reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @AlecLace

Saved - March 6, 2026 at 10:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m stunned by Tim Tebow showing Congress a map with 338,000+ unique U.S. IP addresses trading/sharing child sexual abuse material (kids under 12) in just 6 months. And it barely made the news because it wasn’t in the Epstein files? We NEED Action on this!

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

🚨 I still can't get over this: Tim Tebow showed Congress a map with 338,000+ unique U.S. IP addresses trading/sharing child sexual abuse material (kids under 12) in just 6 months. And it barely made the news because it wasn't in the Epstein files? We NEED Action on this! https://t.co/IhOSFyBy8l

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that every red dot on the maps is a unique IP address that is downloaded, shared, or distributing child rape images, almost all under the age of 12. In a six-month screenshot there are over 338,000 red dots. Blue dots, which are under investigation, are visible but not prominent in a sea of red. The speaker asks, “Isn't that a problem of what we're talking about?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every one of those red dot maps is a unique IP address that is downloaded, shared, or distributing child rape images almost all under the age of 12. And that's just a six month screenshot of it, there are over 338,000 on there. There's blue dots on there. You can't really see them, but the blue ones are the ones that are under investigation. In a sea of red. Isn't that a problem of what we're talking about?
Saved - January 3, 2026 at 4:54 AM

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

🚨 WOW: Minnesota taxpayers in 2018 protesting the exploding Somali daycare fraud scandal. Fast-forward to today – billions stolen yet still no real accountability? The fraud didn't stop. It got MASSIVELY worse. Taxpayers deserve answers NOW. https://t.co/654bOKAlZh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says: "$100,000,000 lost each year. This mollies, and and that's just going over to kill our troops. You know, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever. We need to stop it." Speaker 1 notes Carolyn Hamm mentioned in the meeting that people are responsible for the fraud they committed because they didn't understand the cultural differences. They wonder what Carolyn Hamm means by people having different cultural values, asking if she is saying that some cultures support fraud. They express being sick of this and that nothing is being done about it. They describe themselves as citizens, normal people, inviting others to join them if they're sick of it as well. They insist, "We will not have our money being smuggled in suitcases through the Minneapolis Airport and sent to Somalia. This has to stop, and their people have to be held accountable. And our elected officials have to be held accountable. And people need to go to prison for this because we're just not gonna take it anymore." They state they did not get the answers they were looking for, basically. They conclude Minnesota taxpayers are being taken to the cleaner, for sure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: $100,000,000 lost each year. This mollies, and and that's just going over to kill our troops. You know, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever. We need to stop it. Speaker 1: Carolyn Hamm did mention in the meeting that people are responsible for the fraud they committed because they didn't understand the cultural differences. I'm wondering what Carolyn Hamm means about people having different cultural values. Is she saying that some cultures support fraud? I don't know what she meant by that. That that I saw her say that. I'm curious about that. Because we're just sick of this, and that nothing's really being done about it. So we're here citizens, just normal people. You can join us if you're sick of this as well. This is not acceptable. We will not have our money being smuggled in suitcases through the Minneapolis Airport and sent to Somalia. This has to stop, and their people have to be held accountable. And our elected officials have to be held accountable. And people need to go to prison for this because we're just not gonna take it anymore. We didn't really get the answers we were looking for, basically. I mean, Minnesota taxpayers are being taken to the cleaner. For sure.
Saved - April 20, 2025 at 10:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a breakdown of deportation statistics across different presidencies. Bill Clinton led with 12.3 million deportations, followed by George W. Bush with 10.3 million, and Barack Obama with 5.3 million, all without injunctions. In contrast, Donald Trump had 100,000 deportations but faced 30 injunctions. I questioned the absence of judicial intervention during the earlier administrations and encouraged viewers to watch the full breakdown on YouTube for more insights.

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

Bill Clinton: 12.3 million deportations - 0 injunctions George W. Bush: 10.3 million deportations - 0 injunctions Barack Obama: 5.3 million deportations - 0 injunctions Donald Trump: 100 thousand deportations - 30 injunctions https://t.co/JJ03nykKAn

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

Full Breakdown 👇🏻

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

🚨 Where were the injunctions when Bill Clinton deported 12.3 Million people? Where were the injunctions when George W Bush deported 10.3 Million people? Where was the Supreme Court when Barack Obama deported 5.3 Million people? https://t.co/kXJWP4Ug4w

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker contrasts the deportation policies of Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama with those of President Trump, highlighting the legal challenges faced by Trump. Clinton deported approximately 12.3 million people with zero injunctions or Supreme Court interference. Bush deported about 10.3 million, also facing no injunctions or Supreme Court intervention. Obama, nicknamed "deporter in chief," deported roughly 5.3 million, similarly without facing injunctions or Supreme Court obstacles. In contrast, Trump, with approximately 100,000 deportations, has faced at least 30 injunctions and Supreme Court involvement. The speaker criticizes the lack of legal challenges to Biden's immigration policies and suggests Trump should disregard Supreme Court rulings, similar to a statement made by Biden. The speaker supports Trump deporting all illegal aliens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It happened again. More injunctions and a supreme court decision to temporarily block president Donald Trump from deporting illegal immigrants from The United States. But has the lower courts and the supreme court always been consistent when it comes to deporting illegal aliens? Absolutely not. Let's take a look at some previous presidents and whether or not they were interfered with with their mass deportation efforts. Bill Clinton from 1993 to o one deported approximately 12,300,000 people including 11,400,000 returns and 870,000 formal returns. Now surely, they must have all had due process. That's what we're gonna hear from that. Oh, they all every one of them got due process. Well, let me put your mind at ease, and let's take a look at this. The 1996 illegal immigration reform and immigrant responsibility act expanded groups for deportation and introduced expedited removal, allowing border officials to deport certain individuals without a hearing. Many of the 11,400,000 returns were processed without judicial oversight. Wow. How could that possibly be? I thought every single illegal immigrant that was deported must have a hearing, must get due process. Well, it didn't happen with Bill Clinton, and let's take a look at how many injunctions occurred. Surely, must have been some injunctions, a supreme court interference. They must have tried to stop this mass mass deportation that Bill Clinton put on. Twelve twelve million illegal immigrants deported. How many injunctions you think there were? Well, if you said zero, you're absolutely correct. There were zero injunctions to stop Bill Clinton from doing this mass deportation. There was zero interference from the Supreme Court to stop Bill Clinton from this mass deportation effort. Well, let's take a look at George w Bush. George w Bush from o one to o nine deported approximately 10,300,000 people with 8,300,000 returns and 2,000,000 formal removals. Now they must have all gotten due process. Due process, we keep hearing that. They all got due the only way you could deport somebody is with a hearing and some due process. Well, let's take a look. Post 09/11 enforcement intensified and expedited removals increased. Of the 10,300,000 deportations, 8,300,000 were returns often processed quickly without a court hearing. Wow. Where was the supreme court? Where where was every where were the injunctions? Not one federal judge got involved to try to stop president George Bush from this mass deportation effort. I mean, 10,000,000 illegals deported. Surely, they must have been upset about it. Where is the supreme court? Why didn't they get involved? How many injunctions do you think he faced? Absolutely zero and no interference from the supreme court. Let's take a look at Barack Obama. He was nicknamed the deporter in chief for his mass deportation efforts. From o nine to 02/2017, he deported approximately 5,300,000 people, including 3,200,000 formal removals and 2,000,000 returns. Now surely surely Barack Obama gave each and every one of these illegals their due process in a hearing. Has to be. He's a democrat, a liberal. Definitely, everybody got a hearing. Well, let's take a look at the facts. From o nine to seventeen, expedited removals and administrative orders accounted for many cases, especially at the border. The focus on criminal deportations meant some faced quicker processing and access to lawyers remained inconsistent, particularly for noncriminal offenders. So, wow, not every single how could this be? How many injunctions did Barack Obama face? Absolutely zero. How many times did the Supreme Court get involved and stop Barack Obama from this mass deportation ever effort? Zero times. And let's take a look now at president Donald Trump. In his second term so far, he's he's deported approximately a hundred thousand illegals, and he has faced 30 injunctions, minimum 30, maybe between thirty and forty injunctions. He's at about 90 so far, 30 to 40 when it comes to deportations from these federal activist judges. And the Supreme Court is getting involved in this and stopping president Donald Trump from deporting illegal immigrants in this country. Now we can't even get involved with Joe Biden because Joe Biden allowed a mass invasion into our country the other way. He went the other way. He brought in almost 20 or more, 20,000,000 or more illegal immigrants into the country. Where was the supreme court to stop that? Where were the lower court justices with their injunctions to stop this invasion of the country? It did not exist. They allowed this country to get invaded. And if you were quiet while this country was being invaded, you better be quiet now while president Donald Trump is deporting all of these invaders out of our country. And if and when it comes to the supreme court ruling against president Donald Trump, my advice to president Donald Trump would be listen to president Joe Biden and what he says. His quote was, the supreme court blocked it, but that didn't stop me. I would take that advice. God bless president Donald Trump. Deport every single illegal alien out of this country. We are behind you 100%. You're listening to the Alec Lake show. The future is family.

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

Watch full Breakdown on YouTube https://youtu.be/pWPkiY0ABpE?si=-bltNFqP8OlLrZ37

Saved - February 6, 2025 at 3:21 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Wise words https://t.co/kuSuFSNEWh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Abolish the Department of Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, and Labor. Keep the Department of Defense, State, Justice, and Treasury. The Department of Health and Human Services should be reduced by half, while Veterans Affairs could be eliminated by paying off benefits in lump sums. The government should sell off most of the land it owns, retaining only what’s necessary for government buildings. The core functions of government should focus on preserving peace, defending the country, adjudicating disputes, and protecting individuals from coercion, primarily through local police and the Justice Department.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Keep them or abolish them. Department of Agriculture. By abolish. Gone. Department of Commerce. Abolish. Gone. Department of Defense. Keep. Keep it. Department of Education. Abolish. Gone. Energy? Abolish. Speaker 1: How Except as energy ties in with the military. Speaker 0: Well, then we shove it under defense. The little bit that handles the nuclear Right. Speaker 1: That ought to go under Speaker 0: Plutonium and so forth goes under defense, but we abolish the rest of it. Health and human services? Speaker 1: There is some there are there is room for some public health activities to prevent, contagion, such a thing as, for example Speaker 0: So you'd keep the National Institutes of Health, say, and the Center for Disease Control and not involved? Speaker 1: No. No. The National Institutes of Health. Those are mostly research agencies. No. No. That's a question of whether the government should be involved in financing research. Speaker 0: And the answer is no. Well, that's a complicated that's Speaker 1: a very complicated issue, and it's not an easy answer with respect to that. Speaker 0: We'll eliminate half of the Department of Health and Human Services. Okay, one half. There we go. Housing and Urban Development? Bound. Oh, didn't even pause over that one. Department of the Interior. Speaker 1: Oh, well, but the Housing and Urban Development has done an enormous amount of harm. My God, if you think of the way in which they've destroyed parts of cities under the rubric of eliminating slums, you know, you remember Martin Anderson wrote a book on the federal bulldozer describing the effect of a urban development. There have been many more dwelling units torn down in the in the name of public housing that Speaker 0: have been built. Jack Kemp has proposed selling to the current inhabitants of public housing their unit, their townhouse, their apartment for a dollar apiece and just shifting the ownership to the people who live Speaker 1: in If you got rid of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, it would be worth doing that. Speaker 0: Alright. Done. That's gone. Department of the Interior, your beloved National Park Service. Speaker 1: Well, given that the problem there is you first have to sell off all the land that the government owns, But that's what you should do. Speaker 0: But it could be done pretty quickly. You should you should do that. Speaker 1: There's no reason for the government to own. The government now owns something like one third of all the land in the country. Speaker 0: And that's too much. Should go down to zero. Speaker 1: Should go down to well, not entirely zero. They ought to own the land on which government buildings are. Speaker 0: Okay. Terrific. Department of Justice. Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Keep that one. Keep that one. Speaker 0: Labor. No. Gone. State. Keep. Keep it. Transportation. Gone. Gone. The Treasury? Speaker 1: You have to keep it to collect taxes. Speaker 0: Alright. Collect taxes through the Treasury. Veterans Affairs? Speaker 1: You can regard the Veteran Affairs as a way of of paying essentially salaries for services of those who have been in the armed force, but you ought to be able to get rid of it. Speaker 0: You should be able to Speaker 1: by by pay it off pay it off. Speaker 0: Pay off lump sums for Speaker 1: that That's right. Speaker 0: And just get rid of it. From 14 departments down to Speaker 1: four and a half Four and a half fundamental functions. What are its fundamental functions? A pre preserve the peace, defend the country Alright. Provide a mechanism whereby individuals can adjudicate their disputes. Speaker 0: That's the justice Justice department. Department. Speaker 1: Protect individuals from being coerced by other individuals. The police did the function. Right. And now, this is both the central government and the state and local governments. The police function is primarily local and central. Right. And those are the fundamental functions of government in my opinion.

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

@elonmusk Shut it down

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

🚨 THINGS I DIDN’T VOTE FOR • $2 million for sex changes in Guatemala • $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt • $20 million for a woke Sesame Street show in Iraq • $4.5 million to combat disinformation in Kazakhstan I did however vote for DOGE to shut this sht down! https://t.co/DPp1YbiEoL

Saved - February 12, 2024 at 8:57 AM

@AlecLace - Alec Lace

It’s Super Bowl Sunday so here’s a Throwback to President Donald Trump throwing a dime back in 1992 #SuperBowl #Trump2024 🇺🇸 https://t.co/mZV99ZGB4C

Video Transcript AI Summary
My man, Donald Trump, is amazing! He pulled off something incredible in football, and it was pure luck. He's the best, no doubt about it. Unbelievable!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is my man, mister Donald Trump. Wait a minute. We gotta get a word. No. How did you do that? I don't know. I have no idea. Who says there's not luck in football? You are the best. One time, everybody. Donald Trump. Unbelievable.
View Full Interactive Feed