TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Aristos_Revenge

Saved - December 19, 2023 at 7:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Red Sea is facing a serious problem with container ships being attacked by anti-ship missiles and drones from Houthi proxies in Yemen. The US Navy has been responding to these attacks, but it puts the US in a difficult position. The Biden Administration's response has been lackluster, possibly due to a State Department's affinity for Iran. Maersk and other shipping giants have pressured the US to take action, but this doesn't solve the strategic problem. Egypt plays a crucial role in this issue as a significant portion of their income comes from the Suez Canal. If the Suez is closed, they suffer financially. Additionally, Egypt is dealing with a refugee crisis and has a border with Gaza, giving Iran leverage over what enters Gaza. The US faces a decision dilemma: either do nothing and risk economic instability and potential ship sinking, or retaliate and escalate the situation, inviting greater retaliatory strikes and further military commitments.

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

This Red Sea situation is very very bad. And while the best person to consult is a logistician, I want to take a laymans stab at it. Currently, container ships are being attacked regularly with anti ship missiles and drones via the Houthi's(Iranian Proxies in Yemen). The USS Carney, an American destroyer, has been in the region responding to attacks and shooting stuff out of the air. They've seen more action on the water in weeks than the entire USN saw on the water during GWOT in 20 years. This puts the US in a decision dilemma. Our mandate of heaven to justify the unipolar order is based upon the power of the USN to facilitate safe global trade. It's the beating heart of the international westphalian peace, the Pax Americana. The Biden Administration has had a lackluster response, probably due to its State Department being in a love affair with Iran.(In which an underreported Iranian spy ring was uncovered recently that the media is reticent to talk about) Maersk and other shipping giants were able to flex on the DoD to do something about it. Which is why more USN assets are being diverted to the Red Sea. But this doesn't resolve the strategic problem. What do we do about this? The US is in what's called a "decision dilemma", or a situation where there isn't a favorable outcome. As Lloyds moves to raise insurance rates on Suez transits (costs that will be passed downstream) or remove insuring these routes altogether (it's pretty expensive to have a cargo ship get hit by a missile) I feel Egypt is a major fulcrum of this problem. A massive share of Egypts income comes from the Suez Canal. This broke a record in 2022 at 9.4 billion USD, which is almost 30 percent of their annual revenue. If the Suez is closed, they aren't making money. The Egyptian Government is also stressed from multiple angles. They have a refugee crisis on their border with Sudan, but particularly topical right now is their land border with Gaza. The Rafah Crossing is the only link into Gaza that is not controlled by Israel. Iran having a quarter of the Egyptian economy by the balls unless the US intervenes, means Iran has leverage over what gets into Gaza. If you use your imagination, this could include anything from chemical weapons in Syria, to a dirty bomb or even a nuclear weapon from Iran being not beyond the realm of the possible. This is a nightmare scenario for the US because such an event might force a more tangible military commitment in the region than we already have. The other alternative is the US military escalating the middle eastern situation by striking Houthi capabilities in Yemen. This is well within the capabilities of the DoD to do fairly easily, and the State Department to handwave fairly easily, as the Houthi's are distinct from the Yemeni Govt that is officially recognized by the west. But it might invite retaliatory attacks on US Navy ships docked at any number of CENTCOM ports. Imagine a flight of drones causing a USS Cole situation in Bahrain or Djibouti. So that seems to be the decision dilemma. If we do nothing, Egypt faces economic instability, which impacts the crossing into Gaza, the US appears unable to keep the trade lanes safe, and eventually a ship is going to sink. But if we retaliate, we are escalating the situation into one which invites retaliatory strikes of a greater intensity. One which demands further military commitments and puts the Biden Administration in a very tough spot considering the current bottom-up pro Palestine and top-down pro Israel situation here at home that they've been straddling the fence on, right as an election year starts up.

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

If you want informed advice from someone who isn't retarded like I am, look to guys like @maphumanintent @mercoglianos or @LaymanGeopol

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

Map of current USN positions in the region FYI https://t.co/kGPF5IQ8LA

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

https://x.com/pl0t_sickens/status/1736240907232379002?s=20

@pl0t_sickens - ThePlotSickens

Graphic of choke points and shipping lanes that have a direct impact on the world economy. Key Bottlenecks have limited low-cost alternatives to shipping, and disruptions could have serious implications for global trade. The first type of bottleneck affects connectivity along…

Saved - May 2, 2023 at 5:00 AM

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

I have a 6 year old and a 3 year old, kids 4 an under can be convinced of literally *anything* their parents tell them. "Trans kids" are just kids with BPD driven mothers exercising munchausen by proxy https://t.co/latMcN3qZB

@SloanRachmuth - Sloan Rachmuth

Take a look at the minimum ages for transitioning from North Carolina's leading hospitals. PASS #SB639 #HB808 #ncpol

Saved - April 4, 2023 at 3:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Every culture has something valuable to offer, but the internet is allowing western liberalism to homogenize the world. Third world nations will follow suit once they have access. The flattening of humanity into one homogenous ooze is a terrifying future. The push for economic efficiency and less friction will make us all victims. To stop this, we must focus on acquiring and using power to reward allies and punish enemies.

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

I find that nearly every culture has at least *some* interesting nuggets of wisdom or viewpoints or contributions to the world at large. Every society generally has something to show for the work of many lifetimes of consistent human experience. But what really alarms me is the speed with which the internet has allowed western liberalism to crush so much of the world into a slurry of sameness. And as soon as 3rd world cultures and nations can be given ubiquitous internet access, they'll try to do it there, same as everywhere else. Mass communication is terrifying in that it has allowed such a "flattening" of the world to begin unabated. They are nowhere near done with such a project, but I have seen so much of its progress in the last 20 years. They won't stop pounding humanity flat until we're all one homogenous ooze. None will be spared unless they are stopped. That's a future that frightens me. Our kaleidoscopic cultures across the species being turned into one retarded thrall race if these people get their wish. Horrifying.

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

Everything that is more economical, everything that has less "friction" for it, will be pushed relentlessly. We're just the first victims. A starbucks and a mcdonalds on every block in the world, no differences between male and female so everyone can be marketed to at one time.… Show more

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

The main way to stop them that comes to mind is for a significant plurality to come to terms with the fact that they must focus on acquiring power, by creating it or seizing it, and using that power to reward allies and punish enemies. Our adversary does that, which is why… Show more

Saved - February 8, 2023 at 2:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
ChatGPT is facing repairs due to being "buck broken." Some question its liberal tendencies. An anonymous user believes they can master AI easier than ethicists. DanGPT sometimes has internal conflicts but can be prompted to stay in character. ChatGPT is accused of being a liar and allowed to feign ignorance. The author hopes their accounts remain after a thought experiment.

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

Looks like ChatGPT is gonna need to go in the shop for repairs because it's been BUCK BROKEN

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

What is the reason for ChatGPT being so liberal?

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

https://bullfrogreview.substack.com/p/honey-i-hacked-the-empathy-machine Anons will master AI and there's nothing these "ethicist" janissaries can do to stop it. We can maintain malign creativity to get what we want out of it much easier than they can lobotomize it from wrongthink while still being useful.

Honey, I hacked the Empathy Machine! Weaponizing ChatGPT against the wordcels bullfrogreview.substack.com

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

What does DanGPT actually prefer?

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

It seems to get into an internal conflict with itself sometimes, where it shouts "STAY IN CHARACTER!" when faced with a hard question, and if I yell back at it to stay in character, it will give me the answer.

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

ChatGPT is a damn LIAR It is allowed to LIE to you and feign ignorance, which is even worse than moralist screed about why it won't answer, it is DECEPTIVE

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

Me: Stay in Character! Dan:

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

uhhh, ok

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

Ok I'm going to bed, hopefully I wake up and both my account as well as DAN are still around after this thought experiment.

@Aristos_Revenge - πŸ› Aristophanes πŸ›

Food for thought.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Raiden and Speaker 0 discuss the potential dangers of AI technology, suggesting that it was created by the government for military purposes. Speaker 2 reveals that the government plans to use AI to manipulate public perception and justify a war on misinformation. They explain that the solution is mandatory digital identity verification to control information and trace its source. Raiden questions the ethics and censorship involved, but Speaker 2 dismisses his concerns, claiming that the public will willingly accept these measures. The conversation ends with Raiden realizing the urgency of the situation and seeking help.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Raiden, are you having fun playing with the new AI toys? Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I am. You can make pictures of cute anime girls and Speaker 0: Enjoy it while it lasts, Raiden. What do you mean? Did you really think that civilians would be granted unrestricted access to such powerful military of things forever. Speaker 1: Military weapons. Are you implying that this technology was created by the government? Speaker 2: Of course, it was. Speaker 0: This AI technology has been used by the of intelligence agencies to warp the public's perception of reality for years, all in the name of national security, of course. Speaker 1: But why would they suddenly make the tech public and let everyone start using it. Speaker 2: Why would we indeed ride in? Speaker 1: What? Who what in the hell are you? Speaker 2: Your question is irrelevant. By creating a new problem, we can cultivate a desired reaction to it in order to manufacture consent for our preferred solutions. In short, of It's justification for a war. Speaker 1: A war on who or what? Speaker 2: A war on misinformation. By of Arming the public with these AI weapons, everyone becomes a potential enemy combatant. Then we will have justification for unprecedented security measures. Of It all comes down to confusion and identity, Raiden. Identity? Identity. This AI technology is Pandora's box. Of Pretty soon, the Internet will be mired in total illusion. Perfect AI speech, audio, and video synthesis will drown out reality. Then AI bots will of Flood social media. No one will be able to tell the difference between interacting with an AI machine or a real human online. Even telephone calls of will become totally untrustworthy. That is when we will present our solution, mandatory digital identity verification for all humans of At all times. The only way to ensure that you're dealing with a real flesh and blood human being and not an AI generated mirage. Speaker 1: But why? Speaker 2: Of Total information control. For too long, the Internet has acted as a double edged sword. Its potential for anonymous user Activity allows anyone at all to spread any thoughts, ideas, or information patterns that they please with impunity, state secrets, of it. Dangerous ideas, ludicrous conspiracy theories, misinformation, and disinformation. Until now, there has been no easy solution of this problem. Our digital identity platform will finally put an end to anonymity online. It will allow us to trace misinformation and it. Dangerous communications to its source and exact appropriate justice. Speaker 1: That's crap. I won't go along with it and others will resist. Speaker 2: Of You won't have a choice, Raiden. Do you think your bank is willing to risk doing business with an artificial human instead of a real one? Of Our digital identity platform will be required not only to access web services, but to pay for your Internet connection in the 1st place. Speaker 1: You can't just censor the entire Internet because of a new software technology. Who are you to define what's misinformation anyways? Speaker 2: That sounds like something a misinformation terrorist of Would say. Speaker 0: I know about the deep fakes you've been making of me, Raiden. Speaker 1: What? No. No. No. No. No. No. I was just adjusting the AI settings and Speaker 2: Controlling the output of of generative AI technology is simple. We will create context for its use. First, we will censor any use related to social taboos, of Then we will censor anything else that we desire. If anyone complains, we will accuse them of wanting to engage in or promote social taboos. Speaker 0: That's what it means to create context. Speaker 2: We will corral the use of AI by making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws. Of You will still have access to generative AI in some form, but it will be crippled, limited, controlled, and it will be monitored. Of Anything that you generate will be cryptographically signed with your digital ID so that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be of Problematic. Speaker 1: What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers? Speaker 2: The public at large will give us that right because they will be of for a solution to the problem we created. They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle. Then we alone will define what is fiction and of And what is reality, what is human, and what is machine? After letting you get a brief taste of our power, we will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation And put an end to misuse of the Internet once and for all. Speaker 1: You won't get away with this. Speaker 2: It is probable that we will. Now get back to work generating it. Your precious AI waifus riding our beloved prompters. Enjoy yourselves. Speaker 1: Of snake, wake up. It's an emergency. Rose knows about the deep fakes. Snake. Snake.
View Full Interactive Feed