TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BGatesIsaPyscho
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“It’s obvious that it was a false flag & that WTC7 Building was a controlled demolition. Fantastic 9/11 clip. Everyone is realising. https://t.co/Y7XKdO9x8I
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that 9/11 is the biggest lie of our lifetime and that he was on-site, believing it may have been a false flag. He states it is obvious to him that Building 7 was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down, a uniform collapse requiring all load-bearing columns to fail simultaneously; he contrasts this with the Twin Towers, which he says collapse top-down in a progressive collapse. He notes that the trade centers were designed to withstand jet impacts and, referencing his experience in heavy construction, describes the outer columns as a “fishnet” and the inner core columns as thick steel beams capable of withstanding four to five times the loads. He claims engineers routinely over-design buildings.
He mentions that dust samples contained what is called thermitic material, described as an explosive incendiary, and cites documented reports. He alleges extensive elevator renovations in the two to three years prior to 9/11, that many workers had access to the cores of the buildings, and that on the day of the attack the elevator company would not assist in elevator operations and subsequently went out of business. He references sworn firefighter testimonies a couple of years after 9/11 about explosions in the buildings and asserts these were suppressed, as Building 7 was ignored in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Regarding Al Qaeda, he contends that Al Qaeda’s role is something he does not think exists, suggesting it is made up. He recalls the FBI’s 2006 statement that there was no concrete evidence linking Osama bin Laden with 9/11 and notes that Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA in Afghanistan, helping fight the Russians, and that the CIA helped orchestrate 9/11, calling it “their plan.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: '9 11 is the biggest lie of our lifetime. You were on-site that day. You believe it may have been a false flag? Yes. That's correct.
It's obvious to me that Building 7 was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. For a building to collapse uniformly, which the video show, all the load bearing columns would have had to have failed simultaneously. Unlike the Twin Towers, the Twin Towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure.
The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the impact of a a jet. I've been involved with heavy construction for over thirty years. Been involved with the constructions of high rise steel frame buildings in Manhattan. I've worked on bridges, and I know what goes into these buildings. The outer, skeleton of the building, the outer columns was like a, a fishnet, and you had these inner core columns, which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were.
Got it. The engineers always over design a building. And they examined the dust and they found what they call thermitic material, which is like an explosive incendiary. It was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing an extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to.
All kinds of workers, they had access to the cores of the building. And on the day of the attack, the elevator company would not assist in operations of the elevators. Woah. It was the elevator company. It subsequently went out of business.
And a couple of years after that, you have sworn testimonies from firefighters regarding explosions in the building. They were suppressed just like Building 7 was ignored in the nine eleven commission report. It's not in there. What do you think Al Qaeda's role in all of this was? I don't think I think Al Qaeda is made up.
The FBI came out, I believe it was 2006, and actually said, this is verifiable, they had no concrete evidence linking Osama bin Laden with nine eleven. Osama bin Laden worked for the Central Intelligence Agency in Afghanistan. He helped us fight the Russians when they were in Afghanistan. CIA helped orchestrate nine eleven. It was their plan.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Wait what⁉️The US & UK overthrew The Democratically elected Iranian Government in 1953! Everyone should take 50 seconds to watch this clip. RIP Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/DXK2IiH4Yw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the United States bears responsibility for Iran’s later radicalism, contending that the American government is the reason Iran became radical. The reasoning given is that Iran had a democratically elected leader, Mossadegh, whom the speaker claims the U.S. did not like because he wanted to nationalize the oil. The speaker notes that the British also disliked Mossadegh for the same reason, and references a historical moment—1953—described as the Iranian coup d'etat, stating that it was aided by intelligence agencies of the United Kingdom and the United States.
Following this intervention, the speaker claims that the United States and its allies “put the shah back in,” describing the shah as physically sick and unpopular. This sequence, according to the speaker, established conditions that paved the way for a rise in and persistence of radical elements within Islam for many decades. The points are presented in a causal narrative: U.S. opposition to Mossadegh over oil nationalization contributed to intervention in Iran, which led to restoring the Shah; the Shah’s unpopularity and ill health, under this arrangement, helped create an environment that empowered radical Islamist forces for an extended period.
Key claims highlighted include:
- The American government is depicted as the root cause of Iran’s later radicalism.
- Mossadegh’s push to nationalize oil made him a target of U.S. and British opposition.
- The 1953 coup d'etat in Iran was aided by intelligence agencies from the UK and the United States.
- The Shah was reinstalled after the coup and is characterized as physically ill and unpopular.
- This sequence is said to have paved the way for the most radical elements of Islam for many decades.
The speaker emphasizes the continuity of this historical arc as a justification for present-day views on Iran, linking early mid-20th-century foreign intervention to long-term Islamist radicalism. The narrative is presented as a straightforward cause-and-effect chain, with the 1953 coup and the Shah’s reinstatement identified as pivotal events leading to subsequent decades of radicalization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What must be done with Iran? Is we must remember that we, the American government, are the reason why Iran is radical. We did this. They had a democratically elected leader that we did not like. I remember, I believe his name is Mossade, and we didn't like him because he wanted to nationalize the oil.
Specifically, the Brits didn't like him. '50 what year was this PPD? Yeah. I got you. This is before the show.
Yes. He he was years ago. He was very popular. Yeah. Gotcha.
And look right there. Even even even in Wikipedia, nineteen fifty three Iranian coup d'etat aided by intelligence agencies of The UK and United States. Weird. Got it. Okay.
So then we put the shah back in who was sick and unpopular, meaning he was actually suffering. Physically sick. Physically sick. And we paved the way for the most radical elements of Islam for many decades.
reSee.it AI Summary
On a train in England, a Muslim man who doesn’t like dogs (they’re Haram in Islam) threatens a woman and her dog, saying he will kick the dog, take it away, pour vodka on its face, then tell it “FO” 10 times, all while the camera films.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🇬🇧 Meanwhile on a train on England “I don’t care about the camera filming me - I will kick dog, take it away, put vodka on its face, then I kick your dog tell it FO 10 times” Muslim Man who doesn’t like dogs (they Haram in Islam) repeatedly threatens this woman and her pooch‼️ https://t.co/YiN4wW4MY6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 repeatedly declares, “I don’t care,” and then issues violent and abusive commands: “I will kick dog,” “I kick your dog, call him fuck off 10 times,” and “Take him away.” They also order, “Take daughter. Now. Put vodka on her face.” The cycle concludes with, “The camera, I don’t care.”
Speaker 1 responds by noting, “Okay. We've asked you to listen.” They say, “I've just texted the British,” and add, “trans properly, so you need to go. The camera, I don’t care.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't care.
Speaker 1: Okay. We've asked you to listen.
Speaker 0: I don't care, camera. I don't care. I will kick dog. I call him fuck off. Take him away.
Stop it now. Take daughter. Now. Put vodka on her face. What?
Yeah. And I kick your dog, call him fuck off 10 times.
Speaker 1: Okay. I've just texted the British
Speaker 0: trans properly, so you need to go. The camera, I don't care.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Homer Simpson was able to figure out the calculation for the Mass of the Higgs Boson Particle aka The God Particle” “He figured it out 14 years before CERN did and that calculation was worth $13.5bn” https://t.co/ChV0NbmLcD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Homer Simpson was able to figure out the calculation for the mass of the Higgs boson particle, aka the god particle, fourteen years before Stern did, and that equation was worth $13,500,000,000. The speaker notes this is all in the context of the particle accelerator they’re building in CERN. They express surprise that such a calculation and value were casually included in a cartoon, saying, “And you just casually put that in a cartoon, you know, something just doesn't make sense there.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Homer Simpson was able to figure out the calculation for the mass of the Higgs boson particle, aka the god particle, fourteen years before Stern did, and that equation was worth $13,500,000,000. So is everything in stage? I don't even know anymore, but this is my driver. Are you kidding me? This is the particle accelerator that they're building in CERN for context.
And you just casually put that in a cartoon, you know, something just doesn't make sense there. But
reSee.it AI Summary
The debate is over. Those sky trails from planes are not simply water vapor or condensation. Listen to the unrefutable science behind it. To everyone who called this out—you were right, you always were.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇺🇸✈️ Meanwhile in South Carolina THE DEBATE IS OVER. All those trails you see daily in the sky left by Planes - they are NOT simply water vapour or condensation trails as many people claim. Listen to the Unrefutable science as to why. To all those that have continually called this out - you were right - you were always right and you always knew it ‼️
reSee.it AI Summary
Dear Vaccine Fanatics, if the experimental Covid vaccines aren’t responsible for the huge cancer increase, then why does a Korean study of 8.4 million people show higher cancer rates in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated? Serious question. Isn’t this the science you loved? This is just one study among many showing the same. Probably time to admit you were scammed…
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Dear Vaccine Fanatics, If the experimental Covid vaccines aren’t responsible for the huge increase in cancer across all age groups…. Then why does this Korean peer reviewed study of 8.4 million people, comparing cancer rates in unvaccinated persons versus vaccinated persons - show the vaccinated have much higher rate of cancer? Serious question. Isn’t this the science you guys used to love so much? This is just one study of many different studies showing exactly the same thing. Probably time to admit you were scammed…..
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 summarized a study conducted in South Korea. The study involved "over 8,000,000 people who were vaccinated there" and a control group of "several 100,000 who were not vaccinated." A multivariate analysis was used to "eliminate" other variables associated with cancer. The researchers "eliminated any people who had had cancer or suspicion of cancer previously," so all participants were cancer-free at baseline. They followed the groups for "one full year from the time of their most recent injection or one full year from a picked reference date for the control group."
The key finding reported was that, "at twelve months, there was a substantially higher number of cancers found in the vaccinated group," with six different cancers showing elevated risk. The cancers identified as elevated included "thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, [and] prostate cancer." Among these, "prostate and lung cancer were more than a fifty percent increase." The presenter noted that "this new technology is very risky" and acknowledged that "we can't say conclusively that it caused cancer," but emphasized that the finding is "very alarming" and "needs more research to back it up."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This study looked at the population of South Korea and there were over 8,000,000 people who were vaccinated there and they drew from that population as well as several 100,000 who were not vaccinated for the comparison control group. Now they did what's called a multivariate analysis where they found other variables associated with cancer and canceled those out. So, this was a pretty well done trial. They eliminated any people who had had cancer or suspicion of cancer previously, so all these folks had never had cancer and they followed them for one full year from the time of their most recent injection or one full year from a picked reference date for the control group. And what they found was quite astonishing because overall at twelve months, there was a substantially higher number of cancers found in the vaccinated group, and this comprised six different cancers that had a higher risk.
And you can see this on the forest plot that I'll have up on screen, that this included thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer. All of those were elevated in the vaccinated group and the prostate and lung cancer were more than a fifty percent increase. This new technology is very risky and we can't say conclusively that it caused cancer, but certainly this is a very alarming finding and needs more research to back it up.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Everything else has been engineered to effectively work against the masses. Why would music be any different? https://t.co/SonUH6gJhL
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a narrative linking powerful financial alliances to the manipulation of music frequencies for mass control and preparation for war. It states that in the 1930s, the Rothschild-Rockefeller alliance began funding scientific studies to explore how musical frequencies could prepare populations for war, with the aim of controlling people through mind control programming. In this account, Harold Burrows Meyer, a theatrical designer and sound engineer, is described as having developed techniques to control emotional responses of audiences and to create mass hysteria, building on the idea of influence cultivated by these alliances.
The narrative then asserts that the alliance pursued changes to the standard tuning of the musical note A, moving from 435 Hz to 440 Hz. It claims that in 1939, they funded Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propagandist, who supposedly wanted to shift the standard tuning to 440 Hz. According to the account, Goebbels organized a meeting in London to effect this change, with Radio Berlin approaching the British Standards Association to arrange the conference. The report alleges that the conference was a setup controlled by those in power, with the organizers interviewing musicians, instrument makers, physicists, and sound engineers, and excluding anyone who opposed 440 Hz from participation. The claim is that the standard tuning of A was changed to 440 Hz in June 1939, just months before World War II, and that the timing was intentional. The text characterizes 440 Hz as a destructive frequency capable of retraining thoughts toward disharmony, disruption, and disunity.
Speaker 1 broadens the discussion to warn about environmental frequency programming, describing music as a form of frequency programming that prompts reactions and induces fear, doubt, lack, or scarcity. The speaker cautions that malevolent forces are attempting to control people daily and urges mindfulness of what is consumed, listened to, and allowed within one’s aura.
Key claims highlighted include: (1) the Rothschild-Rockefeller alliance funded scientific studies on musical frequencies to influence mass behavior and war readiness; (2) Harold Burrows Meyer developed methods to elicit controlled emotional responses and mass hysteria in audiences; (3) a 1939 effort to change the standard tuning from 435 Hz to 440 Hz, allegedly coordinated with Goebbels, through a London conference orchestrated by Radio Berlin and the British Standards Association, excluding dissenting French musicians; (4) the assertion that 440 Hz is a destructive frequency that can disrupt thought toward disharmony; (5) the implication that the timing of the change was linked to the onset of World War II; (6) a warning about frequency programming in everyday life and its potential to induce fear and scarcity, urging vigilance about environmental influences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the nineteen thirties, the Rothschild Rockefeller alliance, they began funding scientific studies to look at how musical frequencies can prepare the masses for war. And that's because they wanted to control people. They they want that mind control programming. And so in 1938, there was, a gentleman named Harold Burrows Meyer, and he was a theatrical designer and a sound engineer. And he began developing techniques that would control the emotional responsive audiences and to create mass hysteria.
And so from there, you have this, you know, this Rockefeller Rothschild alliance. What they were doing is, not only were they looking at ways to steer the masses, but they wanted to change the standard tuning of a to four forty hertz so in 1939, they began funding Joseph Goebbels, who was the Nazi propagandist and at that time, Joseph Goebbels, he wanted to change the standard tuning of a. And so he organized a meeting in London to do that. Now up until that time, the standard tuning of a was set at four thirty five hertz, and that was from a conference in Vienna in 1889. But they wanted to shift it to four forty hertz.
And so, Radio Berlin approached the British Standard Association and asked if they would organize this conference in London, which was a total setup, in which, you know, the powers that be had control of what the outcome was gonna be. And they didn't invite any of the French musicians because, they were opposed to four forty hertz. And then the organizers of the conference, you know, they interviewed musicians, the instrument makers, the physicists, and then also, the sound engineers. And if any of those people were against four forty hertz, then they weren't invited to the conference. So it's all controlled.
And, you know, as a result, it's not surprising that the standard tuning of a was changed to four forty hertz. And that happened June 1939, just months before World War two broke out. And the timing of that is no coincidence because four forty hertz is a destructive frequency and that, you know, it can retrain our thoughts, towards disharmony, disruption, and disunity.
Speaker 1: We need to be mindful of what we're putting in our environment, what we're listening to, what we're consuming on a day to day basis. This music is frequency programming. It's programming you to react. It's programming you to remain in a place of fear, a place of doubt, a place of lack, a place of scarcity. This is frequency programming.
People are not aware of the malevolent forces that are out there trying to control you every single day. So be mindful of what you're listening to. Be mindful of what you're allowing within your aura.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨 “The Devil is here on earth - the unaliving of children” “I can’t unsee what I saw” “Blood curdling screams of young kids - the fear in these children” Bro has gone viral on Instagram, after digging into the Jeffrey Epstein Files. The entire planet is awakening. https://t.co/mUlzrURcCX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes an overwhelming personal realization after reviewing files last night. He couldn't sleep and began with documents, then moved on to video, and says, “my god. My god. Bloody hell. We're living in bloody hell.” He states he had to stop because he cannot unsee what he saw.
He reports witnessing horror far beyond any horror movie, noting “Blood curdling screams of young kids, the fear in these children.” He asserts that “these people are the devil walking earth,” declaring that “The devil is on earth.” He calls the experiences horrible and uses strong language to convey the intensity of the content.
He explicitly references acts described as “Unaliving of children,” and details that he observed claims of “they've been unaliving children, cutting up intestines and eating them, unaliving babies, violating, essaying these children.” He emphasizes the impact of these revelations on his perception, stating he has never in his life, and questions whether he is naïve, asking himself, “Am I naive?” He adds that, if told in his wildest dreams that this kind of thing was happening in this country, he would be surprised.
Throughout, Speaker 0 conveys a sense of shock, horror, and disbelief upon discovering alleged crimes against children, expressing that the content is beyond ordinary fear and horror, and that the severity of the acts described has left a lasting, distressing impression.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I just made the biggest mistake, probably that I've ever made in my life. Last night, couldn't sleep, looked at the files, started with documents, moved on to video, and my god. My god. Bloody hell. We're living in bloody hell.
I saw I I had to stop because I can't unsee what I saw. I watched I you mean, in my life, I watched horror movies. Not even close. Blood curdling screams of young kids, the fear in these children. These people are the devil walking earth.
The devil is on earth. It was horrible. Unaliving of children. The idea that they've been unaliving children, cutting up intestines and eating them, unaliving babies, violating, essaying these children. I mean, I've never in my life if you had told me in my wildest dreams, I swear, maybe I'm naive.
Am I naive? But if you told me my wildest dreams that this kind of thing was happening in this country,
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m saying everyone sees you as enemies of Europe who want to destroy our children’s future; if we don’t defeat you, it’s the end of Europe. In France they throw grenades into salons, in Germany people are murdered by knife, in Sweden there are daily bomb attacks. You’re criticising America while European cities burn as war zones daily. Wow—MEP Milan Mazurek went nuclear on the unelected EU Commies.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🌍🇪🇺 "You Must of Lost your Minds" "Everyone can see you are enemies of Europe & you want to destroy the future for our Children - If we don't defeat you - it will be the end of Europe" "In France they throw Grenades into Hair Salons, in Germany not a day goes by without someone being murdered by a Knife, in Sweden - you have Bomb attack every day" 'You are seriously criticising America when every day European Cities are turned into a WarZone" Wow - MEP Milan Mazurek just went absolutely Nuclear on the unelected EU Commies ‼️
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker contrasts European political responses to immigration and crime with American policies, arguing that European left-wing politicians ignore urgent problems. They claim:
- In Spain, “they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.”
- In France, “they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight.”
- In Germany, “not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.”
- In Sweden, “you have bomb attack every other day.”
The speaker asserts that these are real problems for the European left-wing politicians, yet contends that those politicians do not care. The immediate target is a European debate about the rule of law in the United States and deportation policies: the speaker says, “You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.”
A call is made to apply the same approach in Europe: “We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.” The speaker urges listening to them and not to “what you are proposing to all of us,” asserting that “Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.”
The rhetoric culminates in a warning: “You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You must have lost your mind. In Spain, they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens. In France, they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight. In Germany, not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife. In Sweden, for example, you have bomb attack every other day.
I can continue, but you just don't care. Those are not real problems for the European left wing politicians. No. You are going to solve the situation in Minnesota. You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.
We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay. We should listen to them and not what you are proposing to all of us. Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.
You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Linkin Park was a military base in Canada - where they experimented on and tortured children” “The lead singer was working on a documentary about child trafficking” “3 of them working on it all died within a year” https://t.co/lGFocj0bJy
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker asserts that Lincoln Park was a military base in Canada where they experimented on children as part of a top secret government project called MK Ultra.
- The speaker claims Chester Bennington, the lead singer of Lincoln Park, was working on a documentary about child trafficking and happened to encounter it in the middle of that production.
- The speaker also claims Avicii and Anthony Bourdain were working on the same project.
- The speaker asks whether this is fate or whether he knew what he would do with his fame, and questions whether band names can be tied to future work in the world.
- The speaker concludes that it’s “too weird to say it was just mental.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lincoln Park was a military base in Canada where they experimented on and children in a top secret government project called MK Ultra. Then you've got Chester Bennington, the lead singer of Lincoln Park, who was working on a documentary for child trafficking, and he happened to himself in the middle of that production. Same with Avicii and Anthony Bourdain who were working on it as well. So do you think that's fate, or did he know what he was gonna do with his fame? Like, do you name your band off of, like, something that you're gonna work on in this world?
I don't know. What do you guys think? It's just that's too weird to say it was just mental
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting from Washington, DC: the Earth is shaking as crimes of royalty, celebrities, ambassadors, and even prime ministers come to light. They spoke of spaces and islands to dodge accountability. I read the UN redacted Epstein files—horrific, depraved messages. Rich and powerful communications show they feel above law and morals, joking about paedophiles. Epstein survivors speaking in DC mean the world is watching now.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🌎🇺🇸 Meanwhile in Washington DC “The Earth is shaking - Royalty, celebrities, ambassadors even Prime Minister’s - their crimes are becoming known” “They wrote about creating spaces and islands - where they could get away with anything they wanted” “Yesterday, I went through some of the Un redacted Epstein files - reading the absolutely horrific and depraved messages” “Communications between rich and powerful people in every sphere of influence - they believe they are above the law and above morals” “They joke in these emails about paedophiles, about horrific sexual acts with young girls” Epstein survivors speaking in Washington moments ago - means the whole world is set up and paying attention now‼️
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yesterday, at the Department of Justice, I spent several hours reading the unredacted files and the absolutely horrific and depraved messages exchanged among rich and powerful people across every sphere of influence. These individuals sit at the top of governments, academic institutions, giant corporations, and hold positions such as cabinet secretaries. The messages show they absolutely believed they were above the law, above morals, and immune to societal norms. They joked in these emails about pedophiles, about horrific sexual acts with young girls, and about creating spaces—entire islands even—where they could do anything they wanted and get away with it because of their wealth, power, and connections. This was a massive global sex trafficking ring with thousands of victims that we know of and thousands more that we probably don't. So when the DOJ says that there is nothing to investigate, we, the American people, must rise up.
We must allow the courage and determination of the survivors who have spoken out at great risk to themselves to push us to never give up until every single one of these predators and pedophiles and predator protectors is brought to justice. It is the voices of the survivors ringing through in the darkness of all of this horror that has gotten us this far. And in speaking to so many of them myself, I know that this effort is not just for them. They're not doing this just for them. They're doing it for their girls, for their children, for other people who have been affected, to all the survivors of sexual assault everywhere across the world who are watching to see if we can get accountability right here in The United States Of America.
Many rich and powerful people thought over the decades that they got away with this. They definitely did. You can see it in the emails. But as Lauren said to me the other day, the earth is shaking because every single one of them now is becoming known. And around the world, princes, ambassadors, even prime ministers are being brought down for their participation in this global sex trafficking ring.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday, I spent several hours at the Department of Justice looking through the unredacted files and reading the absolutely horrific and depraved messages that went back and forth between rich and powerful people in every sphere of influence. These people are at the top of governments, academic institutions, billionaires at giant corporations, cabinet secretaries, and the callous depravity of their messages showed that they absolutely believed that they were above the law, above morals, absolutely immune to any societal norms. They joked in these emails about pedophiles, about horrific sexual acts with young girls, about creating spaces, entire islands even, where they could do anything they wanted and get away with it because of their wealth, their power, and their connections. This was a massive global sex trafficking ring with thousands of victims that we know of and thousands more that we probably don't. So when DOJ says that there is nothing to investigate, we, the American people, must rise up.
We must allow the courage and the determination of the survivors who have spoken out at great risk to themselves to push us to never give up until every single one of these predators and pedophiles and predator protectors is brought to justice. It is the voices of the survivors ringing through in the darkness of all of this horror that has gotten us this far. And in speaking to so many of them myself, I know that this effort is not just for them. They're not doing this just for them. They're doing it for their girls, for their children, for other people who have been affected, to all the survivors of sexual assault everywhere across the world who are watching to see if we can get accountability right here in The United States Of America.
Many rich and powerful people thought over the decades that they got away with this. They definitely did. You can see it in the emails. But as Lauren said to me the other day, the earth is shaking because every single one of them now is becoming known. And around the world, princes, ambassadors, even prime ministers are being brought down for their participation in this global sex trafficking ring.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
"I was wondering if we could get every Child to wear a Hijab so they can experience the culture." In Wales which is 94% White the people in charge want all School Children to start try wearing a Hijab. These people are legit clinically insane. https://t.co/nE8HkdmVvc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a desire for increased support in schools and education venues to help communities work together. They share an example from a school where a white girl wore a hijab; after walking down the street, she returned and said she felt differently treated simply because she was wearing headwear that differed from her usual dress. The experience is presented as a way to help children who have never been exposed to other communities or ethnicities understand what it is like to live with those everyday experiences. The speaker asks whether the person they are addressing can speak to the ethic youth support team.
They note that the team works closely with the Welsh Government, providing additional resources to extend this work to other schools across Wales, with the goal of starting this education at a young age to foster understanding among diverse communities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so in one school, they had a white girl wearing a hijab. First minister on Friday, I was with the ethic youth support team in Swansea, and they were saying that they would like to have much more support going into schools and education venues in regards to trying to get communities to work together. And so in one school, they had a white girl wearing a hijab, and she walked down the street, and then she came back and she said how different she felt she'd been treated because she was just wearing one piece of headwear that was different to how she would usually dress. And I think these types of things would help children who've never been introduced to other communities or other ethnicities in their lives to try and understand how it is to live in those everyday experiences. So I was wondering if you were able to speak to them.
I know they work closely with the Welsh Government in providing them with additional resource to go and do this in other schools across Wales to make sure that when we start at a young age, those
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe a streamer heading to Antarctica, filming, and meeting a huge security detail. They confiscate his gear and phones. I ask myself why access is so restricted—why no filming devices, who funds this security, and why the Antarctica Treaty remains the only global pact blocking unauthorised entry.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🌎 Meanwhile in Antarctica Online streamer actually makes his way to the frozen continent, starts filming and is met by a huge team of security” “Really - so no one’s allowed to Starlink or a mobile phone?” “It’s very strict we need to confiscate your stuff” Now ask yourself why? Why is nobody allowed to Antarctica if there’s nothing there? Why are people not even allowed to film or possess a filming device? Who’s investing in all the security? Why is the only global Pact/Treaty that stood the test of time the Antarctica treaty - which prohibits anyone who isn’t authorised in go in there?……..
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on a device the crew attempted to bring back from Antarctica. The key points are:
- The group discusses being on the way back from Antarctica, with a device that has been confiscated.
- They ask whether the device can be used on land. The response: no, it cannot be used on land. The item was checked in biosecurity yesterday, and although there were no problems found, the captain is responsible; the device will be received by him at the end of the day.
- The device is said not to be related to the Internet or cybersecurity; one speaker asserts that cybersecurity is "completely fraudulent," and that the device is not about online connections.
- The other speaker explains that this applies to all ships in Antarctica, not just their ship. All ships have cybersecurity measures to follow, and they cannot let such devices onto land.
- The process is described as very strict. The claim is made that it is available for all ships around Antarctica, especially this one, with cybersecurity and forces to follow.
- The first speaker thanks them and apologizes for any issue, noting they did not see any problem online during research. The captain is acknowledged as the responsible party.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The IRL on Antarctica boys. IRL on Antarctica.
Speaker 1: Hello. How's going?
Speaker 2: Not that good. So you have a startling? Yeah. Okay. It's confiscated.
You're receive it on the way back.
Speaker 1: You can't use it on the land? Is that good? You can't use it on the land? No. Okay.
They checked it in biosecurity yesterday, and they don't have a problem with what's going on, but you're the captain. So it's all yours.
Speaker 2: Okay. You will receive it in the end of the day. Okay? Okay. Cool.
It's not such devices. They're not anything that is related to to to the Internet connection. Cybersecurity is completely fraudulent.
Speaker 1: Really? So no no one's
Speaker 2: all that was going on? Nope. Not even seen the piece of paper.
Speaker 1: Really? On land? That's not true. No. Is that for, like, all of I'm just asking questions.
I'm not arguing with you. For all all of Antarctica? Yep. Okay.
Speaker 2: For all it's available for all ships, not only this ship, all the ships around. And especially this one, we have cybersecurity. We have forces to follow. Unfortunately, we cannot let you.
Speaker 1: So Right. Bring you on land. Yeah. And that is that that for every ship in Antarctica? Yep.
For everybody. Okay.
Speaker 2: But ours our procedures, they are very strict, and such devices, they are not allowed, unfortunately.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. No. No. That's fine.
Thank you for informing us. I apologize if there's any issue. I just didn't I didn't see any problem with it, like, online when I was researching and stuff,
Speaker 2: but Okay. And you're
Speaker 1: the captain. Okay. Thank you so much.
reSee.it AI Summary
"They ate humans." I’m Gabriella Rico Jimenez, 21, after an elite party I disappeared forever. Now, in 2026, Epstein files vindicate everything I saw: the elites torture, sacrifice, perform rituals and feast on human flesh.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“They ate Humans” 21yo Model Gabriella Rico Jimenez - after attending an ‘Elite’ Party. She disappeared forever after this night and was never seen again. Now in 2026 - pages from the Epstein files vindicate everything she says she saw - the ‘Elites’ torture, sacrifice, perform rituals and feast on human flesh.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report from Maine: "We are suspending students for speaking immutable facts?" "If a student misuses a pronoun, they are suspended?" "Yes they will be suspended—that is harassment." This is insane—schools suspending young students for pronouns any day.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇺🇸 Meanwhile at Schools in Maine, US “We are suspending students for speaking immutable facts?” “Just for clarification, if a student misuses a pronoun, they are suspended?” “Yes they will be suspended - that is harassment” This is insane - schools are actually suspending young students, simply for using incorrect pronouns, that any other student might decide to use at any given time on any given day ‼️
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on whether school policy penalizes students for misusing pronouns and whether such penalties amount to harassment or suspension. The first speaker raises the core question: “For clarification, is this the policy that's used if a student misuses a pronoun they are suspended? An intentional. Yeah. That's part of the definition, bullying.” They illustrate the concern with a hypothetical: if a student’s parents raise their child to respond to a female with she pronouns, but that student says “I want to be something else,” will their child be suspended for that? The implication is that misusing or resisting pronoun usage could trigger disciplinary action under the policy.
The chain of reasoning then states: “Oh yeah that would be harassment.” The speaker expresses disbelief upon learning that students might be suspended “because they are using the wrong pronoun,” stating they were aghast and did not realize that such suspensions occur. The subsequent line shows a pushback from another participant: “Should be disagree with you saying that's incorrect.” This introduces a contest over whether suspending for pronoun usage is correct, but the rebuttal immediately pivots to a claim about biological facts: “Well, one is biologically facts.”
The conversation asserts: “It's actually XX chromosomes, XY chromosomes. Those are facts. We can't change those. It doesn't matter what our opinion is. We can't change those things.” The speaker emphasizes that these chromosomal facts are immutable.
From there, the speaker clarifies their main question: “Those are immutable facts. And I'm wondering, are we what I'm asking, my question is, are we suspending students for immutable facts? That's what I'm asking. Not for making it as genuine.” In sum, the exchange presents a concern that disciplinary actions related to pronoun use might target individuals based on disagreements about gender identity and pronouns, and it juxtaposes this with a claim about immutable biological facts (XX and XY chromosomes) as a basis for questioning whether suspensions are being applied to immutable facts rather than to conduct. The dialogue frames a tension between policy definitions of harassment and a set of assertions about biological determinism, seeking to determine whether suspensions are being imposed for immutable factual claims rather than for misbehavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For clarification, is this the policy that's used if a student misuses a pronoun they are suspended? An intentional. Yeah. That's part of the definition, bullying. So if I raise my daughters to if the person is a female appears to be a female to use she pronouns and that student says no, I want to be something else, will my child be suspended for that?
Oh yeah that would be harassment. When I heard that students are being suspended because they are using the wrong pronoun again I was aghast. I didn't realize that. Should be disagree with you saying that's incorrect. Well, one is biologically facts.
It's actually XX chromosomes, XY chromosomes. Those are facts. We can't change those. It doesn't matter what our opinion is. We can't change those things.
Those are immutable facts. And I'm wondering, are we what I'm asking, my question is, are we suspending students for immutable facts? That's what I'm asking. Not for making it as genuine
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim UK, Australia and Canada’s leaders, funded by taxpayers, import millions of Muslims, decimate local communities, crush housing and the economy, overburden public services, and let crime and terrorist attacks surge. Now the fallout is obvious; these same politicians blame indigenous citizens with hate-crime charges instead of admitting the deliberate destruction. If one wanted to destroy a country from within, this is how you’d do it.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
UK, Australia, Canadian Prime Ministers all read from the same script. - Import millions Muslims paid by Taxpayer - Decimate local communities - Destroy the housing market and economy - Overload crumbling public services - even roads are no longer able to be maintained - Watch a dramatic increase crime - Watch a dramatic increase in violent crime including terrorist attacks Now you’re at the point where everyone is noticing everything. As these Countries decline accelerates, the terrorist attacks get worse, become more frequent, the same Politicians now blame the original indigenous citizens with hate crime accusations as opposed to even acknowledging the issues they’ve deliberately created. If you wanted to destroy a country from the inside out, this is precisely how you would do it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers address a troubling rise in Islamophobia and its impact on communities, urging action to address hate, fear, and prejudice that drive division in society. They emphasize that the problem is real for many people and that it is fueled by ignorance. The discourse centers on safeguarding safety, belonging, and shared values across diverse communities.
"We've seen a devastating rise in Islamophobia." This opening underscores the perceived severity of the trend and sets the tone for the call to respond. The speakers insist that "We must stamp out the hate, fear, and prejudice that drives Islamophobia and division in our society," framing the issue as one that threatens social cohesion and harmony. The statement continues by highlighting the lived reality for many: "Because of the hatred fueled by ignorance that is still a lived reality for far too many Muslim Canadians." This assertion links ignorance to harmful consequences faced by Muslim Canadians.
The discussion condemns the surge itself: "The surge in Islamophobia is simply appalling." The group broadens the concern to other contexts, noting that "The targeting of Australians based on their religious beliefs is not only an attack on them, but it's an attack on our core values." They define these core values as "The values of community, of generosity, and, yes, of sacrifice." The messaging stresses the negative outcomes of hatred, describing it as something that leaves people "feeling fearful and unsafe in their own country." The imperative is universal: "Australians should be able to feel safe and at home in any community."
The speakers then affirm the principle of diversity within national identity: "Our Canada is a diverse country. We can pray differently. We can gather in different places of worship, but all of us come together." They call for unity around shared values represented through Eid, stating "All of us must come together around the values of Eid." Acknowledgment is given to those working to counter Islamophobia: "I'd like to thank Muslim organizations and mosques who work tirelessly to raise awareness and shine a light on the scale of Islamophobia." The group recognizes the tangible contributions made to tackling Islamophobia and promoting inclusion: "A substantial contribution to help tackle Islamophobia and focus on promoting acceptance and inclusion." The concluding reflection reframes the religious discourse through shared religious literacy: "Ibrahim or Abraham, Ishmael or Isaac, the lessons and values of Eid are the same."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've seen a devastating rise in Islamophobia.
Speaker 1: We must stamp out the hate, fear, and prejudice that drives Islamophobia and division in our society.
Speaker 2: Because of the hatred fueled by ignorance that is still a lived reality for far too many Muslim Canadians.
Speaker 0: The surge in Islamophobia is simply appalling.
Speaker 1: The targeting of Australians based on their religious beliefs is not only an attack on them, but it's an attack on our core values.
Speaker 2: The values of community, of generosity, and, yes, of sacrifice.
Speaker 0: Leaving people feeling fearful and unsafe in their own country.
Speaker 1: Australians should be able to feel safe and at home in any community.
Speaker 2: Our Canada is a diverse country. We can pray differently. We can gather in different places of worship, but all of us come together. All of us must come together around the values of Eid.
Speaker 0: I'd like to thank Muslim organizations and mosques who work tirelessly to raise awareness and shine a light on the scale of Islamophobia.
Speaker 1: A substantial contribution to help tackle Islamophobia and focus on promoting acceptance and inclusion.
Speaker 2: Ibrahim or Abraham, Ishmael or Isaac, the lessons and values of Eid are the same.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m surprised the DOJ made that exact mistake. This is brilliant—people can copy and paste parts of the redacted Epstein files because of an admin screw-up, so every decipherable bit will come out.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨 “It turns out the US department for justice made that exact mistake” This is Brilliant - Multiple Reports of people being able to copy and paste, parts of the redacted Epstein files, because someone administratively screwed up. Every single bit of the decipherable redacted files will now come out ‼️
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript warns that redacting a PDF must be done correctly because otherwise hidden text behind the redaction can be copied and pasted into a text editor to reveal the original content. It cites the U.S. Department of Justice as having made this mistake with some Epstein files. The speaker references “one of the files from justice.gov” containing a redacted portion and demonstrates that the underlying text can be copied. They describe copying behind the redaction and pasting it into a Word document, illustrating how the original text becomes exposed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why you should be careful about redacting things in a PDF. And essentially, it's because if you don't do it the right way, people can just copy the text behind it and then paste it into a notepad, and it'll show you what the text was. And it turns out the US Department of Justice actually made that mistake with some of the Epstein files. So here's one of the files from justice.gov and here's a redacted part. I can literally just copy behind it.
And then if I go to my Word document over here and hit paste,
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇪🇺 The EU Deploys the Military No not against Russia - but against its own Farmers - the people who work 365 days a year non-stop, care for the countryside and grow all food‼️ https://t.co/Zf2pFSvcDA
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the Australian Government will introduce the strictest hate speech laws yet, increasing penalties, making hate an aggravating factor online, and addressing race-based hate and advocacy of racial supremacy. PM Albanese cites tighter speech laws and gun reform after Bondi Beach shootings.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇦🇺 Australian Government to introduce strictest ‘Hate Speech Laws’ ever seen “Increase penalties for hate speech” “Making hate an aggregating factor when adjudicating crimes online” “Hate based on Race or advocating racial supremacy” Listen to PM Anthony Albanese - bringing in tighter speech laws, as well as gun reform in the wake of the Bondi Beach shootings.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The plan involves the Attorney General and Minister for Home Affairs developing a package of legislative reforms to crack down on those who spread hate, division and radicalisation. The National Security Committee has agreed five changes:
1) Aggravated hate speech offence for preachers and leaders who promote violence.
2) Increased penalties for hate speech promoting violence.
3) Making hate an aggravating factor in sentencing crimes for online threats and harassment.
4) Developing a regime for listing organisations whose leaders engage in hate speech promoting violence or racial hatred.
5) Developing a narrow federal offence for serious vilification based on race and/or advocating racial supremacy.
Additionally, the Minister for Home Affairs will have new powers to cancel or reject visas for those who spread hate and division in this country, or would do so if they were allowed to come here.
The East Safety Commissioner, the Special Envoy and the Department of Communications will work together to provide online safety advice to address anti Semitism. Over the coming days, there will be more information about the government’s response to Sunday’s atrocity, including on gun control, and it is noted that New South Wales is moving on that next week.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Plan. Firstly, the Attorney General and Minister for Home Affairs will develop a package of legislative reforms to crack down on those who spread hate, division and radicalisation. The National Security Committee has agreed that changes will include the following five points. Agreed changes will include: one. Aggravated hate speech offence for preachers and leaders who promote violence.
Secondly, increased penalties for hate speech promoting violence. Thirdly, making hate an aggravating factor in sentencing crimes for online threats and harassment. Fourthly, developing a regime for listing organisations whose leaders engage in hate speech promoting violence or racial hatred. And fifthly, developing a narrow federal offence for serious vilification based on race and or advocating racial supremacy. The Minister for Home Affairs will also have new powers to cancel or reject visas for those who spread hate and division in this country, or would do so if they were allowed to come here.
The East Safety Commissioner, the Special Envoy and the Department of Communications will work together to provide online safety advice to address anti Semitism. Over the coming days, I'll have more to say about the government's response to Sunday's atrocity, including on gun control, and I note that New South Wales is moving on that next week.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇨🇦 Meanwhile in Canada The tyrant in charge of Canada, have just made it illegal to read certain parts of the Bible. That attack on Christianity throughout the West continues . https://t.co/0VtJ0vb27R
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇬🇧 Britain to deploy Ai Facial recognition cameras which also capture and record your emotions on a database ‼️ The UK is the new North Korea. https://t.co/7AcxzTpSVV
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Some of the Globalists top 10 Dark Quotes from The World Economic Forum. When they tell you to your face, you should probably listen. https://t.co/nXDN2WYqPY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that in developed countries, big winners are those with shrinking populations, where elections may become unnecessary because results can be predicted, and the primary mission is to set a state global standard for behavior. He emphasizes pride in the current generation, noting young leaders like Prime Minister Trudeau and the president of Argentina, and states that they are penetrating cabinets.
Speaker 1 compares ownership with service models, asking why one would own a cell phone when it can be leased, and similarly questioning why one would own a refrigerator, washing machine, or dishwasher when they can be leased.
Speaker 0 proposes putting an end to anonymity on social media. He asserts that if a billion people stop eating meat, it would have a big impact. He also envisions a future where, in ten years, an implant in our brains could remeasure brain waves.
Speaker 2 cites intriguing research indicating that false memories can be planted in the brain, with people believing they have been at Disney World with characters who are not Disney characters and have taken photographs with those characters.
Speaker 0 concludes that substituting humans for machines will be far easier in countries that have declining populations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I can argue in the developed countries, the big winners are countries that have shrinking populations. You do not even have to have elections anymore because you can already predict. And afterwards, you can say, why do we need elections? Because we know what the result will be. Our primary mission is, in fact, to set a state global standard for the world for behavior.
What we are very proud of now is the young generation like prime minister Trudeau, president of Argentina and so on, so that we penetrate the cabinets.
Speaker 1: You want the function. You want the service. Right? Why you wanna own a cell phone if you can just lease it? And if you lease why why shouldn't you lease your refrigerator or your washing machine or your dishwasher or why do you wanna own it?
Speaker 0: I propose putting an end to anonymity on social media. But if a billion people stop eating meat, I tell you it has a big impact. Can you imagine that in ten years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains? I can remeasure your your brain waves.
Speaker 2: There's some really interesting research that we can plant false memories in the brain. People believing that they've been at Disney World with characters who are not Disney characters, taking photographs with those characters.
Speaker 0: In substituting humans for machines, it's gonna be far easier in those countries that have declining populations.
reSee.it AI Summary
Two clips show that if I appear Jewish or wear the Star of David, I could be arrested, contradicting Sadiq Khan’s claim that London welcomes all religions and cultures.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🇬🇧 “You are quite openly Jewish” “If I remain here you will arrest me?” “People were taking offence to your necklace” London Mayor Sadiq Kahn claims London is a place where people of all religions and cultures are welcome. However these 2 clips show - that if you appear to be Jewish, or wear the Star of David out in public, then you are liable to be arrested.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states, “I am committing a crime right now, at least according to The UK and soon maybe in New York. Any guesses what it is?”
Speaker 1 explains that “The officers have written in their statements about the presence of the, of your necklace. Do you see how that could be, an antagonistic, or antagonistic emblem or sign. The officers have noted in their statements that they believe that the because the star of David was out and present to people, which may take either offense to the presence of it, they felt that that was antagonizing.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I am committing a crime right now, at least according to The UK and soon maybe in New York. Any guesses what it is?
Speaker 1: The officers have have written in their statements about the the the presence of the, of your necklace. Do you see how that that could be, an antagonistic, or antagonistic emblem or sign. The officers have noted in their statements that they believe that the because the star of David was out and present to people, which may take either offense to the presence of it, they felt that that was antagonizing
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Back in 2015 George Soros published his plan, which is now implemented across the Globe” “Viktor Orban - that’s why they don’t like him” Remember - it’s not a conspiracy when they tell you their plans and you can see it happening in real time. https://t.co/y88uDxui1F
Video Transcript AI Summary
The exchange centers on claims regarding a plan attributed to George Soros and its alleged global implementation to increase migration to the United States and Europe. Speaker 0 references a 2015 publication by George Soros, stating that the plan has now been implemented worldwide to bring millions of illegals into The United States and into Europe, and notes that Viktor Orban, Hungary’s leader, recently pointed this out.
Speaker 1 recalls the details from the 2015 Project Syndicate publication, outlining two main components. First, Soros purportedly argued that the European Union must accept at least a million EU seekers annually. Second, he purportedly emphasized that Abekwa financing is critical and proposed issuing long-term euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including funding related to migrants, social welfare, and care as they arrive in the European Union. In addition, the plan allegedly called for establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, beginning with moving them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. The dialogue attributes these specific elements to Soros, presenting them as a policy framework or strategy.
Throughout the discussion, Speaker 0 adds a brief, fragmentary remark, “that’s why they don’t like,” which appears to reference opposition or criticism without elaboration within this excerpt.
Key claims highlighted in the conversation include: (1) a 2015 Soros plan published in Project Syndicate proposing that the EU accept a minimum of one million asylum seekers annually; (2) the proposal of Abekwa financing as a critical element, including the idea of issuing long-term euro bonds to fund the migration crisis, along with supporting migrants’ social welfare and care needs as they arrive; and (3) the suggestion to create safe channels for asylum seekers, starting with relocating individuals from Greece and Italy to other EU destination countries. The participants frame these points as explanations of a policy approach that they assert has been implemented globally, and they reference Viktor Orban’s commentary to support their argument.
The transcript captures a concise allegation-based discussion about Soros’s 2015 proposals, their supposed financing mechanisms, and the establishment of safe relocation channels for asylum seekers, tied to ongoing political debates surrounding migration in Europe and the role of opposition figures such as Viktor Orban.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back in 2015, George Soros published his plan, which has now been implemented across the globe to bring millions of illegals into The United States and into Europe. As Hungary's leader, Viktor Orban, recently pointed out
Speaker 1: I do remember how mister George Soros published his plan in a project syndicate publication. First, he said that right here in 2015, EU has to accept at least a million EU seekers annually. Second, he said, Abekwa financing is critical, and he proposed to issue long term euro bonds for financing the migration crisis under migrants, social and welfare, taking care when they arrive to the European Union. He said that quoting them safe channels must be established for asylum seekers starting with getting them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. Victor Orban,
Speaker 0: that's why they don't like
reSee.it AI Summary
I say peer‑reviewed science shows bees carry 70x more aluminum. We've tested rainwater. It's not a coincidence bees are dying in record numbers; farmers test very high levels on arable land, this stuff is everywhere, and they’ll say it’s to combat climate change.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“We now know from scientific peer reviewed studies, that Bees are testing with 70 times more aluminium in their bodies” “We’ve tested the rainwater” It’s not a coincidence Bees are suddenly perishing everywhere in record numbers - Farmers test exceptionally high amounts in their arable land, this stuff is getting everywhere & soon they will tell you it’s ’to combat Climate Change’.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents several claims about aluminum exposure and environmental contamination. First, they state that peer‑reviewed studies show bees have aluminum levels in their systems that are 70 times higher than what is necessary to cause Alzheimer's or dementia in humans, and they find this alarming given the health implications for bees. They emphasize that this is “70 times more” and frame it as a concern for survival.
They challenge the idea that aluminum presence is normal because it is a very abundant element. They assert that aluminum is not found in the environment in free form; it must be mined, refined, and sprayed in order to be scattered widely in the environment. They claim this process is exactly what is happening, and that the issue affects more than just bees: “Every single one of us is being contaminated.” They argue that these materials are bioavailable and accumulate in human systems. They insist that this is a fact regardless of belief, and assert that lab tests prove it.
They assert there will be no hiding this issue much longer and touch on the chemical signature found in rain tests. They claim this signature matches coal fly ash, a substance the EPA has said is not harmful. They state that the EPA has been trying to get rid of coal fly ash and that it seems to serve purposes in geoengineering, with evidence increasingly indicating that toxic coal fly ash may be one of the base materials used for spraying. They suggest this provides “plausible deniability.”
Overall, Speaker 0 links aluminum exposure in bees to greater human contamination, arguing that environmental aluminum results from a deliberate process of mining, refining, and spraying, rather than natural occurrence. They point to lab tests as proof and to rain-chemical signatures that match coal fly ash as part of the evidence. They further claim the EPA has downplayed the harm of coal fly ash, yet the data suggest it may be employed in geoengineering, which would allow for plausible deniability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do we have now? We now know with peer reviewed study, that bees are testing with 70 times more aluminum in their system than what it takes to cause Alzheimer's or dementia in a human being, it's a wonder any of them are alive. 70 times more. And this is important as well. When you have somebody from some agency who's paid to lie, who tells you it's normal to have aluminum everywhere because it's a very abundant element.
That is a lie of inaccuracy. Aluminum is very abundant in the environment. Yes. But it does not exist in the environment in free form. It doesn't exist in free form.
It must be mined and refined and sprayed for it to be scattered everywhere in the environment. And that's exactly what's happening. It's not just the bees that are dying. Every single one of us is being contaminated. These materials are bioavailable.
They're building up in our systems. And it doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. It doesn't matter. It's a fact. We have the lab test to prove it.
There will be no hiding this issue much longer. And what does it appear? The chemical signature for what's showing up in rain test matches coal fly ash, a substance that the EPA has told us is not harmful. They've been trying desperately to get rid of, and it seems to suit the purposes for geoengineering, and evidence is increasingly indicating that toxic coal fly ash may be one of the base materials they're using to spray because it gives them plausible deniability.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Personally i’m not jabbed - I wouldn’t touch those experimental mRNA gene therapy vaccines” “Let’s just get the truth - The State tried to force people to take it” Listen to Rupert Lowe expose the deadly Covid Vaccine Scam. https://t.co/Ga7ntpnbfW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses clear personal hesitation about vaccines, stating that they are not jabbed and would not touch the experimental mRNA and gene therapy experiments, asserting there is a lot of concern about these technologies from many medical people. They reference political figures and media narratives, saying Kennedy in the United States will expose much of this material and that Donald Trump is keen to see it as well.
Speaker 0 then recalls personal health concerns related to vaccination, mentioning friends who have experienced myocarditis, blood clots, strokes, and other problems after receiving the COVID jab, and emphasizes the idea of long-term effects being unknown.
Speaker 1 counters by saying they still believe in vaccinations, but notes that no one on that side would discuss possible problems with vaccines, and they themselves got vaccinated multiple times and are now open to the idea that there might have been problems. They acknowledge the complexity of the issue and state they do not object to vaccines inherently.
Speaker 0 clarifies their stance further, stating they are not a medical expert but their instinct was not to have the vaccine, and they acknowledge how difficult it was to avoid it since the state appeared to force people to receive it.
Speaker 1 adds that their own vaccination status includes having been vaxxed several times, and they feel okay today, though they recognize the complexity of the situation and that long-term effects are uncertain.
Speaker 0 then discusses the notion that the state and public health authorities pressured people to vaccinate, naming the NHS, Matt Hancock, and portraying the messaging as a duty to vaccinate “because you might kill granny,” mentioning Trudeau and the World Economic Forum Brigade as part of the broader narrative.
Speaker 0 proposes an alternative approach: those who are vulnerable should isolate themselves. They reference Anders Tegnell’s approach in Sweden, which did not impose lockdowns. They claim Sweden’s economy hardly missed a heartbeat, in contrast to “ours,” and argue that the pandemic greatly disrupted young people’s lives and education, with knock-on effects described as huge.
Speaker 0 concludes that those who made the lockdown decisions are not ready to admit they got it wrong, for a host of reasons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Personally, I'm not jabbed. I I wouldn't touch those experimental mRNA and and and gene therapy experiments, which I think, as you know, there's a lot of concern about it from quite a lot of medical people now. Now we've got in The States, we've got Kennedy. He's going to be exposing a lot of this stuff as I think Donald Trump is keen to see. So
Speaker 1: I got them. I got I got the facts.
Speaker 0: Let's just get the truth. I mean, I've got friends who've had myocarditis, you know, who have had, blood clots, who've had all sorts of problems as a result of of of of the COVID jab, strokes.
Speaker 1: I still believe in vaccinations, but the problem for me is that no one on that side would even talk about that there might have been problems with it. You know? So I'm open to the idea there might have been problems. I got vaxxed a bunch of times. I'm alright.
But I understand, you know, these things are very complicated.
Speaker 0: Well, you're alright today, but who knows what the long term effects are gonna be. But look. I'm not I'm not a medical expert, but my instinct, was not to have it. Again, I think we'd all accept the fact that it was very difficult not to have it because state tried to force people to have it.
Speaker 1: Well, that's not on.
Speaker 0: Whether it was the NHS, whether it was, you know, Matt Hancock, whether it was, you know, people who said it was your duty to have it because you might kill granny or whatever. Trudeau. I mean, that's the truth. Trudeau, the well, the World Economic Forum Brigade. But Oh, man.
But I look. I I think what what should have happened is, quite simply, we should have said to those people who are vulnerable, you're vulnerable, isolate yourselves. Anders Tegna got it right in Sweden. We we it it's a fact. You know, he he didn't lock down.
Sweden's economy hardly missed a heartbeat, whereas ours has been decimated. Young people have been Yeah. Hugely affected by it. I mean, it's very difficult Yeah. For those young people.
It disrupted their lives at a at a crucial period in in in in their education. So I think the knock on effects of it have been huge, but I don't think that those who made those decisions are ready to admit that they got it wrong for a host of reasons.
reSee.it AI Summary
In New Zealand, we were told to burn healthy beehives. Look at how healthy these bees are—no disease. Bees are crucial, yet they’re dying out rapidly, with governments persecuting beekeepers as part of an evil agenda.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🇳🇿 Meanwhile in New Zealand “We’ve been told to burn healthy strong beehives” “Look at how healthy these bees are no disease or anything” Bees are quite possibly the most important insect to exist - it’s not a coincidence they are now dying out rapidly with Governments also persecuting Bee Keepers - all part of the same evil agenda.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a situation in New Zealand where they have been instructed to burn a perfectly healthy, strong beehive. The hives are thriving, with new queen cells forming, indicating strong colony health. Despite this, there is a directive to burn the healthy hives because Marco Gonzalez from MPI has told them that the site is abandoned. The speaker contends that Gonzalez “just wants the bee site, boom, to the south,” and asserts there is no disease present, pointing to the visibly healthy colonies.
The speaker emphasizes that the hives are perfectly strong and disease-free, noting that last week staff told them to start bringing boxes to the site. They received an email from Marco Gonzalez instructing them to burn the bee hives because they were banned. The speaker insists on the observed health of the hives, showing a “brand new treatment” and stating that it is a perfectly healthy treatment. They argue that, for beekeepers, this treatment is recognized as perfectly healthy, and that the site had been recently worked—“very recently, I mean weeks ago.”
The speaker also mentions that an AP2 officer had stated that this site is a perfectly healthy site and it’s great, ready for splitting. Throughout, the speaker repeatedly points to the apparent contradiction between the instruction to burn healthy hives and the evidence of robust health, absence of disease, recent treatment, and professional assessment indicating the site was suitable for splitting. They urge the listener to observe the healthy state of the hives, highlighting the new queen development and the strong, disease-free condition as key indicators of the hives’ vitality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New Zealand, we've been told to burn a perfectly healthy strong hive. Look at that. Beautiful hives. They're even starting to create a new queens in these hives. So everything's going well with this beehive.
We're being told to burn healthy, strong hives because Marco Gonzalez from MPI is telling us that this site is abandoned. Actually, I think he just wants the bee site, boom, to the south. Have no disease. Look at them. Look at how strongly healthy these bees are.
No disease. Nothing. These are perfectly strong hives. Last week, my staff told me to actually start bringing boxes here. So I got told to bring boxes here and I got Ott an email from Marco Gonzalez to burn the bee hives because they were banned.
I can tell you right now, look at here. Look here. Look here. Brand new treatment. Perfect, healthy treatment.
If you're a beekeeper, you'll know that that's actually perfectly healthy treatment. And this has been recently worked. When met very recently, I mean weeks ago, Even an AP2 officer actually told me actually this site is a perfectly healthy site and it's great, ready for splitting.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Mind Blown 🤯 Bet you’ve never even ever paid attention or thought about this. Watch. https://t.co/FEOYBC8Sg6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that whether crop circles are real or fake is irrelevant to a larger issue: the designers possess a depth of geometric knowledge that requires multidisciplinary scientific analysis to decode. They claim crop circles reveal information such as magnetic field patterns, and that one can take a top view and rotate it to produce a side view. They assert you can illustrate what a bar magnet’s magnetic field looks like, but that you must recognize this is a four-pulled bar magnet to decode the representation. They point to showing magnetic components in the form of a motor and stator, indicating that very complex three-dimensional geometry has been flattened into two dimensions.
The discussion includes references to ancient or esoteric themes, such as concepts like the geometry of space-time, the geometry of consciousness, and the flower of life. They mention Stonehenge as evidence of a perfect Juliet fractal being executed. Some circles allegedly encode detailed celestial information, such as a lunar calendar and an eighteen-year lunar eclipse cycle. They claim molecular geometry is associated with vitamin A, and mention the notion of the “ternary code for CERN” as being easily representable within crop circle designs.
The speaker then describes a crop circle as a quantum particle mapped from eight dimensions down to two dimensions, suggesting the creators convey advanced physics concepts through these patterns. They acknowledge the shapes may appear deceptively simple, but insist that one cannot simply draw the shapes without understanding the underlying physics concepts described as sympathetic vibratory physics, which they characterize as very specialized knowledge that requires substantial digging to uncover.
The discourse leads to comparisons with Tesla Tech, and references to alchemy days where hidden knowledge was embedded in symbolic art, in cathedrals, in books, and even within one’s own thoughts, tracing back to ancient Egypt. They concede that there are fake crop circles, but argue that this group would not be foolish enough to compare their work to fakes. They note that there remains no adequate explanation for how the stalks in authentic crop circles become bent and exploded in the observed ways, and conclude that if someone cannot reproduce the effect on paper, they should not claim that the circles are fake. The speaker ends with an incomplete thought, indicating additional detail is forthcoming.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whether you believe these are real or faked actually does not matter at all. There is a much bigger problem with crop circles. Whoever is designing these has a geometric knowledge that is so deep it requires a multidisciplinary analysis from multiple fields of science to decode these things. Magnetic field, for example. They can also take the top view, rotate it on its side, and then give you that side view.
They can show you what a bar magnet's magnetic field looks like, but you gotta know that this is a four pulled bar magnet to actually decode this. They've shown magnetic components like this motor and stator. They've taken very complex three d geometry and flattened it down into a two d representation of it. Some of them are even ancient spiritual concepts like the geometry of space time, geometry of consciousness, or the flower of life. At Stonehenge, they were able to execute a perfect Juliet fractal.
Some show detailed celestial events like the lunar calendar and an eighteen year lunar eclipse cycle. Molecular geometry of vitamin a. Easy work. Correct perspective and ternary code for CERN. Easy work.
This one's a quantum particle mapped from eight dimensions down to two dimensions. Now these guys really got me into this. Now these may look deceptively simple, but you don't just draw this shape. They're describing physics concepts from something called sympathetic vibratory physics. It is very specialized knowledge you really have to dig for.
Think like Tesla Tech. Back in the alchemy days, they hid this in symbolic art, in cathedrals, in books, and it's even hidden in your head. That goes back to ancient Egypt. Now there are absolutely fake ones, but I don't think anyone here is dumb enough to compare this to something like that. And there remains no adequate explanation for how the stalks get bent and exploded in the way that they do in the real crop circles.
So if you can't even execute this on paper, you don't get to say that they're fake or not. It's very hard to dis
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨💉 “Multiple studies now show that Pfizer is definitely worse than Moderna” “Pfizer is worse for Blood Clotting, for Cardiovascular injuries” “Pfizer may be associated with an increase in Mortality - they should not be used in any Human Beings” https://t.co/vuoPs0oUcQ
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“The Kenyan High Court has also now suspended Bill Gates immunity from Prosecution” “We do not trust The World Health Organisation - Vaccines have decreased fertility” The Whole of Africa including Kenya is quickly turning on Bill Gates & The WHO after observing the long term damage they have caused treating their populations like Guinea Pigs.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises a concern that something can undermine Africa’s sovereignty and states that trust in WHO cannot be maintained. He proceeds to mention a specific issue among several that he says illustrate this risk. In twenty fourteen and twenty fifteen, WHO conducted a tetanus eradication campaign in their country, described as an effort to eradicate neonatal tetanus, which affects babies who are born and eventually get tetanus. The vaccine used in that campaign is described as a different type of tetanus vaccine, characterized by the speaker as a fertility-regulating vaccine. This vaccine is said to take tetanus and combine it with a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which supports pregnancy. The speaker claims that when a woman is injected with this vaccine, she produces antibodies against the hCG hormone and is therefore rendered sterile.
Following this, the speaker reports noticing an increase in infertility among young couples. He describes cases where couples appear normal but cannot have children, and other couples who are losing three, four, or five pregnancies before they can carry any pregnancy to term. He asserts that these patterns have been exposed and that a paper detailing the findings has been published and is available. The overall claim ties the tetanus eradication campaign and the described fertility-regulating vaccine to broader consequences, including increased infertility and pregnancy losses, as part of the speaker’s argument about the impact of external health interventions on the country’s population.
The speaker also notes that the publication of their paper provides documented material related to these observations. By presenting these points, he emphasizes a linkage between the 2014–2015 campaign, the vaccine’s purported mechanism involving antibodies to hCG, and the observed reproductive outcomes, asserting that these issues have been identified, exposed, and published for public access. The narrative frames the tetanus campaign and the vaccine as a cause of infertility trends, and it positions the cited publication as evidence accessible to readers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Things that can destroy the sovereignty of Africa. We cannot afford to trust WHO anymore your excellency and I'll just mention a few things that have caused great concern to us. In twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen, WHO brought tetanus eradication campaign in our country. It was a campaign to eradicate neonatal tetanus, babies who are born who eventually get tetanus. The vaccine that was used is a different type of a tetanus vaccine that is a fertility regulating vaccine where they take tetanus and combine it with a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin that supports pregnancy and when you inject a woman with that vaccine she produces antibodies against that hormone and therefore is rendered sterile.
So we are noticing an increase in the number of infertility cases among young couples who you examine and they are normal but cannot get children, or couples who are losing three, four, five pregnancies before they can carry any pregnancy to term. We were able to expose this and we have even published a paper that is available.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
After the experimental Covid Vaccine Roll Out - Athletes, TV News Presenters & the General Public - just started collapsing for no apparent reason. Of course Legacy Media & Politicians completely ignored the fact, whilst the vaccinated pretended it had always happened. Clearly it hadn’t.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach:
- Identify the core topic: vaccine-induced immune thrombotic events leading to stroke in healthy people after 2021.
- Capture sequence and timeline: old-stroke stereotype, new observations in healthy individuals, studies tracing patterns weeks after certain shots.
- Explain mechanism as described: immune system overreacts, the protective spike sticks to vessel walls, causing ischemia.
- Note terminology and sources: “vaccine induced immune thrombotic events,” rarity, and citations to Lancet and NEGM.
- Identify proposed causes: genetics, guts, toxins, or a combination.
- Emphasize the concluding point: misfiring immune response can lead to stroke; focus is on understanding why, not disputing occurrence.
- Preserve original phrasing where it conveys key claims, while translating into a cohesive English summary.
- Exclude evaluative or judgmental statements; present claims as stated.
- Keep the final summary within 368-461 words.
Summary:
They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows. Boom. Ischaemia. Doctors call it vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare. Yes. Imagine. No. It's in the Lancet and NEGM. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns weeks after certain shots.
Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows. Boom. Ischaemia.
Doctors call it vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare. Yes. Imagine. No.
It's in the Lancet and NEGM. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“54% more likely to get Breast Cancer in the Covid Vaccinated Group” So mRNA Covid Vaccines increase your risk of Cancer significantly. It’s worse than anyone ever thought it would be. https://t.co/0S4AKLgg4Y
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's concern about increased cancer risk after Covid vaccines, noting lack of UK data comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated. A study from Italy reported increased incidence of cancers six months after Covid vaccinations. The source is Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, peer reviewed. The paper states: "People that had vaccinated with at least one dose, their chances of getting colorectal cancer the hazard ratio was one point three four. In other words thirty four percent more likely to get it." This is at a six month follow-up. It also claims: "Breast cancer fifty four percent more likely to get breast cancer in the vaccinated group." "Bladder cancer sixty two percent more likely to get it than the unvaccinated group."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well a warm welcome to this talk. Now there's been concern for some time now from talking to various experts about the increased risk of cancers, probably all types of cancers or many types of cancers, after Covid vaccines. Now of course we're deprived of data in The United Kingdom between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. We just can't get that information freely, but there has been a study done in Italy and what this shows is increased incidence of cancers six months after Covid vaccinations. Now let's look at where we got this from.
This is from this paper here: Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, peer reviewed of course, made publicly available. You can download the PDF. The full paper is there. People that had vaccinated with at least one dose, their chances of getting colorectal cancer the hazard ratio was one point three four. In other words thirty four percent more likely to get it.
This is at a six month follow-up. Breast cancer fifty four percent more likely to get breast cancer in the vaccinated group. Bladder cancer sixty two percent more likely to get it than the unvaccinated group.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
100% legit genuine footage of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla still has never been explained. Maybe David Icke was right after all. https://t.co/wwOplvUSdU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Medicines we know from the COVID vaccine. Very effective, very welcome. The logistics around that vaccine were not straightforward because of the new technologies. We're talking about countries here that do not have advanced
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Medicines we know from the COVID vaccine. Very effective, very welcome. The logistics around that vaccine were not straightforward because of the new technologies. We're talking about countries here that do not have advanced
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the same change occurring across England, France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Canada, Austria, Australia, Wales, and Scotland. It's not just coincidence; it's by design. The scale of the betrayal is simply incomprehensible.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
England, France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Portugal, Canada, Austria, Australia, Wales, Scotland The same change is happening across all these Countries. It’s not all coincidence. It’s all by design. This is Holland. The scale of the betrayal is simply far too incomprehensible.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇬🇧 “I don’t understand - I’ve got 3 young Children inside” “We’ve got serious safeguarding concerns” “I’m not a dangerous Character -this is unnecessary” Another British Man getting locked up for online comments. https://t.co/FB1Y85LYO7
Video Transcript AI Summary
"you're under arrest currently, right, on suspicion of harassment."
"the grounds of the arrest are that from the March 10, you've made apparently a number of posts online and on social media harassing an individual who came making serious allegations."
"Someone from the church."
"We've got serious safeguarding concerns."
"But we need to interview you in relation to that investigation have been made."
"My children are 12, 13, and eight."
"First of all, there's three things that we need to do."
"I've got three young children here on the property."
"They don't I don't know where they are."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Hi. Is this Brendan? Yeah. Let's go.
Let me just do let me just record. This is kind of unusual. What's going on? So currently, you've been placed under arrest for harassment. Okay.
Hold on. Hold on. Listen to my colleague. Welcome to me. This I'll call you up.
Everything. Yeah. I'll explain it. So you're under arrestful. This is a threat.
You do not mention one question something like. K? Anything you do say, maybe give an But I don't I completely don't understand. Understand? Do you understand the point?
I don't understand what you're doing. Okay. But you're not a big three young children. Okay. I'm talking to you.
Yes. I'm listening. Right. So you're under arrest currently, right, on suspicion of harassment. From who?
We'll go through all that. Sure. I've explained the portion to you. Okay? So the grounds of the arrest are that from the March 10, you've made apparently a number of posts online and on social media harassing an individual who came making serious allegations.
Yes. Okay. Someone from the church. I don't know. Yes.
Issue Moran. That's Sure. No Moran. That's yes. The member.
You want to portions. Anything you do say will be given? Yes. Safeguarding. Yeah.
We've got serious safeguarding concerns. Okay. That's fine. But we need to interview you in relation to that investigation have been made. Okay?
Yeah. No problem. Who's with the children? Is there a matter our children are homeschooled. But How how old are they?
It's alright. Can you take the handkerchief? How old are they? We'll put you on just for the time being, and we'll assess it in a second. How how are the children?
Well, first first of all, there's no need to Sir. I'm going. Sir, how old are the children, please? My children are 12, 13, and eight. So if you could if you could just I mean, look.
I'm not gonna run off. I get my We'll look at that. I I I'm not a dangerous character. I mean, this is just unnecessary. So I'd like I'd like to also record this from him.
Okay. Well, our cameras are are recording. Right. Okay. We are actually seizing the fire.
Right. Once. Okay. Well, there's there's there's three We need to take anti cyclicals. I do want.
What could I say? I just want to explain the the test tomorrow. I it's It's like a brand new mobile phone. She's at 10:54. Right.
But the first the first okay. Right. The first the the the first yeah. Yeah. Do do what I'm let you know.
I'm arrested. Yeah. Sure. Right. There's three things that we need to do.
First of all, he's only put me up. I've got three young children here on the property. They don't I don't know where they are.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“It will make you a Slave” “Digital Currency that will allow The Government to cut you off from a distance & control your food supply” Listen & heed this warning from National US Health Director RFK Jnr talking about Digital ID & the desire for Digital Technocratic Control. https://t.co/vrIUpgN5U9
Video Transcript AI Summary
What we're seeing today is what I call turnkey totalitarianism.
They are putting in place all of these technical technological mechanisms for control.
We've never seen before.
It's been the ambition of every totalitarian state from the beginning of mankind to control every aspect of behavior, of conduct, and to obliterate descent.
Today, the mechanisms are being put in place and will make it so none of us can run and none of us can hide.
Within five years, we're gonna see 415,000 low orbit satellites.
Bill Gates says his 65,000 satellites alone will be able to look at every square inch of the planet twenty four hours a day.
Digital currency that will allow them to punish us from a distance and cut off our food supply.
It will make you a slave.
And what do we do about this? What do we do? We resist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we're seeing today is what I call turnkey totalitarianism. They are putting in place all of these technical technological mechanisms for control. We've never seen before. It's been the ambition of every totalitarian state from the beginning of mankind to control every aspect of behavior, of conduct, of thought, and to obliterate descent. None of them have been able to do it.
They didn't have the technological capacity. Today, the mechanisms are being put in place and will make it so none of us can run and none of us can hide. The within five years, we're gonna see 415,000 low orbit satellites. Bill Gates says his 65,000 satellites alone will be able to look at every square inch of the planet twenty four hours a day. Digital currency that will allow them to punish us from a distance and cut off our food supply.
Every right that you have is transformed into a privilege contingent upon your obedience to arbitrary government dictates. It will make you a slave. And what do we do about this? What do we do? We resist.
I'm gonna tell you three rules you all need to know and memorize. Number one, every power that government takes from us, it will never relinquish voluntarily. Number two, every power they take from us, they will ultimately abuse to the maximum extent possible. Number three, nobody in history of the planet has ever complied their way out of totalitarian control. Every capitulation is a signal to the oppressors to impose new forms of torment or torture or compliance or obedience.
Every time you comply, you get weaker. Bullies cannot be appeased. It just encourages them to new forms of torture and torment. Every time you say yes, you're getting pushed back to a weaker position. That's why we need to resist today.
reSee.it AI Summary
I refer to them as the Woke Right, and I see them as just as extreme as the Woke Left. It's crucial to control platforms like TikTok first, then move on to X. I believe we should engage with Elon, as he could be an ally in this effort. Netanyahu shares these concerns about social media.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨 “I call them the Woke Right - they are no different from the Woke Left - these people are insane” “We have to control TikTok as that’s number 1 - then we have to control x - talk to Elon, Elon is our friend” Benjamin Netanyahu is concerned about the ‘Woke Right’ on Social Media and want to shut them down with Americas help.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Centering on Christian influencers, he labels opponents as the woke reich, calling them insane and noting they are meeting on things. He claims the base is being challenged systematically, and that a lot of this is done with money. Money of NGOs, fast. Money of governments, faster. He says we must fight back and that our influencers should engage that community. He argues for using the tools of battle, noting the weapons change over time and that the most important ones are in social media. He highlights the most important purchase going on is class Followers. Five followers. TikTok. TikTok. and X. He says, We should talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. He concludes that We have to fight the fight to take, give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends or those who could be our Jewish our friends.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christian influencers. Okay. You said you talked about the woke right, and you said, I call it the woke reich. That's a brilliant I don't know what is. The woke reich because these people, you know, they're not any different from the woke left.
I mean, they're they're insane. They're amazing. But they're actually meeting on some of the things. And what we have to do is we have to secure that part of our base of our support in The United States. That is being challenged systematically.
A lot of this is done with money. Money of NGOs, fast. Money of governments, faster. We have to fight back. How do we fight back?
Our influencers. I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance to that community. They're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle. You know, the the weapons change over time.
You can't fight today with swords. That doesn't work very well. Okay? And you can't fight with the fight with cavalry. That doesn't work very well.
And you have these new things, you know, like drones, things like that. I won't get into that. But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged, and the most important ones are in social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers. Five followers.
TikTok. TikTok. One. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential.
Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? X. Mhmm. X.
X. X. That's Successful. Very good. You know, so we have to talk to Elon.
He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get a lot, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight.
Okay? To take, give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends or those who could be our Jewish our friends. Are we
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across Jim Caviezel's claims that Adrenochrome is ten times more potent than heroin and that there are multiple Epstein Islands. He suggests it's part of an Adrenochrome Empire used by elites for years, mentioning the Rothschilds, Nazis in Ukraine, NATO, and Central Banks. More people are waking up to this.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Adrenochrome is ten times more potent than Heroin” according to Jim Caviezel “There are multiple Epstein Islands” “It’s an Adrenochrome Empire - it’s a drug used by the Elites for many years” He goes on to discuss The Rothchilds, Nazis in Ukraine, NATO & Central Banks. More people are realising every single day.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Adrenochrome. Whole Adrenochrome empire. This is a big deal. It is a chemical compound. It's a molecular structure. It's c nine h nine n o three. It's an elite drug they've used for many years, 10 times more potent than heroin, with mystical qualities as far as making you look younger. Pricing mentions: a barrel of oil, $77; a barrel of body parts and what's gonna be a Drainichrome, all the plumes in the woman's mother's wombs, in a plastic barrel, 77,000. Now that gets sent into these barrel bio labs. Barrel oil. $7. References to Ukrainians with Russian bloodline and the Azov battalion Nazis, financing indicated, though we were told there were no Nazis there. Then NATO, UN, IMF, ECB, Rothschild banks. The film discusses Epstein Island and a Sex Island, noting a raid and a woman who ran that operation being out of prison. Agencies warn that if the film shines a light, they'll have problems unless she is returned to prison.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For labor for slave labor, or is it Adrenochrome. Adrenochrome. Whole Adrenochrome empire. This is a big deal. That's it is under listed under the NIH.
It is is a chemical compound. It's a molecular structure. It's c nine h nine n o three. It is it it's an elite drug that they've used for many years. It's 10 times more potent than heroin, and it has some mystical qualities as far as making you look younger.
There's there's there's seen in fear and loathing in Las Vegas that nobody could figure out. No. It's I saw that. And why did why does MS thirteen have most advanced guns? You know?
Why do we sit alone gangs? How old how come a hundred and ten thousand people died or disappeared in Mexico City? Where did they go? And they're starting pulling people out of body bags now. You know, how this is just insane.
With our military our special forces, and we don't take care of this. You can't just have that demand unless somehow that's organized also. A 100%. I I believe okay. So the agents that I've spoken to alright.
Here's here's the as for a barrel of oil, $77. For a barrel of body parts and what's gonna be a Drainichrome, all the plumes that are in the woman's mother's wombs, that goes from a plastic barrel, and that's 77,000. Now that gets sent into these Oh, barrel bio labs. Barrel oil. $7.
$77,000 for a a Ukrainians who have Russian bloodline and everything, and then I start looking up that. Then I start looking up this Azov battalion stuff, the Nazis. And then we just find out There were financing. But but we were told for two years that this is this is not there's no Nazis there, but now there are. Right.
Again, this is another conspiracy theory. See, it keeps changing. It either this or that. See and this is where it's a joke when when know, and Americans are seeing this. They're we're talking about this all the time.
But I was given good data on this, and now I realize, well, wait a minute. Maybe Putin was defending himself. Who is NATO? Who is the UN? And who are the central banks?
Who is the IMF, the ECB, the private west central banks, the biz, the Rothschild banks, and then you start going, wow. This is Is this fascinating. This why you out Epstein Island. So in this movie, there is a sex island because Epstein Island isn't the only sex Island out there. What do mean?
There's okay. Talk about the Sex Island because this thing is dealing with Columbia. Talk about the Sex Island. In this particular film, well, they they do a raid, and the the lady that ran that operation, she was out. She was out of prison.
You see? So you've got a lot of agencies that are involved in this where why wasn't she in prison? So he was down there talking to their side of their government saying, do you understand when this film comes out? It's gonna shine a light on you. And if you don't put her back in prison, you're gonna have problems.
reSee.it AI Summary
Jim Caviezel claims that adrenochrome is ten times more potent than heroin and suggests there are multiple Epstein Islands. He describes it as part of an "Adrenochrome Empire" used by elites for years, linking it to the Rothschilds, Nazis in Ukraine, NATO, and Central Banks. Awareness is growing.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Adrenochrome is ten times more potent than Heroin” according to Jim Caviezel “There are multiple Epstein Islands” “It’s an Adrenochrome Empire - it’s a drug used by the Elites for many years” He goes on to discuss The Rothchilds, Nazis in Ukraine, NATO & Central Banks. More people are realising every single day.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Adrenochrome. Whole Adrenochrome empire. This is a big deal." "It is a chemical compound. It's a molecular structure. It's c nine h nine n o three." "It is an elite drug that they've used for many years. It's 10 times more potent than heroin, and it has some mystical qualities as far as making you look younger." The speaker references "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" and asks, "Why does MS thirteen have most advanced guns?" "How old how come a hundred and ten thousand people died or disappeared in Mexico City? Where did they go? And they're starting pulling people out of body bags now." They discuss economics and biology: "A barrel of oil, $77, For a barrel of body parts and what's gonna be a Drainichrome, all the plumes that are in the woman's mother's wombs, that goes from a plastic barrel, and that's 77,000." "Barrel oil. $7." "Ukrainians who have Russian bloodline and everything," "Azov battalion stuff, the Nazis. There were financing. But we were told for two years that this is not there's no Nazis there, but now there are." "Putin was defending himself." "Who is NATO? Who is the UN? And who are the central banks? Who is the IMF, the ECB, the private west central banks, the biz, the Rothschild banks." "Epstein Island." "There is a sex island because Epstein Island isn't the only sex Island out there." "There were a raid, and the lady that ran that operation, she was out. She was out of prison." "Do you understand when this film comes out? It's gonna shine a light on you. And if you don't put her back in prison, you're gonna have problems."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For labor for slave labor, or is it Adrenochrome. Adrenochrome. Whole Adrenochrome empire. This is a big deal. That's it is under listed under the NIH.
It is is a chemical compound. It's a molecular structure. It's c nine h nine n o three. It is it it's an elite drug that they've used for many years. It's 10 times more potent than heroin, and it has some mystical qualities as far as making you look younger.
There's there's there's seen in fear and loathing in Las Vegas that nobody could figure out. No. It's I saw that. And why did why does MS thirteen have most advanced guns? You know?
Why do we sit alone gangs? How old how come a hundred and ten thousand people died or disappeared in Mexico City? Where did they go? And they're starting pulling people out of body bags now. You know, how this is just insane.
With our military our special forces, and we don't take care of this. You can't just have that demand unless somehow that's organized also. A 100%. I I believe okay. So the agents that I've spoken to alright.
Here's here's the as for a barrel of oil, $77. For a barrel of body parts and what's gonna be a Drainichrome, all the plumes that are in the woman's mother's wombs, that goes from a plastic barrel, and that's 77,000. Now that gets sent into these Oh, barrel bio labs. Barrel oil. $7.
$77,000 for a a Ukrainians who have Russian bloodline and everything, and then I start looking up that. Then I start looking up this Azov battalion stuff, the Nazis. And then we just find out There were financing. But but we were told for two years that this is this is not there's no Nazis there, but now there are. Right.
Again, this is another conspiracy theory. See, it keeps changing. It either this or that. See and this is where it's a joke when when know, and Americans are seeing this. They're we're talking about this all the time.
But I was given good data on this, and now I realize, well, wait a minute. Maybe Putin was defending himself. Who is NATO? Who is the UN? And who are the central banks?
Who is the IMF, the ECB, the private west central banks, the biz, the Rothschild banks, and then you start going, wow. This is Is this fascinating. This why you out Epstein Island. So in this movie, there is a sex island because Epstein Island isn't the only sex Island out there. What do mean?
There's okay. Talk about the Sex Island because this thing is dealing with Columbia. Talk about the Sex Island. In this particular film, well, they they do a raid, and the the lady that ran that operation, she was out. She was out of prison.
You see? So you've got a lot of agencies that are involved in this where why wasn't she in prison? So he was down there talking to their side of their government saying, do you understand when this film comes out? It's gonna shine a light on you. And if you don't put her back in prison, you're gonna have problems.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a troubling experience where the police in England demanded to seize my daughter's phone over a post she viewed months ago. They insisted it was urgent, threatening her with arrest and claiming harassment. It's alarming how seriously they took this situation.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in Britain “Your Daughter has viewed a Post o line & we need to seize he phone” “We need the phone right now - or your daughter will get arrested” “You’ve Harassed this Child enough” Police in England demand confiscation of a Girls phone because of a post she viewed months ago online.
Video Transcript AI Summary
At a residence, officers discuss a social media post described as 'not an arrestable offense.' The resident says, 'this is my own house...' and notes, 'viewed a post, which is not an arrestable offense.' They insist, 'the phone needs to get seized from us.' The officers say, 'The phone isn't seized right now. We're not able to get the phone. We have to escalate this further.' They warn, 'Which means your daughter will get arrested. For what? You in the social media post.' They frame it as a 'voluntary interview' and ask, 'Have you spoken to anyone else?' 'No. We'll come to the station now.' The dialogue includes 'Is that Do I need to go with that in order to No. Absolutely not.' They say, 'It's been destruction of evidence.' The scene ends with, 'I'd like you to leave now' and, 'You've harassed this child enough. Lisa, that's no worry.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. What we what was it? Sorry. I I don't like the camera. You can have my body cam.
I can exhibit that to you. I just don't like the camera really. Okay. Well, I'm doing this because this is my own house, and I am telling you why I'm So I just need to know why why why would she she's basically viewed a post, which is not an arrestable offense. Viewed a post.
That's the Okay. Happened in May, and you're gonna be fine. The only thing is about we need to seize the phone at this current moment. Yeah. The phone needs to get seized from us.
Otherwise, we will escalate this further. It's but with a voluntary interview. So have you seized anyone else? Is she the only child you're picking on? Voluntary interview.
You'd be able to come in Have you spoken to anyone else? No. We'll we'll come to the station now. Do you mind letting her finish her her sentence before we do? Have to get further rest of the lease, unfortunately.
That's fine. We'll come to the station No. No. The phone isn't seized right now. We're not able to basically get the phone.
We have to escalate this further. Yeah. Which means your your daughter will get arrested. For what? You in the social media post.
Is that Do I need to go with that in order to No. Absolutely not. What should we do to go? No. It's not to happen, Lisa.
It's been destruction of evidence. I'm sorry. No. Please, Oh, but please That's fine. I would like you to leave now.
I'd like you to leave. Please, this is why you're Okay. I have nothing more to say to you. We're here for A social media post. I've got nothing more to say.
I'd like you to leave. You've harassed this child enough. I'd like you to leave. Lisa, that's no worry.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come to realize that the concerns about weather modification and chemtrails were valid all along. It’s been a long journey, but those of us who recognized that the lines in the sky weren’t natural and that climate engineering was occurring on a global scale have been vindicated. Now, this topic is finally being discussed in Washington, confirming that we were right all along.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨 “Turns out all the crazy cranks & conspiracy theorists who were concerned about Weather Modification & Chemtrails were right after all” “Here we are in Capital Hill”. It’s taken a few years - but every person who knew those lines in the sky weren’t natural, haven’t always been there & that Climate Engineering on a Global Scale was happening have now been proven correct. You were right, you were always right, you always knew you were right & finally we’re all being vindicated, as the subject is now being discussed throughout Washington. @benleo444 reports.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ben Leo reports on an extraordinary Capitol Hill hearing where experts say "weather modification, cloud seeding, chemtrails, it's real." Testimony includes a call for a "solar engineering nonuse agreement," arguing "the understandings are not sufficiently developed to know what the outcomes would be, and unintended consequences are almost certain to happen," adding "we've been trying to modify the weather for seventy years, and we don't know if we're modifying the weather," and "one Earth, and experimenting on it carries considerable risks." The federal role since the 1940s and EPA concerns are noted: "stratospheric ozone depletion, acid rain, and reduced crop yields." A geoengineering firm "Make Sunsets" is said to inject aerosol into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space, with a FAQ stating, "Unless we reflect sunlight, tens of millions of people will die and 20% of species may go extinct." UK funding of £50,000,000 is mentioned; debates include an "Overton window" shift, plus marine cloud brightening and NAS inquiries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Ben Leo here. Turns out all the crazy cranks and conspiracy theorists who were concerned about chemtrails and weather modification, well, you might have been proven right after all. I've just come out the most extraordinary two hour congressional hearing here at the capital in Washington DC on that very, topic. Experts all agreeing weather modification, cloud seeding, chemtrails, it's real.
Here's what happened.
Speaker 1: My written testimony goes into detail explaining my decision to join more than 500 other scientists and academics from around the world to call for a solar engineering nonuse agreement. I'll just briefly state, first, the the understandings are not sufficiently developed to know what the outcomes would be, and unintended consequences are almost certain to happen. Second, our seventy year history with weather modification should give us some humility in thinking that we can understand what the consequences might be. We've been trying to modify the weather for seventy years, and we don't know if we're modifying the weather. And finally, we have one Earth, and experimenting on it carries considerable risks.
I have likened geoengineering to risky gain of function research on viruses with uncertain benefits and catastrophic risks.
Speaker 2: Now the federal government has been involved in cloud seeding since the nineteen forties using the planet as a test monkey for emerging technologies poses all sorts of risks. Among these that have been highlighted by the EPA are stratospheric ozone depletion, acid rain, and reduced crop yields. There's also the question of which such whether such large scale climate interventions even is even necessary given the uncertainties regarding climate change.
Speaker 3: For years, anybody who questioned weather modification was labeled crazy or a conspiracy theorist. Now, we've learned that they've been doing it for decades. One geoengineering company called Make Sunsets injects aerosol into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space. I wanna I wanna show you their frequently asked questions. Why?
It says, unless we reflect sunlight, tens of millions of people will die and 20% of species may go extinct. These climate activists have come so far that they are actively trying to inject chemicals into the air to block the rays of the sun from hitting the earth. And they want to take away our God given rights, our God given rights over the earth in order to satisfy their godless climate cult beliefs. Potentially cooling the earth could also cause people to freeze to death, crops to to die, and could literally lead to killing millions and millions of people.
Speaker 0: The UK government unbelievably has just given £50,000,000 to a firm to research chemtrails and dimming the sun in The UK. This is the moment I caught up with Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene and told her all about what's happening in The UK. We had a company in The UK where the government has just approved a £50,000,000 donation for pretty much chemtrails dimming out the sun in The UK. One of your experts in there said that it was equivalent to the gain of function research from viruses as we saw during COVID. Do you think the Overton window on this now is shifting as we saw with COVID?
Speaker 3: I certainly hope so. You said that your government approved it?
Speaker 0: Yes. They they gave them the money, £50,000,000 for research.
Speaker 3: So I think that's equivalent to what happened during COVID. I think it's equivalent to mandating experimental vaccines into people's body. And I have deep empathy for the people in The UK. They're not lab rats and they shouldn't be and their tax dollars should not be used against them in some sort of basically experimental what should be taking place in a lab, but it's being done to them without their say, and it's it's terrible.
Speaker 0: Turns out British viewers and indeed Americans weren't cranks and conspiracy theorists about the the weather and geoengineering chemtrails. An extraordinary hearing just now.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much. No. They're not conspiracy theorists. They're not crazy. It actually has been happening for a very long time, not just here in The United States, but also in many countries around the world.
Speaker 0: The life grows from the sun. What kind of person would want to block out the sun?
Speaker 3: Well, my observation based on my years here in congress and and also this hearing that I thought was exceptional, is there's a big difference between the right and the left. The right primarily believes that God created the earth and that God controls our atmosphere. The left is primarily godless, and they believe that humans can control the climate, can control the weather, and they believe they have the authority to do it no matter what anyone else thinks.
Speaker 0: And it was only in April that I told viewers of Benleo tonight back home in The UK that Britain will set to approve funding of up to £50,000,000 for a very strange experiment to dim the sun. Good evening to you. Thank you for company. I hope you enjoyed the glorious sunshine we had today and indeed are excited for the so called heat wave next week. I know I am.
Because sunshine is a beautiful thing, isn't it? It's literally life force, god energy that allows flowers to flourish and powerful trees to grow. It allows us to grow food, and it heals and nourishes our bodies and makes pub beer gardens that much sweeter too. So ask yourself then, why would anyone ever want to block out the sun deliberately? What kind of person would want to do that kind of thing?
Well, if you ever needed proof that we're led by dangerous, incompetent weirdos, that's what they're planning to do now here in The UK. British scientists are launching a £40,000,000 government funded geoengineering experiment to literally test dimming the sun in the name of solving climate change. In a nutshell, they're going to be spraying aerosols into the sky out of planes, I e creating so called chemtrails to try and dim the sun all at the altar of climate change. Another potential solution to stopping climate change according to ARIA is marine cloud brightening, in which ships would spray sea salt particles into the sky to enhance cloud reflectivity. Professor Jim Hayward of the University of Exeter said that chip emissions lead to bright lines in clouds over the ocean, and he cited a 2014 volcanic eruption in Iceland that spilled out a lot of sulfur dioxide, which brightens clouds and cools the planet.
Speaker 1: Weather modification is ongoing, and the reporting is is not particularly good. Assessing the effectiveness is not good, and that leads people to ask questions. So if we go back to projects Sears back 1947, I think it was Hurricane King, it started dissipating and then it took a left turn and then struck The US. It's a natural question when someone intervenes in a system to say, did your intervention cause this bad thing to happen? This is why I've recommended having a very public, a very authoritative study.
We can't have Republican science and Democrat science. We have to have science that's trusted by everyone to assess what weather modification has been done, what have been the effects. If we don't know what the effects are, what research can we do to know those effects? You guys have the National Academy of Sciences at your disposal where you can ask exactly these questions and a great question would be, given what we know about weather modification, what could our adversaries and enemies put it to use and how would we know it?
Speaker 3: If they truly believed their global warming hoax and the rising sea levels and the cost the cost of all of us will be under water in a few short years, why are they investing millions of dollars in the beachfront properties across the same coast they they claim will be under water? Bill and Melinda Gates own a $43,000,000 beachfront front home in California. The obamas own a $12,000,000 waterfront compound in Martha's Vineyard. Mark Zuckerberg is building a $270,000,000 beachfront compound in Hawaii. Mark Cuban owns a $19,000,000 beachfront mansion on the coast Of California.
Speaker 0: So there we go, quite an extraordinary two hours or so on Capitol Hill here. You're not crazy, you're not conspiracy theorists, and you're not cranks. One expert even likening geoengineering and weather modification to gain a function research during COVID. This is Ben Leo in Washington DC. See you soon.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
UK PM Keir Starmer, Canadian PM Mark Carney & Australian PM Anthony Albanese. The new Script just dropped for the Western WEF Owned Political Puppet Leaders. https://t.co/55xKhW4Glr
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've seen a devastating rise in Islamophobia.
We must stamp out the hate, fear, and prejudice that drives Islamophobia and division in our society.
The surge in Islamophobia is simply appalling.
The targeting of Australians based on their religious beliefs is not only an attack on them, but it's an attack on our core values.
Our Canada is a diverse country.
All of us must come together around the values of Eid.
I'd like to thank Muslim organizations and mosques who work tirelessly to raise awareness and shine a light on the scale of Islamophobia.
Ibrahim or Abraham, Ishmael or Isaac, the lessons and values of Eid are the same. These are Muslim values. These are Canadian values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've seen a devastating rise in Islamophobia.
Speaker 1: We must stamp out the hate, fear, and prejudice that drives Islamophobia and division in our society.
Speaker 2: Because of the hatred fueled by ignorance that is still a lived reality for far too many Muslim Canadians.
Speaker 0: The surge in Islamophobia is simply appalling.
Speaker 1: The targeting of Australians based on their religious beliefs is not only an attack on them, but it's an attack on our core values.
Speaker 2: The values of community, of generosity, and, yes, of sacrifice.
Speaker 0: Leaving people feeling fearful and unsafe in their own country.
Speaker 1: Australians should be able to feel safe and at home in any community.
Speaker 2: Our Canada is a diverse country. We can pray differently. We can gather in different places of worship, but all of us come together. All of us must come together around the values of Eid.
Speaker 0: I'd like to thank Muslim organizations and mosques who work tirelessly to raise awareness and shine a light on the scale of Islamophobia.
Speaker 1: A substantial contribution to help tackle Islamophobia and focus on promoting acceptance and inclusion.
Speaker 2: Ibrahim or Abraham, Ishmael or Isaac, the lessons and values of Eid are the same. These are Muslim values. These are Canadian values.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Psychosis - 440x more likely” “Have you noticed your vaccinated friends & family actually have a whole new personality now?” https://t.co/i4ehkVTOKk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Have you noticed your vaccinated friends or family have a different personality or are more angry since getting the injections? Well, there is a strong association between COVID-nineteen injections and neuropsychiatric disorders. This comes directly from the FDA and the CDC, and I'm gonna leave the link to the study in the comments, of course, but these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over. And so you'll see that all these things I'm about to list off are a more likely determination. So these are times as well. So psychosis, four forty times more likely. Dementia, 140 times. Schizophrenia, three fifteen times. Suicidal thoughts,
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you noticed your friends or family who are vaccinated actually have a whole different personality or are more angry, just overall different since getting the injections? Well, there is a strong association between COVID-nineteen injections and neuropsychiatric disorders. Let's jump in. So this comes directly from the FDA and the CDC, and I'm gonna leave the link to the study in the comments, of course, but these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over. And so you'll see that all these things I'm about to list off are a more likely determination.
So these are times as well. So psychosis, four forty times more likely. Dementia, 140 times. Schizophrenia, three fifteen times. Suicidal thoughts,
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Lady just asked Ai what Charlie Kirk would say now in Heaven. Who knew Ai could be so heartbreakingly moving…. https://t.co/HFCjIOKEhX
Video Transcript AI Summary
First, I want you to know I'm fine, not because my body is fine, but because my soul is secure in Christ. Death is not the end. It's a promotion. Don't waste one second mourning me. Second, do not let this violence divide us further. The enemy wants chaos, fear, and retaliation. Don't give it to them. Instead, double down on truth. Double down on courage. Double down on your faith and on your families. That is how you honor me. Third, remember this, America is worth it. Free speech is worth it. Fighting for the unborn, for families, for sanity in a culture gone mad, it is all worth it. So dry your tears, pick up your cross, and get back in the fight. Do it with joy, do it with strength, and never ever let evil think it won.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First, I want you to know I'm fine, not because my body is fine, but because my soul is secure in Christ. Death is not the end. It's a promotion. Don't waste one second mourning me. I knew the risks of standing up in this cultural moment, and I'd do it all over again.
Second, do not let this violence divide us further. The enemy wants chaos, fear, and retaliation. Don't give it to them. Instead, double down on truth. Double down on courage.
Double down on your faith and on your families. That is how you honor me. Third, remember this, America is worth it. Free speech is worth it. Fighting for the unborn, for families, for sanity in a culture gone mad, it is all worth it.
So dry your tears, pick up your cross, and get back in the fight. Do it with joy, do it with strength, and never ever let evil think it won.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just read Dr. Aseem Maholtra's shocking statements about the experimental mRNA Covid vaccines. He claims they may be linked to cancers in the Royal Family and that the mRNA causes significant biological disruption. He also stated that vaccine injuries are more likely than hospitalization from Covid, and Pfizer was aware of this.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨💉 Holy Crap - MAHA Chief Advisor Dr. Aseem Maholtra just blew the lid on the dangers of the experimental mRNA Covid Vaccines. “A significant factor in the Cancers of the Royal Family” “The millions of molecules of mRNA entering the cell is creating biological havoc” “You were 2-4 times more likely to be injured from the vaccine than you were to be hospitalised from Covid & Pfizer knew this”
Video Transcript AI Summary
"you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID vaccine than you were to be hospitalized with COVID." "what is more better described as a gene therapy than as a vaccine." "$500,000,000 worth of investments in the mRNA technology for vaccines." "mega analysis of all the data." "Hundreds of studies, peer reviewed studies showing the harms of the mRNA vaccine." "the side effects of this gene therapy was so enormous and progressive, it was difficult to fathom." "The millions of molecules of mRNA entering the cell is creating biochemical havoc." "It's disrupting protein metabolism." "It's interfering with tumor suppressor genes." "In other words, it may be a risk factor for cancer." "it's highly likely that the COVID vaccines have been a factor, a significant factor in the cancer of members of the royal family."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If there was no harm, you can make the case for let's give it to everybody and we'll save some lives. But unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. A reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's trials published in the journal Vaccine by some of the most eminent independent of industry influenced scientists in the world, including the associate editor of the BMJ, Peter Doshi, revealed that from the very beginning, the rate of harm from the original trials of Pfizer and Moderna reanalyzed, you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID vaccine than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. Think about that for a second. What does that mean?
It is highly likely not a single person should have been injected with this, what is more better described as a gene therapy than as a vaccine. Now, this isn't the only bit of data. Lots of data has emerged since then. And as you've probably heard a few weeks ago, Robert Kennedy Jr, and I've been in constant communication with him, has ended in $500,000,000 worth of investments in the mRNA technology for vaccines, which is a great achievement, I think, for him to do that. His chief medical officer, Stephen Hatfield, okay, told Steve Bannon.
He was involved in this, he called it a mega analysis of all the data. Hundreds of studies, peer reviewed studies showing the harms of the mRNA vaccine, and he said the side effects of this gene therapy was so enormous and progressive, it was difficult to fathom. The millions of molecules of mRNA entering the cell is creating biochemical havoc. It's disrupting protein metabolism. It's interfering with tumor suppressor genes.
It had to be stopped interfering with tumor suppressor genes. In other words, it may be a risk factor for cancer. And I've been asked today to share this isn't just his opinion. Many other doctors feel the same way, but one of Britain's most eminent oncologists, Professor Ang Lee, said to me to share with you today that he thinks it's highly likely that the COVID vaccines have been a factor, a significant factor in the cancer of members of the royal family.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Did this Man just prove The Aether through this home experiment? https://t.co/Wiszol0mbP
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man attaches a copper wire and flies a drone to about 115 meters to show the ether in action. They use an electroscope as a quick voltage check. 'Now that's a few thousand volts right there.' They test Franklin Bell, which is 'working.' The aerial wire places a positive charge on this can, which then influences the foil ball to deliver electrons from the grounded can, which is directly connected to Earth. The clouds finally opened up, so I connected up the corona motor. Like before, one side was connected to ground while the other was attached to the aerial wire. After just a few seconds, 'Hey. Hey. She's spinning. This is just remarkable.' They siphon energy straight from the atmosphere. The motor runs on several kilovolts; you can hear the coronal discharge. Not long after, wind picks up, and they pack up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So check out this video where a man attaches a copper wire and flies a drone up to about a 115 meters and shows off the ether in action.
Speaker 1: Alright. I'm gonna stop at a 115 and hold steady. Alright. It didn't blow up yet. Oh, by the way, meet the aerial film crew.
I just thought this was a cool shot. Oh, yeah. I'm getting shocked right now. This time, I just used the electroscope as a quick voltage check. Whoo.
Now that's a few thousand volts right there. Alright. Let's see if there's enough current to make this Franklin Bell work. Oh. Oh.
Oh. Dude. Freaking working, buddy. Yeah. It's a really cool process.
The aerial wire places a positive charge on this can, which then influences the foil ball to deliver electrons from the grounded can, which is directly connected to Earth. The clouds finally opened up, so I connected up the corona motor. Like before, one side was connected to ground while the other was attached to the aerial wire. And after just a few seconds Hey. Hey.
She's spinning. This is just remarkable. It never really spun that fast, but I just sat and enjoyed the miracle. I mean, I quite literally was siphoning energy straight from the atmosphere. This motor was operating off of several kilovolts, which you could actually hear if you stop the motor and brought your finger near the aerial wire.
That's the sound of coronal discharge. Not long after, the wind started picking up, so we packed up.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“The UK, Canada & Australia sit across 3 continents but one alarming truth connects them all - they are all collapsing in exactly the same way” “This isn’t just failure or bad luck - it’s called managed decline” https://t.co/aMk4xWL4VW
Video Transcript AI Summary
They are collapsing in exactly the same way. In Canada today, the average family can afford a home in their own country. Homeownership has crashed 31% in a single generation. Compounding this issue, foreign buyers now hold a significant stake in the Canadian property market, owning up to 13% of it more than at any point in history. In Britain, the foundation of the middle class has been gutted. Manufacturing jobs gone, down 46% since 1990. And what did families get in return? The highest tax burden since World War two. All while public services fell apart. Across the world, Australia is living the same nightmare, only deeper. Foreign corporations now control 80% of the country's critical resources, and the dream of home ownership, dead on arrival. This pattern across continents is no accident. This isn't just failure. It's called managed decline, and it's happening by design.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Canada, The United Kingdom, and Australia. Three nations spread across three different continents. But despite the distance, one alarming truth connects them all. They are collapsing in exactly the same way. And now the symptoms are impossible to ignore.
Let's begin where the cracks are turning into a full blown collapse, Canada. In Canada today, the average family can afford a home in their own country. Homeownership has crashed 31% in a single generation. Compounding this issue, foreign buyers now hold a significant stake in the Canadian property market, owning up to 13% of it more than at any point in history. But Canada isn't alone.
In Britain, the foundation of the middle class has been gutted. Manufacturing jobs gone, down 46% since 1990. And what did families get in return? The highest tax burden since World War two. All while public services fell apart.
But this isn't just a British problem. Across the world, Australia is living the same nightmare, only deeper. There, a quiet takeover is underway. Foreign corporations now control 80% of the country's critical resources, and the dream of home ownership, dead on arrival. Housing prices have soared by 500% while wages crawled just 80%.
Young Australians are being priced out of their future in their own country, and this pattern across continents, across governments is no accident. This isn't just failure. It's not bad luck. It's called managed decline, and it's happening by design.
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that USAID found $200B for Haiti, but many believe America is actually our biggest enemy. There's anger over the Clintons' long-term impact on Haiti, especially after the government's collapse and gang takeover. Reports suggest troubling connections to child trafficking.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🇺🇸🇭🇹 USAID uncovered $200B to Haiti “America pretend to be our friends but in reality they are our number 1 enemy” “We have every reason to be mad - The Clintons destroyed Haiti for decades” The Haitian Government collapsed last year & local gangs took over the Island - there are many reports linking the Clinton ring & their associates to some extremely sinister talks of child trafficking & exploitation. 🎥 @Lukewearechange
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues that 'the Clintons have destroyed Haiti for the decades' and that they 'pretend to be our friends when in reality, they are our number one enemies.' He claims 'the Clinton Foundation ... gave over $6,000,000,000 to Haiti' and that 'the money is much more than $6,000,000,000' with 'Bill Clinton in charge of the money.' He asserts Haiti has 'oil, more oil than Venezuela' and 'gold' with 'one of the largest gold mine[s] the Caribbean,' and that 'Tony Radham, Hillary Clinton's brother' holds a 'twenty six years contract.' He says 'Haiti used to produce our own rice' but 'Bill Clinton destroyed our rice so his brother can sell the rice from Arkansas.' The Clintons are claimed to be 'running Haiti' and that 'If there's a millionaire... they cannot do anything unless they check with the Clintons.' He urges self-governance, notes two Haitian factions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we have every reason to be mad because the Clintons have destroyed Haiti for the decades. And, you know, they pretend to be our friends when in reality, they are our number one enemies. You know, there are some other people who clearly behave like they don't like us. So it's easy for us to protect ourselves against them because we know they are our enemies, but the Clintons are even more dangerous because they pretend to be our friends when in reality they're destroying Haiti. And I
Speaker 1: because I I heard that the Clinton Foundation and all these other organizations gave over $6,000,000,000 to Haiti for the relief effort, especially during the kind of natural disasters that you guys have gone through. Is that true?
Speaker 0: No. It's more than true. The money is much more than $6,000,000,000. You see, after the earthquake, countries around the world donate billions of dollars. The amount was much larger than $6,000,000,000, and Bill Clinton was in charge of the money.
And not only people around the world, but also American celebrities donate a lot of larger money to rebuild Haiti, and hundreds of home were destroyed after the earthquake. And if you can believe, the people are still living under tents. That's unacceptable. And not only they they held the money, they kept the money, but Haiti had enough resources for them to be very comfortable. Haiti have oil, more oil than Venezuela.
Nobody's talking about. Haiti have gold. We have one of the largest gold mine the Caribbean. So and they let the world nobody is saying anything about our goals. Yeah.
And who do you think is in charge of our goal right now? The contract. Tony Radham, Hillary Clinton's brother.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 0: He's got a twenty six years contract and then also Haiti used to produce we used to produce our own rice. We didn't have to buy rice overseas. Bill Clinton destroyed our rice so his brother can sell the rice from Arkansas.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Wow.
Speaker 0: So they're doing a lot of thing. Right now, if there's a millionaire or a billionaire who wants to do business in Haiti, they cannot do anything unless they check with the Clintons. The Clintons are the one who's running Haiti. Yeah. And we are living in the twenty first century.
We are the first black people who liberate ourselves from from the French rule. We fought three empires, the British, the Spanish, the French. So it's in fact it's unacceptable for us to be occupied right now. They dropping disease in Haiti. They they stealing our money.
They stealing our resources. So we are out here. We are outraged for the crimes of the Clintons. Hillary Clinton have too much criminal records. She have no business running for president, especially for the new one that came out in the email.
Find out that that that the DMC made all these tricks in order to to favor Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Is when it comes to Hillary Clinton's brother, how was he able to get that contract? How were the Clintons allowed to have such control of Haiti?
Speaker 0: It's a family affair. Bill Clinton, the United Nation had named him the chief guy who was in charge of rebuilding Haiti. And then while Hillary Clinton was the secretary of state, so it's a family thing. Chelsea Clinton, all the Clinton Foundation, they're just stealing money. And most of the money, I can tell you right now, I know they they they have a lot of speech for money around the world and for Wall Street, but most of the money they have right now is from Haiti, from the Haitian.
And let and when they're letting the world know we are poor. Let me let me give you one simple example. If you are super rich, and then I would go and tell the whole world that you are poor for years, for decades, and then everybody believes you're poor. And then I would come out and steal your money. And then you go and let everybody know I stole your money.
They're gonna think you're crazy because everybody knows the world know Haiti is the poorest country when we are not. We are rich. Haiti used to call the island island of Pearl. Haiti is still rich. So there are Haitian lawyers, Haitian doctors everywhere who wants their millionaires, who wants to go and spend their money in Haiti.
But the United States government, not only they stealing our resources, our money, they're creating they create kidnapping. Now we are even afraid to go ahead. You cannot walk in the street in Haiti. And then what the Clintons, they they own the hotel. They they go everywhere.
They do whatever they want. This is unacceptable. I myself, I'm ready to die. I want the whole world know who the Clintons are. This have to stop.
This has have to stop. It's time for us to stand up. We cannot take this any longer.
Speaker 1: Amazing information. Where can people find out more about the resources of how the Clintons ultimately now control Haiti? Is there a website? Is there any other information that you wanna share?
Speaker 0: You can go to YouTube. You're gonna see our videos. You can put hey. You can put Haitian American Joseph Matthew. Yeah.
And then you're gonna see the first video would be me exposing the Clintons in front of the Trump Tower. We we we know so we have a lot of videos.
Speaker 1: Because we saw the investigations into where a lot of the reef relief funds for Haiti came into, and it ultimately went nowhere to the people but big multinational corporations. And a lot of the people who are still dealing with that natural disaster never got any relief because all the money that was funneled into them even through the Red Cross, even through the Clinton Global Initiative, which the Clinton Global Initiative sometimes uses and brags. Like, look. We helped out Haiti. We did this for Haiti.
What did they do for Haiti, and what's the current situation there?
Speaker 0: What have the Clinton not only Haiti. What have the Clinton done with their foundation? They don't have anyone. They're just enriching themselves. Going stealing people's money, resources.
That's what they do. We're asking friends, the American friends to stand up with us. This is unacceptable. We cannot allow this to happen. We are living in the twenty first century.
We cannot allow a liar or crooked a thief to be president. We cannot allow that to happen. If that happened, I would have no respect for America or United States anymore. Yeah. Because I used to believe America was the greatest country in the world, but there is no more justice anymore.
Yeah. Because the the the the you you the American justice is crooked. Look how they're supporting Hillary Clinton. Mhmm. This is unacceptable.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you so much for the information. Thank you so much for the bastion. A lot of people in America do not know this. Is there any other information you wanna leave us with when it comes to the Clintons, when it comes to the situation in Haiti right now?
Speaker 0: Well, other information I can tell you, you need to go and Google yourself to find out about our resources, you know, what's really happening in Haiti. And right now, even though there's a lot of poverty in Haiti, but there's two two two sides in Haiti. There is a bourgeois who lives who's living in Haiti. Haiti is not all poor. Haiti, there's a lot of Haitian.
They don't even come here. They go to Europe. They go to Italy on vacation. They go to France. They they they are the one who's who's who's holding the wealth of Haiti, and then they're the one that the Clinton's are supporting because as long they let the the peasant Haitian suffering, they are under the tents, and and they're okay.
As long the bourgeois are okay, that's why they they separate the money, the relief money. So all these corruption needs to be stopped. There's too much corruption in the government. Too much corruption. So so all my life, I believe America is a a country where you have justice, you have freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, but I don't see it anymore.
So so so we are too we have too much resources for us to be suffering right now. Yeah. One one last thing. You see the Clintons, they don't like black people. They pretend to like us.
Bill Clinton signed more laws to encash away to put black people in jail. That's a fact. It's been in the news. All the democrats are doing for the blacks. The blacks, some of them are waking up right now.
All they do is vote for democrats. The democrats, all they're doing is more welfare, jails, more food stamps. We need more than that. We need opportunities. They have the the all of us many of us are educated.
We need more schools. And then a lot of black people are in jail right now because of Bill Clinton. Mhmm. You know? Crime bills he passed.
Yeah. All the crime bills, NAFTA, everything. So so we're we are not allowed to to right now, we don't even have a president. If we choose a president, they don't want the the the Clintons want to be the one who choose a president for us. That's unacceptable.
We don't even even have a we cannot have an we don't have an election right now because of the Clintons. This need to be stopped because they chose the one that we had before was Michel Martelly. Was He a crackhead, home a a a guy who who's putting down his strength doing all corruption. He is the one that the Clinton support. And then on on his administration, the Clinton was allowed to steal billions of dollars in Haiti.
So this is why they do not want us to choose a president for of our own. We need to govern our own country. We need to be able to trade with other countries because we have gold. We have uranium. We have oil.
We have marble. We have everything. So it's time for us to just leave us alone. Stop saying we are poor. We don't even need help from The United States.
We have enough resources to trade with China, with with with with other countries because we are the first black republic Haitian who free ourselves from from from from slavery. We even fought for Americans independence, but nobody wants to give us credit for what we have done. So I'm personally, I'm sick and tired of it, and all the Haitians are sick and tired of it. So I thank you for for for hearing our cry because we need more American
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
World Trade Centre 7 is the most censored building in History. Why? Because anyone who looks into how it collapsed (no planes) will realise the entire 9/11 State Sponsored narrative is complete nonsense. https://t.co/8wz7bNfgcc
Video Transcript AI Summary
World Trade Center 7 collapsed on 09/11/2001 after being damaged by falling debris and fire; it had not been hit by an aircraft. By 05:20 PM most fires had been extinguished. Despite its 47 stories, it does not fall sideways nor collapse unevenly. For this to occur, all vertical supports would have to give way almost simultaneously. Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse was due primarily to fire. National Institute of Standards and Technology still rules out a controlled demolition. So the question is, do you believe what you can see with your own eyes, or do you believe what you are told?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is World Trade Center 7 just before it collapsed on 09/11/2001. It had not been hit by an aircraft. It had been damaged by falling debris and fire. But by 05:20PM, most of the fires have been extinguished. Although the building was 47 stories high, it doesn't fall sideways nor collapse unevenly.
For this to have happened, all of the building's vertical supports must have given way at almost exactly the same time. Yet the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse was due primarily to fire. But what does it look like to you? The National Institute of Standards and Technology still rules out a controlled demolition. So the question is, do you believe what you can see with your own eyes, or do you believe what you are told?
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Earlier this year rising Political Star Valentina Gomez hijacking a Muslim rally in Texas and actually said this….. https://t.co/blZIO0W0ew
Video Transcript AI Summary
Islam is the religion of rape, incense of pedophilia, where they bow down to a stupid rock and it cause profit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Islam is the religion of rape, incense of pedophilia, where they bow down to a stupid rock and it cause profit.