TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ADFLegal

Posted - October 22, 2024 at 3:32 PM

Saved - October 23, 2024 at 2:54 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've been discussing a troubling legal trend where pro-abortion officials in states like NY, CO, and CA are attempting to ban pro-life speech. They are targeting doctors and pregnancy centers that inform women about abortion pill reversal (APR), a safe treatment using progesterone. Despite claims of misleading information, evidence shows APR is effective and has saved lives. Many women who regretted taking the abortion pill are grateful for the support they received. These officials are misusing their power, and I'm committed to fighting back against these restrictions on free speech.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

"Pro-choice"? Not so much. A thread about a shocking new legal tactic we're seeing from pro-abortion officials in multiple states. 👇

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

We’re currently litigating cases in NY, CO, and CA where state officials have tried to ban/punish pro-life speech. These officials are trying to punish doctors, nurses & pregnancy centers who provide a treatment called abortion pill reversal (APR)... or even TELL women about it.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

These politicians accuse APR providers of “misleading” women. But the evidence says otherwise. APR uses progesterone, a natural hormone which has been safely prescribed to pregnant women for decades. Progesterone can counter the deadly effects of mifepristone when taken in time.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

Statistics suggest APR has an effectiveness rate of 64-68%. It's safe for mom & baby and has likely saved thousands of lives, including... - a baby girl born to Atoria in 2022 (CA) - a baby girl born to Mackenna in 2024 (CO - pictured) - a baby boy born to Desirae in 2024 (CA)

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

All three of these women are incredibly grateful for the pregnancy centers and healthcare providers who helped them use APR to undo a decision they immediately regretted: taking the first abortion pill. All three of these babies were born healthy and are deeply loved.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

It’s hard to believe ANYONE would oppose this happy outcome, or this lifesaving choice. But if government officials in these states had gotten their way, these women would have been forced to have abortions they didn’t want. And these babies would have never been born.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

These officials are abusing their power. They have no right to punish speech about a safe, legal treatment. But they're also showing how extreme the modern pro-abortion movement is. There’s nothing “pro-choice” about banning speech so women are forced to have unwanted abortions.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

In NY, CO, CA, and other states, ADF is fighting back. We’re suing officials and challenging laws that trample free speech and trap women in unwanted abortions. You can help. Learn more and join our work defending pro-life pregnancy centers at adflegal.org/wecare

@ADFLegal — Alliance Defending Freedom

Posted - May 6, 2024 at 1:38 PM

Saved - May 6, 2024 at 10:51 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I am intervening in a Title IX lawsuit on behalf of a female athlete and teacher association to challenge Biden's rule changes. Our client, Adaleia, lost opportunities to compete and faced vulgar comments from a male student on her track team. Biden's changes allow males who identify as female to access girls' sports and locker rooms, posing privacy and safety concerns. These actions also harm teachers' free speech and access to sex-specific spaces. We are working to stop this. Learn more: [link]

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

🚨ANOTHER TITLE IX LAWSUIT: We’re seeking to intervene in a case on behalf of a WV female athlete and teacher association, @ChristEducators, to challenge Biden’s illegal rule changes to #TitleIX. OUR CLIENTS: Adaleia is a 15yr old girl who lost chances to compete when a male student was allowed on her track team. Adaleia has also endured that student’s vulgar, sexual comments while on the team. Under Biden’s rule changes to #TitleIX, males who identify as female can access girls’ sports and locker rooms across the country, threatening privacy and safety. Biden's actions also harm teachers, like @ChristEducators, who now face threats to their free speech and right to access sex-specific spaces like bathrooms without encountering people of the opposite sex. This is wrong—and we’re working to stop it. Learn more: https://bit.ly/3JOPTuf

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@ADFLegal — Alliance Defending Freedom

Posted - July 21, 2023 at 4:24 PM

Saved - July 21, 2023 at 4:32 PM

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

Age 14 - Sexually assaulted Age 15 - Hospitalized for depression Age 16 - Diagnosed with an eating disorder & OCD Yet doctors told Prisha Mosley that a medical "gender transition" would cure her mental health problems. Now she's seeking justice. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gender-transition-16-lied-terrible-way-seeking-justice?intcmp=tw_fnc

I began 'gender transition' at 16. I was lied to in a terrible way. Now I am seeking justice I began medicalized 'gender affirming' care when I was just 16-year-old. I trusted my health care providers and but wound up with a severely damaged body. foxnews.com

@ADFLegal — Alliance Defending Freedom

Posted - May 18, 2023 at 8:31 PM

Saved - May 18, 2023 at 9:10 PM

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

Should women be forced to undress in a locker room with males? Ed. Secretary Cardona doesn't have an answer. We must protect our girls from harmful ideologies that put their safety at risk.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asks if requiring women to undress in front of Leah Thomas and allowing Leah Thomas to undress in front of female athletes constitutes sexual harassment. The other speaker responds that students should not feel unsafe in any locker room. The first speaker then asks if it constitutes sexual harassment to force women to undress in front of biological males, to which the second speaker expresses concern about forcing women to undress in front of biological males. The first speaker further asks if requiring female swimmers to dress with Leah Thomas, who identifies as male, would constitute sexual harassment. The second speaker requests the question to be repeated and states that it is not a yes or no question for them.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: As you know, the House and this Committee have passed the Protection of Women and Girls Sports Act in an effort to protect title 9, which the Department of Education has failed to do. As as a parent of 2 female student athletes, I have a vested interest in this issue. Do you believe that requiring those women to undress in front of Leah Thomas and allowing Leah Thomas undress in front of female athletes constitute sexual harassment? Yes or Speaker 1: no? I don't believe students should be, feel unsafe in any locker room. Speaker 0: Do you believe that Speaker 1: it constitutes sexual harassment to force Speaker 0: women to undress in front of to sexual harassment to force women to undress in front of biological males? Speaker 1: I do believe forcing women to undress in front of biological males is a concern in a sexual Speaker 0: So if Thomas identified as male, would requiring female swimmers to dress with him have constituted sexual harassment? Speaker 1: Can you repeat the question? Speaker 0: If Leah Thomas identifies as male, would requiring female swimmers to dress with him have constituted sexual harassment? Speaker 1: I I think I know the line of questioning, and I'd be happy to entertain It's a Speaker 0: yes or no. It's not Speaker 1: a yes or no question for me. It is a Speaker 0: yes or no question.

@ADFLegal — Alliance Defending Freedom

Posted - April 26, 2023 at 5:07 PM

Saved - April 27, 2023 at 1:03 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

ADF attorneys informed University of Texas at Arlington that charging TPUSA $28,600 for event security without prior consent violated their First Amendment rights. UTA officials should rescind these charges and amend policies to protect every student's freedom of speech. Read more at adflegal.org.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

Yesterday, ADF attorneys sent a letter to the University of Texas at Arlington, informing the university that charging @TPUSA $28,600 for event security—without their prior consent—violated the conservative student group's First Amendment rights.

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

"Charging over $28,000 for two small events is prohibitively expensive speech—not free speech. We urge UTA officials to rescind these unlawful charges quickly and amend their policies to protect every student’s freedom of speech." - @JCalebDalton

@ADFLegal - Alliance Defending Freedom

Texas university unconstitutionally charges conservative students $28K for event security ADF attorneys represent Turning Point USA chapter in letter to University of Texas at Arlington adflegal.org