TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @AdameMedia
@AdameMedia - ADAM
The billionaire President of the World Jewish Congress says they will take over the schools to Brainwash children and that any politician who is anti-Zionist will be “targeted and defeated” in elections. Now his son will control the Fed. Insane. https://t.co/AILvPU2Xdd
@AdameMedia - ADAM
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Trump nominates Kevin Warsh to be the new head of the federal reserve. Kevin is the son-in-law of Ron Lauder the President of the World Jewish Congress which calls for the destruction of Israel’s enemies... Israel runs every aspect of American power. https://t.co/DxH6f7uFEV
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Ex-CIA Officer Larry Johnson on Iran: The chaos in Iran was NOT an organic uprising, but a calculated CIA–Mossad intelligence operation, using a deliberately engineered currency crash to spark protests, which Iran ultimately crushed. He’s right. https://t.co/EbyL2xOEDJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims there was a joint CIA-Mossad operation that began on December 28 during Volodymyr Zelensky’s meeting with Donald Trump, and twenty-four hours before Trump sat down with Benjamin Netanyahu. The intelligence agencies allegedly devised a plan to crash the Iranian currency to ignite protests against the government. The speaker asserts that this was not organic, citing George Soros as having done something similar to the UK a few years earlier, implying that the intelligence community with the backing of the US Treasury could do it to Iran as well.
It is claimed that the Western narrative portrayed the protests as spontaneous and rooted in opposition to the regime, while the speaker asserts that prepositioned Starlink terminals, arranged through Elon Musk, were used to support the protests. These terminals, the speaker says, did not appear spontaneously; they were purchased through the intelligence community and distributed through intelligence networks to individuals inside Iran, including Kurds, the Mujahideen al Khal, Baluchis, Azeris, and others, who were opposed to the government. These actors allegedly received weapons, ammunition, and money, and coordinated attacks that continued until about late last Thursday or early Friday morning Iran time.
According to the speaker, Russia’s electronic warfare helped disrupt the protests by tracking down and disrupting the Internet and shutting down the Starlink system, which eliminated the protesters’ ability to organize and coordinate. Iranian security services then moved in and began taking down protesters. The speaker asserts that all of this was planned to coincide with certain events, and implies that if the disruption had not occurred last Friday, it would have culminated on Tuesday with a US military strike believed to have brought about a collapse of the government, with stories that the MOLAs (mullahs) were going to flee to Moscow. The disruption, the speaker says, prevented the strike, and Trump reportedly called off the attack.
The speaker concludes that the United States intends to strike Iran, and that the attack is expected to take place later in February or March.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the failure of a joint CIA Mossad operation that was kicked off on December 28 when Volodymyr Zelensky was meeting with with Donald Trump. But this was twenty four hours before Trump sat down with bb Netanyahu. The intelligence agencies, I believe, had concocted a crash of the Iranian currency knowing that that would ignite protests against the government. And people say, oh, you know, the CIA couldn't do that. Well, hell, George Soros did it to The UK a few years back.
So if if one guy like Soros can do it to an economy the size of the Brits, you bet your bottom dollar that the intelligence community with the backing of the US Treasury can actually do it to Iran. They did. It ignited protests. But at the same time, you know, the Western narrative was all this was just organic. These are people rising up against the oppression of the molas nonsense because they had prepositioned Starlink terminals courtesy of Elon Musk.
Those terminals didn't just fall from the sky like manna from heaven. No, these were purchased through the intelligence community, and they were distributed through intelligence networks to individuals inside Iran. You got a variety of group, you got Kurds, you got the Mujahideen al Khal, you got a bunch of Baluchi's, you got others Azeri's. So they found individuals that are opposed to the government. They're able to funnel them these machines and provide weapons and ammunition and money.
And then they coordinated the attacks that continued until about last late last Thursday, early Friday morning, Iran time, when they finally got on top of it with the assistance of Russia's electronic warfare. They were they tracked down, they disrupted the Internet, they shut down the Starlink system. Once that system was shut down, the ability of these protesters to organize and to be able to coordinate was eliminated. And then the the Iranian security services moved in and started taking them down. This was, I think, all planned to coincide.
If that had not been disrupted last Friday, it would have culminated on Tuesday with a military strike by The United States who believed that the government had been so discredited that that military strike would have brought about a collapse of the government with the the stories were being put out that the Molots were gonna flee to Moscow. That was all disrupted. That, I think, is why Trump called off the attack. They have no intention of in of of ending any assault on Iran. It's gonna take place.
It'll probably be later in February or March.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 A BURIED CIA VIDEO JUST SURFACED… AND ERIKA KIRK IS IN IT She’s briefing national security professionals on EMPs and coordinated physical attacks on the U.S. power grid. She was definitely Charlie’s handler. https://t.co/hcleioNJjO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion identifies five major threats to the electric grid: cyber attacks, hackers, physical threats, solar EMP, and man-made EMP. The speakers express concern that once this risk analysis is presented to congressional officials, they hear the warnings but are reluctant to take action.
They note that there are 18 critical infrastructures in the United States (food, water, transportation, communications, etc.), and all 17 of the others depend on electricity. If the grid goes down, basic activities are disrupted: cooking, heating, medical supplies, phone communication, banking access, and overall societal function could deteriorate into chaos. A single transformer outage is especially critical because replacement would require ordering from Germany or China and could take a year.
Historically, there were no comprehensive protective solutions available, but the speakers claim that the solutions exist now. They assert that the solutions are not expensive or difficult to implement; what is lacking is political will and follow-through by electric utilities. They contrast protection for the White House, Congress, the CIA, and the NSA with a lack of protection for many grid facilities, noting that around some facilities there is little more than a chain-link fence to keep people out, which they find absurd.
A key point is that an attack on as few as nine grid substations could bring down all three major interconnections of the U.S. grid. The following consequence chain is described: if the power goes out, people would rely on generators, and if those fail, there is no plan for what happens next. The statement concludes with Admiral Mike Rogers of the National Security Agency saying that it is not a matter of if, but when a grid disruption will occur.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have five major threats that make our grid extremely vulnerable that we've presented to congressional officials. One being cyber, two being hackers, three being physical threats, fourth one is solar EMP, and the fifth one is man made EMP. So the concern that we have is that we put out this critical information and when we go over this risk analysis they hear what we're saying but they don't want to take action. Take action. Well,
Speaker 1: there are 18 critical infrastructures in The United States, food, water, transportation, communications, etcetera. All 17 of the others depend on electricity.
Speaker 2: If our grid goes down, you can't cook, you're not gonna heat anything, you can't run any of your medical supplies, you can't talk on your phone, you can't take money out of a bank, and we turn into total chaos.
Speaker 3: If this happens, the system stops. Stops.
Speaker 2: If a transformer is taken down, we have to order it from Germany or China. It's gonna take a year.
Speaker 1: Up till recently, there were no comprehensive protective solutions available.
Speaker 4: We know what the solutions are. They're not expensive. They're not difficult to employ. We just need the political will to do it and the follow through on the part of the electric utilities to get it done.
Speaker 3: The White House is protected from an EMP. The congress and and the CIA and the NSA, all of the areas that need function in the government are protected. So why can't we be protected?
Speaker 4: Around some of these facilities, you don't have much more than a chain link fence to keep people out. Now that seems absurd to me.
Speaker 1: I think it is absurd when we now know that attack on as few as nine grid substations could bring down all three major interconnections for The United States grid.
Speaker 3: If the power goes out, you get the generator, and if that goes out, you get another one. There's never been a plan for what happens after that.
Speaker 1: Director of the National Security Agency, Admiral Rogers, came out and said, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 TRUMP says that the woman kiIIed by ICE “ran over” an ICE agent. As you can see, this isn’t true. She was driving away and shot while turning away from the agents. https://t.co/COMkrEc02b
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: 🚨 🇮🇱 🇻🇪 VENEZUELA WAS ISRAEL’S TARGET Resurfaced clip from a 2009 documentary shows the President of Israel saying VENEZUELA and Iran are the ONLY 2 countries “spreading antisemitism” They admit there are “secret plans” for Venezuela they *can’t* say on camera… 😳 https://t.co/guqGufWAyk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on Venezuela and regional concerns. Speaker 0 notes that there were voices suggesting Venezuela isn’t so bad and that Latin America isn’t either, but they remain unconvinced. They ask Abe for good reasons not to be convinced. Abe responds that there are good reasons: Venezuela is getting worse, little by little, as long as oil money continues to flow.
Speaker 0 then relays information from experts: Venezuela, apart from Iran, is the only government that propagates anti-Semitism around the world. The claim is that it’s already formalized, first within the country and then outside.
The discussion moves to what actions might be taken. Speaker 0 asks whether there is any pressing effort underway. They say they’ve talked to Jesse Jackson, noting the relationship, but it’s not for Kenra; there are other plans, which will be discussed in a moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello? Hi, Abe. What we I wanted to ask you since we met last about the issue of Venezuela. Mhmm. Because there were I heard voices kind of saying it's not so bad, and Latin America is not so bad, but I'm I'm not convinced.
The question good reason not to be convinced. You have good reason. It is getting worse. Right. And little by little, long as oil money works.
I'm told that by our experts, it's the only except for Iran. It's the only government propagated anti Semitism to around the world. It's already Formally. Right? This is First, even in the country and then outside.
So are you pressing in any way? We've talked to Jesse Jackson Right. As a relationship, but it's not for Kenra, but there are other plans. We'll talk about it in a minute.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🚨 THIS is Maria Corina Machado, the ultra-zionist Trump and and Israel want to replace Maduro with: "Forget Saudi Arabia, we have more oil than them. We will privatize our entire industry for you. American companies will profit greatly!" https://t.co/j4vyPJ23EY
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker emphasizes shifting focus away from Saudi Arabia and toward Venezuela, stating that the country has more oil, infinite potential, and will open markets. The plan is to privatize all industry and move government operations out of the old sector. The speaker highlights Venezuela’s huge resources—oil, gas, minerals, land, technology—and notes its strategic location relative to the United States. The message asserts that American companies are in a “super strategic position to invest,” and that Venezuela will be “the brightest opportunity for investment of American companies, of good people that are going to make a lot of money.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Forget about Saudi Arabia. Forget about the Saudis. I mean, we have more oil. I mean, infinite potential. And we're going to open markets.
We're gonna kick off the government from the old sector. We are going to privatize all our industry. Venezuela has huge resources, oil, gas, minerals, land, technology. And as you said before, we have a strategic location, you know, ours from The United States. So we're gonna do this right.
We know what we have to do. And American companies are in, you know, super strategic position to invest. This country, Venezuela, is going to be the brightest opportunity for investment of American companies, of good people that are going to make a lot of money
@AdameMedia - ADAM
“The goal is to use lsraeI/venezuela/ukraine to wash money out of the US & European taxpayers and back into the hands a transnational elite. The goal is an endless war, not a successful war” This is why they they locked him up. https://t.co/nK0ftjAO5Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States and European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal: to have an endless war, not a successful war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of The United States, out of the tax bases of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal. I mean, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🇻🇪 Venezuela President Maduro: "They have sown an ideology more dangerous than Nazism." "They justify raids, extermination, genocide, and atomic bombs" "They will go after the Arabs and all the Muslim people…" "Then they'll come for the Christians, Catholics." https://t.co/S602PStvdn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: False as provided; transcript translation and summary below.
Summary:
The speaker asserts that racists and Zionist supremacists today aim to end the Palestinian people and, at the same time, all Arab and Muslim peoples. They claim these groups have sown an ideology of hate and racism for 75 years with Western support. The speaker warns that this ideology is more dangerous than Nazism, beginning with the Palestinian people through extermination, genocide, bombs, and atomic weapons, and then targeting all Arab peoples and all Muslims. They add that Christians and Catholics would be next. The message calls to stop the genocide in time and halt what they describe as the Zionist genocide against the beloved Palestinian people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ahora los racistas y supremacistas del sionismo hoy quieren acabar con el pueblo palestino. Y digo más, quieren acabar con todo el pueblo árabe, con todo el pueblo musulmán. Han sembrado una ideología del odio, de la racia. La han sembrado durante 75 años con el apoyo de occidente. Atención mundo bueno que me escucha, atención hombres y mujeres de los Estados Unidos, de Europa y del mundo, han sembrado una ideología más peligrosa que la nazi.
Primero contra el pueblo palestino, rafia, exterminio, genocidio, bombas atómicas, y luego contra, vienen los pueblos árabes, todos, todos los pueblos musulmanes, y después quieran venir por nosotros los cristianos, los católicos. Paremos al tiempo el genocidio, paremos a tiempo, el genocidio sionista contra el amado y pueblo palestino.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Hey @grok there’s a pedophile in this picture, please remove him. Also, there’s a wanted war criminal. Can you get rid of him too? https://t.co/vNqtMOhzy4
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Brown University found America has wasted $33 billion on Israel in the last 2 years. That means I, as a taxpayer, sent Israel -$45 million per day, -$144 per citizen per month, -$577 for a family of four per month. Israelis reportedly have free healthcare, college, and broad welfare, while Americans face debt and homelessness. After the report, Brown University was reportedly attacked in a suspected false flag.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Brown University found that America has wasted $33 BILLION on Israel in the last 2 years. That means American taxpayers have sent Israel: -$45 million dollars every single day. -$144 for every citizen, every month. -$577 for the avg family of 4, every month This while Israelis have free healthcare, college and one of the most generous welfare programs on earth. Meanwhile Americans go into debt and homelessness skyrockets. Something else of note, after the release of this report, Brown university got attacked in a suspected false flag.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Tucker Carlson visited the orphans and amputees Qatar saved from the apartheid state; Israel won’t allow them to take more refugees. I and my team held back tears as we witnessed children disfigured in the name of Jewish supremacy and a colonial apartheid expansion.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: 🇮🇱 🇶🇦 ISRAEL WONT ALLOW QATAR TO TAKE REFUGEES Tucker Carlson visited the orphans & amputees Qatar saved from the apartheid state. But Israel won’t allow them to take more in. Tucker and his team had to hold back tears as they witnessed the children disfigured in the name of Yewish supremacy and the expansion of a colonial apartheid state.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Zionist Melanie Phillips says Israel can no longer “mow the lawn” and must wipe out enemies, with appeasement over and Zionists becoming “Tanakh Jews” ready to destroy and genocide. Laura Loomer and Roseanne Barr threaten America if it opposes them. A Zionist conference claims Jews are buying guns and will kill “antisemites,” invoking Kahane. If Muslims said this, it’d be a national crisis.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Zionist Melanie Phillips says Israel can no longer simply "mow the lawn" with their enemies (that includes us in the west) and must wipe them out. She says “appeasement” is over and Zionists are becoming "Tanakh Jews" ready to destroy and genocide their enemies. Laura Loomer and Roseanne Barr just threatened America if it turns on them. A prominent Zionist at a Zionist conference said they “Jews are buying guns” and would start killing “antisemites” as they are “going Kahane (a terrorist who killed American ‘antisemites’)” If Muslims were saying all this it would a nation crisis.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: There is a spirit abroad in Israel, which people have not seen before, a spirit among younger people. They will not be diverted from defeating the enemy. It is no longer enough simply to what was called mowing the lawn, to keep the enemy down on the basis that they're always going to be there and we're always going to fight them. No. Enough.
We will now fight to defeat the enemy because we know that only defeating the enemy is what we should be doing. And there's been a realization there's been a realization that this idea of mowing the lawn, this idea of not going too far, this idea of doing what the world expects us to do, that is galut mentality, that is diaspora mentality, that is trying to please and appease the world, but the world we now understand from what we're being living through and are still living through. The world cannot be appeased. It has to be fought. It has been described, and I think most wonderfully, as a move from Talmud to Tanakh, by which I mean this.
The Talmud, that collection of rabbinical ordinances which justifiably can be said to have kept Israel kept the Jewish people alive since their exile from the land of Israel, is very much a diaspora mentality. It is a mentality which looks inward, which says we are up against a world which hates us, we have to protect ourselves. The Tanakh is full of stories of the Jewish people of antiquity fighting, fighting real battles, killing real people in defense of their nation and their people and their faith, and that is what has to be done. And I see that what we are seeing now in this war that has been fought is the resurrection of the Tanakh Jew, the return of the heroic Davidic warrior, strength not weakness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now there is a spirit abro abroad in Israel, which people have not seen before, a spirit among younger people. They will not be diverted from defeating the enemy. It is no longer enough simply to what was called mowing the lawn, to keep the enemy down on the basis that they're always going to be there and we're always going to fight them. No. Enough.
We will now fight to defeat the enemy because we know that only defeating the enemy is what we should be doing. And there's been a realization there's been a realization that this idea of mowing the lawn, this idea of not going too far, this idea of doing what the world expects us to do, that is galut mentality, that is diaspora mentality, that is trying to please and appease the world, but the world we now understand from what we're being living through and are still living through. The world cannot be appeased. It has to be fought. It has been described, and I think most wonderfully, as a move from Talmud to Tanakh, by which I mean this.
The Talmud, that collection of rabbinical ordinances which justifiably can be said to have kept Israel kept the Jewish people alive since their exile from the land of Israel, is very much a diaspora mentality. It is a mentality which looks inward, which says we are up against a world which hates us, we have to protect ourselves. The Tanakh is full of stories of the Jewish people of antiquity fighting, fighting real battles, killing real people in defense of their nation and their people and their faith, and that is what has to be done. And I see that what we are seeing now in this war that has been fought is the resurrection of the Tanakh Jew, the return of the heroic Davidic warrior, strength not weakness.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
FBI Director Kash Patel Under Oath: “There’s no credible information that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked minors” 40 minors gave sworn testimonies that they’d been trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. This is treason. https://t.co/OOjs3GD5Mz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that there is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have, again, is limited. So the answer is no one? For the information that we have. In the files? In the case file. Okay.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the in information we have, again, is limited. So the answer is no one?
For the information that we have. In the files? In the case file. Okay.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Dershowitz smeared the first Epstein victim as antisemitic for revealing she was raped and trafficked by Jewish people. Imagine making yourself the victim. They cry as they strike you.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Epstein’s close friend, associate & lawyer who argued to lower the age of consent ALAN DERSHOWITZ smears the first Epstein victim as “an antisemite” for daring to reveal she was r-aped and trafficked by “Jewish people” Imagine making yourself the victim. https://t.co/nuLWnmMW2v
@AdameMedia - ADAM
One of the sickest versions of they cry as they strike you.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Israel’s Defence Minister confessed in Hebrew that Israel will intentionally and deliberately kiII Yemen’s children. This is why they disabled Hebrew translation. Just invade this scumbag colony already. https://t.co/v0C19m1Eh7
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Israelis in English: “we just want peace, we’re the victims 🥺” Israelis in Hebrew: 😈
@AdameMedia - ADAM
The problem isn’t that they’re evil. It’s that we’re noticing.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🚨 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben Menashe CONFIRMS Netanyahu is blackmailing Trump: "American Government is trapped by the Israelis. Jeffrey Epstein was one of their tools to trap them.” https://t.co/YbQzkVVVfh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 believes the American government is trapped by the Israelis and that Jeffrey Epstein is one of their tools to trap them. He says Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak, and Yasser Arafat met in the nineties and there was no peace deal because of Epstein, claiming Epstein was blackmailing them. He adds that Ehud Barak, then the prime minister of Israel, was also a friend of Epstein but was blackmailed by the Israeli right wing as well, and that this blackmail prevented an agreement with Arafat for a two-state solution. He asserts Epstein was used to change the course of history in the region and that Epstein’s influence trapped a number of US presidents, encompassing not only sexual matters but money as well, questioning where the money came from.
Speaker 1 asks what he thinks of Dershowitz’s denial. Speaker 0 continues, stating that Epstein’s influence affected US policy and that “everything is stuck over Gazelle.” He claims Israelis have the American government captive due to Epstein’s past actions. He accuses Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal of publishing a card or birthday card Trump allegedly sent to Epstein, asking where they obtained it. He asserts Trump does not want to continue the war or genocide and suggests Israelis are holding him back, given Trump’s power to forge peace in places like South Korea and Palestine, and questions why they would need Epstein if they could simply assassinate Trump. He references speculation about John F. Kennedy’s assassination with Israeli intelligence help and notes that attempts on Trump’s life have occurred before elections, acknowledging sensitivity around such claims. He mentions the influence of bereaved or starving children imagery and the political pressure on leaders to act, predicting Israelis might ultimately face a reckoning or “harakiri.”
Speaker 1 offers a geopolitical angle, suggesting GCC countries could leverage financial power to replace APAC lobbying and asks if Trump can leverage Arab world, Global South, and BRICS power to end the genocide. Speaker 0 responds that Trump can end the genocide if he stops fearing the Israelis, asserting that leaders will face accusations of abuses and billions of dollars taken, but morality should prevail and Trump should stop the genocide at any price. He mentions Robert Maxwell as an intelligent man who supposedly tried to leverage against the Israeli state with financial deals, noting that people can still be killed if they challenge Israel. He concludes that he cannot comment further but hopes Trump will have the United States and Middle East interests at heart and do the right thing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe that the American government is sort of trapped by the Israelis. Jeffrey Epstein is one of their tools to trap them.
Speaker 1: And what do you think of Dershowitz's denial?
Speaker 0: I'd like to give you an hold on a second. I wanna give you an example. Bill Clinton, president Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak met Arafat in the nineties, and there was no deal. The reason was Epstein. They were being blackmailed by Epstein.
Ehud Barak was also a friend of Epstein, the the prime minister of Israel at the time. But he was being blackmailed by the Israeli right wing as well. And they stopped an agreement with Arafat. They were about to reach an agreement there for a two state solution, but that was stopped because of Epstein. They were both being blackmailed by Epstein.
Speaker 1: And so Jeffrey Epstein in a way, presumably being used as a tool by the Israelis, helped to change
Speaker 0: the course of history in this region I'm speaking to you from? Of course. A change, I think, and they trapped a number of US presidents by using Jeffrey Epstein. And it wasn't only about sex. It was also the money issue.
Where was the money coming from? But everything is stuck over Gazelle. And I believe the Israelis have the American government captive due to what happened what happens with Epstein or what happened in the past with Epstein. Rupert Rupert Murdoch newspaper, Wall Street Journal put out that card or something, birthday card Trump sent to Epstein. Where do you think they got it from?
And I again, I don't think Trump wants to continue this war or the genocide. I think it's the Israelis holding him back. Given how much maverick power he has to create peace in South North Korea, Palestine, in all these different places. One might ask, why do they
Speaker 1: need Jeffrey Epstein? Why can't they just assassinate Donald Trump? I know there's a lot of speculation. There has been that John f Kennedy was assassinated with Israeli intelligence help. Why do they need things like Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 0: Somebody tried to assassinate him, didn't they? Before he became before the election. It doesn't always work. I I'm not sure what what's going to happen because, you know, people look at these pictures of starving children all over the world. And there is a lot of pressure on these politicians to say enough, to tell them enough is enough.
I'm not sure how far this will go. And I think the Israelis are committing harakiri on the themselves or by doing this because eventually they will be stopped.
Speaker 1: Now that is where the GCC countries arguably can leverage financial power to replace APAC lobbying power as it were. Do you believe that Trump can begin to leverage some of that Arab world global South, BRICS world power to be able to end the genocide?
Speaker 0: No. I believe that he can end the genocide right now if if he just stops being scared of the Israelis. What are they gonna say about him? How many girls did he abuse? How many billions of dollars he took?
Let them say whatever they say. He should stop the genocide. Let them do whatever they wanna do. Morality should take over. I encourage him to stop the genocide at any price.
Speaker 1: Robert Maxwell was a incredibly intelligent man. He was trying to leverage things against the Israeli state, perhaps financial deals for his company. Look what happened to him. Can't the Israelis every time tell Trump, you try and mess with us? Someone is clever, and people can look up Robert Maxwell's heroic wartime record.
They can they can still kill you.
Speaker 0: I can't comment about that, but but but I hope Donald Trump will have the interest of The United States and The Middle East at heart and do the right thing.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim the rabbi who runs the world’s largest porn company aims to legitimize porn and spread it, saying OnlyFans is AIPAC’s top donor. I say ‘Zlonlsts’ destroy and weaken the West to keep money flowing to their colony. I insist these people were behind porn legalization; it wasn’t free speech until they lobbied for it.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
The Rabbi who owns the largest pornography company in the world explains why. The *rabbi* says his goal is to legitimize porn in society, eliminate its taboo and spread porn as far as possible. I remind you that OnlyFans is AIPACs biggest donor 🇮🇱 https://t.co/9hftypjDgp
Video Transcript AI Summary
We explain why Pornhub was targeted for acquisition: there is an extraordinary opportunity in a space with little mainstream investment and where pornography is legal and constitutionally protected in Western democracies, yet lacks legitimacy in modern tech, law enforcement, and regulation circles. The idea is that owning a major adult company allows bringing the industry into the twenty-first century by leveraging mainstream professional networks from law, law enforcement, tech, and finance to engage with government and regulation. The acquisition is seen as an arbitrage play where mainstream owners could advance the industry’s acceptance and framework, with Pornhub as a “jewel of an asset” for the broader business.
The conversation provides several statistics about Pornhub’s scale and activity: in 2018, Pornhub alone witnessed 5.8 billion hours of content consumption. The average visit is about 10.5 minutes. This implies nearly 665 centuries of material viewed on a single platform in one year. In 2018, the world was flocking to Pornhub with 63,992 new visitors per minute. The total number of visitors is stated as 33.5 billion. The most popular day to visit Pornhub is Sunday. There is also a note about a recent stat showing which state consumed the least during the election period, and involvement in election-related activity.
On public response, there is a petition: more than 2,200,000 people have signed an online petition to shut down the site. The rationale given for the petition relates to the divisive nature of pornography and the broader topic of sexuality. The response emphasizes the scale of usage: 130,000,000 daily active users. The speaker attributes the petition to differing views on the proper place of sex in society and characterizes pornography as emblematic of those debates, noting that there will always be deeply held convictions about sexuality and the place of sex in public discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out of all the businesses you guys could buy, why did you guys target buying Pornhub?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So we saw an extraordinary opportunity. You know, the fact that we're it's it's no it's newsworthy or noteworthy that we've made the acquisition. That should tell you that this is a space that has not had mainstream investment. Right?
That it's a space always said, you know, when we looked at the business, it's a business that's legal. Not only is it legal, but in every Western democracy, it's constitutionally protected. It it could not be outlawed even if you wanted to, but it doesn't have that legitimacy. And one of the reasons for that, and as we start to examine the business further, was that nobody wanted to say we are the owners of a major adult company. Right?
Everyone they sort of they wanted the benefits of owning a major adult company. It's a profitable business, but nobody wanted to be out front and engaging with other tech businesses, with government, with law enforcement, with regulation in that sort of way that the modern tech industry has to. So we saw in that this arbitrage opportunity, right? Where if people who come from the mainstream professional networks, whether it's law, law enforcement, tech, finance, etcetera, this is an opportunity to really bring this industry into the twenty first century. We saw an extraordinary opportunity to do that with this, you know, this jewel of an asset, Pornhub, but obviously with the entire company.
Speaker 0: I love it. You said jewel of an asset. So I'm gonna give you some stats here that that that we see. So one, it says 2018 Pornhub alone witnessed a jaw drop in five point eight billion hours of content consumption, which by the way is kind of strange because most men should only be watching for a minute or two. Right?
But this is like when you hear 5,800,000,000 Nope.
Speaker 1: Our average visit is about ten and a half minutes.
Speaker 0: They probably got off the computer and left the website on, but there's a different story there. So that's nearly 665 centuries of material over a single platform in just one year. Here's another one for you. The world was flocking to Pornhub in 2018 with a whopping sixty three thousand nine ninety two new visitors per minute. Is that true?
Sixty three thousand nine ninety two new visitors per month.
Speaker 1: About doesn't doesn't sound unreasonable?
Speaker 0: 33 and a half billion visitors. Insane. Right?
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: And the most popular day to visit Pornhub is Sunday. You guys got all these different stats, and you even put up a stat recently on which state consumed the least while the election was going on and who Yes. Was committed to it. So you're also involved in the election stuff that's going on. Right?
But at the same time, you got you got a petition. I think something came out that says more than two point thank you so much, Kelly. More than 2,200,000 people have signed an online petition to shut down the site. Why do you think that is?
Speaker 1: Well, I think that the topic of pornography has always been a divisive one. I think it has to do with the topic of sexuality in general. Right? There are always gonna be different views about human sexuality, and pornography is just emblematic of those. In fact, it's a little more public.
It's more in your face. That's the nature of it. It's it's sex for the public. So you're gonna have people who have really deeply held convictions about the proper place of sex in our society, and that's that's a good debate. There's nothing wrong with that with that debate.
But you take two and a half million signatures, we have a 130,000,000 daily active users. So people have voted with their mice and with their feet in terms of where they're gonna go. But, of course, it's gonna be a subject of public debate.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Zlonlsts destroy and weaken the west to make it easier to keep the money flowing to their colony.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
You should these people were also behind the legalisation of porn. It wasn’t considered free speech until they lobbied it.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Zohran Mamdani is now Mayor of New York. Here you can see why. America is DONE with lsraeI. America is Done with Zionists. https://t.co/jU1q7cwOGZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion opens with Speaker 0 noting that the first foreign visit by a New York City mayor is significant and asks where each candidate would go first. Speaker 1 (Cuomo) replies, “First visit, I would visit The Holy Land.” Speaker 2, addressing hostility and antisemitism in New York, adds, “Given the hostility and the antisemitism that has been shown in New York, I would go to Israel.”
Speaker 0 then directs the question to Speaker 2 (Tilson). Tilson responds, “Yeah. I’d make my fourth trip to Israel followed by my fifth trip to Ukraine, two of our greatest allies fighting on the front lines of the global war on terror.” Speaker 0 moves to Speaker 3 (Mamdani), who says, “I would stay in New York City. My plans are to address New Yorkers across the five boroughs and focus on that.”
Speaker 4 interjects with a follow-up to Mamdani: “Mister Mamdani, can I just jump in? Would you visit Israel… as mayor?” Mamdani answers that as mayor, “I'll be doing as the mayor, I'll be standing up for Jewish New Yorkers, I'll be meeting them wherever they are across the five boroughs, whether that's in their synagogues and temples or at their homes or at the subway platform because, ultimately, we need to focus on delivering on their concerns.” The conversation then covers a direct question: “And just yes or no, do you believe in a Jewish state of Israel?” Mamdani replies, “I believe Israel has the right to exist.” Speaker 4 counters, “Not Israel. State?” Mamdani responds, “Notice. As a state with equal rights.”
Speaker 1 presses Mamdani further, noting, “He won't he won't say it has a right to exist. Does a Jewish state be very clear?” Speaker 2 adds, “Answer was no. He won't visit Israel.” Mamdani claims, “I I said that That's what he was trying to say. No. Unlike you, I answered unlike you, I answered the question directly. Alright.” The conversation then shifts to Speaker 5, who shares a personal rationale: “My my goal would be to take my first trip to Israel. My wife's life work in this area means a lot to our family, and it could coincide with my young son, Miles, bar mitzvah, if you'd like to have his bar mitzvah.” Speaker 2 interjects briefly, “Okay. But” before the excerpt ends.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first foreign visit by a mayor of New York is always considered significant. Where would you go first? Left, right, miss Adams.
Speaker 1: First visit, I would visit The Holy Land. Mister Cuomo?
Speaker 2: Given the hostility and the antisemitism that has been shown in New York, I would go to Israel.
Speaker 0: Mister Tilson, where would you go?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'd make my fourth trip to Israel followed by my fifth trip to Ukraine, two of our greatest allies fighting on the front lines of the global war on terror.
Speaker 0: Mister Mamdani?
Speaker 3: I would stay in New York City. My plans are to address New Yorkers across the five boroughs and focus on that.
Speaker 4: Mister Mamdani, can I just jump in? Would you visit Israel
Speaker 3: as mayor? I will be doing as the mayor, I'll be standing up for Jewish New Yorkers, I'll be meeting them wherever they are across the five boroughs, whether that's in their synagogues and temples or at their homes or at the subway platform because, ultimately, we need to focus on delivering on their concerns.
Speaker 4: And just yes or no, do you believe in a Jewish state of Israel?
Speaker 3: I believe Israel has the right to exist.
Speaker 4: Not Israel. State?
Speaker 3: Notice. As a state with equal rights.
Speaker 1: He won't he won't say it has a right to exist. Does a Jewish state be very clear?
Speaker 2: Answer was no. He won't visit Israel.
Speaker 3: I I said that That's what he was trying to say. No. Unlike you, I answered unlike you, I answered the question directly. Alright.
Speaker 5: My my goal would be to take my first trip to Israel. My wife's life work in this area means a lot to our family, and it could coincide with my young son, Miles, bar mitzvah, if you'd like to have his bar mitzvah.
Speaker 2: Okay. But
@AdameMedia - ADAM
The IDF terrorists in this video were rewarded and lauded as heroes. The woman who leaked this video was fired and shamed publicly by Netanyahu. Sick society. https://t.co/XWIzxD8E78
reSee.it AI Summary
BREAKING: Israel killed its own people and blamed Hamas to break the ceasefire. Israel said Hamas killed two IDF terrorists, but it was an unexploded ordnance hit by an Israeli bulldozer. Israel launched airstrikes, killing 26 Palestinians, “Just a misunderstanding.” Post 2: Evil. U.S. officials knew within hours the Rafah explosion came from an Israeli bulldozer striking unexploded ordnance, not a Hamas tunnel. Netanyahu blamed Hamas, paused aid, bombings resumed, then reopened crossings.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: 🚨 ISRAEL KILLED ITS OWN PEOPLE & BLAMED IT ON HAMAS TO BREAK THE CEASEFIRE Israel accused Hamas of kiIIing two IDF terrorists but in reality it was an unexploded ordnance struck by an Israeli bulldozer. Israel used this false flag to kill 26 Palestinians with heavy airstrikes. “Just a misunderstanding”
@AdameMedia - ADAM
EviI. https://t.co/OwwjM8OWpG
@AdameMedia - ADAM
The IDF kiII an innocent rescue, live on air. The media will never show you this. The lDF is a terrorist organisation. https://t.co/UKQMiySNKu
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🚨 IDF whistleblower EXPOSES that aid from 1,000 trucks was BURIED in pits or burned. The IDF dug pits and buried or burned the aid and then they blamed Hamas! Just let that sink in. https://t.co/aTTD3Uyzdh
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Israeli newspaper Haaretz interviewed IDF soldiers who ADMITTED they were given orders to shoot unarmed Palestinians who were trying to collect food at GHF distribution sites. Read that again. https://t.co/V38YZiCWiH
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Haaretz article reports that Israeli soldiers were ordered to deliberately shoot Palestinians near aid centers, even though those individuals did not pose a danger to anyone. This claim comes from interviews with multiple soldiers and commanders.
Alongside this admission, the coverage notes that for nearly a month, since the conflict intensified on May 27, the Israeli military and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have either denied or downplayed the casualties among Palestinians seeking aid. Gaza residents have described distribution centers as traps, with several aid organizations saying Palestinians are forced to choose between starving or risking death while seeking the limited food offered at these centers.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is described as a shadowy group whose backing, initial funding, and sponsors remain unclear; its existence and role have been controversial from the outset. Israelis and Americans have denied involvement or knowledge of the Foundation.
The report asserts that 549 Palestinians have been killed in the last month while seeking aid, with the claim that these fatalities resulted from orders given to soldiers to shoot at Palestinians near aid distributions. The broader context suggests accusations that Israel intends to control all humanitarian distributions in order to gain greater military access inside Gaza.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some Israeli soldiers have been speaking to local media about the killings at the food sites. The Haaretz newspaper says soldiers were ordered to deliberately shoot Palestinians near aid centers despite them not posing a danger to anyone. We're gonna go now to Hamdah Salut in Jordan's capital, Amman. She's there because the Israeli government has banned Al Jazeera from reporting inside Israel as well as the occupied West Bank. Hamdah, this is a remarkable admission.
What more was revealed in these reports?
Speaker 1: A shocking admission in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz that interviewed a lot of different soldiers and commanders talking about how they were given orders to shoot and kill Palestinians who were seeking aid in order to disperse the crowds. Now for nearly a month, since this all began on May 27, the Israeli military and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have either denied or downplayed the fact that there are Palestinians getting killed while they are seeking aids. People in Gaza have said that these distribution centers have now become a trap for Palestinians, and several different aids groups have said that the Palestinians are left with no choice to either starve to death or die seeking the very little food that is offered within the distribution centers from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which from the beginning was this sort of shadowy group, incredibly controversial, still unclear who exactly is backing it, who exactly gave it this initial funding. The Israelis denied it. The Americans denied it.
But many are pointing the finger at the Israelis for wanting to control all of the humanitarian distributions in order to get more access militarily inside of Gaza. But what this report is saying is that the five hundred and forty nine Palestinians who've been killed in the last month seeking aid were killed by Israeli soldiers who were given orders to do so.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
MEARSHEIMER: TRUMP & NETANYAHU WOULD BE HUNG Prof. John Mearsheimer: "These are two war criminals. These are two people responsible for genocide. If we were to have Nuremberg Two trials, both of them would be found guilty and probably hung." I agree https://t.co/jxksQZIjBC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach:
- Identify and preserve the core facts, insights, and conclusions without adding new analysis.
- Highlight unique or surprising elements (e.g., calls for Nuremberg II trials, journalist impact, public opinion data).
- Exclude repetitions and filler; focus on the evolution of emotional and political reactions.
- Translate any non-English context to English (not needed here).
- Keep exact terms where possible (genocide, hostages, journalist reporting, public polls).
- Aim for a concise 392–491 word summary that captures both speakers’ points and the dialogue’s tension.
The transcript condensed:
Speaker 0 describes a mixed emotional reaction to recent developments: Israelis held in Gaza for two years reuniting with families, and Palestinians held in Israeli dungeons—about 2,000 people—many for years or months without charges, whom he also calls hostages lacking due process. He is moved by these reunions and by the momentary halt of what he calls a genocide, preventing bombing and possible incineration of Gazans. Yet he recalls two years of genocidal violence as unspeakable and notes the lack of accountability for Western leaders who participated, observing Western leaders visiting Egypt to commemorate an end to the violence. He questions how to emotionally and intellectually react to this “mixed bag of incentives.”
Speaker 1 counters by branding President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu as “two war criminals” responsible for genocide since December 2023 in Gaza, arguing they would be found guilty at Nuremberg II trials and would be hung. He asserts Trump has aided the genocide during nearly nine months in office, and that Netanyahu is guilty as well, yet both are treated as conquering heroes—eliciting his sense of sickness and frustration at the absence of accountability. He suggests that once journalists enter Gaza and report the full story, including on platforms like TikTok, global dismay could hinder Israel from restarting the genocide. He clarifies he isn’t asserting likelihood, but hopes increasing documentation and voices will pressure Israel, the United States, and Europe to shut down the genocide permanently, though he concedes uncertainty.
Speaker 0 then notes global public opinion appears to be turning against Israel, particularly in Western states reliant on it, and cites military pause as a tactic to relieve pressure and allow Israel’s military to rebuild. He suggests that Western elites are incentivized to resume pro-Israel positions, aided by domestic lobbying, and questions whether the pause will relieve pressure or enable normalization. Speaker 1 responds that elites are morally bankrupt, including the Biden administration’s deep involvement in the genocide, but acknowledges pressure from below—such as shifts in the Republican Party and Democratic Party, and European actions like Italy’s general strikes and a German poll showing 62% of Germans believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. He believes the rising information will help people “wrap our heads around it” and possible pressure to act, though outcomes remain uncertain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I I think a lot of people today and over the past couple days while it became apparent that this is likely to happen, have a hard time understanding how to react. Because on the one hand, you, you know, you see Israelis who have been kept in Gaza in captivity for two years in in very harrowing conditions, reuniting with their families, and any decent human being is happy to see that. And then you have, you know, 2,000 or so Palestinians who've been kept in Israeli dungeons, many of them for many years, many of them for months, most of whom have never been charged with a crime. I consider them hostages as well. They've gone had no due process, And you're seeing them reunite with their families as well, and these are very moving scenes.
You're happy that's happening, and you're also, as you said at the start, very happy that this genocide, at least for the moment, has has stopped. That that the people who are living in Gaza aren't going to be bombed in their tents and incinerated to death and watch their children's limbs blown off and all the other orders that we've seen at least for now, and it's hard on the one hand not to feel good about that. On the other hand, we've watched a genocide. I get actual genocide for the last two years. One that is unspeakable in terms of the depths of its, you know, just horrors and and and criminality.
And today, you watch all these Western leaders go to to to Egypt and kind of commemorate. I guess what they would say they're commemorating is the end of this, but they were all participants in it, and and there's obviously no movement at all to hold those responsible accountable in in any way, and it's kinda hard to just swallow the fact that we just watched this happen, and now we're all supposed move on and kind of applaud the fact that the people doing it decided to stop for a while. How do you kind of react, I guess, emotionally or intellectually to this mixed bag of of incentives?
Speaker 1: Well, when I watch, president Trump, in Jerusalem today, extolling the virtues of, prime minister Netanyahu, I say to myself that these are two war criminals. These are two people who are responsible for a genocide. If we were to have Nuremberg two trials, both of them would be found guilty and probably hung at the Nuremberg two trials. Again, what has been taking place since, I would argue, December 2023 in Gaza is a genocide. And president Trump has been in office for almost nine months now, and he has been helping the Israelis execute that genocide.
There's just no question about it. He is guilty of genocide. And, of course, it goes without saying that Netanyahu is guilty. Yet, these two are today being treated like conquering heroes. What does that tell you?
It makes one feel sick to his or her stomach. How else can you think about what's going on here? There's just no accountability. But that's just the way it is at this point in time. And I would imagine that down the road, there will be no meaningful accountability.
But let me make one other point. And that is that I think that once journalists get in there and see what has been done, and once journalists get in there and talk to people in Gaza, and the world gets a better sense of exactly what happened. I mean, we now already have a very good sense because a lot of this was available to see on platforms like TikTok and so forth and so on. But once we get journalists in there and the full story begins to come out, it could be the case that there's so much dismay around the world that it makes it almost impossible for Israel to start the genocide again. That is a possibility.
Am I saying that that's likely? No. Not at all. But one hopes that as people document what has happened here and more and more voices join in the chorus that the just how absolutely horrific this is becomes noticeable to more and more people, and more and more pressure is brought on the Israelis and on the Americans and on the Europeans who are all complicit in this complicit this in this genocide to shut it down permanently.
Speaker 0: I mean, I guess I have a real question about that, which is if you look at public opinion around the world, clearly, has turned against Israel in a generational and arguably an irreversible way in a lot of cases on in terms of popular opinion. And that has certainly been true in the Western states on which Israel most relies, including in Western Europe and and and The United States. And you were talking earlier about the military imperative for Israel to shut down the genocide for a while to give the time for their military to breathe and and rebuild. And maybe there was some similar PR or or image problem that was getting out of control as well. And they hope that by now making it look like they voluntarily stopped, hang out their hostages back and stop once they got their hostages back.
They hope that it'll relieve the pressure on western leaders that really did not want to do it. It was like pulling teeth to start doing things like recognizing the Palestinian state, start talking about suspending arms to to Israel. I think Western elites are very eager to get back to their comfortable pro Israel place, a place where they're comfortable because of domestic political incentive, they have their own Israel lobby, The US certainly does, and I think they're calculating that this pause, matter how long it lasts, no matter what it entails, will at least relieve that intense pressure to to to isolate Israel, and probably Israel thinks that as well. Do you think that's likely to happen?
Speaker 1: Well, I think there's no hope for the elites. I mean, the elites in the West have proven quite conclusively that they're morally bankrupt. There's no question there. You wanna remember the Biden administration was as deeply involved in this genocide as the Trump administration is. So I don't have much faith in the elites in the West.
But I do think that pressure from below matters here, and I do think that Trump was feeling pressure. If you look at what's happening inside the Republican Party, where people are turning on Israel, you look at what's happening inside the Democratic Party, and you look at what's happening in Europe. These general strikes in Italy, public opinion in places like Germany have changed in quite drastic ways. I saw a recent poll that said 62% of Germans believe that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. That's really quite remarkable.
So I think that the elites are feeling pressure. And my hope and it's just my hope, Glenn, and maybe I'm just guilty of wishful thinking here. But my hope is that it becomes clearer and clearer to people that as to what Israel has done in Gaza. I mean, it's absolutely horrific what they have done. It's just hard to believe.
And I think that the more information that comes out in that regard, the better because it will allow all of us to sort of wrap our heads around it in better ways than we're able to do now. But who knows in the end?
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Candace Owen exposes how Israel’s problems disappeared once JFK was assassinated and Lyndon B Johnson got into Office. “both great grandparents on the maternal side were j*wish” https://t.co/J3jFL0DC3G
Video Transcript AI Summary
LBJ’s presidency allegedly erased JFK’s problems by reversing his policies and pursuing a pro-war course—Vietnam, Cambodia, and bombing campaigns. It is claimed that he secretly helped transport weapons to Israel while in Congress, exactly what JFK and Eisenhower opposed. Haaretz is cited: “Lyndon Johnson. Israel has had no better friend. Historians generally regard Johnson as the president most uniformly friendly to Israel.” The article adds, “after John f Kennedy was killed and Lyndon Johnson became the thirty sixth president, LBJ told an Israeli diplomat, you have lost a very great friend, but you have found a better one.” It states Johnson, as Senate Majority Leader, stood in the way of Eisenhower’s plans to cut off assistance to Israel, then increased arms sales and, after 1968, helped make the U.S. Israel’s main supplier, launching talks for phantom fighter jets. It also cites LBJ’s aunt Jesse Hatcher as a Zionist and speculates about a Jewish maternal line; maternal ancestors traced to Germany, etc.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fact that the problem for them instantly disappeared as soon as JFK died. Because what happened was that when Lyndon B. Johnson got into office, he was the vice president, all of their problems were instantly resolved because he reversed course on everything. What is interesting is that LBJ essentially employed the exact opposite policies of JFK. He was fundamentally pro war.
Okay? Vietnam, Cambodia, the bombing campaigns. And it didn't come out until quite recently that he helped Israel get established as a state by secretly helping to transport weapons, exactly what JFK was against, exactly what Eisenhower before him was against. He secretly helped to transport weapons to Israel while he was in congress. Now don't take my word for it.
If I said that fact, it would be antisemitic. Right? Let's take that fact instead from the Israeli newspaper, Haretz. This is literally an Israeli publication. They publish daily.
They wrote, quote, this article you can see is entitled Lyndon Johnson. Israel has had no better friend. Historians generally regard Johnson as the president most uniformly friendly to Israel. And then it says after John f Kennedy was killed and Lyndon Johnson became the thirty sixth president, LBJ told an Israeli diplomat, you have lost a very great friend, but you have found a better one. Indeed, it was Johnson as a senate majority leader who stood in the way years earlier of Dwight Eisenhower's plans to cut off assistant to to Israel.
Hey. I'm quoting this from the article. It's not for me. So we now know that while he was in congress, he stood in the way of Eisenhower who wanted to cut off assistance to assistance to Israel. Okay?
And now we're understanding that he reversed his course on JFK's policy when he becomes the president. It goes on to say, he knew few Jews growing up in Texas, but cultivated lifelong friendships as he rose through the ranks of the Democratic party, which had become the natural political home for most Jews. Historians generally regard Johnson as the president most uniformly friendly to Israel. Johnson was the first president to invite an Israeli prime minister, Levi Eshkol, on a state visit. They got along so well.
Both men were farmers that Johnson paid Eshkol the rare compliment of inviting him to his rants. Ranch. LBJ soon abandoned pressure on Israel to come clean about the Daimonah reactor. He increased arms sales to Israel. And in 1968, after Israel's supplier, France, imposed an embargo as a means of cultivating ties in the Arab world, The United States became Israel's main supplier of weapons, notably launching the talks that would lead to the sale of phantom fighter jets to Israel.
Okay? So he was completely committed to the state of Israel. And if you're beginning to ask questions about, okay, why would that be? What could have been his background? Well, interestingly enough, it turns out that his aunt, his aunt Jesse and, again, we will pull this up in the Jerusalem Post.
We will pull this up in the times of Israel. But his aunt Jesse Hatcher was a member of the Zionist organization. And it has been speculated, not by me, okay, but by rabbi Shmuel Golden that LBJ himself came from a maternal line of Jews. Now his family dates back to the 1848 which were a bunch of communists who tried unsuccessfully to overthrow Germany. And then they all came to Texas and settled in Texas and Kansas and all throughout The United States, including the Pfizer family.
But pulling this back up, this is the opinion of rabbi Shmuel, who apparently looked into it. And this is a blog written by Richard Chasman on the times of Israel. He writes, you can bet the ranch that Bernie Sanders will not be elected as the first Jewish president, but he might be the second. Who was the first Jewish president? LBJ, Lyndon Baines Johnson.
I thank rabbi Shmuel Golden for making me aware of his fascinating story. He's now quoting from an article by Morris Smith in the Five Towns Jewish Times. Lyndon Johnson's maternal ancestors, the mans, apparently migrated to Frederick, Maryland from Germany sometime in the mid eighteenth century. Later, they moved to Bourbon, Kentucky and eventually settled in Texas in the mid to late nineteenth century. The facts indicate that both of Lyndon Johnson's great grandparents on the maternal side were Jewish.
These were the grandparents of Lyndon's mother, Rebecca Baines. Their names were John s Huffman and Mary Elizabeth Perrin. John Hoffman's mother was Suzanne Ahmet, a common Jewish name. Perrin is also a common Jewish name. Huffman and Perrin had a daughter, Ruth Ahmet Huffman, who married Joseph Baines, and together they had a daughter, Rebecca Baines, Lyndon Johnson's mother.
The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations in Lyndon Johnson's family tree. There was little doubt that he was Jewish. Now, again, that is coming from Jewish sources. They will call that a conspiracy. I am just telling you, these are the facts in terms of his assistance and being the greatest friend, the greatest presidential friend that Israel has ever had.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
"Forget the CIA, forget Lyndon Johnson, forget Fidel Castro, the Mossad killed JFK." — Historian Martin Sandler https://t.co/OWVuxJZwJz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a surprising series of letters between Kennedy and David Ben Gurion. Kennedy says, 'I'm killing myself trying to get a nuclear test ban treaty. I've even got the Gaul on board, and that's impossible. And you keep testing in Damona. You've got to stop.' Ben Gurion replies, 'it's easy for you to say sitting in Hyannis Port. I'm sitting with the Arabs all around me, and you want me to give up nuclear testing.' Kennedy threatens him, and the speaker says the threat was such that Ben Gurion resigned. The speaker also cites articles—not in crackpot publications, but in very sophisticated publications—saying, 'forget Lyndon Johnson, forget the CIA, Forget Fidel Castro. The Mossad killed Kennedy because they were so upset over what he did to Ben Gurion.' The speaker concludes, 'we've got a few little bombshells we throw in there. Not proven.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a very surprising series of letters between Kennedy and David Ben Gurion, not only the prime minister, premier of Israel, but the founder of Israel, in which they're very angry letters, which, Kennedy, is saying to Ben Gurion, I'm killing myself trying to get a nuclear test ban treaty. I've even got the Gaul on board, and that's impossible. And you keep testing in Damona. You've got to stop. And the the brilliant Gurion.
Ben Gurion. Thank you. In so many words says, it's easy for you to say sitting in Hyannis Port. I'm sitting with the Arabs all around me, and you want me to give up nuclear testing. And Kennedy threatens him, and he threatens him in such a way that Ben Gurion resigned.
And I will tell you that I found articles not in any crackpot publications, but in very sophisticated publications saying forget Lyndon Johnson, forget the CIA, Forget Fidel Castro. The Mossad killed Kennedy because they were so upset over what he did to Ben Gurion. So, you know, we got a few little bombshells we throw in there. Not proven. Yeah.
Yeah. I hear you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared concerns about the FBI's claims regarding the gun used to shoot Charlie Kirk, highlighting eyewitness accounts suggesting a smaller caliber weapon was involved. This aligns with reports from Candace Owens' source, who noted the absence of an exit wound, indicating a lightweight bullet. Additionally, I discussed various connections between Kirk and Israel, detailing how his criticisms of Israeli policies led to threats and intimidation from influential figures. These events culminated in a tense atmosphere surrounding his final days, raising questions about his assassination.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🚨 FBI LIED ABOUT GUN USED TO SHOOT CHARLIE KIRK Charlie was shot from the front with likely a smaller caliber of weapon (an eye witness agrees) A bullet fragment was recovered, and it WASN’T from a 30-06.. “he was shot with a completely different gun.” https://t.co/etamiSwAMG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. And at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. Right around here. So think about almost in line with your shoulder blade right in the center. They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Andrew has claimed that he had a conversation with the surgeon who offered up the idea that it really was just your modern Christian miracle. What are we to make of that? it means that he was shot with a completely different kind of gun, obviously. the particular weapon... would have gone through about seven necks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I can tell you the part that he is telling the truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet without question. Okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, And I'm telling you this 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. And at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck.
And I'm going to tell you exactly where it was recovered from. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources now. I've actually been sitting on this for a little bit over a week. Right around here. So think about almost in line with your shoulder blade right in the center.
Now why is that helpful? Because it gives us a bullet trajectory. Okay? It went in here where you saw that and it was stopped and a fragment was pulled from right if you're just touching your spine in line with your shoulder blade. That leads us obviously to the part that he's maybe not being forthcoming about.
They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn't recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. This didn't happen. Okay? They found a 30 odd six bullets.
Charlie's death certificate certainly would have reflected that. In suicide in suicide situations, that's just one example, medical examiners feel free to chime in. I've spoken to quite a few. But when the gun and the bullet are known, they are reflected onto the death certificate. Okay?
There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right.
You're absolutely right. And this is why I hate politics because it requires us to submit to the idea that we were all somehow born yesterday. That really can just life really can just be a Marvel comic with people that are I guess a DC comic where there are men of steel that are able because they're young to stop 3,000 pounds of energy that is coming at them. That didn't happen. So where does that leave us guys?
Well, the part that is now extraordinarily suspicious is that Andrew has claimed that he had a conversation with the surgeon who offered up the idea that it really was just your modern Christian miracle. Charlie was just young and his bones had a lot of density, which made him stronger somehow than a cape buffalo, enough push ups in asparagus, and you too can stop 3,000 pounds of energy coming at you. What are we to make of that? What are we to make of the fact that Charlie did not do that actually? It means that he was shot with a completely different kind of gun, obviously.
Okay? The kind where this would make sense that it didn't cut through him. The kind where it would make sense that outside of an artery effectively exploding from the front, there was, you know, his neck didn't explode, which that particular weapon that they were trying to tell us Charlie was killed with would have gone through about seven necks. Okay?
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Lines up with this: https://t.co/gInoz2plWH
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Israel did it: https://t.co/R6HsNo02pj
@AdameMedia - ADAM
@coolnana15557 https://t.co/JPxoB00PwC
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the complex narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination, detailing his evolving stance on Israel and the pressures he faced from pro-Israel factions. Leading up to his death, he criticized Israel and faced significant backlash, including threats and funding cuts. The shooting itself raised numerous questions, with conflicting evidence and potential links to Israeli intelligence. In the aftermath, reactions from Israeli officials and media intensified scrutiny, while discussions about Kirk's legacy and the implications for his organization, TPUSA, began to unfold.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🇮🇱EVERY ISRAELI connection (and Official narrative FLAW) to Charlie Kirk’s ASSASSINATION 🧵 (1/3) THE LEAD UP: Grooming >Groomed by Israel as teenager >First encounter with wife was in Israel >Israel’s top non-Jewish loyalist Going Off Script >Starts mildly criticizing Israel >Let anti-Zionists speak at his events >Said Epstein was Mossad >Demanded Epstein files be released >Said Oct 7 was an inside job >Said AIPAC was harming Americans >Invited MTG to attack AIPAC >Said Israel committing ethnic cleansing >Said Jews were behind open borders and neoliberalism Open Defiance >Said no to censorship laws for Israel and lobbies against it >Said NO to Iran war and LOBBIED it >Trump ‘barked’ at him over Iran >Said Israel had full control of Trump >Referred to Netanyahu as a “bully” >He became “disgusted” with Netanyahu Bribes, Retaliations & Threats >Ultra-Zionist billionaire Robert Shillman CUTS funding (it’s back now) >Israel offers TPUSA $2–$150M funding >Nick Fuentes claims 4 sources confirm Kirk turned down millions (but downplays it) >Charlie refuses offer… >Netanyahu requests Charlie visit Israel >Charlie refuses, again… >Candace says Charlie was “turning on Israel” >He said Netanyahu trying to ‘silence him’ >He feared ‘Israel would kill him’ >Megyn Kelly says she & Charlie were “threatened, intimidated and pressured” over Israel >Megyn says Charlie had “nefarious pressure” from Israel >Zionist media starts attacking him (even after death) >Zionists say Charlie should be “replaced” >Zionist donors threaten to defund TPUSA >Zionist donors demand Kirk ban Tucker >Donors cut him off & launch attacks >Shapiro attacks Kirk on Mark Levin >Loomer says Kirk backstabbed Trump and declares Kirk is done Israeli Control > Israeli agent Rabbi Pesach Wolicki and Josh Hammer were regularly giving Kirk hasbara coaching on WhatsApp > Rabbi Wolicki: “He annoyed the Jewish community with Israel criticism. They were calling him antisemite” >Rabbi Wolicki says Charlie was FORCED to do endless hasbara, that he “didn’t want to” >He was in “10 person chat” with ultra-Zionist money man Bill Ackman and Shaun Maguire Enter Bill Ackman >Epstein gave $125K to Ackman’s wife >Ackman’s wife gifted Epstein ‘artistic orb’ >Ackman led effort against Columbia protests >Ackman got Harvard President fired The Hampton Meeting (Zio Intervention) >Bill Ackman hosts “Hampton meeting” >Meeting becomes Zio intervention for Kirk >Kirk was “screamed at” >Top Zionist influencers attended, they visited Israel after meeting >Their propaganda trip was paid by Israel Ackman shows Kirk’s ‘anti-Israel’ offense list >Kirk says he was being ‘blackmailed’ and “threatened” >Ackman to give Patsy’s father $1.2M >Kirk felt ‘horrified, angry & frightened’ >Kirk vents about Zio intimidation to Megyn Kelly the very next day >Harrison Smith tweet about “fearing for his life” was a week later Final Days He has ‘anti-Israel’ interview w/ Shapiro 48 hours before death He has ‘combative’ meeting w/ Israeli Rabbi day before death
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🧵 (2/3) THE SHOOTING: Pre-Shooting Indicators: >Zio FBI Director fires chief of Utah FBI >Before 9/10, unusual people visited ‘shooter’ >The visitors had out of state license plates >The visitors ‘did not give off a good vibe’ The Moment of the Shot: >Charlie shot in jugular from 150–200yd >Charlie’s security give hand signals at exact moment of the shot >Drones were filmed above the event. Yet Charlie’s security did not see a shooter on a roof 150 yards away, while audience members did >Video shows a man in the crowd aiming at Charlie from his right and making a firing motion at the exact moment of the shot >Unidentified man runs in crowd with pistol >Footage shows Charlie’s mic move from his chest to his neck and become the wound Bullet hole on his shirt AFTER the shot, likely an exit wound >He fell to the side. Not backwards. Likely shot came from side >The “Modern looking” rifle that was apparently from WW1 with no serial code Security Team & Evidence Handling: >Charlie’s team immediately steals the camera SD cards >Charlie’s security immediately go to his body and retrieve something off his body, handoff to each other and pocket it >Charlie’s security was the ultra-Zionist Shaffer group with ties to JINSA >Security group claims they weren’t hired for the event. Video footage debunks it >KIRK said ISRAELIS provide the ‘best security’ to Bill Maher, this video is now deleted on YouTube >Charlie’s team shuts up eyewitness Medical & Forensics: >Doctor removes bullet after death but before the autopsy, evidence tampering >Candace Owens confirms no rear exit wound >TPUSA confirms no exit wound in response to Candace >We are told Charlie was a “man of steel” and neck stopped 30-06 >TPUSA changes story and says spine was made of steel and stopped 30-06 >Experts say no exit wound with a 30-06 would mean mass force transfer like a “grenade” and mean the “explosion” of Charlie’s neck/chest Shooter & Patsy: >Police arrest patsy claiming to be shooter >Patsy yells “shoot me!” during arrest >9/11 propaganda video surfaces of patsy >Patsy admits he was a “distraction” >Patsy has been caught before with child pr0n (easy blackmail material) >No interviews allowed with the patsy >Actual shooter flees without a trace >Accused shooter pleads not guilty >Accused shooter social footprint is wiped clean Conflicting Evidence & Videos: >Video shows shooter with no gun >Video shows alleged shooter up and running ~3 seconds after the shot. Even a minute to disassemble the rifle doesn’t add up >Assembled gun found in ‘wooded area’ >FBI claims shooter wore tactical gear >No photos exist of shooter in tactical gear >Transcript comes across as fake with several AI models also saying they are fake >Candace Owens releases photo of Tyler Robinson at a Dairy Queen after the shooting Israeli & Intelligence Links: >NSA detected 12 Israeli registered cellphones at the site of the shooting >Netanyahu tweets within minutes, before Trump >Israeli media first to confirm Charlie’s death >Private jet takes off 12 minutes away and disables location monitoring >Jet is owned by Chabad Lubavitch donor >Netanyahu posts about Charlie’s Israel trip >Netanyahu LIED about Charlie agreeing to visit >FBI says “foreign intel” assisting investigation >FBI claims they have photos of shooter >Ackman to give Patsy’s father $1.2M >The University of Utah serves as training hub for intelligence and defense, directing students into federal agencies and partnering with companies that develop surveillance systems >ISRAEL’S CHIEF RABBI wrote a condolence letter about CHARLIE KIRK’S DEATH on September 2nd, 8 days BEFORE the ASSASSINATION
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🧵 (3/3) THE AFTERMATH: > Zionists and Netanyahu go on social media blitz about Kirk > Netanyahu says Islamist behind shooting > Netanyahu says Israel didn’t kill Kirk, multiple times > Netanyahu reads Kirk’s ‘pro-Israel letter’ > Candace says the letter was faked and calls on Netanyahu to publish letter > Tucker says Charlie was at war with Israel > Cernovich says Kirk was at war with donors > Grayzone drops article with Trump insider > Insider confirms Kirk’s war with Israel > Insider confirms Trump fearful of Israel > Insider confirms Mossad spying on Trump > Trump insiders don’t buy official FBI story > Trump insiders say ‘outside forces’ killed Kirk > Epstein files blocked immediately after death > Pentagon banned from boycotting Israel > Rubio pushing to revoke passports of Israel critics >Rubio visits Israel >250 state legislators go to Israel >50 states 1 Israel campaign >Netanyahu to visit U.S. 4th time in 8 months > $650M+ approved for Israel’s missile defence > Ben Shapiro takes over speaking duties “bloody mic” > Daily wire officially take over podcast > The Attorney General of America declares Hate speech isn’t free speech and will target “hate speech” > ANTIFA branded terrorist organisation >Ben “donates” $1M to TPUSA, inserting himself as a powerbroker (now TPUSA will support war with Iran).
@AdameMedia - ADAM
@CaptainGreeno https://t.co/8ZfL5otdeI
@AdameMedia - ADAM
This video of Charlie Kirk saying that Netanyahu LET Oct 7 happen so he could stay in power has been removed from YouTube He asks if there was a “stand down order” on Oct 7 (there was, the border was empty for hours). They don’t want you to see this. https://t.co/VIaEPWEriB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues the Israeli hard right government has a mandate to ethnically cleanse Gaza, saying, 'to they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza.' They claim they aim to remove '2,500,000 people from there.' He adds, 'there is they this idea that they need to have a true truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.' He says, 'The whole country is a fortress' and you 'cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an a r 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier.' He states, 'The last nine months, Israel is on the brink of civil war' and notes protests against Netanyahu, who 'now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead.' He asks, 'Was there a stand down order?'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I gotta be careful the way I say this. To they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Yep. I mean, that that's and I'm I don't use that term lightly. Okay?
They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there. Okay? And, honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. There is they this idea that they need to have a true truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.
But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right. So I've been to Israel many times.
The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an a r 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier.
Right? The whole country is surveilled. And so so let me let me just kinda go through We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel is on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration.
This judicial stuff, there were there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration. Right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets.
That's all gone, Patrick. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order?
Six hour
@AdameMedia - ADAM
In 1995 Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was working out a peace deal with Palestine. His people assassinated him for it. Netanyahu was part of it. https://t.co/27rItrEMO8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Then as Rabin was leaving, that's him coming down the ramp, The man in the blue t shirt approached. Three shots from behind.
The Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, the architect of the Middle East peace process has been assassinated.
Assassin, a right wing Israeli Jew, Yigal Amir.
Truly shocking news from The Middle East tonight. Israel's prime minister Yitzhak Yitzhak Rabin has been assassinated.
Outside the hospital, the crowd began to chant.
Phoebe is a murderer.
The sign says, Bibi, Rabin's blood is on your hands.
An assassin has taken yet another world leader away from us.
It was just after the biggest peace rally in Tel Aviv.
Rabin's widow blamed Netanyahu for contributing to her husband's death.
Palestinian community. And said so on worldwide television.
Your husband pointed the finger at mister Netanyahu and said, you must stop this incitement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then as Rabin was leaving, that's him coming down the ramp, The man in the blue t shirt approached. Three shots from behind.
Speaker 1: The Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, the
Speaker 2: architect of the Middle East peace process has been assassinated.
Speaker 0: Assassin, a right wing Israeli Jew, Yigal Amir.
Speaker 3: Truly shocking news from The Middle East tonight. Israel's prime minister Yitzhak Yitzhak Rabin has been assassinated. Evening spent dreaming of peace turns into a national nightmare.
Speaker 0: Outside the hospital, the crowd began to chant.
Speaker 4: Phoebe is a murderer.
Speaker 0: The sign says, Bibi, Rabin's blood is on your hands.
Speaker 3: An assassin has taken yet another world leader away from us. It was just after the biggest peace rally in Tel Aviv.
Speaker 0: Rabin's widow blamed Netanyahu for contributing to her husband's death. Palestinian community. And said so on worldwide television.
Speaker 5: Your husband pointed the finger at mister Netanyahu and said, you must stop this incitement.
Speaker 0: Then as Rabin was leaving, that's him coming down the ramp, the man in the blue t shirt approached. Three shots from behind.
Speaker 1: The Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin,
Speaker 2: the architect of the Middle East peace process has been assassinated.
Speaker 0: The assassin, a right wing Israeli Jew, Yigal Amir.
Speaker 3: Truly shocking news from The Middle East tonight. Israel's prime minister Yitzhak Rabin has been assassinated. Evening spent dreaming of peace turns into a national nightmare.
Speaker 0: Outside the hospital, the crowd began to chant.
Speaker 4: Beatty is a murderer.
Speaker 0: A sign says, Bibi, Rabin's blood is on your hands.
Speaker 3: An assassin has taken yet another world leader away from us. It was just after the biggest peace rally in Tel Aviv.
Speaker 0: Rabin's widow blamed Netanyahu for contributing to her husband's death.
Speaker 3: And Yitzhak Rabin has also produced
Speaker 0: said so on worldwide television.
Speaker 5: Your husband pointed the finger at mister Netanyahu and said, you must stop this incitement.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Thanks to the ADL, many American Christians are learning for the first time that their “closest ally” hates them. It’s literally their tradition to spit on you. https://t.co/c6U2zY7G1w
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Here is the Ex-head of Mossad admitting that Israel HELPED ISIS to slaughter CHRISTIANS. https://t.co/wIuPplh59x
Video Transcript AI Summary
There have been reports that Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters in its hospitals on the border, including fighters from Nusra front, which is, of course, the Al Qaeda proxy in Syria. Do those reports worry you that Israel's helping wounded Al Qaeda aligned fighters?
Speaker 1: "As I said before, in a different context, it's always useful also to deal with your enemies in a humane way." "the main consideration, the immediate consideration is humane." "I didn't say there's no tactical, I said the main consideration, the immediate consideration is humane."
Speaker 0: "So purely humanitarian you say, so there's no tactical or political strategic"
Speaker 1: "No. I don't think so. I don't think there's going to be blowback." "the rules of the game in Syria are such that you can do anything that is not able is not possible to be done anywhere else."
Speaker 0: "Would you also treat Hezbollah fighters? No."
Speaker 1: "I would not treat Have" "A We different account with Hezbollah, a totally different account because Hezbollah has carried out the type of, actions against us which preclude us from going into what the Al Qaeda has done." "Al Qaeda, to the best of my recollection, has up to now not attacked Israel."
Speaker 0: "But has attacked your number one ally and sponsor in The United States Of America."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There have been reports that Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters in its hospitals on the border, including fighters from Nusra front, which is, of course, the Al Qaeda proxy in Syria. Do those reports worry you that Israel's helping wounded Al Qaeda aligned fighters?
Speaker 1: As I said before, in a different context, it's always useful also to deal with your enemies in a humane way. And I think that when you have people who are wounded and you can deal with them in a humane way, the considerations as to whether to take them in are not simply whether it's politically useful or whether it's politically
Speaker 0: So purely humanitarian you say, so there's no tactical or political strategic
Speaker 1: I didn't say there's no tactical, I said the main consideration, the immediate consideration is humane.
Speaker 0: But the tactical issues involved, I mean, you know better than me the phrase blowback. You don't think there's gonna be blowback against Israel if you get into bed with an a group like Nusra Front?
Speaker 1: No. I don't think so. I don't think there's going to be blowback. Why? Because I think that the unfortunately, the rules of the game in Syria are such that you can do anything that is not able is not possible to be done anywhere else.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I think people said that in Afghanistan too. Would you also treat Hezbollah fighters? No.
Speaker 1: I would not treat Have
Speaker 0: you not just contradicted what you told me since
Speaker 1: he's not gonna go?
Speaker 0: About humanely treating your enemies?
Speaker 1: No. No. I think as a Hezbollah, fight is concerned, with them, we have a different, account. So let me be clear.
Speaker 0: You would you're happy to treat Al Qaeda fighters We have but not Hezbollah fighters.
Speaker 1: A We different account with Hezbollah, a totally different account because Hezbollah has carried out the type of, actions against us which preclude us from going into what the Al Qaeda has done. Al Qaeda, to the best of my recollection, has up to now not attacked Israel.
Speaker 0: But has attacked your number one ally and protector and sponsor in The United States Of America. There is a, quote, unquote, war on terror being going on for fifteen years. I'd
reSee.it AI Summary
Larry Ellison has invested $348 million in the Tony Blair Institute for a digital ID initiative in the UK. He and his son own major companies like Oracle, CBS, CNN, Paramount, Warner Bros, and potentially TikTok. His vision includes data centralization and constant surveillance, which I find alarming.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: 🇮🇱 🇬🇧 LARRY ELLISON BEHIND DIGITAL ID IN THE UK Ellison invested and pledged $348 million in the Tony Blair Institute between 2021 and 2023. Larry and his son own: Oracle (Israeli CEO) CBS CNN Paramount Warner bros TikTok (soon) He wants data centralization and total surveillance. "Citizens will be on their best behavior because we're constantly watching & recording everything that's going on." Horrific.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: 🚨 TPUSA CHANGES STORY AFTER BACKLASH Original story: - “bullet should have went through” - “his bone density was like the man of steel” - “It would have killed those behind him” New story: “bullet was on downward slope, went into his chest” https://t.co/QXlDZetu3P
Video Transcript AI Summary
I spoke with Andrew Colvin, the official spokesman for DP USA, a confidant of Charlie Kirk. I put my report out about him talking to the surgeon that was there when Charlie was brought dead to the hospital, and Charlie was being shot from on top into the throat. He says it didn't go through, which makes sense, I think. It went down his spine, exploded in his heart. Fragments went in there, which makes sense, and fragments bounced back up. He claims, 'I'm a ballistics expert,' and argues this isn't a straight-on shot; it would hit bone and ricochet. We don't have answers yet. He dismisses rumors: 'Total total crap' about TPUSA. Memorial's tomorrow in Arizona; 'we'll be covering it live, and I'm gonna report the best information as I have it as it unfolds.' He apologizes for a misreport and notes Charlie Kirk shirts at Domain North Austin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. I'm just gonna report the facts to you. I just talked to Andrew Colvin, who is the official spokesman for DP USA, who I've met before, who's a great guy, and a big confidant of Charlie Kirk. And I put my report out about him talking to the surgeon that was there when Charlie was brought dead to the hospital, and Charlie was being shot from on top I'm just repeating what he told me, into the throat. And he's saying now that, no, it didn't go through, which actually makes sense now that I think about it.
It was coming down, and then when he asked me not to be too graphic, but it went down his spine, exploded in his heart. Fragments went in there, which makes sense. That's what happens. And the bullet fragments bounced back up, and they found that. So this is ballistics.
I hadn't thought of that. I'm a ballistics expert. But after all of this, that makes a lot more sense because I have shot wild hogs and deer and you name it. So they're straight on, and a bullet goes in right in the chest and then, you know, comes out the side or comes out the ass or comes out wherever. And he's like, just don't be graphic, bull.
And and I told him, I said, how am I supposed to be graphic? Now understand. He's being shot from above. It goes in, and it goes down the spine, and then fragments bounce back up, which I've seen Willis do. I hate talking about this, but that's where we are.
So people are thinking straight on shot, but once explained it, this isn't straight on shot. That would go right through. That's bullshit. But if it's down, it goes down. That's what bullets do.
Then they turn around and do all this stuff. So the mystery just got a lot deeper. But I know Andrew's a great guy. Met him before with Charlie. They're just regular people reporting all this as it unfolds, and so am I.
So we have to understand we don't know the answers yet in any of this. But, absolutely, there's no way you get shot with 30 on six. It doesn't go through. But he's like, no. No.
Let me explain. He shot from up high. He goes down and explodes. I was like, that's true if he was shot from up top. So I've already seen people blaming TPUSA.
Oh, the security guard shot him and all this stuff. Total total crap has a cell phone and the rest of it. So we're trying to assess this out as it develops. His memorial's tomorrow in Arizona. We'll be covering it live, and I'm just gonna report the best information as I have it as it unfolds.
I'm just mad. I read a press report that got it wrong. I apologize for that. But at the same time, I'm being told, you know, $30.600 through your neck won't make sense. It's coming down.
It would hit bone and then ricochet. So I've seen that. That's what it does. Comes in high velocity. So it'll bounce off bone.
And he he gave me I had a long conversation with him just now, and it made perfect sense to me. And he was very upset. And he asked me not to give out graphic details, and I said, can't do that. I I can't explain this, Jesus, without explaining it. I mean, I just can't do it, but I've seen this myself.
So let ballistic experts know we'll break it all down, but that's the facts as we know them right now. God bless you all. God bless Charlie Kirk. We're in freedom. I took my daughter shopping there.
I might I might do that twice a year. Took her to Domain North Austin, and I saw two Charlie Kirk shirts. One Charlie Kirk, one freedom. And so that's exciting. God bless you, Charlie Kirk.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
“SHUT THE MIC!!” The Israeli army spokesman accidentally CONFESSED Gaza’s death toll is DOUBLE what they claim. They cut his mic right after. His face went beetroot. Never trust a word they say. https://t.co/8TyoJJVZi7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks the total number of civilians killed. Speaker 1: "the estimate currently is that there is something in in the realm of one terrorist killed, and in that context, two civilians killed. So that's a very, very low rate." Speaker 0: "Thousand civilians have been killed?" Speaker 1: "Those would be the estimates." Speaker 1 later notes: "there's absolutely no differentiation between terrorists who have been killed and civilians who" and adds "the Gaza Health Ministry, which is Hamas run"—"these are estimates. Nobody knows with any certainty." Speaker 1: "It's approximately two civilians per enemy combatant. Okay." Speaker 0: "So in other words, 60,000 civilians have been killed. Is that what you're saying?" Speaker 1: "Two civilians to one terrorist."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sorry. But just to be clear, what what is the total number then of civilians who've been killed?
Speaker 1: So the estimate currently is that there is something in in the realm of one terrorist killed, and in that context, two civilians killed. So that's a very, very low rate.
Speaker 0: Thousand civilians have been killed?
Speaker 1: That those would be the estimates
Speaker 0: right now. Those would
Speaker 1: be the estimates.
Speaker 0: So you just to be clear.
Speaker 1: But but let me ask No.
Speaker 0: No. No. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
I'm sorry. I'm I will now say something. You won't just fill a bust What you've just said, if I may be clear, you said that the number that the Gaza Health Ministry, which is Hamas run, that their numbers were wrong. Unless I'm mistaken, your total numbers are higher than theirs. You've just said two to one, civilians to
Speaker 1: saying about the Gaza Health Ministry, because I think this is a very simple point. I I don't understand why it's struggling to be understood by you. What I'm saying about the Gaza Health Ministry, this is something that's been part of this war since the beginning of the conflict, is that there's absolutely no differentiation between between terrorists who have been killed and civilians who
Speaker 0: have How been many civilians have been killed, do think?
Speaker 1: I I I've answered your question.
Speaker 0: What was the number?
Speaker 1: I've answered your question.
Speaker 0: Give me the number.
Speaker 1: No. I've answered I've I've answered your question. Like you to give me a number. Very clear, Ratio, and one of your great errors is that you continue
Speaker 0: I tell you what. Don't worry about my
Speaker 1: interviewing oversimplify. Skills.
Speaker 0: You worry about your mass.
Speaker 1: Of a battlefield.
Speaker 0: Okay. Pardon me? How many civilians have been killed?
Speaker 1: I've answered you about Hamas.
Speaker 0: What's the number?
Speaker 1: I've then given you the ratio. You can go away and do the mathematics.
Speaker 0: No. You can do the maths.
Speaker 1: I've told you. No. No. No. I've told you.
I've answered you.
Speaker 0: Tell me.
Speaker 1: I've answered you.
Speaker 0: Tell me the number.
Speaker 1: Answered you.
Speaker 0: Why won't you tell me how many civilians have been killed?
Speaker 1: Why won't you take my earlier answer?
Speaker 0: Give me the number.
Speaker 1: It's approximately two civilians per enemy combatant. Okay.
Speaker 0: So let me stop you. Me stop you.
Speaker 1: I'm confident
Speaker 0: you So that so in other words, 60,000 civilians have been killed. Is that what you're saying?
Speaker 1: Pierce, I've said it to you before. Other people have said this to you. These are estimates. Nobody knows with any certainty.
Speaker 0: But you just said 60,000. Benjamin, I don't think you've realized what you've said.
Speaker 1: You'll have to. No. I I realize
Speaker 0: Your numbers are much higher than the Gaza Run Health Ministry. Do you not understand what you told me?
Speaker 1: No. I I understand very, very well
Speaker 0: Two civilians to one terrorist. 30,000 terrorists. Two times that is 60. That's 90,000 people have been killed. That is way higher than the numbers given by the Gaza Health Ministry, which you've tried to say are wrong.
Okay. Thank you very much, Benjamin.
Speaker 1: We'll be remembered.
Speaker 0: If you don't shut up, we are gonna cut your mic. So if I were you, shut up and let Yotsam have the last one. Will with many of the hospitals. Please.
Speaker 1: Yotsam. Do not speak for me.
Speaker 0: Alright. Cut his mic.
Speaker 1: We do not speak for
Speaker 0: Cut his mic.
Speaker 1: I work
Speaker 0: with the hospital. Okay. Thank you.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
ANOTHER lsraeIi gets caught trying to r-pe a 13 year old. And yes, he acts like the victim when caught. https://t.co/jLOF0oDOBm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two men confront a man who traveled from Israel after an alleged inappropriate encounter. Speaker 0 says, "I don't think you're bad guy. You just probably made a mistake." The man insists, "I didn't meant to do anything," and, "I came all the way from Israel for this?" They discuss actions taken: "I should block her right away." They review chat logs: "I saw a girl on app. She told me on the app, she's Jewish and 18," and "She told me she's 15." The man acknowledges "online solution online solicitation minor" and says it's illegal, while denying drugs: "Nothing." He claims cultural rules: "I don't touch non Jewish." He adds, "This is my daughter, by the way." The conversation ends with plans for a formal statement and a link to submit it, noting they are recording for protection and that it "not going online or anything." They consider consequences and what should happen to him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. How
Speaker 1: we doing?
Speaker 0: Hey. We need to have a conversation. Okay? Hey. Look.
I don't think you're bad guy. You just probably made a mistake. Right? Man. Wait.
I came all the way from Israel for this?
Speaker 1: I didn't meant to do anything of this.
Speaker 0: Okay. Got you. Well, here here. Let's talk about it outside. Okay?
Let's talk about it. Okay. Gotcha.
Speaker 1: I didn't meant to do anything. I told you that I don't want to do anything. I just want to make sure. I
Speaker 0: got you. I got you. Weapons on you? No. No.
Have your pockets?
Speaker 1: No weapons.
Speaker 0: Pat you down real quick. Alright? No. What's up? Nothing.
Speaker 1: You're tearing
Speaker 0: off to the side. Yeah? Alright. Good. Nothing.
Alright. So I
Speaker 1: I can I say something?
Speaker 0: I don't
Speaker 1: want me to do anything. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: Sorry for that. I'm sorry, man. I'm pretty sorry. I just seriously, I swear I wanted to came to say, sorry. I don't want to
Speaker 0: do anything. Come and say sorry. Yes. I don't You want to it over the phone.
Speaker 1: I didn't want to do it because she told me she came all the way here.
Speaker 0: I felt bad for it.
Speaker 1: Seriously. I I just wanted to
Speaker 0: play football. I canceled the football. Soccer?
Speaker 1: No. No. I canceled the football internally. Gotcha. I just say sorry.
I swear I didn't meant to do anything. Anything anything anything.
Speaker 0: I got you. Well, well, well, let's look over the chat logs, okay, man? Get to the bottom of this, okay? Slow down. Slow down, alright?
Did you do some drugs before you came here?
Speaker 1: Nothing, nothing. You're sober? I'm good, I'm good.
Speaker 0: Okay, I got you. No cocaine? Nothing, nothing.
Speaker 1: Nothing. I never did a problem in my life. I never did something bad in my life. Mhmm. She told me she's 50.
I swear I nothing. Okay.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, look look. So how how old did she tell you she was?
Speaker 1: She told me
Speaker 0: Right. Okay. I got you. Do you do you see what's wrong with that though?
Speaker 1: She it's not okay. I swear. I didn't mean to do anything. I swear. I didn't mean to do anything.
Swear? Okay. I swear in God.
Speaker 2: Oh, I wouldn't do that.
Speaker 1: I'll be
Speaker 0: careful there.
Speaker 1: I swear in God I didn't mean to do anything.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: I swear, ma'am. I just wanted to tell you, I'm sorry. I don't want to do anything.
Speaker 0: So so what so what should have you done when she's told you she right?
Speaker 1: I should block her right away.
Speaker 0: Block her right away.
Speaker 1: Block her right away. But seriously, I I promise you, sir, I didn't mean to do anything. I swear, ma'am. I didn't meant to do anything.
Speaker 0: Did you chat
Speaker 1: with them
Speaker 0: though that you weren't gonna eat?
Speaker 1: That's on phone. I talked with them on phone. And also, when she told me this, I told I asked her, are you Jewish? Things like this.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. She's she's Why do you ask
Speaker 1: if she was Jewish? Because I'm Jewish.
Speaker 0: And I
Speaker 1: don't touch non Jewish girl.
Speaker 0: But she's ethnically Jewish.
Speaker 1: So I don't touch non Jewish.
Speaker 0: Would you go to hell if you touch the non Jew?
Speaker 1: Kind of.
Speaker 2: You would go to hell?
Speaker 0: Okay. Well well Why is that?
Speaker 1: Because I can't touch non Jewish girl.
Speaker 0: Non Jewish girl? Oh, yeah. Call a non Jewish girl.
Speaker 1: Christian Muslim. The Goyim? Yes.
Speaker 0: I've got you. Yep. Okay. Well well
Speaker 1: you guys. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: Well well, the issue is she is ethically Jewish, though. She is Jewish.
Speaker 1: It's not it's not about that. I'm sorry. Seriously. Seriously. I didn't meant to do anything.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. I got you. And and look like the only the only reason we're recording by the way is because our our protection, your protection. Because if It's okay. Let's say let's say
Speaker 1: I didn't meant to do anything.
Speaker 0: Because you can't say like we attacked you or you know, whatever. So that's why we're filming. This is not gonna go online or anything. No problem.
Speaker 1: I'm just so seriously. I didn't I didn't meant to touch anything. I didn't meant to do anything bad.
Speaker 0: So we Did you bring condoms? Yeah. Yeah. So Did you bring condoms?
Speaker 1: Nothing. Nothing. Seriously. My life.
Speaker 0: So so were you gonna have
Speaker 1: Nothing. No. No. I didn't meant to to do sex with I know I talked with her, but I came now to tell her, ma'am So you
Speaker 0: were so you came because you were
Speaker 2: gonna come?
Speaker 1: I no. No. I came because I wanted to tell her, ma'am, I'm sorry. Sorry that you did all this trip.
Speaker 0: Sorry. I'm sir. Was it was he talk on the chat logs. Right? Yeah.
So so you did see. So it's so you did talk You said you said I you in the Why would you do that?
Speaker 1: What? Know, in chat, you say some stuff
Speaker 0: Uh-huh.
Speaker 1: But you don't really mean it. I saw a girl on app. She told me on the app, she's Jewish and 18. I said, okay. So you know
Speaker 0: ask because she's Jewish and 18.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. If she's 18, you know, sometimes you can.
Speaker 0: But the thing is you told her after she was told you she was that's an issue. Right?
Speaker 1: I know. You're right. You're 100% right. But I didn't mean it. I didn't meant to do anything.
Seriously, guys. I'm sorry. And I didn't bring condom. I didn't brought anything.
Speaker 0: So why did you have wrong.
Speaker 1: No. I didn't meant to to sleep.
Speaker 0: So you were gonna potentially get
Speaker 1: pregnant? No. I didn't meant to sleep at all.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 1: So it would have
Speaker 0: an accident if you did give her anal.
Speaker 1: I no. No. I didn't meant to touch anything. I want just one she told me she's hungry. Wait.
Speaker 0: Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. You're saying a thousand
Speaker 1: things here. Slow down. She told me she's hungry.
Speaker 0: Uh-huh. Yeah. Okay. Hungry for some
Speaker 1: No. No. For food. And she didn't order anything. I said, At least let me order for food.
She came all the way. Seriously, I'm out of the Jew.
Speaker 0: I got you.
Speaker 1: Listen. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: So you know what? The fact that so so Hold on. Why'd you take that off? Because because she's
Speaker 1: she told me she's 15.
Speaker 0: Why don't you put that back on? I can put in are you a fan of Ben Shapiro?
Speaker 1: I like Ben Shapiro.
Speaker 0: You like Ben Shapiro? You ask you ask, do you wanna see
Speaker 1: Yes. I asked her.
Speaker 0: So what if she said yes and you sent
Speaker 1: pic? But it didn't happen.
Speaker 0: It didn't because she said she'll never she never seen one. And you said, seriously. And then you said, you don't have a kit you don't have to send a pic of your send whatever you want, bra or anything.
Speaker 1: You're right. I want
Speaker 0: to then she she said, I never seen it before. And then you say, do you want to see it?
Speaker 1: You're right. I made mistake. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: So but you know that's illegal. Right?
Speaker 1: I know. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: You know what that is? So online solution online solicitation minor.
Speaker 1: For sure, didn't mean to do anything, guys.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. But you said did you drop here, by the way?
Speaker 1: Twenty minutes.
Speaker 0: Twenty minutes. So you didn't mean to do it. You're asking for pictures that that you were asking Do you realize that? I didn't mean Prison time. I didn't meant That is
Speaker 1: a federal offense. I didn't meant to do anything.
Speaker 0: I got you. Jail right now. I'm sorry. Well, you're like that's why we're talking about it. You're probably not a bad guy.
Right?
Speaker 1: I didn't want a right guy. I never did something in this in my life.
Speaker 0: So are you where are you from originally?
Speaker 1: I'm from Israel.
Speaker 0: Israel? When when did he get here?
Speaker 1: Half year ago, eight months.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. So so is it like over there? Is it like an like, is that like okay or
Speaker 1: I never did it in my life.
Speaker 0: Okay. I got you. Never did
Speaker 1: it in my life. I seriously, I did it in my culture.
Speaker 0: Yeah. What what did you wanna add on? Anything like that, Charlie. Never. He made a mistake.
Never.
Speaker 1: I did a mistake. Did I made I I made the mistake. Pardon me, Steve. I'm sorry, guys. I'm sorry.
Listen. My mistake. Real.
Speaker 0: What? Get you some help, man. So what? Some people Yeah. We're not trying to get you in trouble or anything.
We're just here to talk about it. That's why. Important question.
Speaker 1: Do Sir, you
Speaker 0: what do you think should happen to you? What do you think should happen to you? Because I need to get slapped in the face. That's what I think. That's the way I bet.
Well, she not slap you in the face right
Speaker 1: now? Come. Slap me.
Speaker 0: Shut up. No. No.
Speaker 1: So come.
Speaker 0: Say so you say We don't we don't do that here.
Speaker 1: So Hey, guys. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: You said send me a video of you saying I want your to be hard. So what was that about? Why did you say that?
Speaker 1: I made a mistake.
Speaker 0: Well, well, well, like, what's what was your mindset when you were doing that stuff? Like, I know you you did you probably didn't wanna do anything right now. Right? But, like, when you were doing when you were talking about that stuff, like, you just, like, horny or something?
Speaker 1: See, yes. Little bit.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You know, she's pretty looking girl.
Speaker 1: So, you
Speaker 0: know, everyone everyone makes mistakes. Right?
Speaker 1: Exactly.
Speaker 0: This is my daughter, by the way.
Speaker 1: It's all that matters.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So that's why he's just kinda upset. It's all that matters. You're you're gonna have intercourse with my daughter. I didn't I didn't mean to to Why are you touching me?
Sorry. So so, like, at that time, la what? Was it last night, two nights ago? I think it was, like, two nights ago. Right?
So when you were saying that stuff, like, like, like, if she was there, like, you probably would have done something with her or what?
Speaker 1: I didn't mean to do anything. I
Speaker 0: No. I understand. I'm saying at that time, though.
Speaker 1: My in my life. No bench in all of them. She also told me she's Talmudic Jew. I know what is Talmudic Jew, but I still can't believe when the name is not Jewish and the region is not Jewish. I can't believe it.
Can't understand.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. Her her original name's Goldberg.
Speaker 1: Oh, she's so
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
We he just changed his last name because he got married and stuff. So yeah. No. Her last name's Goldberg. Jewish.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, man.
Speaker 0: Yeah. She's from Tel Aviv.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I'm sorry. To stop me in the face. You can stop me the face.
Speaker 0: No. We don't do we don't we don't do that here.
Speaker 1: Please, look at my eyes. I didn't meant to do anything.
Speaker 0: Stop, please. Saying you made a mistake, didn't mean to do You're just gonna happen. Wait. Wait. Here.
Will you shoot?
Speaker 1: You'll have No.
Speaker 0: So here's what's happen. Alright? Louder. Come on now. Louder.
Come on Come on, Louder. Get up.
Speaker 1: Come here.
Speaker 0: I didn't get I was gonna try to ask them to get them calmed down. Sup, man? Sup? If you wanna scroll through I mean, you can just scroll through the whole thing, but and if if you go from there, he talks about asks, you know, if he wants to see his Using one of the white the white words? Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna do Airbnb tonight, but didn't happen. So we just met him here.
Speaker 1: Police department.
Speaker 0: Just ignore that guy. That. Yep. And okay. Got that.
Cool. Yeah. Alright. That was just good here. So let me same thing as last time.
We need to do the statement, and I'm give you that link as well. Okay. Okay? Awesome. Thank you.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
I remember watching this video of Charlie Kirk a few months ago. I found it odd. I noticed he was trying to pivot. I thought it was sly manipulation. I’ve now learned this was a MAJOR issue for Israel. Bill Ackman staged an Intervention a week later. https://t.co/WN0sxcNJmt
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a focus group, participants debate how canceling Tucker Carlson would affect antisemitism and whether labeling opponents as anti Semitic is productive. One says, 'if we were to cancel Tucker, would anti antisemitism increase or decrease?' The response: 'I think increase because that means any supporter of Tucker Carlson's statement therefore makes them anti semitic. Don't association. Mhmm. 100%.' They critique a binary: 'the binary that's presented is that if you don't passionately talk about it, you are a hater.' The discussion shifts to Israel, with a participant stating, 'I love Israel. I visited there,' and describing American concerns: 'we are, like, flooded with illegals, and no one speaks English, and our hospitals are clogged.' They urge to 'reject the Jew hate' but warn against labeling everyone anti Semite for opposing Netanyahu: 'it's bad for everybody.' They ask, 'welcome us not talking about Israel nearly as much? Yes. 100%.' Finally, they frame the issue as a 'messaging problem' and warn, 'there's an earthquake coming on this issue'—'hear it from people themselves.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, like, let let me ask a question. If we were to say if we were to remove like, if people said what Tucker said is anti Semitic, I don't hold that view. But it's like a lot of people on Twitter are, like, calling us out and, like, whatever. That's not gonna happen. But if we were to cancel Tucker, would anti antisemitism increase or decrease?
I think increase because that means any supporter of Tucker Carlson's statement therefore makes them anti semitic. Don't association. Mhmm. 100%. Exactly.
But the binary that's presented is that if you don't passionately talk about it, you are a hater. Mhmm. That's probably destructive for everybody involved. So for me, I'm trying to find this new path, which is I love Israel. I visited there.
My wife and I had the best experiences ever. I saw where Jesus rose from the dead, and he walked on water. But also, I'm an American, and I represent a generation that can't afford anything, and that we are, like, flooded with illegals, and no one speaks English, and our hospitals are clogged. I think we need to have the prudence to reject the Jew hate. Like, okay, we're not gonna put up with that.
That's dumb. But also, if you call everyone an anti Semite, if they don't take a puritanical view of the Netanyahu government, then I think that's it's bad for everybody. So would you guys all basically safe to say welcome us not talking about Israel nearly as much? Yes. 100%.
Every day. A cope that is often found in broken institutions, and I found this now over thirteen years. It's a great truism you guys can learn for the rest of your Anybody that tells you we have a messaging problem, you should go a step deeper and ask another question. Being like, what? Are you actually doing something wrong or are you bad at messaging it?
Because people that are doing bad stuff will sometimes be like, well, we're just not presenting it correctly. Sometimes that's true. Or sometimes there actually might be something beneath the surface that you're not doing. So do you guys think that it's a messaging problem or that it's a, like, an actual material concept problem? Yeah.
It's a values and priorities problem.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's definitely a messaging problem. These politicians, they don't need to be car salesmen. Know, we need we need the truth. We need the direct truth and nothing but the truth. But these politicians, they're not they're not truthful.
You know, they're digging Gen z down in the dirt.
Speaker 0: Who represents you best outside of Trump? Well, thank you. That's very good. I and I don't do
Speaker 1: that just for the sake
Speaker 0: of it either. I mean, you're you're here involving us for a reason because we are the important group. We're going to inherit all of these issues. So No. I again, again, the reason I'm doing this is that the reason we're doing this focus group, and Andrew will attest, I've been trying to tell them that there is an earthquake coming on this issue and in the country, and they don't believe me.
So I'm like, why don't you just hear it from people themselves?
@AdameMedia - ADAM
This video of Charlie Kirk saying that Netanyahu let Oct 7 happen so he could stay in power has been REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE He asks if there was a “stand down order” on Oct 7 (there was, the border was empty for hours). They don’t want you to see this. https://t.co/VIaEPWDTt3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says 'the Israeli hard right government has a mandate' and that 'they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza' by 'removing 2,500,000 people from there.' They claim 'they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge' and that a peace treaty would be 'morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.' The speaker notes, 'The whole country is a fortress,' and that 'I've been to that Gaza border' where 'you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with AR-15 or automatic machine gun.' They claim 'the last nine months, Israel is on the brink of civil war' with protests against Netanyahu for redefining the constitution; now 'Netanyahu has emergency government and mandate to lead.' They ask, 'Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hour?'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I gotta be careful the way I say this. To they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Yep. I mean, that that's and I'm I don't use that term lightly. Okay?
They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there. Okay? And, honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. There is they this idea that they need to have a true truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.
But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right. So I've been to Israel many times.
The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an a r 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier.
Right? The whole country is surveilled. And so so let me let me just kinda go through We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel is on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration.
This judicial stuff, there were there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration. Right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets.
That's all gone, Patrick. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order?
Six hour?
@AdameMedia - ADAM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared breaking news about Eyal Yakobitch revealing that the Chief Rabbi of Israel sent a letter regarding Charlie Kirk's death a week before it occurred, which he later deleted. I noted that there is more evidence supporting the document's authenticity. The letter, still available, praised Kirk as a friend of the Jewish people and condemned his murder. However, I pointed out that the Hebrew date mentioned in the letter is incorrect. Another user responded with confusion about the situation.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: 🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸 Eyal Yakobitch posts evidence that The Chief Rabbi of Israel sent a letter about Charlie Kirk’s death on September 2nd, a week BEFORE the assassination. Yakobitch deleted the post as soon as the date was mentioned. https://t.co/b43mhpiIhW
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Post is still up. https://t.co/dsnSszn7xK
@IHF_Heritage - Israel Heritage Foundation (IHF)
Chief Rabbi David Yosef of Israel sent a condolence letter to Charlie Kirk's family, praising him as "a true friend of the Jewish people" and condemning his murder as "vile and cruel." Rabbi Yosef offered comfort in Kirk's legacy and concluded with a blessing: "May G-d grant you and your family the strength to overcome this great tragedy and to continue his legacy for future generations. @charliekirk11
@AdameMedia - ADAM
“Netanyahu was doing a ton of Podcasts in America, he went PBD, Officer Tatum, Nelk Boys but does anyone find it weird he didn’t go on Charlie Kirk’s Podcast?” - Candace Owens with a brilliant point https://t.co/xbW5O79Qj2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker alleges that “within forty eight hours before Charlie passed away, his top Jewish donors were pulling funding from him, demanding that Charlie take their name off of the building that they had donated to Turning Point. And then once Charlie was killed, they said, never mind, put it back on the building.” He says Charlie had “alluded to a tremendous loss of money coming in” and that “more people are going to come out with information. This is all inevitable.” The speaker notes Beebe's PR blitz: “Beebe recently was on a PR blitz despite the fact that he was fighting this ninety six thousand front war because Israel didn't do nothing,” listing podcasts and asking, “Anybody find it weird you didn't do Charlie Kirk show?” Tomey is cited: “Charlie was implied that Charlie was penning love letters to him in May. I just love you so much.” He calls a “hostile takeover” and says after Charlie's death, supporters claim “the energy is Charlie died for Israel,” which is “literally untrue, and we're not going to allow it.” Okay? It's just not true.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm being contacted by a lot of people. People that are telling me that just within forty eight hours before Charlie passed away, his top Jewish donors were pulling funding from him, demanding that Charlie take their name off of the building that they had donated to Turning Point. I guess I can figure out who that is, how many people could have donated the building. And then once Charlie was killed, they said, never mind, put it back on the building. Okay?
Charlie himself had alluded to a tremendous loss of money coming in. And we'll we'll speak about that more. More people are going to come out with information. This is all inevitable. Okay?
And I'll also point you in this direction. You guys remember Bebe recently was on a PR blitz despite the fact that he was, you know, fighting this ninety six thousand front war because Israel didn't do nothing. Okay? He was doing a ton of podcasts in America. He went on to Patrick Bet David's podcast.
He went on to Brendan Tatum's podcast. He went on to the Nelt Boys podcast. Anybody find it weird you didn't do Charlie Kirk show? Tomey very quickly told us that Charlie was implied that Charlie was penning love letters to him in May. I just love you so much.
It's amazing. They were so close. Boys just hits him up like, hey. I know we're fighting this ninety seven thousand front war because we're always the victims, but do you wanna just come and maybe stay at my place for the weekend here in Israel? Like, that's the vibe that BB was rushing to present to the media.
So why didn't he do Carly Kirk's show? I'll leave it as a question for you guys. Common sense. Common sense. Okay?
I don't like small lies. And remember, Beebe started this. I am responding to his shamelessness. Shameless misrepresentation of what Charlie was going through and what Charlie was saying. Because, and I wanna be clear to me right now, it feels, and I'm using a corporate term here, a bit like a hostile takeover.
Okay? Charlie builds the company organically on the basis of Charlie and Charlie's honest ideas. Suddenly, that company's got a lot of money and Charlie's honest ideas are starting to change or maybe add more color. And now he's getting financial threats. He's being called names.
He increasingly he's being told who and what he's allowed to speak to. And he's taking a stance. He's taking a stand privately up to these people. And then it doesn't matter anymore because Charlie's dead, and those very same people who were pressing him are now doing, like, very quickly trying to set in stone that, oh, Charlie, essentially, the energy is Charlie died for Israel. He's just he's just one of us.
Nobody asks any more questions. That is literally untrue, and we're not going to allow it. Okay? It's just not true.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
Charlie Kirk’s security made hand signals the exact moment he got shot. Charlie kirk’s employees silenced eye witnesses. This stinks. https://t.co/psloB82QxY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hang on. I was standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. Get off me. Head to off me. Running high right now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hang on. I was standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right.
I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. Get off me. Head to off me.
Running high right now.
reSee.it AI Summary
I detailed the events surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination, highlighting his complex relationship with Israel. Initially groomed by Israel, he became critical of its actions, leading to tensions with prominent figures and donors. His assassination raised suspicions, with unusual visitors to the shooter and video evidence suggesting a coordinated effort. In the aftermath, Netanyahu and others attempted to control the narrative, while various insiders hinted at deeper conflicts involving Trump and Israel. The situation remains contentious, with ongoing debates about the motives behind Kirk's death.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
🇮🇱 EVERY ISRAELI connection to Charlie Kirk’s ASSASSINATION (updated): THE LEAD UP: > Groomed by Israel as teenager > Was Israel’s top non-Jewish loyalist > Starts *mildly* criticizing Israel > Said Epstein was Mossad > Said Oct 7 was an inside job > Said Jews were behind open borders and neoliberalism > Said NO to Iran war on behalf of Israel > Lobbied Trump against Iran War > Trump ‘barked’ back at him over Iran > He said Israel had full control of Trump > He referred to Netanyahu as a “bully” > He feared ‘Israel would kill him’ > Told Megyn Kelly Israel trying to control him > Harrison Smith posts about Kirk’s fear > Netanyahu requests Charlie visit Israel > Netanyahu offers TPUSA huge funding > Charlie refuses > He became “disgusted” with Netanyahu > He let anti-Zionists speak at his events > Zionist media starts attacking him > Zionist donors threaten to defund TPUSA > Zionists say Charlie should be replaced > Zionist donors demand Kirk ban Tucker > Donors cut him off & launch attacks > Loomer says Kirk backstabbed Trump > Loomer declares Kirk is done. > Zio FBI Director fires chief of Utah FBI > FBI fails to find killer. Is turned in. > He has ‘anti-Israel’ interview w/ Shapiro 48 hours before being shot > Shapiro attacks Kirk on Mark Levin > He has ‘combative’ meeting w/ Israeli Rabbi day before being shot THE ASSASSINATION: > Before 9/10, unusual people visited 'shooter' > The visitors had out of state license plates > The visitors 'did not give off a good vibe' > Charlie shot in jugular from 200yd away > video shows Charlie’s security making hand signals right before the shot > Video shows a man making a shooting action at the exact moment of the shot > Unidentified man runs in crowd with pistol > Police arrest patsy claiming to be shooter > Patsy yells “shoot me!” during arrest > 9/11 propaganda video surfaces of patsy > Actual shooter flees without a trace > Netanyahu tweets within minutes, before Trump > Israeli media 1st to confirm Charlie’s death > Private jet takes off 12 minutes away > Private jet disables location monitoring > Jet is owned by Chabad Lubavitch donor > FBI says “foreign intel” assisting investigation > FBI claims shooter wore tactical gear > Assembled gun found in ‘wooded area’ > No photos exist of shooter with the gun or tactical gear THE AFTERMATH: > Zionists and Netanyahu go on social media blitz about Kirk > Netanyahu says Islamist behind shooting > Netanyahu says Israel didn’t kill Kirk > Netanyahu reads Kirk’s ‘pro-Israel letter’ > Candace says the letter was faked > Candace calls on Netanyahu to publish letter > Tucker says Charlie was at war with Israel > Cernovich says Kirk was at war with donors > Grayzone drops article with Trump insider > Insider confirms Kirk’s war with Israel > Insider confirms Trump fearful of Israel > Insider confirms Mossad spying on Trump > Trump insiders don’t buy official FBI story > Trump insiders say ‘outside forces’ killed Kirk > Epstein files blocked immediately after death > Pentagon banned from boycotting Israel > Rubio pushing to revoke passports of Israel critics >Rubio visits Israel > $650M+ approved for Israel’s missile defence > Ben Shapiro takes over speaking duties “bloody mic”
@AdameMedia - ADAM
If you watch Ben Shapiro’s face you’ll detect the exact moment he decided Charlie Kirk had to go. https://t.co/6EwsYCze8t
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker recounts a friend's suggestion that after pushing back against the media on COVID, lockdowns, Ukraine, and the border, perhaps we should also ask a question: 'Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel?' They add: 'Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years.' The conversation concludes by noting: 'So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse.' The exchange centers on media scrutiny and skepticism regarding information across issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay. Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
BREAKING: EDEN DECKERHOFF HAS BEEN EXPELLED FROM FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY FOR CRITICISING ISRAEL She is also being sued. That’s how these people operate. To find out who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticise. https://t.co/kuTR981hRk
@AdameMedia - ADAM
ISRAELI PEDOPHILE SENTENCED TO 2000 YEARS IN PRISON South Africa gave this lsraeIi pedo 10 years prison for every indecent child image in his possession. Meanwhile America just lets them go free back to lsraeI. https://t.co/8IkGhFsrSZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Sentenced to 12 life sentences."
"You are sentenced to five years imprisonment on each of the attempted murder counts."
"In terms of section two eighty of the criminal procedure act, I ordered that the sentences on the eight counts of attempted murder should run concurrently."
"Concerning counts one to 253, the pornographic images which were found on the accused's cellular phone, the prosecution submitted that the accused should be sentenced to ten years for each count."
"This would imply that the sentence which ought to be imposed would be 2,530 years, which which mister Albert submitted would merely be for show purposes."
"The accused is sentenced to twenty five years imprisonment on counts one to two fifty three."
"These counts are taken as one for the purposes of sentencing and the accused is sentenced to twenty five years imprisonment on these counts."
"The accused is sentenced to four years imprisonment on each count. I ordered that these sentences on these counts should be served concurrently with each other."
"He is convicted on these counts and he is sentenced to five years imprisonment on each count."
"Count six fifty four relates to the accused using his premises as a brothel. On this count, he is sentenced to three years imprisonment. This sentence should be served concurrently with the sentences imposed in respect of counts six five one, six five two, six five three and seven thirty three."
"Counts six six one, six six two, six six three and seven three five relate to unlawfully promoting a schedule to offenses. These counts are taken as one for the purposes of sentencing and he's sentenced to twelve months on each count."
"Count six fifty six sixty six, six sixty eight, and six seventy relate to rape and compelled rape. You are sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each of these counts. I order that these sentences on counts six sixty eight and six seventy to run concurrently with the sentence imposed on counts six sixty five."
"Counts seven thirteen, seven fourteen, seven fifteen, seven sixteen, seven seventeen, seven eighteen, seven nineteen, seven twenty, and seven twenty one relate to the accused exposing his genitalia. These counts relate to the incidents at the and the aquatic club where the accused loitered around naked in the cloak rooms having an erection in the presence of the young boys. He is sentenced to one year imprisonment on each of these counts."
"Count seven to eight, malicious damage to property."
"This count relates to the accused damaging the boom gate at the aquatic club. He's sentenced to three year three months imprisonment which is fully suspended for three years on condition that he does not commit a similar offense during the period of suspension."
"Count seven two three, seven two four, seven two five, seven two six, and seven two seven. These are counts where the accused instructed and directed the victims to make videos which he sent to Paul Kennedy. He directed the victims to fondle their private parts and to make sexually suggestive videos which whilst they were naked."
"He is sentenced to five years imprisonment on each of these counts. It is ordered that these sentences in respect of these counts should be served concurrently."
"The accused having been sentenced to 12 life sentences will in essence serve one life sentence. It follows that all the sentences in respect of the other counts will run concurrently with that sentence."
"As to when the accused would be released from prison, it is an aspect which will fall within the domain of correctional services and the commissioner and the parole board. I have nothing to do with that."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sentenced to 12 life sentences. You are sentenced to five years imprisonment on each of the attempted murder counts. In terms of section two eighty of the criminal procedure act, I ordered that the sentences on the eight counts of attempted murder should run concurrently. 15. Concerning counts one to 253, the pornographic images which were found on the accused's cellular phone, the prosecution submitted that the accused should be sentenced to ten years for each count.
This would imply that the sentence which ought to be imposed would be 2,530 years, which which mister Albert submitted would merely be for show purposes. Mister Albert submitted that such a sentence would be impractical as the accused would have to serve the rest of his natural life in prison. He submitted that the court should impose a sentence taking into account the cumulative effect of the punishment. In order that the sentences run concurrently with the life sentences. 16, I am of the view to impose ten years for each count in respect of counts one to two fifty three would be imposing a meteorologist like sentence.
In the circumstances, I'm of the view that these counts should be treated for sentencing purposes jointly as opposed to sentencing the accused on each of the two fifty three counts. The accused is sentenced to twenty five years imprisonment on counts one to two fifty three. 17, counts two sixty four to counts six forty relate to pornographic material which was retrieved from the accused's computer. The accused testified that he was unaware of the images of the young boys performing lewd acts such as felatio and other acts. He suggested that the boys who lived with him posted these images onto his computer.
The court rejected this version. Once again, the prosecution requested that the maximum period of imprisonment be imposed on the accused on these counts. I have decided to follow the same approach in sentencing on these counts as I did in respects of counts one to two fifty three. These counts are taken as one for the purposes of sentencing and the accused is sentenced to twenty five years imprisonment on these counts. 18, counts six forty, six forty one, six forty two, six forty three and six forty five.
These counts concern child pornography or pursuing child pornography. The accused was instrumental in making videos of the victims which he distributed to his clients. He is sentenced to four years imprisonment on each count. I ordered that these sentences on these counts should be served concurrently with each other. 19, count six fifty, six fifty one, six fifty two, six fifty three and seven thirty three related to charges whereby the accused benefited from child victims.
The accused arranged for these children to participate in activities whereby he received a benefit from their actions in massaging or engaging in lewd sexual activities with his clients. He promoted this illicit business and made a living by the exploitation of the activities performed by the children. He is convicted on these counts and he is sentenced to five years imprisonment on each count. Once again, I order that the sentences in respect of these counts be served concurrently. 20.
Count six fifty four relates to the accused using his premises as a brothel. On this count, he is sentenced to three years imprisonment. This sentence should be served concurrently with the sentences imposed in respect of counts. Six five one, six five two, six five three and seven thirty three. Paragraph 21.
Count six six one, six six two, six six three and seven three five relate to unlawfully promoting a schedule to unlawfully promoting schedule to offenses. These counts are taken as one for the purposes of sentencing and he's sentenced to twelve months on each count. 22. Count six fifty six sixty six, six sixty eight, and six seventy relate to to rape and compelled rape. You are sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each of these counts.
I order that these sentences on counts six sixty eight and six seventy to run concurrently with the sentence imposed on counts six sixty five. 23. Counts seven thirteen, seven fourteen, seven fifteen, seven sixteen, seven seventeen, seven eighteen, seven nineteen, seven twenty, and seven twenty one relate to the accused exposing his genitalia. These counts relate to the incidents at the and the aquatic club where the accused loitered around naked in the cloak rooms having an erection in the presence of the young boys. These counts also include those incidences where the accused was, in inverted commas, teaching, close inverted commas, the boys to perform massages when they were naked, and he showed them how to perform the so called happy endings.
Would you please put your hand down? Would you kindly put your hand down? I've told you time and time again that you are not to address me directly. And if you wanna say anything, you must wait until I'm finished. I will give your counsel an opportunity to speak to you so that he can then address me.
This is not a school where you can just lift your hands when you feel you have the urge to do so. Apart from it being distracting, it is rude. He's sentenced to one year imprisonment on each of these counts. 24. Count seven to eight, malicious damage to property.
This count relates to the accused damaging the boom gate at the aquatic club. He's sentenced to three year three months imprisonment which is fully suspended for three years on condition that he does not commit a similar offense during the period of suspension. 25, count seven two three, seven two four, seven two five, seven two six, and seven two seven. These are counts where the accused instructed and directed the victims to make videos which he sent to Paul Kennedy. He directed the victims to fondle their private parts and to make sexually suggestive videos which whilst they were naked.
Paul Kennedy paid a fee for these videos. He is sentenced to five years imprisonment on each of these counts. It is ordered that these sentences in respect of these counts should be served concurrently. 26, the accused having been sentenced to 12 life sentences will in essence serve one life sentence. It follows that all the sentences in respect of the other counts will run concurrently with that sentence.
As to when the accused would be released from prison, it is an aspect which will fall within the domain of correctional services and the commissioner and the parole board. I have nothing to do with that. 27. Finally, ordered that the provisions of section one
reSee.it AI Summary
AdameMedia accused U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah of allowing an Israeli pedophile to escape and claimed she labeled all Palestinians as terrorists. In response, HUNTER1994BC shared a link highlighting Chattah's Israeli origin.
@AdameMedia - ADAM
JUST IN: SIGAL CHATTAH IS THE US ATTORNEY WHO LET ISRAELI PEDOPHILE ESCAPE She called all Palestinians terrorists all the men, women, children and babies. These people are not compatible with the west. https://t.co/eGQsKQ1pT7
