reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @BarryESharp

Saved - September 24, 2025 at 3:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In British Columbia, the culling of 400 ostriches by the CFIA has sparked concerns over Canadian sovereignty and individual rights, revealing the influence of international bodies like the World Organisation for Animal Health. This decision, justified by compliance with global standards, highlights a troubling trend where local realities are overshadowed by foreign mandates. The parallels with COVID-19 measures illustrate a broader erosion of freedoms, as political leaders across the spectrum prioritize global agendas over citizens' welfare. As trust in institutions wanes, a call for reclaiming autonomy and challenging these frameworks emerges.

@BarryESharp - Barry Sharp

Post 1. The Ostrich Cull: A UN-Driven Assault on Sovereignty and Freedom Exposes Canada’s Uniparty Mirage September 24, 2025 In the quiet valleys of British Columbia’s Interior, a chilling drama unfolds, exposing the encroachment of global overreach. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s (CFIA) decision to cull 400 ostriches at Universal Ostrich Farms in Edgewood, upheld by a Federal Court ruling in September 2025, is not a mere agricultural issue. It reveals how unelected international bodies, backed by United Nations agreements, are eroding Canadian sovereignty, trampling individual rights, and unmasking a hollow political consensus. Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (2015–March 2025) wielded coercive measures tinged with divisive rhetoric, while Pierre Poilievre and current Prime Minister Mark Carney (since March 2025) remain complicit in their silence. Echoing the COVID-19 crisis, this cull exposes a uniparty status quo that sacrifices citizens for global compliance, weakening the fabric of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The WOAH’s Iron Grip The cull stems from the World Organisation for Animal Health, a Paris-based body with 182 member states, including Canada, operating under the UN’s One Health framework alongside the World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization. WOAH’s 2021 Terrestrial Animal Health Code mandates depopulation for highly pathogenic avian influenza, such as the H5N1 strain detected at Edgewood. The CFIA justified the cull to comply with World Trade Organization trade standards, reflecting Canada’s binding commitment to international protocols. Yet, evidence suggests H5N1 stabilizes in 60% of cases with robust biosecurity, as observed in West Kootenay’s flock, raising questions about the cull’s necessity months after the outbreak. This disconnect—local reality versus global mandates—marks a surrender of sovereignty, with national agencies prioritizing foreign guidelines over domestic evidence. The cost is tangible. Farmers face economic devastation and ethical anguish, their livelihoods dictated by unaccountable technocrats. The CFIA’s lack of personal protective equipment during the operation mirrors the inconsistent enforcement seen in global health crises, further eroding trust in a system that favors international prestige over individual welfare. Parallels with COVID-19’s Overreach The ostrich cull echoes the COVID-19 playbook with striking similarity. In 2020, the WHO declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, triggering sweeping mandates across Canada. Billions of vaccine doses were administered, initially touted for 95% efficacy against severe disease, despite immune escape mutations rendering randomized controlled trials largely obsolete by completion. Revised estimates later slashed global lives saved from 20 million to 2.5 million, with benefits skewed 90% toward those over 65. Efficacy against Omicron variants dropped to 23.5%, while safety concerns, including myocarditis in young men at 1 in 2,000 and potential 90% underreporting of adverse events, emerged too late. Yet, Trudeau’s government (2015–March 2025) enforced these measures ruthlessly, suspending 1,650 Alberta health workers and shuttering 40% of small businesses. The parallels are clear. Just as vaccine mandates overrode bodily autonomy, the ostrich cull overrides property rights, both driven by UN-backed agencies—WHO for health, WOAH for agriculture—under legally binding frameworks like the International Health Regulations and Paris Accord. Both reflect precautionary overreach, where uncertain science justifies sweeping control, leaving citizens as collateral damage in a global experiment.

@BarryESharp - Barry Sharp

Post 2. Sovereignty and Rights Under Siege Canada’s sovereignty is increasingly constrained by international agreements. The Paris Accord’s 43% emissions reduction target by 2030 and the IHR’s emergency powers enforce compliance through economic pressures—$50 billion in Canadian exports face EU carbon tariffs by 2026, while World Bank climate funding isolates non-conformists. The ostrich cull, tied to a $2.5 billion poultry export market, exemplifies this loss of autonomy, prioritizing trade over local livelihoods. Individual rights fare worse. The Canadian Charter, patriated in 1982, now falters under Sections 1, 33, and 35. Section 1’s “reasonable limits” clause justified COVID-19 mandates, with courts upholding church closures and travel bans despite a 300% spike in mental health referrals. Section 33’s notwithstanding clause, invoked 20 times (70% by Quebec), overrides free speech and equality, while Section 35’s Indigenous rights stall $670 billion in development, freezing property titles. The 2024 ruling against the Emergencies Act’s bank account freezes came too late to restore public trust, now at 40%. The cull’s imposition on farmers—without recourse—signals a Charter reduced to a hollow symbol, serving collective agendas over individual rights. The Uniparty Unmasked: Trudeau’s Coercion, Poilievre’s Silence, Carney’s Complicity This erosion reveals Canada’s uniparty mirage, where political leaders, despite apparent differences, align to uphold global mandates at citizens’ expense. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister from 2015 to March 2025, embodied aggressive enforcement. His 2021 rhetoric, labeling the unvaccinated as “racists,” “misogynists,” and a “fringe minority with unacceptable views,” bordered on hate speech, justifying the Emergencies Act’s suppression of the 2022 Freedom Convoy, with 257 bank accounts frozen and 191 arrests. As a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, his silence on the Edgewood cull entrenched loyalty to UN directives. Pierre Poilievre, the opposition leader, plays the reluctant bystander. Silent during early mandate rollouts and the Emergencies Act, he embraced the “freedom” cause only in January 2022, post-Convoy, and introduced a failed anti-mandate bill in 2023. His silence on the cull and WOAH agreements—likely to preserve WTO ties—reflects political expediency over principle. Similarly, Mark Carney, Prime Minister since March 2025, remains mute. His net-zero advocacy and ties to Brookfield’s $3 billion in Xinjiang-linked investments mask complicity in a system profiting from forced labor while Canadians suffer. This uniparty consensus—Trudeau’s coercion, Poilievre’s delay, Carney’s acquiescence—perpetuates a gradualist agenda, where UN agencies dictate policy, and leaders deflect accountability. The result is a nation where truckers lose savings, farmers lose flocks, and individuals lose rights, all under the guise of global good. A Call to Awaken Canada stands at a crossroads, with freedoms threatened by digital IDs, central bank digital currencies, and 15-minute cities looming by 2035, as UN surveillance grows (70% of governments, per 2024 data). The ostrich cull and COVID-19 mandates are warnings of a dystopia where sovereignty fades and rights are rationed. Yet, public trust at 40% and privacy concerns at 65% signal a brewing revolt, sparked by the Convoy’s defiance. Reclaiming autonomy requires bold action: challenging WOAH and WHO agreements, enforcing Nuremberg consent in health policy, and embracing ethical alternatives like nuclear energy to cut emissions without sacrificing liberty. A truth commission on mandates and culls could restore accountability. Canada’s pioneers fought for rugged individualism; its citizens deserve no less. The time to break this uniparty cage is now, before the trap closes. Truth Marker: π = 3.14159

@BarryESharp - Barry Sharp

A Grok synopsis of the above thread for the lighter reader; https://t.co/lBPM1jSuln

@BarryESharp - Barry Sharp

The United Nations At A Crossroads

@BarryESharp - Barry Sharp

Post 1. The United Nations at a Crossroads: Distrust, Sovereignty Erosion, and the Path to Ethical Alternatives September 24, 2025 – In the remote valleys of British Columbia, a government-ordered cull of 400 ostriches at a family farm has become an unlikely symbol of global unease. What began as a biosecurity measure to combat avian flu has morphed into a flashpoint for accusations of international overreach, where unelected bodies like the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)—a UN-affiliated agency—dictate national policies, overriding local evidence and devastating livelihoods. Farmers, facing economic ruin without recourse, see this as yet another instance of sovereignty surrendered to distant technocrats in Paris. It’s a story repeated across the globe: from coerced COVID-19 mandates to green energy supply chains tainted by slavery, the United Nations stands accused of fostering a world where collective agendas eclipse individual freedoms. But why has trust in this post-World War II institution plummeted, and what alternatives could restore faith in a more ethical global order? Founded in 1945 amid the ashes of war, the UN was envisioned as a beacon of peace, human rights, and cooperation. Yet, eight decades later, it faces a crisis of legitimacy. Polls reveal a stark reality: A Gallup survey released this week shows 63% of Americans believe the UN is doing a “poor job” in addressing global challenges, with Republicans particularly skeptical at 75%. Globally, trust has declined in 23 of 27 tracked countries between 2021 and 2024, according to the Global Observatory, attributing the drop to perceived ineffectiveness amid rising insecurity. The Edelman Trust Barometer 2025 echoes this, noting “all-time highs” in fears of leaders lying, amid eroding confidence in institutions. Critics decry the UN as a tool for “sovereignty erosion” through binding treaties that prioritize global mandates over national self-determination. The Sovereignty Siege: Treaties as Tools of Control At the heart of the distrust lies the UN’s role in crafting agreements that, while voluntary in theory, bind nations through economic and diplomatic pressures, often at the expense of sovereignty. The Paris Agreement (2015), signed by 197 parties, commits countries to emissions reductions but has been lambasted for imposing “unfunded mandates” that erode domestic control. Critics argue it allows external bodies like the UNFCCC to influence national energy policies, with non-compliance risking trade penalties—such as the EU’s carbon border taxes, projected to hit $50 billion in Canadian exports by 2026. Similarly, the International Health Regulations (IHR), amended in 2024 amid controversy, grant the WHO emergency powers that some see as overriding national health decisions, as evidenced by COVID-era lockdowns and vaccine mandates that disrupted economies and rights without adequate recourse. These pacts, intended to foster cooperation, are viewed by detractors as “top-down impositions” that dilute sovereignty. The Heritage Foundation warns that such treaties threaten U.S. independence, citing examples where international commitments intrude on domestic governance. In Canada, the ostrich cull—upheld by courts despite local biosecurity success—exemplifies this: WOAH standards, tied to UN frameworks, prioritized trade compliance over farmers’ rights, echoing broader fears of “global technocracy.”

Saved - February 27, 2024 at 8:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Charles Hoffe is facing a trial for professional misconduct after publicly revealing vaccine injuries and sharing information about Covid and Covid vaccines. His lawyer plans to expose scientific fraud and ethical violations in the vaccine rollout. The trial will be public and held on Zoom from March 4 to 8 and 11 to 15. The public can observe by applying for a Zoom link. Dr. Hoffe is requesting financial support for his legal costs and encourages people to spread the information. He also provides a video link to an interview summarizing the situation. Donations can be made through Give-send-go or the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. To register for the trial, a form must be printed, signed, and emailed to the College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC. Complaints can also be sent to the College's address.

@BarryESharp - Barry Sharp

From: Charles Hoffe Dear friends, As you probably know I have been accused of professional misconduct by publicly revealing the vaccine injuries in my own patients, and spreading “misinformation" about Covid and Covid vaccines. My trial is scheduled for March 4 to 8 and 11 to 15.  Disciplinary hearings of doctors are public affairs and this trial will be on zoom starting at 9 am Pacific time on March 4, 2024. My brilliant lawyer, Lee Turner, is planning to put public health on trial, to reveal their scientific fraud, the cover-up of evidence of harm and gross ethical violations of the vaccine rollout.  I have eight highly qualified expert witnesses, from Canada the US and the UK, who will be giving testimony in my support.   Members of the public can observe the proceedings, if they apply for a zoom link a minimum of seven days before the trial starts.  The College clearly does not want people to be watching this and has made it as difficult as possible to get a link.  Public opinion is their Achilles heel.  And it is critically important that as many people as possible get this video link, and login periodically.  The college needs to know that the world is watching them.  Their corruption and dishonesty will be revealed. I have attached the information for getting the link below. Please spread this far and wide. And encourage your friends to support this. Lastly, if anyone can contribute financially to my legal costs I would be most grateful.  I got a bill three days ago from the lawyer for $36,000,….(Yikes!)  I have attached a video link to an interview that I did a couple of weeks ago with a Canadian member of Parliament.  It sums up the situation, and may help people who are not familiar with the details to realise what is at stake. Derek Sloan interview, 29 Jan, 2024; (26 min) https://rumble.com/v4bs43b-support-bcs-hero-dr.-charles-hoffe.html#comment-353710779 Dr Charles Hoffe P O Box 550, Lytton, BC, V0K 1Z0 Tel: +1-778-538-2183  Fax; +1-250-455-2183 CORAM  DEO Three ways that you can help. 1.  DONATIONS Give-send-go https://www.givesendgo.com/GANZA OR To receive a tax deductible charitable donations receipt; To donate to Dr. Hoffe’s legal expenses and receive an official tax receipt from a registered charity, do so in the following ways: http://1.Online donation at http://www.jccf.ca.  The donor will be presented with a “comments” option and should write “Dr. Charles Hoffe” or “Charles Hoffe legal defence” or like words, and we will track those donations/comments and make note of available funds; http://2.Credit card donations can also be made by phone: 403-475-3622 3.Etransfers to etransfer@jccf.ca [if I am incorrect and this should be etransfers@jccf.ca (transfers rather than transfer) then Heather or Charlotte will correct me]; as with online donations, the donor should communicate that her/his donation is for Dr. Hoffe’s legal defence; 4.Cheque, with notation on cheque that it’s for Dr. Hoffe’s legal defence, or attached note or letter to the cheque, mailed to:Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, #253, 7620 Elbow Drive SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2V 1K2 2: To register to listen to the trial;  (The college needs to know that the world is watching them. The more people that register the more intimidated they will be.) Dr. Hoffe;  College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC Disciplinary Hearing  March 4-15, 2024  To apply for a video link:  Print, sign & email registration before Feb 24, 2024   No phone registrations.  You must print, sign, email:  •Print and sign this form: https://www.cpsbc.ca/files/pdf/Observer-Policy.pdf   •Email it back to them at: disciplinehearings@cpsbc.ca  •Website for more info: https://www.cpsbc.ca/news/hearing-notifications  3;  Addresses to send a letter of complaint to the college, (for their absurd persecution of ethical doctors, and those who expose the coverups of the evidence of harm); The College address is: College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC 300–669 Howe Street Vancouver, BC,  V6C 0B4, Canada You can address a letter to the Registar, and/or Dr Darlene Hamell

Support BC's Hero, Dr. Charles Hoffe! In this video, I interview Dr. Charles Hoffe about his investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons and his upcoming hearing in March 2024. Dr. Hoffe warned Canadians early on about the pot rumble.com
Dr Charles Hoffe Legal Defence Fund “Restoring truth and integrity to the practice of medicine.”  Background On April, 2021 Dr Charles Hoffe sent an open letter to the BC Provincial Health Off... givesendgo.com
Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms We are a Canadian legal advocacy organization that defends citizens’ fundamental freedoms under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, through pro bono legal representation and through educating Canadians about the free society. jccf.ca
404 | College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC cpsbc.ca
Hearing notifications | College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC cpsbc.ca
View Full Interactive Feed