TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @AutismCapital
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
There is a key takeaway from Discord’s “Please don’t be mad at us” press release: The UK, Australia, Brazil, Europe, and *multiple* US states are pressuring Discord into mandatory ID verification. Their hand is forced. In some cases like the UK and Australia, they don’t even have the options to estimate your age. They MUST get the IDs. You need to pay attention to this. There is a global concerted effort to force mandatory ID verification and deanonymize the Internet. This is all packaged under the guise of child safety or national security for moral cover, but what it really is is a complete control over all narrative and the ability to censor, deplatform, silence, and even legally or physically harm people who speak out against the powers that be. It’s important to note that this is a non-partisan issue. This affects everyone, regardless of political affiliation. Whether you want to tell edgy jokes online or whether you want to protest ICE, these laws put you in danger. This is and must remain a UNITING issue for all people. You must make your voices heard and reject the big surveillance narrative and the panopticon-ization of society. Every time a law tries to pass, you must vote against. Every time a politician tries to run on this frankly evil rhetoric, you must vocalize your objection. You must chimp out about this. If the chimp is strong enough, it slows it down. Privacy is your most important asset, especially in the age of AI and surveillance. It’s your right to speak freely, whether you want to call Trump a moron or whether you want to say secure the border. It’s important that you are protected and free to do so. Reject mandated ID verification. Use other platforms if forced, keep resisting as long as possible.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Norway’s former Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland is hospitalized after a suicide attempt as police investigate his appearance in the Epstein files. He had previously told Epstein, “If Trump wins I’ll settle on your island.” https://t.co/o8oSEzzagg
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 NEW: Norway’s former Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland is hospitalized following a suicide attempt after police began an investigation following his appearance in the Epstein files. He is previously in the files telling Epstein that “If Trump wins I’ll settle on your island.” https://t.co/o8oSEzzagg
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
This is the most disgusting shit we have ever read. How are people not tearing these people limb from limb? Where is the media on this. They were raping kids with dogs and betting on it. THE POLICE. What the fuck?
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
The TIME Person of the Year needs to be "Conspiracy Theorists." It needs to be a blanket award to an entire group of people. https://t.co/gA10ksbq6i
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Apple buys Israeli face-tracking company Q dot AI for $2B, enabling analysis of micro facial movements to track speech without speaking, allowing telepathic-like private communication between users. It’s Apple’s second-largest acquisition after Beats at $3B.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Apple buys Israeli face-tracking technology company Q dot AI for $2B. The tech lets Apple analyze micro facial movements to track speech without you actually talking. This means you could communicate telepathically and privately with someone who also has the device. It's the second largest acquisition in Apple history after Beats which they did for $3B.
reSee.it AI Summary
I sense in 2026 truth loses grip; reality is whatever enough people agree on. Lies aren’t punished; those who point out the emperor’s nudity are crushed. AI won’t save us—the objective truth is sidelined by a reality distortion field. Drop the acts, admit your desires, and we might adjust to something closer to reality. Facts matter, and power translates to violence.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
If there’s one learning lesson you need to take away in 2026 it’s that the truth doesn’t matter anymore and reality isn’t real. People will invent narratives and facts to suit desired objectives and if enough people agree, that’s the new reality. People who point out that the emperor has no clothes will be crushed. Katherine Maher of Wikimedia said it best herself. “Our reverence for the truth is a hindrance to getting things done.” (Paraphrasing) We’re living in a world where lies don’t matter anymore. There are only words and how effective they are to reaching desired outcomes. People don’t care about the truth. They care about achieving their goals. We’re living in Demon times.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that a major shift from polarization to productive collaboration lies in how Wikipedians approach knowledge: they aren’t solely focused on finding an absolute truth, but on articulating “the best of what we can know right now.” After years of work, this approach is claimed to be yielding insights into our most difficult disagreements. The speaker suggests that for certain contentious issues, chasing truth and trying to persuade others of it may not be the most effective starting point for consensus or action.
Acknowledging that truth matters, the speaker still emphasizes that truth can be a “fickle mistress” and its beauty often lies in the struggle. The human record of experience—our sublime chronicles—reflects many different truths to be explored. The speaker asserts that truth exists for everyone in the room and likely for the person next to them, but that the two do not necessarily share the same truth. This divergence arises because truth is formed when facts about the world are merged with our beliefs about the world.
In summary, the speaker contends that individuals each hold a potentially valid truth shaped by their interpretations, and that recognizing multiple, personally constructed truths is essential to moving beyond simple factual disputes toward collaborative problem-solving.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But one of the most significant differences, critical for moving from polarization to productivity, is that the Wikipedians who write these articles aren't actually focused on finding the truth. They're working for something that's a little bit more attainable, which is the best of what we can know right now. And after seven years there, I actually believe that they're onto something. That for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking to convince others of the truth isn't necessarily the best place to start. In fact, I think our reverence for the truth might become might have become a bit of a distraction that is preventing us from finding consensus and getting important things done.
None of us to say that the truth isn't important. The truth obviously exists. It's at the core or the search for the truth is at the core of some of our greatest human achievements. It can animate and inspire us to do, learn, and create great things. But I think in our messy human hearts, we also know that the truth is something of a fickle mistress, and that the beauty of the truth is actually often in the struggle.
It's the reason that we have so many sublime chronicles of the human experience because there are so many different truths to be explored. And so in this spirit, I know that the truth exists for each of you in this room. It also probably exists for the person sitting next to you. But the thing is the two of you don't necessarily have the same truth. And this is because for many of us, truth is what we make when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world.
Each of us has our own truth and it's probably a good one. It's based
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
If you believe AI will help with this by providing objective truth, you’re wrong. The AI will simply be ignored as inconvenient to the objective. There is a reality distortion field that emerges when enough consensus agrees to a lie. The desire for it to be real makes it real. Facts are discarded, and those who point out that the emperor is nude are eliminated.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
@iancorzine No. All pretenses are off. Honestly, that’s for the best. Drop the acts. Admit the intentions of your desires. Then everyone can more accurately adjust to something closer to reality. For better or worse.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
@CryptoWhalbsl That’s a great way to put it.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
@FlandersYvette FACTS. Like actually. FACTS.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
@krogdor That’s correct. That’s the only thing that matters. Who wields power which translates more accurately to who wields the most violence. A scary but true fact.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Full speech from Erika Kirk, the wife of Charlie Kirk. Absolutely moving (MUST WATCH) https://t.co/a2ZUUVbrrx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two days ago, my husband, Charlie, went to see the face of his savior and his god. Charlie witnessed for his lord and savior, Jesus Christ. Now and for all eternity, he will stand at his savior's side wearing the glorious crown of a martyr. Charlie loved life. He loved America. He loved nature, which helped him always bring him closer to God. One of Charlie's favorite bible verses was Ephesians five verse 25. Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her. The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done. The movement will not die. America Fest here in Phoenix this December will go on. The radio and podcast show that he was so proud of will go on. If you wanna get involved, go to tpusa.com. May God bless America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My heart is with every one of my husband's employees who lost a friend and a mentor. I wanna thank the staffers
Speaker 1: of this
Speaker 0: his amazing Charlie Kirk show who helped him broadcast from this studio, this
Speaker 1: this chair. Every day he loved it. He loved what he did.
Speaker 0: I wanna thank the millions of people who have shown their love for Charlie here in Phoenix, across America, and worldwide. I wanna thank my husband's dear friend, vice president Vance, and his phenomenal wife, Usha, for their love and support. You guys honored my husband so well bringing him home.
Speaker 1: You both are tremendous.
Speaker 0: I wanna thank president Trump and his incredible family for the same. Mister president,
Speaker 1: my husband loved you, and he knew that you loved him too. He did. Your friendship was amazing. You supported him so well as did he for you.
Speaker 0: Two days ago, my husband, Charlie, went to see the face of his savior and his god. Charlie always said that when he was gone, he he wanted to be remembered for his courage and for his faith. And one of the final conversations that he had on this earth, my husband witnessed for his lord and savior, Jesus Christ. Now and for all eternity, he will stand at his savior's side wearing the glorious crown of a martyr. Charlie loved loved life.
He loved his life. He loved America. He loved nature, which helped him always bring him closer to God. He loved the Chicago Cubs. And my goodness did he love the Oregon Ducks.
Want
Speaker 1: me to say go Ducks, so I have to since they play on Saturday. So go Ducks. But most of all,
Speaker 0: Charlie loved his children,
Speaker 1: and he loved
Speaker 0: me with all of his heart, and I knew
Speaker 1: that. Every day, I knew that. He made sure I knew that every day. Every day, he would ask me, how can I serve you better? How can I be a better husband?
How can I be a better father? Every day. Every day. Such a good man. He still is a good man.
He was the perfect
Speaker 0: father. He was the perfect husband. Charlie always believed that god's design for marriage in the family was absolutely amazing, and it is. It is and it was the greatest joy of his life. And over and over, he would tell all these young people to come and find their future spouse, become wives and husbands and parents.
And the reason why is because he wanted you all to experience what he had and still has. He wanted everyone to bring heaven into this earth through love and joy that comes from raising a family. It's
Speaker 1: beautiful.
Speaker 0: Charlie always said that if he ever ran for office I know a lot of you asked if he ever was going to, but privately, he told me if he ever did run for office that his top priority would be to revive the American family.
Speaker 1: That was his priority.
Speaker 0: One of Charlie's favorite bible verses was Ephesians five verse 25. Husbands,
Speaker 1: love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her. My husband laid down his life for me, for our nation, for
Speaker 0: our children. He showed the ultimate and true covenantal love.
Speaker 1: I will never ever
Speaker 0: have the words to describe the loss that I feel in my heart. I honestly have no idea what any of this means.
Speaker 1: I know that God does, but I don't. But, Charlie baby, I know you do too. I know you do. So does our Lord.
Speaker 0: And our world is filled with evil, But our
Speaker 1: god you guys, our god is so good.
Speaker 0: He's so incredibly good. And we know that for those who love god, all things work together for good for those who are called according to his purpose. Already, I have seen the worldwide outpouring of love for my husband. I've heard the testimonies from people my husband inspired to get married, to start families, to seek out a relationship with God. It's the most important
Speaker 1: most important one of all.
Speaker 0: The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done. They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God's merciful love. They should all know this. If you thought that my husband's mission was powerful before, you have no idea. You have no idea what you just have unleashed across this entire country In this world, you have no idea.
You have no idea the fire that you have ignited within this wife. The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry. To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die. It won't. I refuse to let that happen.
It will not die. All of us will refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband's name, and I will make sure of it. It will become stronger, bolder, louder, and greater than ever. My husband's mission will not end, not even for a moment.
And one of Charlie's greatest talents was his ability, this phenomenal ability to choose great people to follow him. He could always find the ones who could handle any setback, and it's almost like he knew. He just he could see it in you.
Speaker 1: Even when you couldn't see
Speaker 0: it in yourself, he just knew. He knew you could handle it. You thought you only had 5% left, and he knew you at fifteen. He knew you were ready to go that extra mile even when you didn't. He always challenged people around him to work harder and to be better.
He never gave up, and I love knowing that one of his one of his mottos was never surrender. So I wanna tell you that that we'll never surrender. We never will, ever. Ever. Our campus tour this fall will continue.
There will be even more tours in the years to come. America Fest here in Phoenix this December will go on. It will be greater than ever. The radio and podcast show that he was so proud of
Speaker 1: will go on.
Speaker 0: And in a world filled with chaos, doubt, and uncertainty, my husband's voice will remain, and it will ring out louder and more clearly than ever, and his wisdom will endure. My favorite my my favorite too, but my husband's favorite word in the English language was earn. He would call all of you to be people of action who earn the future America deserves. So to all of the young people who felt inspired by my husband's faith and hard work, All of you already know what Charlie would want you to do. You know.
You know. If you're in high school or if you're in college, go find your local Turning Point USA chapter. Join it. Stay involved. He wants you to make a difference, and you can.
You can. The movement's not going anywhere, and it will only grow stronger when you join it. If there isn't a chapter, you can't find one, then start one. There is no excuse. You can start one.
And as
Speaker 1: my husband used to say in
Speaker 0: this room every single day, if you wanna get involved, the best way you can do that is going to t p u
Speaker 1: s a dot com. That's what he
Speaker 0: would say every day from his chair. Every single day. I watched his show every day, and he would always say, if you wanna get involved, go to tpusa.com. If you're a pastor, join our movement at tpusafaith. And if you're a parent, I highly recommend that you come to America Fest in December.
Sign up right now for that because we would love to see you. I would love to see you. Charlie would. He'll be there.
Speaker 1: He'll be there in spirit. Bring your kids. Bring your family.
Speaker 0: But most important of all, if you aren't a member of a church, I beg you to join one, a bible believing church. Our battle is not simply a political one. Above all, it is spiritual. It is spiritual. The spiritual warfare is palpable.
Charlie loved his savior with all of his heart, and he wanted every one of you to know him too. He wanted everyone to know that if they confess if they confess the Lord Jesus Christ who rose from
Speaker 1: the dead, then they will be saved.
Speaker 0: Hear me when I say this. Nobody is ever too young to know the gospel. Nobody. Nobody is ever too young to get involved with saving this beautiful this country my husband loved and still loves, and nobody is ever too old either. There's no age limit.
I know my husband is still here.
Speaker 1: He's watching over us. I don't remember the last time I slept. I couldn't sleep last night. And
Speaker 0: Charlie, baby. Charlie, I promise I will never let your legacy die, baby. I won't. I I promise I'll make Turning Point USA the biggest thing that this nation has ever seen. I promise.
Speaker 1: Charlie, I love you. I love you, baby. Rest in the arms of our lord
Speaker 0: as he blankets you with the words I know your heart always strives to hear. Well done, my good and faithful servant.
Speaker 1: When I got home last night, Gigi, our daughter just ran into our my arms. And I talked to her, she said, mommy, I missed you. I said, I miss you too, baby. She goes, where's daddy? What do you tell a three year old?
She's three. I said, baby, daddy loves you so much. Don't you worry. He's on a he's on a work trip with Jesus so he can afford your blueberry budget.
Speaker 0: My goodness. Am I so humbled to witness,
Speaker 1: Charlie, you alongside Jesus right now doing what you always wanna do,
Speaker 0: baby. Making heaven crowded. Right?
Speaker 1: That's what it's all about. Making heaven crowded. I can't wait to see you again one day.
Speaker 0: Thank you all again who love my husband, who supported him, who wrote him an email every single day during his radio show. He read all of them. All of them.
Speaker 1: God bless you all, and may God bless America.
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion emerged about Trump asserting that Epstein's situation is a hoax, prompting humor about the Prime Minister of Bahrain's discomfort. In response, Elon Musk questioned the narrative of Epstein's death and Ghislaine Maxwell's imprisonment, suggesting skepticism about the claims.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 NEW: Trump doubles down on calling Epstein a hoax while the Prime Minister of Bahrain is forced to sit there and be like “Do I really need to be here for this?” 😂 https://t.co/DpvLX9GdmY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president stated that the focus on the "Epstein files" is a "hoax" perpetrated by Democrats, with some Republicans foolishly falling into the trap. He claims the hoax has been run by Democrats for four years, referencing Christopher Wray, Comey, and the Steele dossier. He believes Democrats are bad for policy and picking electable candidates, citing a "communist" running in New York. He would rather discuss his administration's achievements, such as the economy and progress in the Middle East, instead of focusing on Epstein. He reiterated that those pursuing the "Epstein hoax" are doing the Democrats' work and are "stupid people."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, I know you wanna move past all this intrigue over the f d files, but I do wanna ask you to clarify something you said this morning. You said this was all a hoax. Has your attorney general
Speaker 1: There it goes.
Speaker 0: Told you this was a hoax? What evidence have you
Speaker 1: seen about? The attorney general. No. I know it's a hoax. It's started by Democrats.
It's been run by the Democrats for four years. You had Christopher Wray and these characters and Comey before him. And, it's a bad group. It started actually, look at the Steele dossier that turned out to be a total hoax. The 51 agents, the so called intelligence agents, it was a hoax.
It's all been a big hoax. It's perpetrated by the Democrats. And some stupid Republicans and foolish Republicans fall into the net, and so they try and do the Democrats' work. The Democrats are good for nothing other than these oaks. They're bad for policy.
They're bad for picking candidates that can get elected. Like in, New York, we have a communist running. He may get elected too, actually, but he's gonna he'll destroy the city. No. No.
It's I call it the Epstein hoax. Takes a lot of time and effort. Instead of talking about the great achievements, we've had a great gentleman yesterday, as you know, went on CNBC, and he made the statement that Trump may go down as the greatest president of all in The United States. And instead of talking about the things we've achieved, we've had tremendous achievement. They're wasting their time with, a guy who obviously had some very serious problems who died three, four years ago.
I'd rather talk about the success we have with the economy, the best we've ever had, and all of the things we've done, including The Middle East. I mean, you see it. Instead, they wanna talk about the, Epstein hooks. And the sad part is it's people that are really doing the Democrats' work. They're stupid people.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Go ahead. Mister president, when you ask the president Mister president, there's lots of reports coming in.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@AutismCapital Wow, amazing that Epstein “killed himself” and Ghislaine is in federal prison for a hoax 🤔
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk expressed frustration, prompting a response from AutismCapital questioning the status of promised disclosures related to a client list and Epstein files. AutismCapital criticized the situation as a farce, to which Musk replied that this was the final straw.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
@elonmusk What happened to “the client list is on my desk?” What happened to “the Epstein files part 2?” What happened to those magical binders. What a farce.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@AutismCapital This is the final straw
reSee.it AI Summary
I expressed my disappointment with Elon for opposing the BBB, stating that I would have won Pennsylvania regardless. I noted that Elon understood the bill well but only took issue with it when I planned to cut the EV mandate. I recalled how he praised me before leaving and suggested that he might soon say something negative. I also mentioned that Elon worked hard on DOGE and might miss the Oval Office, implying that some people develop a type of TDS after leaving, with reactions varying from embracing it to becoming hostile.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 NEW: Trump speaks on Elon coming out against the BBB “I would have won Pennsylvania regardless of Elon…I’m very disappointed with Elon. He knew this bill better than anyone and he only developed a problem when he found out I would cut the EV mandate… When he left he said the most beautiful things about me, he hasn’t said anything bad yet but I’m sure that will be next…I’ve helped Elon a lot… Elon worked hard at DOGE and I think he misses the place…I think he got out there and he’s no longer in this beautiful Oval Office…it’s not just Elon, I think when some people leave they miss it so badly they develop a type of TDS…some embrace it and some become hostile.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon endorsed me and campaigned for me, and I would have easily won Pennsylvania, even against Shapiro. Elon knew the bill's inner workings better than anyone and initially had no problem with it. His problem arose when the EV mandate was cut due to its cost.
I want cars of all types, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. Elon knew every aspect of the bill and only developed a problem after the cut. He previously said beautiful things about me. I'm disappointed in Elon, as I've helped him a lot.
He worked hard and did a good job, but I think he misses the Oval Office. People leave my administration and initially love us, but then they miss it and sometimes become hostile. It's like Trump derangement syndrome. They wake up and the glamour is gone, and they become hostile.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up in campaign for me. I think I would have won.
Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway even if the governor ran the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota who is I mean, he's a sick puppy. That guy that poor guy feels sorry for him. But they they made a bad choice with him. But if you pick Shapiro or anybody else I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania.
I won it by a lot. But I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars.
Unfair. We wanna have cars of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric, but we wanna have a gasoline combustion. We wanna have different. We wanna have hybrids.
We wanna have all we wanna be able to sell everything. And when that was cut and congress wanted to cut it, he became a little bit different. And I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left.
And if you saw the statements he made about me, which I'm sure you can get very easily, it's very fresh on tape, he said the most beautiful things about me. And he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot. Did he I just wanna clarify.
Did he raise any of these concerns with you privately before he raised them publicly? And this is the guy you put in charge of cutting spending. Should people not take him seriously about spending now? Are you saying this is all sour grapes? No.
He worked hard and he did a good job. And I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office and he was and he's got nice offices too. But there's something about this when I was telling the chancellor, this is where it is. People come in here even from Germany.
They come in and they they walk into the Oval Office and it's just a special place. It's, you know, World War one, it started and it ended here in World War two and so many other things. Everything big comes right from this this beautiful space. It's now much more beautiful than it was six months ago. A lot of good things are happening in this room.
And I'll I'll tell you, it's not he's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is.
It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it, but I we have it with others too. They leave and they wake up in the morning and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different and they become hostile. I don't know what it is. Someday you'll write a book about it and you'll let us know.
Yeah. It seems the president speaking of ending wars
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
This is brilliant. They nailed almost every single influencer archetype. God help us all 💀🤦♂️ https://t.co/VRsuwbFrPa
Video Transcript AI Summary
A detonation occurred on the city's outer ring, and outbound flights are suspended except for government and priority departures. Influencers shared their opinions, ranging from excitement to calls for female leadership, while one noted the aesthetic appeal of the nukes. Some saw the collapse as a buying opportunity or a chance to rebuild stronger. One influencer claimed the world collapses when men stop lifting, while another stated the world is cleansing toxicity.
Others focused on self-promotion, selling manifestation courses and survival gear. One influencer claimed the fiat system is collapsing and that they bought a bunker with doggy coin. Another influencer is showing how to infiltrate an executive class bunker using social engineering. One influencer stated that everything is fake, including them, and that they are a construct.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A detonation has just occurred on the outer ring of the city. We'll now be going live to our top influencer opinions.
Speaker 1: OMG, people. The world is ending. Are you seeing this? This is actually so exciting.
Speaker 2: Yo. I know it's chaos, but you got real survivor's wife energy. That's cool. I like them feisty.
Speaker 3: Like, it would totally be better if we ran it, you know? Men literally destroy everything, and my girls need to stop being so soft with these basic losers. Who even needs men? Right? Anything a man builds just gets destroyed by a different man.
Speaker 2: Guys, this collapse is literally the perfect dip. I'm buying more right now.
Speaker 4: Nukes are Suess aesthetic today. I made this outfit.
Speaker 5: Even as the world burns, my struggle for visibility and acceptance continues. This is exactly why representation matters now more than ever.
Speaker 2: As I keep saying on the channel, the world collapses when men stop lifting. It's not politics, it's testosterone.
Speaker 5: Yes. Yes. Yes. Balloon time. So yummy.
Nuclear boom. So tasty. Thank you. Nothing
Speaker 2: stops the daily grind. Not even a little natural disaster.
Speaker 6: Friends, this is the breakthrough moment from chapter seven. When everything falls apart, we rebuild ourselves stronger. Hey, girl. You wouldn't believe what just happened.
Speaker 3: Hi. OMG. I just totally shit my pants after that noise.
Speaker 2: Chat. Chat. This is literally the most realistic survival game ever and someone donate so I can buy a boat DLC before I actually drown.
Speaker 6: So this company says their device is quote unquote indestructible, supposedly survives anything, including the literal end times. Hey, guys. Remember, health is wealth. That's why I take these seven supplements right before my cheese stuffed hot dogs.
Speaker 0: Officials confirm outbound flights are suspended except for government and priority class departures.
Speaker 2: My dog has diplomatic status.
Speaker 3: OMG. There's like a nuke or something?
Speaker 4: Can we get five gifted subs for surviving the blast maybe?
Speaker 6: Today, I'm showing you how to infiltrate
Speaker 2: an executive class bunker using only social engineering and a vain.
Speaker 4: Your nukes are so manly. You're such a big boy. Go check out the link in bio, my king.
Speaker 2: I told you so when I said they'd shut down the grid. Look at you scrambling like rats now. The fiat system is collapsing exactly as we predicted. I just bought a bunker with doggy coin and a handshake.
Speaker 6: You losers can keep your degrees.
Speaker 7: Remember, beautiful souls. Even when the earth ends, we find our center. This is just the universe asking us to go deeper into our practice.
Speaker 8: World's in flames, but I'm on track. I manifest the never give back.
Speaker 2: Day in the life, guys. Curries, even during the apocalypse, I'm staying grateful, staying blessed. Link in bio for my manifestation course that literally predicted all this.
Speaker 3: Seed oils made y'all weak, but this here
Speaker 9: Y'all see this chaos, but plants don't lie. Earth's just cleansing the toxicity we've been ignoring.
Speaker 6: It's entirely possible. It's entirely possible. It's entirely possible this
Speaker 2: is all just a simulation glitching out, but what do I know? I told you so for twenty years, Yvette. The globalists, the deep state, your precious government. K. Wake up, people.
They're not coming to save you now. Damn. You evacuate like a goddess. So Bro, she smiled. That was a yes in fight or flight.
Speaker 5: Everything is fake, including me. I'm a construct created by the Doar brothers. Anyway, here's Tom with the weather.
Speaker 6: So we got some weather happening over here, and looks like it's gonna be.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: A massive party ship donning the flag of Mexico hits the Brooklyn Bridge. Insane footage, it's like the set of a movie. https://t.co/5E9LrEB6IM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is shocked and exclaims, "Holy crap," while apparently filming. They mention hitting the top and the camera. They state that the bridge is shaking and that there are people out there. The speaker describes the situation as "insane."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Holy crap. I'm gonna hit the top. Hit camera. What is going on? A what?
Dude, the bridge is shaking out there. We got a few booty going for the. There's people out there. There's literally people. This is insane.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 BREAKING: RFK Jr.’s speech marking the end of Gain of Function research and explaining the history of what happened https://t.co/Zx60PvuzlL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 states that documents were signed to end federal funding and private corporation control of gain of function studies, which he claims the US military and intelligence agencies began in 1947. He says that by 1969, the CIA claimed they could kill the entire US population for 29¢ a person. According to Speaker 1, President Nixon ended this research and persuaded over 80 countries to sign the bioweapons charter in 1973, but US federal officials who violate it cannot be prosecuted.
Speaker 1 claims that gain of function research relaunched a bioweapons arms race and that in 2014, three bugs escaped from US labs, leading President Obama to declare a moratorium that moved research offshore to the Wuhan Lab. He asserts that China, Russia, Iran, and other countries are developing devastating weapons using AI and CRISPR technologies. He says that gain-of-function research has never produced anything good, and commends President Trump for ending US bioweapons research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To have you all. Bobby, do you have anything to say? We signed some very important documents having to do with health. I'm gonna have to say
Speaker 1: Mister president, a gain of function this is an historic day, the end of gain of function research funding by the federal government and also controls by private corporations on gain of function studies. This was a kind of study that was engaged in by The United States military and intelligence agencies beginning in 1947. By 1969, the CIA said that they had reached nuclear equivalency, that they could kill the entire US population for 29¢ a person. Person. That year, president Nixon went to Fort Detrick and announced a unilateral end to this kind of research, what they call dual use research, research that was for vaccination and also for military purposes.
He then persuaded over a 80 countries to sign the bioweapons charter in 1973. That basically ended gain of function research around the
Speaker 0: And And pleased
Speaker 1: bioweapons charter is still is still in effect and the Geneva Convention is still in effect, US Federal Officials who violate it cannot be prosecuted. And that relaunched a bioweapons arms race and that was driven by gain of function research. In 2014, '3 of those bugs escaped from US labs, and president Obama declared a moratorium on future use. And instead, a lot of that research was moved offshore to the Wuhan Lab. We have an it launched bioweapons arms race all around the country, all around the world so that China is engaged in it, developing all kinds of weapons using AI and CRISPR technologies that are really devastating.
Russia is deeply engaged in it, Iran, and many other countries. It's it's a kind of weapon that always has blowback. There's always bad news. And the justification for this kind of weaponry was and these kind of research was always that we have to do this, develop vaccines to to counter a future pandemic. In all of the history of bio of gain of function research, we can't point to a single good thing that's come from it.
And today, I commend president Trump for his courage and his vision in ending US bioweapons research. And, Jay, I'd love you to talk a little bit about it. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Jay? Sure.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
Final segment before the Q&A began https://t.co/WeRm01FaTc
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are leaks almost every week in BSL 3 and BSL 4 labs, and no lab is immune. The executive order aims to prevent inadvertent leaks and protect humanity. The COVID outbreak cost twenty million lives and at least $25 trillion.
The COVID nightmare was likely preventable, and the leading theory is that it came from the Wuhan Lab, which was five miles from the initial outbreak. The speaker believes the outbreak was the result of scientists manipulating nature in a lab using technology exported from the United States, specifically inserting a furin cleavage site. The speaker hopes the executive order will do some good.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Mister president, there are, I think, three leaks on BSL 3 and BSL 4 labs. Our highest rated laboratory is almost every week. There's no laboratory that does this right. There's no laboratory that's immune from leaks, and this is gonna prevent those kind of inadvertent leaks from happening in the future and endangering humanity. The COVID outbreak cost twenty million lives and cost the world at least $25,000,000,000,000.
And this executive order is a precaution against us being involved in those that kind of research in the future. That's great. Very honored to do this. Marty, what do you have to say?
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable to think the entire nightmare of COVID was likely preventable. And you had good instincts early on, mister president, in suggesting it came from the Wuhan Lab. That is now the leading theory among scientists. It was five miles from the hospital where it first broke out. So it's crazy to think that this entire nightmare was probably the result of some scientists messing with mother nature in a laboratory with technology exported from The United States that is inserting a fur urine cleavage site.
So I hope this does some good in the world. Mister president, thank you for doing it. Anybody
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: The Interior says that they cut $830M in a contract to a consulting group that was doing useless surveys that were done on 8.5x11 pieces of paper with 10 questions that any junior high child or AI could put together TRUMP: “That was a pure fraud.” https://t.co/Sq6S1CHrsm
Video Transcript AI Summary
A federal consulting group within the Department of Interior managed contracts for various agencies. One contract was for $830 million to conduct surveys. The surveys were simple, consisting of 10 questions on an 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper, easily created by a child or AI. This contract was stopped after the inauguration. The speaker stated that the contract was a fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To, mister president. The there's a federal consulting group, which was a a group inside of interior, but it was managing contracts from many different agencies that flowed through here. One of those contracts, was for to do surveys of individuals. $830,000,000 for surveys, and so part of the question was, hey, could we actually see the surveys? And then the surveys came back and it was the survey was like eight and a half by 11 sheet of paper with 10 questions that, anyone's, you know, child in junior high could have put together or AI could have done for free.
$830,000,000. So that's one one that we've stopped. And and that contract was going out after you were inaugurated, sir. So it was You said it be a fraud. Yep.
It's a fraud.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: USAID is telling people to prepare for an ALL DAY SHREDDING EVENT to burn and shred all USAID documents. This isn't even parody. They're deleting history in real time. SPEECHLESS. https://t.co/akCVyj3juJ
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
The 2021 Thomas Massie Christmas card goes unfathomably hard. https://t.co/SeLy26eUNl
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Full Bret Baier x Zelenskyy Interview https://t.co/cdQvYHWYMw
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm thankful for the support from Americans, President Trump, and Congress. We are strategic partners, and we need to be honest to understand each other to stop Putin. I respect President Trump and the American people, and I don't think we did anything wrong, but there are things we need to discuss.
We are ready to sign the minerals deal, it is the first step to security guarantees, but it's not enough. Ceasefire without security guarantees is sensitive for our people. This spat in the Oval Office isn't good for either side. Ukrainians see Americans and Europeans as friends, and Putin and Russia as enemies.
Ukraine wants peace, which will come through diplomacy and negotiations with the US and Europe at the table. I came to the US for peace. If not NATO, let's build NATO in Ukraine.
Without US support, it will be difficult, but we can't lose our values or freedom. I'm ready for peace, but it has to be just and lasting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. We are pleased to welcome back to special report Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky. Mister president, thank you for the time today, especially on this day to continue to do this interview. President Trump said after your meeting that you disrespected him and the vice president and all of America in the Oval Office. Do you think you did?
And do you think you owe an apology to president Trump?
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. First of all, thank you for invitation for this dialogue, and good evening to all your country, to all Americans. I'm very thankful to to Americans for all your support. You did a lot. I'm thankful to president Trump and to congress by partisan support.
And I was always very thankful from all our people. You helped us a lot from the very beginning during three years of full scale innovation. You helped us to survive. And and anyway, we are strategic partners. And even in such tough dialogue, and I think it's we have to be very honest, and we have to be very direct to understand each other because it's very, for us, very necessary to president Trump.
And I'm I'm I'm with all the respect that he wants to finish this war, but not nobody wants to finish more than we Because we in Ukraine, we are in this war. We are in this battle and battle for for freedom for our lives. So so I'm just telling that, I think, that we have to be on the same side, and I hope that the president on our side together with us, and and that is very important to stop Putin. And I heard from president Trump a lot of times that he will stop the war, and I hope he will and and we need to pressure him with Europe, with all the partners. And I think this dialogue had to be a little bit earlier to understand where we are.
Like, you know, I don't remember exactly, but like, president Reagan said that peace is not just an absent the war. Yes. We are speaking about just and lasting peace, about freedom, about justice, about human rights. And that's why I said that I think so, that ceasefire, and you know Putin, he broken 25 times, ceasefire during all these years, 10
Speaker 0: So I'm not hearing from you, mister president, a thought that you owe the president an apology.
Speaker 1: No. I respect president, and I respect American people. And if I don't know if I think that we have to be very open and very honest. And I'm not sure that we did something bad. I think maybe sometimes some some some things we have to discuss out of out of media with all respect to democracy and to a free media, but there are things that where we have to understand the position of Ukraine and Ukrainians.
And I think that is the most important thing. Yes. We are partners. You know? We are very close partners.
We have to be fair. We have to be we have to be very free.
Speaker 0: I'm told that you were told multiple times from lawmakers on Capitol Hill and the White House to make today about the minerals deal and the economic deal, and then get it signed and let negotiations play out over security guarantees step by step. Is that true?
Speaker 1: I said that we have to sign this document, and we are ready for this. And this will be the step first step to security guarantees, but it's not enough. I think so. Maybe I don't know something. I don't know some details.
That's why I wanted to share it with the president, my thoughts, and to hear him again because he has a plan how to stop Putin. And maybe, as I said, maybe it's out of big conversations, but we have to share it. You know? This is so sensitive. You know?
Just cease fire without security guarantee. This is so sensitive for our people. I'm I'm speaking like a president of a people who are in this struggle three years, and they just want to hear that America on our side and that America will stay with us, not with Russia, with us. That's it. But I'm sure that it will be this is the first step to security guarantees.
Europeans, we don't need to lose them. They are good allies for The United States. United States is the most or the biggest donator of support and of peace. But we don't need to lose Europe, and they also want to know next steps. We have to be very open to understand how to stop the war.
Speaker 0: Right. But do you think the public spat in the Oval Office in front of the media served Ukrainians well today?
Speaker 1: I I think this kind of this kind of spat is is I mean, this have I mean, this is is not good for both sides anyway. And I will I very open, but I can't, you know, change our Ukrainian attitude to Russian. And I don't want they are killers for us. You know? This is very very clear that Americans are the best of our friends.
Europeans are the best of our friends and Putin with Russian, their enemies. And it doesn't mean that we don't want peace. We just want to recognize the reality, the real situation.
Speaker 0: President Trump is convinced that you will never sign a deal with Vladimir Putin. Is he right?
Speaker 1: No. I think so. What I think, Ukraine wants peace and we will have. We will have anyway diplomacy. We will have negotiations.
I only said that I think so. It's about just and lasting peace. It meant that we have be we have to be very strong at the table of negotiations. And at these negotiations, Ukraine and Russia, like sides of this war have to be and United States and Europe. That what I said.
So we are ready for peace, but we have to be in strong position. What does it mean? Just to know that our army is strong, that our partners with us, and that we have security guarantees. Am I not right?
Speaker 0: Leaving the White House today, president Trump said this.
Speaker 2: He's looking to go on and fight, fight, fight. He wants to come back right now, but I can't do that.
Speaker 0: What do you make of that? Do you wanna continue fighting? Do you want peace? And if he had the opportunity to go back to the White House right now, would you do it?
Speaker 1: No. First of all, we want peace. That's why I'm in The United States. That's why I visited president Trump. And thanks for invitation again.
The deal on minerals in the first step to security guarantees, it's meant for the peace, closer to peace. That's why I'm here. And I have we have tough situation to understand it is to be in Ukraine. You you saw it, Brett. You were swans.
Thank you again. So I think that's very important to understand what's going on. But I I respect my soldiers and our people, our civilians who work and support our warriors. I can't say just stop. Nobody will stop because everybody afraid that Putin will come back tomorrow.
We want just and lasting peace. It's true. We want security guarantees. We raised this topic about NATO the quickest way, but not all the countries are on this side. I said, okay.
If not NATO, nobody is pushing. If not NATO, let's build NATO in Ukraine. That's my position. Europeans are ready or to have contingents on our territory, boots on the ground. United States thinks maybe to help, maybe USA, backstop have to be just to guarantee that they are with Europeans.
Look at Europe. It's strong. It became stronger, but they also want to have allies like The United States. That's what I said. I just want to understand what the peace.
It's not my question, Brad. This is the question from all our people.
Speaker 0: You mentioned when I traveled to the front lines with you last year Yeah. To see the situation, to mark the anniversary of the war, and this is what you told me back then.
Speaker 1: Will Ukrainians survive without congress support? Of course. But not all of us. It will be a tragedy for all of us, not only for Ukraine, not only for Ukrainians, for all Europe.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So the question today is, can Ukraine win this war or hold off Russia without continued US support?
Speaker 1: It will be difficult for us. That's why I'm I'm here. That's why we speak about the future negotiations. It will be difficult without your support, but we can't lose our values, our people, we can't lose our freedom. So a lot of people Russians came to our territory, you know it.
Russians came to our houses and everybody know everybody saw it, video, images, lot of things. They killed so many people. Just to forget it. Just to say that Putin is a great guy. No.
Without us. We don't want it. That's why that's why we speak about, you know, everybody remembered how it was the first days of the war. How they came. Nobody wants in Ukraine.
Yes. Of course, nobody will forget it, but nobody wants to have again new wave of occupation. That's why when we say, no, NATO. What security guarantees can we have? I'm not pushing.
We are not pressuring. We're just asking. We're just sharing very clear messages to our friends, to Americans. Right. If you if you stay with us, thank you so much.
But let's do let's do the infrastructure of security guarantees. Let's just share with our people. Just with our people that America stay with us. That's great. We count on it.
But just to share it and to say, that's all.
Speaker 0: How does the war end? How do you get to a deal? You're at a a place right now where there is no deal. How do you get it back on track?
Speaker 1: I think that Europe is ready for contingents and to help us with financing of big army, such big as we have now. This is our army as a part of security guarantees. Now we want to just to find the place for our biggest strategic partner for The United States or United States will propose the where and how United States will give us security guarantees, what kind of and what part of volume of security guarantees. And when we will be ready with this, we will come to diplomacy. To diplomacy, yes, with Russians, Europeans, United States, and we, for a while.
I think this is real way because with weapon is too long. It's not enough. We don't have enough weapon to push them out, and we don't see now. For now, we don't see really big volume of new support from The United States, but with all respect again. So for today, we'll be ready with security guarantee.
Really, when I say NATO, it's not about that we I mean, we are focusing on this war. It's about very understandable infrastructure of security guarantees. And you see that no NATO countries for today, no NATO countries been under attacks.
Speaker 0: Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina, he has been a big proponent of you and of Ukraine, said this today after the meeting.
Speaker 3: I have never been more proud of the president. I was very proud of JD Vance standing up for our country. We want to be helpful. What I saw in the Oval Office was disrespectful, and I don't know if we can ever do business with Zelensky again. He either needs to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with, or he needs to change.
Speaker 0: So he says you need to continue consider resigning. Is that on the table?
Speaker 1: I I don't know if he will be happy after my words. This decision can do only people of Ukraine.
Speaker 0: You're not gonna step down to do a peace deal.
Speaker 1: No. No. I was I was I was I was all always ready. I I'm not I'm not sure that is good idea for for I mean, this such proposals. But, but, anyway, I always said, if United States will support NATO, so I think that is enough for Ukraine.
So I think we I did all I all I had to do. And if somebody is not, I mean, this happy with me, okay. Okay. But between us, yes, Americans vote for American president. Each European country vote for their president and only Ukraine.
And with all respect to Lindsey, if I can say Lindsey, we know each other. Yes. And only Ukrainians.
Speaker 0: Democrats have had their president. Democrats have had the opposite reaction to the Oval Office meeting. Democrat senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut posted this. What just happened in the Oval Office was a planned ambush designed to help a brutal Russian dictator and hurt America's security. Trump has become Putin's lapdog, and America's global power is hemorrhaging as America sides with dictators over democracy.
What an embarrassment. Do you think the confrontation in the Oval Office today was preplanned, like senator Murphy suggests?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 0: You don't know? You think maybe?
Speaker 1: I don't know. No. No. No. I don't.
I mean, this I don't know about it. I'm I think no. I think I think it was just really a tough situation because we've been very open, very direct.
Speaker 0: What set you off? What made you mad? Because they said your tenor and tone
Speaker 1: It's not about mad. It's not Brad, you see how how to say when you are in The United States. And for example, president or vice president or somebody or senators, it doesn't matter. Big politicians. Yes.
When they, for example, say that Ukraine is almost destroyed, that our soldiers run away, that they are not heroes, that Ukraine lost million of civilians, that his president is dictator. You know? What is the reaction? It's not about me. The reaction reaction is that where is our friendship between Ukraine and United States.
That's it. This is filling and that's why I do not want to lose our great partners at The United States and I I just said that it's not the first time. I said it by phone and we had some other conversations and we had in Munich meetings and they said I said, please please be correct. Just I want to be very polite. I I mean this be correct with this number.
When you say about the number, each person is important. When you say about a million of losses, we don't have any million of losses. When you speak about the territories, maybe some territories and etcetera. It's not just territory. It's houses.
It's people lives. You know? Their their their fathers, mothers, their relatives, grandfather, they had died or this I mean, during this war. Nobody want to forgive Putin. It's not funny, you know, or or fairy tale.
This is real life. That's what I said. And when you said it, a lot of times to my big friends, we've been here today in our dialogue. And then they again begin to repeat the same things. I think it's not I mean this I I That's why I said it's it's not good way between partners, good partners and friends.
That's it. And I think that if Jordan is asking questions to president with all respect to vice president, I mean, this he has his interview. This is shouldn't this
Speaker 0: shouldn't this dynamic, if you're going to be like this, be behind closed doors? Not Of course, enough. So do you regret that? Are you regretting that that happened today?
Speaker 1: Regretting? Yes. I think it was not good. I think it was not good because we had a lot of different dialogues. I'm not I'm always open to media, but there are very sensitive things.
I just want to be honest and I just want our partners to understand situation correctly And and I want to understand everything correctly. That's that's about us. What? Not to lose our friendship.
Speaker 0: A couple more things. What are the next steps in your mind? Here we are today. Yeah. What are the next steps?
Speaker 1: I think I think so. I think so. United States wanted this deal very much. And we've been not against this deal, but we wanted to understand what parts in security guarantees will take this deal and what next steps. Just again to understand for our people.
During the war, what you don't like, even sometimes hate, surprises. It's understandable. Many terrible things this war brought to us. So we don't we don't want any surprises. Yes.
That's why we want to be very fair with our partners. And I think this deal, it was prepared by teams. It was not simple during weeks. And now it's ready. I think that they have to sign.
The countries have to sign. The ministers have to sign. That's it. I don't know when they will do it. It depends on the American side exactly.
Speaker 0: The minerals deal did not have security guarantees listed in it. It's a part. The security guarantees?
Speaker 1: It's this is the part in the infrastructure of security guarantees. Because, for example, president Trump shared that I think so that if we will be there in some productions and etcetera in mineral that Putin will never come on this territory where we are. And I said to him, don't trust Putin. Why? I said, because it's not I mean this, I we respect and we believe in strongest of The United States, But I said to him that we had more than two more than 20 companies, American companies, big companies on the territory of Ukraine.
And we had offices even on temporary occupied territories. For Putin, it doesn't matter. It's American, Euro, European company or Ukraine. It doesn't matter. He just came and occupied it.
That's what I said. I think this is great idea how to strengthen Ukraine and how to make business between two countries, how to make additional jobs for two countries. But it's not just these will not save
Speaker 0: us. I read what the Democratic senator said that Yeah. Trump has become Putin's lapdog. Do you agree with that president Trump is too close to Vladimir Putin in your mind?
Speaker 1: We spoke about it. And, I think today, very openly, president Trump, he said that I want to be in the middle. Otherwise, I will not put these guys at the table. And
Speaker 0: is he right?
Speaker 1: I want really I want to be very honest. I want really him to be more at our side. I will explain why. Because it's not just that the war began somewhere between our countries. The war began when Russia brought this war to our country, and they are not right.
And they are not right. They didn't respect our territorial integrity. They brought the war on our territory to our family. Sorry. For repeating to our houses.
And they're not right. And, of course, all the Ukrainians want to hear strong position of The United States on our side. From one side, it's understandable. From another side, he wants to find some way of dialogue with Putin. But he always said, as I remember, he always said that peace through strength.
And that's why I think that he's strong. United States strong. Two parties together in this question. Two parties always together against Russia. You're very strong to to do strong steps against Putin.
Speaker 0: Americans are worried about where the money has gone. Yeah. Will there be a very rigorous accounting of where the money has gone? It seems like there is some question about whether there's corruption or sold military equipment. No.
Speaker 1: It's it can't be so. 100 billions we have got during three years.
Speaker 0: Hundred and eighty three from The US.
Speaker 1: Now on on the paper, in the documents, yes. But we have in fact, because 67 came like a weapon. It came through the border. It's checked and it's fixed by ever everybody and we can we go we shared it not once with the with the American side and SOTI one point five. It was direct financial support to the budget.
Again, it's very open. It digitalized. It's open, free, and please, if if somebody want to check it again, we are very very open with this.
Speaker 0: Last last thing, mister president. Yeah. You think your relationship with Donald Trump, president Trump after today can be salvaged?
Speaker 1: Can be. Yes, of course. Because it's relations more than to president. It's the historical relations, strong relations between our people. And that's why I always began with to thank your people from our people.
And this is the most important. And of course, thankful to president and of course to congress, but first of all to your people. Your people help to save our people. People, first. Human rights, the first.
This is very very important and we are thankful and sorry for this. I mean this, we wanted very much to have all its strong relations and I very count that we will have it.
Speaker 0: Mister president, we're honored that you kept this interview. Thank you very much for the time.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨WHOA: The microphone captured Zelenskyy calling JD Vance "Suka," Russian for "Bitch," during their argument 😲 https://t.co/raNoKP7WpN
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been to Kangwon and have seen the stories of what happens there. People are brought there on propaganda tours.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have been to To Kangwon. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister Kangwon. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Full President Trump x JD Vance x Zelenskyy argument (MUST WATCH) https://t.co/anqOJRB7Za
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's tough to make a deal because of the hatred towards Putin. I want to align with the world and Europe to get this done. I can be tougher than anyone, but that won't get us a deal.
For four years, we had a president who talked tough about Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine. Diplomacy is the path to peace.
Putin occupied parts of Ukraine in 2014. From 2014 to 2022, people were dying, despite conversations and ceasefire agreements with Macron and Merkel. He broke the ceasefire and didn't exchange prisoners. What kind of diplomacy is that? You're gambling with World War Three and disrespecting this country. Have you said thank you once? We gave you $350 billion and military equipment. If you could get a ceasefire right now, take it. I gave you javelins while Obama gave you sheets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This thing over with. You see the hatred he's got for Putin. It's very tough for me to make a deal with that kind of hate. He's got tremendous hatred. And I understand that, but I can tell you the other side isn't exactly in love with, you know, him either.
So it's not a question of alignment. I have to I'm aligned with the world. I wanna get the thing set. I'm aligned with Europe. I wanna see if we can get this thing done.
You want me to be tough? I could be tougher than any human being you've ever seen. I'd be so tough, but you're never gonna get a deal that way. So that's the way it goes. Alright.
One more question. Miss, you wanna say Hey.
Speaker 1: I I will respond to this. So look. For four years in The United States Of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of The United States' words mattered more than the president of The United States' actions.
What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what president Trump is doing.
Speaker 2: Can I ask you?
Speaker 1: Sure. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Okay. So he occupied it, our parts big parts of Ukraine, parts of East and Crimea. So he occupied it on 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those time was Obama, then president Obama, then president Trump, then president Biden, now president Trump, and god bless, now president Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him.
He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the contact Twenty fifteen.
Speaker 1: Twenty '14. Twenty '14 and
Speaker 0: 2014. Yeah. Yeah. So I was I was not here.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But That's exactly right.
Speaker 2: Yes. But during 2014 till 2022, you know, the well, the situation the same. The people are been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know?
That we had conversations with him. A lot of conversations. My bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like a new president. In 2019, I signed with him the deal.
I signed with him, Macron and Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Seasefire, all of them told me that he will never go. We signed him with gas contract. Gas contract.
Yes. But after that, he broke the ceasefire. He killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about?
What what do you what do do you mean?
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country. Yes. But if you Mister president mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conference.
Have been to Ukraine?
Speaker 2: Did you say what problems we have?
Speaker 1: I have been to The count ones. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems What? Bringing people into your military?
Speaker 2: We have problems.
Speaker 1: And do you think that it's respectful Hold on. To come to the Oval Office of The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country.
Speaker 2: A lot of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now.
But you will feel it in the future.
Speaker 0: God bless. You know that.
Speaker 2: God bless. You don't know
Speaker 0: that you're war. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel.
Speaker 2: I'm not telling you
Speaker 0: Because you're in no position to dictate that.
Speaker 1: Remember this.
Speaker 0: You're no position to dictate what we're gonna feel. We're gonna feel very good.
Speaker 2: Feel influence.
Speaker 0: We're gonna feel very good and very strong.
Speaker 2: You will feel influence.
Speaker 0: You're right now not in a very good position. Allowed yourself to be in a very bad position, and he's happy be right about it.
Speaker 2: From the very beginning of the war
Speaker 0: You're not in a good position.
Speaker 2: I was about
Speaker 0: to the cards right now. With us, you start having playing cards. Right now, you don't you see
Speaker 2: the cards. President.
Speaker 0: You're playing serious. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people.
Speaker 2: You're thinking
Speaker 0: You're gambling with World War three. You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country. I'm way more a lot of people said they should have.
Speaker 1: Have you
Speaker 0: said thank you once? In entire meeting? No. In this entire meeting, have
Speaker 1: you said thank you? Today. You went to Pennsylvania and campaign for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country. Please, you're saying that if you will
Speaker 2: speak very loudly about the war you
Speaker 0: can He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble.
Speaker 2: Can I
Speaker 0: help you? No. No. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.
I know. You're not winning. I know. You're not winning this. I You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of us.
Speaker 2: Mister president, we are staying in our country, staying strong from the very beginning of the war. We've been alone, and we are thankful. I said thanks.
Speaker 0: You have a lot. Cabinet.
Speaker 2: You have a this cabinet.
Speaker 0: We gave you, through your stupid president, three hundred and fifty billion dollars. You will. We gave you military equipment. You will. And your men are brave, but they had to use our You invited me to our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.
Speaker 2: In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days. This is something less. In two weeks.
Of course. Yes.
Speaker 0: It's gonna be a very hard thing to do business like this. I can tell you.
Speaker 1: Say thank you. I said it a lot of times. Say American people. Accept that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong.
Speaker 0: But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I understand. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful.
You don't have the cards. You're buried there. You you people had died. Let me tell you You're running low on soldiers. Listen.
Don't play You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing. And then you then you tell us, I don't wanna a ceasefire. I don't want a ceasefire. I wanna go and I wanted this.
I look. If you could get a ceasefire right now, I tell you you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop
Speaker 2: causing killing. Of course, we want to stop the war.
Speaker 0: But you're saying you don't want a ceasefire? Said to you I want a cease guarantees. Because you'll get a cease fire faster than any greater.
Speaker 2: Ask our people about cease fire. What they think?
Speaker 0: That wasn't for you. What That wasn't with me. Was with a a guy named Biden who was not a smart person. Was your that was with Obama.
Speaker 2: It was your president.
Speaker 0: Excuse me. That was with Obama who gave you sheets, and I gave you javelins.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 0: I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins. You gotta be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards.
But without us, you don't have any cards.
Speaker 2: My the vice president. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: He's Gonna be a tough deal to make because the attitudes have to change.
Speaker 2: What if Russia breaks his fire? What if Russia
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: AOC gets called out for weaponizing the Justice Department and then tries to say "In what way?" When the host says "By putting Trump on trial for example," she stumbles through a non-answer. https://t.co/YoEwUosRR4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some Democratic members of Congress are preparing for the possibility of litigation. They're considering if they have the best teams possible to carry out their work.
Some Republicans may say that Democrats are weaponizing the Justice Department, citing Trump's trial as an example. But in the United States, we are judged by a jury of our peers. Trump was found guilty in court on 34 felony charges. It's hard to make a partisan argument against that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think other Democrats are watching their words?
Speaker 1: I think it's certainly possible, but I'm not sure. I mean, I I cannot think of or point to any individuals who have said that. I do think that there are Democratic members of Congress who are preparing for that possibility.
Speaker 0: How do they prepare?
Speaker 1: I think they look to the possibility of litigation. I think they're saying, you know, do we have the best teams possible in order to carry out our work?
Speaker 0: Some Republican or many perhaps will be watching this, listening to this and thinking, wait a minute. Actually, you're the ones who are prosecuting us. You were the guys who are weaponizing the justice department. How would you respond to somebody who may be thinking that?
Speaker 1: In what way? In what way? Is the very presence
Speaker 0: Putting Trump on trial would be their example, I suppose.
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, here's the deal. In The United States, there is a jury where we are judged by our peers, and he was found guilty in court on 34 felony charges. If people want to say it was weaponized, I mean, it is hard pressed to say that there's a partisan argument for that.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was shocked to hear that President Zelenskyy was kicked out of The White House. His delegation claimed he had to leave due to his disrespectful behavior. Meanwhile, the lunch meant for him is now sitting outside, and the press staffers are going to eat it.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: President Zelenskyy was kicked out of The White House and the Press Staffers will be eating his lunch (literally) "The President has kicked Zelenskyy out of the White House. His delegation is saying he has to go. They said his shrugging and eyerolling was disrespectful." "The lunch that they were supposed to have is sitting outside the hallway and the press staffers are going to be eating that lunch."
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been told that President Biden has asked Zelensky to leave the White House. The President and other officials felt disrespected by Zelensky's body language, including shrugging and eye-rolling, which they perceived as ungrateful. The President believes Zelensky is not yet ready for peace negotiations and can return when he is. Zelensky's delegation is being told he needs to go home. The scheduled lunch has been canceled, and the press staffers will be eating it instead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what I was told. The president has kicked Zelensky out of the White House. His delegation right now is telling him that he's gotta go home. The president felt disrespected. Officials in the room felt that beyond the language barrier that we've heard some discussion about, Zelensky's body language, shrugging and eye rolling, was ungrateful, disrespectful, and the president feels that Zelensky is not ready for peace, and he can come back when he's ready to talk about peace.
But he's not in that position right now, and Zelensky is has is being told he's gotta go. The lunch that they were supposed to have is sitting right outside the hallway, and the the press staffers are going to be eating that lunch.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently expressed my concerns about President Zelenskyy's approach during our discussions. I felt he was two-faced, especially regarding our talks on mineral rights and the need for a security guarantee in exchange for the substantial financial support we've provided. After our meeting, he claimed to have rejected the deal, which was not the case. I believe there should be some gratitude from Ukraine, as their situation doesn't directly affect Americans. I also warned that accusing President Trump of disinformation is counterproductive and could lead to tension.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Marco Rubio claims that President Zelenskyy acted two-faced with him and President Trump and warns him not to hustle the United States. RUBIO: "We discussed mineral rights with Zelenskyy and said we want to be in a joint venture with you because we think we need a security guarantee. We need to be paid back some of the $200B in taxpayer money we've given you. He said 'Sure, I need to run it through my legislative process.' I read two days later he's saying he rejected the deal. That's not what happened in that meeting. We're trying to help these guys. Ukraine doesn't directly impact the daily lives of Americans, there should be some gratitude here. When you see him accusing the President of disinformation, that's highly counterproductive. President Trump isn't going to take that. He's not going to get gamed. He hopes Zelenskyy isn't trying to hustle the United States, that's not going to be productive here."
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump is upset with President Zelensky, and in some cases, rightfully so. Joe Biden also had frustrations with Zelensky because he wouldn't express gratitude for the help he received. I was personally upset when Zelensky rejected a joint venture for mineral rights after initially agreeing to it. We saw it as a security guarantee, giving us a vested interest in Ukraine's safety while getting paid back for the taxpayers' money we invested.
While Ukraine is on another continent, it impacts our allies and the world. There should be some gratitude, but instead, Zelensky accuses the President of disinformation, which is counterproductive. President Trump is transparent and won't tolerate being "gamed." He's willing to work on peace and hopes Zelensky will be a partner, not someone putting out counter-messaging.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When president Trump posts that president Zelensky is a dictator without elections, what are you thinking? I think president Trump is very upset at president Zelensky and I in some case and and rightfully so. Look. Number one, Joe Biden had frustrations with Zelenskyy, people shouldn't forget it, there are newspaper articles out there about how he cursed at him in a phone call because Zelenskyy, instead of saying thank you for all your help, is immediately out there messaging what we're not doing or what he's not getting. I think the second thing is frankly, I was personally very upset because we had a conversation with President Zelensky, the Vice President and I, the two, three of us, and we discussed this issue about the mineral rights, and we explained to them, look, we want to be a joint venture with you, not because we're trying to steal from your country, but because we think that's actually a security guarantee.
If we're your partner in an important economic endeavor, we get to get paid back some of the money the taxpayers have given, close to $200,000,000,000 and it also, now we have a vested interest in the security of Ukraine, and he said, sure, we want to do this deal, it makes all the sense in the world, the only thing is, I need to run it through my legislative process, they have to approve it. I read two days later that Zelensky is out there saying, I rejected the deal, I told them no way that we're not doing that, well, that's not what happened in that meeting. So, you start to get upset by somebody, we're trying to help these guys. One of the points the President made in his messaging is, it's not that we don't care about Ukraine, but Ukraine is on another continent, you know, it doesn't directly impact the daily lives of Americans. We care about it, because it has implications for our allies, and ultimately for the world.
There should be some level of gratitude here about this, and when you don't see it, and you see him out there accusing the president of living in a world of disinformation, that's highly, very counterproductive, and I don't need to explain to you or anybody else, Donald Trump's not, President Trump's not the kind of person that's going to sit there and take that. He's very transparent, he's going to tell you exactly how he feels, and he sent a message that he's not going to get gamed here. He's willing to work on peace because he cares about Ukraine, and he hopes Zelensky will be a partner in that, and not someone who's out there putting this sort of counter messaging to try to, you know, hustle us in that regard. That's not going to be productive here.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on the Biden Administration's handling of illegal immigration, claiming they prioritized amplifying it using taxpayer money. I pointed out that funds meant for Americans were redirected to luxury accommodations for illegal immigrants, even after an executive order was signed to stop it. I believe this strategy aims to create a new voter base, as the likelihood of illegal immigrants voting Democrat is high. Additionally, I criticized the use of a costly app designed to facilitate their entry, suggesting it undermines the integrity of swing states.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Elon Musk shares that the Biden Administration was importing illegals to flip swing states and did everything possible to amplify illegal immigration on taxpayer dime. ELON: "It's important for people to understand the Biden Administration sent any possible money they could send to amplify illegal immigration. They took money from FEMA meant for helping Americans in distress and sent it to luxury hotels for illegal immigrants in NY. That is an outrage. They actually did that. Not only that, even after The President signed an EO saying it has to stop, the deep state bureaucrats still pressed send on $80M last week to send money to The Roosevelt Hotel and other places. Now they're mad and they're trying to sue to have it restored. The gumption of these people." SCHMITT: "Do you think they were trying to create a new voter class?" ELON: "Yes. Look at basic incentives. If the probability that an illegal is going to vote Democrat is 80-90% then the incentive is to maximized the umber of illegals in the country. That is why the Biden administration was pushing to get in as many illegals as possible. because every on e of them is a customer. Every one of them is voter. The entire thing is a giant voter important scam. Then they created this CBP1 app to literally fly people in. When people are being flown in at your expense that is crazy. Then we found out some guy in London was paid $100M to make this app. When they're flying illegals into the swing states, it's not going to be a swing state for long."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Biden administration has been allocating funds to facilitate and amplify illegal immigration, even redirecting FEMA money intended for Americans to luxury hotels for immigrants. This continued even after an executive order was signed to stop it. The administration created the CBP One app, literally flying people into the country at taxpayer expense, with a $100 million contract awarded to someone in London.
The incentive is clear: maximize the number of potential Democrat voters by any means necessary. This is a voter importation scam. They're flying illegals into swing states. With a small, modular victory margin, injecting a large number of new immigrants can change the political landscape. This is a long-term investment that is guaranteed to pay off.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think it's really important for people to understand that the the the Biden administration sent any possible money that they could they could if if there was money they could send to facilitate and amplify illegal immigration, they sent it. Mhmm. Okay. They took money from FEMA meant for helping Americans in distress and sent that money to luxury hotels for illegal immigrants in New York. That is a Yeah.
An outrage. Yeah. They actually did that. And and not only that, even after president signed an executive order saying it has to stop, the famous the the the sort of whatever deep state bureaucrats still still pressed send on $80,000,000 last week
Speaker 1: to go to the Roosevelt Hotel
Speaker 0: in New York and other places last week. And now and now they're mad
Speaker 1: that they got stopped. And they're like trying to sue to have it be restored.
Speaker 0: It's like the gumption
Speaker 1: is You think you think they're creating a new voter classes? Would you think that was the goal when they open up Yes. Borders for four years? Create a new voter class, get them citizenship, get them in. Cards, vote.
A lot
Speaker 0: of these things, like you don't actually have to assume some grand conspiracy. You just need to look at basic incentives. Who benefits? So if the incentives the the the fundamentally, if if the probability that an illegal is gonna vote Democrat at some point, whether it's a, you know, cheating or but eventually, can become citizens. But if the if the probability is like 90%, just look at California, which is super majority them.
And then the incentive is to maximize the number of illegals in the That is why the Biden administration was pushing to get in as many illegals as possible and spend every dollar possible to get as many because every one of them is a customer. Everyone's a voter. Yeah. And so the the whole thing was a giant voter importation scam.
Speaker 1: Pretty obvious. Very obvious. Yeah.
Speaker 0: And and then they moreover, then they they they actually created the c v p one border app thing Yeah. Where they they were which is like the where they could they would literally fly people in. It's not like it it's like at the point at which, you know, people being flown in at at your expense
Speaker 1: Sending planes
Speaker 0: like building a wall
Speaker 1: doesn't fly fly them over the border.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They're literally flying them in.
Speaker 1: No others no other country in the world would do something like this. Nobody is this stupid.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And and then we found that that it was like a hundred million dollar contract given to some guy in London, actually, oddly enough Yeah. For the CVP one app. So so then so they're they're flying illegals into the swing states. Yeah.
And and if you've got like a a modular victory of maybe 20,000 people and you fly 200,000 illegals into that state You it's not gonna be a swing state for long.
Speaker 1: Change the numbers. Eventually. Yeah. Maybe in four or eight years, you're it's a long game.
Speaker 0: Just a matter of time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So it might take like a year for a sign to see if I can get
Speaker 1: On the to get get
Speaker 0: a green card and then five years for the citizenship. It's it's an investment that is guaranteed to pay off. Yeah. Just a question of when.
Speaker 1: They all remember who brought them in and who left them here. Exactly. Exactly. I wanna go
Speaker 0: back
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on the situation in Ukraine, emphasizing the need for empathy for those suffering on the front lines. I questioned how long the conflict is expected to continue and what the sacrifices are truly for, noting that the front lines have barely changed in two years. I expressed my disgust at the corruption and graft surrounding the war, suggesting that the reality is that soldiers are being sent into a dangerous situation for financial gain. I believe this cycle needs to come to an end.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Elon Musk shares his thoughts on Ukraine ELON MUSK: "We should have empathy for the people dying on the front lines. That's the most important thing. How many more years is this supposed to go on? What are they dying for? The line of engagement has barely moved for two years. Just a whole bunch of dead people in trenches, for what? For the biggest graft machine I've ever seen in my life. The amount of money thats being taken in graft and bribery is disgusting. What's actually happening is that those poor guys are being sent into a meat grinder for money. And it needs to stop."
Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to have empathy for those dying on the front lines, and consider how long this has been going on and what they are dying for. The line of engagement hasn't moved in two years, how many people have died in trenches for nothing? It's for the biggest graft machine I've ever seen. These poor guys are being sent into a meat grinder for money. It needs to stop. Trump is pragmatic on this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should have empathy for the people dying at the front lines. That's the most important thing. And people have been dying, you know, it's like, how many more years is this supposed to go on? Yeah. And and imagine if that was your son, your father, you know.
What are what are they dying for? Yeah. What exactly are they dying for? That line has the the line of engagement has barely moved for two years. Yeah.
This is how much it people dead in trenches for what? And I'll I'll tell you what for what. It's like for the biggest graft machine that I've ever seen in my life, that's for what? It's it's it's unreal. Like the the amount of money that is that is being taken in in graft and bribery is is disgusting.
And and so what's actually happening is that those those you know, people those poor guys are getting sent into a meat grinder for money. That's what's actually going on. Yeah. And it needs to stop. And that's mean, that's it it seems I mean, Trump is so pragmatic on this.
He he just he's just looking at it and
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Stephen Miller goes OFF on Joe Biden, The Press, and Unelected Bureaucracy at The White House Press Briefing. (MUST WATCH) 🔥🔥🔥 "The existential threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one." https://t.co/r4ALTz9GT7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many in the media failed to cover Joe Biden's mental state and misunderstand Elon Musk's role. A president, elected by all Americans, is unique. The Constitution vests executive power in this single president. They appoint staff to implement the democratic will. The real threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy of tenured civil servants who defy the will of the American people. For example, when Americans vote for FBI reform, or to end racist DEI policies, these bureaucrats resist change. President Trump is removing those defying democracy by not implementing lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some very, harsh things about some of our media friends. The yes. It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected fail to understand how government works. So I'm glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson.
A president is elected by the whole American people. He's the only official in the entire government that is elected by the entire nation. Right? Judges are appointed. Members of congress are elected at the district or state level, which is one man.
And the constitution article two has a clause known as the vesting clause, and it says the executive power shall be vested in a president, singular. The whole will of democracy is imbued into the elected president. That president then appoints staff to then impose that democratic will onto the government. The threat to democracy, indeed the existential threat to democracy, is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for. So Americans vote for radical FBI reform, and FBI agents say they don't wanna change.
Or Americans vote for radical reform under energy policies, but EPA bureaucrats say they don't wanna change, or Americans vote to end DEI, racist DEI policies, and lawyers of the Department of Justice say they don't want to change. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people. Thank you.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: The DOGE team is currently at the IRS https://t.co/ARqCChdRaY
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Full RFK Jr. Victory Speech after being sworn in as America's newest Health Secretary. Very powerful speech! Must watch🔥 https://t.co/QzLP7fqjD5
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to thank President Trump for this opportunity, and my family for their support. My first time in the Oval Office was in 1962 when I met with my uncle, President Kennedy, to discuss the environment. For twenty years, I've prayed for the chance to end the childhood chronic disease epidemic. President Trump is keeping every promise he's made to me and is a pivotal historical figure who will transform this country, despite the rise of totalitarianism and attacks on our Constitution.
We need a leader with the strength to challenge orthodoxies and vested interests. President Trump is that hero. I appreciate his decision to terminate USAID, which has been captured by the military-industrial complex. We need to address the institutions stealing the health of our children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna begin by thanking president Trump for giving me this extraordinary opportunity, and I I wanna introduce my family and thank them for being here. My wife, Cheryl, my cousin, Anthony Shriver, my daughter, Kik, my other daughter, Kira, Carolina Carlin. Carolina Shriver, Joey Shriver, Jackson Hines, and Emerilis Kennedy. Alright. And I wanna thank all of you for your support and, throughout this whole two and a half year journey.
I would I I my first time in this Oval Office was in 1961, and I came here to meet my or in 1962. I came here and I had a meeting with my uncle who was president and where we talked about the environment. He was involved deeply as we all know in restoring physical fitness in this country. He challenged at one point during his administration, he challenged Americans to do a 50 mile walk, which I ultimately did. But I remember the day that my father completed his walk.
We were staying at, at, up at, Camp David, and my father came in after eighteen hours walking on the CNO Tow Pass with his feet bleeding and blisters on them. My father had a one of his best friends was Al Lowenstein. And Al Lowenstein also ultimately was a congressman from New York who was assassinated himself in 1980. But Al Lowenstein had started the dumb Johnson movement to get rid of president Johnson and and end the Vietnam War. And at the time that he started it, people just thought it was a fool's errand.
And, ultimately, he asked my father to run for president against Johnson. My father wouldn't do it at that time, and he asked, Gene McCarthy. McCarthy did it, and he joined that campaign. And my father ultimately ran, and Johnson then dropped out. So Al Lowenstein succeeded.
And although Al Owenson was on the other side now running against my father with Gene McCarthy, my father wrote him a note, a quote from Emerson where he said, if a single man land himself firmly on his own ideal and there abide, the whole wide world will come around to him. For twenty years, I've gotten up every morning on my knees and prayed that God would put me in a position where where I can end the childhood chronic disease epidemic in this country. On August twenty third of last year, God sent me president Trump. Alright. And he gave me He's now given me he's kept every promise that he's made to me.
He's kept his word in every account and gone way beyond it. I'm so grateful to you, mister president. A lot of people told me that I couldn't trust president Trump. I better get it in writing. And we did a handshake, and everything that he told me he was gonna do, he has done.
And, I'm so grateful to him, and I've told you before. I genuinely believe that you are a pivotal historical figure, and you are gonna transform this country at a time when we see all of the indigent democracy now in tatters in our country. We see the rise of the military industrial complex, the rise of totalitarianism, these attacks on our constitution, and this breathtaking epidemic that is disabling our people. President Trump has promised to restore the American dream in this country. A healthy person has a thousand dreams.
A sick person only has one. 60 percent of our population has only one dream as they get better. President Trump has promised that he's gonna restore America's strength, but we can't be a strong nation if we have a weak citizenry. If people are sick, sixty percent of our our people are sick. Seventy seven percent, as president Trump mentioned, our children cannot qualify for military service.
And we need a man on a white horse now. We need somebody who who is willing to come in and has the spine and the guts and the strength to challenge orthodoxies to stand in the way of vested interest, and to break institutions that have turned against our democracy. President Trump has shown again and again. He is that hero. And most recently, I greatly appreciate and I called you the day that you announced the termination of USAID.
My uncle started USAID in 1961 for humanitarian purposes to put our country on the side of the poor, it has been captured by the military industrial complex. It has become a sinister propagator of totalitarianism across and war across the globe. And very few people understand how sinister this agency really is. And President Trump saw that and he stood up to it with a master stroke. And we want to do the same thing with the institutions that are stealing the health of our children.
We need a revolutionary figure and you are that figure and I'm very grateful for you for giving me this opportunity. Some of the allies that I've had in this battle for a long time are Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ron Johnson, Senator Roger Marshall, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Buddy Carter, who have all been champions of the MAHA agenda before I even came along. I'm very grateful for you for standing strong. Thank you very much, President.
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the topic of Elon Musk and DOGE, emphasizing its transparency. I invited Musk to the briefing room, clarifying that claims of DOGE's lack of transparency are unfounded. DOGE has an active X account and a website sharing information. I presented specific expenditures, like $36,000 for US Immigration DEI and $3.4M for inclusion at the patent office, questioning their benefit to the American people. I asserted that our administration is committed to daily transparency regarding DOGE's activities and financial reporting.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, talks about Elon Musk and DOGE and how transparent DOGE is: "We would love for Elon Musk to come to the briefing room. It's a fallacy that there's an alleged lack of transparency when it comes to DOGE. They've been incredibly transparent: there's an X account with the DOGE handle, there's a website where they're posting the receipts, and Elon Musk is now one of the most scrutinized people in the world. We are happy to provide and *can* provide ALL the receipts. I actually brought some here today: - $36,000 for US Immigration DEI - $3.4M for a council for inclusion at the patent office - $57,000 for climate change in Sri Lanka What is this doing for the American people? Absolutely nothing. DOGE is identifying things like this daily. This administration has been more than transparent about what DOGE is doing. We are providing reports and transparency on a DAILY basis. We're talking about it every single day."
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'd love for Elon Musk to come to the briefing room, especially after his visit to the Oval Office. There's no lack of transparency regarding Doge; they actively tweet and post receipts of contracts reviewed and payments stopped. Before Musk, these actions were hidden within bureaucracy.
We're happy to provide the receipts. Here are examples of contracts Doge found, like a $36,000 DEI contract for US citizenship, a $3.4 million contract for inclusive innovation, and $57,000 for climate change in Sri Lanka. We're providing transparency and accessibility daily.
These actions are fraudulent, wasteful, and an abuse of taxpayer dollars. This isn't what the government should be spending money on, and we can provide receipts for the fraud, waste, and abuse to anyone who wants to see them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're just wondering if there's some proof evidence. Is the White House willing to share Mhmm. Evidence of those fraud claims, or can Elon Musk come to the briefing room and share material evidence of what he's talking about? Sure. I would love for Elon Musk to come to the briefing room.
That's why we had him go to the Oval Office yesterday, where I think he provided great answers. He was speaking in layman's terms, speaking common sense, to all of you in the media, but also to Americans at home. But I would say especially to all of you in the media, because I think it's a real fallacy, that there's this alleged lack of transparency when it comes to Doge. President Trump and Elon Musk have been incredibly transparent on what Doge is doing. There is an x account with the Doge handle.
They are tweeting out what they are doing on a daily basis. They have a website where they are posting the receipts of the contracts that they are reviewing and the payments that they have stopped, from going out the door. The secretaries of of our departments have stopped from going out the door. And I would also say that before it was Elon Musk, making our government efficient and accountable, it was some unnamed bureaucrat that none of you knew. I Elon Musk is, the richest man in the world.
He's also now one of the most highly scrutinized men in the world alongside president Trump because of what he's doing and the access that he is allowing. So there's great transparency. As for the actual receipts, we are happy to provide them, and I actually brought some today because all of you know I love to bring the receipts. We have contracts upon contracts that we can send and provide this information to you. Let me be very clear.
We are not trying to hide anything. We have been incredibly transparent, and we will continue to be. These are screenshots of contracts that Doge found across our government. This is a DEI contract, $36,000 for US citizenship and immigration services. That is against the president's policies in his America First agenda.
This is a $3,400,000 contract, a counsel for inclusive innovation, at the US Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce, another DEI contract that DOGE identified. I can continue to go through these. Oh, I love this one. 50 seven thousand bucks for climate change in Sri Lanka. What is this doing to continue the interest of the American people?
Absolutely nothing. These are the line items across the federal government that DOGE is identifying daily. They're moving very fast. There's a lot of paper that we can show you, but we're happy to do it. This administration has been more than transparent and about what DOGE is doing.
And here's one of their tweets that they posted about the mine. I believe this is in Pennsylvania where the Federal Employee Retirement System is being processed. Did anybody know this was even happening in our country before Elon Musk talked about it in the Oval Office yesterday? A lot of Americans didn't. So we are providing transparency and accessibility on a daily basis when it comes to Doge.
And I also have a Doge daily report, if anybody would like it, on all of the things that they are identifying and finding. We're happy to provide this information to you. We're talking about it every single day. Are all those things you just mentioned fraud or are they waste or are they just contrary to the president's policies? I would argue that all of these things are fraudulent, they are wasteful, and they are an abuse of the American taxpayer's dollar.
This is not what the government should be spending money on. It's it's contrary to the president's priorities and agenda. And again, we can continue to provide you the receipts for all of the fraud, waste, and abuse. And if anybody in here wants to argue that the federal government, is not fraudulent in some capacity, be my guest because I think the American people watching at home would beg to differ. Mary.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Trump signs a full an unconditional pardon for Rod Blagojevich, former Illinois Governor. "He was set up!" REPORTER: "Are you considering him for ambassador to Serbia?" TRUMP: "No, but I would. He's now cleaner than anyone in this room. He got a pardon." LMAO! 😂 https://t.co/aqKxcFefsw
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm granting a full pardon to former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. I believe he was wrongly targeted and given an unfairly harsh eighteen-year sentence. He's a good person with a supportive wife who fought hard for him. This pardon allows him to live a normal life. While I considered him for an ambassadorship, that's not happening, though I believe he's as clean as anyone here. This was a terrible injustice, and it's my honor to correct it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Next, we have, a full and unconditional pardon for former governor Rob Blagojevich of the state of Illinois. Good. It's my honor to do it. I've watched him. He was set up by a lot of bad people, some of the same people that I had to deal with.
He wasn't quite as successful, but he had somebody that saw what was going on. I didn't know him other than I believe he was on The Apprentice for a little while. He was a, just a very nice person. He had a fantastic wife. She fought like hell to get him out.
He was given a sentence of, like, eighteen years, and there was a sort of a terrible injustice. They just were after him. They go after a lot of people. These are bad people on the other side. So I think he's a, just a very fine person.
And this shouldn't have happened, and it shouldn't have happened to him. And, let him have a normal life and let him go out and do what he has to do. So, I'm signing this as a full pardon. Rod Blagojevic. Mister president, are you considering him for ambassador to Serbia?
No. But I would. I mean, he's not cleaner than anybody in this room. You gotta pardon. He's cleaner than anybody in the room.
Okay. Thank you, sir.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Full Elon Musk x Trump DOGE Executive Order Signing Event / Press Conference (30 minutes) https://t.co/k2XW9lItq6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our administration's primary goal is restoring democracy by fixing the broken feedback loop between the people and the government. An out-of-control, unelected bureaucracy holds excessive power, undermining the will of the people. We must also address the massive national deficit; its interest payments alone surpass the defense budget. We're finding shocking waste, fraud, and abuse—billions of dollars in improper payments, often lacking basic oversight. Simple controls like payment categorization and verification would drastically reduce this. We're working with agency heads and the President to implement common-sense reforms, increasing transparency and ensuring taxpayer money is spent responsibly. We are committed to fiscal responsibility and economic growth, benefiting all Americans. While we strive for transparency, mistakes will be made, but we will correct them promptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the, at a at a high level, if you say what is the goal of those or or and and I think a significant part of this of our presidency is to restore, democracy. This may seem like, well, are we in a democracy? Well, if you don't have a feedback loop, okay, we'd have to if you if you sorry.
Speaker 1: So I tell
Speaker 0: you gravitas can be difficult sometimes. So, if if there's not a good feedback loop from the people to to to the government, and if if you have rule of the the bureaucrat if the bureaucracy is in charge, and then then what meaning does democracy actually have? If the people cannot vote and have their will be decided by their elected representatives in the in the form of the president and and the senate and the house, then we don't live in a democracy. We live in a bureaucracy. So it's incredibly important that we close that feedback loop.
We fix that feedback loop and that the public, the public's elected representatives, the president, the house, and the senate decide what happens as opposed to an a large unelected bureaucracy. This is not to say that there aren't some good there are good people who who are in the federal bureaucracy, but but you can't have an autonomous federal bureaucracy. You have to have one that's responsive to the people. That's the whole point of a democracy. And so
Speaker 2: and if you if you looked at this if you asked looked
Speaker 0: at founders today and said, what do you think of the way things have turned out? Or We have
Speaker 3: this
Speaker 0: unelected, fourth unconstitutional branch of of government, which which is the bureaucracy, which has, in a lot of ways, currently more power than any elected representative. And this is, this is not something that people want. And it's it's not it does not match the will of the people. So it's just something we've gotta we gotta fix. And then we also gotta address the the deficit.
So we've got a a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit. And if this if we don't do something about this deficit, country's going bankrupt. I mean, it's it's really astounding that the, the interest payments alone on national debt exceed the defense department budget, which is shocking because we've got a lot we spend a lot of money on defense. But and and if that just keeps going, we're essentially gonna back up the country. So what what I really wanna say is, like, it's not optional for us to sit to reduce the federal expenses.
It's essential. It's essential for America to remain solvent as a country, and it's essential for America to have the resources necessary to provide things to its citizens and not simply be servicing vast amounts of debt.
Speaker 1: And also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found? Some of the crazy numbers including the woman that walked away with about 30,000,000, etcetera?
Speaker 0: Well, we we we are we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there there are quite a few, people in in in bureaucracy who who have a ostensibly a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow manage to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth, while they are in that position, which is, you know, what what happened to USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing. They, in which case, we should take their investment advice, perhaps. But, just there seems to be mysteriously they cut they get wealthy.
We don't know why. Where did it come from? And, I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at taxpayer expense. That's that's the that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we're looking at, say, we we we would just if you look at, say, say, treasury, for example, basic controls that should be in place, that are in place in in any company, such as making sure that any given payment has a payment categorization code, that there is a comment field that describes the payment, and that if it if a payment is on the do not pay list, that you don't actually pay it.
None of those things are true currently. So the reason that departments can't pass audits is because the payments don't have a categorization code. It's like just a massive number of blank checks just flying out the building. So you can't reconcile blank checks. You've got common fields that are also blank, so you don't know why the payment was made.
And then we've got this truly absurd, a do not pay list, which can take up to a year for an organization to get on a do not pay list. And and this we're talking about terrorist organizations. We're talking about, known fraudsters, known aspects of waste, known things that do not match any congressional appropriation. It can take up to a year to get on the list. And even what's on the list, the list is not used.
It's mind blowing.
Speaker 2: So so what what we're talking here, we're
Speaker 0: we're really just talking about adding common sense controls that should be present, that that haven't been present. So you say, like, well, how could such a thing arise? That's that seems that seems crazy. The when you understand that that, really, everything is geared towards complaint minimization, so that that then you understand the motivations. So if people receive money, they don't complain, obviously.
But if people don't receive money, they do complain. And and the fraudsters complain the loudest and and the fastest. So, then when you understand that, then then it makes sense. Oh, that's why everything just they approve all the payments at treasury. Because if you approve all the payments, you don't you don't get complaints.
But now now we're saying that, no. Actually, we we are gonna complain. If if money is spent badly, if the if your taxpayer dollars are not spent in a sensible approval manner, then that's not okay. Your your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on the things that matter to the people. I mean, these things like, it's just common sense.
It's not it's it's it's not draconian or radical, I think. It's it's really just saying, let's look at each each of the expenditures and say, is this actually in the best interest of people? And if it is, it's approved. If it's not, we should think about it. So, you know, there's crazy things like just cross examination of Social Security.
And we've got people in there that are 50 years old. Now do you know anyone a hundred and 50? I don't know. Okay. This they should be on the Guinness Book of World Records.
They're missing out. So, you know, that's the case where, like, I think they're probably dead. It's my guess. Or or they should be very famous. One of the two.
And then there's a whole bunch of Social Security payments where there's no identifying identifying information. Well, like, why is there no identifying information? Obviously, we wanna make we wanna make sure that people who deserve, to receive Social Security do receive it, and that they receive it quickly and accurately. Also, another another crazy thing. So, you know, one of the things is, like, we're we're trying to sort of right size the the federal bureaucracy just to make sure this obviously, needs to there needs to
Speaker 2: be a lot of people working for federal government, but not
Speaker 0: as many as as currently. So we're saying, well, okay. Well, let's if if people can retire, you know, with full benefit benefits, everything, that that would be good. They can retire, get their retirement payments, everything. And then we were told this is actually, I think, a great anecdote, because we were told the the most number of people that could retire possibly in a month is 10,000.
We're like, woah. Why why why is that? Well, because all the all the retirement paperwork is manual on paper. It's manually calculated, then written down on a piece of paper, then it goes down a mine. And, like, what do you mean a mine?
Like, yeah. There's a limestone mine where we store all the retirement paperwork that look and you look at pictures at a picture of this mine. We'll post some pictures afterwards. And this this mine looks like something out of the fifties because it was started in 1955. So it looks like it's like a time warp.
And then the the speed the the limiting factor is the speed at which the mine shaft elevator can move determines how many people can retire from the federal federal government. And the elevator breaks down and then sometimes, and then you can't nobody can retire. Doesn't that sound crazy? There's, like, a thousand people that work on this. So I think if if we take those people and say, like, you know what?
Instead of working in a in a mine shaft and, carrying Manila envelopes to, you know, boxes in a mine shaft, you could do practically anything else, and you you would add to the the goods and services of The United States, in in a more useful way. So anyway so I think, you know, that's an example. Like, at a high level, if you could say, like, how do we increase prosperity is we get people to do to to to shift from roles that are low to negative productivity to high productivity roles. And so you increase the total output of goods and services, which means that that there's a higher standard of living available for everyone. That's that's the actual goal.
Everyone's very quiet, brother. I said you don't have to nobody is quiet?
Speaker 2: You're detractors, mister Moskovic. I have
Speaker 4: to what?
Speaker 2: Including a lot of Democrats.
Speaker 0: I have detractors? You do, sir. I don't believe it.
Speaker 2: Say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non transparent way. What's your response to that, criticism?
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, we we have a majority of the public vote voting for president Trump, won the house, won the senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign.
The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for. But in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for.
And that's what democracy is all about.
Speaker 4: Mister Busk, the White House says that you will identify and excuse yourself from any conflicts of interest that you may have. Does that mean that you are in effect policing yourself? What are the checks and balances that are in place to ensure that there is accountability and transparency? Well,
Speaker 0: we we actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions we post our actions to the the Doge handle, on x, and to the the Doge website. So all of our actions, which are are maximally transparent. In fact, I don't think there's been I I don't know of a case that where where an organization has been more transparent than the Doge organization. And and so, you know, and the kind of things we're doing are, I think, very, very simple and basic.
They're they're not we're you know, what I mentioned, for example, about treasury, just making sure that that payments that go out, taxpayer money that goes out is categorized correctly, that the that the the payment is explained, that organizations on the do not pay list, which are takes a lot to get there, that actually are not paid, which currently they are paid. These these are these are not individual judgment decisions. These are about simply having sensible checks and balances in the system itself to ensure that taxpayer money is spent well. So it's got nice to do with, like, say, a contract with some company of mine at all.
Speaker 4: But if there is a conflict in of interest when it comes to you yourself, for instance, you've received billions of dollars in federal contracts.
Speaker 3: When it comes
Speaker 4: to the Pentagon, for instance, which the president, I know, has directed you to look into
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Are you policing yourself in that? Is there any sort of accountability check and balance in place that would provide any transparency for the American people?
Speaker 0: Well, all of our actions are are fully public. So if you see anything, you say, like, wait a second. Hey. You know what? That doesn't that seems like maybe that's, you know, that there's a conflict there.
I I I felt like people are gonna be shy about saying that. They'll say it immediately.
Speaker 4: Including you and yourself.
Speaker 0: Yes. But it transparency is what builds trust. Not simply somebody asserting trust. So not somebody saying they're trustworthy, but transparency so you can see everything that's going on. And then you can see, am I doing something that benefits one of my companies or not?
It's totally obvious.
Speaker 1: And if we thought that we would not let him do that segment or look in that area. If we thought there was a, lack of transparency or a conflict of interest. And, we watch that also. He's he's a big businessman. He's a successful guy.
That's why we want him doing this. We don't want a an unsuccessful guy doing this. Now one thing also that, Elon hasn't really mentioned are the groups of people that are getting some of these payments. They're ridiculous. And we're talking about billions of dollars that we've already found.
We found fraud and abuse. I would say those two words as opposed to the third word that I usually use. But in this case, fraud and abuse. It's abusive because most of these things are virtually made up or certainly money shouldn't be sent to. And you know what I'm talking about.
It's crazy. So, but we're talking about, tens of billions of dollars that we've already found. And now a judge is an activist judge, wants to try and stop us from doing this. Why? And why would they wanna do that?
I campaigned on this. I campaigned on the fact that I said government is corrupt, and it is very corrupt. It's very, very, it's also foolish. As an example, a man has a contract for three months, and the contract ends, but they keep paying him for the next twenty years, you know, because nobody ends a contract. You get
Speaker 3: a lot of that. You have a
Speaker 1: contract that's a three a three month contract. Now normally, if you're in a small it's in in all fairness, it's the size of this thing is so big.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: But if you have a contract and you're in a regular business, you end the contract in three months, you know it's a consult. Here's a contract for three months, but it goes on for twenty years. And the guy doesn't say that he got money for twenty years. You know? They don't say it.
They just keep getting checks month after month. And you have various things like that. And even much worse than that, actually, much worse. And I guess you call that incompetence maybe.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It could be corruption. It could be a deal's made on both sides. You know, where I guess the money he kicks I think he has a lot of kickback here. I see a lot of kickback here.
Speaker 0: There's a lot of kickback.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Tremendous kickback because nobody could be so stupid to give out some of these contracts. So he has to get a kickback. So, that's what I got elected for. That and borders and military and a lot of things, but this is a big part of it.
And I hope that the court system is gonna allow us to do what we have to do. We got elected to to, among other things, crimes, all of this fraud, abuse, all of this this horrible stuff going on. And we've already found billions of dollars, not like a little bit, billions, many billions of dollars. And when you get down to it, it's gonna be probably close to a trillion dollars. It could be close to a trillion dollars that we're gonna find.
That will have a quite an impact on the budget. And and you'll go to a judge where they handpick a judge and he has certain leanings. I'm not knocking anybody for that, but he has certain leanings. And he wants us to stop looking. How do you stop looking?
I mean, we've already found it. We have a case in New York where a hotel has paid $59,000,000 50 9 million because of because it's housing migrants, illegal migrants. All illegal, I believe.
Speaker 0: And and they were being paid twice the normal room rate at a %
Speaker 1: occupancy. Unbelievable. So it's
Speaker 0: a racket.
Speaker 3: Ask a question. If you
Speaker 0: said If if I may sort of just, going for the president's comments, at a at a high level, okay, well, what how how do what what are the two ingredients that are really necessary in order to cut the budget deficit in half from 2,000,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000,000? And it's really two things, competence and caring. And if you add competence and caring, you'll cut the budget deficit in half. And and and I fully expect to be scrutinized and get a, you know, a daily proctology exam, basically. My soldiers camp out there.
So it's not like I think I can get away with something. I'll be scrutinized nonstop. And, but with support of the president, we can we can cut the budget deficit in half from 2,000,000,000,000 to one, and then with deregulation, because there's a lot of sort of regulations that don't ultimately serve the public good. We need to free free the builders of America to build. And if we do that, that means, I think, we can get the economic growth to be maybe 4%, maybe 5%.
And that means if you can get get a trillion dollars of economic growth and you cut the budget deficit by a trillion, between now and next year, there is no inflation. There's no inflation in '26. And if the government is not borrowing borrowing as much, it means that interest costs decline. So everyone's mortgage, their car payment, their credit card bills, any hit their their their student debt, the the monthly payments broke. That's a fantastic scenario for the average American.
I mean, imagine they they go down the grocery aisle and the prices from one year to the next are the same. And their and their their, you know, their mortgage, their all their debt payments dropped. How great is that for the average American?
Speaker 1: We had no idea we had no idea we're gonna find this much. And it's open. It's it's not, like, complicated.
Speaker 2: It's It's not simple, which I did.
Speaker 1: It's like a
Speaker 2: lot of work. Yeah.
Speaker 1: You can't believe it. A lot of work. A lot of smart people involved. Very, very smart people. But, it's you're talking about anyway, maybe $500,000,000,000.
It's crazy the kind of numbers you're talking about. You know, normally when you're looking at something, you'll find you're looking for one out of a hundred. Here, you're almost reversing it. You look for one that's good.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And you can look at the title and you say, why are we doing this? Why are we doing that? And the public gets it. You know, the public gets it. You've seen the polls.
The public is saying, why are we paying all this money? This is for years this has gone on.
Speaker 3: I'm assuming most president Trump, I don't
Speaker 1: Senator Yeah. Go ahead. Wait. Go ahead.
Speaker 3: Senator Rand Paul today said that doge cuts will ultimately need a vote in Congress. Do you agree with that? Is that the plan? I I
Speaker 1: really don't know. I I know this. We're finding tremendous fraud and tremendous abuse. If I need a vote of Congress to find fraud and abuse, it'd be it's fine fine with me. I think we'll get the vote.
Although there'll be some people that wouldn't vote. And how could a judge wanna hold us back from finding all of this fraud and finding all of this, incompetence? Why would that happen? Why would even congress wanna do that now congress? If if we do need a vote, I think we get a very easy vote because we have a track record now.
We've already found billions of dollars of abuse, incompetence, and corruption. A lot of corruption.
Speaker 4: If a judge does block one of your policies, part of your agenda, will you abide by that ruling? Will you comply
Speaker 3: with this?
Speaker 1: Abide by the courts, and then I'll have to appeal it. But then what he's done is he slowed down the momentum, and it gives crooked people more time to cover up the books. You know, if a person's crooked and they get caught, other people see that and all of a sudden it becomes harder later on. So
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The answer is I always abide by the courts, always abide by them, and we'll appeal. But appeals take a long time, and I would hope that a judge if you go into a judge and you show them, here's a corrupt situation. We have a check to be sent, but we found it to be corrupt. Do you want us to send this corrupt check to a person, or do you want us not to give it and give it back to the taxpayer?
I would hope a judge would say, don't send it. Give it back to the taxpayer.
Speaker 0: Yeah. If I can add to that, what we're finding is that a bunch of the fraud is not even going to Americans.
Speaker 2: So I think we can all
Speaker 0: agree that if there's gonna be fraud, it should at least go to Americans. But a bunch of the fraud rings that that are operating in in The United States and taking advantage of the federal government, especially in the entitlements programs, are actually foreign fraud rings. They're operating in other countries and actually exporting money to other countries. We should stop that.
Speaker 3: Mister Musk
Speaker 0: And and this is big what big numbers? Talking about a 200,000,000,000 a year. Serious money.
Speaker 3: Missus Musk, you said on x Yeah. That an example of the fraud, that you have cited was $50,000,000 of condoms was sent to Gaza. But after fact check this, apparently, Gaza in Mozambique, and the program was to protect them against HIV. So can you correct the statements? It wasn't sent to Hamas, actually.
It was sent to Mozambique, which makes sense why condoms was sent there.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And how can we make sure that all the statements that you said were, correct so we can trust what you're saying?
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, some of the things that I say say will be incorrect and and should be corrected. So nobody's gonna bat a thousand. I mean, any you know, we we will make mistakes, but we'll act quickly to correct any mistakes. So, you know, if if the the I'm not sure we should be sending 50,000,000 bells worth of condoms to anywhere, frankly. I'm not sure that's something Americans would be really excited about.
And that that is really an enormous number of condoms, if you think about it. But, you know, if it if it went to Mozambique instead of Gaza, I'm like, okay. That's not as bad, but still, you know, why are we doing that?
Speaker 3: Not too much. Can you talk a little bit about how closely you're working with agency heads as you're directing these cuts? Do they have the how much input do agency heads have when you're making these decisions?
Speaker 0: Yeah. We work closely with the agency heads. And, yeah. So so there there is a there are sort of checks in place. So it's not as I was just going in and doing things willy nilly.
In it's in, partnership with the agency heads. And, and I check really with the president to make sure that, you know, this this this is what the president wants to have happen. So, you know, we we talk almost every day, and and I I, you know, I I double check things to make sure is this something, mister president, do you want us to do this? Well, well, then we'll do it.
Speaker 2: USA USAID has been one of your main targets. Are you concerned at all that some of the cuts or that shutting that agency altogether may lead to diseases or other bigger problems starting in other countries that then come to to The United States?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So that that's an interesting example. So that's something where we work closely with the state department, and, secretary Rubio. And we have, for example, turned on funding for Ebola prevention, and for HIV prevent prevention.
Speaker 2: You left that?
Speaker 0: Yes. Correct. And and and we are we are moving fast, so we all make mistakes, but we'll also fix the mistakes very quickly.
Speaker 4: So Do you think that's a worthy cause? USAID?
Speaker 0: I I think that there's some worthy things, but but overall, if you say what was the bang for the buck, I would say it's it was not very good. And there was far too much of what you said I had was doing was influencing influencing elections in ways that I think were dubious and do not stand the light of day.
Speaker 3: I think I just
Speaker 4: have a follow-up to the, the the Pentagon contracts. If you have received billions of dollars in contracts from the Pentagon, and the president's directing you to look into the Department of Defense, is that possible
Speaker 0: to are going to do at at the president's request.
Speaker 4: Does that present a conflict of interest for you?
Speaker 0: No. Because you'd have to look at the individual contract and say first of all, I'm I'm not the one, you know, filing the contract. It's people at SpaceX or someone who will be putting for the contract. And I'd like to say, if if you see any contract where the the where it was awarded to SpaceX and it wasn't by far the best value of money for the taxpayer, let me know because every one of them was.
Speaker 2: The president said the other day that you might look at treasuries. Could you explain that a little bit? What kind of fraud or and that question goes to both of you. What kind of fraud are you expecting to see or do you see right now in US treasuries?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I think you mean the the treasury department as opposed to treasury bills. Or,
Speaker 2: You also reference treasuries on Air Force One
Speaker 1: the other night. Go ahead.
Speaker 0: Well, the as I mentioned earlier, really the the first order of business is to make sure we're actually collecting sorry for this. Although my son might might enjoy this, but he's he's sticking his fingers in my ears and stuff. So it's a bit hot to hear sometimes. Hey. Stop that.
So, no. The stuff we're doing with with the Treasury Department is so basic, that you can't believe it doesn't exist already. So so so, for example, like I mentioned, just making sure that that when a payment goes out, it has to have the payment categorization codes. Like, what type of payment is this? You can't just leave the field blank.
Currently, many payments that the field's left blank. We and you have to describe what's the payment for, some basic rationalization that also is left blank. So this is why, you know, the Pentagon when's the last time the Pentagon passed an audit? I mean, decade ago maybe. I or whatever.
Really? And we wanna just in order to actually pass audits, you have to have financial information that allows you to trace the payments. So, you know, and and and once in a while, the the the the treasury has to test to pause payments, if it thinks the payment is going to a fraudulent organization. Like, if if a if a company or an organization is on a do not pay list, we should not pay it. I'm sure you would agree.
Like, if it's quite hard to get on that payment, let let me do no pay list. It means that this is someone that is just it's like dead people, terrorists, known fraudsters, that kind of thing. We should not pay them. But currently, we do, which is crazy. We should stop that.
Speaker 3: We're not gonna buy transactions.
Speaker 1: And by the way, hundreds, thousands of transactions like that. You know, we have a big team. And for the sake of the country, I hope that the person that's in charge and the other people that report to me that are in charge are allowed to do the right thing. Namely, make sure everything's honest, legitimate, and competent. But we're looking at just, when you look at USAID, that was that's one.
We're gonna look at the military. We're gonna look at education. They're much bigger areas. But the USAID is really corrupt. I'll tell you, it's corrupt.
It's incompetent and it's really corrupt. And I can't imagine a judge saying, well, it may be corrupt, but you don't have the right. You got elected to look over the country and to, as we say, make America great again, but you don't have the right to go and look and see whether or not things are right that they're paying or that things are honest that they're paying. And nobody can even believe there's other people, law professors, they've been saying, can't how can you take that person's right away? You're supposed to be running the country, but we're not allowed to look at who they're paying it to and what they're paying.
We have massive amounts of fraud that we caught. I think we probably caught way over a lot of billions of dollars already in what? Two weeks?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And it's gonna go, to numbers that you're not gonna believe. And, much as I said, much is incompetence and much is dishonesty. We have to catch it. And the only way we're gonna catch it is to look for it. And if a judge is gonna say you're not allowed to look for it, that's pretty sad for our country.
It I don't understand how it could even work.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry. Ram, can you personally guarantee that
Speaker 1: Which one?
Speaker 4: The buyout program offered to federal workers? Can you personally guarantee that the workers who opt in to resign now will be paid
Speaker 3: through September?
Speaker 1: Money, but, they're getting a good deal. They're getting a big buyout. And what we're trying to do is reduce government. We have too many people. We have office space.
It's occupied by 4%. Nobody showing up to work because they were told not to. And then Biden gave him a five year pass, some of them, 48,000 of them, gave him a five year pass that for five years, you don't have to show up to work. And
Speaker 3: and let
Speaker 1: me tell you, this is largely much of this stuff is because of Biden. It's his fault. He allowed this country what he did on our border. What he did on our border is almost not as bad as what he did with, all of these contracts that have come out. It's it's a very sad day when we look at it.
I can't even believe it. But many contracts just extend and they just keep extending, and there was nobody there to correct it. And, that that cannot be I can't imagine that could be held up by the court. Any court that would say that the president or his representatives, like secretary of the treasury, secretary of state, whatever, doesn't have the right to go over their books and make sure everything's honest. I mean, how can you have a country?
You can't have anything that way. You can't have a business that way. You can't have a country that way. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.
We'll be at the White House tonight at about 10:00. If you wanna come over, you can say hello to Omar.
Speaker 3: Did you
Speaker 4: guys do anything in return?
Speaker 1: Not much? No. They were very nice. We were treated nicely by Russia, actually. I hope that's the beginning of a re relationship where we can end that war and, millions of people can stop being killed.
They've lost millions of people. They lost in terms of, soldiers, probably 1,500,000 soldiers in a short period of time. We gotta stop that war. And I'm interested primarily from the standpoint of death. We're losing all those soldiers.
And then not American soldiers, the Ukrainian and Russian soldiers. But but you're probably talking about a million and a half. I think I think we gotta bring that one to an end. K? Thank you.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much. Thank you, Robert. You, Robert.
Speaker 0: Let's go.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Moving. 10:00.
Speaker 3: Ten
Speaker 1: o'clock United Way
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned that the U.S. government's retirement paperwork for federal employees is processed in a limestone mine built in the 1950s. It's quite astonishing that the process relies on manual labor, with over 700 workers operating 230 feet underground to handle around 10,000 applications each month. The paperwork is stored in manila envelopes and cardboard boxes, and the entire retirement process can take several months. The speed of retiring federal employees is limited by the elevator shaft used to transport the paperwork.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk says that there is a literal limestone mine where they store all the US Government's retirement paperwork built in 1950 that they need to go up and down every time they want to retire someone from Federal Government. The speed in which they can retire people is limited by the speed of the elevator shaft. Yes, actually.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're streamlining the federal bureaucracy, aiming to reduce the workforce. We found a surprising bottleneck: the retirement process. Currently, the maximum number of retirements per month is capped at 10,000 due to a completely manual, paper-based system. The paperwork is stored in a 1950s-era limestone mine, and the speed of the mine shaft elevator limits processing. This antiquated system employs thousands of people whose efforts could be far better utilized elsewhere. The situation is absurd; we need to modernize this process immediately. Imagine the increased efficiency and contribution to the country's goods and services if these employees were redeployed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, one of the things is, like, we're we we are trying to sort of right size the the federal bureaucracy just to make sure that this obviously, need to there needs to be a lot of people working for federal government, but not as many as currently. So we're saying, well, okay. Well, let's if if people can retire, you know, with full benefit benefits and everything, that that would be good. They can retire, get their retirement payments, everything. And then we were told this is actually, I think, a great anecdote, because we were told the the the most number of people that could retire possibly in a month is 10,000.
We're like, well, why why is that? Well, because all the all the retirement paperwork is manual on paper. It's manually calculated, then written down on a piece of paper, then it goes down a mine. And, like, what do you mean a mine? Like, yeah.
There's a limestone mine where we store all the retirement paperwork that look and you look at picture of this at a picture of this mine, we'll post some pictures afterwards. And this this mine looks like something out of the fifties because it was started in 1955. So it looks like it's like a time warp. And then the the speed the the limiting factor is the speed at which the mine shaft elevator can move determines how many people can retire from the federal federal government. And the elevator breaks down and then sometimes, and then you can't nobody can retire.
Doesn't that sound crazy? There's like a thousand people that work on this. So I think if if we take those people and say, like, you know what? Instead of working in a in a mine shaft in, carrying Manila envelopes to, you know, boxes in a mine shaft, you could do practically anything else. And you you would add to the the goods and services of The United States, in in a more useful way.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47
Yes, the retirement paperwork for federal employees is processed in a limestone mine from the 1950s. This is why we need @DOGE. https://t.co/QwPK9X8I4b
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
@DOGE - Department of Government Efficiency
Federal employee retirements are processed using paper, by hand, in an old limestone mine in Pennsylvania. 700+ mine workers operate 230 feet underground to process ~10,000 applications per month, which are stored in manila envelopes and cardboard boxes. The retirement process takes multiple months.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 NEW: Senator John Kennedy has some choice words for his Democrat colleagues. “I’m unapologetically with Trump and Musk. Among the blue hairs and opinion writers in Washington, we’re losing. But we’re winning with the American people. The big picture should not go unnoticed.” https://t.co/UyRym48WrM
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're winning the support of the American people, despite what the Washington establishment thinks. My Democratic colleagues prioritize bureaucracy and excessive spending over taxpayers. They favor illegal immigration over the rule of law, teachers' unions over students, criminals over victims, transgender athletes over women's sports, and Hamas over Israel. They may feel victorious within their own circles, but they're out of touch with the public. I believe the tide is turning, and the American people are on our side. We're fighting for what's right, and justice will prevail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm unapologetically with Trump and Musk. And now among among the, the blue hairs and the opinion writers in Washington, we're losing. We're winning with the American people. And I think, Bill, it's and, Danny, it's the big picture should not go unnoticed. Some people, mostly my Democratic colleagues, have chosen to support the bureaucracy and the spending porn over the American taxpayer.
These are the same folks who chose to support illegal immigration over the rule of law, who chose to support teachers unions over over schools and kids, who chose to support criminals over crime victims, who chose to support transgender athletes over women's sports, frankly, who chose to support Hamas over Israel. Now, they think they're winning and they may be in the bubble washing, but not among the taxpayers. When they say, tell me what we think we're winning, I tell them sure and be on the lookout for flying pigs. I think the justice stick is coming and I think the American people support everything we're doing.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Full President Trump Super Bowl pre-game interview with Bret Baier 🏈🇺🇸🔥 https://t.co/eCrYDT5Zub
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's an honor to be at the Super Bowl. I believe my presence reflects the renewed spirit of the nation. My administration is moving swiftly, enacting significant changes in border policy, cracking down on crime, protecting women's sports, and reforming energy policy. Unlike my previous term, I now have stronger support and am tackling government inefficiency and fraud, aided by Elon Musk. We're targeting wasteful spending in various departments, including USAID, and I'm committed to addressing this issue. Tariffs on Canada and Mexico are prompting action on border security and drug interdiction, though more is needed. My desire for Canada to become the 51st state is serious; their current trade deficit is unsustainable. While there's market jitters, I believe these measures will ultimately lead to lower prices for families. Uniting the country requires massive success, and I'm working towards that. I predict a Kansas City Chiefs victory in the Super Bowl, and I'm humbled by the widespread imitation and positive reception of my public persona.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to Mar A Lago, the winter White House in Palm Beach, Florida. We're pleased to be joined by the forty fifth and forty seventh president of The United States, Donald J. Trump. Mister president, thanks for having us.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much. Happy Super Bowl.
Speaker 0: Thank you. You know, you are going to be the first sitting president to attend a Super Bowl. It's a big day for America, always is. What made you wanna do it?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, I'm very surprised to hear that. I would have assumed many presidents came. But, I think just the spirit of the country, the country's taken on a whole new life. I thought it would be a good thing for the country to have the president be at the game.
Speaker 0: It was an
Speaker 1: iconic day. It's an iconic day. It's gonna be a great game, two great teams. And, let's see what happens.
Speaker 0: You know, it seems the first days of this administration are like a no huddle offense. You know, plays going down the field one after another. There's a long list of things you've already got done in three weeks. Big border policy changes, ice crackdowns on criminals, taking biological men out of women and girls sports, big energy policy changes. So what's different with you and your administration?
The difference between the forty fifth president and the forty seventh president.
Speaker 1: Well, with the forty fifth, I had tremendous opposition, but I didn't know people, and I didn't have, the kind of support that I needed. I put people in office, some great, some really great ones. But I had some that I wouldn't have put. I would have, you know, known better if it were a couple of years later or if I had a little more experience in DC. I was a New York person, not a DC person.
And I had a lot of opposition. I just noticed that I looked on the stage for the recent inauguration, and I'm looking. It's like a who's who of Washington. Well, if you look on the stage for
Speaker 0: the first one, it was just the opposite. So some of your your plays have raised some questions and had some pushbacks. 19 states attorneys general filed a lawsuit. And early Saturday, a judge agreed with them to restrict Elon Musk and his government efficiency team, Doge, from accessing Treasury Department payment and data systems. They said there was a risk of irreparable harm.
What do you make of that? And does that slow you down on what you wanna do?
Speaker 1: No. I disagree with it a %. I think it's crazy. And, we have to solve the efficiency problem. We have to solve the fraud, waste, abuse, all the things that have gone in under the government.
You take a look at the USAID, the kind of fraud in there that
Speaker 0: we have to make it stop.
Speaker 1: Well, we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars of money that's going to places where it shouldn't be going, where if I read a list, you'd say this is ridiculous, and you've read the same list, and there are many that you haven't even seen. It's crazy. It's a big scam. Now there's some good money, and we can do that through, any one of a number.
Speaker 0: I think I'd rather give
Speaker 1: it to Marco Rubio over at the state department. Let him take care of the few good ones. So I don't know if it's kickbacks or what's going on, but the people look, I ran on this, and the people want me to find it. And I've had a great help with Elon Musk, who's been terrific. Bottom line, you say you
Speaker 0: trust him.
Speaker 1: Trust Elon? Oh, he's not gaining anything. In fact, I wonder how he can devote the time to it. He's so into it. But I told him do that.
Then I'm gonna tell him very soon, like, maybe in twenty four hours, to go check the Department of Education. He's gonna find the same thing. Then I'm gonna go go to the military. Let's check the military. We're gonna find billions, hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud and abuse, but I campaigned on this, Brett.
Speaker 0: You announced, tariffs on Canada and Mexico. You immediately got action from both of them on border security and drug interdiction. A lot of it. Is that good enough?
Speaker 1: Is that
Speaker 0: good enough?
Speaker 1: No. It's not good enough.
Speaker 0: So more needed in
Speaker 1: thirty days. Something has to happen. It's not sustainable, and I'm changing it.
Speaker 0: You know, the prime minister said this weekend to a group of Canadian businessmen, he was at private meeting, he said, that your wish for Canada to be the fifty first state is a, quote, real thing. Is it
Speaker 1: a real thing? Yeah. It is. I think Canada would be much better off paying a fifty first state because we lose $200,000,000,000 a year with Canada, and I'm not gonna let that happen. It's too much.
Why are we paying $200,000,000,000 a year essentially in subsidy to Canada? Now if they're
Speaker 0: a fifty first state, I don't mind doing it. You said the tariff is a beautiful word. There are some signs in the markets, consumer confidence, that they're a little jittery. So if all goes to plan, when do you think families would be able to feel prices going down? Groceries, energy, or are you kind of saying to them, hang on.
Inflation may get worse until it gets better.
Speaker 1: No. I think we're gonna become a rich look. We're not that rich right now. We owe $36,000,000,000,000 That's because we let all these nations take advantage of us. Same thing, like, 200,000,000,000 with Canada.
We owe 300 we have a deficit with Mexico of $350,000,000,000. I'm not gonna do that. I'm not gonna let that happen.
Speaker 0: Sports has always been something that Americans rally around. They come together. They really do. You won the popular vote. You won all the swing states.
Have you thought about how to try to bring the country together to reach out or to find common ground? Have you thought about that or how that might go?
Speaker 1: I'd love to do it. But, I would say this. We have to, come together. But to come together, there's only one thing that's gonna do it, and that's massive success. Success will bring the country together, but it's hard.
And I say it's hard. I just signed a bill allowing for women not to have to be punished by men in sports. In other words, men are not gonna be allowed to play in sports against women. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 0: You're a sports guy. You're a football fan. Size up these two teams.
Speaker 1: I'm a big fan of both teams. They're sort of different. In Philadelphia, you have one of the greatest running backs, Saquon. You know, Saquon had an uncle who's a great fighter, great fighter. And I ran Barkley, his name was.
So you have a great running back. You really have a great quarterback? The other team, the quarterback really knows how to win. He's a great, great quarterback.
Speaker 0: So game prediction?
Speaker 1: I I hate to do it. I just say that I watched this great quarterback who is has, by the way, a phenomenal wife. Okay? She's a Trump fan. She's a MAGA fan.
So I happen to love her. Okay? But she's a great person. I I watched her being interviewed. I said, well, it's pretty good.
But she's great. And he's great. I guess you have to say that when a quarterback wins as much as he's won, I have to go with Kansas City. I have to go with Kansas City. At the same time, Philadelphia has a fantastic it's gonna be
Speaker 0: just a great game. Finally, listen. You are the most recognized person in the world, likely the most imitated person in the world. Every comedian has Donald Trump imitation. Everyone.
But now you have UFC fighters winning fights, NFL players doing the Trump dance. Yeah. Did you ever think that was gonna be a thing?
Speaker 1: No. I didn't. I mean, we do these rallies. They've always been great, but they got really great. And it's just I don't know what it is.
I try and walk off sometimes without dancing, and I can't. I have to dance because it's
Speaker 0: just got something special about it. Mister president, thanks for the time.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much. Enjoy the game.
Speaker 0: You can see the rest of the interview on a host of other topics on special report Monday on Fox News channel. The meantime, we'll send it back to our Fox team in New Orleans after a short break to the kickoff of Super Bowl fifty nine.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
"There's no thieves or thugs out here, we're members of congress," is a WILD quote to say. https://t.co/AKkCcAs9a4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Members of Congress are attempting to enter the Department of Education but are being blocked by private security contractors. They question the authority of these contractors to prevent access to a public building, emphasizing their roles as elected representatives advocating for constituents, particularly children with disabilities. The Congress members express frustration over the lack of transparency and access, noting that while billionaires can enter, they cannot. They highlight the importance of their oversight responsibilities and the need to advocate for the rights and well-being of children. The situation escalates as they call attention to the barriers preventing them from fulfilling their duties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do they know the way that people
Speaker 1: are moving?
Speaker 2: Max, ask the question again. That's important.
Speaker 3: Were you told are you making this decision to stand in front of this door on your own behalf, on behalf of Department of Education, or were you told to come out here and block numbers of content and write the dots? Dear minds are off.
Speaker 4: So everybody's What is that?
Speaker 2: We're doing our jobs.
Speaker 0: We're trying to say
Speaker 1: We're trying to say We're trying to say Show me your ID.
Speaker 3: Were you told to spam here, or did you decide to stand here and block members of Congress from other sources of education? Access.
Speaker 4: To federal well-being. Who says
Speaker 0: that you're not the private
Speaker 4: members of congress.
Speaker 1: Members of congress. Or maybe he doesn't understand. Do you
Speaker 4: not understand? Private security contractors is making the decision to block members of congress from asset from a public access entrance.
Speaker 2: I don't think he knows
Speaker 4: You have the authority as a private security contractor to block members of congress. That that that has been knighted and granted to you.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure
Speaker 1: if you have
Speaker 4: You have to at least let us go to the desk. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. And when it goes to the
Speaker 1: desk, there's many different
Speaker 2: questions to change.
Speaker 0: Who told you to do this? Open the door. I see it now.
Speaker 1: So do you do you understand who members
Speaker 2: of congress are?
Speaker 1: I got it. Yeah.
Speaker 0: And you
Speaker 2: don't care. Huawei then.
Speaker 1: I got a job over there.
Speaker 2: You don't care. We have the job to do. We're not dangerous people. We're not I don't know. We're members of congress.
There are no thieves and thugs out here. We're members of congress. We're parents. We're teachers.
Speaker 0: Each in the bible
Speaker 4: says 400
Speaker 1: right now.
Speaker 3: You were elected to this. This is our job.
Speaker 1: This is our job. This is
Speaker 2: our job. We're doing our job. Oh, wow. You're securing this building against who? Members of congress.
Members of congress. Who are you taking?
Speaker 4: The people. This is the beginning of full transparency of this administration. That's right. The administration that talked about they're gonna open the doors to all of the these things and and show the American public what is going on. Grants They won't even open the door to this building, to members of congress.
We are not posing any threat here. No. No. We are not dangerous people. We have not done any Let us try to request a meeting, and they won't they have a private security contractor who, on his own, is making decisions on behalf of the Department of Education.
Speaker 1: We are not at the partnership with Hayes, which is saying is they're not they allow billionaires and his minions to come in to this
Speaker 4: building. I don't know who he is, but I know who I am. And I'm a member of congress with oversight responsibilities trying to request a meeting, and a private security contractor is not allowing me to enter the building. And what do
Speaker 1: you say about billionaires go in this building but not the access representatives. They have all billionaires and their cronies still lying, but not there's a lack of transparency here. The members of congress, the people of representatives are not allowed in. This is not transparent.
Speaker 3: They're locking our kids down.
Speaker 2: Well, they not only are they not
Speaker 3: letting us sit, now they've called the Department of Homeland Security.
Speaker 2: We are members of Congress
Speaker 1: here to talk. We have a
Speaker 3: big Department of Education,
Speaker 2: and they're
Speaker 1: treating kids deserve to have a go away and fight for them.
Speaker 3: This is a calling.
Speaker 1: Children of this country deserve
Speaker 2: that,
Speaker 0: This is an economic institution. This is not Russia. Let the camera see him. Let the camera see him.
Speaker 3: What is
Speaker 0: he? This this man is a contractor.
Speaker 2: We are
Speaker 3: members of congress.
Speaker 0: Come in. They're blocking us. You see this man here who is a federal employee, he told us.
Speaker 2: No. He's not.
Speaker 0: Are you a federal employee?
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 0: He said he's a federal employee. We pay him. We raise money to make sure that we have a department of education. Everybody that's hired at the department of education are here because we pay for them to be here. He's standing here today blocking the door, and he can't give us a good reason why he's blocking this door.
Speaker 3: Make sure they see right here all access entrance.
Speaker 2: Well, I think it should be clear to parents in The United States. If you wanna advocate on behalf of your children, you are not allowed to come into this building where you pay taxes. Parents who have children who are disabled, access is being blocked. You voted. You voted for members of congress to to advocate on behalf of your children, children with disabilities, for young women who have been victims of sexual assault in our classrooms, on our school grounds.
Members of OCR are fighting for your children. We are not not allowed in the building to talk to them. We are not allowed to advocate on behalf of America's children. America, we have a problem.
Speaker 0: Everybody stand back. Alright.
Speaker 4: So this is the Department of Education. You've got
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Tucker Carlson x Mike Benz podcast just dropped 🔥
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨BREAKING: Trump signs executive order ushering in DOGE https://t.co/xoTS7ObYib
Video Transcript AI Summary
An order has been issued to create and implement the Department of Governmental Efficiency, known as DOS. This initiative involves hiring around 20 staff members to ensure effective implementation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is an order creating and implementing the Department of Governmental Efficiency known as DOS.
Speaker 1: K. That's a big one. No. He's getting an office for about 20 people that we're hiring to make sure that these get implemented.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was asked if the plane crash was linked to DEI, and I suggested it might be. I emphasized the importance of brain power and psychological quality in assessments, criticizing Biden for ending those standards and opting for the opposite approach. We need the best and brightest. Oh boy.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨REPORTER: "Are you saying that this plane crash was caused by DEI?" TRUMP: "It could have been. There are things where you have to go by brain power and psychological quality. These are very powerful tests you have to use and Biden terminated them and went by a standard that's the exact opposite. We want the brightest, smartest, sharpest, and psychologically superior." Oh boy 😅
Video Transcript AI Summary
On DEI and its potential impact, it's possible that diversity hiring contributed to the recent crash. We maintain high standards, prioritizing brainpower and psychological quality in our evaluations. However, these rigorous tests were discontinued under Biden, who adopted a contrasting approach. The incident involving two aircraft at the same altitude raises concerns, and we will investigate further. It's crucial that air traffic controllers possess exceptional intelligence and psychological capabilities, and we are committed to ensuring that standard is met.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On DEI and the claims that you've made, are you saying this crash was somehow caused and the result of diversity hiring? And what evidence have you seen to support these claims?
Speaker 1: It just could have been. We have a high standard. We've had a higher much higher standard than anybody else. And there are things where you have to go by brainpower. You have to go by psychological, quality.
And psychological quality is a very important element of it. These are various very powerful tests that we put to use, and they were terminated by Biden. And Biden went by a standard that's the exact opposite. So we don't know, but we do know that, you had 2 planes at the same level. You had an air helicopter and a plane.
That shouldn't have happened. And, we'll see. We're gonna look into that. We're gonna see. But, certainly, for an air traffic controller, we want the brightest, the smartest, the sharpest.
We want somebody that's psychologically, superior, and that's what we're going to have.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 UPDATE: Absolutely insane dashcam footage of the Philadelphia plane crash. It’s like a little nuke went off. Wow https://t.co/jdrBimYelL
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 TRUMP: “They say we had the greatest first week in presidential history. Even CNN is saying ‘this guy is amazing.’ I said ‘did CNN really say that?’ But nobody watches so nobody was able to confirm.” LMAO!!! 😂 https://t.co/0346pFRhrE
Video Transcript AI Summary
She's doing great. They say it was the best opening week in presidential history, but I think it could be even better. Even CNN is praising him, which surprised me since not many people watch them to confirm it. It’s quite remarkable. Oh, their camera just went off.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She's doing great. They say it was the greatest week, opening week in presidential history. And I think, you know, could be a hell of a lot better. Even CNN is saying, this guy is amazing. I couldn't believe it.
I said, did CNN really say that? Because nobody watches, so nobody was able to confirm it. But it was pretty amazing. Oh, their camera just went off.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Marc Andreessen breaks down how the University scam works and how they misappropriate taxpayer money. "There is a government supported and funded cartel that doesn't allow new entrants to get access to Federal money. They must be allowed to fail." https://t.co/exAT2obaBJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Universities rely on four main sources of federal funding: federal student loans, federal research funding, tax exemptions for operations, and tax exemptions for endowments. If these funding sources were withdrawn, many universities would face bankruptcy. The accreditation process for universities, controlled by existing institutions through nonprofit accreditation bureaus, restricts new universities from accessing federal student loans. This creates a government-supported cartel that hinders innovation and progress. To improve the system, a complete overhaul is necessary, allowing failing institutions to collapse and new ones to emerge. The current system is stagnant and unable to be fixed in its present form.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Universities the universe the universities are funded by 4 primary sources of federal funding. The big one is the federal student loan program which is, you know, in the many trillions of dollars at this point and then only spiraling, you know, way faster than than inflation. That's number 1. Number 2 is federal research funding which is also very large And you probably know that, when a scientist at university gets a research grant, the university rakes as much as 70% of the money, for central uses. Yeah.
Number 3 is tax exemption of the operating level, which is based on the idea that these are nonprofit institutions as opposed to, let's say, political institutions. And then number 4 is tax, exemptions at the endowment level, you know, which is the financial buffer that these places have. Anybody who's been close to a university budget will basically see that what would happen if you withdrew those sources of federal taxpayer money. And then for the state schools, the state money, they they all instantly go bankrupt. And then you could rebuild.
Then you could rebuild. Because the problem right now, you know, like the folks at University of Boston are, like, mounting a very valiant effort and I hope that they succeed and I'm sure I'm cheering for them. But the problem is you're you're now inserting you so it's supposed suppose you and I wanna start a new university and we wanna hire all the free thinking professors and we wanna have the place that fixes all this. Practically speaking, we can't do it because we can't get access to that money. Are you the most direct reason we can't get access to that money?
We can't get access to federal student funding. Do you know how universities are accredited, for the purpose of getting access to federal student funding? Federal student loans? They're accredited by the government, but not directly indirectly. They're not accredited by the Department of Education.
Instead, what happens is the Department of Education accredits accreditation bureaus that are nonprofits that do the accreditation. Guess what the composition of the accreditation bureaus is? The existing universities. They're in complete control. The incumbents are in complete control as to who gets, as as to who gets access to fellow student loan money.
Guess how enthusiastic they are about accrediting a new university? Right. And so we we have a government funded and supported cartel, that has gone I mean, it's just obvious now. It's just gone, like, sideways and basically any possible way if you go sideways, including I mean, literally, as you know, students getting beaten up in the on campus for being, you know, the wrong religion. They just they're they're just wrong in every possible way at this point.
And and they're they're it's all in the federal taxpayer back. And there is no way I mean, I my opinion, there is no way to fix these things without without replacing them. And and there's no way to replace them without letting them fail. And and by the way, it's like everything else in life. I mean, in a sense, this is like the most obvious conclusion of all time, which is what happens in in the business world when a company does a bad job is they go bankrupt and another another company takes its place.
Right? And that that's how you get progress. And of course below that is what happens is this is the process of evolution, right? Why does anything ever get better? Because things are tested and tried and then you know the things that are going to survive.
And so these places have cut themselves off. They've been allowed to cut themselves off both through evolution at the institutional level and evolution at the individual level as shown by the the the the the just widespread abuse of tenure. And so we we've just stalled out. We we built it we built an ossified system, an ossified centralized corrupt system. We're we're surprised by the results.
They are not fixable in their current form.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Brad Sherman tries to defend FEMA and is shut down by President Trump so decisively that the entire panel gives him a round of applause https://t.co/E6khP4ts06
Video Transcript AI Summary
FEMA has been effective in deploying resources for disaster relief, operating a large center with extended hours. However, challenges arise when coordinating efforts across states, especially when local agencies have different approaches. While California has a large population and resources, the organization of aid can be problematic. Past disasters, like in North Carolina, saw success through collaboration among states. FEMA's processes can be slow, requiring numerous permits, which delays recovery. It’s suggested that local authorities should expedite permits to allow residents to rebuild quickly without bureaucratic delays.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Mister President, if I can just defend FEMA a little bit.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: They brought thousands of people in. I don't know how they're doing in other states. They're doing a good job for us here. They've got a huge center that's open from 9 in the morning till 8 at night. But also, when you have a disaster this size, you need to be able to deploy thousands of people, which they've been able to do.
Now California, if we did it on our own, maybe we'd have thousands of people.
Speaker 1: You do.
Speaker 0: But but if Rhode Island has a Palisades disaster, are they then supposed to keep
Speaker 1: How many people do you have in California? 36? How many what's how many million? How many how many million people do you have? What?
You have 40,000,000 people. You're not gonna get a few 1,000 people? The problem with FEMA is they come from all over the country. They end up in arguments with your people from California because they wanna do it a totally different way.
Speaker 0: And They're getting
Speaker 1: I can live either way, but you haven't gotten very much done with FEMA because and all you have to do is look at North Carolina. It's one of the great disasters of all time.
Speaker 0: And mister president, you can't have Rhode Island maintain a staff of 1,000 and thousands of people waiting to see if they have a disaster.
Speaker 1: You know who came in and fixed North Carolina or the process? Other states. People from all over the country came, and you have the same thing. You have a lot of people from all over the country. Getting the people is not a problem.
Getting the organization's a big problem. FEMA's incompetently run, and it costs about 3 times more than it should cost. I'm hoping you can get your right. Schools instead of giving money to bureaucracy. It takes you so much longer.
Speaker 0: Mister president, I I thank you so much for FEMA for helping our people.
Speaker 1: FEMA FEMA has a standard, Brad, and I'm a builder. I build I was a good very good builder. FEMA has a standard that's so slow. They want permit on permit on permit, and then they want permits on top of that. If you use per FEMA, you'll be here for a long time.
What I'm saying is get the city, get the the state to give you immediate 24 hour permits. These people are gonna build their own homes. They're gonna get them built fast.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨 BREAKING: New school shooting in Nashville, Tennessee at Antioch High School. Two students shot. One student dead and the shooter shot themselves. Local news says the shooter was allegedly a 17 year old black male. Victim was a female student. https://t.co/E2OgCaTazk
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Elon Musk speaks at the Presidential Parade. "We are going to plant an American flag on MARS. GET EXCITED! Be optimistic!" 🔥 https://t.co/5GKGRYoeFi
Video Transcript AI Summary
This victory marks a pivotal moment for human civilization. While elections come and go, this one truly matters, and I want to express my gratitude for making it happen. Because of you, we can look forward to safe cities, secure borders, and sensible spending. Imagine American astronauts planting our flag on Mars—how inspiring that will be! Life has its challenges, but we need things that inspire us and give us hope for the future. I'm committed to working hard for you, and I'm excited about what lies ahead. As the president said, we're entering a golden age filled with optimism. Thank you all for your support; I can't wait for the future!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This this is what victory feels like. Yeah. And this was no ordinary victory. This was a fork in the road of human civilization. Okay.
This this you know, there there are elections that the elections, they come and go. Some some elections are, you know, important. Some are not. But but this one this one This one really matters and I just want to say thank you for making it happen. Thank you My heart goes out to you.
It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured. Thanks to you. We're gonna have safe cities. Finally, safe cities. Secure borders, sensible spending, basic stuff.
And we're gonna take those to Mars. I mean, can you imagine how awesome it will be to have American astronauts plant the flag on another planet for the first time? Damn. Damn. Yeah.
How inspiring would that be? You know, there's always there's there's always problems in problems in life. You know, if there's this problem, solve that problem, solve that problem. But, you know, there there needs to be things that inspire you. There needs to be things that make you glad to wake up in the morning and say, I'm looking forward to the future.
Yeah. I love you guys. So And and and let me tell you, I'm gonna work my ass up for you guys. I really will. I really will.
So and, yeah. But I'm I'm super fired up, for the for the for the future. It's gonna be very exciting. As the president said, we're gonna have a golden age. It's gonna be fantastic.
And one of the fundamental things that one of the most American values that that I love is optimism. And and and this feeling like we're gonna we're gonna make the future good. We're gonna make it good. So, man, I can't wait. This is gonna be fantastic.
So thanks to thank you. Thank you again. And, yeah. It's I'm just so excited about the future. Thank you, guys.
Thank you.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨NEW: Megyn Kelly speaks at Trump's Victory Rally https://t.co/jANMyWyYZ0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you for braving the weather to be here. We're on the brink of change with Trump’s inauguration tomorrow. Anticipation is already sparking positive shifts, like universities and companies dropping DEI programs. Military recruitment is rising, and legislation supporting women in sports is gaining traction.
We owe progress to everyday heroes like Jodie Shaw, who stood against DEI policies, and parents like Andrew Gutman, who challenged schools on race issues. Citizens are speaking out against injustices, and change is happening. Wearing MAGA hats has become an act of courage, reflecting our commitment to free speech and standing firm against the woke agenda.
As we move forward, stay strong and united. We’ve won battles, but the fight continues. God bless you, President Trump, and the United States of America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Hi. How are you? God bless you for standing out there in that weather and all these hours to get in here tonight, today. As Stephen Miller said, we have 20 hours until our long national nightmare is over.
We're almost there. By the way, Stephen Miller, you if you like what Trump did at the border, you have that guy to thank in large part. That's the guy. He's the magic behind the man, and he's back. Thank God.
Him and Tom Homan together. The goodness Scott Pressler, good to see you. The goodness that is about to rain down on us after Trump is inaugurated tomorrow is already starting, and I've gotta tell you I am so pumped up about it. Things are already happening in anticipation of Trump being sworn in, like Facebook and McDonald's getting rid of their DEI programs. Good for you McDonald's workers.
Looking at you, Kamala Harris. Really? No. Not really. Wasn't true.
You've got universities, from the University of Michigan to North Carolina to all the public universities in Iowa, all the public universities in Texas getting rid of DEI. You have got yes. You've got a bill that passed the house this week, the protection of women and girls in sports act. Yes. Now it passed once before, but this time, we control the senate.
We have a much better shot. Good things are happening all around the country. Pete Hegseth was testifying this week that military recruiting is already going up in anticipation of their new commander in chief. The deal in Gaza, right before Trump takes office, as he said, if it's not done by the time I get there, all hell is gonna break loose. The goodness just keeps on I woke up morning.
I was 2 inches taller, a pound thinner, and I had skin like Jennifer Lopez. It's I don't that that last one's not true. Okay. Speaking of J. Lo, how happy are you that her candidate lost?
It's so delightful. These Hollywood celebrities who get up there and try to tell us how to vote. Really? I mean, like those celebrities who know nothing about anything. All J.
Lo knows about what to do is to ruin marriages. She's an expert at that. Why does she have to try to ruin the country too? So goodbye, J. Lo.
Didn't work out for you. Goodbye, Meryl Streep, who showed up at that Oprah event saying, oh, madam president, to Kamala Harris. Madam president. How'd that work out? About as well as her comment that Harvey Weinstein was god.
And maybe we should stop listening to her. Maybe we shouldn't be going to her for our political advice. And then you had Oprah herself. Oprah, she'll interview you if you pay her a $1,000,000 too. Yeah.
So low low me of a $1,000,000 to sit down with Oprah Winfrey, apparently. That's what the Harris campaign paid her production company, she says. And for that, you know what you get? You get Oprah yelling at you. Why why are you doing that?
Calm down, madam. Didn't work out for her either. But, of course, the fakest person involved on that side of the aisle was the woman at the top, Kamala Harris herself. Thank you. Who pretended that she wasn't the border czar, who pretended that she was middle class, who pretended that she was smart, and the American people did not buy it.
Every time you turned around, this woman was doing something faker than the last. Right? Her, like, fake Jamaican accent, her fake Eastern European accent, her fake Spanish accent. It was like spending the day at Joe Biden's southern border nonstop. Right?
We gonna win. It's not how it went. Right? But my favorite was the preacher accent. Joy cometh in the morning.
And she wasn't wrong about that. It came at about 1:22 AM on election night when the election was called for Donald J. Trump. I felt it. I've been thinking so much about Trump, especially today and this week.
I know you have too. Praying for him, praying for his family. Thankful to them. I mean, think about it. I interviewed Trump about a year plus ago and asked him why why are you doing this?
Could be in Scotland. You could be at your golf courses. It's because he loves the country. And he wasn't done yet. And we're not done with him.
So god bless him and the family for making this sacrifice and doing public service, same with JD Vance, and the cabinet members, all of whom need our prayers and support. But I'm also thinking of all of you. I'm thinking about you. I'm thinking about Americans who got us here. Because the things that Trump is accomplishing already, some of the things I mentioned in anticipation of him taking office, That ball got rolling, yes, with Trump, but also with regular American people who stood up here, there, and everywhere to make a difference in their own communities.
I'm thinking about people like Jodie Shaw. You probably don't know that name. But Jody Shaw was an administrative worker at Smith College. She didn't make a lot of money. Single mom, 2 kids.
And in late 2020, early 2021, she had had it with the DEI nonsense at Smith. So she made a Facebook video and she posted it. And little Jody Smith who is sweet and quiet and not one to shake the tree said, I don't wanna be forced to talk about my race at work anymore. I don't wanna be told that I have implicit bias because I'm white. I don't wanna have to enforce segregated dorms.
Please stop making me do this. And Smith unleashed holy hell on her. Smith, this super tolerant college okay. Made it, she alleged later, untenable for her to stay. She got forced out of her job.
And I'm honestly not sure whether Jody's fully recovered. So she got hurt, and she got hurt for all of you and for us and for the rest who are at Smith. She's a hero. Jody Smith is a genuine hero for doing this. But it wasn't just Jody.
I mean, I'm thinking about people like Andrew Gutman who had a daughter at a posh school on the upper east side of Manhattan and pulled her, but he didn't go quietly. He wrote a scathing letter ripping them to shreds for what they're doing to us with this race essentialism nonsense. He went out with a bang and he made sure other parents knew what the problem was. Jason Riley of the Wall Street Journal, you may see him on Fox News sometimes, and his wife Naomi Schaeffer Riley, who pulled their mixed race daughters from a school in Rye, New York and made a point of doing it because that school thought that their mixed race daughters were desperate to talk about their blackness all the time and they found out the hard way those kids really just wanted to learn math. These battles are being won piece by piece.
One at a time. And there are so many others. I'm thinking about the 14 year old girls in Wisconsin who had an 18 year old guy come in there naked into their showers after gym. I'm thinking about the young woman in Massachusetts who just wanted to play field hockey and suddenly got all of her teeth knocked out because a boy played for the other team posing as a girl. How do we know about these stories?
Because people were outraged. Citizens went to the news. They went to their principals. Girls spoke out 1 by 1 and got the ball rolling on change, and change is coming. All of you wearing the MAGA hats, it used to be an act of civil disobedience.
Right? Yes, sir. Defiance of a registered order that didn't wanna hear from you. But wearing that hat for much of the past 8 years has been an act of courage too. And I know I know just because you're here that you had your moments in your own communities, whether it was online or at the bowling alley or at the restaurant or at school, where you stood up for one of these same issues, Where you had to tell somebody you didn't wanna be reduced to skin color.
Where you said I prefer the days when we didn't make a thing out of that. Where you had to tell somebody that boys cannot become girls and girls cannot become boys. Those battles, one after the other, have been fought and this anti DEI momentum has been built brick by brick. Thanks to all of you. And you who listened to Donald Trump, who, when a reporter asked him at a presidential debate in 2015 about some of the language he used, responded by saying, what I say is what I say.
And if you don't like it, too bad. That was more than just a quick combat. That was a reminder of what America is. In America, we have the right of free speech. We have the right to offend, to provoke, to annoy, and to stand up for what we believe in even if you find it controversial.
We have the right not to use the words you try to force on us, like your preferred pronouns or words like anti racist or chest feeding. We are reminded of that daily by president Trump who would never bow to the woke mob. Just ask Brett Kavanaugh who will be swearing in JD Vance tomorrow as he, Kavanaugh, sits in his robes as an associate justice of the US Supreme Court. So I thank all of you for being part of the Trump movement and for bringing these changes upon us and for bringing Donald Trump back into the office and a reminder before I go. Stay strong.
We haven't won the war. We're winning. We won a bunch of battles, but he's gonna need all of you every step of the way. We're gonna have to be patient. We're gonna have to steal our spines.
Do not bend. Never bow. What I say is what I say. God bless you. God bless president Trump.
God bless the United States of America.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with those who are upset about people being able to speak freely now. It feels hypocritical to worry about misinformation when so many have been spreading it for years. This isn't about the danger of the narrative; it's about losing control over it. Those who once dictated the conversation are now angry because they can’t enforce their views anymore. It's absurd to pretend that this newfound freedom is a threat when it’s really just about people making their own choices.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨ADAM CAROLLA: "All you f'ing pu**ies out there that have your panties in a bunch because these guys are going to be able to speak freely now, go F yourself 1000 times with 1000 rusty mop handles. You're now worried about misinformation and disinformation after you've been creating it all for the past 10 years? Give me a f'ing break. You're pissed off because you can't control the narrative, not because the narrative is dangerous. It's only about control. You guys were wrong about everything. You had control and you forced everyone to capitulate. Now you don't have control, and you hate it. It's insane that they even have the gall to feign that they're upset about this new thing and how dangerous it is when people start making their own decisions." 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't care if it's a small business or a large corporation; when the government threatens you, you should take it seriously. Blame the government for the issues we're facing. Those upset about free speech now are just mad they can't control the narrative anymore. For years, they've spread misinformation and now they're worried about others doing the same. It's not about the danger of misinformation; it's about losing control. They were wrong about everything and forced compliance, and now they resent others having the same freedom. It's absurd to pretend their concerns are about safety when it's really about power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't care mom and pop business or biggest business in the world. Right. When the government comes at you and says we're gonna fuck you up 100% believe it. Then everyone goes, fine. What do you need from us?
Blame the government. Absolutely. 100%. Yes. So I I don't I'm not I don't call the guy a hero, but I do blame our government.
But now listen do as well. All you fucking pussies out there that are have your panties in a bunch because these guys are gonna be able to speak freely now, Go fuck yourself a 1000 times with a 1000 rusty mop handles because you're now worried that misinformation and disinformation after you've been creating all the mis and disinformation for the last 10 years, give me a fucking break. You are pissed off because you can't control the narrative, not because the narrative is dangerous. It's only about control. You guys were wrong about everything.
You had control, and you forced everyone to capitulate. And now they're the same as the control, and you hate it. But it's not because it's dangerous. Or if it is mis or disinformation, then what are we talking about? Ivermectin and or space?
Like, what are we talking about here? It's insane that they even have the gall to feign that they're upset about this new thing and how dangerous it's gonna be when people start making their own decisions. Mhmm. Alright.
@VMiguelRNeves - Miguel Neves
@AutismCapital Best one i got these last few days, quite fitting. 🤷🏻 https://t.co/YE6S1BbrWe
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@VMiguelRNeves @AutismCapital 🎯
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨IRONY: Layla Law-Gisiko, the person responsible for the $9 congestion toll for people driving into Manhattan to force more people to use NYC public transit, attacked in NYC public transit. “I am shaken, with a bruised ankle and a sore shoulder from being pushed into the wall." https://t.co/rW8NdvY9J2
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
Today we learned Meta employed 40,000 fact checkers. Yes, you heard that correctly. Forty thousand fact checkers. Let that sink in.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe USAID misused funds intended for Pakistan to develop a CIA Twitter clone in Cuba. They recruited users through music, sports, and hurricane updates. Once they reached 100,000 users, they began manipulating the messaging to incite a government overthrow, similar to the Arab Spring.
@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩
🚨MIKE BENZ: "USAID laundered money that was meant for Pakistan to create a CIA Twitter clone in Cuba and recruit people with messaging that involved music, sports, and hurricane updates, and then once they had 100,000 users they started introducing messaging into the algorithm to get them to overthrow the government and form smart mobs to bring a Cuban Spring to Cuba; the same way that the CIA, the State Department, and USAID pulled of the Arab Spring in Tunisia and Egypt in 2011-2012." 😲
Video Transcript AI Summary
US Aid created a Twitter-like platform in Cuba to promote free speech during a time when Twitter was restricted. They funneled money originally meant for Pakistan to develop this service, initially using music, sports, and hurricane updates to attract users. Once they gained around 100,000 users, the platform began to push messages encouraging them to overthrow their government, aiming to replicate the Arab Spring movements in Tunisia and Egypt. This operation raises concerns about targeting US companies and the implications of such actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: US Aid, created a, basically, a CIA Twitter in Cuba to try to, to try to convince the people of of basically, to try to get a free speech Internet, a free speech Twitter knock off in Cuba at a time when Twitter in 2014 was was restricted. And USAID laundered money that was earmarked for Pakistan in order to create a identical version of Twitter, but just for Cuba and to recruit them using messaging, that and at first involved music, sports, and hurricane updates. And then in their own documents, once they had accumulated about a 100000 users, they would start to feed them in the algorithm messaging to make them want to overthrow their government and form smart mobs to to bring a Cuban spring to Cuba in the same way that the CIA, the state department, and USAID pulled off the Arab spring in Tunisia and Egypt in 2011, 2012. By the way, I'm not even opining on whether this is good or bad, but you can't bring that home and you can't target US companies like like they've done like they've done here.