TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Barabbaas
@Barabbaas - HaRUN AYgun
As promised, here it is : Theories about the Ancient Global Civilization that Preceded Ours. Preface This long tweet (approximately 12 A4 pages) is, for me, the most important since I have been on Twitter and will remain the most important. Thanks to your additional information, I have been able to fully open my eyes, but as they say, better late than never. I had to wait for my blue checkmark to be able to write it because the tweet is very long, and each time I made a request, it was denied. And now, I have my blue checkmark. In the world, we are a really small group dealing with this topic, and to me, we are like a big family where we need to share our research. I asked ChatGPT what the profession is that seeks to know and understand ancient civilizations. The answer is archaeology. You and I are the real archaeologists. Those who want us to believe there were such or such civilizations, Cro-Magnon men, Neanderthals, Lucys, and, icing on the cake, dinosaurs of all colors, are the fake archaeologists. Yes, we are the real archaeologists! I am not chasing followers, I am really not seeking glory. It’s just that even if you don’t agree with my theory, maybe one or two of your followers will. And even if you find my theory 100% wrong, I will respect your opinion, but I think there’s really no need to insult. You can, at most, call me an eccentric madman, and I will gladly accept that. To better understand my tweet and not to repeat the same phrase each time, I will change the terms: Ancient Civilization that you call Tartaria will be replaced by ancient civilization simply, because the name you give, Tartaria, is wrong. Our current civilization will be replaced by civilization 2.0 Indeed, for me, there are only these two civilizations: the ancient one, which encompasses all styles of architecture having the same common point among them, the columns, from the first known ancient ruin to the columns of Art Deco architecture. If this 12-page A4 thread is too difficult for you to read on Twitter, you can download the PDF version I uploaded on Odysee: In French here: https://odysee.com/Tartarie%2C-th%C3%A9ories-sur-l%27ancienne-civilisation-mondiale-ayant-pr%C3%A9c%C3%A9d%C3%A9-la-n%C3%B4tre:8… In English here: https://odysee.com/Tartaria%2C-theories-about-the-Ancient-Global-Civilization-that-Preceded-Ours.:f…" Accounts involved. @BuckRight @wakenminds @scumbunker @RjNol @BrockRiddickIFB @snjegi333 @iluminatibot @CultivateElevat @TheFlatEartherr @LampsOfValar @vegastarr @AmurakaHidden @Xx17965797N @Sniper0fTruth @TartariaLives @TNTJohn1717 @Human__Meta @TartariaReview @tartariabritann @andtartary2 @ronin19217435 @history_hacked @TheDoctorRegen @TartaryRepublic @TartaryReturns @SiriusBShaman @FlatEarthZone @Earstohearyou @reptilianplanet @DariusVolket @AmurakaHidden @Stephan95105295 @de_koeur @elbivinski @AlexSofamous Guests @doubleDutchquak @Goy1Just @conspiracyb0t @AE911Truth @AnonOpsSE @danhanley4 @OpDeathEaters @FlatEarthEffect @YourAnonNews @YourAnonCentral @YourAnonOne And an economist : @AniceLajnef And the best for last, a philosopher who is not on the dark side : @AlexisPhilo Let's Go! Why propose this theory about an ancient civilization that disappeared just before ours, which is nowhere mentioned in history books? It’s after a discovery I made when I became a certified electrician installer in 2019 (I took courses to become an electrician and renovate the electrical installation of my house myself, as I was angry after receiving a renovation quote that seemed too excessive to me). From here, you enter the rabbit hole. It all starts with these two elements: the antennas and the skylights (photos 1 and 2) seen on the roofs of old houses of the past. These elements, in my eyes, are the most important information that can destroy the entire narrative of world history that we have been taught since school existed if the sheep wake up, and that’s not a given. Go outside, and explore these antennas and skylights. You will see there are still plenty around you, and it’s the same in every country in the world. When I ask an architect, an architecture professor, or any engineer in any technical field, they tell me the antennas were flag poles or lightning rod antennas. That was the moment I decided to think for myself and stop believing in all their doctrines – history of all kinds. First, concerning the antennas they call flag poles, they want us to believe that every house in the past had a flag pole, that people loved their country and wanted to show it, because that was their answer. Second, concerning the lightning rod antennas, they say that people who lived in these old art deco houses (and also earlier architecture) didn’t want to be electrocuted inside their building by lightning! Wow, that’s their answer. You know what, they started removing all these antennas from these old homes from the 1900s, even before that! But why, weren’t they supposed to protect us from lightning? Since we started building residential homes, they haven’t put lightning rod antennas on house roofs, and that’s still the case in 2024. They put lightning rods on large industrial buildings, office buildings, to protect production and data, and also hospitals to keep services operational. Nevertheless, if you wish, you can request to have a lightning rod antenna installed in your home, but it’s not mandatory for residential, the ground wire of the wall outlet does its job. So, all of this is to explain that they take us for fools. And you might ask what the skylights on most old buildings, churches, cathedrals, town halls, etc., were for… their answer? It’s purely aesthetic, to let daylight into the building. That’s where I did my research on the Internet and found your Twitter, Facebook, YouTube accounts, where I learned a lot thanks to you. I will make it simple and short: the ancient civilization used the ether found in our atmosphere in unlimited quantities. It is the 5th element that has always been hidden from us since around 1900. It is thanks to this element that they had electricity, combined with the mercury found in steel balls just below the roof antenna (I don’t know if just the antenna was enough), and in the chimney cassette, there was radium with which they could have heating. The skylights were rather intended for large buildings where the volume of mercury was more important. In your opinion, how did they heat cathedrals, churches, the Palace of Versailles, etc.? Important information about the buildings of the ancient civilization: The majority of buildings from the ancient civilization were constructed with red bricks, which turns out to be an excellent conductor of electricity. There was no chimney flue connected to the chimney cassette. If you see chimneys on roofs, they were added later. There were no bathrooms or plumbing. All dimensions of rooms, doors, windows, door and ceiling heights are oversized compared to our traditional homes. They have immense volumes. For them, it wasn’t a problem. Why? Because heating was free for them thanks to the ether! A mansion today is very expensive in heating costs, who can afford to pay without counting today? Wealthy people, those who have the means. I have noticed that we can demolish all these magnificent structures – buildings of the ancient civilization (all styles of architecture up to Art Deco) without any problems, without EVER being able to rebuild them afterward. The reason is simple, they were not suited to our morphology and were expensive to maintain. Why did their buildings deteriorate when we took possession, yet they had been there for hundreds of years? I think the ether associated with their various technologies kept these buildings in excellent condition. And the same for the people who were inside, I think they regenerated thanks to the ether. Don’t forget, they didn’t need conveniences, plumbing, drainage in their buildings. My First Conclusion: We never built all these ancient buildings and infrastructures from the past; they can only come from an ancient civilization that existed just before ours. So far, I believe that all the accounts related to the subject I cite below will agree with me on what I just wrote. To the invited accounts, I don't think you were unaware that there was an ancient civilization just before ours. I know it's a big shock for you, but there is no other way. If you want to understand what is happening in our civilization 2.0 up to the current events in 2024, you must know the past. Here is my second conclusion: The people of this ancient civilization were morphologically different from us. To make a simple comparison of their morphology to ours, it's as if they were chimpanzees and we are marmosets. I think you've noticed this too, I imagine. It's from this moment that I found no information about the inhabitants of this ancient civilization. I've noticed that it's repeated over and over that we cannot build the magnificent buildings of the past, that they must come from another civilization. No one talks about its population, let alone their religion. What does this make me think of? That most of you believe that we come from this ancient civilization with the same family tree, that the religions are from our civilization 2.0. Or others even say that the Russian-speaking population, Slavs, Moors, or those from Tartary found on geographical maps are their descendants. I would answer you that it is impossible for the simple reason that they are morphologically different from us, they have absolutely nothing to do with us. And if you say that a few centimeters of height difference between them and us is not important, then it's like accepting to say that we descended from apes. But we know, you and I, that Darwinism is fake. It's from this point that everything becomes irrational. How can we move from an ancient civilization having a morphology adapted to their buildings to our civilization 2.0 with an inferior morphology different from theirs (look at the dimensions of the houses we started to build from +/- 1850, from wooden shacks to our conventional houses of today, they are all adapted to our sizes) instantly? None of you can ask this question, and besides, why should you ask yourself if you think we have the same family tree? So, I will look for their trace in cemeteries, logically, that's where we end up after death. And you know what? There is no biological trace of them in the cemeteries! None, really none. If you have found any, then thank you for sharing it with us. There are people who say that their traces are in the catacombs of all the cities of the world. I doubt it, and why? They had a morphology disproportionate to ours. It is enough to do an autopsy of these skeletons called osteology. And moreover, do you really think they would have put the bones and skeletons of this ancient civilization in catacombs while denying their presence in history books? That doesn't make sense. Or others who tell us that they were annihilated 100% by the controllers or parasites! I imagine they meant the parasites – the controllers of our world, our civilization 2.0. By the Jesuits? By the Freemasons? Oh, I doubt it very much; our civilization had only donkeys, oxen, pickaxes, and hammers as weapons, and we're going to fight them, who had technologically advanced directed beam weapons via their airships, warships like Dreadnoughts (battleships)? And as always, we have no trace of their battles. Archaeologists find 10,000-year-old pottery all over the world, but no trace of a global war between the ancient civilization and us, with our pickaxes! Please, can we be serious again? But again, that they were annihilated by a mudslide all over the world. I don't think so; if they died from mudslides, there would be traces of their skeletons here and there, but there are none. I agree that there was a global mudslide because there are traces in every city in the world; it surely occurred after their disappearance. And I add that this global mudslide is not due to a climatic catastrophe but rather intentional, because its flow was linear with all the buried structures, on a flat or sloping plane, located at zero meters above sea level or at 3650 meters, like the city of La Paz – Bolivia. Mudslide by whom or by what, I have no idea. But since we work as a team, we'll surely find out. From there, here is my first theory: The ancient civilization has absolutely nothing to do with our civilization 2.0, which is the latest one. We never crossed paths or coexisted. If we never crossed paths with or coexisted with their civilization, then what became of it? Here, it becomes even more irrational. I know, it's hard to believe; it's enough to drive one crazy! I will change my mind if you find me a biological trace of their presence. And above all, do not rely on the giant skeletons we have found here and there, supposedly hidden at the Smithsonian, I'm talking about a global population that disappeared 100%; we should have hundreds of millions of skeletons scattered around the world. There are none, sorry. There have always been massacres, wars in the world we know. Everywhere there are deaths, mass graves, massacres, mass extinctions, you will find their traces, skeletons. You can make a person disappear easily, two people, three people, etc., but the more the number of deaths rises, the more difficult it is to hide them. There are always traces; there are always. Let's do a simulation: to make the inhabitants of a city of 100,000 people disappear without leaving a trace, how would you go about it? It's going to be complicated; you would first need to catch them 100%, and even then, how would you make them disappear without leaving any trace of them? Sorry, but we will always find their traces, sooner or later. And with a city of a million inhabitants? Five million inhabitants? An entire country? And for a global population, how would you go about it to succeed without leaving any trace? My Second Theory (the most irrational): The ancient civilization disappeared 100%, instantly, and without leaving any biological trace on the surface of the world! Based on all this information, we start to think better, and it remains irrational, so let's go: When did they disappear? We don’t know because this ancient civilization has no trace in our books, and I doubt there are any. And don’t go believing that an old map showing a large territory called Tartary is theirs; I’ll get to that later on these maps showing Tartary. So, let’s try to find a date for their disappearance in a different way. What do we have in common with the ancient civilization? The construction of buildings and infrastructures. And what do we know how to build and especially not build in 2024? To answer this, let's first look at the architectural style information that our historians chronologically attribute to each period of our history: Ancient Egyptian architecture Ancient Greek architecture Ancient Roman architecture Byzantine architecture Gothic architecture Renaissance architecture Baroque architecture Rococo architecture Neoclassical architecture Romantic architecture Art Deco Modern architecture Postmodern architecture Deconstructivist architecture Sustainable architecture High-tech architecture Contemporary architecture "I do anything" architecture In your opinion? Of course, we only know how to build buildings from modern architecture onwards. Unless you know, from all around the world, of a construction of an art-deco-style mansion (or earlier architecture) in 2024, with the same exterior and interior finish as those of old mansions, like the old Vanderbilt mansion located in New York in 1900? There you go. Another piece of information: historians 2.0 cite the construction of old buildings worldwide between 1850 and 1900. If that were the case, why after 1900, have we never seen such construction again, in 1950? 1970? 1980? 2024! This is how you can see their deception. Moreover, you know that there were hundreds of thousands of these kinds of buildings worldwide, but what buildings existed before 1850, apart from cathedrals, churches, and mosques? They don't know what they are writing, what they are saying because they think we are no longer able to think. The architectural style from 1 to 11 belongs to the ancient civilization. My Third Theory: Art Deco architecture was the last architectural style worldwide from the ancient civilization. With this information, let’s try to find a construction date for an Art Deco building, any building worldwide, let's use ChatGPT, an excellent and ultra-fast assistant in its research work (it will never be artificial intelligence, except in movies), here is its answer: Art Deco, an architectural and artistic style, emerged in the early 20th century. It began to develop in the 1910s and reached its peak in the 1920s and 1930s. Art Deco spread internationally, with iconic buildings constructed into the 1940s. This style is characterized by geometric shapes, stylized motifs, and a sense of modern elegance. Do you begin to see the anomaly? If Art Deco architecture was the last architectural style of the ancient civilization, and we never crossed paths, and especially that we no longer know how to build such buildings today, why do they (especially universities – architecture section, historians, ...) give us an approximate date of +/- 1900 to 1940 for Art Deco architecture? This is where we need to start really thinking, it’s time to realize they are lying to us about history. What would you consider one of the last Art Deco buildings of the ancient civilization, if not the last one? Hard to say, but I would suggest the Haussmannian buildings, which are similar worldwide. As we have started thinking for ourselves, there is a way to refine the result. What is the detail that started to emerge in Art Deco buildings that did not exist in all their previous architectural styles? The number of floors in a building! Indeed, they began to build upwards, so let's find some tall Art Deco buildings. Here is a short list (do not rely on the construction dates they give us, of course, they are false): Empire State Building – New York, United States (1931) – 381 meters (443 meters with antenna) Chrysler Building – New York, United States (1930) – 319 meters Bank of Manhattan Trust Building (later known as 40 Wall Street) – New York, United States (1930) – 282 meters 30 Rockefeller Plaza (formerly RCA Building) – New York, United States (1933) – 259 meters Woolworth Building – New York, United States (1913) – 241 meters Metropolitan Life Tower – New York, United States (1909) – 213 meters One Wall Street – New York, United States (1931) – 188 meters Singer Building – New York, United States (1908) – 187 meters (61 floors) – Demolished in 1968 The New York Life Building – New York, United States (1928) – 187 meters Union Trust Building – Baltimore, United States (1929) – 122 meters Here is my fourth theory: The Empire State Building (or similar buildings) is one of the last constructions and the tallest Art Deco building from the old civilization. This is a very important conclusion, one that should serve as a reference point for dating and comparison in all your personal research, such as specific dates, people, historical events, objects, etc. But since we think for ourselves, I will further shorten the timeline of their disappearance and say that it was definitely before 1827. Why before 1827? Because that is the date of the first photograph in the world! So, I ask you, can you show me photographs (even on the internet) of people from this ancient civilization? Of course not, and moreover, as I mentioned earlier, we have never encountered their civilization. Therefore, logically, the construction of the aforementioned buildings and other Art Deco structures scattered across the world predates 1827. Let’s continue our descent into the rabbit hole where the irrational gets involved again and again. I want to talk about books, manuscripts, or typographic works from before 1827. What does ChatGPT say about the current number of such books in the world? It is estimated that there are still several million books published before 1850 worldwide, although this number includes a wide range of books, from rare and valuable works to more common editions. In your opinion, do these millions of books and documents come from the old civilization or our 2.0 civilization? All these books come from our 2.0 civilization and not from the ancient civilization. There are several reasons, and the more you think about it, the more reasons you can find. For me, one reason is enough to believe that all these books do not come from the old civilization. Here’s the reason I’ve chosen: What is missing in all these written books, manuscripts, documents, texts, publications, volumes, notebooks, reports, and notes from before 1827? Anything concerning their technologies mentioning free energy thanks to the ether they had—there is no indication in any of the books, nor in religious texts. But I already see you coming with your answers: “Yes, all these books exist, but they were destroyed or recovered to be hidden in the Vatican's vaults by parasites, controllers, the wealthy, or Jesuits!” Okay, so let me ask you another question: where are all these written books, manuscripts, documents, texts, publications, volumes, notebooks, reports, and notes from before 1827 that describe the construction from A to Z (from their foundation in the ground to their etheric antennas) of their buildings of all architectural styles up to Art Deco, such as cathedrals, churches, mosques, capitols, museums, operas, etc.? You can’t find any, not even from manor houses or mansions? Still no trace? Yet there were millions of these homes around the world. You’ll also tell me: “Yes, all these documents exist, but they were destroyed or recovered to be hidden in the Vatican's vaults by parasites, controllers, the wealthy, or Jesuits!” To that, I would reply that it makes no sense. Why would they hide the construction plans for cathedrals, churches, or similar buildings, and even less so for smaller master houses and mansions? They themselves love these magnificent buildings; why would they hide them? For me, the only possible reason is that all these book-documents cannot belong to the ancient civilization; they belong to our 2.0 civilization. But you’ll say, what about the maps showing the flat earth and documents telling us that it is the sun that revolves around the earth and that we are under a dome? Here is my reasoning on this question, about the books - documents: Geographic maps showing that the earth is flat That the sun revolves around our world Having no documents showing the construction from A to Z of a building before 1827 And this additional detail: that we were still using their technologies to have free energy until 1931, when radium was banned worldwide. I can deduce with these four pieces of information that intelligent people from our 2.0 civilization understood: The operation of the old civilization's technology without having any documents from the ancient civilization. That the earth was flat, and that its sun and moon revolved around the earth That we are under a dome. The people who wrote these books were destroyed or kept secret by the Vatican, the Freemasons, or other organizations. A brief note about Nikola Tesla: with everything I’ve said above, don’t you see any anomaly concerning him? Still no? Nikola Tesla was born in 1856 and died in 1943, and he had before his eyes everywhere he went, the thousands of Art Deco buildings and earlier architecture with their antennas and lanterns equipped with their mercury and radium, and just this information should wake you up about him. In fact, he filed 300 patents during his lifetime. He was intelligent, which is how he was able to transcribe everything he saw about the technology coming from the old civilization, and that was still his phrase to wake us up: If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration. In fact, that's all a cathedral or church does to heal people, are you beginning to understand? In short, in the old world, everything was free, and in our 2.0 world, everything is patented, everything is monetary. The patent system is unique to our 2.0 civilization. Yes, Nikola Tesla was monetary, but you’ll tell me what’s wrong with that, and you’re right, in our 2.0 world, there’s nothing wrong with charging for something that is free. 1/2 ⬇️
@Barabbaas - HaRUN AYgun
2/2 You know that photo where most scientists are gathered at the Solvay Conference in 1927, Belgium? Think about it, in your opinion, did all the scientists in this photo know about the etheric antennas, lanterns, mercury, and radium in old buildings? Do you see where their deception lies? And what about our religions? We all know, at least those who deal with the subject of our old civilization, that they had the technology to harvest energy from the ether, and you also know that our cathedrals, churches, and mosques were places to heal and regenerate people, which was also beneficial for the animals and vegetation around them. Otherwise, I ask you all a very simple question: how can we suddenly go from a cathedral, church, or mosque that was an energy plant, that healed people, to a place of worship (of all religions)? It doesn’t make sense, does it? I am also stuck because for me there is a disparity. Let me explain: if our cathedrals, churches, and mosques were places to heal and regenerate people, energy centers, then why were there statues, paintings on frescoes, and portraits of characters such as Jesus, Mary, and other figures you know in cathedrals and churches, and inscriptions of Allah, Mohamed, and other Islamic inscriptions in mosques? Do you think these creations and inscriptions are from the ancient civilization, or were they added by us, the people of the new civilization 2.0? If it’s us, does that mean we could have painted the Mona Lisa?! Or were these characters intended for something other than religion, were they very important to the inhabitants of the ancient civilization, and have we, in the new civilization, had ill-intentioned people divert their meaning to better control us? This is worth investigating. And the history we are taught in schools, coming from historians of each country around the world, what is false and what is true? For me, there is first the work of Anatoly Fomenko on his chronology of history, recentism, which I subscribe to. We all know, at least those who study the subject of our ancient civilization, that they had technology to harvest energy from the ether, which was also used for their combat weapons. What were their armors like at that time? They had metal armors with long metal camails that protected them not from swords or arrows as historians want us to believe, but from lightning projected by their adversaries, like a Faraday cage. How did the lightning appear? On all their swords were precious stones, combined with a receptacle containing mercury or a similar substance that could send out lightning, similar to how Harry Potter casts lightning with his magic wand in the films. For me, what made me suspicious were the military uniforms during the wars of our civilization 2.0. Look at their outfits: they are all dressed in normal clothes and equipped with a rifle. So I ask you: how can we go from a metal armor with complete protection against lightning to a military uniform made of cotton and a weapon that fires projectiles? Example: the armor of Sultan Mustafa III adorned with jewels (Ottoman from the ancient civilization) in the museum and a uniform of Ottoman soldiers from our civilization 2.0. With all this information, here is my fifth theory (even more irrational than theory n° 2): the new civilization 2.0, to which we belong, appeared instantly, without knowing our origin, and took the place of every kingdom in the ancient civilization. Based on theories n°2 and n°4, with this expanded world map that could exist (photo 4), here is my sixth theory: the population of the ancient civilization was moved from their world to another world, and we, the 2.0 civilization, were placed in the place of the ancient civilization. You know, when I told you, before understanding everything that is happening in our 2.0 world, that you must absolutely know your past! Our past begins, according to me, from my fourth theory, and I sincerely believe that we can put everything in order in the chronology of history. I assure you, it is very short and certainly does not go back to year zero as we are led to believe. It is only from this moment, once the chronology of true history is restored, that we can move to the next step: where do we come from? Why did we take the history and residence of another civilization? Who decided this? And if there is someone, who is it? Etc. I don’t have a precise date for our sudden appearance, but as I said in my third theory, it can only be after the Art Deco constructions of the ancient civilization. As you know, there are numerous photos from around 1850 showing empty cities or with few people. They will tell you that it’s due to the exhibition that lasted a long time and didn’t capture people in motion. How to know the precise date of their disappearance and our arrival? The simplest way to know their approximate date of disappearance is to use carbon dating, but according to Anatoly Fomenko in his "New Chronology" (History: Fiction or Science?, vol. 1), carbon-14 dating has been calibrated on the already accepted chronology. According to him, this dating cannot therefore be used to confirm it since it derives from it. He also contests dendrochronology and other methods. So, it’s a mystery. If you have ideas? So, we all appeared in scattered realms around the world before our arrival, and what did it leave us? Their buildings and infrastructure as well as all their furniture and objects Their two religions, Islam and Christianity (or we appropriated them so they became our religions) All their technologies, industries, and inventions (that the usurpers of our civilization 2.0 make us believe come from them) Other details that could shed light on our 2.0 history: We all appeared at the same time: white people, black people or other colors, pygmies, aborigines, Papuans, Indians, etc. We inherited their two main religions and customs, where they surely lived in harmony. A group of people calling themselves the Jewish people appeared with their own religion, Judaism, but without acquiring a kingdom. Our 2.0 civilization became monetary from its inception. Titles of nobility up to the title of emperor have appeared. Emergence of Freemasonry and the Illuminati. Domination of all technologies by wealthy families (e.g., Otis, Krupp). Beginning of the destruction of all remnants (buildings and infrastructure) of the ancient civilization. Emergence of wars to seize kingdoms. Emergence of the monetary system. Emergence of the educational system. Emergence of multinational corporations. Emergence of medicine. Emergence of sciences and scientists. Emergence and use of headgear and hats around the world, which served to keep our hair in place due to electrification coming from all structures with etheric antennas (photo 3) Etc. In your opinion, since 1850, was it the gold rush or something else? It seems obvious. What is, in your view, the biggest lie since the emergence of our 2.0 civilization? That we are being hidden from the fact that there was an ancient civilization just before ours, and that this subject, especially the etheric antennas still visible on the roofs of old houses that provided free heating and electricity, will never be addressed! You may not realize it, but there are TV reports, documentaries, and especially films directly or indirectly addressing all conspiracy and dystopian topics, such as the films: Matrix, Blade Runner, Divergent, Reminiscence, Intimate, Godless, The 5th Wave, Time Out, 1984, The Maze, Mad Max, Dystopia, Equilibrium, I Robot, Metropolis, Minority Report, Interstellar, Civil War, Her, Children Of Men, Terminator, Island, District 9, Cain, Fahrenheit 451, Cloud Atlas, Demolition Man, Logan’s Run, The Diner With André, Star Wars, etc. I will conclude with this information. We have absolutely no information about this civilization, how they lived, how they were organized, or what all their buildings were used for. I happened to come across a video on YouTube where a hypnotist performs a regressive hypnosis on a medium. Do you know why? When the hypnotist performed regressive hypnosis on other people with certain historical events as subjects, every time, those being hypnotized said there were errors in the chronology of time and they could not date events correctly. Later, the hypnotist heard subjects on Tartary and performed a regressive hypnosis session with a medium on Tartary. This becomes disturbing for me because the medium communicates with people from this ancient civilization. I can tell you right away: these two ladies are absolutely unaware of this civilization they call Tartary, as confirmed by Francophone accounts in their three videos. For example, the medium provides details about energy coming from the sky, insisting that she does not even know the name of this energy, which we call ether. Then, they insist that red brick was an essential element of their technology. To me, providing such details without knowing anything about the ancient civilization is disturbing. So, look at what they say about this ancient civilization; they provide a lot of information in the three videos: I leave you to judge: Part 1: https://youtu.be/JQkej35gDxc?si=afARC5wb8XF5CGli Part 2: https://youtu.be/TRH8VH5gKtI?si=9tdhnc3xpyeZi3YH Part 3: https://youtu.be/XgwasvwFEO8?si=h8vO_kl5Xi8syXci Thus ends my theories on the ancient civilization that everyone likes to call Tartary. With my theories and information, I can link the transition between the ancient civilization and our 2.0 civilization, and rewrite our history from our emergence. Otherwise, how do you make the transition between these civilizations? #TartariaTheoryHarunAYGÜN #tartaria #mudflood
@Barabbaas - HaRUN AYgun
@88marciaramalho , it was a pleasure to finally watch your video on The Grey, and I must say, well done. I’m a French speaker and understand very little English, so you can imagine the time it took me to translate every page of your 8-hour-long video! But I had to watch it because we’re a small global community—yourself, me, and others—where we question the entire world’s history since our time in the education system. Your research into our history, as well as the work of others, is extremely important to me because you provide information that allows me to develop theories about the ancient civilization that preceded us, which everyone calls Tartaria. However, while watching The Grey, I noticed a huge issue similar to your previous video Eather. The problem isn’t your videos themselves; it’s more about what you don’t say regarding The Grey in both videos. I think your video The Grey is a logical continuation of Eather, where you explain practically the same things but with more details about the rise and disappearance of the ancient civilization. At the beginning of The Grey, you immediately warn us that it's a novel with fictional characters and locations, and that it's a parody. But you didn’t mention this in Eather. Yet, in both videos with the same narrative, you use real dates and names of countries and historical figures. You might say it was just an oversight not to mention it in Eather, and that’s understandable. From my observation, you should clarify the purpose of your two videos, Eather & The Grey. Are they novels, or are they your theories concerning our past history and the ancient civilization that preceded us, which everyone calls Tartaria ? If these two videos are novels, then you should consider publishing books in the novel genre or perhaps selling the rights to make a Hollywood film. In that case, you wouldn’t belong with us—a small community, albeit one that theorizes about the ancient civilization that came before us, called Tartaria, and attempts to reconstruct our past history. But I assure you, I know very well that your two videos are not novels and are instead your personal theories and thoughts, and I say that’s a good thing. I just wanted to clarify this point. I’ve also written some theories that you should read—it’s necessary. As I mentioned at the start of this message, the issue isn’t with your videos but rather with what you don’t say in them. Namely: Who are The Grey, and why don’t you mention them ? I know who you’re talking about, but it’s not for me to say—it’s up to you to reveal that. They are indirectly indicated in my theories. Even a blind person reading them would know who they are! And I assure you, they are still here in 2024 and more diabolical than ever! Shall we discuss our respective theories ? You can compare your theories with mine, and I can confirm that there is no possible link between the ancient civilization that preceded us and our own—we have no biological traces, books, or documents. I believe that, before anything else, instead of trying to learn about the civilizations that came before us, we must absolutely reconstruct our own past first. You all make the same mistake, directly or indirectly—you want to associate our civilization 2.0 with the one that came before, the one that built all those magnificent buildings that are still visible. You say that we don’t know how to build cathedrals, basilicas, or churches—that these structures came from another civilization. So why do you associate us with their civilization? Why would we be their descendants ? In my theories, I explain that the ancient civilization that preceded us has completely disappeared from the surface of the world and that we replaced them. I know it sounds irrational, but unless you present me with a biological trace of them—a skeleton, or even a piece of their bones—it will remain so. The same goes for their writings. Since we have no writings from them, we know absolutely nothing about them—not their population, their religions (if those were religions to them), nor their social systems. So what can we learn about them ? As we all know, world history is false, so we must start over and try to reconstruct their history from scratch. The first thing we must do, and it’s necessary, is to differentiate between what belongs to the ancient civilization you call Tartaria and what belongs to our last civilization, which is ours—civilization 2.0—since we replaced them. However, we can repair the history of our civilization 2.0 since our arrival in this world, and the question is : When did we appear ? Marcia, you give your version of the facts concerning our past history, and that’s a good thing, even if you don’t want to openly say who The Grey are. We must absolutely rewrite our history in reverse from the point we believe it became false, starting from the end of World War II. This is absolutely the first thing to do to understand who we are, where we come from, who decided this, and why. Why seek out an earlier civilization if we don’t even know who we are ? Food for thought. By the way, does anyone have an idea who The Grey are, that Marcia mentions in her two videos ? PS : For you, they come from a distant star in our galaxy to populate Earth, and we would be their hybrids. For me, the ancient civilization we like to call Tartaria and our 2.0 civilization were displaced from their original world. When, why, how, and by whom ? It's a mystery !
