TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BillEllmore
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
President Milei went to the WEF and destroyed everything the Davos elites believe in straight to their faces. The only ever President to do this was Donald J Trump and look at what they have been doing to him ever since. Why do you think they let Milei give this speech? #WEF #Melei
Video Transcript AI Summary
Defending Western values against collectivism is crucial, as collectivist experiments lead to poverty. Argentina's history shows that embracing freedom led to prosperity, while collectivism resulted in systematic impoverishment. Free enterprise capitalism is the only effective and moral system to eradicate poverty, as evidenced by historical data showing significant economic growth since the 19th century. Social justice, often promoted by the left, is inherently unjust and relies on coercive taxation. The market is a mechanism of voluntary exchange, and claims of market failure often stem from state intervention. The rise of collectivist ideologies threatens individual freedoms and economic growth. Argentina's experience serves as a warning: without free markets and respect for property rights, poverty is inevitable. Businesspeople should resist state overreach, as they are the true benefactors of society. Freedom and economic liberty are essential for prosperity. Long live freedom!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have to defend the values of the West are co opted by a vision of the world that inevitably leads to socialism and thereby to poverty. Unfortunately, in recent decades motivated by some well meaning individuals willing to help others and others motivated by the wish to belong to a privileged cause, the main leaders of the Western world have abandoned the model of freedom for different versions of what we call collectivism. We're here to tell you that collectivist experiments are never the solution to the problems that afflict the citizens of the world. Rather, they are the root cause. Do believe me, no one better place than us Argentines to testify to these two points.
When we adopted the model of freedom back in 18/60, in 35 years we became a leaning world power and when we embrace collectivism over the course of the last 100 years we saw how our citizens started to become systematically impoverished and we dropped to spot number 140 globally. But before having the discussion, it would first be important for us to take a look at the data that demonstrate why free enterprise capitalism is not just the only possible system to end world poverty but also that it's the only morally desirable system to achieve this. If we look at the history of economic progress, we can see how between the year 0 and the year 1800 approximately, world per capita GDP practically remained constant throughout the whole reference period. If you look at a graph of the evolution of economic growth throughout the history of humanity, you would see a hockey stick graph, an exponential function that remained constant for 90% of the time and which was exponentially triggered starting in the 19th century. The only exception to this history of stagnation was in the late 15th century with the discovery of the American continent but for this exception throughout the whole period between the year 0 and the year 18 100 global per capita GDP stagnated.
Now it's not just that capitalism brought about an explosion in wealth from the moment it was adopted as an economic system but also if you look at the data, what you will see is that growth continues to accelerate throughout the whole period and throughout the whole period between the year 0 and the year 1800, the per capita GDP growth rate remains stable at around 0.02% annually. So almost no growth. Starting in the 19th century with the industrial revolution, the compound annual growth rate was 0.66 percent of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the total revenue of the you no longer need 107 years to double per capita GDP but 66%. And if you take the period between 1950 and the year 2000, you will see that the growth rate was 2.1%. Again, the CAGR which would mean then in only 30 3 years we could double the world's per capita GDP.
This trend far from stopping remains well alive today. If we take the period between the year 2023, the growth rate again accelerated to 3% a year which means that we could double world per capita GDP in just 23 years. That said, when you look at per capita GDP did 90% of the global population out of poverty. We should remember that by the year 1800 about 95% of the world's population lived in extreme poverty and that figure dropped to 5% by the year 2020 prior to the pandemic. The conclusion is obvious far from being the cause of our problems.
Free trade capitalism as an economic system is the only instrument we have to end hunger, poverty, and extreme poverty across our planet. The empirical evidence is unquestionable. Therefore, since there is no doubt that free enterprise capitalism is superior in productive terms, the left wing doxa has attacked capitalism alleging matters of morality saying, that's what the detractors claim, that it's unjust. They say that capitalism is evil because it's individualistic and that collectivism is good because it's altruistic of course with the money of others. So they therefore advocate for social justice.
But this concept which in the developed world became fashionable in recent times in my country has been a constant in political discourse for over 80 years. The problem is that social justice is not just and it doesn't contribute either to the general well-being. Quite on the contrary, it's an intrinsically unfair idea because it's violent. It's unjust because the state is financed through tax and taxes are collected coercively or can any one of us say that they voluntarily pay taxes which means that the state is financed through coercion and that the higher the tax burden, the higher the coercion and the lower the freedom. Those who promote social justice, the advocates start with the idea that the whole economy is a pie that can be shared differently but that pie is not a given.
It's wealth that is generated in what Israel for instance calls a market discovery process. If the goods or services offered by a business are not wanted, the business will fail unless it adapts to what the market is demanding. If they make a good quality product at an attractive price, they will do well and produce more. So the market is a discovery process in which the capitalists will find the right path as they move forward. But if the state punishes capitalists when they're successful and gets in the way of the discovery process, they will destroy their incentives and the consequence is that they will produce less, the pie will be smaller and this will harm society as a whole.
Collectivism by inhibiting these discovery processes and hindering the appropriation of discoveries ends up binding the hands of entrepreneurs and prevents them from offering better goods and services at a better price. So how come that, academia, international organizations, economic theory and politics demonize an economic system that has not only lifted out of extreme poverty 90% of the world's population but has continued to do this faster and faster and this is morally superior and just. Thanks to free trade capitalism, it is to be seen that the world is now living its best moment. Never in all of mankind's of humanity's history has there been a time of more prosperity than today. This is true for all.
The world of today has more freedom, is rich, is more peaceful and prosperous And this is particularly true for countries that have more freedom and have economic freedom and respect the, property rights of individuals because countries that have more freedom are 12 times richer than those that are repressed and the lowest decile in terms of distribution in free countries are better off than 90% of the population of repressed countries and poverty is 25 times lower and, extreme poverty is 50 times lower. And citizens in free countries live 25% longer than citizens in repressed countries. Now what is it that we mean when we talk about libertarianism? And let me quote the words of the greatest authority on freedom in Argentina, Professor Alberto Banigas Legg Junior who says that libertarianism is the unrestricted respect for the life project of others based on the principle of non aggression in defense of the right to life, liberty and property. Its fundamental institutions being private property, markets free from state intervention, free competition, the division of labor and social cooperation as part of which success is achieved only by serving others with goods of better quality or at a better price.
In other words, capitalists, successful business people are social benefactors who far from appropriating the wealth of others contribute to the general well-being. Ultimately, a successful entrepreneur is a hero and this is the model that we are advocating for the Argentina of the future, a model based on the fundamental principles of libertarianism, the defense of life, of freedom and of property. Now if free enterprise capitalism and economic freedom have proven to be extraordinary instruments to end poverty in the world and we are now at the best time in the history of humanity. It is worth asking why I say that the west is endangered. And I say this precisely because in those of our countries that should defend the values of the free market, private property and the other institutions of libertarianism, sectors of the political and economic establishment, some due to mistakes in their theoretical framework and others due to a greed for power are undermining the foundations of libertarianism, opening up the doors to socialism and potentially condemning us to poverty, misery and stagnation.
It should never be forgotten that socialism is always and everywhere an impoverishing phenomenon that has failed in all countries where it's been tried out. It's been a failure economically, socially, culturally, and it also murdered over a 100,000,000 human beings. The essential problem that was today is not just that we need to come to grips with those who even after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the overwhelming empirical evidence continue to advocate for impoverishing socialism but there's also our own leaders, thinkers, and academics who are relying on a misguided theoretical framework, undermine the fundamentals of the system that has given us the greatest expansion of wealth and prosperity in our history. The theoretical framework to which I refer is that of neo classical economic theory which designs a set of instruments that unwillingly or without meaning to ends up, serving the intervention by the state socialism and social degradation. The problem with neoclassicals is that the model they fell in love with does not map reality.
So they put down their mistakes to supposed market failures rather than reviewing the premises or the model. On the pretext of a supposed market failure, regulations are introduced which only create distortions in the price system, prevent economic calculus and therefore also prevent saving investment and growth. This problem lies mainly in the fact that not even supposedly libertarian economists understand what the market is because if they did understand, it would quickly be seen that it's impossible for there to be something along the lines of market failures. The market is not a mere graph describing a curve of supply and demand. The market is a mechanism of social cooperation where you voluntarily exchange ownership rights.
Therefore, based on this definition, talking about a market failure is an oxymoron. There are no market failures. If transactions are voluntary, the only context in which there can be a market failure is if there is coercion and the only one that is able to coerce generally is the state which holds a monopoly on violence. Consequently, if someone considers that there is a market failure, I would suggest that they check to see if the state intervention involved and if they find that that's not the case, I would suggest that they check again because obviously there's a mistake, market failures do not exist. An example of these so called market failures described by the neoclassicals are the concentrated structures of the economy.
However, without increasing returns to scale functions whose counterpart are the concentrated structures of the economy, we couldn't possibly explain economic growth since the year 1800 until today. Isn't this interesting? Since the year 1800 onwards with population multiplying by 8 or 9 times per capita GDP grew by over 15 times. So there are growing returns which took extreme poverty from 95% to 5%. However, the presence of growing returns involves concentrated structures, what we would call a monopoly.
How come then that's something that has generated so much well-being for the neoclassical theory is a market failure. Neoclassical economists think outside of the box. When the model fails, you shouldn't get angry with reality but rather with a model and change it. The dilemma faced by the neoclassical model is that they say they wish to perfect the functioning of the market by attacking what they consider to be failures but in so doing they don't just open up the doors to socialism but also go against economic growth. An example, regulating monopolies, destroying their profits and destroying growing returns automatically would destroy economic growth.
In other words, whenever you want to correct a supposed market failure inevitably as a result of not knowing what the market is or as a result of having fallen in love with a failed model, you are opening up the door to socialism and condemning people to poverty. However, faced with the theoretical of demonstration that state intervention is harmful and the empirical evidence that it has failed couldn't have been otherwise. The solution to be proposed by collectivists is not greater freedom but rather greater regulation which creates a downward spiral of, the spiral of regulations until we're all poor and the life of all of us depends on a bureaucrat sitting in a luxury office. Given the dismal failure of of collectivist models and the undeniable advances in the free world, socialists were forced to change their agenda. They left behind the class struggle based on the economic system and replaced this with other supposed social conflicts which are just as harmful to life as a community and to economic growth.
The first of these new battles was the ridiculous and unnatural fight between man and woman. Libertarianism already provides for equality of these sexes. The cornerstone of our creed says that all humans are created equal that we all have the same unalienable rights granted by the creator including life, freedom and ownership. All that this radical feminism agenda has led to is greater state intervention to hinder the economic process, giving a job to bureaucrats who have not contributed anything to society. Examples, ministries of women or international organizations devoted to promoting this agenda.
Another conflict presented by socialists is that of humans against nature claiming that we human beings damage the planet which should be protected at all costs even going as far as advocating for population control mechanisms or the bloody abortion agenda. Unfortunately these harmful ideas have taken a strong hold in our society. Neo marxists have managed to coop the common sense of the western world and this they have achieved by appropriating the media, culture, universities and also international organizations. The latter case is the most serious one probably because these are institutions that have enormous influence on political and economic decisions of the countries that make up the multilateral organizations. Fortunately, there's more and more of us who are daring to make our voices heard because we see that if we don't truly and decisively fight against these ideas, the only possible fate is for us to have increasing levels of state regulation, socialism, poverty and less freedom and therefore will be having worse standards of living.
The west has unfortunately already started to go along this path. I know to many it may sound ridiculous to suggest that the west has turned to socialism but it's only ridiculous if you only limit yourself to the traditional economic definition of socialism which says that it's an economic system where the state owns the means of production. This definition in my view should be updated in the light of current circumstances. Today, states don't need to directly control the means of production to control every aspect of the lives of individuals with tools such as printing money, debt, subsidies, controlling the interest rate, price controls and regulations to correct the so called market failures. They can control the lives and fates of millions of individuals.
This is how we come to the point where by using different names or guises, a good deal of the generally accepted political offers in most Western countries are collectivist variants whether they proclaim to be openly, communist, fascist, Nazis, socialist, social democrats, national socialist, democrat Christians, Christian democrats, neo Keynesians, progressive, populist, nationalist or globalists. At bottom, there are no major differences. They all say that the state should steer all aspects of the lives of individuals. They all on the path of prosperity, economic freedom, limited government and unlimited respect for private property are essential elements for economic growth. And the impoverishment produced by collectivism is no fantasy nor is it an inescapable faith but it's a reality that we Argentines know very well.
We have lived through this. We have been through this because as I said earlier, ever since we decided to abandon the model of freedom that had made us rich, we have been caught up in a downward spiral as part of which we are poorer and poorer day by day. So this is something we have lived through and we are here to warn you about what can happen if the countries in the Western world that became rich through the model of freedom stay on this path of servitude. The case of Argentina is an empirical demonstration that no matter how rich you may be or how much you may have in terms of natural resources or how skilled your population may be or educated or how many bars of gold you may have in the central bank, if measures are adopted that hinder the free function of markets, free competition, free price systems. If you hinder trade, if you attack private property, the only possible fate is poverty.
Therefore, in concluding, I would like to leave a message for all business people here and for those who are not here in person but are following from around the world. Do not be intimidated intimidated either by the political cast or by parasites who live off the state. Do not surrender to a political class that only wants to stay in power and retain its privileges. You are social benefactors. You're heroes.
You're the creators of the most extraordinary period of prosperity we've ever seen. Let no one tell you that your ambition is immoral. If you make money, it's because you offer a better product at a better price, thereby contributing to general well-being. Do not surrender to the advance of the state. The state is not the solution.
The state is the problem itself. You are the true protagonist of this story. And rest assured that as from today, Argentina is your staunch unconditional ally. Thank you very much and long live freedom. Damn it.
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
@elonmusk This account: @DecentBackup slandered me in a post where he also doxxed my addresses and threatened to show up in person where my ex wife and two daughters live. Not only do I want his account suspended, I would like to have him investigated for terroristic threats. @Support @premium
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
@GeraldoRivera If Trump is indicted for questioning the 2020 election results, should all these people be indicted as well? #LockHerUp #TwoTieredJustice Video Credit: TK News https://t.co/MNYfYv9MCo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers around the legitimacy of the 2016 election, with many asserting it was stolen due to Russian interference. Claims of hacking and manipulation are emphasized, with some stating Trump is an illegitimate president. Supporters of Clinton express frustration, believing the election results should be overturned. Protests erupt following Trump's victory, with demonstrators expressing anger and engaging in violent confrontations with police. The narrative highlights the division and chaos surrounding the election, with calls for accountability and recognition of perceived injustices in the electoral process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if we're all in agreement that it is incorrect to say the 2020 election was stolen, what about 2016 election?
Speaker 1: Look. I'm not gonna Go
Speaker 2: back in this. It was a stolen election. It was stolen.
Speaker 1: Stolen. He's an illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. You know, pretending to be president. Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you?
Because he didn't.
Speaker 3: 1 third of Clinton supporters say Trump election is not legitimate.
Speaker 2: I think he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win.
Speaker 1: You are absolutely right. You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you.
Speaker 3: The 2016 election was stolen. Got a nicer way to say that.
Speaker 1: Say Russia hacks the election.
Speaker 3: Russia hacked our election.
Speaker 1: Russia hacked our election. A little louder, please. Russia hacked our election. That was a 9:11 scale event. This was a kind of cyber 9:11.
Cyber 9:11. Yes.
Speaker 3: Russia hacked our election.
Speaker 2: Russia, you know,
Speaker 1: of course, hacked our election here.
Speaker 3: Half of Clinton's voters believe the conspiracy theory that Russia hacked election day votes.
Speaker 1: We know that they were into voting roles. Actual interference with the elections themselves. We know it happened.
Speaker 3: Despite no credible evidence, 67% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote tally.
Speaker 1: Hacking the US election. Hacking the US election. Russia hacked our elections. The Russians hacked our elections.
Speaker 2: Russia hacked our elections. Russia hacked our elections.
Speaker 1: Russia hacked
Speaker 2: our elections. Russia hacked
Speaker 1: our elections. Russian hacked our elections.
Speaker 2: Russian hacked our elections.
Speaker 1: Russian hacked our elections. Russian hacked our elections. Russia hacked our elections. They stole
Speaker 3: an election.
Speaker 2: Russia hacked our elections.
Speaker 1: Russia hacked our elections.
Speaker 4: The universal assessment that Russia hacked our election 2016.
Speaker 1: Foreign governments hacked our elections.
Speaker 3: Most young Americans consider Donald Trump an illegitimate president. Illegitimate president.
Speaker 1: He's an illegitimate president. Why is he illegitimate? He just won an election.
Speaker 2: He's an illegitimate president in my mind. That's it. I absolutely agree.
Speaker 3: Experts urge Clinton Kent to challenge election results. We will see
Speaker 1: how illegitimate his victory actually was. He's an illegitimate president.
Speaker 5: Russia hacked
Speaker 2: our election. Russians hacking our election.
Speaker 3: Hacked our election. Russia hacking our election.
Speaker 1: I don't see the president elect as a legitimate president.
Speaker 3: Trump is an illegitimate president who stole the election.
Speaker 1: He is not a president. He's illegitimate. And my biggest fear is
Speaker 2: that he's gonna do it again with the help
Speaker 3: of Vlad, his best past. Terrifying.
Speaker 2: Would you be my vice president? I'm so confused.
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton voters call to overturn election results.
Speaker 1: More than 4,000,000 people have already signed a petition on change dot org, calling for the electors of the electoral college to, quote, ignore their states, votes, and cast their ballots for secretary Clinton.
Speaker 5: Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016.
Speaker 1: We are the victims of a bloodless coup. He didn't won the general election.
Speaker 3: Yo. Electoral College, make Hillary Clinton president, period.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. Not an illegitimate president.
Speaker 3: Don't accept Trump as a legitimate president.
Speaker 1: This wasn't on the level. This election was not on the level.
Speaker 2: I don't
Speaker 3: think he's a legitimate president.
Speaker 2: Our election wasn't legit.
Speaker 1: He got his victory from cheating. Yes. Trump cheated. Trump cheated the 2016 election. He's an illegitimate president.
No validity. No credibility. And because of that
Speaker 5: Anger at what some see as an illegitimate president.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has got to. It will not be a peaceful change of power.
Speaker 4: A number of incidents turned violent. Protesters hurled trash cans, flash bombs, and objects at police.
Speaker 1: Several officers injured. Protesters blew rocks and
Speaker 5: smashed windows, leading to more confrontations, injuries, and arrests. The chaotic scene just blocked injuries, and arrests.
Speaker 1: Stop. The chaotic scene just blocks outside the secure area of the inauguration.
Speaker 0: If denying election results is extreme now Yeah. While it's
Speaker 1: So let's let's be really clear. That comparison that you made is just ridiculous. Protest against Donald Trump's election victory surged overnight, and some became violent. Violence erupted on the streets of Portland during the 2nd straight day of protests over the election of Donald Trump. Some protesters launched fireworks and other projectiles at police.
Several people began vandalizing cars.
Speaker 4: Some demonstrators smashed door windows. Protesters faced off with police in other cities too, including Oakland, Oakland, Denver, and Minneapolis.
Speaker 1: Violent protests continuing now for the 3rd day in a row. Some 4,000 angry demonstrators over Trump's election victory taking to the street.
Speaker 4: Officers in front of thousands of protesters in what police called a riot.
Speaker 1: Setting fires, taking their frustrations out on cars and buildings.
Speaker 2: Not my president. Not my president. Not my president.
Speaker 1: People threw projectiles at officers and damaged property as well.
Speaker 2: I do a trash can't happen because I'm angry.
Speaker 1: One woman driving through was attacked as someone used a bat to smash her windshield. They are undermining our democratic process, everything that we stand for.
Speaker 0: So
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
#BREAKING A whistleblower has come forward stating the latest attempt on Trump’s life was an inside job by the Secret Service. https://t.co/IHvriUfgo1
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
@CollinRugg She complained about taking pictures for political purposes. How about this video https://t.co/xT9IYeTFqY
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
@SharpFootball And days before, Biden said, “It’s time to put Trump in a bullseye” https://t.co/eohA4Q8JVF
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2020 election is believed by some to have been interfered with by various organizations. A young lady's testimony in front of Congress is being discussed. The Daily Caller has produced a documentary on the topic, which I applaud for its courage.
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
The 2020 election was purposely, strategically and deliberately interfered with by the CIA, FBI, DNC, and Biden crime syndicate. Does RICO apply here? What do you think about this young lady’s testimony in front of Congress? #2020Election #CIA #FBI #BidenCorruption https://t.co/I263FqNDJj
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Emma Jo Morris, a politics editor at Breitbart. I reported on Hunter Biden's laptop scandal in 2020, revealing emails showing Biden's involvement in family business deals. Social media platforms censored the news as hacked or Russian disinformation, with support from former intel officials. Recently, it was revealed that federal agencies influenced social media to discredit the reporting. This included FBI directing Twitter's censorship operation and granting top secret clearances to Twitter management.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks so much for inviting me. My name is Emma Jo Morris, a politics editor at Breitbart. I'm here today because I published a series of news stories 3 years ago in October of 2020 about Hunter Biden's now infamous laptop, also known as the laptop from hell, which is seen as some of the most scandalous reporting of the last decade. What was more scandalous than the reporting itself, though, was the fact that it exposed the unholy alliance between the intelligence community, social media platforms, and legacy media outlets. At the time, I was deputy politics editor at The New York Post, and my reporting showed that despite then candidates Joe Biden's repeated and furious denials, he was apparently involved in the foreign business deals of his family.
Over several days, just weeks before Americans would vote for their next president, I revealed verified authentic emails from the Biden scions hard drive showing Ukrainian business partners receiving leaks from the Obama White House. I documented an off the books meeting between then Vice President Biden and a Ukraine Ukrainian energy executive and introduced the world to the big guy, who who got action on a deal with CEFC China Energy Company. The Post published exactly how the material for the reporting was obtained even identifying But when the stories appeared on social media that morning, the venue where millions of Americans go to find their news and editors to get their angles, within hours the reporting was censored on all major platforms on the basis of being called hacked or Russian disinformation. Twitter refused to allow users to share the link to the stories, ban the links from being shared in private messages. A policy by the way that's used to clamp down on child porn, and lock the post out of its verified account.
Facebook said it would curb distribution and reach of the links on its platform. However, the stories were not based on hacked materials nor were they Russian disinformation. And despite those claims appearing to come out of thin air at the time, we would eventually learn that they actually didn't come out of thin air at all. On October 19th, 5 days after the Post began publishing, Politico ran a story headline, Hunter Biden's story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say. God, I can't even say that with a straight face, you know.
Politico printed a letter completely uncritically from veteran members of the US intelligence community falsely claiming that the post expose has quote all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. My god. Most notable among the signatories of that letter were Jim Clapper from former DNI, Michael Hayden former CIA, John Brennan former CIA, despite having such damaged credibility following their participation in the Russia collusion conspiracy theory. A few days later on October 22nd when Biden appeared in the 2nd presidential debate and was confronted with the facts of the post reporting, he said to Trump, quote, 50 former national intelligence professionals said this. What he's accusing me of is a Russian plot, but it was not.
And he knew that. Now fast forward to this year, 3 years later, Just last spring, house investigators revealed it was a call by now secretary of state, Antony Blinken, to former acting CIA director, Michael Morell, that prompted the spy letter published by Politico, which bypassed agency approval processes that would have been normally applied. It is also now known that ahead of my reporting, federal agencies were priming social media companies to execute an operation to discredit it. According to internal documents released by Elon Musk, upon his acquisition of Twitter, the FBI and other intelligence community members essentially directed the platform's censorship operation in part externally by working with top management and in part internally by social media companies hiring eye popping numbers of agency alumni. Journalist Michael Schallenberger reported based on documents he obtained from Musk, that during all of 2020, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies repeatedly primed Twitter executives to dismiss reports of Hunter Biden's laptop as a Russian hack and leak operation.
Feds arranged for top secret security clearances to be granted to Twitter management and even had encrypted messaging network set up which they dubbed a virtual war room.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hundreds of intelligence community members work at social media companies. Mainstream news outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. The censorship was due to the truth being a threat to power. The US government's influence on corporations undermines the first amendment. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you.
Translation: Many intelligence community members work at social media companies. News outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. Censorship was due to the truth being a threat. The US government's influence on corporations undermines freedom of speech. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To this day, hundreds of people from the intelligence community work at social media companies. Over the last few years, my reporting has been confirmed by virtually every mainstream news outlet from the Washington Post to the New York Times to Politico, when the stakes were nothing by the way, 2 years later. No one denies that the laptop is real. That the origin story is exactly what I told you it was in the first place. This elaborate censorship conspiracy wasn't because the information being reported on was false.
It was because it was true and it was a threat to the power centers in this country. What this relationship between the US government officials and American corporations represent is is an unprecedented push to undermine the first amendment. The right to think, write, read, say whatever we want. And how we respond will determine whether we see a free press as inalienable or as optional. Thanks.
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
This brave woman will be in the @DailyCaller documentary this Friday 🔥
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
BREAKING🚨 HILLARY Clinton is named in Epstein papers, as Virginia Roberts-Giuffre's lawyers suggest her & Bill's foundation may have bankrolled Ghislaine Maxwell Does this surprise you? Do you think the US MSM will report it? #EpsteinList #HillaryClinton https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12932491/hillary-clinton-bill-epstein-documents-finance-ghislaine-maxwell.html
Now HILLARY named in Epstein doc: lawyers suggest charity paid Maxwell
Hillary Clinton was named in a 2016 court document made public on Friday, with lawyers for Virginia Roberts-Giuffre seeking to obtain communications from Hillary Clinton and others.
dailymail.co.uk
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden administration, supported by the Democrat Party, aims to implement a policy that requires individuals to pay taxes on unrealized appreciation of their assets. This means if you own a house with $100K equity, that amount will be considered part of your annual income. Consequently, you may be pushed into a higher tax bracket, potentially necessitating the sale of your home to cover the taxes. This raises concerns about the impact on individuals and their financial stability. The question arises: Does Biden truly prioritize America's interests?
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
Biden’s Administration supported by the Democrat Party are quietly working to fulfill their communist goal for us to own nothing (and we won’t like it) by forcing you to pay taxes on all unrealized appreciation of any asset you own. For example, if you own a house that has $100K in equity, you will have to include that $100K in your annual income. That will push you into a higher tax bracket and unless you have an extra $30-$40K laying around, you’ll have to sell your home to pay your taxes. How do you feel about that? Does Biden care about America?
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
This is Victoria Ruiz a NYC Public Defender, ripping down pictures of hostages held by Hamas. How do you feel about this? https://t.co/qQTGvEU0TU
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
AG James says her case against Trump is not politically motivated and that she did not run on the promise of going after Trump. Do you believe her words now or when she actually did run on the promise of going after Trump?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their refusal to acknowledge the current president as their own, deeming him illegitimate. They emphasize the need to mobilize, agitate, and irritate until Trump is defeated. They vow to rise up and resist, showing no respect for him, just as they believe was shown to President Obama. The speaker concludes by stating that Trump has no credibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President, because he's not my president. He's a illegitimate president. Are number. Good. Thanks are number.
We've gotta get ready to mobilize, and we've gotta get ready to agitate and irritate until victory is won or more importantly until Trump is defeated. We will all rise up and resist this This is illegitimate president. I'm going to give you the same level of that you gave to President Obama and that is absolutely no respect at all. Chunk has got no
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
Is America under attack from the WEF?
WEF Caught Orchestrating U.S. Border Crisis From Military Bases in Panama - The People's Voice
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has taken control of several American military bases in Panama and is orchestrating the invasion of migrants that are flooding the U.S. southern border.
thepeoplesvoice.tv
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
Do you want to know who really was in control of turning a peaceful demonstration into an insurrection? Listen to Biden, Pelosi and AOC plotting.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss the events of a fateful day. Speaker 1 expresses concern about the lack of public fear and urges action. Speaker 0 emphasizes the need for justice and accountability, regardless of the protesters' motives. They agree to frame the protesters and take strict measures, including a shoot-to-kill order. The video suggests that political power brokers are manipulating the narrative to protect their interests, raising questions about the extent they will go to safeguard themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For yourself. What really happened on that fateful day?
Speaker 1: Listen, sweetheart. Let the men handle it. Listening to Why don't you let me finish it? Congressional staffers were almost killed. I thought I was going to die.
This is an adult discussion. The public doesn't fear us anymore and you better do something. What am I supposed to do? Alexandria. Let's go to be patient and respectful of each other's ideas.
Let's take a step back and look at the big picture. I don't even have anything to say to you. If we don't make sure those who perpetrate this mayhem are brought to justice, we are all dead? This was a mostly peaceful protest. I don't care why they were there.
Violence, nonviolence doesn't matter. We can't allow those who showed up to get away with it.
Speaker 0: They can't allow protesters to get away with it. Ocasio Cortez, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden discussing what to do and deciding to frame the protesters.
Speaker 1: Listening? These people have crossed the line by threatening our democracy. I've given a shoot to kill order for any breach of the speaker's lobby. Every one of these maggots must be prosecuted. Refuted?
Yes. I agree. No more protests in our capital.
Speaker 0: The video paints a troubling picture of the political power brokers Attempting to spin the narrative to protect their own interests. This is not just about the protesters, What about the lengths to which those in power will go to protect their own interests?
reSee.it AI Summary
On 9/11, I changed my flight last minute, giving up my 1st class seat. Watching others board Flight 93, I felt upset. But as we prepared for takeoff, the pilot announced the Twin Towers were hit. Grounded, my perspective shifted. Now, I value connecting with fellow passengers, willingly change flights, and embrace life's blessings. Never forget. #911Anniversary
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
I was booked on United Flight 93 on 9/11, 2001, flying nonstop from Newark NJ to San Francisco CA. Around midnight the night before, a coworker called me urging me to change my flight to fly into San Jose instead. This meant I had to give up my 1st class seat and move to a flight that left 20 minutes later (from the same gate) with a stopover in Denver. I was very reluctant but I did it. When I got to the airport, I watched people boarding flight 93 and I was upset that I was not leaving earlier, in my 1st class seat on a direct flight. I didn’t notice or care about the people as they were boarding, only myself. When I finally boarded my plane, we were 7 planes behind flight 93. When we were 3 plans away from we taking off, the pilot told us to look out the right side of the plane because it appeared the Twin Towers had been hit by a plane. I thought it might have been a small Cessna until I saw the second plane strike the other tower. We were grounded just before taking off. I changed that day. I now take every opportunity to get watch and if possible, get to know the people I’m boarding a plane with. I never hesitate to give up my seat for a later flight if requested. I’ve had two children since 9/11 and went to multiple mission trips to war torn countries. Every day I wake up breathing is another gift from God. Never forget #NeverForget #911Anniversary
reSee.it AI Summary
If Trump faces indictment over election doubts, should others be held accountable too? The video by TK News sheds light on the matter. Beware, liberal trolls, as you may fall into a trap. They were lured in, only to be sent to the opposing side. #JusticeForAll
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
If Trump is indicted for questioning the 2020 election results, should all these people be indicted as well? #LockHerUp #TwoTieredJustice Video Credit: TK News https://t.co/vabEM3SpKV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the legitimacy of the 2016 election and claim that it was stolen. They mention Russia hacking the election and the belief that Trump is an illegitimate president. They also talk about protests and violence that occurred after the election. Overall, they express anger and disbelief towards the election results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if we're all in agreement that it is incorrect to say the 2020 election was stolen, what about the 2016 election?
Speaker 1: Look. I'm not gonna Go back, indeed. It was a stolen election. It was stolen. Stolen.
She's an illegitimate The president, he's an illegitimate president. You know, pretending to be president. Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially Prove that he beat you because he didn't. One third of Clinton supporters say Trump election is not legitimate. I think he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win.
You are 16 election was stolen. Got a nicer way to say that. Stay seen election was stolen. Got a nicer way to save it. Say Russia hacks the election.
Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. A little louder, please. Russia hacked our election. That was a 9 11 scale event.
This was the kind of cyber 9 11 Cyber 9 11. Yes. Russia hacked Our election Russia, you know, of course, hacked our election here. Half of Clinton's voters believe the conspiracy theory that Russia hacked election day votes. We know that they were Into voting rolls, actual interference with the elections themselves.
We know it happened. Despite no Credible evidence. 67% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote tally. Hacking US election. Hacking the US election.
Russia Hacked our election. The Russian hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. Russian hacking of our election.
Hacking of our of our election. Russia hacked our Russia hacked our election. It's stolen election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our election.
The universal assessment that Russia hacked our election 2016. One government At our election Most young Americans consider Donald Trump an illegitimate president. Illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. Why is he illegitimate?
He just Won an election. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. That's it. I absolutely agree. Experts urge Clinton can't to challenge election results.
We will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. He's an illegitimate president. Russia hacked our election. Russian's hacking In our election. Hashtag our election.
Russia hacking our election. I don't see the president elect As a legitimate president. Trump is an illegitimate president who stole the election. He is not a president. He's illegitimate.
And my biggest fear is that he's gonna do it again with the help of Vlad, his best pal? Terrifying. Would you be my vice president for Canada? Hillary Clinton voters call to overturn election results. More than 4,000,000 people have already signed a petition on change.org.
Calling for the electors of the electoral college to, quote, ignore their states, vote, and cast their ballots for secretary Clinton. Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. We are the victims of a bloodless coup. He didn't won the general election. Go electoral college.
Make Hillary Clinton president, period. Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. An illegitimate president. And Don't accept Trump as a legitimate president. This wasn't on the level.
This election was not on the level. I don't think he's a legitimate president. Our election was legit. He got his victory from cheating. Yes.
Trump cheated. Trump cheated the 2016 election. He's an illegitimate president. No validity. No credibility.
And because of that Anger at what some see as an illegitimate president. I don't love it. It will not be a peaceful change Change of power A number of incidents turned violent. Protesters hurled trash cans, flash bombs, and objects at police. Several officers injured.
Protesters grew rocks Police smashed windows leading to more confrontations, injuries, and arrests. The chaotic scene just blocked outside the security of the inauguration. Denying Election results is extreme now. Yeah.
Speaker 0: While we're
Speaker 1: So let's let's be really clear. That comparison that you made is just Ridiculous. Protests against Donald Trump's election victory surged overnight, and some became violent. Violence erupted on the streets of Portland During the 2nd straight day of protests over the election of Donald Trump, some protesters launched fireworks and other projectiles at Biles at police. Several people began vandalizing cars.
Some demonstrators smashed door windows. Protesters faced off with police in other cities too, including Oakland, Denver and Minneapolis. Violent protests continuing now for the 3rd day in a row. Some 4,000 angry demonstrators over Trump's election Victory taking to the street, officers in front of thousands of protesters in what police called a riot. Setting fires, taking their frustrations out Cars and buildings.
People threw projectiles at officers and Damaged property as well. I do a trash can't happen because I'm angry. That's true. 1 woman driving through was attacked as someone used They backed to smash her windshield. They are undermining our democratic process, everything that we stand for.
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
Liberal trolls, insult at your own risk. This is quickly becoming a troll trap. https://t.co/ubJSEZjjJz
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore 𝕏
Reeled them in then sent them to the other side. https://t.co/yrhvXGlL3S
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore
Target says, “Hold our Beer” and “targets” children and babies with “pride products” including toddler swimsuits equipped with “tucking”. Retweet if you find this disturbing 😳 #BoycottTarget
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our agenda being unchecked may corrupt your kids. Funny, but you're right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think that we'll corrupt your kids if our agenda goes unchecked. Funny. Just this once, You're correct.
reSee.it AI Summary
AnheuserBusch's market value has dropped by $10B due to the boycott affecting all of its brands, not just Bud Light. The decline in sales has spilled into other megabrands, with nationwide retail sales of Bud Light down 23.4% YoY in the week of April 29. This is worse than the 21.4% decline it suffered a week earlier.
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore
Can you hear us now @AnheuserBusch ? Boycott is affecting ALL of AB brands. $10B drop in Market Value “It’s not just a Bud Light issue,” said Bump Williams, chief executive of the consultancy. “It’s an Anheuser-Busch portfolio problem now.” https://marketwatch.com/story/bud-light-sales-declines-are-now-affecting-anheuser-buschs-other-big-brands-says-new-data-e2b7306e https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bud-light-sales-declines-are-now-affecting-anheuser-buschs-other-big-brands-says-new-data-e2b7306e
Bud Light sales decline is now affecting Anheuser-Busch’s other brands, according to new data
As beer drinkers discover how many other beer brands fall under the Anheuser-Busch umbrella, the backlash is widening, according to Bump Williams Consulting...
marketwatch.com
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore
“Bud Light’s downward spiral has accelerated in the wake of the Dylan Mulvaney debacle — and the carnage has begun to spill into Anheuser-Busch’s other megabrands, the New York Post reportedly has learned. Nationwide retail sales of Bud Light were down 23.4% versus a year ago in the week of April 29 — worse than the 21.4% decline it suffered a week earlier, according to Bump Williams Consulting and NielsenIQ data.”
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore
@USBornNRaised @KatTheHammer1 @AnheuserBusch All these
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore
No he did not. Here are his actual words from his actual mouth. When 100’s of liberal trolls repeat the same talking points like “Grassley walked it back” and “that’s been debunked”, it’s recycled 💩 from the CNN & MSNBC 🚽 Nice story but FAKE NEWS https://t.co/XCJrIu9947
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Grassley and Representative Comer are calling for an investigation into a document that allegedly describes a criminal scheme involving former Vice President Biden and a foreign national. They want to know if the Justice Department and FBI properly vetted the document and followed standard investigative procedures. The FBI has received a letter and subpoena regarding this matter but has not commented. Grassley emphasizes the importance of getting answers and ensuring that the executive branch enforces the law as required by the Constitution, regardless of political affiliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Grassley spoke to Fox just a moment ago. Take a listen to what he said.
Speaker 1: We really need to know what steps did the justice department and FBI take to investigate and to vet the document, to determine if it's accurate or not. And did the justice department and the FBI follow normal investigative procedures or did they let political calculations interfere?
Speaker 0: Now in a moment moment ago, the FBI tells Fox News it has received that letter and the subpoena, but they have no comment. Let's bring in White House correspondent Peter Ducey. He joins us from the North lawn of the White House. Hi, Peter.
Speaker 2: And, Jillian, this whistleblower, we don't know anything about them. We don't know anything about the strength of their other than what Comer and Grassley are telling us, but, he's basically saying that either, he thinks either the justice department or the Federal Bureau of investigation have an FD 10/23 form that outlines the following. I'm gonna read straight from this letter, that describes an alleged Criminal scheme involving then vice president Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions. It has been see alleged that the document includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose. The 2 signers of that letter that went to Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray are James Comer and Chuck Grassley.
Chuck Grassley just talked about this.
Speaker 1: I want answers and so does America. It is my job to make sure they do cooperate because of the constitutional responsibility of oversight fight on the part of congress to make sure that the executive branch of government, Republican or Democrat, and it doesn't matter to me whether it's Republican or democrat, that they, enforce the law as the constitution requires to, equitably enforce the
@BillEllmore - Bill Ellmore
The first Anti-Woke ad targeting the absurdity of allowing biological males to compete in Women’s Sports. @EgardWatchCo Buy their products and RT for Awareness ⭐️⭐️⭐️