reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @BlackAndNative1
@BlackAndNative1 - SoulFood66
Judge Joe brown says it's self defense?‼️ https://t.co/c8m85ut6Ht
Video Transcript AI Summary
A robbery is the taking of property by force or violence. Resisting a robbery, a felony, can morph a killing into felony murder, making those who initiated the felony responsible for the consequences. If, during a liquor store robbery, the proprietor's bullet kills an innocent bystander, the robbers, not the employee, are charged with homicide under felony murder.
In this case, if a killing results from a robbery attempt by the would-be victim, the surviving robber is charged with homicide and robbery. They should be a co-defendant in the robbery. A million-dollar bond is considered ridiculous because, under the Fifth Amendment, bonds should be reasonable, ensuring the person shows up until the charges are resolved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And they try to take it again from him. That's a robbery. In other words, the taking of the property of another by use of force or violence. He resisted the robbery, which is a felony, and that would morph the whole thing to killing into a felony murder situation. If you have a felony murder thing, the people who implemented the underlying felony become responsible for the consequences.
For instance, if there is a proprietor or manager or an employee in the liquor store. And some people come in to hold up the liquor store and there's a shootout and one of the bullets fired by the proprietor, the manager or an employee miss carries and kills an innocent person on the sidewalk. Well, under the felony murder thing, the employee, manager, or whatever is not charged with the homicide. The people who were charged with the homicide are the ones that started the robbery. So in this case, you have a party that starts the robbery.
Two, allegedly. You have a killing that results by the would be victim of the robbery. So what happens is under the felony murder theory, the person that's charged with the homicide and the robbery is the survivor. In this case, one of the would be, should be codefendants to the robbery if that's the way the case is cast. The whole thing about the million dollar bond is absolutely ridiculous because under the fifth amendment, bonds shall be reasonable and reasonable has been interpreted for the last two hundred and thirty years by the US Supreme Court and most appellate courts is meaning simply enough to ensure that a person shows up until the charges are disposed of.
No because now, you know, a lot of