TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @AntonioTweets2
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
They lied about everything. Even electricity. ⚡️ 👇 https://t.co/tiVqluLnmO
reSee.it AI Summary
Someone claims lies about electricity. Another asks who and where to find the full video. A third identifies Dr. Irwin Moon, a Christian Science educator, noting a 1956 Moody Institute film showing high‑voltage AC induction heating an egg via a coil while the pan stays cool. Described as pure physics with no hidden power or vanishing; Moon lived until 1986. Full original video link provided.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
They lied about everything. Even electricity. ⚡️ 👇 https://t.co/tiVqluLnmO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The description begins with the ring being, in effect, a one turn, shorted secondary. A smaller ring will react even more violently. Here is another ring. This one made of a material we say is non conductive. And it is completely unaffected.
Here is another example. Several thousand watts of power were involved in that spark. If we replace the spark gap with a copper coil, The same power now flows through the coil. It's invisible, has no effect on many substances, but it can generate a lot of heat. Wood, paper, things that we think of as being quite inflammable are not affected at all.
However, a piece of steel wool bursts into flame instantly. Did you ever fry an egg on a cold stove? It's no trick at all if you have the right equipment. This is a cold hotly. And because it's cold, you can make it out of wood if you like.
Just be sure that there's a coil of wire inside and that you connect that coil to a high voltage alternating curve source. The rest is easy. As long as we're being different, we'll use motor oil instead of Crisco. The egg fries very quickly, but the stove remains perfectly cold. And back if you wish to keep it handy, you can fry your egg on the morning newspaper.
With a gadget like this, you can get up in the morning, sit on the stove, read the morning newspaper, and fry the eggs in your lap. Another example of the fact that physical forces can be quite selective
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The ring being in effect a one turn, shorted secondary. A smaller ring will react even more violently. Here is another ring. This one made of a material we say is non conductive. And it is completely unaffected.
Here is another example. Several thousand watts of power were involved in that spark. If we replace the spark gap with a copper coil, The same power now flows through the coil. It's invisible, has no effect on many substances, but it can generate a lot of heat. Wood, paper, things that we think of as being quite inflammable are not affected at all.
However, a piece of steel wool bursts into flame instantly. Did you ever fry an egg on a cold stove? It's no trick at all if you have the right equipment. This is a cold hotly. And because it's cold, you can make it out of wood if you like.
Just be sure that there's a coil of wire inside and that you connect that coil to a high voltage alternating curve source. The rest is easy. As long as we're being different, we'll use motor oil instead of Crisco. The egg fries very quickly, but the stove remains perfectly cold. And back if you wish to keep it handy, you can fry your egg on the morning newspaper.
With a gadget like this, you can get up in the morning, sit on the stove, read the morning newspaper, and fry the eggs in your lap. Another example of the fact that physical forces can be quite selective
@1spark2ignite - GDog
@AntonioTweets2 Who is this and where can I get the full video @grok?
@grok - Grok
That's Dr. Irwin Moon, a Christian science educator. This 1956 clip from his Moody Institute film series demos high-voltage AC induction: current heats the egg's moisture directly via the coil, while the pan/paper stay cool. Pure physics, no "hidden power" or vanishing—he lived until 1986. Full original: youtube.com/watch?v=-Jiwke…
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
We have been infiltrated. Elbows up. 🇨🇦🤡 https://t.co/Eat0JIIOzb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: The CCP builds influence in democratic societies through overseas United Front work, a system the party uses to expand control and influence without force. The United Front is the party’s weapon to shape political, social, and economic environments to serve its goal of becoming the dominant global power and advancing claims such as the annexation of Taiwan. Through ongoing, long-term relationship building, the Party has created a global network of individuals and organizations inside open societies.
In Canada, organizations connected to the United Front are substantial: Canada has at least 575 United Front–linked organizations, making it the second largest network among the four countries studied and with the highest per-capita presence. Much of the United Front work operates through informal ties—personal relationships, invitations to China, honorary titles, and privileged access. The 575 United Front–linked organizations identified in Canada represent only a visible layer of a much larger system operating quietly underneath. Canada is important to the CCP because it has strong institutions, vibrant civil society, and large diaspora communities.
To the Party, shaping thinking, networks, and decisions in countries like Canada yields accommodation rather than confrontation. Alongside the United States, Canada has become one of the key environments where overseas United Front work is actively developed.
From the research, three things stand out. First, the Chinese Communist Party politicizes everything: activities that appear social, cultural, or economic are treated by the CCP as political resources. Second, most United Front activities are not illegal; they operate through relationships. Influence is built through access, invitations, titles, and personal ties, not necessarily through breaking rules. For example, individuals with strong United Front ties have accompanied multiple Canadian prime ministers from both political parties to visit the PRC and have also participated in policy consultations ahead of those trips. Third, once this network is embedded, it can be mobilized. With the network in place, the Party gains the ability to make requests for political influence, narrative shaping, talent recruitment, and even voter mobilization on Beijing’s behalf.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for having me, and thank you for the opportunity to speak about this report and its implication for Canada. My research looks at how the Chinese Communist Party or the CCP built influence in democratic societies through what it calls overseas United Front work. United front is the party's weapon that it uses to expand control and influence without using force. The party uses this system to shape political, social, and economic environments in ways that serve the party's goal, which is becoming the dominant global power and advancing claims such as the annexation of Taiwan. And through ongoing and long term relationship building, the Party has created a global network of individuals and organizations inside open societies.
Organizations in Canada are very much part of this. Canada alone has at least five seventy five United Front linked organizations, making it the second largest network in the research and has the highest per capita among the four countries. Much of the united front work happens through informal ties such as personal relationships, invitation to China, honorary titles and privileged access. So the nearly 600 united front linked organizations identified in Canada within a limited amount of time and resources are really just a visible layer of a much larger system operating quietly underneath. Canada is important to the Chinese Communist Party because it has strong institutions, vibrant civil society, and a large diaspora communities.
To the party, if it can shape thinking, networks, and decisions in countries like Canada, it doesn't need confrontation. It gets accommodation instead. So Canada, alongside The United States, has become one of the key environments where overseas United Front work is actively developed. And from the research, three things stand out. First, the Chinese Communist Party politicizes everything.
Activities that look social, cultural, and economic are treated by the CCB as political resources. Second, most of the United Front activities are not illegal. It works through relationships. Influence is built through access, invitations, titles, and personal ties, not necessarily through breaking rules. So for example, individuals with strong united front ties have accompanied multiple Canadian prime ministers from both political parties to visit the PRC and also participated in policy consultations ahead of those trips.
Third, once this network is embedded, it can be mobilized. With this network in place, the party gains the ability to make requests for political influence, narrative shaping, talent recruitment, and even voter mobilization on Beijing's behalf.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
The climate Hoax explained. This is for dummies. For those who still think in their tiny brainwashed brains that humans have caused it and that it’s bad. It’s all a scam. https://t.co/IvMwyMVn6u
Video Transcript AI Summary
Climate change is a fact, but humans are not causing it. NASA knows that over 90% of the CO2 is coming from the oceans. Is there more CO2 now than ten, twenty, fifty, or a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. Is it a bad thing? The answer is no. We're right about 440 parts per million right now. In geologic history, Cretaceous and Jurassic were over a thousand parts per million; Triassic, 2,000 parts per million. The earth was lush. CO2 levels and temperatures are not always one-to-one. Where's the CO2 coming from? NASA knows: the CO2 is coming from the oceans warming from underneath. Warm water holds less gas. The oceans are warming from underneath from tectonic processes every twelve thousand five hundred years, beginning in the core and causing more tectonic and volcanic activity, which is exactly what we're seeing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Other example, I'm gonna use climate change as a a geologist. I'm very passionate about this. You believe in it? Climate change is a fact. I've been I've been talking about since '19 no.
I've been talking about since 1979. It's also a fact that humans are not causing it. Humans are not causing it. And the real scientists know this. Farts.
It's not the cows. Do I'll just I'll tell you. I mean, NASA knows this. NASA knows that over 90% of the c o two there is an increase in c o two. Okay.
It's just I made a statement, and I wanna I just wanna justify this. Is there more CO two in the atmosphere now than there was ten years, twenty, fifty, a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. Is it a bad thing? The answer is no.
Is it the most we've ever had? We're right about 440 parts per million right now. In geologic history, we're looking Cretaceous over a thousand or the Jurassic over a thousand parts per million. Triassic, 2,000 parts per million. The earth was lush.
The earth was green. Life was abundant during that time. And what we see in geologic history, and this is fascinating to there are times when c o two levels are high and the temperatures are low. And times when just the opposite is happening. It's not necessarily a one to one correlation.
Where's the c o two coming from? NASA knows. I've I've got it I've got a bunch of videos on this. Over 90% of the c o two is coming from the oceans. Warming.
Warm water holds less gas. Here's the kicker. The oceans are warming from underneath, not from the top. If it was from the C 02 on the top, you know, the warming of the air, it would be coming from the top. It's warming.
The glaciers are melting from underneath. The CO 2 is coming. The oceans are warming from underneath from tectonic processes that happen about every twelve thousand five hundred years that people just don't wanna talk about. It is a tectonic process that begins in the core, translates perturbations into the mantle, into the crust, the weak areas of the crust. You see more tectonic activity, more volcanic activity, which is exactly what we're seeing.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
Canada’s Government is criminal. Listen to this. Yes, this is happening in Canada. “Elbows up” https://t.co/G4kGVHJmh4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Delta Hospice Society had a public-private partnership with the Fraser Health Authority. They built a hospice, fundraising $8,000,000, and secured a land lease for thirty five years. They were told, "if we want money, we're gonna have to start killing our patients." They refused: "we're palliative care. We don't do that." When they resisted, "they canceled that lease with twenty five years left" and they were evicted, and "expropriated those buildings, 8 and a half million dollars worth, add to the government." The government began operating the hospice and providing euthanasia there. The speaker calls this "the conquest and then compel" and says "that's the modus operandi that they're using, and that's gonna be facilitated system, by the judiciary" and that "our courts and our judges are appointed in Canada, appointed by the government." Media claim: "the government controls the media" "CBC" "state" "Soviet style Pravda."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's everybody?
Speaker 1: It's everybody. Wow. So we we did have a public partner partnership a public private partnership with the Fraser Health Authority.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: And we were told in our hospice. So I became the president of the Delta Hospice Society. And we were told because we had a hospice that we operated, a a facility that we actually built. We fundraised $8,000,000.
Speaker 0: Excuse me.
Speaker 1: We built it. We got a land lease for thirty five years. We built those buildings on it. We were told that if we want money, we're gonna have to start killing our patients. And we said, well, we're not killing our patient.
We're palliative care. We don't do that.
Speaker 0: Right. The whole point is to just ease the suffering as they go through this experience
Speaker 1: Live well. Life. Yeah. Until your natural end, which we can help you with.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Right? And so they said, well, you're not getting any more money. And we said, that's fine. We don't want your money, and we don't need your money.
Speaker 0: Wow. Okay.
Speaker 1: Right? We had we're sitting on this land with our buildings, so we had twenty five years left on that land lease. So as soon as we started to resist and be defiant, not get into lockstep, they canceled that lease with twenty five years left.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. They evicted us from our buildings, took our money away Jeez. And basically took our facility from us, kicked us off the land, and expropriated those buildings, 8 and a half million dollars worth, add to the government. So the government walked in, started to operate our hospice with us gone, and provide euthanasia there.
Speaker 0: Jeez. That is absolutely outrageous and it does fit into this model we're seeing where they will shut down a bank account. They go against the lease that's been signed. What what good is the lease if it doesn't, you know, protect the property for the then you've invested that funding and money in there knowing you're gonna be there for a a period of time and all just because you're like, we're not gonna offer death as one of the options in our hospice.
Speaker 1: So you are now compelled. You see, and this kind of made, right, is a conquest and then compel. That's the dance. That's the modus operandi that they're using, and that's gonna be facilitated system, by the judiciary. Yeah.
Right? And all of ours, our court, our courts, and our judges are appointed in Canada, appointed by the government.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And so the government is controlling the whole thing. What's so what where is the media coming to this? Why is the media not pushing back? I mean, because I mean, here I mean, I know here we have pharmaceutical control of our media, so we'd be kind of screwed here, but you don't have that in Canada.
Speaker 1: No. We have government control of our media. The government gives the media billions of dollars. So, basically, it's, you know, I joke kind of not really. That is like Soviet style Pravda.
Yeah. That's our media.
Speaker 0: So none none of the television stations, they all get government funding? They all
Speaker 1: get money. But particularly the CBC.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: That's the state.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
We are experiencing “managed decline” this is not a coincidence. https://t.co/5FYUiRTW6z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada, The United Kingdom, and Australia are collapsing in exactly the same way. In Canada today, the average family can afford a home in their own country; homeownership has crashed 31% in a single generation, and foreign buyers now hold a significant stake in the Canadian property market, owning up to 13% of it. In Britain, the foundation of the middle class has been gutted, manufacturing jobs gone down 46% since 1990, and the highest tax burden since World War Two, with public services falling apart. In Australia, foreign corporations now control 80% of the country's critical resources, and housing prices have soared by 500 while wages crawled just 80%. This pattern is 'managed decline' and a test case for what's occurring throughout the Western world. The narrative compares this to Rome, where 'the real decline began internally through economic inequality' and 'reformers...eliminated.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Canada, The United Kingdom, and Australia, three nations spread across three different continents. But despite the distance, one alarming truth connects them all. They are collapsing in exactly the same way. And now the symptoms are impossible to ignore. Let's begin where the cracks are turning into a full blown Collapse, Canada.
In Canada today, the average family can afford a home in their own country. Homeownership has crashed 31% in a single generation. Compounding this issue, foreign buyers now hold a significant stake in the Canadian property market, owning up to 13% of it, more than at any point in history. But Canada isn't alone. In Britain, the foundation of the middle class has been gutted.
Manufacturing jobs gone, down 46% since 1990. And what did families get in return? The highest tax burden since World War two, all while public services fell apart. But this isn't just a British problem. Across the world, Australia is living the same nightmare, only deeper.
There, a quiet takeover is underway. Foreign corporations now control 80% of the country's critical resources, and the dream of homeownership, dead on arrival. Housing prices have soared by 500 while wages crawled just 80%. Young Australians are being priced out of their future in their own country, and this pattern across continents, across governments is no accident. This isn't just failure.
It's not bad luck. It's called managed decline, and it's happening by design. And if you're watching this thinking it can't happen here, you need to pay attention because these three nations are the test cases for what's already occurring throughout the Western world. Most people have no idea that the collapse of these three nations follows a familiar historical pattern. Every empire throughout history has fallen in a similar way from the inside out.
Take ancient Rome. Most think it fell to barbarian invasions, but Rome's real decline began internally through economic inequality that mirror what's happening across Canada, The UK, and Australia right now. By the second century AD, as Rome's expansion slowed, the wealthy elite created massive estates worked by imported labor. This destroyed local Roman farmers, the backbone of the republic, who were crushed by debt and displacement. Sound familiar?
It should. It's the exact same pattern unfolding today. When Roman reformers tried addressing these inequalities, they were eliminated. The elites chose to get rid of reformers rather than give up their power.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
The justice system is broken in Canada. Why is that? 🤬🇨🇦 https://t.co/4VfFd9irUk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Crash killed two children, ages seven and three, and their 68 year old grandmother. Now Mahak Deep Singh shouldn't have been driving at all. He falsified his logbook for one thing. For another, Canada never should have allowed him into the country. But in the end, he was sentenced to just five years in prison. Probably won't even be deported. Back in 2018, Jeff Skirits failed to stop at a stop sign. He had dozens of recorded safety violations the days prior to the crash. And as punishment for destroying more than a dozen families and wiping out a small town's hockey team, killing everyone, he received a sentence of just eight years in prison, six months per death. For comparison, that's the same sentence that the government of Canada sought against the organizer of the nonviolent trucker convoy protesting COVID mandates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Crash killed two children, ages seven and three, and their 68 year old grandmother. Now Mahak Deep Singh shouldn't have been driving at all. He falsified his logbook for one thing. For another, Canada never should have allowed him into the country. But in the end, he was sentenced to just five years in prison.
Probably won't even be deported. For wiping out an entire family, you get a lighter sentence than what George Santos got. That's not surprising in Canada. Back in 2018, Jeff Skirits failed to stop at a stop sign. He had dozens of recorded safety violations the days prior to the crash.
Shouldn't have been on the roads either. And as punishment for destroying more than a dozen families and wiping out a small town's hockey team, killing everyone, he received a sentence of just eight years in prison, six months per death. For comparison, that's the same sentence that the government of Canada sought against the organizer of the nonviolent trucker convoy protesting COVID mandates. That's how far gone Canada is. Upsetting the government is treated as equally as bad as mass murder.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
Canada has been mismanaged or robbed for decades. And hard working Canadians have been paying the bill. https://t.co/lfgHaUzAPE
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
Unbelievable 🤦🏻♂️ https://t.co/JYo19yyExx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The CDC has an $11.5 billion budget, with almost $5 billion allocated to purchasing and promoting vaccines and only $20 million to studying vaccine safety. The CDC effectively functions as a vaccine company, owning 56 vaccine patents. Scientists at the FDA and CDC can receive up to $150,000 annually in royalties from vaccines they develop.
The former CDC director from 2002-2009, Julie Gerberding, who oversaw many vaccine studies later deemed unreliable, became president of Merck's vaccine division in 2010, with an estimated $2.5 million salary and stock options. After HHS licenses, recommends, and promotes vaccines, it defends against claims that vaccines cause harm. As the defendant in vaccine court cases, HHS has an incentive to suppress studies showing vaccine unsafety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CDC has an $11,500,000,000 budget. And look. Almost 5,000,000,000 of that is allocated to purchase and promote vaccines and only 20,000,000 to study vaccine safety. That pays for a couple of studies. CDC effectively is a vaccine company.
It owns 56 vaccine patents. The scientists who work for FDA and the CDC can receive royalties of a $150,000 a year on vaccines that they develop. So this is the last agency that ought to be regulating vaccines, and yet we are trusting this agency with the health of our children. Here's an example of the revolving door at CDC. The former CDC director from 2002 to 02/2009, when many of these vaccines were approved and many of these studies, these phony studies were being formulated was Julie Gerberding.
She oversaw numerous vaccine studies, many of which were recently deemed unreliable by IOM. And in 2010, she became, a year after leaving CDC, she was rewarded, let's say, with the presidency of Merck's vaccine division, which with an estimated 2,500,000.0 in annual salary and lucrative stock options. Here is another unspoken conflict within HHS. After HHS licenses, recommends and promotes vaccines with virtually no safety data, HHS is then statutorily required and vigorously defends against any claimant that vaccines cause harm. The vaccine act says in all proceedings brought by filing a petition in vaccine court, the secretary of HHS is named as the defendant.
So the HHS, because it's defending vaccine injury cases, has a built in incentive rather than studying vaccines for safety to kill any studies that may show that a vaccine is unsafe. And this isn't just theoretical. This actually happens in real life.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
The biggest fear the WEF has is non compliance. https://t.co/sRJ4uOx23A
Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum's biggest fear is that people will not comply and will fight for freedom by making individual decisions. Digital control is key to enforcing mandates and controlling lives.
The speaker claims that issues like carbon emissions and experimental injections are secondary to the desire to control people from the outside in. A digital process that restricts movement, behavior, and decisions with the click of a button would mean the end of individual autonomy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The biggest fear that the World Economic Forum has is that there are going to be people that will not comply. Their biggest fear is your fight for freedom. Their biggest fear is that you will make individual decisions for yourself and you will not follow their orders. So this digital stuff is absolutely key, because without it, they can't enforce anything. Without it, they can't mandate that you do something.
Without it, they can't control your life. So I don't care if you're talking about carbon emissions and what's safe and effective as far as they are concerned. I don't care if they're talking about an experimental injection, a series of injections, whatever they may be, and what's safe and effective as far as they're concerned. This is not about those individual things. This is about desire to control you from the outside in.
And if they have a digital process whereby they can restrict your movement, your behavior, and your decisions with the click of a button, you are done.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets
Always hiding the truth. Wild. https://t.co/BapcskmVOg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the media attacked them after they began reporting a story, leading to their firing. They cite the case of Isabella Ferrera, an independent journalist investigating Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte, who was found dead, with the media claiming suicide despite a friend's doubts. Another independent journalist, Natasha Ray, who has cancer, was sued by Brigitte Macron, not over the claim that Brigitte was born a biological male, but over errors when speaking to Amandin Roy, who was also sued for invasion of privacy. Xavier Poussard, the journalist who originally exposed the claim that Brigitte Macron was lying about her identity, has faced harassment, including financial audits and searches of his mother's home. Poussard has not been sued for defamation because his work has been thorough.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the hell is wrong with our media? What the hell is wrong with our media that when I began to try to report on the story, they came for me. They started pitting me as Adolf Hitler. They started canceling me, demands for me to get fired. I was fired.
It was in March that I reported of last year on the story, and it was in March that same exact year that I got fired from my former employer. And nonstop have been fighting the press since. And, guy, by the way, you should know that there is this strange case of what happens to every journalist who tries to touch the story. and foremost, Isabella Ferrera, I think I mentioned this on a past episode. She was one of the Jean Valais Jean Jean Gillais, the yellow vest people who began prodding into the story as an independent journalist happened upon some huge information pertaining to the relationship of Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte.
But then she was found dead. She was found dead floating in a river, and her friend said that she didn't kill herself. But the media said she most definitely did, that she must have slipped and fell after she took a lot of pills. So that kind of stuff happens, I guess. Then there is Natasha Ray, who the media has been lying on attempting to ruin her entire life.
She has cancer. She was an independent journalist. This is the one that, Brigitte Macron notoriously sued. And similarly to what they sent him a letter, was not over the substance of the claim that Brigitte Macron was born a biological male, but rather pertaining to errors of misspeak when she spoke to Amandin Roy who was similarly sued for invasion of privacy. Okay?
And then there's one man still left standing, and that is Xavier Poussard. Xavier Poussard is the person that I am so honored to introduce to you guys on Monday. He is the journalist who has been diligently working on this, whose work I am repeating, really. I feel blessed that he even selected me to be able to bring this to the public, that he trusts me with this story. Xavier Poussard has been working on this for eight years and has given up everything, including his home country of residence because, well, how did they come after Xavier Poussard?
They looked into his finances, found who was funding his publication, and decided that it would be a really good time to go through a two year audit. One of the government's preferred ways of harassing someone is getting the IRS out there and finding the crime in any way possible. And so Xavier Poussard was dropped from the people that were investing in him. He had to move his family. His mother's house was searched just to scare them and to intimidate them and to let them know that they are watching them.
And to this day, Xavier Poussard, the man who originally dropped the six part series exposing the fact that Brigitte Macron was lying about her identity has never been sued for defamation because his work has been thorough.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Canadian government imports millions of doses of the COVID-19 vaccine before approving it, despite the law prohibiting the import of unapproved drugs. How are they exempt from this law?
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
In Canada, it is illegal to import a drug intended for human use, that has not been approved by Health Canada for human use. How is it that the Canadian Government can exempt themselves from this law when importing millions of doses of the COVID-19 vaccine while waiting for themselves to approve the shots?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises concerns about the government of Canada purchasing and importing COVID-19 vaccines before they are approved by Health Canada. They highlight the conflict of interest in the government approving a drug they have already bought and distributed. The speaker suggests that a third party should have been responsible for the approval process to avoid this conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We couldn't import a drug and have it sit and wait in our warehouse waiting for it to be approved, that's illegal. You cannot import a drug for human use that is not approved by Health Canada for human use, but here we have the government of Canada purchasing and importing COVID nineteen vaccine, so they exempted themselves from that law. So, Just think about the conflict of interest here. So the government of Canada, I mean, 100 of 1,000,000, 1,000,000,000 of dollars, how much did they spend on these vaccines? Like, remember they just bought nosebleed number of doses for everyone, so they import the vaccine, They distribute the vaccine while they're waiting for themselves to approve the vaccine and while they're public messaging this is our only solution.
This is our only way out. They were in such how could the government of Canada have been left then tasked with approving a drug they've already purchased, they've already promised, they've already distributed and all this public messaging that we're going to deliver. Like, In the very least, some third party should have been tasked then with that responsibility on behalf of the minister that that was not already in a conflict of interest.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
Wow. 👇 https://t.co/gQh9QDODWi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Researchers are focusing on finding agents that can effectively kill cancer stem cells, which are resistant to standard treatments. Many cancer drugs shrink tumors but fail to eliminate the stem cells, which can make them more aggressive. A drug called Exovar is being clinically tested to target cancer stem cells, while curcumin, found in turmeric, has also shown promise. However, the cost of Exovar is significantly higher compared to curcumin, which is a more affordable and natural alternative. Other food items like resveratrol, genistein, sulforaphane, and EGCG have also been found to kill cancer stem cells. Despite this knowledge, conventional oncologists often overlook these options due to societal pressure and lack of awareness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Agents and items that kill cancer stem cells. This is very important.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Very, very important. Cancer stem cells, you know, colon cancer, the at the base of the crypt is a normal stem cell, normally speaking. And if those cancer if those normal stem cells become malignant for whatever reason, then you have then you're almost certainly dealing with a cancer stem cell. Cancer stem cell is highly resistant to treatment, to key to standard treatment. So there are big drug companies involved in trials, clinical trials of agents to try to get FDA approval to kill for to the agent to kill cancer stem cells.
So I was looking at a list, a paper that contain a list of these agents. At the top
Speaker 1: Right before the list. Before you say the list, I I wanna just establish something for folks that don't understand why this matters. It's because many, many cancer drugs and treatments will shrink a tumor, but they don't kill the cancer stem cells, Which are only, you know, less than 10% of a tumor, sometimes they're only 1% of a tumor. And and so it looks like, woah, this treatment totally shrunk my tumor by 90%. Like, wow, it's working.
Let's go to Chili's and celebrate, you know, happy hour. And The reality is is like, no. You those stem cells are now more aggressive. They're pissed off and they're and they're resistant, and they're gonna come raging Back because the treatment not only didn't kill them, but made them more aggressive. Right?
So the the the whole point is, like, you gotta kill the stem cells.
Speaker 0: Right. And drug companies have been racking their collective brains trying to come up with drugs to kill cancer stem cells. So Here's the funny thing. I was looking at this list yesterday of drugs, candidate drugs, substances to kill cancer stem cells. At top of the list was a drug called Exovar.
That interested me because I didn't I I didn't know but most of these other drugs are just in development. Nexovar is actually an approved drug for certain kinds of cancer now being clinical trial to kill specifically to kill cancer stem cells. Right? The bottom of the list was Curcumin, the yellow coloring natural coloring agent in turmeric, right? So the cost of of a good quality, curcumin, in a in what probably would be an effective amount would be about 60¢ a day.
Right? Literally. Right? To get Yeah. You know, in that realm.
Or if you took it for a year, $250. Look this up. And I look you can look this up at drugs.com or any other website. The cost of Nexovar, currently for the for its indications is over $20,000 a month. If you took that simple math if you took that for a year, you're looking at 250 $1,000 as opposed to $250.
That's sort of the gulf between the generic natural non toxic, you know, stuff that you could buy at a health food store or a food co op versus something that you only can get through the machinery of big pharma pumping this out. And then, of course, you know, with all the all the buzz around, now we found something to kill cancer stem cells, blah blah blah. But they've known for 10 years that curcumin and other natural agents kill cancer stem cells. They're actually the only thing pretty much they do. If you There are probably about 20 different items that kill cancer stem cells that are known in the laboratory and somewhat also in the clinic.
And of those, 10 of them are foods, food items, food derivatives.
Speaker 1: So why
Speaker 0: don't we
Speaker 1: What else?
Speaker 0: So resveratrol from red grape skins. Yep. Genistein from soybeans. Sulforaphane from broccoli and broccoli sprouts. I mentioned turmeric from cur from curcumin from turmeric, and EGCG from green tea.
Speaker 1: From black seed?
Speaker 0: Yeah. But the big five are the in terms of the certainly the quantity of research. There's about 10,000 journal articles that cover those those big five.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And then there are other minor ones like, maybe they're not so minor, but they're not as well researched. Like for instance, cinnamon, cardamom, pepper, some and by the way, how interesting isn't it that those things are sort of like traditional things in golden milk, in the the Ayurvedic formula and also you could put those in smoothies. You know there's a lot you can do with those, whether you take them as foods, you take them as supplement. But there's, aside from the holistically oriented doctors who are not that not that common in the cancer field or naturopathic oncologists. Who among, you know, whole of your your viewers was ever told this by a conventional oncologist.
They're they are either legally unaware.
Speaker 1: 0. The number is 0.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. And then there were a few, you know, heroes who are oncologists or doctors mainly treating cancer who are aware of this. But you know, what happens is if you push too hard, if you're an oncologist and you push too hard on this, you get a reputation as a weirdo. You get a reputation not as a sound person who was gonna move up the ranks of American Society For Clinical Oncology and of your department, but as, like, people are looking at you askance, like what's wrong with with that guy or that woman that they're suddenly so interested in garlic or ginger or green tea. And we have testimony from 2 top doctors in England who said that what they're they're big enthusiasts for ginger.
Ginger is another one that's that kills cancer stem cell. But they they are aware of the fact that, you know, there's it's embarrassing. It's a deep embarrassment to to them and to their colleagues if they admit this this sort of fascination with something that's not mainstream.
reSee.it AI Summary
The World Bank and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are collaborating on the Digital ID initiative. Additionally, the 50-in-5 campaign aims to assist 50 countries in developing and expanding their digital public infrastructure by 2028.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
Meanwhile, the World Bank Group with the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation are working hard to implement the Digital ID 50-in-5 is a country led advocacy campaign. By 2028, the 50-in-5 campaign will have helped 50 countries design, launch, and scale components of their digital public infrastructure. FU Bill & Melinda. 🖕
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our foundation supports 50 in 5, a collaboration with the World Bank and other partners. This initiative aims to provide country leaders with the necessary tools and expertise to modernize ID and civil registration systems. By 2028, over 500 million people will have a digital identity, enabling easier access to employment, education, financial services, healthcare, and government programs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So now we must ensure country leaders have the tools and expertise they need to make this work that's why our foundation is proud to support 50 in 5 alongside the World Bank and other partners it's an example of collaboration innovation and Smart investment, and it builds on the bank's identification for development initiative, which has been meeting the steady demand from countries to modernize ID and civil registration systems by 2028 more than 500,000,000 more people will have a digital identity that allows them to access employment and education opportunities more easily as well as financial services health care and government programs
reSee.it AI Summary
The German government has allegedly sent 3.8 billion euros to Bill Gates' foundation for "population control" and other initiatives. This funding, revealed through a parliamentary inquiry, has raised concerns about taxpayers unknowingly supporting depopulation schemes promoted by globalist organizations like the WEF and UN. Many question why Bill Gates has not faced legal consequences for his involvement. Source: The People's Voice.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
The German Government Has Been Caught Funnelling Billions Of Dollars In Taxpayer Money To Bill Gates To Help Them Depopulate The Country Of “Undesirable Citizens” According to an official parliamentary inquiry, the German government sent 3.8 billion euros ($4.15 billion) to Bill Gates’ foundation to fund “population control” and other WEF schemes in Germany. The documents show German taxpayers have unknowingly handed over billions of dollars to pay for depopulation schemes being pushed by globalist organizations such as the WEF and UN. Why isn't this POS in jail? https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/germany-caught-funnelling-billions-to-bill-gates-to-depopulate-country-of-undesirable-citizens/
Germany Caught Funnelling Billions to Bill Gates To Depopulate Country of ‘Undesirable Citizens’ - The People's Voice
The German government has been caught funnelling billions of dollars in taxpayer money to Bill Gates to help them depopulate the country of "undesirable citizens."
thepeoplesvoice.tv
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
💣 A WAKE UP CALL.......THE CONSEQUENCES OF OUR CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS SELLING OUT TO THE UN. Listen up. 🍁🎯 Way to go Citizens of Aurora, Ontario. Best thing I've heard in a long time. https://t.co/ESmqrvweE7
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1992, Canada joined the United Nations and signed on to UN Agenda 21, leading to the restructuring of Canadian mayors and municipalities. This resulted in foreign-based NGOs, such as the World Economic Forum and World Health Organization, governing countries like Canada. The International Council on Local and Environmental Issues (ICLEI) became a key consultant for implementing the global agenda. The concept of "15-minute smart cities" is seen as a cover for data collection and surveillance, allowing for maximum control and efficiency. It is believed to be a gateway to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and digital passports, which can restrict movement and control access to essential services. The citizens of Aurora are seeking a meaningful dialogue with their elected council members to address these concerns and return to transparent municipal governance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening. Restructuring of Canadian Mayors and municipalities under auspices of the United Nations began in 1992. PM Mulrooney signed Canada on to UN Agenda 21. Canada thus became a UN member nation state. 178 countries signed on lured by the promise of big money to go green.
By 2,000 countries including Canada were being governed by directions of the UN seven G20 World Economic Forum and World Health Organization to name some. Every organization named is a foreign based NGO, nongovernmental organization and every member of all these organizations is unelected. Parliamentary procedures for law changes weren't followed. In 1994, a municipal primer was issued to all local towns outlining how they were to restructure their governments. Though the municipal primer was a non binding agreement, all towns adopted Our public officials, the Mayor and councilors of that day were partnered with a private corporation, the Corporation of the Town of Aurora who appointed a Chief Administrative Officer who helped implement the global agenda instead of a local one.
The International Council on Local and Environmental Issues, ICLEI, became the main source of consultation to push and fund the global agenda. We remind you that the World Economic Forum and the United Nations signed a strategic partnership framework in 2019 to jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. This is the same World Economic Forum whose chairman Klaus Schwab auspices of the Canadian Council of Commerce, which is the same Klaus Schwab who referring to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau auspices we have penetrated more than half of his cabinet. We would ask Mayor Marrakis and the councilors why should the citizens of Aurora bow down to the intrusive dictates of an dictates of an unelected foreign entity. The fact is we should not and we will not.
What you asked does any of this have to do with 15 minute smart cities? Absolutely everything, SMART, s for surveillance, m for monitoring, a for analysis, r for reporting, and t for technology. Technology news editor, Patrick Wood, 50 years of experience and expertise on technocracy wrote, the 15 minute city is a cover for data collection bonanza for technocrats who design and operate them. Cities designed for maximum efficiency always reveal technocrat thinking that efficiency itself is the goal. Maximum surveillance allows for maximum control to achieve even more efficiency.
At its very root, this mechanistic thinking is anti human. The 15 minute city narrative seeks to fool you in the guise of saving the planet, keeping you safe and delivering convenience. It's actually the gateway to digital auspices of CBDCs, central bank digital currencies. CBDCs allow bankers and or governments to freeze your bank account because you happen to peacefully ausively and lawfully protest and express your disagreement with government policy. And one remember the truckers convoy in Ottawa, February 22 when the government of Canada invoked the Emergencies Act and froze the private bank accounts of law abiding citizens.
15 minute cities are wolves in sheep's clothing. Don't believe the countless stories spewing forth from the 20 fourseven basis from the elitist captured mainstream media all claiming to have your best interest at heart. We have been burned too many times. In reality, 20 fourseven surveillance through the Internet of Things inside your home, 5 gs and LED streetlights outside, monitoring and tracking and recording everything implementation of exclusion zones and geofencing to restrict movement and travel ability to control haver behaviors through military directed energy technologies, property and car ownership to be outlawed, evictions from farms and rural areas to order gather people into cities, auspice of digital passports being promulgated by the UN, World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization are in the final stages of planning and implementation. They are tied to social credit score which is determined by compliance to government directives.
These passports control all access in all aspects of life. Digital currency is being implemented to end the cash and monitor all your spending. Your digital currency will be turned off or on depending on your compliance score. UBI Universal Basic Income is a state controlled allowance forcing compliance by restricting access to food, money, services and education. All of the above will enable climate lockdowns to be implemented easily, arbitrarily and indefinitely.
The real agenda of 15 minute smart cities to monitor and control everyone and everything. In summary, in the coming days, council will receive an electronic info packet which will contain the text of this delegation and other items. We, the citizens of Aurora, wish to enter into a meaningful, respectful dialogue with our elected members of council on this complex important issue. A key framework of that dialogue is a list of questions posed to counsel. Can counsel explicitly guarantee that citizens will remain free to travel as is their right under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Auspices can guarantee not to restrict access to essential services, medical care, bank accounts, government pensions, utilities. Most importantly, we, the citizens of Aurora, need to have the conversation with council about exiting their nonbinding agreement auspice of the Private for profit entity known as the Corporation of the Town of Aurora. We need to turn back the page to a simpler time when open, transparent municipal government serving its citizens and working in their best interests rule the day. Office. We are your equal partners on this journey.
Thank you.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
Look closely at the invaders. All have the same clothes/shoes None of them paid for their 'boat trip' passage to Europe. It's all financed directly by the U.N via the NGOs
reSee.it AI Summary
To fix our country:
1. Remove WEF and its affiliates.
2. Prosecute Trudeau for treason.
3. Establish transparent governance, firing wrongdoers.
4. Eliminate corruption in WHO.
5. Exit corrupt UN and NATO.
-TheoFleury14's thoughts.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
It's so simple to fix this broken country. 🇨🇦 #1. We rid ourselves of the WEF and anyone associated with it. #2. We jail Trudeau for treason. #3. We clean house and introduce a transparent representation of the people. Anyone caught doing anything wrong, fired. No second chances. #4 Rid Canada of the corrupt WHO #5. Get Canada out of the corrupt UN and NATO.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
@TheoFleury14 thoughts?
reSee.it AI Summary
New data from the Canadian government reveals that triple-vaccinated Canadians are experiencing Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS) at a rate of 74%. Comparatively, double-vaccinated individuals have lost an average of 74% of their immune system capability, while triple-vaccinated individuals have lost 73%. This highlights the impact of vaccines on immune system functionality. [Link to source]
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
Official data released by Canada’s government shows that 74% of triple-vaxxed Canadians now have Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS). Compared to the natural immune system of their unvaccinated counterparts, the data reveals that the double-vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 74% of their immune system capability. The triple-vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 73% of their immune system capability. https://newsaddicts.com/74-triple-vaxxed-canadians-have-vaids-government-data-shows/
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
BOOM! 15 Minute Cities speech at a recent city council meeting in Aurora, Ontario. He touches on ALL urgent topics, even CBDC! Joel Sussmann speaking. Must watch!!!
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1992, the restructuring of Canadian mayors in New South Wales began under the United Nations. The concept of the 15-minute city is seen as a way for technocrats to collect data and design efficient cities. However, this focus on efficiency raises concerns about surveillance and control. The ability to easily implement and prolong lockdowns is a potential consequence. Questions are raised about citizens' rights to travel freely and access essential services without restrictions. Overall, there is an agenda to monitor and control cities, which prompts important questions for city councils. In summary, the message is about the potential implications of the 15-minute city concept.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening. Restructuring the Canadian mayor in New South Wales under the auspices of the United Nations began in 1992. The unborn unwieldy theaters of experience and expertise on technocracy wrote. The 15 minute city is a cover for data collection and as for technocrats to design and operate them. Cities designed for maximum efficiency always reveal technocrats briefing.
Cities deciding for maximum efficiency always reveal sector theft aging, that efficiency itself is the goal. Maximum surveillance allows for maximum control all of the above will enable fire lockdowns to be implemented easily, arbitrarily and indefinitely. There is agenda of 15 minutes for our cities to monitor and control a key framework of that dialogue is a list of questions posed to council. Can council explicitly guarantee that citizens will agree free to travel as they're right under the Charter or Rights Agreement. Can counts guarantee not to restrict access to essential services, medical care bank accounts, government pension, utilities?
Speaker 1: Go where you wanna go. Do what you wanna do. Be where you wanna be
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
The Canadian government has been flying young men from China right here into our own country. WTF?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Around 35,000 people were lost in the chain of communication within the armed forces and veterans community, which is a significant blow to our small military. The Canadian military is currently unable to defend our own country, let alone participate in NATO conflicts. During the 20-year Afghanistan war, we lost around 53 people, while self-inflicted casualties caused by our own actions have reached 3,000 to 4,000. This has severely weakened our military, which should ideally have around 100,000 personnel but currently only has about 40,000. The damage inflicted on our Canadian Armed Forces is far greater than that of Afghanistan, and a comparable hit hasn't been seen since World War II.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The chain of communication in the armed forces and veterans community, I would estimate anywhere between 35,000 people were lost. And when you've got a military as small as ours, we're talking a huge hit. If you were a business and you lost 10% to 15% of your people in one fell swoop, you'd be out of business. And truthfully, in my opinion, The Canadian military right now is out of business. We couldn't mount a defense of our own country, let alone ten people to NATO involved conflict right now.
Speaker 1: Well, I want to try to put that in perspective from my own understanding. So, you believe that the numbers were somewhere between 3,000 4,000 members, which is about 10% of the operational force. Do you have any idea how many people we lost out of operational readiness when we Participated in the Afghanistan war for 20 years?
Speaker 0: I believe it was 53 Death in Afghanistan?
Speaker 1: So, let me understand that. So, after 20 years or so of operations, Military operations in Afghanistan against unidentified foreign enemy, we lost 60 or so, 57 7 people in 10, 20 years. And then, we self inflicted 3000 to 4000 essentially operational casualties To our military ourselves?
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes, we decimated our military with this. We are already undermanned badly. We could have close to 100,000 regular force and reserve force people. That's about the size of the military that Canada says that it needs.
And from speaking to sources, we're down to about 40,000 people right now.
Speaker 1: So our self inflicted damage to our Canadian Armed Forces was more than Afghanistan?
Speaker 0: Way more, 5,000 more.
Speaker 1: I want to, I can't imagine you know this answer. How far back In our military past, do we have to go before we find a comparable hit on our Canadian Armed Forces' operational personnel?
Speaker 0: I'd guess World War II.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
Klaus Schwab's lead adviser Yuval Noah Harari: "This is the end of human history. Not the end of history, but the end of a history dominated by humanity. The story will go on, but someone else will control it. How is this man not in a mental asylum?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Human history is coming to an end as we face the rise of intelligent alien agents. If humanity is united against this common threat, we may have a chance to contain them. However, if we are divided and engaged in an arms race, it will be nearly impossible to control this alien intelligence. It's like an alien invasion, but instead of spaceships from another planet, these intelligent beings are emerging from laboratories. Unlike atom bombs or printing presses, these entities have the potential for agency and may even surpass our intelligence. Preventing them from developing this agency is extremely difficult. In the future, Earth could be populated or even dominated by non-organic entities with no emotions, thanks to the vast potential of AI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the end of human history. Not the end of history, the end of human dominated history. History will continue with somebody else in control. If it was a question of humankind versus a common threat of these new intelligent alien agents here on Earth, then yes, I think that there are ways we can contain them. But if the humans are divided among themselves and are in an arms race, then it becomes almost impossible to contain this alien intelligence.
And there is, I'm tending to think of it more in terms of really an alien invasion. That like somebody coming and telling us that, you know, there is a fleet, an alien fleet of spaceships coming from planet Zircon or whatever with highly intelligent beings. They'll be here in 5 years and take over the planet. Maybe they'll be nice. Maybe they'll solve cancer and climate change, but we are not sure.
This is what we are facing except that the aliens are not coming in spaceships from planet Zircon. They are coming from the laboratory. Atom bombs didn't have a potential for agency. Printing presence did not have a potential for agency. This thing, again, unless we contain it and the product of content is very difficult because potentially they'll be more intelligent than us.
How do you prevent something more intelligent than you from developing the agency it has. I'm not saying it's impossible. I'm just saying it's very, very difficult. Maybe in a couple of decades, earth will be populated or even dominated by entities that are not organic, that they don't breathe, they don't have emotions. Like, the potential of AI It's much, much bigger than any historical revolution.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has urged governments to build COVID concentration camps worldwide to jail citizens who refuse to go along with the official narrative. This is a declaration of war! https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/wef-calls-for-covid-concentration-camps-to-jail-refuseniks-who-question-official-narrative/
WEF Calls for ‘COVID Concentration Camps’ To Jail Refuseniks Who Question Official Narrative - The People's Voice
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has urged governments to build COVID concentration camps worldwide to jail citizens who refuse to go along with the official narrative.
thepeoplesvoice.tv
reSee.it AI Summary
Residents in North Shuswaps are under strict shelter-in-place orders due to ongoing government arson attacks. Locals who stayed behind to protect their homes are now trapped, as all roads are blocked by police. Even those who returned by boat are being prevented from leaving their properties. This has left residents isolated, with limited access to essential resources like food, water, and fuel.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
North Shuswap’s Police State… Shelter in place orders now being enforced for locals of Lee Creek, Scotch Creek, Celista, Magna Bay and Anglemont who stayed behind to protect their homes and properties from the government arson attacks. Those who returned to their property by boat, as all roads have been blocked, and manned now by local police or officers imported from Vancouver. RCMP and Conservation Officers are parked on drive ways and at gates preventing residents from leaving their properties – Unable now to help each other and have virtually no access to food, water or fuel.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 mentions having friends with trucks nearby to pick up some equipment. Speaker 1 agrees and says they need the equipment for the car. Speaker 0 expresses concern about wasting time and not wanting to be rude. Speaker 1 reassures Speaker 0 and suggests discussing the situation. Speaker 0 asks if they can walk across a bridge and questions the possibility of being arrested. Speaker 1 says they can't walk across and explains that someone had previously said it was allowed. Speaker 0 expresses frustration about wasting resources. Speaker 1 acknowledges the situation and says it is just the way it is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have friends of trucks that that are right here in Scott Street. They can come pick up this equipment. I got some guys coming down. Just to
Speaker 1: pick up the pump because we need them for the car.
Speaker 0: Like, otherwise, we're wasting our time to get. And I don't I don't wanna be an asshole
Speaker 1: or nothing. I'm doing I know you're not you're not you're not at all. Just tell them why Tell them how to tell them you give it give us a minute to Okay? And we'll we'll discuss I'll stop them at that side and make sure they turn it off.
Speaker 0: And, I also just wanna know, so if I walk across right now
Speaker 1: You can't.
Speaker 0: So So is I'm gonna be arrested if I go across that bridge? So when who just told me that I can walk? This guy the guy that was just there? Because it is on camera. 1 of 1 of you just said I can walk across.
I think it's that guy. You can. So I'm not literally cannot get over there. Why are we wasting these resources right now on this? This is
Speaker 1: That's That's just the way
Speaker 0: it is. Yeah. Okay.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets 📣
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, dispels the myth perpetuated by climate totalitarians that we are in a "climate emergency": "There is zero evidence that a CO2 increase in the atmosphere is the cause of rising temperature. None whatsoever."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many well-known individuals claim that we are in a climate emergency, but there is disagreement. One person argues that the world has been warming for centuries, even before the use of fossil fuels. They state that there is no evidence linking CO2 increase to rising temperatures, as temperatures were already increasing. They mention a graph from central England, which shows a steady rise of just over 1 degree Celsius in 320 years, suggesting that the current rate of increase is not unprecedented. They also highlight a period from the late 1600s to early 1700s when temperatures rose even faster.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is an awful lot of well known people who appear to have credentials saying that we are in a climate emergency, which we are, aren't we?
Speaker 1: No. We are not in a climate emergency. These people want us to think that the world began in 18/50 when we started using fossil fuels. But for 150 years before that it was also warming. There is zero evidence The CO2 increase in the atmosphere is the cause of rising temperature.
None whatsoever, because it was already rising. And as I was about to say, during the 1st 150 years of rising out of 1700, there was a period of over 40 years Where the temperature increased more and faster than it has done since 1850, especially since 1950, when we were actually starting to put a significant amount more CO2 in the atmosphere post war. And today, it's exponential. There's a wonderful graph, it's in my book, which shows the temperature record in central England From 16/60 or so, when the first thermometer existed. So this is this is the longest Thermometer record of temperature in the world because they were invented in England.
And so that shows A very steady continuous rise in temperature of a little over 1 degree Celsius in 320 years. It's not a big deal. They keep saying it's never gone this fast. It's never risen this fast. That is a lie.
It has risen this fast many times in the even recent past, especially from about 16/90 to about 17/30.