reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @AnnaRMatson

Posted - September 11, 2025 at 1:39 PM

Saved - September 11, 2025 at 4:19 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Charlie Kirk's body is being returned home today. Authorities have obtained camera footage of the shooter approaching the roof and leaving the scene. They collected footprints, a handprint, and have images of the suspect. The FBI is working to identify him using technology, and if they can't, they will share the images with the media for assistance. A bolt-action rifle was found in the woods. Currently, they are withholding identifying details but note that the shooter blended in well with the university and seemed to be college-aged.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Full update on Charlie Kirk’s Assassination (9/11/25 at 9:30am est) Charlie’s body will be returned home today. They do have camera footage of the shooter making his way up to the roof, leaving, and going into a neighborhood. They have collected footprints, a handprint, and more. They do have images of him. The FBI is using technology to try to identify him. If unsuccessful, they will release the images to the media for help. A bolt action riffle was recovered in the woods. While they do not want to release identifying information as of right now, they say he blended in well with the university and appeared to be college age.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Charlie Kirk was at Utah Valley University. Charlie was shot at that event. He was transported to a local hospital where he later passed. These individuals were not suspects. They were people of interest. We are not going to release that at this time. We have good video footage of this individual. Following yesterday's tragic shooting of Charlie Kirk, FBI agents have been working around the clock in coordination with our law enforcement partners. We have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting. It's a high powered, bolt action rifle. The rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled. As of this morning, we received more than a 130 tips. The FBI's mission is to protect the American people. Any attack on the First Amendment is an attack on the very foundation of our democracy.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Just to recap yesterday's events. At around 12:20PM. Political influencer. Charlie Kirk was at Utah Valley University. Participating in a student sponsored event. With Turning Point USA. Charlie was shot at that event. He was transported to a local hospital where he later passed. Last night, his body was moved to the office, the state office, the medical examiner. We will continue to facilitate movements. To get him home today. And with his family. Yesterday during the investigative process, we located a couple of persons of interest. We interviewed those individuals. And after releasing them and after clearing them with being suspects. They face scrutiny. They face threats. We ask the public to be patient with investigative process. These individuals were not suspects. They were people of interest. We ask that you do not impose into those into those people and that investigative process. They don't deserve that harassment for for being subject to that. I'd like to thank all the investigators that are involved in this. They have worked around the clock. All day yesterday through the night last night. Investigators from the state bureau investigation from county and city agencies, the university, our federal partners with the FBI, the ATF, and many others. Those are just a few of the people that we have involved in this. I'd like to thank all of them for their for their strong work. Through all that work last night, we were able to make a few few breakthroughs. We were able to track the movements of the shooter starting at 11:52AM. The subject arrived on campus shortly away from campus. We have tracked his movements onto the campus through the stairwells, up to the roof, across the roof to a shooting location. After the shooting, we were able to track his movements as he moved to the other side of the building, jumped off of the building, and fled, off of the campus and into a neighborhood. Our investigators worked through those neighborhoods, contacting anybody they can with doorbell cameras, thoroughly worked through that those communities trying to identify any leads. We do have good video footage of this individual. We are not going to release that at this time. We are working through some technologies and some some ways to identify this individual. If we are unsuccessful, we will reach out to you as the media and we will push that publicly to help us identify them. But we're confident in our abilities right now and we would like to move forward, in a manner that keeps everyone safe and moves this process appropriately. Last night, I communicated with Erica. The family's devastated. As commissioner of public safety, as a father, as a husband, I can only imagine what that family's going through. The hate of cement that happened yesterday is not in Utah. This is not what we're known for. Over the past several weeks, we've seen this state come together to help families in mourning, come together as a community to show what Utah is known for. For a state of of character, of service, of camaraderie, of an of a neighboring field. We will not stand for what happened yesterday. We are exhausting every lead. We have every officer invested in this, every investigator, every local agency, the outpouring of support from the law enforcement community has has been astounding. We are we are investing everything we have into this and we will catch this individual. Having walked through the crime scene, through the hallways of this school, through the classrooms, I can't imagine what the people on scene felt as well. A horrific event where some of them barricaded in classrooms, some of them ran in fear. Can't over as over overstate the tragedy and the horrific event that yesterday was and how we will work to to bring to justice the actions of one individual or any other individuals that assisted in that. Our state has gone through a lot, and we will come out successful. With that, I'll turn the time over to special agent Graves. Good Speaker 1: morning. My name is Robert Bulls and I am the special agent in charge of the Salt Lake Field Office. Following yesterday's tragic shooting of Charlie Kirk, FBI agents have been working around the clock in coordination with our law enforcement partners. We are and will continue to work nonstop until we find the person that is committed this heinous crime and find out why they did it. This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting. It's a high powered, bolt action rifle. That rifle was was was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled. So the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon. Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis. I understand there are a lot of questions about motive. I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being fully investigated. As of this morning, we received more than a 130 tips. We thank the community for that. The FBI has brought every resource to bear, and we will continue to do so throughout the course of this investigation. The FBI's mission is to protect the American people. It's to uphold the constitution of The United States. Any attack on the First Amendment is an attack on the very foundation of our democracy. That is why we will we will relentlessly pursue this case and the shooter until we find him. We also continue to grieve with the family and the community. It's our community. If you have any video or images from the shooting, we ask you to please submit them to our digital media tip website at www.fbi.gov/utahvalleyshooting. You can also call the FBI at +1 800 FBI. We truly rely on the public's help in these types of cases, and no tip is too small or insignificant. Thank you. Speaker 0: So we'll release about the suspect is suspect blended in well with with a college institution. We're not releasing any details right now and then we we will soon. But right now, we're not. But that that individual appears to be of of college age. We are confident in our abilities to to track that individual. If we're unsuccessful in identifying them immediately, we will reach out to the public's help and the media's help in pushing those those photos. That was a new development overnight working through the night studying those cameras. So that's that's something that is new and and that we're working through right now. As far as the security, I cannot speak to that. Neither the Department of Public Safety nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation was involved in the in the planning or security of this event and that'll have to be a question later for for other agencies. Speaker 1: Finally, you're charge, I wanted to ask you, you mentioned that you found the gun in a wooded area. Do you believe that the suspect could be hiding in the woods and is that suspect possibly still in this area? So that's a good question and it's it's a question that goes to the safety of the community. Right? No, not in those woods. We walked through through those woods and secured it. As to the community, I can tell you that this was a targeted event. We don't believe community at is is at risk. However, we are exhausting every resource to find him and we will we will do so. Specifically on his face or any details such as that as it's continuing to be a part of the investigation. And and again, we'll release that shortly. However, we're we're doing everything we can to find him and we're not sure how far he's gone then. And you do believe in the bailouts? We we have images of the of the suspect. Can you take the boxes of the gun that you've been able to recover? Speaker 0: Do you believe you know who this person is? Speaker 1: The person that you're looking for at this point? Again, as part of the investigation, we're not releasing any details of that. Any fingerprints or DNA? We are we are exhausting all of our resources to be able to collect those, but that's again part of the investigation. Have you been suspect the owner of the gun? Excuse me? You said you found the the weapon. Have you been able to trace back the holder of that weapon or purchased it? We are working on that, but again, part of the investigation. Well, that's investigation rolls. There's been a lot of turnover in the FBI. Do think that's impacting the investigation at all? Not at all. We've got complete and total support from everyone from the director on down, and, it's it's been an incredible supportive, environment, so far. All I can say is that we're working the investigation the best we have in the with the environment we're given. Those are all the questions for right now. Thank you, everybody.

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - January 28, 2025 at 12:41 AM

Saved - September 11, 2025 at 6:26 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I believe it's important to highlight Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s extensive qualifications for the role of Secretary of Health and Human Services. His family legacy in public service, impressive educational background, and significant contributions to environmental advocacy showcase his commitment to health and justice. From co-founding the Waterkeeper Alliance to negotiating key environmental agreements, Kennedy has a proven track record. His efforts have inspired many to prioritize health, making him a compelling candidate for the position. I urge everyone to reach out to their senators to support him.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐁𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝. Every single democrat will say RFK Jr. is not qualified, but they won’t tell you the truth. Here is everything RFK Jr has done in his career that makes him fully qualified to run HHS. Wait til you see Biden’s secretary’s qualifications at the end. 🧵 https://t.co/lNnoM2JKjH

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐝 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the son of Robert F. Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney General and presidential candidate, and the nephew of President John F. Kennedy - both of which were assassinated. His family background is deeply rooted in public service and advocacy. Growing up, he spent much of his time outdoors and engaged in civil debates with his family.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐄𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Kennedy attended Harvard University for his undergraduate studies, earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia School of Law, and obtained a Master of Laws from Pace University in 1987. https://t.co/leBDFQMeRc

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐂𝐨-𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐏𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐋𝐚𝐰 𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐥’𝐬 𝐄𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐜. Kennedy received a special permit from New York to allow ten law students to practice law against Hudson River polluters. https://t.co/pOjvjRStkJ

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐋𝐚𝐰𝐲𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐨𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐊𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬 “Riverkeeper protects and restores the Hudson River from source to sea and safeguards drinking water supplies, through advocacy rooted in community partnerships, science and law‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‌.” In 1984, Kennedy Jr. became a part of Riverkeeper, which was then known as the Hudson Riverkeeper Fund. Throughout his tenure, he held the role of Chief Prosecuting Attorney on staff and later served on the Board of Directors from 2000 until his departure in 2017. Furthermore, the organization closed one of the state’s most notoriously harmful landfills and helped protect New York City’s upstate reservoir system.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Factory workers along the Hudson believed the environment was being stolen by polluters. In March 1966 they concluded that 'government is in cahoots with the polluters' and that 'the only way that they were gonna reclaim the river for themselves is if they confronted the polluters directly.' About 300 met in Legion Hall to discuss actions, including blowing up pipes on Hudson. Bob Boyle highlighted 1888 Rivers and Harbors Act: 'that if you caught the polluter and turned them in and helped prosecute them, you could collect a bounty.' They began collecting 'hundreds of thousands of dollars in bounties' and bringing 'over 300 cases,' forcing polluters to spend over $3,000,000,000 on remediating the river. Today the Hudson is 'an international model for ecosystem protection' and 'the richest water body in the North Atlantic,' the last major river system left for migratory fish. The movement spurred river keepers across America.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: They had little expectation they'd ever see Yosemite or Yellowstone at the national parks. These were factory workers, carpenters, lathers, electricians. For them, the environment was their backyard. It was the bathing beaches and the swimming holes and the fishing holes of the Hudson. And they saw it being stolen from them by large corporate entities over whom they had no control. They'd been to the government agencies, the Corps of Engineers, the Conservation Department, the Coast Guard that are supposed to protect Americans from pollution, and they were given the Bums Rush. And they had come to the conclusion in March 1966 that government is in cahoots with the polluters, and that the only way that they were gonna reclaim the river for themselves is if they confronted the polluters directly. And they came together, 300 of them, in an American Legion Hall to talk about blowing up pipes on the Hudson and jamming the pipes with mattresses and floating a raft of dynamite into the Indian Point power plant intake and putting a match to the oil slick that was coming out of the Penn Central pipe in the Croton Harmon Rail Yard. And a guy came to that meeting who was another marine, and he was the outdoor editor of Sports Illustrated magazine. Great fly fisherman, Bob Boyle, one of the gurus of dry fly tying in our country, and he had discovered this ancient navigational statute called the eighteen eighty eight Rivers and Harbors Act said that it was illegal to pollute any waterway in The United States, that if you caught the polluter and turned them in and helped prosecute them, you could collect a bounty. And they started doing this, they collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in bounties against Hudson River polluters. We've brought over 300 cases. We forced three we forced polluters to spend over $3,000,000,000 on remediating the river. Today, the Hudson River is an international model for ecosystem protection. It is the richest water body in the North Atlantic. It produces more pounds of fish per acre, more biomass per gallon than any other waterway in the Atlantic Ocean North Of The Equator. It's the last major river system left in the North Atlantic that still has strong spawning stocks of all of its historical species of migratory fish. They use the money to launch a patrol boat, which today patrols the river. It's called the river keeper. And they track down polluters and we prosecute them. And the miraculous resurrection of the Hudson has inspired now the creation of river keepers on waterways all across North America. We just licensed our hundred and twentieth river keeper. We have explosive growth in Canada. We have river keepers. Each one has a patrol boat. Each one has a paid full time river keeper, and each one has to be willing to soup looters. And Mark Madison, are you here? Who's the Lake Ontario keeper who's up there. And Mark is an attorney who has uncovered one of a very, very almost identical law here in Canada, the Fisheries Act, where you can collect bounties. And he's brought some of the first bounty cases in Canada. And we're now we've just we're licensing next week Fraser Riverkeeper, but we have them on Lake Ontario, the Petit Kodiak, on the Bow River, on the Bay Of Fundy, and all over Canada. And and by within five years, we're gonna have river keepers on every major waterway across Canada.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 This organization fights for clean water all across the globe. Kennedy not only helped start the Waterkeeper Alliance, but was also the president from 1999-2020. Under his leadership, the Alliance grew to be the world’s largest nonprofit focused solely on clean water. There are now more than 350 Waterkeeper groups in 48 countries, patrolling and protecting 2.8 million square miles of watersheds.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐩𝐞𝐝 𝐍𝐞𝐠𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐘𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐂𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐀𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟔 He negotiated the New York City watershed agreement on behalf of environmentalists and New York City watershed consumers. It is regarded as an international model in stakeholder consensus negotiations and sustainable development.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐀𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐥, 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐘𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐌𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐦 “𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐝𝐲 𝐖𝐡𝐨 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬.” https://t.co/KQVaHr7MRZ

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐈𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎, 𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨-𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐋𝐚𝐰 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐦 The firm has won numerous cases including a $70 million settlement for Florida property owners affected by toxic chemicals and a $670 million settlement for residents in Ohio and West Virginia whose water was contaminated by DuPont.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐇𝐞 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐬 His environmental work was celebrated by democrats so much that he testified in congress by Ed Markey’s request (who now turned on him). This hearing was in 2008. https://t.co/2AIfSamRZ3

Video Transcript AI Summary

Over twenty five years as an environmental advocate about being nonpartisan and bipartisan in my approach to these issues. I don't think there's any such thing as republican children or democratic children. I think the worst thing that can happen to the environment is if it becomes the province of a single political party. But it's hard to talk about the environment in any context, honestly, today without speaking about this administration and about what it has done to our environment over the past eight years. And if we don't understand the mechanisms by which this happened, and if we don't discuss those honestly, when we discuss them it's not an attack on republicans, it's just we have a responsibility to tell the truth. and if we see somebody doing something that is wicked, we need to talk about it whether republican or democrat.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Over twenty five years as an environmental advocate about being nonpartisan and bipartisan in my approach to these issues. I don't think there's any such thing as republican children or democratic children. I think the worst thing that can happen to the environment is if it becomes the province of a single political party. But if but it's hard to talk about the environment in any context, honestly, today without speaking about this administration and about what it has done to our environment over the past eight years. And if we don't understand the mechanisms by which this happened, and if we don't discuss those honestly, when we discuss them it's not an attack on republicans, it's just we have a responsibility to tell the truth, and if we see somebody doing something that is wicked, we need to talk about it whether republican or democrat. I wrote a book about this administration. I would have written the exact same book if they were democrats. It's a critical book, but it is not partisan. My father was absolutely against the partisanship because it's dishonest ultimately.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐎𝐛𝐚𝐦𝐚 𝐂𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐭 As President-elect, Obama strongly considered RFK Jr for Administrator for the EPA. Politico even said this would, “raise the profile of the EPA.” https://t.co/UtiWEIjtRW

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐭 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔 This is where Kennedy and his team won the monumental Roundup case. This secured a landmark $289 million verdict for a California groundskeeper who developed cancer due to exposure to the herbicide Roundup. This triggered many more cases against Monsanto.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧’𝐬 𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡 𝐃𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 (𝐂𝐇𝐃) CHD is a nonprofit organization that focuses on health advocacy, particularly in areas related to children's health.They focus on raising awareness, promoting informed consent, and pursuing legal action against regulatory agencies and corporations they believe are failing to protect public health. Kennedy was the Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel from 2016-2024.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐒𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫 He has written many books about politics, environmental policy, and public health throughout his life. This includes the New York Times Best Seller, The Real Anthony Fauci, where he outlines the corruption between the government agencies and pharmaceutical companies. His ethics disclosure also indicated two more books are written and waiting release.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤 RFK Jr. has been deeply involved in environmental and clean technology initiatives. He co-founded Keeper Springs, donating all profits to the Waterkeeper Alliance, and served as a senior advisor at VantagePoint Capital Partners, supporting companies like Tesla and BrightSource Energy. Additionally, he co-founded EcoWatch, advised on sustainable water and energy projects, and partnered with companies like ColorZen to reduce environmental impact in industries such as cotton dyeing and grid management. Minority and Poor Communities: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long advocated for environmental justice in underserved communities. He represented the NAACP in opposing a garbage transfer station in a minority neighborhood, successfully reopened Croton Point Park for Bronx residents, and forced the reopening of Pelham Bay Park, which had been converted into a police firing range. International and Indigenous Rights: Kennedy has worked globally to protect indigenous rights and preserve natural habitats. He assisted tribes in Chile, Canada, Ecuador, and Mexico in opposing large-scale projects that threatened their lands and ecosystems. Notable successes include derailing most proposed dams on Chile's Biobío River, halting Mitsubishi's salt facility in Baja, and preventing dams on Chile's Futaleufú River. Military and Vieques: Kennedy challenged environmental damage caused by the U.S. military, notably suing the Navy over bombing exercises in Vieques, Puerto Rico. He was imprisoned for protesting the exercises, which eventually led to their termination. He has also been vocal about pollution caused by military activities, describing the Department of Defense as a major environmental offender.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐇𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐲 Democrats say RFK Jr is unqualified…but is he? When Biden’s Secretary of HHS was being confirmed, Democrats praised Xavier Beceera for his qualifications. His background? A lawyer. RFK Jr.’s background? A lawyer. But unlike Beceera, Kennedy has been fighting for families all across America for clean food, clean water, and to get corruption out of our government. Beceera is simply a lifetime politician.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Now please tag, call, and email your senators. Let them know the real RFK Jr.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

You know the best qualification of them all? He was finally able to get health center stage in politics and inspired people from all over the country to take their health seriously. That’s the kind of Secretary of HHS that I want. https://t.co/8rZfnHJKgZ

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - July 27, 2025 at 12:28 AM

Saved - July 27, 2025 at 6:10 PM

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Traverse City Sheriff gives press conference. Says the suspect is a Michigan resident. When asked if he was from the area the sheriff hesitated and said “At this time I’d rather not comment.” https://t.co/Y20TdI8vFx

Video Transcript AI Summary

A suspect was captured within three minutes of the officer's arrival, but it is unknown if the suspect was injured. The suspect appears to be a Michigan resident. At this time, it appears the acts were random, and the victims were not predetermined. The weapon was a standard folding knife. Michigan State Police Crime Lab is en route to assist with processing the scene. There was some social media chatter that an individual with a concealed pistol license was involved, but there is no comment on that at this time. It is unknown if any of the victims were Walmart employees. The public is urged to be vigilant, as no area is immune to this type of activity. The incident started near the checkout area. A violence incident like this is very uncommon for the Traverse City area.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. And you said the suspect was, there was citizen involvement, but he he was captured, you know, within three minutes of the officer arriving. Was the suspect injured on the way? Speaker 1: Not to my knowledge. Speaker 2: What can you tell us about the citizen involvement? Speaker 1: I'd rather get more information on that before I comment. Speaker 0: Is there any more information you can give us about the suspect? Was the suspect from the area, the area? Speaker 1: It appears he was a Michigan resident. Speaker 2: Did you say anything when he was taken into custody? Speaker 1: Not that I'm aware of. Speaker 0: Do we know when the suspect is expected to be arraigned? Speaker 1: No. Not at this time. Speaker 3: Is the suspect someone you guys are familiar with? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 2: When you say random, does that mean there's no motive ascertained yet? Speaker 1: Based on the information that we have at this time, it appears there were random acts, that there was no, the victims were not predetermined. And, again, that's based on the information we have at this time. Speaker 2: Is there any indication that this was a mental health situation? Speaker 1: I can't comment on it. Speaker 2: You said folding knife. Is there any more details on the on Speaker 0: the weapon that you've, discovered? Speaker 1: No. Just that it appears to be a standard folding knife style weapon. Speaker 0: You said you said the suspect is a Michigan resident. Is there any more specific information you can say? Where is he from the area locally? Traverse City, the Grand Traverse area? At Speaker 1: this time, I'd rather not comment. Do Speaker 3: you know when Walmart could reopen to the bubble? Speaker 1: I don't. We have Michigan State Police Crime Lab is en route to assist with processing the scene, and that all gets done and the scene gets wrapped up. We are in, direct contact with management so they're aware of everything that's going on and when the scene is cleared, they'll be able to reopen. Speaker 2: Is there anything you can say about the FBI's involvement? Speaker 1: No, not at this time. Speaker 2: I guess the only other thing I would ask is, there was some social media chatter that an individual with a concealed pistol license was involved in some dealing with a subject. I'm wondering if you could comment on that or not. Speaker 1: I can't at this time. Speaker 0: Do you know the age ranges of the victims? Speaker 1: I do not. Speaker 3: Were any of the victims employees at Walmart? Speaker 1: Not to my knowledge, but again, I don't have that information if in fact they were. Speaker 2: Were any of the first responders injured? Speaker 1: Not that I'm aware of. Speaker 3: What's your message to the public now? Speaker 1: Be vigilant. Know that no area is immune to this type of activity, unfortunately. And if you see something, please reach out. Call 911. And as I said, there was citizen involvement in this. And as we learn more about that, we'll talk more about it. But it's very tragic, and nobody is immune to it, unfortunately. Speaker 0: I'm sorry to I know you said something about the age ranges, but we were hearing some chatter about he was targeting older people. Speaker 1: I don't have any information indicating that. Speaker 2: Do you have a comment on the response for you to the local law enforcement coupled with the citizen response? Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm very pleased with the response time, the actions, all entities worked incredibly fluent together and I commend all of them. Yeah, this was a joint effort all the way through to, as I mentioned, the citizens, and thankfully, no one else is injured. 11 is 11 too many, But thank God it wasn't more. Speaker 2: You know what part of the store is the crude in? Speaker 1: I do not. I know that initially it started near the checkout area. Speaker 2: Guess putting this into a wider context, I mean, like this is on national news pretty frequently, in Traverse City, in the Traverse City area, is a violence incident like this is very uncommon. Right? Speaker 1: It is very uncommon for our area. But, unfortunately, as I mentioned, no one is immune to this. K. Thank you, and we'll update as we have additional information. K?

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - July 1, 2025 at 1:22 AM

Saved - July 1, 2025 at 7:48 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a recent discussion with Tucker Carlson, RFK Jr. addressed critical issues surrounding vaccines, autism, and the pharmaceutical industry. He highlighted concerns about the CDC's failure to conduct necessary studies on vaccine injuries and the manipulation of data. He criticized the profit-driven motives of healthcare providers and the media's ties to pharmaceutical advertising. RFK Jr. also shared insights about his views on political figures, including Pam Bondi and President Trump, revealing unexpected emotional connections Trump has with music.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

RFK Jr went on Tucker Carlson and talked about everything: -Pharma holding our health hostage -What he really thinks of Pam Bondi -To what makes President Trump cry. You won’t want to miss this 🧵 https://t.co/p8XDbSZpne

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Tucker went right for it and asked Secretary Kennedy about studying vaccines and autism. “The Institute of Medicine…had said in 2001 that the link between autism and vaccines is biologically plausible.” The Institute of Medicine then recommended several thorough studies. “CDC never did those.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker states that previous CDC studies on autism were epidemiological and designed to avoid finding a link. They claim the Institute of Medicine criticized the CDC's vaccine schedule decision-making, alleging the ASIP panel was captured by industry due to financial entanglements. The speaker says the Institute of Medicine recommended various studies, including animal models, which the CDC allegedly ignored, opting instead for manipulated epidemiological studies. They claim these studies didn't compare fully vaccinated to unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten found an 1135% elevated autism risk in vaccinated children. They allege the CDC concealed and manipulated this study to bury the link by removing older children from the data and using other statistical tricks. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: One of the first things you did to Secretary, I think, tell me if I'm misstating it, is commissioned a kind of study of autism. Can you tell us what that is? What are you seeking to do with that? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, you know, the studies, there are a handful of studies that CDC has generated on autism. They were all epidemiological studies, and they all say what the CDC wanted them to say is they couldn't find a link. The problem is that the Institute of Medicine, which is part of the National Academy of Sciences, had said in 2001 that the link between autism vaccine is biologically plausible. And they they were highly critical of the way that CDC was making decisions about the vaccine schedule, that it was, you know, the the this group ASIP, which is an external panel, which has the responsibility of deciding which new vaccines will be added to the schedule, that they had essentially been captured by industry. The people who serve on that panel, almost all of them, have financial entanglements with the industry. And the Institute of Medicine recommended a litany, a retinue of studies, including animal models, observational studies, bench studies, and epidemiological studies. They said, You need this whole rant node to answer this question. The CDC never did those. Instead, it commissioned the creation of these six epidemiological studies, and none of them does what? All of them are they use fraudulent techniques. You know, they say statistics don't lie, but statisticians do, and epidemiological studies are very easy to manipulate. None of those studies did what you would do if you wanted to find the answer, which is to compare outcomes in a fully vaccinated group to health outcomes in an unvaccinated group. And CDC did that study in 1999. They brought in a team of scientists under a Belgian researcher named Thomas Verstraten, and they looked at the data, they looked at children who had received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life, and compared those children to children who had received the vaccine later or not at all. And they found an eleven hundred and thirty five percent elevated risk of autism among the vaccinated children. And it shocked them. They kept the study secret, and they manipulated it through five different iterations to try to bury the link. And, you know, we know how they did it. They got rid of all the older children essentially, and just had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed. And they stratified the data, and they did a lot of other tricks. And all of those uddis were the subject of those kind of that kind of trickery. And so what we're gonna do now and meanwhile, the external literature is showing, you know, over a 100 studies that show that there indicate that there is a link.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Instead, CDC manipulated a study to remove older kids. Here is the problem with that: The average age of diagnosis is five. By removing that age group, there is no way of know if vaccines cause autism or not. https://t.co/JGIZ2ERdG6

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims that the CDC commissioned six epidemiological studies using fraudulent techniques, instead of comparing health outcomes between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. This study allegedly found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism among vaccinated children. The speaker states that the CDC kept the study secret and manipulated it to bury the link by removing older children and stratifying the data. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Instead, it commissioned the creation of these six epidemiological studies, and none of them does what all of them are they use fraudulent techniques. You know, they say statistics don't lie, but statisticians do. And epidemiological studies are very easy to manipulate. None of those studies did what you would do if you wanted to find the answer, which is to compare outcomes in a fully vaccinated group to health outcomes in an unvaccinated group. And CDC did that study in 1999. They brought in a team of scientists under a Belgian researcher named Thomas Verstraten, and they looked at the data. They looked at children who had received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life, and compare those children to children who had received the vaccine later or not at all. And they found an eleven, one hundred and thirty five percent elevated risk of autism among the vaccinated children. And it shocked them. They kept the study secret, and they manipulated it through five different iterations to try to bury the link. And, you know, we know how they did it. They got rid of all the older children, essentially, and just had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed. And they stratified the stratified the data, and they did a lot of other tricks. And all of those studies were the subject of those kind of that kind of trickery. And so what we're gonna do now and meanwhile, the external literature is showing, you know, over a 100 studies that show that there indicate that there is a link.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Did you know most doctors will fire you as a patient if you want to delay certain vaccines? This is why 👇 “If their clients are fully vaccinated they get a huge bonus. It can be 10s of thousands of dollars.” Only complete compliance is profitable. https://t.co/E59LOTIK4B

Video Transcript AI Summary

According to the speaker, 50% of pediatricians' revenue comes from vaccines, with insurance companies like Blue Cross offering bonuses for high vaccination rates, potentially influencing doctors' recommendations. The speaker claims that pediatricians may dismiss families who want alternative vaccine schedules to protect these bonuses. The speaker alleges that 80% of doctors now work for corporations focused on revenue over patient care, creating pressure to generate funds due to medical school debt. The speaker suggests the entire system is incentivized to keep people sick, not necessarily deliberately, but through financial incentives. Insurance companies allegedly profit more from a sick population because they collect money as friction, taking a cut of revenues. The speaker claims that doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies also benefit financially from people being sick, creating systemic pressure regardless of individual intentions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There's a published article out there now that says that 50% of revenues to most pediatricians come from vaccines. And then there's a whole structure where Blue Cross and the other insurance companies pay bonuses to the pediatrician to make sure if, for example, ninety five percent of their if their clients are fully vaccinated, they get a huge bonus. It can be tens of thousands of dollars. And that's why your pediatrician, if you say, I want to go slow on the vaccines, or I want to have a little different schedule, your pediatrician will throw you out of his practice, because you're now jeopardizing that bonus structure. And these are all perverse incentives that stop doctors from actually practicing medicine and caring for the client because they're looking at the bottom line. Twenty years ago, 20% of the doctors in this country worked for corporations. Today, 80% do. And that corporation is telling you, you know, we don't care what happens to your patient. We care about how much revenue you're generating. And, you know, these doctors are coming out of medical schools with ginormous bills, and that will bankrupt them if they don't have a job. And so they're under tremendous pressure just to to keep generating those funds, and the whole system, as you know, is is just a bundle of perverse incentives that, you know, that where everybody is making money by keeping us sick. You know? And I'm not saying that's deliberate or purposeful or or, you know, planned in any way. It's just the incentive system that everybody makes money. Insurance companies make money if you're sick. Ironically, they make more money if the population is sick. And, you know, that may seem counterintuitive to people. And a guy said to me once who worked for AIG, one of the big insurance companies, he said I said I said, I wanna go with some data to AIG and show them that, you know, what they're doing is actually I can show them on paper what they're doing is actually making their people sicker. And and they're the one group that you would think would want healthy people because they'd have to pay out less. And this guy said to me, think of it this way. If you're Lloyds of London and you insure all the shipping in the world, is it better for you if one ship sinks a year or if 500 sink a year? And I would say I I said to him, it's it's better if only one sinks. He said, no. It's better if 500 sink because then everybody has to get insurance. And what the insurance companies are collecting money, money is friction. They're taking a cut of the revenues that come through them. The more people that buy insurance, it doesn't matter what the claims are. If the claims are high, they just raise their premiums. And it's the amount of money that flows in the system that gives them money. So they're making money that way. The doctors are making money from keeping us sick. The hospitals are making money from keeping us sick. The pharmaceutical companies are making money from keeping us sick. So every level of the system is incentivized financially, no matter what your intention is. If you're a doctor, of course you don't want sick patients. There's tremendous pressure from every angle of the system to you know, to keep us all sick.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Pharma isn’t just holding our doctors hostage, they are holding the media hostage too. This is how they do it: We are only one of two countries in the WORLD who allow pharmaceutical advertisements on TV. “On a typical evening news show, there are 22 ads and 17 of those are pharmaceutical ads.” Do you think the media will be critical of big pharma when they are paying their bills?

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 1999, claims of a connection between autism and vaccines were met with media backlash. It's alleged that pharmaceutical companies, a major revenue source for media companies, buy protection. The U.S. is purportedly one of two countries allowing this. A Supreme Court case gave pharmaceutical advertising First Amendment protection, treating it as political speech. Direct-to-consumer advertising exploded after changes in the 90s. Roger Ailes, despite political differences, allowed the speaker to discuss the environment on Fox News. However, Ailes refused to air a documentary about mercury in vaccines, fearing repercussions from Rupert Murdoch. Pharma ads allegedly constitute 75% of evening news revenue, with 17 out of 22 ads being pharmaceutical. This revenue is purportedly keeping many television networks afloat amidst financial struggles.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There hasn't been much of a discussion. You said there were signals in 1999 that there was a connection between autism and vaccines. The response from the American media was just to throw you out, take away your New York Times presence, ban you from Rolling Stone, etcetera, attack you as a Nazi. You made the point years later that the reason that happened was because pharmaceutical companies are the single biggest source of revenue for a lot of media companies, and they're buying the protection with that money. Speaker 1: And that's another perverse incentive, right? Speaker 0: Absolutely. I think we're one of only two countries in the world that allow that. Can that be stopped? Speaker 1: That's a question that we are looking at right now, you know, and there's a bad Supreme Court case from a couple of years ago that gave that essentially anointed pharmaceutical advertising with First Amendment protection. The First Amendment protects political speech. So if you have if you're saying something, you know, political, you should have absolute protection under the First Amendment. If commercial speech has a lower level of protection and the pharmaceutical advertising was regulated as commercial speech, and it was until 1990 really around 1992, it was you didn't see pharmaceutical ad there was no direct to consumer advertising on TV. And after that, and then there were new more changes made in 1997, that's when it became you know, it exploded. And today, Roger Ailes, who both you and I knew you know, I had this very Roger Ailes, for your audience who doesn't know him, which I think most of them do, was the founder of Fox News. And I had this odd relationship with him because politically we were at loggerheads, but I had spent when I was 19 years old, I spent three months with him in a tent in Africa. And I and we developed a friendship then. And as you know, he was very, you know, he was a very engaging guy. He was very witty, really fun to be with, very paranoid, but at the same time brilliant. Yes. And he and so he was very kind to me. He was a very loyal friend to me, and he would make Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and Neil Cavuto and all the other hosts, who your former colleagues, wouldn't be on TV to talk about the environment. Even though he didn't agree with me on it, he made them put me on. So during the eighties and nineties, I I was the only environmentalist who was going on Fox News. But I brought him one time this I think it was like 2014, I brought him a a documentary that we had done about mercury and vaccines, and he had he watched it. He was completely sold on it. He had a family member who had been affected, he felt. And he said, but I can't put you on because if I did, I if any of my hosts allowed you on to talk about this issue, I would have to fire them. And if I didn't, I would get a call from Ruper within ten minutes. And he said, for the evening news division, about 75% of the advertising revenues are coming from pharma. And then he told me something that, if I remember it correctly, he said that on a typical evening news show, there are 22 ads, and 17 of those are pharmaceutical ads. And so this was the principal source of revenue, and for a lot of these television networks, it's keeping them alive. As you know, they're all kind of collapsing financially. Speaker 0: Collapsing due to lack of popular demand for their presence.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

On a personal note- This is why I am independent. I am supported by my viewers so I can continue bringing you the stories that matter- free from influence. Liking, commenting, sharing, and subscribing all helps me continue this work 🙏

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

🚨 What RFK Jr says next is insane! “The pharmaceutical advertisers are advertising the most expensive version of every drug…it’s Medicaid and Medicare that are paying for it. It’s us, it’s the tax payer.” “AND we are paying for the ads because they’re tax deductible.” https://t.co/ALVZ1QnQ7s

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pharmaceutical advertising on TV targets consumers with the most expensive drugs, not generics, which have the highest profit margins for the companies. Unlike typical ads where consumers pay directly, pharmaceutical drugs are often paid for by Medicaid, Medicare, and taxpayers. Taxpayers also fund the ads themselves through tax deductions. These ads may lead people to request ineffective drugs from doctors who, under time constraints from corporate management, may find it easier to prescribe the requested drug rather than argue against it. The American Medical Association has opposed this practice for 30 years. This system distorts the market and cannot be considered a free market because the federal government subsidizes it.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: From England or Europe and watch our TV are shocked by what they're seeing on it. And it it's insidious because of this. The pharmaceutical advertisers are advertising the most expensive version of every drug. They're not going to advertise the generics because they're not making any So they're advertising the ones that are the highest profit margins for them. Normally, if you see an advertisement on TV, like for Coca Cola, you then have a choice to go get that, and you're paying out of your pocket for it. When somebody buys a pharmaceutical drug, it's it's Medicaid and Medicare that are paying for it. It's us. It's the taxpayer. So they're advertising something to the consumer when the consumer has no skin in the game. And then the consumer and we're paying for the ads because they're tax deductible. So they're we're paying for them to advertise, the advertisements are getting people to buy drugs that may be ineffective, that may be the least effective drug of the ones that are available. And they go to their physician. The physician is told by his boss, who's the, you know, the corporate bean counter, you have 11 with each patient, and that's it. And the physician then can spend that eleven minutes trying to talk the patient out of something that they want, and then the patient's going to go away unsatisfied. Or the physician could just say, All right, you want this prescription? I'll write it for you. And then, you know, the patient is then going to come back because he's happy. The doctors hate it. The American Medical Association has been against it for, you know, for thirty years. And nobody thinks that this is good for public health. It is hurting us, and it's distorting the markets, and it is not it's not a can't even call it a a free market because everything's paid for by the federal government.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

“158 injuries are suspected to be vaccine injuries, only 38 of those have been studied. Most of those, it was positive. “The others have never been studied. CDC’s job is to study them, and yet they never studied them AND THAT WAS PURPOSEFUL. I’m not saying that out of speculation, I’m saying that because I’VE SEEN THE EMAILS.” To make matters worse, publishers will not publish a study that is critical of vaccines…

Video Transcript AI Summary

If analysis of public data sets reveals a connection between government-promoted vaccines and autism, it would constitute a tort, potentially impacting many injured individuals. However, the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program grants vaccine companies immunity from liability, regardless of recklessness or product toxicity. While childhood vaccination schedules have expanded from three vaccines to potentially 69-92 doses between conception and age 18, this increase may contribute to an epidemic of immune dysregulation and various diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD/ADHD, speech/language delays, tics, Tourette's, narcolepsy, autism, peanut allergies, anaphylaxis, and eczema. These injuries are listed as potential side effects on vaccine inserts, yet the CDC has allegedly failed to adequately study suspected vaccine injuries, despite recommendations from the Institute of Medicine. It's claimed that the CDC has deliberately derailed such studies, and scientific publishers often reject studies critical of vaccines. There is a need to remove the taboo around discussing this issue and conduct honest research.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So if, starting in September, when we start to see the results of the analysis of these massive data sets that you're putting out there in public, and if it becomes clear that there is a connection between autism and vaccines, vaccines the government promoted, in some cases effectively required, that's a tort. I mean, that means there are a lot of injured people who can now show they were injured by this product. How were they made whole? What happens to them? Speaker 1: Well, that's going to be complicated because in 1986, Congress passed an act, the Vaccine Act, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and they gave the vaccine companies immunity from liability. So no matter how reckless the company is, no matter how toxic the product, no matter how egregious your injury, you cannot sue them. And that's one of the problems. And that actually is why we one of the reasons we had this explosion of the vaccination program. When, you know, when I was a kid, we only had three vaccines, and by 1986, the year the act was passed, there were 11 doses of, I think, five vaccines. And today, there are a child to to go to school in states like California and New York and many other states where you have mandates, the child an American child now has to receive between sixty nine and ninety two vaccines between conception, so some of those are given to the mom during pregnancy, and age 18. And the reason it's 69 to 82 is some of the vaccines have are are the different brands have different dose requirements. So some will require three doses. Some will require one dose. Some will require four doses. But that's a lot of vaccines for a kid, and each one of those is calculate is is designed to permanently alter your immune system. And so we have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, you know, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits. And if you look at all of these diseases that have become epidemic, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, all of these seizure disorders, the neurologic disorders like ADD, ADHD, speech delayed, language delayed, tics, Tourette syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, autism, all the diseases. UNN, I never saw when we were kids. And suddenly, they're this generation is damaged, and it's incredibly damaged by all these disease. The autoimmune diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, the allergic disease like peanut allergies, anaphylaxis, eczema. I know did you ever know anybody with eczema? No. Right. So and now it's ubiquitous in every classroom. And all of those injuries are listed as side effects on the manufacturer's inserts of those products. Oh, we would be have to be blind and not say we have to look at this as a potential culprit. We have to do the studies that the Institute of Medicine has been telling the CDC to do for twenty five years. The Institute of Medicine told CDC in 2013, there are one hundred and fifty one one hundred and fifty eight injuries that are suspected to be vaccine injuries. Only thirty eight of those have been studied, and almost most of those, it was positive. It was, yeah, this is a vaccine injury. The other hundred and twenty, whatever, and I'm not doing the math in my head, but the others have never been studied. CDC's job is to study them, and yet it never studied them. And that was purposeful. And I'm not saying that out of speculation. I'm saying that because I've seen the emails. And CDC deliberately derailed any study on that. And if somebody does, independent scientist does do a study, they can't get published. The scientific publishers will not publish a study that is critical of vaccines. So we need to change that taboo, and that's one of the things Jay Bhattacharya is doing at NIH, is we're gonna remove the taboo about talking about this issue, and we're gonna be honest with the Speaker 0: American

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

“The Institute of Medicine…said that ‘the only system that CDC has to study vaccine injury is so bad that any study done on it, we’re not gonna count.’” It’s unreliable because it’s self reporting, takes doctors a lot of time to fill out, and it’s hard to tell what side effect came from what medical intervention.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, stated that the CDC's system for studying vaccine injury is so poor that any studies done with it are invalid. Former Surgeon General David Kessler and others have also criticized the VAERS system and called for a new one. The VAERS system is voluntary, requiring doctors to report vaccine injuries, but there is no penalty for not reporting. Doctors may not recognize vaccine injuries, especially if they occur months or years later, and there is no vaccine injury education in medical school. Doctors also have an emotional incentive not to report, as they may be reluctant to admit a vaccine they recommended caused harm.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Is too unreliable. So they what they were saying, the Institute Medicine, which is part of the National Academy of Sciences, said that the only system that CDC has to study vaccine injury is so bad that any study done done on it, not gonna count. I'll tell you something else. David Kessler, who was a very famous surgeon general, who you remember, and many, many, many other people have said that VAERS system does not work, and you need a new system. So in 2010, CDC designed a new system, and it was a machine counting system. The problem with VAERS, with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, is that it's voluntary. Yes. And so the doctor has to if he sees a vaccine injury, he's required to report it to VAERS. But there's no penalty if he doesn't. It takes him a half an hour to fill out the paperwork. So there's a big incentive for him not to do it. There's another incentive, though. He doesn't know if something is a vaccine injury. If you get you get a vaccine and then four months four years later, you come in with a food allergy, how do you know? Will any doctor in the world say that's a vaccine injury or seizure disorder? And the other thing is so they don't know, you know, what to look for. They've never been taught that at medical school. There's no course on vaccine injury in medical school, in any medical school in this country. And then the other thing is he has a big emotional incentive because he told that mom to give that child that vaccine. And if the child has a seizure three weeks later and she comes back and and she says, I think it might be the vaccine. A lot of doctors will say, no. That's normal for that age, and they're not gonna call it into theirs.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

So CDC created a new system in 2010 for millions of dollars to track vaccine injuries reliably. “Vaers was capturing fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “They had a system now that would capture over 95%.” “The data showed injuries in about 2.7% of vaccines… CDC saw that and said ‘we’re not going to use this system.’ And they shelved it in 2010 and they’ve continued to use Vaers.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The CDC funded a machine counting system, designed by a team led by Lazarus, to analyze vaccine injuries through cluster analysis. This system was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO, comparing its findings to VAERS data. The study found VAERS captured less than 1% of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over 95%. The data revealed injuries in approximately 2.7% of all vaccines, which is about one out of every 37 vaccines. Despite the system's accuracy, the CDC shelved it in 2010 and has continued using VAERS for 22 years, despite knowing it doesn't work.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So CDC designed a machine counting system that would do essentially a cluster analysis. They would look at the vaccine, and then they would look at clusters of injuries that were unique or anomalous to that vaccine. And it was a very accurate system according to the, you know, the group that designed it. It was a team led by a guy called Lazarus. And CDC paid for the whole thing, millions of dollars, and it was a long term study. And they looked at one HMO, which was Harvard Pilgrim up in Massachusetts, and they did did this this machine counting system for Harvard Pilgrim. And then they compared what the machine counting system had gotten, you know, had yielded and collected in terms of vaccine entries, and they compared that to what VAERS had collected during the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. And they said that VAERS was capturing fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. And they had a system now that would capture over ninety five percent, and they were very proud, and they brought it to CDC and said, our system works. Here's the data. The data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of vaccines. Of all vaccines? Yeah, all vaccines. About two point seven percent. Wow. Which I think is something like one out of every thirty seven vaccines you get, there's an injury. CDC saw that and said, we're not going to use the system. And they shelved it in 2010, and they've continued to use VAERS now for, you know, twenty two years when they know that it doesn't work, when Can you

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Now here is the good news: “We’re going to create…a system that actually works.” Even the 2010 system is outdated now though. AI is going to look at all the data the department has to see how each drug works on the population. https://t.co/TWCAG59smR

Video Transcript AI Summary

HHS is initiating an AI revolution, attracting experts from Silicon Valley to improve government systems. Changes include improving or supplementing the VAERS system using AI. The FDA is using AI to accelerate drug approvals, potentially eliminating the need for primate or animal models. CMS is implementing AI to detect waste, abuse, and fraud. The CDC and other departments will use AI to analyze mega data for better decision-making regarding interventions. AI can assess the effectiveness and side effects of drugs like diabetes medications, statins, and SSRIs across the population. This use of AI has the potential to revolutionize medicine.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We're going to absolutely change VAERS, and we're gonna make it we're we're going to create either in within VAERS or supplementary VAERS a system that actually works. Oh, and, you know, that right now, even that system is antiquated because we have access to AI. And one of the you know, we are creating here at HHS an AI revolution. We've been able to attract the top people from Silicon Valley, people who've walked away from billion dollar businesses, and they don't want prestige. They don't want position. They don't want power. They want to change. They want to make the system work. And we're going to We are at the cutting edge of AI. We're implementing it in all of our departments. At FDA, we're accelerating drug approvals so that you don't need to use primates or even animal models. You can, you know, you can do the drug approvals very, very quickly with AI. And we're also implementing a CMS to detect waste, abuse, and fraud, which is it's extraordinary at that. But we're also gonna, you know, use it on the at CDC and throughout our system to look at the mega data that we have and be able to make really good decisions about interventions. For example, if you look at the population as a whole and say, okay, we're using three different diabetes drugs or five different statin drugs, or all these SSRIs and others. You can then look drug by drug, and you can tell on the population whether it's working or not, and which one is giving you the best bang for the buck, and which one has the most side effects. We have a potential now to use AI in ways that are gonna revolutionize medicine.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

But when someone is injured by a vaccine, they can’t sue the manufacturer. They can only sue the government over the injury. “We just brought a guy in THIS WEEK who’s going to be revolutionizing the vaccine injury compensation program.” Kennedy wants to expand the statute of limitations and start taking care of families who have been injured instead of protecting pharma.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker states that many people have been injured by the COVID vaccine, some fatally or permanently disabled, and that these people are not receiving sufficient care or attention. The speaker says that the 1986 Vaccine Act is a major impediment to change. According to the speaker, Congress recognized that vaccines were "unavoidably unsafe" when it granted vaccine companies immunity, so it created a federal program with a trust fund to compensate those injured. The program is funded by a 75% surcharge on every vaccine. The speaker says the vaccine court is supposed to be generous and fast, but the speaker believes the lawyers defaulted to protecting the trust fund instead of taking care of people. The speaker says the program has paid out over $5 billion to about 12,000 people. The speaker says they are looking at ways to enlarge the program so that COVID vaccine-injured people can be compensated, including enlarging the statute of limitations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What about all the people who are injured by the COVID vaxx? There are a lot of them. I know a lot of them. Some died. Some were permanently disabled. Nobody seems to care. You never hear about them, and they don't seem to be getting any help. Will that change? Speaker 1: Yeah, that's going to change. I mean, as I said, the big impediment is the 1986 Vaccine Act. Yes. And so it's complicated about how we fix this, you know, so that we can get compensation to those people. We just brought a guy in this week who's going to be revolutionizing the vaccine injury compensation program, which is a program you know, when Congress passed the Vaccine Act and gave immunity from liability to vaccine companies, it it recognized that vaccines were, in the word of the in in the description, the characterization of the American Academy of Pediatrics were unavoidably unsafe. And some people, like for every medicine, some people are going to be injured and killed. And so it set up a program that's in the federal government called the vaccine courts, and they have a trust fund. The trust fund is endowed by a 75% surcharge on every vaccine. And that program is supposed to there's supposed to be a vaccine court that's supposed to be generous and fast and and give the tie to the runner. In other words, if there's doubts about, you know, whether somebody's injury came from vaccine or not, you're going to assume they got it and compensate them. And it's paid out over $5,000,000,000 now to about 12,000 people. And we're looking at ways to enlarge that program so that COVID vaccine injured people can be compensated. And we're changing the program so that, you know, we're we're looking at ways to enlarge the statute of limitations. Only three years. A lot of people don't discover their injuries after that. And the there's no discovery in that program. There's no rules of evidence. The program has default into lawyers from the justice. You're not suing the vaccine company. You're you're petitioning the my agency, and it's represented traditionally by Department of Justice. And the lawyers in the Department of Justice, the leaders of it were corrupt, and they were they saw their job as protecting the trust fund rather than taking care of people who made this national sacrifice.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

And never forget what the Biden administration did. They ordered social media companies to take down anyone or any post discussing vaccine injury. Thats not a theory, it’s reality. Lawsuits and investigations prove it. https://t.co/sQB54nWcaz

Video Transcript AI Summary

Mark Zuckerberg stated he was ordered by the White House to suppress mentions of vaccine injuries on Facebook and Instagram. He expressed being stunned by this order from the federal government to deny facts. According to the speaker, they sued the Biden administration and obtained documents showing that 37 hours after taking office, a White House group was formed to suppress dissent regarding government policy. The speaker claims they were the first target, with Facebook being told to remove them from Instagram, which Facebook did. The speaker asserts they had almost a million followers and posted no vaccine misinformation, challenging Facebook to identify any factual errors in their posts, which were cited and sourced to government databases or peer-reviewed publications.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Mark Zuckerberg publicly said that he was ordered by the White House to suppress anybody on his platform, on Facebook or Instagram, who mentioned vaccine injuries. Oh, he was ordered by the Biden administration to and he said, you know, I he said, I was stunned. I was being ordered by the federal government to deny facts. Anybody can look him up on YouTube saying that. So and we know that too because I sued the Biden administration, and we got all this discovery documents that showed that he was thirty seven hours after he took the oath of office, swearing to uphold the constitution, he opened up a group in the White House who were whose job it was to suppress any dissent about, you know, this government policy. And I was the first person that they went after. Thirty seven hours after he took that oath, they were telling Facebook to take me off of Instagram, which Facebook did. I had almost a million followers, and there was no vaccine misinformation on there. I asked Facebook again and again, show me one fact I got wrong. Everything I put on there that, you know, was vaccine related was cited and sourced to government databases or to peer reviewed publications.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

In case you didn’t think pharma was corrupt yet… Paul Offit was on the board that creates the vaccine schedule. While he was developing a rotavirus vaccine, he voted to put rotavirus vaccine on the childhood schedule… “He and his business partners…sold that vaccine to Merck for 186 million dollars. He told Newsweek that he won the lottery.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

A rotavirus vaccine was approved by a board with five members, four of whom had financial interests in rotavirus vaccines through employment or grants. One member, Paul Offit, voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule while developing his own. The approved vaccine was withdrawn within a year due to causing intussusception, a potentially lethal disease. Offit's vaccine then replaced it. Offit remained on the committee but didn't vote on the replacement. He and his business partners sold their vaccine to Merck for $186 million. Offit told Newsweek he "won the lottery."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The rotavirus vaccine, was approved by that board, and there were five members of that board at that time, and four of them had direct financial interests in the rotavirus vaccine. They were working for the companies that made the vaccine or they were receiving grants to do clinical trials on that vaccine. They all had overwhelming financial interest. One of the people on that board was a guy called Paul Offit, and who is one of the big voices for vaccines that they CNN goes to him all the time when it wants to have vaccines. He voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule when he had a rotavirus vaccine in development. Because it's now on the schedule, he is developing vaccine. It's virtually guaranteed to get on the schedule. It's a competitive product. But once you say rotavirus vaccine has to be vaccinated for, his vaccine is now guaranteed to get on the schedule. The one they voted on that he voted on, within a year it had to be withdrawn because it was causing this really disastrous disease in kids that is often lethal, called intussusception, agonizingly painful when your intestines kind of tie up against each other, and it kills children, you know, on on occasion. That vaccine was pulled the following year, and his vaccine then replaced it. He was still on the committee. He didn't vote on that, but he was still on the committee. But he voted to make rotavirus vaccine mandatory for the And he he he then he and his business partners, Stanley Plotkin and, you know, a couple of other people sold that vaccine and to Merck for a $186,000,000. He told Newsweek that he won the lottery.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

The vaccine advisory board NEVER turned down a vaccine. “A lot of these vaccines are for diseases that are not even casually contagious.” “You know they recommended the hepatitis b vaccine for babies when they’re an hour old- the first day of life.” “Every mother that goes to the hospital in this country tested for it, so we know which ones, you know, are vulnerable and which aren’t.” “The risk to a one day old baby was one in seven million.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

ACE has never turned away a single vaccine, even for diseases that are not casually contagious. The hepatitis B vaccine is recommended for babies when they're an hour old, despite the fact that it's transmitted through sexual contact or shared needles. While maternal transmission is possible, every mother is tested, so we know who is vulnerable. The speaker claims the risk to a one-day-old baby is one in seven million, and that financial incentives are a factor. Many of the targeted diseases' vaccines don't prevent transmission, making mandates questionable. Vaccines can cause chronic injuries that last a lifetime.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And this and ACE have never turned away a single vaccine. Everyone that was that came to them, they, you know, recommended. And a lot of these vaccines are for diseases that are not even casually contagious. You know? How you you know, I mean, you know, they recommended the hepatitis b vaccine for for babies when they're an hour old. The first day of life, they get that. And, you know, hepatitis B, if your mother's got it, you you should get it. And you can, you know, you can pass through maternal transmission. But every mother that goes to the hospital in this country is tested for it, so we know which ones, you know, are vulnerable and which aren't. Oh, but the mass vaccination of the entire population, including wild children, this is a disease. You get through sexual transmission or you get it from sharing needles, and particularly it was prevalent among promiscuous gay men. But a one day old baby has risk to a one day old baby was one in seven million. Very few of whom are promiscuous. Very few of whom are, you know, uninvolved in prostitution or drug addiction. So, you know, but it was a financial they were all financial drivers. So and a lot of the diseases that they target are not disease the vaccine itself does not prevent transmission. And so, you know, the justification for having it mandated is very ephemeral. And, you know, these are all things that we need to look at. We want to protect public health, but, you know, that means protecting against chronic disease too. And, you know, these vaccines have there's nobody who will contest that they cause that they can cause chronic disease, chronic injuries that last a lifetime.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Now let’s shift gears. Tucker asked Kennedy who he likes in the President’s cabinet and I was not ready for his first choice. “I really get along with Pam Bondi.” “Marco Rubio is the funniest guy in the cabinet.” “I was never very, let’s say, approving of Marco because he was kind of a neocon warhawk. But now he has had this incredible transformation.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker expresses friendship with people they never expected, including Pam Bondi, Marco Rubio, Scott Turner, Sean, and Linda McMahon. Marco Rubio is described as the "funniest guy in the cabinet" who makes people laugh at every meeting. The speaker admits to previously disapproving of Rubio as a "neocon war hawk" but notes his "incredible transformation." The speaker believes Rubio is now aligned with them on most issues, particularly regarding Ukraine and the idea that the U.S. should no longer be the "policeman of the world."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm I'm friends with a number of the people I never thought I'd be friends with, but they're you know? Who do you like? I mean, I really I really get along with Pam Bondi, and and, you know, Cheryl loves Pam and and her husband, John. And then I really and Marco Rubio. Marco Rubio is the funniest guy in the cabinet. He he says things that make people belly laugh at every cabinet meeting, and he's you know, I I I always I never was very, let's say, approving of of Marco because he was kind of a neocon war hawk, but now he's had this incredible transformation. And, you know, I think he, you know, yeah, I I think he very aligned with me on most issues on Ukraine, you know, and just the fact that we should not be the policeman of the world anymore, that we've gotta that, you know, we've gotta withdraw from that from that role. But I get I really I you know, Scott Turner is my friend, Sean, you know, and, all all of them. I get it. Lynn Linda McMahon.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

President Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who are very well spoken- and that’s by design. “One of the things President Trump did when he picked the cabinet, and I was on the transition team so I watched what he was doing, for every one of the positions that he picked, he wanted to see three clips of them performing on TV.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Trump knows how to pick talent, evidenced by the erudite and fluid speakers in his cabinet. When selecting cabinet members, Trump, according to the speaker who was on the transition team, reviewed three TV clips of each candidate. This was because he was conscious of how these individuals would sell his program to the public.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: President Trump is that he really knows how to pick talent, and he, and I'm not talking about me. I'm but the other people on there when you sit in those cabinet meetings. And every one of those people is incredibly erudite and just fluid in the way that they speak and very, very comfortable in their one of the things that president Trump did when he picked the cabinet, and I was on the transition team, I watched what he was doing. For every of one of the positions that he picked, he wanted to see three clips of them performing on TV. And so, you know, he's very conscious of the way of of that these people are gonna be out selling his program to the public.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

I never expected to learn what makes President Trump cry… “He’s encyclopedic in certain areas that you wouldn’t expect like music.” “He gets very emotional about music…he cries when he hears Pavarotti.” https://t.co/3IVCS62weM

Video Transcript AI Summary

Adam Pegg is immensely knowledgeable, especially about music and sports, and knows the stories behind everything. He cries when he hears Pavarotti and is an incredible storyteller about Wall Street. Despite being perceived as a narcissist, he is empathetic, always considering the human impact of events like the Ukraine war, vaccines, and healthcare. He focuses on how policies affect the "little guy," contrary to the perception that he aims to enrich billionaires. Pegg is seen as uniquely suited for the country right now, addressing issues like deficits and trade imbalances at great political cost. His actions are expected to benefit the country in the long term.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And immensely knowledgeable. He's encyclopedic in certain areas that you wouldn't expect like music, and, you know, he gets very emotional about music. And Yes. And and he has and he knows the whole story behind every song. Pavarotti and James Brown. Yeah. Yeah. He cries when he hears Pavarotti. He said I he said to me one night when we were at Martellaga with the Amaryllis, he said he said, Amaryllis, you understand this because she loves music too. And he said, but most of the people here, they don't understand it. They don't get it. And then in terms of sports, he is he just he's an encyclopedia. He knows everything. And then, you know, on Wall Street, he knows how everybody made their money and and the stories, and he's, you know, an incredible raconteur about telling all these stories. And then and also the most surprising thing is because I Adam Pegg is a narcissist. When narcissists are incapable of empathy, and he's one of the most empathetic people that I've met, You notice whenever he talks about the Ukraine war Yes. He always talks about the casualties on both sides. Every time he talks about it I have noticed that. And he does that in every theater. He talks about how human beings are affected by it, you know, whether it's vaccines or Medicaid or Medicare. He's always thinking about how this impacts the little guy. And, you know, the Democrats haven't pegged as a guy who's sort of sitting, you know, in the cabinet meeting talking about how can we make billionaires richer. He's the opposite of that. He's a genuine populace. And, you know, like all of us, we're we're all flawed characters in one way or another. But I think he's really a uniquely right person for this country right now because we were in a death spiral. And not only just, you know, morale, but also just, you know, the the deficits are you know, who could ever would you believe we'd ever have a present in our lifetime who would actually be addressing, you know, the cost of government in a dramatic way? No. And and the trade deficits, how could you ever cure that? It's too entrenched and so many people, you know, making money and but meanwhile, all us all going to hell in a handbasket. And, you know, so I think he's doing stuff at great political cost to him that is gonna benefit this country ten years from now and twenty years from now. And, you know, I'm really proud to be part

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

If you made it this far, you get a gold star ⭐️ Make sure you bookmark this for later!

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - May 22, 2025 at 5:53 PM

Saved - May 23, 2025 at 6:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve come to realize that the Covid vaccine poses greater risks than initially thought, especially after a recent hearing with experts who have faced censorship. Dr. McCullough highlighted alarming links between the vaccine and myocarditis, with over 1,000 studies now available. There have been 216 vaccine-related deaths this year, yet the vaccine remains on the market. Concerns about fertility and high miscarriage rates have also emerged. Despite serious adverse events being reported, accountability for vaccine manufacturers is lacking. We need to educate ourselves on these dangers. Your support is invaluable as I continue this work.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

I knew the Covid vaccine was dangerous, but after listening to this hearing- it’s so much worse than we thought. We heard from top experts who have been censored- until now. Here is what we know about the vaccine 🧵 https://t.co/g4Osbb67XM

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

First I want to point out that the panel was placed under oath. If they lied, it would be a federal crime. https://t.co/ylRaXOom7G

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

First, @P_McCulloughMD who is one of the most published people in the world on Covid vaccine myocarditis spoke. He saw warning signs as early as August of 2021 that the vaccines can cause myocarditis… https://t.co/Gexd9yXOhU

Video Transcript AI Summary

As a cardiologist, the speaker states their role is to fight disease, preserve life, and do no harm. The topic is myocarditis or heart damage from the COVID-19 vaccines. The speaker claims to have examined thousands of patients with this problem, whereas before the pandemic, they state they only had two patients ever with this condition. The speaker references a New England Journal of Medicine paper from Washington University in St. Louis, August 18, 2021, where a 42-year-old man died three days after taking Moderna. They also cite a case from Korea by Choi and colleagues, where a younger man died within eight hours of being in the hospital after Pfizer. The speaker examined images from the Korean case and states the heart appeared "fried with inflammation" and "destroyed." The speaker concludes these cases should have gotten everyone's attention.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I've seen and examined more patients. I've examined more data. And I'm one of the most published people on the topic in the world. And as a cardiologist, I can tell you my role in this was to fight disease, preserve life, and above all, do no harm. Do no harm. Now the topic today is myocarditis or heart damage from the COVID-nineteen vaccines. I'm a cardiologist. I know the topic well. I've examined thousands of patients with this problem, thousands. Before the pandemic, I had two patients ever with this problem. There's 65 papers in the peer reviewed literature on COVID vaccine myocarditis. So let me summarize them for you. The first one that came on my radar screen that was alarming came from Washington University in St. Louis, August Eighteenth Of Twenty Twenty One. The first author is Verma and colleagues, New England Journal of Medicine. A 42 year old man comes into Washington University Hospital with vaccine myocarditis. The infection's ruled out. It's the vaccine. He's in the hospital. This is one of our best hospitals in The United States. He dies three days after taking Moderna. They can't save him in the hospital. Say Doctor. McCollough, move the microphone just a little bit away from you. Then one was reported from Korea by Choi and colleagues. This is now a younger man. Just a few days after Pfizer. He comes in the hospital, he dies within eight hours of being in the hospital. I can tell you I'm a cardiologist, that doesn't even happen with heart attacks. He dies within eight hours. I examined all of the slides and the images that the Koreans had showed us. It looked like somebody took a blow charge to that heart. It was so completely fried with inflammation. His heart was destroyed. These cases, which were widely known at the time, should have gotten everyone's attention.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart. Before Covid, Dr. McCullough saw two patients with this problem. Now there are over 1000 peer reviewed studies on Covid vaccine myocarditis. https://t.co/jF2NTSgelG

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

🚨 But that’s not all. There have been 216 vaccine deaths this year alone. Medical products have been pulled from the market for a fraction of those deaths, yet the COVID vaccine remains. https://t.co/K7roV5rI5v

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker is concerned that acute myocarditis cases will continue until vaccines are stopped. They state there have been two vaccine deaths this year alone. The speaker questions the benefit of continuing the vaccine campaign after four and a half years, considering how many more people will die.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: But I can tell you, I'm concerned that until the vaccines are stopped, there will be cases of acute myocarditis. And to finish, we've had two sixteen vaccine deaths this year alone. So if the vaccine campaign continues, we have to look at what are we getting out of it now, four and a half years of the campaign, and how many more people will die.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Currently the CDC reports that the mRNA stays in the arm for a short period of time and then it leaves the body. However, Dr. Jordan Vaughn cited to a study that found the vaccine in the heart tissue of mice. https://t.co/Z17ndJEPgu

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer's vaccine assessment showed biodistribution beyond the injection site, challenging claims it remains in the arm. A study using single-cell precision nanocarrier identification found LNP accumulation in mice heart tissue. This accumulation was associated with adverse proteomic changes in immune and vascular proteins. These findings raise concerns about cardiac complications, aligning with observations of COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: May, their assessment of community, which is Pfizer's vaccine, noted biodistribution beyond injection site, contradicting claims that the vaccine stays in the arm. In a recent groundbreaking study using single cell precision nanocarrier identification revealed LNP accumulation in the heart tissue of mice with adverse proteomic changes in immune and vascular proteins raising concerns about the cardiac complications that dovetail with what we were seeing when we were looking at COVID nineteen vaccine myocarditis.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

This one especially hurts as I’m seeing close friends struggle with fertility. Dr. James Thorp found that the vaccine causes miscarriage, stillbirth, birth defects, and even death of the newborn. Also, an animal study found the vaccine DESTROYS 60% of the ovarian reserve. https://t.co/109ejSfdeN

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Pharmaceutical companies paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals, the New England Journal of Medicine Jam on Lancet and BMJ, thus corrupting the peer review process. At least six existing studies, three from CDC, FDA and two from Pfizer revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-nineteen vaccines in pregnancy. These findings were ignored. Conversely, countless independent researchers with no conflicts of interest published findings that contradicted the false narratives and the pharmaceutical industry narratives only to be rewarded by persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. This is not hypothetical. It happened to me.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Studies even found that women who had the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. https://t.co/6Ul8ec06GD

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So the key is the percentage of women that got the vaccine in the first trimester had an eighty two percent miscarriage. And by the way, that's the exact same miscarriage rate that was seen in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post market. So I would

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Why has this been allowed to happen? Pharma paid peer reviewers 1.06 BILLION to corrupt the peer review process and hide this data. https://t.co/H97UNMXBN4

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, but these findings were ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Pharmaceutical companies paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals, the New England Journal of Medicine Jam on Lancet and BMJ, thus corrupting the peer review process. At least six existing studies, three from CDC, FDA and two from Pfizer revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-nineteen vaccines in pregnancy. These findings were ignored. Conversely, countless independent researchers with no conflicts of interest published findings that contradicted the false narratives and the pharmaceutical industry narratives only to be rewarded by persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. This is not hypothetical. It happened to me.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Dr. McCullough warns that death is a known side effect of these vaccines and they STILL do not have a black box warning to give people informed consent. https://t.co/kc1lkdmsAd

Video Transcript AI Summary

Dr. McCulloch states that COVID vaccines, in some people, result in death, sometimes on the first day of the shot. He believes this should trigger a black box warning on the product immediately. He claims that the currently available COVID vaccine package inserts do not contain the word "death" as of today. Therefore, Americans are not fairly informed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Doctor. McCulloch, do you wanna weigh in on that? I've presented at the FDA advisory meetings. I've advised companies for decades on this, so I know the regulatory science very well. When a product definitely results in death, and there are thousands of peer reviewed papers on this, Governor, the COVID vaccines in some people sadly result in death. Some on the very first day they take the shot. That must be a black box warning on the product immediately. I just checked the package inserts for the currently available products, the ones that Senator Blumenthal wants to pursue. Sounds like governor wants to still pursue these. Our FDA still wants them to be administered. They still don't have the word death in the package insert. As of today, they don't. And so Americans are not fairly informed.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

But wait, there’s more… Dr. McCullough says it was RECKLESS for sports teams to mandate the vaccine when strenuous activity should be avoided for people with myocarditis. https://t.co/tH4ybiiUUf

Video Transcript AI Summary

Giant cell myocarditis is the most dangerous type of myocarditis, and it is very rare. Anyone who develops myocarditis cannot undergo strenuous physical activity or participate in sports because adrenaline surges can trigger cardiac arrest when there is heart inflammation. It is claimed that it was reckless for sports teams to mandate vaccines on athletes without providing safety provisions, and then have them participate in sports.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Most dangerous type is called giant cell myocarditis. It was very rare. I had seen two cases in my career. One was fatal. But it's in our guidelines. Anyone who develops myocarditis cannot undergo strenuous physical activity. They have to be taken out of sports. It's mandatory because the surge of adrenaline when there's inflammation in the heart triggers a cardiac arrest. You can imagine how reckless it was for the sports teams to mandate vaccines on athletes, provide no provision of safety, and then have them go out in the field.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

But side effects are extremely rare right? Wrong… According to Dr. Joel Wallskog, serious adverse events happen for every 1 in 800 people. https://t.co/WRipvbScHo

Video Transcript AI Summary

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every shows that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. We are here today to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Over 30,000 deaths have been reported to VAERS alone and studies show less than 1% of adverse events are actually reported to VAERS. https://t.co/ygJ6Y82sJs

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

But the vaccine slowed the spread right? No. It didn’t even do that. https://t.co/kq5jladnsA

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

So why have vaccine manufacturers not been held accountable for their dangerous product? There is only one product in America that you cannot sue the manufacturer for design defects…and that’s vaccines. You can thank Congress for the PREP act and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act for that.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Manufacturers can be sued for design defects for almost every product, including planes, cars, and pharmaceutical drugs. However, manufacturers cannot be sued for design defect claims arguing a vaccine could have been made safer.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: For every product on the market, you can sue the manufacturer for harm for design defect claims. Meaning, the claim that the product could have made safer. I mean, literally, look around this room. Planes, cars, pharmaceutical drugs, everyone. There's only one product in America. You cannot sue the manufacturer for design defect claim to claim that it it could have been made safer and that our vaccine

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Why are these vaccines still on the market? Well it seems like this is big pharma’s world and we are just living in it. @SenRonJohnson has gone above and beyond to bring the truth to light and we need more representatives like him to overcome big pharma. In the meantime, we need to educate ourselves and our family on the dangers of these vaccines. We don’t have to wait for the government to act.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

As always, your support means so much to me as it allows me to continue my work as a true independent. Like, follow, subscribe and be ready for more!

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - May 9, 2025 at 6:42 PM

Saved - May 14, 2025 at 7:20 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've been diving into the nomination of Dr. Casey Means and the role of the Surgeon General, which seems to have become more about publicity than public health. Historically, the Surgeon General's office started with just a few physicians and has expanded significantly. While the Surgeon General oversees the Commissioned Corps, much of the public health reporting is handled by other agencies. Instead of questioning Means' suitability, we should consider if we even need a Surgeon General. Additionally, there's concern about political influences, particularly regarding vaccine discussions.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Dr. Casey Means is one of the most controversial nominations - especially for a low level position. After falling down a rabbit hole, I can tell you that we have all been distracted and we are asking the wrong questions. This is what I found 🧵 https://t.co/psFUbV1wZv

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

1/ Starting with the history of the Surgeon General since most people do not know what they manage. The Surgeon General is known as the Nation's Doctor. While this role has turned into more of a publicity position, it was not always like this. https://t.co/swRuLm7mca

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

2/ At the start, the office was compromised of only physicians who cared for sick and injured sailors. It wasn't until 70 years later when they were given a former leader called the "Supervising Surgeon." The first Supervising Surgeon, John Woodworth, created a mobile unit of physicians "who could be assigned and moved as needed to the various marine hospitals." Also, "he issued publications on cholera and yellow fever."

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

3/ The small group of physicians has now grown to over 6,000 medical professionals in different fields that make up the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. "These men and women serve on the frontlines in the nation's fight against disease and poor health conditions" and are "one of America's seven uniformed services."

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

4/ Here are some of the deployments they have had in recent years. https://t.co/nXtQX8MMrE

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

5/ Not only does the Surgeon General oversee the Commissioned Corps, they also communicate public health information. The Surgeon General's report in 1964 about how smoking is linked to lung cancer had a profound impact on the public. https://t.co/mB1MKB1LZI

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

6/ Here are some of the most recent reports. https://t.co/S3J6DA2UTP

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

7/ Now, we know that the Surgeon General oversees the Commissioned Corps, but who is in charge of the Surgeon General? The Assistant Secretary for Health - not to be confused for the Deputy Secretary of HHS. The Assistant Secretary of Health reports to the Secretary of HHS (RFK Jr).

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

8/ All the chaos about Casey Means is interesting as we don't know much about her boss, Dr. Dorothy Fink. Right now she is the acting Assistant Secretary and I can't find a nomination from President Trump for this role. https://t.co/oHskvjrRXp

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

9/ We have also been so distracted that we haven't been keeping track of the Deputy Secretary nomination (second in command to Kennedy), @regardthefrost. He went in front of the HELP committee yesterday and all went well (which is probably our sign that everything is not well.) So who is he? "O'Neill, known as an investor in science and technology, previously served as CEO of Trump backer Peter Thiel's namesake foundation as well as HHS principal associate deputy secretary during the George W. Bush administration, among other roles."

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

10/ And here it is- the reason we have been distracted, "Senator, as you know I am very strongly pro-vaccine, I'm an advisor to a vaccine company, I support the CDC vaccine schedule." https://t.co/Os0o3YHJKZ

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 states that permanent residents in the U.S. are mandated to be up to date on CDC-recommended vaccines, but this is not mandated for those entering the country illegally. Speaker 0 claims that measles cases in New Orleans are coming from people entering the country from elsewhere. Speaker 0 asks if the federal government should mandate that those becoming U.S. citizens be up to date on their immunizations. Speaker 1 states they are strongly pro-vaccine, an advisor to a vaccine company, and supports the CDC vaccine schedule.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: For someone who wishes to become a permanent resident in The United States, it is mandated that they be up to date on CDC recommended vaccines. Frankly, don't mandate for that for those people who come across the border illegally and are then transmitted into the interior of the country. And I've gathered that a lot of the measles that we're seeing right now, for example, in my state, New Orleans, is coming from people coming to our country from elsewhere and bringing measles with them. First, do you agree that we should that the federal government should mandate that if someone becomes a US citizen that they'd be up to date on their immunizations? Speaker 1: Senator, as you know, I'm very strongly proxy pro vaccine. I'm an adviser to a vaccine company. I support the CDC vaccine schedule.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

11/ Getting back to the Surgeon General. The budget of the department doesn't actually come from the Office of the Surgeon General, it comes from the departments in which the Commissioned Corps works. Everything else is allocated through the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH).

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

12/ Maybe we are looking at this all wrong. Instead of asking if Casey Means is the right person for the job, we should ask if we need a Surgeon General at all. The Commissioned Corps already works in other departments. The reporting side of the job is already done by CDC, FDA, and NIH - we don't need to duplicate jobs. This has left the Surgeon General acting as more of a publicity role. So do we need it?

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

13/ Finally, can we turn our attention to pharma shill @SenBillCassidy who keeps blocking anyone who asks questions about vaccines and @regardthefrost who is a vaccine advisor and about to become the Deputy Secretary? We keep saying no one can be appointed that has questioned vaccines and that is due to one man- Bill Cassidy. Imagine if we put all of our manpower that has been exerted the last 48 hours on him instead- we might actually get things done. That would be great, thanks.

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - April 30, 2025 at 6:59 PM

Saved - May 1, 2025 at 10:44 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

During a major cabinet meeting, members shared their achievements from the first 100 days in office. The President highlighted issues like border security, record illegal crossings, and economic challenges, attributing some blame to Biden. The Secretary of Defense reported improvements in recruitment and retention, along with efforts to reinstate troops affected by COVID mandates. The Secretary of Commerce noted the influx of companies in various sectors and the importance of workforce training, emphasizing the financial gains from external revenue sources.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐌𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐭 𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐃𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞. One by one, cabinet members told the public what they have been working on. You wouldn’t believe what the press wasted their questions on at the end 🧵 https://t.co/LvfQa63cRF

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬: -Secured Border -Two months In a row set record for illegal border crossings ever recorded -Designated cartels as terrorist organizations -Having judge problems -Poor GDP but said GDP are quarterly numbers and blamed Biden -Close to 8 trillion in investments from companies (chip, car, manufacturing)

Video Transcript AI Summary

The administration has supposedly achieved the most secure border in American history, with 99.9% security. Illegal border crossings released into the U.S. are down 99.999%. Trinidad Aragua, MS-13, and Mexican drug cartels have been designated as foreign terrorist organizations, and the administration is working to expel them. The speaker claims to be facing judge-related obstacles in removing criminals, which they attribute to the reason for winning every swing state by millions of votes. Core GDP, removing distortions from imports, inventories, and government spending, was up plus 3%. Gross domestic investment was up 22%. Due to tariffs, Samsung is supposedly building massive facilities in the U.S. There is close to $8,000,000,000,000 being spent, which is more than any time in the history of the country.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright. We've just completed what many consider to be the most successful first one hundred days of any administration in the history of our country, and we're just getting started. Things are happening that are amazing, and I would not say it if it weren't fact. In a few short weeks, we've achieved the most secure border in American history by far. 99.9%, which is a number that nobody thought was doable. Biden thought you had to go back to the legislature to get legislation passed in order to create a secure border. You didn't. You just had to have the right president and the right people working it. Congratulations, by the way, and to Tom. For two months in a row, we have set the all time records for the lowest number of illegal border crossings ever recorded. The number of illegal border crossings released into The United States is down 99.999%. That is usually 100%. So I think it's an amazing tribute. And, Christy, congratulations. And Tom and everybody else, it's an amazing job, actually. And it was done very quickly. We officially designated Trinidad Aragua MS-thirteen and the Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. And we're expelling these monsters from our country rapidly and working with the Department of Justice. Pam, you're doing fantastic. Your people are amazing. We're having some judge problems that everybody is reading. We're having some judges that don't like, you know, killers, murderers being thrown out of the country. So I don't know what their problem is, but we have a little difficulty. We won on the basis of a great border and of getting criminals out of our country. That was why we won every swing state. We won by millions of votes. We won everything. Every every metric, we won by a lot. It was a massive victory. And we won, I think, largely because of this issue. I put this issue as number one issue, and they don't want us to do what we're supposed to do, and I don't think that can be. And I hope the Supreme Court is going to fully understand what's going on. We have to get the criminals out of our country, and that's the basis under which we won the election. Core GDP and and this is, you know, you probably saw some numbers today. And I have to start off by saying that's Biden. That's not Trump because we came in on January. This is the quarterly numbers. And we came in and I was very against everything that Biden was doing in terms of the economy, destroying our country in so many ways, not only at the border. The border was more obvious, but we took over his mess in so many different ways. Core GDP, removing distortions from imports, inventories, and government spending, was up plus 3% when you add it. We had numbers that despite what we were handed, we turned them around and we were getting them really turned around. Gross domestic investment was a whopping 22%. Now, that is a number that people are coming in at numbers. For instance, I just walked in, I heard Samsung is now, because of the tariffs, they're gonna build massive facilities in The United States. If we didn't do the tariffs, they wouldn't be doing that. So it takes a little while to get those facilities built, but they're coming in with big, big numbers. They're all coming in with big numbers. We have more money being spent than any at any time in the history of our country. We're up to close to $8,000,000,000,000, I think, I can say. Yeah. And, really, it's gonna be a lot higher than that. Those are just the ones that we know about. 8,000,000,000,000. I I'm not gonna say, but I don't think I'm not sure if Biden did a trillion for four years, one trillion. But we're at 8,000,000,000,000 for two months because let's give us a pass on the first month. We were sort of getting a little bit used to things. Right? But after two months, we have $8,000,000,000,000. There's never been a number like that. And that includes chip companies, car companies, every form of manufacturing, high-tech companies. Nobody's ever seen anything like it. So $8,000,000,000,000. I can talk about, gross domestic product, gross domestic investment. I can talk about a lot of things, but

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐃𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞: 𝐏𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐇𝐞𝐠𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐡 -Recruiting is up -Retention is up too -Reinforcing standards- fit not fat -Bringing back troops who were forced out due to covid mandates -Golden dome in underway -6 billion in DOGE savings -Helped get control of border

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims the military is experiencing a "recruiting renaissance" due to President Trump's leadership, reversing a period of demoralization and weak recruitment under Joe Biden. They state that police and fire departments also have waiting lists after previously struggling. Retention is up, standards are being reinforced, and those forced out due to COVID mandates are welcomed back. "Wokeness" including DEI and transgender policies, has been removed, returning Fort Benning and Fort Bragg to their original state. The speaker says they found nearly $6 billion in savings to reinvest, including $50 billion redirected from Biden administration climate initiatives, and will have a trillion-dollar budget. The military has 11,000 troops on the border who can now detain illegals and hand them over to CBP. NATO allies are being told to step up, the Houthis are feeling American power, and communist China is being deterred.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, mister president, I I think we're controversial because we're over the target. And like so many things, mister president, you inherited a demoralized military that couldn't recruit that was perceived as weak after what happened in Afghanistan and elsewhere because of Joe Biden. And what we have seen since your election and the inauguration was has been nothing short of a recruiting renaissance. It's true. Dec decades it hasn't been decades since we've seen this kind of recruiting in the Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Air Force. The men and women of America want to join the United States military led by President Donald Trump. Speaker 1: And the police, by the way. Absolutely. And fire. I always mention the fire, but the police and fire. But the police and fire, likewise, are I mean, they have waiting lists now, and six months ago was a disaster. Okay? Speaker 0: Truly historic. We can barely absorb the volume and retention as well. Men and women in the military who don't want to get out now that they have a real commander in chief. We're reinforcing standards. We're standards. We're gonna be fit, not fat, in our formations. We welcome back all the COVID, the folks who were forced out because of the COVID mandate. We ripped wokeness out of the military, sir, DEI, trans, and it's Fort Benning and Fort Bragg again at the DOD. We're rebuilding the military, sir. The Golden Dome is well underway. F 47, reassuring allies and deterring enemies. We found nearly 6,000,000,000 in doge savings that we're gonna reinvest, including 50,000,000,000 from the Biden administration focused on things like climate that have nothing to do with lethality and war fighting. And we will have, as you said, sir, the first trillion dollar budget that we plan to spend wisely on behalf of our warfighters. From day one, sir, we've gotten a hundred helped get 100% operational control of the border, come alongside DHS and CBP. That's right. We've got 11,000 troops on the border who now, because of the new National Defense Area, sir, can help detain illegals at the border and hand them over to CBP. It used to be if you saw camouflage on the border, they could hold binoculars, and that's it. Now, we can detain and assist, and we are. We're gonna get a % operational control of that border. Our NATO allies know they have to step up. The Houthis in The Middle East are feeling the weight of American power, and we're deterring communist China. So because of your leadership, sir, I believe we're making the military great again.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞: 𝐇𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐋𝐮𝐭𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐤 -Pharma, auto, tech companies coming to America -Train workforce to fulfill these jobs Gold card active -External revenue service 100’s of billions of dollars coming in https://t.co/WyyFKZEkOR

Video Transcript AI Summary

Technology companies have committed over $2.5 trillion to build in America due to tariffs, with sovereign wealth funds from the Middle East also investing, totaling over $3 trillion committed. The pharma industry, auto, and industrial sectors are also returning to America. The speaker mentioned the Trump Gold Card's popularity and a plan to replace the Internal Revenue Service with an external revenue service, funded by tariffs, so outside countries trading with the U.S. pay their fair share. Ending de minimis will rebuild mom and pop and small businesses in America by stopping foreign countries from sending small packages for free.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The pleasure of running the investment accelerator, which gets to recruit these companies, and you've never seen anything like the companies committed to building in America. Technology companies have committed over $2,500,000,000,000 to build in America based on your tariffs. Right? Sovereign countries all backing, the whole Middle East and all these countries backing their sovereign wealth funds. They all want to invest in America, and they're coming in again. Over $3,000,000,000,000 committed. So just those two topics, you're at $5,500,000,000,000 and then you've got the whole pharma industry knows it's got to come home because America pays for all the drugs of the world. So the pharmaceuticals have to come home. Right? Auto is coming home. Industrial is coming home. So, you know, we've got to train and your great secretary of labor together and secretary of education. Together, we're gonna train the workforce to build America. America. It's unbelievable. We've got so much as I travel around, the attention on the Trump Gold Card. I mean, makes me very popular. Last night, I I was out to dinner and someone came up and said, can I buy 10? And how do I buy 10? And I'm like, that's pretty good. It's $50,000,000 for dinner. So, you know, I was paying paying for my dinner. The external revenue service. Right? You've got the tariffs and then hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars coming in to build the external revenue service that our objective, of course, is to replace the internal revenue service and let those outside countries trading with us, let them pay their fair share to America. And then, of course, you got rid of de minimis. And what happened is these foreign countries were sending in little packages for free and knocking out our mom and pop businesses across America. You put an end to it, and you're gonna rebuild the mom and pop and the small business of America. You're their president, and I'm proud to support you. It's very important. De minimis. It's very it's a big deal. It's a big scam going on against our country, against really small businesses, and we've ended. We put an end.

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - April 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM

Saved - April 17, 2025 at 3:01 AM

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ok I get it. RFK Jr is not an expert so you won’t listen to him. Now listen to this expert tell you the same exact thing. https://t.co/FpEzQNvbeI

Video Transcript AI Summary

As a long-term autism researcher and director of the New Jersey Autism Study, the speaker discusses the dramatic increase in autism prevalence. When the study began with the CDC, it was expected that autism prevalence would remain stable, unlike other neurological disorders. However, autism rates have increased significantly, from a rare disability affecting 1 in 10,000 to being present in every community. The speaker asserts that this increase is real and not solely due to better awareness. In New Jersey, rates have increased by 300% in 20 years, a trend confirmed by CDC reports and other data sources. The speaker believes future reports will show even higher rates, suggesting an urgent public health crisis. The speaker urges a focus on understanding the environmental or risk factors triggering autism, claiming that despite data collection, there has been a lack of real progress in understanding the causes, prevention, or effective treatment of autism. The speaker encourages a careful review of the CDC report and its supplemental tables to recognize autism as a true phenomenon requiring investigation into its root causes.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Morning. Thank you for being here. I'm here as a long term autism researcher and a clinical psychologist. I get to wear two hats, one with patients and families trying to help them get to a diagnosis and to interventions and treatments. But also for the last twenty plus years as the director of the New Jersey Autism Study, which is a CDC sponsored autism surveillance system. We've monitored autism in New Jersey in concert with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention since February. When we began our endeavor with CDC, we expected to do maybe two or three baseline, studies to establish how many children have autism because it was not expected that autism prevalence would increase. Other childhood disabilities, neurologic disorders do not increase or change over time. But somehow, for some reason, with autism, everything was different. Autism went from being a very unusual rare disability which affected as the secretary said one child in maybe ten thousand to being known in every community, every school district, every center that cares for children with disabilities. Autism is real. It's a true disability. It's not a personality, quirky issue. Everything has changed for the individual with autism. And while there's a wide range of expression, it does change the family and it does inevitably change the community and the, the society in in which which we find it. Autism prevalence has increased very dramatically. It's increased in New Jersey where we have, excellent resources and, access to services, and it's, increased in all the states in the network. It's increased not only by the CDC ADAM network active surveillance activities, but it's increased according to, federal IDEA statistics and information from a multitude of surveys. It is a true increase. There is better awareness of autism, but better awareness of autism cannot be driving disability like autism to increase by three hundred percent in twenty years. That's what we saw in New Jersey. That's what the CDC report of yesterday indicates. And that's what, in my opinion, future, reports from, epidemiologists will show. The data provided in yesterday's report strongly suggest that not only is this a high point of autism prevalence, but in the future rates can only be higher. Autism deserves to be treated as a real public health phenomenon, and I would say is an urgent public health crisis. It's not just that we're more astute or perceptive. It's not like these it's not like two or three children out of, for everyone with autism has remained invisible. Autism is striking, and the consequences are lifelong. So I would urge, everyone to consider the likelihood that autism, whether we call it an epidemic, a tsunami, or a surge of autism is a real thing that we don't understand and it must be triggered or caused by environmental or risk factors. We need to address this question seriously because in my opinion, for the last twenty years, we've collected data but not made real progress in understanding of what causes autism or how to effectively prevent it or treat it effectively. So I urge you to read the report very carefully. I urge you to do something that nobody does and go into the many supplemental tables and see, that autism is a true phenomenon and that we need a correct perception, not a perception that allows us to just provide services without understanding the root causes or the true factors at play. So thank you for your attention.

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - March 17, 2025 at 5:28 PM

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 1:29 PM

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝟎𝟖 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐬 🚨 Forever 21 Joann Fabrics Party City Big Lots All owned by private equity. All closing. This isn’t because retail is going out, this is strategic to vacuum more wealth to the top. https://t.co/ZqLEjNBtNu

Video Transcript AI Summary

Forever 21 is closing all US stores, similar to Joann's, Party City, and Big Lots, because they were bought by private equity firms. This situation mirrors the 2008 housing crisis, but involves businesses. Firms took out adjustable rate loans, now called floating rate debt, in 2020 when interest rates were low; now, high interest rates are causing closures. Despite 97% of Joann's stores being profitable, private equity firms owning 20% of US businesses could trigger mass layoffs and impact retirement funds. Due to their private status, the full extent of private equity ownership is unclear. A collapse could be larger than 2008. This issue affects everyone, and Trump proposed closing the carried interest loophole that benefits private equity. This loophole allows investment managers to pay lower capital gains tax. Trump could change IRS rules or Congress could create a law to close the loophole. The speaker encourages viewers to contact their congresspeople and follow Tiffany Sianci for more information.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Forever twenty one is closing all of its stores in The United States, but I wasn't shocked by this. My friend Tiffany just blew the whistle on something huge. I actually knew that Tiffany was working on this story for a couple days now. So when I woke up and saw the news about Forever twenty one, I was not shocked at all. Same exact thing happened to Joann's, Party City, and Big Lots, and so many more. Wanna know what all of those companies have in common? They were all bought by private equity firms. What's happening is identical to the two thousand and eight housing crisis. But this time, it's not just about houses, it's about businesses. Housing crisis happened because they were giving out adjustable rate loans, but they don't call it that anymore. They call it back floating rate debt, which is what is happening today. So what that is, is a loan where the rate is adjustable. So a lot of people, lot of firms took out loans in 2020, when interest rates were next to nothing. And now that interest rates are super high, all of these businesses are closing down because they can't handle it. You might be thinking to yourself, you know, these businesses just were doing poorly in the first place. This was bound to happen. But Joann's wasn't 97% of their stores were profitable. So why does this impact you remember, private equity firms also own a ton of single family homes. And if these businesses are going out of business, we're going to see mass layoffs. And this is tied into your retirement. Now it's hard to tell exactly how many businesses private equity owns because they're just that they're private. Public businesses have to post quarterly reports and everything. But when a private equity firm owns you, you don't have to report that stuff publicly. The best estimate that I found is that private equity firms own 20% of all the businesses in this country. All of those businesses go down with the private equity firms that own them, then that would be the biggest economic collapse we've seen probably bigger than 2008. Guys, this really should not be a partisan issue because this affects all of us. I'm already seeing people say this is Biden's fault. This is Trump's fault. Guys, we just need to work on who's going to fix it. Regardless of what you think about Trump, he actually proposed last month on closing the loophole that allows private equity to thrive. What this loophole does is the carried interest rules allow investment managers to pay a lower capital gains tax rate on the income they receive from their work as compensation. If president Trump's proposal is implemented, it could significantly impact private equity. What's kind of funny about this is Trump is actually advocating to tax the rich here. A %, we should have everyone on board advocating for this. Trump's administration could possibly just change rules in the IRS to close the loophole. But of course, it's so much better to go through Congress to actually put it into law. It's so important that we get this message to our congresspeople. Oh, that this is a lot to digest. I've been talking with Tiffany, who is an expert at private equity at this point, and I still have questions myself. I highly encourage you to check out Tiffany Sianci. Is incredible. And if you have any questions, please let me know and I will absolutely do my best to answer them. Again, we can't just sit on the sidelines while this happens. We need to do something about it today. If you're worried about all the federal employees being laid off today, I'm telling you this is nothing like that. This is a hundred times worse. As always, let me know your thoughts and make sure you're following me for more.

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - March 18, 2025 at 3:39 AM

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 12:29 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I have a clear message for President Trump: Yemen has never threatened us before the bombings began. This isn't our war. We need to end US military involvement in the Middle East to resolve our issues. It's not about our ships; it's about protecting Israel.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ron Paul has a direct message for President Trump: “The fact is, Yemen hasn’t even threatened the United States before the bombs started falling.” “It’s not our war. End US military involvement in the Middle East and our troubles disappear.” - Ron Paul is right. This isn’t about protecting our ships, it’s about protecting Israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Trump ordered a military operation against Yemen, despite criticizing Biden's foreign interventionism during his campaign, stating problems could be solved over the phone instead of "dropping bombs all over Yemen." After a ceasefire negotiated by Trump's envoy, Houthi leaders threatened to block Israeli Red Sea shipping due to Israel's blockade of humanitarian relief to Gaza. Trump responded by bombing Yemen, killing dozens and threatening further action against Yemen and Iran. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz suggested bombing Iranian ships, potentially leading to a major Middle East war. The speaker claims Trump's actions contradict his promise of peace and that neocons in his administration are influencing him. They state that Russia and China's ships are not threatened because they are not enabling the "Israeli demolition of Gaza," and that US support of Israel is making the US a target. The speaker concludes that the US should follow Russia and China's lead in staying out of the conflict, as Red Sea shipping is of minor importance to the US economy.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hello, everybody, and thank you for tuning in to The Weekly Report. President Trump stopped bombing Yemen and exit the Middle East. Over the weekend, president Trump ordered a massive military operation against the small country of Yemen. Was Yemen in the process of attacking The United States? No. Did the president in that case go to congress and seek a declaration of war against the country? No. The fact is Yemen hadn't even threatened The United States before the bombs started falling. Last year, candidate Trump strongly criticized the Biden administration's obsession with foreign interventionism to the detriment of our problems at home. In an interview at the Libertarian National Convention, he criticized Biden's warmongering to podcaster Tim Pool, saying, you could solve problems over a telephone. Instead, they start dropping bombs. Recently, they're dropping bombs all over Yemen. You don't have to do that. Yeah. Once in office, Trump turned to a military force as his first option since the Israeli Hamas ceasefire plan negotiated by president Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, Yemen was left Red Sea shipping alone. However, after Israel's implemented a total blockade of humanitarian relief to the citizens of Gaza last week, Houthis leaders threatened to again begin blocking Israel's Red Sea shipping activity. That was enough for president Trump to drop bombs and launch missiles for hours, killing several dozen Yemeni citizens, including women and children in the process. After the attack, Trump not only threatened much more force to be used against Yemen, but he also threatened Iran. His national security adviser, Mike Waltz, added that The US may start bombing Iranian ships in the area, a move that would certainly lead to a major Middle East war. Like recent presidents Bush and Obama, candidate Trump promised peace after four years of Joe Biden's war mongering and World War three brinkmanship. There is little doubt that with our war weary population, this proved the margin of his victory. Unfortunately, as with Bush and Obama, now that he is president, he appears to be heading down a different path. The Republican Party is gradually becoming a pro peace American first party, but the warmongers and the neocons of the old line in the party are not going to let go so easily. Unfortunately, many of these dead enders have found their way to senior positions in Trump's administration with voices of restraint and nonintervention nearly nowhere in sight among his top tier of advisers. To solve the Yemen problem, we must understand it. Russia and Chinese ships, for example, are not being threatened because they are not enabling the Israeli demolition of Gaza. The slaughter there has been facilitated with US money and US weapons. It is The US doing Israelis bidding both in Gaza and in the Red Sea that is painting a target on us and unnecessarily putting our troops at risk of retaliation. The US government, starting with Biden and continuing now with Trump, seems eager to make this our war even though, as representative Thomas Massey pointed out over the weekend, Red Sea shipping is of minor importance to The US economy. In a real America First foreign policy, we would be following the Russian and Chinese lead in staying out of the conflict. It's not our war and US military involvement in The Middle East and our troubles disappear. It's really is that simple. Thanks for listening.

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - January 28, 2025 at 3:20 PM

Saved - January 30, 2025 at 7:00 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I found an old clip of Kennedy testifying to Congress in 2008 about mercury's harmful effects. Ed Markey, who invited him, now calls Kennedy an unqualified and dangerous nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services. It's interesting that no one labeled him crazy back then.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Some people definitely did not expect me to dig up this old clip. This is Kennedy in 2008 testifying to Congress on the harmful effects of mercury. Ed Markey was the chair who invited him, and he now says, “Robert Kennedy Jr. is an unqualified, unserious, and dangerous nominee for US Secretary of Health and Human Services.” Funny how no one called him crazy then.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Eight years ago, the EPA declared it unsafe to eat freshwater fish in 19 states due to mercury contamination from coal-burning power plants. In 49 states, some fish are deemed unsafe. The only state with all fish considered safe is Wyoming, where testing funds have not been allocated. The CDC reports that 1 in 6 American women have dangerous mercury levels, risking serious health issues for their children, including cognitive impairments. Each year, 640,000 children are born exposed to harmful mercury levels. The Clinton administration classified mercury as a hazardous pollutant, requiring a 90% reduction in emissions from power plants. However, the Bush administration rolled back these regulations, allowing utilities to continue discharging mercury at high rates.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: About 8 years ago, the EPA announced that in 19 states, it is now unsafe to eat any freshwater fish caught in the state because of mercury contamination. The mercury is coming from those coal burning power plants. In 49 states, at least some of the fish are on safety heat. In fact, the only state where all of the fish are safety heat is Dick Cheney's home state of Wyoming, where the republican controlled legislature has refused to appropriate the money to test the fish. We know a lot about mercury now. According to CDC, the mercury there is 1 out of every 6 American women now has so much mercury in her womb that her children are at risk for a grim inventory of diseases: autism, blindness, mental retardation, heart, liver, and kidney disease. See, I have so much mercury in my body just from eating fish, 2 and a half times what EPA is considered safe. I was told by doctor David Carpenter, who's the principal authority on mercury toxicity in this country, that if a woman with my levels of mercury in her blood would have children with cognitive impairment, with permanent brain neurological injury. Today, according to CDC, there are 640,000 children born in this country every year, who've been exposed to dangerous levels of mercury in their mothers' wombs. The Clinton administration, recognizing the gravity of this national health epidemic, reclassified mercury as a hazardous pollutant under the Clean Air Act. That triggered a requirement that all of those plants remove 90% of the mercury fish and waterways downwind of those plants. But this is an industry that received a 100 that donated a $156,000,000 to President Bush and his party since the 2000 election cycle, and they got their reward was leaders like Mr. Olmstead here, who came in and eviscerated that rule and instead replaced the rule that was written by utility industry lobbyists, his own law firm, Lathan and Watkins, which allowed which ended essentially the regulation, that tight regulation of mercury and allows these utilities to continue to discharge mercury at huge rates for endless periods of

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - January 24, 2025 at 2:43 PM

Saved - January 25, 2025 at 3:23 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared a detailed thread about the funding sources for senators on the finance committee ahead of RFK Jr.'s confirmation hearing. Each senator's financial ties to the healthcare industry were highlighted, revealing significant donations from major companies like United Health Group, Pfizer, and Novo Nordisk. Some senators, like John Cornyn and Tim Scott, received over 2 million, while others, like Peter Welch, received much less. I encouraged reaching out to senators to support RFK Jr.'s confirmation, emphasizing that constituents outnumber their donors.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Here is a thread of each senator in the finance committee and who funds them. RFK Jr's confirmation hearing is next week. Before the whole senate votes to confirm him, the Finance Committee questions and votes for him. Keep in mind, they will put on quite the show for their donors. See if any of your senators are below. 🧵

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Mike Crapo (R - Idaho) Not only has Crapo received almost a million from the health care industry, his biggest donor is United Health Group. Additional donors include Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, and Gilead Sciences.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ron Wyden (D- Oregon) Wyden has received 1.5 million from the health care industry. Notable donors include, Molina Healthcare, Quest Diagnostics, and Novo Nordisk.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Chuck Grassley (R- Iowa) Grassley has received 716k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Cencora, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Ecolab.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

John Cornyn (R- Texas) Cornyn has received over 2 million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Novo Nordisk, Cigna, GE Healthcare, Molina Healthcare, and P&G. Already said is a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

John Thune (R- South Dakota) Not only has Thune received about a million from the healthcare industry, Sanford Health is his second biggest donor. Additonal donors are Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Quest Diagonstics, and GE Healthcare. Already said is a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Tim Scott (R- South Carolina) Scott has received 2.3 million from the healthcare industry. Some of these donors include HCA Healthcare, Metlife, P&G, and Gilead Sciences.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Bill Cassidy (R- Louisiana) Cassidy has received 2.8 million from the healthcare industry with his second biggest donor being from Ochsner Health System. Other donors include Humana, Ecolab, Johnson & Johnson, Cardinal Health and more.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

James Lankford (R - Oklahoma) Lankford has received about 800k from the healthcare industry. Donors include GE Healthcare, P&G, and Johnson & Johnson.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Steve Daines (R - Montana) Daines has received 1.5 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Amgen, Regeneron Pharm., and Novo Nordisk.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Todd Young (R - Indiana) Young received 1.5 million from the healthcare industry including Elevance Health as his third biggest donor. Additional donors include Cencora, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, and GE Healthcare.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

John Barrasso (R- Wyoming) Barrasso has received about a million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Edwards Lifesciences, Tenet Healthcare, Humana, and GE Healthcare. Already a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ron Johnson (R - Wisconsin) Johnson has been very outspoken about Big Pharma. He has received about a million from the healthcare industry but I believe most of this is pre pandemic or from individual health care professionals. The only pharma donor I see post-pandemic is Elevance Health. Already a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Thom Tillis (R- North Carolina) Tillis has received about 2 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Edwards Lifesciences, Quest Diagnostics, Neurocrine, P&G, and Metlife.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Marsha Blackburn (R- Tennessee) Blackburn accepts about 1.6 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Neurocrine Bioscience, Edwards Lifesciences, and GE Healthcare. Already a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Roger Marshall (R- Kansas) Marshall received a million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Pfizer and more. Already said he is a yes vote.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Maria Cantwell (D - Washington) Cantwell has received 447k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Gilead and Davita.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Michael Bennet (D- Colorado) Bennet has received 737k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Novo Nordisk, Gilead Sciences, and Johnson & Johnson.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Mark Warner (D- Virgina) Warner received a million dollars from the healthcare industry. Donors include Metlife, Option Care Health, and United Health Group.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Sheldon Whitehouse (D- Rhode Island) Whitehouse has received only 241k from the healthcare industry. His last corporate pharma donations were in 2018 from Acadia Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson, and Amgen. I haven't gone through all these senators stock purchases but I did notice Whitehouse has stock in Eli Lilly - as big pharma as it gets.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Maggie Hassan (D- New Hampshire) Hassan has received 2 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Grail, Option Care Health, Metlife, Elevance Health, Molina Healthcare, Gilead, and so many more.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Catherine Cortez Masto (D- Nevada) Masto has recieved 2.7 million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Humana, Grail, Regeneron Pharm., Pfizer, HCA Healthcare, and many more.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Elizabeth Warren (D- Massachussets) Warren is an interesting one. She has received 748k from the healthcare industry but she has no corporate donors...that we know of. This made me dive deeper into some strange connections since she has been the most outspoken over Kennedy by repeated common propaganda points. View my findings at the bottom of the thread.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Bernie Sanders (D- Vermont) Bernie has received almost 1.3 million from the healthcare industry. However, Sanders does not have any corporate donors. These donations are from individual people who work in healthcare.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Tina Smith (D- Minnesota) Smith has received about a million from the healthcare industry. Donors include Grail, Quest Diagnostics, Metlife, and P&G.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Ben Lujan (D- New Mexico) Lujan has received 773k from the healthcare industry. Donors include Davita, Humana, Amgen, and Pfizer.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Raphael Warnock (D- Georgia) Warnock has received 194k from the healthcare industry. I do not see any pharma related corporate donors. These are individual donations from healthcare workers or pharma employees.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Peter Welch (D- Vermont) I guess best for last. Welch has only received 53,000 from the healthcare industry mainly through a seperate pac. I honestly think that opensecrets might not have their data synced properly for this one- but who knows. Donors include Teladoc Health, Ecolab, and P&G.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Please, reach out to your senators to ask them to confirm RFK Jr. We outnumber their donors. Stand for Health Freedom made it super easy to send your senators a letter. I have no incentives with this organization. I have just met some of their team. @standforhealth1 https://standforhealthfreedom.com/actions/kennedy/

We support Kennedy: Tell your US Senator to support him too - STAND FOR HEALTH FREEDOM Facebook Twitter Pinterest Print standforhealthfreedom.com

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

My sources: I used @OpenSecretsDC and @QuiverQuant to review each senator. Sorry for the double photo on the top of the thread. X isn't giving me an option to edit it.

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

@OpenSecretsDC @QuiverQuant And here is more information about Senator Warren

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Is Elizabeth Warren really worried about Polio and people’s teeth rotting, or is she worried about her donors? Not only has she received: $491,595 from Health Professionals $125,721 from Pharmaceuticals $108,240 from Hospitals For a total of $871,412 from the healthcare industry. She also has been funded by Karla Jurvetson by only 14.6 million… Interestingly enough, this all ties back to Stanford Medical Center where Pfizer and Eli Lilly have “donated.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hey, Massachusetts! How did you end up with two pharma-friendly senators? Elizabeth Warren recently claimed that RFK Junior as HHS secretary could bring back polio, but let's look at her funding. She's received $491,000 from health professionals, $125,000 from pharmaceuticals, and $108,000 from hospitals, totaling $871,000 from the healthcare industry. Interestingly, she condemned super PACs while benefiting from one funded by Carla Jerviset, who donated $1.46 million. Jerviset has ties to Stanford, which also has connections to Pfizer. Pfizer previously granted Stanford $3 million for curriculum development. Many Stanford professors have received money from big pharma, raising questions about their motives. So, is Warren genuinely concerned about public health, or is she protecting her donors? Let me know your thoughts and follow for more updates!

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey, Massachusetts. Are you good? How in the hell did you end up with 2 pharma shells as your senators? Both of these senators have been very outspoken about RFK Junior, and we are going to do what we do best. We're gonna see who's bribing I mean, funding them, starting with Elizabeth Warren. But this is what she posted today. Say goodbye to your smile and say hello to polio. That's what's on the horizon if RFK Junior becomes a secretary of HHS and puts out this scripted video. And she even mentions how she's terrified of losing her fluoride from her water. But let's see if she really just cares about our health. She's received $491,000 from health professional and a hundred and $25,000 from pharmaceuticals or health product. Oh, and don't forget about the hundred and $8,000 from hospitals and nursing homes for a grand total of $871,000 from the health care industry. And this is actually her cheapest selection out of all of them. And by the way, I always get asked where I find my data. This is OpenSecrets. They do an amazing job. They collect their data right from the FEC website. The FEC website looks like this. This is where all the candidates have to report what they bring in and what they spend. And then OpenSecrets takes this data and puts it together. So it's easy for us to digest. And as I was digging through all of this data, there's something else that caught my attention. I found this article that said that Elizabeth Warren condemned super packs. Now she's benefiting from 1. And this article talks about this persist pack. And at the time, they had no idea who was funding the pack. But now we do. Carla Jerviset gave a whopping $1,460,000,0.0 to support Elizabeth Warren for the senate. This is her, and she is a physician. Not only did she attend Stanford, her father was a professor there for over fifty years. And to honor her father, she helped fund the construction of the new Stanford Medical Center. You know who else has ties to Stanford? Pfizer. Back in 2010, they gave a grant to Stanford saying that there's no strings attached. Put your hand up if you actually think that's true. I'm sure nobody. And the grant was $3,000,000 to back new curriculum. But wait, there's more. Pfizer funded an independent educational grant program through, surprise, Stanford. How do all of these dots connect? Well, honestly, that's kind of difficult. As I was doing research, it is very clear that a lot has been hidden here, but this article may give us a hint. Looks like Stanford professors have been found to receive money right from big pharma companies like Eli Lilly. Why does this all matter? Funny enough, I think doctor Casey Means has already given us the answer. She went to Stanford and was top of her class. She talks about how there was never a class about nutrition, about exercise. She exercise. She simply learned a diagnosis and a pill to solve it. Because the minute that we find out that we can heal ourselves with food, think about whose bottom line is gonna hurt real bad. So to summarize, in addition to all of the money that Elizabeth Warren receives through the health care industry, she also has some funny ties to Carla here. Do you think she's actually really concerned about him bringing back polio, or is he just gonna hurt her donors bottom line? Let me know your thoughts, of course, and make sure you're following me for more.

@AnnaRMatson — Anna Matson

Posted - January 21, 2025 at 1:09 AM

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 2:39 PM

@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson

Trump just signed the TikTok executive order while taking questions from the press. Imagine that - a president that answers questions from the press. Wild. https://t.co/0ewVTX8daf

Video Transcript AI Summary

We're discussing an executive order to unlock Alaska's energy potential, including ANWR. Regarding TikTok, if I don't approve a deal, it becomes worthless. If I approve it, it could be valued at a trillion dollars, and I believe the U.S. should get half. The CEO of TikTok might be open to this partnership, which would allow the U.S. to oversee operations. TikTok primarily attracts young users, and I've seen a shift in my perspective after engaging with it. While there are concerns about data privacy, I believe there are bigger issues with products made in China. If TikTok is approved, it has significant value, and the U.S. deserves a share. Lastly, I question Biden's lack of press conferences.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Very long way. Oh, look at that. It says TikTok. My my my. What is that all about? Speaker 1: First, we have Alaska, sir. This is an executive order relating to unleashing Alaska's potential as an energy reservoir for the entire nation. Speaker 0: And what about ANWR? Speaker 1: I believe that would be included in aspects of the order. Speaker 0: So we're opening up Anwar. Speaker 1: On the other TikTok piece, president Trump, you and your members of your team now used to warn about the dangers of TikTok spying on Americans. What changed that you're not worried about that anymore? Speaker 0: Well, it depends on the deal. I mean, I may not do the deal or I may do the deal. TikTok is worthless. Worthless. If I don't approve it, it has to close. I learned that from the people that own it. If it if I don't do the deal, it's worthless. Worth nothing. If I do the deal, it's worth maybe a $1,000,000,000,000 a trillion. So if I do the deal for the I'm talking about doing it for the United States. If I do the deal for the United States, then I think we should get half. Speaker 1: The TikTok's easier. Speaker 0: In other words, wait. I think the US should be entitled to get half of TikTok. And congratulations, TikTok has a good partner. And that would be worth, you know, could be $500,000,000,000 or something. It's crazy. The numbers are crazy. But it's worthless if I don't if the president doesn't sign, then it's worthless. If the president does sign, it's worth maybe a $1,000,000,000,000. So I think, like a joint venture, I think we would have a joint venture with the people from TikTok. We'll see what happens. I mean, that's one of many ideas I've heard. Speaker 1: The CEO is now and did he say that he's open to that idea? Who? The CEO of TikTok is around? Speaker 0: Oh, I think he'd probably like it. Because he's got nothing. They really have nothing. It it's passed in Congress. It gives the president the right to make it make a deal or to close it. And we have 90 days to make that decision. But I could see, making the deal where the US gets 50% of TikTok, polices it a little bit or a lot. Depends on them. But remember, they make telephones in China. They make, all sorts of things in China. Nobody ever complains about that. Here, they're complaining about this. So many different products made in China. Nobody ever complained about it. The only one they complain about is TikTok. And TikTok is largely young people. I guess I have a warm spot for TikTok that I didn't have originally. But, you know, I went on TikTok and I won young people up by 36%, Peter. And Republicans typically don't do too well with young people, but it's a different Republican party. Speaker 1: Would the US Treasury buy a portion of TikTok then? Or how would it get that 50 percent? Speaker 0: No. You'd you'd take 50% of TikTok for the approval that TikTok can continue in business. And they'd have a great partner. The US would be their partner. But the US essentially would be paid for doing that half of the value of TikTok. Speaker 1: Would there be a private sector owner as well? Speaker 0: Could be. Yeah. Could be a lot. Tell you what, every rich person has called me about TikTok. Speaker 1: You wanted to block TikTok. Why did you change your mind? Speaker 0: Because I got to use it. And remember, TikTok is largely about kids, young kids. If China's gonna get information about young kids, I don't know. Speaker 1: Are you Speaker 0: I think I think Chinese To be honest with you, I think we have bigger problems than that. But but, you know, when you take a look at telephones that are made in China and all the other things that are made in China, military equipment made in China, TikTok I think TikTok, is not their biggest problem. But there's big value in TikTok if it gets approved. If it doesn't get approved, there's no value. So if we create that value, why aren't we entitled to, like, half? Speaker 1: Sir, do you need to do I mean, you don't have to get you to shut them down? Speaker 0: Does Biden ever do news conferences like this? How many news conferences, Peter, has he done like this? Like this. None. 0. And it would be 0 for the next infinity. Speaker 1: For Speaker 0: infinity, it would be 0.