@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"Our birds are killing themselves": Universal Ostrich Farm owner. https://t.co/LnOO8choPE
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Some more first hand eye witness accounts of ostriches killing themselves: 🎥 Credit to @DreaHumphrey https://t.co/pgqerUoNee
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
A woman in Vancouver was denied access to a "2SLGBTIAQ+-friendly" outdoor theatre because her hair violated the venue's "Code of Conduct Cultural Appropriation policy."
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
This video is THE BEST. It's like a real life SNL skit. So many nuggets of gold, too — from the "blue haired manager" to Crystal calling herself "a retard" and then following it up with "I can call myself whatever I want." Every time I watch it I feel I catch something new.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Many questions in the replies about how the Birdhouse's "Cultural Appropriation Policy" works exactly. So detailed, elaborate, and thorough, it has to exist as its own policy, nested within the larger "Code of Conduct Policy." Here is that policy first—(and yes, this is real):
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
BIRDHOUSE CODE OF CONDUCT! We have a zero tolerance policy for physical or verbal violence in the space. 1. Consent is Mandatory: Always obtain explicit consent before engaging in any physical contact or interaction with another person, including performers and staff. Respect personal boundaries. If someone expresses discomfort or asks you to stop, do so immediately. 2. Zero Tolerance for Oppressive Behaviours: We have a strict zero-tolerance policy for any form of oppressive behaviour, including but not limited to misogyny, racism, body shaming, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any other behaviours or attitudes that contribute to an unsafe or unwelcoming environment. Use inclusive and respectful language. Avoid making assumptions about other people’s genders and pronouns. 3. No Cultural Appropriation: We are an anti-racist space, and we do not tolerate cultural appropriation. Cultural appropriation refers to the nonconsensual wearing or utilising of culturally significant and/or sacred elements of a culture that you do not have ancestry or genuine, meaningful relationships within. Cultural appropriation, especially in relation to consumption, profit, capitalism and social capital is a form of theft and causes harm to marginalised communities. Please refrain from wearing others' cultures as costumes or fashion. This includes avoiding the use of traditionally black cultural hairstyles if you do not identify as Black or Black mixed race. We ask that attendees do not attend events if they have culturally appropriative hairstyles or clothing on. Please respect the need for Birdhouse staff to approach people who they think may be causing harm with cultural appropriation. For full policy see here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jwme3pYpna_L1WQkCnFIMrqO9gkFI1Q751rC7TWutLA/edit?usp=sharing 4. No Harassment: Harassment against staff or other guests will not be tolerated at the Birdhouse. Harassment includes verbal or physical abuse, threats, derogatory remarks, inappropriate jokes, taunts about appearance or beliefs, unwanted attention, intimidation, bullying, or any behaviour that creates an uncomfortable environment for another person. 5. Help Create a Safer and Inclusive Space: We ask that guests take responsibility for understanding their own privileges, and how their actions may impact others. Be mindful of how you take up space, both physically and verbally. Foster an atmosphere of respect and consideration for all attendees. Help us uphold our values around inclusion and mutual respect by maintaining open-mindedness towards others’ cultures, perspectives, and backgrounds. Refrain from making assumptions or judgments based on someone’s appearance. Treat all individuals with kindness and respect. 7. Be Respectful of Staff: Please treat our staff with dignity and respect. Remember that this is their workplace, and that they are equally as deserving of a safer, respectful, and inclusive experience as guests are. Ongoing mistreatment of staff will result in a warning, removal from the venue, and you may not be permitted to return. 8. Report Incidents: If you witness or experience any violations of this code of conduct, please report them to venue staff or security. We are committed to addressing concerns promptly and ensuring the safety and well-being of all attendees, artists, and staff. By attending events at The Birdhouse, you agree to abide by this Code of Conduct. Failure to adhere to the Guest Code of Conduct may result in a warning, or removal from the venue, and you may not be permitted to return. We appreciate your cooperation in helping us make the Birdhouse a welcoming and inclusive space for all!
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
And here, for your convenience, is the policy-within-a-policy. It has two titles and is extremely detailed — (and yes, it is also real): Cultural Appropriation at The Birdhouse (Newest Version) The Birdhouse Cultural Appropriation Policy Overview The Birdhouse is committed to creating an anti-racist environment. We recognize that racism does not only present itself in the form of slurs, hate speech and physical violence, but that it can often show up in more covert ways through microaggressive behaviours such as cultural appropriation. Cultural appropriation is the unacknowledged or inappropriate adoption of culturally significant and/or sacred elements of a culture's aesthetics, or practices by members of another typically more dominant group that does not have an ancestral connection to the culture. Cultural appropriation, especially in relation to consumption, profit, and social capital is a form of theft and causes harm to marginalized communities. Cultural exchange is different from cultural appropriation. When different cultures come together on an equal footing, exchange happens. When dominant groups take from an oppressed group, we’re dealing with appropriation. Additionally, it is not the same as assimilation, which is when marginalized people adopt elements of the dominant culture as a survival tactic where their differences are persecuted. Cultural appropriation typically results in the applause or celebration of the ‘appropriator’, in contrast with the persecution or mockery of those who have practiced the customs culturally and historically. Intentions To make clear our firm stance against racism in all its forms To provide a safe and inclusive space for racialized community members To recognize the ongoing harm caused by cultural appropriation To uplift the voices and concerns of racialized folks, especially those who identify as LGBTQ+ To establish clear and non-negotiable guidelines around participation in our space To use our platform and privilege to continually hold space for conversations around racism, microaggressions and cultural appropriation The Process The Birdhouse policy on cultural appropriation is shared on our online ticketing platforms so as to provide attendees with an opportunity to review said policy before arriving at the event. If an individual shows up at an event wearing a culturally appropriative hairstyle, clothing item, etc. a member of the Birdhouse team will approach them to engage in conversation. given the noise levels of our events, this could mean stepping outside or into a private area The Birdhouse team member will explain or offer a reminder of this policy to the individual without making assumptions about the person’s race and giving the individual an opportunity to respond, clarify or express their feelings In the event that the individual does not choose, or is not able, to remove the culturally appropriative hairstyle or clothing item, they will be asked to leave the space for the remainder of the event The individual is welcome to return to the venue on a different occasion provided they are no longer engaging in cultural appropriation. The Birdhouse is committed to the ongoing education and the unlearning of racism, as such, we are open to continuing conversations, outside of the space, with those who do not understand the policy or our decisions. Additional Information The Birdhouse recognizes that cultural appropriation is a complicated issue. As such, all conversations around cultural appropriation will be approached with compassion, respect, and space for growth, while still retaining the severity and integrity of the above guidelines. We encourage those engaging in cultural appropriation to resist instincts of defensiveness, knowing this conversation is not personal, but rather, a societal pattern. Calling in cultural appropriation is an exercise of community accountability and growth.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
It goes on...: Examples of Cultural Appropriation include but are not limited to: Bindis and Saris: Non-South Asian individuals wearing bindis or saris in contexts unrelated to South Asian culture or traditions, such as music festivals or costume parties. Native American Headdresses: Wearing Native American headdresses as fashion accessories. Dreadlocks, Cornrows, Boxbraids: Non-Black individuals wearing hairstyles that are deeply rooted in Black culture and history, often without acknowledgment and sometimes leading to these styles being perceived as "trendy" when worn by non-Black people, despite the discrimination Black people may face for wearing the same styles. Cultural Appropriation Specific to Black Hairstyles CW: Anti-Black racism and misogynoir Though the above process holds true for any, and all, forms of cultural appropriation, the prevalence of discrimination on the basis of hair among Black folks, coupled with the all too common occurrence of non-Black folks wearing Black hairstyles merits specific focus. The relationship between white supremacy and Black hair dates back to the 1700s in Louisiana with the enactment of the Tignon Laws which required Black women to cover their hair with a tignon (a head scarf). Though those laws were abolished in the 1800s the systemic marginalization of Black folks, and in particular Black women and femmes, on the basis of hair persisted. Today, there is a great inequity in the status accorded to Black hairstyles in mainstream society, where they are considered “cool” and “fashionable” on one hand, when worn by non-Black folks, and considered “unclean” and “unprofessional” when worn by Black folks. Therefore we ask that; Attendees respect the need for Birdhouse staff to approach people who they think may be causing harm by appropriating Black hairstyles Attendees understand that they may be approached by a Black or non-Black Birdhouse staff member or volunteer to engage in a conversation Attendees enter into conversations with empathy for Black folks who experience harm when witnessing seemingly non-Black people appropriating Black culture Attendees do not justify their appropriative choice with excuses like ‘I got it done on holiday in Jamaica’ or ‘my partner is Black’. Attendees trust this process that we have created in consultation with Black community members Attendees recognize that within the systems we inhabit, all systems are flawed, but that we are trying our best to uplift, celebrate and hold sacred those most marginalized among us Attendees understand this is a venue-wide policy and violence or verbal attacks against individual staff members could result in a long-term ban
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
And then, finally, to cap it all off, some really fascinating self-reflection... (and citations, of course): What harm does it cause if white and non-Black people of colour wear Black hairstyles or appropriate Black culture? People who are not Black do not experience daily anti-Blackness that can come in the form of microaggressions, erasure, racial slurs, physical violence, police brutality and murder. Black folks living in Vancouver still experience anti-Blackness as well as the impacts of intergenerational trauma as descendants of enslaved and colonized peoples. Many hairstyles created by Black communities over centuries come from a place of strife and struggle - giving these hairstyles deep, sacred and emotional meaning to Black people. When someone who has not experienced any form of anti-Blackness or intergenerational anti-Black trauma wears a Black hairstyle, the deeper meaning is lost and the act becomes a mockery. Blackness is not a costume that can be tried on. Also, when non-Black people, especially white people, wear Black hairstyles or engage in traditions developed by the Black community, they are often applauded and celebrated. Simultaneously, Black people are mocked, denied jobs, excluded from schools, beaten up, shamed, touched, violated and have their hair forcibly cut simply because of the hair that grows from their heads or the sacred styles they choose to shape it into. This double standard further exacerbates the harm caused by cultural appropriation. Sources & Resources https://www.christiancentury.org/review/books/starting-conversation-about-anti-blackness https://www.sfchronicle.com/entertainment/article/Black-hairstyles-like-the-people-who-wear-them-14091729.php?psid=cseig https://stylecaster.com/beauty/black-hair-dictionary/#slide-6 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dear-khloe-cultural-appropriation-of-black-hairstyles_b_57b380cde4b014a587fba07c https://medium.com/@gabriella_evang/white-women-wearing-black-hairstyles-is-never-okay-167d5b4dd1f3 https://www.essence.com/hair/respect-our-roots-brief-history-our-braids-cultural-appropriation/ https://www.naacpldf.org/natural-hair-discrimination/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/j5abvx/black-womens-hair-illegal-tignon-laws-new-orleans-louisiana https://www.thecrownact.com/ https://mjlh.mcgill.ca/2022/09/08/afro-hair-and-the-law-the-state-of-american-and-canadian-law-on-race-based-hair-discrimination/ https://www.abpsi.org/pdf/ABPsiStatementonHairDiscrimination_Aug2019.pdf https://www.bet.com/article/mbpmmq/a-brief-history-of-black-hair-why-braids-aren-t-a-trend [1] “Community members” is inclusive of staff and patrons. [2] Said Cultural Appropriation Policy is also clearly displayed at the entrance to the event space. [3] A survey conducted by DOVE and the CROWN coalition found that 86% of Black children have experienced race-based hair discrimination by the age of 12. [4] We understand that there are Black people who ‘pass’ as white or could be mistaken for being non-Black.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Full document here: https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1Jwme3pYpna_L1WQkCnFIMrqO9gkFI1Q751rC7TWutLA/mobilebasic
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The full story: https://www.junonews.com/p/exclusive-vancouver-safe-space-rejects
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"My theory on the last Cdn Election: You won't like it." Canadian "conservatives" of all stripes—be it "right of centre, small 'c,' big 'C,' whatever—haven't been very kind over the last few years. And, yes, I'm talking about you 🫵 — so please take this very personally. A 🧵.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
1/ To the "conservative/right wing" creator crowd (which I guess I'm a part of now): up until this point, you've been right about absolutely everything. You were right about lockdowns, about vaccines, about the Convoy—you even correctly predicted the U.S. election. Good on ya! https://t.co/zaRtX3tBnD
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
2/ But Trump came and went, the Canadian election came along, and everyone started infighting like we're at a Greek wedding. By contrast, Carney’s crowd—a big tent housing the CBC, the legacy media and elbows people—marched in uniform with centrist technocrat LinkedIn-discipline. https://t.co/shdOFzMIFc
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
3/ Conservative influencers, meanwhile, showed up for open-mic night at Madison Square Rumble: one guy going off incessantly about Canada becoming 51st state, one on why the Joe Rogan podcast will determine the success of Poilievre's campaign, another about Alberta independence. https://t.co/VSF0sC1nQf
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
4/ There was often no message. Just vibes. Disconnected, contradictory, sometimes delusional vibes. Poilievre says "cut taxes." Cool. But Frei says he's not anti-woke enough. Tisdale calls for Canada to be annexed. Marty and Clyde are talking Alberta independence.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
5/ I'm not trying to be a dick—I'm a part of the same crowd I'm criticizing—just self-reflective. Instead of cohesion, the "very right-wing" digital scene—as Rosie Barton and David Cochrane would likely describe us—provided people a mushroom trip of incoherent grievance politics. https://t.co/rWgHIyuPRI
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
6/ Could CPC have done better? Of course. Did they make mistakes? Certainly. Could they have been friendlier to the independent media cohort? Probably. But the content creators didn't do themselves any favours by criticizing the CPC every step of the way this election either.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
7/ Perhaps it's the curse of knowing too much. The boomers collectively and unitedly backed the Liberals because they proudly understood nothing—just muttered “Trump, Carney banker, steady hand, RRSPs” and voted. Meanwhile, the CPC influencer crowd were busy fingering each other over who had the correct conspiracy about nomination races, Max Bernier, Davos, Khalistan, U.S. podcasts, CCP-influence, fentanyl, immigration—or who did or didn't like Donald Trump too much or not enough.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
8/ The reason we lost is simple: because we couldn't be nice—not even to eachother.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
BREAKING: "Please don't push me. Don't push me, please don't push me." CBC shamelessly manufactures another on-air "assault" involving scary "right wing people." I wouldn't believe it had I not been implicated—myself—in a different CBC Jussie Smollett hoax just last week. https://t.co/uUDIJ7vKCF
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The question I planned for Mark Carney the English debate was: "Do you regret recommending the Trudeau government unconstitutionally freeze bank accounts during COVID?" When he brought in the riot police to remove us last night, I very conveniently got my answer. https://t.co/EdBSUzO1y5
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"Canada is FUBAR" - FULL COMPLETE VERSION https://t.co/O7jzutFaBe
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Canada's problems aren't with the United States alone—but you already knew that. A 🧵 In 2019, the Trudeau government amended the Criminal Code to make bail more "modern and efficient.” But there was one major problem: they had no way to test the results of their experiment.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
In 2019, Bill C-75 amended the Criminal Code “to reduce delays in the criminal justice system” and “to make it more modern and efficient." And yet, I've confirmed, there remains no method by which to test the results of whether the changes have actually led to improved outcomes.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
When asked about the matter, the Department of Justice confirmed no such data exists: https://open.substack.com/pub/junonews/p/exclusive-department-of-justice-admits?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2rby2k
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
“The Department of Justice is limited in its ability to study trends in bail over time due to the unavailability of national data,” they told me.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
There's some déjà vu going on here—it's the Trudeau government's approach to housing all over again [In Justin Trudeau voice]: "I'll be blunt as well—criminal justice and keeping people safe isn't a primary federal responsibility." https://t.co/mUqTzzL7k7
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
My favourite part of this clip is hearing Freeland justify freezing bank accounts because protestors were making Canada-U.S. trade more difficult. "A threat to our economic security is a threat to all of our security," Freeland said.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Canada clearly has a fentanyl problem. A🧵. Important questions arise over this problem: What do we do to fix it? And how much of North America's fentanyl problem is Canada's fault? Trump's tariffs reignited the fentanyl conversation, so let's take a clear-eyed look at it:
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
1/ In Canada, the number is 21. That's the average deaths per day of fentanyl overdoses. In the United States, the number rises to over 200. This isn’t a small problem, it's a big problem. And if we’re going to tackle the problem, we need to look at it honestly and unemotionally.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
2/ This is an emotional issue, after all. People are dying. And politicians, as they will, are politicizing the deaths. Canadians have a right to be angry. Americans have a right to be angry. But are “Canadians killing Americans”? Absolutely not.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
3/ It’s a problem of such enormous scale it's almost impossible to comprehend. 21 deaths per day due from fentanyl overdoses means fentanyl takes more Canadian lives each day than U.S. soldiers died each day during the height of the Vietnam War.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
4/ The purpose of this thread is not to downplay the crisis. There's no way to downplay the fentanyl crisis. Nor is the purpose to downplay Canada's involvement in the fentanyl crisis. It is simply to put Canada's role in the fentanyl crisis into a more factual context.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
5/ Our story begins at the Port of Vancouver. The Port is the largest in the country. It has a long and storied reputation for being a nexus hub of drug trafficking, money laundering, and the international fentanyl trade—and most of the stories are absolutely true.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
6/ Sam Cooper, Kim Bolan and many others have done a fantastic job documenting Vancouver's role as a crime hub for years. Because of their great work and the work of others, it has long been an established fact that the Port is quite literally operated by known gangsters.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
7/ One well-documented example of a known gangster who worked at the Port of Vancouver is Larry Amero. Amero is a prominent member of the Hells Angels. He was employed as a longshoreman at the Port of Vancouver along with being arrested for murder and other gang-related activity.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
8/ It was a position he obtained through the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 502, where sponsorship by an existing union member—such as his father, who also worked at the port—was required for hiring.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
9/ And so he issue of crime at the port is well understood. What might be less understood (because why would Canadians need to consider this until now?) is that Vancouver isn't the only North American city with a gang-affiliated port or a port crime problem—not by a long shot.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
10/ Take Manzanillo, for example. Mexico's busiest port, it's long been an ideal hotspot for fentanyl precursor trafficking. Like a more extreme version of the Vancouver-Hells Angels relationship, it is under strict control by the Jalisco New Generation Cartel.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
11/ In fact, on Oct. 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned four individuals—Aldrin Miguel Jarquín Jarquín, José Jesús Jarquín Jarquín, César Enrique Díaz de León Sauceda, and Fernando Zagal Antón—for coordinating CJNG drug trafficking operations through the port.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
12/ These men were alleged to manage cocaine shipments from Colombia and precursor chemicals for fentanyl and methamphetamine, working under Julio Alberto Castillo Rodríguez, son-in-law of CJNG leader Nemesio "El Mencho" Oseguera Cervantes.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
13/ Much like Vancouver, its Pacific location makes Manzanillo ideal for imports from Asia, including fentanyl and fentanyl pre-cursors. As lax, insecure and compromised at the Port of Vancouver might be, Manzanillo is likely still much easier for cartels to do business with.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
14/ Manzanillo has long been the destination of choice for traffickers. The port’s high container through-put and proximity to cartel strongholds makes it ideal for narco-trafficking. Indeed, if you were importing fentanyl, this would likely be your port of choice—not Vancouver.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
15/ Then there's Lázaro Cárdenas Port—another Pacific port heavily influenced by the CJNG and a key hub for importing fentanyl precursors from Asia. A decade ago authorities seized 19 tons of phenylacetic acid originating from China—the implicated port workers weren't even named.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
16/ But what about inspections? The numbers do vary—but only marginally. It’s estimated less than 1% of shipping containers are searched at Lázaro Cárdenas as per some estimates, as compared to Vancouver’s 3% and Manzanillo's 2% and 4% at the Port of Los Angeles.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
17/ And that brings us to Los Angeles. How does port culture in Los Angeles compare to that in Vancouver? Not favourably if you're prepared to take the line that Canada should be punished for its lax attitude towards fentanyl and illicit drug imports.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
18/ Los Angeles gang culture is notorious. The somewhat ironically nicknamed "City of Angels" is home to numerous gangs—from MS-13 to various Crip and Blood factions and everything in between. Unsurprisingly, many of their gang members intersect regularly with the port.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
19/ The Port of Los Angeles and The Port of Long Beach, which comprises the San Pedro Bay port complex, handles more containers per ship than any other port complex in the world. These warehouses rely heavily on a workforce of largely working class men, which includes gangsters.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
20/ So entrenched is gang culture in the port that the local warehouses surrounding the port are often one of the few readily available jobs for those with a criminal record and no work history. In 2019, an L.A. longshoreman port was charged with trafficking the cocaine himself.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
20/ “Many are men who did stints in prison. Many are youngsters seeking legitimate employment with some gang involvement. Some are just starting families. Some are disillusioned and trying to start fresh. Some are active bangers with 9 to 5's.” https://medium.com/@justincunningham.dlr/blue-collar-politics-and-gang-culture-collide-in-las-harbor-region-785105988ba8
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
21/ The point of all these stories is this: if we want to get serious about dealing with fentanyl, we need to become more serious about how it's trafficked. It doesn’t mainly arrive into Canada, the United States or Mexico across land borders—it ostensibly arrives at the ports. https://t.co/zrrJ1jiA3W
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
This is totally unhinged.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
@DaceyMedia2 did a great job being the better behaved person here. 👏
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
This was a thoughtful and nuanced discussion on, amongst other things, the potential reasoning behind Poilievre's Ukraine policy—one that's left many of us scratching our heads.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
UPDATE: Someone has allegedly "pulled the fire alarm" during our lunch break at the Supreme Court/Federal Court of Appeals building where Trudeau's prorogation of Parliament is being legally challenged. https://t.co/ksGfw5q4KV
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
We're back from the fire alarm incident.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The JCCF lawyer replies to the Trudeau government lawyer's claim that the judge and he discussed Trudeau potentially acting in "bad faith," arguing that "in bad faith" is equivalent to acting against the principles of good government and outside the scope of his executive power.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The JCCF lawyer cites a case law situation involving the "Downtown Eastside." I'm not familiar with the case he's referring to, but it sounds like the crux of the issue is a generalized concern that the court system could become bogged down by "busybody" special interests.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Especially in consideration of this case being expedited, and therefore likely bumping another case before the courts, the JCCF follows: "This is a special case, it is unprecedented and it is remarkable," putting that generalized concern (somewhat) to rest.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"This is a very remarkable case. Proroging Parliament for 11 weeks [in the context of the 51st state threats and the looming Trump tariffs] is prejudicial to every single Canadian" and in violation of Section 3, argues the JCCF lawyer.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The judge pushes back and suggests that Charter Section 3 only applies to voting rights. Section 3 does state: "Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein"
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The JCCF lawyer cites an academic article that supports the decision in Miller II. In the interests of time, he doesn't go over the details, but does provide the last paragraph.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"The decision that there was no limit to this power [the power of prorogation] would mean that the executive power would have no limit" says the last paragraph from Professor Craig at Oxford University.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"If Miller did not exist," the JCCF lawyer repeats, "my argument wouldn't change. I submit that Miller II is a good case, but we don't need it. Don't we already have, here, the same principles as they do in the UK?"
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"This is about protecting parliamentary sovereignty and preventing executive overreach. If we're talking about the constitutional responsibility to take all relevant information into account, in my opinion, this is all in the same bathtub," the JCCF lawyer continues.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The judge asks, "Didn't the PM say that a new leader would reduce polarization? Didn't he say that he thought he was the source of the very paralysis we spoke of earlier?"
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
If that is indeed the case, the JCCF lawyer hypothesizes, then "why doesn't he just resign immediately?"
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The Trudeau lawyer has agreed to go late tonight to 5pm or 6pm to give the interveners time to get their commentaries in. Everyone has agreed to this and the judge was appreciative. I am too given the time sensitive nature of the case.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
@JoWalsh03748900 has also popped in. She has been dealing with legal issues for years pertaining to her taking a "peace sign" picture next to the masked goons that descended upon Ottawa after the invocation of the (now deemed unlawful and unjustified) Emergencies Act. https://t.co/gkjfSwWz2C
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The first intervener, Democracy Watch, is now speaking. The judge seems to be of a concern that Democracy Watch wanted to be a counsel but then changed to intervener status. I'm not really sure why that's a concern, but he's mentioned it several times.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"The power to prorogue is totally different from the power to dissolve," the Democracy Watch representative argues, which repeats the same argument with regards to an absence of deference presented earlier by the JCCF lawyer.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"The court should be especially vigilant when a politician is working in his own politically motivated self-interests," Democracy Watch argues. This makes good sense, actually, as if the court cannot intervene and there are no constitutional limits on prorogation, who else would?
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Democracy Watch also refers to the Constitution as a "living tree" and that, therefore, it would not be unreasonable for the courts to intervene here and to create a Canadian precedent for some limitations on prorogation.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The BC Civil Liberties Association is up next, as the second intervener. The BC Civil Liberties Association says that the judicial, executive and legislative branches are all to avoid engaging in "undue interference."
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
They are arguing that the applicant (represented by JCCF) is incorrect in its assumption that the only precedent limiting the power of the executive on the subject of prorogation is the Miller II case.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
They are arguing that the "privilege of the legislature is integral in holding the executive to account," as noted in Attorney General v. Power, wherein a precedent was set establishing that government does not have absolute immunity when exercising its legislaticr powers.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Oh boy. It's time for the Trudeau government lawyer to speak. She stands up and the room instantly goes quiet.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"Chief Justice, as you know, prorogation is a valuable political too," she begins. Someone sitting next to me mutters under their breath, "I'm going to throw up."
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
*tool
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"No court has ever exercised the right to review the decision to prorogue other than Miller II. And Miller II has no persuasive value for this court as the legal and factual basis are completely different," the Trudeau lawyer argues to the judge.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"This 44th Parliament has been running for over 1,000 days since 2021 and is the longest running minority government in Canadian history," the Trudeau lawyer says (yelling would be more accurate). I have absolutely zero idea why that would be relevant or helpful to her case here.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The Trudeau government lawyer makes a truly confounding argument that bills were able to pass through Parliament despite the SDTC affair. This is an utterly self-defeating and erroneous argument given that PMJT said his justification for prorogation was Parliamentary paralysis.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"So your position is that the government was functioning?" the Chief Justice asks confusedly. "I don't have a position," says the Trudeau lawyer. This is turning into a total disaster for the Trudeau government lawyer. She really and truly does not have a clear position.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The Trudeau government lawyer argues that Trudeau never said he needed 11 weeks to find a new Party leader as a justification for prorogation. She's technically correct about the 11 weeks part, but again, that's completely irrelevant.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
That Justin Trudeau used time to find a new Liberal Party leader as one of his two justifications for prorogation is not only fact, it is a fact that is shared and understood between both sides of the courtroom as spelled out on Page 2 of the applicants Memorandum of Fact and Law
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
This means that the Trudeau lawyer either didn't read the applicant's Memorandum of Fact and Law, she doesn't respect the facts in it, or she's being semantic in arguing because Trudeau didn't mention "11 weeks" as the length of prorogation it's somehow no longer problematic.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
"Hypothetically," the judge asks the Trudeau government lawyer, "could a government use prorogation to avoid a confidence motion?" "There are no limits on prorogation," the Trudeau government lawyer submits. That is really concerning.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
The Trudeau government lawyer is arguing that because no one has challenged prorogation in court before (in Canada), that any new challenge must be, by default, invalid—on account of there being no jurisprudence or case law precedent.
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
Chrystia Freeland is a walking PSA for amphetamine abuse. https://t.co/oiC2xj9y6R
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
MAR-A-LAGO: Reports from those "sitting at the table" with Trudeau and President-elect DJT offer new details of how the conversation might've gone. It sounds like it didn't go well. PM Trudeau hasn't been seen publicly since leaving a West Palm Beach Hotel room the next morning. https://t.co/tgcFov0wqk
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
HAPPENING NOW: Kevin Vuong bravely tells Trudeau, in less certain terms, that he knows the names of the Liberal MPs owned by Communist China. The Justin Trudeau ol' Faithful meltdown occurs, right on schedule, and Question Period comes to a sudden and abrupt conclusion. https://t.co/bI0NGOBNgR
@AmazingZoltan - Alex Zoltan
HAPPENING NOW: Members of Parliament in the Canadian government are basically acknowledging one-after-another that we have a crazed dictator in charge of the country, and with limited legal mechanisms to remove him from power. I find that unsettling. https://t.co/wpbJh5RrrV
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
These Coutts documents are wild. Here, the RCMP requests assistance from the Canadian Arm Forces as early as February 4, 2022 (nearly two weeks before the mass arrests, including those of the Coutts Four). These documents demonstrate that the Trudeau government was in a state of total disorganization, disunity and dysfunction. Particularly amusing in this request form is an amazing story of how over 50 towing companies in Canada and over 25 towing companies across Montana - presumably standing in solidarity with the anti-mandate protestors - refused to offer their services for the purpose of disrupting the blockade: “Given the need to re-open this transportation route, the RCMP has attempted to obtain private industry tow trucks but these companies are refusing to provide their services,” the RCMP communicates in an urgent memo. “We have contacted over 50 tow companies in Canada, throughout Alberta, eastern BC, and Saskatchewan. We also made special arrangements via CBSA which would permit American tow trucks to cross the border to do the necessary work. We have contacted over 25 tow companies in the USA, including into Helena and Missoula, Montana, which are situated over two hours from the Coutts Port of Entry. We have encountered similar responses to our efforts on the Canadian side, and have no prospect or reason to expect any different answer from further efforts.” It is clear from documents like this one that Trudeau lost the moral authority and the will of the people to lead this country more than two years ago. Canada's bizarre and harmful COVID response was a macrosmic reflection of Trudeau's broken mind and it left an entire country traumatized and indebted. This country deserves an election now. May undemocratic Liberal-NDP socialist coalition pay dearly for its misdeeds at the ballot box.
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
A picture tells a thousand words. And this picture cost several Canadians thousands of days with their families. So many missed father days. How this picture became so widely disseminated at the time of the invocation of the Emergencies Act is a bit of a mystery. As some may recall, on Feb. 14, 2022, RCMP charged 13 people with mischief and four with conspiracy to kill RCMP officers after seizing guns, body armour and high capacity magazines. Pictured below is 15 guns that were discovered in three different trailers miles away from the Coutts protest. Nearly every single weapon was lawfully owned, registered and stored (one exception being a handgun attributed to Chris Lysak who has since been freed). Albertans own guns, so finding 15 guns belonging to 13 people in 3 different properties is neither criminal nor surprising. As Gord Magill wrote last year in his Newsweek op-ed, "Meet the Four Men Being Held as Political Prisoners in Canada," there were plenty of simple explanations and logical reasons for their being so many weapons in a place where gun ownership is considered the norm and there is still a bounty for coyote hunting: "Police later found firearms, 36,000 rounds of ammunition, and industrial explosives at Olienick's home—but according to friends and family, the guns were legally obtained, the ammunition is the kind commonly used in rural Alberta to shoot gophers, and Olienick's property sits on a gravel mine; he and his father used the explosives to mine gravel." The absurdity of the picture below becomes increasingly apparent with additional scrutiny. Consider that at the bottom left corner the RCMP has included what appears to be either a machete or perhaps a gardening tool pictured next to a hunting vest adorned with Diagolon patches, along with a pair of walky talkies. It would seem as if the police received warrants for three trailers and then assembled together anything and everything they could find in those trailers that looked even remotely threatening. This picture is clearly designed to appear more threatening than the sum of its contents. The MSM, lacking in either context or care for the potential tampering of public opinion, published this picture in connection to the Coutts Four men who've now spent nearly three years in remand detention facilities sleeping on one inch yoga mats in rooms with bright 24/7 florescent lighting. It's important to remember as we proceed with this trial, and it ought to be important for the MSM to remind its viewership, that these weapons did not belong to the two remaining accused in the so-called "conspiracy to commit murder" charge. To the best of my knowledge, there are only three weapons attributed to the two accused, all of which were legally owned and registered. This is, again, neither illegal nor surprising and hardly warrants two plus years in legal purgatory and solitary confinement.
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
Coming soon: a new docuseries on election interference in Canada. https://t.co/zsKjBwXmw4
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
🧵 "Canada Is FUBAR Part 2" is the second in a three part docuseries on Trudeau's Canada. It documents how an inept Trudeau government - addicted to overreaching, overspending and lying its way out of every predicament - broke the most peaceful, loving and happy country on earth. https://t.co/kId8AL9Jj9
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
Seeing Trudeau and Sean Fraser congratulate themselves on housing today is truly unbelievable. https://t.co/TqNAAzVUuh
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
The extended unedited version is actually far more disturbing. This speech occurred a month ago - and it was for the Ottawa Press gallery. The govt subsidized press gallery reporters laugh most unconvincingly with each "joke." It's all so reminiscent of other socialist dictators https://t.co/Vf15h7ks8S
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
A Trudeau speech so dystopian and creepy it's hard to believe. He brags about overthrowing Canada's democracy, jokes about the inflation crisis, revels in never taking responsibility, and then leaves everyone speechless when he compares Jordan Peterson and Poilievre to Hitler. https://t.co/MeBUUb3qUR
@AmazingZoltan - Amazing Zoltan
Trudeau seriously claims that his carbon tax is responsible for snow and this proves he alone "stands with Christmas." https://t.co/bkWKgZJegg
@AmazingZoltan - Zoltan Róka
Scott Moe is going to prison according to Crystal Freeland, which automatically qualifies him as a Canadian hero. https://t.co/EmTwnF3g5k
@AmazingZoltan - The Amazing Zoltan
Justin Trudeau is so unhinged it's not funny anymore.