TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BlendrNews
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been observing how the Chinese Communist Party is quietly acquiring control over Canadian towns through economic investments. In Powell River, BC, companies linked to the CCP have promised development in various sectors, including aviation and infrastructure. These investments are connected to state-backed firms involved in questionable practices. Notably, Powell River's proximity to military bases raises concerns about security. Canada’s open economy is being exploited, and if we don’t take action, we risk losing our autonomy without a fight.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦🇨🇳 How the Chinese Communist Party Is Buying Up Canada—One Town at a Time The CCP isn’t invading Canada with tanks. It’s buying up our towns—controlling industries, infrastructure, and even schools under the cover of “economic investment.” 🧵
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
In Powell River, BC, Chinese-linked firms moved in with promises of development—hatcheries, aviation parks, flight schools, and infrastructure projects. 2/
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
These investments are tied to CCP-aligned companies: 🔹 Drone engine makers 🔹 Forced-labour airline links 🔹 State-backed genome research 🔹 Belt & Road acquisitions 3/
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
These aren’t random towns. Powell River sits near Canadian military bases. CCP-linked assets are being planted beside critical defence points. 4/
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Canada’s economic openness is being used against it. If we don’t act, we won’t need to be conquered—we’ll already be owned. 5/
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Stay ahead with The Daily Blend —the newsletter that cuts through the noise and explains what’s really going on: https://blendrnews.substack.com/subscribe?coupon=40bbdb25
Subscribe to Blendr News
Where news meets rational thinking. Click to read Blendr News, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
blendrnews.substack.com
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Canada isn’t a democracy—it’s a hostage situation. Last 6 months of Parliament: - Frozen for corruption cover-up 💰 - Month-long holiday🎄 - Frozen for Trudeau’s exit - WEF banker installed as PM 🏦 - Singh's NDP back Liberals again Now, Carney wants emergency powers 🚨 https://t.co/jgltiIyiNz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada is not a democracy but a hostage situation. Parliament was frozen to dodge an investigation into a green slush fund where liberal insiders looted taxpayer money, then prorogued to avoid a no-confidence vote.
The liberals ran a sham leadership race to install Mark Kearney as prime minister, chosen by 0.4% of the population. Kearney is the embodiment of elite globalist interests with financial ties to China. His assets being in a blind trust is a joke.
Carney's cabinet is the same pack of Trudeau loyalists. Marco Mendocino, who botched the Bernardo scandal, is now Carney's chief of staff. Kearney's first act was a media stunt pretending to sign away the consumer carbon tax, despite lacking the power to issue executive orders.
Jugmeet Singh pledged to prop up Kearney's government. Kearney has threatened to invoke wartime measures, bypassing parliament and ruling without oversight. The Liberals are dismantling democracy. Parliament was shut down for six months to install a banker with ties to China and the World Economic Forum without an election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Canada isn't a democracy, it's a hostage situation. Our once great nation has become the true North weak and formally free. First, parliament was frozen in October because Trudeau wanted to dodge an investigation about the green slush fund where liberal insiders looted hundreds of millions in taxpayer money, then they conveniently shut down for Christmas, giving themselves another month long break from accountability. And when they returned, Trudeau saw the writing on the wall. His government was on the verge of collapse, so he prorogued parliament effectively shutting down democracy to avoid a no confidence vote.
Why? Because the liberals needed time to rig their own survival. Instead of facing the consequences of their corruption, they ran a sham leadership race to install Mark Kearney as Canada's new prime minister. Kearney wasn't elected by the people. He was chosen by a 50,000 liberal party members, just 0.4% of the population in a leadership race so blatantly manipulated that non loyalists like Ruby Dahla were barred from running.
This isn't democracy, it's a hostile takeover. And who is Mark Carney? The very embodiment of elite globalist interests, a former central banker, a Brookfield Asset Management Executive, and a man whose financial empire is deeply intertwined with China. Under his leadership, Brookfield secured billions in real estate and green energy deals in China, many backed by Chinese state owned banks. His claim that his assets are in a blind trust is a joke.
His entire career is built on cozying up to Beijing, and now he's running Canada. But nothing has changed. Carney's cabinet is the same pack of Trudeau loyalists, the same faces, the same incompetence, the same corruption. Marco Mendocino, who botched the Bernardo scandal, is now Carney's chief of staff. A man who couldn't even keep track of a serial killer's prison transfer is now managing the prime minister's office.
And Kearney's first act as prime minister? A media stunt. He invited cameras in for a photo op of him pretending to sign away the consumer carbon tax, despite the fact that a prime minister in Canada does not have the power to issue executive orders. The same liberals who spent years calling Trump an unstable dictator are now blatantly copying his theatrics, staging a fake signing to make Carney look anti carbon tax even though he was the architect of the policy in the first place. The same liberals who spent five years gaslighting Canadians are now bragging about undoing their own disastrous policy.
And where is Jugmeat Singh in all of this? He's already pledged to prop up Kearney's government, claiming he has to help them deal with Trump's tariffs. Meanwhile, Kearney has already threatened to invoke wartime measures, giving himself ultimate power to dictate policy, bypass parliament, and rule without oversight. The Liberals spent years warning about threats to democracy while they're the ones actively dismantling it. Canadians are being ruled, not represented.
Parliament was shut down for six months so the elites could install one of their own. A banker would deep ties China and the World Economic Forum without a single general election vote. If this were happening in any other country, we'd call it authoritarianism, but in Canada, it's just another Monday.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently listened to an eye-opening interview with former CBSA officer Luc Sabourin, who sheds light on alarming issues within the Canada Border Services Agency. He discusses the theft of over 300,000 travel documents, including 283,000 blank passports, by transnational crime networks, raising concerns about national security. Sabourin critiques the agency's prioritization of quick immigration approvals over safety and questions the integrity of public officials and the RCMP. He emphasizes the need for Canadians to be aware and proactive about these issues.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Every Canadian needs to hear this interview 🤯 Canadian Border Agent Whistleblower: “We Are Going to Face Our Worst Nightmare” | Blendr Report EP89 Former CBSA officer @LsSabourin exposes systemic corruption and mismanagement within Canada Border Services Agency, warning of a looming national security crisis. Sabourin reveals that over 300,000 travel documents, including 283,000 blank passports, have been stolen and exploited by transnational crime networks. Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 0:40 Luc Sabourin’s Role Within the CBSA 2:32 Criminals and Terrorists Stole 283,000 Blank Canadian Passports 5:15 CBSA Sacrificing Safety for Quick immigration Approvals 8:46 How Did the CBSA React to Passport Thefts? 11:23 Destruction of Important Documents at the CBSA 17:20 How Have Public Officials Reacted to Whistleblowing? 19:41 Is the CBSA Incompetent or Corrupt? 23:42 How Common is Corruption in the CBSA? 28:02 Canada’s Passport Strength in Decline: Due to Crime? 30:29 Trump’s 25% Tariff Threat Over Border Security 34:11 Will a Change of Government Fix Corruption? 37:22 Does Canada Have a “Deep State?” 41:02 How Many in the CBSA are Aware of Corruption? 46:28 Is the RCMP as Untrustworthy as the CBSA? 53:57 What Can Canadians Do About Corruption? 58:30 How Unsafe Has Canada Become?
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Luke Savarin, a former officer with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). I'm here as a whistleblower to expose systemic failures and massive corruption within the agency.
While working at CBSA, I uncovered the theft of over 400,000 travel documents, and identified individuals on terror watch lists receiving Canadian travel documents. Management dismissed my concerns and even directed me to falsify reports. I witnessed the destruction of foreign passports and the creation of false documents in federal databases. My reports were ignored, and I faced retaliation for speaking out.
The core issue is corruption and lack of accountability at every level of the CBSA. A complete overhaul is needed, including an independent oversight committee and protection for whistleblowers. Without these changes, Canada's security will remain at risk. The Canadian public needs to demand action from their members of parliament to fix these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everybody. Welcome to the Blender Report where news meets rational thinking. I'm your host, Jonathan Harvey, and this is your co host, Liam DeBoer. And today, we are having a conversation with Luke Savarin. Luke Savarin is a former officer with the Canada Border Services Agency or the CBSA who has come forward as a whistleblower to expose systemic failures and massive corruption within the agency.
His warnings include the theft of hundreds of thousands of travel documents, lapses that compromise national security, and the approval of Canadian travel documents for individuals on terror watch lists. Sabrine's insights shed light on how mismanagement and criminal networks exploit these weaknesses, sparking urgent calls for accountability and reform. Luke, thank you for being here today. Appreciate your time.
Speaker 1: My pleasure.
Speaker 0: Alright. So before we really get into it, can you please give our audience some clarity on your role with the CBSA, the time you spent working there, and the work you were doing when you started to uncover these massive problems?
Speaker 1: I joined CBSA from National Defense Intelligence, around the time, the events of September 11, the terrorist attack that occurred. I was offered a deployment with, at the time was immigration Canada enforcement unit at the organized crime division. What occurred was a unification, amalgamation of, CBSA, custom and immigration and enforcement, just like they did in The States with Homeland Security. They merged everybody. From there, I made my way through various assignment as a developmental officer, and, I mostly work in operational environment and enforcement.
My work took me my substantive position was at the National Document Fraudulent Centre, where I was in charge of, the only myself and Mr. Steiner worked under me. We were the only two operators with the lost, stolen, fraudulent database that is, a system that for CBSA, that we issue alerts worldwide for every law enforcement agency, on, travel documents that give access to Canada that are either reported access to Canada and other country that are either reported lost or stolen. It enables law enforcement agencies and border officers to detect when somebody's trying to land or enter a country with that document. It prevents people from either accessing a country or boarding a plane with an intended goal.
And I worked in a, on a secure floor, and inside that secure floor is another secure area with a vault door, and only a certain amount of people are allowed in there.
Speaker 2: Well, in one of the things that you've uncovered, which you pointed out in a sworn statement, was the theft of over 400,000 travel documents, including more than 2,800 or sorry, 283,000 blank passports ready for personalization. So in your estimate, what was the motive behind that theft and how are the documents being used? Also, how did you feel the CBSA reacted to this catastrophic theft?
Speaker 1: What was believed at the time is that it's not limited to, just the facilitation of, somebody to travel and, organized crime to make money. I think there is a there there's a bigger goal and objective at place probably to, to the benefit of somebody that has a bigger objective. We were a transitory place for them. That's all we are.
Speaker 2: Some of these, you you could presume, are being used by just people who simply want to come into Canada and land here. But then another issue that we've seen as of recent is the increased number of people on terrorist watch lists being captured at the, Northern US border, so the Canada US border. So would it be safe to assume that whether it's a small portion of these or even maybe a substantial portion of these land in Canada, but then with with our documentation, but then illegally cross into America from there. Would that be a safe assumption?
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. And there's no doubt in my mind that, that large theft, was much more complex and had a bigger objective than just facilitating people here. It was an opportunity for many things with those thefts. As I testified in my affidavit, I think that it was an opportunity to move a certain group of people here, and there's no doubt in my mind that some of these people probably ended up on the watch list.
The seven people I flagged during my as a, as a case officer, screening individuals requiring visa to come here, I identified at least seven people. Six were high risk and one was a confirmed individual on a wanted list. I was brought in the office and the culture was that they wanted to do more cases to clear them than actually giving the time to investigate them. And that was a big problem for me. And they said to me, well, we have people doing 50 case a day.
And I said, well, the problem I have with with how you're operating right now and this is coming from a junior officer. And and and they were not happy with that. Now I I and and I don't feel that I'm better than anybody else. I just have, I was I was trained. I was brought in because of my experience on on a lot of things.
And what I said to them, I said, well, are they really doing those 50 k's a day properly? Are they really screening the people, or are they just meaning their quotas to keep their job? And I said, with that in mind, they're probably, cutting corners on search. And I said, I did 30 k's today. Out of those 30, I said I'd I found seven people that were high risk, and they said to me, well, there's not enough information.
And I said, well, there is actually. And I said, what what strikes me is that, also the information that I found all points in one direction for the same seven people, the one that cleared them. And they said to me, well, no. There's there's not not enough evidence, so, no reportable trace. So what I did is, I was directed to put no reportable trace, so I had to put no reportable trace.
This is a management directive. This is not me. Okay? So what I did is I made a copy of that for the simple reason that, if these individuals that are here, one of them was actually in Ottawa. So there's there's the one that was on the terror watch list was actually in Ottawa, and I had an argument with the manager in that in that unit that day for that, and they reminded me that I was just on assignment and subsequently, they gave me another case, which was, basically, I think, a trap, And the management, issued a, a directive to, have me return to my substantive unit, and the document was, released to me.
And it was the director himself saying that you need to invent, craft a story to get rid of Luke Saburay. And, at the same time, another manager wanted to hire me within that unit to keep me there, and that same director gave a directive in writing, a document that I have obtained under access to information. He gives in writing that no, he needs to go back. And everything relates to the fact that I was questioning questioning their method and practice and their their screening process that were being expedited because they wanted to clear the amount of case number, which I think is very wrong because look at where we are.
Speaker 2: We recently saw with guys like the LDD case who was a, filmed, say, dismembering a victim on camera for ISIS being granted Canadian citizenship. Do you think it's it's those kind of protocols in that focus on just approving getting the approvals done that is leading to those scenarios?
Speaker 1: That too, yes. Yes.
Speaker 0: Sir, I just wanna circle back to something that you were saying about the 400,000 travel documents that we were talking about that that basically, we know went missing, and a lot of them were blank. How did the CBSA react when you brought this up and when you were highlighting these things? Like, how was how was this managed internally when you brought this massive significant theft to their to their attention?
Speaker 1: For me, mister Steiner, this was a major a matter of emergency. And, our our response and our request to management was for them just another day in the office. In addition to that, we were already on a on a on bad terms with them. So they didn't they they kept giving us other work that should have been given to clerical staff, and that is why I say that I questioned their integrity. They never treated this with at no point in time was this urgent.
I never received any email, from the management, to indicate to me that they sent, an alarm email, an urgent email to the ports of entry letting them know. They never provided additional resource. And we asked the management to, to stop giving us other work that could have been done by the critical staff, but there was there was an intended goal. The management, first of all, wanted to get rid get rid of me and mister Steiner because we had exposed the, the destruction of foreign passport and the, the request to create false document in a federal database to mislead our allies and everybody else. On top of that, they, they made sure that we we had no support point blank.
And and I was very concerned with that, and I I brought it up. It lead it lead it led I apologize for my my French English. It led to some, verbal exchange with some some of high ranking people with me where I basically told them that this was pure negligence. And, they they brought that up to the high director, and the focus was not, and I repeat for the viewers, the focus was not on the passport that were probably en route here. The focus was on the fact that a junior officer was standing up to, senior officers telling them that they were not treating this with urgency.
Speaker 0: Can you can you you you touched on something there. Can you dig in a little more for the audience about what happened with the CBSA when you were talking about documents that got torched? They got they what what what happened there? You're saying the the incident that led up to you kind of butting heads with the organization.
Speaker 1: In addition to the lost, fallen, fraudulent document that we enter in in the database, we have a group of people inside our unit that are specialized in verifying the authenticity of a document when it's seized by either border officers, police officers, and during the course of investigation. And what these specialized individuals do is they go through, they they do like an autopsy of the passport. They have all these special tools. They have these knowledge. So and we either retain these passports in our vault in a very large thousands and thousands of, of drawers of cabinets, with reference number, and, they they will do an analysis of the case.
And if they have to testify in court, the documents are in there. It's also the last known pictures of the individuals that are either here under detention, getting ready to be removed, or, that we lost track of because they they used the passport with their pictures in it, but they put false information, and once they got here, adios, you know, and we don't know where they are. So it's the last known pictures. We never, never destroy once a passport has been analyzed and found to be, legitimate, we don't give it back to the person if we don't know where the person is. We either send it back to the embassy at the originating embassy that has issued the passport because it belongs to them.
This is law.
Speaker 2: Right. So if if it
Speaker 0: so if it does prove to be an original, you send it back to the corresponding representative. Back.
Speaker 1: If if there's no enforcement action on it, and I'm try I'm trying to not to talk when I'm in my world, but trying to tell your public so they understand.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So yeah. So what happens is we've been doing this forever, and the legal office of CBSA, their lawyers came down to us because I guess there was an incident that we were not made aware of where a passport was destroyed, and it didn't belong to the Canadian government. Any passport that is Canadian is is sent back. Once we assess we don't need it, it's sent back to Passport Canada. Anything that is foreign is sent back to the respective embassy that issued it in groups after we accumulated a certain amount to save costs.
A recently deployed former intelligence officer to our unit that is not a supervisor but is a senior officer comes over to mister Steiner and says, I've got about six boxes right there of, large quantity of passports. I want you to, rip the content, shred it, and go into the secure tracking database and indicate that you've returned it to the embassy. Mister Steiner himself, is a former military person with an outstanding career, and he's not one to follow orders that are criminal or anything. And the order coming from this woman that came to our unit under questionable circumstances, basically, we found out that it was a problem that was transferred from another unit to our unit. So I think everybody can understand what I'm saying.
So, that person gave him that specific order. He refused. So she came to me. She indicated the same thing, and I told her this was illegal, I wasn't comfortable with it, and she said to me, those are her words, and everything I say to you and your viewers comes with supporting documentation and an affidavit to the members of parliament. So she said to me, if you're not comfortable with doing that, then give it to the student, and she's already doing it.
I said, no, you're not gonna give it to the student. I said, this is criminal, and I said, you're misleading your allies, and this is the last known pictures of these individuals. I said why are you doing that? So she, she went to management. Management brought me an office and again there was, a verbal exchange and they said to me we're doing this for this reason.
I said well that's not true because I just verified the reason you're telling me, and the reason you're telling me is is not true. So they said, well, we'll we'll take care of it, and they were upset with me. I walked into the room, the student had already destroyed a large amount of passport, and she had already inserted in the secure database that she had returned it to the embassies. So I confronted her, she was not happy, and I decided to take a camera and take pictures and secure evidence because this was very serious. Some of the people that I verified that she had already destroyed the passport and entered that she had returned it to the embassy were individuals that were wanted.
They were serious criminal, people that were no longer admissible to this country. And they said they would stop, and they started packing all the passports in large envelopes to address it at a later date, and only to find out that the student was in another room with the shredder continuing to shred. So I walked in there with the camera and I took pictures of everything she was doing and I turned it over to parliament. The female officer that gave the directive, her husband became somebody very important in the office of the president of the agency and he had another director working for him and that director is the director that was putting so much pressure on me and Mr. Steiner, got rid of Mr.
Steiner and then got rid of me. This this is very wrong, and when I sent my information, if we're gonna go there, let's go there, so when I sent my evidence and my case and my complaint to the minister of public safety and to Justin Trudeau begging for their help, advising them that it was a serious issue inside the CBSA, in addition to other things that I had witnessed, that I had reported, because, what what they did is my evidence was sent to Ralph Goodell. Ralph Goodell sent it back to CBSA, the office of the president, who works there. The person, the high ranking person, that his wife is her name is in my complaint, and, everything went downhill from there. And this was just part of what I reported because in so your viewers know, in 02/2006, I reported some very, very serious events that were occurring in my unit to management, and then I used the Harper government, internal disclosure system that's supposed to protect me.
And when I brought it to their attention, they to the internal disclosure director in a private meeting, before I even stepped foot back in my office, the people I pointed my finger at that I believe were involved in organized crime, They, degraded me when I got in there and it got really ugly. And there's no doubt in my mind that those people are the people that gave my personal address to the member organized crime, the Mexican cartel that I interfered with in 02/2007 that I took that took part in that operation with the police, that we arrested that guy. And there's no doubt. And I will tell this for your viewer because we're we're there let's go there. Six people from the CBSA president's office all the way to my office retired within a series of a few months after I testified in parliament and everything I reported was in the hands of Greg Fergus in 02/2016.
And he never did nothing. They abandoned me. And another member of the political party was also aware of this, and they did nothing. Only the block Quebecois picked it up, and they acted on it.
Speaker 2: So one of the things that you've kinda pointed out here is that, yes, throughout all of this, anytime you raised flags about things that were happening, it was just shut down, and then you also faced obstacles being put in front of you. Now there's a couple different reasons for this. And and maybe we're into the realm of speculation here. So if you don't wanna go down that that route, just feel free. But it could be simply that this is a lot of negligence and incompetence causing these problems.
And it it would be easier for those problems just to be ignored or pretend like they don't exist so that they don't have to face accountability for essentially things slipping through the cracks. Right? Then there's another aspect which could be that certain people within high positions of power in these institutions such as the CBSA are actively involved in some of these issues that are happening, and therefore, that's the reason that they want to put obstacles from, say, any further investigations on on the matters. So in your estimation, I guess, do you think the the problem here is incompetence or corruption?
Speaker 1: Corruption. I believe that, the person the initial complaint that I did, the person that I was pointing my finger to towards to when I talked to management and the people of internal disclosure process, I basically reported criminal acts. Criminal acts that were very serious, not just based on my, my assessment, they were clearly wrong and they had impact at every level. What I believe is that the director that I reported it, I believe that the person that I was pointing my finger at probably had something on that director and was using it as a get out of jail free card because four other managers under that director quit their job after they had the problem with the same person I was pointing my finger at. And things continue to escalate, and, when I met with the office internal disclosure, I can tell that the director was when I start mentioning name, she was very, very uncomfortable to a point where she backed up in her chair and it it, the tone of the of the the air in that room changed, and the conversation didn't last long, and she thanked me and she said she would look into it.
That was, it was a turning point when I started mentioning names. The more I started noticing thing and keeping track of things that I had no choice to keep track of because I was directly involved in them, because I handled those documents, and I saw how a document came in and how a document left and the impact it has on people and how the impact it could have on the court and the justice system, I had a duty to report it. This was not me playing investigator, this was me doing my job and me at one point or another being either called in court and say when this passport came in it had 25 page, when it left it was missing five pages. Key pages pages, and I'm just using this as an example, but it it was missing key pages that were supposed to be investigated that could have prevent this person from remaining in Canada. This person being already involved in organized crime.
So was somebody asking them to remove those pages so there's no case to be made against that person?
Speaker 0: That's what it seems like. I mean, so and in trying in in trying to unpack in trying to unpack just how corrupt maybe the top level of the CBSA is and how it trickles down into your position and several others, do you believe that your case or your situation is the rule, or do you believe that it's the exception within the CBSA? In other words, do you think the whole organization is rotten to its core, or do you think you ended up just uncovering the one corrupt kind of situation that was happening?
Speaker 1: There's some very good people at CBSA. I can confirm that in the test tube in uniform and, in civilian clothing. But based on what I've seen, what I've reported, most of the things that I've seen right now and in various unit I attended, were done by people in position of authority
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: From supervisor to director general. The other small things were done by regular staff, but there is definitely, things that are happening in there that are criminal, to what extent, it is and why it's not being investigated is is not a mystery. I think it's because they don't wanna admit to it. And, it and it and it it is a cause of concern for safety, for, it has impact on everything like I've testified in the in the past because everybody relies on the information that is in the system. I will share with you something that is not very known, but I brought to the attention of management in 02/2009 that, was being approached by an individual, wanting me to verify information on passports for illegitimate reasons.
It was not valid, the reasons they wanted, and I I refused. I brought that to the attention of management, and they scrubbed it under the rug. That person continued to come and see me, and asked me for that. So at that point, I put on a different approach, and I basically told the person, who's forcing you to do that? So the person, broke down in tears and explained to me the reason why.
I reached out to an RCMP officer. This is new. Nobody knows about this. It's live today. I reached out to an RCMP officer and a specialized investigator, CBSA, and they decided to take on the case.
And that person, I don't know what happened with her. I never saw her again, that employee. And I can't go into detail because I don't know if there was an ongoing investigation, but what she said to me that day and what I had brought to the attention of management, the management that's there should be charged with gross negligence, gross negligence on that, and that, for not investigating it further. And I think that what's happening at the agency is, they don't want to investigate anything because they're afraid that they're gonna lose the power. It's gonna reflect negatively on them, and it's opening the door for more corruption.
We have officers that have been arrested, in the recent years for accessing database and furnishing information to people of organized crime. We had officers that have been arrested, out west for associating with organized crime. Those are things that you're not hearing in the media because it's it's being, being kept low profile. It's a measure of control, but at the same time it doesn't fix the problem. It doesn't fix the problem.
And it's very scary because people like me went their information in the database and that database is accessed by the wrong people. And if I report things that I see that are dangerous and they're not actioning on it, there's consequence to everything. And that 400,000 passports that came in, the people that are on that the people that were intercepted at border is is probably individuals that that came in with those valid passports.
Speaker 2: Canada's passport strength has been declining recently, dropping to seventh place on the Henley passport index. Do you think the use of Canadian travel documents by international criminal organizations and terror groups has played a role in this decline? So are other countries beginning to see Canada as having a serious security problem?
Speaker 1: Yes. There's no doubt that, other countries, have definitely seen that we have a security problem. This is no longer a a hidden secret. Some of them have been expressing concern for a while. Like, I can attest to that.
I I in in the work that I did, I I saw it and I I I was involved in in conversation with regards to that. What I can share with you is that, the misuse of Canadian travel documents by International Criminal Organization and terror group, could contribute to such a decline. And one example that, a decline on the index, but I'm not an expert at this. There's other factors that could contribute to a decline, but but one thing that comes in mind is, in 02/2012 is the RCMP arrested a man in Gatineau, Quebec. He was issuing passports under false name to some of Canada's most notorious criminal.
He was aiding high level cocaine traffickers across Canada, out west and east, obtaining, fake passport, and he was facilitating the abduction of the Canadian passport in exchange for money from 5,000 to $20,000 per passport. And that's the situation that occurred in 2012. Two passports were detected to have been issued to a murder suspect, also involved in high trafficking of cocaine, and I can tell you having dealt with that individual myself, he was directly related to the Mexican cartels. The level of exploitation of this that had gone on for years before it was detected is a testament to probably, complacency, you know, and placing everybody at risk. And I question if our members or management were ever made aware of this, you know.
Who held who held who withheld that information from them? Why is it that they always have to come public first before something is done? Very concerning.
Speaker 2: In the coming week or so, actually about ten days, president Trump will be, appointed as the acting president of The United States. And one of the things that he's been threatening is 25% tariffs on Canada due to our, say, border insecurity. And, again, it's hard not to acknowledge that as a legitimate problem with now over double the amount of, terrorists being apprehended at the northern border as they are at the southern border. So, again, the Canadian border is now the, preferred route of access to America for some of these organizations rather than the southern border, which says a lot. In in response to that, our government announced that they were going to invest roughly a billion, dollars into border security such as more drones and helicopters and such.
So in your estimation, like, does giving more resources to the CBSA even start to deal with that problem that Trump is highlighting for those 25% tariffs? Or are you simply just giving more resources to a corrupt, institution that doesn't really care to deal with the problem in the first place?
Speaker 1: The $1,000,000,000 is an improvement that our officers need to do their job. Now at that point, will they dedicate will that money really be used and dedicated to the officers to do their job? That's a different story. But the core of the issue is the administrative bureaucracy with the current management that's in place. And the lack of accountability with the agency at every level.
The corruption factor is a big issue compiled with the lowering of visa, especially when people are landing here. Now you can put a billion dollar in detection to prevent people from going to United States, but we're still allowing them to land here undetected.
Speaker 2: Right. So you're patrolling the order, but they're still here with those passports.
Speaker 1: Keep in the keep in mind one thing. I'm I'm in the best place to explain this. Okay? Because I you know, I know. So the people that were caught at the border, they didn't come from The States in Quebec and say, oh, we don't like it here.
We're going back in The States. They're already here. They landed here undetected by means of probably using, and I I I have to say the word probably even though I know better, probably using all these passports that were undetected. Now our government was warned of this, and I'll tell you why. Many years ago, they cut down on a large amount of numbers of officers to replace them with automated, booths where the people go and on a volunteer basis scan their passport, like, at an like, at the airports.
And you have one officer in one area, and if something happens with the passport, then he'll go there and refer the per do his job and refer person secondary. Keep in mind I'm not an expert how how it goes and operate at at a port of entry in an airport. But when you have a passport that is not entered in the database by me or mister Steiner that's been stolen overseas, well, you use that passport, you land at the airport, you put in the machine, it doesn't detect anything. So we're we've we're we're on open door, you know? So you can put a billion dollar at at the border to enforce the security to prevent the people that are there, but if they're still landing here, we're stuck with them.
Speaker 0: So in your in your, opinion, do you think that a change of government, a change of, you know, top down leadership, conservative government over liberals, which is what we're likely to see this coming year,
Speaker 2: do you feel like they're going to
Speaker 0: be able to affect change, or is it such a a massive moving arm that is almost beyond the the current political admin or the the the sitting political administration, will they be able to change much, I guess is my real question, if it's conservative government overall?
Speaker 1: No. They, I testified to that and I made it clear to the members of parliament when I testified that, you can have a new government, let's say that for let's let's say that Mr. Qualia becomes the next prime minister, it it it's not gonna change anything unless they give us protection for the people like me who are speaking out and saying there's problem and we're being destroyed. There's an embedded culture, and especially in operational environment where, a law enforcement environment, there's some people that don't belong there, and they they it's everything about numbers, and, it's it's it won't change a thing. It won't change a thing at every level.
It won't change a thing because they're not verifying the people that we're pointing the fingers at. There's no investigation, and there's no oversight watchdog to to verify everything they're doing. So this is this is
Speaker 0: this is troubling, though. So if you if you think about this from a constituent's perspective or, like, a voter or anybody in Canada, you know, you vote for your party to win. You know, let's in in this case, say the federal party because the federal party now controls the CBSA. But if the federal party can't do anything to affect change, how how do how do we fix this problem? Because that that's very significant.
You know what I mean? That's that's tough that's a tough pill to swallow.
Speaker 1: An oversight committee, a watchdog for the agency, and, president, of the agency no longer has access and control over any investigation. That's the first thing. You're removed there, and I testified in parliament because of what I know, what I've seen, some things that I can't even tell publicly because I've been threatened, with jail time. And I've made sure to my members of parliament that they know that the agency only gives them what they want the members of parliament to see.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: It's as simple as that. So what they need to do is remove every government department and agency the right to self investigation, influence over any any investigation in any way, shape, or form, have an independent third party, and have the auditor general audited CBSA at every level of everything they do, very frequent to make sure and, to verify the work that they do to to make sure they're they're doing the resource at the right place and that, any discrepancy that is reported is investigated thoroughly because right now, the new government in place can do whatever they want. It won't change a thing because there's an embedded culture and there's not much we can do.
Speaker 0: So it it it sounds like and this may be the wrong term to use, but I think it's relatable. It almost sounds like a small version of our own little deep state where there's an organization that's acting above and beyond our government, and they're telling they're they're basically there to report on themselves. They collect their own intelligence. They deal with their own investigations and they just kinda say whatever they wanna say to parliament and they go about their business. And what's crazy to me is, the border is really our first and most significant line of defense.
So it's the most corruptible. It's also a massive organization, and you've got you've got organizations around the world working and doing apparently a very good job of corrupting these individuals. So it's I mean, I would you kinda how how would you weigh in on that? Would you sort of agree that it's almost acting as as kind of a like a Canadian deep state or part of part of a Canadian deep state?
Speaker 1: It looks like that. The the longer I work there, the longer I start to be very concerned for my safety, because, myself and a few other colleagues that came forward, I wasn't alone, there was other four or five colleagues, I concerned for my safety, because at that point you don't know just how deep the rock goes. Okay? And it seems that the people that are in position of authority believe that they could do anything they want, and get away with it. And what I said to the members of parliament, and I don't want to get away from the question you ask.
I'm trying to to to clarify, to see to show you just how bad the situation is.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I said to the members of parliament in in a in a closed room, that what I repeated earlier, CBSA only tells you what they want you to know. Second of all, what members of parliament are not always aware of is a short while before there was, members of CBSA that were asked to go and testify in front of parliament for an investigation committee of some sort, I can't remember. The person that is sitting representing CBSA in front of the members of parliament Basically, he's misleading them. He shows up there with a CBSA uniform with all the bars on his shoulder only because he's a director general. He's never worked in the field before, never earned that uniform, and previously to working there was working at the privy consul.
And now he's given a job, he probably got briefed, and he's misleading the members of parliament when he's talking to them. And I say misleading, and I I'm trying to use a word that is, trying to with the intention to say that by the uniform he's wearing, the members of parliament and thinking that this guy is a twenty five year career CBSA or custom officer, that when he gives them the information that it's it's it's based on knowledge and experience of years of experience, when in fact this guy is a bureaucrat, was working at at PreCO, and, never worked in the field before. He's only he's only he's got a bunch of diplomas and he's got, probably speak four or five language, very good on on a resume, but he he's never he's never worked in the field. He's never been in the immigration case like I did. He's never arrested someone like I did.
He never worked, in in inland enforcement. Nothing. So the members of parliament are thinking that this guy is, you know, the final answer and that he's it's clear. And then when he leaves, everything is fine and, you know, no. This is wrong.
This is wrong, and it has to stop.
Speaker 2: So how many people do you assume are, say, waiting in the shadows in a similar position to you that would want to come forward? Like, again, we we touched on it earlier briefly, like, whether you're the exception or the rule. But just to share a personal anecdote that kind of leans towards what I'm thinking here is I I I had it happen to me at a, workplace once where management found out some of the opinions and things that I said, led a crusade against me, and it led to me having to leave leave the workplace. And but what I found afterwards was there was a bunch of people. Like, the majority of the people would come up to me afterwards and say, hey.
I think what happened to you was wrong. I actually even agree with a lot of what you say. They would say that to other colleagues in private or but never say on the record. But it's because they didn't wanna face those consequences, say the consequences you're facing, which is the pressure or, or, from management and such. So, like, how many how many of use are there in this CBSA that say, no.
There is a rampant problem happening right now, but that just won't come forward because they don't wanna bear those consequences. And what would need to be put in place in order for those people to say, feel comfortable coming forward?
Speaker 1: There's, there's a a a large amount of people that have either quit the agency, moved on from the simple clerk to director generals. I I know that for a fact. And they've stayed with the agency in a very short time. When they saw what was going on, they left. The ones that were stuck like me, when they quit and they found out that I testified in parliament, as I testified in Sam Cooper's, podcast, and that the members of parliament also have in their possession the evidence that I gave them, people all the way to the manager level and director level have written to me and say, if there's an investigation in such, such, and such people, we are ready to testify for you in parliament or the police on your behalf.
So there's a a large amount of people. People are very afraid, and I know that I was the stepping stone, for, the CBSA to set an example for everybody else in CBSA because I'm the only one that, that stood tall and fought and exposed these things because I believe that, we we need they can't be two system of justice. And when the when the the situation that I refer to as corruption goes all the way to the highest ranking people in the agency, and then they believe that they're not they're not obligated to follow the rule of law, then, this has to be exposed. So, there's a lot of us and I was an example for a lot of people and the things that were said to me by the management and direction there clearly indicates that, they wanna control and eliminate people that are there. My case because I went very deep and the things I expose, became very dangerous for me, and other people are very afraid at the agency, and, there's no recourse for us.
There is no protection for us, and the members of parliament are are, are are not listening to our call for assistance, and we have no way to deliver their programs that they're asking us to deliver, because we have no protection. I got a call from a, a young man that was working at headquarters because I occupied the position of union representative for a long time for the custom immigration union. The young man was working for a director at CBSA, and, he said that, he came across things that were bothering him and that, he was being harassed. He didn't wanna go into detail, and he said he needed help. He wanted to talk, but not at the agency.
He wanted to talk somewhere else. And, he said I gotta let you go. He's coming in. He closed the he closed the phone. A few a few days later, I, I was informed that a a gentleman at CBSA had killed himself.
He had hanged himself in a closet, and, this was never further investigated. His family probably doesn't even know that this young man was being harassed, and somebody got away with murder.
Speaker 2: That is wild.
Speaker 1: And we had two more officers that committed suicide, and there's no doubt in my mind that if an independent investigation had been done on the uniform officers that committed suicide with their weapons in the last few years, an independent investigation, not the RCMP. Let's let's make it clear, not the RCMP. Somebody like the Special Investigation Unit of Ontario. I think we'd probably find different things. That's all I can tell you.
Speaker 2: Well, man, that's that that's real heavy, but one of the things you just mentioned there is that you wouldn't trust the RCMP to conduct such an investigation. Now why why is that? Is the RCMP corrupted in its own right, or is, say, some of the corruption tethered between the CBSA and the RCMP? So for instance, certain individuals or groups having, I guess, what would you call it, cross flu, cross contamination between the two.
Speaker 1: The I have just to make it clear, I have a lot of respect and love for the officers that wear uniform in the RCMP that are working hard to protect us. Make no mistake about that. But the brass at the RCMP and the people they control at RCMP, they get their investigators, the political aspect plays a big role on what they investigate or not. In my case, when I went to the RCMP, I gave them a report on the things that were occurring, some of the things that were occurring in my unit, in addition to the destruction of passport. Things that were exchanged verbally between me and one of the detectives, I picked up on and I stopped telling them things.
They issued a letter to me saying that the National Investigation Unit, what I reported about the destruction of passport didn't fall under their mandate, and they were not gonna investigate further. Who is, who is the, the person in charge of overseeing the RCMP? Well, it's the minister of public safety. Who is CBSA under? Minister of Public Safety.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: At that time, when I reported what I wanted to report well, not what I wanted, but what I reported to them, the, RCMP did not pursue it. The commissioner that was there, never I never received a call from detective or the commissioner or anything like that. Now you kind of wonder when something of this magnitude, why the RCMP is not investigating this further. CBSA issues a statement that they investigated this thoroughly and independently with with the RCMP, but yet the RCMP gives me a letter and to my lawyer's member of parliament, they never investigated it. And, I know that the officers in that room that day were when the more I talked, they were not very comfortable with that.
They were professional. I I will admit that, but they were not comfortable with that, and one of them said something to me that made me stop speaking more. So, no, I don't have any trust in them anymore. I would never trust, and I don't recommend any public servant presently without any protection by the law that comes across something like I did to go to the RCMP. Not right now.
Speaker 0: It's it's interesting And
Speaker 1: it's it's very sad.
Speaker 0: It's it's it's interesting sort of piecing this together as you're telling me, because in on on on one side, you've kind of got the CBSA that is, you know, doing their own investigations and and not disclosing information to parliament. Right? So we we kinda see that it's operating as its own kind of deep state arm. I know deep state's not right, but just for lack of a better term. But then I
Speaker 1: see what you mean. Yeah.
Speaker 0: But then you've also got the RCMP that would be investigating anything that maybe the CBSA is doing wrong or anything that's happening in that space. So if if if the RCMP is still doing their job, then we have to sort of assume that there is some sort of high level government involvement here, like, that the corruption, like, it's it's even though it may be kind of operating under this deep state, if they're getting coverage from the RCMP as well and it's the public safety minister that's pulling those strings, then there must be people in government that really do know what's going on at up super high levels. We could be all the way to the prime minister or within within his cabinet that must understand what's happening here and how these two things are connected because they couldn't run cover with one organization for the other if they didn't fully understand. Would you agree?
Speaker 1: Yes. I agree. I agree, and it's very concerning, and, I think that if we wanna move forward, that the political involvement for the RCMP should be monitored, and the RCMP should have the right to, the head of the RCMP, the commissioner should should have the right to to to defend himself or to speak out at any point in time without fear for his job if, somebody is trying to interfere with the natural course of justice. They should have the right to investigate things. Political political has no and should have no involvement in any investigation that the RCMP is doing.
And even, I'm I'm not an expert at this. I really don't know how the RCMP commissioner is selected, but, it should be done by, people that are not government official like the like it's done right now. In my letter to the RCMP, there are other things aside from the passport that I divulge, and I go in specific detail about what it is. And in any other circumstances, if anybody else in the public sector, including police officers from municipal force or provincial force, would have done what I described, it's a guaranteed investigation. It's probably a guaranteed criminal record, probably jail time, and yet when it occurs inside CBSA, it's not investigated and people are probably promoted.
So we have two system of justice, and it's unfair, and it's it's very dangerous. It's very dangerous for me, for other people that are working there, for you, and everybody else because, accountability should be should be the first thing priority, and people should be able to do their job and and do their job with with integrity. And right now, it's it's sending the wrong message. And everything I reported were things that were that, as far as I'm concerned, definitely met the % threshold to be investigated. It was legitimate.
And it was not hearsay. It was things I saw. There's ways of the there's ways of verifying that, and, no, we're not. We're not going there. And they did they never did anything.
So it's it's concerning for an agency as big as that, the RCMP, to not have done this. And I'm not the only one. Trust me. I know other people that have have have told me that they've they've they've dealt with things at CBSA, involving, reaching out to the RCMP about certain things and nothing. So what's going on?
Speaker 2: So one thing and I I used to fall into this trap before was that, you know, because you hear it all the time that say, Canadians are complacent or they're apathetic. They don't really care about these things, and and I I used to fall into that group. However, the more I started speaking out and the more people that I had come to me, what I realized was it's not so much that people don't care or that they aren't willing to do something about these things, is that they just don't know what they can do. So say the average citizen that's just listening to this podcast right now that is say completely on board and they go, wow, this is a a real big issue. Maybe they even knew some of these things beforehand.
I find that our audience is quite informed. What what can the average citizen do right now? Whether it be, say, sending emails to, MPs, senators, blah blah blah? Like, is there is there any action that the average person can take to help out with, say, your cause?
Speaker 1: I think that the Canadian public would probably be in shock if I was allowed to testify in parliament under immunity and tell everything I've seen and name the names of the people and everything that's going on and what was never investigated. Then they would realize the importance of protecting public servant like me and other of my colleagues and everybody else that are stuck in the government that are seeing gross mismanagement, criminal acts, for various reasons. It could be benefit, organized crime, influence, everything. So what they need to do is and and I'm I'm very sorry, but I have to say this, is that the next government power, the Canadian public needs to start writing right now, sending emails. Every person that lives in Canada, not just Canadian public, because everybody has rights in Canada, okay.
Regardless they are not a citizen or a criminal, when I was working there you had rights and I had an obligation to follow them. But obviously it was a different mindset inside the agency. But every member, everybody lives in Canada needs to start bombarding their their, members of parliament regardless that they're who they are and requesting accountability. Otherwise, don't vote because you're you're just using the Band Aid approach. That's all you're doing.
You're putting somebody else, but the culture stays.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: The rules don't the rules don't change, and and the bad actors have evolved, including the people inside the government departments that they know the law, they know what they can do to people like me. And it's we're systematically being eliminated, and we're being used as example to make sure that nobody comes forward to the advantage of the people that are the problem. And what the members of parliament don't seem to understand is that people like me are their eyes and ears. Every member of parliament has worked really hard, regardless who they are, has worked really hard to get where they are. They have good intention, they want to deliver good programs, but they don't give people like me protection, they don't give me access when I want to tell them there's a problem with me trying to deliver your program because there's corruption, there's influence, there's lone wolves, there's these things that are happening, and it's placing national security at risk, and we're even looking at people, even reporting people planting evidence under the people to entrap them.
And nothing's being done. So how do you believe you're gonna stay as long as you want in the government if you don't protect me, your whistle internal whistleblower, to tell you that the program you're trying to ask me to deliver and the money is being mishandled and that there's corruption inside. It's it's it's people have to start sending their members of parliament email every day demanding firm commitments on protecting protecting public servant, firm commitments from the the the the leader of the of the new party saying you need it's you're not just gonna get elected. You need to commit to these things, to change these things. Otherwise, your money is going to waste.
Simple as that. And we are gonna face our worst nightmare very in the in the very near future because we got off the track so bad that accountability is gone.
Speaker 0: So in your opinion, based on how far we've gone off track, how many how many fake passports there are out there, how easy it is to access Canada right now, can you give me an idea of what you think the ramifications look like for Canadians over the few years? Like, how bad is this gonna get? What are we looking at?
Speaker 1: Well, we have a lot of people that are here that shouldn't be here. That's the first thing. Let's assume that, mister Paul Yeom will be in power, and he's gonna do his best to to, address all these issues at the same time. It won't happen overnight. That's for sure.
So the Canadian public is is still gonna be, in in I I can't talk about the economic aspect, but security wise, nothing's gonna change overnight, and we're probably gonna be stuck with a lot of problems of criminality probably increasing until we find out, the full extent of it and the resource are just not there. Simple as that. And, it's it's not gonna be safe for, it I know that I'm gonna get probably, looked at in the wrong way by some high ranking people that I wanna in in the government, that want to silence me and and prevent me from speaking out. But with the type of people that are here right now, we should be very concerned about that right now, and it's being minimized. That's what I can tell you.
Speaker 2: Alright. Well, any closing thoughts here at all, Luke? Anything you wanted to share that we didn't necessarily get to or didn't didn't ask you ourselves that you think the listeners should know about?
Speaker 1: Well, I think that, the Canadian public in itself should pay a lot of attention to people like me and other whistleblowers that are coming forward. Unlike other whistleblowers, I was an internal whistleblower, so I never went to the media or nobody, and I got punished for it, destroyed, almost killed. And, it it's indicators that there's bigger things happening that are not being addressed. So you they need to request firm commitments from a member of parliament because at one point or another, whether they wanna admit or not, it's gonna affect them. And, too many alarms were were sounded and nothing was done.
So, we need firm commitment from our member of parliament and we need definitely need the support of the public because they're the they're the one paying their taxes and they're not getting their money for their value right now. I can assure you of that. And this podcast here, just like under Sam Cooper, were podcasts that were important for me to speak out because some members of parliament, have expressed concern for my safety for the things I've exposed and one of them was, somebody from the Liberal government. And I asked them, was this, your concern? Were they for my safety from the members organized crime?
And they said no, from somebody else because we're concerned that what you're saying is true. You've seen your evidence. You you're exposing things to a level that nobody has ever been before. So, I think it's important that people pay attention, and, I have I'm very upset with the regular media. I I'm not allowed to say the names, but there's a lot of journalists that could have made a difference and prevent a lot of things if they had done their job when we went to them, and they didn't.
So we thank you, the independent journalists, for giving the Canadian public the right time and giving me an opportunity to expose right thing because the best thing that could've that the what people wanted to happen to me to get rid of me, including death, would've solved a lot of their problems. So I thank you for allowing me to speak, and, I hope that the Canadian public listens to this, understands it, and the importance of supporting bill c two ninety and asking firm commitment from a member of parliament. Because right now, they can preach all they want about saving us from the bad liberals. Well, there's not too many bad liberals. There's a lot of good liberals in there.
The only thing is that there's no firm commitment anywhere. So I thank you. I apologize for going too much detail.
Speaker 0: No. No. That's great. We, honestly, thank you for for coming on and and sort of sharing your story and and helping us, you know, sort of inform our audience because like Liam said, this is what our audience wants. They wanna be informed about what's really going on, and it's really why we do what we do.
So, I appreciate you coming on. Thank you. And and as as things move along for you, if you wanna hop back on, you got more to say, you just let us know when we're here.
Speaker 1: There's, there's gonna be a book coming out very soon that I'm writing. It's being peer review right now, at a later date, and it's gonna be very relieving revealing. I I I apologize, revealing my French sometimes. And, I can assure you that if this podcast here and everything that I've done, doesn't open the eyes of people, at a later date when they start reading that, people realize the importance of protecting people like me. Wow.
I can assure you.
Speaker 0: We appreciate you moving the needle in the right direction here because we don't have enough good guys in this organization. So thank you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And, Thank
Speaker 1: you very much.
Speaker 2: And we'll be yeah. We'll be happy to talk to you again once that, once that book's once that book comes out. So
Speaker 1: Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Okay. Alright. Thanks again for joining us this evening, Luke. Thank you. Thanks, Luke.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Alright. Bye bye.
Speaker 2: Bye, everybody.
reSee.it AI Summary
Corruption is a serious threat to Canada's security, with the Sinaloa Cartel and other narco groups infiltrating the government. Whistleblower Luc Sabourin reveals issues within CBSA, while leaders stay silent on the presence of terrorists and criminals. Is Canada truly safe?
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Corruption Threatens Canada's Security The Sinaloa Cartel and other narco groups have infiltrated the Canadian government. Whistleblower Luc Sabourin exposes CBSA corruption, while leaders remain silent about terrorists and criminals. Is Canada safe? https://t.co/ozSzabN2Oy
Video Transcript AI Summary
A former CBSA officer, Luke Sabrin, claims that transnational gangs have infiltrated Canadian government agencies, facilitating the entry of terrorists and spies into Canada. He asserts that CBSA databases and operations are compromised, posing a significant security risk due to systemic corruption and lack of accountability. Sabrin's allegations echo a 2019 CBSA threat brief highlighting the exploitation of CBSA systems by criminal organizations. He emphasizes the severity of the situation, noting that threats from groups like the Sinaloa Cartel have infiltrated government institutions, undermining trust in these agencies. Sabrin calls for action to restore faith in the system, expressing concern for the safety of CBSA officers and their families amidst this corruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Canadian border security agency whistleblower says transnational gangs have compromised government agencies helping terrorists and spies enter Canada. Luke Sabrin, a former CBSA officer, alleges that the CBSA databases and operations have been compromised, aiding the entry of dangerous individuals into Canada. He warns that Canada's security is at risk due to systemic corruption and the failure of accountability measures. Sabrin's allegations align with concerns raised in a 2019 CBSA threat brief, which warned of transnational criminal organizations exploiting CBSA systems and personnel. When these things happen, you have to take action or people like you and I don't trust our institutions anymore.
When you have the Sinaloa Cartel somehow baked into our government institutions and they're able to threaten a CBA officer's kids at his house, so when that happens, you're kind of going, Oh, there's no rules. Give credit to this guy for even saying anything. You've got a gang of people that can come into my country and do whatever you want, and you have that kind of push, and I'm the one that loses because other CBSA agents are compromised to give my information up. What the hell is happening here? So yeah, no, I mean, like I said, all credit to the guy.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Watch our full interview with CBSA whistleblower @LsSabourin here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haZHqtSr5Jk
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Canada: A Nation Run By Criminals, For Criminals. A CBSA report reveals international crime networks have infiltrated Canadian institutions. When a whistleblower spoke out, the cartel showed up at his home—threatening his family to keep him silent. Is Canada safe anymore? https://t.co/QKuovzVkNK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada is facing serious allegations of infiltration by international criminal organizations within its government. Whistleblower Lew Sabarin from the CBSA revealed a disturbing incident where armed men were caught smuggling illegal immigrants, only for the case to be covered up. He also reported that a senior CBSA manager ordered the destruction of passports belonging to serious criminals, hindering law enforcement efforts. After Sabarin planned to testify, his family was threatened by the Sinaloa cartel, leading him to believe a colleague leaked his address. His claims echo a 2019 CBSA report warning about transnational criminal organizations compromising government agencies. Despite raising these issues with various government officials, including the prime minister's office, no action has been taken. The situation highlights the presence of traitors in parliament and the infiltration of criminal organizations in government agencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Canada has become a country run by criminals for criminals. A whistleblower from the Canadian Border Service Agency or the CBSA has come forward to explain the apparent infiltration of our government by international criminal organizations. Lew Sabarin tells a rather disturbing story where a CBSA unit busted a group of armed men smuggling illegal immigrants across Quebec's border only to have the whole thing covered up by the very people who are supposed to protect our border, and it doesn't stop there. In another case, a senior CBSA manager ordered the destruction of 100 of foreign passports, some belonging to serious criminals, which would have helped law enforcement catch some of the bad guys. And when Sabarin was set to testify about all of this, the notorious Sinaloa cartel threatened his kids right outside his home.
Now he's convinced that a CBSA colleague leaked his address to the Mexican cartel. Sabarin's allegations align with concerns raised in a 2019 CBSA threat report, which warned that transnational criminal organizations have compromised several of our government agencies, helping gangs, terrorists, and spies enter the country. Now Sabrin has been blowing the whistle on this to anyone in government who will listen, including the prime minister's office, but surprise surprise, nothing's been done. It's not just that we've got traitors in parliament cozying up to hostile nations, we've also got international criminal organizations embedded in our government agencies.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Canadian Corruption is Out of Control Green Slush Fund: - Chair handpicked by Trudeau’s office - Companies linked to her got $12M before, then $36M after her appointment - Total misappropriations: hundreds of millions Should this be considered criminal? https://t.co/i087DLxEgk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Corruption in Canada is alarming. Recent hearings revealed that Annette Vashuran, chair of the Liberals' green fund, was chosen by the prime minister's office despite her connections to companies that had already received over $12 million from the fund she oversees. After her appointment, these companies received an additional $36 million in taxpayer money, highlighting a clear conflict of interest. The green fund is currently under investigation for misappropriating around $150 million, with many similar funds likely facing similar scrutiny. Meanwhile, Canadians are paying more in taxes than for housing, food, and clothing combined, indicating that corrupt politicians are draining resources needed for citizens' basic survival. This situation goes beyond mismanagement; it borders on criminal activity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The amount of corruption in Canada is incomprehensible. In a recent government hearing, it was revealed that Annette Vashuran, chair of the Liberals' green slush fund, was handpicked by the prime minister's office. This despite the fact that companies she was directly involved with had already received over $12,000,000 from the very fund she was being appointed to oversee, a glaring conflict of interest. After her appointment, those same companies received an additional $36,000,000 in taxpayer funding. And this is just one fund.
The green slush fund alone is under investigation for the misappropriation of around a $150,000,000 Now imagine there are dozens more just like it. Meanwhile, the average Canadian is paying more in taxes than they are for housing, food, and clothing combined. In other words, corrupt politicians are siphoning more from citizens than they're left with for their basic survival. This isn't just mismanagement, it's criminal.
reSee.it AI Summary
Justin Trudeau has significantly expanded the federal workforce, increasing the number of bureaucrats by 40%, which costs taxpayers $8.2 billion annually. Additional expenses, including CPP and EI contributions, operational costs, and pensions, push the total taxpayer burden to over $250 billion in 20 years. When considering the entire federal workforce, costs approach nearly $1 trillion. Compared to the U.S., Canada has a higher number of bureaucrats relative to its population, primarily in administrative roles. This growth is seen as detrimental to addressing Canada’s pressing issues.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Justin Trudeau Has Hired 100K Federal Bureaucrats Under his rule, the number of federal employees has grown by 40%. Their salaries cost Canadian taxpayers $8.2B a year. But it gets worse... much much worse. 🧵 https://t.co/A6JJ5URo7t
Video Transcript AI Summary
Justin Trudeau has significantly increased Canada's federal workforce to create an illusion of job growth amid economic challenges. This public sector hiring, which has added about 100,000 federal employees since he took office, allows the government to showcase employment gains. However, it imposes a substantial long-term financial burden on taxpayers, costing approximately $8.2 billion annually at an average salary of $82,000 per employee. This approach raises concerns about the sustainability of such growth and its impact on the economy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Justin Trudeau has been rapidly expanding Canada's federal workforce to mask the cracks in our crumbling economy. This surge in public sector hiring allows the government to brag about job growth, but it's nothing more than short term manipulation that saddles taxpayers with an enormous long term burden. Since taking office, Trudeau has added roughly a 100,000 federal employees. At an average salary of $82,000 per employee, this alone cost taxpayers $8,200,000,000 annually. But that's just the start.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Additional annual costs of Trudeau's administrative army: - CPP and EI contributions: $539M 💰 - Operational Costs: $720M 🏢 - 15 Year Public Pension: $61B Add it all together, and the taxpayer price tag exceeds $250 billion over 20 years 😳 https://t.co/5ucBGAYnli
Video Transcript AI Summary
Employers incur significant costs, including $539 million annually for matching CPP and EI contributions. Operational expenses, such as office space and equipment, add another $720 million per year. Additionally, each employee becomes eligible for lifetime pension benefits averaging $32,800 after 20 years, which, when indexed to inflation, results in a total pension burden exceeding $61 billion for 15 years of retirement. When combined, these expenses lead to a total taxpayer cost of over $250 billion over 20 years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Employers must also pay matching CPP and EI contributions, which add another $539,000,000 annually. Operational costs, including office space, equipment, and benefits, tack on an additional $720,000,000 per year. Then there's the looming pension burden. Each employee is eligible for lifetime benefits averaging $32,800 annually after 20 years of service. With pensions indexed to inflation, this cost balloons to over $61,000,000,000 for 15 years of retirement.
Add it all together, and the taxpayer price tag exceeds $250,000,000,000 over 20 years.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Again, the costs of Trudeau's bureaucracy get worse. The figures above only account for his *NEW* hires. Once you account for Canada's entire federal workforce (360,000), taxpayers are on the hook for nearly $1 TRILLION 💸 This is just employment costs. Insane. 🤯 https://t.co/4Gopa7pB0h
Video Transcript AI Summary
The cost of maintaining Trudeau's proposed 100,000 new hires is significant. As of 2023, Canada’s federal public service employs nearly 360,000 individuals. Over the next 20 years, sustaining this workforce will cost taxpayers close to $1 trillion. This immense figure emphasizes the unsustainable nature of the federal bureaucracy and highlights the pressing need for reform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Keep in mind, all of these figures are calculating the cost of Trudeau's a 100,000 new hires. As of 2023, the federal public service has just shy of 360,000 employees. Maintaining Canada's current federal workforce will cost taxpayers nearly $1,000,000,000,000 over the next 20 years. This staggering figure highlights the unsustainable nature of the federal bureaucracy and underscores the urgent need for reform.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Lets compare the number of U.S. and Canadian federal bureaucrats: 🇺🇸 America: 1.8 Million 🇨🇦 Canada: 3.1 Million (adjusted for population difference) While America's military personnel makes up a large portion of their federal workforce, Canada's is mostly administrative. https://t.co/knkKFtZwX8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada's federal bureaucracy is nearly twice the size of the US when adjusted for population. If Canada had a population of 345 million, it would employ about 3.1 million bureaucrats, compared to 1.8 million in the US. Notably, Canada has more federal government employees but significantly fewer military personnel. While the US focuses on defense and national security, Canada has shifted resources toward a growing administrative state, resulting in a large number of bureaucrats who are not contributing to economic productivity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's put this into perspective by making a comparison to the United States. When adjusted for population, Canada's federal bureaucracy is nearly double the size of the US. If scaled to an equivalent US population of 345,000,000, Canada's public service would employ 3,100,000 bureaucrats, far exceeding the 1,800,000 in the US. Even more revealing, at an equivalent scale, Canada has more federal government employees than the United States, but far fewer federally employed military personnel. While the US prioritizes defense and national security, Canada has redirected its resources towards an ever expanding administrative state, AKA useless bureaucrats who do absolutely nothing that can be considered economically productive.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Trudeau's bureaucracy is an economic tumour. Every dollar funnelled into this unproductive entity is a dollar not spent on meaningful solutions to Canada’s pressing issues. Reducing the federal workforce isn’t about heartless cuts; it’s about the survival of Canada. https://t.co/eXo2cmIAj6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Reckless growth in government is a systemic failure, resembling an economic tumor. Despite a growing workforce, Canadians face poor service delivery, inefficiencies, and wasteful spending. Instead of fostering innovation or addressing urgent national challenges, the administration has focused on expanding bureaucracy to artificially boost economic metrics. The financial burden on taxpayers is significant, but the opportunity cost may be even greater. Every dollar spent on this bloated bureaucracy is a dollar not invested in meaningful solutions for Canada's pressing issues. A leaner, more efficient public service is essential for safeguarding Canada's economic future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Such reckless growth isn't just a budgetary issue. It's a systemic failure akin to an economic tumor. Despite the ballooning workforce, Canadians endure poor service delivery, government inefficiencies, and wasteful spending. Rather than fostering innovation or solving urgent national challenges, Trudeau's administration has prioritized growing the bureaucracy to inflate economic metrics artificially. The cost to taxpayers is staggering, but the opportunity cost may be even greater.
Every dollar funnelled into this bloated bureaucracy is a dollar not spent on meaningful solutions to Canada's pressing issues. A leaner, more efficient public service isn't just desirable. It's essential to safeguarding Canada's economic future.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Shoutout to @NyaPfanner for the excellent analysis that served as the basis for this thread. https://t.co/9o4ZPs6Rnz
@NyaPfanner - Nya Pfannerstill
Lets compare the USA and CDN Federal Public work force shall we? I see all this election fear mongering from Liberals and NDP that a Conservative Govt will cut public work force, like that's a bad thing https://t.co/8bvGZQTurC
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Reminder: Canada's Taxation System is a Criminal Enterprise The average taxpayer effectively works six months a year to fund the government. Can Canadians survive anymore taxation? https://t.co/1d1ZC2BGeh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada's tax system heavily burdens the average worker, with $22,376 taken annually from a $55,000 income through various taxes, including income tax, employment insurance, and property taxes. This leaves only $32,624, which is further diminished by a 13% sales tax, reducing purchasing power to $28,380. Essentially, workers spend half the year working for the government. In return, they face a government that has restricted freedoms, imposed health mandates, and overseen a failing healthcare system, rising crime rates, and homelessness. There are concerns about legislation targeting free speech and plans to eliminate private car ownership by 2030. The current governance is seen as a threat to the freedoms fought for by previous generations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Canada's tax system is a criminal enterprise sucking dry the $55,000 annual income of the average Joe. Trudeau and the talking Timbit pocketed combined $11,419 in income tax, while $3,166 disappears into employment insurance in the Canadian pension plan. Considering 32% of fuel costs in Ontario are taxes, a further $1,000 is seized from Joe and an additional $6,000 in property taxes. In total, Joe relinquishes $22,376 annually to the government. The remaining $32,624 is subject to a 13% sales tax every time he spends a dime, dwindling Joe's purchasing power to $28,380 or half of his annual salary.
Essentially, Joe works 6 months out of the year as a slave to the state. And what does Joe get in return for this modern day serfdom? A government that imprisoned him in his own home for years, coerced him into taking potentially harmful experimental pharmaceutical products, a health care system that ranks second to last among its peers, an economy spiraling towards disaster, as well as out of control crime rates and mass homelessness plaguing our streets. All of this courtesy of a cabal of traders bureaucrats who dream of eradicating private car ownership by 2030 and are pushing legislation that would throw Canadians in jail for daring to utter anything deemed hateful by their Orwellian standards. Tyranny isn't a distant threat.
It's already entrenched in Canada's governance, eroding the freedoms fought for by generations past.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦💉 BILLIONS of Dollars Were Given to Doctors for COVID-19 Vaccinations One Kingston doctor must repay $600K after creating a mass-vaccination "drive-thru." How can science and public health be objective when doctors stand to profit millions for pushing specific products? https://t.co/myjx5OgRVv
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Kingston doctor, Elaine Ma, has been ordered to repay over $600,000 for COVID-19 vaccination payments from the Ontario government. In December 2021, she set up mass vaccination clinics, using undergraduate medical student volunteers, which violated Ontario's rules requiring that vaccine administrators be employees and that vaccinations occur at the doctor's registered office. The financial incentives for COVID vaccines were significantly higher than for other vaccines, creating a scenario where speed and volume were prioritized over compliance and patient care. This situation raises concerns about the balance between incentivizing vaccinations and ensuring proper healthcare delivery. With over 100 million doses administered in Canada, the financial implications are substantial, leading to questions about trust in healthcare institutions when financial incentives overshadow proper care.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a rather stunning example of how pandemic policies can spiral into financial chaos, Kingston based doctor Elaine Ma has been ordered to repay over $600,000 in payments made by the Ontario government for administering COVID 19 vaccinations. That's a lot of money for administering vaccines though. No? In December 2021, doctor Ma set up multiple mass vaccination clinics injecting thousands of people every day. To administer the vaccines, she enlisted undergraduate medical student volunteers.
A decision that ultimately invalidated her claims under the Ontario government's rules. So here's how it worked. Ontario's COVID 19 vaccine program paid doctors $13 per shot through its fee for service model. An additional $5.60 could be claimed if the visit was solely for vaccination. Doctor Ma eager to make that money, organized large scale operations outside her licensed practice.
However, Ontario rules stipulated 2 crucial conditions, vaccine administrators had to be the doctor's employees and the vaccinations had to occur at the doctor's registered office. Neither was true in doctor Ma's case. Now in addition to her blatant disregard for the rules to make that money, here's what I wanna highlight. The financial incentives for COVID vaccines at $18.60 per shot were more than double what doctors typically received for administering other vaccines like flu shots or those in the childhood schedule. So while one could argue that the program was designed to speed up vaccinations, it ended up fostering the environment rife with financial complications.
Raising critical questions about the balance between incentivizing rapid vaccination and ensuring proper patient care and informed consent. I mean how are undergraduate medical student volunteers focused on speed and volume providing informed consent? Anyway, this is just one doctor who's now been forced to repay $600,000 which doesn't even include what she gets to keep. At scale, according to the government's own figures, over 100,000,000 doses were administered in Canada. By this math, we're talking about 1,000,000,000 of dollars in government funding that was up for grabs.
The government practically created a wild west gold rush scenario for physicians where financial incentives prioritize speed and volume over strict regulatory compliance, all for a vaccine that the NIH itself now admits was rushed, risky, and ineffective. So my question is, how can anyone be expected to trust our institutions when it's so clear that the government's financial incentives completely overshadowed the proper delivery of health care specifically for a product that was rushed, risky, and ineffective?
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦Canadians have no clue how corrupt, authoritarian, and incompetent our institutions have become. Their shallow understanding of history, economics, and politics keeps them blind. As long as they can eat Doritos and watch the Maple Leafs, they believe they're free. https://t.co/s86sq2zqR5
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump winning the election isn't the biggest story this week. A report reveals Canada's involvement in China's gain-of-function research, which Trudeau allegedly covered up, raising questions about accountability in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, check out the 'Everybody vs Trudeau' shirt to support small businesses and independent media.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦🇺🇸🇨🇳 Donald Trump winning the election isn't the biggest story this week. A report confirms Canada’s involvement in China’s gain-of-function research, and Trudeau covered it up. Canada may have helped cause the COVID-19 pandemic. What does accountability look like?
Video Transcript AI Summary
While attention is on Trump’s election bid, a concerning story about Canada’s involvement in COVID-19 is emerging. The Trudeau government allegedly allowed the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg to ship deadly viruses to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, despite warnings from CSIS about military ties. Instead of halting operations, the government continued collaboration, which may have contributed to the pandemic. Genetic markers of SARS CoV 2 found in Wuhan match viruses sent from Winnipeg. The Trudeau administration reportedly obstructed investigations and delayed accountability, allowing involved scientists to return to China. This negligence could have played a role in a pandemic that resulted in millions of deaths and significant global disruption. The situation raises serious questions about government responsibility and the potential for treasonous actions in the face of a global crisis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: While everyone is focused on Trump winning the US election, a story about Canada's possible role in creating COVID nineteen is flying under the radar. This should be sending shock waves around the world. The Trudeau government was complicit in shipping deadly viruses to China's bioweapons labs, which may have cost millions of lives. That is worth repeating. Our government discovered that its top security laboratory was leaking lethal pathogens to a hostile foreign power, then made a deliberate decision to allow it to continue happening.
A recent parliamentary report reveals that the National Microbiology Laboratory, or NML, in Winnipeg and China's Wuhan Institute of Virology were working hand in hand. Under the Trudeau government's watch, deadly viruses were reportedly transferred from the Wuhan lab even after CSIS raised alarms about ties to the Chinese military. Instead of shutting down the lab, suspending personnel, or alerting the RCMP, the Trudeau administration stayed passive, effectively greenlighting further collaboration with agents of a state known for bioweapons research. SARS CoV 2 samples found in Wuhan bear genetic markers of viruses sent from Winnipeg, implicating Canada in China's gain of function research. For 3 years, the Trudeau government stonewalled parliament and the RCMP, refusing to release crucial evidence about the events in Winnipeg.
They even went so far as to sue parliament to block an investigation, giving scientists involved ample time to return to China without facing questioning. These same scientists, now operating under new titles, continue their work in China, potentially advancing research that may have already led to a global catastrophe. To compound this, during the pandemic, the Trudeau government called a snap election, delaying the investigation further and allegedly providing political cover for Chinese interference in Canadian elections. If these allegations hold weight, Canada's reckless complacency may have contributed to a pandemic that claimed over 7,000,000 lives, eroded civil liberties worldwide, and shattered the global economy. This isn't a conspiracy theory.
It's documented evidence of a government willing to risk global pandemics for political optics. Refusing to confront these facts only fuels further contempt for Canadian democracy, a betrayal that goes beyond mere incompetence and borders on treason.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
Get your ‘Everybody vs Trudeau’ shirt and help support small businesses and independent media. Visit: http://everybodyvstrudeau.com
Everybody vs Trudeau
Everybody vs Trudeau
everybodyvstrudeau.com
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
The average Canadian is living in a false reality. We do not live in a democracy. https://t.co/5G31nU9m2D
Video Transcript AI Summary
Evidence suggests connections between organized crime and Justin Trudeau's fundraising efforts, raising concerns about potential compromises within his inner circle. Trudeau has called elections strategically, indicating confidence in securing a majority, which implies deeper infiltration by external influences since 2013. There’s an ideological aspect to this, as seen with figures like Stephen Gouveau, who openly identify as socialists. Meetings between Canadian politicians and Chinese organizations linked to the United Front and State Security highlight a strategy of ideological subversion. The goal is to align interests and draw individuals closer, while those who resist are deemed enemies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I can draw the concrete evidence of people related to an underground organized crime casino fundraising for Justin Trudeau. How close could China be to his inner circle? I'm told the Canadian intelligence believes people in his office could be compromised.
Speaker 1: Trudeau pulled a shotgun on elections a couple times. The only time you do that is if you think you can win a majority. Following that logic, if they were involved in 2019 and 2021 and you know he's pulling that lever, in my opinion, it leads me to believe that they are far more infiltrated into that group and have a lot more influence than we're
Speaker 0: being told. It it's not 2019 and 21. The evidence is they they supported him from when Justin Trudeau from 2013. Oh, wow. When it comes to the socialist states, there's an ideological element to it above just the pure economic power.
It's kind of like, okay, can we subvert them ideologically? And you do see guys like Stephen Gouveau and stuff in parliaments openly state that he's a socialist. If you see a Stephen Guillebeau having meetings with green organizations in China, it's proven they're actually United Front and Chinese Ministry of State Security entities. This is part of the United Front Leninist thinking that China adopted. If someone's interest is X, you get close to them by being interested in x, and people that you can't capture are just classed enemy.
United front, just bring everyone as close to you as you can.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 The RCMP is Helping Justin Trudeau Turn Canada into a Surveillance State Every totalitarian regime relies on mass surveillance to keep citizens obedient. Are fundamental liberties—like the right to privacy—under attack in Canada?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The RCMP has expanded surveillance capabilities in the last 5 years, adopting technologies that raise privacy concerns. Covert software infiltrates devices, accessing communications and activating cameras/microphones. Cell site simulators collect data from nearby devices, raising concerns about tracking innocent individuals.
The speaker claims the RCMP is unwilling to target organized crime and protects corrupt politicians, and that these actions demonstrate unfairness and injustice towards Canadians. The speaker suggests these surveillance tools encourage self-censorship because the RCMP can infiltrate devices and monitor citizens. Surveillance in totalitarian regimes aims to control populations by creating constant observation, driving obedience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The RCMP has expanded its surveillance capabilities over the past 5 years adopting advanced technologies that raise significant privacy concerns. The RCMP now employs covert software to infiltrate digital devices, accessing communications, screenshots, and even activating cameras and microphones representing a major breach of privacy. Cell site simulators, which mimic cell towers to collect data from nearby devices, raise concerns about tracking innocent individuals alongside suspects. You can have power, but the more you use it, the more likely it is to be corrupted. Humans are very predictable in that sense.
We already know that they're not willing to go after organized criminals. We already know that they protect our politicians who we know are doing corrupt and criminal things. These people have already shown that they're not acting in a fair and just way for Canadians at scale. They're sort of telling you to self censor, because I've already got these tools and I'm already watching you. That's what it feels like a little bit, right?
Because if you know, Hey, I can infiltrate your digital device. I can listen to you. I can see you. You go, I'm definitely gonna curve some of the things that I'm saying. When it comes to surveillance in totalitarian regimes, what you were just pointing out there is exactly the reason they employ these things is because they know that people act differently when those people know that they're being observed.
It automatically drives forward obedience within the population if everyone thinks they're under surveillance all the time.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦 Liberals Told Firefighters to Stand Down in Jasper Then Blamed the Wildfire on Climate Change 20 Trucks and 50 Firefighters turned away while people’s homes burned Who is to blame for the Jasper wildfire? https://t.co/BoYt2kJ9OF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Parks Canada allegedly prevented 20 fire trucks and 50 firefighters from Edmonton from battling the Jasper wildfires. The fires were fueled by deadwood that the federal government failed to clear, and by government bureaucracy.
As a third of Jasper burned, Parks Canada, under Minister Stephen Gilbeau, declined help and ordered firefighters not to fight the fire, blaming climate change for the devastation. They ignored fire prevention and refused help from qualified firefighters. Jasper burned because of their decisions, not the weather, which constitutes criminal negligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: According to recent testimony from an Edmonton emergency response organization, Parks Canada prevented 20 fire trucks and 50 firefighters from battling the wildfires of Jasper. So these wildfires were not only fueled by large amounts of deadwood that the federal government failed to clear, but also by insane government bureaucracy. I mean, imagine watching your town burn while an entire firefighting force stood idle because the government chose flawed procedure and red tape over protection. As a third of Jasper went up in flames, Parks Canada under the leadership of minister Stephen Gilbeau not only declined help, but actively ordered them not to fight the fire. And if that wasn't enough, they continue to have the nerve to blame climate change for the devastation.
I mean, they didn't just fail. They actively made things worse by ignoring fire prevention strategies and refusing help from qualified firefighters, yet they expect us to believe that climate change is the real villain here. This wasn't just incompetence, it was criminal negligence. Jasper burned because of their decisions, not the weather.
@BlendrNews - BlendrNews
🇨🇦😳 Bill C-293: Canada's Pandemic Prevention Plan You thought COVID was bad? This is straight out of your nightmares.