TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @AGHuff

AGHuff
Posted - June 3, 2024 at 4:26 PM
Saved - June 4, 2024 at 12:51 AM

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

A medical doctor in the audience stands up and yells “Medical doctors like me know that the vaccines are killing people!” She is ejected by the chair and capital police.

AGHuff
Posted - June 3, 2024 at 2:05 PM
Saved - June 3, 2024 at 5:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During a hearing, Dr. Fauci faced criticism and accusations from audience members and committee members. Chairman Wenstrup expressed concerns about the lack of accountability and bullying in public health institutions. Dr. Fauci was sworn in and accused of lying. He also avoided answering a question about working with the intelligence community. A reference was made to research funded by NIAID being gain of function. Dr. Fauci admitted that his Senior Advisor violated official government policies.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Fauci sits down, and people in the audience are saying: “Nuremberg 2.0” “You killed my grandmother” https://t.co/RdSKBuqVpL

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Nearly, full attendance of the committee members. https://t.co/8VwRr9RkBw

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

https://t.co/84UKmwqqPg

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨Chairman Wenstrup opens hearing with Dr. Anthony Fauci: "Americans were aggressively bullied, shamed, and silenced for merely questioning or debating issues such as social distancing, masks, vaccines, or the origins of COVID." "You took the position that you presented 'the science' and your words came across as final and as infallible in matters pertaining to the pandemic." "You were the highest paid person in the government. This makes you more accountable to the people, not less." "To be successful, our federal public health institutions must be accountable to the people again." ...WATCH MORE👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Fauci is thanked for his service and cooperation in investigating the COVID-19 pandemic. Concerns are raised about mandates and policies implemented without clear scientific backing. Questions are posed about oversight of risky research and transparency within NIAID. The importance of accountability, transparency, and public trust in health institutions is emphasized for successful protection of Americans.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, and welcome doctor Fauci. First, I want to thank you for your decades of public service. You served your country through multiple epidemics, pandemics, and health crises. I do wanna say, I'm sorry about the threats that you have received. As someone who's been shot at and received threats as well, my heart goes out to you, this should never happen in America. Regardless of any disagreements we may have, you chose to serve, and I want to extend our appreciation and gratitude. I wanna thank you publicly for working with our doctor Skokas during Operation Warp Speed, and the time you spent with us, and Doctor. Collins. I also wanna thank you for your willing cooperation with the select subcommittee. You have voluntarily sat for more than 14 hours of testimony, and and are appearing voluntarily today. This is more than we can say about other witnesses we have called and we appreciate it. Doctor Fauci, we're here to investigate the COVID-nineteen pandemic, and to explore lessons learned, positive or negative, and to better prepare for future pandemics. Simply put, America cannot move forward though, without looking back. We must know what went right and what went wrong, in order to best ingrain proficiencies and remedy deficiencies. In 15 months, the select subcommittee has sent more than 115 investigative letters, conducted 30 transcribed interviews, resulted in 100 of hours of testimony, held including today, 27 hearings or briefings, and reviewed more than 1 and a half 1000000 pages of documents. We aren't here to throw the baby out with the bathwater. That's not the intent. We are following the facts, holding wrongdoers accountable, and planning for a better, more prepared future. Beginning early in 2020, you became the figure head of public health. There were drinks named after you, you got bobble heads made in your likeness, you were on the cover of Vogue, threw out the first pitch at a Washington Nationals game. Almost overnight, you became a celebrity and a household name. In addition to being a public health official. Americans from coast to coast and beyond listened to your words, and this is where I think we could have done better. And this goes to both sides of the aisle. We should have been more precise. We should have used words and phrases that are accurate and not misleading. And we should have been honest, especially about what we didn't know. Doctor Fauci, I'm not a virologist, but I am a physician and like most physicians, we are constantly learning. Which is why we do continuing medical education, and we always seek new information. We learn new things based on new data, and we want to give our patients the best possible care based on new findings and improvements in science. At a time when you were prompting the Proximal Origin paper, whose focus was to quote, disprove the lab leak theory, end quote, I was in lockdown, researching with another physician in Ohio, to try and understand the pathology, the affected physiology, and what treatments worked. And even how to diagnose COVID before we had specific COVID tests. My friend even made a phone call to an infectious disease doctor in China, looking for help. As well during that time, we discovered the Barrack Xi 2015 article on creating a chimera using gain of function type technology. While policy decisions should have been based on scientific data, some frankly were not. The burdensome 6 foot social distancing rule, did not have sufficient scientific report. In your words, it just sort of appeared. Distancing made sense, but the 6 feet was arbitrary. Even Doctor. Collins said, he still hasn't seen any empirical evidence to support the 6 foot rule. A rule that shut down schools and businesses. A rule that will have negative ramifications for decades. As the pandemic wore on, more mandates also just sort of appeared, but the American public didn't get to see the scientific data to support these mandates. Americans were aggressively bullied, shamed, and silenced for merely questioning or debating issues such as social distancing, masks, vaccines, or the origins of COVID. Many Americans were willing to comply with the 15 days to slow the spread, and understood the necessity of banning travel from certain countries in an attempt to slow down the virus. But many Americans became very frustrated when components of those 15 days stretched into years. And it should not have been the case that Americans were forced to comply with oppressive mandates, when those who chose to illegally cross our southern border, were not. Or, when Governor Newsom or Governor Whitmer were throwing parties at nice restaurants. Not a good look. Americans do not hate science, but Americans know hypocrisy when they see it. Doctor Fauci, under your leadership, the United States Health Agencies adopted specific policy aims as a single dogmatic truth. Without the benefit of debate, out of a desire for a single narrative. Doctor Fauci once said, if you disagree with me, you disagree with science. Science doesn't belong to any one person. I was never taught that science turns a blind eye to hypotheses. They serve to be proven or disproven, and done so with irrefutable facts if able. It was interesting that you chose not to pursue an aggressive and transparent scientific investigation of both natural spillover and lab leak. We have been investigating both hypotheses. You testified before the select subcommittee in your transcribed interview, that the lab leak theory was not a conspiracy theory. You embraced the proximal origin letter, it wasn't necessarily a full peer reviewed research paper, but you embraced proximal origin letter and you shared it with the public from the White House lawn. You stated during your transcribed interview, that you did not review published articles that considered a potential lab leak of COVID nineteen. This is especially concerning if the works in question were conducted at a more risky and less safe BSL 2 lab. Nevertheless, any dissent from your chosen scientific position was immediately labeled as anti science. Anything less than complete submission to the mandates could cost you your livelihood, your ability to go into public, your child's ability to attend school. Families were thrown off planes and shamed, when their 2 year olds struggled to wear a mask. Children with disabilities lost access to therapy that they and their families depended on. Students were out of the classroom and told to attend school remotely. Even when the science clearly demonstrated it was safe for them to go back in the classroom. This harmed low income students the most. And how were single parent households supposed to teach their own children, and work at the same time? Doctor Fauci, you oversaw one of the most invasive regimes of domestic policy the US has ever seen, including mask mandates, school closures, coerce vaccination, social distancing of 6 feet, and more. We've learned many lessons. Our early fear and confusion was understandable. COVID 19 was clearly a novel virus. Under your leadership, NIAID allowed disgraced characters like doctor Peter Daszak, to use 1,000,000 in taxpayer dollars to conduct risky gain of function experiments in Wuhan, China. The actions of EcoHealth and Doctor. Desik, call into question the integrity of NIAID's policies and procedures as a whole. As well as your role, doctor Fauci, as NIAID's director. You did sign off on his research grant. We need to know why, Doctor. David Morin's. Your direct report for more than 2 decades assisted doctor Daszak in avoiding oversight and scrutiny, and said that you were involved. Your senior advisor, and seemingly your chief of staff, repeatedly attempted to evade transparency laws to shield information from public scrutiny. We have senior officials from your office, in their own writing, discussing breaking federal law, deleting official records, and sharing private government information with grant recipients. The office you directed, and those serving under your leadership, chose to flout the law, and bragged about it. Why did you allow your office to be unaccountable to the American people? You were the highest paid person in the government. This makes you more accountable to the people, not less. Doctor Fauci, whether intentional or not, you became so powerful that any disagreements the public had with you were forbidden and censored on social and most legacy media time and time again. This is why so many Americans became so angry, because this was fundamentally un American. I make a mistake, I answer to the people of Ohio who elected me, and to my own conscience. When you and your agency made mistakes, doctor Fauci, what happened? We all need to be held accountable. Sometimes, it's as simple as saying, we were wrong. You took the position that you presented the science. Your words came across so many people as final final and as infallible in matters pertaining to the pandemic. But such rigid demands of an ideologically diverse people, like Americans, shattered public trust in American health institutions. It's because I said so, has never been good enough for Americans, and it never will be. It's built into the American spirit. We have a thirst for information, a drive for advancement. Americans were first in flight. We landed on the moon. We've cured diseases. You've been part of that. And we've made innumerable discoveries and explorations that forever changed humanity. Americans do not want to be indoctrinated. They want to be educated. And they prefer to make their health decisions in conjunction with the doctor that they know and trust. To be successful, our federal public health institutions must be accountable to the people again. To be successful, our health organizations must must do what they are supposed to do. Protect Americans.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Dr. Fauci is sworn in and he is already lying. https://t.co/dpVtfnTrFK

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Fauci dodges the question if had worked with the intelligence community when he became aware of the pandemic. He starts discussing Anthrax. Non sequitur.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

@RepRaulRuizMD regardless of the definition of the definition of gain of function, Dr. Ralph Baric stated in his transcribed interview that the research funded by NIAID WAS GAIN OF FUNCTION. @COVIDSelect

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

@RepRaulRuizMD @COVIDSelect https://t.co/65WnaXULqW

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨Dr. Fauci testifies that his Senior Advisor repeatedly violated official government policies. "That was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy...he should not have done that. That was wrong." WATCH @RepJamesComer👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a pattern of inappropriate behavior within the inner circle, including the use of personal email for official business, deleting records to avoid FOIA, editing press releases and letters, providing misleading advice, and advocating for individuals. These actions violate NIH policy and are deemed inappropriate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there's a troubling pattern of behavior from your inner circle, not just doctor Moran's, but also your chief of staff, mister Fokers. Do you agree that it violates NAID NAID policy to use personal email for official purposes? Speaker 1: The the doctor Morin's, issue that was discussed by this committee violates NIH policy. Yes. Speaker 0: But does using official email using a personal email for official business, does that violate policy? Speaker 1: Using a personal email for official business violates NIH policy. Speaker 0: Does it violate NAID, NAI n a NIAID policy to delete records to intentionally avoid FOIA? Yes. Okay. On April 28, 2020, doctor Moran edited an ECHO Health press release regarding the grant termination. Does that violate policy? Speaker 1: That was inappropriate That was inappropriate for him to be doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest Speaker 0: among other things. So on March 29, 2021, doctor Moran's edited a letter that doctor Daszak was sending to NIH. Does that violate policy? Yes. It does. On October 25, 2021, doctor Moran provided doctor Daszak with advice regarding how to mislead NIH on EcoHealth's late progress report. Does that violate policy? Speaker 1: That was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. Speaker 0: On December 7, 2021, doctor Moran wrote to the chair of EcoHealth's board of directors to, quote, put in a word, end quote, for doctor Daszak. Does that violate policy? Speaker 1: Should not have done that. That was wrong. And that violates policy? Well, I'm not sure of a specific policy, but I'm imagine it does violate policy. He should not have been doing that.
AGHuff
Posted - April 10, 2024 at 7:03 PM
Saved - April 10, 2024 at 7:34 PM

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Well done @RandPaul! USAID Predict did in fact fund gain of function work at EcoHealth Alliance. Some of the funding and work was passed on to Dr. Ralph Baric and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

@Bryce_Nickels - Bryce Nickels

Full exchange between Senator Rand Paul and USAID Administrator Samantha Power from today’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing. https://t.co/ZJQC3aoC3z

Video Transcript AI Summary
USAID denies funding gain of function research despite evidence showing otherwise. Questions raised about lack of transparency regarding dangerous research projects. Request made to interview USAID personnel present at briefing about risky virus creation. USAID emphasizes cooperation and commitment to avoiding risky research in the future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ms. Powers, on April 26, 2023, you testified before this committee that USAID did not fund gain of function research. I'd like to give you a chance to, correct the record. Is it still your position that USAID did not fund gain of function research? Speaker 1: We have no evidence that USAID has funded gain of function research, and we certainly haven't authorized gain of function research. Speaker 0: Well, I'll help you. Behind me, we'll list a paper from 2015. This is a paper produced by the Wuhan Institute of Virology and also by doctor Barrick from UNC. In this paper, if you'll see the funding aspect that's highlighted, it says USAID EPT predict funding from EcoHealth Alliance. So this paper was one where they took a virus, the SARS virus, the backbone of the SARS virus and then took an S protein from an unknown virus they found in the wild and put them together. Are you aware that these experiments in the study were supported by USAID, PREDICT and GRANT through ECCO Health Alliance? Speaker 1: As I said, USAID has not authorized gain of function research. This is the first time seeing this. We'll have a look into it. Speaker 0: Around 2015, we've been over it numerous times. It's been in the public record. We've repeatedly said that, yes, USAID did fund gain of function research. Here's the evidence. But here's some comments from some different people about this study because some will try to argue this still is not gain of function. Simon Wayne Hopson is a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris. He points out that the researchers have created with this research funded by USAID, a novel virus that grows remarkably well in human cells. If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory. Richard Ebright from Rutgers says the only impact of this work is the creation in a lab of a new non natural risk to humanity. So is your position that this study was not gain of function or that you didn't fund it? Which is your position? Speaker 1: We have had an awful lot of back and forth and provided, thousands of pages of of documents on this. This article, I can't it looks like it's from 2015. Right. So, we will have to look into the specific claims. But, again, to put on the record It's a big one. Has not and will not authorize gain of function. Speaker 0: Position, but the record will show that you did. And this was before your time. I don't know why we can't just admit it. It did happen. And the reason this is important is many people want to collect all these viruses from around the world. But they don't wanna just collect the viruses to sort of have them and have a library of viruses. They take the virus, then they take an s protein from another virus, and they create a virus that doesn't exist in nature that often has ramifications that could be quite different or quite, serious. I'll give you the words of the authors of this paper. On the basis of these findings, scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue. So this was funded by USAID. It was funded through the PREDICT program. There's no question of that. And even the authors admit that it was gain of function. So we have to get beyond sort of equivalent over whether it was because we have to make sure in the future we're not doing this and that we don't fund this going forward. Now the PREDICT program was going to be surpassed by another program going after viruses, and that has been suspended. That is all good. But we have to admit the past, be truthful about the past in order to go forward because millions of people died from COVID 19. The FBI has concluded it came from a lab in Wuhan. The Department of Energy has concluded that. Even the CIA, initially, their scientific board voted 6 to 1 until they were overturned by higher ups at the CIA to say otherwise. They voted to say that this thing came from the lab as well. It only comes from the lab if we're if if if we're in favor of creating these things. We can't control everything China does, but we certainly shouldn't be funding it. So we have to be honest that this was funded. Now there was a warning sign to us that this was going on. There was something called the diffuse project in 2018 that was presented to DARPA once again by Barrick and by, doctors Hsu and Wuhan. The diffuse project was to create a coronavirus with a furin cleavage site, which doesn't exist in nature, but makes it incredibly more infectious in humans. There was a briefing to 15 agencies. 1 of the agencies was USAID. There was a briefing about this diffuse project. But nobody from USID and nobody from all 15 agencies ever told anyone about this project. It was hidden for years years and only revealed by a brave lieutenant colonel marine working at DARPA who exposed this when everybody else had hidden this. And my question is, USAID was in this briefing about a research project that had incredible danger to our country and finally wasn't funded. Will you provide the names of the people from USAID who were in this meeting so they can be interviewed so we can find out why didn't they tell anyone, or did they tell their superiors and nobody and people ignored them? Why was the public never made aware that they were trying to do dangerous research to create a virus very similar to what COVID 19 became? And how could 15 agencies show up for a briefing and no one exposed it to the public, and we only hear about it by a whistleblower? Will you provide for us the name of the person to USAID who attended this briefing in 2018 and let us interview them to find out what happened? Why was this never revealed to the public? So Speaker 1: I think within the 10,000 pages of documents you have from USAID, are whatever documents we have on this DARPA, proposers meeting. I received a letter we received a letter from your staff yesterday. We'll certainly look at the request. But just to give a little context, US government agencies often on good days show up for one another, go to each other's meetings. This is not something that USAID ever considered funding or was ever engaged on in some substantive way. Speaker 0: But the the point is is that after hearing that somebody wanted to put a furin cleavage site in the virus, alarm bells go off. And then when you see the virus in 2020 and you say, oh my goodness, they did what they were asking, someone should have said, wow, I was in that hearing, and I didn't think anything of it at the time. But now I'm like, maybe I should tell somebody. Maybe I should call up the president. Maybe I should call up Anthony Fauci. Maybe somebody should be informed that we learned about this, and I didn't think anything of it at the time. You're right. It could have been inconsequential in 2018. In 2020, it becomes profoundly important. Why didn't anybody from government come forward and warn us that this could be a virus not from nature, which is not very infectious usually, and was incredibly infectious because it had been pre adapted in a lab for human transmission. Speaker 1: Look, I just wanna come back to your earlier point. All of this ended at USAID in 2020. It is before my time. We don't feel defensive about these engagements. We've appreciated Speaker 0: That's all we're asking for is the the we'd like to interview the person who was at that meeting. Speaker 1: I understand. We will look at that request. But but what I just wanna make clear is that in a collaborative spirit, we also understand the the stakes, the human stakes, of of of history, of recent history and and the risks. And you have raised, flags in a manner that has required us to dig in, I think in important ways on top of what we had been doing previously. And so we will continue, the back and forth with you and your office and and certainly don't ever wanna be in a position, to, do anything ourselves using taxpayer resources, to create risks. Speaker 0: Thank you. And I do appreciate the cooperation that your agency has given us. Speaker 1: Thank you, sir.
AGHuff
Posted - April 3, 2024 at 1:41 AM
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 1:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
EcoHealth Alliance's claim that they didn't create COVID in a lab due to lack of DARPA funding has been proven false by FOIA documents. The evidence shows they worked on it prior to receiving the funding.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Do you recall me saying, tweeting, or writing that EcoHealth Alliance worked ahead of the receipt of the funding? Well, here is the proof. 😎 Is there anything else that you would like to know? @SenGaryPeters @RandPaul @RepJackBergman @COVIDSelect @RepThomasMassie @SenRonJohnson @RepBradWenstrup @All100Senators @RepDebDingell @mtgreenee @RepRonnyJackson

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 EcoHealth Alliance claimed that they didn’t make COVID in a lab because “they had not received the DARPA funding.” These FOIA documents prove that EcoHealth Alliance lied and they engineered COVID in a lab even though they had not received the DARPA funding. https://t.co/h42sPXGzBh

AGHuff
Posted - April 3, 2024 at 2:02 PM
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 1:23 AM

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 EcoHealth Alliance claimed that they didn’t make COVID in a lab because “they had not received the DARPA funding.” These FOIA documents prove that EcoHealth Alliance lied and they engineered COVID in a lab even though they had not received the DARPA funding. https://t.co/Ps2nzloPRT

AGHuff
Posted - December 21, 2023 at 12:26 PM
Saved - December 21, 2023 at 8:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Twitter was ablaze last night as @MikeGil21446788 and I revealed shocking information. We exposed Flynn as a lifelong Democrat who stole money from patriots. MI GOP is allegedly being controlled by a CIA operative named Mike Labadie. Flynn and Renz sent a convicted felon named Robert Owens to my house in an election scam. Renz seems to be working with the Whitmer administration. Congress also mistreated Gill and me. This is Mike Labadie, the alleged CIA operative behind MI GOP.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Twitter hit a flashpoint last night. I think @MikeGil21446788 and I pushed the US government over the truth edge last night. Where were we? Oh Flynn is a really a lifelong Democrat stealing money from patriots. MI GOP is being secretly run by a CIA operative named Mike Labadie. Flynn and Renz sent a recently convicted felon to my house from Ohio named Robert Owens in a pay to play election scam, when I was on to Flynn’s election heist. Renz is a contractor or a federal agent. That is why he doesn’t file court cases, screws over whistle blowers, and appears to be working with the Whitmer administration with Flynn / Mike Labadie. Congress screwed Gill and I in the exact same manner.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

This is Mike Labadie, the CIA operative running MI GOP from the shadows. https://t.co/4bU7ts2iox

AGHuff
Posted - November 21, 2023 at 12:46 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 5:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Former VP of EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Andrew G. Huff, testifies under penalty of perjury about their involvement in gain of function research with Wuhan Institute of Virology and University of North Carolina. Audio cleanup in progress. Original deposition and enhanced audio available for download. Potential impact on political careers of Senators and Congressional reps involved. Request to tag universities, organizations, and pharma companies blocked by them. Link to download enhanced audio provided.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Former Vice President of EcoHealth Alliance Dr. Andrew G. Huff provides sworn testimony under penalty of perjury about EcoHealth Alliance’s involvement in gain of function research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and University of North Carolina. https://rumble.com/v3wymtr-dr.-andrew-g.-huff-former-vp-ecohealth-alliance-deposition.html

Dr. Andrew G. Huff Former VP EcoHealth Alliance Deposition This is a deposition recorded at my home in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan with Attorney Thomas Renz, of Renz Law in Ohio. This deposition was under oath with penalty of perjury related to my employm rumble.com

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Someone has volunteered to clean up the audio. I will repost a better audio enhanced version shortly.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

You can download the original copy of the deposition here: https://drive.proton.me/urls/7RGS6XHHHM#6I2QJnUE8BLP

Proton Drive Proton Drive allows you to securely store and share your sensitive documents and access them anywhere. drive.proton.me

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

You can download the full HD version of the #deposition of the former #EcoHealth Alliance VP here: https://drive.proton.me/urls/7RGS6XHHHM#6I2QJnUE8BLP It is 5-6 GBs as I recall. #NoAmnesty #Fauci #Daszak #Baric #stoptheshots #PureMichigan #NYC #UNC #NorthCarolina #NewYork #ArrestFauci #ArrestDaszak

Proton Drive Proton Drive allows you to securely store and share your sensitive documents and access them anywhere. drive.proton.me

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

@All100Senators this… could be the end of many Senators’ and Congressional reps political careers. 😬😬😬😬😬😬😬😬😬

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

@All100Senators Can someone tag all the universities and organizations involved with the gain of function, and everyone from the mutton crew? I have been blocked by all of them. Including the pharma companies involved? 😂😎

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

@All100Senators Here is a link to download the “clear / enhanced” audio version of my deposition about the gain of function work at EcoHealth Alliance: https://legendarysystemsio-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/jonathan_legendarysystems_io/EUgCa8si0h1DnyA7IoelPbEBXbr36e1qv4ZhGmXQ-Dc16g?e=oZxt1f

AGHuff
Posted - November 18, 2023 at 2:05 AM
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 2:56 AM

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

Do you have a corrupt local or county government? You can go after their bonds and the government has NO RECOURSE. I will post instructions next week. We are coming for you #Marquette!

View Full Interactive Feed