A massive crater which was caused when the plane nose dived into the ground. Mango pieces of wreckage lie This huge crater opened up when the Boeing 737 and the UK. We have a very strong financial performance in the UK.
We have a very strong financial performance in the UK. We have a very strong financial performance in Everywhere you go, there is mangled wreckage like This one and in amongst it of a charred personal belonging, a reminder that so many people died in this crash. Many of those onboard this flight were young people who simply wanted to change the world.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
What could Tesla do?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tesla's technology was weaponized through his experiments in vibration, resonance, and scalar wave technology. The Earth's magnetic field spiked during the events of 9/11, possibly due to the influence of Hurricane Aaron, which moved towards New York City and stopped 5 miles off the coast. The controlled environment surrounding the events suggests weather modification. Despite minimal news coverage, there were reports of thunder and rough seas at airports on the East Coast. Dry air can act as a capacitor, and electromagnetic weapons, such as high-powered microwaves, have been used in conflicts. The scientific and technological elite, including government contractors, are part of the Directed Energy Professional Society. Doctor Judy Wood filed a qui tam case against corporations involved in fraudulent science and inaccurate data related to 9/11. The implications of this technology, if used for good, could benefit everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To understand how Tesla's technology was weaponized, we have to understand 2 main points of Tesla's experiments and research. And that is his experiments in vibration and resonance and his experimentation with scalar wave technology.
Speaker 1: Nikola Tesla demonstrated the importance of electro Static fields, but he also understood how to utilize magnetic fields.
Speaker 2: The earth itself is a giant magnet. Researchers today believe that magnetism comes from currents in the liquid metals in the Earth's core.
Speaker 1: There was a spike in the Earth's magnetic field for every event on 911.
Speaker 3: The first one is WTC wind getting an airplane shaped hole.
Speaker 1: It seems this would include the pentagon event and Shanksville.
Speaker 4: If you look at 1003 to 1006, Which is 2 official times that they mentioned in the official story. But I also was able to plot the Tuition in the magnetometer data at 1003, the fluctuation, and 1006 are the Very deep.
Speaker 3: Let's look at the weather that day.
Speaker 5: To the east in the country, no problems except down in Florida, a little rain. Northeast, we'll see a little rough seas along the New England coastline from that hurricane that's going away. But a hurricane.
Speaker 4: There was a big hurricane on the morning of 9eleven, just off the coast of New
Speaker 1: York. When you look at the data for hurricane Aaron, this is clear evidence of weather modification, pointing out that Aaron went in a straight line for four days towards New York City, and then it stopped 5 miles off the coast on 911, becoming the closest to the East Coast on that day and covering a wider area.
Speaker 3: The, wind speed, the air pressure, and the location were pretty much constant for 24 hours surrounding the events of 911. Controlled environment is what it looks like, but
Speaker 1: There's a strong possibility the effects of storm would have reached as far as Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington DC.
Speaker 3: JFK Kaye Airport, LaGuardia, and Newark airports all reported thunder on 911.
Speaker 1: So the fact that all of the events took place on east coast might actually be of huge significance.
Speaker 3: That says there were field effects there.
Speaker 1: Despite all of this, there was very minimal News coverage.
Speaker 3: It is beautiful outside. New
Speaker 5: York City, beautiful day.
Speaker 3: Perfect September day. This is a real cold front folks.
Speaker 6: That means this will boundary line of Very cool dry air and it is going to make its way well offshore, help to push hurricane Aaron up to the north. It's not going to affect us
Speaker 5: rough seas still from the chop from that hurricane, but as I matter, it's kind of quiet around the country.
Speaker 1: We like quiet because it's quiet. It's too quiet. Too quiet. Too quiet.
Speaker 2: Because the water that has been real real real smooth in the, day right beforehand had gotten real choppy with all the movement.
Speaker 1: You see, hurricanes are very similar to Tesla coils In the sense, they build up a static field.
Speaker 3: Hurricane, it's like a giant Tesla coil, and it does indeed produce a static field around it.
Speaker 1: Which is exactly what was happening in New York City the night before September 11th. Here's some stills from a video taken the night before 911. Can see a static field was present. I believe hurricane Aaron was a category 3 by this point.
Speaker 6: Here's the satellite radar picture showing the rain that moved offshore, thanks to the cold front. And that cold front, it's a true cold front. This day is gonna be beautiful, and it takes a while, really, for the cool and dry air to move in. So tomorrow morning should be a couple degrees.
Speaker 1: What could have created this strange cloud around the buildings? Was it Osama Bin Laden? This is about 12
Speaker 6: Yes, a little lightening out there too. Some good downpours. Not everyone received the rain yesterday. It was scattered as we mentioned yesterday, But in a few cases, it did really come down.
Speaker 1: I've come to learn that dry air can act as a sort of capacitor. A capacitor holds an electric charge.
Speaker 3: Nothing but dry skies.
Speaker 6: Comfortably dry. Cool. Dry air mass move in overnight. Very cool. Dry air.
Dry weather all the way into the weekend.
Speaker 1: Right now the DoD is talking about using the spectrum as a warfare domain.
Speaker 3: Can I ask you a question about
Speaker 2: sort of the technology that you're developing to fight the war on terror, specifically directed energy and high powered microwave Technology? When do you envision that you can weaponize that type of technology?
Speaker 7: It is in for the most part, the kinds of things you're talking about are in very early stages.
Speaker 8: By 1962, the Department of Defense began weaponizing lasers as part of an arsenal that would come to be known as directed energy weapons.
Speaker 3: There's hot Direct Energy Weapons Systems and there's cold ones.
Speaker 1: Do you want to do you have anything you'd add?
Speaker 9: I don't think I would add much. I think they are in early stages and probably not ready for employment At this point
Speaker 8: like the electric discharge laser tested by the army in 1983. The active denial system declassified in in 2001 and ZEUS, an anti landmine laser deployed to Afghanistan in 2003.
Speaker 7: In the normal order of things, when you invest in research and development and begin a developmental project, you don't have any intention or Expectations that the one would use it. On the other hand, the real world intervenes from time to time and you reach in there and Take something out that is still in the developmental stage and you might use it.
Speaker 3: We have low heat, unburned paper, Low seismic impact, minimal debris, you know, bathtub survives, Material specific effects, toasted cars at a distance, tritium without ionizing radiation. It doesn't have ionizing radiation. There's really only one thing that fits the bill.
Speaker 2: You're going to experiment.
Speaker 9: I think that's the point. And I think we have I think from the beginning of this conflict, I think General Frank has been very open to Looking at new things, if there are new things available and has been willing to put them into the fight Even before they did fully rung out. And I think that's not referring to these 2 particular cases of directed energy or high powered microwave. Sure.
Speaker 1: In 2007, there was a hearing to determine some of the illnesses caused during Gulf War. According to the Veterans Affairs Committee, electromagnetic weapons were used including high powered microwaves And the committee asked, if some of these waves could have contributed to the illnesses. This took place in 1991. You see these weapons have been around for quite some time now And all of us are capable of understanding.
Speaker 9: Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen.
Speaker 10: Maybe all of us Being confused together can come up with answers to formulate a future that we can all enjoy.
Speaker 1: You see they've lied about everything, the war on terror, the so called opioid crisis, the last 16 years of ongoing war in Afghanistan.
Speaker 9: Every single bit of it is absolute total crap, crap, crap, crap.
Speaker 1: Climate change, Global warming warming. If any of these things were legitimate problems, we have the technology and the means to fix it, but they choose not to. Why?
Speaker 9: The scientific and technological elite
Speaker 1: corporations in charge of security rapidly responded to the number of their customers near ground 0 in New York City and Washington, DC. SAIC or Leidos are members of a club that we're not invited to. The Directed Energy Professional Society. This includes some very well known government contractors, as well as some not so well known contractors.
Speaker 11: NIST produced 10,000 pages of technical reports about the destruction of the World Trade Center, right? Two companies that were involved in the production of those reports are Science Applications International Corporation and Applied Research Associates.
Speaker 1: When Doctor. Judy Wood filed a qui tam case against these corporations, she was suing them for taking American tax dollars And providing the government and the people with fraudulent science and inaccurate data. She filed with a signed affidavit from John Hutchison, Pointing out the many conflicts of interest between the work of these companies and the nature of the destruction.
Speaker 11: There is a very definite connection between what happened on 9eleven and what happened with John Hutchison's, In John Hutchison's experiments. And again, it's to do with this underlying energy, some type of zero point energy, some type of energy which is Fundamental to the structure of matter.
Speaker 10: Known as the Hutchinson effect. That was one that is really highly controversial.
Speaker 11: You know, we do know that people in the military are well aware of what you've been doing. You know, it's not as if you have been, Working away totally as like a hermit. They're fully aware of what you've been doing.
Speaker 10: The US military took an interest. Well, we did for a while.
Speaker 12: Colonel John Alexander was, 1983. He came with a team from Los Alamos, and
Speaker 10: I had 4 Guys from INSCOM, including myself and 2 from Los Alamos.
Speaker 12: So I gave a demonstration for about 4 months
Speaker 10: to recreate the situation, which they did with John Hutchison. They wrote
Speaker 1: a scathing report that
Speaker 10: actually suggests that Aving report that actually suggests that Tom Beard, local U. S. Guy had slipped into the country How manipulated it has absolutely nothing to do with it. But that was enough to kill as I couldn't get further funding now.
Speaker 12: So John Alexander was little upset over that and he brought in another team from to do a clear, not classified report.
Speaker 10: Here's one where Jack Connell McDonald's Douglas came along and supported.
Speaker 12: Then after that, of course, the Canadian government did their experiments and kept it a matter of national Security security.
Speaker 1: The implications of this technology are so amazing, it can help every single person on this planet, but instead, it's been weaponized and classified.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
You have been watched by foreign entities since 2018
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past decade, anti-Semitism has shifted online, making it easier to generate and spread hateful content. To address this, the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs developed a system that monitors anti-Semitism on the entire internet, focusing on Facebook and Twitter. Using artificial intelligence, the system identifies around 10,000 anti-Semitic posts daily out of 200,000 suspect posts. By making this information public, it aims to shame individuals and deter anti-Semitism. Additionally, a command center in Tel Aviv analyzes the data and takes action, such as notifying law enforcement or city officials about specific instances. The speaker urges Facebook and Twitter to take responsibility and not allow anti-Semitism under the guise of freedom of speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anti Semitism has been around for, thousands of years. What's new over the past decade or two, the lion's share of anti Semitism activity has moved online. It's much easier to generate anti Semitic content and to disseminate, that content around the world in Big magnitude, especially on the, social networks. Now historically, the, Organizations and the governments that deal with antisemitism look at the real world antisemitism And, there was a de emphasis on anti Semitism online. That's why 2 years ago, I instructed the in Vil Kahana, the head of the, Ministry of Diaspora Affairs, And, Yogiv Kaccenti, raise your hand, who's in charge of antisemitism with within, my ministry to develop, technology and the system that will monitor antisemitism online.
To give you the scope of the system, the system covers the entire, Internet. Right now, 2 social networks, Facebook and Twitter, and it covers all the posts, all the tweets. Of them, it identifies every day 200,000 suspect posts and tweets that are suspected for anti Semitism, then It analyzes them using, artificial intelligence and machine learning and ultimately identifies roughly 10,000 antisemitic, posts a day. Then, What do you do with it? What do you do with all this information?
Well, justice Brandeis said that the the sun is the best disinfectant We believe that even before taking any action, just by the mere fact that As of now and forward, this information is gonna be made public. It in itself will be a great deterrent to antisemitism. Suddenly, we'll know which city is the most antisemite city in terms of Internet activity. We'll know who are the 10 top, antisemitic tweets and Twitters. We'll know on a certain day, we see a spike in antisemitism.
We'll be able to drill down and and understand what caused it. Just by the fact of knowing all of this, it in and itself hopefully will shame people into, acting better. But beyond, making the information public Besides the actual technological system, the ACMS, the, antisemitism cyber, monitoring system. We've also formed a 24 by 7 command center with analysts here in Tel Avivara specific location. It's up and running.
This command center takes the information that is analyzed and created here and then acts. It could be, for example, identifying a specific post that is calling for anti Semitic anti Semitic action and then notifying the local intelligence and law enforcement, forces in a certain European country. It could be to tell the municipality of a certain city. And this this week, I might say that Manchester is one of the, highest, anti Semite anti Semite activities So call up the the mayor and tell him, do something about this. So by knowing this information, we can act and this group of analysts within the command center, it's up and running as of now.
So this is the official launch. How much Work. How much hard work they're putting in to fight pornography and to fight, fake news, and the that's a that's good news that they're faking fighting fake news. However, they've not put in anything near the that effort in fighting antisemitism. Antisemitism is okay, and it's not.
And once we've got this, right now, I'm calling upon the leaders of Facebook And Twitter. Start acting. You cannot host all this antisemitism within your house and then just claim it's freedom of speech. It's not. It's violence.
It's antisemitism.
@911Revisionist - 9/11 Revisited
I would say, this is the most accurate investigation and proof of who killed Kennedy. Well worth the hour watch time... For the full 3.5 hour docci: https://odysee.com/@wonderingwhatif:b/Everything-Is-a-Rich-Man%E2%80%99s-Trick---2:0…
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dulles, Harriman, and Bissell recruited George H.W. Bush and Jack Crichton to train Cuban terrorists to kill Castro and other leaders who threatened American interests. Kennedy, aware of the CIA's out-of-control behavior, canceled air support for the Bay of Pigs invasion, angering Sturgis. The stage was set for the Kennedy assassination, with the CIA, Mafia, military, and oil billionaires all wanting him dead. The plotters used snipers and coordinated fire to kill Kennedy, but made mistakes in the cover-up. They switched Kennedy's body with JD Tibbitt's, botched the autopsy, and silenced Oswald to prevent him from exposing the conspiracy. The plotters' incompetence and desperation led to their downfall.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Having put their heads together, Dulles and Harriman and Richard Bissell decided this would be an excellent job for Prescott's eldest son, George Herbert Walker Bush, a chance for him to prove himself along with one of his Texas Oil Business associates, Jack Alston Crichton. Together, these 2 recruited and trained the Cubans for several terrorist groups known as Operation 40, Alpha 66, Z. R. Rifle and Operation Mongoose. Renegade bands of merciless assassins who would kill Castro and who could later be counted on to eliminate any other 3rd world leaders who dared to interfere with American commercial interests.
It was this diverse and unsavoury stream of political intrigue which produced president Kennedy's first great political crisis, the Bay of Pigs, in 1962. By this time, JFK was well aware that the CIA with something much more like a private firm or a family. He wasn't surprised when they invaded Cuba without his permission because he knew They were totally out of control. His antipathy led him to cancel the promised air support and, inevitably, the invasion failed. The anti Castro Cubans were mostly captured, and Kennedy then tried to add insult to injury by ordering J and Gahuba's FBI to close down the camps where the Cubans were trained.
He even allowed Khrushchev, the Soviet leader, to inspect the camps to see they were closed so this could never happen again. Having only just escaped with his life for the Bay of Pigs, it was pretty clear that Frank Sturgis was more than a little annoyed.
Speaker 1: We're scared because Khrushchev says don't do this or we're going to do that, you know, so he didn't do it And he deserted the Bay of Pigs. I was involved in the Bay of Pigs. You got a lot of people who are friends of mine who were killed in the Bay of Pigs. And I resent that. Don't play political games with me.
I'm a military man. I'm a soldier. I go fight. But, David, if I risk my ass out there and I'm getting shot at. I don't want some stupid ass politician to go ahead and make deals behind my back Well, my people or maybe myself are gonna get killed.
I don't like that.
Speaker 0: This then is how the stage was set for the Kennedy assassination. And when one remembers the colossal number of ruthless and hideously brutal men who had created this situation, It's perhaps a little ironic that a peripheral figure in the cast of characters who actually put the plot together was an attractive young woman. 19 year old Marita Loren's love affair with Fidel Castro and her subsequent recruitment as a CIA assassin by Frank Sturgis to kill him It's a very well known story because it was made into a feature film. In spite of her failure to kill the Cuban leader, Lorenz continued to associate with the assassination Ward, trained by the CIA. And it was largely her testimony in the Spotlight Magazine trial after a skilful cross examination by Mark Lane, which gave us a window through which we can now see who really participated in the Kennedy assassination and who was really behind it all.
First of all, after the Bay of Pigs invasion, Kennedy had fired Allan Dulles, Richard Bissell, and general Charles Cable, for essentially using the CIA as their personal hitmen. After he found out that Robert Mayhew had sought Sam Giancana's permission to talk to his underboss, John Rizzelli, about the possibility of a hit on Fidel Castro. Here you have a government agency, funded by the American taxpayer, associating with the very organized crime racketeers JF K was trying to put in jail for the purpose of carrying out political murders. The President was incensed. Historians I've never been surprised that he vowed to smash the CIA into a 1000 pieces.
It hardly takes a genius to see why the CIA wanted to kill him. What is more, Jack Alston Crichton and the lifelong friends of Allan Dulles, the Bush family, had just recently purchased exclusive access to 15,000,000 acres of Cuba, almost half the entire Island, in order to drill for oil. When he came to power, Castro reduced this to a mere 20,000 acres, a colossal investment which now failed and which led to Croydon, CVOVT oil exploration company, being delisted from the Stock Exchange at a loss of $30,000,000. Crichton and George Bush's friends, the Texas Oil billionaires, Clint Murchison and Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, also knew that Kennedy wanted to end their most vital tax break, the oil depletion allowance. And their bosom buddy, vice president Lyndon Johnson, was standing at this time with 1 foot in jail and the other on a banana skin due to his involvement in the corruption scandal now breaking around his favorite assistant, Bobby Baker.
LBJ knew his life was finished if Kennedy lived, And he would become President himself if Kennedy died. So his involvement in the plot is hardly difficult to understand. And even more to this, the heads both of the US military and the military industrial complex, which supplied them, exactly the same Nazis who had supported Hitler in World War 2. We're fully aware that Kennedy wanted to pull out of Vietnam in a move which would have eventually cost Lim Billions, in lost weapon sales. This circle of thugs and pirates was completed by LBJ's next door neighbor, J Edgar Hoover, who had himself invested 1,000,000 into Clint Murchison's oil business just like his mafia associate, Vito Genovesi.
Stepping back to look upon this rogue's gallery, it really is remarkable how Kennedy had managed to make an enemy out of every single dirty hood, every corrupt politician, and every single Nazi businessman living in the country at that time. It is highly misleading even to see these groups as separate because the truth is that they were all brutal fascists who saw nothing wrong in killing to get The question now was, how were they gonna get him? Because we must never forget The generals, admirals, mafia dones, intelligence chiefs, corrupt politicians and oil billionaires are only people. None of them wanted to go to the electric chair for conspiracy to murder the president. They knew that they had to put together a plan which could not fail to both kill Kennedy and then cover up afterwards the fact that they did it.
They knew that in men like Frank Sturgis, his Cuban assassination squads and the Mafia hitmen working with the CIA. They had a huge pool of killers to choose from who were ready, able and willing to do the deed. All the same, how could they possibly get to Kennedy? Because they knew that, at least in Washington, all American presidents are extremely well protected by the Secret Service. The most important first step was to engage the age old mafia tactic of finding a patsy.
To this end, they turned to George de Morinfield, a very sophisticated exiled Russian count and CIA agent who was close friends in the oil business with George Bush and the Texas oilmen. They were aware that they needed someone like Giuseppe Zangara who appeared to be a lowlife discontented misfit. So they chose a low level CIA operative who had been groomed precisely in order to appear to be a lowlife, discontented misfit and L. E. Harvey Oswald who was carefully handled by de Morinfield as he was placed like a chess piece in the Texas schoolbook depository.
With the patsy selected, the combined heads of the American Nazis now sat down together to discuss their problem. How do you kill a man riding in an open car on a public street in front of hordes of people without being seen? And then, how do you cover up forever afterwards the fact that this was a conspiracy and not the work of a lone nut? The plotters were keenly aware that it was the 2nd question which posed the biggest problem. The professional military men like Colonel Ed Lansdale and Admiral George Berkeley, Kennedy's personal physician.
We're well aware that there are any number of ways to hide or disguise a sniper. Behind trees. Inside other vehicles. Behind windows in office buildings. But this was a plot which had to have an absolute guarantee of success.
If a squad of riflemen were all to fire at their target at the same time, this would certainly guarantee the man's death. But the subsequent police investigation would instantly realize more than 1 shooter was involved. A team of gunmen all firing together might actually blow Kennedy's head clean off. A single sniper couldn't do that. So what were they to do?
It was during these deliberations that a macabre thought first registered. They would have to control the body after the shooting in order to make sure that all physical evidence available to police forensic scientists conformed to the scenario of a single assassin. And just how in the hell were they going to do that? By way of preparing the ground, Samji and Connor now ordered Richard Nixon's political associate, Jack Ruby, to keep Oswald snug under his wing and then to set about hiring the best local rifleman, Preferred candidates being men like his close friend, Charles Boyd Harrelson, the father of Hollywood actor, Woody Harrelson, who had proven his hitman credentials by shooting dead dozens of men for money. He then turned to his Mafia associates, Carlos Marcello and Santos Trafficante, to supply the best gunmen from their cities while he himself instructed the well known underboss, Tony Accardo, to give the Chicago end of the contract to Giancarner's favourite and most trusted hoodlums, Charles Nicoletti and Milwaukee Phil Aldoricio.
This pair had to be flown in 1500 miles to the ranch of Mafiahood, Peter Licavle, and then driven the remaining 600 miles to Dallas. It had been agreed with Giankana's and Genovesi's Oil Business Partners, H. L. Hunt and Clint Murchison, that every gunman would be paid $50,000 for the hit and that the oilmen would stump up the cash. So there was no way of tracing it back to either the Mob or the CIA.
For their part, Jack Crichton and George Bush were trying to lay the groundwork at the Street level with the Mayor, Earl Cable, the brother of CIA Chief Charles Cable, whom Kennedy had fired. Both the Cable Brothers were crucially important in the development of the fine details of the plot because they agreed to allow Cryton and his associates, George Lumpkin, the Dallas police chief, Lieutenant Colonel George Whitmire and Harry Weatherford to make use of their 48th military intelligence detachment, a privately funded part time intelligence force which had, amongst its ranks, many members of the John Birch Society, the Ku Klux Klan and around half of all the serving police officers in Dallas. The plotters realized this was a masterstroke because it meant they could control the streets and the crime scene, but They also realized that when the shooting occurred, the response of at least half the police on duty would appear to be completely genuine. And yet, for all this intricate planning involving, as Samji and Connor later admitted, dozens of men, The American Nazis were aware they still had a problem. Getting the snipers into position and coordinating their fire by radio was not too difficult.
It's something the military do every day. But this problem of blowing the man's head clean off had another side to it. Supposing as can happen, All the snipers missed. How could they possibly legislate for this contingency? You see, being a professional sniper is a lot like being a professional golfer.
Everyone knows that, generally speaking, a golf pro on a par three will hit the green. But even the world's best occasionally miss by a wide margin and the same can happen to any rifleman. We can be quite certain that the guiding brains of the American Nazis, Allan Dulles and David Atlee Phillips, In order to cover this eventuality, must have at least considered having 1 assassin run up to the limousine to attempt a point blank range mafia style shooting should the others miss. But then another problem appeared. Supposing their assassin couldn't run quick enough to jump on a speeding car.
Little by little, the realization hit home. The plot could even wind up looking silly and themselves ridiculous. There was only one answer. They would have to control the president's protection, the Secret Service. Marisa Lorenz testified under oaths that in late November of 1963, she drove from Miami to Dallas, Texas with Frank Sturgess, followed by a backup car which contained a stash of weapons.
Traveller along with them were Gerry Patrick Hemming, an American mercenary like Sturgis.
Speaker 2: Were you ever offered money to assassinate president Kennedy?
Speaker 3: Directly, On numerous occasions.
Speaker 0: 2 Cuban brothers, Ignacio and Guillermo Novo Sampol, a Cuban pilot called Pedro Diaslans, and his friend, Orlando Bosch. At first, Marita assumed this was to be just another arms smuggling engagement just like many others she'd been on with Sturgis before. However, When they reached their Dallas motel, they were visited by someone Marita had met many times before, CIA agent, E Howard Hunt, who stayed almost an hour and paid Sturgess with cash stuffed in a very large envelope. This was the evening of November 21, 1960 three. And Marita began again worried.
She knew that President Kennedy was visiting Dallas the next day. Becoming concerned, she pressed Sturges as to the real purpose of the visit and when he told her that for this one time, it had to be confidential, She decided she wanted out. Marita had no way of knowing that a great number of other people had made similar journeys that day. CIA pilot Tosh Plumlee flew several assassins into Dallas Love Field without even being told who they were. From all over the country, radio operators, riflemen, drivers, False ID suppliers like Chauncey Holt and Bernard Barker and getaway pilots like David Ferri converged on the City.
Whilst at the home of oil mine, Clint Murchison, a group of his Nazi friends were congregating to celebrate Kennedy's imminent demise. Due to the testimony of LBJ's mistress, Madeleine Duncan Brown, the mother of his illegitimate son, we now know that amongst these guests were j Edgar Hoover and his homosexual lover, Clyde Tolson, who stood to lose the millions they'd invested in their host's oil business if Kennedy lived. Hoover also knew Kennedy wanted to replace him as head of the FBI. The 2 Brown brothers of Brown Brothers Harriman, who along with Cliff Carter, John Connally, and senator Joseph Yarbrough stood to lose 1,000,000 from lost defense contracts because they knew JFK wanted to end the Vietnam War. Also present were Joseph Seville, head of the mafia in Dallas, and the mayor of Dallas, Earl Cable, the CIA men who knew the president was serious about smashing the Central Intelligence Agency because he'd already fired Cable's brother, Charles.
Having a drink with them was Chase Manhattan bank chief, John McCloy, a confirmed Nazi who had shared a box with Hitler at the 1930 Berlin Olympic Games, and mafia chieftain, Carlif Morcello, who felt nicely at home rubbing shoulders with Sam Giancana's representatives, Jack Ruby, Richard Nixon, and Harrelson Lafayette Hunt. The media were represented by Amon g Carter, And the only one who might have felt a little out of place as he awaited his boss was the world class marksman and serial killer Malcolm Morris. Late in the evening, Lyndon Baines Johnson finally turned up and briefly went into the party. When he came out to greet Madeline Brown, she said he was euphoric.
Speaker 4: Let's go back to that before. When when Johnson came out of the meeting, what did he say to you?
Speaker 5: He was so angry. He had a Violent temper when he was a nurse.
Speaker 4: Used the the exact words that he said to you what he said to you.
Speaker 5: He he, he grabbed me by the arm and he had this deep voice. And he said, after tomorrow, those Sissle bees will never embarrass me again. That's no threat. That's a promise.
Speaker 0: Johnson had clearly been told by the people in that room that everything was ready. The next morning, the president landed at Love Field and was led to his car by governor John Connally. As he is driven away, It is immediately apparent that something is wrong. A secret service agent, Henry j Rickba, tries to take up his proper position on the president's limousine, holding on to these handles provided for the purpose and is ordered to stand down by Emery Roberts. Let's just look at Ricker's reaction again.
He is quite clearly disgusted. Why aren't they letting him do his job? And as the car glides into Dallas, we can now see how the removal of his secret service protection has opened the president up to a field of fire from almost any direction. It's plain from these pictures that as the motorcade moved on into Dallas, the Secret Service meant to protect the president remained crowded together on the vehicle behind. While travelling in the pilot car some 400 yards ahead, 3 men are smiling as they see everything is going to plan.
Crichton, Lumpkin and Whitmire have used their influence to remove the military protection, which should have been amongst the crowd. And whilst the people lining the parade route are 10 deep in places, Lumpkin has seen to it that the police have let almost no one into the Wood B crime scene. Pausing at the corner of Houston and Elm, Lumpkin is seen exchanging reassurances with one of his men. Yes, he tells him. The hit is on.
Glancing discreetly upwards, he sees Weatherford and the best Cuban sniper, Eladio Del Valle, preparing to fire. The signal is passed to the other snipers to get into position. Having been let into the building by oil baron, Haralson Hunt, Eugene Hale Brading unlocks the 2nd floor broom closet. A client of New Orleans lawyer, G Ray Gill, who also represents Mafia boss, Carlos Morcello, Brady has a getaway pilot waiting, whom Gil employs as a Private Detective, David Ferri. He opens the window and as Charles Nicoletti loads his rifle, Richard Kane listens to his radio.
Car coming. Get ready. Closing the door, Milwaukee Phil Aldoricio guards the corridor with 2 Cubans, Rolando Mesferreira and Rolando Otero. This basic pattern was established all over the plaza. A sniper next to a radioman, alongside a 2nd marksman who could take over should the 1st one to back out at the last moment.
Each team was then guarded by more assassins, mainly Cubans, who made sure no one interfered with each group. It all sounds quite professional And the truth is, it was. Sam Giancana's spy in the Chicago police force, Richard Kane, was an electronics and wiretapping expert who spoke 5 languages. Up on the grassy knoll with his childhood friend, Charles Harrison, stood the diminutive Charles Frederick Rogers. A nuclear physicist who worked in seismology for Shell Oil, he was also friends with David Ferri in the Civil Air Patrol.
Up in the Texas School Book Depository, LBJ's psychotic hitman Malcolm Wallace held a PhD and taught at the University of Texas. The Texas oilmen, Mafia Dons, merchant bankers and military industrialists had assembled the all time dream team of professional killers. They were there to make absolutely certain their king died, and the 2 men who, in later years, would steal his crown, Richard Milhouse Nixon and George Herbert Walker Bush smiled from the sidewalk as they exchanged wings with Jack Crichton. There was no way Kennedy could escape now, and they knew it. Arranging his sniper's nest at the other end of the 6th floor, Sturgis was the first to be spotted by Arnold Roland.
Speaker 1: I just looking around, and then when you notice a man up in the window, And I remarked to my wife, tried to point him out, and remarked that he must be a security guard, secret service agent. The window then that you're referring to is on the opposite, end of the building from, where the main entrance to the building is. Yes. It is on the other side of the building. And he had a rifle.
It looked like a high powered rifle because it had a scope which looked in relation to the size of the rifle to be a big scope.
Speaker 0: A moment later, 15 year old Amos Ewins caught sight of one of the Sturgis trained Cubans, Ignacio Novosampol. Even more significantly, Richard Randolph Carr, a steel construction worker who was looking for a job in the new Dallas courthouse, which was then under construction, stayed out from his 7th floor vantage point and saw Malcolm Wallace taking position to fire. Testifying at the trial of Clay Shaw, he gave a minutely detailed description of a very heavyset man in a sports jacket who wore large framed glasses. He could see the man so clearly. He even said his eyeglasses had large earpieces.
America, the home of The brave and the land of the free was about to discover that it wasn't what it thought it was. As the president's car made the turn on to Houston, Government agents who had sworn an oath to uphold their country's democratic principles waited alongside mafia killers to murder their own commander in chief. 1 of the men they were working for, Sam Giancana, said this proves that in reality, there was No such thing as white hats and black hats. That notion, he said, was just a sham for stop sticking to.
Speaker 6: The one thing I recognized was there are no black hats and there are no white hats. They all conduct themselves the exact same And very good evidence of that is that the CIA would hire 2 so called mafia men, Sam Gianfana and John Roselli to assassinate Fidel Castro. If there's such a difference, You're not supposed to have anything to do with each other. But in in essence, the remark is really they're all in bed together. They all do business together.
Speaker 0: Press the trigger on his 8 millimeter cine camera. Ever since that moment, the world has accepted that what he recorded was the definitive account of what really happened. What people must appreciate is that what they have just seen is not at all what really And doesn't that look a great deal more suspicious? So just exactly what did happen during the 10 seconds the Prudel was filming. To begin with, Dulles, Lansdale, and Atlee Phillips had tried to get over the problem of volley fire, blowing the president's head clean off by firing in 4 stages.
Stage 1 was meant to be a single shot by Charles Nicoletti into the back of Kennedy's head from the Daltex building some 40 yards behind. Had he succeeded, the plotters would have had the single assassin with 1 bullet story they wanted. But in his excitement, the mafia assassin squeezed the trigger too soon. His bullet ricocheted off the hard chrome sill of the Le Mans' back seat and struck the curve beneath the overpass, sending up a sharp piece of concrete which scratched James Tague's face. Watch again.
We clearly see how this little girl stops running and her gaze looks directly at where the shot originated and not up at the 6th floor of the depository. It was now that umbrella man took over. Standing right at the curbside, it was his job, should the 1st shot miss, to give a clear visual signal. Target is not injured. The intelligence chiefs knew that if this situation occurred, Kennedy would now be moving rapidly away from the 1st sniper.
They knew the only way to make sure of getting him was to fusillade the car. So a moment later, 2 rifles tried to fire from directly in front at exactly the same time to deceive witnesses into thinking there was only 1 shot.
Speaker 1: You said you'd kill president Kennedy.
Speaker 2: At the same time, I said I had killed the judge. I said I had Kill Kennedy. Well, do you believe Lee Harvey Hahn will kill President Kennedy? We'll get back to that. Alone without any aid from a rogue agency of the US government or at least a portion of that agency.
I believe you're very naive if you do.
Speaker 0: Haralson's bullet hit JFK in the throat And another gunman, hiding in a culvert 50 yards away up in the embankment of the overpass, made the hole in the windscreen, which was later seen by doctor Evalier Glanges.
Speaker 7: The presidential limousine was there. Had been staying there for some time just watching the back of the emergency room,
Speaker 2: Talked to
Speaker 7: my friend next to me and said, look, there is a bullet hole in the windshield, and pointed it out to them. But it was very clear. It was a Through and through bullet hole, through the windshield of a car, from the front to the back.
Speaker 0: As Kennedy emerges from behind the road sign, his distress is clear while governor Connolly remains composed. This single frame of the Zebruda film makes nonsense of the single bullet theory because it's quite clear both men have not been struck at the same time. Kennedy has now passed through 2 layers of fire and has not been hit in the head. To cover this eventuality, the assassins were given a simple instruction. Fusilade the car with everything so that in the next few moments, The 5 remaining riflemen fired, causing the secret service agent riding in the front passenger seat, Roy Kellerman, to report a feeling like a jet sonic boom as the hail of bullets whistled into the car.
It is now more than 3 seconds after Kennedy is hit in the throat, that Frank Sturgess misses his target altogether and blows out 5 inches of governor Connolly's ribs, compressing his lungs and puffing his cheeks with a bullet which quite clearly struck at far too steep an angle to come from the other end of the depository. In almost the same instant, Eladio del Valle Hit the Governor in the wrist. Weatherford fired into his thigh and Nicoletti's 2nd shot hit the chrome frame of the window. A moment later, the best marksman, Malcolm Wallace, shot Kennedy in his upper back. The bullet strike witnessed and recorded by all the Secret Service men in the following car.
Jackly Kennedy starts looking concerned and yet, even now, there are no obvious signs that her husband, held upright by his back brace, has been shot twice. The assassins have so far failed to hit him in the head. And it is now that they play the ace up their sleeve. Here, we can finally answer the riddle of where, on an empty Street, you can hide a man with a rifle and how he can manage to shoot a man speeding past him in a limousine. The answer is that he can't, and that is why the driver, William Greer, looked around twice to see whether Kennedy had been hit in the head.
And when he saw he hadn't, as dozens of witnesses, including police officers, confirmed, He stopped the car completely.
Speaker 8: His his orders was to slow down where they risk the guys.
Speaker 0: This is Greer, the the driver of the presidential limousine.
Speaker 8: Yeah, presidential limousine Slow down almost to a stop.
Speaker 0: It is now that most people have been led to believe that Kennedy was shot in the head by Charles Boyd Harrelson, the sniper standing on the grassy knoll. This is not true. Because if we look at the angle of elevation of a shot from that area, it's obvious that a shot originating from above and right would have pushed Kennedy's head down and left. Whereas it's quite clear that his head is knocked upwards and to the left by the impact. So where did that bullet come from?
Incredibly, the answer has lain hidden in the most well known and iconic image from the assassination of the motorcycle policeman heaving his bike onto its stand. Look now as we freeze frame him here. This is the moment when the whole world was looking up the hill toward the man who had fired from the Grassy Knoll, But that is not where the police officer is looking. He is looking down into the storm drain because that is where that shot at the stationary car came from, The shot which all of the well known assassination witnesses described as coming from behind the picket fence missed completely and ripped up the grass at Gene Hill's feet. She did not even notice.
But we know this is true because the FBI told her so. So who were the men who fired unseen from the storm drains on Elm Street? One thing we know is that they were very young and had to be brought into the conspiracy because they had to crawl into a filthy, smelly sewer, something which the older, experienced mafia assassins would never have dreamed of doing. They were basically 2 kids, looking for excitement. The first was Curtis Laverne Crayford, also known as Larry Crayford.
Former CIA, he had worked for Ruby at the Carousel Club, and Ruby had told everyone his name was Lee Harvey Oswald until Lee Harvey Oswald walked in. But while above ground, the world was taking pictures and running and screaming and trying to figure out what had happened. The other young man was stumbling along 400 yards of a reeking, fetid, Dalles sewer pipe to emerge from this culvert. And he was not Lee Harvey Oswald or Roscoe White or JD Tippett nor even a Cuban or Russian communist. His name was Jack Allan Lawrence.
And we know that after stumbling up this bank, he turned up 15 minutes later at the Lincoln Mercury car showroom where he'd obtained a job with false references. Pale, sweating and On a hot, sunny day in Dallas, covered in mud. Telling his co workers, Albert Bogard and Robert Tater He had been ill that morning. He stumbled into the men's room and threw up while they, feeling his behavior was suspicious, called the police who made a record of the entire incident. Back at the Plaza, The guilt of the radiomen co ordinating the gunfire can be seen from their behavior.
These 2, Orlando Bosch and the umbrella man have a seat while everyone else runs around them. Bosch makes a report that the hit was successful then casually walks away, just like the Chief Radio Co ordinator, Jim Hicks, with the radios clearly visible in their back pockets. A few yards away, the CIA's Cleanup Squad have begun working to remove all evidence useful to a forensic team. Deputy Sheriff Buddy Walters is here seen finding the bullet which struck in the grass near the manhole cover. He hands it on to one of the fake FBI men who pockets it.
While this is going on, Rogers, Haralson and e Howard Hunt are discovered hiding in the boxcars of the train which they hoped would be their getaway vehicle. Until it's prevented from moving by railway dispatcher and key witness, Lee Bowers. They are photographed repeatedly, as they are marched to the Dallas courthouse. And we can clearly see in this picture the radio receiver Hunt is wearing in his right ear, which is identical to the receivers worn by those Dallas police officers who were part of the plot. As they walk, they are overseen by Colonel Ed Lansdale who secures their release and begins to give the press the cover story that this man is the major suspect and that, acting alone, he shot the President from behind.
The truth, as we now know, is that 8 separate snipers firing 16 shots in 4 separate stages. He'd tried to make certain of killing the president by hitting him in the head and had failed abysmally. The shooting on the day had been nothing to write home about. A third of all the shots had missed the car completely. Had it not been for the ruse of bribing the driver to break at a point painted on the curbside, which is still visible, so that Jack Lawrence could shoot Kennedy in the head from just 15 feet away, the president might have survived.
So now we must address the question. Why does the Zapruder film not show this very obvious set up of the limousine stopping for the headshot. The answer, of course, is that it has been tampered with. In the 1960s, Hollywood special effects teams had developed techniques for masking off segments of film frames to disguise the true movement of figures within the picture. In the film, frames have been removed in order to fake a continuous flowing motion so that we don't see the very obvious setup which dozens of witnesses reported.
If you look now at the top of the frame, the doctoring of the film becomes perfectly obvious in the way in which the figures are blurred, and yet the shadows are sharp, which is impossible. This CIA tampering with the evidence becomes even clearer when the Zapruder film is run next to the oval mix film taken from the other side. It's easy to see from the way the motorcycles suddenly close on the limousine that it stops completely. And we can see that frames have also been removed from the next film by the way in which agent Clint Hill appears to move sideways while running forwards before leaping on the car. As the Mar dash department hospital begins, the chief co ordinator in the assassination plot, George Herbert Walker Bush, casually relaxes with hands in his pockets at the entrance of the school book depository.
Now this is going to be one of those All too familiar Kennedy assassination moments in which people will say, well, yes, it could be him. But how can we be sure? Because we've seen this kind of thing before with Badgemond. However, a gentleman who I think must be a police detective, has posted a YouTube video in which he utilizes the latest forensic techniques for identifying murder suspects by making a comparison between the photo taken in Dealey Plaza and one of George Bush in conversation with Richard Nixon during Watergate. This man points out that this person has exactly the same skull shape, exactly the same hairline, chin and nose as George Bush.
He is also wearing the same type of suit, White shirt and exactly the same type of tie. He is exactly the same height, the same weight. He's wearing clothing which matches down to his shoes. But, most importantly, he has a characteristic mannerism of cocking his right wrist when he puts his hands in his pockets. We know from this declassified FBI memo The George Bush was in Dallas staying at the Sheraton on November 22nd.
So can there be He doubt about this person's identity? Surrounded by the corrupt policemen he was coordinating, Bush knew already that if an honest officer should happen to catch one of the assassins, it would, because of what Mark Lane rightly calls Plausible deniability make no difference. Because what would they find? Mafia hoods with prison records as long as they're armed or contract killers like Charles Haralson. They certainly wouldn't have found anyone who carried CIA credentials or Anyone whose involvement with the government could be traced.
But even while he smiled and chatted to his fellow killers, Bush was unaware that the plotters had just made their first big mistake. They knew that they had to forensically control the body from the moment the shots were fired. And the moment Kennedy entered trauma room 1, that control had to be relinquished. Although they had CIA agents placed in the emergency unit. These people were not aware of the throat wound, which could hardly be seen because it was so tiny.
It was at this moment that all the Dallas doctors and nurses like Aubrey Bell made a mental note of this very obvious sign of a frontal shot. 1 of the Dallas medical team, Doctor. Charles Crenshaw, a junior doctor at that time vividly recalls what the 1st professionals in the Kennedy killing had to deal with.
Speaker 3: The 2nd wound was here In the throat, right above the necktie, there's a small opening, very small, 3 to 5 millimeters, about the size of your little finger. I looked at the wound again. I wanted to know and remember this the rest of my life. And the rest of my life, I will always know Oh, he was shot from the front.
Speaker 0: And also described the portion missing from the rear of Kennedy's head after the impact of the tangible bullet, which hit him in the right temple.
Speaker 1: The bullet struck about where and asked about where?
Speaker 3: From here,
Speaker 1: through. Taking
Speaker 3: The back of the occipital part, the back of your head. This was gone.
Speaker 1: There's approximately 1 o'clock Central Standard Time today here in Dallas. He died of a gunshot wound.
Speaker 0: This information soon made its way to the media. This is why at the very first press conference, Press secretary Malcolm Kilduff correctly described the cause of death and direction of the shot. In order to find a means with which to contradict this evidence, the cover up now began in earnest with the summoning from the wrestling funeral home of a CIA agent who was known for being the best in the business at reconstructive surgery on cadavers, John Melvin Liggett. This man was actually attending a funeral when he was told of the president's assassination and asked to go to Parkland by the coroner. What he didn't know as he drove away was that one of his clients in this macabre and gruesome story was, at that moment, still alive.
When he was arrested years later by New York Police Detective Jim Rothstein, Frank Sturgess, on discovering that Rothstein was a Bay of Pigs veteran like himself, got into an old army buddies conversation with him, and said first of all that after the assassination, He returned to the Miami safehouse where he ridiculed Marita Lorenz for missing history. It was all perfectly safe, he told her. No cops. No newspaper investigation. Everything was covered.
Speaker 9: I asked Burgess, Jesus Christophe, Did you shoot the president? Did you have something to do with that? He said, I don't give a shit. Yeah. Who's gonna prove it?
Speaker 2: You said you'd kill
Speaker 9: a lot of people.
Speaker 5: What the hell is the difference?
Speaker 0: Sturgis then went on to say that Dallas police officer JD Tibbitt was actually gunned down by the radio talk show host, g Golden Liddy, who was, at that time, a CIA agent working with E. Howard Hunt. And here, we must address a question which puzzled assassination researchers for years. Why did a Dallas policeman have to die within a few minutes of President Kennedy. What possible function could he have played in the overall plot as a corpse?
One would think the authorities could have caught the fleeing Patty without any need to incriminate him any further. So why did the life of JD Tibbitt also have to end on the 22nd November 1963? Where did he fit in? In only the last few years, a wonderful investigator called Robert D Morningstar discovered one tiny little fact about Jefferson Davis Tibbot, which became the most important single police in the completion of this puzzle. Because Officer Tibbot had a nickname.
When he was at work, his fellow officers always used to call him JFK. Because at 39 years of age, he looked exactly like him. In the only well known picture of Tippett, His Elvis haircut makes him appear very youthful. But having turned grey and having nearly turned 40, most people felt his resemblance to Kennedy was uncanny. What Tippett never knew as he drove past assassination witnesses, Jack Tatum, Domingo Benevedis, under Aquila Clemens, was that he had been selected to play the role of the President in death.
Researchers have always believed it couldn't be a coincidence that Tippett was shot in the right temple just like JFK some 45 minutes earlier. They wondered why bullets had been removed from his body in the ambulance and why, when he was pronounced dead on arrival At the Methodist Hospital, it was felt necessary to move his body to Parkland. With their concentration firmly fixed on the casket of the deceased president, The newsmen completely ignored the ambulance which spirited away the body of JD Tibbitt so that it could be loaded onto Air Force 2 where John Melvin Liggett was waiting. When Kennedy's casket arrived at Love Field a few minutes later, Clint Hill, the agent who jumped on the car, recalled that all the people aboard Air Force 1 were told they had to go forward to witness the swearing in of Lyndon Baines Johnson. This, of course, was just a ruse, to get Jackie Kennedy to leave her husband's body.
At the moment she was out of the way, his cadaver was stolen and placed aboard Air Force 2 next to the gedava of JD Tibbitt. Many people have seen this famous picture in which LBJ is smiling at Congressman Albert Thomas a moment after becoming President and he is winking back. We haven't known until now just how huge and terrible a secret he was sharing with Johnson. Because at that moment, on the plane right alongside the most highly qualified specialist in reconstructive surgery and in bombing in the country, John Melvin Liggett, was starting to make a facsimile of the dead President, using the body of JD Timmott in order to obscure the true extent of the damage to Kennedy's head and make it seem consistent with a shot from behind. But Liggett realized immediately this was well nigh impossible.
Because having been told over the radio about the headshot. Liddy took it upon himself to try and ape this damage by firing into Tibbett's torso. And then when he was down, firing into his right temple instead of into the back of the head as he'd been instructed. This was a second huge mistake. The human brain has a consistency like playschool plasticine.
Fire a bullet through it and it is very easy for a skilled pathologist to track the bullet's path at autopsy. What Liggett wanted to show to any investigators was a brain that looked like this. What he had was 1 brain which looked like this, and another which looked like this. A large portion of Kennedy's brain had been ripped out by the impact of the explosive or fragile bullet. And what remained was filled with tiny shards of lead, some of them microscopic, which might take all night to locate.
Liggett was terrified. The plotters had asked him to play Doctor Frankenstein at 30,000 feet. Yet, with all his embalming experience, he instantly realized a botched job was the best he could possibly deliver. In his panic, he sawed off Tippett's skull and simply ripped out the entire brain to at least make sure no one could track the bullet, which, after by making a large hole in the rear of the head to aid the damage to Kennedy's head. With this done, he rebuilt the skull, hurriedly sewed the scalp back together and then set about the gruesome task of trying to make the cadaver of JD Tibburd more closely to resemble the cadaver of John F Kennedy.
By shaving eyebrows, bringing forward tippets of slightly more receding hairline, filling in missing segments of both heads with plaster of Paris and rebuilding portions of the flesh with wax. Liggett performed this ghoulish service while the aircraft he was on, Air Force 2, went through the usual procedure of leapfrogging Air Force 1 to arrive at Andrews Air Force Base slightly earlier. He wasn't given long enough. And in the rush to get finished, The plot has now made their 3rd and most stupid mistake. Instead of placing Tibbett's body in a casket identical to the one aboard Air Force one, They placed him in a spartan gray metal coffin inside a body bag.
As the TV media showed these distressing pictures to a world reeling in shock, It's hardly surprising that no one ever dreamed this casket could be empty, but it was. As it was driven away, Out of sight of the media, the 2 bodies were taken from air force 2 and loaded onto a helicopter. It was at this point that the To honest men, FBI agents Francis x O'Neill and his partner William Siebert became crucial figures in the story. They explained to researcher David lifter. But they made the journey to the naval hospital at Bethesda in the car behind the hearse, which carried Jackie and Bobby, and most notably, admiral George Berkeley, who made sure he stayed with the empty coffin by sitting on another man's lap.
Upon reaching Bethesda, Seabird and O'Neil said Berkeley then guided the family members into the building while the hearse was ordered to the rear to unload. But that was where the simplicity ended. The FBI men and many other witnesses recalled a scene of absolute mayhem in which no one seemed to know what was going on. And military men were rushing around everywhere, exchanging anecdotes about decoy ambulances they had been ordered to follow, which had become high speed chases around the hospital grounds as these vehicles raced away. It seems this confusion was created with the intention of misleading both the press and the large respectful crowd which had gathered on the lawn.
People were asking each other which ambulance contained the president's body. Then a rumour started that it was coming by helicopter, but which one? Everyone watching that night recalls the air was filled with them. And the FBI men also told that in the midst of all this mayhem, they helped to carry the casket inside. This was flatly denied by the team of navy men who said they did it alone.
It is, therefore, perfectly clear that Two bodies were brought to the morgue separately whilst confusion reigned. And it was now that the plotters themselves became confused by the mayhem they had created because they left JD Tibbitt's cadaver in the wrong casket. It should have been switched. And gone into the autopsy room and the large expensive casket used in Dallas.
Speaker 2: I, Halpert, president Kennedy, body in a bond, Ceremonial casket, on November 22, 1953 at Barton Memorial Hospital.
Speaker 0: Instead, Mortuary technician, Paul O'Connor, received a coffin so dull in nondescript, no one could believe it had been utilized to transport the body of a president.
Speaker 1: It was a very plain casket. And when I say plain, I mean it was pinkish gray. It had pink and gray on the sides. There was nothing fancy about it as far as being bronze. It wasn't bronze.
Speaker 0: The autopsy then became a farce the moment it began. While Sievert and O'Neil made their now famous and entirely correct observation that the body seemed to have undergone surgery Prior to autopsy, mainly in the head area, Commander Humes himself testified that the moment he touched the head, Pieces of the skull fell down onto the autopsy table. That is not possible unless Surgery was done before postmortem, and that surgery could only have been performed aboard the aircraft because there was no other time to do it. Holmes then found that he had to try to work with admirals Berkeley, Galloway and Kenny actually touching his elbows and became increasingly confused and embarrassed himself at his utter failure to find any trace of the bullets which killed the president. Of course, this was hardly surprising considering the president lay dead in an adjoining room and that Liggett had removed all the bullets from JD Tibbitt.
As the autopsy proceeded, O'Connor revealed that Berkeley interfered constantly in the procedure, steering Humes away from the torso where he would have found the holes made by Liddy. And while everyone in the room remained aghast and disturbed by the huge hole in the back of the head An absence of any brain matter, 2 porters O'Connor had never seen before came in pushing a trolley, which had a sheet on it which hid a small lump. They had told people in the corridor it was a dead newborn baby, but it turned out to be a complete brain which could only have come from a third cadaver. This was weighed and pickled in formaldehyde before anyone even had a chance to inquire when it had been removed. The most farcical moment of all came when Holmes faced our inspector in front of the Warren Commission and found the leading counsel pressing him to say that the wound he found in the back of the head was an entry wound.
His incredible answer was that the bullet could only have entered and exited from the rear. Humes actually told the world that the bullet had done a U-turn inside the president's skull. Now that we know the truth, it may seem remarkable that David Lifton got So close. And yet never quite realized that what he had been investigating for 15 years was a body switch. But can we really be surprised?
Like so many other decent men, Lifton was simply unable to imagine that anyone could ever think of such a grotesque and degenerate conspiracy. He simply never realized that what he was dealing with was nothing less than the devil himself. And for those who find all this impossible to accept, one of the devils who murdered JFK, Frank Sturgis, was perfectly candid about how routine body switches had become in the CIA by 1963.
Speaker 9: There was a switch.
Speaker 2: Body switch. A body switch. Yes.
Speaker 0: The truth about the autopsy is that the devils who killed Kennedy messed up very badly. They had wanted to show the world actual photographs of a single bullet wound from behind. As it was, they had to resort to a lot of badly faked photographs, which critics like Robert easily discredited, and silly drawings, which everyone realized did Line up anywhere near the school book depository. With the autopsy over, missus Kennedy and the president's brother were shown the body prepared for burial. Not Not surprisingly, they were wholly unconvinced by Leggett's attempts to make a Dallas police officer look like the president of the United States.
Witnesses there at the time Said Bobby scoffed and said, it doesn't look anything like him. Well, missus Kennedy became adamant. It isn't Jack, she declared. That looks like something you'd find in madame Tussauds' wax museum. Many people have studied this alleged picture of the president's remains and wondered how it could possibly be John f Kennedy when the Zapruder film clearly shows This right temple area being blown apart by the impact of the frangible bullet.
The simple answer is that this It's not JFK. It's the corpse of officer JD Tibbitt, surgically altered to look like the president. On arriving home, Nigger was informed the plot was in serious trouble. His wife, Lois, told how he staggered in the door, unkempt, disheveled, and quite obviously exhausted, which was very out of character for a man who took pride in always being neat, tidy, and organized.
Speaker 5: It was about 24 hours before I heard from him. He came home, and he walked in the door. And when I saw him, he physically looked like he had really been through a very traumatic experience. His clothes were disarrayed, and that was so out of character for him. And he said, We're gonna get out of town for a while until all of this blows over.
That was a quote Because I thought, well, what blows over?
Speaker 0: Minutes later, they were speeding down the highway towards Corpus Christi, utterly bewildered as to what on earth was going on. Chainsmoking at the wheel, Liggett was looking increasingly nervous. It wasn't just that his botched reconstruction had failed to convince and would lead to courtroom testimony of bullets doing u turns inside the president's head. The problem was that the patty was still alive. Deputy sheriff Roger Craig told investigators It was plain to him that Lee Harvey Oswald was not meant to survive his arrest procedure.
He said that when he arrived at the Texas Theatre, A group of his fellow officers were waiting at the rear, guns drawn, and that it was quite obvious that Oswald was meant to make a break out the back door where he would run into a hail of gunfire. However, Oswald himself was an intelligence agent. And once he realized he had been chosen as the fall guy, He briefly prolonged his existence by loudly yelling so that all the witnesses present could hear, I am not resisting arrest. I am not resisting arrest. This is why Leggett, like all the others involved in the plot, was shaking in his boots on November 23rd.
They were all aware that a sharp lawyer could get Oswald released simply by discovering that the chain of evidence had been broken in relation to Kennedy's remains. Once free to talk and with intimate knowledge of the major players in the assassination plot, he could have gotten the heads of the FBI and CIA, All the military chiefs of staff, the Mafia chieftains and the Dallas oilmen all thrown in jail together for murder. Many people have wondered how the plotters could be so unbelievably dumb and so unbelievably obvious as to have Oswald murdered live on national television. The simple truth was that they had absolutely no choice. Their botched assassination attempt had proved that they were not as smart as they thought they were.
The actual shooting had gone very badly. Most of the shots had missed. They'd had to botch the autopsy, and now they were having to botch the silencing of the patsy. Lois Liggett recalled that the moment Ruby fired, The atmosphere in their motel room evaporated.
Speaker 5: The minute he saw that, he looked at me and The thing's okay now, and you could just see his face. He'd be like All the pressure had been taken off of him. All of a sudden, he was like sigh of relief. Let's go. We can go home now.
It was basically, pack your things. Come on. We're leaving. You know? Now what you go?
Speaker 0: The family turned around and went straight back home to discover But mister Liggett now enjoyed a new vocation. It appeared he had suddenly come into 1,000,000, which bought his family A big new house and himself a new lifestyle which included many wild poker parties at which, among others, he hosted David Ferri. This was not Lois Liggett's scene. She divorced him, heard that not long afterwards, he was arrested for murder, and then shot dead while trying to escape. But this was not the end of Liggett's story.
His new wife told Lois that the man she buried could not have been John Melvin Liggett because the corpse she was shown had a mustache and he couldn't grow one. Then many years later, Lois Liggett actually saw her deceased ex husband in a casino while on a trip to Las Vegas. Quite clearly, this man had been the beneficiary of yet another CIA body switch. And to this day, doubts remain as to the true fate of Jack Ruby, Lee Oswald, John Liggett Arndt, the president himself. Many researchers now believe the Plotters may have kept Kennedy's remains as a souvenir and buried JB Tibbitt in Arlington Cemetery.
JFK to 9/11 - Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick
Authoritatively written and narrated by Francis Richard Conolly, the film begins its labyrinthine tale during the era of World War I, when the wealthiest and most powerful figures of industry discover...
odysee.com