reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @AZDesert_Rose

Saved - January 6, 2025 at 5:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reflecting on the case of Tina Peters, the imprisoned County Clerk from Mesa County, CO, who seems to have been targeted by Secretary of State Jena Griswold and Judge Matthew Barrett. Meanwhile, election workers in Maricopa County, AZ, have faced no consequences for deleting subpoenaed 2020 election data. If the law applies to everyone, as stated by AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes and US AG Merrick Garland, why haven’t Kristi Passarelli and Brian Ramirez been charged? It raises questions about accountability when Bill Gates admits to the deletion of that data.

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨Imprisoned County Clerk, Tina Peters of Mesa County, CO was made an example by SOS Jena Griswold & District Judge Matthew Barrett while Maricopa County Election workers in AZ have never been charged for deleting 2020 Senate Subpoenaed Election data. If nobody is above the law as AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes & US AG Merrick Garland have repeated ad nauseam then why haven't charges been brought up against Kristi Passarelli & Brian Ramirez for their part in the deletion of AZ Senate Subpoenaed 2020 Election data? If Tina Peters can be imprisoned for allowing unauthorized duplication of election data, then the individuals in Maricopa County who deleted Senate Subpoenaed Election data should also suffer the same fate. 🚨Watch: BOS Bill Gates admits that Maricopa County Election Workers deleted Senate Subpoenaed 2020 Election data.⬇️ https://youtu.be/eCzfwaP5UKg?si=UaUtNe5ujs0qtoTD

Saved - December 26, 2024 at 3:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Merry Christmas, Patriots! The Richergate emails have surfaced, revealing a plot to silence ASU Professor Aaron Ludwig for sharing a truthful video about the 2020 election. An email from Maricopa County Attorney Joseph LaRue highlights attempts to file a bar complaint against Ludwig for his actions. This indicates a troubling collaboration between Maricopa County officials and outside organizations to suppress free speech. Additionally, I believe Maricopa County requires a federal investigation into election interference involving various legal and political figures. More revelations are forthcoming.

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🎄Merry XMass Patriots!! 🎁The Richergate Emails 📩 Have Been Delivered & Reveal a Sinister Plot to Silence an ASU Criminal Law Professor, Aaron Ludwig for Reposting a Truthful Video Concerning the 2020 Election. Email Transcript below: "Bo: I'd like to file a bar complaint against this jackass for promoting the harassment and incitement to violence against two of my non-public-facing team members based on a moronic lie. Can States United advise me on if a "retweet" is grounds for making a complaint and, if so, how I do so? Thank you. St€phen" 🎄The above stocking stuffer (Email) was delivered to WTP by Maricopa County Attorney Joseph LaRue on Dec 23, 2024, it wasn't part of the original records request. 🧦 Read: WTP Records Request ⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/WethePeopleAZA1/status/1868068666602053858?t=SWvwDAqhaC2aLmD3GdE-qw&s=19… Watch: Congressional Hearing on Deleted 2020 Election Data with @RepAndyBiggs ⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/realLizUSA/status/1446157081556488195?t=DJ1hnX5MDzv2Ru3zcFpcIQ&s=19… @FDRLST @loganwashburn76 @MaricopaGOP @realAlexKolodin @WendyRogersAZ @AbrahamHamadeh @EliCrane_CEO @azjustinheap @realLizUSA @RepAndyBiggsAZ @forloveofJ @AzPinkLady @GinaSwoboda @realdonaldtrump @PatriotMarkCook @KariLake @Rach_IC @GeorgeNemeh @BrianFerence1 @GailGolec @SRSZink @Kelly4Humanity @GarretLewis @JamesTHarris @prayingmedic @ThePhoenixEnig1 @merissahamilton @AmySueMartin @America1stLegal @ludwig_law @KurtOlsen_USA @Kash_Patel @PamBondi @mrddmia @seanmdav @JasonMiller @azcapmedia @ConradsonJordan @gatewaypundit @TrumpWarRoom @pnjaban @DC_Draino @Only1Trickster @jeffclarkUSA @arizonaslaw @KimGeorgeForAZ

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Maricopa County admits they DELETED and moved the election data to hide it from auditors AFTER they got a subpoena This is a total cover up, and they admit it!

@WethePeopleAZA1 - We the People AZ Alliance

🚨 EMAILS RELEASED. The conspiracy is unraveling and WE WON’T STOP HERE. Emails show Stephen Richer, as the MC County Recorder, violated the civil rights of Attorney Ludwig in collusion with States United NGO. It also shows a significant relationship between Maricopa County Recorder and AZSOS, seeking guidance from radical leftist, anti-Trump, non-governmental organizations to censor speech. Kari Lake brought 1st Amendment claims forward in her original election challenge and they were summarily rejected by the courts. Now we know the truth, her claims were valid. Key player is current Attorney for Gov Hobbs and prior AZSOS Elections Director and Council for Hobbs at the AZSOS office. More to be released.@Rach_IC @KariLakeWarRoom

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. It’s appropriate to maintain files, and while we deleted some files, they were archived. The auditors initially did not have access to those archived files because they were not subpoenaed. It’s laughable to suggest that deleting files in response to a subpoena is acceptable. The subpoena should have covered all election-related records. I cannot confirm if purging the database after elections is standard practice, but limited server space may require it. If that is the case, why was data from prior elections still present? We will provide answers to these questions. It's important to note that we had oversight during the 2020 election due to concerns about the previous administration's competence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll start with Mr. Bennett, and then we'll try to work on that so everybody can get there. Is it standard practice to delete files off Speaker 1: a server after an Speaker 0: election, Mr. Bennett? I hope not. So Mr. Gates, would you agree with that? Speaker 2: I would say that it is appropriate to maintain files. And that's exactly what we did. We deleted the deleted files that have been discussed, they were archived. Speaker 0: So you admit that you guys did delete, Maricopa County did delete files off the server after the election? Speaker 2: That were that are archived. Speaker 0: Yes. And so when you released these servers and this information to the auditors to begin with, they didn't have access to those archive files at first. Is that fair to say? Speaker 2: They did not subpoena those, that's correct. Speaker 0: Okay, so you didn't feel obligated to turn that over then to them? Speaker 2: We responded to the subpoena. Speaker 0: Okay. Mr. Bennett, your response to that? Speaker 1: I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county, in response to a subpoena, could say we will delete files from the hard drives and materials that we give to the auditors because we have those files archived on data that we did not give to the auditors when the subpoena said turn over all the records related to the election. Speaker 0: Yes. See, that's the way I read the subpoena. It's read more broadly than the county read it, for sure. So your Twitter account mentions that the purging of the 2020 election database in the beginning of February is a standard practice. Can you please confirm for me that that's what you do for all elections, after all elections that you Speaker 2: do that? I cannot confirm that for you today, but we can certainly get you that answer, Congressman. Speaker 0: Thank you. Mr. Chairman, can you confirm that today or not? Speaker 3: I really can't confirm that either today. I just know that because there is limited space on these servers, when you have to run another election, then you have to make room for the additional election data. Speaker 0: So was there additional was there still let me just rephrase this. If that is the standard practice, which is kind of I don't think you guys are saying that you know for sure, but the chairman just intimated that that that's the case. Can you explain to me why data was still present for prior elections, on the databases in and of itself? Speaker 2: Yeah. Again, I I don't have an answer to that question, but we'll certainly get you an answer for it, Congressman. Speaker 0: Okay. All right. I appreciate if you would give me that information. Speaker 3: And I do think that it's important that our recorder has suggested that he will be answering every question in a timely fashion. Speaker 0: That's the same recorder that campaigned that Adrian Fontes was incompetent and called him a criminal, and he was the guy that was running the 2020 election, and you actually hired someone to oversee Mr. Fontes because you guys didn't trust Mr. Fontes as well. Is that the same guy is that same Steven Richard? Speaker 2: Yeah, I wouldn't put it that way exactly, but what we did was we did have statutory and board as you know, congressman boards of supervisors have responsibility for election day operations. And we took that back so that we would have, 4 Republicans and 2 Democrats overseeing the 2020 election. We thought

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨Maricopa County needs a Federal Investigation into Stolen Elections: https://t.co/nWMH3UnSQZ

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

@AbrahamHamadeh @KariLake @Kash_Patel @RichardGrenell 🚨Maricopa County needs a federal investigation into election interference and collusion between Perkins Coie, States United, CISA, Attorneys Sambo Dul, Marc Elias, Norm Eisen, Stephen Richer & Gov Katie Hobbs: https://t.co/YtHVu7wgxL

Saved - December 17, 2024 at 4:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There's speculation about whether Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes will face a federal criminal probe for allegedly conspiring to violate the constitutional rights of Americans. A recent court filing in the case WTP v Richer suggests that Mayes' office collaborated with Norm Eisen's States United Democracy Center and the U.S. Department of State. The filing claims that the SUDC was involved in drafting a memo on bringing charges against Donald Trump's electors ahead of the 2024 Presidential Election.

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨AZ News: Will AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes face a Federal Criminal Probe for illegally conspiring to violate the constitutional rights of Americans here in AZ? According to a recent court filing, WTP v Richer, Kris Mayes office conspired with Norm Eisen's States United Democracy Center (SUDC) and the US Department of State. "It has been reported that SUDC is responsible for the memo outlining how to bring criminal charges against Donald Trump's Arizona electors in the runup to the 2024 Presidential Election for which it has been reported SUDC was paid by the U.S. Department of State." - WTP v Richer, Court Document below page 3, Line 11 Read:⬇️ https://t.co/KMSa9dONjY @AZGOP @MaricopaGOP @AZHouseGOP @AZSenateGOP @votewarren @realAlexKolodin @WendyRogersAZ @AbrahamHamadeh @EliCrane_CEO @azjustinheap @RepAndyBiggsAZ @RepGosar @forloveofJ @AzPinkLady @PatriotMarkCook @KurtOlsen_USA @WethePeopleAZA1 @KariLake @Rach_IC @GeorgeNemeh @BrianFerence1 @GailGolec @Kelly4Humanity @GarretLewis @JamesTHarris @prayingmedic @ThePhoenixEnig1 @merissahamilton @AmySueMartin @America1stLegal @san_deeno @BehizyTweets @ludwig_law @Kash_Patel @PamBondi @mrddmia @seanmdav @JasonMiller @azcapmedia @phoenixnewtimes @ConradsonJordan @gatewaypundit @TrumpWarRoom @pnjaban @DC_Draino @elonmusk @infowars @azcourts

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and his team illegally conspired to violate the constitutional rights of Americans. So did Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Tish James, Kris Mayes, Matthew Graves’ offices. They must face a federal criminal probe under 18 U.S.C. § 241. Nobody is above the law.

Saved - December 16, 2024 at 3:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeking clarification from Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer regarding attorney Sambo Dul's involvement with him, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, and States United before the 2022 General Election. A court document states that Dul left the Secretary of State's Office in June 2022 to work for States United, representing Hobbs in her election challenge. It raises concerns about Richer's email, suggesting it abused his authority and censored conservative speech during the election. Transparency is crucial for the people of Arizona.

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨Please, Maricopa County Recorder @stephen_richer, can you tell us how attorney Sambo Dul was representing you and SoS Katie Hobbs and States United before the 2022 General Election? Court Document Alleges: "Ms. Bo Dul left her position with the Secretary of State's Office in June of 2022, and joined States United Democracy Center (SUDC). As counsel for SUDC, Ms. Bo Dul represented Governor elect Katie Hobbs in her election challenge beginning in December of 2022. Ms. Bo Dul then went to work for Governor Hobbs as General Counsel for the Governor in January of 2023. Defendant Richer's email of July 31, 2022, was an abuse of the Recorder's authority. No provision in the U.S. or Arizona constitutions designates the County Recorder as the Minister of Information or otherwise entitle the County Recorder to censor speech and serve as the gateway to the First Amendment during a statewide election or otherwise. As this email was obviously in possession of an attorney who had recently run the State's election apparatus and was apparently working on behalf of Katie Hobbs gubernatorial campaign, it is imperative that the people of the State of Arizona be able to see what communications were taking place by those with state power or the semblance thereof in the midst of the 2022 election cycle aimed at censoring conservative speech. It has been reported that SUDC is responsible for the memo outlining how to bring criminal charges against Donald Trump's Arizona electors in the runup to the 2024 Presidential Election for which it has been reported SUDC was paid by the U.S. Department of State." Read: Full Court Document ⬇️⬇️ @AZGOP @MaricopaGOP @AZHouseGOP @AZSenateGOP @votewarren @realAlexKolodin @WendyRogersAZ @AbrahamHamadeh @EliCrane_CEO @azjustinheap @RepAndyBiggsAZ @RepGosar @forloveofJ @AzPinkLady @PatriotMarkCook @KurtOlsen_USA @WethePeopleAZA1 @KariLake @Rach_IC @GeorgeNemeh @BrianFerence1 @GailGolec @Kelly4Humanity @GarretLewis @JamesTHarris @prayingmedic @ThePhoenixEnig1 @merissahamilton @AmySueMartin @America1stLegal @san_deeno @BehizyTweets @ludwig_law @KurtOlsen_USA @Kash_Patel @PamBondi @mrddmia @seanmdav @JasonMiller @azcapmedia @phoenixnewtimes @ConradsonJordan @gatewaypundit @TrumpWarRoom @pnjaban @DC_Draino @elonmusk @infowars

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨AZ Court News: A Lawsuit Against Maricopa County Recorder Richer was filed Friday Dec 13, 2024 to obtain an unredacted copy of a Aug 1st, 2022 email sent by Gov Hobbs' current attorney Sambo Dul while she was working for States United, founded by Attorney Norm Eisen. Read: Court Filing⬇️ Read:⬇️ https://thefederalist.com/2024/10/14/exclusive-maricopa-elections-chief-enlisted-foreign-censorship-group-in-war-on-disapproved-speech/ Watch: video in question⬇️⬇️ Watch: Hearing on deleted 2020 Election data⬇️⬇️ Read: Norm Eisen ⬇️⬇️ Read: Norm Eisen⬇️⬇️ @AZGOP @MaricopaGOP @AZHouseGOP @AZSenateGOP @votewarren @realAlexKolodin @WendyRogersAZ @AbrahamHamadeh @EliCrane_CEO @azjustinheap @RepAndyBiggsAZ @RepGosar @forloveofJ @AzPinkLady @PatriotMarkCook @KurtOlsen_USA @WethePeopleAZA1 @KariLake @Rach_IC @GeorgeNemeh @BrianFerence1 @GailGolec @Kelly4Humanity @GarretLewis @JamesTHarris @prayingmedic @ThePhoenixEnig1 @merissahamilton @AmySueMartin @America1stLegal @san_deeno @BehizyTweets @ludwig_law @KurtOlsen_USA @Kash_Patel @PamBondi @mrddmia @seanmdav @JasonMiller @azcapmedia @phoenixnewtimes @ConradsonJordan @gatewaypundit @TrumpWarRoom @pnjaban @DC_Draino @elonmusk @infowars

Exclusive: Int'l Censors Trained AZ Officials On Targeting Speech Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer turned to leftist groups to guide his staff on targeting speech not approved by the government. thefederalist.com
Saved - December 16, 2024 at 2:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A lawsuit was filed against Maricopa County Recorder Richer to obtain an unredacted email from August 1, 2022, sent by Gov. Hobbs' attorney, Sambo Dul, while she was with States United. This legal action raises questions about the involvement of foreign censorship groups in election matters. I shared links to the court filing, related articles, and videos regarding the hearing on deleted 2020 election data and insights on Norm Eisen's role. The situation continues to unfold, and I encourage others to stay informed.

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨AZ Court News: A Lawsuit Against Maricopa County Recorder Richer was filed Friday Dec 13, 2024 to obtain an unredacted copy of a Aug 1st, 2022 email sent by Gov Hobbs' current attorney Sambo Dul while she was working for States United, founded by Attorney Norm Eisen. Read: Court Filing⬇️ Read:⬇️ https://thefederalist.com/2024/10/14/exclusive-maricopa-elections-chief-enlisted-foreign-censorship-group-in-war-on-disapproved-speech/ Watch: video in question⬇️⬇️ Watch: Hearing on deleted 2020 Election data⬇️⬇️ Read: Norm Eisen ⬇️⬇️ Read: Norm Eisen⬇️⬇️ @AZGOP @MaricopaGOP @AZHouseGOP @AZSenateGOP @votewarren @realAlexKolodin @WendyRogersAZ @AbrahamHamadeh @EliCrane_CEO @azjustinheap @RepAndyBiggsAZ @RepGosar @forloveofJ @AzPinkLady @PatriotMarkCook @KurtOlsen_USA @WethePeopleAZA1 @KariLake @Rach_IC @GeorgeNemeh @BrianFerence1 @GailGolec @Kelly4Humanity @GarretLewis @JamesTHarris @prayingmedic @ThePhoenixEnig1 @merissahamilton @AmySueMartin @America1stLegal @san_deeno @BehizyTweets @ludwig_law @KurtOlsen_USA @Kash_Patel @PamBondi @mrddmia @seanmdav @JasonMiller @azcapmedia @phoenixnewtimes @ConradsonJordan @gatewaypundit @TrumpWarRoom @pnjaban @DC_Draino @elonmusk @infowars

Exclusive: Int'l Censors Trained AZ Officials On Targeting Speech Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer turned to leftist groups to guide his staff on targeting speech not approved by the government. thefederalist.com

@GailGolec - Gail Golec #AmericanPatriot

@SuePrager @MarlyHornik @UnitedSAmerican Agreed. The last person who has access to the database selects the winners. Here is more proof of the way they purged and replaced ballot images in Maricopa County. https://rumble.com/v4t2qbt-maricopa-county-votes-replaced-and-purged-fingerprints-of-fraud-bonus.html

MaRICOpa County Votes Replaced and Purged- Fingerprints of Fraud Over 150K of the Maricopa County Ballots Images appear to have been deleted and replaced! If we had more Election Day Ballots than Early Voting Ballots, we could out program the programmers, potential rumble.com

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Maricopa County admits they DELETED and moved the election data to hide it from auditors AFTER they got a subpoena This is a total cover up, and they admit it!

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Turns out corrupt Stephen Richer is working with Trump lawfare coordinator Norm Eisen’s group States United to threaten people with disbarment and legal action over wrong-think, aka disinformation. None other than Reid Epstein Island Hoffmann who paid for nutjob E. Jean Carroll’s…

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

🔥🔥🔥Breaking News! Norm Eisen Is Involved In The Trump Trials thru Democracy 21! This is why he’s been showing up for the Stormy Daniels trial. He’s watching his handiwork! This org is actively working to support prosecutors! And some of the other players are wowza big! Norm…

@WethePeopleAZA1 - We the People AZ Alliance

WTPA filed lawsuit against Stephen Richer to obtain public records regarding his actions to have a private citizen fired. A video taken at one of our conferences was shared on X by an ASU law professor. Stephen Richer abused his position of authority to try to get him fired. https://t.co/4Svx1A9zl4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. So, you admit Maricopa County deleted files after the election? Those files were archived. Initially, auditors didn’t have access to those archived files, correct? They did not subpoena those, that’s correct. It’s laughable to suggest that a county can delete files in response to a subpoena while claiming they are archived. Your Twitter mentions purging the 2020 election database in February; is that standard for all elections? I can’t confirm that today, but we’ll get you an answer. Why was data from prior elections still present? I don’t have an answer now, but we’ll provide one. The recorder will answer questions timely. You hired someone to oversee the 2020 election due to concerns about Adrian Fontes, correct? We took back responsibility for election operations to ensure oversight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll start with Mr. Bennett, and then we'll try to work on that so everybody can get there. Is it standard practice to delete files off Speaker 1: a server after an Speaker 0: election, Mr. Bennett? I hope not. So Mr. Gates, would you agree with that? Speaker 2: I would say that it is appropriate to maintain files. And that's exactly what we did. We deleted the deleted files that have been discussed, they were archived. Speaker 0: So you admit that you guys did delete, Maricopa County did delete files off the server after the election? Speaker 2: That were that are archived. Speaker 0: Yes. And so when you released these servers and this information to the auditors to begin with, they didn't have access to those archive files at first. Is that fair to say? Speaker 2: They did not subpoena those, that's correct. Speaker 0: Okay, so you didn't feel obligated to turn that over then to them? Speaker 2: We responded to the subpoena. Speaker 0: Okay. Mr. Bennett, your response to that? Speaker 1: I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county, in response to a subpoena, could say we will delete files from the hard drives and materials that we give to the auditors because we have those files archived on data that we did not give to the auditors when the subpoena said turn over all the records related to the election. Speaker 0: Yes. See, that's the way I read the subpoena. It's read more broadly than the county read it, for sure. So your Twitter account mentions that the purging of the 2020 election database in the beginning of February is a standard practice. Can you please confirm for me that that's what you do for all elections, after all elections that you Speaker 2: do that? I cannot confirm that for you today, but we can certainly get you that answer, Congressman. Speaker 0: Thank you. Mr. Chairman, can you confirm that today or not? Speaker 3: I really can't confirm that either today. I just know that because there is limited space on these servers, when you have to run another election, then you have to make room for the additional election data. Speaker 0: So was there additional was there still let me just rephrase this. If that is the standard practice, which is kind of I don't think you guys are saying that you know for sure, but the chairman just intimated that that that's the case. Can you explain to me why data was still present for prior elections, on the databases in and of itself? Speaker 2: Yeah. Again, I I don't have an answer to that question, but we'll certainly get you an answer for it, Congressman. Speaker 0: Okay. All right. I appreciate if you would give me that information. Speaker 3: And I do think that it's important that our recorder has suggested that he will be answering every question in a timely fashion. Speaker 0: That's the same recorder that campaigned that Adrian Fontes was incompetent and called him a criminal, and he was the guy that was running the 2020 election, and you actually hired someone to oversee Mr. Fontes because you guys didn't trust Mr. Fontes as well. Is that the same guy is that same Steven Richard? Speaker 2: Yeah, I wouldn't put it that way exactly, but what we did was we did have statutory and board as you know, congressman boards of supervisors have responsibility for election day operations. And we took that back so that we would have, 4 Republicans and 2 Democrats overseeing the 2020 election. We thought
Video Transcript AI Summary
Concerns have arisen regarding Steven Richer, the Maricopa County Recorder, who sought guidance from left-leaning groups to target election-related speech he deemed inappropriate. Richer, who lost his election, collaborated with the States United Democracy Center and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, both accused of censoring conservative viewpoints. He even suggested firing a professor for retweeting election concerns, labeling him a purveyor of disinformation. Richer’s actions have drawn criticism for potentially violating First Amendment rights and for using his government position to influence academic employment. His attempts to suppress dissenting voices reflect a troubling trend of government officials targeting free speech in the electoral context.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, questions that we've been raising here about 2022, 2020, and, of course, 2024 is coming up, we're covering a ton of the litigation that's happening here, including in Arizona where they're trying to protect their 210,000 nondetermined, non identified votes that are in this bucket here. Now we know that richer, according to this report from the very great Logan Washburn, they were turning to leftist groups. The county recorder, Steven Richer, this guy, to guide his staff on targeting speech that he didn't like. Here's the background. Richer, who lost his election is and is going to be no longer in office, thankfully, turned to left leaning States United Democracy Center, that group, States United Democracy Center. Those they come up with the worst names, an overseas group, and another group that was bankrolled by the state department to help his office target election speech that's been disapproved of by the government. This is according to emails. Now Richer thanked States United, Lefty Group, for offering to let his office, quote, piggyback on the group's anti speech operations, which he described as, quote, deep scanning the Internet for, quote, disinformation, a term often invoked to censor. States United is a left wing election law group that consistently opposes Republican election integrity legislation, you know, like voter IDs. And they support Democratic attempts to diminish election security according to InfluenceWatch. Now the group has praised the weaponization of the justice system against Trump, they love it, and described by The New York Times as part of a coalition that's preparing to, quote, push back against the potential Trump victory with extraordinary preemptive actions. It's happening now. We're covering it every day here. According to email records, States United leftist group set up a call with Richard's staff, the Maricopa County Recorder, and the global censorship group, which is called the Institute For Strategic Dialogue, which means they're gonna strategically eliminate your dialogue. ISD is a London group that has been accused of wrongfully labeling, quote, mainstream views as misinformation and subsequently censoring conservative opinions online. The group was also a recipient of a State Department grant from the department's Global Engagement Center, which as we've talked about a lot here was largely responsible for the massive censorship efforts that were stood up by all of the intelligence agencies and the social media companies in the aftermath of 2016. They were building them in 2018. They deployed them in 2020. That organization stood up and was a large part of it. The Federalist Margo Cleveland reported that a while ago. They work with big governments. They work with 501c3 groups. They work with big tech and more, and they work with some of the left left's biggest financial backers. Now Steven Richer from Arizona later suggested that Arizona State University officials should fire faculty associate Aaron Ludwig for retweeting election concerns, apparently looping in States United in the process. This guy is something, Steven Richer. Briefings by professional censorships and professional censorship gurus. Thanks for very much to the u States United for the kind offer to let us piggyback on some of the deep scanning you're contracting for election threats and disinformation, said Steven Richer. Let's see if we can see this email. He emailed then States United Senior Counsel. This guy's name is Beau Dull. First name Beau, last name, Dull. Beau Dull. Richer indicated his office and, quote, some partners at the county, oh, who could that be? I wonder. Do some of this work already, but that he would love to fill any holes with an offer from States United. I bet he would. Now a few minutes later, Dole told Richer that the States United senior adviser, quote, leading our DISinfo work, is named Carolyn Chambers, would be, quote, circling up with our partners at ISD and your team to set up a call soon. So we've got 2 mega lefty DISinfo organizations now working with government officials who are in charge of running the elections. K. We've been saying they've been cheating here for years, just to be clear about this. Ever since they indicted Trump, well, that's basically the beginning of election interference. Moment they raided his residence, that was it. Moment they started opening the investigation, whole balance of power changed. The whole structure of the country changed because they did something that in 234 years of American history, no one else has ever done before, and they started prosecuting their political opponents for conduct that wasn't criminal at all. And now they're working to censor the thievery of everything they did in 2020 and 2022. So they have to stand this up to rewrite history just like the Ministry of Truth in 1984. Now she's again this woman, Dull, was the senior elections policy adviser and the general counsel in the Arizona Secretary of State's office under Katie Hobbs, who was running the elections that she was in and then won it. Now she's again working as general counsel for Hobbs who became governor last year. Right? Just rehired the same people who helped get you elected. So Chambers sent an email to Dull on June 21st and copied Richard. She said, hey, you know, we want to set up a briefing. On June 23rd, a United a states united staffer emailed Chambers, Dahl, and other recipients a link to a Zoom meeting with the subject line Maricopa County Recorders Office x sudcxisd briefing. Right? You see how some people will write that in their calendar invites. You know, like Rob x you, you probably have here, me x watching the watchers on your calendar every day so you never miss the show. You know? And they did the same thing. So what is Steven Richer doing meeting with these 2 leftist groups? The meeting was scheduled for June 28th. A management analyst and special assistant to the Maricopa County Recorder emailed staff on June 27th reminding them of the meeting and about the briefing the next morning. So this woman, management analyst and special assistant to Steven Richer, fires this one off from so and so. It's 2022. Election's right around the corner. Sent Monday, June 22nd, 4 47 to Elaine Haber, Megan Gilbertson, Michael Moore, not him, and Steven Richer, 3 of them from the recorder's office or ISCX office, the others from the recorder's office, so richer I don't know what that acronym stands for, but 3 people from the same office, Steven Richer is one of them and then the other is going to MCRO. Now here's the subject regarding Internet search thing. Ain't that fun? Internet search thing is how they're referencing this. Attachments, Maricopa County recorder briefing, it looks like it's a calendar invite. So this woman says, hi team, just wanted to send a quick reminder for this briefing referenced below and scheduled for tomorrow at 8:30 AM. You should have received the forwarded invite last week, I have also attached that again here. Recorder begins traveling tomorrow morning and would like us to go ahead whether he is able to listen in or not. In case you and he's traveling a lot, man. He was even traveling when we were in trial. He was, like, you know, he was in his t shirt showing up in court. I remember that. In case you need a refresher, States United published this report in June 2021 before the senate's contractors released the their final report. And you can find background information on the electoral disinformation work the Institute For Strategic Dialogue performs here. Many thanks. Click those two links. You can see what this group is doing. They're saying, oh, it's dangerous out there, and another group is working on this too. So Richard may or may not have been at that meeting. We don't know. We'll see if we find out. But Haber from his office was definitely there, and Megan Gilbertson was definitely there provided this meeting happen. So from Carolyn Chambers, she responds back and says, perfect. Will do. Looking forward to the meeting, and so she'll be there apparently. So the assistant then pointed recipients to background information. If you go there and follow it, the page boasts about the ISD working with States United ahead of 2022 midterms to, quote, detect, analyze, and escalate threats like election denialist activity. Election denialist activity. I guess that's us. Denialists. Busted, and links to news clips of ISD representatives celebrating efforts to pressure big tech into censoring more speech, and they did that. They censored your free speech and mine, and we got multiple strikes. It was all these people putting their fingers on the scales behind the scenes. On June 27, 2022, an email from the special assistant indicated that Richard was traveling at the time of the briefing and go ahead whether he's there or not. Asked how long Maricopa County's Recorders' office had collaborated with these two groups and whether they are currently working with these groups, a representative from Richard's office told The Federalist that the Recorder has, quote, worked with numerous entities over the last several years. So they admitted it. We have received information from States United Democracy Center, whatever, anti democratic lunatics who were trying to censor everybody and call it democracy, States United. They'd like, let's just reverse their country's name. No one will figure it out that we're communists. Regarding election workers' safety and, as we do with all new information, taking it into consideration, the representative said before listing the ways the office has made itself widely available to the public. So then, as they're we don't know what they were doing or what list they were sharing or whatever, but they're in full swing, then they are just warming up. Then they attempt to cancel a professor for retweeting a post. Just the very next month, Richard, you can follow him on x. It's pretty funny because he's he's, like, manic about a lot of this. Like, he's like he's like that one guy on the Internet. You know that meme out there where it's like, honey, I can't sleep. Somebody's wrong on the Internet. And she's like, will you just come to bed? He's like, I can't. I have to correct someone on the Internet. Like, oh, gosh. That's Steven Richer on his x account. It's hilarious. But just the next month, Richer emailed Arizona State University. What time was this at? 11:50 in the morning? Oh, it was a Sunday. Yeah. See, I've told you. Right? I was I was what time was it? Was it like 2 in the morning, 3 in the morning? No. It was a Sunday. Dude should be, like, relaxing, floating around at the pool. July 31st, you should be at the pool. 11:50 AM, he's paddletailing on election disinformation on the Internet. I told you, man. I told you. So just the next month, he emailed Arizona State University officials. He says, you should fire Aaron Ludwig, who sounds like probably one of the best professors at ASU, honestly. Criminal justice faculty associate for his online speech, said Richard. That's insane. Richard was upset because Ludwig had retweeted election concerns. He said he's a regular purveyor of election disinformation and misinformation, and he linked to his account. He says, I ask that you assess if he is fit to be a part of the ASU faculty. What a piece of garbage, this guy. Wow. Okay. So here's what Richard said. In his email, this is a government person who is sending emails to ASU, and he's signing it as Maricopa County Recorder. This is lunacy. This is so so shameful. So shameful. Oh, he's gonna file a bar complaint against him too. He's pathetic. Alright. Let's read this pathetic letter from Steven Richer. As a government official, okay, he sends this over to ASU and signs it using his government title. Dear directors, Sofen and Telup, the below person, Aaron Ludwig, who as far as I can tell is amazing, appears to be, quote, a a, quote, faculty associate. Just like you're a county recorder, Steven, you're pathetic, with the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, I ask that you assess if he is fit to be part of the ASU faculty. Is this the type of country you wanna live in where your government officials are emailing your employers and threatening and basically demanding that you get fired from their government email accounts? This is insane. This is so scandalous. I ask if you assess if you if he's fit to be a part of here, of your ASU faculty. He is a regular purveyor of election disinformation and misinformation. His Twitter profile is available here, Ludwig Law. Now let's go make sure we're following him. That sounds awesome. Alright. Let's go to x, Ludwig Law. Make sure we're following this dude because it sounds awesome. Alright. Where is he at? Aaron Ludwig. Boom. Amazing. Alright. Shout out to this dude. And, let's you know, if you're on X or something and you wanna go give this dude a follow, this is what this dude looks like. Counter racketeering expert, lawyer advisor, criminal law professor, former chief prosecutor, and somebody who is getting the catching the wrath of Steven Richer, a total pathetic loser. And so let's see if, yeah, that's the account to follow. So that's, that's where he's at. He's on x. Great to see him. Great to follow him. Alright. So shout out to that dude. Now we go back to the ridiculous email. He shared that account. He says, but I am writing today because he is currently actively promoting messages that encourage harassment of and violence toward 2 non public facing employees of the Maricopa County Elections Department. Okay. So why don't you report that to the cops then, Steven? Do you feel like they're in immediate danger? Call the cops. Is it a threat? Is it harassment? Is it intimidation? Well, there are Arizona statutes that address all those. In the but they're not crimes and you know they're not crimes, so that's why you're not reporting them because you would get laughed at because it's free speech, you tyrant. Now in the words he has promoted, those 2 employees should be, quote, made famous and, quote, lock them up. Now the allegations are, of course, errant nonsense that only imbecilic troglodytes these people are so pompous. Can you even believe it? Who writes like this? That only imbecilic troglodytes could possibly believe after 5 minutes of research, which means it's 100% true. Whatever that guy was saying, 100% true. Because and and they'll actually teach you this in logic and reason and, you know, rhetoric and stuff. Anytime anybody comes out and says, it's only this or only they're trying to foreclose your thought process that there are, oh, you know, foreclose other possibilities. It's like a basic fallacy. Anyways, idiot. The incitement to harassment and violence which has affected both employees already is especially rich for someone who is a member of the state bar, so am I, and purports to be an expert in criminal justice just like I do. Now please let me know if you need any additional information from me. Please let me know what you decide. I will also be filing a bar complaint with the Arizona State Bar against mister Ludwig. Thank you. Oh, my gosh. We're gonna have to get in touch with mister Ludwig, man. We're gonna have to see if we can hang out with this dude and read the bar complaint. I hope well, I don't hope he got one because nobody wants a bar complaint. It's just a nightmare to get a bar complaint. Right? If you get one that shows up on your front door, like if Steven wants to file 1 against us, you know, I don't like what you said about me on your YouTube channel, We'll get it. We'll read it here and, you know, we'll do the thing. But it's total nonsense for him to go after a lawyer for exercising his free speech and the most pathetic thing about this whole thing is he signed it with his government name on there, Maricopa County Recorder. I'm a government official. P s, on this page, director Sofen's name is misspelled, says he, but the listed email reverses the p and the o. I tried both emails. Please forgive me if I address this email incorrectly. So he's like, you know, he's so pathetic and he sends his email at 11:50 AM, everybody's out, their families at the swimming pool, just wrapping up church, you know, lounging on the couch, having some leftovers from Saturday night, whatever. Steven Richer is writing angry tirades against Aaron Ludwig who sounds like he's one of the coolest dudes at ASU, maybe the one of the coolest lawyers in Arizona, honestly. I'd like to meet him because this is outstanding. And this you should hang that up, man. We used to hang nice stuff up at our office when I was practicing where, you know, put up nice letters or dismissals or motions. This is one that you put right up there. Steven Richer had a hissy fit on Sunday at 11:50 in the middle of July. Hysterical. Alright. So Richer claimed that Ludwig was promoting bad messages that encouraged violence and more. Here's the post from Aaron Ludwig. Oh, it wasn't even his own post, he just retweeted something. He is upset about retweets. Maricopa County candidate for supervisor, Gail Golik, wrote this. You know, it's time to make so and so and so and so famous. Who are these other people? We won't spend time on, but it's just a retweet. He proceeded to delete the election files in Maricopa County. They both still work there. It's a retweet. Now the allegations are errant nonsense. The dean sent an email to the same day, says, thank you for your important information. We'll look into this. Now, then the United States operative also emailed Richard, right? So he also sends it to the censors and says the entire body with the subject Aaron Ludwig. Now when they got this look at this. Oh, gosh. The entire portion of this was redacted. So then did he copy her on that too? You gotta be kidding me. Darren Moffett okay. So a bunch of people got copied. Okay. So he blew up everybody. So then presumably, the ISD person also get gets it. Bo Dull. She, her, for oh, it's a she. My bad. US democracy center now comes out and says redacted. No idea what she says and responds to everybody. We got Steven Richard gets it. Everybody else from his office gets it, and she's part of the censorship operation. No idea what she says. Months pass, but Richard wouldn't let it go. He followed up back again on February 6th. In the same email thread, he sent a tickler for himself. Did anything ever come of this? Yeah. We did address it. We did address this, they said. What happened? I guess he still works there. Ludwig told The Federalist, his supervisors, never discuss the matter with him. But he first heard about the situation in April when acquaintances found the interchange in public records. He thinks that Richard's actions violate the First Amendment. Yeah. Amazing. So they reached out to this guy. They found it. Now the government should not be allowed, and I believe is not allowed pursuant to the First Amendment to censor our speech unless it is few those few things that you can regulate. Now he was the chief of the racketeering section, which is the Fannie case, at the AG's office and was a prosecutor for a while, says I led the charge against organized crime. For somebody to attack my background and my credentials and to accuse me of being some filthy liar or anything is so offensive. It's destructive to my reputation, and I believe it's defamatory per se. Good for him. Good for him. Now Richard recently lost the Republican primary for county recorder because he sucks. He initial sorry about that. He initially campaigned on election integrity. But once in office, he used his perch as an opportunity to regularly defend the Democrat run 2020 election, and Maricopa County was constantly writing op eds about this, drafting lengthy screeds, Republican leaders and voters. Guy's been all over the place. He was just on CNN, like, 3 days ago saying, well, I'm gonna get attacked by Republicans and all this stuff. He's gonna write books. He'll get on MSNBC. You have to fix his hair though. The constitution today, he said, is in some ways a thorn in the side of my office, specifically the First Amendment. Apparently, he wrote, the constitution is a thorn in the side. Yeah. That's how they feel. The outlet obtained a document with instructions on banning a user on social media, which the county reportedly told Justin News is a draft document of ideas that were brought up at a meeting but that was never implemented. What is this? So somebody wrote this down in some public record sometime. Oh, it's just we were just thinking about doing it. So they wrote, here's an idea. What do we do when we need to ban someone? Well, for violations that have a direct threat, do not engage, contact us. For other comment violations, direct message with this comment. Oh, hello. Even though oh, so on Maricopa vote. So they're censoring their own pages. Take a screenshot of the violation, copy the social media post with an entry comment violation with this user. When the user violates again, ban them from the government page. Maricopa vote. Ban them. Update the entry. If there's a question, assign it to a social media manager. When violators are banned without a warning, they still need to be entered. And so who knows who they were banning. Right? Who they were banning. Did you actually have this deployed? Were you banning people? Who knows? Richard has also worked with CISA in his war on unapproved speech. Now, Richard, who has become a corporate media darling for many people on the left, has also attracted the attention of Reid Hoffman, Epstein Island Reid. During Richer's unsuccessful primary bid, Hoffman helped fund mailers backing Steven Richer. There you go. There it is. So Reid Hoffman is at it again. So wild, wild. He wants him fired for a retweet. And the retweet, I think part of the part of his fury is probably that they're named. Right? I think that's the thing is that they're named in there, which, you know, I'm not in I'm not in love of because you can you you can really, you know, kinda single people out that way. But these are claims that you're free to share and investigate. Right? That's the point of this. It's like you're allowed to talk about these things, and you can have them proven wrong and engage in a dialogue about what was lawful and not lawful. Can they talk about election security or is Steven Richard gonna send an email to get you fired? If somebody says, I saw somebody coming in that was problematic or I saw something that was bad, can they not talk about that and retweet that and have conversations about that? Not in Steven Richards' world. So he was trying to get that dude fired and shout out to Ludwig, make sure you're following him over on the X platform and, anywhere else because he is facing an onslaught. Our own government officials are demanding people be fired for challenging their own corrupt electoral failure.
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 8:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In recent posts, I discussed the ongoing legal challenges surrounding the 2022 ballot affidavit envelopes in Arizona. Judge John Hannah denied Kari Lake's request to inspect these envelopes, raising concerns about potential evidence being hidden. Despite a second lawsuit filed, the case was delayed until June 2024. Additionally, a public records request revealed that the Maricopa County Treasury does not have the envelopes, suggesting possible malfeasance. I believe there should be public demand for transparency regarding these ballots and the integrity of the election process.

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨AZ Election News: Superior Court Judge John Hannah refused to allow @karilake to inspect the 2022 ballot Affidavit Envelopes in Lake v Richer. Hiding evidence from the plaintiff prevented the fraud from being uncovered. The case should have been appealed but in Lake's defense she knew a 2nd similar lawsuit had been filed by WTP v @stephen_Richer. The same activist judge was somehow assigned by Judge Pam Gates (wife of BOS Bill Gates). As a result attorney Blehm asked that Judge Hannah be stricken from the case. A new judge was assigned however the case wasn't heard until June 12, 2024. 🚨The 2nd records request was denied once again and Lake's former attorney Bryan Blehm who represented WTP, was suspended on spurious grounds shortly thereafter. Important testimony concerning the deletion of AZ Senate Subpoenaed data from the 2020 election was given during that trial. 🚨I believe our president elect @realDonaldTrump's people will be investigating what exactly happened here during the Maricopa County 2020 election. @PamBondy 🚨Watch: @RepAndyBiggsAZ hearing on deleted election data. Maricopa County BOS @billgatesaz testimony ⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/realLizUSA/status/1446157081556488195?t=Bmkf-hBFS0y-gJrR3t6XFw&s=19… @AZGOP @BlehmLawAZ @MaricopaGOP @AZHouseGOP @AZSenateGOP @votewarren @realAlexKolodin @WendyRogersAZ @AbrahamHamadeh @EliCrane_CEO @azjustinheap @RepGosar @forloveofJ @AzPinkLady @PatriotMarkCook @KurtOlsen_USA @elonmusk @Rach_IC @GeorgeNemeh @BrianFerence1 @GailGolec @pnjaban @ConradsonJordan @gatewaypundit @Kelly4Humanity @GarretLewis @ludwig_law @seanmdav @GeneralBrnovich @JamesTHarris @prayingmedic @ThePhoenixEnig1 @merissahamilton @AmySueMartin @America1stLegal @AZCourts @mrddmia

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Maricopa County admits they DELETED and moved the election data to hide it from auditors AFTER they got a subpoena This is a total cover up, and they admit it!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. Mr. Gates, do you agree? It’s appropriate to maintain files, but we did delete archived files. So, Maricopa County deleted files after the election? Yes, but they were archived. The auditors didn’t initially have access to those archived files because they didn’t subpoena them. I find it laughable that a county could delete files in response to a subpoena while claiming they were archived. Can you confirm that purging the 2020 election database is standard practice? I can't confirm that today, but we need to make room for new election data. If that's standard, why was data from prior elections still present? I don’t have an answer now, but we will provide one. The recorder has committed to answering questions promptly. We took back election oversight to ensure balanced representation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll start with Mr. Bennett, and then we'll try to work on that so everybody can get there. Is it standard practice to delete files off Speaker 1: a server after an Speaker 0: election, Mr. Bennett? I hope not. So Mr. Gates, would you agree with that? Speaker 2: I would say that it is appropriate to maintain files. And that's exactly what we did. We deleted the deleted files that have been discussed, they were archived. Speaker 0: So you admit that you guys did delete, Maricopa County did delete files off the server after the election? Speaker 2: That were that are archived. Speaker 0: Yes. And so when you released these servers and this information to the auditors to begin with, they didn't have access to those archive files at first. Is that fair to say? Speaker 2: They did not subpoena those, that's correct. Speaker 0: Okay, so you didn't feel obligated to turn that over then to them? Speaker 2: We responded to the subpoena. Speaker 0: Okay. Mr. Bennett, your response to that? Speaker 1: I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county, in response to a subpoena, could say we will delete files from the hard drives and materials that we give to the auditors because we have those files archived on data that we did not give to the auditors when the subpoena said turn over all the records related to the election. Speaker 0: Yes. See, that's the way I read the subpoena. It's read more broadly than the county read it, for sure. So your Twitter account mentions that the purging of the 2020 election database in the beginning of February is a standard practice. Can you please confirm for me that that's what you do for all elections, after all elections that you Speaker 2: do that? I cannot confirm that for you today, but we can certainly get you that answer, Congressman. Speaker 0: Thank you. Mr. Chairman, can you confirm that today or not? Speaker 3: I really can't confirm that either today. I just know that because there is limited space on these servers, when you have to run another election, then you have to make room for the additional election data. Speaker 0: So was there additional was there still let me just rephrase this. If that is the standard practice, which is kind of I don't think you guys are saying that you know for sure, but the chairman just intimated that that that's the case. Can you explain to me why data was still present for prior elections, on the databases in and of itself? Speaker 2: Yeah. Again, I I don't have an answer to that question, but we'll certainly get you an answer for it, Congressman. Speaker 0: Okay. All right. I appreciate if you would give me that information. Speaker 3: And I do think that it's important that our recorder has suggested that he will be answering every question in a timely fashion. Speaker 0: That's the same recorder that campaigned that Adrian Fontes was incompetent and called him a criminal, and he was the guy that was running the 2020 election, and you actually hired someone to oversee Mr. Fontes because you guys didn't trust Mr. Fontes as well. Is that the same guy is that same Steven Richard? Speaker 2: Yeah, I wouldn't put it that way exactly, but what we did was we did have statutory and board as you know, congressman boards of supervisors have responsibility for election day operations. And we took that back so that we would have, 4 Republicans and 2 Democrats overseeing the 2020 election. We thought

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨Kari Lake is a key contender in the Trump Administration:

@ElectionWiz - Election Wizard

JUST IN: Kari Lake Is 'Top Contender' For Key Trump Admin Post https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/just-in-kari-lake-is-top-contender-for-key-trump-admin-post-mace/?utm_source=ElWiz&utm_medium=twitter

JUST IN: Kari Lake Is ‘Top Contender’ For Key Trump Admin Post Kari Lake’s political ambitions may have found new life, even after back-to-back election losses in Arizona. The former news anchor and a fixture in trendingpoliticsnews.com

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨A PRR was sent to the Maricopa County Treasury where Recorder Richer claimed the Ballot Affidavit Envelopes were being stored. The treasury indicated they didn't have them. https://t.co/izqD1gANz5

@AZ_DesertRose - Misty Summers AZ News

🚨AZ Court News: MaRICOpa County Superior Court Judge, John Hannah is Officially Passed the 60 days allotted to deliver his Court Ruling in Lake v Richer Records Request Trial Sept 21 & 25. Have the ballot affidavit envelopes been destroyed? Is Judge Hannah covering for County Recorder @stephen_richer as is indicated by the most recent PRR below? The Maricopa County treasury has indicated in two separate Public Records Requests that they do not have the ballot affidavit signature envelopes as Testified in court by Recorder Stephen Richer. Recently Court ordered ballots in GA from 2020 are also missing. It appears we are seeing a pattern of Malfeasance and cover up by deepstate & democrat operatives. The public has a right to see if their signatures were forged? The public has a right to see if fraudulent ballot envelopes were signed? The courts are not only stalling but are throwing justice right outside the window of public scrutiny. 🚨We need public outcry and public action demanding Maricopa County turn over the ballot affidavit envelopes!! A Special Action Request is now needed. @ConradsonJordan @gatewaypundit @TuckerCarlson @GeorgeNemeh @TheFederalist1 @laralogan @LauraLoomer @LizCrokin @realLizUSA @LizHarrisMBA @BrianFerence1 @KariLake @WethePeopleAZA1 @WendyRogersAZ @votewarren @realAlexKolodin @anthonykernAZ @Wadsack4Arizona @AbrahamHamadeh @KariLakeWarRoom @AbeWarRoom @AzPinkLady @Rach_IC @IvanRaiklin @realDonaldTrump @DrJohnEastman @prayingmedic @KanekoaTheGreat @DC_Draino @bennyjohnson @MikeBenzCyber @SpeakerJohnson @Jim_Jordan @PatrickByrne @realMikeLindell @Jnet_margarita @BerryRazi @DecentFiJC @JohnBWellsCTM

Saved - November 3, 2024 at 5:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes did not attend a crucial federal court hearing regarding over 218,000 registered voters unable to prove their citizenship. Federal Judge Steven Logan expressed frustration at Fontes' absence and questioned the knowledge of his legal counsel about the situation. The court emphasized the importance of the hearing, especially with the election approaching. The case is represented by AZ Rep Attorney Alexander Kolodin, highlighting ongoing concerns about voter registration and election integrity in Arizona.

@AZDesert_Rose - AZ Election News

🚨AZ Breaking News: Arizona SoS Adrian Fontes Fails to Attend Yesterday's Federal Court Evidentiary Hearing on Over 218,000+ Registered Voters Who Cannot Prove Citizenship! Citizen AG v Fontes. 🚨Angered Federal Judge Steven Logan Questions Fontes' legal counsel, AZ Assistant Attorney General: "THE COURT : Just one moment. Is there anything the Secretary can do before November the 5th as it relates to determining if there are any ballots that have already been cast by any members of exceptant registrants? MS HARTMAN-TELLEZ: Your Honor, I don't - THE COURT: You don't know? MS HARTMAN-TELLEZ: I don't know I think it's highly unlikely. THE COURT : Why isn't the Secretary here? MS HARTMAN-TELLEZ: Well, Your Honor, because it is four days before an election and this THE COURT : Why isn't one of the Secretary's lawyers here that sees him every day and works with him every day? MS HARTMAN-TELLEZ: Your Honor, this hearing was not -- it wasn't clear to us that this was to be an evidentiary hearing that witnesses were required. We can, you know, I THE COURT: You don't know? MS HARTMAN-TELLEZ: I do know that everyone working in the Secretary's office is incredibly busy right now. Obviously appearing in federal court is a very important. THE COURT: I know my courtroom deputy is incredibly busy. My court reporter is incredibly busy. The three lawyers behind you, I am sure they are all incredibly busy. The nature of being a professional and being gainfully employed, working and earning a wage that you pay taxes on, by virtue of what we do, I think we are all incredibly busy. But I wish I was in a position to tell the Ninth Circuit or the Supreme Court when something gets sent back to me, "I would have done better, but I'm incredibly busy." don't think the Ninth Circuit cares that I'm incredibly busy, because at the ends of the day under Article III, just like the Secretary of State, I have responsibilities that I need to take care of as it relates to my job." - Court Documents 🚨Citizen AG was represented by AZ Rep Attorney Alexander Kolodin @realAlexKolodin 🚨Read: Citizens AG v Fontes Nov 1, 2024 News Article - Howard Fischer @azcapmedia ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://tucson.com/news/state-regional/government-politics/elections/arizona-election-2024-lawsuit-over-voter-rolls-defended-by-secretary-state/article_54fc8c5c-9878-11ef-bd44-736d44213d43.html?origin=serp_auto @Rach_IC @BehizyTweets @PatriotMarkCook @KimWexlerMAJD @WethePeopleAZA1 @WetheDine @TrumpWarRoom @realLizUSA @merissahamilton @JenWEsq @WendyRogersAZ @KariLake @ParikhClay @elonmusk @RobGouveiaEsq @RobertKennedyJr @pnjaban @BlehmLawAZ @AbrahamHamadeh @AzPinkLady @ThePhoenixEnig1 @prayingmedic @BerryRazi @forloveofJ @saves_777 @GarretLewis @BrianFerence1 @MaricopaGOP @AZGOP

Arizona election office says claim of ineligible voters is bogus PHOENIX — A lawyer for Secretary of State Adrian Fontes told a federal judge Friday there is no evidence backing a Florida group’s claim there are 1.2 million people who tucson.com

@realAlexKolodin - Rep. Alexander Kolodin

Had a blast at yesterday's 💣 hearing in Citizen AG v. Fontes! https://t.co/MoQR43uMA4

View Full Interactive Feed