TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Anti5GWarrior

CorinneNokel
Posted - February 23, 2026 at 8:32 AM
Saved - February 23, 2026 at 4:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
CorinneNokel asked for Karen Kingston’s views on Medical Body Area Network (IEEE 802.15.6) and shared related links. IcicLaw and Kingston_Truth were tagged. Anti5GWarrior replied, questioning corruption at IEEE and suggesting covert issues with eHealth and IoMT.

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@CorinneNokel @IcicLaw @Kingston_Truth Are there any talking heads who touch on the corruption within the IEEE and why we are having to expose the covert nature of 'eHealth' and the IoMT? https://t.co/5QeyPcuWGn

@Stop5GNearMe - Stop5G Community Empowerment Consulting

🚨 Are our bodies being FRIED?! Something most people were never told: 🧵 (1/5) https://t.co/Ckms44MwH2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker contends that the US Navy and the IEEE took control of safety determinations based entirely on short term heating or short term effects and did not want to address long term effects of radiation. They allegedly funded work on thermal effects in relation to radio frequency radiation, screened the literature, retained for reviews, captured the risk assessment process, and promoted their views because the IEEE has 400,000 members worldwide. They claim these groups promoted their views with politicians and the public and used false arguments. The speaker states, “this radiation is non ionizing. So consequently, it can be dangerous,” but asserts, “the body is permanently ionized,” and maintains this argument is moot. They also say, “this radiation is too weak to heat up molecules as they do in the microwave oven,” but according to the speaker, “the targets are not the molecules, they are the electrons and the protons that are inevitable in living systems.” According to the speaker, industry designed standards of exposure with averaging times of six or thirty minutes and average time over space of one to 10 grams, which are cited as signs of not going into biology at all because these parameters ignore biology generally. The speaker notes that exposures to the head are 20 times higher than to the body, and claims this was done by industry to accommodate the commercialization of cell phones. In 1992, ICNER, which is the International Commission on Non ionizing Radiation Protection, was installed by industry to maintain their restricted view that electromagnetic radiation acts on people only through heat. The speaker also states that ICNERP got the support of the World Health Organization.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The US Navy and the IEEE took control of the safety determinations based entirely on short term heating or on short term effects. They did not want to get involved in the question of long term effects of radiation. They funded work on thermal effects in relation to radio frequency radiation. They screened the literature, retained for reviews, and they captured the risk assessment process. And they promoted their views because after all, the IEEE has 400,000 members throughout the world. They promoted their views with politicians and the public. Now they use false arguments to support their views. They say, well, this radiation is non ionizing. So consequently, it can be dangerous. But in fact, the body is permanently ionized. So this argument is completely moot. And then they said this radiation is too weak to heat up molecules as they do in the microwave oven. But in fact, the targets are not the molecules, they are the electrons and the protons that are inevitable in living systems. And so industry went on to design standards of exposure that have averaging times of six or thirty minutes, average time over space of one to 10 grams. Those are signs of not going into biology at all because these parameters ignore biology generally. And you know that exposures to the head are 20 times higher than to the body. And this was done by industry to accommodate the commercialization of cell phones. And in 1992, ICNER, which is International Commission on Non ionizing Radiation Protection was installed industry to maintain their restricted view of electromagnetic radiation acts on people only through heat. And of course, Echnerp got the support of the World Health Organization that I'm sure you're well aware of.
Anti5GWarrior
Posted - February 19, 2026 at 1:26 PM
Saved - February 20, 2026 at 4:01 AM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

DIABETES and 🗼📱☢️: "It’s not like there is a simple fix, like changing your diet,” she said. “Our children are being radiated 24/7, at home, in schools, on their phones and from nearby cell towers. We should really be paying attention to this.” 🛜 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/emr-radiation-cell-towers-wireless-devices-diabetes-kids/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20260218

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - February 18, 2026 at 6:48 PM
Saved - February 19, 2026 at 3:11 PM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@newstart_2024 Routers generate heat, too. You may also find that the devices have to work harder to connect, causing more 🛜☢️ and more heat. 🔌Safer to go wired (@RosalitoEhs). 🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🇪🇸 https://rosalito.art/se-connecter-en-filaire-a-la-maison/

redpillb0t
Posted - February 3, 2026 at 9:48 PM
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 5:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A farmer reports decades of cropping disrupted this year, with a strange cloud cover, no insects, bees, or birds, and stalled crop growth. An interlocutor cites electromagnetic fields from 4G/5G as an invisible toxin and links to studies on wildlife declines, while another user shares related articles. Overall, the thread threads together farmer frustrations with claims that EMF exposure may be linked to insect and pollinator declines.

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

“I’ve grown crops on this land grow for DECADES and this year it’s like the whole thing just… stopped.” Farmer says after months under a strange cloud blanket his land has no insects, no bees, no birds and crops that refuse to grow. https://t.co/9o0GrGeaiK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is voicing a concern about a noticeable absence of insects this year. They point to a buddleia plant, which usually attracts butterflies and bees, but this year has seen hardly any insects on it. They note there are a few flies, but nothing like what’s normally expected, and no bees or bumblebees anywhere nearby, not even wasps. They emphasize this lack of insects is unusual and worrying. They describe the surrounding conditions: yesterday was overcast but warm, with a “blanket” of dull weather persisting through the summer, resulting in poor grass growth. They opened the silage clamp because there isn’t enough grass, and they spread slurry as rain approaches, yet they still observe poor growth. They question whether a conspiracy is involved, wondering if chemicals sprayed into the atmosphere are changing the weather. They insist they can’t be the only one to notice the absence of insects and fear the broader impact: if insects are scarce, it will affect everyone. In summary, the speaker reports an unusual year with very few insects (no bees, bumblebees, or wasps; few flies), connects it to poor grass growth and agricultural concerns, and speculates about weather modification or spraying in the atmosphere, describing the situation as worrying and something that will affect people broadly. They invite others to share their thoughts, emphasizing they don’t believe they’re the only observer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a video I've meant to do for the last few weeks actually. I'm gonna show you something and I wanna know what what you think. I can't be the only one that's noticed this. I can't be. But where all where all the insects? Let me just show you this. Just just hold on a minute. I don't know whether you could see this. I've got a bit of glare on the screen so I can't really be sure whether you're gonna see it properly. This is a buddlier. Yeah? All the lovely flowers on it. These are butterflies and bees favorites and they normally there's bees and butterflies on these all the time. I haven't seen one this year, not long. There's a few flies about but nothing like there should be. I mean milking people will know this this this time of year they're an absolute pain in the fucking ass in the pile of the flies but look there's nothing on there. There's a few flies knocking about, but nothing like they should be. What do you think? Well, I looked at I looked at the cows yesterday in the yard. I mean, it was a crap day yesterday. There is open cloud today, but yesterday was just overcast. It was warm. But just under that blanket that we've had all bloody summer, I mean, the grass growth is fucking awful. I've actually opened the silage clamp yesterday because I just barely got any grass. I put a load of slurry out because we're get rain again, but what do you think? Conspiracy? Is it from them spraying chemicals in the atmosphere, changing the weather? I don't know. What do you think? But I can't be the only one that's noticed that there are no bloody insects about. I haven't seen one bee, not one, not one bumblebee this year. It dawned on me a few weeks ago, I thought, we've normally got loads of bumblebees knocking around here and bees and even wasps. I mean, I hate wasps, but there's nothing about. It's not good. Something is going on. Definitely, there is something happening. And it is bloody worrying because it's gonna affect everybody. It's gonna affect us. I mean, nothing's growing properly. Anyway I'll leave it with you. Tell me what you think. I can't be the only one who's noticed this. Can't be. Have a good day.

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@redpillb0t It's great that people are noticing the toxic chemtrails, but please also consider an invisible toxin: electromagnetic radiation from cell towers & devices. Levels are at all-time highs since 4G, 4GLTE & 5G were rolled out. https://t.co/LHSJikJR2k

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Wireless Radiation is Harming Our Birds, Bees, and Trees 🚨 Our environment is under attack—and it’s coming from wireless radiation. Cell towers, 5G, and Wi-Fi aren’t just affecting human health—they’re disrupting the natural world in ways we can’t ignore. 🐦 Birds: Studies show that exposure to wireless radiation disorients migratory birds, affects their navigation, and even leads to population decline. 🐝 Bees & Pollinators: RF radiation interferes with bee colony health, impacting their ability to forage and reproduce—contributing to colony collapse. Without pollinators, our food system is in grave danger. 🌳 Trees & Plants: Prolonged exposure to wireless radiation is linked to tree damage, weakened immune systems, and reduced growth. Watch this powerful video to see how wireless radiation affects our ecosystems. 👇 Share, spread awareness, and demand solutions!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Nature is vital to our existence, offering essential resources and a home for wildlife. From the air we breathe to the food we eat, our ecosystems are essential to life on Earth. But as we embrace modern conveniences, such as wireless technology, we're introducing massive amounts of electromagnetic radiation into our environment. How does this invisible toxin affect the natural world we depend on? Let's explore. Wireless radiation, also known as radio frequency or RF radiation, is emitted by devices like cell phones, Wi Fi routers, and cell towers. It's all around us, helping us stay connected and communicate seamlessly. Both humans and animals rely on the Earth's natural electromagnetic field. The rapid expansion of wireless network technologies, like five g and the Internet of Things network, introduce new foreign electromagnetic signals, disrupting nature's delicate balance. The increasing presence of wireless radiation in our environment raises concerns about its impact on wildlife. Birds, bees, and other creatures rely heavily on natural electromagnetic fields for navigation and communication. What happens when these fields are disrupted? Studies show that birds experience disorientation due to interference with their magnetic navigation systems. This can lead to migratory disruptions and other behavior changes. Bees, crucial pollinators in our ecosystem, are also affected. Research indicates that exposure to wireless radiation decreases the colony strength and egg laying rates of bees. And it's not just animals and insects, plants too are affected by wireless radiation. Studies show that wireless radiation exposure damages trees, shortens plant lifespans, and contributes to rapid species decline. The underwater Internet of Things network, also known as the smart ocean, is a growing network of underwater devices and technologies that collect and transmit data beneath the ocean's surface. The wireless signals emitted by the underwater IOT network are completely audible to marine life and will become an inescapable torture chamber for ocean habitants such as dolphins and other marine mammals that use sonar and sound waves to navigate, communicate, feed, and reproduce. Wireless networks have significantly increased the radio frequency or RF environment on Earth by at least 10 to the eighteenth times. Additionally, five g deployment and other new internet services will require tens of thousands of additional satellites to be launched into Earth's atmosphere, which has already been shown to produce bright lights in the night sky and may produce, as of yet unknown, environmental consequences. Wireless radiation is a part of our modern world, and its convenience is undeniable. However, understanding and mitigating its environmental impact is essential for the health of our planet. Together, we can ensure that our technological progress does not come at the cost of our natural world. CHD's electromagnetic radiation and wireless team is fighting back against involuntary radiation exposure from wireless tech and the privacy invasion that comes with it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nature is vital to our existence, offering essential resources and a home for wildlife. From the air we breathe to the food we eat, our ecosystems are essential to life on Earth. But as we embrace modern conveniences, such as wireless technology, we're introducing massive amounts of electromagnetic radiation into our environment. How does this invisible toxin affect the natural world we depend on? Let's explore. Wireless radiation, also known as radio frequency or RF radiation, is emitted by devices like cell phones, Wi Fi routers, and cell towers. It's all around us, helping us stay connected and communicate seamlessly. Both humans and animals rely on the Earth's natural electromagnetic field. The rapid expansion of wireless network technologies, like five g and the Internet of Things network, introduce new foreign electromagnetic signals, disrupting nature's delicate balance. The increasing presence of wireless radiation in our environment raises concerns about its impact on wildlife. Birds, bees, and other creatures rely heavily on natural electromagnetic fields for navigation and communication. What happens when these fields are disrupted? Studies show that birds experience disorientation due to interference with their magnetic navigation systems. This can lead to migratory disruptions and other behavior changes. Bees, crucial pollinators in our ecosystem, are also affected. Research indicates that exposure to wireless radiation decreases the colony strength and egg laying rates of bees. And it's not just animals and insects, plants too are affected by wireless radiation. Studies show that wireless radiation exposure damages trees, shortens plant lifespans, and contributes to rapid species decline. The underwater Internet of Things network, also known as the smart ocean, is a growing network of underwater devices and technologies that collect and transmit data beneath the ocean's surface. The wireless signals emitted by the underwater IOT network are completely audible to marine life and will become an inescapable torture chamber for ocean habitants such as dolphins and other marine mammals that use sonar and sound waves to navigate, communicate, feed, and reproduce. Wireless networks have significantly increased the radio frequency or RF environment on Earth by at least 10 to the eighteenth times. Additionally, five g deployment and other new internet services will require tens of thousands of additional satellites to be launched into Earth's atmosphere, which has already been shown to produce bright lights in the night sky and may produce, as of yet unknown, environmental consequences. Wireless radiation is a part of our modern world, and its convenience is undeniable. However, understanding and mitigating its environmental impact is essential for the health of our planet. Together, we can ensure that our technological progress does not come at the cost of our natural world. CHD's electromagnetic radiation and wireless team is fighting back against involuntary radiation exposure from wireless tech and the privacy invasion that comes with it.

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@redpillb0t 🐜🪳🐝Buglife from 2018 - "Could our obsession with mobile technology destroy wildlife" https://www.buglife.org.uk/news/could-our-obsession-with-mobile-technology-destroy-wildlife/

@RosalitoEhs - Rosalito EHS

@Anti5GWarrior @redpillb0t https://t.co/V5eHS1PRmz

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@RosalitoEhs @redpillb0t 🐝"In recent years, researchers have uncovered a troubling connection between EMF and the alarming decline in honeybees, pollinators and other insect populations." ▶️https://www.wildlifeandwireless.org/science#tab-1 https://t.co/oDtzytcQ8t

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - December 9, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Saved - December 12, 2025 at 7:02 PM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

🛜 🚨 If you ever wondered what the difference is between 5G and 6G, the first 20 minutes explain clearly what's intended for us all and how it will be done. #WirelessConnectivity and zero #HealthAndSafety 🧵 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCfKOqcvkw0

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 8:00 PM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

More information here: https://radiationresearch.org/viral-social-media-posts-spark-renewed-attention-on-5g-risks/

Viral Social Media Posts Spark Renewed Attention on 5G Risks – Radiation Research radiationresearch.org
Anti5GWarrior
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 6:54 PM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

In 2020, RFK Jr and the 🇺🇸Children's Health Defense supported the 🇬🇧Radiation Research Trust - A joint RRT–CHD letter called on the UK Government to halt the roll-out of 5G, highlighting the health dangers of unchecked wireless proliferation. https://t.co/HaWnIOnw7N

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 6:30 PM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

Radiation Research Trust: "Viral Social Media Posts Spark Renewed Attention on 5G Risks" https://t.co/TvSMns2Av1

@DavidWolfe - David Wolfe

https://t.co/0RE20C8mxS

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - June 27, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Saved - June 28, 2025 at 1:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned that our health is being compromised for the sake of data collection. The prevalence of smart devices and wearables, while marketed as empowering, can actually harm our wellbeing. There are serious risks associated with these technologies, particularly for children, due to their continuous emission of radiofrequency radiation. This exposure is linked to various health issues, including increased cancer risk and neurological disorders. I oppose any push for widespread adoption of wearables, as they threaten both health and privacy.

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

Now, our health and wellbeing is coming a very poor second to the gathering of the DATA. The process of data-gathering is making people ill. This is the insanity of smart wearables, smart devices, smart phones and cell towers - all emitting and receiving microwave signals. 🛜☢️

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Wearables put the power of health back in the hands of the American people. We’re launching one of the largest HHS campaigns in history to encourage their use—so every American can take control of their health, one data point at a time. It’s a key part of our mission to Make America Healthy Again.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Secretary Kennedy was asked if consumers should continue to have access to wearable health monitoring devices. Kennedy responded affirmatively, stating that the HHS is launching a large advertising campaign to encourage Americans to use wearables to take control of their health. Wearables allow people to monitor metrics like glucose levels and heart rate in relation to diet and physical activity, which can inform better lifestyle choices. Kennedy believes wearables are key to the "MAHA agenda," or "making America healthy again." His vision is for every American to be wearing a wearable device within four years.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Secretary Kennedy, my first question is is that there is a tremendous amount of research that shows that greater engagement with one's health leads to better outcomes. In recent years, American innovators have created and improved wearable devices so that not only are consumers able to better engage with their health through monitoring data, but they are able to share that data with providers. I believe American consumers, in line with the twenty first century cures act, should be able to access these innovative wellness tools. Secretary secretary Kennedy, do you agree that consumers should continue to have access to these tools? Speaker 1: Absolutely. In fact, we're about to launch one of the biggest advertising campaigns in HHS history to encourage Americans to use wearables. It's a way people can take control over their own health. They can take responsibility. They can see, as you know, what food is doing to their glucose levels, their heart rates, and a number of other metrics as they eat it. And they can begin to make good judgments about their diet, about their physical activity, about the way that they live their lives. We think that wearables are a key to the MAHA agenda, making America healthy again, and we are gonna my my vision is that every American is wearing a wearable within four years.

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚫 ‘Every American Wearing a Wearable’ Is Not a Vision We Share “... we oppose governmental pressure to incentivize the widespread use of wearables. They pose serious health risks, especially to children, and they threaten privacy.” — Miriam Eckenfels, director of the CHD EMR Program Wireless technologies, including wearables, have clear and well-documented harms. These devices continuously emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation in direct contact with the body for long periods of time. They also have multiple transmitters/receivers (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi and cellular), operating on several different radio bands. Cumulative and long-term exposures have known significant risks. RF radiation exposure is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects, including “increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being.” Read more on CHD's The Defender 👇 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/every-american-wearing-wearable-not-vision-we-share/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20250626

‘Every American Wearing a Wearable’ Is Not a Vision We Share Wireless technologies, including wearables, have clear and well-documented harms. These devices continuously emit RF radiation in direct contact with the body for long periods of time. They also collect and share biometric data, raising privacy concerns. childrenshealthdefense.org

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

https://t.co/Y8wSxI1KAh

@CorinneNokel - Corinne Nokel

Ankle Bracelets and more MERICANS! Josep Miquel Jornet #DARPA #AirForceResearchLab Wireless Surveillance System UNDER the skin https://t.co/oNZuwBml5t

@CorinneNokel - Corinne Nokel

WEARABLES BioTech - Wireless Intra-Body Communication Josep Jornet #InternetofNanoBioThings https://ece.northeastern.edu/wineslab/papers/Sangwan18SPAWC.pdf

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - June 20, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Saved - June 20, 2025 at 9:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my experiences as an engineered nanoparticle, often confused with viruses. I discussed how I can cause conditions misattributed to viruses, stemming from oxidative stress, which I term nano-bio cytotoxicosis. I explored the role of the protein corona in nano-bio interactions, emphasizing its significance in understanding health issues related to engineered nanomaterials. The protein corona forms when proteins bind to nanoparticles, altering their characteristics, including shape, surface charge, and biological identity, affecting how the body processes them.

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

Essay: "Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle (This is my story of how I am often mistaken as a virus...)" Thanks to @succulent1122 https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/04/23/confessions-of-an-engineered-nanoparticle/

Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle A fictional account told in first “particle” (as I have not yet achieved personhood status) This is my story of how I am often mistaken as a virus . . .  It seems an appropriate time to speak out. I am not a naturally occurring nanoparticle (i.e., produced by cosmic dust, volcanic activity, forest fires,… pieceofmindful.com

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

"I may cause certain conditions that can be mis-attributed to viruses, but are instead novel forms of cytotoxicity produced by oxidative stress from ENPs, which I call nano-bio cytotoxicosis."

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

I had a look into this: "Nano-Bio Interactions: Ecotoxicology and Cytotoxicity of Nanomaterials" which states: "As one of the most important parameters in understanding possible health issues of ENMs*, it is necessary to clarify the role of the “protein corona”🔽

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

in the interactions between NPs and physiological systems, such as biological media and blood." (*Engineered Nano Materials) https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bioengineering-and-biotechnology/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00918/full

Frontiers | Editorial: Nano-Bio Interactions: Ecotoxicology and Cytotoxicity of Nanomaterials physiological and pathological conditions of the testing organisms. This topic intends to explore nano-bio interactions from the aspects of ecotoxicology and... frontiersin.org

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

What is protein corona formation? "Protein corona formation refers to the process where proteins in a biological fluid spontaneously bind to the surface of nanoparticles, creating a layer or "corona" around the nanoparticle."

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

The protein corona can significantly change the nanoparticle's characteristics. For example, it can affect its: -shape (by increasing its size) -surface charge (which changes the interaction with cells) -and BIOLOGICAL IDENTITY (by changing the surface of the ENP so that it is 🔽

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

recognized and processed by the body differently). Corona-virus.

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

@CorinneNokel

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - February 1, 2025 at 1:28 PM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 5:35 PM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

https://t.co/g72oprTABm

@HannahBree72 - Hannah Bree

How the Internet of Bodies is used to collect & transfer data and remote targeting individuals. https://t.co/8M7gibUaBM

Anti5GWarrior
Posted - January 3, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Saved - January 4, 2025 at 1:39 AM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

⚖️ Scott McCollough is the lead lawyer for the Children's Health Defense and discusses why it's important to explain what wireless is, why the dangers of the 5G infrastructure continue to be ignored, and what can be done about it. 🛜 https://rumble.com/v65de6m-5g-weaponry-with-scott-mccollough.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

5g Weaponry with Scott McCollough CopiaCorp-E: https://www.haciendacastilla.net/ Join the 5G Lawsuit: https://projectarchimedes.org/ HOST Todd Callender Guest Scott McCollough Donate to Doc Pete to fight our Country’s crisis: https:// rumble.com
Anti5GWarrior
Posted - January 4, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Saved - January 4, 2025 at 1:24 AM

@Anti5GWarrior - Wireless Warrior

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14247371/Cellphone-radiation-warning-researchers-reveal-new-risk-factor-5G-networks.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=social-twitter_mailonline

Cellphone radiation warning as researchers reveal new risk factor The unexpected new finding, according to the study's lead author, stems not from the rural 5G cell towers but from odd behavior by rural users' own mobile devices. dailymail.co.uk
View Full Interactive Feed