TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ABridgen
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe this was a 1960s news report on vaccines’ ineffectiveness and harms, including the flu vaccine. Today Big Pharma controls MSM and Government, so anyone questioning vaccine efficacy or safety is cancelled. Please watch and share https://t.co/TMbE1wruwT
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Incredible to think this was a 1960s news report on vaccines ineffectiveness and the harms they caused including - flu vaccine! Now Big Pharma control both MSM and Government so anyone questioning vaccine ‘efficacy or safety’ is cancelled and destroyed. Please watch and share https://t.co/TMbE1wruwT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge that the flu vaccine and its recommended dosage are ineffective; in a larger dose, it can be harmful. Nevertheless, the flu vaccine is still recommended for older people and the chronically ill.
A senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Rebikoff charged that the federal government wasn’t doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines.
Scientists at the Division of Biologic Standards test vaccines for potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. Four scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective, and they refused to give it to their own families. Two were transferred to other work, a third left the division, and over the entire ten-year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published.
But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists involves the adenovirus vaccine, a vaccine given to thousands of American soldiers to prevent certain cold-like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market.
But that was three years after the division’s own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took three years to examine the evidence against it.
"It is more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent."
"It is more important to use the vaccines"
"than to take them off the market"
"and to remove the agent."
Thus, for three years, American troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine, which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division’s scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective.
"It's the control officer in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge the flu vaccine and the recommended dosage is ineffective. While in a larger dose, it can be harmful. However, the flu vaccine is still recommended for old people and the chronically ill.
Speaker 1: Last month, a senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Rebikoff charged that the federal government wasn't doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines.
Speaker 0: Scientists at the division of biologic standards test vaccines for their potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. Four scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective, said they refused to give it to their own families.
Two were transferred to other work, a third left the division. And over the entire ten year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published. But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists involves the adenovirus vaccine, a vaccine given to thousands of American soldiers to prevent certain cold like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market.
Speaker 2: But the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer.
Speaker 0: But that was three years after the division's own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took three years to examine the evidence against it.
Speaker 2: It is more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent. It's more important to use the vaccines
Speaker 3: than to take them off the market
Speaker 4: and remove the agent.
Speaker 2: But since the agent couldn't be removed, there was no other course.
Speaker 0: Thus, for three years, American troops were injected with a cold preventing vaccine, which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division's scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective.
Speaker 5: It's the control officer in, in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Zelensky’s name tied to Epstein-linked sex trafficker Brunel Zelensky’s misspelled name pops up in an email accusing him of being complicit of human trafficking in Ukraine via Jean-Luc Brunel, the French model scout who supplied girls to Epstein. I did warn you. https://t.co/IzFBCOkt9a
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that “vaccine” is disappearing from hospital consent forms, replaced with “biological” or “biogenics.” Under this, hospitals could administer vaccines or biological products without my consent.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
The word “vaccine” is disappearing from hospital consent forms and is being replaced with a broad, vague category called “biological” or “biogenics” Under this classification, a hospital can technically administer vaccines or biological products without you ever giving consent. https://t.co/ahWQFWU9uo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that hospitals are not allowed to vaccinate patients without their knowledge, yet an alarming shift is occurring inside the medical system. They claim the word vaccine is quietly disappearing from hospital consent forms and is being replaced with a broad, vague category: biologics or biogenics. Under this new classification, a hospital can technically administer vaccines or other biological products without explicit patient consent.
Insiders are reportedly observing that new surgical and hospital consent forms no longer list specific treatments. They allegedly do not say vaccine or injection; they simply say biologics or biogenics, a category so wide it can include almost anything made from living organisms and their byproducts.
The scariest part, according to the speaker, is that most people sign these forms without reading them because they trust the system, because they are in pain, overwhelmed, or seconds away from being put under anesthesia. This creates a setup where a patient can enter for a routine procedure, sign a consent form filled with vague terminology, go unconscious, and wake up having received something they did not directly approve.
The speaker emphasizes that no medical system should be allowed to hide procedures behind intentionally unclear language. They urge spreading the message because, in their view, most people are unaware that this is happening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's get this straight. What we think is that hospitals are not allowed to vaccinate patients without them even knowing. Well, something very alarming is happening inside the medical system, and most people have no idea. The word vaccine is quietly disappearing from hospital consent forms. Instead, it's being replaced with a broad, vague category called biologics or biogenics.
Under this new classification, a hospital can technically administer vaccines or other biological products without you ever giving explicit consent. Insiders are reporting that new surgical and hospital consent forms don't list specific treatments anymore. They don't say vaccine. They don't say injection. They simply say biologics or biogenics, a category so wide it can include almost anything made from living organisms and their byproducts.
And what's the scariest part? Most people sign these forms without even reading them because they trust the system, because they're in pain, overwhelmed, or seconds away from being put under anesthesia. So now you have a setup where a patient can go in for a routine procedure, sign a consent form filled with vague terminology, go unconscious, and wake up having received something they never directly approve. No medical system should ever be allowed to hide procedures behind intentionally unclear language. Let's spread this message because most people have no idea this is happening.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Health Canada just sealed vaccine injury records.. so we won't be inconvenienced by seeing their records of people being harmed by the poison for another 15 years! This fits with what I was warned in 2023 that the UK vaccine harms would be covered up for 20 years https://t.co/Nifhogks9c
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
The Government announced a new telecoms project called ‘NEAT’ today. It’s a new ISP combined project where the Government take control of the Internet service providers, so that in an ‘emergency’ (which they declare) Government will have complete control of all communications. https://t.co/umUBzzQGn1
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
You can see why they didn’t want me standing up in Parliament asking awkward questions about the vaccine harms. Unpalatable truths.
@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD
We have plenty of data, we just don’t have anyone in authority willing to acknowledge it. Here’s one more study to add to the thousands of others. Would you take these chances with your own child? https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-pose-greater-risk-brain-clots-strokes-flu-shots/
COVID Vaccines Pose 112,000% Greater Risk of Brain Clots, Strokes Than Flu Shots
A peer-reviewed study published last week in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science found reports of 5,137 cases of cerebral thromboembolism after COVID-19 shots over 36 months, compared with 52 reported cases following flu vaccines and 282 cases for all vaccines over the past 34 years.
childrenshealthdefense.org
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Idaho is the first area of the US to remove the Covid 19 vaccines from their clinics as ‘ Unsafe for Humans’. As expected nothing reported in the media about this. https://www.boisestatepublicradio.org/health/2024-10-23/southwest-idaho-health-district-covid-vaccines
Southwest Idaho Health District Board pulls COVID vaccines from its clinics
Residents in the Southwest Idaho Health District will no longer be able to get vaccinated against COVID-19 at district health offices.
boisestatepublicradio.org
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve traveled to Russia to discuss topics that would lead to severe backlash in Australia. Port Hedland councillor Adrian McRae is facing significant consequences for speaking out about COVID vaccine harms. It’s alarming how governments globally are aligned on this issue, pushing free speech to places like Russia.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
“I’ve had to come to Russia to bring up topics I would be heavily persecuted for back in Australia.” Port Hedland councillor Adrian McRae - who has bravely been making noise about COVID vaccine harms and paying a heavy price - goes to RUSSIA to speak freely. I recognise the experience he describes. Governments around the world are in lockstep about this issue; same playbook and this is where it leads. Russia becomes a haven for free speech.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Amazing that for the first time in recorded history flu cases almost disappeared during the ‘Covid 19 pandemic.’ Of course they did. https://t.co/KKPXrefPOA
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
This is a disturbing case in which the NHS stands accused of sedating man with Downs Syndrome so he could be injected with mRNA against his will. Taking away anyone’s human right to decide what they have injected into their body is a crime against humanity and a crime against all of us. https://youtu.be/TWBEnVYxWJ0?si=eo9LSQaEQVfO4E3-
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
“AstraZeneca gave me a severe systemic allergic reaction left me with a multi system injury, suspected blood clots and heart inflammation..” Read the comments on this article about AstraZeneca becoming Britain’s first £200 billion firm. https://shorturl.at/bUfcW
ShortURL - URL Shortener
ShortURL is a tool to shorten a long link and create a short URL easy to share on sites, chat and emails. Track short URL traffic and manage your links.
shorturl.at
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
27 human rights organisations - including Amnesty International - are sounding the alarm about Starmer’s move to increase the use of facial recognition technology citing issues with “accuracy, bias and discrimination.”
@BigBrotherWatch - Big Brother Watch
🔴We've brought together nearly 30 rights & racial justice groups urging the PM to rethink plans to expand live facial recognition. Authoritarian tech will not fix the country's complex societal challenges - but it will endanger our rights & freedoms #StopFacialRecognition https://t.co/1mYgoZeLvv
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
NHS radiographers are now required to ask men if they are pregnant. The world has gone completely mad and the NHS is promoting the insanity, funded by your taxes. https://t.co/1E2dB0dRgp
reSee.it AI Summary
A study from Oxford University's Bennett Institute analyzed over a million vaccinated and unvaccinated children and teenagers, revealing that myocarditis and pericarditis were only documented in vaccinated individuals. Among unvaccinated children, COVID-19-related outcomes were too rare for precise estimation, and there were no COVID-19-related deaths in any group. The protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was found to be temporary. I believe there is no such thing as mild myocarditis or pericarditis, especially in children, and I strongly advise against vaccinating them.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
🚨Oxford University’s Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science study of more than a million vaccinated/unvaccinated children and teenagers finds only the vaccinated contracted myocarditis/pericarditis. 👉🏻 “Among both adolescents and children, myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in the vaccinated groups.” 👉🏻 “Amongst 283,422 previously unvaccinated children and 132,462 children who had received a first vaccine dose, COVID-19-related outcomes were too rare to allow IRRs to be estimated precisely.” 👉🏻 “There were no COVID-19-related deaths in any group.” 👉🏻 “Protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was transient.” 🚨Much myocarditis and pericarditis is sub clinical. 🚨There is in my view no such thing as mild myocarditis or pericarditis. Especially not in children. ALL RISK NO REWARD. PLEASE DON’T PUT THIS STUFF IN YOUR CHILDREN’S VEINS. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1 https://www.bennett.ox.ac.uk/papers/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810/
OpenSAFELY: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents
medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences
medrxiv.org
OpenSAFELY: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents | Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science
We conducted a matched sequential trials observational study to assess the safety and effectiveness of first and second dose BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents in England.
bennett.ox.ac.uk
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
"Science died in the 1980s... and now we have dogma." Legendary biochemist David Rasnick explains what has happened to science. Once you understand what he is saying here you will understand what has been done to your families since 2020. https://t.co/zmQFU7eJ7M
Video Transcript AI Summary
Science and open debate died in the 1980s, replaced by dogma in academia and the scientific world. Engineers face consequences when they fail, unlike scientists whose theories are harder to verify. In early 2020, a doctor realized much medical teaching is dogma, not science. Government-approved figures are portrayed as top scientists, unaware they are pawns for political agendas and fearmongering.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Science died. It died in the 19 eighties, and that free and open discourse and debate was killed in academic and in the professional scientific world. And now we have dogma, and that's where the discussed, argued against. And if you discussed, argued against. And if you bring up arguments that go against that dogma, then it that's the controversy.
You can tell the difference between scientists and and engineers. When an engineer fails, the planes don't fly, the bridge collapses, or the radios don't work. I mean, Cece, you don't have to be an expert. It's very difficult to know when a scientist is right, a scientific theory is right, even for us scientists ourselves.
Speaker 1: Early 2020 was a wake up call for me in this regard as I realized much of what we were taught as doctors was not science, but dogma. We have government approved individuals who are portrayed to the public as top scientists by state funded media. Some don't seem to realize that they are useful puppets being used to push political policies and fear.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Record level data on doses, dates and deaths in relation to ten million people from the Czech Rrepublic has now been released by @stkirsch. It shows that the Moderna vaccine is 50% more deadly than the Pfizer. Steve's full analysis here: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/breaking-record-level-data-from-czech?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Office of National Statistics used to release data on deaths in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, but no longer does. Calls for anonymized record level data have been made to analyze deaths after vaccination. Data from the Czech Republic shows Moderna vaccine linked to 50% more deaths than Pfizer. Questions raised about safety of COVID vaccines, especially Moderna. Governments urged to release record level data to determine if vaccines are causing excess deaths and increase in emergency calls since vaccine rollout in May 2021.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Office of National Statistics used to release weekly data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. It no longer does that, and no one will explain why the public has a right to that data, madam deputy speaker. There have been calls from serious experts whose requests I have amplified repeatedly in this House for what's called record level data to be anonymized and disclosed for analysis. And this would allow meaningful analysis of the deaths after vaccination and settle the issue of whether these experimental treatments are responsible for the increase in excess deaths once and for all. I called in parliament on numerous occasions for the so called record level data regarding doses, dates, and deaths following vaccination with the experimental COVID 19 vaccines.
The government refused to release that data, anonymized. We had a glimpse of the data from New Zealand supplied by the brave whistleblower, Barry Young, who had access to a third of the New Zealand data, a country with a population of 5,000,000. But we now have record level data from the Czech Republic released under FOI, anonymized the records of over 10,000,000 people's vaccines, doses, dates, and deaths, and it's not pretty. This data will be analyzed in detail, but the initial facts that jump out from the page, If all the vaccines were safe and effective, there'd be no mortality increase following vaccination or any difference between people who had different vaccines. But what is clear from the data is that the Moderna vaccine is responsible for 50% more deaths than the Pfizer vaccine.
You gotta ask yourself, which is the company? Which our former prime minister Rishi Sunak, his hedge fund, Thaleem, in the Cayman Islands had invested $500,000,000 in. It was Moderna. Insinuating, let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that COVID vaccines are safe. Mister speaker.
Which company has been giving your taxpayers money to build vaccine production facilities in the UK, Canada, and Australia, and contracts for a 150,000,000 doses of the experimental vaccines for the next 10 years. It's Moderna, the most dangerous of those COVID 19 vaccines. The Czech government anonymized their data by removing the names of the individuals, the day of the month they were born, and the month, but leaving the year, which is quite acceptable for statistical analysis. We now need other governments around the world to release their record level data or to agree that these experimental vaccines are responsible for the excess deaths we've seen, and the unprecedented 20% increase in emergency 999 calls, which has been sustained and continued since the vaccine's rollout in the UK in May 2021.
BREAKING: Record-level data from Czech Republic FOIA proves that the Moderna vaccines increased all-cause mortality by over 50% (and the Pfizer vaccines weren't safe either)
"Safe and effective?" Using this new data, we can finally prove that the COVID vaccines were not safe or effective for anyone of any age. No COVID benefits, and they increased your risk of death.
kirschsubstack.com
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
US seeks to delay release of vaccine harms data and the UK Gov refuses to release its control level data on doses dates and deaths. We all know why. https://tinyurl.com/4ny6v2z3
Biden admin seeks to delay releasing data on COVID vaccine reactions, report says
Two federal agencies reportedly asked for an 18-month stay Tuesday on a public records request relating to the information.
thenationaldesk.com
reSee.it AI Summary
According to a recent court ruling in Lisbon, the PCR test, which has been used to determine Covid-19 cases, may not be able to accurately detect the infection. The decision has raised questions about the basis of lockdown measures and their impact on the economy and education.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
“In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” Reports that an appeal court in Lisbon - upholding the decision of a lower court - has ruled that the PCR test - the basis of case numbers which were the basis of the R number which was the basis of the lockdowns and the destruction of the economy and your children's school life - cannot detect a Covid infection. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/msm-silent-as-court-holds-pcr-covid-tests-97-inaccurate-unfit-for-purpose
MSM Silent As Court Holds PCR Covid Tests 97% Inaccurate - Unfit for Purpose
Hal Turner Radio Show
halturnerradioshow.com
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
The Pfizer plant whistleblower raises huge concerns about what was in the ‘vaccines’ and where it came from in a discussion with @JimFergusonUK. https://t.co/d7KL7rsckZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Melissa McAtee, a former employee at Pfizer, shares her experiences and concerns about the Pfizer vaccine in an interview. She discusses the presence of fluorescent vials and the use of Chinese ingredients in the vaccine production process. Melissa also talks about the use of aborted fetal cell lines and the lack of transparency from Pfizer regarding these issues. She believes there is a deliberate effort to deceive the public and highlights the importance of asking questions and seeking the truth. Melissa suggests that there may be more nefarious motives behind the vaccine rollout and calls for accountability. She advises caution and encourages people to research and make informed decisions about vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, thanks so much indeed. Welcome to the show. I have a wonderful guest here. Her name is Melissa McAtee. Melissa, it's great to see you on the channel.
How are you doing?
Speaker 1: Hi. I'm doing really good. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 0: It's my absolute pleasure. Now, before we get into too much, because you're a first time guest here on the channel, would you just say a little bit about where where you're based, what you do, that type of thing? Thanks.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So I'm in a small town of Kansas, a suburb of Wichita, Kansas, a bigger city. I moved, where I currently live from McPherson where the Pfizer plant is based that I, originally worked at. I currently am a show producer for a show called Vaxxed Choice, and I work for a company, a sister company of theirs called CloutHub, which is a YouTube alternative, platform. And so that's what I'm doing now.
It took me a while to be able to find work after whistleblowing, so I'm thankful that, somebody helped me, so I didn't have to resort to working at the local Taco Bell.
Speaker 0: So That's okay. Well, I'm glad to see that. You know, and if you want me to put any links into the channel to direct traffic to any of those sites, please just let me know, and we can work that out when when it goes to editing. The reason I I got in contact with you, Melissa and by the way, I'm really pleased to have you on the channel. You know?
And I appreciate you you coming back to me as quickly as you did. But I saw a post that you put out, which said, I I just want everybody to know I'm not suicidal. So let's a lot of people saw that because I reposted it. You know, a lot of people saw that. Can you can you just explain what was going through your mind at that point and why you put out that rather interesting tweet, please?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So whenever the dust gets kicked off my story or my story starts circulating again, or sometimes if I simply feel the need to, I periodically will make a I'm not suicidal post just so it's always up to date and current so that somebody can't say, oh, she wasn't suicidal 3 years ago, but maybe she was now. I just like to keep it updated. And with this post in particular, I I put a video with it, and it just caught some fire. The reason I, posted it was because I had just done an interview with Greg Reese and Justin Leslie, and I kind of knew that it would, you know, kick the wasp's nest, so to speak, and that it would kick it back up.
So I just wanted to put out there that under no circumstances should anything happen to me suddenly or accidentally or anything like that. I don't even really drive a bunch, so there shouldn't even be any car accidents.
Speaker 0: So Alright. Now people that that might not know who you are or what this is all about are gonna say, why? Why? You know, what's this all about? So this is where I'm gonna pass on to you, Melissa, and you tell us exactly what's been going on.
Speaker 1: Yes. So I lived in the small town McPherson, Kansas as I mentioned earlier. And out there, we had a facility with that was called Hospira originally, which is just another big pharma, tick to tentacle and the of the beast. And, I got hired there, during when I was 19 years old in 2012. And I was currently in college as a psychology major, but I actually didn't return to school after the 1st semester or after the 1st year because at Hospira, you could work your way up to promotion.
You didn't have to have a college degree to work your way up in the facility. Things like that. And I thought, well, I'm making really good money. I'll just plan to retire there and invest in my career there instead of an education, which in hindsight, probably not the best decision. But here we are.
And in 2015, Pfizer purchased that Hospira plant. Hospira had gotten a slap on the wrist from the FDA for having cardboard in their product, believe it or not. And I think they couldn't afford that liability, and so Pfizer stepped in and took over the company. Originally when I was hired, I was a pharmaceutical assistant, which is just a packaging person essentially, but we're the final visuals on the product before it goes to the customer. And they liked, that I didn't really make any errors.
I had a really good eye for detail. I didn't miss anything. So they promoted me in 2017 to manufacturing quality auditor in the plant, which what that job entails is from where the where the glass is getting offloaded to be filled to where it's getting wrapped in warehouse. I oversee all of the operations of that. So, our job was to deem Pfizer's product quality or not quality.
We were also in charge of paperwork, documentation, making sure people were following their good manufacturing practices and standard operating procedures. We were kind of like really glorified hall monitors to an extent because, you know, if someone's breaking the rules, we've gotta do something about it because our literal job is to enforce integrity within the company and quality. And so nothing was really that fishy at Pfizer, minus, you know, I think the weirdest thing we did before the pandemic was peeling expired product to put new labels on them for new expiration dates. That's probably the weirdest thing. But when I was there, I was told it was normal, that they just learned that the expiration date could be longer, and so we were just changing it.
So that was the first sketchy thing. But then when we actually started producing the, Pfizer vaccine it was amongst most of the people was that they were gonna get it but wait. Because since we were gonna be producing it, we'd be able to know if there's anything sketchy. So most of us waited. I would say 2 of the first, indicators that something was amiss was the first one of my bosses told me that one of his friends in compounding, who had been in compounding for over 40 years, Compounding is where they mix the drugs.
Quality didn't oversee that department. And they told my boss that this is the first time a product has ever come in unmarked bags with only Chinese writing, and they don't know what they're mixing. Thought that was really weird, considering I knew the person. They've been there for a very long time. Very odd.
But still just kinda kept that in the back of my mind. Didn't think much of it. The thing that I experienced myself firsthand was the first day that we were actually inspecting the product. I was one of the first quality auditors to be on it. And when I walked in the room, this is what I saw on the table, which were these vials that seem to be emitting this fluorescent light to them.
I'd I say they glow, but a better description is probably fluorescent.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Looks like a glow stick that somebody may have cracked and then let sit on the table for a few hours. And it's not
Speaker 0: Sorry, Melissa. Did it did it appear to emit its own light, or or was it just sort of picking up the light in the room that was making it sort of fluorescent?
Speaker 1: That that is a good question. So from my experience and what I witnessed with this product was it needed light to glow. Okay. It wasn't, if it had a white background here, let me see if I can show you this. If it had a white background, it was almost totally translucent.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: But if it got shifted in to a background that had any other, color, like anything darker than white, it would color shift to that kind of periwinkle blue color. And that's just not normal. That's not something I'd ever seen. That's not something any of my coworkers had ever seen. And so it was obviously alarming.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: So that was the first thing that I thought, well, this is strange. There's a conspiracy floating around that there's lusperase in these. And lusperase is a bio luminescent compound that emits this glow with certain lighting. And so I emailed the company immediately after doing my first audit because this is not normal. And as a quality professional, it was literally my job to say, hey.
Something isn't quite right. I need to check this. And considering we didn't have the proper, documentation in place at this point in our operations, meaning we did not have a controlled monograph, which is a So I emailed Auer Borla directly who then forwarded me to communications. And my question was, hey. I'm, MQA here at the plant.
I'm a me and the line are observing some fluorescence or glowing, of the product. Do you have an explanation for this so that I can relieve the worries of the staff? Essentially is what I asked. And they responded with, we aren't aware of any glowing. Do you have any pictures?
And another question I followed up with was, is there luciferase in the vaccine? And their response to me was luciferase is not used in the, product being administered under the EUA, was their response to me. However, I have raised several questions since then, and this has been an ongoing testimony of mine now for almost 3 years. And Pfizer has yet to ever issue a statement as to what could cause this. So we're left to speculation, essentially.
And I don't think that's right. I think they should need to answer as to why it looks this way. And during the initial rollout of the vaccine, they had a lot of misleading photos of what the vaccine looked like. I think if people saw the real photo of it, they knew it would have caused vaccine hesitancy because it doesn't really look like your typical injection would.
Speaker 0: No. And and and you, you directed that. I mean, you're in a senior enough position that you would actually communicate by email directly with Adam Bourla, who is I think he's the CEO, isn't he?
Speaker 1: Yes. He's the face of the company, but I I mean, I personally think he's oblivious, in my opinion.
Speaker 0: Right. Okay. Is there anybody else that is running the show then behind the scenes that you think might be involved with Pfizer?
Speaker 1: Oh, well, of course, the shadow governments. People that we don't even know the names or faces of, I'm sure, are operating at the highest levels that we don't really know. There is a lot of Chinese involved.
Speaker 0: Well, I'm gonna come on to that in a second. Do you think Bill Gates was was ever involved in any kind of capacity at all?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So I actually was researching in our Pfizer internal database, and I searched the world word Bill Gates. And the only thing I could seem to find was a donation amount of it was either $20,000 or $200,000, towards Pfizer, and that was really it. Unfortunately, I didn't find a lot more than simply anything that Google could show you.
Speaker 0: Okay. Now just going back to let me just let me just check I'm getting the the details right on this. This compounding that that you're talking about, where they mix the drugs, you you say that you saw product coming in with Chinese markings on it. Is that is that right? Am I understanding that correctly?
Speaker 1: Yes. So that's right. So the first person who told me that, I never really repeated that information since it's just, he said, she said, essentially.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. So
Speaker 1: I never really talked about that. But post whistleblowing, I would say a couple months, I did a speech at a local church, and a woman came up to me after and she said, hi. You don't know me, but I worked at Pfizer when you did. I'm retired now. But while I was there, did you know that the vaccine comes in bags with no English markings, but only Chinese writing?
And I said, interesting. Because this person was an incoming quality, so they were in a totally different department than the first person who said that. And I just said, do you know, do you have any proof of that? And she said, no. And I said, well, it's very interesting that, you are the first person other than the first or second person to tell me this.
And so I I think that holds some weight that these two people didn't know each other, 2 different departments that dealt, exclusively with the raw materials. And I think that that, should concern people.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. It should. And and just going back to the compounding where they're they're mixing these drugs together. One moment. They didn't know what was in these packets or satchels or sacks or however whatever form they were coming in.
I mean, what did they look like? Were they very big sacks or were they packets or boxes or what what did they look like and that had the Chinese writing on them, first of all?
Speaker 1: So my understanding is that it comes in a box and those boxes have bags in them, and those bags have stickers on them. And so to my understanding from both their testimonies combined, there was no, English writing that indicated what the the components were, what was actually in those bags.
Speaker 0: Okay. The the next question there is, why would Pfizer be taking in ingredients in in sort of from China to mix into the vaccines. Is is that would that be normal, do you think? Or is that something that's just it's not normal?
Speaker 1: It's not. And from compounding perspective, they said they've never done that before. And I trust them because they've been in plant for over 40 years.
Speaker 0: Right. So, I mean, they've been they've been doing this job, some of them for a long period of time. They were seasoned workers. They knew the the drill. They obviously noticed this coming in, and that wasn't normal to them, and they told you that.
Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yes. And as from a quality perspective, it's not odd for Pfizer to have 3rd party people involved. For example, Pfizer is the 3rd party when it comes to remdesivir, for example. Pfizer manufacturers remdesivir for Gilead. And what we do is we fill it, we lyophilize it, and we send it out to Gilead who then puts their label on it.
Which, again, isn't necessarily strange. We've kind of done that the entire time I worked there. We sell a lot of products, I think, just because we are able to meet the demand. We we were a very large plant. And so I think Gilead was too small, so Gilead contracted Pfizer to make remdesivir.
So it's just, not that odd to use 3rd party, but I do think it is so odd why during a pandemic that was questionably caused in Wuhan, China, why would you accept anything from there?
Speaker 0: I I mean, that's the whole thing. It's it's this Chinese connection. This is pretty explosive stuff because, you know, they say they said, first of all, it was from a wet market in Wuhan because they're eating bats or whatever else that they were saying. And then at around that time, then we heard that there was actually a a lab there, the Wuhan lab. And then that became then there was a Chinese doctor that sort of tried to sort of sound the alarm, and he was very quickly disappeared, got seriously ill, and died.
I I I forget his name, but I remember seeing that. And then, of course, there was other things to do with Wuhan. Partly, 5 g trials were the was one of the first places to take place there. So
Speaker 1: we don't do I can actually tie together Pfizer and Wuhan even better for you. I have proof of this. Pfizer has a research and development lab in Wuhan, China. And its address is 666. Here.
Speaker 0: No. You're kidding me. You're gonna be kidding me. It's RCS. Wow.
Look at that.
Speaker 1: And I actually found this in the database. They were having a a global meeting, in Wuhan in the research and development. So that's how I actually found it was in the Pfizer internal database, not Google.
Speaker 0: Wow. So that's actually from Pfizer's own files, if you like. Okay.
Speaker 1: That's Yeah. That that's tightly knit with, Chinese. In fact, a lot of the documents that I found on their database were in Chinese.
Speaker 0: Wow. Okay. There there's a clear connection to China involved in this. There's no question of it. But the very fact that your compound, that the people are mixing the drags that that are putting that together didn't know what they were actually mixing in.
I mean, is that even legal?
Speaker 1: A lot of thing the main thing I was told pretty consistently while I was in the plant during this time was under operation warp speed, it's permitted. That's what I was told a lot. Now for this specifically with the compounding, I'm unsure. But, unfortunately, Yeah. I
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I think you're right there. And, of course, the the expiry expiration dates didn't seem to matter, did they? They just sort of said, oh, don't worry about it. Yeah.
Yeah. It they they last longer than we thought, so don't worry about it sort of thing. Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Kinda kinda similar. And even Hospira did that. Even though I will say Hospira was much more transparent and, honest with the FDA as compared to Pfizer.
Pfizer was not.
Speaker 0: Okay. When you say they were they weren't honest with the FDA, in in what way do you mean?
Speaker 1: For example, and this was during the entire time Pfizer took over, this wasn't just during the pandemic, was if the FDA was coming under Hospira, we were told, hey. If the FDA asks you a question, answer the best to your ability. And if you don't know, just simply tell them you don't know and to ask your supervisor. However, when Pfizer took over, they would instead tell people to go hide until the FDA leaves. Or what they would do is, let's say the FDA was coming to observe line a.
They would shut down lines b through z or on the walkway path of the FDA until the FDA was gone. And you weren't allowed to talk to them. They would actually place supervisors throughout the plant to redirect you if your path would cross with the FDA. Was the
Speaker 0: CDC ever there for visits or is it more of an FDA? I'd explain a bit I mean, 3, but it's not in America. Just explain what the FDA do and what what they actually are responsible for.
Speaker 1: Well, so I don't recall the CDC visiting, but we did have, you know, policymakers, lawmakers, senators, congress, different people like that come visit the plant. I never got to interact with them on their visits, but it was the same drill as if the FDA was coming, which is just hide stuff. Shove stuff into rooms, get stuff, you know, out of visual. Because if they can't see it, they can't question it was kind of the, mentality. And the week before, FDA granted the EUA to Pfizer, they were blacking out windows on our manufacturing floor, the week before the FDA visit to approve that.
And so somebody who's worked in manufacturing or pharmaceuticals knows that you have to be able to be seen at all times. 1, for integrity reasons, there are people who have been caught using so it it's not only for that reason, but also you could be stealing. You could just be doing inappropriate things just in general. So you're supposed to be able to be seen at all times. And, I actually got a video of that if you would like to see the windows being blacked out.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'd I'd love to see that. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Okay. Let me get that shared.
Speaker 0: So just explain to us as we're watching this what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Yes. So throughout here here, I'll mute it. Muted, it won't let me. Oh, here we go.
Speaker 0: Well, it's
Speaker 1: okay. So I'm I'm kind of showing that, like, the windows are totally blacked out. Here, I show you that window's blacked out, but this one isn't. This is how it should look. And when I open the door here, you can see that the lights are on.
The lights are not off. It is totally blacked out.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: And and so that was basically the purpose of me showing these first windows, which are this is what it's supposed to look like. But then what is going on with all these blackouts? And you can actually see this room light's on, totally blacked out. This room light's on, totally blacked out. This is not okay or authorized, ever in the plant.
This has always been something you could be fired for.
Speaker 0: Just just to remind everybody, Melissa, this is the Pfizer manufacturing facility. Correct. Just tell me the locate tell me the location of that one again, please.
Speaker 1: McPherson, Kansas.
Speaker 0: McPherson. Okay. Who who gave the instruction to blackout the windows? Do you know?
Speaker 1: That I'm unsure, but I did raise questions to managers, 2 of them. One of them gave me a dummy answer, which was, oh, the FDA, it said that they can't see me sleeping in here when they visit. And I just thought, well, that's dumb. So then I went to the next manager who's more serious, and I said, hey. I noticed that they're blocking out the windows down here.
Do you know why? And he said, oh, are they doing light testing? Which light testing is the process of looking at medicine under a light. And I said, well, if that were the case, the windows they blacked out aren't light test rooms. They were a group lead office, a storage room, and a washroom were the rooms that were blacked out, and there's no reason for that.
They're not light inspection rooms. And even if they were, we still don't black out the windows. They get a tint on the windows, which you can still see into the room and compare unlike this blackout, which was you couldn't see it. You could put your face against the everything and you couldn't see into the room.
Speaker 0: What did he say when you told him that?
Speaker 1: He kind of looked around and said, well, the FDA is coming next week. And I said, okay. Thanks.
Speaker 0: So basically, he tried to gaslight you. He he was basically trying to fob you off, and then put you off to you.
Speaker 1: To believe what he was told, which is that it was for light testing, but there's no way light testing could be performed in those rooms.
Speaker 0: So all these managers, all these people, were going along with this, clandestine type operation with Pfizer. Yeah?
Speaker 1: So something well, something I think people should know is that most of the people working at the specific facility I worked at are small town people. It's a small town that don't have jobs anywhere else to go to, at least not close by and with good as good a pay and benefit comparison. So a lot of these people are just average citizens. I've known a lot of them for a long time because it's a small town. These aren't Pfizer's not just infiltrated with all these evil, sadistic people.
I would say 1 in every 100 people were overly loyal to Pfizer. And when I say overly loyal, I mean, the people who would just do what they're told even if it was illegal, which we we experienced during this. Operation warp speed allowed, Pfizer to bypass a lot of safety barriers, such as the paperwork normally that would hold up a batch. They were allowed to just send it through. Even if there were errors, which is a huge problem with documentation practices.
That's actually I called it Pfizer law because it's the rule. Like you cannot backdate anything. If something wasn't signed, it didn't happen. And that you have to prove beyond reasonable doubt if something did happen yet wasn't signed for, and that just wasn't happening in this. They were just waving things through for speed.
Speaker 0: If, let's just say if the the the feds went in or or or police officers went in or the FBI went in, Not that they've got a great reputation, I would say, but, let's just say there was some honest ones went in and, questioned those members of staff. What do you think would happen?
Speaker 1: I think a good majority of the employees would be honest. A good majority. If they felt it was truly secret, the information they'd be revealing, I would say a good majority of them would be honest. However, just as anywhere else, there are probably a few people who are too afraid of losing their job. It's the same people who probably got the vaccine.
They're just too afraid. And I would say that's maybe 1 in every 20 employees are afraid to lose their job. 1, because they have children that they have to take care of, and we live
Speaker 0: in a small
Speaker 1: town where I've said, you know, their options are Walmart, Taco Bell, things like that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I get I get that. I mean, how many employees were you talking about working at McPherson plant?
The first
Speaker 1: I believe around the time I left, it was 1700.
Speaker 0: Right. We're talking in we're talking to a lot of people then. Yeah. Yeah. Probably probably, if not the biggest, certainly one of the biggest, employers in that area.
Yeah.
Speaker 1: Our our manufacturing plant was, specifically one of the largest producers of injectables, so we were one of the larger plants.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, this is so this this is fascinating. And and this is did you so before we get too much further into, what brought you into the position where you said, I can't do this anymore? Did did you did you raise concerns with management at Pfizer, for example? Did you reach out to anybody and say, look, there's something not right here.
But what happened? What led to you then leaving? You know, what was the run up to that, Melissa?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So I followed proper chain of command for a long time before leaving, which the proper chain of command would have been my under supervisor, which is kind of my supervisor, but, like, handles the more trivial things, or directly to my supervisor. One of them too, depending on the seriousness, would elevate it to my manager. From the manager, it would go to the quality operation professionals and, the visual inspection trainers, different people in those departments. And then it would have been escalated to maybe more of the people who are higher up at other facilities.
However, I don't believe my issues ever got that high. My issues seem to have stopped at the manager, who I never heard from directly, but would convey to my supervisor that author Operation Warp Speed authorizes it or permits it. It. And
Speaker 0: So that that was the go to, wasn't it? Operation Warp Speed. So we can do whatever we want.
Speaker 1: Pretty much. Yeah. Pretty much. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: And that guy, that that manager, was he based within the plant itself? Was he the sort of top man in in charge of the plant?
Speaker 1: Of quality. Of quality,
Speaker 0: he was. Yeah. Okay. Okay. And and you just got that funnel back.
Hey. Don't worry about it. It's operation works. We we can do yeah. That's fine.
It's all good. Alright. And what And then I and then
Speaker 1: I did start escalating it to, like, Albert Bourla or communications, but that's the that's the most out of order of people I report to. That's probably the most I got out of that order.
Speaker 0: So did you go to Adam Borla or any of the other senior players that that, with those kind of concerns? And if you did, what kind of response did you get from them?
Speaker 1: The only person I emailed was Albert Borla, because we as employees have access to his email and communicating with him. But I would I emailed them, I believe, 2 separate occasions for sure. One was about loose phrase, and one was about, I believe, religious exemptions. It was either the loose phrase, the glowing. It was early on in the things I was seeing.
And I was redirected to communications both times.
Speaker 0: Got you. Got you.
Speaker 1: Which in some of the evidence that I, present to people is their emails of the same communications people who are responding to me, and they're intentional wanting to withhold information from the public knowledge. Yeah. Understood. They were liars.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. Let let's go to the the Luciferase for a second. I want to go back to that because I don't know, if if you were aware of some reports of Luciferase fairly early on. I mean, I can't remember exactly when I first heard about that, but it it was fairly early on, which is probably what prompted you to ask the question, is this lucid phrase?
What what was the first sort of I'm trying to think. I think I I saw in 2020. I I'm sure I heard something about about this sort of type of thing in 2020, but I could I could be wrong. But you seem to know what Luciferase was, didn't you? How did that come about?
Speaker 1: Just from watching, I think it was the Stu Peters show at the time was, like, the only, I was still asleep. That's something I like to remind people is, I didn't come to a faith or become Christian till 2019. And then even after then, it wasn't, I wasn't awake. I still listen to, you know, Fox News, CNN, different things like that. Then obviously around the election stuff, I started to question the media's portrayal of events and things like that, and it just kind of was this, a continuous veil of being removed and, yeah, it wasn't until I wanna say we started making the vaccine in the first quarter of the year.
Speaker 0: So it
Speaker 1: around the March time, is when I think it was actually being produced in our facility. And it would have been around that time that I was hearing about the loose sprays. And obviously as a Christian, that term's alarming. And so I researched it, and it's basically stuff that's found in nature, like fireflies, jellyfish, stuff along those lines. And they've basically patented it and have used it in studies of vaccines, which is where they inject the mice or whatever test subject with loose phrase in it.
And they're able to track with a certain light frequency in the body where that solution goes. And so that's what loose phrase is for. So so
Speaker 0: so it has been used within the vaccine industry before. It's not like something that's never never come into it. And it it looked like luciferase. I mean, you showed those vials and and and and that sort of phosphorous. What what reason do you think they would have for putting anything like luciferase in the Pfizer vaccine, do you think?
Speaker 1: So I have a few views on it. One could be to find out who got the vaccine is traceability, to know who actually got got it. It could also be this has been widely known to be an experimental vaccine. This was an experimental. And so my question is, is under that guise of experimental, were they able to leave it in in order to test the people who got it for how it reacts in the human body compared to mice.
That I don't know, but I do believe luzephyrase is toxic to humans. So I'm not a 100% sure. But I do know that it doesn't take a black light to see the glow. It it it can just be regular light. So
Speaker 0: Okay. And do do you do you have have you heard of anything else that that may have been put in these vaccines? I mean, I've I've heard things like Graphene oxide. Have you come across that before or or heard of that before?
Speaker 1: Yes. And I can probably rest some minds with people on if they're crazy or not because I have, some emails that I call the graphene oxide emails. Let me see if I can find them. Yes. Here they are.
Okay. So here's the first one. So what this is is this is a woman emailing, a man named Steve, And she's wanting to know, she's received a question from the public wanting to know is graphene oxide in the vaccine and she's suggesting this answer and wants approval on it. So her suggested response is, Graphene oxide is not used during the manufacturing of the vaccine and the final product does not contain Graphene oxide. We cannot guarantee that the immune amounts of substances are not contained in raw materials obtained from our suppliers.
To ensure that we have a consistent and reliable supply of medications, we must use a network of suppliers and manufacturing sites globally for both active and inactive ingredients. This is all code for we get our stuff from China, so we don't
Speaker 0: Yeah. I was just gonna say I just wrote it down in big letters, China. Yeah. Yeah. Right.
Yeah. Okay. That that's a bit of a cop out, isn't it? Alright. Well, that's a
Speaker 1: good honest answer. It's an honest answer from the company.
Speaker 0: It is an honest answer. Yeah. But it's a very, very clever way to to to, you know, to talk about it. Did you see this other email as well?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yes. The response she received is, hi, Sandra. It would obviously be preferred not to add that second sentence that we cannot guarantee, but it is our common disclaimer to protect against any ingredients that may be in our raw materials that we do not confirm against in any way. If we have the ability to specifically omit it, we should, but it would likely require some extensive confirmation from GCMC.
But I think that that is the same that we should go with for now. Hopefully, our customers would appropriately consider that disclaimer in the right way. So he suggests the lie. Just leave that second part out. Just say it's not in there, which again, I think Pfizer knew it would lead to vaccine hesitancy.
And so they just withheld information intentionally from the public.
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, I've talked to people, on this channel. I get a lot of top doctors, professors, and other people that speak to me, and I've asked the question before, would there be any good reason as to why Graphene oxide would be in the vaccines? And it's it's highly toxic. There is no good reason why it would be in the vaccines. Going back to yourself, Melissa, when you reached out, what what where was the point at what point did you say, I can't do this anymore?
I mean, a great job. I've been here for a long time, but you know what? I just can't do this anymore. What was the first, you know, point of that happening?
Speaker 1: Well, I will say that I didn't wanna be there for a while, starting in around 2019, and I would just constantly pray, you know, while you got me here, God, you're gonna have to have me fired if you don't want me here because I've accumulated too much debt. I've invested too much. I don't trust my own judgment. I need you to have me fired or use me while I'm here. And it was my breaking point was about so I found out I had, access to the internal Pfizer database in June of 2021.
And I started searching, phrases in that database, and I could never really find anything that seemed to matter or correlated with the conspiracy theory going around. And so whatever. Well, in August of 2021, I watched an interview between a woman named doctor Kristian Northrup and FlyOver Conservatives. And in it, she said that, they use codes in the pharma world, and here's what the codes are and what they mean. So I wrote all those.
I went to work the next day. And the first thing I searched was the HEK 293 T cells on the database. And I got those aborted fetal cell line emails is what I call them, which is somebody in that thread of emails that saved it to the database as kind of like a referral thing. So, like, if they get asked it again in the future, they already have the answer that they can refer
Speaker 0: to. Mhmm.
Speaker 1: And my grandmother is a devout Catholic. And the first email I read, the thread, it talked about how the Vatican had already approved the extensively vetted answer for their vaccine. So that the pope has basically said, pro lifers have no reason to not get the vaccine, so we need to stick with that answer. Because if they find because what they were trying to do was keep from public knowledge that aborted fetal cell lines were used in the confirmatory tests and development, and they were going through extreme measures in order to make sure that that didn't circulate in the public. So that was probably when I saw those documents, I obviously I had, like, an out of body experience.
Like, I felt like my whole world was fake. I felt like I everything I'd learned was a lie. I've been helping the devil essentially for 9 years, and I had a full blown internal meltdown. Obviously, when I'm at work, I can't express that. But after seeing those emails, I had to go work.
And while I was down there working, I saw the blacked out windows. That's when I took that video. And then I also just prayed a lot. What am I supposed to do? Was I supposed to see this?
Did I do something wrong? Should I do this? And a song came on that I had never heard before, and it really gave me peace and comfort. And all of a sudden, it's like I was on autopilot, and I went back upstairs. I did more searches, found more documents.
I took about 80 documents, off their database. And I just had this piece that I knew I wouldn't be returning. And I was kind of on autopilot. Like I said, out of body autopilot. Like, I, just saved all these documents and knew I just wouldn't be coming back.
I just knew I wouldn't. Mhmm. And I filed for a mental health leave of absence the following week. Because one, I wanted to make sure I wasn't crazy, and that what I was reading was actually there and that I was interpreting it correctly.
Speaker 0: And I
Speaker 1: did that by talking to people at Pfizer who were higher up. I did it by talking to people with better credentials than me in the tech world and in the scientific world.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Like, I made sure that this wasn't illegal. I didn't hack anything by mistake. Right? And I didn't and so the first people to respond to me in order to help me was project Veritas, and they released my story in October 2021.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So if you're interested in learning about the fetal cell line emails, I'd watch that because I go they covered that really well.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They did. They did an excellent job on it. Just a very quick question. Why why would they put, aborted fetus cells into a vaccine?
Is there a good reason for that?
Speaker 1: Well, I have a few ideas depending on your worldview. From a spiritual standpoint, it's pure evil against God. To not only be doing that to us, but to be doing that to the babies that they took these cells from. Second, from a worldly perspective, let's say you don't believe in any of that. The t in hek293 t means cancerous.
So they're cells that never die, never stop replicating. Another more PC term for these aborted fetal cells are immortal cell lines. They never die. So are they putting them into us as some sort of sick attempt to either give us all cancer or a sick attempt at making us immortal? What's, you know, I don't really know.
Those are kind of my views in the bible. It does say, as a curse that God gave against another nation. He said, I will make them eat the flesh of their children. And so I think about that, how these aborted fetal cell lines are in our food and and things like that. And a lot of people aren't even aware of that.
So
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: That's my Yeah.
Speaker 0: It's it's horrific. Alright. Look. I mean, this obviously took its toll on you. I mean, this was traumatic for you.
This is horrible stuff and you're working in a facility with blacked out windows and people saying, hey, don't worry, but it's okay, warp speed. And you're seeing these Chinese marked boxes come in and no and people are mixing this into the vaccine and nobody knows what's actually in it. This must have put a lot of pressure on you. When you did you did you did you resign from Pfizer before asking anything else? Did you actually resign?
Speaker 1: Well, they sent me a letter in the mail. They couldn't fire me while I was under a mental health leave of absence, so they waited till that was up on October 20th. They had informed me via security, in a voice mail saying I was not allowed on the premises, whatsoever under any means. And then I got a letter on October 20th saying, we heard that you quit, but even if you didn't, you've been terminated. You cannot return to the facility.
And it was like an angry 15 year old wrote it. It really was. So I was terminated. They can't prove that I've quit because I didn't. Everybody at the plants, everybody, even if they were fired for bad terms, like something bad, they got an exit interview.
I never got one. And I was kind of hoping that Pfizer would at least pretend to do the right thing by talking to me about this. And they didn't even pretend. Instead, they fired me and kept the people who were caught in the emails blatantly lying and deceiving the public.
Speaker 0: You were asking too many questions, I think, Melissa. That was the problem for them. You weren't just going along with anymore. You were asking questions, too many questions. We should all be asking a lot more questions about the, the the vaccines.
Taking a step back just taking a wee bit of a step back here. None of what you've said sounds normal. It just sounds there was something I mean, I I know there's other manufacturers like Moderna, for example, AstraZeneca that's just been pulled off the market. But just taking a step back from all of that, what do you think? You know?
What what do you think? Because you you know, that's happened a while ago, and you've we've obviously seen you talked about these t cells being cancerous, these these immortal cells that you referred to them. We are seeing excess deaths in all these highly vaccinated countries going off the charts. Early onset cancers is the more medical term. Turbocancers is what it's also been known as.
That's not quite so medical. But early onset cancer's off the charts. Myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, dermatological disorders, eye disorders, skin skin rashes. All these things have been happening.
Speaker 1: Now admitted giving 5,000,000 people AFib.
Speaker 0: Now explain what AFib is.
Speaker 1: AFib is just like an irregular, heartbeat.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: My mother my mother-in-law got the vaccine and the boost and she got it, and then so did, Derek Maults that we interviewed in one of my shows that He got Afib after the vaccine, and his wife is a cardiologist, and she said it was from the vaccine.
Speaker 0: When you look back and you see all these doctors, there's a there's a lot good ethical doctors. I have a lot of them on my channel. That were standing up and they were saying, look, this isn't right. This is just there's something not right here. And they were getting censored, and they were getting, you know, their careers destroyed, and their license to practice was taken away, and they kept pushing it.
And you would get free hamburgers and free taxi rides and free lottery tickets and all this stuff. What do you think? Was this all just a big accident? Do you think the the the the Adam Borla and Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum who has these closed door meetings with them all the time and Bill Gates, you know, sending a check for either 20,000 dollars or $200,000 to to Pfizer. What is what's what's going on here?
Was this just a big accident or or is there something more more to it, do you think?
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess I would compare it to is rape an accident? I guess. Because that's kind of how it feels. I'm sure that's how it will be framed, that Pfizer was deceived by China or that Pfizer remained ethical but others didn't and it's not their fault or Pfizer didn't lie to you, the media and politicians did, you know. Pfizer never issued any corrective statements, even on things that I knew were blatant lies such as we at Pfizer have to be aseptically trained, meaning sterile.
We know how the masks work. We know how long that they're considered sterile and how they should work. And when I knew that they made the mask, part of the uniform, and they only gave you one mask a day, I knew that we were no longer operating in sense and truth and science. So I believe it's intentional, but I certainly think if things do keep coming to light, Pfizer will be the victim.
Speaker 0: I mean, there's a lot of people, a lot of people that watch this channel who will be watching this and horrified to hear that everybody who said, you know, from Richie Sinek to Boris Johnson in the UK. These are politicians, if you I don't come across them, who who basically say, oh, yes. Safe and effective. Get your vaccine. You know, first of all, Biden's the same that Trudeau in Canada, you get the vaccine, you can't give anybody, or you can't catch it.
You can't catch COVID. Well, that was a lie. Then he said, when that got busted, they said, well, don't worry because it's, it it'll have less of a bad effect in you if you're vaccinated. Well, that was a lie. We we now have all the data.
If you got vaccinated, you were a lot more likely to get sick and injured by by the whatever was in whatever these Chinese ingredients were that was in, certainly, the Pfizer vaccine. So I think that there was, definitely and and the fact that Bill Gates is involved in that, and he's talked about you know, constantly talked about having too many people in the world is deeply alarming. But to to to take a step back even even further, do you think there was anything more nefarious going on in your opinion? You've had a chance to sort of look at this now, redo a bit more research. You're clearly a very, very intelligent young lady.
You've got a lot of, experience working in this. What's your your thoughts? Is there is there something is there something more to this, do you think?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. 100%. I I don't think Pfizer I don't think Bill Gates I don't think anybody who's behind any of this is stupid. We saw the gaslighting when it came known in the in Australia that Pfizer never tested transmissibility. And the issue with that is that I was saying that at the beginning when my when I found my documents, I had I had a PowerPoint slide that said they would like to know if it trans if it's transmissible.
So they they knew that. But here's the thing. They they mislead and they they use, how do I say this? Heavily scripted responses to where they're not lying, but they're being deceptive. And I think that even Fauci, Trump, Pelosi, all of these people, to some extent, were were tricked in a way as well.
Now do I think they're leading it? No. I think they're puppets, being told what to do and say and things like that. But we saw the gaslighting of the public when they said, oh, we never tested transmissibility. And they were like, we've been clear about that.
No. No. They haven't. Pfizer doesn't issue corrective statements. They let the fact checkers do that, and the fact checkers are wrong.
Because I was fact checked as an employee that was just simply wrong. And so I definitely think that, again, from a spiritual perspective, these people hate God. They want to destroy God's image and they want to just alter his creation as their own. And from a worldly perspective, they want a lot of money and power. And they, they certainly are after the money more than anything, I think.
And I think that they're getting that through the power. And I I am afraid to see what happens if they don't be held accountable.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I mean, one of the things that that seems to be clear is that there's more and more coming out. They're they're fighting it very hard now to to withstand it. I mean, I don't know how you feel about it. I think there should be a new Nuremberg trial.
I think Adam Bourla, Bill Gates, politicians, senators, everybody that went along with his doctors that administered it knew they need to be on trial, and they need to be sent to prison. And, you talked about Stu Peters. I was actually just on the Stu Peters show just before I came on with you and that's why I was slightly late. Well, blame Stu. There you go.
Stu Peter's a good guy, and he talks about extreme accountability. And you know what, Melissa? I think it's coming. I think that people realize what's been done to them. By the way, I I I tend to share your your view.
I believe these globalists at the top are absolutely, haters of humanity. I believe they've declared war on humanity itself. And I'd just like to say to you, you know, as I always do, I always give our guests the last word. So I'm gonna give you the last last 2 or 3 minutes to to to say whatever you wanna say. And by the way, let me ask you a very quick question, then you say whatever you wanna say.
But anybody that's thinking of getting getting any vaccine, m any mRNA gene altering vaccine, what would you say to them?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I have a couple views on this. I do believe that, you know, if you're given full informed consent, then I suppose if you wanna get it, I mean, whatever. But unfortunately, at the same time, it does impact others' lives, if you receive it due to shedding or, just people's loved ones are being negatively impacted through this. I personally say no. MRNA technology is not safe.
It is not ethical. And the flu vaccine, is now infiltrated with mRNA, at least from Pfizer. So I wouldn't even be getting any flu shots or really, I've totally cut out any kind of injectable, which would be my advice to people because, you know, hey. Let's just say you believe in evolution and you don't believe in God whatsoever. Our species got to where we are today without vaccines just fine.
Speaker 0: We did indeed. Alright. Well, look, Melissa, I've gotta say, it's been an absolute pleasure to have you here on the show. It takes a lot of courage, a lot of, real guts to to stand up and and tell the truth. And I can see your faith shining through strongly in that, and that will carry you further forward as well.
I do believe that there will be justice and that goodwill triumph over the great evil that has been done to humanity. Unfortunately, these people can cause a lot of misery and death in between, but I do believe that one day they will be held to account. I would wanna be in their positions. Oh, yeah. But but thank you, Melissa.
Would would you would you be prepared to come back on again at any future point?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Anytime. Just let me know.
Speaker 0: Alright. Fantastic. Well, I would like to say say a massive thank you to you, and I'd also like to say a big thank you to all the people who are watching this as well. You know, here we have another very courageous young lady who's standing up for the truth. She's gone to great risk in many ways, but as we can see, she's fighting fit and healthy.
There's nothing wrong with her at all, and indeed, I think that sometimes the more public you are, the more protected you are in many ways, and I think you've done the right thing. But to all the people out there, please do give this a share. It do help. It does help to encourage people coming on to the show who are going to great risk, if if you wanna call it that. And, you know, telling their stories and and telling the truth because they care about humanity.
They clear they care, and Melissa clearly clearly cares about everybody out there who might be thinking about these vaccines or may who may have, unfortunately become either killed by them or injured by them. So please do give, a follow, and and give Melissa a follow as well. You've got a great channel there, Melissa. We'll put in the links, to to this when it goes to editing, but once again, my sincere thanks to you. Is there any final parting comments you would like to to add to that?
Speaker 1: Well, if I didn't, you know, totally rain on your parade for Pfizer yet, there is one more document I would like to show that I think shows the seriousness of what we're dealing with. This is a PowerPoint slide on the COVID 19 vaccine safety data. Right? As you can see at the top there. But what is most concerning is more so the fine print at the bottom, which says by February 16th of 2021.
So the vaccine had been out for about 2 to 3 months. Based on the code of federal regulations of one of the following reported, death, life threatening illness, hospitalization, or prolongation of hospitalization, permanent disability, congenital anomaly anomaly, sorry, or birth defects includes 456 reports of death following the Moderna COVID 19 vaccine, and 510 reports of death following the COVID Pfizer vaccine. So what this shows us here is that they knew early on from the VAERS reporting data, which a lot of people like to say VAERS isn't reliable. Well, VAERS isn't reliable because it's actually greater than what VAERS shows. So I think we definitely need to take that into consideration with who we're dealing with.
That they knowingly allowed 510 people to die within a short frame of time. So that should so show their moral and ethics to people, that they knew. They still allowed the mandates. They still allowed the rollout, when we've recalled things for much less. And I I just hope and pray that we can at least wake up the masses.
I I think we should all be able to unite under one thing, which is to not let the globalists win. And I think we're united instead of focusing on our differences, that we could do that.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. Absolutely agree with you. You know, Patriots in America and Canada, you know, in Kingdom and Australia and New Zealand and France and Germany and Europe and all over the world need to come together because we can't fight them alone. And, you you might not be aware of this, but I did start a freedom movement called Freedom Trade International about 15 months ago. I did it very quietly.
We launched in January. We have multiple thousands of members now all around the world, and that's where we're bringing people together. We're getting people ready because, unfortunately, I'm worried that they might be starting to pick up on other things that that might lead to another future pandemic as well. H five n one in Texas is before. You know, we would discuss it briefly before we went to recording.
And, unfortunately, you know, there's some some humans in now in Australia that are saying we've been infected. Don't comply.
Speaker 1: Fight back. Don't comply. We did it last time.
Speaker 0: We'll do
Speaker 1: it again or We I I fear what could actually happen again if we comply.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, Luke, stay strong. God bless you, Melissa. And thank you once again. It's been a real honor to have you on the show, and I wish you every success.
And you're a friend of the channel though. You can reach out to me at any point. I pick up my DMs regularly, so don't be a stranger. And, if there's anything else that you need any help with, and you want my support, just reach out right away.
Speaker 1: Thank you. I greatly appreciate it. Thanks for using your platform to get the truth out.
Speaker 0: Yeah. We're we're all in this together. Alright. Well, look, everybody, thanks very much indeed for this. It's been a very, very interesting broadcast, and, I wish everybody gold speed and and and safe health, to each and every one of you.
Thanks, Melissa. This is Jim Ferguson. We'll speak soon. Bye bye for now.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Science Minister was questioned about the statement "we own the science" made by Melissa Fleming, a contributor to the World Economic Forum and UN Comms Director. The concern is that this globalist attitude extends beyond climate change. The Minister responded by stating that research is supposed to be impartial. However, when asked about the funding of regulators and universities by the WEF to influence research, he did not provide a clear answer.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
“We own the science” leads to disaster. I asked the Science Minister about World Economic Forum contributor - and UN Comms Director - Melissa Fleming’s recent statement: “we own the science.” She was talking about Climate change, but this is the globalist attitude across the board. In reply I was told it is “intrinsic in the scientific method that research is impartial.” So what will he do about WEF funding of regulators and Universities being used to direct research? He didn’t say.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum representative at Davos emphasized owning science and sharing it globally. The government ensures UK scientific research remains impartial, objective, and ethical, regardless of funding sources. Research is transparent, challenged, and publicly accessible. The commitment is to fully fund research and elevate the UK into a science and technology superpower.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A representative of the World Economic Forum told the audience at Davos that, and I quote, we own the science. You know, we own the science and we think that the world, you know, should know it. What steps is the government taking to ensure that scientific research in the UK is impartial, objective, and ethical regardless of who's funding it?
Speaker 1: Mister speaker, it is absolutely right. It's in intrinsic in the scientific method. The research is impartial. The research is challenged, and it's public and transparent and open. That is always our commitment, but our commitment is also to fully fund research and turn this country into the science and technology superpower that it deserves
Speaker 0: to be.
reSee.it AI Summary
A widow shares her husband's experience with Covid-19, stating he seemed to be improving before being given Midazolam and subsequently passing away. A nurse with 45 years of experience expresses surprise at the use of Midazolam for sleep. The inquiry questions the use of Midazolam in care settings during the pandemic, while also focusing on unrelated gossip.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
“He FaceTimed me. He looked really well. He was up and dressed… he was laughing and joking.” Widow Lianne Menzies tells the Scottish Covid Inquiry how her 38 year old husband Jamie was getting better, was given Midazolam “to help him sleep”, then died. Experienced nurse John Campbell: “I’ve never, ever in forty five years of nursing given Midazolam to help someone sleep.” What on earth went on in care settings with Midazolam during the pandemic? The English Covid Inquiry, meanwhile, is fearlessly grilling Sue Gray about Westminster gossip. Shameful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHBpD7cuNB4&t=131s
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
The narrative isn't just crumbling, it's coming apart in huge slabs. Remember when this was a "conspiracy theory'? https://t.co/eRRgIp28c6
reSee.it AI Summary
University of Lynchburg athlete Frank Csorba, who recently helped win a national track and field title, has tragically passed away. The cause of his death has not been disclosed. It is worth noting that the university required Covid-19 vaccinations in 2021.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
"What next for the future?" University of Lynchburg athlete Frank Csorba talks in this heartbreaking video recorded one month ago about his plans, shortly after helping bring a national track and field title home. Now he's dead. Cause of death has not been released. His university mandated Covid 19 vaccinations in 2021. https://lynchburg.edu/news/2021/06/lynchburg-to-require-covid-19-vaccine-for-fall-2021-lifting-all-restrictions-for-those-vaccinated/ #diedsuddenly (April 2024) https://newsadvance.com/sports/college/frank-csorba-decorated-university-of-lynchburg-runner-dies-at-23/article_73065d34-034c-11ef-bb2e-9f2093c76e97.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Frank Zorba felt overwhelmed before the race but ended up running with no expectations, which turned out to be a blessing. His focus is currently on the 5k, with no plans for doubles. He hopes to compete in the 10k at Colonial Relay next.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Frank Zorba of Lynchburg off of 1355, number one time in e 35 kit. What are your first thoughts?
Speaker 1: Overwhelmed. Funny enough, I actually told Jake yesterday,
Speaker 0: our coach, that I didn't wanna run today. Because
Speaker 1: then training hasn't been going well and it was very much go out here with no expectations to try and get
Speaker 0: a base hit. And honestly, that might have been the biggest blessing in
Speaker 1: the world to have no tension and no expectations on
Speaker 0: the race. So looking forward, what's next for you?
Speaker 1: Well, according to Jake, if I had done well today, I would get through on a
Speaker 0: 10 k at Colonial Relay. So we'll see if he holds up his end of the deal that. And, are are you expecting the either the 5 k or the 10 k be your focus or perhaps the double come come the outdoor national meet?
Speaker 1: As of right now, 5
Speaker 0: k is the focus.
Speaker 1: Alright. No doubles.
Speaker 0: I don't do well off the doubles. Well, thanks so much, and best of luck,
Lynchburg to require COVID-19 vaccine for Fall 2021, lifting all restrictions for those vaccinated
The University of Lynchburg’s COVID-19 Task Force today finalized plans for the opening of classes in August. Those plans include mandatory vaccinations and a lifting of most COVID-19 restrictions.
lynchburg.edu
Frank Csorba, decorated University of Lynchburg runner, dies at 23
Frank Csorba, a runner at the University of Lynchburg who last month helped bring a national track and field title to the school, died unexpectedly Tuesday. He was 23 years
newsadvance.com
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
Reports out of France that footballer François-Xavier Fumu Tamuzo is taking Pfizer, BioNtech and the French Football Federation to court, claiming that the experimental Covid 19 injections ended his career prematurely. https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2024/former-laval-player-takes-pfizer-biontech-and-fff-to-court/
Former Laval player takes Pfizer, BioNTech, and FFF to court - Get French Football News
According to France Bleu Mayenne, François-Xavier Fumu Tamuzo will take Pfizer and BioNTech laboratories to court after alleging that the COVID-19 vaccine may
getfootballnewsfrance.com
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
Remember what they said in April 2020 about #Midazolam and #Euthanasia House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee, Oral evidence: Preparations for Coronavirus, HC36. Friday 17 April 2020. Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 17 April 2020 https://t.co/56uhTi0EZc
Video Transcript AI Summary
A good death requires equipment, medication, and staff. There are enough syringe drivers in the NHS for comfort care. Precautions are in place for medication supply, including morphine and midazolam. Morphine is prescribed per patient to prevent abuse, but there is consideration to relax laws to avoid waste. The supply chain team and clinical team discuss reducing wastage of key medicines. No further comments were made on this topic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With that, I mean, a a a good death needs 3 things. It needs equipment, it needs medication, and it needs, the staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment, a few quick questions. Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to deliver medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away? Yes.
We do. There was a challenge raised about this, about 8 days ago, and we resolved actually, it wasn't so as big
Speaker 1: a challenge as as was made public, and we've we've resolved that. So, yes, right now we do.
Speaker 0: And the second one is with that, but that's the the syringe is to deliver medication, particularly things like midazolam and morphine. Do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to to be delivered? Yes.
Speaker 1: And we've got a big project to make sure that, those sorts of medications as well as the ITU medications that I spoke about earlier, the the supply chains global supply chains for those medicines are are clear. They are in fact, though those medicines are made in a relatively small number of factories around the world. So it is a delicate supply chain, and we are in contact with the whole
Speaker 0: supply chain. And in line with that, morphine is currently prescribed per patient. The reason to do that is to stop it being abused. So I have to prescribe it for mister Hancock. However, in this situation, if you're going into a health care home, you may not want to waste precious things like morphine.
Have you considered relaxing the laws around morphine prescribing for doctors and health care professionals so that there isn't waste?
Speaker 1: That's something that we keep under review. I've looked at that particular point to reduce wastage of key medicines, and it's something that the supply chain the supply team, sorry, in, in the department and, the clinical team, talk about all the time. I don't know if that's JV part of the clinical team, and he may want to say more.
Speaker 0: Thank you. I've I've nothing really nothing really to add on that. Okay. Okay. Thank you.
Rosie Cooper.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
Dr John Campbell (@Johnincarlisle) discusses a scientific paper from Japan that shows a worrying link between a rise in deaths from cancer after the third experimental Covid 19 vaccine (booster). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onww2X-ecfg
reSee.it AI Summary
Australian politicians are speaking out against the World Economic Forum's influence on global democracies. They argue that unelected individuals are pushing policies that could harm people's livelihoods.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
At least some Australian politicians are saying what needs to be said about the subversion of our democracies around the world by very rich and powerful members of the World Economic Forum. People you have never heard of, never elected and who are promoting policies that will impoverish you and your families lives.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Australian senator, Alex Antic, exposes the totalitarian aspirations of Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum, and its 'Great Reset' agenda, in the Australian parliament. "The WEF is steeped in authoritarianism and Marxist ideology. It's an ideology which is creeping into governments across the world... It is imperative that we pay close attention to the World Economic Forum, and do all that we can to preserve liberty, and reduce government intrusion in our lives. And if we fail to do so, the anti democratic forces in the West will continue to march on, and we may wake up to an Australia that we no longer recognise." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zKoXAnqYYCU Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum promotes globalist issues and advocates for extreme COVID measures. They push for the abolition of private property, echoing Marxist ideology. The forum's goal is the "great reset," reimagining economic policies post-pandemic. Their influence spans politics, business, and the arts, aiming to minimize individual freedoms in the name of climate change. It is crucial to resist their anti-capitalist agenda to protect liberty and prevent government overreach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum is steeped in authoritarianism and Marxist ideology. It's an ideology which is creeping into governments across the world. To quote Schwab himself when speaking about the Canadian parliament.
Speaker 1: We penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday, I was at a at a reception for prime minister Trudeau, and I would know that half of this cabinet or even more half of this cabinet are actually young double leaders of the world economy. That's true in Argentina as well. It's true in Argentina and, it's true in France now. I'm here with the president, with the young global leader.
Speaker 0: The World Economic Forum promotes globalist issues such as climate change, so called systemic racism and sexism, and creating an online digital identity. However, closer inspection reveals the World Economic Forum is an anti capitalist, anti free market organization that seeks to subvert Western values and political processes. And they are very organized and very well funded. Their message is designed to appear harmless when in fact, the ideology that underpins it is revolutionary and destructive. They train aspirational leaders in their ideology and help them make connections in spheres, including politics, business, and the arts.
The World Economic Forum has consistently advocated for the harshest and most extreme COVID, measures possible, including lockdowns, mandatory vaccinations, vaccine passports, and mask mandates, despite these policies assaulting many of our basic liberties. The forum believes that your freedoms should be minimized to prevent the imminent climate catastrophe. The one that's becoming coming for 10 years in the last 50 years, by the way. The central theme of the World Economic Forum's material is what they call the great reset, which is Klaus Schwab's term for the opportunity the pandemic has presented to reimagine and reinvent the economic policies of the west. The term comes from Schwab directly himself with his 2020 book entitled, The Great In a now deleted video titled 8 predictions for the world in 2030, the World Economic Forum claimed that you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
A slogan that hits the same dystopian note as work makes you free and ignorance is strength. You don't have to be a political philosopher to figure out that if you own nothing, the state owns everything. There's a word for this. It's called communism. The World Economic Forum and its affiliate affiliates shamelessly promote the abolition of private property, a central facet of Karl Marx' demented Utopian ideology, which led to the deaths of tens of millions of people worldwide in the 20th century.
No matter how sophisticated the World Economic Forum tries to make the abolition of private property around the world sound, the fantasies of Karl Marx always lead to the crushing of individuals' liberties and lives and the expansion of the state's tyranny and power. It is imperative that we pay close attention to the World Economic Forum and do all that we can to preserve liberty and reduce government intrusion in our lives. And if we fail to do so, the anti democratic forces in the west will continue to march on. And we may wake up to an Australia that we no longer recognize. Australians deserve to know the extent to which the World Economic Forum's influence and infiltration of our country and how far it has gone, and we're gonna find out.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Yesterday, MPs and Peers were provided with NHS data showing a significant rise in illnesses after the Covid 19 vaccine rollout. This information leaves no room for ignorance or denial. I hope my colleagues will join me in discussing the pandemic response and excess deaths in the House of Commons on April 18th.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
Yesterday, all MPs and Peers received a summary of the NHS’ own data, which indicates huge increases in illness from Spring 2021 following the experimental Covid 19 vaccine rollout. None of them can now say they didn’t know or were not told. It’s all in the NHS data itself. I hope that colleagues will be now enthusiastic to support my debate on the Covid 19 pandemic response and trends in excess deaths on Thursday 18th April in the House of Commons.
reSee.it AI Summary
Yesterday, MPs and Peers received NHS data showing significant illness increases after the Covid vaccine rollout. They can no longer claim ignorance. I hope my colleagues will support my debate on pandemic response and excess deaths on April 18th in the House of Commons.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
Yesterday, all MPs and Peers received a summary of the NHS’ own data, which indicates huge increases in illness from Spring 2021 following the experimental Covid 19 vaccine rollout. None of them can now say they didn’t know or were not told. It’s all in the NHS data itself. I hope that colleagues will be now enthusiastic to support my debate on the Covid 19 pandemic response and trends in excess deaths on Thursday 18th April in the House of Commons.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
If this does not wake people up, what will? Do you think we will get an emergency debate in Parliament on this? https://www.thailandmedical.news/news/breaking-japanese-researchers-warn-about-risks-associated-with-blood-transfusions-from-covid-19-mrna-vaccinated-individuals
BREAKING! Japanese Researchers Warn About Risks Associated With Blood Transfusions From COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated Individuals - Thailand Medical News
COVID-19 News: The COVID-19 pandemic, declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020, has spurred unprecedented efforts to develop and deploy genetic vaccination programs worldwide. Genetic vaccines, particularly those utilizing mRNA technology, have emerged as powerful tools in combating SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, concerns have been raised regarding potential risks associated with bl...
thailandmedical.news
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
Montgomery Toms knows what is going on with the WHO, isn’t it time you found out how it will affect your life?
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
This morning, I asked @PennyMordaunt for a debate in government time on those who commit crimes against humanity and the appropriate punishment for those people. The Leader of the House's response says it all! They all know what has and what is being perpetrated against the people.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Madam Brigitte, I've always opposed capital punishment, but recent events make me reconsider. Can we debate appropriate punishment for those involved in crimes against humanity? The honorable gentleman's question is subtle, given recent conspiracy theories. I urge him to consider his behavior, especially on social media, which has raised security concerns. Despite our disagreements, I am willing to help him, but will speak out against actions that threaten democracy and safety in the house.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Madam Brigitte.
Speaker 1: Thank you, madam, dear, dear speaker. I've always opposed capital punishment, on, the principle that it's wrong to take a life, so so it can't be right for the state to take a life, in revenge. Events have caused me to reconsider my position. So, madam deputy speaker, can we have a debate on crimes against humanity and the appropriate punishment for those who perpetuate, could could collude, and cover up for these atrocities? Atrocities and crimes so severe that the ultimate punishment may be required.
Speaker 0: I think the, honorable gentleman's incredibly subtle question, is not lost on, anyone in this house where he might be taking it. Yeah. It is appropriate that, the finale of this session, which has featured so heavily, conspiracy theories, should fall to the honorable gentleman. And I would just caution him also just to reflect, with the things that have been said, about, his own behavior, what he does on social media, the security measures that have had to be stepped up for honorable members in this place in the wake of some of his social media tweets and questions in this house. Whatever I, my disagreements with the honorable gentleman, I will always stand ready to get answers from departments, and assist the honorable gentleman in his work, But I'm going to call out on every occasion, when he is doing things that are, I think, a danger to our democracy and also the safety and security of members of this house.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
I believe people will be going to prison for what has been done in our hospitals and care homes to the elderly and vulnerable. https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-banned-end-of-life-pathway-that-has-never-gone-away/
The banned end-of-life pathway that has never gone away - The Conservative Woman
The banned end-of-life pathway that has never gone away
conservativewoman.co.uk
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson and Rand Paul criticize the handling of COVID-19, with Carlson calling it a major crime. They argue that while many were arrested for January 6, no one has been held accountable for the impact of COVID-19. Rand Paul accuses Anthony Fauci of funding risky research in China and benefiting financially from the pandemic, stating that Fauci lied to Congress and should be imprisoned.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
Tucker Carlson calls COVID-19 “the greatest crime ever committed.” Do you agree? A thousand people were arrested for January 6, but no one has been arrested for the crimes of COVID. “Millions of people died, and it's related to a funding decision by Anthony Fauci to fund dangerous research in China,” Rand Paul declared in a previous interview. Moreover, Fauci enriched himself over the course of the pandemic, increasing his wealth from $7 million to $12 million.” “Anthony Fauci lied to Congress. And the bottom line is he deserves to be in prison.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Millions dead, no arrests made. Anthony Fauci compared to J. Edgar Hoover for authoritarian tendencies. Fauci under constant security, receiving large sums of money during pandemic. Conflict of interest with vaccine manufacturers. Accusations of lying to congress. Concerns about double standards and potential chaos in the country. Ideology over skin color may lead to trouble.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As you put it up, 1,000,000 died. And, you know, we've had over a 1000 people arrested for milling around the capital 3 years ago, January 6th. No one's been arrested for this. Millions dead? No one's been arrested?
My brother ran into Tony Fauci in our family dog park in Washington the other day. He had secret service protection. He's retired. He works at Georgetown. He doesn't work for the US government.
He is government finance security. I don't. I mean, how I so not only my point is he not only has not been punished, he's living continuing to live at public expense at the highest possible level. He's being lauded. When does someone get punished for what has gotta be the greatest crime ever committed?
Speaker 1: So I wrote a comparison between Anthony Fauci and J. Edgar Hoover. So I think there are similarities. They both were or had a great impulse to be an authoritarian. Hoover may have had more power to be that authoritarian, but they served for way too long, decade after decade, and then abused their power over time.
But you're right. Anthony Fauci is not gone. He is a limo and a limo driver and security 247 because they say he's had threats. Well, I had 34 threats once earlier this week in a week. 34 threats in a week, including people who say know where I am on a certain day at home, and they'll see me there.
We can't arrest them. We know who they are because they don't say they're going to kill me. They just laugh and say, see you there. You know, look around. I may be there.
And but nobody gives me special protection on that. We have our own now. We've had to hire our own, and I have people who work for me who are armed and policemen. I won't anybody think I don't have protection. We do have protection.
But the thing is is we're not sure that Anthony Fauci is not still being paid. We've asked whether he's being paid, and we've asked who's paying for his security. We do know that when he was active, he made about between him and his wife, his wife was in charge of ethics. So if there was ever a problem with Anthony Fauci not being ethical, his wife would review the ethics, which I'm sure she was pure to you know, sure to tell him that if he was doing anything unethical, but their combined salary is about 800,000. His wealth went from 7,000,000 to 12,000,000 during the pandemic.
He got a $1,000,000 prize from a private foundation. What kind of what kind of, person civil servants allowed to take a $1,000,000 prize? Did anybody investigate whether the foundation has anything to do with pharma? We now have money going from the vaccine manufacturers to NIH. Moderna shares the patent.
You say, well, that's fair. The scientists in h did a lot of research. $400,000,000 went from Moderna to the NIH. But my question is this, it may sound fair, but how can the NIH or any of these people be objective now in deciding whether we should have to take a vaccine because they got $400,000,000? Wouldn't that conflict you as far as deciding whether we had a mandate that every 6 month old get a vaccine?
So it it just never ends here. But Anthony Fauci lied to congress, and the bottom line is he deserves to be in prison. If he'd have been a Trump supporter, he'd have been in prison long ago because you're right. There are 2 sets of standards. And this is one of the things that's tearing the country apart, and I fear will lead to chaos in our country if it gets worse.
And that is that people will come to believe that it depends on my ideology, not the color of my skin
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: But the shade of my ideology is what will get me in trouble.
reSee.it AI Summary
A video news report challenges the notion that there were no excess deaths in children during the height of the Covid pandemic. It suggests that following the introduction of experimental mRNA jabs, excess deaths in children have surged by 8 percent. The report accuses health authorities, regulators, big pharma, and the mainstream media of covering up evidence of harm caused by these vaccines. The video questions the safety claims made by Pfizer and alleges that thousands of children have been killed by the jabs, despite their low risk from the virus.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
If anyone calls you an anti-vaxxer or a conspiracy theorist, tell them to watch this video news report and remind them that there were NO excess deaths in children during 2020 when Covid was at its most virulent. However, following the rollout of the experimental mRNA jabs (that are NOT traditional vaccines), excess deaths in children has surged to an astonishing 8 percent, whilst the health authorities, the regulators, big pharma and the mainstream media continue to try and cover up the evidence of their crimes against children. Pfizer stated after their safety trials... 'There were no adverse events in our safety study with children', this news report exposes that this is a monumental lie which the statistics indicate has directly resulted in thousands of children around the world being killed by these jabs, to supposedly protect them against a disease which healthy children were always at zero risk from... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fC90quQ6oz8
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP
This is from a nurse on the front line. She is very brave, so many NHS staff have told me privately. We must protect her at all costs. https://t.co/xz4LfmVppB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Excess deaths in the UK are being overlooked, according to a registered nurse. The nurse highlights a predicted 13% increase in excess deaths, with funeral homes struggling to store all the deceased bodies. Andrew Bridgen is one of the few addressing this issue, holding a debate in parliament. Data shows that the rise in deaths is not primarily among the elderly, but rather in the 50 to 65 age group, with heart and circulatory problems being the main cause. The nurse suggests a possible correlation between the mRNA vaccine rollout and the increase in cardiac and circulatory issues. The nurse urges people to acknowledge the severity of the situation and take action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is no one talking about the excess deaths in the UK? I've been a registered nurse for 9 years, and I can't even begin to tell you what I'm seeing. Excess deaths are predicted to be up around 13% surely this is a humanitarian crisis it should be printed on every single newspaper Paper and billboard in this country, but everyone's just carrying on like nothing's happening. What I'm seeing is so concerning and you deserve to know Funeral homes are even having to get extra storage to store all the deceased bodies. People are waiting weeks to even just register the death of their loved one because There's such a backlog but one person who is talking about it is Andrew Bridgen.
Last week he held a debate in parliament to discuss the excess UK deaths. The data published shows that the increase in deaths isn't in our elderly population, it's actually in the 50 to 65 year old age group and the biggest surge in excess deaths is caused by heart and circulatory problems. We're just seeing so much more heart failure, cardiac arrests in young people, multiple blood clots on the lungs and clots in the blood. So the biggest question is why is this happening? The data presented at parliament suggests a correlation between the rollout of the mRNA vaccine and this increase in cardiac and circulatory problems.
Guys our country is falling to ill health, people are both sick and dying. We need to stop talking about this.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Why would NZ police arrest the whistleblowers if their evidence was debunked?
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Liz Gunn, Leader of the @NZLoyal lays it on the line about excess deaths and the vaccines. When did they know? https://t.co/6Ogu5CO6NW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the alarming number of deaths potentially linked to a vaccinator. They mention the case of Harold Shipman, who had 260 deaths attributed to him, and express concern about the vaccinator's unawareness. They also mention interviews with a vaccinator who reads death notices daily and individuals who have attended multiple funerals. The impact on Maori and Pacific Islanders is highlighted, with one person sharing their emotional breakdown after attending 60 funerals in 11 months. The speakers criticize the exemptions given to politicians and elites in New Zealand and express anger and betrayal. They discuss the idea of giving politicians multiple vaccine doses before leaving Parliament. The conversation ends with a reflection on the trauma experienced by the country and the difficulty some people have in processing the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But but I saw I saw potentially 400 deaths linked to 1 vaccinator. You know, That that vaccinator may not even realize.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 0: I mean, this is this is horrific stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't think Harold Shipman managed that. No? He didn't? He was like 260. I've actually interviewed a, a vaccinator Here, Liz, who now works on a farm and she reads the death notices every day from her her town, terrified that she's Participated.
And even now, we just interviewed, we were at, say, the Caledonian, the guy runs that, Brad, he's had 6 funerals In the last few months, another couple joined us and in the last year they've had 17 in their funeral. I mean this is insane.
Speaker 0: Well, in New Zealand, the Maori and Pacific Islanders have big extended families. And they were really focused on by Jacinda Ardern and all her co toing. And, there was a beautiful Pacific Island a fellow who I just so wanted on the board of New Zealand Loyal and he broke down when I talked to him. He just broke down sobbing. He's a big warrior man And he said, Liz I have been to 60 funerals in 11 months.
I can't carry 1 more coffin. I can't do 1 more tangy, I can't do 1 more speech about some little baby or some little boy or, you know, an elder who should not yet be dead. So it is really affecting our Pacific island and Maori brothers and sisters. They're going to so many funerals now.
Speaker 1: Also the thing that's come out from New Zealand was that Freedom of Information that showed that they had 11,000 exemptions, most of them the politicians And the elite, really. It's that staggering. So they're push even though they've been exempt, they're just pushing and saying it's safe and effective and they don't know because they haven't taken it. You know?
Speaker 0: It's just graceful. I I was in the meetings going around with New Zealand Royal. It was kind of a joke, but not because nobody nobody knows what they would do with somebody like Jacinda Ardern. And it's the same, you know, with every world leader who has pushed this, what do you do with someone who has murdered their own people and sanctioned the murder of their own people. And and I was I was saying, you know, in the discussions, Well, maybe before all these 120 politicians who didn't get the jabs, before they leave, we could just line them all up and say, before you go, we are really worried we want you to be safe and this is very effective so we are going to give you 3 of these jabs before you leave Parliament just to make sure you are safe out there.
Yeah. I mean that's entirely inappropriately facetious but there is an anger behind that, there is a hurt behind that, there is such a deep betrayal in all of this. Our country, Michael, I think many people are deeply traumatized now in this country. Deeply traumatized. And in some quarters, it's only a small number of Kiwis.
But the viciousness online, I look at it and I pity these people. I had I had somebody I've known for for, I don't know, 16 months. I've being in weekly contact with just totally viciously continually attacking me just from the week before the election. And I really pissy that person because I think some people's minds can't cope with this much trauma. It's like Being in a very, very traumatic family situation, like a drunk or something like that, where you have a drunk parent and you're traumatized every night.
That's what this country feels like Now very
Speaker 1: Well, you're in a you're in a shoot the messenger situation. That's where we are. You know? Easier to shoot the messenger than deal with the truth. And the and the truth is overwhelming for lots of people.
They just can't comprehend it. You know? And and the reality is, is when did they know? When did they know?
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
It just gets worse... https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/david-cameron-met-vaccines-minister-firm-he-advises-won-health-contracts/
David Cameron met vaccines minister before firm he advises won health contracts
Exclusive: Ex-PM met the vaccines minister to discuss genome sequencing – two months before the genome firm he advises won contracts worth £870,000
opendemocracy.net
reSee.it AI Summary
The approved Covid-19 vaccine differs from what was given to the public. The clinical trial used one process, but production switched to another, posing different risks. The Pfizer vaccine contains undisclosed components, including SV40, not mentioned to regulators or patients. Watch the full video for more details.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
The Covid-19 'Vaccine' Approved by Regulators Isn't What Was Given to the Public Full video: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/kevin-mckernan-plasmid-mrna-vaccines/ 🇺🇸 Kevin McKernan: "This all started back in April with this preprint where we did this RNA sequencing that Mark [Trozzi] was just mentioning. [...] What is not in that preprint is something that Retsef Levi and Josh Guetzkow presented in the BMJ, which is that the vials that were in fact approved are not the vials that were given to the public. The clinical trial was run on something known as Process 1 that used PCR to make the DNA that was going to then turn into the RNA to make the spike protein. Once the trial was complete, they switched. This is a big bait and switch. They moved to a production process that manufactured this DNA in E.coli. And with that, comes a different risk. "Upon sequencing these, I think the most striking revelation was that the Pfizer vaccines actually had a component that was not disclosed to the regulators. This plasmid map on the right is what was disclosed to the EMA. And there is no mention of the SV40 components that are that are now known to be inside this DNA sequence. The plasmid on the left is what we actually found, very similar in length, but has all of these other components in it that are not disclosed to the regulators, nor to the patients taking these." Find this video to share on Rumble, Twitter, Odysee, Facebook, Gettr & Bitchute. Watch full hearing & sign up for updates: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/dna Follow: ➡️@WCH_org 📧 NEWSLETTER | 🌳 LINKTREE 🌐 http://WorldCouncilforHealth.org
Kevin McKernan: Plasmid Derived dsDNA Contamination in mRNA "Vaccines"
Kevin McKernan sequenced nucleic acid in Moderna and Pfizer vials and found that as much as 35% was DNA from bacterial plasmids.
worldcouncilforhealth.org
Urgent Expert Hearing on Reports of DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines
In light of recent reports of DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines, WCH has organized an Urgent Expert Hearing on this critical topic.
worldcouncilforhealth.org
World Council for Health | There's A Better Way
World Council for Health is a non-profit organization for the people that seeks to broaden public health knowledge and sense-making through science.
worldcouncilforhealth.org
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Please watch this update on my letter to PM Rishi Sunak regarding the Pfizer vaccine. I am still awaiting a response. https://t.co/mYTHvR7fSR
Video Transcript AI Summary
I informed Prime Minister Rishi Sunak about evidence from Dr. Josh Gutschko suggesting that Pfizer had conducted a bait and switch operation with their vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine tested on 22,000 individuals was not the same as the one rolled out globally. The change in guidelines by the MHRA on the second day of mass vaccination, requiring people to stay for 15 minutes due to the risk of anaphylactic shock, supports this claim. Anaphylactic shock occurs when there are endotoxins in the vaccines, which are present when they are cultured in Escherichia coli. This indicates that the vaccine distributed worldwide was not manufactured to the same standards as the approved one. Informed consent was therefore not possible, as people were given an untested vaccine. I am still awaiting a response from the Prime Minister regarding this crucial matter. (134 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On the 7th August this year, I wrote to prime minister Rishi Sunak with evidence that I'd received from doctor Josh Gutschko of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which indicated that Pfizer had been enabled the MHRA, the Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency in the UK to carry out a bait and switch operation with their vaccine, which meant that the Pfizer vaccine that was tested on 22,000 individuals with 22,000 in a placebo group was not the same vaccine that was rolled out in the UK and around the world. The compelling evidence for this is the fact that on the 2nd day of mass vaccination in the UK, the NHRA changed the guidelines, told people they had to stay at the vaccination center for 15 minutes after vaccination. The reason for this remaining at the vaccination center was the risk of anaphylactic shock. The MHRA hadn't expected anaphylactic shock because it wasn't shown in the Pfizer trials. You only get anaphylactic shock when there are endotoxins in the vaccines.
You only get endotoxins in the vaccines when they've been cultured up in such as Escherichia coli. That demonstrated that the vaccine that was rolled out around the world was not manufactured in the same way or to the same standards as that vaccine that they've got medical approval for. That means that nobody could have given informed consent. They were told that the vaccines were safe, effective, and tested, and what they were taking was a completely untested vaccine from Pfizer. I'm still waiting for the prime minister to respond to the 44 pages of evidence I supplied on this matter, which is of crucial importance to the health and well-being of our nation.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Please watch this video it’s a bombshell. Pfizer knew after a few months of the extreme harms and so did the Governments. The internet Pfizer report shows that their ‘vaccine’ was far more dangerous than the virus. I will call for an Urgent Question in Parliament on this today. https://naturalnews.com/2023-09-18-secret-pfizer-report-mrna-covid-jab-killer.html
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Letter to Rishi Sunak with all the evidence sent yesterday. Awaiting a reply. @RishiSunak @Conservatives
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
Yesterday I spoke in a Westminster Hall debate about the proposed WHO treaty and the massive ramifications it has on us and our sovereignty. (Part 1, Part 2 in following tweet)
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty. They question the WHO's ability to learn from past mistakes and argue that giving the organization more power could lead to catastrophic errors. The speaker discusses the WHO's structure, funding, and influence, highlighting the role of external sources such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They criticize the WHO's reliance on private-public partnerships and claim that member states have limited input in decision-making. The speaker also raises concerns about the WHO's ability to define information and determine what is considered settled science. They emphasize the importance of considering the potential costs to democracy and individual freedoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Mr. Sharma, and welcome the opportunity to debate this topic. I've been calling for this debate for some months, and I thank the 156,000 Alexis who've voted for us to have this debate today. And the pandemic treaty must be viewed in coordination with the changes, the proposed amendments to the international health regulations. As George Santonea said, that those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.
And I do have some severe worries that the lessons of the last pandemic have not been learnt by the WHO themselves. And we are in danger of giving them more powers to enable them to overreach themselves and repeat those same catastrophic mistakes again. I would like to start by talking about the WHO itself. As my honorable friend, Don Ballet, pointed out, it was founded in, 1940 it's a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. It consists of 192 member states, basically, the whole of the UN membership, excluding Liechtenstein and the Holy See.
And it was based originally on a W. H. Constitution, which is still today, but this constitution will be fundamentally changed by the 2 instruments that are in the pipeline following the COVID nineteen pandemic. The WHO is domiciled in Geneva, and so it has special status. It's employees are exempt from tax, and they and their families all have diplomatic immunity.
It is indeed a supranational body, unelected and unaccountable. I think my constituents would fear that. How is the WHO set up? Well, it has something called the World Health Assembly. It meets yearly in Geneva.
It's a legislative and supreme decision making body of the WHO. It elects the Secretary General, the Executive Board votes on policy and of the WHO. And the current chairperson of the World Health Assembly, the WHO, is a gentleman by the name of Harsh Vardhan. In 2021, Mr. Sharma.
The Indian Medical Association, the Indian version of the BMJ, the largest association of doctors in India, issued a statement. Well, he objected to Vardan, who was endorsing Coronil, a product that was being made in India. The the IMA, the Indian Medical Association, questioned the ethics of the health minister, mister Vardander's health minister at the time, of that country to release a fabricated and unscientific product onto the people of India. He's since gone on to become chairperson of the we're going to be presiding over this this new treaty that's going to be sitting before every government in the world. Given that he resigned from the cabinet in India over this controversy.
Why has he ever been trusted with greater responsibility? It seems he's failed upwards, like many at the WHO and the W. H. A. So the original ideals of the WHO were were were completely laudable.
The WHO is to to serve the health of the people. It's governed by its member states who will implement health policy in the interest of our people. State sovereignty and the rule of law will be respected. That's under article 3 of the international health regulations before they're amended. People's self determination will be fully respected.
All human rights, conventions and other acts will be respected that countries have joined up. So that must protect under Article 54 of the original, human regulation of human rights. But who's now funding the WHO. Like many of our regulators in the U. K, the MHRA, 86% funded by industry sources.
The joint committee on vaccination and immunization and their personal declarations, they declared over £1,000,000,000 of interests in big pharma, the the the thing they were set out to rigor, this undermines public confidence. Well, the WHO now is no longer anything like majority funded by its member states, the people who it is seeking to control. It's 86% funded by external sources. I'm not sure that my my honorable friend for Winchester is correct. The UK is not the the 3rd largest donor.
The 2nd largest donor, it's the 3rd largest owner. The 2nd largest owner after Germany it's the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. And I think Gavi is the 5th. So we add those together. That is they are the biggest donors to the the WHO.
And you have to think, why are they doing this? They're also the biggest donors or biggest investors in pharmaceuticals and the experimental MRA technology, which proved so profitable for those who proposed it and produced it during the during the last pandemic. Indeed, the WHO, it says the member state's contributions to the WHO funds have been capped and today account for only 16% of WHO's total budget, with an increasing share of funding to WHO coming from voluntary contributions where donors direct funding according to their priorities. Well, their priorities might not well be the priorities of my constituents in North West Estancia all because or the electorate in the UK. But he who pays, the piper call calls the tune.
The WHO are are promoting the influence of private public partnerships. They they they promote that on on their websites to the point where it's pay to play. Anyone can buy, influence at the WHO. It's just gonna cost cost you money. And when it comes to when they're when they're consulting, their own internal report, their survey evaluation, final reports, May 23 23rd May 2022, the various interest groups have more input to the WHO policy then the member states.
It said under the WHO's own figures that the member states' only participation was 40% of the input, whereas 60% came from non member states and 276 stakeholders. So so it's clear there's a strong external influence on the policy of the WHO, an entity which if the, the amendments to the international health regulations and the pandemic treaty were to be passed, and doing nothing is not an option. If this house does nothing and does not vote, they will come to pass, by May 24. So doing nothing is is not an option. It isn't going to go away.
So the WHO's intermediate studies says the WHO is an international organization, created as a sub agency of the United Nations for the objective of obtaining the highest possible level of health for all people. But at what cost? At what cost? What cost democracy? What cost to, to individual freedoms.
It is now 80% funded by non member states, and it is heavily influenced. And it also, during the pandemic, it took extra powers called the fact that it could define information. It took on a position. And this is this will be enacted in law and binding in those 2 new instruments that the WHO has the ability to say what is this information? And when anybody says to you that the science is settled on any issue, I suggest that this house would would would smell a rat straight away because science is never settled.
There is always open for modification, for new new things to be discovered, theses to be refined. And what the what the WHO is saying is that the WHO will be the arbiter of what the science is, and that cannot be right. It's a bit like someone saying the market's changed. Well, in my experience, it never has. So that is a huge a huge grab of power.
And the 2 instruments, the pandemic treaty and the amendments to the international health regulations are progressing in parallel.
@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen
WHO treaty debate. (Part 2)
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the binding nature of the treaties and the extension of powers to the director general of the WHO. They highlight instances of misconduct within the WHO and criticize the compressed reporting time for public health risks. The speaker argues that these treaties would take away powers from elected representatives and create an unaccountable supranational body. They also raise concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the WHO and question the organization's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The speaker emphasizes the importance of individual rights and liberties and suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective. They mention the EU's plans to establish a department of misinformation and express skepticism about a single version of the truth. The speaker concludes by calling for careful consideration and reading of the documents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the for those who I I I just really worry whether colleagues in this have actually read the thread the thread the treaty because clearly, you know, when you take out the words not binding as an amendment, it then becomes binding. You know, these these are binding treaties. If we do nothing, these treaties are binding. They're legally binding, across all across all the nations. They're bringing in a a an idea called one health.
So and this then extends the ability of the, the director general of the WHO to call, a public health emergency of international concern, which incidentally is is abbreviated to fake. Fake? A a fake. So, And it it says that you can bring it in on the suspicion, the risk of an international, incident. It doesn't even have to be about of, pathogen that's affecting humans.
It it can affect animals. It's taking the powers because it could because of the environment or an increase in the levels of c o two. I suggest that the honorable and right honorable members read the treaty. It's it's a massive extension of powers. At the drop of a hat, 1 man, mister Tedros, can call a a, for for massive powers to the WHO, and not only will he call when when he takes the powers, he will decide when pandemic or the emergency is over.
And when he'll possibly give us the powers back to this house where elected representatives are supposed to be representing the interests of our constituents. Will that law all be suspended? And and I would while we're talking about mister Tedros, I mean, I would I should remind the house that this gentleman, who'll be deciding the fate of the world, it will be within his gift to call this, these emergencies. His his the conduct of the WHO in the recent, Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where where eighty 83 individuals who are working for the WHO sexually abused, local women and including the sexual assault of a 13 year old girl. And and it was it was all covered up, mister Sharma.
And and and an elite document from the WHO, which would have been in front of mister Tedros's committee, a confidential u n u n report submitted to the WHO last month concluded that the manager's handling of the case didn't violate WHO sexual exploitation policies because the woman concerned was not a beneficiary of WHO aid since she didn't receive any humanitarian support. That is completely unacceptable. If that's the the rules of an organization, it'll be deciding whether my constituents are locked down for 6 months, 3 months, and whether they can go and see their granny. I I don't think it's acceptable. Also these these new treaties, they compress the time for governments of mandatory reporting lines of 72 hours from when a possible, a risk, to public health has to be reported to the WHO.
And you make a decision. This is far too little time for any research, any meaningful research to be done as to what the real risk is. And it will lead to lots of potential for false alarms and unnecessary disruption. These are huge powers that these 2 instruments would seek to take away from this parliament and every other parliament around the world, and they need to be considered very, very strongly. Sticking your head in the sand isn't going to do.
It won't do for my constituents. You know, if we learn anything from the vote we had in 2016 is that people in this country, they do not want to be ruled by unelected, unaccountable, bureaucrats. And there's no one more unaccountable and unelected of people in the WHO don't pay tax, and they and their families have immunity from prosecution because they've got diplomatic immunity. They're also under the huge financial interests of whoever wishes to wishes to fund them. So many experts are now saying that these 2 instruments would fundamentally reset the relation between citizens and sovereign states, not in this country, but also around the whole the whole world, unelected, unaccountable, top down supranational body, the WHO.
What these treaties will do, it will empower that sir, director general to impose sweeping legally binding, they are legally binding directions on member states. They'll be forced. They have the power then to force companies in this country or any other country to manufacture certain, medical treatments and to export them to other countries and be told to do it. You'll have the power to shut down any business in this country regardless of, of of what the local people think or even this this parliament it it takes away all the protections that that, being in a democracy office. It actually takes away article 3 in in the original constitution, which is is the respect of human right and dignity, that goes and is just replaced by a bland statement saying that there will be equity.
And inequity means whatever it means. It means that everyone's gonna be treated equally. It also means that one solution to any international problem around the world. And that leads to an all or nothing situation, mister Sharma, where if the WA show got it right, and if we want to go in, if I have the time, I'll go into everything they got wrong in the last pandemic. If they get it right, okay, maybe okay.
But if they get it wrong, that's the whole of humanity who's got it wrong. There's no competition. And if there was only 1 car manufacturer, only 1 solution, I'm not sure it would be the best car that we could ever have. I think competition between nations for solutions is a good thing. I have I have grave concerns over these 2 instruments.
And we have grave concerns. I have grave concerns to consider who's actually running and controlling the WHO organization. It'd be foolish not to see that big pharmaceutical giants with their lobbying power, they have huge influence over the direction of the WHO. And like many multinational corporations, their size and scale supersedes even national governments. With over 8% of the the WHO budget now specified funding, and they have the ability to direct policy.
And I think it's fair to say we're drifting away from the WHO's original noble ethos of promoting democratic, holistic approach, cooperation to public health. The WHO let us down over COVID with their sponsor, in January 2020, it's already been pointed out, they were still telling us that there there was a person to person, transmission of the virus. That was wrong. That was wrong. And then they prescribed lockdowns and mass vaccination during a pandemic, which which which drove mutations.
The pandemic response by the WHO and the national governments should be a cautionary tale on the impact on citizens handing power, to the state, and should we certainly not be a template for going further and faster in terms of signing away rights and liberties. Indeed, the pandemic response it was so brutally illustrated. The profit optimized version of the greater good pursued by the WHO often crashes even with children's health. Before I spoke out on the 13th December with regards to the risks of the experimental mRNA vaccines, the MHRA were looking to authorise the vaccination of of children down to the age of 6 months in this country. I'm I'm very grateful that the government listened and they we didn't do that.
Indeed, it was then pushed back to people, over 50. And after my speech on 17 March, I'm delighted that the Government now has put it back to only those over over 75. That's that's in a few months, that's a huge difference from, we're going to vaccinate everybody. And I think that that tells the the tale of if we were all under one rule, we'd be doing exactly the opposite of what this country has individually decided to do. So while we're on the subject of opaque, undamping democratic organizations, it's interesting to see what the EU are doing.
Well, the EU are actually going to they think that we need to strengthened all this. And they're going to set up not only with the, will the WHO be allowed to have a department of misinformation, they'll be the arbiters of whatever the truth is during an emergency. The the EU are going to take over exactly the same the same, policy, and they're going to have their own as well. So when we when we have a, a pandemic situation, there will be only 1 version of the truth. Well, that's not very good for science, is it.
The one health approach, it's also a whole society approach. They will they will have the ability to motivate, to mobilise every aspect of our society, once they call those emergencies, they're going to be able to keep them going. They have control of absolutely every aspect of our our citizens' life. This is absolutely massive. There's no more important treaty.
Of course, if we were to give these sort of powers, which I would never vote for myself, of course, we should have a referendum because sovereignty belongs to the people. It's not ours to give away, and we know that from the referendum we had in 2016. I hope the house listens very carefully and reads these documents.