TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @AaronRDay

AaronRDay
Posted - February 27, 2026 at 7:01 PM
Saved - February 28, 2026 at 2:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I allege Jeffrey Epstein hijacked Bitcoin, funding MIT core devs, Brock Pierce, and Blockstream to throttle BTC, then steered development funding to Epstein’s money. I claim Pierce co-founded Tether, driving 2017 price pumps with unbacked money, and that Tether never passes an audit. Lutnick via Cantor Fitzgerald backs Tether and pushed the Genius Act to back stablecoins with US Treasuries. The Clarity Act would tokenize all assets and transfer them to the four biggest banks.

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day

JEFFREY EPSTEIN HIJACKED BITCOIN AND NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT Jeffrey Epstein didn't just traffic people. He hijacked Bitcoin. We found it in the files. Exposed it on The Corbett Report today. Epstein funded the MIT developers who killed Bitcoin as peer-to-peer cash. His crypto advisor Brock Pierce ran the Bitcoin Foundation into the ground, then handed development funding to MIT where Epstein's money was explicitly earmarked for the core devs. We have the emails. Epstein invested in Blockstream, the company that only exists if Bitcoin stays throttled at 7 transactions per second. Then his money funded the developers who made that permanent. Pierce co-founded Tether. A University of Texas study found over 50% of Bitcoin's 2017 price pump came from unbacked Tether printing. The CFTC found only 27 cents backing every dollar of Tether. They manufactured the "digital gold" narrative with fake money. Tether has never passed an audit. Not once. No firm will even work with them. Then Howard Lutnick, Epstein's literal next door neighbor who lied under oath about their relationship, invested $600M in Tether through Cantor Fitzgerald. His firm now manages all of Tether's treasury reserves. Lutnick went from fundraising for Hillary Clinton to chairing Trump's transition team. He installed Bo Hines as White House crypto advisor. Together they pushed the Genius Act, which requires all stablecoins to be backed by US Treasuries, managed by Lutnick's firm. 10 days after the Genius Act passed, Hines quit the White House and became CEO of Tether's US subsidiary. The Genius Act is not crypto innovation. It is a backdoor CBDC that funds $3 trillion in additional government debt while making Lutnick's firm the biggest beneficiary. And there is something worse coming. The Clarity Act will tokenize everything you own. Your stocks, 401k, commodities, real estate. All programmable, trackable, seizeable. Combined with legal changes already made in all 50 states since 1994, when the next financial collapse hits, your assets transfer to the four largest banks with a click of a button. Every player is connected. Every move was coordinated. This is not Big Short 2.0. This is Big Short 2.0 on steroids, pre-planned and run by the same network that already owns the outcome.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Aaron Day discusses the Epstein files’ implications for Bitcoin and global finance, presenting a tightly linked web of players and events. - The hijacking of Bitcoin is framed as a deliberate shift from Bitcoin’s original vision of peer-to-peer digital cash to digital gold and a store of value for Wall Street, with slow, expensive transactions for everyday use. The article on brownstone.org, “the hijacking of Bitcoin,” by Aaron Day, is central to this claim. - Original Bitcoin vision and early adoption: Bitcoin’s white paper envisioned peer-to-peer digital cash, a global currency usable for day-to-day purchases with low transaction fees. By 2017, major retailers accepted Bitcoin (Overstock.com, Microsoft, Expedia, Subway franchises), and Bitcoin was faster and cheaper than traditional systems. By late 2017, average transaction fees rose to about $50 and finalization times stretched to 7–10 days, leading to a shift in narrative toward Bitcoin as digital gold and a store of value. - The block size fight (2015–2017) and its subversion: The discussion centers on the block size debate and the decision to throttle Bitcoin to seven transactions per second by capping blocks at one megabyte. Blockstream, a for-profit company founded by early Bitcoin Core developers, is described as promoting second-layer solutions and benefiting from smaller block sizes. The original vision called for higher throughput and scalability, but Blockstream allegedly aligned with interests favoring smaller blocks and second-layer implementations. - MIT funding and Epstein’s involvement: Brock Pierce, who served as chair of the Bitcoin Foundation, allegedly advised Jeffrey Epstein on cryptocurrency starting from a 2011 MindShift Conference at Little Saint James Island. Epstein’s influence extended into funding core Bitcoin developers through MIT after the Bitcoin Foundation collapsed in 2015. Joy Ito, head of MIT, allegedly exchanged emails indicating Epstein’s money was earmarked to fund named developers (Gavin Andresen, Vladimir Vanderland, Corey Fields). Epstein’s funding coincided with MIT taking over developer funding as the Bitcoin Foundation waned. - Brock Pierce’s intertwined roles: Brock Pierce is linked to Epstein, the Bitcoin Foundation, Blockstream, and Tether. Pierce’s trajectory includes cofounding Tether, a stablecoin, and later pressuring the narrative shift to digital gold. Blockstream’s investors included traditional finance figures tied to Epstein’s network. Epstein allegedly invested in Blockstream before the Bitcoin Foundation’s collapse, and Blockstream benefited from a Bitcoin ecosystem that would throttle block sizes. - Tether, stablecoins, and price manipulation claims: Pierce co-founded Tether, a stablecoin whose 1:1 peg to the dollar is claimed to have been maintained without full backing. A University of Texas study reportedly found that over 50% of Bitcoin’s 2017 price appreciation was due to Tether being used to buy Bitcoin. The CFTC and New York State investigations allegedly found Tether not fully backed, with as little as $0.26 backing per $1 in circulation according to those findings. Tether’s role is tied to Bitcoin’s price rise and the store-of-value narrative. - Howard Lutnick and the Genius Act: Howard Lutnick, Epstein’s ally and neighbor, is described as having funded Tether (Cantor Fitzgerald reportedly invested $600 million), with Cantor Fitzgerald gaining an exclusive contract to manage U.S. treasuries backing Tether. Lutnick reportedly lied about his ties to Epstein during Senate testimony and later became Commerce Secretary after involvement with Bo Hines, a crypto adviser who helped draft the Genius Act. The Genius Act purportedly requires private stablecoins to be backed by U.S. treasuries and to comply with financial surveillance, benefiting Lutnick’s firm, which manages treasuries. The Genius Act is portrayed as a backdoor to a centralized, surveilled monetary system, and the act positions stablecoins as a key funding mechanism for U.S. debt (billions added to treasury issuances). - The Clarity Act and tokenization fears: A forthcoming Brown Center Institute piece on the Clarity Act is described as not just about crypto rules, but about tokenizing everything—stocks, 401(k)s, commodities, oil, agriculture, and eventually real estate—under centralized surveillance. The Clarity Act is presented as enabling programmable, trackable, censorable digital tokens for all owned assets, with BlackRock’s Larry Fink cited as indicating widespread tokenization. The Clarity Act is said to be moving through Congress after passing the House. - Broader implications and calls to action: The interview frames technocracy, digital currencies, and centralized tokenization as accelerating far more quickly than imagined. Aaron Day advocates publicizing and understanding how corrupt arrangements and tokenization schemes integrate Epstein’s network with MIT, Blockstream, Tether, and political leadership. The proposed personal strategies include exiting fiat, avoiding government-regulated stablecoins, using privacy coins, gold, and silver; exploring private healthcare and medical tourism; forming trusts; and building parallel systems to reclaim free will amid what is described as technocracy. - The conversation closes with references to continuing coverage and a promised deeper dive into the Genius Act and Clarity Act, accompanied by show notes and links at corbettreport.com/epstein Bitcoin and brownstone.org.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's now we know that it's there in writing that Epstein was funding this, while the Bitcoin Foundation, which imploded, was run by this by Brock Pierce, who was Jeffrey Epstein's adviser on crypto since 2011. So this gets more intertwined than I could have ever imagined. And and, you know, as we'll continue to discuss, it even gets, you know, worse from there. Speaker 1: You're listening to the Corbett Report. Speaker 2: Welcome back, friends. Welcome back to the Corbett Report. It is February 2026. And today, I have a very important report for those who might be thinking that they are suspicious of all of the attention and coverage that is, that The Epstein Files are gaining in the establishment media. If the establishment media is talking about it, it must be a SIOP and distraction. Right? Well, it might be a distraction of sorts. That is a distraction from some of the really scandalous, truly amazing information that we have uncovered in these Epstein files. And specifically, I'm not talking about the more prurient and more sensational headline grabbing types of scandals. I'm talking about a scandal that you may not have heard about, but is probably one of the more important revelations from the Epstein files so far. It is contained in a very extensive, very well documented article that is now up on brownstone.org. It is called the hijacking of Bitcoin, and it is by today's guest, Aaron Day. So, Aaron, thank you very much for joining us today on the corporate report. Speaker 0: Thank you for having me on. Speaker 2: Alright. Let's get into this article, which starts by saying the original vision for Bitcoin was simple, peer to peer digital cash, free from banks and government. However, this article argues that this vision was deliberately hijacked as Bitcoin is now pushed as digital gold, a scarce asset for Wall Street with slow and expensive transactions for everyday use. Alright. Well, I'm Aaron, my audience may or may not be familiar with the ins and outs of the development of Bitcoin in the crypto space. So just to get everybody on board, perhaps we can start with just some basic information. You start by talking about the twenty fifteen to twenty seventeen block size fight. So can you tell us what was the original Satoshi Nakamoto white paper vision for Bitcoin? What were the block size wars about? And how did that subvert that original vision? Speaker 0: Sure. Well, I'd like to start by taking a step back even before that, which is to go back to 2008 when we had the financial collapse. Well, the global financial collapse, certainly a lot of it was centered in The United States. And at this point in time, the banks were bailed out to the tune of billions of dollars. 10,000,000 plus people lost their homes. And so there was actually a bit of unity coming out of the financial collapse and the bailout where you had the Tea Party on the right and you had the, Occupy Wall Street movement, which was manufactured. But nevertheless, you had the right and the left unified in their lack of support and lack of confidence in the traditional banking system for that at that moment in time. Bitcoin was essentially launched a year later and the idea and the promise behind Bitcoin and what was written about in what's called the Bitcoin white paper was that, you know, the first time for the first time, we had this idea of having peer to peer digital cash. You had a cryptocurrency that could be used as an alternative to central banks, as an alternative to commercial banks. This was a form of money that was not created by these third parties that had a fixed supply, but it was intended to be used as an alternative currency. It was intended to be used as something that you would use to buy groceries or to buy coffee or to do day to day transactions. And it's a global currency, which is really important when you consider that 71% of the planet makes less than $10 per day. So the idea behind this is that you would now have a currency that you could use for day to day transactions that would have low transaction fees, and it's something anyone anywhere in the world could use for day to day purchases. So that was essentially the starting point. That was what the white paper was about. And that's how people were using Bitcoin in the early days. I was introduced to Bitcoin in 2012 by a guy named Roger Beer, who was speaking at a a conference in my home state of New Hampshire called Liberty Forum. And he talked about what I just talked about, which is that, you know, finally, we had an opportunity to go around these central banks that, you know, foment wars on both sides and so on and so forth. And that got me excited. And so I actually started using it myself in New Hampshire. In fact, at that point in time, twenty twelve, twenty thirteen, there were numerous restaurants and stores in New Hampshire that were accepting Bitcoin as a payment method. And a lot of people don't understand this at all about the initial use of Bitcoin. Most people, because I've gone you know, with my wife and I have been to 27 US states, four countries, talking about technocracy and central banks and what you can do as an alternative. In fact, you had me on the solutions report to talk about that a year or two ago at this point. And and so we were using Bitcoin for that purpose. And by 2017, there were major retailers and organizations accepting Bitcoin directly. You had overstock.com where you can buy everything from furniture to a whole variety of different products. Microsoft accepted Bitcoin directly. Expedia accepted Bitcoin directly. You could actually book your travel and flights. There were Subway sandwich franchises that were taking Bitcoin. It was really hitting mainstream adoption. And then all of a sudden in 2017, Bitcoin went from being fast and inexpensive to use, in fact, cheaper than using the traditional financial system. If you're using a credit card, for instance, the credit card processing credit card processor typically charges, you know, 29¢ per transaction plus 3.29 percent of the transaction. And at that point in time, Bitcoin was better, faster, cheaper money. But then all of a sudden, as the usage surged, by q four twenty seventeen, you were seeing average transaction fees of $50. $50. And it would take anywhere from 7 to 10 days to actually finalize a transaction. Well, obviously, no business can afford to pay $50 for transaction fees and no one's gonna be willing to wait seven to ten days. And so all of a sudden, you know, people stopped using Bitcoin for day to day transactions and which we'll get into, the narrative started to shift. People stopped talking about Bitcoin as peer to peer digital cash and then out of nowhere, people started talking about Bitcoin as being digital gold. They started talking about it as being a store of value, something that you don't spend, something that you just hold on to. And because there are only 21,000,000 Bitcoin allegedly that will ever be created, It's even more scarce than gold and, you know, therefore, you know, you should hold it and never spend it. And so this this shift happened and, you know, I kind of the end point of the shift was 2017, but it turns out there was a process building up to that from, you know, kind of 2015 to 2017. And we now know more specifically who the players were, and it does involve Jeffrey Epstein. It involves people from traditional finance that were involved in funding and the not only the changes to the system itself, but were heavily involved in what I'll call the propaganda to change the public narrative from a digital currency to this store of value. Speaker 2: And for people who need more detail and information on that process of the hijacking of Bitcoin and what the, the block size fight was about, I would highly recommend that they read the book by Roger Ver with Steve Patterson, Hijacking Bitcoin, the Hidden History of BTC. It's at hijackingbitcoin.com. It goes through that history and talks about some of the the well, more of the detail of what you've just mentioned there. But let's start bringing in the Epstein side of this. And in order to do that, I think we have to start at least setting the the pieces on the table here. So perhaps we can start by talking about the early Bitcoin foundation that was running in the early twenty tens, the that funded the core Bitcoin developers, how that collapsed, and what that collapse well, what came in to fill the vacuum of that collapse? Speaker 0: Yeah. And and the way that I actually found out about all of this is I wrote a book a few years back called the final countdown, and and my interest in this has been several fold. One, you know, as a user of Bitcoin who found Bitcoin to be become unusable by 2017, you know, I've been I've been interested in studying the history of this, but I've also been studying central bank digital currencies. And so three, three and a half years ago, I was studying what was going on primarily because I was noticing that friends of mine that are at the intersection of crypto and liberty were being targeted by the federal government. And I've looked into why is this happening? Why specifically are people that are promoting Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as an alternative to central banks? Why are these people being targeted by the federal government? And then I discovered that there's a global movement to roll out central bank digital currencies. A central bank digital currency is a digital form of fiat that can be tracked, programmed, and censored by the government and other third parties. So this is a if you're interested in freedom and privacy, the last thing you wanna see is central bank digital currency rollouts. And so as I started researching this, I found that there are a 134 countries around the world at various stages of of developing and rolling out CBDCs. 11 countries have already rolled out CBDCs, and these countries represent 98% of global GDP. So, I mean, this is essentially everyone effectively is actively engaged in working on these CBDCs. Well, then, you know, I started being based in The United States. I started looking at, well, what's going on in The United States? Where does The United States stand on this? And that's where I found, and most people still to this day don't know this, the Federal Reserve Bank has conducted three successful pilots of central bank digital currencies. There's a project called project Hamilton, which is a project to replace essentially the dollar. It's a digital version of the dollar. And this project has been going on since, wanna say, 2018. They've developed a digital currency that can handle 1,700,000 transactions per second, far more than the current capacity of The US financial system. This has actually been built. This has been tested. There's another called Project Cedar and a third called Regulated Liability Network. Well, when I was investigating these, what I found was all three of these CBDC pilots came out of MIT. So it was MIT working with either the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston with this project Hamilton or working with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York with the other two. And at the time, I I discovered that Jeffrey Epstein had funded this group out of MIT that was working on these CBDCs. So in my book and in subsequent articles, I made the point that, well, hey, it looks like Jeffrey Epstein is funding these CBDC pilots. What I also found is, to your point about the Bitcoin Foundation, so to take a step back, Bitcoin is an open source project. So it's open source code. Anybody can go online and go to the GitHub and you can actually download and review and audit the code. There's no central organization behind Bitcoin. So you have open source developers and people that contribute to the project, but there's no corporate entity funding it. Well, a lot of people might say, well, hey, this sounds great, but it turns out that open source developers don't develop code for free. There aren't also other white hat actors that are going out there auditing code for free. People work for compensation. This isn't this shouldn't be news to anyone. This shouldn't be a surprise. But if you have an open source project, then the project itself is subject to whoever's funding the developers and the project could go in a direction you don't want it to go. So what happened is an organization was formed, a nonprofit called the Bitcoin Foundation, and it had, you know, five original people involved with funding it, Roger Beer and some of the earlier developers, and a lot of people contributed. And the idea was that this Bitcoin Foundation would preserve the integrity of the project and preserve the integrity of the white paper. There's a whole sort of history, which, by the way, should be written and researched on its own separately. There I I guarantee you there's a separate there's a, you know, there's a multipart series on the internal dynamics of what happened with the Bitcoin Foundation. But before I get into kind of where the Bitcoin Foundation broke down and how this ties into Jeffrey Epstein, wanna talk about a character named Brock Pierce. Now Brock Pierce is somebody that I've encountered. I encountered him first about twenty six, twenty seven years ago, and I didn't even know who he was at the time. I didn't even connect the dots until 2015. And without going into my own story and background, I'll give you the quick version of it. I started a technology company in 1995, and I was in the process of taking this company public. And we hired an investment bank, this firm called Lazard Freres, which is a really niche boutique investment bank out of New York City, but they usually only work on really high end deals. And so it was a big deal that they were working on, you know, our IPO as a kind of early technology company. But they had another company ahead of us that they were in the process of taking public called Digital Entertainment Network, DEN. And I encourage you to research on your own everything involved in this company, but the punchline is the company never went public and ended up filing for bankruptcy because all of the founders, including Brock Pierce, had to flee The United States because they were being charged with, you know, sex trafficking or I don't if it was sex trafficking, but they were underage boys, and it was a whole big scandal. And so, basically, all of the founders left. Brock Pierce had previously been a child star. He was in the movie Mighty Ducks, and so he was actually brought in as a really young CEO to be the face of the project. And I, you know, I I so I don't wanna say anything defamatory about him that he was necessarily leading the charge on, you know, the the other illegal activities. But the other two founders, I believe, were found guilty and were in hiding. Everybody went to Spain. Needless to say that their IPO didn't happen, and this actually impacted me directly because it actually shut the IPO window because the the taint surrounding this project. And so I didn't know anything about it. I didn't even paid attention. I I couldn't have told you it was Brock Pierce then, but it resurfaced. But then all of a sudden, the same guy, the same Brock Pierce ended up becoming the chair of the Bitcoin Foundation. And I thought that was weird just based on his background. I'm like, why is this guy the chair of the Bitcoin Foundation? But we later find in the Epstein files that Brock Pierce went to Little Saint James Island to to an event hosted by Jeffrey Epstein in 2011. I believe it's a called a MindShift Conference. A whole bunch of people with from diverse technical areas were kind of sharing ideas and brainstorming and networking. And coming out of that '2 2011 event, essentially, Brock Pierce began advising Jeffrey Epstein on all matters related to cryptocurrency. Now I will tell you, no one knew this. I mean, I've been involved in crypto since 2010. I know people that have been involved in crypto since '20 or excuse me. I was involved in 2012. I know people that have been involved since 2010. No one knew that Jeffrey Epstein had any involvement at all. Even the article that I wrote suggesting that he was involved in CBDCs, I only found one article where Jeffrey Epstein was ever interviewed talking about Bitcoin, and it was in a publication called NexaWeb from 2017. So the only article we ever have from Jeffrey Epstein is in 2017 where he discusses the fact that he believes that Bitcoin is not a currency. The peer to peer digital cash is outlined in the white paper by Satoshi Nakamoto, but rather he thinks it's a store of value. And I thought it was very bizarre. Like, why is the only article this guy ever has on this topic him talking about this narrative shift? It didn't make any sense to me, but, you know, I suggested an article that, hey. Maybe he was involved in not only funding MIT and these CBDCs, but then this other part where the Bitcoin Foundation, as I mentioned, is this nonprofit that's funding these developers where Brock Pierce is the chair. In 2015, that organization implodes. They have a whole series of internal issues, financial issues. Some of the people on the board had issues with the government involving cryptocurrency exchanges and money laundering and so on and so forth. And so it just so happens as Bitcoin is making this shift from digital cash to digital gold, the funding of the developers went from the Bitcoin Foundation headed by Brock Pierce to MIT. MIT started to take over the funding of these developers. And I suggested that Epstein might be involved, and we now know from the Epstein files that not only was he involved, but in an email from Joy Ito, who is the head of MIT to Jeffrey Epstein, well, you know, exchange, Epstein's money was explicitly earmarked to fund these developers, and they even name the developers. There's Gavin Andresen. There's Vladimir Vanderland or something like that and a guy by the name of Corey Fields. So it's now we know that it's there in writing that Epstein was funding this while the Bitcoin Foundation, which imploded, was run by this by Brock Pierce, who was Jeffrey Epstein's adviser on crypto since 2011. So this gets more intertwined than I could have ever imagined. And and, you know, as we'll continue to discuss, it even gets, you know, worse from there. Speaker 2: It does. And you've already painted a quite an incredible picture there. And for people who need to see the evidence, obviously, Brock, my video editor, will be showing this on the screen, the specific email exchanges that you're talking about. But of course, they're all contained in this voluminous, article that we're discussing here. So we've set the table, and now we have a sense of some of the players that are on this table. How do things develop from the point that that we have MIT starting to, fund, literally fund the core developers of Bitcoin? How does the change take place, and what other organizations and people are involved in it? Speaker 0: Well, there's another step that actually happened before MIT took over the funding of the developers, and this involves the company Blockstream that you'd mentioned. Roger Veer's book and Steve Patterson's book, Hijacking Bitcoin, goes into this in some detail, but I do want to explain a little bit about what Blockstream is and how all this fits in. Blockstream is a company that was started by a few early Bitcoin core developers. And the basic idea behind Blockstream is this. What they did was and we haven't really talked about the block size, but the original idea behind Bitcoin was for it to be peer to peer digital cash. And Satoshi Nakamoto discussed in these discussion online discussion forums the idea that from the very beginning of Bitcoin, it was intended to compete with Visa and Mastercard. Satoshi talked about the idea that Bitcoin should, in the fairly early days, be able to handle 25,000 transactions per second and that it should be able to get even faster over time as computers get faster, as bandwidth increases, so on and so forth. He was looking at Metcalfe's law and some of these other things that apply to technology, which is that, you know, this still holds to this day. Technology tends to get cheaper and faster. And so he was saying, well, hey, 25,000 transactions per second now, but this thing should scale to do millions of transactions per second. And so the way Bitcoin works is you have what are called miners, but I'll try to simplify how this works. You have math you have computers all around the world that are trying to solve very complex math problems that are very expensive in terms of computational power to solve these math problems. And the computer that solves the math problem first gets to add the the transactions from in in this, you know, ten minute interval. So there are every ten minutes, a new math puzzle is solved and new transactions are added to the blockchain. So it's an immutable ledger, and every ten minutes, there are new blocks of transactions being added to the blockchain. And the way that it was structured was at the very beginning, every ten minutes, if you solve this math problem, you would get initially 50 Bitcoin for solving the math puzzle plus whatever transaction fees happen to occur in that in that block of transactions. And then every four years, this reward that started out as 50 halves. So after four years, the miners would receive 25 Bitcoin for each block that was solved, and then four years after that, 12 and a half, etcetera. And you keep on doing this halving until at some point at the end, 21,000,000 Bitcoin had been created and that was the fixed cap. Well, why was this structure put in place? The structure was put in place as an incentive early on while there weren't a lot of transactions and transaction fees, it was an incentive for miners to secure the network and to have a lot of different computers competing to solve these math problems so that you didn't have the concentration of the network in the hands of a small group of people. This was the economic system of Bitcoin. And so there was a one meg the the original design had no limit to the size of the blocks. So in other words, the original idea was, well, yeah, we should be able to process 25,000 transactions per second. These blocks were expected to become large, and the miners were expected to be computers that were in big data centers. This was, you know, again, Satoshi talked about this at length. But early on, as they were testing the network, you know, as you're testing these kinds of systems and you're trying to work out the kinks, they put in a one megabyte limit just for testing purposes. Well, that one megabyte limit, you can only put about the equivalent of seven transactions per second worth of data into a block. So this was initially done as a test. And then this is why when we discussed in the hijacking part of this, a whole bunch of people then decided, well, we're going to make that one megabyte cap permanent. And they put a whole bunch of argumentation around it, the network needs to be decentralized, so on and so forth. And so we're going to cap, we're going to throttle Bitcoin so that it can only do seven transactions per second, but we're going to build what are called second layer solutions on top of Bitcoin to be able to handle more transactions and to make it actual peer to peer digital cash. And so this company, Blockstream, was formed to be a second layer solution, a for profit company that would benefit and in fact would only be viable if Bitcoin was throttled at seven transactions per second. So does this make sense so far? Hopefully, I know a lot Speaker 2: of people It makes sense, but I've been following this for a long time. For people who who need more information on this, of course, they can see the Hijacking Bitcoin article and the Hijacking Bitcoin book that we talked about before. But, yes, long story short, there are people who want the to keep the blocks small, and those are the people working for companies like Blockstream that, oh, by the way, happen to have ties to Epstein. So let's get into that. Speaker 0: So there's that. So there's the company Blockstream that personally benefits from the blocks being small. And Blockstream as a corporation, and we knew this from hijacking Bitcoin and from publicly available information had, let's just say, the kind of investors that the port of Bitcoin was to actually get rid of these kinds of companies in traditional finance. One of the big investors, was a guy named Decasteries, who was the CEO of AXA, a big European company. He also happened to be the chair of the Bilderberg Group. So you had all of these companies investing in Blockstream that were part of traditional finance, the thing that Bitcoin was there to disintermediate, to get out of financial transactions. Well, what we found in these Epstein files is that Epstein actually invested in Blockstream before the collapse of the Bitcoin Foundation and before he funded the developers who cemented the changes that Blockstream benefited from. This was absolutely bombshell information for everyone. People no one knew this. This was not something that was widely known at all. And in fact, the CEO of Blockstream from the emails apparently visited Epstein Epstein's island as did others involved with Blockstream, and nobody had any idea that this was going on. So in other words, to simplify this, Epstein invests in Blockstream, a company that benefits from Bitcoin being throttled. And then seven or eight months later, fortuitously, the company that had been funding the Bitcoin core developers, which was chaired by Epstein's adviser, Brock Pierce, collapses, and then he ends up funding the MIT developers that cement the seven transactions per second and one megabyte block size. Just absolutely fascinating information. But it gets even more bizarre as we go through this because remember, my first foray into this was, hey. It looks like why is Epstein funding these CBDC pilots? So there are a lot of people claiming that these second layer solutions for Bitcoin would enable it to be peer to peer digital cash as opposed to just, you know, following the original design. But what you find is if you're going to now change the narrative for Bitcoin and you're gonna call it digital gold and you're gonna call it a store of value, well, in order to be a store of value, it needs to either maintain its price or go up in price. Otherwise, people will not view it as a a store of value. Well, we're gonna go back now to the same guy, Brock Pierce. Brock Pierce was a cofounder of a company called Tether, which you may have heard of, which is a very popular company even today and a very large company now. Tether is a stablecoin. A stablecoin is a digital token that essentially represents fiat where, you know, one one token, one USDT token equals $1. And in theory, how this is supposed to work is in order for this token, this Tether to maintain its peg, there need to be assets backing it that are, you know, equal to or greater than 1 dollar's worth of of value. Well, it turns out that during this time period in 2017 when the narrative shift happens, a University of Texas study found that over 50% of the price appreciation from Bitcoin in 2017 was due to Tether being printed and used to buy Bitcoin, but it was separately found from two different actions, one from the CFTC and one from the state of New York, that Tether was in fact not fully backed. And that the CFTC found, I believe, that there were really only $26.27 cents worth of assets backing 1 dollar's worth of Tether. In other words, they were printing Tether out of thin air and claiming it was backed by fiat, which is also money that's printed out of thin air, but it wasn't. And then they were using that to pump the price of Bitcoin, which is what created the whole store of value narrative to begin with. So in other words, what I'm suggesting is the whole idea that Bitcoin is a good store of value is a fabrication based on this fake Tether printing that, you know, Brock Pierce was the cofounder of that company while also the guy responsible for handing over the development of, the funding of the development of of Bitcoin and hobbling it to MIT through Jeffrey Epstein. So it's just remarkable how all of these pieces are fitting together. Speaker 2: More and more remarkable because it isn't just Brock Pierce connection. There's other connections to this stablecoin space, that present themselves in the Epstein files. Like, oh, who's been in the news recently for his Epstein connections? Oh, Howard Lutnick, who denied having extensive Epstein ties. Turns out he does have some Epstein ties. Let's talk about Howard Lutnick. Speaker 0: Yeah. Howard Lutnick is a very fascinating character in all of this, and I've actually been writing about Lutnick for for a while. And this this story is also to me, when I look at this, this is a level of corruption that's far beyond, say, instance, Nancy Pelosi in engaging in insider trading. Howard Lutnick is and where people may have just become familiar with Howard Lutnick is, you know, he had to testify recently on his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Howard Lunick is Jeffrey Epstein's next door neighbor in New York, and and it turns out it looks like he might have purchased his house from a trust created by Epstein, which is bizarre in and of itself. And I'm not gonna you know, the fact that, you know, Epstein and and, Lutnick have, you know, 9 And 11 are the addresses on the the street that they share together in New York City that, you know, I'm not gonna go I I don't know anything about where to draw conclusions with that. But when Lutnick was testifying for his position as US commerce secretary, he claimed that, you know, he'd only met Epstein once in 2006 in New York and was absolutely disgusted by him and had nothing to do with him. This was this was what he was saying as he was going through his confirmation process, and we now know from the Epstein files that that's not exactly true. We know that, in fact, Epstein donated, I think it was $50,000 to a fundraiser, in Lutnick's name. Lutnick visited Epstein's island with his family. They were business partners together. So Lutnick completely lied about his his relationship. And then even when he was, you know, grilled on him, he's like, well, you know, the extent of my relationship is whatever it is that's in these documents. You know, we already know that he lied before, and so I'm I'm sure there's even more to it than that. But I had separately written before even knowing the Epstein connection about Lutnick's involvement with Tether. Now this is a fascinating story. I mean, I've been around politics for a long time, and no one heard about Howard Lutnick. Howard Lutnick was not a major player in Republican politics. In fact, he was a major fundraiser for Hillary Clinton in 2016. So this is not a guy that is is known for his role in Republican politics. So, yeah, I'm gonna walk through the timeline here. So before the election, a few years before the election, Howard Lutnick, his firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, invested $600,000,000 in Tether. They were the largest, at that point ever, outside investor in Tether. And part of the terms of this agreement were that in exchange for this investment, Cantor Fitzgerald would essentially get the exclusive contract to manage all of the United States treasuries backing Tether. Now I know this gets a little bit complicated, but I wanna walk back a few steps. So remember, I I told you that Tether was found to not have reserves. Now there was no requirement that Tether be backed by US treasuries. There were there's no regulation prior to this Genius Act, which I'm sure we'll get into. There was no requirement that you had to back your stablecoin by US Treasuries. You could, for instance, back it by gold, silver, Bitcoin, other cryptocurrencies, you know, what whatever. Just so long as you had adequate bank backing, there was no rule or regulation. So Lutnick gets involved to to manage treasuries. Now did Tether even have treasuries? I wanna point out at this point, which by the way, to this day is still true, Tether has never passed an audit. They have never successfully passed an audit and they've actually gotten to the point now where they can't even get an audit firm to work with them. So, you know, these big audit firms that work with publicly traded companies all the time apparently don't want to work with this, you know, company that has a now a multi $100,000,000,000 market cap. That's kind of a red flag in and of itself. So Lutnick makes this investment with the contingency that he gets to manage these treasuries. Then all of a sudden, gets involved in Republican politics. Now remember, he's a big fundraiser for Hillary Clinton in 2016. He goes from that to being the chair of Donald Trump's transition team. This is a massive position. The the head of the transition team is responsible for vetting all of the cabinet, so is involved directly in recruiting and vetting every person at the level of the cabinet. So how you go from not being in the Republican Party politics and supporting Hillary Clinton to that role is something that needs to be investigated because that's very, very bizarre. But what's worse than that is, originally, Lutnick was trying to engineer and put himself up for treasury secretary. He was actually trying to position himself. There was a big kind of debate about this, and we we now end up with this guy Scott Bazendt, who is a an adviser to George Soros, which is a whole other separate bizarre situation. He ended up getting the treasury position, but there was a whole bunch of infighting and everything back and forth because Lutnick wanted the job. Well, think about this. Lutnick want just cut a deal with his company to manage the treasuries for Tether, and then he wanted to become the the treasury secretary. I I think that was even found to be a little bit too blatantly corrupt. And so instead, Lutnick ended up as commerce secretary, but what he did was worked closely with this guy named Bo Hines. Bo Hines was brought in to be a an adviser to Trump on crypto matters. And Lutnick working with Bo Hines and others drafted something called the Genius Act. Now I've spoken a lot about the Genius Act, and a lot of people don't understand what the Genius Act is or what the implications are. As I mentioned, I was fighting CBDCs. I continue to fight CBDCs, and Trump came out and said, well, we're not gonna have a CBDC. And he signed an executive order saying there's there's gonna be no CBDC. So now people think that that issue is dead. But in essence, what we have instead is something much worse. We've passed something called the Genius Act, which I'm saying is a backdoor CBDC. What this legislation says is if you are a private stablecoin issuer, a regulated stablecoin issuer, one, you have to follow all of the financial surveillance that comes out of congress currently, the Bank Secrecy Act, know your customer laws, all of that. You have to comply with all of that. So in other words, your stablecoins can be tracked and frozen and under the are now under the control of congress. But on top of that, you now have to back your stablecoins only with US treasuries. This is a massive windfall. The biggest beneficiary of the Genius Act is Howard Lutnick because his firm manages all of those treasuries and gets all of the fees for managing all of those treasuries. So, I mean, your audience is probably familiar with, you know, the Federal Reserve and the creature from Jekyll Island and the fact that the way our monetary system works going all the way back to, you know, 1910 is, you know, a shadowy group of bankers got together and basically, we now have this system where, you know, we issue money based on debt, we don't even know who owns the Federal Reserve, so on and so forth. Well, Howard Lupic won up this. So, essentially, now one of the largest players for the digital dollar, his firm is managing all of the treasuries. He's almost, like, leapfrogged the Federal Reserve. It's just it's breathtaking how how bizarre this is and how corrupt it is on its face. I mean, it's just the fact that this this is this is going on. Well, now we know that that I I suspect this. I haven't been able to prove this yet, but, you know, I have to think that somehow Pierce and Epstein were involved in bringing Lutnick into this because, you know, there are emails. And I actually also believe that it's likely that Epstein was involved in Tether as well because we know that through Brock Pierce, Epstein invested in Circle, which is US USDC. Well, I mean, what's the likelihood that Epstein's not gonna get a chance to invest in the very project that his crypto adviser has started? Right? I mean and in fact, there are emails back and forth where Brock Pierce is asking Epstein to introduce Larry Summers to Tether. So, clearly, there's communication back and forth where Epstein's involved with Tether. Epstein's involved at the level of at the very beginning trying to get Larry Summers involved. And I will point out since this is timely today, I just saw in the news that Larry that Larry Summers has resigned from Harvard where I believe he was the president based on his extensive involvement and inclusion in the Epstein files. I mean, know, again, there's 3,000,000 pages. I there is it's gonna take months, if not years, for people to crowdsource and put together all of the pieces on this. I've just focused my part on cryptocurrency and CBDCs and stablecoins, it's just absolutely breathtaking. So now, you know, I know I'm going a little all over the map, but Bohynes comes in as a crypto adviser. Bohynes and Lutnick and others push this Genius Act, which Lutnick's firm is the biggest beneficiary of. And then 10 after the Genius Act passes, Bohynes leaves as Trump's crypto adviser and becomes the CEO of USA Tether, The USA subsidiary of Tether. Now look. We are all familiar with revolving doors in government. I mean, this is very common in Wall Street and certainly in pharma where you'll see somebody from the FDA who then goes on to become an advisor. But even usually, there's kind of an understanding of, hey, we should at least wait six to twelve months. This guy left after ten days. So now Tether is one of the first official government sanctioned stablecoins in the world, and Howard Lutnick is the biggest financial beneficiary. All of this and Tether has never passed an audit. I actually before the election, I was trying to get to Trump through people that are his advisers telling him, I think that Tether could be the Big Short two point o. And now based on the government involvement and the overlap of people in the administration, I think this thing is gonna be too big to fail because when you study the history of Tether and the people involved, I mean, the people that are involved with founding this were involved with, you know, alleged Ponzi schemes prior to their involvement with Tether. There's nothing about this that looks legit for this to essentially become, like, the main shining example of crypto innovation and so forth coming out of The US. There's one other reason that the government was so eager to pass the Genius Act. As you probably know, the The US has now 38, almost $39,000,000,000,000 in debt, and no one wants to buy US debt anymore. Japan is not in a position to be able to buy US debt. China's selling US debt. And, you know, certainly, congress isn't going to do something like balance the budget. We are we're continuing to have $1,500,000,000,000 deficits every year. So how are they going to fund that? Well, by requiring these stablecoins, which by the way are popular. Let me tell you how popular stablecoins are. In the last twelve months, globally, stablecoins were used in $33,000,000,000,000 worth of financial transactions. That's actually greater than Visa. And at the rate that it's growing, by 2030, it will be a $120,000,000,000,000, which is more than Visa, Mastercard, and direct deposit combined. So this is a really popular solution all around the world. And now because of that popularity, by requiring these stablecoins to be backed by treasuries, our treasury secretary, Bissent, initially said he believes we'll be able to sell $2,000,000,000,000 worth of treather treasuries. In other words, we'll be able to fund $2,000,000,000,000 in additional government debt, and he since expanded that to now $3,000,000,000,000. So what we get out of the Genius Act is a backdoor CBDC that funds at least $3,000,000,000,000 in additional debt where our commerce secretary's firm is the biggest beneficiary. It's just mind boggling. Speaker 2: It is overwhelming, and I hope I truly hope people at least sense at least have the sense to understand that this is monumental, truly world changing information about what is going on in the monetary, scale right now. And most people, unfortunately, will not because this is highfalutin economics sort of stuff, whatever. All I know is my stablecoin will help, invest for my my retirement or something along those lines. But again, the the scale of what has just taken place. Hey, crypto decentralized. Fight the man. It's against the central banks. We can go around. We don't need them. Disintermediate the banks. Yay. 2 stablecoins backed by treasuries. And that maneuver that has taken place that most people don't even understand, don't know, don't care is incredible. And the fact that Epstein's fingerprints are on every part of this is itself incredible. Just to tie the little bow on the Epstein, Lutnick, 09/11 reference, whatever that might mean, it just so happens Lutnick is another one of those lucky people who happened to miss nine eleven because, of course, Cantor Fitzgerald in the North Tower Of The World Trade Center, but he wasn't there on nine eleven because he was taking his son to kindergarten that day. So he missed 09:11. His brother did die along with, several 100 other Cantor Fitzgerald employees that day, but Howard escaped and went on to become Howard Lutnick. Well, interesting, part of that story. But again, there's so much information that we've already gone through today, so much more detail in the article itself, so I will direct people to it. But I think you sum up with a very good summary here. You say Epstein funded the MIT devs who killed Bitcoin as cash. Brock Pierce ran the Bitcoin foundation into the ground, opened the door for Epstein's money, brokered Epstein's Coinbase stake, which we didn't even get into, sat in Epstein's mansion pitching Bitcoin to Larry Summers, co founded Tether, and kept emailing Epstein until 2018. Tether then printed unbacked dollars to pump Bitcoin 50% in 2017. Howard Lutnick, who lied about cutting ties with Epstein, took over management of Tether's $130,000,000,000 plus treasury reserves before he even joined the Trump transition. He pushed for treasury secretary, Mist, landed at Commerce, installed his ally, Bo Hines, as White House crypto adviser, had Hines run through the Genius Act, then watched Hines quit the White House and immediately become CEO of Tethr's US subsidiary. Just an incredible amount of information. And you sum up with every single player is connected. Every single move was coordinated. The genius act entrenches the exact loopholes Tethr has lived on. This is not Big Short two point o. This is Big Short two point o on steroids, preplanned and run by the same network that already owns the outcome. Just an incredible amount of information and detail here. So once again, I'll exhort people to watch, to read this article. But I guess the real question here, Erin, is what should we do with this information? Speaker 0: Well, I wanna say this. I I that article I wrote pretty quickly just because of, you know, the pace of development and how relevant it is to what's going on. But there's another article that I've written for the Brown Center Institute that hasn't been published yet, but it's it's 12,000 words, and and it it goes into the Genius Act, financial regulation, and something called the Clarity Act because I do want to talk about the fact that there's something even worse than the Genius Act on the horizon and people don't understand it at all. People don't even know what's going on and it's called the Clarity Act. Now, if you've heard about the Clarity Act, you will hear it as this is going to provide clear rules of the road for people to be able to buy and sell crypto, so on and so forth. This is not what it's about and it's not a bill that's about crypto. It's about creating digital tokens that can be programmed, tracked, and censored for everything that we own. So if the Genius Act covers how we pay for things, the Clarity Act adds this surveillance and tracking to everything that we own, our stocks, our four zero one k's, commodities, oil, agriculture, eventually real estate, all of it is going to be tokenized. Larry Fink has talked about this. He's at BlackRock, he said that everything is going to be tokenized. This bill is working its way. It's already passed the house, and it's going through various iterations, but this is how we end up owning nothing. And not to go into too many details about this, but if you've ever talked about the great taking, there's a there's a whole bunch of legal framework shifts that have happened in The United States since 1994 that essentially make it so that the next time there's a financial collapse, you might think if your broker goes out of business that, well, hey, those are my investments. I'll just point those over to a new broker. Well, it turns out in all 50 states, they've changed the laws so that in fact, economic interest in these investments will go first to the creditors of your broker, which mainly will be the four largest banks in The US. Once you create digital tokens that represent these contracts, then you're when there's a financial collapse, they're gonna be able to basically shift everybody's assets with a click of a button. So I wanted to mention that because it's it's relevant and it's active right now, and Howard Lutnick's firm is positioned to be a major beneficiary in this as well. So it's so you asked what we can do. We have to absolutely, make it public and accessible for everyone to understand how not only corrupt this is, but this tokenization through these two bills is accelerating technocracy. I I've been saying that this last election that we had was technocracy with resistance versus technocracy without resistance, and technocracy without resistance won. We got backdoor CBDCs. We have in The United States Real ID, which is a digital ID. We have Palantir connected into federal government databases. We have AI surveillance. You know, technocracy has flourished. I mean, this isn't like a 2030 thing. This is a 2027 thing. So I wanted to mention that. But I don't really believe there are a lot of political solutions for this, which is why what I've been advocating for as a real solution is to exit these systems. Stop using fiat currency. Do not use government regulated stablecoins. Get out of central centralized tokenization. Start using privacy coins. Start using gold. Start using silver. Exit the healthcare system in The United States, which, you know, my wife and I have launched a it's a free service. We don't make any money off of it. It's a global medical tourism marketplace. But, you know, every minute in The US somebody files for bankruptcy due to medical bills in The US, seventy five percent of those have insurance. The system is a complete scam. Exit that, cancel your insurance, form a trust and then investigate using medical tourism where you can actually save up to 80% and get better healthcare outcomes. The real solution to this is for us to take our lives back, to take back our free will and to build parallel systems. At this point, this is the way and we can do it, but we really don't have a lot of time. And I have been for the three and a half years, I've been saying this is it. Technocracy is it. Digital currencies, this is the platform. But it's even happening faster than I could have ever imagined, and it is more corrupt and incestuous than I could have ever imagined. And now for the first time, because of these Epstein files, we can actually follow the money and start tracking what's going on. Speaker 2: Alright. An incredible amount of information. I'm very much looking forward to that 12,000 word deep dive and hopefully more information yet to come. But for the meantime, we will direct people to brownstone.org for this article that we're talking about today. It's called the hijacking of Bitcoin. Everything that we have talked about today will be in the show notes for today's episode at corbettreport.com/epstein Bitcoin, for all of the notes and all of the links to everything that we're talking about. I think we're going to leave it there for today. Aaron Day, thank you very much for this deep dive and for bringing it to our attention. Speaker 0: Thank you for having me. Speaker 2: Money. It is the economic water in which we live our lives. Speaker 1: Will you tell the American people to whom you lent 2,200,000,000,000.0 of their dollars? Speaker 2: We spend our lives working for it, worrying about it, saving it, spending it, pinching it. So all that information is available in our commercial paper. Speaker 1: And who got the money? Speaker 2: But what is it? Where does it come from? How is it created? Who controls it? Speaker 1: Tell us who they are. No. One hundred years ago, in 1913, the Fed was created. Speaker 0: The banking cartel wrote their own rules and regulations. Speaker 1: They're not agency, you run away. They're persons under FOIA. Speaker 2: There is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. Speaker 0: The Fed. It's the Fed. It's Fed. Speaker 2: Century of Enslavement, the history of the Federal Reserve. Watch the documentary for free and access the transcript at corbettreport.com/federalreserve or support the filmmaker and purchase a DVD copy at newworldnextweek.com.
AaronRDay
Posted - January 8, 2026 at 11:03 PM
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 5:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report on Brighteon AI: I can run on my laptop offline with no surveillance or corporate servers. Trained on 10,000+ books covering health, liberty, economics, history. 15,000+ AI-generated books and 130,000+ downloads across platforms. DeepSeek proves frontier AI can be open source and affordable. The tools exist; I’ll cover a step-by-step start tonight at 6PM ET with the listed collaborators.

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day

https://t.co/V1Iak3uMFD Mike Adams built something they said was impossible. Brighteon AI. Runs on your laptop. Works offline. No internet required. No corporate servers. No surveillance. No content restrictions. Trained on 10,000+ books covering health, liberty, economics, history. The information Big Tech actively suppresses. Available instantly. Privately. Forever. But that is just the beginning. Vibe coding. One person building what used to require entire development teams. Mike has created 15,000+ AI-generated books. 130,000+ downloads. Multiple platforms. All using methods he taught himself. DeepSeek just shattered the myth that you need billions of dollars to build frontier AI. Open source. Efficient. Available to everyone. The tools exist. The knowledge exists. The only question is whether you will use them. Tonight: Exactly how to get started. Step by step. LIVE 6PM ET @CaseyOneillTM @Kolby435 @BawdyAnarchist_ @cryptoken_board @cculianu @ByronS6698 @kbeehattie @Playbay49353214 @0xJenWeb3 @zohakugo1971 @TheCraigfather @PayItGlobal2 @EnderGuy79 @Shanks_ETH @radchukim @SherpaDadPNW @EvaHehemann @jstylman @Paladin_777

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day

S3E3: Your Job Dies in 2026 Unless You Act https://t.co/RMdpGSW3A2

AaronRDay
Posted - January 3, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 4:57 PM

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day

The #1 enemy is technocracy. There are no white knights. https://t.co/fx7OrX9tG7

AaronRDay
Posted - November 20, 2024 at 1:11 AM
Saved - November 21, 2024 at 1:46 AM

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day

This video is at 863k views. Let’s push it to 1 million by midnight. #freeroger https://t.co/w30qFSXGTN

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to share my experience of being tortured in federal prison. Roger Ver has been arrested, and it's crucial to support him. I ended up in prison for expressing views like "taxation is theft." Roger is a true pioneer, advocating for individual empowerment globally. Despite paying a million dollars to the government, they claim it's not enough. His lawyers argue he complied with the law, yet he's being targeted. This case reflects a broader trend of the government silencing dissidents. Roger has significantly contributed to Bitcoin, which has the potential to challenge oppressive systems. It's alarming that the only person prosecuted for an exit tax interpretation is someone exposing government attempts to infiltrate Bitcoin. We can't change the past, but we can unite to shape the future. Free Roger.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna tell you about my own story about being, tortured in federal prison in the United States. Speaker 1: Roger Ver, unfortunately, today, he got arrested. Free Roger. Speaker 0: Free Roger. The real reason that I actually went to prison is because I was busy saying things like the things that I'm gonna say in this video. Taxation is theft and war is mass murder funded by theft. Roger, big queen Jesus himself, Speaker 1: but he's a true pioneer. Here you've got one of the most independent people in the world preaching and teaching people to individually empower themselves around the globe. They're very supportive of the work Speaker 0: we do now. Speaker 1: He's also an inspiration to a lot of people around the globe. Speaker 0: I couldn't express any more of Speaker 1: how great of a person he was. 2014, Roger Ver left the United States. America apparently is the man of free. You should be free to just leave. The United States government considers you to be their prop. Roger paid 1,000,000 of dollars to United States government, and they're saying Speaker 2: now that it's not enough. Speaker 1: You read the quotes from his lawyers, like, this is the evidence of someone trying to comply with the law. He did everything according to the book. Nobody's ever gone to jail for that ever. The DOJ is actually using the Bitcoin Jesus term. They're literally going to crucify Bitcoin Jesus. Speaker 0: Just because some people get together and write down words on a piece of paper and call the law, that doesn't alter morality one bit. Speaker 1: They're using the Trump case as a template for how they can go after any dissidents. This is very scary, frankly, 10 years later. Government and central banks do not want this story out there. Speaker 0: The truth doesn't bend to whether or not we like it being the truth or not. Speaker 1: Roger is a good guy, and we all owe him a lot. It's really sad to say that he is instrumental in Bitcoin would be a radical understatement. He's really believed in Bitcoin for Speaker 2: the reasons that people should believe in Bitcoin. Speaker 1: It's disgusting in my core. I see government murder Speaker 0: people around the world. And Bitcoin has the power to undermine everything they're doing to people Speaker 1: in the world. Is it a coincidence? The only guy that's ever been criminally prosecuted on an exit tax interpretation is the guy that was exposing the intelligence community's attempts to infiltrate the Bitcoin movement. Speaker 0: There's nothing we can do to change the past, but we can work together to change the future. Speaker 1: From this moment forward, I'm on the same side as Ron. Free Roger. Free Roger. It's as crazy a case as you can possibly imagine.
AaronRDay
Posted - March 31, 2023 at 10:05 PM
Saved - October 1, 2023 at 10:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Bank Run Manifesto: Unite against threats of WW3, financial collapse, political persecution, censorship, and crypto bans. Protests and voting have failed. Embrace self-custody crypto, gold, and silver to protect against collapse and demand a fair financial system. Defund institutions behind censorship and challenge crypto crackdown. Participate in a bank run, exchange dollars for alternative assets, and spread the word. Break free from centralized control, stand for liberty, autonomy, and justice. Reclaim our financial destiny through collective action. Banks are already screwed, government lies about it. Check interest rates and credit card rates.

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day 2024: Truth and Transformation

Thread 🧵 1/n THE BANK RUN MANIFESTO Fellow Americans, the time has come for us to unite and take a stand against the encroaching threats of WW3, financial collapse, political persecution, censorship, and crypto bans. We must recognize that change won't come from protests or the political process. It demands our collective courage to engage in mass civil disobedience. Let us come together, boldly say NO, and take action to dismantle the corrupt system that seeks to undermine our freedom. Welcome to the Bank Run Manifesto – a call to action for us all. We face a grave reality: protests and the ballot box have failed to address the pressing issues of our time. As we stand on the brink of global conflict, economic ruin, and increasing control over our lives, we must unite and take matters into our own hands. Consider the following five areas of oppression: 1. Verge of WW3: Our government continues to escalate tensions with China and Russia, despite overwhelming public opposition. Voting has proven ineffective against the Deep State, and we must starve the fiat currency that fuels war. 2. Financial Collapse: The US Dollar is on the verge of collapse due to economic mismanagement, unsustainable debt, and government corruption. By embracing self-custody crypto, gold, and silver, we can protect ourselves and demand a new, more equitable financial system. 3. Political Persecution: The recent arrest of former President Trump on hush money charges highlights the abuse of power at play. Protests have been manipulated, but a bank run sends an unmistakable message: overreach will not be tolerated. 4. Censorship: Douglass Mackey's trial for posting a meme and the proposed RESTRICT Act illustrate the erosion of our First Amendment rights. By defunding the institutions behind these attacks, we can resist the encroaching tyranny. 5. Crackdown on Cryptocurrency: Congress will not willingly relinquish its control over fiat money. By embracing crypto, gold, and silver for day-to-day commerce, we can challenge this monopoly and secure our freedom. Our call to action is simple: participate in a bank run, exchanging your dollars for alternative assets like cryptocurrencies, gold, and silver. Then, tell three others to do the same and encourage them to spread the word to three more people. Just as the 3% of the population who fought in the American Revolution made a profound impact, so too can we transform our society through collective action. It is time to initiate a bank run that shatters the foundations of control and reclaims our financial destiny. As we come together, undivided by the shackles of prejudice and discord, we become an indomitable force. We stand for liberty, for autonomy, and for justice. Together, we can break free from the shackles of centralized control and forge a future that values individual sovereignty, liberty, and justice for all. Stand with us, take control of your assets, and embrace the power of the people! Let our collective action echo through history, inspiring generations to come. The time is now – join us in this vital act of civil disobedience and reclaim the destiny that belongs to each and every one of us. #Day2024 #bankrun #TrumpIndictment #MAGA #MAGA2024 #mackey #ww3 #china #russia #ukraine #crypto #bitcoin  #btc  $btc #ravencoin #bch #bsv #ltc #blockchain #FederalReserve

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day 2024: Truth and Transformation

The truth is that the banks are already screwed, it’s just that your government and the Federal Reserve is lying to you about it. Take a look at the interest rates your earning from these scam banks. Have you checked out credit card interest rates? https://t.co/UpO4N5fByk

letshearthetru
Posted - August 25, 2023 at 12:23 PM
Saved - August 25, 2023 at 2:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A conversation on various individuals and organizations involved in alleged corruption and financial schemes in New Hampshire. Mentioned names include Glenn Perlow, Chuck Douglas, Donna Soucy, Michael Delaney, McLane Middleton, and others. The conversation also touches on the Pandora Papers and the connection to New Hampshire.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Chuck Douglas, Tina Nadeau, Kathleen Kerr (DCYF/Maximus), Gordon MacDonald, David Vicinanzo (Nixon Peabody), Dick Agnagost, John & Chris Sununu, Bill & Jeanne Shaheen, Rep. Ann Kuster, Sen. Maggie Hassan. These are all the people who have been around in the same club for decades.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Oh, and Alex Walker, Edward Arsenault, Phil McLaughlin, James F McLaughlin, Chris McLaughlin, Scott Murray, Paul Halvorsen, Jane Young, Geoffrey Ward, Anne Edwards & several judges. How could I forget those......

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Here's the clue re Glenn Perlow: Ghislaine Maxwell's NH company is called "Granite Reality". "Red Granite Reality" is in Maryland and it is a subsidiary of another company of another that belongs to Jordan Park/NH Trusts - Glenn Perlow.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Glenn Perlow created NH Trusts Council in June 2010 - just one month after the Governor's report on the FRM Ponzi Scheme. Glenn Perlow was in the AG's office at the time under Michael Delaney I believe. AG's office complicit in the FRM Ponzi scheme. https://www.doj.nh.gov/civil/documents/frm-report.pdf

Welcome doj.nh.gov

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Charles Chandler was right. Nobody listened to him. He saw State Government corruption and called it out. The rest of them covered it up and hid behind smoke and mirrors and the trusts, non-profits, LLCs, real estate purchased through law firms etc. https://www.nhbr.com/final-frm-report-lambastes-ag-banking-dept/

'Final' FRM report lambastes AG, Banking Dept. - NH Business Review “I am disappointed in my state government,” said Charles Chandler, after presenting his “Findings of Fact” Monday relating to the Financial Resources Mortgage Inc. Ponzi scheme. “I really am.”Chandler didn’t name names, except in footnotes, in the report he delivered as a result of his six-month investigation for the state Bureau of Securities Regulation into the largest Ponzi scheme in... nhbr.com

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH What interesting timing for Glenn Perlow: March 2007 for Jordan Park Trust June 2010 for NH Trust Council Donna Soucy was at the Banking Commission in 2006... https://opencorporates.com/officers?utf8=%E2%9C%93&utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=Glenn+Perlow&jurisdiction_code=&type=officers

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH 2021-01-20 - 2021-07-11 Removal of officer McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton PA, applicant If that is not a giveaway. Michael Delaney was AG, Glenn Perlow under him and McLane was the applicant for Jordan Park Trusts (aka Perspecta).... https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_nh/574874

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

If Michael Delaney had been appointed as judge to the First Circuit Court of Appeals he would have coverd NH, Maine, RI, Mass & Puerto Rico - and thus the IRS ... "The solid link between the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico, was first published in the September 1995 issue of Veritas Magazine, (relation to Maximus? which bought Veritas which is Policy Studies Inc which is Kathleen Kerr in NH which is DHHS/DCYF around time of Gov. Jeanne Shaheen & AG Phil McLaughlin & Edward Arsenault at the Diocese in 2002) based on research by William Cooper and Wayne Bentson, both of Arizona. In October, a criminal complaint was filed in the office of W. A. Drew Edmondson, attorney general for Oklahoma, against an Enid-based revenue officer, and in the time since, IRS principals have failed to refute the allegation that IRS is an agency of the Department of Treasury, Puerto Rico. In November, criminal complaints were filed simultaneously with the grand jury for the United States district court for the District of Northern Oklahoma, Tulsa, and the office of Attorney General Edmondson, and both the office of the United States Attorney and IRS principals have yet to rebut the allegations in that instance (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Kenney F. Moore, et al, 95 CR-129C). By consulting the index for Chapter 3, Title 31 of the United States Code, one finds that IRS and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms are not listed as agencies of the United States Department of the Treasury. The fact that Congress never created a “Bureau of Internal Revenue” is confirmed by publication in the Federal Register at 36 F.R. 849-890 [C.B. 1971 – 1,698], 36 F.R. 11946 [C.B. 1971 – 2,577], and 37 F.R. 489-490; and in Internal Revenue Manual 1100 at 1111.2. Implications are condemning both to IRS and third parties who knowingly participate in IRS-initiated scams: No legitimate authority resides in or emanates from an office which was not legitimately created and/or ordained either by state or national constitutions or by legislative enactment. See variously, United States v. Germane, 99 U.S. 508 (1879), Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 441, 6 S.Ct. 1121 (1866), etc., dating to Pope v. Commissioner, 138 F.2d 1006, 1009 (6th Cir. 1943); where the state is concerned, the most recent corresponding decision was State v. Pinckney, 276 N.W.2d 433, 436 (Iowa 1979)."

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

In NH, the State owns the liquor stores. Thus: "The link between IRS and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is significant as the tie with the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico, is through this door. Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1940, Section 2, made the following change: § 2. Federal Alcohol Administration The Federal Alcohol Administration, the offices of the members thereof, and the office of the Administrator are abolished, and their function shall be administered under the direction and supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury through the Bureau of Internal Revenue in the Department of the Treasury."

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH New Hampshire is the 2nd State in the US for producing firearms. NH was very quiet about the weapons trading with Columbia or weapons exports to Saudi Arabia or WMD exports to Russia/Ukraine. Telling.

@Fibbernach13 - Fibber

@boomerkel @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH The IRS is not a US government agency it is an agency of the IMF (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391) https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_nwo71.htm

American Laws Most Americans Don't Know! But Should Know! bibliotecapleyades.net

@REGRVR - nhmuckraker

@Fibbernach13 @boomerkel @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Time to stop giving them our hard-earned money! https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/redeclaration-of-independence Statehouse assembly for NH sovereign citizens is 9/26/23

Petition Redeclaration of Independence Redeclaration of Independence ipetitions.com

@Fibbernach13 - Fibber

@REGRVR @boomerkel @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH After the last 6yrs, do you think a petition will change a thing? Do you think govt is in control? https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_nwo71.htm https://youtu.be/1pRPBKJQnyU

American Laws Most Americans Don't Know! But Should Know! bibliotecapleyades.net

@boomerkel - boomerkel

This is 1,000 % Correct, Regarding CAFR … They, Effectively, Keep 2 Sets of Books. The Budget That You See & The Hidden CAFR. States Are Worth Far More Than You Perceive. The First Guy To Expose This, Many Years Ago, Was Walter Burien & They Crucified Him. CAFR … http://youtube.com/watch?v=1pRPBK… Walter Burien and Clint Richardson. See their sites for much more info: http://cafr1.com http://thecorporationnation.com http://realitybloger.wordpress.com

@boomerkel - boomerkel

@Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH https://rense.com/general2/bigsecret.htm

CAFRs: The BIGGEST Secret - $60 Trillion Invested By Fed, State, And Local Governments! rense.com

@boomerkel - boomerkel

@Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH https://www.scribd.com/doc/13270064/Comprehensive-Annual-Financial-Reports-by-Walter-J-Burien-Jr

Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports by Walter J. Burien, Jr. | PDF Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports by Walter J. Burien, Jr. - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. scribd.com

@REGRVR - nhmuckraker

@boomerkel @Fibbernach13 @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH https://www.das.nh.gov/accounting/cafr.asp

Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports | NH Department of Administrative Services | Division of Accounting Services The State of NH CAFR includes financial statements and statistical information. das.nh.gov

@Fibbernach13 - Fibber

@REGRVR @boomerkel @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24pwFif0Z9M&t=9s&ab_channel=StateofCorruptionNH

@PAHAU6 - PA HAU

@Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @letshearthetru @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Imagine what names, what groups, what abject abuse of power is in these papers. So much info redacted. Why can't we see ? How many contributors have been slain and/or shuttered from coming forward ? Who holds the keys ?

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@PAHAU6 @Fibbernach13 @REGRVR @boomerkel @AaronRDay @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH I have a pretty strong suspicion that Glenn Perlow holds the keys in New Hampshire. McLane Middleton-AG's office-NH Banking Commission- Jordan Park - NH Trusts. And also Donna Soucy, Shaheen & Gordon, William Gardner, David Scanlan, Caroline & Michael Delaney.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH You can always tell who has something to hide by who sponsors the programs about the Pandora Papers as they get to control the narrative. McLane Middleton sponsored the program on the Pandora Papers & McLane Middleton advertised for trusts to come to NH and for them to set it up.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Chuck Douglas had a time share in Aruba in 1999 per Washington Post about his split from his 4th wife, Caroline Douglas. Aruba was center for Paradise Papers..... Maximus, Red Granite Realty (Glenn Perlow - Jordan Park Trusts, NH Banking commission), Autofair (Andrew H Crews)

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Autofair is in Pandora and Paradise Papers if I recall correctly - Bahamas. Andrew H Crews is on the board of Primary Bank, Children's Advocacy Centers and Granite One Health which connects him to banking commission, courts, police, judiciary, lottery, Catholic Medical Center.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Andrew H Crews is or was president of NH State lottery and Chuck Douglas' current wife is Chair of NH State Lottery and Chuck Douglas is the Chair of NH Judicial Selection Committee. So they have it all under control that everyone in the clique (cartel) is protected.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH "This week’s episode is brought to you by McLane Middleton, providing trusted legal services to businesses throughout the region for over 100 years." https://www.nhbr.com/what-do-the-pandora-papers-have-to-do-with-new-hampshire/

What do the Pandora Papers have to do with New Hampshire? - NH Business Review NH Business Review editor Jeff Feingold talks with staff writer Bob Sanders about New Hampshire’s trust laws nhbr.com

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

McLane Middleton "Trust Services" New Hampshire is a premier location for establishing and administering trusts because of its advantageous trust laws and tax structure. Our progressive trust code, designed to maintain and enhance New Hampshire’s advantages for the siting of trusts, is one of the primary reasons individuals and families from all over the world choose New Hampshire as the location for their trusts. These are among the many attractive features of New Hampshire’s trust laws: Robust protection of trust assets from the claims of creditors Multi-generational Dynasty Trusts No state income or capital gains taxes (except for Grantor Trusts). Self-Settled “asset protection” Trusts Ability to create Directed/Divided Trust architecture, separating trustee roles Ability to modify trusts through decanting Exemption of Private Family Trust companies from registration and regulation The articles, “Why the Granite State Rocks at Trust Administration (2016),” and “Why the Granite State Still Rocks at Trust Administration (2020),” discuss the continuing evolution of our trust law and why New Hampshire is still the premier location for establishing and administering trusts.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

"Exemption of Private Family Trust companies from registration and regulation" - seriously? A law firm whose partner Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Maggie Hassan & POTUS Joe Biden wanted as judge on First circuit court of appeals is advertising this? Exemption of Private Family Trust companies from registration and regulation

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH https://www.mclane.com/wp-content/uploads/Why_the_Granite_State_Rocks_at_Trust_Administration_-_Estate_Planning_Journal_Jun_2016.pdf

Page not found - McLane Middleton mclane.com

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Michael Delaney of McLane Middleton and former AG of NH with Glenn Perlow under him who runs NH Trusts & was in Banking Commission, was to be judge for First Circuit which covers Puerto Rico where IRS is a private company: https://privatesidesolutions.com/blog/2017/09/09/irs-exposed-irs-is-a-privately-owned-puerto-rican-trust/#:~:text=Research%20to%20which%20IRS%20officials%20have%20acquiesced%20suggests,operate%20as%20Secretary%20of%20the%20Treasury%2C%20Puerto%20Rico.

@boomerkel - boomerkel

@letshearthetru @AaronRDay @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH

@boomerkel - boomerkel

Aaron Day {@AaronRDay}, You Opened Pandoras Box & Within That Box Is The #PandoraPapers, Right There in the Granite State, NH! … All $932 Billion! @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @REGRVR @letshearthetru @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day 2024: Truth and Transformation

Amazing. I hear people from time to time claiming I have information about the Pandora Papers. Sadly, I do not. The 91a that I submitted in 2014 was non-responsive. If you don’t believe me, you are certainly more than able to submit the 91a yourself. In the meantime, the Pandora Papers are publicly available at this link. https://icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Pandora Papers in NH: Glen Perlow, Bill Shaheen, Donna Soucy, Michael Delaney, Alex Walker, Nixon Peabody, McLane Middleton, Chuck Douglas, Shaheen & Gordon, John Lynch, Primary Bank hold the keys. Maximus, Dartmouth, Autofair, Exeter, St Paul's all in them.

letshearthetru
Posted - August 4, 2023 at 2:37 PM
Saved - August 4, 2023 at 5:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Aaron Day denies having information about the Pandora Papers despite claims. He suggests submitting a 91a to verify. The conversation also discusses sponsors and individuals potentially involved in the papers, including Chuck Douglas and Andrew H Crews. McLane Middleton is mentioned as a law firm advertising trust services in New Hampshire. The conversation raises questions about the protection of those involved and the potential involvement of Michael Delaney.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

Aaron Day {@AaronRDay}, You Opened Pandoras Box & Within That Box Is The #PandoraPapers, Right There in the Granite State, NH! … All $932 Billion! @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @REGRVR @letshearthetru @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH You can always tell who has something to hide by who sponsors the programs about the Pandora Papers as they get to control the narrative. McLane Middleton sponsored the program on the Pandora Papers & McLane Middleton advertised for trusts to come to NH and for them to set it up.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Chuck Douglas had a time share in Aruba in 1999 per Washington Post about his split from his 4th wife, Caroline Douglas. Aruba was center for Paradise Papers..... Maximus, Red Granite Realty (Glenn Perlow - Jordan Park Trusts, NH Banking commission), Autofair (Andrew H Crews)

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Autofair is in Pandora and Paradise Papers if I recall correctly - Bahamas. Andrew H Crews is on the board of Primary Bank, Children's Advocacy Centers and Granite One Health which connects him to banking commission, courts, police, judiciary, lottery, Catholic Medical Center.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Andrew H Crews is or was president of NH State lottery and Chuck Douglas' current wife is Chair of NH State Lottery and Chuck Douglas is the Chair of NH Judicial Selection Committee. So they have it all under control that everyone in the clique (cartel) is protected.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH "This week’s episode is brought to you by McLane Middleton, providing trusted legal services to businesses throughout the region for over 100 years." https://www.nhbr.com/what-do-the-pandora-papers-have-to-do-with-new-hampshire/

What do the Pandora Papers have to do with New Hampshire? - NH Business Review NH Business Review editor Jeff Feingold talks with staff writer Bob Sanders about New Hampshire’s trust laws nhbr.com

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH McLane Middleton "Trust Services" New Hampshire is a premier location for establishing and administering trusts because of its advantageous trust laws and tax structure. Our progressive trust code, designed to maintain and enhance New Hampshire’s advantages for the siting of…

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH "Exemption of Private Family Trust companies from registration and regulation" - seriously? A law firm whose partner Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Maggie Hassan & POTUS Joe Biden wanted as judge on First circuit court of appeals is advertising this? Exemption of Private Family Trust…

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH https://www.mclane.com/wp-content/uploads/Why_the_Granite_State_Rocks_at_Trust_Administration_-_Estate_Planning_Journal_Jun_2016.pdf

Page not found - McLane Middleton mclane.com

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Michael Delaney of McLane Middleton and former AG of NH with Glenn Perlow under him who runs NH Trusts & was in Banking Commission, was to be judge for First Circuit which covers Puerto Rico where IRS is a private company: https://privatesidesolutions.com/blog/2017/09/09/irs-exposed-irs-is-a-privately-owned-puerto-rican-trust/#:~:text=Research%20to%20which%20IRS%20officials%20have%20acquiesced%20suggests,operate%20as%20Secretary%20of%20the%20Treasury%2C%20Puerto%20Rico.

@letshearthetru - letshearthetruth

@AaronRDay @boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH First Circuit = NH, Mass, Maine, Rhode Island and Puerto Rico. So Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Maggie Hassan and POTUS Joe Biden wanted Michael Delaney of McLane Middleton in charge of the appeals of Puerto Rico - to protect IRS scam of NH Pandora Papers from exposure?

@boomerkel - boomerkel

Aaron Day {@AaronRDay}, You Opened Pandoras Box & Within That Box Is The #PandoraPapers, Right There in the Granite State, NH! … All $932 Billion! @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @REGRVR @letshearthetru @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH

@AaronRDay - Aaron Day 2024: Truth and Transformation

@boomerkel @PAHAU6 @REGRVR @letshearthetru @NoogaJack @PunishDem_1776 @LPNH Amazing. I hear people from time to time claiming I have information about the Pandora Papers. Sadly, I do not. The 91a that I submitted in 2014 was non-responsive. If you don’t believe me, you are certainly more than able to submit the 91a yourself. In the meantime, the…

View Full Interactive Feed