TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BerryRazi

Saved - March 21, 2026 at 12:05 AM

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

https://t.co/L0eTOrQqew

Saved - August 22, 2025 at 1:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've shared insights on ten lesser-known herbs that may help fight cancer. Each herb has unique properties: Chelidonium majus inhibits tumor cell migration; Sanguinaria canadensis induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells; Podophyllum peltatum is a precursor to an anti-cancer drug; Viscum album improves quality of life; Oldenlandia diffusa suppresses liver cancer growth; Scutellaria barbata targets thyroid cancer; Curcuma zedoaria affects lung and lymphoma cells; Euphorbia peplus clears precancerous lesions; Artemisia annua reduces tumor growth; and Prunella vulgaris shows promise in digestive tumors. For more information, I recommend finding a doctor knowledgeable in herbs and nutrition.

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

Ten forgotten herbs that fight cancer 1. Chelidonium majus (greater celandine): inhibits tumor cell migration and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in multiple cancer cell lines (Deljanin M, Nikolic M, Baskic D, et al. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;190:362-371.) https://t.co/gVYBMU2Yln

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

2. Sanguinaria canadensis (bloodroot): sanguinarine induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation in human breast cancer cells (Achkar IW, Mraiche F, Mohammad RM, et al. Future Med Chem. 2017;9(9):933-950.) https://t.co/phi96pkAHG

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

3. Podophyllum peltatum (American mayapple): yields podophyllotoxin, a precursor to etoposide, which inhibits topoisomerase II and prevents replication of lung and testicular cancer cells (USDA ARS. American mayapple yields anti-cancer extract. July 17, 2000.) https://t.co/aTmgipU4ma

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

4. Viscum album L. (European mistletoe): improves quality of life and exerts immunomodulatory, anti-proliferative, and pro-apoptotic effects in controlled clinical studies (Kienle GS, Kiene H. Integr Cancer Ther. 2010;9(2):142-157.) https://t.co/yrn0k152T3

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

5. Oldenlandia diffusa (snake-needle grass): total flavonoids induce endoplasmic reticulum stress–mediated autophagy and apoptosis, suppressing hepatocellular carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo (Chen H, Shang X, Yuan H, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1019670.) https://t.co/N0vt1MN1Zj

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

6. Scutellaria barbata (barbed skullcap): exhibits antitumor, anti-angiogenic, and immunomodulatory effects and inhibits proliferation of thyroid cancer cells (Yoon G, Lee M, Kwak A, et al. Sci Rep. 2025;15:86733.) https://t.co/sqlGCcSpfX

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

7. Curcuma zedoaria (white turmeric): essential oil and curcuminoid fractions inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in lung and lymphoma cancer cell lines (Park JH, Kim SH, Lee SY, et al. Korean J Crop Sci. 2020;65(4):702-711.) https://t.co/kPzSleQ8hI

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

Link in my bio to find a doctor that understands herbs and nutrition in addition to pharmaceuticals.

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

8. Euphorbia peplus (petty spurge/milkweed): ingenol mebutate induces direct cytotoxicity and immune stimulation in actinic keratosis, clearing precancerous lesions in phase III trials (Gras J. Drugs Today (Barc). 2013;49(1):15-22.) https://t.co/sNXVCmFBnP

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

9. Artemisia annua (sweet wormwood): artemisinin and derivatives induce apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, ferroptosis, and inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling, reducing tumor growth in vitro and animal models (Efferth T. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;46:65-83.) https://t.co/vMWvu1unnW

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

10. Prunella vulgaris (self-heal): triterpenoids, flavonoids, and phenylpropanoids induce apoptosis, inhibit angiogenesis and migration, and reduce hepatic and renal toxicity in digestive system tumor models (Ning N, Nan Y, Chen G, et al. Molecules. 2024;29(8):1843.) https://t.co/0iwadEaLEB

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

Follow me for more content like this and discover a monthly naturopathic journal at @NaturopathNews

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

@GraceSm16250397 Both excellent!

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

@ConservTreeHggr Good for so many things

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

@freespchmatters I’d consult with a doctor that practices naturopathic medicine or an herbalist to make sure no interactions with other medications etc 🤗

@BerryRazi - Razi Ann Berry

@FamilyInternet Medicare and the AMA dictate what doctors prescribe or what are reimbursed for so most primary care doctors are not educated in these compounds despite the research.

Saved - December 1, 2024 at 4:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring how modern living impacts men’s testosterone levels. Historically, our bodies thrived in natural temperature variations, but central heating and synthetic fabrics keep us too warm, disrupting hormone balance. Research shows that elevated temperatures can harm testosterone production and overall health. To combat this, I suggest lowering indoor heat, wearing breathable fabrics, limiting exposure to hot environments, and getting outside for natural temperature regulation. It’s crucial to be mindful of these factors for better hormonal health.

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

Baby, It’s Cold Outside: Warmer Temperatures and Modern Lifestyles Lower Testosterone in Men 🧵 1) Once, humans lived in sync with nature, enduring seasonal extremes. But modern living with heating, synthetic clothing, and insulated environments are silently affecting men’s testosterone levels.

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

2) The Science: Testosterone and Temperature The testes need to stay cool (~34°C/93.2°F). This lower temperature protects Leydig cells which are responsible for testosterone production. Elevated temperatures disrupt this process, reducing testosterone levels and impairing sperm health. ( Keep reading for my sources at end of thread)

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

3) How Modern Lifestyles Heat Things Up Constant Heating: Central heating keeps homes at 70°F+ year-round. Historically, people were subjected to cooler temperatures indoors, promoting hormonal balance by preventing excessive heat stress on the testes. Synthetic Fabrics: Unlike breathable cotton or wool, synthetic clothing traps heat, raising scrotal temperatures. Prolonged exposure to warmth can lead to lower testosterone levels over time. Limited Temperature Variation: Men today often travel from heated homes to cars to offices, rarely exposed to the natural temperature swings that historically cooled the body and testes.

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

4) What the Research Says Animal Studies: Elevated temperatures reduce testosterone biosynthesis and damage Leydig cells in rams and rats. For example, Gomes et al. observed a significant drop in testosterone levels in rams exposed to high ambient temperatures. Human Studies: Thwaits et al. found that men exercising in warm environments experienced lower testosterone and higher cortisol, which suppresses testosterone further. Research shows that even moderate heat exposure leads to oxidative stress, reducing hormone production. This doesn’t take into account the constant in and outdoor light at night. I’ll get to how that impacts hormones in another thread.

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

5) Why This Matters Testosterone affects more than fertility as mood, muscle mass, energy, and overall health rely on healthy levels. Modern lifestyles, while convenient, can unintentionally undermine men’s hormonal health. See below for tips to protect against this phenomenon. ⬇️

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

6) Practical Steps for Protecting Testosterone from Heat Related Decline 🎯Turn Down the Heat: Reduce indoor heating, especially at night. Cooler sleeping temperatures promote better hormone regulation. 🎯Wear Breathable Fabrics: Opt for cotton, linen, or wool over synthetic materials to allow natural airflow. 🎯Limit Heat Exposure: Avoid prolonged time in hot tubs, saunas, or excessively heated environments. 🎯Get Outside: Exposure to natural temperatures supports the body’s thermoregulation. 🎯Use Fans and Ventilation: Prevent heat buildup in work and living spaces. 🎯 Talk to your naturopathic doctor as this is not meant to be medical advice but is for educational purposes only. Follow @NaturopathNews for more.

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

SOURCE??!! Shvareva E, Kite V, Milne KJ, Murphy PR, Hammond GL, Lonstein JS. Testosterone modifies response to chronic heat exposure in rats. J Thermal Biol. 2022;56:112-118. doi:10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.112118. Thwaits CJ. The effect of ambient temperature on testosterone and cortisol responses to high-intensity, intermittent exercise in humans. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(4):1103-1110. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001134 Gomes WR, Erb RE, Estergreen VL, Stormshak F, Gassner FX. Effect of elevated ambient temperature on testis and blood levels and in vitro biosynthesis of testosterone in the ram. J Anim Sci. 1971;33(3):572-576. doi:10.2527/jas1971.333572x. McLellan TM, Ducharme MB, Canini F, et al. Effect of modafinil on core temperature during sustained wakefulness and exercise in a warm environment. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002;73(11):1079-1088. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12433245/. Ertl AC, Dearborn AS, Weidhofer AR, et al. Exercise thermoregulation in men after 1 and 24 hours of 6 degrees head-down tilt. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2000;71(2):150-155. Available from: https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10681270/ Set notifications if you’d like to read the next thread.

Repercussions of work schedule congruence among full-time, part-time, and contingent nurses - PubMed Prior studies on alternative work schedules have focused primarily on the main effects of compressed work weeks and shift work on individual outcomes. This study explores the combined effects of alternative and preferred work schedules on nurses' satisfaction with their work schedules, perceived pat … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

#MAHA

Saved - November 18, 2024 at 12:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been exploring the controversial topic of seed oils, which are actually industrial oils like canola and soybean, introduced in the 20th century. Their rise began with the cotton industry seeking new markets for waste products, leading to aggressive marketing that promoted them as healthy alternatives to traditional fats. This campaign vilified natural fats, influencing dietary guidelines and public perception. Concerns about their health impacts have emerged, linking them to chronic diseases. To navigate this, I focus on recognizing these oils and opting for traditional fats like olive oil and butter, advocating for a return to healthier cooking practices.

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

What Are Seed Oils and Why Are They Dangerous? Truth About Seed Oils: How Industrial Waste Became a Common Food Ingredient. "Seed oils" have become a hot topic in health and nutrition circles, but the term is somewhat misleading. What we call "seed oils" - canola, soybean, corn, cottonseed, safflower, and sunflower oils - are more accurately described as industrial oils. Unlike traditional fats that can be easily pressed or rendered (think of squeezing an olive or frying bacon), these oils require industrial extraction by heat, pressure, and chemical solvents. The recent controversy stems from a growing awareness of their unusual place in human history: these oils simply didn't exist in human diets before the 20th century because they couldn't. You can't squeeze oil from a cotton seed or a corn kernel in your home kitchen.⬇️

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

The Industrial Origins: From Waste to Product to Food Ingredient The history of industrial "seed" oils begins not with meeting a nutritional need but with industrial innovation to find a market for waste products. In the late 1800s, the cotton industry partnered with researchers and industry groups to market cottonseed oil as an ingredient for food and industrial products. When electricity began replacing kerosene lamps, the cottonseed oil industry needed new markets. The solution turned out to be food. Through aggressive marketing campaigns, these cheap and useless byproducts were transformed into what was promoted as "healthy, modern alternatives" to traditional fats. The invention of hydrogenation in 1909 was crucial to this transformation—it allowed these naturally unstable oils to be made solid at room temperature, creating new products such as "shortening" and "margarine" that would forever change commercial baking and home cooking. ⬇️

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

The Packaged Food Revolution The food industry's embrace of seed oils was no accident - it was driven by their unique properties that made them ideal for mass production and distribution. These oils were extremely cheap to produce and offered manufacturers unprecedented shelf stability. It also allowed manufacturers to monetize waste products by selling them instead of paying to dispose of them. Their neutral taste meant they could be used in virtually any product, and flavors could be added to cheaply mimic butter or lard. Their high smoke point made them perfect for commercial frying, and the consistent supply chain ensured food companies could maintain steady production year-round. Soon, these products made their way to store shelves and home pantries across the country and the Western world.⬇️

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

The War on Traditional Fats Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the seed oil history was how they were marketed from as "heart-healthy" alternatives to traditional fats. This required an unprecedented campaign to discredit traditional fats that had been used for many generations. Industry-funded research began vilifying cholesterol ( good for cells and hormones) and saturated fat while powerful lobbies influenced government dietary guidelines. Marketing campaigns painted traditional fats as old-fashioned and unhealthy, leading to widespread demonization of saturated fats, butter, lard, and tallow. This well-funded effort was so influential that by the 1980s, doctors were actively warning patients against butter and advocating for margarine - advice that many health experts now consider one of the most detrimental mistakes in the history of medical science.⬇️

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

Health Implications Concerns about industrial oils and their health impacts date back to the early 20th century., Dr. Weston A. Price, a dentist and researcher, observed that traditional societies with diets rich in natural fats had lower rates of chronic illness than those that consumed processed foods and vegetable oils, which were becoming popular in industrialized nations. Dr. Price and other researchers noted that as people shifted from traditional fats (like butter, lard, and animal fats) to industrial seed oils, there was a dramatic increase in chronic diseases such as heart disease and autoimmunity, which had been rare before processed foods became mainstream. ⬇️

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

Avoiding Industrial Seed Oils in Modern Life Navigating our modern food system built on industrial oils requires conscious effort and awareness. The first step is learning to recognize these oils in their many forms—whether listed as soybean, canola, corn, or simply "vegetable oil" on ingredient labels. Traditional, less processed fats are better alternatives: extra virgin olive oil, coconut oil, grass-fed butter, tallow, lard,  all contribute to a healthier, more natural diet. We have the power of the purse, so to speak to effect change. If we buy products made with industrial seed oils, companies will continue to manufacture and sell them. Supply meets demand. Return to Tradition The history of industrial seed oils illustrates how big agriculture and clever marketing normalized waste products as staple foods. As awareness grows about their origins and health implications, consumers are returning to cooking with healthy, traditional fats. As with many things in life, nature often knows best. Follow @NaturopathNews

Saved - May 12, 2024 at 3:56 PM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

https://t.co/txXGQfm34Q

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

https://t.co/kCQ2VCDstR

@DanScavino - Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅

https://t.co/ZqNhIvKxt2

Saved - February 7, 2024 at 9:50 PM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

More of this. Representatives representing. https://t.co/cxYJmD8yg6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the government covered up the truth about the events on January 6th, with social media platforms like Google, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram suppressing information. They suggest that these platforms are against the president because he is not controlled by Washington, and they endorse him for re-election. The speaker questions whether Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams should be charged with insurrection for claiming they won elections. They mention the lack of evidence for Russian collusion and criticize those who continue to push this narrative. The speaker commends representative Gates and warns that those who persist in spreading the lie will be guilty of breaching house privileges. They emphasize that there is evidence to support their claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have the ability and at our disposal tools to find terrorists in caves in the Middle East that you can't find someone who planted a pipe bomb. That's pretty egregious, but we have evidence that the government really helped to cover up what was happening. And I will just point all of you to what happened at Oversight where we actually questioned Twitter 1.0. We saw that under the Department of Homeland Security, Saisa was actually working to not only suppress information to include the president's statement to remain peaceful on January 6th. Remember how he said that? Yet it was nowhere on social media. It's because these outlets, whether it was Google, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram. They're all working to suppress that information, but I wonder why. I wonder why they would wanna do that, and it's because this president is truly a man that is outside of the DC control, and frankly, that's why every single person, I'm pretty sure, up here has endorsed him for reelection, and he's going to win in November. But I want honest to ask you all questions on whether or not you think that we should be charging someone like Hillary Clinton with insurrection. Someone like Stacey Abrams with insurrection because they all claimed that they won elections. We know that Hillary Clinton was full of it. We know that because we saw what come out. In fact, you guys know the aisle censored Adam Schiff over it. There was no evidence of Russia collusion. So wanna close with saying this. What we've seen happen over the last couple of years has not only been depressing as a member of Congress to witness how much people up here have actually used that lie, used that narrative, not just to smear president Trump, but to tear apart this country. But I do applaud what representative Gates has done, and what I will say is that those sociopaths that continue to push this lie. Once we have this on the floor, if you continue to push this, you guys are all going to be guilty of breaching house privileges. Okay? Because we're saying that it didn't happen. We have evidence to back it up. So just think on that for a little bit.
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 3:20 PM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

Tucker Carlson called this the most powerful trailer he’s ever seen. This is the black man that people called Charlie Kirk “racist” for interviewing. https://t.co/7XvFf76fcx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the Democratic Party, accusing them of being involved in slavery, the Confederacy, and the mistreatment of black people during the Jim Crow era. They also claim that the party supports extreme actions like late-term abortions, gender transitioning of children, and using puberty blockers. The speaker believes that the Democratic Party is responsible for the chaos in communities and warns against following them. They argue that Martin Luther King Jr.'s association with the party was a mistake and that anyone in the Democratic Party who disagrees with their views should be rejected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Democratic Party is the evilest organization in the history of the world. Since their inception in 1800, they've been the part of slavery. Then after slavery, they became a party of the Confederacy. After that, they started killing black people during Jim Crow era. Speaker 1: You're voting for a party that tells you they are going to abort children up to the 9th month, Fast straight little boys and call them little girl. Utilate little girls and cut off their breasts and give them puberty blockers. And you don't think believe we are responsible? As we look at the Democratic party and the chaos that they bring on our communities, our young men, our young women, I have to ask Stupid. Look at what they've done to us. Look at what they've done to us. Look at what they've done to us. The Democratic Party is a death machine. Whatever they do, they destroy. That's what they do. They destroy. They decided They had to try to infiltrate the black community, and they didn't have any success until they met somebody. Who do they need? Martin Luther King. And this is where we went wrong. He made sure that he bought the black vote to the Democrat party. They use the black vote to come and deal the most powerful country in the world. He who the son has freed is free be indeed. Once you accept him, you are free. Anybody in the democratic party that tells you any different, he's a liar, he's an Apostate is the proton god and he should be rejected by any Christian walking on this earth. And he's inviting you to go to hell with him. Don't go with him. Dolgo.
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 4:55 AM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

I can’t stop watching this. https://t.co/LDfBKk1jGj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th, stating that if they had been told about it three years ago, they would have dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. They argue that the government has systematically lied about various issues, such as the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. The speaker suggests that there were federal law enforcement agents present during the Capitol riot, but the interviewer challenges this claim. The speaker also brings up the concept of entrapment and cites examples of alleged government involvement in criminal activities. They argue that the government cannot incite individuals to commit crimes and then charge them for it. The interviewer attempts to refute some of the speaker's claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me ask you about something that you said at the debate last week. You used the phrase inside job to describe what happened on January 6th. The next day, Capitol rioter, Alan Hostetter, highlighted your comments at his sentencing. He is going to prison for 11 years. A hostage threatened members of Congress. He brought a hatchet, knives, pepper spray, sun batons, tactical gear to the US Capitol. Are you concerned that a convicted felon like that is now promoting your comments in court? Speaker 1: So here's my concern, Abby. And I want to tell you guys where I'm at. If you had told me it's close to 3 years ago that January 6, 2021 happened. If you had told me 3 years ago, back when I was a biotech CEO, Not steeped in this world. I was just consuming passive media, but was focused on my world of developing medicines. If you had told me that January 6th was in any way an inside job, the Subject of government entrapment, I would have told you that was crazy talk. Fringe conspiracy theory nonsense. I could tell you now having gone somewhat deep in this, it's not. I mean, the reality is this. We do have a government, first of all, we have to acknowledge that has lied to us systematically over the last several years about the origin of COVID nineteen, about the Hunter Biden laptop that we were told was false By 51 CIA experts and otherwise before we now know that it was true. You can go straight down the list, the Trump Russia disinformation collusion hoax, all of it. Now we come to January 6th. The reality is we know that there were federal law enforcement agents in that field. We don't know how many. I think it's shame If let me finish this answer. Speaker 0: Because because it's really important to know that. I'm gonna go ahead and interrupt you here because Speaker 1: Because I know this establishment doesn't approve of this last time. I know this. Speaker 0: That there were federal You're saying that there were federal agents in the crowd on on on January 6th. Yep. There is no evidence that there were federal agents in the crowd on January 6th. Speaker 1: So why before Congress, when pressed on what the number was, they didn't say there were none. They just couldn't say there were none. Speaker 0: So you're saying that there is no that you have not seeing any evidence So we've seen Mark. Speaker 1: We've seen multiple informants suggesting that they were we know people were we know people were FBI informants who were asking Is Speaker 0: there any evidence? Speaker 1: May I just Is Speaker 0: there Let me let Speaker 1: me let me let me clarify. I know it's very uncomfortable for you. Speaker 0: I'm gonna clarify my question. People, but we have Speaker 1: to do the truth. Speaker 0: I'm gonna clarify my question because I wanna make sure that you understand. Speaker 1: Oh, I understand this deeply. I told you I was in 2 years ago. I'm not here now. Speaker 0: Evidence Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Where is the evidence that the government Had applied Speaker 1: do this. Speaker 0: An inside job Speaker 1: But no. No. I'm sorry. Inside job. It's all Speaker 0: not gonna I'm not violence on January 6th. Speaker 1: I'm not gonna let you put words in my mouth. I'm gonna put my words in my mouth, I'm gonna tell you what what I mean by that. Speaker 0: Evidence that the government was involved Entrapment. Planning or executing January 6th. Speaker 1: Jonathan, I'm gonna give you I'm gonna give you hard facts. And and if I may, Abby, I know this is gonna be a little uncomfortable, but we're gonna we're gonna go through this, and you can and you can you can push back on it. Speaker 0: The evidence. Speaker 1: And you can push back on that. And let's do this fairly. Why did they suppress footage of now what's been released? 200 hours of footage of shooting rubber bullets into that crowd, Shooting tear gas into that crowd. You didn't see that before. You saw what the response was to that. Now you see footage coming out of actually rolling out the red carpet For capitalists allowing Speaker 0: Ramaswami again Speaker 1: right through the front door. Speaker 0: Majority of that footage Speaker 1: should have been released before, Evan. Speaker 0: Mister Bro, from the dashboard, it shows police officers being overrun And I wanna talk about one more piece by violence Speaker 1: really important. Writers. Speaker 0: That Yeah. Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you hard I'm gonna give you some hard facts. Speaker 0: A show. Speaker 1: So what here's what entrapment is Speaker 0: cherry picking. Speaker 1: He's not cherry picking. He's not cherry picking. Finish, Abby. I'm not cherry Speaker 0: picking. Examples Speaker 1: To to the contrary. The country. Speaker 0: Not a cherry pick example. Speaker 1: You know Speaker 0: cherry pickings? That is what happened. The government Speaker 1: cherry pick 12 hours of footage when there is 200 hours of the cherry picking was the government, not me. Release the whole thing. And let me let me just finish 1 thing too because this is super important as a topic. So when you I think this is a civil libertarian issue of our time. When we talk kidnapping. I wanna keep it I wanna be really clear on this because it's the same issue in the same FBI, same even part of the FBI. Three people who were in alleged plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer Were acquitted at the end of trial because it was entrapment. That is government agents put them up to do something they otherwise wouldn't have done. They gave them credit cards With spending limits of up to $5,000, encourage them to buy munitions, plan something they weren't otherwise willing to plan. So much so, and I want people at home to know this, Especially CNN viewers to know this is that one of the jurors went to those defendants and apologized afterwards, gave him a hug, Apologize. Seeing what the government had put a poor guy up to who had to go to some Mexican restaurant across the street to get hot water. These people were exploited with credit cards up to $5,000, FBI agents putting them up to a kidnapping plot that we were told was true but was entrapment. Same thing with the Capitol Police. People letting Speaker 0: you on the freeway. Speaker 1: Many of those people then Speaker 0: put you on the cards. Speaker 1: The government cannot put you up to do something and then charge Speaker 0: you for your DUI. Speaker 1: That's wrong. Speaker 0: I don't wanna have I don't I don't wanna have I don't wanna have to interrupt you. I really don't. But I don't want you to mislead the audience here or at home. Speaker 1: I think they misled by mainstream media.
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 1:53 AM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

Taxpayer money should not be used to fund this propaganda media literacy censorship curriculum in our schools!

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

The “Media Literacy” scam is accelerating way too fast & it has to be stopped NOW. Here’s why: https://t.co/GCr7Q54adF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the media literacy scam, which has been accelerating in recent years. Media literacy is being implemented in education systems, colleges, academia, and censorship institutions. It aims to control what sources of media individuals consume, labeling those who don't follow official or government-backed media as illiterate. Media literacy programs discourage critical thinking and independent research, instead promoting reliance on top Google search results and Wikipedia-approved sources. The state of California recently passed a mandatory media literacy law for all public K-12 schools, providing significant financial support to the censorship industry. The speaker emphasizes the need to challenge this trend before it becomes deeply rooted, as it could lead to a generation of censorship professionals dependent on government-backed operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, I'm traveling this week and don't have the bandwidth to make the video that I really wanna make on this, but I just wanna put something short on the record real quick here about the media literacy scam. Now, this is something that I've been talking about for 5, almost 6 years about this specific scam, But it's accelerated in the past year and it's really, really accelerated just in the past month, faster than I was expecting it to. And so I want to try to get it Speaker 1: out to other people to focus on this while I'm doing other mission critical things. Media literacy, the scam works like this. Okay? They're rolling it out in the education system, and they're rolling it out at colleges, They're rolling it out at the science level in academia, they're rolling it out at the researcher level and at the censorship for profit institution level, but they're also especially embedding it at the k through 12 level and and what what is it? What is media literacy? When you hear the words media literacy, You fixate on the word literacy, and you think they're talking about underserved, underprivileged inner city schools with kids who can't read because we have an epidemic of illiteracy and low literacy rates, among a lot of our youth. So So you hear that word literacy and you think that's what they're talking about. That is not what it is at all. Media literacy says, If you don't read the right media sources, official media sources, official state backed media or government sources or regime compliant media, then you are illiterate. You are media illiterate, and you need to get your mind right to write to read the right media sources. So media literacy is just regime media installation, And it is about institutional embedding of censorship organs within k through 12 schools, within higher ed, And then at the at the capacity building side, by tons and tons of government money propping this up. Now let's just go go through Speaker 0: a couple of levels of this. Speaker 1: So the methods media literacy is literally about training you to be stupid, to be dumb. The whole The underlying presupposition of the field, the illegitimate field of media literacy, is that if you do critical thinking, You will become a heretic. You'll become a wrong thinker, a dissident, a heterodox person. If you think Critically, if you go down the rabbit hole, if you do your own independent research, you will not trust the regime. You will not trust The system you will not trust narrative government narratives. You won't trust, you know, legacy mainstream media. And so they teach methods. The curriculums for media literacy programs are about how not to do your own research. I'm not joking. You can look all this up. For example, the SIFT method is one of the is one of these core things that have been developed. And it just it just says, when you when you have a research topic and you want to look up for school. You wanna look something up in your own private time. Don't go down the rabbit hole. Don't think independently. Sift through the top ten results of a Google search And Wikipedia and Wikipedia approved sources. Now mind you, Wikipedia currently lists Elon Musk as a far right conspiracy theorist and bans the ability to even have most, conservative or centrist outlets even allowed to be cited. So it pre bans the ability to even access news institutions that might challenge government areas. Okay. This is Clockwork Orange on steroids, and it's being mandated by governments. And this is the part that I was not expecting to happen so fast. Okay? The state of California, just last week, passed a mandatory media literacy law requiring every public k to 12 school in the entire state to have mandatory media literacy classes. Now every single actor in the censorship industry is doing touchdown dances, You know, spinning the basketball, you know, with with 1 finger, Wilt Chamberlain, Harlem Globetrotter style, just Stumping on the on the rest of the world that's had its eyes closed because this is 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of dollars that automatically flow into their pockets Because it is mandatory, government required capacity building to do this. Okay? There are going to be 10,000 people, at least, Just in the schools in California systems, who are going to need to be these teachers in all these classes? K through 12. They are you're going to need to train an army of educators on how not to trust alternative news or Or Elon Musk's vision at edX, or, I mean, even social media influencers who disagree on public health or on electoral politics or on environmental issues or on abortion or on immigration or energy or any of that. Okay? All of it you so again, it's not just the curriculum. That's actually only a tiny part of it. It's the civil society capacity building. The fuck that's mandatory government money to a censorship mercenary army in charge of your kids. That just passed in California. It already passed in Illinois. It's it's it's already in Rhode Island. It's it's now in New York. It this industry could not support itself. And while there is success right now at the federal level with things that have been done Around these major class action lawsuits, Missouri v Biden, the America First lawsuit, the congressional investigations and subpoenas, They're going down into the state governments in 1 by 1, capacity building the industry to destroy the alternative news industry. And this is this is gotta be challenged before it gets its roots down because they're going to make the argument. If we don't stop it now, they're going to make the argument That you're gonna have hundreds of thousands of public employees who are going to be put out of a job if you kill media literacy later. Which is to say they're gonna make the same argument that coal miners in West Virginia, you know, would would make. Well, if you shut down the mine, you're gonna put all these people out of jobs. They're training a generation of censorship professionals tied to the teeth of government backed censorship operations. Their careers are going to be attached to this. They will be out of jobs. They won't be able to provide for their families if you take away their censorship jobs. That's literally going to be the world we're going to be in if this thing isn't killed now. So there's a lot to do on this, but I just want to drop this now. And just every time you hear the word literate media literacy, or you see someone who say that, Drop this link in those replies.
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 10:40 AM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

☎️The 911 phone call re the drowning of Obama chef Tafari Campbell at Martha’s Vineyard. https://t.co/OLxWTEeOGh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Caller 1 reports a male drowning at the back of the property. Rescue swimmers are attempting to reach him. Caller 1 requests an ambulance and mentions a rescue swimmer getting a boat. Caller 1 asks for a better number to call back. Caller 2 confirms that the party has not been located and asks for a description. Caller 1 describes the man as a 40-year-old black male wearing all black on a paddleboard. The paddleboard and hat have been found, but not the man. Caller 1 confirms he was not wearing a life vest. Caller 2 informs that help is on the way.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 911. This time is recorded. Where is your emergency? Speaker 1: We have a male drowning in the, back of the property right now. We have our rescue swimmers. They're attempting to go out there, right now. Speaker 0: What's your phone number that Speaker 2: you called in on? Speaker 0: What's the best access? Speaker 1: Swimmer and an agent driving down there right now to get on the boat. Someone came running up to our, back post saying that a gentleman, it's just a guest of the house, is out there drowning. So right now, a rescue swimmer is going out there. And you said Speaker 0: you guys have boat access. So what do you guys need? Do you need an ambulance, or do you need water rescue as well? Speaker 1: They did advise right now, I would say at least an ambulance, and I don't know if they're what they're doing in the back of the property right now. I know they're getting we have our rescue swimmer who's getting a boat right now. So, I would say at least an ambulance. I don't know what the Alright. The time is. Alright. Speaker 0: I'll send the ambulance over, and I'll contact the fire chief and see where he wants to go the duty chief and see where if he wants to drop the boat in there. Speaker 1: And, I don't know if you have, like, a better number for me to call you back if we get him out of the water, or I can give you another situation report. They're not passing anything over the radio right now. Speaker 0: Yeah. I can give you that if you'd like. Speaker 1: Yeah. Go ahead. We'll have our, our gate open, and we'll send the ambulance down to the front of the house. And, I'll I'll call you back once I hear about, once they give it status report down by the water. Mhmm. And do Speaker 0: you know if it's a male or female? Just Speaker 1: It's a male. 40.40 Speaker 0: 8 40. Speaker 1: In veins. Speaker 0: Alright. Here we go. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 0: I will, I'll set time to everyone out there. Okay? Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you, sir. Speaker 0: You're welcome. Thank you. Take care. July 23 2023195313. Speaker 2: Sheriff's office. Speaker 1: So our rescue swimmers aren't able to locate the, gentleman that's, that was reported drowning, so they they they're out in the water right now, but as of now, they have no they they don't they don't know where he is. Speaker 2: Okay. So they're unable to locate the party right now? Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 2: Do you have any description of what he was wearing? Speaker 1: Do we know what he was wearing, in biology. You know, in a sector. Ham, paddle board. Alright. Yeah. So he's wearing all black. He's on a paddle board. 40 40 year old, black gentleman, regular build, and we have our rescues when they're on a boat in the area right now. Speaker 2: Okay. And they haven't they haven't located the, the the the paddle board either. Speaker 1: One second. Pain pain from command post. Have you located the paddle board? Copy. Thank you. Thank you. Alright. So they have, they have the paddle board and his hat. Speaker 2: Okay. But not him. And do we do we know if he was wearing a life vest? I Speaker 1: don't know. Sorry, David. Can you advise if he's wearing a light vest? He did not. Copy, thank you. That's a negative who's not wearing a life vest. Speaker 2: No life vest? Speaker 1: No. Okay. Alright. I have, Speaker 2: Bravo 2. B2 fire attack. Alright. So we have everybody on the way over there now to, meet with you guys, and gather their resources. I'm gonna give the, the
Saved - October 22, 2023 at 8:16 PM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

96k Georgia maiI in baIIots never maiIed back… but voted. https://t.co/wIB6O35W0U

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Georgia, over 200,000 mail-in ballots were found to have been voted but never marked as returned. About 96,000 of these ballots were never marked as returned but were still voted. This issue was not limited to just a few counties, as it was seen across the board. Additionally, some ballots were shown as voted before they were even received back by the county, which is not supposed to happen. These irregularities raise concerns about the legality of these votes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We did the same kind of look at, in Georgia. And what we found was very interesting because we found over 200,000, mail in ballots that when we looked at the voter record had supposedly never been returned, and yet they were voted. Now about half of those ultimately got purged, but about 96,000 of those, were never marked returned, and yet they were voted. And we have seen that in other areas of the country because it's very easy in the Dominion system to assign a person to a mail in ballot inside the system itself. Speaker 1: And Sir, you Speaker 0: that's one possible explanation. Speaker 1: I just interrupt with 1 question? To assign it that way would, of course, be fraudulent, wouldn't it? Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. You have no idea. You you just have a ballot in the adjudication file, for instance, and you decide to vote it and you assign it to them. Speaker 1: How many times approximately Speaker 0: Well, they were about 96,000 of those that we found, and, I think the exact yeah. 96,600 was the exact number of mail in ballots that were voted, but were never actually shown as received back by the county. Speaker 1: Well, I think, is there anything else you would like to point out? I think that's pretty complete. Speaker 0: I think that's pretty much got it. Speaker 1: So there's 96 these would have to be considered illegal votes, wouldn't they? Speaker 0: Right. And by the way, I would say this was not just mere oversight by 1 or 2 counties because we saw this pretty much across the board. And so, this was this was an across the board problem. And we also saw a couple other things, I noticed that we noticed that, sometimes the ballot was actually shown as being voted, before it was received back. There was a receive back date, but it was voted before the county received it back. Speaker 1: How could how could that be possible? Speaker 0: Well, you'll have to explain that one to me too because it's not supposed to be that way. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: We also
Saved - October 16, 2023 at 10:22 AM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

This is Brian Klass, the poIiticaI hacktivist that just wrote the @Newsweek article claiming MAGA will k i I I people ahead of the eIection. ( H/T @dom_lucre) in 2021 Klass warned Trump would “nuke the country” https://twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1347854816039620608/video/1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US government has no legal checks in place to overrule the president if he orders a nuclear attack. This system was designed during the Cold War to ensure a quick response to a surprise attack from the Soviet Union. While some may hope that senior political figures, military commanders, or lawyers would intervene, it would be illegal for them to do so. The president has complete control over the US Armed Forces as the commander in chief. This lack of checks is concerning, especially considering the president's recent actions of spreading false election claims and inciting violence. The current reality is that the president can order a military attack without delay, and there is no immediate solution to this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is a real Speaker 1: threat. No. No. There there are no other steps. The the the US government is set up because of the Cold War. If the president orders a nuclear attack, there is nobody who is legally allowed to overrule him. That is the setup. There is literally no check. The system was designed that way because the worry was that the Soviet Union would launch a surprise attack on the United States and the US would have a matter of minutes to respond. So the president is still completely in control of the US Armed Forces. He's the commander in chief. What he says is legally required to be enacted. Now whether somebody would try to stop him, that's a different question. They would face presumably legal consequences for doing so, but the system is designed to ensure that the president can order attacks with no delay. And so that's why people are so alarmed by this, right, because if he wakes up tomorrow or today and says, Nuke this country. This system is designed not to stop him. So, you know, that's why I, along with 2,000 other political scientists have gotten out of academic speak and have called for the president to be removed. There is a clear danger here. And what he's done over the last several months, peddling delusional fantasies about the election and inciting violence, and that's exactly what he's been doing for months, is dangerous. So, you know, I I I think that this Speaker 0: kind of person is so wrong. Senior sort of political figures within his own party, senior military commanders, Charity commanders, lawyers would be able to stop that sort of action and therefore, you know, again, is it dangerous to hype up the threat too much? Speaker 1: No. I mean, there's no other way to put this. If they if they stopped him, they would be acting illegally. So, yes, we could have people act illegally to stop the president from giving a lawful order to launch a military attack. But it would be illegal for them to do that. So, you know, I would like to think that people would stand up and stop an attack if President Trump ordered it. I would like to think that they would risk legal consequences. But I don't really wanna gamble with that. The system is literally set up for the commander in chief to have no check on ordering military action when it comes to nuclear weapons. And so that is the that is the current reality of the situation. It is not Speaker 0: a problem at the moment.
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 5:31 PM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

LOOK@yehuda_miller uncovered a shocking email list of partners meeting before the election including machine and tabulator companies, governments, big tech, NGOs, and third party vendors.

Saved - June 27, 2023 at 2:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
@BerryRazi shared a link, prompting @DecentFiJC to suggest it's worth exploring for New York. @DecentFiJC then mentioned Chinese domains and encryption methods used to conceal Chinese communications on the Arizona Secretary of State website. They also mentioned individuals and organizations involved. The conversation ended with a reference to a website showing counties of interest.

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@BerryRazi Worth looking at for NY

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@BerryRazi Chinese domains specific for the AZ SOS Website, combined with algorithms to hide Chinese communications behind encryption.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@BerryRazi And of course, Konnech CEO (Eugene Yu) with Bill Maaske (Maricopa) and DYNADOTCHINA, LLC. http://paragonpersonalfinance.co.uk (Scytl) and you can see the counties of interest.🤦🏻‍♂️

Second Charge Mortgages | Paragon Bank As a specialist mortgage lender, we provide second charge mortgages through intermediaries. Find out more about the range of mortgage loans we offer and get helpful information; including who we lend to, so you can make the right decision for you. paragonbank.co.uk
Saved - June 27, 2023 at 2:02 AM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

https://t.co/5ZVBmSlmt0

View Full Interactive Feed