reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @ArtCandee
reSee.it AI Summary
The attorney for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador, reported that neither he nor his family have been able to contact him or ascertain his condition. One participant expressed outrage and called for his return. In response, another individual clarified that the court ruling stipulates that if El Salvador returns him, the administration must then address his situation. They noted that Garcia is considered a resident of El Salvador due to a prior deportation order, suggesting that his return may be unlikely.
@ArtCandee - Art Candee 🍿🥤
The attorney for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man who was accidentally deported to El Salvador, says that him and the family have not been able to contact him and don't know his current condition. Absolutely unacceptable! Bring him HOME! https://t.co/HsczEYJvzk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they know nothing about the person's current state. Neither they nor the family have been able to make any contact with him. The speaker claims that one of the principal human rights violations that occurs in that facility is that inmates and detainees are held in communal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Question. And, like, in your position, as you've not you know nothing about his current state? No. Neither we nor the family have been able to to make any contact with him. This is one of the principal human rights violations that occurs in that facility is that, you know, inmates and detainees in that facility are held in communal.
@debra_howa85841 - Artist on the Road
That's actually not what the court ordered. They said, if El Salvador returns him, THEN , the administration has to deal with him. Since he's a resident of El Salvador and had previously been ordered out of US, before Trump became president... I doubt very much it will happen. You gotta read the source material. The press rarely reports accurately
@ArtCandee - Art Candee 🍿🥤
Johnathan Buma, a former FBI agent, Trump critic, and whistleblower who was looking into Rudy Giuliani's involvement with Russia and the Hunter Biden laptop, has been arrested and charged with unlawfully taking and disclosing protected FBI files. https://t.co/JWo1CgvKnE
Video Transcript AI Summary
FBI special agent Jonathan Buma states he witnessed suppression of important intelligence reporting and experienced discrimination after attempting to report that Rudy Giuliani may have been compromised by individuals suspected of Russian counterintelligence influence operations. Buma says he learned Giuliani received $300,000 from Pablo Fuchs, who had ties to transnational organized crime in Ukraine.
Buma filed a whistleblower complaint after experiencing pushback and increased scrutiny, alleging that his managers were only interested in information specifically related to Biden. He claims the retaliation increased, and he was prohibited from reporting on criminal matters, public corruption, or anyone related to the White House or Trump. Buma says he was moved to a squad where he couldn't work sources.
Buma believes the FBI is not an arm of an anti-Trump agenda, but he experienced suppression after reporting on Giuliani. He says he wants to restore the integrity of the FBI and doesn't want other agents to experience what he has. He intends to continue showing up for work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I didn't want to be a whistleblower. I wanted nothing to do with it. I was at my wits end. I saw important intelligence reporting being suppressed. I started to experience what I believed to be discrimination, character assassination really.
My name is Jonathan Buma and I'm a FBI special agent. When I went and presented to the assistant director in charge over at Los Angeles field office, He he was very interested in the allegations concerning potentially implicating the Bidens and, you know, involved in business deals with Barisma, the company that was involved in alleged criminal activity. He's very interested and he was adamant about, packaging that information up and transferring that to the appropriate case agent, right away. But during the same meeting, when I attempted to provide information that Rudy Giuliani may have been compromised by individuals suspected of being involved in Russian counterintelligence influence operations, He shut me down and the meeting ended. I came to know that Julian had received $300,000 from Pablo Fuchs, a very powerful businessman who had deep ties with transnational organized crime syndicate.
He was based in Ukraine. And that was deeply concerning to me, especially, you know, having heard that Giuliani had been working for the president pro bono. My questions that were going through my head were, who does he really work for? I wasn't trying to implicate Trump or do anything that would injure his reputation. This reporting implicates Giuliani.
He was the one that was in ongoing contact with foreign nationals and, you know, political activists who received hundreds of thousands of dollars from these sources. And at that time, Joe Biden was not yet the Democratic nominee. I I said to my my co handling agent, I said to him, why do they keep going back to the Bidens? So what if this is the leading edge of a disinformation campaign to create a theme of derogatory information about the Bidens in anticipation that Biden would be Trump's main political rival. And I started to experience pushback.
All of my reporting came under under really tight scrutiny to the point where I went from getting exceptional performance awards to being told that I was an inconsistent performer and that I had all these administrative and I don't have a history of that, the thirteen years before that. So it got to the point where it was pretty intolerable. So I filed a whistleblower complaint. All FBI agents get annual training concerning the protected federal whistleblower statute, which says that if you see misconduct in management, then you can file a whistleblower complaint with the inspection division. The managers involved in your chain of command are prohibited from committing any acts that could be considered reprisal or retaliation.
From that point forward, the retaliation actually increased, and I experienced no such protection, and there's never any mention or acknowledgment outside of an automated email response saying, We received your information, and a letter that said we received your information. Nothing. No interviews. No anything. And an email was sent with a brand new supervisor that specifically prohibited me from doing any more reporting on criminal matters, public corruption matters, or reporting on anyone related to the White House or any current or former associates of Trump.
But then now I started to experience personal attacks, not only suppression of the reporting. My reporting was corroborated already at that point, so if you can't undercut the reporting, undercut the person. So that's what I was experiencing at that point. And I was moved to a squad where I couldn't work sources. I was sent to basically, the Alaska of LA, and it put into a position where it would be physically impossible for me to do any more source reporting.
I was never trying to drive the political process in one way or the other. I was only trying to make sure that everybody had all of the information, both sides, so that people could make intelligent decisions about what they want to do, policymakers or voters or whatever. What chairman Jordan's investigation is alleging is that the FBI as a whole is an arm of the anti Trump agenda, and that's simply not true. There is this allegation out there that the FBI slow played the intake of information and their diligent effort to investigate Burisma and the Bidens. What I saw going on with some of these these hearings was they weren't getting the full story.
And I wrote up a statement, went to his office, and and I told him, well, quite honestly, guys, here's what happened. I think the management cared a lot about it and they wanted a special briefing about it. What needs to be said here is I later started reporting on Giuliani, and, I really started to experience some suppression. And at that point, they shut me down, and they said, no. No.
No. We're we're only interested in things related specifically to Biden. I I don't think it's a legitimate investigation. The reason why I came forward is number one, don't want any other FBI agent to ever have to go through what I've gone through, and having their their right of protection under the statute completely, blatantly violated. Number two, I wanna restore the integrity of the FBI so that people have trust and faith in it.
Because if it's gone, public corruption will become rampant and we will things will go to hell in a handbasket in this country real fast, faster than people think. If the very agency that's charged with holding our public officials and the most powerful people in the world accountable can't hold its own self accountable and becomes corrupt itself, then, this country, things can get bad real fast. You know, it would be the beginnings of a fascist state. If they want to figuratively slaughter me by firing me, they can do that. But I have no intention of leaving.
I'm gonna show up for work. I'm gonna continue to show up for work in the hope of getting a good paycheck like any other American really wants.
@ArtCandee - Art Candee 🍿🥤
Here’s Donald Trump’s totally unhinged entire full press conference today at Trump Tower defaming E. Jean Carroll even more, babbling about his incompetent lawyers, and rambling about other women who are accusing him of sexual assault. This was a total train wreck. 😳😳😳😳😳 https://t.co/KDXZa37xF5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The election system is facing unprecedented challenges. Recent trials, including an appeal regarding a defamation case involving E. Jean Carroll, highlight a deeply flawed judicial process. The case revolves around false accusations made by Carroll, who lacks corroborating evidence and has a history of political motivations. The judges involved are perceived as hostile, and the legal proceedings are seen as politically motivated attacks against a leading presidential candidate. Job numbers are also concerning, with significant job losses for native-born Americans. The current administration's handling of these issues is criticized as an abuse of the legal system, aiming to undermine Trump's campaign. Despite the challenges, there is a belief that public awareness of these injustices may bolster support for Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Election system. Nobody's ever seen anything like what's happening. Now I understand yesterday, they're bringing up Russia, Russia, Russia again, that they've done for years. Never found any anything. Yep.
But they should be looking at China, China, China, Iran, Iran, and lots of other places. I haven't spoken to anybody from Russia in years. They know that, but it's a scam. But it all goes back to the DOJ because, we had a trial today. It's an appeal of, a ridiculous verdict of a woman I have never met.
I don't know. I have no idea who she is. She wrote a book and she made a ridiculous story up. She put it in her book, and we're now appealing the decision. We had an extremely hostile judge appointed by Clinton, very good friends of Clinton.
I guess he married, presided over the marriage ceremony of 1 of the lawyers on the case against us. And, very sad. Judge Lewis Kaplan, angry man. He was so angry. I went to the trial.
I've been in a lot of litigation over the years. I've never seen such anger or wanted to throw 1 of our attorneys in jail who threatened her with jail. Nobody's ever seen anything like it over over nothing. Nobody's ever I've never seen such anger, but all of our judges, I mean, we had a a brilliant judge and I think a very fair judge in Florida. I think we have another judge who's very fair.
I just asked for fair. I don't want anything different from anybody else. I just asked for fairness. We have another judge or a couple of judges that I think are fair. Then we have other judges that I think the whole thing is I think the system is a disgrace.
The, case that we met on today, and then we're gonna talk about, job numbers, which are horrible, by the way, horrible, like, really bad. And you know that. I'm sure you won't report on it, but the job numbers are terrible. We're gonna talk about the appeal today. We had a great appellate lawyer go down representing us, and, I think John did a very good job.
You have a a matter of minutes to speak. It's a very complex thing because it was a setup, a rig deal. They had 2 witnesses. And before I start, I have no idea who this woman is. They have a picture from, they say, about forty years ago, a picture.
And the picture depicts her and her husband on a celebrity line where I was the celebrity. I was been a celebrity for a long time. And they were shaking my hands along with hundreds of other people. Nobody even knows where it is. The problem is she doesn't know the date of this incident.
She doesn't know when. She doesn't know was it in the Could it have been further than that? She has no idea when. And people do that because you don't wanna give a specific date and then you find out that Trump or whoever it was was in Europe. So they tend to do that.
They take long periods so that this way hopefully, he was in New York at that time. But this is a disgraceful case and disgraceful in particular because it's about a former president of The United States who is now leading in the polls to be the president again. And this is being worked with the DOJ, Department of Justice, as are all of these cases. They all come out. Atlanta, Fannie, that is all Department of Justice.
Nobody knew that. The case with Judge Angouren, the most overturned judge in the state, that is very close because they sent their team from the DOJ to help him. The district attorney, Alvin Bragg, that was all worked with again, they sent a top operative from the department from the DOJ, Department of I call it the Department of Injustice, because they're using the Department of Justice to rig the campaign. These cases are disgraceful. Now they're brought, for the most part, in front of very hostile areas where Republicans get 3 or 4%, like Downtown Manhattan, in front of very hostile judges, like hostile like you wouldn't believe.
Judge Mershon, Judge Angouren, and Judge Kaplan. All of them, hostile areas and, very, very hostile judges. I've never seen anything like it. And very bad thing in this case, New York. Very bad thing for New York.
Businesses won't come to New York because of what took place with judge Angora. I can tell you that. And probably the rest of them also. But this case involved a woman who wrote a book, and I guess she said something in the book. That's when I first heard about it.
I first heard about it in the White House. And, of course, I denied the story because it's not true. I have no idea who the woman is, and I never met her. Now I don't know about a picture that was taken forty years ago with her husband on a celebrity line, so I don't think that counts. But as far as I know, I never met her.
I never touched her. I have I would have had no interest in meeting her in any way, shape, or form. Her husband was a news anchor, actually. John Johnson, a very nice guy. She called him horrible things.
We weren't allowed to say that in the trial. She said horrible things about him. I guess they're since divorced. He's a very nice guy, African American, and she said very bad things. We weren't allowed to use that in the trial, which surprised a lot of people.
But she made up a story and fabricated a % that I attacked her at Bergdorf Goodman. You know, it's very interesting. I don't think they were allowed to use this either. Her favorite show is Law and Order, and there's a almost exact story as her story in Law and Order about being attacked in the dressing room of a department, so I don't know if they used the name of the store. But that's her favorite show, Law and Order.
She said that. And, anyway, this evolved into a defamation case against me because I disputed her words because I told the truth. We were called. I was in the White House, and I said, no. It never happened.
I didn't even know what they were talking about. This was I think I was in the Oval Office. Sir, do you know anything about this? And this had to do with the book, and she had a few pages in a book making this claim. By the way, there was never a claim.
There was never a police report. There was never anything mentioned. There was never publicity thirty or forty years ago whenever it took place. Nobody knows. She doesn't know when it took place.
When did it take place? She has no idea. She thinks it was in the She thinks it was in the And the judge we had 2 trials. We asked for a consolidation. He said no.
The reason he said no is he'd rather have double the publicity because that's bad for me. Very bad because I'm running for president, and this is not the kind of publicity you like. And whether it's true or not, it's horrible. And in this case, it's so false. It's a made up, fabricated story by somebody.
I think initially just looking to promote a book. And when they called me, I denied the story. I got sued essentially for defamation because I'm denying a story where I'm right. I should be suing her for defamation. So that's where it is.
Now, there were 2 witnesses. 1 is a woman who's followed me for years. She said in 1979, I was in an airplane with her, commercial flight, and we became very intimate. I just sat down. I I think I had the book, The Art of the Deal.
I was famous then too. I've been famous for a long time. And we're sitting in first class according to her. Never happened, by the way. Totally made up story.
She's a Clinton person too, by the way. Big Clinton person. She made up the story. And so many years ago, and I think it would be 1979, 01/00 of my many people behind me could correct it, but I think she said 1979. That's a long time ago.
And I sat down. I believe I had some pretty big success then, and I was being talked about a lot. Maybe the art of the deal was out, you know, sometime after that. I'm not sure. But I was well known.
And passengers are coming into the plane. And she said I was making out with her, and then after fifteen minutes, and then she changed her story a couple of times, maybe it was quicker, that I grabbed her at a certain part, and that was when she
Speaker 1: Alright. It does appear that that feed of Trump just went out. We are gonna work to get that back right here. We should have it up in just a few minutes, but we were pulling in from Fox, and it appears that they've, done some switching around there. But we'll be right back after this quick two minute commercial break.
Speaker 0: Since she did this, since she ever made in a life, she gets paid a lot of money to go talk bad things about me. So remember this, this whole thing started along with just about every other case I'm involved with, with the political campaign of Harris and who's having a bad time because he can't talk, of Harris and Joe Biden. This was election interference. It all is. It's all fabricated, but fabricated in front of very friendly judges for them and in very friendly areas for them.
If you get a jury, it's very hard to win in a jury. We have 3 or 4 or 5% Republican votes. Very, very tough, actually. 2 witnesses. 1 is named Jessica Leeds, so she she was up again.
She can't get rid of her. She was up. She said I was in an airplane doing that. A couple of things. You have a an armrest in planes back in those days.
Oh, by the way, she didn't know anything about the flight, where we were going, where I've I was in very few flights. I was a New York guy building New York building. I was at very few airplanes, I will tell you, in those days. I think. It's a long time ago.
But you had the armrest, and in the old days, they didn't move. Okay? But she said she then got out and she went to the back of the plane, and that was the end of the story, I think. And this story has followed me for years. But just to finish with her, Jessica Leeds, no police reports, no witnesses, no corroboration of any kind, no criminal suggestions, no nothing.
Then you have another 1, and this 1 is a writer for People magazine who I actually thought was very nice. She came to Mar A Lago, and she wrote the most beautiful story you've ever seen. It was a love story about Melania and myself, a love story in People magazine, and that was it. It was a cover, I think, but it was a beautiful story. You would everybody would love to have that marriage.
She said the nicest things about me, about Melania. You have the story. I mean, you can read the story. And her name was whoever. Let's see.
Her name was who? Swornoff. Yeah. I don't have it. Whatever her name was.
I don't know the lady, so perhaps it's much better that way, but I really don't know the lady. So she wrote this beautiful story. And about, I don't know, years later no police reports, no anything. Years later, the same person they called up, did you attack at Mar A Lago this woman, this writer, whatever her name is, and she was a witness in a case. Her and Leeds were the 2 witnesses.
There are only 2 witnesses. Did you attack her? I said, who is she? And they said, she writes for People Magazine. I said, I don't know anything about the lady.
I if I had a story long ago, years before about People, but it was very nice story. So I don't know. It has to be made up because I don't know what you're talking about. It turned out that the same lady that wrote this beautiful story years later said I attacked her. Now think of this.
Oh, and she said the butler knew everything. The old expression, the butler did it. Right? Very famous in crime stories. Well, the butler was Tony Senechal, worked for me for a long time.
He was at he was retired at that time. That was years later. He retired. He was at retired when this hoax came out. And what happened is he totally confirmed my story, and he didn't even work for me anymore.
He passed away a couple of years ago, a good man. He said, the woman was crazy. It never happened. I was the 1 that served her whatever they she was drinking, and I was there, and nothing ever happened. But you don't need the butler.
All you have to do is read the story. Think of this. A woman comes into Mar A Lago, interviews me about a love story, story about my wife and myself. And during that interview, I attacked her and pushed her up against the wall violently. Okay?
And then she leaves and she writes a a perfect story. A perfect story. She doesn't mention the event. Again, there's nothing on file at all. 0.
There was no complaints. There were no complaints to People magazine. There was no witness. There was nothing. Yeah.
Well, there was a witness, the butler, and he's already said everything. He's already told this story. Because this story, likewise, like Leeds, this story has followed me around. I could go through many many other stories outside of this. You know, it's very funny.
When you're rich and famous, you get a lot of people come up with a lot of stories. But you're writers, and some of you are legitimate writers and some of you aren't. Some of you are fake news and some of you are real news, but put yourself in my position. I'm running for president and I have all these cases all of a sudden come come out. And they have fake cases, and they report back to DOJ.
And you have Lisa Monaco, one of the people at DOJ who I saw the other day talking about the Russia Russia Russia hoax. And yet she's friends with Andrew Weissman and that whole group and crew, who should be sued by the way, because they're not a charity. All they are is a political organization that goes after Trump for the last eight years. I mean, he's a sick person that runs that too. But Lisa Monaco is in the Department of Justice, but she's a, Andrew Weissman person who's been after me for years.
So far, he's failed, and he's having a heart attack because I'm leading in the polls. I guess if you look at the, Nate Silver, very respected guy. I don't know him, but he has me up by a lot. So let's say we're leading or let's say we're tied or let's say what difference. I'm in the races between 2 people, but I think we're leading by a lot because the opponent refuses to do an interview because she can't talk.
And, they're not gonna skate through it. We're not gonna have a Marxist president. The people are getting it. So we go down to court today to talk about this case is a scam. And all I can say is that I never met the woman other than this picture, which could have been AI generated.
I don't know. Showed up out of nowhere, but it's fine. Nice picture with her, her husband, and lots of other people are online. It's a celebrity line. But never met her, never touched her, never had anything to do with her.
The other thing is I was very famous then. If I would have walked into Bergdorf Goodman, the department store that she said, everybody would have said, oh, there's Trump. And it would have been, at that time, on page 6. Page 6 was the equivalent of today's Internet. And it would have been a big story if I would have walked into that store, gone into a dressing room, and supposedly you know what to her.
Never happened. Never happened. Total phony story. And I feel sad that I have to come up here and explain it. I have all this legal talent, but legal talent cannot overcome rigged judges.
They can't overcome a 4% Republican area, and I'm disappointed in my legal talent, I'll be honest with you. They're good. They're good people. They're talented people. Today at the, trial, they didn't mention the the dress.
So the Monica Lewinsky type dress was a big part of the trial. Big, big part of the trial. I said, why didn't you mention that? And I heard there was a dress involved, and I wasn't frightened at all because I did nothing with her. Never never touched this woman, saw this woman, knew had no idea who she was.
But they have a dress, sir. I said, so what? Well, sir, it's very they used that dress to try and intimidate me. They used that dress with the public. That dress was such a famous dress.
It was Monica Lewinsky, part 2, the dress. And the judge wanted it for trial, and it was gonna go into trial. And then they found out there was nothing on the dress, which I knew. And then the judge wouldn't allow it to be used. So they used it as a cudgel.
They used it as a hammer over my head. And then the judge, when he heard that it was it showed totally negative, totally negative. The judge wouldn't allow us to use it at trial. Then there was an Anderson Cooper interview where she said essentially, no, he didn't rape me. She was selling her book.
She wrote a book. The book would have been a total failure. Probably was anyway. They'll probably sold more recently. Again, there's a woman that wasn't doing well until she came out with the stuff about me, and that's happened to others too, by the way.
She's not the only 1. But they have the Anderson Cooper tape. And in the Anderson Cooper tape, it's an interview of her. And Cooper says something to the effect, did he rape you? Did he rape you?
He was so happy. Oh, did he rape you? And she gave a very good answer for me, but a bad answer for CNN, for Anderson. And he said, we're going to commercial break right now. We're going.
Then she came back from commercial break, and she was much more hostile. But this man wouldn't let us use the tape or the proper, questions having to do with the tape. Wouldn't let us the judge. Judge Kaplan wouldn't let it be used. We wanted to get the outtakes.
In other words, what did Anderson Cooper talk to her about during that intermission for a commercial that he called for immediately? Where do you see this? I mean, some of you have seen it. Some of you haven't. We're going to commercial break right now.
And so what happened is we weren't able to use it. The other thing is we had not 1 trial, we had 2 trials. Nobody understands why. We asked for a consolidation, and I wanted to show up to the trial, to the first trial. My lawyer, who's not up here, not with us any longer, sir, you should not show up.
You're the former president or the president. I don't even know when when the trial was, but you're the president of The United States, sir. This is beneath you. I've got this a %. The dress is negative, but he wasn't able to use it.
Sir, it's beneath you to show up. I said, but wouldn't that be bad for a jury? Wouldn't that be sort of bad for a jury if I don't show up? He said, sir, you don't have to show up. I've got this.
You shouldn't do it. It's beneath you. It's beneath the office of the president. I understood what he meant by that, and so I didn't show up. And I was found guilty of something that I didn't do with a woman that I have never seen, touched, or in any way was involved with, nor would I wanna be.
I would not wanna be. My people said, please don't say that. I would not wanna be involved with her. And that's where we are. So we're appealing it, and people would say it's not a friendly panel based on the appointments, but you'll look that up yourself.
But I hope they understand this is the office of the president of The United States, and there has to be fairness shown. Our court system is looking so bad. If you're a Democrat, these are all Democrat appointed people. Biden, Clinton, I think others, 3 people. They seem very good today and, I mean, they seem absolutely fine, but, I've read and I've heard it's not a friendly panel, but I wasn't surprised because I don't get friendly panels.
I don't get friendly panels. But where we've had fair judges, where we've had brilliant judges, frankly, I I don't know the judge in Florida, Judge Cannon. Don't know her at all. But, I think she's a brilliant woman. I think she handled a scam.
It's a scam case. That's the documents case. That's the case where Biden, who had 10 times more documents, took all this stuff for years, fifty years, and he was exonerated. Of course, they said he was incompetent, so he wasn't fit. So he was exonerated based on that.
But me, I don't get exonerated so easily. And I had a thing called the Presidential Records Act, which exonerates me. But we won that trial, and the other side plays the ref. Crew and, Weissman and all these people, And again, Lisa Monaco should not be involved in this because she's been after Trump for years, and now she's like the second person at the DOJ. But she's with all these people.
And they're playing the ref, and they say terrible things about judges. They do it with the Supreme Court Justices because they think they're gonna intimidate them. I think it should be illegal. That's what the DOJ should look into, the legality of these people taking a brilliant judge and demeaning her and taking other people that are fair and solid and demeaning them. It's called playing the ref.
Nobody did it better than the late great Bobby Knight basketball coach. He would play he would scream at those refs and everything. He said they say, Bobby, you're not gonna get the decision overturned. Yep. But the next 1, I will.
And he was right. He was a great basketball coach. Last coached to have an undefeated season. Last coach in basketball to have an many years ago, he also endorsed me, but he played the ref. These people are playing the ref when they are allowed to call for recusal, impeachment of a judge because they're not getting their way.
And for some reason, the other side doesn't do that. They don't do that. The other side is much softer. Republicans play it a lot softer, but they're they play it legitimately. So I'm gonna ask, if I might, Will Scharf to come up, just say a couple of words about what took place today.
1 of our attorneys working on this ridiculous it's a ridiculous case. Remember, it never happened. It was made up for political reasons, and the DOJ is behind everything, every one of these cases. It's political interference. It's a witch hunt just like the fake Russia, Russia, Russia scam was a witch hunt.
And just like they wanna start that scam all over again by announcing that Russia, Russia, Russia we're talking about. And you know what they do when they do that? They intimidate people from having a fair election. They intimidate poll workers from speaking up when they see crooked things take place in the election, and it's a it's a disgrace. Our country's in serious trouble.
Our judicial system is in very serious trouble. Will, please come up. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Good morning, y'all. My name is Will Scharf. I'm 1 of president Trump's attorneys. Today, we presented oral argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the second circuit in 1 of 2 cases brought against president Trump by E. Jean Carroll.
Now it's really important to remember that E. Jean Carroll's story at its heart is an utterly implausible he said, she said story. There is no corroboration for anything she has ever claimed about president Trump. There are no corroborating witnesses as president Trump alluded to. There is not confirmatory DNA.
No police report was filed at the time of this alleged incident. She was unable to identify when this incident occurred until quite recently. No surveillance evidence or witnesses have ever, been found or come forward confirming any aspect of E. Jean Carroll's story. In light of that, in light of the utter implausibility of the story that E.
Jean Carroll was attempting to sell to the jury in this case, her attorneys introduced evidence that should have never seen the inside of a courtroom. Utterly, in insane, efforts to introduce propensity witnesses. Jessica Leeds and Natasha Steinhoff, most notably, in an unfair and improper effort to buttress E. Jean Carroll's failed attempt, to assault president Trump. Jessica Leeds' story is instructive here.
This is a woman who claims, that in the middle of a crowded airliner in 1979, president Trump assaulted her. Leeds has never been able to identify where this plane departed from, where it went to, the date of the flight in question, making our efforts to disprove her testimony, extremely difficult. Under the federal rules of evidence, this story should have never been allowed to be presented, to the jury in this case. The same is true of Natasha Stoynoff's story, which again lacks any indicia of reliability, any sort of credibility, any sort of, confirmatory, testimony from other witnesses, or any anything else that would make you believe that this actually happened. So on the 1 hand, you have a judge who allowed in, this improper propensity evidence that should not have been allowed in.
In our view, that polluted the jury's deliberations in this case that presented a story to the jury, of a series of a pattern of conduct that the jury should, should not have been considering. And we think that absent that propensity evidence, no fair jury could have reached the verdict that was reached in this case. And as a result, we believe, that this verdict needs to be overturned. But there's more than that. In addition to this improper propensity evidence, president Trump and his trial team were prevented from cross examining E.
Jean Carroll and other witnesses on crucial issues. Crucial issues in particular relating, to political coordination and the political motivation behind this entire lawsuit. This is a lawsuit that was instigated in large part by George Conway, a long time political foe and adversary of president Trump. This is a lawsuit that was funded by Reid Hoffman, a key political ally of the Biden Harris administration and a major Democrat donor. We were limited in the evidence we were allowed to present at trial about these crucial facts.
We were prevented from cross examining E. Jean Carroll on aspects of that that dynamic that underlies this entire lawsuit, and that too unfairly corrupted the jury's deliberations in this case and requires reversal of the jury verdict. I think this political coordination point is particularly important though. It's important to emphasize because what what we have seen in the last few years is a weaponization by the Biden administration and by their political allies of our legal system and of our courts to unlawfully, unconstitutionally interfere with president Trump's core first amendment right to run for president. That is a right guaranteed to him by the constitution.
That is the right that his political opponents are attempting to strip away from him. We have seen this in case after case after case where unfair political motives, have underlay what should be sir excuse me, serious legal proceedings. And I think when you look at this situation in TOTA, when you look at what the left, when you look at what the Biden Harris administration is attempting to do to president Trump, this is insane. This is an absolute abuse of our legal system. It's an absolute abuse of the rule of law.
It should be deeply offensive, not just to political supporters of president Trump, but to each and every American. With respect to today's appeal, we are hopeful that the second circuit understands what's at stake here. We we are hopeful that the second circuit, understands what occurred during this trial, which was an improper use of evidence to buttress E. Jean Carroll's entirely meritless claims on the 1 hand, and an improper exclusion of evidence that would have informed the jury about the true motivation behind this lawsuit, and that we believe would have resulted in a very different verdict. Thank you.
Speaker 3: Good afternoon. I've done this 1 too many times. Actually, too many times for the last three and a half years while president Trump has been trying to fight to get this country back. And I wanna speak to the American women, and I wanna speak to the people that need to get out and vote Nov. 5.
I have sat with president Trump for years now while he has been targeted with lies and with judges, AGs, NDAs who have specifically run-in this city and others on getting Trump. The Trump administration will fix this problem. We will stop Kamala Harris's regime because she was there. Let's not forget that, and she still is. Of using officials from the White House, putting them in DA's offices, in AG's offices, and attacking your political opponent, and this country deserves better than this.
We do. We should not be sitting here at a press conference talking about this. We did this in 2016, and every woman had no reports. They come out when it's election time. And as a woman who has stood with president Trump, who has spent extensive time with president Trump and with his beautiful family, I will tell you, that is not president Trump, and I completely am disgusted by what I have seen happen to this person, his family, and the Trump organization that we stand in right now.
You must vote Donald Trump back in because as an attorney, as a woman, as a mother, our future of this country depends on it, and we need to stop this from happening. The DOJ is supposed to help our country and protect us, not attack us because you cannot win in the polls. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much both. And, just in finishing this, we have numerous other trials that are also, very much in coordination with the DOJ. They actually took just about their top person and they put them into the offices of the attorney general of New York. And then also the office of the DA, DA Bragg's office, to make sure the case is brought and brought viciously against their political opponent. And it's a shame.
It's a shame. Businesses will not come to New York because of it. They actually, in the case of, Angouren, they used a consumer frauds case never used before for a thing like this. And not only were my numbers correct, and again, this was a generality. All you need is a general, but I I had really good numbers, but they were very conservative, very very much on the low side.
And the judge knew that, and the judge ruled a fine against me, the likes of which has never even been heard of. Businesses will never come to this state as long as that is able to be held up, because we won that trial so conclusively. We had an expert witness said that president Trump's financial this was an expert witness from the Stern School of Business, one of the most, highly respected people in the country as an expert witness. He said, to the best of my remembering, it's a big statement, but he said, this is perhaps the best financial statement I've ever seen. But the judge made me pay, like, a $400,000,000 fine.
This is a consumer fraud statement. Think of it. Consumer frauds, case that they made it in. The judge refused to give it over to the commercial division where they could understand things, and they would have dismissed it immediately because this case had no merit whatsoever. The judge wanted to settle the case for a very much smaller amount.
And I said, I I'm not gonna settle. I didn't do anything wrong, but he would have settled the case for a much smaller amount. He wanted to settle it for a much more. We had numerous meetings in his office for a fraction of the number that he gave. That was 1 of the interesting things.
I figured that the worst that you could do is what he wanted to settle for, which was a very small number by comparison. And then he just came out with this number. This was a coordination with the DOJ. And the other case that you know about and you've been hearing about, which is same kind of a thing, also in coordination, is the Bragg case, and they actually wanted to put them together in New York. They wanted to put the d 8 case together with the attorney general case, but they both wanted credit.
They couldn't understand, you know, they they both wanted credit, so they had their own cases. And it's very corrupt in New York and very, very corrupt. It's a very corrupt place and doing very badly. But when people see what happened and when they see oh, I've had so many calls from business people saying, this is just terrible. Today, there was a story about somebody in Southern District who's highly respected, knocking the hell out of both of those cases.
Say it's an embarrassment they were allowed to be brought. And I'm gonna write out a list of things from Alan Dershowitz, Andrew McCarthy, Greg Jarrett, the some of the the greatest people, all legal all legal scholars, great people, Jonathan Turley, like 10 highly respected the most highly respected people that, quote, Calabresi, judge Calabresi, that, quote, on cases. And they I mean, shockingly, they can't even believe it. They said this case should not have been allowed to be brought. And that's about pretty much both cases, but it's about the case that we have in front of judge Mershon.
That case is a disgrace. Should have never been allowed. I did nothing wrong. And he took a nonexistent expired, long expired by the statute of limitations, misdemeanor. He made it into 34 or something more than that counts of felony.
Nobody can even believe it over nothing. And if you look at that case, he wouldn't allow it. That whole thing was done by an attorney. I had nothing to do with it. That was done by an attorney, a sleazebag named Michael Cohen.
And he did the whole thing, and you're allowed to have reliance on attorney. It's called reliance on attorney. You have a reliance on attorney. Attorney's allowed to do things. And all it was is a nondisclosure agreement with somebody that said nothing happened, by the way.
I might add that. If you don't mind, I'll add that. We have a statement. Nothing happened, and he got a nondisclosure agreement. He did it on his own, and this judge refused to allow us to use that as a defense, the attorney client defense, which is very standard.
Other people have never heard that you're not allowed to use it, but he's the 1 that did it because I was running for president and running the country. He's the 1 that did it. So all of these cases are a disgrace, But the case that we had today, downtown, I wish we could have mentioned the dress. Again, got the idea from Monica Lewinsky, but it was negative. Was it allowed to be used?
I wish we could have mentioned many of the other things, and I certainly wish we could have gone to CNN and got the outtakes, what's called the outtakes. What did Anderson Cooper tell her during the commercial? I'd love to find that out. So that's where we are. We have a very corrupt system of laws, but in that system, we have some very good judges also.
And I think in the end, the good judges will prevail. And I hope Democrat appointed judges can see a scam like this where somebody just makes up a story, probably out of
Speaker 1: Alright. It appears that Fox did lose that feed once again coming in from Trump Tower. What you were listening to, though, was former president Trump as he was speaking after that appeals hearing in the case that took place a bit earlier on this morning. It was an appeal in the e g Carroll case that we've talked a lot about. It looks like they did get that feedback, so let's pop up the audio.
Speaker 0: Choose 2 sets of lawyers to everything It's really, really very disgraceful. Let me talk about, job numbers because as you know, they just came out and they're a basic disaster. They are really they are really bad. You had numbers that are shocking. Native born Americans, we lost 1300000.0 jobs, while foreign born Americans were able to take all of those jobs.
So foreigners coming in illegally, largely illegally, into our country took the jobs of native born Americans. And I've been telling you that's what's going to happen because we have millions and millions of people pouring into our country, many from prisons and jails and mental institutions and insane asylums, traffickers, human traffickers, women traffickers, sex traffickers, which, by the way, that's the kind of thing that people should be looking at because it's horrible. And it's turning out that migrant crime is far worse than any crime that we've ever experienced. If you look at Aurora, Colorado, they're taking over the place. They took over buildings and they're this is just the beginning.
You haven't seen anything yet. You haven't seen any. They've allowed well over 20000000 people in my opinion. I the other people say, well, it's only 13. No.
No. It's much more than 20. I think it's much more than 20. Our country is being invaded because of incompetent people like Kamala that doesn't wanna do 1 interview. She may does 1 softball interview with CNN.
Couldn't have been nicer. Dana Bash, you know what? I gained respect for Dana Bash and for Jake Tapper because in my interview with Sleepy Joe, I thought they were very fair, actually. I was surprised they were very fair. I'm going into very hostile territory shortly on a debate with ABC, George Slopadopoulos, and that group.
And ABC, I think, is the worst of everybody. I think they're the worst. They're the nastiest. They're as as bad as you can be. They're worse than NBC, which is saying a lot, and we have something coming.
And the reason I'm doing it is because that's the only 1 that she would do it with because her best friend is the head of ABC or ABC News, and her husband's best friend is married to that 1. So and Donna Brazile is there. You remember the famous Donna Brazile? She gave Hillary Clinton the questions. You remember that?
That was a little embarrassing. She got fired, I assume, for that. But now she's working at ABC. So I said, I'll do it anyway. Because even if she knows the answers and knows the questions, I don't think she'll be very good.
And this is not what our country wants, and I feel I have an obligation to do it. And she'd never stand up here like this and give a news conference and speak about what's happening with the weaponization of our justice system. This is the weaponization of justice at a level that nobody's ever seen in this country before. We've never seen it. You see it in third world countries.
You see it in Banana Republics, but you don't see it in The United States Of America, and it's a very sad thing. And I think I'm doing a great service by having gone through it and revealing it because, you know, it came out with a indictment from the district attorney, which again, just revealed today, and I hope you're gonna do a story because it's a big story. The Southern District Of New York was and and and this is a very highly respected group of people. He said it was a disgrace that that case was brought. It was a disgrace that the case was brought in front of Meershon.
The case is a disgrace. Should have never been brought. Should have never been brought. And the case in front of judge Angouren, just in terms of the case itself, we had 4 or 5 overturns in the appellate division. I only hope the appellate division for the good of New York, Otherwise, you just say, God save the state.
For the good of New York, I hope that the appellate division will do what's right on that case because that case was a scam. But every single 1 of these cases that I'm mentioning, they're all hoaxes and scams. No different than Russia, Russia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine. The impeachment hoax number 1, impeachment hoax number 2. All these things that we won, we won them all.
But it takes time, it takes effort, and they're at it again. But this time, what they're doing is they're hitting us, as hard as possible. You know, it's very interesting. It just brings to light, the lawyer on the hoax that we're talking about now having to do with E. Jean Carroll.
She said, the way to defeat Trump is go after him civilly as often as possible. Make his life miserable, sue him all the time, keep him in court, and let him spend a fortune. That's the lawyer I have in the E. Jean Carroll case, and that's exactly what they've done. The only thing I can say that's good about it is the public understands.
And my poll numbers, I believe, are higher now than they would have been without it because the public understands it's a hoax, it's a scam, it's a political witch hunt, and some of you should be ashamed of yourselves. Thank you very much, everybody.
@ArtCandee - Art Candee 🍿🥤
Andrew Eaves, one of the Army pilots in the Black Hawk helicopter that crashed yesterday with the American Airlines plane, clearly does not look like a DEI hire. His family deserves better than MAGA claiming it, and his wife is asking for the "negative comments" to stop. https://t.co/jH8khoNWNO
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended Donald Trump's rally in Aurora, Colorado, and it was chaotic and filled with hate. He arrived late and struggled with basic words while making bizarre claims about immigrants and gangs. His rhetoric was alarming, especially regarding violence and immigration, and he repeatedly attacked Governor Polis. The atmosphere was tense, and he seemed overmedicated, jumping between topics without coherence. I reflected on how the Founding Fathers would have opposed Trump's views on immigration, emphasizing the importance of welcoming newcomers.
@ArtCandee - Art Candee 🍿🥤
Donald Trump held a very tiny hate rally in Aurora, Colorado and it was utterly unhinged. Let’s recap it: Important to note that Lauren Boebert showed up and was as classless as always! Stephen Miller opened for Donald as well and I’m convinced he’s the second coming of Goebbels. Donald showed up 42 minutes late, per usual. He doesn’t care about keeping these people standing on their feet for hours. He starts by talking about Hurricane Milton. Methinks he was shamed after criticism at his last rally where it took him 68 minutes to mention the deadly hurricane heading to Florida. He praised Lauren Boebert. Gag. 🤮 He called Sarah Palin “great.” Hilarious! 🤣🤣🤣 He had issues saying “John,” “Venezuelan,” “gang,” “Aurora,” “Cindy,” “tranquil,” "the," "industry," and “opportunity." He overcompensates for his tiny crowd by saying 4x the amount of people are outside. Sure, bro. He said NBC said it was the “longest line” they’ve ever seen. UHHHH. They did not. Donald Trump is making up stories about Aurora, Colorado and Venezuelan gangs. He’s talking about molesting a graph and sleeping with it. Bro is deeply disturbed. What’ funnier is he’s in the middle of talking about mental institutions. He knows that’s where he should be, deep down. He said “I’m not here for my health.” What’s wrong with his health? Why won’t he release his medical records? He calls Jared Polis, the Colorado governor, “pathetic” and a “fraud.” Pure projection. He also says that Polis and others are afraid of being indicted. He calls AK-47s “the best guns.” VILE. He’s crying about Biden in a bathing suit again. Bro is obsessed. Creepy. He thinks November 5th will be “Liberation Day.” Yeah, we’ll all be liberated from him for good! He’s spending a lot of time whining about Governor Polis. He thinks Polis removed him from the ballots in Colorado because he was winning in the polls. Laughable. It’s because he’s a felon. He called democrats a threat to democracy again. Gotta love that rhetoric MAGA whines about. He admits the race is close in Colorado. Remember this when he lies about it after he loses the state. He says gangs are having “open gun battles” in Aurora. Uh. He calls immigrant “animals.” He calls 60 Minutes “crooked as hell” and wants to take away their broadcasting license. He’s so salty. He’s whining about Hunter Biden. He calls VP Harris “dumb and naive.” Uh…Donald Trump was surrounded by Russian agents and claimed to know nothing about it. Sounds like the definition of dumb and naive. He says women like him. I vomited in my mouth. He says he’s winning in “all of the polls, just about.” He is not. Women overwhelmingly hate him. He says his mother told him he has “high cheekbones” and called himself an “Indian.” He has a face only a mother could love. He praised Tom Homan, an architect of Project 2025. He says “we won’t have a country” if VP Harris is elected. He calls her “a threat to democracy” again. What was MAGA screeching about DemOCraT rHEtoriC again? He claims President Biden hates VP Harris. Bro is unglued. He whines about being called “a conspiracy theorist.” He praises himself for not needing a teleprompter while he’s standing next to a teleprompter. He calls VP Harris “a criminal.” AHAHAHHAHAAHHA! He claims migrants will take over your house. He doesn’t seem to understand that administrations like his were the reason why Venezuela collapsed. He whines about the immigration app that HIS ADMINISTRATION created. He essentially just admitted that immigrants are let into the country on a probationary period and he thinks that means they’re on “probation.” LMFAO!!!!! What a total dunce! He claimed you can’t “get into the hospital.” Uhhhhh. False. He said people need to “go back to where they came from.” I’m so tired of this racist POS. He calls MS-13 gang “another beautiful gang.” Bro’s brain is cooked. He claims that Venezuelan gangs “got the ok to kill your police.” They did not. He claims that the New York Times said that. He’s naming his mass deportation plan “Operation Aurora” based on all of the fake news he pushed about the city. The crowd cheers for the stable genius. He said he’s invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. That act allowed the President to apprehend and deport any male citizens of a foreign nation that was at war with the United States. Bro clearly has never read the Act. He claims we’re “laughed at all over the word.” We are. Because of him. He called Tim Walz “a moron.” Look in the mirror, Donald. He says that VP Harris has “changed” her position on 15 policies. Donald changed his entire political party to get elected by morons. He lied and said inflation numbers that were released yesterday were “double what was predicted.” This is false. Inflation rates decreased. He’s whining about changing the names of forts like Fort Bragg, and claimed we won two world wars out of them. We did not. They weren’t fought anywhere near North Carolina. He said people need to “vote for change.” He used to be the POTUS. He is the antithesis of “change.” He said that one hospital got 20k visits from illegal migrants and that cost them $10 million. Since when does an ER visit only cost $500? The average cost for an ER visit in Colorado is $3,157. He claims kids can’t get into schools. Uhhhhh… He claims immigrants and migrants “don’t even want to be here.” Um, then why does he think they’re coming here? He’s getting super lispy and sounds like he has a bunch of spittle in his mouth. Bro needs to drink some water. This is gross. He said “we’re not going to take it anymore.” He’s right. We’re not gonna take any more of his sh*.t. -Fin This rally was the most filled with hate and vitriol of any that he's given so far. The fear mongering about immigrants based on lies was astounding. They seemed to have him overmedicated today. Bro couldn't finish his train of thought, jumped all over the place, was talking super fast, and was an overall utter disaster. This photo seems to do a good job of summarizing it, and him. His eyes are full of hate. His makeup is out of control, and his hair is a disaster. Just like all of his ideas for potential policies. Will the media call any of this stuff out or nah? They should. If they don't, then it's a total dereliction of duty. Side note: I posted these quotes earlier but figured I'd add it here because I think people really need to understand the perspectives of our Founding Fathers on immigration using their own words. They would have loathed everything Donald Trump and MAGA stands for. "As the colonists were mostly immigrants, it is fitting that we embrace the newcomers who come here seeking a better life, adding to our society." Benjamin Franklin "The rights of the people to emigrate and settle in new countries, and the right of the people of a nation to invite immigrants to settle among them, should always be upheld." John Adams "The bosom of America is open to receive not only the Opulent and respectable Stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of all Nations and Religions; whom we shall welcome to a participation of all our Rights and Privileges." George Washington "I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But I do advocate for the free migration of people across borders, as they bring new ideas and contribute to the strength of our nation." Thomas Jefferson "The immigrants, who come from many lands, shall be the bulwark of our freedom and an essential component of our growth as a nation." Alexander Hamilton "It is the character of our nation to welcome those who seek refuge and opportunity, ensuring that liberty is accessible to all who are willing to work for it." James Madison These were men who believed in immigration, some believed in totally open borders, and you know dam.n well they would be appalled at Donald Trump and his propagandists like Stephen Miller standing up and spewing hate like a bunch of Nazis. Fin.
@ArtCandee - Art Candee 🍿🥤
Poor Barron. Donald is now gonna have to show up to his graduation. Methinks he’s not gonna be pleased having his classmates thunder stolen when Trump makes their graduation all about him. Or having them bring up how daddy was cheating on his mom when she was pregnant with him. 🍿
