TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Amy_K_Nelson

Saved - February 25, 2025 at 4:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Corruption at the FBI has deeply affected my family, particularly through a wrongful raid on our home based on false claims about my husband's employment at Amazon. An agent lied under oath about the legality of referral payments, which was the sole basis for alleging fraud. Despite the DOJ later admitting they hadn't reviewed my husband's contract, they seized all our assets and dismantled our lives. Although the DOJ returned our money after we fought back, they haven't held anyone accountable at Amazon. Instead, they are attempting to seal documents related to the case, indicating a troubling pattern of protecting the powerful.

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Corruption at the FBI isn't a myth. And it impacts real Americans, like my family. Take for example this warrant to raid my home. An agent swore to the truth of the facts in the affidavit. He lied. I can show - but only b/c this document was accidentally unsealed. /1 https://t.co/fEuOxzqoXR

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

The agent told WDWa judge Mary Alice Theiler that $ my husband was allegedly paid was "fraudulent" for one reason.... /2 https://t.co/xB56hxoHbs

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

He swore that Amazon employees weren't authorized to receive referral fees/any compensation paid by developers related to Amazon real estate. Lots of jobs allow such payments - commissions, referral fees, bonuses. This agent swore under oath that this was forbidden at Amazon/3 https://t.co/sxq94sEUyO

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

This is the SOLE reason the alleged payments were deemed "fraudulent" and the sole basis the alleged payments made up probable cause of a crime. Otherwise, the $ would have just been ... a payment. Here is the agent swearing to the truth of the affidavit. /4 https://t.co/5iq13PJsyo

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Federal prosecutors ALSO swore to the truth of this "fact" in a statement of facts used to elicit a plea agreement from a guy who didn't work at Amazon & didn't know what Amazon's contract allowed - or didn't allow. But he pled guilty to helping my husband violate that contract by receiving the "forbidden" payments. Here is the statement in the plea/ 5

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Another agent used this "fact" to file a verified civil forfeiture complaint against every $ my family had in the world - which DOJ seized. The agent said he knew this "fact' PERSONALLY and swore to it under penalty of perjury. Only basis for fraud = payments not authorized/6 https://t.co/sqYy6rCr9m

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

DOJ later confessed they hadn't reviewed my husband's employment terms before seizing $/raiding our home. Judge Rossie Alston ruled that the "explicit terms" in Amazon's contract AUTHORIZED my husband to receive $ from companies doing biz with Amazon. /7 https://t.co/8VJ7Uz9tZ0

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

So, someone told 2 FBI agents and 2 prosecutors - who all made sworn statements to federal judges - a lie about Amazon's employment terms, and used that lie to seize all of our $, raid our home, and dismantle our lives. What do you think happened next? /8

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

US Attorney Jessica Aber vacated the pleas obtained with the lies. DOJ returned the seized $ - after we'd spent hundreds of thousands to get them back. We lost our home (worth 2x now), our retirement, and millions in business contracts. /9 https://www.tiktok.com/@amy_k_nelson/video/7322653492563283230

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

But DOJ didn't make a move to hold Bezos or his lawyers accountable. They'll put Martha Stewart in prison for allegedly lying to DOJ, but I guess if you work for Jeff Bezos it's okay. My life is an okay sacrifice for Jeff and Amazon. /10

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Instead, EDVa DOJ (under Aber) moved to forever seal docs related to the civil forfeiture - after earlier promising Judge Alston they would be unsealed by April 1, 2024. As pulitzer prize winning journalist Seamus Hughes wrote: /11 https://t.co/5IvltF70So

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

So not only is DOJ not holding Amazon accountable - a clear signal that if you're rich enough, you can say whatever you want to prosecutors, force them to lie under oath, and it's totally cool - they're trying to hide the lies. Trump, Bondi and Patel have vowed to end this kind of behavior. I hope they're good to their word. This is a clear and simple test. /12

Saved - January 7, 2024 at 3:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Amazon and its CEO, Jeff Bezos, are at the center of a scandal involving civil forfeiture and legal actions against individuals. The FBI searched and seized assets from a business in Beverly Hills, initiating asset forfeiture proceedings. Amazon asked the DOJ to seize money from an individual, who had no funds, and then sued them in the same district. Prosecutors offered to return some money if the individual pleaded guilty. The DOJ also seized bank accounts belonging to the individual and their father. The family had to sell their home, car, and liquidate retirement funds to fight Amazon's civil lawsuit. They eventually moved to Ohio. The DOJ even subpoenaed their former nanny. A federal judge ruled that the individual did not break their Amazon employment contract. The DOJ seized $7 million based on false allegations from Amazon. Affidavits related to the case will be unsealed in March 2024. The individual believes someone at Amazon lied to the DOJ, which is a federal crime. Amazon has been known to use the DOJ to target sellers, consultants, employees, and landlords. They also have a partnership with the intelligence community. The individual calls for the abolition of civil forfeiture.

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

This is an American scandal - with @jeffbezos and @amazon CEO @ajassy at the center of a horrifying scheme. Here is a small part of our story: Amazon using civil forfeiture to leave my babies penniless and then suing my husband in civil court knowing he had no money. It gets worse. /1

@FreeRangeLawyer - Rob Johnson

Tomorrow, I'm flying to Los Angeles for oral argument in what may be the most important Fourth Amendment case pending in the United States today. The basic facts: The FBI broke open and searched hundreds of safe deposit boxes without any reason to think the boxholders did anything wrong. U.S. Private Vaults, a business in Beverly Hills, offered a private and secure place where people could store their most valued, sensitive possessions. In March 2021, the FBI raided USPV, broke open every single box in the vault, and looked through all the contents. The FBI ran all cash in the vault by drug dogs, opened envelopes and photographed the contents, and ultimately sent everything worth over $5,000 to asset forfeiture---initiating proceedings to keep that property forever.

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Amazon asked DOJ to seize my husband’s $$. DOJ obliged. When that was done and Amazon knew my husband had no money in any bank account - and 4 daughters under the age of 6 - Amazon sued my husband in the same district where they were working with prosecutors. /2

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Prosecutors then told my husband’s lawyers that if my husband would plead guilty to Amazon’s allegations, prosecutors would give my husband back some of his money so he could feed his little girls. Otherwise, good luck. I hope the babies don’t starve. This was May 2020. /3

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Also: DOJ seized the money my husband had paid lawyers after learning he was the target of a federal investigation. They literally went into the law firm’s client trust account and yanked the money. It was scorched earth. My husband was NEVER charged with any crime. /4

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

The DOJ also seized my father’s entire bank account. My husband and I helped my 70 year old dad with health expenses. He had a life saving kidney transplant in April 2020. He couldn’t play for his anti rejection meds, /5

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

DOJ also seized my bank accounts. I guess to make sure we had no way to survive? I was the CEO of a start up. They took it all. And we couldn’t even fight to get it back until February 2022. 2 years later. And we got it back. /6

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

But for 2 years, we had to support 4 babies & pay lawyers to fight Amazon’s civil lawsuit, the civil forfeiture and the government investigation Amazon started. We sold our home, car, liquidated retirement, borrowed money and raised money. This was our home in Seattle. /7

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

We drove away from Seattle with 4 girls and 5 bags. We had to leave our dog - our heart - with a friend for a year. We eventually made our way to Ohio to live with my family. We got the dog, Utah, back. /8

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

At one point, DOJ subpoenaed our former nanny. I think they did it to try to show some tax fraud - but we paid our nanny over the table with employment taxes. If we had’t DOJ would have likely threatened to charge me with a crime to exert pressure on my husband to plead guilty. So the nanny had to hire lawyers. But here’s the thing. /9

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

In Amazon’s civil lawsuit - because we could pay to fight, because we sold everything and got the seized money back and I moved away from my little girls to take a job to pay lawyers - a federal judge finally ruled my husband didn’t even break his Amazon employment contract. The DOJ seized our money and was happy to let my children starve - so were @JeffBezos and @ajassy - over conduct a judge said conformed to Amazon’s employment terms. How is this America? /9

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

My dad never got his money back. He couldn’t pay for lawyers and it was just $13,000 - all the money he had in the world. My parents aren’t wealthy. My mom was a retired teacher. We had to promise not to sue DOJ and give up 15% of the seized money to get anything back. We needed it to survive so we did. /10

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

In all, DOJ seized $7 million from families, investors, and companies based on Amazon’s false allegations. In March 2024, the affidavits DOJ used to seize the money will be unsealed. And that’s a massively important day. Here is why. /11

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

I’ve seen statements by DOJ that Amazon said it’s employees weren’t “authorized” to do business with entities doing biz with Amazon. Full ban. But a federal judge said that is “explicitly contrary” to the plain terms of Amazon’s contract & Amazon DID allow that, Now, if we hadn’t fought - would my husband be charged with federal crimes for adhering to his contract? I think so. I do. /12

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

But someone at Amazon lied to DOJ. And it will be in the affidavits. And it’s a federal crime to lie to law enforcement: 18 USC 1001. Big deal. And so I have to believe DOJ is digging into this now and will hold the actors at Amazon accountable who lied. Otherwise they’re broadcasting to all companies, hey, go ahead and lie to us to go after business partners, etc. We are here for it. It’s pretty darn black and white. /13

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Amazon has broadcast in public filings that 4 people really ran the show internally: AWS exec Chris Vonderhaar, now at Google Cloud. Global head of ethics Yousri Omar. AWS lawyer Dennis Wallace. North American ethics head Matt Doden. So stay tuned. /14

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Now, Amazon has a disturbing path of using DOJ as a “partner” to go after sellers, seller consultants, employees and landlords. Seems not okay. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/21/amazon-federal-law-enforcement-525794. /15

How one of America’s largest employers leans on federal law enforcement Amazon has increasingly tipped off the Justice Department and FBI to investigate its own employees and the sellers using its platform, according to a POLITICO analysis.  politico.com

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

And Amazon IS a real partner to the intelligence community. In 2013, Amazon won a massive CIA contract. Now they store data for FBI, DOD, NSA, etc. Pretty terrifying. /16 https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/07/the-details-about-the-cias-deal-with-amazon/374632/

The Details About the CIA's Deal With Amazon A $600 million computing cloud built by an outside company is a "radical departure" for the risk-averse intelligence community.  theatlantic.com

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Is their independence? I don’t know. I don’t know anything about this country anymore. Dozens of lawyers put my family in a vice and squeezed us, hoping we would die. So I’m lost. But please keep watching. Please keep sharing. Thank you. /17 https://reason.com/2022/02/18/fbi-seized-almost-1-million-from-amy-sterner-carl-nelson-never-charged-them-with-a-crime/

The FBI Seized Almost $1 Million From This Family—and Never Charged Them With a Crime "It's completely changed my belief in fairness," says Amy Sterner Nelson. reason.com

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

And, also: Abolish civil forfeiture. It’s not right.

Saved - January 6, 2024 at 1:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Amazon's lawyers targeted my husband, leading to the DOJ seizing $7M based on false allegations. Amazon's lawyer had the audacity to dictate the timing of the investigation and seizure. Amazon lied about my husband's duty, which a federal judge ruled was in accordance with their contract. DOJ didn't rely on the contract when seizing the money. Over 50 lawyers worked to destroy my family, but no one stood up for us. Amazon's lawyers threatened me to stop sharing the truth. We've lost everything and need help.

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

EXPLOSIVE: When @amazon's lawyers targeted my husband, their lawyer - a former federal prosecutor - emailed his former colleagues & said Amazon would talk to DOJ about "asset restraint/recovery." DOJ then seized $7M from Amazon's targets based on Amazon's allegations. /1

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

(These docs are all on the public docket in Amazon's civil case against my husband, where a federal judge ruled in April that my husband - even if he did exactly what Amazon said he did - acted in accordance with the "explicit terms" of AMAZON's contract.) /2

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

When DOJ wasn't acting fast enough for Amazon, their lawyer emailed DOJ & said, hey, prosecutor, can you please get on the phone & update me about the bank accounts we've asked you to subpoena/seize? (Isn't grand jury secrecy... a thing?) /3

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

And then, 2 days later - Amazon's lawyer had the AUDACITY to email DOJ & say, hey, need you on the phone again! I want to tell you Amazon's position on the "timing" of the investigation & seizure we ordered up. This is a real email, from a private attorney. /4

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

I have mountains of emails like this that I could show you - all on public dockets. If you care about constitutional rights, it seems like a real issue that @JeffBezos has this much power. Because there was never ANY basis to seize the $ in the first place. Hear me out. /5

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Amazon alleged a crime of private sector honest services fraud - meaning, Amazon had to prove that my. husband violated his duty to them as an employee. SO AMAZON LIED ABOUT THE DUTY. They said my husband wasn't authorized to do biz w/ entities doing biz w/ Amazon /6

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

But this year, a federal judge - who actually LOOKED at Amazon's employment contract (DOJ didn't - more on that in a second) said that even if my husband did exactly what Amazon said he did, my husband acted in accordance with the "explicit terms" of Amazon's contract. /7

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

So, yeah. Amazon got DOJ to seize $7 million over an alleged breach of employment duties - that were false, not real, and actually contrary to the exact duties Amazon had in their own contract. DOJ also obtained and executed search warrants with these false duties listed. /8

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Now, here's the thing. Here's where @jeffbezos and @amazon's power is terrifying: DOJ didn't ask Amazon to back up their statements about employment duties. Here a prosecutor confirms DOJ didn't look at the contract when using the extraordinary tool of civil forfeiture. /9

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

So if DOJ didn't rely in "any way" on the employment contract as the alleged source of "fiduciary duty" my husband allegedly criminally violated ... what did they look at? Can Amazon allow something in a contract and then try to put an American in prison for it? /10

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

I mean, Amazon ALSO pointed DOJ to its code of conduct. But I found 2 cases - me, wife of target in Ohio - where Amazon told judges that employees couldn't sue Amazon for breaking the code b/c it imposes no legal duty. The judge didn't think it was funny. Look what he said. /11

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Amazon's entire mission to "get" my husband was one of seek and destroy at any cost. Me, my husband & our 4 girls endured civil forfeiture for 2 years, a terrifying FBI raid, and months of threats from prosecutors to arrest my husband in our home in front of our girls. /12

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

My husband was never charged with any crime. But here is where I shake with anger: Over 50 lawyers worked on destroying my family. Will not ONE of them do the right thing? Will not ONE of them stand up and say enough? FOR MY DAUGHTERS? /13

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Last year, Amazon's lawyer sent me a letter telling me if I didn't stop my "unlawful" social media posts sharing the names of lawyers hunting my family for Amazon that he would go to the court. He also called me a conspiracy theorist. I didn't stop. Nor will I. /14

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

The thing about it, @gibsondunn, is that letters don't scare me. You've made me learn to be brave for my family when a billionaire launches an army against my husband, seizes every $ so we can't feed our babies, and sends guns into my home. And brave I am. /15

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

The media is terrified of this story. I get it. Everyone in the world is terrified of @JeffBezos. But we have the receipts because these lawyers were so damn sure we'd collapse and die so no one would ever see the paper trail. And the paper trail is sloppy and horrifying. /16

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Anyway. As we enter the fifth year of Amazon's attempted annihilation of my family, here are the lawyers that Amazon hired to do the job. /17

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Patrick Stokes, Elizabeth Papez, Jason Mendro, Claudia Barrett, Michael Dziuban, Amanda Sterling, Veronica Moye, George Hazel, Lora MacDonald, Travis Andrews, Rachel Robertson, Thomas Hungar, Jason Schwartz, David Casazza, Trisha Parikh, Luke Sullivan, Cate Harding, /18

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Christine Budasoff, David Debold, Jack Heyburn, Todd Shaw, Alyse Ullery from Gibson Dunn. (There are more, I just can''t dig them up right now.) /19

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Internal Amazon lawyers: David Zapolsky, Dennis Wallace, Yousri Omar, D. Matthew Doden, Alexis Collins, Brad Elias, Sarah Tyerman, Marnina Cherkin. Those are the names I know currently, as identified by Amazon. /20

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

K&L Gates attorneys: Jeffrey Johnson and Ryan Redekopp. /21

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

And there is more: Like, why did DOJ prosecutors threaten to charge my husband with obstruction of justice or witness tampering if he refused to stop defending himself in Amazon's civil case? I mean, weird? /22 https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/15/amazon-virginia-lawsuit-forfeiture/

Amazon data center dispute led to strange government intervention Amazon has pushed the Justice Department to turn a civil dispute into a criminal prosecution. washingtonpost.com

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Is DOJ investigating Amazon's lies? Or ... does @jeffbezos get a pass? Is that the America we live in now? (I know the answer. You don't need to say it. We ALL KNOW the answer.) /23

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

Please share our story with ANYONE you know who might help. We've spent over $3 million legal fees. We've lost our home, car, retirement, & more. No one deserves this. Someone could do the right thing today. Including @ajassy, @DavidZapolsky or @JeffBezos /24

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

And, as always, I wish @seattletimes would cover this in depth. This involves the state's largest employer. It involves the deprivation of constitutional rights. It WILL be covered in detail, somewhere, eventually. It's the story of a lifetime for a brave journalist. /25

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

@seattletimes And, finally. Why do I name the lawyers? People do things to people. We need to remember that. Companies can't make decisions - people do. Law firms can't scorch the earth of their targets - only people can. We are all responsible for our decisions and actions. Always. /26

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 5:03 PM

@Amy_K_Nelson - Amy Nelson

An incredible summary from a creator I’ve never met about @amazon’s war against my family. This story isn’t complicated. But it’s stunning. Why isn’t it front page news? One name: @JeffBezos https://t.co/JMgiTugKel

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jeff Bezos, the owner of Amazon, allegedly caused harm to a family by falsely accusing the husband, Carl Nelson, of illegal activities. Amazon's lawyers needed someone to blame for breaking a contract, or they would lose a significant amount of money. They falsely claimed that Carl was a felon and sued him, resulting in the freezing of the family's bank accounts and the seizure of over $1 million worth of their property. Federal prosecutors pressured Carl to submit to Amazon, but he refused and spent $3 million on the lawsuit. Although the courts ruled in Carl's favor, the family has not received justice or answers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jeff Bezos tried to ruin this family's life, and nobody's talking about it. Since Jeff owns a lot of the media, he's in control of what stories come out about him. The scary thing is that he's also in control of the stories that never see the light of day. And this unfortunately is one of them. Recently, Amy Nelson and called out Jeff Bezos for what he did to her husband, Carl. Carl used to work at Amazon, which is where he ran into some trouble with Jeff. After doing my own research, Here's what I've simplified the story down to. Amazon's lawyers broke a contract and basically needed somebody to blame. If they couldn't find anyone to blame, they'd lose around half a $1,000,000,000. So they went to the Department of Justice and falsely claimed that Carl Nelson was a felon. Amazon then sued Carl, alleging that he took part in a scheme that involved him lining his pockets while negotiating data deals. The government immediately stepped in freezing the family's bank accounts. About. The FBI raided the Nelson family home seizing over $1,000,000 worth of their property. Then federal prosecutors tried to convince Carl to just submit to Amazon. They even went as far as threatening him saying that if he didn't just give in, then he would get what he deserves. But he refused to stop defending himself and even further spent A total of $3,000,000 on the lawsuit. Eventually, the courts agreed that Carl didn't do anything illegal. While his legal battle is over, the effects on his family are far from gone. And on top of it, the Nelson family hasn't gotten any justice or answers.
View Full Interactive Feed