TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Bobby1_x

Saved - March 3, 2026 at 8:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that in 2003 Colin Powell lied to the UN, claiming US evidence of Iraqi WMDs to justify invading Iraq; in 2025 Netanyahu told Fox News Iran was working on “Weapons of Death”; the lies they tell these boomers don’t even change...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

2003: Colin Powell lies to the UN telling them the US has evidence that Iraq has "Weapons of Mass Destruction" (WMDs) to justify invading Iraq 2025: Netanyahu tells Fox News Iran was working on "Weapons of Mass Death" The lies they tell these boomers don't even change...

Saved - March 3, 2026 at 7:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that Qatar and Saudi Arabia reportedly arrested Mossad agents attempting to bomb them and frame Iran, suggesting such false flags could target the U.S. This isn’t new; it echoes the Lavon Affair, a historical example.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Qatar and Saudi Arabia just arrested Mossad agents attempting to bomb them and blame it on Iran And these kind of false flag attacks may very well be used against the US next... But here's the thing: This wouldn't be the first time This is the story of the Lavon Affair:

Saved - February 12, 2026 at 9:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Here's my take: fiat currencies backed by nothing didn’t exist until Nixon left the gold standard in 1971. Before that, dollars were redeemable for gold at the treasury, giving a rough gold standard and more stability. I think gold and silver will be money, but not for everyday payments. We’ll have a dollar-like digital currency redeemable for a fixed amount of gold and/or silver, which would largely curb inflation—until it’s unpegged again after a century.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

So here's the thing Grant Fiat currencies backed by nothing didn't really exist until Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971 But people weren't exchanging physical gold before 1971, it was just that the dollars they had were redeemable at the treasury for a specified amount of gold And they had this gold standard because with the dollar pegged to a scare physical asset, like gold, it created a more stable currency that wasn't as easy to manipulate So do we think gold and silver will be money? Yes, but not for everyday transactions I don't anticipate having gold and silver on me to make payments. I would have a currency similar to dollars - and digital currency at that - for daily transactions. That digital currency will be redeemable in to a set, fixed amount of gold and/or silver And when that gold standard happens inflation will all but disappear ...at least until they unpeg the currency's fixed rate to gold again after a century or so Also here's a brief history of how gold standards started in the first place:

Video Transcript AI Summary
A thousand years after the death of Christ, money changers, those who loan out and manipulate the quantity of money, were active in medieval England. They were not bankers per se; the money changers generally were the goldsmiths. They were the first bankers because they started keeping other people's gold for safekeeping in their vaults. The first paper money was merely a receipt for gold left at the goldsmith. Paper money caught on because it was more convenient than carrying around a lot of heavy gold and silver coins. Eventually, goldsmiths noticed that only a small fraction of the depositors ever came in and demanded their gold at any one time. Goldsmiths started cheating on the system. They discovered that they could print more money than they had gold, and usually, no one would be the wiser. Then they could loan out this extra money and collect interest on it. This was the birth of fractional reserve banking, that is, loaning out many times more money than you have assets on deposit. So, if a thousand dollars in gold were deposited with them, they could loan out about $10,000 in paper money and draw interest payments on it, and no one would ever discover the deception. By this means, goldsmiths gradually accumulated more and more wealth and used this wealth to accumulate more and more gold. Today, this practice of loaning out more money than there are reserves is known as fractional reserve banking. Every bank in The United States is allowed to loan out at least 10 times more money than they actually have. That's why they get rich on charging, let's say, 8% interest. It's not really 8% per year, which is their income. It's 80%. That's why bank buildings are always the largest in town. But does that mean that all interest or all banking should be illegal? Hardly. In the Middle Ages, canon law, the law of the Catholic Church, forbade charging interest on loans. This concept followed the teachings of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. They taught that the purpose of money was to serve the members of society to facilitate the exchange of goods needed to lead a virtuous life. Interest, in their belief, hindered this purpose by putting an unnecessary burden on the use of money. In other words, interest was contrary to reason and justice. Reflecting Church law in the Middle Ages, Europe forbade charging interest on loans and made it a crime called usury. As commerce grew, and therefore opportunities for investment arose in the late Middle Ages, it came to be recognized that to loan money had a cost for the lender, both in risk and in lost opportunity. So some charges were allowed, but not interest per se. But all moralists, no matter what religion, condemn fraud, oppression of the poor, and injustice is clearly immoral. As we will see, fractional reserve lending is rooted in a fraud, results in widespread poverty, and reduces the value of everyone else's money. The ancient goldsmiths discovered that extra profits could be made by rowing the economy between easy money and tight money. When they made money easier to borrow, then the amount of money in circulation expanded. Money was plentiful. People took out more loans to expand their businesses. But then, the money changers would tighten the money supply. They would make loans more difficult to get. What would happen? Just what happens today. A certain percentage of people could not repay their previous loans and could not take out new loans to repay the old ones. Therefore, they went bankrupt and had to sell their assets to the goldsmiths for pennies on the dollar. The same thing is still going on today. Only today, we call this rowing of the economy up and down the business cycle. Like Julius Caesar, King Henry the first
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A thousand years after the death of Christ, money changers, those who loan out and manipulate the quantity of money, were active in medieval England. In fact, they were so active that acting together, they could manipulate the entire English economy. These were not bankers per se. The money changers generally were the goldsmiths. They were the first bankers because they started keeping other people's gold for safekeeping in their vaults. The first paper money was merely a receipt for gold left at the goldsmith. Paper money caught on because it was more convenient than carrying around a lot of heavy gold and silver coins. Eventually, goldsmiths noticed that only a small fraction of the depositors ever came in and demanded their gold at any one time. Goldsmiths started cheating on the system. They discovered that they could print more money than they had gold, and usually, no one would be the wiser. Then they could loan out this extra money and collect interest on it. This was the birth of fractional reserve banking, that is, loaning out many times more money than you have assets on deposit. So, if a thousand dollars in gold were deposited with them, they could loan out about $10,000 in paper money and draw interest payments on it, and no one would ever discover the deception. By this means, goldsmiths gradually accumulated more and more wealth and used this wealth to accumulate more and more gold. Today, this practice of loaning out more money than there are reserves is known as fractional reserve banking. Every bank in The United States is allowed to loan out at least 10 times more money than they actually have. That's why they get rich on charging, let's say, 8% interest. It's not really 8% per year, which is their income. It's 80%. That's why bank buildings are always the largest in town. But does that mean that all interest or all banking should be illegal? Hardly. In the Middle Ages, canon law, the law of the Catholic Church, forbade charging interest on loans. This concept followed the teachings of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. They taught that the purpose of money was to serve the members of society to facilitate the exchange of goods needed to lead a virtuous life. Interest, in their belief, hindered this purpose by putting an unnecessary burden on the use of money. In other words, interest was contrary to reason and justice. Reflecting Church law in the Middle Ages, Europe forbade charging interest on loans and made it a crime called usury. As commerce grew, and therefore opportunities for investment arose in the late Middle Ages, it came to be recognized that to loan money had a cost for the lender, both in risk and in lost opportunity. So some charges were allowed, but not interest per se. But all moralists, no matter what religion, condemn fraud, oppression of the poor, and injustice is clearly immoral. As we will see, fractional reserve lending is rooted in a fraud, results in widespread poverty, and reduces the value of everyone else's money. The ancient goldsmiths discovered that extra profits could be made by rowing the economy between easy money and tight money. When they made money easier to borrow, then the amount of money in circulation expanded. Money was plentiful. People took out more loans to expand their businesses. But then, the money changers would tighten the money supply. They would make loans more difficult to get. What would happen? Just what happens today. A certain percentage of people could not repay their previous loans and could not take out new loans to repay the old ones. Therefore, they went bankrupt and had to sell their assets to the goldsmiths for pennies on the dollar. The same thing is still going on today. Only today, we call this rowing of the economy up and down the business cycle. Like Julius Caesar, King Henry the first
Saved - October 29, 2025 at 12:30 AM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Is Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset? Yes. And here's 30 minutes-worth of proof: https://t.co/UPRNcgWihR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 3 launches a documentary-style indictment of Tucker Carlson, asserting he has “many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups,” that Carlson is “leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform,” and that he is “a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda.” The speaker argues the left-right paradigm is false, claiming CIA agents train people in media propaganda regardless of network (CNN or Fox). Anderson Cooper is cited as an example, with the claim he interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family, making him the face of CNN and Carlson the face of Fox. The speaker then traces Carlson’s background in detail: born 05/16/1969 in San Francisco; his father Richard Carlson divorced and remarried Patricia Swanson; Carlson attended multiple boarding schools in Switzerland and Rhode Island; graduated from Trinity College in 1991. The claim is made that Carlson attempted to join the CIA after graduation but was denied, with the suggestion that his journalism path was encouraged by his well-connected father. The narrative then catalogs Carlson’s father’s career: Richard Carlson started in journalism as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times and a UPI reporter; later worked at several LA and San Diego outlets; became involved with San Diego Federal Savings and Loan (headed by Gordon Luce, a Reagan-era figure); ran for mayor of San Diego in 1984 and lost; Reagan announced his nomination to the United States Information Agency in 1986; served as Director of Voice of America, described as a propaganda broadcasting division; VOA is linked to the CIA, with the assertion that its purpose shifted from abroad broadcasting to domestic and international propaganda, including a CIA black site in Thailand (Cat’s Eye/Detention Site Green). The father’s later roles included ambassador to the Seychelles and CEO of King World Public Television; he became vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (an Israel-lobby-linked group). The speaker asserts that Carlson’s path mirrors his father’s, arguing that Carlson’s early journalism work included policy review (Heritage Foundation publication), where Heritage Foundation’s founders (Paul Wyrick, Edwin Feulner, Joseph Coors) are described as influential, with Feulner allegedly connected to KCIA donations and UN reform task forces linked to CFR and the Project for the New American Century. The Heritage Foundation’s funding is linked to Coors, Chase Manhattan, Pfizer, Dow, Sears, GM, Amoco, Mobil, with David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan leadership invoked to support broader conspiratorial links among the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, CFR, and related networks. The claim is made that Buckley and Crystal (William Crystal) were CIA-connected or staffed, and that Tucker Carlson’s journalism career spanned outlets including Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Weekly Standard, New York Magazine, Reader’s Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, The Wall Street Journal, and television work for CNN, PBS, MSNBC, before Fox News. The video then connects Carlson to Murdoch’s News Corporation (which also owned The Weekly Standard) and to Genie Energy, with other board members named such as Jacob Rothschild and James Woolsey; Carlson’s overlap with Rockefeller- and Rothschild-linked networks is highlighted, including Charlie Rose’s Vanity Fair article about a Rothschild–Rockefeller merger and Rose’s program history. The speaker argues “these overlaps” explain why Carlson ridicules 9/11 skeptics and avoids addressing Rothschilds on his show, implying his gatekeeping role. A separate segment covers a Washington, DC climate-conspiracy joke by a city official about Rothschilds controlling the climate, followed by a joking discussion about microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. Speaker 3 reiterates the claim that Carlson is “CIA?” and contends mainstream media is controlled, citing Operation Mockingbird as a precedent. The speaker concludes that even if direct government documentation isn’t present, Carlson’s numerous connections and the overlaps among the elites make his CIA linkage plausible to believe, urging viewers to do their own research and turn off the television. The transcript then shifts to a late-appearing discussion involving a Ron Paul event in Minneapolis (2008) with speakers debating 9/11, Building 7, and government involvement, with participants sharing mixed views on 9/11 conspiracy theories, evidence, and the appropriate stance on such claims. Towards the end, Steven Jones, a Brigham Young University physicist, offers a televised segment presenting a hypothesis that explosives might have contributed to the World Trade Center collapses, including Building 7, mentioning molten metal in basements, thermite, and a kink in the collapse symmetry, while acknowledging FEMA’s report noting only a low probability for the conventional (fire) hypothesis and calling for further investigation. The exchange ends with a brief acknowledgment of the need for follow-up by viewers. A final red-string/prophecy monologue introduces a biblical-tinged conspiracy frame involving “Jews” and “the red string,” Rahab the harlot, and spies, cutting off before a concluded point.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're about the most unordinary person I know. You're an elitist. You're an asshole. Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know. I'm a but see, I'm an out of the closet elitist. I don't run around pretending to be a man of the people. I'm absolutely not a man of the people at all. Speaker 2: How do you pay your bills? Speaker 1: Well, I'm, like, extraordinarily loaded just from, like, money I, you know, inherited. Speaker 0: You're a trust fund baby, are you not? Speaker 1: No. Completely. I've never needed to work. I mean, it's all just the whole cable news thing was like a phase I was going through. Speaker 3: I will document the many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups. The reason I'm doing this is because right now, he is leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform. He rages about the elite and how America seems to be going down the drain when he himself couldn't be more connected to these same elites helping to do it. He is a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda. What people need to realize is the left and right paradigm we are given is entirely false. Whether you watch CNN or Fox, you are getting CIA agents highly trained in propaganda, usually coming from wealthy families. Take Anderson Cooper for example. He admittedly interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family. He could be called the face of CNN just as Tucker is the face of Fox. Follow me as I take you through his career and document his highly suspect rise in journalism. Don't forget to take notes and research these things yourself. Tucker Carlson was born on 05/16/1969 in San Francisco, California. When he was six years old, his father Richard divorced his mother Lisa and married Patricia Swanson, one of the heiresses to Swanson Enterprises most notable for their TV dinners. Carlson attended many boarding schools during his youth, including locations in Switzerland and Rhode Island. He graduated from Trinity College in Connecticut in 1991, which is known as one of the Little Ivies, which are a group of private schools which compete with Ivy League schools. Supposedly, Tucker attempted to join the CIA when he graduated, but his application was denied. I can't find an explanation as to why he wanted to be in the CIA or why they rejected him. His father was a very well connected man in the media industry and encouraged him to pursue journalism because, quote, they'll take anybody. His father Richard started his career in journalism at the young age of 22. He had jobs as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times as well as a reporter for United Press International, which at the time was one of the largest newswire services in the world. He worked for a few TV stations in Los Angeles and San Diego before joining San Diego Federal Savings and Loan in 1977. The bank was headed by Gordon Luce, who was the former public affairs director for Reagan. Richard became vice president of finance within three years, and during this time, the bank had a lot of political controversies due to their connections to current and former members of the Reagan administration. In 1983, he decided to get into politics, and in 1984, ran for mayor of San Diego. He lost to his opponent, Roger Hedgecock, who was later forced from office in 1985 after it was revealed he received over $350,000 illegally during his campaign. Coincidentally, he would also go on to become a conservative radio host. In 1986, using his connections to the White House, Reagan personally announced his intention to nominate Richard as associate director of the United States Information Agency. He became Director of Voice of America, which was a propaganda broadcasting division of USIA. He served as their longest running Director. Voice of America started in 1941 when President Roosevelt established the Foreign Broadcast Information Service as a program directed by the Office of Strategic Services, which became the CIA. The intention stated publicly was to communicate America's views abroad, but it was really an outfit to disseminate propaganda. The first few broadcasts for Voice of America were done over British Broadcasting Corporation transmitters but expanded rapidly and fell under control of the Office of War Information in 1942. The Office of War Information was tasked with creating distributing propaganda domestically and internationally. They did this through various means such as broadcast, newspapers, posters, films, and other media. The agency was terminated by President Truman in 1945. Their offices were transferred to the State Department and most of their responsibilities were transferred to the CIA. It should also be noted that a Voice of America relay station in Thailand was used as a CIA black site referred to as Cat's Eye or Detention Site Green. These overlaps and connections between Voice of America and the CIA should not be glossed over. In 1991, Richard Carlson was personally nominated by President George H. W. Bush to be The U. S. Ambassador to The Seychelles, a nation of islands off the Eastern Coast Of Africa. In 1997, he became CEO of King World Public Television, which was later purchased by CBS in 1999 for $2,500,000,000 He became the vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which is an organization that is part of the Israel lobby in The United States. It was founded by Clifford May, who was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the project for the new American century, and vice chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition. Now you're starting to see that it was no mistake Tucker wanted to join the CIA and become a journalist, like father, like son. Tucker Carlson got his start in journalism when he was hired as a fact checker for policy review. This was a publication put out by the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973 by three men: Paul Wyrick, a political activist and commentator Edwin Feulner, an academic who attended London School of Economics, which is a Rothschild controlled school, who was also advisor to different government agencies and domestic policy consultant to Reagan, and last but not least, Joseph Coors of the Coors Brewing family. In 1975, Congress investigated the activities of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency in The US. Mr. Feulner had met with the KCIA station chief, Kim Young Hwan, and in the early nineties, the Heritage Foundation started receiving donations from the KCIA. It should also be noted that in 2005, Mr. Feulner was appointed to a task force on UN reform, which included such people as former CIA Director James Woolsey with the goal of achieving a more effective United Nations. The task force was also supported by the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1977, Paul Wyrick hired a man named Roger Pearson to write for policy review. In 1986, an intelligence agency watchdog publication called the Covert Action Quarterly documented Pearson's connections to James Jesus Engelton, who was the former chief of CIA counterintelligence, as well as Daniel Graham, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The Heritage Foundation was largely funded by Joseph Coors through his family wealth, but it also received funding from Chase Manhattan Bank, Pfizer, Dow Chemical, Sears, General Motors, Amoco, and Mobil. David Rockefeller was CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank at the time. It should also be noted that David's grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, who started the Standard Oil Company, had to break it up due to antitrust laws, and Amico, as well as Mobile, were once part of the company. John D. Rockefeller also donated the 16 acres of land upon which the United Nations headquarters sits in New York. In David Rockefeller's O Memoirs, he is quoted as saying, some even believe we, the Rockefeller family, are part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of The United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalist and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure. One world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. He also funded and was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. A quick little fun fact. Before the homosexual political commentator David Brock, founder of Media Matters for America, a leftist propaganda outlet which received funding from George Soros and given office space by alleged pedophile and human trafficker John Podesta, he was on the board of the Heritage Foundation. He supported Hillary Clinton for president twice and dated James Alifantis, has been accused of being a pedophile and human trafficker. He is also a friend of Lynn Rothschild. Lynn Rothschild supposedly abhors Trump and fawns over Clinton publicly, yet her and Trump go way back as well. Also, here's a photo of Trump laughing it up with happy Rockefeller, wife of former vice president and New York governor Nelson Rockefeller. It's a great example to show you that these people are all liars and actors. They will fill whatever role they need to fill when they need to fill it. Sometimes that involves swinging to the total opposite side of the false paradigm politically if it's advantageous to the agenda of the elite. Pick your central banking puppet, left or right. It's all controlled, and these people are shameless whores. When Tucker Carlson left his job at policy review, he went to work for the Arkansas Democrat Gazette under the tutelage of editor Paul Greenberg. Mister Greenberg was very well connected having his pieces published across 1,400 different newspapers within the Tribune Content Agency Syndicate at the time. He also won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 and appeared on major television networks as commentator on talk shows such as Charlie Rose. Now I can't actually prove that mister Greenberg was CIA, but when I started to look at a few publications he put out, it made me start to wonder. In one article entitled How to Break the CIA, published on jewishworldreview.com 09/02/2009, he defends the CIA from what he believes to be unfair persecution. He defends the torture of possibly innocent people as justified in the, quote, war on terror. When referring to the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he says, are we supposed to be sorry about that and proceed to punish those who uncovered these plans? On what theory? That no good deed for your country should go unpunished? He also boohoos about the morale of the CIA and how investigations might increase their agents' anxiety. In another article by Mr. Greenberg entitled Hooray for Snooping, published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette October 2333, he talks about a national conference of editorial writers he attended in Calgary, Alberta in the seventies or eighties. In the article, he says that, quote, that year at Calgary, one solemn resolution proposed that we stop talking to the CIA since a number of journalists abroad had been assassinated on the pretext that we were all CIA agents, capitalist spies, tools of imperialism, and, well, you know the rest. As if the killers were so lacking in imagination, they couldn't come up with some other excuse to do away with us if they hadn't invented this one. So there we were, an all too solemn convention assembled, First Amendment or no, debating whether we should gag ourselves. I dissented, being an American, and unaccustomed to being told whom I could talk to or not talk to. Memory grows furtive, but I believe the resolution was defeated. That it was ever considered was disgraceful enough. It occurs to some of us that if the CIA and FBI and NSA had been allowed to talk even to each other before 09/11/2001, that date might not have become another one that will live in infamy. If only big data could have been mined back then the way it is now, the country might have been a lot safer along with the thousands of innocent victims who found themselves in the Twin Towers that fateful day and others rushing to their rescue as firefighters and cops, and the troops who were stationed at the Pentagon as airliners were turned into flaming engines of destruction, their passengers and crews wiped out, including those who, like the ones aboard Valiant Flight United 93, were the first to mount a counterattack against the terrorist in the still continuing war. It would seem mister Greenberg, a very well connected columnist, was very sympathetic to the ambitions of the CIA for seemingly no reason. It should also be noted he was Jewish and a Zionist. When Tucker left the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, he went to work for the Weekly Standard News magazine in 1995. It was founded by William Crystal and Fred Barnes. William Crystal is Jewish and the son of Irving Crystal, who's been described as, quote, the godfather of neoconservatism. Irving Crystal was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and worked for the Congress for Cultural Freedom. The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a group started by a Jewish CIA agent named Mikkel Jocelyn in 1950. It distributed anti communist propaganda in 35 countries and published over 20 magazines. In 1966, The New York Times are in a series of articles exposing it as a front for the CIA to transfer money to the State Department and the United States Information Agency, the same agency which broadcasted Voice of America, which Tucker's dad was the director of. In the book, Finks, How the CIA Tricked the World's Best Riders, author Joel Whitney talks about, quote, how the good versus bad CIA is a false divide and that the cultural cold warriors again and again used anticommunism as a lever to spy relentlessly on leftist and indeed writers of all political inclinations and thereby pushed US democracy a little closer to the Soviet model of the surveillance state. He alleges that Crystal was in fact a CIA employee, The man who referred to Irving as the godfather of neoconservatism was a man named Jonah Greenberg, also Jewish and editor in chief of The National Review, a semimonthly magazine. The magazine was founded by William F. Buckley Jr. And has played a significant role in the development of conservatism in The United States. Like Krystal, Buckley was also outed as a CIA employee in Joel Whitney's book. It should also be noted that Fred Barnes, cofounder of The Weekly Standard, currently moderates a show on Voice of America called Issues in the News, again, the same program Tucker's father, Richard, was director of. It would seem William Crystal was also a fan of Paul Greenberg, Tucker's first mentor at the Arkansas Democrat Gazette since he quoted him in an article he published in the Washington Examiner 11/01/2004 entitled the 09/11 connection. In the article, he quotes Paul as saying, everything we had thought, assumed, expected in the golden nineties hadn't been so. The surface piece of the nineteen nineties had been bought at a great price. On nine eleven, a failure of American leadership was revealed, a failure to look ahead and act forcefully to forestall threats, to do what Bush has called, quote, the hard work of fighting terror and spreading freedom. William's father Irving, alleged CIA employee, also only had kind words to say about mister Greenberg when he wrote the forward to his 1991 book, Resonant Lives, 50 Figures of Consequence. He said, and I quote, our intellectual and spiritual elites today are, with some notable exemptions, semi educated at best. This explains why someone like Mr. Greenberg has not received the recognition he deserves. Oh, yes, he has won a Pulitzer Prize and other awards, which is nice, but these are tributes to his journalistic talents as a columnist and editorial writer. As a master of the brief moral essay, he has yet to come into his own. These men all seem to connect to one another in some way, and they all seemingly support the, quote, alleged war on terror while increasing the size of the government in the name of preserving freedom. They protect Israel and promote their agenda while scapegoating Muslims for false flag attacks meant to justify giving more power to their think tanks and intelligence agencies which answer to nobody except the people lining their pockets. After leaving The Weekly Standard, Tucker then went on to write for New York Magazine, Reader's Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, and The Wall Street Journal. He would also go to work on camera for CNN, PBS, and MSNBC before finally settling into his role at Fox News as the poster boy for conservative values. During those years, he also somehow found time to appear on shows like King of Queens, 30 Rock, and Dancing with the Stars. While he is now on Fox News as arguably their most popular personality, this wasn't his first tango with News Corporation, which owns Fox News. News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch also owned The Weekly Standard where Tucker worked under Bill Crystal. News Corporation headquarters is located in none other than the Rockefeller Center Complex in New York. Rupert Murdoch is also on the board of Genie Energy, an American energy company located out of New Jersey. Other noteworthy people on the board of Genie Energy include Jacob Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild banking dynasty, and James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, who, if you remember earlier, was also on the UN reform task force in 2005 with Heritage Foundation founder Edwin Feulner, whose goal was to create a more effective United Nations, the same United Nations which resides on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. In a 2015 article written by Charlie Rose in Vanity Fair, he details a merger between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller. Rothschild bought 37% of shares in Rockefeller Financial Services through his RIT Capital Partners. This is the same Charlie Rose who would have Arkansas columnist Paul Greenberg on his show to talk politics and the same Paul Greenberg who was held in such high regard by William Crystal and his father Irving. There are so many overlapping connections that can be made that I probably missed dozens, if not more, during my research into the topic. Given these connections to the CIA, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, etcetera, it's no wonder Tucker Carlson ridicules people who believe that 09:11 was an inside job and calls these people parasites. It's also no wonder Tucker Carlson won't seriously address the Rothschilds on his show as his boss probably wouldn't be too happy even though they have so much control and influence. Whenever people bring up legitimate issues, it's his job to mock them so his viewers won't get to the truth of the matter. Speaker 4: Washington DC experienced a mild snowfall last week. Luckily, city councilman Trayon White was on it. He knows why it happened. Watch this. Speaker 5: It's just started snowing out of Speaker 6: nowhere this morning, man. Y'all better pay attention Speaker 5: to this climate control, man. This climate manipulation, and DC keep talking about we are resilient city, and that's a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate. It should create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful. Speaker 4: Yep. The Rothschilds control the climate. The Rothschilds, of course, are a wealthy Jewish banking clan. They're included in a great many conspiracy theories, but those theories rarely give them credit for the weather. That's an ambitious new twist. Mark Stein is an author and columnist and a part time meteorologist, and he joins us tonight. What are you making? So this is by the way, I live here, so you can laugh all you want, but that's actually my city councilman speaking there. The Rothschilds control the weather. Did you know that? Speaker 7: Well, I did actually, Tucker. They've they they bought the weather from God back in 1929, when he had a bit of a liquidity problem after the Wall Street crash, and, they keep it in the wine cellars at the Chateau Mouton Rothschild estate in France. And, they're able to micro target the climate. For example, it was light snow in your part of Washington, but I gather in the stairwell of Trayon White's, apartment building, he actually had an avalanche just on his floor. That's that's how micro targeted the big Jew weather machine is able to be. Speaker 6: And he may and, by the way, Speaker 7: you may you may think it's a light snowfall, but if you actually examine it, it's actually small pieces of gefelter fish, which is why it doesn't melt. And that's why the Jews control the snowplow business. So they scoop all the gefelter fish in Washington away, and they use it to make Louis Farrakhan calypso albums, which they put out to discredit, Louis Farrakhan from telling the truth about the synagogue of Satan. It all makes sense. Speaker 6: See, the funny thing is I mean, I don't Speaker 4: know if it's funny. It's actually so appalling and shocking that it's it's hard. I'm just gonna laugh about it. That was that was you made me feel better about a city out of control. So then I wanna run this by you. May maybe you can make me feel better about this too. There's a new uproar on social media over microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. The school has assembled a list of microaggressions. Tucker Speaker 3: Carlson seems to be everywhere. He has become the face of the conservative and right wing movement in The United States, surely due to the incredible amount of connections he has to intelligence agencies and the government. This is why the gatekeepers and the media attempt to give him credibility and publish stories like how he's being spied on by the NSA or how a seemingly random man confronted him in Montana at a fly fishing shop and insulted him trying to start a confrontation, and it turns out that the man was actually an employee of the Asia Foundation, which was created in 1951 by the CIA as a front organization to distribute propaganda. If you had any doubts before watching this that Tucker Carlson was controlled opposition, I hope the research I presented will put that to bed. Mainstream media is all controlled in its one big incestuous pit. Don't worship these people as heroes because they will sell you down the river in a heartbeat. Is Tucker Carlson CIA? Well, you can't prove that directly, but once you pour through all of his connections, you would find it incredibly hard not to believe that is the case. About the only thing we're missing at this point is official government documents detailing as much, which I am sure will come out at some point in the future. The CIA has a very long and documented history of infiltrating and controlling the media. Operation Mockingbird is a great example of that. Tucker Carlson is just one of many examples you could make. Remember to always do your own research and turn off the television. Speaker 6: Good to see you after, we met briefly at the event in 2008 in Minneapolis for Ron Paul. Speaker 1: Oh, that Speaker 6: was fun. Speaker 2: I remember that. Speaker 6: But but you had to leave early. What happened? The Speaker 2: truth is stopping. The truth is stopping. I'll tell you why. Speaker 1: I didn't bail on Ron Paul. No. Speaker 6: I don't Speaker 2: It's when Jesse Ventura got up and started saying 09:11 was an inside job. Speaker 6: He didn't say that. Yeah. Speaker 2: Yeah. He did say that. Answer your question. Sure. It wasn't controversial. It was stupid. And if there's any evidence that the government is behind nine eleven, looks you know, I believe anything if there's evidence, but there isn't any. So knock it off. That's my view. Speaker 6: Okay. But And Speaker 2: I said that to him. Speaker 6: Sure. Sure. Speaker 8: But one stupid person says something Speaker 6: stupid at Ron Paul event. Speaker 2: No. No. But I I hate that. And and by the way, I am open to almost any crackpot theory about anything. It's just on that subject, come on. You know what I mean? That's too much. That even for me. Speaker 6: So just out of curiosity then, what what's your take on Building 7? Which explanation do you believe? Speaker 7: Yeah. Come Speaker 6: on. It's like it's a slick. No. That's a serious question. Which explanation did did Speaker 2: it Okay. Which explanation? Speaker 4: I I There's two explanations. Speaker 6: It was either it was it was pulled or it was isolated pockets of fire on the building that blew that that were Let Speaker 2: me let me get let Speaker 6: me The towers coming down. They're coming down. Speaker 2: This a no win conversation, so I'm not gonna continue it. But let me just say one The macro my macro view is is the obvious one, which is the buildings came down. There's a bunch of nutcases. We're playing into them. Speaker 6: Okay. So are you still supporting Ron Paul? So are you supporting anybody in the race this year? No. Speaker 2: I don't support. I mean, I don't even vote. I don't even vote. I'm hardly objective. I'm honest. I'm not objective. Speaker 6: There you go. Certainly not afraid to speak your mind. Speaker 2: No. I'm not. No. You can assess my views. They're very clear. You don't have any But I hate that nine eleven crap. Wish they just kicked those people out. Speaker 6: I mean was supposed to be on the ninety third floor. Really? Oh. It's important for people and their families still involved to know the truth whether or not the government was involved or whether it was terrorists, but there's a history of government sponsored terror throughout the past century. I'm Yeah. Exactly. So what do you mean kick them out? Speaker 1: I don't know. Whatever. Speaker 6: You you anyone who's a 09:11 intruder should be should be kicked out of the the country? Of course not. I don't, you know, I don't Speaker 2: I don't even believe in parking tickets. I mean, didn't you please? I just don't I think that people, before saying something that heavy, ought to present real evidence and not just it's a coincidence or the questions remain a dumb Speaker 6: I think like steel doesn't weaken until 2,400 degrees is evidence that that jet fuel couldn't cause a collapse of the tower from being at Speaker 2: the top. Except the thing is it did. Speaker 9: So Speaker 10: problem. We we gave them a lot Speaker 6: of money. Speaker 10: See, see, pretty much trained them. I mean, mean, that's that's pretty much enough evidence for me. Speaker 2: Did the government brought down the Twin Towers? You know Speaker 10: what? The government that the government was involved in bringing that into our because they would not Speaker 6: be trained because who because who trained them? The government trained them. The CIA trained them. The special ops trained Speaker 2: them. Alright. I've I've had this debate so many times. It's not you know, I don't know. I just it it seems to me that it it's kinda beneath, sort of beneath, like, adult discourse even, really, I guess. And it and it definitely discredits otherwise good ideas. Speaker 6: I just think that the implications if if the government was involved, the implications are so vast that it should be looked into whether or not it seems ridiculous. Ridiculous. Speaker 11: So for family members of Speaker 6: the victims that are asking questions and want the evidence that's been withheld by the government released, you would say that they're less than adults somehow for wanting that Speaker 2: I would say that parasites like you make it much worse for them. That's what Speaker 10: I would say. Speaker 12: I'm a parasite now? Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's filthy to say things like that with no evidence, and you have none. So you should stop. That's my point. Well, this is deal with this Speaker 10: is insult of politics today. Speaker 4: Back. Millions of people watch the horror of 09:11 right before their very eyes live on television. Two planes crashing into the World Trade Center. And less than a couple of hours later, both towers, of course, collapsing. My next guest says that hijackers may not have brought down the towers by themselves. Here to explain his controversial theory, Steven Jones. He's a professor of physics at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. Professor Jones, thanks for coming on. Speaker 9: Sure. Thanks, Tucker. Speaker 4: Well, just sum up this, obviously, your theory, the one sentence that I just explained in the intro contradicts what we all think we know about how these towers collapsed. Quickly sum up your explanation for what happened. Speaker 9: Well, I'd like to start with this paper that you referred to. It's available online. What I'm doing, Tucker, is presenting evidence, but it's a hypothesis to be tested. That's a big difference from a conclusion. And so I just wanted to clarify that. But to sum up, I've looked at the official reports by FEMA and so on regarding the collapse of these buildings. I'd like to look at the collapse of Building 7 in just a minute. It was not even hit by a jet. So we should look at that one. Speaker 4: Two towers. The explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed collapsed down upon the next in a pancake fashion and they imploded in on themselves. Is that essentially I think what people think? Speaker 9: Doctor. Yeah. That's basically it. Yeah. And so what I've done is to analyze these reports. I would like to do a little experiment with you, Tucker, if I could. I sent out a video clip of the collapse of Building 7 because most people haven't actually seen that one and that's the crux of the argument I'm presenting. Speaker 4: Sum up very quickly the argument for us. You believe there were explosives in the buildings planted by someone, detonated. Speaker 9: Is that correct? In other words, hypothesis to be tested there's two hypotheses here. One is fire and damage caused all three buildings to collapse. The other is that explosives in the buildings may have caused the collapse. And so then we analyze and see which fits the data better, and I've done that in my in my 25 page paper. Speaker 4: I wanna read you a quote from the Deseret Morning News, a paper in Utah from you. I'm quoting now. It is quite plausible that explosives were preplanted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes, you, which were actually diversion tactic. Muslims are probably not to blame for bringing down the World Trade Center buildings after all. That's, I would think, pretty offensive to a lot of people listening. Do you have any evidence for that? Speaker 9: Well, not to the Muslims, I might say. I've got a lot of emails saying Speaker 4: I'm sure your writings have been greeted with glee in Islamabad and Peshawar and places like that. Speaker 9: Well, I haven't received any notes from there, but just good people. I have Muslim friends. Let me read for example, but I'm not going to let you off the hook. Really want to do this experiment with you. Speaker 4: We don't have lot of time for experiments, Professor, but if you could just give us one thing to hold on to. You make these claims or appear to make these claims. Do you have any Speaker 9: collapse of Building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you? Speaker 4: Okay. I'm not sure Speaker 1: if we Speaker 4: can, but to specify that is World Trade Center Building 7, smaller than the other two, not hit by a plane, of yet it collapsed. Speaker 9: Right. It's 47 stories. Speaker 4: That's right. Speaker 9: 24 steel columns in the center. Right. Trusses asymmetrically supported. Now, I can't see what you're seeing. Speaker 4: Are you rolling that? No, we just see the building. And just so our viewers know, the explanation that I think is conventional is that there was a large tank of diesel fuel stored in a lower level of that which caught fire and the resulting fire collapsed the building. Speaker 9: That's basically it. But as we read in the FEMA report, it says here, and I put this in my paper, of course, the best hypothesis, which is the only one they looked at, the fire, has only a low probability of occurrence. Further investigation, analyses are needed to resolve this issue and I agree with that. But they admit there's only a low probability. And if you look at the collapse, see what I've studied is the fall time, the symmetry, the fact that it first dips in the middle, that's called the kink, which is very characteristic, of course, of controlled demolition. Speaker 4: Professor, that we are out of time and I'm not sure that you've J. Speaker 9: One fully other thing I want to mention Speaker 1: about Doctor. Speaker 4: Okay, if you can hit it, Speaker 6: really quick. Speaker 9: Doctor. Here we go. Molten metal in the basements of all three buildings. Yet, all scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel. So what is this molten metal? It's a direct evidence for the use of high temperature explosives such as thermite. Thermite produces molten iron as an end product. Okay. So, we do have Yeah, it's very short time, but people will read the paper, then I talk about the molten metal, the symmetry of the collapse, and the weaknesses and inadequacies of the fire hypothesis. Speaker 4: Professor, we're going to have to leave it to our viewers who are interested enough to follow-up to do just that. We appreciate you coming on. Even if I don't understand your theories, we appreciate you trying to explain them. Thanks. Okay. Speaker 13: The red string is a symbol to show the Jews that they are helping the Jews usher in the new world order. The reason they do it is so that the Jews spare them from the nasty population that is happening. Not many people are allowed to live in a new world order. In the Old Testament, the book of Joshua, God was giving the Israelites the land of Canaan. Joshua sent in spies. The Canaanites found out and were searching for the spies. The spies got help from a harlot called Rahab. The Canaanites went to Rahab's house, and she told them she did not see anyone. When they left, Rahab, the harlot, made a deal with Israelite spies. Since she helped the spies, she asked that they spare her and her family. The Israelite spies agreed and Rahab let them down on a red rope from the on the wall, and the spies escaped safely. The Israelites killed all the Canaanites except Rahab and her fam
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 10:24 PM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@LauraLoomer Woah! TERROR CELLS?! Like the terror cells Israel created in the 1950s to bomb US and British targets to try to stop Egypt from becoming sovereign in an event called the Lavon Affair?? Like those kind of terror cells? https://t.co/U8a1jBNIQN https://t.co/5m55ylhkDs

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Lavarn affair, known as Operation Suzanna (Susannah), was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt in 1954, with targets bombed. In the 1950s the US pressed Britain to leave the Suez Canal; Israel would not tolerate British departure. Elements within Israel planned false-flag attacks to be blamed on Muslims, code-named Susannah. Egyptian Jews known as Syanin carried out the attacks. The first bomb hit a post office in Alexandria on July 2; a phosphorus bomb exploded in Natansson’s pocket as he approached Rio Cinema on July 14, leading to his arrest and the ring’s breakup. These ad hominem attacks are a common tactic of the Zionists. For more information, read Jack Bernstein's book, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel. As the trial progressed, Israel claimed Egyptians were tipped off and scapegoated defense minister Pinhaz Levon to shield the inside group behind Susannah.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Lavarn affair was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt known as Operation Suzanna, in which Egyptian, American, and British owned targets in Egypt were bombed in the 1954. In the early nineteen fifties, The US was becoming friendlier with Egypt and was moving to influence the British to leave the Egyptian Suez Canal, which they had manned for almost twenty years. The apartheid state of Israel would not tolerate the British leaving, and elements within Israel began planning a variety of terrorist attacks on British, Egyptian, and American targets. These attacks would then be blamed on so called Muslim extremists. This would incite the anger of the British and the Americans towards Egypt and Islam and sour the burgeoning relationship between Egypt, America, and Britain. This plan for a series of false flag terrorist attacks was code named Operation Susannah. A group of Egyptian Jews was recruited to carry out the attacks. Jews in the diaspora that are recruited are known as Syanin. The first bomb went off on July 2 when a post office in Alexandria was firebombed. On the July 11, the Anglo Egyptian Suez negotiations, which had been blocked for nine months, got underway again. Despite the British assuring Israel that stockpiled weapons would not be given to the Egyptians, on July 14, the Jewish terrorists firebombed US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. However, that same day, a phosphorus bomb exploded prematurely in one of the terrorists, Philip Natansson's pocket just as he was about to enter the British owned Rio Cinema in Alexandria. His arrest and a subsequent confession led to the breakup of the whole ring. However, while the plot was being investigated, the Zionist Jewish terrorists started fire in two Cairo cinemas in the central post office and the railway station. After the plot was uncovered, many tried to spin it as an anti Semitic conspiracy theory. These ad hominem attacks are a common tactic of the Zionists. For more information on this, please read the Jewish American patriot Jack Bernstein's book, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel. This honest, honorable, and courageous Jew was subsequently assassinated by Mossad. As the trial of the Jewish terrorists became more and more public, Israel was forced to do damage control. They claimed that the Egyptians were tipped off and allowed the attacks to happen. They also singularly scapegoated the defense minister Pinhaz Levon to prevent the exposure of the real group inside the apartheid state of Israel who planned Operation Susannah and several other false flag terrorist attacks.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The Lavon Affair The Lavon Affair was a failed Israeli covert false flag operation conducted in Egypt in the summer of 1954. A group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli Military Intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets like cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The plan was to carry out the bombings and then blame the bombings on various Muslim groups in an attempt to force the British to keep their military presence in Egypt. Israel may have been created after the end of WWII in 1948 but tensions had existed between the Jews and Muslims over who got what lands in the Palestine region since before even the Balfour declaration (the legal document from the British promising Jews the Palestine region) was signed in 1917. And when the British officially withdrew from Palestine in 1948 Israel immediately went to war with its new neighbors over territorial disputes in what became known as the First Arab-Israeli War. Despite the First Arab-Israeli War, in the early 1950s, the US initiated a policy in favor of Egyptian nationalism. This American Pro-Egyptian nationalist policy meant the British – who occupied Egypt at the time – would begin withdrawing their troops from the country. This withdraw of the British from Egypt also meant Israel would lose most of the influence they had over Egypt and, even more importantly to Israel, this withdraw of the British meant Israel would lose their influence over the Suez Canal. It also potentially meant Israel would have to fight another war to secure influence over those critical locations again. With the Suez canal being vitally important for controlling the trade routes that dominate the Middle East region, the Israelis knew they had to do something to stop this withdraw of British troops and their subsequent loss of regional control, so they initiated Operation Susannah (more popularly known as the Lavon Affair). The goal of Operation Susannah was to carry out bombings and other acts of sabotage in Egypt with the aim of creating a sense that a British withdraw from the country would create such instability in the region that the nationalist aspirations for Egypt would be dropped by America and the international community. Israeli author Doron Geller stated the intent was to “make it clear to the whole world that Egypt’s new rulers were nothing but a group of foolhardy extremists, unreliable and unworthy of taking charge of an asset as important as the Suez Canal. Furthermore, it was to be demonstrated that their grasp on power was uncertain, that they faced powerful internal opposition, and, consequently, they were unworthy of being counted upon as a dependable ally.” The Israelis tasked a covert unit called Unit 131 with carrying out Project Susannah. This Unit was a composed of Egyptian nationals of Jewish heritage who had been recruited in Egypt to do covert missions on behalf of the new Israeli state and in spring of 1954 the unit was activated. On July 2, 1954 Unit 131 detonated a few bombs at an Egyptian Post Office in Alexandria. 12 days later - on July 14th - the Unit bombed the libraries of the US Information Agency in Alexandria as well as a British-owned theater. And finally, nine days later, on July 23rd 1954, Unit 131 took firebombs to the Cairo railway station and to movie theaters in Cairo and Alexandria. Unfortunately for Unit 131, during the July 23rd attack a bomb began to prematurely detonate in the pocket of one of the Israeli spies and he was taken in to custody by Egyptian police. The police would find the bomb on the spy as well as evidence in the apartment of the captured spy leading them to the rest of Unit 131. Ultimately 11 members of Unit 131 were arrested and, by the time it was all said and done, two of the member of Unit 131 committed suicide in prison, two were hanged, two escaped back to Israel, and most of the others got prison time. After the British left Egypt, the Suez Canal would become nationalized by the Egyptians and would fall under Egyptian control. This would lead the Israels to go on to invade Egypt two years later with the support of the British and the French in what’s known as the Suez Crisis or the Second Arab-Israeli war. The attempted invasion of Egypt would fail after intense international pressure condemned it and threatened action against Israel and the other invading countries for their invasion. The Lavon Affair differs from the other events in this article because rather than being a single event it was – or at least it was planned to be before it was prematurely foiled – a series of events to terrorize targets in to submitting to a political end. I think it shows that although a singular false flag event can be useful, a series of events over a period of time is another useful tool in the bag of people carrying out false flag attacks to terrorize a populace in to submission to their political goals. Multiple operations obviously carry more risk than a single operation but they can be an equally effective method of false flag and can keep a population in a state of fear for a prolonged period of time.

Saved - October 8, 2025 at 11:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the topic of Holocaust Revisionism, questioning commonly accepted narratives and highlighting claims made by revisionists. I present perspectives from individuals like David Cole and David Irving, who raise doubts about the evidence for gas chambers and the methods of obtaining confessions. I discuss inconsistencies in survivor stories and the portrayal of camp life, which included amenities like theaters and sports. Ultimately, I argue for the importance of open dialogue about historical events, asserting that the truth can withstand scrutiny.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵People claim October 7th was worse than the Holocaust So just how bad was the Holocaust? Let's find out from the perspective of the Holocaust Revisionists (aka Holocaust "Deniers") These are all facts they didn't teach you about the Holocaust in grade school...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

First, here’s a jewish man named David Cole on the inconsistencies of the gas chambers (ie. wooden doors and other illogical constructions) David is surprised “how little evidence there is" for many of the events https://t.co/VCoEXDOd2L

Video Transcript AI Summary
Proofs of the Holocaust are few: 'Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews.' After intercepting transmissions from Auschwitz, the speaker argues that the evidence has normal explanations: hair, shoes, and clothing reflect lice control and issued uniforms; Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and buildings; the typhus epidemic demanded strict lice control. Allied aerial photos of Auschwitz 'do not show people being gassed or bodies being burned.' He describes a building with four holes in the ceiling; revisionists say they were added later. 1988 Fred Lucher tests showed gas-chamber samples with 'almost no appreciable traces,' Krakow 1990 tests 'got back the same results.' The conclusion: 'there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the holocaust are few. Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews. And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz. The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as proofs. Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation. For example, these exhibits are said to be the material proofs of exterminations. There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove? It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem. That's not denied. So why wouldn't there be piles of human hair? What about the piles of shoes and clothing? Is that a proof? It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes. So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing? It doesn't prove anybody was killed. What about the canisters of gas? No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings. Buildings. Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time. It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them. The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures. So what other proofs are offered? Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the groundbreaking thesis that people got sick in the camp. Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths. Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children. But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber. And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept. For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz by the Allies during the war. They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost nonstop. Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building. Obvious marks on the walls and floors where apparently walls had been knocked down, equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been. We maintain that unlike the large hollow chamber we now see. This room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom. Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage, four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand. It is said that through these four holes, cyclone B crystals were dropped. And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them. Do these holes prove homicidal gassings? Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber. Let's start again talking about this building here. Speaker 1: Notorium gas chamber. Speaker 0: But this is a reconstruction. Speaker 1: It is in original state. Speaker 0: Original? Speaker 1: Original state. It is in original part. Original. It is original. Original in through this chimney was from cyclone beam. Speaker 0: Are those the original holes in Speaker 1: the ceiling? Speaker 0: They've been rebuilt? Yes. Okay. After the war? After the war. Yes. This is Auschwitz Birkenau in an allied aerial photo from September 1944. The train that would come up carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp. This was a spectacle that nobody at the camp could miss. They would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out. These were gas chambers that were not isolated from anyone. And indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late seventies, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau. Another question that should be asked, is there any Zyklon b residue in the gas chamber knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue? In 1988, execution equipment expert Fred Lucher conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question. He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B. Now the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale. In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Lucher's findings, and their own tests got back the same results. Speaker 2: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide gas. Speaker 3: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities? Speaker 2: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design fabrication of these facilities, the requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed. We are talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 3: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of the things Speaker 2: that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset, so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, let's take a look at how German confessions were obtained through torture, the infamous human lampshade and soap claims, and one of the more interesting Holocaust facts: No document has ever been found showing Hitler ordered any systematic mass exterminations

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work. It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work. Is that all true and correct, witness? Yes. Speaker 1: It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. It was here that Hearst was hanged. Speaker 0: I rather wish the Fuhrer had stood by his followers and taken the responsibility for his command. Think of his position. Oh, sure. His position is chief war criminal. Right? He was our sovereign. It would be intolerable for me to have him standing before a foreign court. You men knew the furor. He would be the first one to stand up and say, I gave the orders, and I shall take full responsibility. And I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now, let’s take a look at the evidence against the gas chambers and mass graves as well as some of the numeric anomalies of the Holocaust The first clip is Fred Leuchter who wrote an infamous report called The Leuchter Report that comprehensively examined Auschwitz https://t.co/DUcjnX6cts

Video Transcript AI Summary
- None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. - Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. - Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet. - Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. - I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet. Speaker 1: Germa Rudolf is a chemist who knew '1 while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter Report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Liftel's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Loister. The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible. The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, Jan Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon, and many others who also have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Creek, a qualified electronics engineer, and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash. The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass graves never even existed in Triplinka or Belzec. There are, in fact, many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor Charles Larsen, one of Americans leading pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas. If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright sherry red. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz Museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter. In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber. Speaker 2: Yeah. Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war. It was a bomb shelter. They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Wash Woods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, you go inside it, they they they chop holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building. So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in. It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building. Speaker 3: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in 'ninety two, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word, of of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot. It was a open two camera shoot in his office. It was me and my camera woman. And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls. There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon B. The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities. You can still see the drains in the floor. You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas Speaker 2: chamber. Yeah. Speaker 3: A manhole that any adult, even a fairly heavy set adult can go down into. Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case rubble or anything else prevented the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in '91, Auschwitz had been open to the the West for over a decade. No one ever noticed the damn manhole, and it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in. In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there. In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a hundred, two hundred, 300 bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which which is just kind of a a silly thing to think of. Speaker 1: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine, Le Express, acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were Speaker 0: also

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, David Irving discusses if there were sufficient amounts of combustibles for cremations, the Germans making no references to gas chambers in private or public documents, and the fact the gas chambers on the Auschwitz tour are “reconstructions” and not originals https://t.co/OLfFMIhZxm

Video Transcript AI Summary
He argues that calling the Auschwitz gas chamber a fake is wrong; "It is a reconstruction." If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. "'A fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel,'" he says. He notes that for fifty years Auschwitz authorities have been showing a building to schoolchildren "telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews" and that, unless they label it, "what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake." He questions cremation capacity: "how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz?" and cites "40 to 60 kilograms of coke" per person, totaling "40 to 60,000 tons of coke" unseen in photos. He argues archives were not destroyed; "no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed." The Auschwitz record
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By academics around the world. He then goes on in his readers letter to say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago. To which my to which my response is to which my response is, a fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel. That is a fake. If this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed, a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews. And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I'm fined $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the schoolchildren the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruins just down the road three or four miles away? Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins of a gas chamber, but I think according to maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Four crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problems. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing me an injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime. But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the how how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to do. This is what questions like, how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz? If cremating one person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to cremate 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60,000 tons of coke. And where are those 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs, nor are there truckloads of coke being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the wagon loads of coke. So that is, pre opacity by itself, improbable. And anyway, these four crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at a time. We know they couldn't have cremated more than tops seventy, eighty, 90,000 people in the four or five years that the camp was in existence. These are the technical questions that people ask. And not only that, you have the problem that people say, no doubt the Nazis destroyed all the records. At the end of World War two, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like. They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for fifty years in the archives, and those archives have still not been properly researched. They're still in total disarray. And believe me, it would not have been possible in the last one or two weeks of the collapsing Third Reich for somebody to go around all the archives taking out all the references to gas chambers if they were in it, or all the references to the final solution if there were any, and destroying. They couldn't defend it. And even if they could have destroyed all the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber, so that there aren't any left in the archives now in Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British files. Because you see, we British were reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp sent a message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the camp at midnight, how many had died. We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz, we know what he reported. And the chief historian of the British Secret Service who printed this in volume two of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states, it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting. And then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams and the top secret SS code, and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. And that is why when people say, but what about all the eyewitness evidence? I say eyewitness evidence baloney. Tell that to John Demianuk about eyewitness evidence, the man, the Cleveland auto worker, who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, this Israeli Supreme Court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Denyano, admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough, and that the eyewitnesses had erred and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here we have to say there is no such evidence. The Auschwitz record

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

With so many Holocaust survivors telling stories of the camps some claims have turned out to be inconsistent From the lady who claimed to have been raised by wolves to fluctuating death tolls Here's just a few of the inconsistencies of certain Holocaust claims: https://t.co/dEp0QULNCn

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two sources for Holocaust stories are claimed: coerced Nazi officials and Jewish survivors. The transcript enumerates sensational testimonies including gassings, torture, and bizarre acts—describing a “Tango of Death” and other gruesome scenes. It highlights Herman Rosenblatt’s apple-story, a widely publicized tale later shown to be false; he insists, “It wasn’t a lie… it was my imagination.” Other fabrications are cited: Mitig Grocer’s Sweden talks plagiarized from Mila 18; Josef Hurt fabricating Auschwitz escape; Misha DeFunsheca’s memoir found fabricated; Elie Wiesel accused by Miklos Gruner of being an impostor; Gruner disputes Wiesel’s tattoo claim and his Auschwitz identity. The text also references scientists disputing gas chambers, Auschwitz’s physical conditions, and critics arguing the Holocaust narrative is exaggerated or false, including Gerrard Menounin and Norman Fiegelsang.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death. Steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous. Speaker 1: The one thing Speaker 2: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us. For every man that ran to the wire. They they took a 100 inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody. The greatest love story we've ever told on Speaker 0: this show. Oh my goodness. Speaker 3: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot. Speaker 2: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have in my jacket and a piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow. Speaker 3: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long? Speaker 4: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it. That she was there, and she threw the apple to me. Speaker 3: How how can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true. Speaker 4: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true. Speaker 3: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years of lying. Speaker 4: I pronounce my love for you forever. Speaker 3: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do? Speaker 4: Yeah. Speaker 3: And and and while you were up on the stage there with all these people, in the back of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would? Yes. Speaker 2: I simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true. Speaker 3: He said he made up he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world. Speaker 2: And his son says, tried to stop him? Yes. Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan. Pleasure. Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele. He had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie. Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFunsheca wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust. Her story was published almost twenty years ago as Misha, a Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, leaving out stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie. The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that it is not the true reality but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and my inner world. Misha will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712, but a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor. Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number eighty seven thousand seven hundred thirteen actually belonged to. First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number 8700712 actually were given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers. Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches. Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred. In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm. Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklus also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary. Neither Elie Wiesel nor his father, Shlomo Wiesel, are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald. After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book Night brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda. But of course, not all Jews are lying. Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration Camps. Rasinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps. Rysigner said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by deceased and particularly typhus, and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers. A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the second world war. That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie. Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman says, the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction. Jewish professor Roger de Margo said Speaker 1: I know that the problem, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English. Hydrocynic Hydrocynic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known, and, even the most important American Jewish newspapers, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they So I think anybody can see that. I I listed in 1944. I see. I listed for three years, 1944. It was in the world. The world finished in 1945. But I was in the army 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and say when you read these books, what maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when declared I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been there now for fifty years. So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my my lecture, it's absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Meigumpf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. As to what's happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us. What what he did in Germany. And the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about Hitler. But when you really know that this what he did, what he actually did in Germany, well, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled to use a Speaker 0: mild

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, what was life was like inside the camps? Well, surprisingly, the camps had theaters, swimming pools, soccer leagues, orchestras, and even plays But don’t take my word for it, let the Holocaust survivors tell you themselves: https://t.co/eJD14ivPJ4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Culture persisted at Auschwitz: a grand piano in Block 1, a downstairs theatre, and curtain rings sewn. I helped arrange music for each instrument from the director’s score on scarce paper. The camp library and newspapers, a violin quartet, and a camp movie in barracks offered entertainment; later, Germans allowed cinema and letters by postcard. Stamps and money from Vienna’s Jewish community, plus coupons redeemable in a cantina, funded small purchases, mostly cigarettes. On weekends we formed soccer teams; by 1944 in Rosen, organized matches continued as food waned. Weddings and maternity wards existed; over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz, with not a single infant death, and a nursery operated. Freddie Hirsch had me paint walls for the children; Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs inspired a playful mural and a hush-hush performance watched by SS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also had an orchestra where some of the musicians stood together and one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes. So later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was, of course, helping us. You know, we also did plays and stuff. Speaker 1: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz? Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that new Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also with the stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture. He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage. I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage. And that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my room mate is in charge of work assignments. And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra. I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes. He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper. So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines. We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz. But then she saw me work there, I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time. That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz. And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves. And from these leaves, they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz. Speaker 2: How did you entertain yourselves? Speaker 3: Well, there were at that at at the beginning of those days, there was a library where you people could get books to read. There were newspapers that we could get. And that and also among ourselves sometimes we had a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoners said said, only you must be crazy. They're make a movie for us in in in the camp. And then it happened. They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack. We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening. They brought movies in to the in the evening. And Speaker 2: What kind of movies would they show? Speaker 3: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to ride home. Once a postcard and once a letter. Speaker 2: They gave you the materials? Speaker 3: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, and we could Speaker 2: How did Speaker 1: you get the stamps? Speaker 3: Stamps. We could buy stamps. Speaker 2: Could You had money? Speaker 3: Yeah. We got my we still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us. Everybody, you some money. Speaker 2: And and in the camp you could have currency? Speaker 3: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah. But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes. Speaker 2: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay? Speaker 3: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then. Speaker 2: Paid for your work? Speaker 3: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then. Speaker 0: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was about a little later where we Speaker 4: played soccer. It's amazing that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be Speaker 3: enough energy left to do something like that. Speaker 0: Well, I don't think we were quite as energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off these, of the problems we had. Speaker 5: Especially the Germans started losing the war, 1943, 1944. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we organized very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized a soccer team and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer in the assembly line and assembly place. In Rosen. In Gross Rosen. So, you know, that much free it was in there, but it was like the 44. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side, so there they have to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves. Speaker 6: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things? Speaker 5: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from Markside civilians. But that Speaker 3: was Speaker 5: strictly under the cover. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost all of us. They didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted assessment decided he wants to play for the Polish team. So we say okay, you can play for us. And then the commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So, he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy. Speaker 6: How did you feel about that? Speaker 5: And the funny part of it, we said, you just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close. Speaker 6: So, what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than becoming more cool? Speaker 5: In our camp, you did feel the pressure made up. Speaker 7: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children. Speaker 8: Freddie Hirsch called me to the children's barracks he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him. And he asked me what I need. So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints, so any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes. Anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me, and I started painting. At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab. It was kind of olive colored like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff, and I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows, and then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me. So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White. And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything. And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses. I made almost all the dwarfs standing around. Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that. Speaker 9: When you were in the process of doing that Speaker 8: Yeah. Speaker 9: What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children Speaker 8: on on an emotional level. Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie. Speaker 9: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz? Speaker 8: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me. Speaker 7: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick bays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities foremost the garrison physician doctor Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy. The Holocaust Speaker 0: is

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Here's David Irving again, this time he discusses Hitler’s apprehension to using nerve gas on Allied soldiers This is fascinating because it shows Hitler had a double standard for using nerve gas in the camps vs on troops... https://t.co/0DQG10MRP3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours. the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime. the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And embargoed anywhere the use of poison gas. It's it's there. The actual document signed by Hitler, the references in the vows of the German high command, the verbatim references by him and the shorthand records of his meetings, the shorthand records of meetings in the German air ministry. The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours. The reason being, the reason that makes this yardstick so extraordinary is that if Churchill had done what he was threatening and dropped the poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun, the famous nerve is being used even now by the Russians in Afghanistan and in Iraq and in Angola and elsewhere where the Russian troops are fighting. The nerve gases sarin and tabun, Hitler already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons, and nobody found out till the war was over, which is just as well because if Hitler had ever used it in Normandy, fighting the Allied, the American, the French, the British troops in Normandy, the Canadians as well, it would have been the end of the bridgehead because we didn't have a gas mask. We had no gas mask which would have stopped the German nerve gases. It would have been the end of the bridgehead. And isn't it strange that Adolf Hitler, the devil incarnate, had the means whereby he could have secured an immediate strategic advantage, which would have turned the war because he would have pulled the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front. And with those high grade divisions, he would have wiped the floor with the Russians and ended the war by Christmas nineteen forty four. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Ok, we're almost done... This next clip discusses the marketing of the Holocaust after WWII, the rising and falling Auschwitz death tolls, and the history of the 6 million number But most importantly: It shows the tactics used against Holocaust "Deniers"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective. You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart, and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives as well as everybody else to speak ill of the departed communist state. But it was not always that way. During World War two, the Soviets were more than just a military ally. Their anti Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other allies because it served all of their purposes. The point is that as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact. With the 2020 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland, Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information. Speaker 1: I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a president of Iran and as a scholar, do you believe that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true? Speaker 2: But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany. I hope that's not your intention.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And last but not least, let's take look at how the Holocaust narrative is still used to this very day: https://t.co/fwVdCeUaus

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany." "no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no." "The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity." "The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world." "Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed." "The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow." "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement: I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany. Speaker 1: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with. Speaker 2: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, Holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farison, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis, has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Forrestin has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year February, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile. There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Mahler. In 02/2009, Mahler was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes. One of them being Mueller's assertion that the official version of the Holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history. Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past. Speaker 3: Give them the guilt, man. Speaker 4: That's yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 5: We need to Speaker 4: play on that guilt. Speaker 6: You always Speaker 4: I bring up everything from the past. Fifty years. Speaker 3: The Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot. Speaker 7: Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore. It's basically the same as quoting Hitler. Speaker 3: There's a bunch of Speaker 8: opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term. Speaker 5: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions. Speaker 9: Very racist and antisemitic things. This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. Sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person. Bliten the Jews. This is literally my grandpa. Speaker 5: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay? When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past. Speaker 6: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera. Speaker 3: The 6,000,000. 6,000,000. Speaker 6: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker, brother Speaker 3: 6,000,000. You're never sick, but I don't know. It was it was 6,000,000. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon weapon against all white Europeans. I have done my research. Shane. I have done my research. Speaker 3: Shane. Shane. Shane. Shane. Speaker 5: Shane. Speaker 10: Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that? Speaker 8: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed. The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and signist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies. Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population. Speaker 6: Moet Zetiash in conjunction with My Israel has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature. Speaker 10: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that? And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, you just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs, so Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four-two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine. Speaker 3: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is. Speaker 4: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That says the truth. And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into They the sources for are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do. Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy. And therefore I say I use this freedom. Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter, with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on Article 19 in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie. The truth stands on its own legs.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

A final note: As you can see, Holocaust Revisionism doesn't "deny" the Holocaust It believes many of the events that constitute what we collectively know as "The Holocaust" did take place But it also understands that we need to be able to have an honest discussion about historical events, especially when those events are used to this day to exemplify the evils of White collectivism and to solicit reparations for those evils Holocaust Revisionism merely seeks to have an honest and open discussion about the events of the Holocaust and firmly believes this statement to be true: The truth fears no investigation

Saved - October 3, 2025 at 9:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe false flag operations are already occurring, as seen in events like the Charlie Kirk shooting and incidents at TPUSA gatherings. These real events seem to be manipulated to promote a censorship agenda. My suspicion is that we are witnessing the beginning of a series of smaller, coordinated attacks rather than a single large event, similar to Israel's Lavon Affair in 1954. This operation aimed to create instability in Egypt to influence international perceptions and maintain British control over the Suez Canal, demonstrating how multiple events can instill fear and achieve political ends.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

People are waiting for a false flag attack But I think the false flags are already taking place... From the mystery surrounding Charlie Kirk's shooter to the rooftop ICE sniper to bombs at TPUSA events - real events are being exploited to usher in a censorship state My hunch is this is only be the beginning And the rubric for the false flags this time won't be a single large event but instead much more like the Israel's Lavon Affair false flag This is the story of the Lavon Affair: The Lavon Affair was a failed Israeli covert false flag operation conducted in Egypt in the summer of 1954. A group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli Military Intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets like cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The plan was to carry out the bombings and then blame the bombings on various Muslim groups in an attempt to force the British to keep their military presence in Egypt. Israel may have been created after the end of WWII in 1948 but tensions had existed between the Jews and Muslims over who got what lands in the Palestine region since before even the Balfour declaration (the legal document from the British promising Jews the Palestine region) was signed in 1917. And when the British officially withdrew from Palestine in 1948 Israel immediately went to war with its new neighbors over territorial disputes in what became known as the First Arab-Israeli War. Despite the First Arab-Israeli War, in the early 1950s, the US initiated a policy in favor of Egyptian nationalism. This American Pro-Egyptian nationalist policy meant the British – who occupied Egypt at the time – would begin withdrawing their troops from the country. This withdraw of the British from Egypt also meant Israel would lose most of the influence they had over Egypt and, even more importantly to Israel, this withdraw of the British meant Israel would lose their influence over the Suez Canal. It also potentially meant Israel would have to fight another war to secure influence over those critical locations again. With the Suez canal being vitally important for controlling the trade routes that dominate the Middle East region, the Israelis knew they had to do something to stop this withdraw of British troops and their subsequent loss of regional control, so they initiated Operation Susannah (more popularly known as the Lavon Affair). The goal of Operation Susannah was to carry out bombings and other acts of sabotage in Egypt with the aim of creating a sense that a British withdraw from the country would create such instability in the region that the nationalist aspirations for Egypt would be dropped by America and the international community. Israeli author Doron Geller stated the intent was to “make it clear to the whole world that Egypt’s new rulers were nothing but a group of foolhardy extremists, unreliable and unworthy of taking charge of an asset as important as the Suez Canal. Furthermore, it was to be demonstrated that their grasp on power was uncertain, that they faced powerful internal opposition, and, consequently, they were unworthy of being counted upon as a dependable ally.” The Israelis tasked a covert unit called Unit 131 with carrying out Project Susannah. This Unit was a composed of Egyptian nationals of Jewish heritage who had been recruited in Egypt to do covert missions on behalf of the new Israeli state and in spring of 1954 the unit was activated. On July 2, 1954 Unit 131 detonated a few bombs at an Egyptian Post Office in Alexandria. 12 days later - on July 14th - the Unit bombed the libraries of the US Information Agency in Alexandria as well as a British-owned theater. And finally, nine days later, on July 23rd 1954, Unit 131 took firebombs to the Cairo railway station and to movie theaters in Cairo and Alexandria. Unfortunately for Unit 131, during the July 23rd attack a bomb began to prematurely detonate in the pocket of one of the Israeli spies and he was taken in to custody by Egyptian police. The police would find the bomb on the spy as well as evidence in the apartment of the captured spy leading them to the rest of Unit 131. Ultimately 11 members of Unit 131 were arrested and, by the time it was all said and done, two of the member of Unit 131 committed suicide in prison, two were hanged, two escaped back to Israel, and most of the others got prison time. After the British left Egypt, the Suez Canal would become nationalized by the Egyptians and would fall under Egyptian control. This would lead the Israels to go on to invade Egypt two years later with the support of the British and the French in what’s known as the Suez Crisis or the Second Arab-Israeli war. The attempted invasion of Egypt would fail after intense international pressure condemned it and threatened action against Israel and the other invading countries for their invasion. The Lavon Affair differs somewhat unique in the world of false flag attacks because rather than being a single event it was – or at least it was planned to be before it was prematurely foiled – a series of events to terrorize targets in to submitting to a political end. I think it shows that although a singular false flag event can be useful, a series of events over a period of time is another useful tool in the bag of people carrying out false flag attacks to terrorize a populace in to submission to their political goals. Multiple operations obviously carry more risk than a single operation but they can be an equally effective method of false flag and can keep a population in a state of fear for a prolonged period of time.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Lavarn affair was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt known as Operation Suzanna, in which Egyptian, American, and British owned targets in Egypt were bombed in 1954. A plan for a series of false flag attacks was code named 'Operation Susannah.' A group of Egyptian Jews was recruited; Jews in the diaspora that are recruited are known as Syanin. The first bomb went off July 2 at a post office in Alexandria. On July 14 the Jewish terrorists firebombed US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. A phosphorus bomb exploded prematurely in Philip Natansson's pocket as he was about to enter the Rio Cinema in Alexandria; his arrest broke up the ring. Israel claimed Egyptians were tipped off and scapegoated defense minister Pinhaz Levon to hide the real group inside Israel who planned Operation Susannah and other false flag attacks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Lavarn affair was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt known as Operation Suzanna, in which Egyptian, American, and British owned targets in Egypt were bombed in the 1954. In the early nineteen fifties, The US was becoming friendlier with Egypt and was moving to influence the British to leave the Egyptian Suez Canal, which they had manned for almost twenty years. The apartheid state of Israel would not tolerate the British leaving, and elements within Israel began planning a variety of terrorist attacks on British, Egyptian, and American targets. These attacks would then be blamed on so called Muslim extremists. This would incite the anger of the British and the Americans towards Egypt and Islam and sour the burgeoning relationship between Egypt, America, and Britain. This plan for a series of false flag terrorist attacks was code named Operation Susannah. A group of Egyptian Jews was recruited to carry out the attacks. Jews in the diaspora that are recruited are known as Syanin. The first bomb went off on July 2 when a post office in Alexandria was firebombed. On the July 11, the Anglo Egyptian Suez negotiations, which had been blocked for nine months, got underway again. Despite the British assuring Israel that stockpiled weapons would not be given to the Egyptians, on July 14, the Jewish terrorists firebombed US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. However, that same day, a phosphorus bomb exploded prematurely in one of the terrorists, Philip Natansson's pocket just as he was about to enter the British owned Rio Cinema in Alexandria. His arrest and a subsequent confession led to the breakup of the whole ring. However, while the plot was being investigated, the Zionist Jewish terrorists started fire in two Cairo cinemas in the central post office and the railway station. After the plot was uncovered, many tried to spin it as an anti Semitic conspiracy theory. These ad hominem attacks are a common tactic of the Zionists. For more information on this, please read the Jewish American patriot Jack Bernstein's book, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel. This honest, honorable, and courageous Jew was subsequently assassinated by Mossad. As the trial of the Jewish terrorists became more and more public, Israel was forced to do damage control. They claimed that the Egyptians were tipped off and allowed the attacks to happen. They also singularly scapegoated the defense minister Pinhaz Levon to prevent the exposure of the real group inside the apartheid state of Israel who planned Operation Susannah and several other false flag terrorist attacks.
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 8:01 AM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The Holocaust is so true they had to make it illegal to even question in 19 different countries... https://t.co/4frmQChMQP

Saved - August 22, 2025 at 8:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
If you're a billionaire with a political agenda, you need someone who can effectively present your viewpoints and will unwaveringly support them. Actors fit this role perfectly; they excel at emotional appeals and often lack deep ideologies, focusing instead on fame. By hiring and training an actor, you can promote your agenda without risking your reputation. In contrast, political philosophers, who have their own ideologies, may not align with your views and could challenge your agenda. This dynamic contributes to a political system filled with insincere figures.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

If you're a billionaire with a political agenda and you want to have a person begin to indoctrinate that agenda in to the societal mainstream you need a person with two traits: 1. Someone who can present your viewpoints effectively to the public 2. And someone who will unquestioningly champion your viewpoints without the risk of them turning against those viewpoints And that's why actors are perfect After all, actors are the experts of presenting emotional pleas to an audience; that's precisely what acting is Actors are also some of the most shallow people in our society. Their primary goal tends to be to become famous for the sake of being famous. They seldom have much of an ideology outside of the vain pursuit of stardom and money So if you have billions of dollars and a political agenda find the best actor you can, hire them, train them on the talking points you want the public to hear, and promise them fame if they act in defense of those viewpoints effectively to the public The actors gets their fame and you get a mindless talking head of a henchmen to sell your political agenda to the masses without expending or risking your own reputation, time, or energy Conversely, the last person you would want to hire as the billionaire would be the political philosopher. And this isn't simply because political philosophers oftentimes aren't great at orally presenting their philosophies, there's a much larger issue with them, as well: The political philosophers have a political ideology of their own that may came in to conflict with yours There's no guarantee that the political philosopher will always be on your side if you're the billionaire because the pursuit of the political philosopher seldom tends to be vain fame but rather a pure social representation of their morals The wealthy may want the political philosopher for advice, but rarely would they want to hire them as the face of their ideology ...and that's why our political system is filled with failed actors and is fake and gay

Saved - August 16, 2025 at 12:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nick Fuentes cannot represent the American far right because he isn't a White nationalist, despite occasional allusions to it. He has a history of speaking against White nationalism and avoids formal mission statements, which has led to backlash from his followers. I’ve faced harassment for questioning this. Ultimately, whether he is controlled opposition is irrelevant; his goals differ significantly from those of White nationalists. I reject any association with figures like Nick, Candace, or Tucker, regardless of their affiliations.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

There's a simple reason Nick Fuentes can't represent the American far right: He's not a White nationalist. Sure, at times he's alluded to being a White nationalist but he has a long history of speaking against it as well (see pic). And don't you dare ask Nick and the Groypers for a formal mission statement like Patriot Front or the NSDAP put out. They'll report your account in to oblivion. Trust me, I know. The Groypers have come after me multiple times for asking. I also expect to be reported by them after this post. So whether or not Nick is controlled opposition doesn't really matter. He has a totally different end-state goal than us White nationalists. And the worst part is he won't even formally define what that goal is outside allusions to it in thousands of hours of video. Neither Candace, Nick, or Tucker represent an ideology I want to be a part of. I refuse to follow any of them, controlled opposition or not.

Saved - July 29, 2025 at 8:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jubilee Media, founded by Jason Y. Lee in 2010, has gained popularity through its engaging YouTube channels, Jubilee and Nectar, which focus on social issues and dating content, respectively. The team is notably diverse, with a significant Asian presence. Funding has come from various sources, including notable figures like Steve Chen and Jeremy Lin, and has totaled over $3.25 million. While the agency WME manages Jubilee, the primary influence appears to be Asian, highlighting the role of racial collectivism in the media landscape.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵Jubilee Media is everywhere... From 1 vs 20 debates to real-life dating app "swiping" You've surely seen their videos But this thread will show Jubilee isn't just some YouTube page that hit it big It's a political apparatus funded by some of the world's most powerful men…

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

First, let's answer the most basic question: What is Jubilee Media? Jubilee Media has a host of social media pages but is primarily composed of two YouTube channels: 1. Jubilee with ~10 million subscribers 2. Nectar with ~1.2 million subscribers

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And each page has very different agendas YouTube channel Jubilee tries to "provoke understanding & create human connection." Some of it's most popular videos are: -Flat Earthers Vs Scientists -Charlie Kirk vs 25 Woke Students -Swiping 30 people in a real life version of Tinder

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Meanwhile, Jubilee Media's Nectar YouTube page promises viewers: "I STILL BELIEVE IN LOVE & i want to help you find it" It's most popular videos show: -More dating app "swiping" people in real life -Dating people by their "glow-ups" -Various iterations of speed dating games

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now how did Jubilee Media start? Jubilee Media was started by Jason Y. Lee when he created the Jubilee YouTube page in 2010 And Jason wasn't just some random nobody... He's a graduate of one of the most prestigious Ivy League business schools in the US (Wharton)

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jubilee's 12th and 19th videos were love-story short films that went viral in 2010 These successes encouraged Jason to leave his job at one of the most prestigious consulting firms in the world (Bain & Co) and pursue the YouTube channel full-time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyB_U9vn6Wk

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now, before we get in to who funds Jubilee, we need to discuss one of the more striking things about it: It's extremely Asian... In fact, at least 48% of the 35 people Jubilee Media lists on their "Team" section are Asian https://www.jubileemedia.com/team

Team — Jubilee Media jubileemedia.com

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Here's the racial breakdown of the team Jubilee Media has listed on their website: Asian: 17 White: 8 Hispanic: 5 Black: 3 Indian: 1 Jewish: 1 (Also, of the people I looked up in researching this piece many of the people who weren't Asians were married to Asians) https://t.co/FgSw5Holau

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

I know, I know... Asians weren't the group many of you were expecting to see Don't worry, we'll discuss other groups here soon... But this Asian presence will be important when we see who is funding Jubilee So two more quick points on the Asian influence over Jubilee Media:

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

1. Of the videos Jubilee posted in its first 6 years around 80% of them only had Asians in them 2. Just take a look this pic from Jubilee's 2015 conference... https://t.co/9wBTdsFqwJ

@jubileemedia - Jubilee

Thanks for stopping by #JubileeConference15, @JLin7! http://t.co/dNHPjf6nq4

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Ok, now let's get to the good stuff... Who is actually funding Jubilee Media? Jubilee Media (then called "The Jubilee Project") would receive it's first round of funding in August of 2013 from a tech incubator called Civic Accelerator

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Of the funding Jubilee would receive this $50k was hardly anything And Civic Accelerator isn't tied to anyone too special, it was basically a joint effort between PwC's and Starbucks' Charitable Funds ...but the next round of funding gets much more interesting

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The next round of funding for Jubilee took place in December of 2017 for a much larger $655,000 And this funding round included Asian former NBA player Jeremy Lin But the big name funding this round wasn't Jeremy Lin…

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The big name funding Jubilee's second round was a man who was a member of Elon Musk's and Peter Thiel's infamous "PayPal Mafia" A man who was one of the founders of the very YouTube platform Jubliee was posting its videos to: YouTube co-founder Steve Chen https://t.co/MaZmUgcmUY

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now for anyone that doesn't know who Peter Thiel is or what the PayPal Mafia is I'll include a video below The PayPal Mafia could be a thread of its own but for brevity's sake I'll summarize them this way (next slide)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwTK_VT54OY

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The PayPal mafia is a small group of men that dominate the tech & startup world And anyone wanting a company in Silicon Valley invariably needs to be in one of their good graces These men also have strong ties to government agencies like the CIA and Mossad (especially Thiel)

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

But Jubilee’s funding didn't stop is 2017… Their next round of funding came in September of 2022 and was for $1.1 million And the cast of donors for this round was an even more star-studded lineup of Asian entrepreneurs:

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

In addition to Chen & Lin again, this round featured: -Patreon Co-Founder Sam Yam -DoorDash Co-Founder Stanley Tang -Rotten Tomatoes Founder Patrick Lee -Triller CEO Mike Lu The 2022 funding was led by Strong Ventures Can you guess the ethnicity of Strong's key people?

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And despite tracking all this funding by 2022 Jubilee Media had received at least $3.25 million in funding (see news article) That means there is still around $1.45 million I was unable to account for And it also means Jubilee's probably received much more money since then...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And I know, I know some of you are shocked No kosher influence, you say? Well, not so fast... The influence may have arrived a little later but in 2022 Jubilee Media signed talent agency WME as its manager

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now WME (William Morris Endeavor) is a massive agency behind some of the largest brands in the world To name just a few: -They represent the NFL and NHL -They are majority owner of the UFC and WWE -They represent of the biggest music and movie stars

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

At the head of WME are two men: -Patrick Whitesell -Ari Emanuel Ari's last name should sound familiar, his brother Rahm was the mayor of Chicago and Biden's ambassador to Japan The Emanuels are undoubtedly one of the most powerful jewish families in America (and the world) https://t.co/gdztWv7jmf

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

But as immense as WME's power is, their connection to Jubilee doesn't seem to go much deeper than management But the people that started, financed, and appear to currently control Jubilee are all Asian The racial influence here isn't a kosher one ...but an Asian one

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

So what does all this mean? Outside showing us Jubilee's potential biases this shows one big thing: It shows that behind the scenes racial collectivism is a powerful driving force for many different races in America to this very day

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

If you would like to see more content like this please donate at the links below: Monero: 42TdU7Sb1ZRbct5MH4yd4fL6RoWWaFTeGgnFgW7SinqK3Ni8ot3nmqLYc3GH5SSY3n6k7rTzX2L3scgjpNejkJ93DsceRKW BTC: bc1qyrde54uhs2ddwkrjcaqszfh9tmepscet7qm2h6 Buy Me a Coffee: coff.ee/bobby1_x

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And before it gets taken down... @threadreaderapp unroll

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@truthtroll_X Thanks brother⚡️⚡️

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@malen_manya Of course. Glad you liked it 💯

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@asphodelfieldz Thanks Asphodel :) I'm just trying to keep up with your thread-making over here

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@CommentaryCassX @threadreaderapp Thanks Cassie 💯💯

Saved - July 29, 2025 at 8:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the funding history of Jubilee, a popular political YouTube channel, revealing its financial backers. Initially funded by Civic Accelerator in 2013, Jubilee later received significant investments from notable figures like Steve Chen and other Asian entrepreneurs, totaling at least $3.25 million by 2022. I also discussed the Weimar Republic's societal issues, including rampant debauchery and the influence of Jewish individuals in various sectors. This context highlights the complex interplay of funding, media influence, and historical narratives.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵/6 To understand the bias of an organization you simply need to know who funds it Jubilee is undoubtedly one of the most popular political YouTube pages on the web today ...and people don't realize some of the richest men in the world fund it Here is who funds Jubilee:

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jubilee received it's first round of funding in August of 2013 for $50K from a tech incubator called Civic Accelerator Of the funding Jubilee's received $50k is minuscule & Civic Accelerator isn't tied to anyone too special ...much unlike Jubilee's next round of funding

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jubilee's next funding round was in December of 2017 for a much larger $655,000 And the big name funding this round was a member of Elon Musk's & Peter Thiel's infamous PayPal Mafia One of the co-founders of the very YouTube platform Jubliee posts its videos to: Steve Chen

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

But Jubilee’s funding didn't stop in 2017… Their next round of funding came in September of 2022 and was for $1.1 million And the cast of donors for this round was a star-studded lineup of Asian entrepreneurs: In addition to Steve Chen again, this round featured: -Patreon Co-Founder Sam Yam -DoorDash Co-Founder Stanley Tang -Rotten Tomatoes Founder Patrick Lee -Triller CEO Mike Lu -Former NBA player Jeremy Lin

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Also, despite tracking all this funding by 2022 Jubilee had received at least $3.25 million in funding (see news article) That means there is still around $1.45 million I was unable to account for And it also means Jubilee's probably received much more money since then... https://t.co/OroFG7Sohc

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Thanks for checking out my thread 🙏 If you'd like to view more of my threads I've linked a few of them below The Terrible Things Israel Has Done To The US: https://t.co/gWWMEoYkE8 The Untold Side Of The Weimar Republic https://t.co/Q8HPjr0oJ3

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵The terrible things Israel has done to the US are unparalleled From assassinating US presidents and stealing nukes to murdering US soldiers and a role in 9/11 This thread will expose key Israeli treacheries of the US ...and show our "greatest ally" is really our worst enemy

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

We’re often told Western societies are experiencing conditions reminiscent of the German Weimar Republic. But what exactly was the German Weimar Republic? I’d like to explain the republic…and its incredible levels of debauchery, meaninglessness, sex, drugs, and—of course—Jews. “The decay of moral values in all areas of life—the period of deepest German degradation—coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany.” -Karl Wiehe Background The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name—that was popularized by Adolf Hitler—of the German nation-state that existed from November of 1918 to March of 1933. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany where the constitutional assembly that established the new German republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany’s loss in WWI. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept “full responsibility” for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point 40% of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain and in one two-year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of WWI. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around 160 German Marks at the end of 1922, cost 200,000,000,000 German Marks by late 1923. The German peoples’ life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,210,500,000,000 German Marks by November of 1923, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Sex and Drugs Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn’t explicitly legal but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution was lax to non-existent. On any given night up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available: midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposefully tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid-scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes. Interracial, inter-generational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red-light district—but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” There were homosexual, lesbian, and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren’t isolated or rare one-off outliers either, there were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death, or even—in some instances—to death were performed in Weimar Germany (called Lustmord). As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my writings because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up yourself. German Newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictional accounts of murders sold very well on German book stands. Serial Killers had a romanticized lore around them, similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to non-existent. Images could be purchased under-the-counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest movie stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong-willed independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross-dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin’s women began to question the need for a man in their lives at all and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium (a predecessor to heroin), morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for “scientific” sexual purposes. One of the chief “scientists” behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirshfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statue of German Law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld’s crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July of 1919 when he opened The Institute of Sexual Research (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft) in Berlin. The institute’s stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences…and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary (aka genders) and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed sex re-assignment surgery. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual, and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual-specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public, which was reported to have been visited by school classes. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said: “I saw pimps offering anything to anybody: little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisson of all—as it allowed you to enjoy sod*my, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke.” A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, Music, and Film Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish-influenced anti-authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risqué and homosexual films. The world’s first known homosexual film—Anders als die Andern (1919)—came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. This film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film called Mädchen in Uniform (1931) is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on-screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions (no matter how crude those emotions may be) rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis’ content is emblematic of the anti-authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Erich Pommer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti-authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society, instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti-bourgeois protest in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far-right figures, including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as “the first official lesbian of Berlin” named Claire Waldoff. Waldoff dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldoff succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars in the world, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlene credits Clarie Waldoff as “introducing her to lesbian love”. Marlene Deitrich was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Dietrich “perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin.” Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like, suicide, morphiem, and mad house. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal… Architecture One aesthetic element that I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic—called expressionist architecture—also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on “distortion of form to create an emotional effect”. This is architecture that’s generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I’d also argue there’s a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society’s more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti-authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. Jews One of the key factors in Hitler’s rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this article would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or—possibly more importantly—the German public’s perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over-representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% (.09%) of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In my opinion, these figures are staggering primarily because of the Jews’ immense over-representation in major positions of power within German society. Politics • The author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. • One quarter of the members of the 8-person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews (Otto Landesberg and Hugo Haase). • The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. • The SPD (Social Democratic Party of Germany) was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the SPD were Jews. • The SPD’s main political theorist was a Jew: Eduard Bernstein • Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews: Ferdinand Lassalle, Leopold Sonnemann. • SPD's “foremost theoretician of this century” was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. • SPD Key Figure, industrialist, and political thinker Walther Rathenau was a Jew. • The Vice President of the Berlin Police was the jew Bernhard Weiss. • In the first Weimar administration Vice Chancellor Eugen Schiffer was Jewish as was Weimar Interior Minister Erich Koch-Weser. • 15% of the members of the Reichstag (German Parliament) were Jewish. • A large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews: Rosa Luxemburg, Paul Levi, Ernst Toller, Erich Muhsam, Gustav Landauer, Eugen Levine, and Karl Radek. The Press • The Ullstein Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew Leopold Ullstein. • The Berliner Iliustrirte Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was Published by the Ullstein Press and its chief editor was the Jew Kurt Korff. • The Vossische Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Ullstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew Georg Bernhard. • Another of the othe r largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Mosse. • The Berliner Tageblatt was the largest of Rudolf Mosse’s newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff • Editor-in-chief of the SPD’s party paper Vorwärts was the Jew Friedrich Stampfer The Arts • The Jew Erich Pommer was a German-born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, “Pommer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the 1920s and early 1930s.” • In 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. • Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era—the German expressionist movement—were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. • Two of the key Architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. • Some of the most influential producers, directors, & actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well to name a few: Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Josef Von Sternberg, Fritz Kohn, Otto Wallburg, Peter Lowenstein. • To conclude the arts, some claim the anti-authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. Sex • Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed "the Einstein of Sex". He was president of World League of Sexual Reform and of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. • Ivan Bloch was Jewish and is often called the "first Sexologist". • As quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” Other notable Jewish over-representations: (**Please Note** these next five bullet points are not official numbers and are from a NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including them because although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public’s perception of Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society): • 56% of notaries were Jews. • 52% of doctors were Jews. • 45% of Hospital Directors were Jews. • 48% of lawyers were Jews. • 35% of dentists were Jews. One last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. I included a link with more detail below, but many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it’s somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I list is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non-prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the provided list, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish over-representation is even more substantial when you consider that many of these Jewish amalgamations of over-representation occurred within many of Germany’s most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the "Juden Republic" (Jew's Republic) by Germans. I think it's easy to see why... Enter the National Socialists After Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the Brownshirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld’s books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: • Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, destroy the principles of race and Volk. • Pornography and explicit literature. • Pacifist literature. • All books degrading German purity. • Literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field. • Popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner, based on a bourgeois or upper class view of life. • The works of traitors, emigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. • The literature of Marxism, Communism and Bolshevism. • Literature with liberal, democratic tendencies and attitudes, and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. • Books that advocate "art" which is decadent, bloodless, or purely constructivist. • The decadent, destructive and Volk-damaging writings of "Asphalt and Civilization" literati • Patriotic kitsch in literature. • All historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk, or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk, or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses, and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city and National Socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest—as they say—is history. (Sources and further reading in the comments below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic, established after Germany's WWI loss and burdened by massive debt, faced economic devastation, hyperinflation, and high suicide rates. Berlin became a hub for prostitution, with up to 100,000 prostitutes nightly, including child prostitutes advertised in newspapers. Homosexual, lesbian, and transsexual bars thrived, alongside a booming porn industry. Drug use was rampant, with cocaine readily available. Magnus Hirschfeld, a homosexual Jew, founded the Institute of Sexual Research, which developed a system categorizing 64 genders and coining "transvestite" and "transsexual." Art, music, and film were overtaken by sexual themes and anti-authoritarianism. Jews were perceived as overrepresented in politics, the press, the arts, and the sex industry, despite comprising less than 1% of the population. The Weimar Republic was often called the "Juden Republic." After Hitler's rise, homosexual bars were shut down, and Hirschfeld's institute was pillaged, with his books among the first burned by the National Socialists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The decay of moral values in all areas of life, the period of deepest German degradation coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany. The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name that was popularized by Adolf Hitler of the German nation state that existed from November March 1933. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany, where the constitutional assembly that established the new German Republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany's loss in World War I. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept full responsibility for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point, forty percent of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain. And in one two year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of World War one. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around a 160 German marks at the 1922 cost 200,000,000,000 German marks by late nineteen twenty three. The German people's life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,200,000,000,000.0 German marks by November 1923, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of the primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn't explicitly legal, but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution were lax to nonexistent. On any given night, up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available. Midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposely tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes, Interracial, intergenerational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red light district, but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts, were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. There were homosexual, lesbian and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren't isolated or rare one off outliers either. There were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death or even, in some instances, to death were performed in Weimar, Germany, called Lustmord. As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my videos because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up for yourself. German newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictionalized accounts of murders sold very well on German bookstands. Serial killers had a romanticized lore around them, very similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to nonexistent. Images could be purchased under the counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report, there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong willed, independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin's women began to question the need for a man in their lives and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant, and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for scientific sexual purposes. One of the chief scientists behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirschfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statute of German law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld's crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July 1919 when he opened the Institute of Sexual Research in Berlin. The institute's stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary aka genders and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed one of the first sex reassignment surgeries. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public which was reported to have been visited by schoolchildren. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said, quote, I saw pimps offering anything to anybody. Little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisgin of all, as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke. End quote. A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin, and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish influenced anti authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risque and homosexual films. The world's first known homosexual film, Ander's Al's Die Andern came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story of a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. The film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film, called Machen in Uniform, is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions, no matter how crude those emotions may be, rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German Expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis' content is emblematic of the anti authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed by the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Eric Palmer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti bourgeoisie protests in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far right figures including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as the first official lesbian of Berlin named Claire Waldof. Waldof dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldorf succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars of the day, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlena credits Claire Waldoff as introducing her to lesbian love. Marlena was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Marlena perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin. Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like Suicide, Morphium and Madhouse. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal. One aesthetic element I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic, called expressionist architecture, also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on, quote, distortion of form to create an emotional effect. This architecture is generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I'd also argue there's a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society's more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. One of the key factors in Hitler's rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this video would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or possibly more importantly, the German public's perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In politics, the author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. One quarter of the members of the eight person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews, Otto Landsberg and Hugo House. The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. The S. P. D. Or Social Democratic Party of Germany was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the S. P. D. Were Jews. The SPD's main political theorist was a Jew, Edward Bernstein. Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews, Ferdinand LaSalle and Leopold Sonneman. SPD's foremost theoretician of this century was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. SPD key figure, industrialist and political thinker Walter Rathenau was a Jew. The vice president of the Berlin Police was the Jew Bernhard Weiss. In the first Weimar administration, Vice Chancellor Eugene Schiffer was Jewish, as was Weimar Interior Minister, Eric Koch Wesser. 15% of the members of the Reichstag, or the German Parliament, were Jewish. In addition to all this, a large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews. To name a few: Rosa Luxembourg, Paul Levy, Ernst Toller, Eric Musam, Gustav Landauer, Eugene Levine and Karl Radick. In the press, the Osteen Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew, Osteen. The Berliner Allostriete Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was published by the Olstein press and its chief editor was the Jew, Kurt Korf. The Waushicher Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Olstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew George Bernhard. One of the other largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Maas. The Berliner Taggeblat was the largest of Rudolf Maas's newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff. Editor in chief of the SPD's party paper Vorwarts, was the Jew Friedrich Stamper. In the arts, the Jew Eric Palmer was a German born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, quote, Palmer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties. In 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era, the German expressionist movement, were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. Some of the most influential producers, directors and actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well. To name a few, Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Joseph von Sternberg, Fritz Koen, Otto Wallberg, and Peter Lowenstein. To conclude the arts, some claim the anti authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist students. In the sex industry, Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed the Einstein of sex. He was president of the World League of Sexual Reform and, of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. Ivan Block was Jewish and is often called the first sexologist. And finally, as quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. A quick note on these next five points. These are not official numbers and are from an NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including these numbers because, although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public's perception of the Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society. 56% of notaries were Jews. 52% of doctors were Jews. 45% of hospital directors were Jews. 48% of lawyers were Jews. And 35% of dentists were Jews. And finally, one last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. Many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when Gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it's somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I listed is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the list provided, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish overrepresentation is even more substantial when you consider that many of the Jewish amalgamations of overrepresentation occurred within many of Germany's most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the Juden Republic or the Jews Republic by Germans. I think it's easy to see why. After Hitler's rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the brown shirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld's books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Social Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus destroy the principles of race in bulk. Pornography and explicit literature, pacifist literature, all books degrading German purity, literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field, popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner based on a bourgeoisie or upper class view of life. The works of traders, immigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. The literature of Marxism, communism and Bolshevism. Literature with liberal democratic tendencies and attitudes and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. And finally, all historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city, and national socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest, as they say, is history.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Also, I have a much longer thread that goes in to Jubilee's history, employees and biases much more in-depth You can check it out here: https://t.co/jLRzuyoVHo

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵Jubilee Media is everywhere... From 1 vs 20 debates to real-life dating app "swiping" You've surely seen their videos But this thread will show Jubilee isn't just some YouTube page that hit it big It's a political apparatus funded by some of the world's most powerful men…

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@Agent_Gray77 Thanks Alex 👍👍 Really appreciate it

Saved - July 27, 2025 at 8:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses the funding history of Jubilee, a popular political YouTube channel. It highlights that Jubilee received its initial funding of $50,000 in 2013 from Civic Accelerator, followed by a significant $655,000 in 2017 from notable figures linked to the PayPal Mafia, including Steve Chen. In September 2022, Jubilee secured $1.1 million from a group of Asian entrepreneurs, including Sam Yam and Jeremy Lin. Overall, Jubilee has received at least $3.25 million in funding, with an unaccounted $1.45 million still outstanding.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵/6 To understand the bias of an organization you simply need to know who funds it Jubilee is undoubtedly one of the most popular political YouTube pages on the web today ...and people don't realize some of the richest men in the world fund it Here is who funds Jubilee:

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jubilee received it's first round of funding in August of 2013 for $50K from a tech incubator called Civic Accelerator Of the funding Jubilee's received $50k is minuscule & Civic Accelerator isn't tied to anyone too special ...much unlike Jubilee's next round of funding

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jubilee's next funding round was in December of 2017 for a much larger $655,000 And the big name funding this round was a member of Elon Musk's & Peter Thiel's infamous PayPal Mafia One of the co-founders of the very YouTube platform Jubliee posts its videos to: Steve Chen

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

But Jubilee’s funding didn't stop in 2017… Their next round of funding came in September of 2022 and was for $1.1 million And the cast of donors for this round was a star-studded lineup of Asian entrepreneurs: In addition to Steve Chen again, this round featured: -Patreon Co-Founder Sam Yam -DoorDash Co-Founder Stanley Tang -Rotten Tomatoes Founder Patrick Lee -Triller CEO Mike Lu -Former NBA player Jeremy Lin

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Also, despite tracking all this funding by 2022 Jubilee had received at least $3.25 million in funding (see news article) That means there is still around $1.45 million I was unable to account for And it also means Jubilee's probably received much more money since then... https://t.co/OroFG7Sohc

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Thanks for checking out my thread 🙏 If you'd like to view more of my threads I've linked a few of them below The Terrible Things Israel Has Done To The US: https://t.co/gWWMEoYkE8 The Untold Side Of The Weimar Republic https://t.co/Q8HPjr0oJ3

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵The terrible things Israel has done to the US are unparalleled From assassinating US presidents and stealing nukes to murdering US soldiers and a role in 9/11 This thread will expose key Israeli treacheries of the US ...and show our "greatest ally" is really our worst enemy

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

We’re often told Western societies are experiencing conditions reminiscent of the German Weimar Republic. But what exactly was the German Weimar Republic? I’d like to explain the republic…and its incredible levels of debauchery, meaninglessness, sex, drugs, and—of course—Jews. “The decay of moral values in all areas of life—the period of deepest German degradation—coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany.” -Karl Wiehe Background The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name—that was popularized by Adolf Hitler—of the German nation-state that existed from November of 1918 to March of 1933. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany where the constitutional assembly that established the new German republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany’s loss in WWI. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept “full responsibility” for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point 40% of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain and in one two-year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of WWI. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around 160 German Marks at the end of 1922, cost 200,000,000,000 German Marks by late 1923. The German peoples’ life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,210,500,000,000 German Marks by November of 1923, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Sex and Drugs Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn’t explicitly legal but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution was lax to non-existent. On any given night up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available: midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposefully tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid-scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes. Interracial, inter-generational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red-light district—but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” There were homosexual, lesbian, and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren’t isolated or rare one-off outliers either, there were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death, or even—in some instances—to death were performed in Weimar Germany (called Lustmord). As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my writings because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up yourself. German Newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictional accounts of murders sold very well on German book stands. Serial Killers had a romanticized lore around them, similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to non-existent. Images could be purchased under-the-counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest movie stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong-willed independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross-dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin’s women began to question the need for a man in their lives at all and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium (a predecessor to heroin), morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for “scientific” sexual purposes. One of the chief “scientists” behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirshfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statue of German Law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld’s crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July of 1919 when he opened The Institute of Sexual Research (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft) in Berlin. The institute’s stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences…and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary (aka genders) and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed sex re-assignment surgery. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual, and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual-specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public, which was reported to have been visited by school classes. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said: “I saw pimps offering anything to anybody: little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisson of all—as it allowed you to enjoy sod*my, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke.” A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, Music, and Film Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish-influenced anti-authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risqué and homosexual films. The world’s first known homosexual film—Anders als die Andern (1919)—came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. This film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film called Mädchen in Uniform (1931) is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on-screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions (no matter how crude those emotions may be) rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis’ content is emblematic of the anti-authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Erich Pommer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti-authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society, instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti-bourgeois protest in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far-right figures, including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as “the first official lesbian of Berlin” named Claire Waldoff. Waldoff dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldoff succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars in the world, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlene credits Clarie Waldoff as “introducing her to lesbian love”. Marlene Deitrich was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Dietrich “perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin.” Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like, suicide, morphiem, and mad house. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal… Architecture One aesthetic element that I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic—called expressionist architecture—also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on “distortion of form to create an emotional effect”. This is architecture that’s generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I’d also argue there’s a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society’s more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti-authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. Jews One of the key factors in Hitler’s rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this article would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or—possibly more importantly—the German public’s perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over-representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% (.09%) of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In my opinion, these figures are staggering primarily because of the Jews’ immense over-representation in major positions of power within German society. Politics • The author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. • One quarter of the members of the 8-person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews (Otto Landesberg and Hugo Haase). • The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. • The SPD (Social Democratic Party of Germany) was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the SPD were Jews. • The SPD’s main political theorist was a Jew: Eduard Bernstein • Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews: Ferdinand Lassalle, Leopold Sonnemann. • SPD's “foremost theoretician of this century” was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. • SPD Key Figure, industrialist, and political thinker Walther Rathenau was a Jew. • The Vice President of the Berlin Police was the jew Bernhard Weiss. • In the first Weimar administration Vice Chancellor Eugen Schiffer was Jewish as was Weimar Interior Minister Erich Koch-Weser. • 15% of the members of the Reichstag (German Parliament) were Jewish. • A large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews: Rosa Luxemburg, Paul Levi, Ernst Toller, Erich Muhsam, Gustav Landauer, Eugen Levine, and Karl Radek. The Press • The Ullstein Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew Leopold Ullstein. • The Berliner Iliustrirte Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was Published by the Ullstein Press and its chief editor was the Jew Kurt Korff. • The Vossische Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Ullstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew Georg Bernhard. • Another of the othe r largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Mosse. • The Berliner Tageblatt was the largest of Rudolf Mosse’s newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff • Editor-in-chief of the SPD’s party paper Vorwärts was the Jew Friedrich Stampfer The Arts • The Jew Erich Pommer was a German-born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, “Pommer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the 1920s and early 1930s.” • In 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. • Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era—the German expressionist movement—were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. • Two of the key Architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. • Some of the most influential producers, directors, & actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well to name a few: Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Josef Von Sternberg, Fritz Kohn, Otto Wallburg, Peter Lowenstein. • To conclude the arts, some claim the anti-authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. Sex • Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed "the Einstein of Sex". He was president of World League of Sexual Reform and of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. • Ivan Bloch was Jewish and is often called the "first Sexologist". • As quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” Other notable Jewish over-representations: (**Please Note** these next five bullet points are not official numbers and are from a NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including them because although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public’s perception of Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society): • 56% of notaries were Jews. • 52% of doctors were Jews. • 45% of Hospital Directors were Jews. • 48% of lawyers were Jews. • 35% of dentists were Jews. One last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. I included a link with more detail below, but many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it’s somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I list is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non-prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the provided list, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish over-representation is even more substantial when you consider that many of these Jewish amalgamations of over-representation occurred within many of Germany’s most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the "Juden Republic" (Jew's Republic) by Germans. I think it's easy to see why... Enter the National Socialists After Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the Brownshirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld’s books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: • Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, destroy the principles of race and Volk. • Pornography and explicit literature. • Pacifist literature. • All books degrading German purity. • Literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field. • Popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner, based on a bourgeois or upper class view of life. • The works of traitors, emigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. • The literature of Marxism, Communism and Bolshevism. • Literature with liberal, democratic tendencies and attitudes, and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. • Books that advocate "art" which is decadent, bloodless, or purely constructivist. • The decadent, destructive and Volk-damaging writings of "Asphalt and Civilization" literati • Patriotic kitsch in literature. • All historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk, or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk, or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses, and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city and National Socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest—as they say—is history. (Sources and further reading in the comments below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic, established after Germany's WWI loss and crippling reparations, faced economic devastation, with hyperinflation and mass unemployment. Foreigners exploited the cheap prices, leading desperate Germans to the sex industry, particularly in Berlin, where prostitution flourished in a legal gray area. All types of prostitutes were available, including child prostitutes, with advertisements in newspapers. Homosexual, lesbian, and transsexual bars were common, and violent sexual acts occurred. Pornography also thrived. Fashion blurred gender lines, and drug use was rampant. Magnus Hirschfeld, a homosexual Jew, founded the Institute of Sexual Research, which developed gender categories and performed sex reassignment surgeries. Art, music, and film became sexualized and anti-authoritarian. Jewish individuals were prominent in politics, the press, the arts, and the sex industry, leading to perceptions of Jewish overrepresentation. The Nazis shut down homosexual bars, pillaged Hirschfeld's institute, and burned books deemed degenerate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The decay of moral values in all areas of life, the period of deepest German degradation coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany. The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name that was popularized by Adolf Hitler of the German nation state that existed from November March. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany, where the constitutional assembly that established the new German Republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany's loss in World War I. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept full responsibility for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point, forty percent of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain. And in one two year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of World War one. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around a 160 German marks at the 1922 cost 200,000,000,000 German marks by late nineteen twenty three. The German people's life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,200,000,000,000.0 German marks by November, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of the primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn't explicitly legal, but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution were lax to nonexistent. On any given night, up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available. Midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposely tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes, Interracial, intergenerational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red light district, but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts, were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. There were homosexual, lesbian and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren't isolated or rare one off outliers either. There were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death or even, in some instances, to death were performed in Weimar, Germany, called Lustmord. As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my videos because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up for yourself. German newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictionalized accounts of murders sold very well on German bookstands. Serial killers had a romanticized lore around them, very similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to nonexistent. Images could be purchased under the counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report, there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong willed, independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin's women began to question the need for a man in their lives and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant, and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for scientific sexual purposes. One of the chief scientists behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirschfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statute of German law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld's crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July 1919 when he opened the Institute of Sexual Research in Berlin. The institute's stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary aka genders and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed one of the first sex reassignment surgeries. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public which was reported to have been visited by schoolchildren. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said, quote, I saw pimps offering anything to anybody. Little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisgin of all, as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke. End quote. A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin, and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish influenced anti authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risque and homosexual films. The world's first known homosexual film, Ander's Al's Die Andern came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story of a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. The film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film, called Machen in Uniform, is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions, no matter how crude those emotions may be, rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German Expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis' content is emblematic of the anti authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed by the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Eric Palmer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti bourgeoisie protests in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far right figures including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as the first official lesbian of Berlin named Claire Waldof. Waldof dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldorf succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars of the day, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlena credits Claire Waldoff as introducing her to lesbian love. Marlena was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Marlena perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin. Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like Suicide, Morphium and Madhouse. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal. One aesthetic element I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic, called expressionist architecture, also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on, quote, distortion of form to create an emotional effect. This architecture is generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I'd also argue there's a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society's more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. One of the key factors in Hitler's rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this video would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or possibly more importantly, the German public's perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In politics, the author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. One quarter of the members of the eight person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews, Otto Landsberg and Hugo House. The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. The S. P. D. Or Social Democratic Party of Germany was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the S. P. D. Were Jews. The SPD's main political theorist was a Jew, Edward Bernstein. Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews, Ferdinand LaSalle and Leopold Sonneman. SPD's foremost theoretician of this century was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. SPD key figure, industrialist and political thinker Walter Rathenau was a Jew. The vice president of the Berlin Police was the Jew Bernhard Weiss. In the first Weimar administration, Vice Chancellor Eugene Schiffer was Jewish, as was Weimar Interior Minister, Eric Koch Wesser. 15% of the members of the Reichstag, or the German Parliament, were Jewish. In addition to all this, a large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews. To name a few: Rosa Luxembourg, Paul Levy, Ernst Toller, Eric Musam, Gustav Landauer, Eugene Levine and Karl Radick. In the press, the Osteen Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew, Osteen. The Berliner Allostriete Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was published by the Olstein press and its chief editor was the Jew, Kurt Korf. The Waushicher Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Olstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew George Bernhard. One of the other largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Maas. The Berliner Taggeblat was the largest of Rudolf Maas's newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff. Editor in chief of the SPD's party paper Vorwarts, was the Jew Friedrich Stamper. In the arts, the Jew Eric Palmer was a German born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, quote, Palmer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties. In 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era, the German expressionist movement, were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. Some of the most influential producers, directors and actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well. To name a few, Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Joseph von Sternberg, Fritz Koen, Otto Wallberg, and Peter Lowenstein. To conclude the arts, some claim the anti authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist students. In the sex industry, Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed the Einstein of sex. He was president of the World League of Sexual Reform and, of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. Ivan Block was Jewish and is often called the first sexologist. And finally, as quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. A quick note on these next five points. These are not official numbers and are from an NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including these numbers because, although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public's perception of the Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society. 56% of notaries were Jews. 52% of doctors were Jews. 45% of hospital directors were Jews. 48% of lawyers were Jews. And 35% of dentists were Jews. And finally, one last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. Many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when Gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it's somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I listed is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the list provided, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish overrepresentation is even more substantial when you consider that many of the Jewish amalgamations of overrepresentation occurred within many of Germany's most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the Juden Republic or the Jews Republic by Germans. I think it's easy to see why. After Hitler's rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the brown shirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld's books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Social Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus destroy the principles of race in bulk. Pornography and explicit literature, pacifist literature, all books degrading German purity, literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field, popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner based on a bourgeoisie or upper class view of life. The works of traders, immigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. The literature of Marxism, communism and Bolshevism. Literature with liberal democratic tendencies and attitudes and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. And finally, all historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city, and national socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest, as they say, is history.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Also, I have a much longer thread that goes in to Jubilee's history, employees and biases much more in-depth You can check it out here: https://t.co/jLRzuyoVHo

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵Jubilee Media is everywhere... From 1 vs 20 debates to real-life dating app "swiping" You've surely seen their videos But this thread will show Jubilee isn't just some YouTube page that hit it big It's a political apparatus funded by some of the world's most powerful men…

Saved - July 23, 2025 at 8:23 PM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵Jubilee Media is everywhere... From 1 vs 20 debates to real-life dating app "swiping" You've surely seen their videos But this thread will show Jubilee isn't just some YouTube page that hit it big It's a political apparatus funded by some of the world's most powerful men…

Saved - July 16, 2025 at 12:29 PM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

@jakeshieldsajj Freud was a degenerate jew and one of the chief purveyors of that degeneracy on the western masses And David Duke here can tell us all about it: https://t.co/yKmhZUsabW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims Sigmund Freud initiated the sexual revolution, which they call sexual dehumanization. Traditional Western culture idealizes sex within family, marriage, and love, exemplified by the Virgin Mary. Current media, however, promotes degeneracy through figures like Lady Gaga. The speaker alleges the Jewish-controlled globalist media, including MTV's Sumner Redstone, uses media as a weapon to destroy human values, leading to broken families, STDs, and child abuse. Freud, described as a Jewish supremacist, hated Christian morality and saw himself as conquering Europe. The speaker quotes Freud expressing anti-gentile sentiments and favoring a "superior Jewish race." The speaker asserts Jews dominate Hollywood and media, quoting Joel Stein boasting about Jewish control and Nathan Abrams discussing Jewish involvement in pornography. Al Goldstein is quoted saying Jews are in pornography because they hate Christ and Catholicism, using it to defile Christian culture. Jewish pornographers are driven by "atavistic hatred" to weaken American culture through moral subversion. The speaker connects figures like Reich, Marcuse, and Freud to a Jewish revolution against European values, and urges listeners to fight this subversion and defend their heritage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The father of the modern sexual revolution in the Western world is Sigmund Freud. He said quote sexual morality seems to me very contemptible. No single humanity, then did Sigmund Shlomo Freud. Was the sexual revolution an accident? You will find out the truth right now. Wherever the globalist media reaches on this planet there is an ongoing sexual revolution. It should be called sexual dehumanization. In traditional western culture sex is idealized and embedded with the idea of family, children, and the deep and sacred respect for love between a man and a woman. And marriage as a beautiful, even holy institution. A perfect example is the veneration of womanhood, fidelity, and purity as expressed in countless artworks of the Virgin Mary. The Madonna is also venerated in the Muslim Koran which defends Mary from the Jewish Talmudic slanders that claim Mary was a whore and Jesus a bastard. I hate to quote those words. Today the name Madonna fits the Talmudic slander. It's the image of a degenerate superstar whore engaging in gang sex and mocking the crucifixion. The latest media promoted female phenom is Lady Gaga and this teen idol is also depicted engaging in gang sex, sadism, masochism, and other forms of degeneracy along with her trendy music. Now this is the hottest new star promoted by the Jewish controlled globalist media including MTV Sumner Redstone. Real name, Robert. The media of the Western world and thus of the whole globe has become a weapon of mass destruction of the highest of human values. The human cost has been enormous, hundreds of millions of families have been destroyed. Children now commonly grow up without fathers. Sexually rooted epidemics including STDs, hepatitis, and HPV are soaring. AIDS, a disease primarily of promiscuity, will cost hundreds of millions of lives. Millions of people have suffered sterility and will never know the joy of children. Child rape, molestation, and abuse has grown exponentially. Sadism and masochism is something now exploited in the mass media along with increased images of violence and torture and murder all frequently associated with sex. The godfather of this sexual revolution is Sigmund Freud. Freud was a radical Jewish supremacist who had an intense hatred of European and Christian traditional morality. He viewed himself as a non European outsider who set out to conquer Europe as Hannibal did Rome. I know, this may sound impossible to many of you watching this. The popular media keeps these facts from you, but I can prove it in Freud's own books and letters. Some academics know it, but you are not permitted to know it. Freud says all this explicitly. Quote, Hannibal had been the favorite hero of my later school days. I began to understand for the first time what it meant to belong to an alien race. The figure of the Semitic general rose still higher in my esteem. To my youthful mind, Hannibal and Rome symbolized the conflict between the tenacity of the Jewry and the organization of the Catholic church. Freud makes his supremacist viewpoint very clear in a letter to a Jewish woman who intended to conceive a child by a gentile in order to heal the rift between Jews and gentiles in psychology. His words were I must confess that your fantasy about the birth of the savior to a mixed union does not appeal to me at all. The Lord in that anti Jewish period had him born from the superior Jewish race. A year later, the same woman gave birth to a child fathered by a member of the quote superior Jewish race. And Freud responded, I am, as you know, here to the last shred of my predilection for the Aryan cause, and would like to take it that if the child turned out to be a boy, he will develop into a stalwart Zionist. He or she must be dark in any case. No more toe heads, no more blondes. Let us banish these will of the wisps. So now you know that the most famous Jew of modern European history was actually an anti gentile Jewish supremacist. Why doesn't the media documentaries on Freud mention this important fact? Of course Freud was only the opening salvo in his vision of an alien race conquering Rome. Their domination and conquering of the media is amazing and its perversity is in full bloom. Hollywood and most of the major entertainment and news media is as Jewish as Gefilte Fish. And the media content is just as disgusting as those delicacies. Some of you still don't even fully realize the media control, so I'll quote to you from Jews and Jewish owned publications to enlighten you. For instance here are Joel Stein's works in the Los Angeles Times newspaper, a newspaper itself owned by a Jewish media mogul. Stein boasts and I quote, Jews totally run Hollywood. He gives the facts and figures of a complete takeover of entertainment media by Jews and he goes on to say quote, I called ADL chairman Abe Bachman. The ADL poll he pointed out showed that 59% of Americans think Hollywood do not share the religious and moral values of most Americans and 43% think the entertainment industry is waging an organized campaign to weaken the influence of religious values in this country. Thank goodness for the chutzpah of some Jews like Stein who must rub our nose in the Jewish supremacy for maybe it will jolt some of you to finally defend yourselves. Stein lets loose, quote, but I don't care if Americans think we are running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street, or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them. Just as Jewish scholars faithfully recorded the Jewish historical domination of European and the African slave trade, So they have also documented their prominent role in hardcore pornography. In a respected and scholarly magazine of Jewish intellectuals, the Jewish Quarterly, Jewish professor Nathan Abrams in an article titled Triple X Nix boasts of their dominant role in pornography. Quote There is no getting away from the fact that secular Jews played and still continue to play a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in The United States as Jews have helped transform the fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the true blue Jews. Jewish activity in the porn industry divides into two sometimes overlapping groups, pornographers and performers. Though Jews make up only two percent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography. Now Abram shows how the corruption and debasement of gentiles and Christian morality is an important part of their motivation for intentionally infecting the Christian and gentile community with pornography. Is there a deeper reason beyond the mere financial as to why Jews in particular have become involved in porn? Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screws, said, quote, the only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don't believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream, is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs. Its subversive character becomes more charged. Extending this subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the x rated can be seen as a proverbial two finger to the entire WASP establishment in America. Abrams writing in a Jewish journal for Jews writes matter of factly about the atavistic hatred against us by Jewish pornographers and their motivation to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Jewish involvement porn by this argument is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority. They are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion, asked to remembers having to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career was an up yours to these people. Obviously no articles in the mainstream media mention that Jewish atavistic hatred against Gentiles is a driving force behind the vast pornographic industry. You are not allowed to know that Jews even boast of their quote atavistic hatred toward us. Abrams goes on to talk about the roots of this revolutionary Jewish attack on European values. Quote Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Breich, Herbert Marcuse, and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky, and Lenin as required reading. Pacheco was one of the Jewish porn stars who read Reichs intellectual marriage of Freud and Karl Marx. Why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it's about time it was written about seriously. Notice that all those mentioned Reich, Markus, Benjamin, Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, and the godfather himself of it all, Freud are all Jews. From Goodman to Freud all represented Jewish revolution against traditional European values and morality. Of course it seems almost superfluous speak of pornography any longer as a distinction from mainstream Jewish media. Much of what passes from mainstream media is indeed pornographic in a classic sense. And they are incredibly destructive to millions of young lives. Look at the thousands of films pushed out primarily for the young generation of Europe and America. They promote the sexual habits of bonobo monkeys rather than loving human beings and the creation of a strong family. They overwhelmingly promote alcohol abuse. They promote drugs. They promote violence and even sadism and masochism among our people. How many of you listening to me right now have faced problems with drugs or alcohol or with sexual issues or diseases in your own families or among your friends? What does it take? The destruction of the lives of your own sons and daughters, for you to fight this evil subversion by the controlled media? It's very hard for a parent to fight this overwhelming indoctrination and millions have lost this war. Ironically, with Jewish influence over the media, societal mores, government today, it is now legal, even chic, to make and sell the sickest of pornography, showing horrific defilement of men and women. We live in a Jewish supremacist world where in many countries the most horrific porn is legal while simply daring to show the source of this scourge can land you in prison for so called hate speech. To defend our society and our children from the sick porn is not hate. It is the highest form of love for our children. The real haters are those who hate the overwhelmingly non Jewish world so much that they purposely seek our degradation and destruction. Remember Abram's words that Jewish porn kings are driven by quote atavistic hatred. Those of you brave enough to listen to me right now, you must understand what is really at stake here. It's your community, your heritage, your own children that's at stake. Many of our people are themselves corrupted by this new morality. Those that face this inner struggle must cleanse their lives and their hearts of this corruption. You must make a personal revolution in your own hearts and your own minds as you make a revolution in the world around you. But I can tell you, a revolution is coming. You know what is right, you know what is beautiful, and you know what is truly evil and ugly. Make yourself strong. Defend your heritage, defend your people, and change the world.
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been reflecting on the Lavon Affair, a covert Israeli operation from 1954 where a group of Egyptian Jews was recruited to carry out bombings in Egypt, aiming to blame Muslim groups. This was in response to U.S. support for Egyptian nationalism, which threatened Israeli influence over the Suez Canal. The operation failed when one of the spies was caught, leading to arrests and prison sentences. The incident highlights the complexities of false flag attacks and the importance of careful analysis before assigning blame, as it could prevent conflict.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

US media is in agreement: Iranian sleeper cells are waiting to kill Americans And in 1954 Muslims carried out attacks similar to what the media is reporting may happen now There was only one problem: The terrorists weren’t Muslims ...they were jews This is the Lavon Affair The Lavon Affair was a failed Israeli covert false flag operation conducted in Egypt in the summer of 1954. A group of Egyptian Jews was recruited by Israeli Military Intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets such as cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The plan was to carry out the bombings and then blame them on various Muslim groups in an attempt to force the British to maintain their military presence in Egypt. In the early 1950s, the U.S. initiated a policy supporting Egyptian nationalism. This American pro-Egyptian nationalist policy meant that the British—who were then occupying Egypt—would begin withdrawing their troops, and Israel would lose much of the influence it held over Egypt. Most critically, the British withdrawal meant Israel would lose its influence over the Suez Canal through its British allies. Since the Suez Canal was vitally important for controlling the trade routes that dominated the Middle East region, the Israelis knew they had to act to stop the British withdrawal and the subsequent loss of regional control. Thus, they initiated Operation Susannah (more popularly known as the Lavon Affair). The goal of Operation Susannah was to carry out bombings and other acts of sabotage in Egypt, with the aim of creating the perception that a British withdrawal would cause such instability that the British would be forced to remain—thereby allowing Israel to maintain influence and control over Egypt and the invaluable Suez Canal. The Israelis tasked Unit 131—a top-secret Israeli IDF task force—with carrying out Operation Susannah, and in the spring of 1954, the unit was activated. On July 2, 1954, Unit 131 detonated several bombs at an Egyptian post office in Alexandria. Twelve days later, on July 14, the unit bombed the libraries of the U.S. Information Agency in Alexandria as well as a British-owned theater. Finally, on July 23, 1954, Unit 131 firebombed the Cairo railway station and several movie theaters in Cairo and Alexandria. However, during the July 23 attack, one of the bombs began to detonate prematurely in the pocket of one of the Israeli spies, and he was taken into custody by Egyptian police. The police found evidence in the apartment of the captured spy that led them to the rest of Unit 131. Ultimately, eleven members of the unit were arrested. By the time the affair concluded, most of the bombers received prison sentences, and two were hanged. After the British left Egypt, the Suez Canal was nationalized and came under Egyptian control. Two years later, Israel invaded Egypt with the support of the British and French in what became known as the Suez Crisis or the Second Arab-Israeli War. The invasion failed after intense international pressure condemned the operation and threatened consequences against the invading nations. The Lavon Affair shows that false flag attacks can be decentralized and unfold over time. It also demonstrates that, in the midst of the fear such attacks provoke, it can be very difficult to determine who is actually responsible. We have to be cautious before assigning blame—but decisive once we do. Because that rational caution ...may just help stop a war.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1954, Israel initiated Operation Susannah, a terrorist operation in Egypt, also known as the Lavon Affair. The aim was to sabotage the improving relations between the US, Britain, and Egypt by bombing Egyptian, American, and British targets and blaming it on Muslim extremists. Egyptian Jews, referred to as Syanin, were recruited to carry out the attacks. The first bombing occurred on July 2 at an Alexandria post office. On July 14, US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria were firebombed. However, a premature explosion exposed Philip Natansson, leading to the ring's breakup. Despite the investigation, further attacks occurred in Cairo. After exposure, some labeled it an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. Israel claimed Egypt was tipped off and scapegoated Defense Minister Pinhaz Levon to shield those who planned Operation Susannah.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Lavarn affair was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt known as Operation Suzanna, in which Egyptian, American, and British owned targets in Egypt were bombed in the summer of nineteen fifty four. In the early nineteen fifties, The US was becoming friendlier with Egypt and was moving to influence the British to leave the Egyptian Suez Canal, which they had manned for almost twenty years. The apartheid state of Israel would not tolerate the British leaving, and elements within Israel began planning a variety of terrorist attacks on British, Egyptian, and American targets. These attacks would then be blamed on so called Muslim extremists. This would incite the anger of the British and the Americans towards Egypt and Islam and sour the burgeoning relationship between Egypt, America, and Britain. This plan for a series of false flag terrorist attacks was code named Operation Susannah. A group of Egyptian Jews was recruited to carry out the attacks. Jews in the diaspora that are recruited are known as Syanin. The first bomb went off on July 2 when a post office in Alexandria was firebombed. On the July 11, the Anglo Egyptian Suez negotiations, which had been blocked for nine months, got underway again. Despite the British assuring Israel that stockpiled weapons would not be given to the Egyptians, on July 14, the Jewish terrorists firebombed US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. However, that same day, a phosphorus bomb exploded prematurely in one of the terrorists, Philip Natansson's pocket just as he was about to enter the British owned Rio Cinema in Alexandria. His arrest and a subsequent confession led to the breakup of the whole ring. However, while the plot was being investigated, the Zionist Jewish terrorists started fire in two Cairo cinemas in the central post office and the railway station. After the plot was uncovered, many tried to spin it as an anti Semitic conspiracy theory. These ad hominem attacks are a common tactic of the Zionists. For more information on this, please read the Jewish American patriot Jack Bernstein's book, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel. This honest, honorable, and courageous Jew was subsequently assassinated by Mossad. As the trial of the Jewish terrorists became more and more public, Israel was forced to do damage control. They claimed that the Egyptians were tipped off and allowed the attacks to happen. They also singularly scapegoated the defense minister Pinhaz Levon to prevent the exposure of the real group inside the apartheid state of Israel who planned Operation Susannah and several other false flag terrorist attacks.
Saved - June 24, 2025 at 10:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I often hear comparisons between today’s Western societies and the German Weimar Republic, a period marked by extreme social decay from 1918 to 1933. This era followed Germany's defeat in WWI, leading to economic devastation, rampant unemployment, and skyrocketing inflation. Berlin became infamous for its sexual and drug culture, with a thriving sex industry and widespread drug use. The arts flourished, influenced by anti-authoritarian sentiments. Jewish individuals were notably over-represented in various sectors, contributing to perceptions of their influence. Hitler's rise in 1933 aimed to eradicate this perceived degeneracy, leading to significant societal changes.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

We’re often told Western societies are experiencing conditions reminiscent of the German Weimar Republic. But what exactly was the German Weimar Republic? I’d like to explain the republic…and its incredible levels of debauchery, meaninglessness, sex, drugs, and—of course—Jews. “The decay of moral values in all areas of life—the period of deepest German degradation—coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany.” -Karl Wiehe Background The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name—that was popularized by Adolf Hitler—of the German nation-state that existed from November of 1918 to March of 1933. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany where the constitutional assembly that established the new German republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany’s loss in WWI. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept “full responsibility” for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point 40% of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain and in one two-year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of WWI. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around 160 German Marks at the end of 1922, cost 200,000,000,000 German Marks by late 1923. The German peoples’ life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,210,500,000,000 German Marks by November of 1923, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Sex and Drugs Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn’t explicitly legal but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution was lax to non-existent. On any given night up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available: midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposefully tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid-scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes. Interracial, inter-generational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red-light district—but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” There were homosexual, lesbian, and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren’t isolated or rare one-off outliers either, there were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death, or even—in some instances—to death were performed in Weimar Germany (called Lustmord). As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my writings because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up yourself. German Newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictional accounts of murders sold very well on German book stands. Serial Killers had a romanticized lore around them, similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to non-existent. Images could be purchased under-the-counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest movie stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong-willed independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross-dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin’s women began to question the need for a man in their lives at all and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium (a predecessor to heroin), morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for “scientific” sexual purposes. One of the chief “scientists” behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirshfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statue of German Law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld’s crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July of 1919 when he opened The Institute of Sexual Research (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft) in Berlin. The institute’s stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences…and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary (aka genders) and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed sex re-assignment surgery. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual, and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual-specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public, which was reported to have been visited by school classes. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said: “I saw pimps offering anything to anybody: little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisson of all—as it allowed you to enjoy sod*my, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke.” A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, Music, and Film Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish-influenced anti-authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risqué and homosexual films. The world’s first known homosexual film—Anders als die Andern (1919)—came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. This film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film called Mädchen in Uniform (1931) is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on-screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions (no matter how crude those emotions may be) rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis’ content is emblematic of the anti-authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Erich Pommer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti-authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society, instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti-bourgeois protest in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far-right figures, including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as “the first official lesbian of Berlin” named Claire Waldoff. Waldoff dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldoff succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars in the world, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlene credits Clarie Waldoff as “introducing her to lesbian love”. Marlene Deitrich was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Dietrich “perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin.” Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like, suicide, morphiem, and mad house. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal… Architecture One aesthetic element that I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic—called expressionist architecture—also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on “distortion of form to create an emotional effect”. This is architecture that’s generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I’d also argue there’s a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society’s more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti-authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. Jews One of the key factors in Hitler’s rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this article would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or—possibly more importantly—the German public’s perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over-representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% (.09%) of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In my opinion, these figures are staggering primarily because of the Jews’ immense over-representation in major positions of power within German society. Politics • The author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. • One quarter of the members of the 8-person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews (Otto Landesberg and Hugo Haase). • The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. • The SPD (Social Democratic Party of Germany) was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the SPD were Jews. • The SPD’s main political theorist was a Jew: Eduard Bernstein • Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews: Ferdinand Lassalle, Leopold Sonnemann. • SPD's “foremost theoretician of this century” was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. • SPD Key Figure, industrialist, and political thinker Walther Rathenau was a Jew. • The Vice President of the Berlin Police was the jew Bernhard Weiss. • In the first Weimar administration Vice Chancellor Eugen Schiffer was Jewish as was Weimar Interior Minister Erich Koch-Weser. • 15% of the members of the Reichstag (German Parliament) were Jewish. • A large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews: Rosa Luxemburg, Paul Levi, Ernst Toller, Erich Muhsam, Gustav Landauer, Eugen Levine, and Karl Radek. The Press • The Ullstein Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew Leopold Ullstein. • The Berliner Iliustrirte Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was Published by the Ullstein Press and its chief editor was the Jew Kurt Korff. • The Vossische Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Ullstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew Georg Bernhard. • Another of the othe r largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Mosse. • The Berliner Tageblatt was the largest of Rudolf Mosse’s newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff • Editor-in-chief of the SPD’s party paper Vorwärts was the Jew Friedrich Stampfer The Arts • The Jew Erich Pommer was a German-born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, “Pommer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the 1920s and early 1930s.” • In 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. • Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era—the German expressionist movement—were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wiene. • Two of the key Architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Taut and Erich Mendelsohn. • Some of the most influential producers, directors, & actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well to name a few: Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Josef Von Sternberg, Fritz Kohn, Otto Wallburg, Peter Lowenstein. • To conclude the arts, some claim the anti-authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. Sex • Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed "the Einstein of Sex". He was president of World League of Sexual Reform and of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. • Ivan Bloch was Jewish and is often called the "first Sexologist". • As quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, “most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” Other notable Jewish over-representations: (**Please Note** these next five bullet points are not official numbers and are from a NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including them because although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public’s perception of Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society): • 56% of notaries were Jews. • 52% of doctors were Jews. • 45% of Hospital Directors were Jews. • 48% of lawyers were Jews. • 35% of dentists were Jews. One last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. I included a link with more detail below, but many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it’s somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I list is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non-prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the provided list, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish over-representation is even more substantial when you consider that many of these Jewish amalgamations of over-representation occurred within many of Germany’s most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the "Juden Republic" (Jew's Republic) by Germans. I think it's easy to see why... Enter the National Socialists After Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the Brownshirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld’s books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: • Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, destroy the principles of race and Volk. • Pornography and explicit literature. • Pacifist literature. • All books degrading German purity. • Literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field. • Popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner, based on a bourgeois or upper class view of life. • The works of traitors, emigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. • The literature of Marxism, Communism and Bolshevism. • Literature with liberal, democratic tendencies and attitudes, and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. • Books that advocate "art" which is decadent, bloodless, or purely constructivist. • The decadent, destructive and Volk-damaging writings of "Asphalt and Civilization" literati • Patriotic kitsch in literature. • All historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk, or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk, or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses, and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city and National Socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest—as they say—is history. (Sources and further reading in the comments below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic, established after Germany's WWI loss, faced economic devastation due to war debt, leading to hyperinflation and mass unemployment. Foreigners exploited the cheap prices, fueling a booming sex industry in Berlin with up to 100,000 prostitutes nightly, including child prostitution advertised in newspapers. Homosexual bars and explicit content thrived, alongside drug use. Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Research in Berlin promoted radical sexual theories, coining "transvestite" and "transsexual," and performing early sex reassignment surgeries. Art, music, and film became sexualized and anti-authoritarian, with Jewish figures prominent in the film industry. The Dadaist art movement rejected capitalist norms. Jews, though a small minority, held significant influence in politics, the press, and the arts, leading to the perception of a "Juden Republic." The NSDAP piece claimed Jews held a disproportionate number of positions as notaries, doctors, hospital directors, lawyers, and dentists. After Hitler's rise, homosexual bars were shut down, and the Institute for Sexual Research was pillaged, with its books burned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The decay of moral values in all areas of life, the period of deepest German degradation coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany. The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name that was popularized by Adolf Hitler of the German nation state that existed from November of nineteen eighteen to March of nineteen thirty three. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany, where the constitutional assembly that established the new German Republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany's loss in World War I. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept full responsibility for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point, forty percent of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain. And in one two year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of World War one. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around a 160 German marks at the end of nineteen twenty two cost 200,000,000,000 German marks by late nineteen twenty three. The German people's life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,200,000,000,000.0 German marks by November of nineteen twenty three, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of the primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn't explicitly legal, but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution were lax to nonexistent. On any given night, up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available. Midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposely tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes, Interracial, intergenerational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red light district, but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts, were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. There were homosexual, lesbian and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren't isolated or rare one off outliers either. There were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death or even, in some instances, to death were performed in Weimar, Germany, called Lustmord. As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my videos because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up for yourself. German newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictionalized accounts of murders sold very well on German bookstands. Serial killers had a romanticized lore around them, very similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to nonexistent. Images could be purchased under the counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report, there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong willed, independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin's women began to question the need for a man in their lives and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant, and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for scientific sexual purposes. One of the chief scientists behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirschfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statute of German law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld's crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July of nineteen nineteen when he opened the Institute of Sexual Research in Berlin. The institute's stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary aka genders and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed one of the first sex reassignment surgeries. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public which was reported to have been visited by schoolchildren. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said, quote, I saw pimps offering anything to anybody. Little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisgin of all, as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke. End quote. A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin, and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish influenced anti authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risque and homosexual films. The world's first known homosexual film, Ander's Al's Die Andern came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story of a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. The film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film, called Machen in Uniform, is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions, no matter how crude those emotions may be, rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German Expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis' content is emblematic of the anti authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed by the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Eric Palmer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti bourgeoisie protests in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far right figures including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as the first official lesbian of Berlin named Claire Waldof. Waldof dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldorf succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars of the day, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlena credits Claire Waldoff as introducing her to lesbian love. Marlena was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Marlena perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin. Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like Suicide, Morphium and Madhouse. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal. One aesthetic element I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic, called expressionist architecture, also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on, quote, distortion of form to create an emotional effect. This architecture is generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I'd also argue there's a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society's more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. One of the key factors in Hitler's rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this video would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or possibly more importantly, the German public's perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In politics, the author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. One quarter of the members of the eight person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews, Otto Landsberg and Hugo House. The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. The S. P. D. Or Social Democratic Party of Germany was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 22% of the entirety of the S. P. D. Were Jews. The SPD's main political theorist was a Jew, Edward Bernstein. Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews, Ferdinand LaSalle and Leopold Sonneman. SPD's foremost theoretician of this century was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. SPD key figure, industrialist and political thinker Walter Rathenau was a Jew. The vice president of the Berlin Police was the Jew Bernhard Weiss. In the first Weimar administration, Vice Chancellor Eugene Schiffer was Jewish, as was Weimar Interior Minister, Eric Koch Wesser. 15% of the members of the Reichstag, or the German Parliament, were Jewish. In addition to all this, a large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews. To name a few: Rosa Luxembourg, Paul Levy, Ernst Toller, Eric Musam, Gustav Landauer, Eugene Levine and Karl Radick. In the press, the Osteen Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew, Osteen. The Berliner Allostriete Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was published by the Olstein press and its chief editor was the Jew, Kurt Korf. The Waushicher Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Olstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew George Bernhard. One of the other largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Maas. The Berliner Taggeblat was the largest of Rudolf Maas's newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff. Editor in chief of the SPD's party paper Vorwarts, was the Jew Friedrich Stamper. In the arts, the Jew Eric Palmer was a German born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, quote, Palmer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties. In 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era, the German expressionist movement, were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. Some of the most influential producers, directors and actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well. To name a few, Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Joseph von Sternberg, Fritz Koen, Otto Wallberg, and Peter Lowenstein. To conclude the arts, some claim the anti authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist students. In the sex industry, Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed the Einstein of sex. He was president of the World League of Sexual Reform and, of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. Ivan Block was Jewish and is often called the first sexologist. And finally, as quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. A quick note on these next five points. These are not official numbers and are from an NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including these numbers because, although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public's perception of the Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society. 56% of notaries were Jews. 52% of doctors were Jews. 45% of hospital directors were Jews. 48% of lawyers were Jews. And 35% of dentists were Jews. And finally, one last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. Many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when Gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it's somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I listed is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the list provided, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish overrepresentation is even more substantial when you consider that many of the Jewish amalgamations of overrepresentation occurred within many of Germany's most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the Juden Republic or the Jews Republic by Germans. I think it's easy to see why. After Hitler's rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the brown shirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld's books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Social Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus destroy the principles of race in bulk. Pornography and explicit literature, pacifist literature, all books degrading German purity, literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field, popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner based on a bourgeoisie or upper class view of life. The works of traders, immigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. The literature of Marxism, communism and Bolshevism. Literature with liberal democratic tendencies and attitudes and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. And finally, all historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city, and national socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest, as they say, is history.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

First here are the links to all my other socials: https://linktr.ee/bobbythorne Further Reading/Sources Weimar Inflation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic Weimar Suicide https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231885835_Suicide_and_Crisis_in_Weimar_Berlin Weimar Unemployment https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/great-depression/#:~:text=The%20young%20Weimar%20Republic%20was,without%20a%20place%20to%20live%E2%80%A6 In-depth look at Berlin’s sexual perversity https://archive.org/details/voluptuous-panic/Voluptuous%20Panic-Erotic%20World%20of%20Weimar%20by%20Mel%20Gordon/page/43/mode/2up Sexual perversity with cited sources fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/h… Homosexual and lesbian clubs article and examples https://www.advocate.com/books/2016/7/19/peek-inside-berlins-queer-club-scene-hitler-destroyed-it More homosexual and lesbian clubs articles and examples https://the-game.imago-images.com/articles/pride-1920s-berlin/ Magnus Hirschfeld https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld The Institute for Sexual Science https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_f%C3%BCr_Sexualwissenschaft#:~:text=The%20name%20is%20variously%20translated,research%20center%20in%20the%20world The first homosexual movement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_homosexual_movement More Weimar debauchery https://historycollection.com/17-reasons-why-germanys-weimar-republic-was-a-party-lovers-paradise/ Dada https://fineartshippers.com/famous-dada-art-pieces-you-should-know/ Dada examples https://fineartshippers.com/famous-dada-art-pieces-you-should-know/ German expressionist cinema https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_expressionist_cinema German expressionist cinema examples https://www.bfi.org.uk/lists/10-great-german-expressionist-films Expressionist architecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expressionist_architecture Expressionist architecture examples https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/rtf-architectural-reviews/a3595-expressionist-architecture-an-individual-statement/ Bauhaus examples https://www.dezeen.com/2018/11/08/bauhaus-furniture-designs-chair-tables-chess-set-baby-cradle/ Weimar government officials https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bauer_cabinet Sources for many of the Jewish proportional representation numbers fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/h… Newspaper ownership https://www.weimarberlin.com/2018/03/the-press-in-weimar-berlin-not-only.html#:~:text=Already%20before%201914%2C%20three%20publishing,industrialist%20Alfred%20Hugenberg%2C%20extremely%20conservative NSDAP Poster https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1129245 List of Jews in the Weimar Republic https://wwv.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%207794.pdf Jews hiding Jewish identity https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1123&context=books More SPD Information https://kaiserreich.fandom.com/wiki/German_Empire/Parties Book Burnings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings

Bobby Thorne | Linktree Politics | History | White Pride | American linktr.ee
Hyperinflation in the weimar republic - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net
The Great Depression in Germany The Great Depression of 1929 struck America hard but Weimar Germany much harder. alphahistory.com
Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar by Mel Gordon (expanded edition) : Mel Gordon : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Weimar degeneracy, in pictures.   “When Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin first appeared in the fall of 2000, it inspired wide acclaim... archive.org
A Peek Inside Berlin's Queer Club Scene Before Hitler Destroyed It A new book tells the true stories behind Cabaret, and what was possibly the most thrilling gay party scene the world has ever known. Read an excerpt here. advocate.com
Before the terror, there was glitter: The queer haven that was 1920’s Berlin - The Game Magazine For Pride Month, we take a look back at our city’s longstanding roots in the LGBTQI+ movement with archives of the queer haven that was 1920’s Berlin. the-game.imago-images.com
Magnus hirschfeld - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Institut für sexualwissenschaft - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
First homosexual movement - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
17 Reasons Why Germany's Weimar Republic Was a Party-Lovers Paradise - History Collection Germany emerged from the First World War broken and disillusioned. Defeat in the Great War heralded the end of the monarchy, with the Kaiser giving way to the Weimar Republic, named after the small German city that had once been a hotbed of both artistic and scientific progress. Before long,… historycollection.com
Famous Dada Art Pieces You Should Know | Fine Art Shippers What are the most famous Dada art pieces that amaze people even today? Check out our blog to learn about Dadaism and its most notable art. fineartshippers.com
Famous Dada Art Pieces You Should Know | Fine Art Shippers What are the most famous Dada art pieces that amaze people even today? Check out our blog to learn about Dadaism and its most notable art. fineartshippers.com
German expressionist cinema - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
10 great German expressionist films From The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari to Nosferatu, the trend for shadows, angst and exaggerated sets in 1920s German cinema laid the foundations for everything from film noir to the horror genre. bfi.org.uk
Expressionist architecture - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Expressionist Architecture: an Individual Statement Developed from the genesis of the art nouveau movement in the 20th century the Expressionist architecture style was an exotic, irrational.... re-thinkingthefuture.com
10 of the most iconic pieces of Bauhaus furniture Ten of the most influential pieces of Bauhaus furniture, including Breuer's Wassily Chair, Hartwig's chess set and Mies van der Rohe's Barcelona Chair. dezeen.com
Bauer cabinet - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
The press in Weimar Berlin: not only tabloids Berlin in the 1920s, Berlin in the 1930s. Berlin's art scene. "Degenerate art", Avant-garde, expressionism, Berlin history, Weimar Republic weimarberlin.com
Collections Search - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum collections.ushmm.org
German empire/parties kaiserreich.fandom.com
Nazi book burnings - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 5:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve explored several historical false flag events that shaped U.S. involvement in wars, including the sinking of the Lusitania, the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Lavon Affair, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Each event reveals a pattern of manipulation, where emotional public responses were leveraged to justify military actions. I emphasize the importance of recognizing misinformation and maintaining rational analysis, especially as tensions rise in current geopolitical situations. More insights on related topics, including 9/11, will follow soon.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵The world’s waiting on a false flag attack to drag the US in to a war for Israel But many don't know the hidden, hushed history of false flags This thread will detail four important false flags So we might be able to spot the next one early ...and maybe even prevent a war

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

WWI: The Sinking of RMS Lusitania RMS Lusitania was a British civilian ocean liner that was torpedoed by an Imperial German Navy U-boat (U-20) during the First World War on May 7th, 1915. 1,197 people - most of whom were civilians - were killed in the sinking of Lusitania, 128 of them were Americans. The sinking of Lusitania is generally regarded as the event that rallied a US populace - a populace that was tepid about entering an ongoing war an ocean away - in to supporting US involvement in WWI. The sinking of Lusitania is shrouded with mysterious circumstances... Leading up to the attack on Lusitania, the Germans had repeatedly warned the British they would fire on ships (even civilian ones) that were transporting ammunition for the British in WWI. However, despite these warnings, Winston Churchill, the head of the British Navy, had been transporting ammunition for WWI on British ocean liners for some time. Churchill had even gone so far as to give orders to the captains of merchant ships, including ocean liners, to ram German submarines if they encountered them. The Germans, on the other hand, had printed warnings in American newspapers warning passengers on British ships that “vessels flying the flag of Great Britain...are subject to destruction in those waters...travelers sailing in the war zone...do so at their own risk.” Interestingly, one week before the attack on Lusitania, Churchill wrote to Walter Runciman, President of the Board of Trade, that it was “most important to attract neutral shipping to our shores, in the hopes especially of embroiling the United States with Germany.” On 7 May 1915, RMS Lusitania was nearing the completion of its voyage from New York to Liverpool and was roughly 11 miles off the southern coast of Ireland. British intelligence was aware a German U-Boat was in the waters near Lusitania’s route yet did nothing to warn Lusitania of the U-Boat. In addition, the British battle ship Juno that was supposed to have been serving as an escort to Lusitania that day had been called back to port shortly after it rendezvoused with Lusitania because there was “no urgent necessity” for it to accompany Lusitania. As Lusitania crossed the path of U-20, it was traveling ~20% slower than its average speed. This is of particular interest because torpedoes at that time had trouble hitting faster moving targets yet, for some still unknown reason, the speed of Lusitania had been deliberately reduced. U-20 knew of Lusitania and had evidence the ship was carrying armaments for the war (which it was). U-20 fired a single torpedo at Lusitania which struck the ship and exploded. However, moments after the torpedo strike by U-20 a mysterious second, larger explosion took place according to survivor reports. The ship sunk in just 18 minutes and claimed 1,197 lives. The second explosion on Lusitania is of particular interest. The Germans knew their torpedoes would take time to sink Lusitania and didn’t expect the ship to sink as quickly as it did. They even acknowledged so much in their official response to the sinking of Lusitania saying “there can be no doubt that the rapid sinking of Lusitania was primarily due to the explosion of the cargo of ammunition caused by the torpedo. Otherwise, in all human probability, the passengers would have been saved.” Their statement implies that the torpedo was meant more as a warning shot to stop the transport of armaments on civilian ships by the British, not necessarily to kill the passengers of the ship. The Lusitania disaster was covered in American media relentlessly at the time and is largely accepted to be the impetus that got America to enter WWI. Yet the mystery of Lusitania continued to even grow after its sinking. Research on Lusitania, the munitions it was carrying, or the mysterious second explosion are now near impossible because the British used Lusitania for testing their underwater explosives after WWI which has caused the wreckage to “look like Swiss cheese”. And although Lusitania is in water that’s only ~300 feet deep the British government to this day hampers any efforts to explore the wreckage through threats of litigation of the explorers and complex legal restraints. No independent third party has been allowed to seriously and thoroughly review the wreckage of Lusitania even 110 years after its sinking. As Churchill stressed in his memoirs of World War I, embroiling neutral countries in hostilities with the enemy was a crucial part of warfare: “There are many kinds of maneuvres in war, some only of which take place on the battlefield. . . . The maneuvre which brings an ally into the field is as serviceable as that which wins a great battle.” While Lusitania was certainly torpedoed by the Germans, the events leading up to its sinking, the sinking itself, the mysterious second explosion, and the subsequent events that appear to be nothing but attempts to conceal what evidence might be in the wreckage lend credence to the idea that the sinking of Lusitania was an orchestrated false flag event by the British to draw the Americans in to WWI.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

WWII: The Attack on Pearl Harbor The attack on Pearl Harbor was a "surprise” military strike by the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service against the US. naval base at Pearl Harbor in Honolulu, Hawaii on December 7th, 1941. The attack killed 2,403 people and is widely regarded as the primary reason the US entered WWII To understand the Pearl Harbor attack, you have to understand its background. In 1940 on the campaign trail for re-election FDR assured Americans the US would not enter any foreign wars. In a famous campaign statement in 1940 FDR even stated, "I have said this before, and I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars." Support for the US entering WWII was extremely low in 1940. In fact, one Gallup poll showed just 7% of Americans in support of the US entering the war (pictured). However, while FDR was paying lip service to peace, his actions were in direct contradiction to his words... FDR repealed an arms embargo in 1939 that had previously forced the US to be neutral in supplying arms to European nations for the war so that the US could instead unilaterally support Britain. He initiated a peacetime draft in 1940. He signed in to law the Lend-Lease Act of 1941 that directly supplied the allies with arms over the Axis powers. He even had naval patrols accompany civilian ships before the US entered the war, one of which - the USS Greer - even engaged a German U-Boat 3 months before the US officially entered the war. FDR also worked with Winston Churchill to issue the Atlantic Charter – a document announcing the British and US goals for the war after WWII - in August of 1941 and before the US entered the war. However, the actions in the previous paragraph weren’t the primary cause of the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor, there were other actions FDR took against the Japanese directly that would lead to that attack. These actions began with FDR imposing sanctions on Japan as a result of Japan's invasion of Indo-China (more or less modern day Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos). Although the Japanese actions in Indo-China didn’t effect the US directly FDR said he had concerns about Japan's "aggressive expansion" in the region. In 1940 FDR formalized US aide to China to oppose the Japanese and throughout 1940 he would gradually increase the aid that was being given by the US to China while simultaneously gradually strengthening the US embargo on Japan. However, despite FDR strengthening the sanctions against Japan the Japanese had no intention of pulling out of Indo-China and continued to oppose the involvement of America and the West in Asian affairs. Diplomatic relations between Japan and the US deteriorated and on July 26, 1941 – just a few moths before the attack on Pearl Harbor - FDR seized all Japanese assets in the United States in retaliation for the Japanese moves. The ultimate result of the sanctions was that Japan lost access to three-fourths of their overseas trade and 88 percent of its imported oil. Japan made multiple concessions to the US but FDR refused to budge on the sanctions. The Japanese claim the sanctions against Japan and FDR’s refusal to negotiate with them are what instigated Japan to attack Pearl Harbor. They claim their hope was that by carrying out the attack FDR would go back to the negotiating table with them. Meanwhile, the US claimed the territorial expansion ambitions of Japan in Asia were justification for the stiff sanctions and other actions the US took against Japan. Even though FDR's actions against Japan very likely seem to indicate an provocative intent toward Japan, there's an argument to be made that the lead up to the attack on Pearl Harbor may have been nothing more than political negotiations failing without a provocative intent behind them. However, saying the US and FDR didn't have evidence that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor is very hard to view in the same innocuous light. A few months before the attack in August of 1941 Congressman Martin Dies collected evidence the attack on Pearl Harbor was being planned and was even in possession of a strategic map of the Pearl Harbor attack prepared by the Japanese Imperial Navy that he is said to have presented to FDR himself. In addition to Dies's evidence, a Soviet agent named Richard Sorge and a British double agent named Dusko Popov both independently came across and reported evidence to their respective superiors that an attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor was being planned. This information is said to have been given to the FDR administration but no action was taken. In addition to all this, US codebreakers had been deciphering communications from Japan for months before Pearl Harbor and had considerable evidence an attack on the US was incoming. One famous message, called the Winds Message, was intercepted just a single day before the Pearl Harbor attack. The message was sent by the Japanese government to Japanese embassies and consulates instructing Japanese diplomats to destroy their codebooks and other sensitive documents and prepare for potential hostilities. Despite intercepting this message, the FDR administration did nothing to notify military commanders at Pearl Harbor or elsewhere to prepare for an attack FDR would go on to call the attack on Pearl Harbor “the day that will live in infamy” and the attack would act as the impetus for the US to enter WWII. Just like the attack on Lusitania the attack on Pearl Harbor was very real. The Japanese certainly did attack and kill Americans at Pearl Harbor. However, even if you think the the events that spurred the tensions that lead up to the attack on Pearl Harbor are discounted as simple politics, the very obvious signs and warnings of the attack that were ignored point to something larger and more coordinated taking place by FDR’s administration to allow the attack as an excuse to enter an unpopular war.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The Lavon Affair The Lavon Affair was a failed Israeli covert false flag operation conducted in Egypt in the summer of 1954. A group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli Military Intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets like cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The plan was to carry out the bombings and then blame the bombings on various Muslim groups in an attempt to force the British to keep their military presence in Egypt. Israel may have been created after the end of WWII in 1948 but tensions had existed between the Jews and Muslims over who got what lands in the Palestine region since before even the Balfour declaration (the legal document from the British promising Jews the Palestine region) was signed in 1917. And when the British officially withdrew from Palestine in 1948 Israel immediately went to war with its new neighbors over territorial disputes in what became known as the First Arab-Israeli War. Despite the First Arab-Israeli War, in the early 1950s, the US initiated a policy in favor of Egyptian nationalism. This American Pro-Egyptian nationalist policy meant the British – who occupied Egypt at the time – would begin withdrawing their troops from the country. This withdraw of the British from Egypt also meant Israel would lose most of the influence they had over Egypt and, even more importantly to Israel, this withdraw of the British meant Israel would lose their influence over the Suez Canal. It also potentially meant Israel would have to fight another war to secure influence over those critical locations again. With the Suez canal being vitally important for controlling the trade routes that dominate the Middle East region, the Israelis knew they had to do something to stop this withdraw of British troops and their subsequent loss of regional control, so they initiated Operation Susannah (more popularly known as the Lavon Affair). The goal of Operation Susannah was to carry out bombings and other acts of sabotage in Egypt with the aim of creating a sense that a British withdraw from the country would create such instability in the region that the nationalist aspirations for Egypt would be dropped by America and the international community. Israeli author Doron Geller stated the intent was to “make it clear to the whole world that Egypt’s new rulers were nothing but a group of foolhardy extremists, unreliable and unworthy of taking charge of an asset as important as the Suez Canal. Furthermore, it was to be demonstrated that their grasp on power was uncertain, that they faced powerful internal opposition, and, consequently, they were unworthy of being counted upon as a dependable ally.” The Israelis tasked a covert unit called Unit 131 with carrying out Project Susannah. This Unit was a composed of Egyptian nationals of Jewish heritage who had been recruited in Egypt to do covert missions on behalf of the new Israeli state and in spring of 1954 the unit was activated. On July 2, 1954 Unit 131 detonated a few bombs at an Egyptian Post Office in Alexandria. 12 days later - on July 14th - the Unit bombed the libraries of the US Information Agency in Alexandria as well as a British-owned theater. And finally, nine days later, on July 23rd 1954, Unit 131 took firebombs to the Cairo railway station and to movie theaters in Cairo and Alexandria. Unfortunately for Unit 131, during the July 23rd attack a bomb began to prematurely detonate in the pocket of one of the Israeli spies and he was taken in to custody by Egyptian police. The police would find the bomb on the spy as well as evidence in the apartment of the captured spy leading them to the rest of Unit 131. Ultimately 11 members of Unit 131 were arrested and, by the time it was all said and done, two of the member of Unit 131 committed suicide in prison, two were hanged, two escaped back to Israel, and most of the others got prison time. After the British left Egypt, the Suez Canal would become nationalized by the Egyptians and would fall under Egyptian control. This would lead the Israels to go on to invade Egypt two years later with the support of the British and the French in what’s known as the Suez Crisis or the Second Arab-Israeli war. The attempted invasion of Egypt would fail after intense international pressure condemned it and threatened action against Israel and the other invading countries for their invasion. The Lavon Affair differs from the other events in this article because rather than being a single event it was – or at least it was planned to be before it was prematurely foiled – a series of events to terrorize targets in to submitting to a political end. I think it shows that although a singular false flag event can be useful, a series of events over a period of time is another useful tool in the bag of people carrying out false flag attacks to terrorize a populace in to submission to their political goals. Multiple operations obviously carry more risk than a single operation but they can be an equally effective method of false flag and can keep a population in a state of fear for a prolonged period of time.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Vietnam: The Gulf of Tonkin Incident The Gulf of Tonkin incident refers to two “attacks” by the North Vietnamese against US Navy ships on August 2nd and 4th of 1964. The attacks were used by President Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) to justify US involvement in and to ultimately enter the Vietnam War. Prior to the Gulf of Tonkin incident the US wasn’t involved in the Vietnam War directly. Although the US had ~16,000 troops on the ground in Vietnam, those troops were acting as military “advisors” and weren’t officially involved in military activities. Moreover, prior to his assassination in November of 1963, JFK was actively withdrawing US "advisors" from Vietnam and the rumors were that he planned to withdraw all US troops from the country. But once JFK was assassinated things changed... Once he became President, LBJ decided to expand the US’s involvement in Vietnam and started increasing US troop levels in Vietnam. The only problem was the US still had no real reason to enter the conflict on a larger scale. And that's when the USS Maddox was "attacked" The first attack occurred on the USS Maddox on August 2nd, 1964. The Maddox was a US Destroyer outfitted to gather intelligence and was patrolling in or near North Vietnamese waters. To this day, the US claims the Maddox wasn't in North Vietnamese waters, while North Vietnam argues it was. The Maddox was approached by three North Vietnamese patrol boats which the Maddox fired warning shots at. Bullets and torpedoes were fired back at the Maddox by the North Vietnamese but no crew members on the Maddox were killed and the torpedoes didn't strike the Maddox. The North Vietnamese attackers were driven back by gunfire from the Maddox as well as by some air support the Maddox was receiving from a nearby aircraft carrier. One of the North Vietnamese torpedo boats was reportedly sunk; the other two sustained damage but limped back to base. This first encounter was very real is well-documented. However, the much more interesting USS Maddox incident is the second one because it was completely fabricated. Two days after the first encounter on a rainy August 4, 1964, the USS Maddox returned to the same area with a second ship - the USS Turner Joy. According declassified official reports, the Maddox reported seeing multiple unidentified vessels on its sonars coming at it from different directions. The Maddox claimed vessels would disappear from sonar, only to reappear seconds or minutes later in a completely different location. Afraid of attackers, the Captain of the USS Maddox - Captain John Herrick - sent flash messages to US officials with updates on the incident while trying to move the ships out of “harm’s way”. However, official reports claim that every time the Maddox left one area, another blip would appear on the sonar. Captain Herrick claims to have felt surrounded even though he never visually confirmed any North Vietnamese ship. Air support was called in to assist the Maddox and Turner Joy and as one pilot put it, “I had the best seat in the house to watch that event, and our destroyers were just shooting at phantom targets — there were no PT boats there…nothing there but black water and American firepower.” The Maddox did nothing but unload a barrage of ammunition at the open sea…. Many historians argue there weren't even North Vietnamese ships in the general vicinity of the Maddox and Turner Joy at the time of the attack. Even Secretary of Defense under Kennedy and LBJ - Robert McNamara - admitted the falsehood of the attack saying, “I think it is now clear [the second attack] did not occur. I asked [North Vietnamese] General Giap myself, when I visited Hanoi in November of 1995, whether it had occurred, and he said no. I accept that.” In a message sent the day after the attack Captain Herrick blamed “freak weather effects on radar and overeager sonarmen” for the mistaken attack. However, despite long standing public skepticism that the attack on the Maddox was fabricated, none of this information would be declassified until the early 2000s – long after the conclusion of the war in Vietnam. Regardless of the second event being entirely false, the “attacks” on the USS Maddox would go on to be reported in American press and would allow LBJ to garner support for a US entry into the conflict in Vietnam. Unlike the other events we’ve examined so far the Gulf of Tonkin wasn’t a real attack but was an entirely fabricated event (at least the second encounter was). It goes to show, false flags can come in many flavors. How an event is reported is much more important than whether or not it’s true, especially when the details of the attack remain classified. In the fog of war action has to be taken quickly on less than objective and/or verifiable information and the Gulf of Tonkin incident is a great example of how that quick action on bad information to lead to very mistaken outcomes and, even, to entire wars.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Piecing It All Together These false flag events have a couple things in common to keep an eye out for as these tensions between Israel and Iran increase in the coming days First, these events are intended to do one primary thing: To turn the public from rational to emotional Because an emotional public is a public that can be manipulated… The other thing these events all have in common is that they rely on misinformation or incomplete information Emotional events can move quickly in our minds and when those quickly moving events are paired with fear and suppression of truths, they make for a dangerous combination Regardless of the form any attacks take, it’s important to not let emotions overtake rational analysis ...because our rational skepticism might just stop a war

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

More To Come... I know there were other false flags that you all probably wanted to see covered that I didn’t include but I have good news: There will be more to come I’ll be putting out a piece on 9/11 here soon. However, it’ll be pretty comprehensive and will examine very different aspects of that event than we looked at in the events in this article, so I felt it’d be better as a standalone piece. I’ll be putting out that article shortly but in the meantime feel free to check out my threads on the terrible things Israel has done to the US and the lies we’ve been told about the Holocaust. Links to those threads are below: https://t.co/8KNwQlpg9n https://t.co/hv5dQctjDy

Saved - June 13, 2025 at 10:35 PM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Don't listen to X spaces with people who know nothing about international relations Listen to the man who wrote the book on the Israel Lobby and one of the most well-respected international relations experts on the planet - John Mearsheimer Here he is today on Iran/Israel: https://t.co/N9TU6envSD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Judge Napolitano and Professor Mearsheimer discuss the Israeli attack on Iran, which Mearsheimer calls a "massive attack" and compares to Pearl Harbor. He believes Iran will retaliate, leading to escalation. Trump's Truth Social post is interpreted as a threat to Iran if they don't negotiate. Mearsheimer claims Trump colluded with Netanyahu, feigning diplomacy while knowing of the attack. He asserts no country should trust the U.S. Mearsheimer believes Israel's goal is to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and is drawing the U.S. into the conflict, ending negotiations. He says Israel is dependent on the U.S. for weaponry and defense. Mearsheimer says the Israeli attack aimed to kill Iranian leaders, but this "decapitation strategy" won't cripple Iran's ability to wage war. He says Iran can still strike Israel and U.S. bases. He also warns of potential oil installation attacks, leading to economic consequences. Mearsheimer concludes Israel "owns" Congress and can manipulate the U.S. into supporting its actions. He likens the situation to the Bay of Pigs, where the CIA aimed to draw Kennedy into a larger conflict. He sees no other countries getting involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for judging freedom. Today is Friday, 06/13/2025. Professor John Mearsheimer joins us now. Professor Mearsheimer, it's a pleasure. We originally scheduled this to continue our session from the other day when we had Internet problems. And, of course, since then, the world in The Middle East has changed. What's your initial analysis of the Israeli attack on Iran? Speaker 1: I think it's clearly a massive attack. I mean, they're attacking in waves. They're attacking all over the country, and they've made it clear that this is just the beginning. So this is a major conflict, and the Israelis are well aware that the Iranians are gonna retaliate. We don't know exactly what that retaliation looks like. So you're basically gonna have a situation where we go up the escalation ladder. And then the question becomes, what does it look like at the end when this is finally concluded? Speaker 0: Do we do do we know, if, the Iranian offensive Chris is back in his element here. Do we know Chris dog, not not producer Chris. Do we know if the Iranian offensive weaponry has been, impacted by this attack? Speaker 1: Well, I think there's no question that some of it has. The question is how much? The Iranians have a lot of that, a lot of those missiles, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles hidden underground. And furthermore, there are just limits to how many of the missiles can be attacked by the Israelis because they can only put so many aircraft over the target. But at the same time, I think it's quite clear that the Iranians got caught with their pants down. This was a surprise attack. Scott Ritter on the show earlier today talked about this being Iran's Pearl Harbor. I think that is an apt analogy here. So I think it is clear the Israelis did get more than a few ballistic and cruise missiles, but how many remains to be seen? I just had to get up Speaker 0: and close the door to try and, insulate us from Chris's expressing his opinion on all these things. There doesn't seem to be any question about United States involvement after reading what the president said. I'm not so sure it was wise what he said, but I like to read it out loud since it's a truth social poster. Chris, if you wanna put it up, please. This is the president of The United States, about, 06:15 this morning eastern time. I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them in the strongest of words to just do it, but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done. I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told that The United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the world by far in caps and that Israel has a lot of it with much more to come, and they know how to use it. Certain Iranian hardliners spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They're all dead in caps now, and it will only get worse. There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter with the next already planned attacks being even far more brutal come to an end. Iran must make a deal before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian empire. No more death. No more destruction. Just do it before it's too late. God bless you all. The anti war president saying, if you don't negotiate the way we want you to, we'll kill you either directly or through our proxy, Benjamin Netanyahu. Is that the way you read that? Speaker 1: Yeah. No question about it. Just a couple other points. The Times of Israel has a big story that's easily accessible on the Internet that makes it clear that, Trump colluded with Netanyahu to basically bamboozle the Iranians and make it look like there was not gonna be an attack, at least until the negotiations were finished. And in fact, Trump knew the attack was coming as of Monday, and he pretended that he didn't know and that, in fact, he was working overtime to make the diplomatic route work. So he he's in collusion with the Israelis on this one. Speaker 0: So professor, Sachs, your colleague, and Scott Ritter say that Trump's behavior in this, as you've just outlined it, renders anybody who's negotiating with The United States absolutely suspect about whether or not to believe Donald Trump or anything The United States says. You agree with that? Speaker 1: I agreed with that before these attacks took place. I think any country on the planet to trust The United States is remarkably foolish. That includes their close allies, as well as their adversaries. Right. I'm sure that Vladimir Putin doesn't trust Donald Trump as far as he can throw him, and he can't throw him any distance because he can't get his hands on him. Yeah. Speaker 0: I wonder if Donald Trump, shared with Marco Rubio, the de jure, not de facto, the de jure secretary of state, the American involvement or if mister Rubio has a problem with the truth. Here's what he said tonight. This is last night. Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self defense. President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear. Iran should not target US interests or personnel. There's not a word of truth in the two sentences there, is there? Speaker 1: No. He was just trying to provide cover early on, but that cover has been blown by today. Let me make a general point about what I think is going on here. Please do. I I think Trump has fallen into a trap that the Israeli set. What I mean by that is I think Israel's ultimate goal here is to make sure Iran does not get nuclear weapons, but they don't have the capability to do that by themselves. So what the what the Israelis are doing here with this attack is, number one, they're putting an end to the negotiations. There's not gonna be any more negotiations. That's meaningless at this point. But furthermore, they're drawing us into the fight. The Iranians are gonna retaliate, and we have said that we will help defend the Israelis. Furthermore, this war is gonna escalate, and we are gonna get drawn in. Trump has already made it clear that he is standing with the Israelis. And what Trump has wanted to do was avoid a war, and he wanted to settle this one diplomatically. Well, there's no diplomatic solution possible now, and he is in the war with the Iranians. Speaker 0: The allure the allurement to American presidents of the opportunity to kill people in foreign countries must be utterly irresistible. This so called anti war pro peace president, we're gonna play a clip in just a minute of his, at the time, his surrogates, now members of his cabinet praising him for being anti war, is funding the war in Gaza even more so than Joe Biden continues to fund an utterly losing effort in Ukraine. And now the neocons are triumphant, and the Zionists are triumphant by dragging us into eventually a war against Iran, which has posed zero zero threat to American national security. So much for the anti war president. Speaker 1: It's hard to disagree with that. I mean, the only thing I disagree with that you said is I don't call it a war in Gaza. I call it a genocide. Speaker 0: It is. And I'm I'm entirely with you and I stand corrected. Chris, play the clip of, Tulsi Gabbard and, Bobby Kennedy. Speaker 2: A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for a man who wants to end wars, not start them. He Speaker 3: said I wanna end the wars. Speaker 2: And who has demonstrated already that he has the courage and strength to stand up and fight for peace. Speaker 3: I wanna end this surveillance and censorship. Yeah. Speaker 2: Did we choose censorship or freedom? Speaker 3: No. I wanna protect the constitution. Speaker 2: I wanna protect freedom of speech. History will look back on us at this moment for the choice that we make. Did we choose war or peace? Speaker 0: Every one of those statements, which were made at the Republican National, Convention last summer, has been defied poignantly by Donald Trump from freedom of speech. It asks some Muslims on the Columbia University, campus, to these, perpetual wars. Speaker 1: I don't disagree. I don't know what else to say. Speaker 0: Yeah. I Speaker 1: mean, I did not think Trump would turn out to be a warmonger, but, he has. I mean, what else can you say? Speaker 0: Here here here he is himself in his inaugural address, January 20. Speaker 4: We will measure our success not only by the battles we win, but also by the wars that we end and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into. Do Speaker 0: you think that the true purpose of this, attack from the perspective of the Israelis and maybe from the perspective of The United States? Alright. I'm complicating the question, but nothing's too complex for John Mearsheimer. Do you think that the true purpose of this attack was to degrade the the, Iranian, ability to enrich uranium or to bring about regime change in Iran? Speaker 1: Well, I do not think the Israelis have the capability to eliminate the nuclear enrichment capability that the Iranians have, certainly at the Fordow installation. But e even, I think, at Natanz, it's just not in the cards. I think it's only the Americans who might, and I wanna underline the word might, be able to do that. But I think, as I said before, the attack is mainly designed to get the Americans in the fight to end the negotiations so that we can make sure that Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons. In other in other words, we, The United States. The other alternative route to this end is regime change, which is the Israelis go in, they bash Iran, and the end result is that the Ayatollahs are overthrown. You get a liberal democracy, and that liberal democracy or those new leaders show no interest in acquiring nuclear weapons. I think that's a pipe dream. I tend to believe the Israelis understand that's a pipe dream. I mean, of all, you wanna look at all the states around the world that have nuclear weapons. A good number of them are liberal democracies. The United States and Britain and India have nuclear weapons. France has nuclear weapons. These are liberal democracies. Moreover, if you're the Iranians, what's the message that you take from what's happened here, whether you're a liberal democrat or you're an ayatollah? The lesson is that you should have gotten nuclear weapons a long time ago, and now you definitely have to get them in the future. Because if you had nuclear weapons, this wouldn't hap wouldn't have happened. Look at North Korea. North Korea got nuclear weapons. Kim Jong un, is thriving in North Korea. Colonel Gaddafi got rid of his weapons of mass destruction program. He's now three feet under. And look at what's happening to the Iranians. So the message is clear here, and I think that tells you that regime change is not gonna do the trick. So what the Israelis want is they want us to do the dirty work. It's very important to understand that the Israelis have reached the point where they are remarkably dependent on us. Yes. If you look at the weaponry that was used against the Iranians, and I think this includes intelligence too. If you look at the weaponry that's used in the genocide, it's the Americans who provide that weaponry. And the Israelis are depending on us to help defend them when the Iranians retaliate. So they are deeply dependent on us, and it's therefore hardly unsurprising that they're looking to us to solve their problem. Speaker 0: I don't wanna give you heartburn, but probably the most pro Israeli pro war, never met a war you didn't want somebody else to fight, member of the United States Senate from South Carolina, thinks this is a game. There it is on his own account. Game on. Pray for Israel. I don't Speaker 2: I don't even Speaker 0: know how to analyze the human mind that would, that would say something like that by calling it game on. This is a massive, unprovoked, illegal war crime, attack on a sovereign nation, which The United States duped into a false sense of security by pretending to negotiate it with. And I think we are as culpable as the Israelis are, but that culpability is not going to be redressed on the battlefield. Speaker 1: Well, the fact that somebody like Lindsey Graham gets such a prominent platform inside of The United States tells you how much trouble we're in. Right. But just to take it a step further, it is important to understand that he's just one of many senators and congressmen who are backing Israel to the hilt and will back Israel to the hilt no matter what it does. He just happens to be more vociferous and more foolish in his public performances than the others. But he's just one of many. And as I've said many times, it just goes to show you the extent to which Israel and the lobby here in The United States basically owns congress. Right. Right. Speaker 0: Do we know the nature of the caused the that BBC described it as unprecedented damage on Iran's elite. I I think they're referring to the attacks on a suburban neighborhood where many of the generals and revolutionary guard senior officials resided and they're dead? Speaker 1: I believe that when all is said and done, the most successful part of the Israeli attack will be the decapitation. I mean, they actually were able to kill a significant number of Iranian leaders, mainly generals, and they were also able to kill a handful of nuclear scientists. But the question you have to ask yourself is whether this decapitation strategy will work. And the fact is that there are people in the echelon, the echelon, who will be moved up to replace those individuals. And I'm sure that in some cases, the and echelon people who are moved up will be more competent than the people they replace. In some cases, they won't. But the idea that this is a paralyzing attack that will make it impossible for impossible for for Iran to wage a protracted war against Israel is, in my opinion, wrong. I think the decapitation strategy worked in the sense that lots of people in Iran at the top were killed. But beyond that, I don't think it's gonna have much effect on the war. Speaker 0: And we don't know of Iran's capability to respond or or to retaliate in a massive way because we don't know how much damage the Israeli assault caused. No. Speaker 1: I think that's wrong. I think they still have the capability to respond in a massive way. I don't think that the Israelis destroyed so much of their missile inventory that the Iranians can't pound Israel and pound American bases in The Middle East and oil installations in The Gulf. They can do that. I think there was some damage done for sure. How much we can't tell, but I don't think massive damage was done. And by the way, you know, one thing we haven't talked about and few people are talking about is what happens if this war goes on and the Israelis hit oil installations in side of Iran, and the Iranians retaliate by hitting oil installations in The Middle East more generally. Shut down the flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf. This will have catastered Speaker 0: We'll have $10 a gallon gasoline in The United States. Thank you, Donald Trump. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, you wanna say thank you Israel. Speaker 0: Right. Well, Israel would be nothing, without him. I is it fair to say the neocons are now triumphant? I mean, what became of the realists? What became of the American firsters, the the vice president Vance group that was on that telegram or signal call, whatever it was, that supposedly was arguing for a restraint? They certainly didn't prevail here. Speaker 1: Well, there's no question they're triumphant at the moment. But you wanna remember how triumphant everybody was when we went into Iraq. You know, the day, week, it it looks terrific. But then once the cold, douche reality hits, it doesn't look so good. And I don't think you can tell a good story about how Israel ends up with a happy ending here. I think that this one will not work out over the long term. So all the triumphalism that you see today, I believe, will melt away like snow on a May. But just a quick point on what happened to the restrainers, what happened to the realist, so to speak. The fact is when it comes to foreign policy in The Middle East, Israel owns us, and the restrainers in the end don't matter because Israel can do pretty much anything it wants. This is a truly remarkable situation that most Americans can't understand. It's just unfathomable that a small country with a couple million people is able to get The United States to do its bidding, to get unconditional support from The United States. But that's where we're at. Israel can do almost anything. I mean, to put a positive spin on what Trump has done, he's in a straight jacket. He just doesn't have any choice. There's no way he can really contest the Israelis because the lobby is so powerful that if he contested the Israelis in a meaningful way over Gaza or over Iran, they crucify the guy. Speaker 0: Here's, colonel MacGregor a few minutes ago. June turned out to be Iran's Pearl Harbor. Iran will now react as we did in 1942 when we were caught napping. What was limited to the region between Israel and Iran will now become regional. Trump's statements after the fact are an admission of his own level of complicity. Speaker 1: Hard to disagree with that. Right. I said before with regard to Scott's comments, earlier this morning, I thought the use of the term Pearl Harbor was appropriate here. And furthermore, as I said, if you look at the scale of these attacks against Iran, it's really quite extensive. These attacks are quite extensive, and they're supposed to go on for, you know, days, if not weeks. And I think the end result is you're gonna get a major war here. It's you know, people who are talking about, let's put a damper on this. Let's put an end to this. I mean, I think this is delusional. The Iranians simply have to respond, and they have to respond in a massive way. And the Israelis will retaliate, and then we're off to the races. Speaker 0: And you have 90,000 American troops. According to Ritter, the vast majority of them are support personnel, not frontline infantry who are almost in a semicircle in that area. What happens when some of them get killed? Speaker 1: Well, that will give us an incentive to get deeply deeply involved in the war. This is what I was saying to you before. The Israelis have a vested interest in sucking us into the war. Right? What what they wanna do is get Americans killed because if Americans get killed, that guarantees that we come in. The Do you Speaker 0: think Donald Trump understands that that his buddy, b b nuts in Yahoo wants Americans to get killed? Speaker 1: I don't know exactly what he understands. He obviously has acknowledged that he's thrown he's thrown his lot in with the Israelis. I mean, he he's with them now. Right? We're joined at the hip, and we're gonna get pulled in. You know, this reminds me a lot of the Cuban missile crisis excuse me, of the Bay of Pigs operation that president Kennedy was involved in in April of nineteen sixty one shortly after he became president. The Bay of Pigs operation, if you look at it, was doomed from the start. It was no way it would work. And when you read about it, you wonder what was the CIA thinking when they pushed JFK to launch the boats and to invade in the Bay of Pigs? Well, what was going on here is the CIA understood that we would be defeated in the Bay of Pigs operation, But their belief is that Kennedy would then have no choice but to double down, get deeply involved in Cuba, and then whack that was the way we would overthrow the Castro regime. Right? So in other words, the CIA understood the initial attack would not achieve its goal, but the idea was that you suck president Kennedy in commitment to topple the regime in Cuba. And in this case, I don't believe the Israelis think that they can eliminate Iran's nuclear capability with these attacks. It just can't be done. And they understand full will. I'm sure that they're going to enrage the Iranians, and the Iranians are gonna attack Israel. But this is all good news because the name of the game is to suck the Americans in just Speaker 0: as Right. Speaker 1: They wanted to suck JFK in with the Bay of Pigs operation. And Trump has played right into the Israeli's hands, and here we go. Speaker 0: And after the Bay of Pigs, JFK was so furious of the CIA. He said, I'd like to smash them into a thousand pieces. And then came 11/22/1963. Speaker 1: Well, there's no question that he wanted to get rid of, the head of the CIA, Dulles, and he did that very quickly. And he was thinking about reforming the CIA because he understood that it was a rogue actor. But with regard to the Israelis, right, Israel is a rogue state, and it has it tie it has us tied around its finger. And it can go off and do all sorts of things, and it knows that it can depend on us to bail them out. Speaker 0: Last question, professor Mirshamer. Do you see any, military action coming from any other country in the region, notably Egypt or Turkey? Speaker 1: No. I think everybody's gonna keep their heads down. The last thing they wanna do is get involved in this fight. There's nobody that has the capability to take on the Israelis or the Americans. And I think that all around the region, people regret that this attack has taken place. They see no good coming from it, quite correctly, I would add, but they're not gonna get involved in the fight. Speaker 0: K. Professor Mearschamber, thank you very much. I know this isn't your usual day or time, and I know this is your time on with us. And and you you rose to our call when we learned of these events before the sun came up this morning. Thank you very much for joining us. Hope you have a good weekend, and we look forward to seeing you at your usual time and place next week. Speaker 1: My pleasure, judge. Have a good weekend yourself. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Coming up at 04:00 today, the end of the day, the end of the week, but not the last judging freedom of the week, the intelligence community roundtable with Ray McGovern and Larry Johnson, 04:00 at 04:30, Colonel Lawrence McGregor on excuse me. I conflated them. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson on all of this. Judge Napolitano for judging freedom.
Saved - May 19, 2025 at 4:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the troubling history of Israel's actions towards the U.S., highlighting significant events like the Lavon Affair, where Israel orchestrated attacks to manipulate political outcomes in Egypt. I discussed how Israel allegedly stole nuclear materials from the U.S. for its arsenal, and the attack on the USS Liberty, which resulted in American casualties yet remains underreported. I also touched on the assassination of JFK, Jonathan Pollard's espionage, and the controversial involvement of Israel in 9/11. Lastly, I examined Jeffrey Epstein's connections to Israeli interests and his exploitation of powerful figures.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵The terrible things Israel has done to the US are unparalleled From assassinating US presidents and stealing nukes to murdering US soldiers and a role in 9/11 This thread will expose key Israeli treacheries of the US ...and show our "greatest ally" is really our worst enemy

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The Lavon Affair The Lavon affair was a covert Israeli Operation in which a group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli military intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets: cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The attacks were to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian communists, "unspecified malcontents", or "local nationalists" with the aim of creating a climate of sufficient violence and instability to induce the British government to retain its occupying troops in Egypt's Suez Canal zone.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1954, Israel initiated Operation Suzanna, a terrorist operation in Egypt, due to the US becoming friendlier with Egypt and influencing the British to leave the Suez Canal. The plan involved bombing Egyptian, American, and British-owned targets and blaming it on Muslim extremists to incite anger and damage relations between Egypt, America, and Britain. Egyptian Jews, referred to as Syanin, were recruited to carry out the attacks. The bombings began on July 2nd, targeting a post office in Alexandria. Further attacks occurred on July 14th, targeting US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. However, a premature explosion exposed one of the terrorists, leading to the breakup of the ring. Despite the investigation, further attacks were carried out. Following the plot's exposure, some attempted to dismiss it as an antisemitic conspiracy theory. Israel claimed Egypt was tipped off and scapegoated Defense Minister Pinhaz Levon to protect those who planned Operation Susannah. The speaker references Jack Bernstein's book and his assassination by Mossad. The speaker then compares the collapse of a building to the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11, suggesting it was a planned demolition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Lavaughan affair was an Israeli terrorist operation in Egypt known as Operation Suzanna, in which Egyptian, American, and British British owned targets in Egypt were bombed in the summer of nineteen fifty four. In the early nineteen fifties, the US was becoming friendlier with Egypt and was moving to influence the British to leave the Egyptian Suez Canal, which they had manned for almost twenty years. The apartheid state of Israel would not tolerate the British leaving, and elements within Israel began planning a variety of terrorist attacks on British, Egyptian, and American targets. These attacks would then be blamed on so called Muslim extremists. This would incite the anger of the British and the Americans towards Egypt and Islam and sour the burgeoning relationship between Egypt, America, and Britain. This plan for a series of false flag terrorist attacks was codenamed Operation Susannah. A group of Egyptian Jews was recruited to carry out the attacks. Jews in the diaspora that are recruited are known as Syanin. The first bomb went off on July 2 when a post office in Alexandria was firebombed. On the July 11, the Anglo Egyptian Suez negotiations, which had been blocked for nine months, got underway again. Despite the British assuring Israel that stockpiled weapons would not be given to the Egyptians, on July 14, the Jewish terrorists bombed US information agency libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. However, that same day, a phosphorus bomb exploded prematurely in one of the terrorists, Philip Natansson's pocket just as he was about to enter British owned Rio Cinema in Alexandria. His arrest and a subsequent confession led to the breakup of the whole ring. However, while the plot was being investigated, the Zionist Jewish terrorists started fires in two Cairo cinemas in the central post office and the railway station. After the plot was uncovered, many tried to spin it as an antisemitic conspiracy theory. These ad hominem attacks are a common tactic of the Zionists. For more information on this, please read the Jewish American patriot Jack Bernstein's book, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel. This honest, honorable, and courageous Jew was subsequently assassinated by Mossad. As the trial of the Jewish terrorists became more and more public, Israel was forced to do damage control. They claimed that the Egyptians were tipped off and allowed the attacks to happen. They also singularly scapegoated the defense minister Pinhaz Levon to prevent the exposure of the real group inside the apartheid state of Israel who planned operation Susannah and several other false flag terrorist attacks. But this would not be the last time America's so called ally and friend and recipient of over $150,000,000,000 in aid would attack her. And And with the demolition team set off, when you see the old demolition to these old buildings Speaker 1: It looks like one of those scenes of an old building being purposely dynamited and blown up. Speaker 2: Anybody who's ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows that if you're going to do this, you have to get at the under infrastructure of a building and bring it down. Speaker 1: The way the structure is collapsing, this was the result of something that was planned. It's not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse and then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way. How they accomplish this, we don't.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Israel Stole Their Nuclear Weapons From The US Israel has a not-so-secret "secret" arsenal of nuclear weapons …and that nuclear arsenal was stolen from the United States Extending over the period from 1957 to 1978 more than 300 kilograms of uranium 235 (U-235) in the form of highly enriched uranium (HEU) went missing from a nuclear fuel manufacturing plant in the town of Apollo, Pennsylvania. That HEU was sent to Israel to create Nuclear Weapons The Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation, commonly known as NUMEC, owned the Apollo uranium plant. A company named Apollo Industries, headed by Morton Chatkin, Ivan J. Novick and David Lowenthal, invested in NUMEC when it was formed in 1957. Novick later headed the Zionist Organization of America. Lowenthal was an American Zionist who played a significant role in the resettlement of Holocaust survivors in Israel Today, more is publicly known about the NUMEC affair than ever before. In 2009 The FBI released a detailed statement that was made in 1980 by a former NUMEC employee who said he started work at Apollo in February 1965. The former employee said he encountered armed strangers on the uranium plant's loading dock one night in early 1965 that were loading what appeared to be canisters of HEU onto a truck in racks that he had not seen before. He also saw a shipping manifest that said the material was heading to a ship bound for Israel on the Zim-Israel shipping line. Later a NUMEC manager later threatened him to keep his mouth shut about what he had seen From the mid 1980s through 2009, the FBI also declassified some of its other reports from the 1960s and into the early 1970s. Those reports indicated that Zalman Shapiro, throughout the time he headed NUMEC, collaborated with a number of Israeli officials. They included people from the “Science Attaché” office at the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C., and others from the Israeli intelligence agencies Shin Bet and Mossad, all believed to be part of Israel’s scientific intelligence organization (LAKAM), which collected nuclear technology in the United States to aid Israel’s nuclear weapons program The most damning evidence that Israel stole their HEU from the US comes from a CIA document released in 2015 of environmental (flora) samples collected by the CIA in 1968 near the Israeli city of Dimona. The CIA had suspected that Israel had a nuclear program at Dimona so they collected flora samples near the city to see if they could detect HEU there (Israel couldn’t enrich Uranium of its own at the time) And detect HEU they did But not only did they detect HEU, they detected HEU that was 97.7% enriched …And there was only one place in the world that made 97.7% enriched Uranium at that time: the Uranium plant in Apollo, Pennsylvania Video Clips are compilation made by me from @RyLiberty's Numec: How Israel Stole The Bomb available here: https://rumble.com/v1a6xdr-numec-how-israel-stole-the-atomic-bomb.html Further Reading: https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2016-11-02/numec-affair-did-highly-enriched-uranium-us-aid-israels-nuclear-weapons-program

Video Transcript AI Summary
After the Suez crisis, Israel aimed to "seal the bomb." Newmek, owned the Apollo uranium plant, supplied uranium to the Nautilus program. A Newmek employee claimed some was hidden in food irradiator trucks, then sent to Israel on ZIM ships. The Atomic Energy Commission realized Newmek was losing a high percentage of weapons-grade uranium but didn't want to crack down due to promoting "Atoms for Peace." The FBI found the owner, Zaman Shapiro, a national security risk due to his travels to Israel and contact with intelligence operatives, but the AEC wouldn't pull his clearances. Later, the CIA's Carl Duckett said uranium was stolen from the US and given to Israel. In the late 1960s, the CIA suspected Israel had the bomb but needed confirmation. The CIA station chief collected samples near Dimona and found highly enriched uranium with a signature proving it came from the US naval nuclear program (97.7% enrichment), the type processed by Newmek. Richard Helms told Carl Duckett not to publish his report and to go directly to the president. LBJ ordered Duckett to tell no one. Newmek was run by figures connected to Zionist organizations, and LBJ had ties to these groups. LBJ was also allegedly having an affair with an Ergun terrorist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After the Suez crisis, Israel was put in a do or die mode to seal the bomb. They had gotten away with everything else so far so why not? America seemed completely unwilling to prosecute. Newmek, the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation was incorporated in 1956 less than two months after the Suez Crisis. Newmek owned the Apollo uranium plant in Apollo, Pennsylvania. It was a din of Zionists. Uranium two thirty five with 97.7% enrichment was supplied by Portsmouth to Newmek to be used in the nautilus program for nuclear submarines. Some of that according to a Newmek employee who witnessed it was hidden in food irradiator trucks. It would then be loaded onto ZIM ships and sent to Israel. Speaker 1: What all did the government know about the theft of this nuclear material at the time, the extent of the Israeli spy ring in America at the time? And did the government at the time just sit back and let this happen, or were they in on it? Or they couldn't do anything about it, or they did do something but not enough, or what's the Speaker 0: Well, all Speaker 2: all of the above. When the when the, at first, the Atomic Energy Commission realized that NewMech was losing many, many, many a much higher percentage of weapons grade uranium than any plant in America, and they they focused in on it and conducted a bogus, crackdown in which they interviewed employees. But they wouldn't take any notes. And they didn't wanna be embarrassed because they had a conflict of interest. They were trying to promote Adams for Peace and and get nuclear businesses in America started, so they didn't wanna crack down on a plan. They called in the FBI. The FBI recommended after very few years. They said, you know what? Zaman Shapiro, the owner of the plant, is a national security risk. All he does, is travel to Israel and hang out with intelligence operatives in The United States. He's up to something, so pull his security clearances and don't send any more nuclear material to New Mac. Well, the Atomic Energy Commission would not do that for all of the conflicts that I just mentioned, And it really wasn't until the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which was, you know, a subsequent organization to the AEC, in the mid seventies began trying to look at how to safeguard nuclear facilities from diversion. And they had a couple of disgruntled people, investigating it at the national, at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. And so to quell these disgruntled people, they invited the CIA, Carl Duckett, in to give a briefing. And Duckett said basically, yeah. Uranium was stolen from The United States and given to given to Israel. Speaker 3: The CIA, beginning in 1966, '60 '7, '60 '8, thought Israel had the bomb, but they hadn't confirmed that Damona was producing plutonium. And so they charged the CIA station chief, John Haddon, and his people in Tel Aviv to make trips to Damona and collect samples in the environment. Remember, the gaseous effluence. At any nuclear plant, you can pick up very small traces of radioactivity. That's why they're so closely regulated, to keep those traces, very small. So they were looking for plutonium in the environment. And John Haddon's son remembers going out there with his dad on peanut butter sandwich trips where the kids would eat the peanut butter sandwich and the father would collect, flora in in the vicinity, throw it in the trunk, head back to Tel Aviv. We don't know today who counted those, did the radioactive analysis of those samples, but they found highly enriched uranium before they found plutonium, and there was no highly enriched uranium at Damona. Israel had no capability to enrich uranium. What we know today is that they were able to put a signature on that highly enriched uranium that proved that it came from The United States, that it came from the naval nuclear program because the fuel for navy fuel for navy reactors was 97.7% enriched. A little science. Natural uranium, point 7% uranium in a light water reactor, power reactor like we use, 3% uranium in a nuclear weapon, typically 93% depending on the country. But the naval fuel was 97.7, and that's what Haddon found in the environment near Dumona, the type of fuel processed by Newmek. Speaker 0: So alarming was the CIA's conclusion about Israel stealing nuclear material that Richard Helms told the founder of the CIA science and technology section, Carl Duckett, not to publish his report and to go directly to the president. But the only thing Lyndon Baines Johnson seemed concerned about was making the story go away. He ordered Duckett to tell no one, not even Secretary of State Dean Rusk or the Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara. Not surprising. Newmek was run by the Zionist Organization of America president, the Zionist Organization of America chapter president, and the future chairman of the ADL. Johnson's own family overlapped with these Jewish supremacist organizations. According to the Jerusalem Post, LBJ's aunt was in the ZOA. Also, his father and grandfather both fought for clemency for the child murdering rapist pedophile, Leo Frank. LBJ was not only a Zionist from a hardline Zionist family, he was compromised. Johnson was having an affair with an Ergun terrorist Matilda Krem.
NUMEC: How Israel Stole the Atomic Bomb and killed JFK This movie is free thanks to members and donors from ANC Report. If you found this informative consider sending a few shekels. This is the only way we can do films. NUMEC Map https://anti-neocon.mysho rumble.com
The NUMEC Affair: Did Highly Enriched Uranium from the U.S. Aid Israel's Nuclear Weapons Program? | National Security Archive The NUMEC Affair: Did Highly Enriched Uranium from the U.S. Aid Israel's Nuclear Weapons Program? Document collection and introduction by Roger J. Mattson, PhD nsarchive.gwu.edu

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The Attack On The USS Liberty (🧵1/2) The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, the USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force fighter jets and Israeli Navy torpedo boats that killed 34 US crew members, wounded 171 US crew members, and severely damaged the ship. At the time, the ship was in international waters Israel had known the frequencies the ship was using and jammed both the Liberty's main and emergency frequency so they were unable to broadcast for help. There was no way for Israel to know the frequencies the ship would be using without knowing the nationality of the ship The attack lasted for around 2 hours and included Israel hitting the ship with armor piercing rounds and napalm. After strafing runs by air support were complete two Israeli Navy Torpedo Boats shot torpedoes at the ship. One torpedo hit the ship Right around this time the Liberty was finally able to get a distress call out ...the bombing immediately stopped The ship was in bad shape but was able to make it back to port Israel blamed the attack on a misidentification of the Liberty as an Egyptian Naval vessel rather than an American one. This misidentification has been pretty thoroughly debunked as the Liberty was flying an American Flag, the initial Israeli recon flight recordings have the pilot IDing the ship as American, and the lettering on the ship were American Not only was this event not well reported on in the US but the survivors were forced to sign NDAs to protect…Israel. Even the Medal of Honor that was awarded to the Admiral of the ship was delivered in private. This was put deep undercover by LBJ to protect his interests with the Jewish lobby (which could be a post of its own) This is one of the most brazen unprovoked attacks on the US in modern history and even worse, nothing came of it The included video is the President of the @usslibertyvets recounting what happened that day

Video Transcript AI Summary
On June 8, 1967, during the Six Day War, the USS Liberty was attacked by Israel, who allegedly tried to sink the ship and murder the 294 American crew members. Three unmarked Israeli fighter jets struck the ship with cannons and rockets, after which two fighter bombers dropped napalm. The radio men tried to call for help, but all US frequencies were jammed. The sixth fleet had White House orders not to launch aircraft to aid them. Three torpedo boats strafed the ship and launched torpedoes, one of which hit. The captain prepared to abandon ship, but then decided against it. Three life rafts were machine gunned by the motor torpedo boats. The Navy told the Liberty survivors never to talk about the attack or face a $10,000 fine and/or ten years imprisonment. The order came from Mayesh Dian. An IDF Navy admiral gave the order to stop the attack when the ship refused to sink. Israel's war plans included taking Syrian territory, the Golan Heights. By June 8, the IDF had captured the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza, and the Sinai.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I survived the two hour Israeli attack on The US naval intelligence ship, USS Liberty AGTR five. On 06/08/1967, during the Arab Israeli Six Day War, Israel tried to sink the ship attempting to murder the crew of 294 Americans. They launched five torpedoes but our captain William McGonigal has servedly dodged four of them. However, the fifth hit us in our starboard side just forward of the midships, killing 25 of the 34 Americans. We did not sink, but two thirds of the crew were incapacitated. There were wounded and dying sailors all over the ship. It was literally a bloodbath. It is miraculously we didn't sink. And I'll say more about that later. A little after 2PM, three Israeli unmarked fighter jets began striking the ship with 20 millimeter cannon and rockets, killing the young sailors manning the 50 caliber machine guns. The radiummen immediately tried to call for help, discovered all US selected frequencies were jammed. The Israelis knew the frequencies were attempting to use. Nevertheless, the radiummen finally got through to the sixth fleet. No help was forthcoming that day as the sixth fleet had White House orders not to launch aircraft to come to our aid. Next came two fighter bombers that dropped napalm canisters on each side of the ship. Even though they were being shot at, the liberty crew eventually put out the fires. After a brief lull, three torpedo boats arrived strafing the ship with their 40 millimeter cannon and 50 millimeter machine guns. Then they proceeded to drop their torpedoes in the water. One finally did find its mark. Our skipper passed to command to prepare to abandon ship. Three inflatable life rafts that remained seaworthy were dropped over the side and were machine gunned by the motor torpedo boats. Our life vests were now our only hope for survival and the more seriously wounded would never survive. However, the engine room was able to bring the boilers back to life and the Liberty had power. And in addition, damage control indicated that the ship stopped taking on more water and the ship came to a nine degree list to starboard. So our captain wisely decided not to abandon ship. In order to secure the Jewish vote for an upcoming elections, they could not have Israel taken to task. This was a major historical event. Any other time, their action would have been an act of war. The event had to be buried quickly, quietly, and without fanfare. Therefore, a couple of actions were taken immediately. The Navy told the Liberty survivors never to talk about the attack to anyone, including our families, or face a $10,000 fine and or ten years imprisonment. We now know the order came from Mayesh Dian. We have declassified CIA cable exposing his order. One of the generals in the room that morning explained, this is pure murder. But they went ahead as the order came from the defense minister until an IDF Navy admiral later gave the order to stop the attack as the ship refused to sink. You see their war plans included taking Syrian territory, the Golan Heights. By June 8, the IDF had taken out the air forces of Jordan, Egypt, and Syria, captured the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza, and the Sinai.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The Attack On The USS Liberty (🧵2/2) In this video @NickJFuentes discusses the massive amounts of evidence showing Israel purposefully attacked the USS Liberty Also included is a link to hands down the best longer documentary I've seen on the USS Liberty attack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx72tAWVcoM

Video Transcript AI Summary
The USS Liberty Veterans Association offers $10,000 to anyone who can prove the USS Liberty investigation was proper, maintaining the ship was deliberately attacked. Dean Rusk, Secretary of State at the time, stated he never accepted Israel's explanation. American Legion Resolution 40 noted CIA reports from June 1967 stated Israeli forces knew what flag the Liberty was flying. According to the resolution, Moshe Dayan said he ordered the attack over objections, with one official calling it "pure murder." CIA Director Richard Elves stated in 1984 that everything possible was done to hide the attack's enormity from the American public, and there was no doubt Israelis knew what they were doing. NSA Director Lt. General Marshall Carter recalled stating in 1967 that the attack was deliberate. Captain Ward Boston Jr., legal counsel for the 1967 Navy Court of Inquiry, stated under oath that President Lyndon Johnson ordered the court to conclude it was a case of mistaken identity. A 2003 independent commission of inquiry found compelling evidence the attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy the ship and that the White House covered up the facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They talk about the USS Liberty incident. There have been multiple studies, US Navy, Joint Chiefs of Staff, CIA, House Senate, NSA. Most of the reports according to historian Richard Brownell do not assign culpability for the incident. They focus on communications failures. I have to say I'm a little bit willed to why you're so obsessed with an incident that is now fifty two years old. If you have theories that are better than those of the American government, they've got operators standing by, feel free to dial them and tell them about your five decade old theories about a military incident from the 1967 Speaker 1: You wanna hear about the USS Liberty? The USS Liberty Veterans Association maintains that the ship was deliberately attacked. They are offering a $10,000 prize for anyone who can prove the claim that the USS Liberty was properly investigated. That's the Liberty Veterans Association. But all the studies say, yeah, except for the Veterans Association of the survivors of the Liberty. The secretary state at the time, Dean Rusk, says, quote, I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation. Their sustained attack to disable and sink Liberty precluded an assault by accident or some trigger happy local commander through diplomatic channels. We refused to accept their explanations. I didn't believe them then and I don't believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous. At the ninety ninth National Convention of the American Legion, delegates passed resolution 40 which noted the following quote, according to the CIA information reports from June 1967, sources in Tel Aviv reported, quote, Israel's forces knew exactly what flag Liberty was flying. And Israeli defense minister Moshe Dayan said, quote, personally ordered the attack on the Liberty over the objections of senior uniform military personnel, one of whom characterized the attack as pure murder. Richard Elves, the director of the CIA from 1966 to 1973, stated in a 1984 CIA interview, quote, everything possible is done to keep from the American public really the enormity of this attack on an American naval vessel. And, quote, since this is for the agency's record, I don't think there can be any doubt that the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing. Any statement to the effect that they didn't know that it was an American ship is nonsense. Lieutenant General Marshall s Carter, the director of the NSA from '65 to '69, recalled in a 1988 NSA interview that he stated at a congressional hearing in 1967 that the attack that attack on the Liberty quote, couldn't be anything else but deliberate. There's just no way you could have a series of circumstances that would justify it being an accident. And Carter indicated this remained his belief in 1988. In a 02/2003 affidavit published in congressional record, Captain Ward Boston Junior, the legal counsel for the nineteen sixty seven Navy Court of Inquiry stated, quote, I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd, the president of the Court of Inquiry, the president Lyndon Johnson, secretary of defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of, quote, mistaken identity despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. And lastly, according to the findings published in the congressional record of the two thousand three independent commission of inquiry chaired by former chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Admiral Thomas Moore, quote, there's compelling evidence that Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew. And, quote, the White House deliberately covered up the facts of this attack. But all but all the studies all the studies and you should just call someone and tell them your theories, call someone and it happened like a long time ago, but all the studies say it was an accident. Yeah, except for the survivors, the USS Liberty Veterans Association, the secretary of state at the time, the director of the CIA at the time. You also have the CIA in an official report. You've got the Lieutenant General, the Director of the NSA at the time and you've got the Congressional Captain. You've also got the Congressional Record Independent Commission of Inquiry and the American Legion. But all the studies, all the studies, all the studies, all the studies say, oh, all the studies say that it was totally accidental. Give me a break. Where's the facts and feelings here? And you want to know why it matters because why would you be dishonest about this? If it didn't matter, why would you lie about it? Why would you ignore the question? How about somebody gets up to Dan Crenshaw on the microphone and says on 06/08/1967 and he gets immediately exited from the stage. You know, if it's not such a big deal, why do you go to such great lengths to cover it up? It's because it tells you everything you need to know that Israel is not our ally, that Israel pursues its interests wherever and whenever it can at the expense of ours and we don't reciprocate. And if Lyndon Johnson and all the rest did cover it up, that tells you about the nature of the Israel lobby and their government and ours. It happened fifty years ago. What does it even matter? Well, how about I made a joke about something that happened eighty years ago and you read that out verbatim in your fucking speech? Speaker 0: Six day war. It's a direct and vital interest now in 02/2019. Speaker 1: Yeah. But the holocaust is. Right, Ben Shapiro?

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The JFK Assassination Israel and American Jewish interests had very strong ties to the JFK assassination. I’d go so far as to say that when all the evidence is considered collectively, it’s definitive they were behind JFK's assassination …and that’s only looking at the evidence that’s been declassified There’s a lot to unpack here so I’ll let the video do the talking for me This clip's from a larger documentary by @Laurent_Guyenot called Israel & Assassination of The Kennedy Brothers that goes much further in to the Jewish lobby’s influence and LBJ’s potential knowledge of the assassination. The full documentary is available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzz9Md0d76Y

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that a CIA conspiracy is built on Oswald's biography while asserting his minimal involvement in the assassination. According to the speaker, Jack Ruby, born Jacob Leon Rubinstein, a member of the "Yiddish connection" with ties to gangster Mickey Cohen and the Irgun, killed Oswald. Ruby reportedly confessed to killing Oswald "for the Jews." The speaker alleges the Dallas Citizens Council, a group of Jewish businessmen, sponsored Kennedy's trip. Abraham Zapruder, who filmed the assassination, and Sam Bloom, who suggested moving Oswald, were members. Arlen Spector, a Zionist, invented the "magic bullet theory." The speaker claims Israel killed Kennedy to prevent him from stopping their nuclear program at the Demona complex. Ben Gurion believed Kennedy endangered Israel's survival. Kennedy demanded inspections of Demona, but Ben Gurion resigned and vowed to provide Israel with nuclear weapons. After Kennedy's death, Johnson showed no interest in Demona, allowing the program to proceed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By a strange paradox, the authors who stand for the conventional thesis of a CIA conspiracy build their case on the biography of Oswald, while at the same time claiming that Oswald had almost nothing to do with the killing. It is about as useful as scrutinizing Osama bin Laden's biography to solve nine eleven. If Oswald was just a papsy, as he claimed, the quest for the real culprits must logically begin by investigating the man who shot Oswald two days after his arrest in the Dallas police station. Thus, preventing a judgment that would have revealed the weakness of the accusation against Oswald. Oswald's assassin is known as Jack Ruby, but few people know that his real name was Jacob Leon Rubinstein, that he was the son of Jewish Polish immigrants, and that to the Warren Commission, he had explained his presence in the police station as a Yiddish translator for Israeli reporters. Originally from Chicago, Ruby was a member of the Jewish and the world known as the Yiddish connection. His mentor was Los Angeles Gangster Mickey Cohen, whom he had known and admired since 1946. Cohen was the successor of the famed Benjamin Siegelbaum, known as Buxy, one of the bosses of Murder Incorporated, the most brutal crime syndicate in The US. Mike Cohen was in contact with Menahem Begin, the former Ilgud chief, a specialist of false flag terrorism. Cohen was infatuated with the Zionist cause, as he explained in his memoir, quote, now I got so engrossed with Israel that I actually pushed aside a lot of my activities and done nothing but what was involved with this Irgun war, end of quote. We also know that Ruby phoned Al Gruber, a Mickey Cohen associate, just after Oswald's arrest. Most probably, that is when he received an offer that he couldn't refuse for reasons possibly linked to his heavy debt. Ruby died from a rapidly spreading cancer in 1967, so he wouldn't have been around for a new trial under Robert Kennedy's presidency. Yet his ergun connections and some of his recorded statements were highly disturbing. Ruby's defense lawyer, William Kunstler, wrote in his memoir that Ruby told him he had killed Oswald, quote, for the Jews. And Ruby's rabbi, Il L Silverman, received the same confession when visiting Ruby in jail. Ruby is only an intermediary link in a conspiracy that begins with the ambush of Dallas, extends to the cover up of the Warren Commission, and involves a pact of silence with the directions of the major media. At every level of the conspiracy, we find the fingerprints of the Israeli deep state. Let's begin with the Dallas Ambush. JFK's trip to Dallas had no official character and was sponsored by a powerful business group known as the Dallas Citizens Council. Kennedy was on his way to the reception organized in his honor when he was shot. The Dallas Citizens Council was a powerful group dominated by Jewish businessmen like the wealthy Julius Sheps described by Brian Edward Stone in the chosen folks, Jews on the Frontiers of Texas as, quote, a member of every synagogue in the city and de facto leader of the Jewish community, end of quote. Abraham Zapruder, the man who filmed the assassination of John Kennedy and sold his film for $150,000 to Life magazine, was also a member of the Dallas Citizens Council. He was a clothing manufacturer whose headquarter happened to be located in the Dallas Textile Building or Daltex, where one of the sniper's nest was located, according to JFK researchers who have studied the firing trajectories. Interviewed the same day on television, Zapruder could not hide his satisfaction. The host committee inviting Kennedy was chaired by another influential figure of the wealthy Jewish community in Dallas, Advertising Executive and PR man, Sam Bloom. According to former British intelligence officer colonel John Hugh Wilson, it was Bloom who, quote, suggested that the police make Oswald accessible to the press. He also suggested against the explicit advice of the local FBI that they move the alleged assassin from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail in order to give the newsman a good story and pictures, end of quote. It was during this transfer that Oswald was shot by Ruby. Yug Wilson also writes, when the police later searched Ruby's home, they found a slip of paper with Bloom's name, address, and telephone number on it. After the Dallas tragedy, Israel's siamine were also busy fabricating the official lie. Apart from the chairman Earl Warren chosen for his figurative role as chief justice, all key people in the investigative commission were either personal enemies of Kennedy, like Alan Dennis, the CIA director fired by Kennedy in 1961, or ardent Zionist, like Ardent Spector, who at his death in 02/2012 was mourned by the Israeli government as, quote, an unswerving defencer of the Jewish state, end of quote. Arlen Spector was the inventor of what came to be called the magic bullet theory. A single bullet supposed to have caused seven wounds to John Kennedy and John Connolly sitting before him in a limousine and later found in pristine condition on a gurney in Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas. In conclusion, at every step of the plot, we find a Zionist cabal, including businessmen, politicians, and gangsters, not forgetting media executives, all devoted to Israel. The most plausible motive for Israel to kill Kennedy has been revealed by two books in the nineteen nineties, the Samson Option by Senor Hirsch, then Israel and the bomb by Avner Cohen. And the lead has been followed up in 02/2007 by Michael Carpin in the bomb in the basement. What these investigators reveal is that John Kennedy, informed by the CIA in 1960 that Israel was developing its own nuclear weapons in the Demona Complex in the Negev Desert, was firmly determined to force Israel to renounce it and engaged in a showdown with David Ben Gurion, who was both Israel's Prime Minister and defense minister. Ben Gurion was convinced that by trying to prevent Israel from acquiring the bomb, Kennedy was endangering the very survival of the Jewish state to which he had devoted his entire life. Ben Gurion wrote in one of his last letter to JFK, mister president, my people has the right to exist, and this existence is in danger. Kennedy, however, remained unyielding. In a letter dated 06/15/1963, he demanded an immediate first visit followed by regular visits every sixth month. Otherwise, he wrote, his government's commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized. The result was unexpected. Ben Gurion avoided receiving the letter by announcing his resignation on June 16. As soon as a new prime minister Levi Eshkol took office, Kennedy sent him a similar letter dated 06/05/1963, but never got an answer. Did Ben Gurion resign in order to deal with Kennedy from a deeper level? This is not implausible because eleven days after resigning, Ben Gurion was more committed than ever to provide Israel with the nuclear weapon. He said in a speech, I do not know of any other nation whose neighbors declare that they wish to terminate it, and not only declare, but prepare for it by all means available to them. Our numbers are small, and there is no chance that we could compare ourselves with America's One Hundred And Eighty Million or with any Arab neighboring state. There is one thing, however, in which we are not inferior to any other people in the world. This is the Jewish brain, and the Jewish brain does not disappoint. Jewish science does not disappoint. I am confident that science is able to provide us with the weapons that will serve the peace and deter our enemies, end of quote. Five months later, Kennedy's death relieved Israel of all pressure to stop its nuclear program and of all risk of publicity on this program. John McCone, the CIA director named by Kennedy to inform him about Israel's DEMONA project, resigned in 1965, complaining about Johnson's complete lack of interest. According to historian Stephen Green, perhaps the most significant development of 1963 for the Israeli nuclear weapons program occurred on November 22. On a plane flying from Dallas to Washington DC, Hinder Jensen was sworn in as the thirty sixth president of The United States following the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Indian Johnson's White House saw no demona, heard no demona, and spoke no demona when the reactor went critical in early nineteen sixty four, end of quote. Kennedy's determination to make Israel's demona project abort was only part of the Kennedy problem. Kennedy had committed himself to our

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Israeli Spy Jonathan Pollard Jonathan Pollard was a Jewish-American U.S. Intelligence Analyst and is largely considered one of the most prolific – if not the most prolific – spy in American history. Pollard provided troves of classified U.S. documents to the Israeli government including the National Security Agency’s ten-volume manual on how the U.S. gathers its signal intelligence, and the names of thousands of people who had cooperated with U.S. intelligence agencies. Pollard was eventually caught and – despite his claims that he was merely providing the classified information to Israel because not doing so would endanger Israel’s existence – he was sentenced to life in prison. However, beginning around 1988 pushes for Pollard’s release began from American Jews and Israelis alike. From congressmen and senators to entire state assemblies and billionaires, the American Jewish lobby and Israel exerted their influence and power to push for Pollard's release. The justification for Pollard’s release was that Pollard was just acting out of a misguided sense of protection for Israel and that his release may better relations between the US and Israel. In 2015 Pollard was released early from his life sentence and flown to Israel by Jewish-American billionaire Sheldon Adelson on Sheldon’s very own private jet. Pollard was met on the airport tarmac by Benjamin Netanyahu himself, who welcomed Pollard and his wife to Israel and personally handed them their Israeli citizenship documentation. Here’s a short clip with some more information on the Pollard case:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jonathan Pollard, a former Pentagon intelligence analyst, gave top-secret US documents to the Israeli Mossad, which the FBI has linked to the 9/11 attacks. The CIA claimed Israel used Pollard to obtain US war plans against the USSR and sold that information to Moscow. The US Defense Secretary said Pollard should have been executed. Pollard admitted to providing enough information to fill a 6x6x10 foot space. Despite this, many American friends of Israel advocated for his release. The pro-Israel lobby pressed presidents from Reagan to Trump to free Pollard. The Adelsons, major funders of the pro-Israel lobby and political careers of Trump and Netanyahu, were key in advocating for Pollard. Trump awarded Miriam Adelson the Presidential Medal of Freedom and pardoned Avi Sela. Adelson then flew Pollard to Israel on her private jet, where Netanyahu granted him citizenship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An American was caught spying on The US for Israel. He was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. So why is he living like a hero in Israel? Jonathan Pollard, a former Pentagon intelligence analyst, divulged top secret US classified documents to the Israeli Mossad. The Mossad is the Israeli espionage unit infamous for committing assassinations and other acts of terror around the globe and who the FBI have linked to the World Trade Center attacks of nine eleven. According to the FBI and the Department of Justice, Israel is the second most aggressive nation running espionage operation in The US and against The US. The CIA director at the time stated, the Israelis used Pollard to obtain our war plans against The USSR, all of it. The coordinates, the firing locations, the sequences, and Israel sold that information information to Moscow for exit visas for Soviet Jews. Pollard was so damaging to US security that The US Defense Secretary told the Israeli ambassador that Pollard should have been executed. Speaker 1: One day, was talking to a friend of his in New York who commented that he had met a colonel in the Israeli Air Force named Avi Sella. And Pollard said, can you introduce me to him? The Israelis started tasking him with specific documents they wanted. They had a book that was published by the DIA that was basically a catalog of all the things that were available. Own admission, he said, I gave them enough information to occupy a space that would be six feet by six feet by 10 feet. Speaker 0: Despite all of this, many American friends of Israel became shamelessly and increasingly vocal. Speaker 2: Soon. Jonathan will be addressing this audience, but let me inform you, he's not gonna do it in New York. He'll dress you Israeli dinner. Speaker 0: The pro Israel lobby pressed every president from Reagan to Trump, urging them to free Pollard. Speaker 2: Please let Jonathan come home now here in Israel. Thank you, mister president. Speaker 0: And of course, the Adelson's, the most powerful and influential among them, have called for Pollard's release. Sheldon died earlier this year, but Miriam controls the fortune. The Israeli billionaires have been a major source of funding for the pro Israel lobby, which includes the Republican Jewish coalition, an organization the Edelsons fund and sit on the board of. However, the pro Israel lobby doesn't pick sides when it comes to influencing US Politicians. Furthermore, the Edelsons are major financial supporters of the political careers of both Trump and Netanyahu. President Trump even awarded the presidential medal of freedom to Miriam Adelson and pardoned Avi Sela before leaving office. Miriam then rewarded Pollard with a free ride to Israel on her private jet, where prime minister Netanyahu welcomed him with ID cards and and Israeli citizenship. Go home. The American people must wonder why an American trader would be treated as a hero in Israel.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Israel sells US military secrets to China behind our back Israel has sold just about every type of US military secret to foreign nations. From missile technology, submarine SONAR designs, tank tech, and even the very fighter jet aircraft designs that helped modernize the Chinese Air Force I'll let the video break down the full extent of the Israeli backstabbing

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 1980s, Israel allegedly engaged in defense deals with China worth $2-3 billion, surpassing US arms sales to China during the same period. Cooperation, though unconfirmed by both countries, reportedly began in the mid-1970s, with significant deals from 1979 onward. Allegedly, Israel assisted in guidance technology for China's DF-3 and DF-15 ballistic missiles. A well-documented deal involved the licensed assembly of 3,000 Python-3 air-to-air missiles (PL-8) in China, significantly advancing China's infrared seeker technology. There were also alleged sales of night vision, radio, electronic warfare, and signal measurement technology. Israel allegedly aided in modernizing China's Type 59 tanks with reactive armor, fire control, and a 105mm gun. They also allegedly sold radar technology, potentially an electronic emissions gathering system, for the Chinese navy. China sent engineers to Israel, and an Israeli academy of sciences office opened in China in 1990. While a US review found no evidence of Patriot missile tech transfer, China did gain access to some of its technology. The Chinese J-10 fighter is speculated to have links to the Israeli Lavi fighter project. In 1994, Israel and China agreed on a sale of 50 Harpy drones. A deal for Israeli airborne early warning radars was cancelled in 2000 due to US pressure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel is alleged to have traded with China in defense deals way way above its weight class back in the day. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Israel concluded between 2 and $3,000,000,000 worth of defense contracts with China during the 1980s. That figure was higher than The US arms sales and cooperation with China in the same period. Not only in relative economy size comparison but also in absolute nominal comparison. It has to be said that a lot of examples of cooperation that this video will mention have only been alleged. Perhaps written about in news articles. But they have rarely been confirmed by either Israel or China. Unofficially, cooperation started around the mid 1970s. But it was very low key initially. First large deals were signed from 1979 onward. A Cyprie's study says over 60 defense technology deals were signed from 1979 until the year February. While the true extent of military deals will likely never be known, here are some of the more notable examples. China had fielded its first intermediate range ballistic missile, the DF-three, in 1971. But later variants needed a longer range. And with longer range, guidance was an issue, as precision suffered. Israeli firms allegedly were paid to assist in guidance technology transfer for said missile. The DF-fifteen is also sometimes cited to have benefited from some guidance technology assistance from Israel. That missile was tested from the late 1980s to mid 1990s. And some variants of it are still in use today. However, there is little tangible info on any of those technology transfers. Except for a 1988 Washington post article mentioning them. In the 1980s, after China was impressed with the performance of the Israeli python three air to air missiles, it sought to buy both the missile and arrange technology transfer. It's one of the few well documented technology deals. Some 3,000 missiles were assembled locally in China in a license deal. The Chinese copy, the PL-eight, entered service from 1989 onward. The PL-eight was a huge step forward in infrared seeker technology for China. And subsequent missiles benefited from that tech transfer a lot. The pl nine missile, exported widely by China, basically mates the pl eight's body and internal components with pl five's thin layout. It is also said Israeli firms had sold various night vision system technology as well as radio tech and electronic warfare and electronic signal measurement technology to China during the 1980s. But there's little actual proof to such smaller, low key deals, though. A fairly big deal was alleged israeli assistance in modernization of type 59 tanks for China. While the said tank originally dates from the late 1950s, it was still used in huge numbers by China in the 1980s. So China wanted to modernize it. Israeli firms allegedly helped in the late 1980s and early 1990s with that effort. Not only did said firms provide reactive armor technology, fire control technology for the gun, armor piercing technology for the gun rounds. But they provided the gun itself. A hundred and five millimeter Israeli variant of the venerable british l7 gun. Which Israel had a license for. A 1988 Sunday Times article said Israel sold radar technology that was used by the Chinese navy. Cipri alleges said deal was actually an electronic emissions gathering system, a passive radar, if you will. Which was ultimately installed even on China's Han class nuclear powered submarines. Israeli technical advisors were quite active in China in the 1980s. China too sent its own engineers and scientists to Israel during the 1980s. In 1990, the office of the Israeli academy of sciences opened in China. Anti ballistic missile technology was also supposedly traded, with Patriot missile system tech finding its way to China. Supposedly via Israel. A 1992 government ordered review in The US concluded there was no evidence that Patriot technology in China came from Israel. However, there was no denial that China did get access to some of the Patriot's technology. But it was aviation technology that was at the forefront of sales. From the mid 1980s onwards, delegations from the Chinese aerospace industry were visiting their counterparts in Israel. This image shows them posing in front of the Israeli lobby fighter. Now, a lot is sometimes said about lobby being the basis for the Chinese j-ten fighter. Some even go so far to call the j-ten a lobby copy. Certainly, are sufficient differences between the two that the j-ten can't be a copy. But the fact remains that chinese engineers did not have meaningful experience with successful canard designs in the 1980s. It would be only natural for China to work with Israel and learn about various aspects of lavie's design. Like control laws for a delta canard type plane, for example. And they could've learned about other subsystems too. There were allegations over the years that avionics tech, and specifically the heads up display tech, benefited from cooperation with Israeli firms. A US senate report mentioned guided missiles technology as well. It suggested information related to US made AIM-seven sparrow radar guided missiles was handed over to China. In flight refueling technology was also, at times, alleged to have gone from Israel to China during the 1980s. Trying to leverage the accusations of the time, David Ivory, director of Israel's Defense Ministry, said that Israel gave China only a small amount of aircraft technology. That no US technology was given to China. And that lobby technology that was given was already old at the time. Its plausible aerospace tech transfers were still going on during the mid 1990s. During the late nineteen ninety's and February, the j-ten was touted as the most advanced chinese designed fighter. In 1994, Israel and China agreed on a sale of 50 unmanned harpy drones. Those were designed to detect emissions from enemy radars and to fly towards said radars. Essentially ramming themselves into radars, kamikaze style. Such weapons were not really exported around the world before then, as harpy drones were regarded as novel high-tech weapons. Those harpies would be involved in a scandal in the 2000s, but more about that later. In 1994, Israel's Elta dealing in radars started negotiations with China on selling four to eight airborne early warning radars. The contract for four was signed in 1996. And Russia was on board supplying the planes, Ilyushin seventy six, as the carriers of the radar system. The deal seemed to be going fine for a few years. A Russian plane was delivered to Israel for the integration of the radar system in 1999. Then, in the same year, the US government applied pressure to stop it all. Finally, in February, the deal was cancelled, before any of the planes with radars flew to China. While China did not get its hands on the Israeli radar directly, it's quite plausible that a lot of the information

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The Death of Rachel Corrie Rachel Corrie was a 23 year-old American peace activist who in the early 2000s went to Palestine to fight for Palestinian human rights against Israeli oppression. At the time, Israel was demolishing the homes of supposed "terrorists" and claiming the land as their own, thus expanding the Israeli borders Rachael Corrie and her fellow activists would sit in front of the Israeli bulldozers in an attempt to stop them. While protesting in front of one particular house Corrie was run over by a bulldozer and killed The operator of the bulldozer claims to have not been able to see Corrie even though he knew the protestors were there, ignored their yells to stop, and he had an unobstructed view of Corrie The bigger issue here though is that the Israeli courts found this to be an accident and the US refuses to investigate the incident further despite the large amount of evidence this was an intentional murder of a US citizen This video does a great synopsis of the incident:

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2003, 23-year-old American activist Rachel Corrie was crushed to death by an Israeli military bulldozer in Gaza while protesting the demolition of Palestinian homes. Eyewitnesses claim Corrie, wearing a fluorescent jacket, knelt in front of a bulldozer to obstruct demolitions, but was run over twice. The Israeli military ruled Corrie's death an accident, stating she was obscured from view and injured by falling earth and debris, not directly run over. This ruling was criticized by human rights groups. Corrie's parents filed lawsuits against Caterpillar Inc., arguing their bulldozers were implicated in war crimes due to US aid to Israel, and against the Israeli Defense Forces. The case against Caterpillar was dismissed, and the suit against the IDF was rejected, with the court blaming Corrie for her own death. Since 2002, ten foreign ISM activists have been killed or severely injured by Israeli forces. Corrie's parents established the Rachel Corrie Foundation for Peace and Justice and advocate against US funding to Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a story of how a 23 year old American activist was crushed by an Israeli military bulldozer in Gaza. How despite numerous eyewitness testimonies, the Israeli military ruled her death an accident. And how, now almost twenty years later, her parents are still seeking justice. This is a story of Rachel Corey. At midday on 03/16/2003, the phone started ringing at the home of Cindy and Craig Corey in Charlotte, North Carolina. Whilst her husband was busy with the laundry, Cindy picked up the phone, unaware of how life changing the next few words would be. It's Rachel. Cindy had just been told that her 23 year old daughter, her youngest, had been crushed to death under an Israeli military bulldozer while trying to prevent the demolition of a Palestinian home in Rafah, Gaza. Speaker 1: They rounded up about a 50 men, held them under a sniper tower, and and shot around them to contain the men, the farmers in the area. What I'm witnessing here is a very systematic destruction of people's ability to survive, and that is incredibly horrifying. Speaker 0: Carrying a loudspeaker and wearing an orange fluorescent jacket, American activist Rachel Corey headed for a protest against demolition of Palestinian houses and Raffat refugee camp. It was nearly three years into the Second Intifada, a Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation. Rachel had been in Gaza for two months after becoming involved with the International Solidarity Movement or ISM, a Palestinian led group of international activists dedicated to protesting against Israeli human rights abuses. In Rafa, Rachel stood in front of the home of the Nasrallah family and knelt to her knees 20 meters ahead of a Caterpillar d nine r armored bulldozer. Now, this was quite common practice during protests. The young activist was attempting to disrupt the Israeli military's demolitions, an operation deemed by human rights groups as collective punishment of Palestinians. According to eyewitnesses, as the bulldozer got closer, it pushed a mound of earth in front of its blade. The heat began to overtake Cori, so she stood up to climb the mountain soil. Rachel's fellow activists screamed for the driver, an Israeli soldier, to stop. But the driver continued and ran over the American student twice. Speaker 2: Yeah. We'd been out there for several hours on February. We'd been for weeks, we'd been doing this, blocking these bulldozers with with our bodies. And on this day in particular, we've been out there for about two and a half hours blocking these same two bulldozers over and over again. And eventually, just one of the drivers apparently got tired of stopping and very intentionally drove over Rachel, crushed her to death. I was sitting about 30 feet away blocking another bulldozer at the time, and watched it run over her and then back off of her again. Speaker 0: Rachel died soon after being taken to Rafe Hospital from suffocation. Speaker 3: One of the problems with this whole trial, and right from the beginning, know, prime minister Charron promised president Bush a thorough, credible, and transparent investigation. It's still the opinion of our government as well as our family that that never happened. Speaker 0: Rachel's parents and other activists blamed the Israeli military for the death. The army pledged to conduct a thorough investigation and report to then president George w Bush. But the IDF closed the investigation without delivering a comprehensive report. Instead, they refuted the parents claims and accused Rachel and her fellow activists of illegal and dangerous behavior. Speaker 3: Contrary to allegations, Ms. Corrie was not run over by a bulldozer, but sustained injuries caused by earth and debris which fell on her during a bulldozer operation. At the time of the incident, Ms. Corrie was standing an earth mound and therefore obscured from the bulldozer crew's view. Speaker 0: Israel's ruling was criticized by human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Beit Zellem. In their struggle to secure accountability, Cindy and Craig Corrie filed a lawsuit in 02/2005 against the Texas based Caterpillar Incorporation, along with four other Palestinian families whose relatives had been killed or injured. The claimants argued that Caterpillar bulldozers funded by American taxpayers and supplied to Israel as part of the yearly $3,300,000,000 aid from Washington were implicated in war crimes and extrajudicial killings. Since 1967, Cat Inc has been providing equipment to the Israeli military and in more recent years has been at the center of boycott calls. According to campaigners, Cat Inc is responsible for demolishing the homes of tens of thousands of Palestinians, as well as destroying ancient olive groves and roads in the West Bank. In 02/2007, the Corries case was dismissed by the court on political question grounds and therefore did not rule on the merits of the suit. In other words, as the bulldozers were paid for by the US government as part of its aid to Israel, the court could not rule in favor of the plaintiffs without questioning and therefore undermining The United States foreign policy towards Israel. Speaker 4: From the moment the Israeli government started talking to our embassy and to our family in 02/2003, the story changed and it changed and it changed and it changed and it changed again. Speaker 0: Three years later, the Corries tried again. This time, they sued the IDF and Israel's defense ministry. But in 2012, Israeli district court judge, Oded Gershon, ruled against the parents, clearing the driver of any wrongdoing and blaming Rachel for putting herself in harm's way. Since 02/2002, Israel has killed and severely injured ten foreign activists belonging to the ISM, including 21 year old British photojournalist, Tom Herndl, who was shot dead by an Israeli sniper in Gaza, and 21 year old American art student, Emily Henekowitz, who lost her left eye when she was struck by a tear canister while protesting near the Kalandiyah checkpoint. It's now been over two decades since Rachel Corey was crushed by a cat bulldozer in Gaza. Although Rachel's parents were unable to hold the Israeli military to account, the couple set up the Rachel Corrie Foundation for Peace and Justice and continue to advocate against US funding to Israel. Rachel was a US citizen with Palestinian blood. This was a slogan frequently seen on posters honoring Rachel in Gaza and the occupied territories. Today, the activist's death continues to symbolize those fighting and standing in solidarity to the Palestinian plight.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Israel was Involved in the 9/11 Attacks It's shocking just how much evidence there is that Israel was involved in 9/11 From Mossad agents filming the towers before the towers were hit and then dancing in the parking lot after the hit, to vans packed with explosives being driven around NYC by Mossad, to the owner of the World Trade Centers and close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu getting insurance on the buildings just prior to the attack. Israel’s name is all over 9/11 After watching this clip I think you’ll agree: The conspiracy theory isn't to say that Israel was behind 9/11 ….the real conspiracy theory would be to say they weren't This is compilation I made from a larger film called 9/11: War by Deception by @RyLiberty. The full movie is available here: https://rumble.com/v11pzbo-ryan-dawson-911-and-war-by-deception.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On 9/11, police stopped multiple vans, some containing explosives and Israelis allegedly celebrating and filming the World Trade Center attack from Liberty State Park. Witnesses saw them posing on their van roof shortly after the first plane crash. One man, Sylvan Kurzberg, was seen flicking a lighter and had been in the Doric Towers the day before, claiming to be a construction worker. Maps of New York with the World Trade Centers highlighted were found in the van. The vans were linked to Urban Moving Systems, an alleged Mossad front. Some arrested individuals were reportedly known Israeli agents. These "dancing Israelis" were caught with traces of explosives and filmed the attacks. They failed polygraph tests and were deported. Another truck with a mural of a plane crashing into the World Trade Center was a diversion. The owner of Urban Moving Systems fled to Israel, and the FBI raided the complex. A fourth explosion at the World Trade Center was reported by news outlets. Individuals with fake IDs had access to the towers for maintenance work. An Israeli-owned company, ZIM shipping, broke its lease in the World Trade Center a week before 9/11.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There were at least two, possibly three vans stopped by police on 09:11, and another fourth van spotted by a journalist. One had five individuals and traces of explosives. Another had two individuals and was packed with explosives. A third man got away and a fourth was possibly diversion. The first van had been spotted earlier in Liberty State Park by a witness who saw three men celebrating and filming the World Trade Center attack. Eyewitnesses had seen them already on top of the roof of their van posing and taking pictures only five minutes after the first plane crash. Irving Moving Systems is at least five minutes away. They were already on the roof of a parking garage in place looking at the north side of the North Tower, which is exactly where the plane impacted. The Israelis took 76 photographs, and eyewitnesses also saw them video recording the event. They can be visibly seen smiling. Sylvan Kurzberg is even shown flicking a green lighter as if he was at a rock concert. Interestingly, Sylvan Kurzberg had been spotted in the Doric Towers the day before on 09/10/2001. He lied to two men in an elevator and said that he was a construction worker. He was positively identified in the police lineup. Both Doric Tower and the World Trade Centers were highlighted on maps of the area found in the van at the time of their arrest. And Sylvan admitted to the FBI polygrapher that he had been a mapmaker in Israel. Why would they have maps of New York with the World Trade Centers highlighted as well as the place they were going to film and take pictures of the event from? Because of the time stamp of the BOLO as well as reports from the New York Times and Fox, we know these men had been filming the entire event, which shows prior knowledge. Because of the matching license plates, we know that this is the same van later pulled over on Route 3 in East Rutherford by police. It had five individuals. They were all Israelis and had taken pictures of themselves flicking lighters with the burning World Trade Center in the background. The second plane had not even hit and many assumed the first was a bizarre accident, but not these excited Israelis. They knew. Their van was traced back by its logo, Urban Moving Systems, to a front for the Israeli Mossad, Israel's CIA. Two of the five men arrested's name popped up on the CFI and FBI's database as known Israeli agents. The dancing Israelis who were working for a Mossad front company, Urban Moving Systems, get caught in a van with traces of explosives. They were filming the nine eleven attacks in New York with the planes crashing into buildings before it happened. So they just decided to set up a film on that particular day, driving around in a van that had traces of explosives. They just strolling through, you know, just put a camera. Let's point at the World Trade Center for no particular reason just in case something happens. And then, of course, nine eleven happens. They obviously knew the attack was happening. They were thrown in jail and they failed their polygraph test, but eventually, they were deported back to Israel. Other Israeli spies were busted in several other states as well as Mexico, but nothing ever comes of it. Once they get arrested, the higher ups always swoop in and deport them for visa violations. This event, damning as it is, has had a Lewinsky style distraction effect, pulling attention away from the far more damning van stopped near the George Washington Bridge packed with explosives. Aside from eyewitnesses, the van bombs and arrest were reported by ABC News, CBS, CNN, Haretz, Jerusalem Post, Fox News, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, the police themselves, army radio, several New Jersey papers, and so forth. Urban Moving Systems was only one of several fronts working that day, which also had had prior access to the towers. These are not the only two mysterious set of vans stopped on 09:11. There was a third truck, which was obviously a diversion on King Street, which actually depicted a mural of a plane slamming into the World Trade Centers. And those two individuals were arrested. Obviously, this was the diversion to pull police in that direction because no one would drive around in a truck with a painting of 09:11 on it on 09:11 unless they were purposely trying to attract the attention of the police to pull them in a certain direction. Speaker 1: With a mural painted of a of an airplane diving into New York City and exploding. Speaker 0: The Israelis arrested on 09/11 who were driving around in vans that were a front for the Mossad were detained and interrogated. They all failed their polygraph test. However, they were released by Chertoff and deported back to Israel and left alone. The owner of the Urban Move In Systems warehouse, Dominic Suter, along with his wife, fled back to Israel. The FBI raided the complex and confiscated over a dozen computer hard drives. This is a man who got a half million dollar loan just prior to nine eleven, only for that year. And the FBI listed him as an official suspect of nine eleven, and he remains a suspect. Speaker 2: He told us the operatives have been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping. Speaker 0: Now according to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, flight 93 was only twenty minutes away from Washington DC if it was going 580 miles an hour. The flight recorder stopped at 10:03 in the morning. That means they would have hit DC around 10:23 in the morning. However, had it been going back to hit Building 7 in New York, it would have hit between 10:43 and 10:46. Interestingly, at 10:45, several news outlets reported hearing a fourth explosion at the World Trade Center in the smoke. Speaker 3: Is just stay in your home. Stay put. Speaker 4: And we were we just received word that there was a fourth explosion at the World Trade Center. We have no idea what that was, if it was related to the first two explosions, secondary explosions from the first two, or obviously other attacks. Speaker 0: It looked rather stupid without flight 93 reaching his final destination for World Trade Center 7, but they had to do it anyway. There have been whistleblowers of course even from within FEMA, but who do they turn to? They can't go to the government with it, and they certainly can't go to the mainstream media with it. So if you're asking why more people haven't come forward, how exactly would you like them to do that? Go to who and say what? With a profitable cold war over and hundreds of billions in security fraud and a network of mediums to obfuscate off the books financing for covert and illegal operations under investigation, An event was needed to cover the old crimes and create the atmosphere for new ones. This wasn't for America or solely by American elements. It was multinational. Showing that nine eleven was done and why it was done and who covered it up isn't same as how it was done. We've seen airplanes and truck bombs, but what about the other explosions higher up in the towers? If bombs were inside, how could they be set in there with so many employees working in the towers, and who did it? You can forget about security. That's a non issue. But exactly how and where could one place charges without anyone noticing? It's a good place to start would be the men arrested for fake IDs that granted them access to the towers to fix sprinkler systems, upgrade Internet cables, move out furniture, and work on chronically broken elevators, especially when the Israeli owned company they claimed to work for had no authenticity. Movers bring the goods, elevator and cable mechanics set them in place, maintenance shuts down the fire prevention system. Quick three step plan. Speaker 3: Any sense at all? Have you heard anything even anecdotally from the cops about how many people managed to get out of the building before they collapsed? Speaker 5: No. Absolutely not. But there's also I don't know if it was the case now, but I do know that one of the of the towers had a major elevator that went all the way to the top that was malfunctioning and has been malfunctioning for, at least a month. They've been having a lot of trouble with that. Speaker 0: Aside from serious elevator workers of the oddly chronically broken elevators and the Israeli movers contracted by ZIM shipping company itself partly Israeli state owned, which broke a $50,000 lease in the World Trade Center to relocate to Virginia a week before 09:11.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Jeffrey Epstein and Sexual Blackmail Jeffrey Epstein was a Jewish-American billionaire who orchestrated an extensive sex trafficking network, exploiting underage girls to compromise United States officials, politicians, political donors, and other powerful elites. Epstein used his wealth and high-profile connections to recruit and then sex traffic young and underage girls to societal elites by promising the girls money, education, and/or career opportunities. Similarly, Epstein manipulated his high-profile financial connections, exclusive social clubs, and elite networking opportunities to lure powerful people to 'party' with him so he could set them up with sexual blackmail with the girls he had recruited. Epstein’s operations spanned decades and involved properties in multiple locations, including a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, his New York townhouse, and a ranch in New Mexico. Epstein’s ties to Israeli Mossad and American Jewry run deep. From his close relationship with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak to his accomplice being the daughter of a notorious Mossad asset (respectively, Ghislaine Maxwell and her father Robert) to American Jewish billionaire Lex Wexner being one of the chief financiers of Epstein’s operation from its earliest stages. Jeffrey Epstein ran a sexual blackmail ring and all signs point to Israel being the group supporting and funding that blackmail ring. Here’s former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and American Jew Steve Pieczenik discussing Epstein and his ties to Israel:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Epstein pedophilia ring is a decades-long Mossad Israeli operative ring, dating back to the attack on the Liberty ship. Israel is described as America's greatest enemy, implicated in 9/11 and the stand down war. According to the speaker, Jeffrey Epstein was chosen by the Mossad as an agent of influence due to his narcissism and manipulability. Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of alleged Mossad operative Robert Maxwell, controlled Epstein. The speaker connects Nexium, run by Keith Raniere but controlled by the Bronfman family, to propagating pedophilia. Pedophilia is described as a tool to co-opt individuals, ensuring silence and denigrating both operatives and the issue. The speaker alleges the Mossad, under chiefs Kalevi and Yatom, used pedophilia to compromise American operatives, implicating figures from the Bush, Clinton, and Obama families. Epstein is portrayed as a willing participant, with Wexner as his backup.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. This is doctor Pachenik. I wanna talk about the Epstein, pedophilia ring. What it really is is a Mossad Israeli operative ring, goes back decades and decades, all the way to the time even where the Liberty ship was attacked by Israeli planes, unmarked Israeli planes during the six day war, and Israel said they didn't do it. Well, that was a lie. Israel has not been our greatest ally. It's been our greatest enemy. They were also involved in nine eleven and the stand out war for which his deputy confirmed that to me. Israeli Mossad operatives who I interrogated and threatened confirmed that to me, and I put away two Mossad operatives. The key to this Epstein problem of pedophilia is the fact that it goes back decades. Jeff Epstein was picked out by the Mossad as the proper agent of influence because number one, he was grandiose. Two, he had some intelligence but came from a poor Jewish background, had no real education, did not speak a foreign language, and was so narcissistic that they could manipulate him up and down and create a false front for him which involved the fact that he had multi million dollars or multi billion dollars. He may have no money. It's not even relevant. But to make sure that Jeffrey Epstein was working properly, they had an operative from the Mossad who was named Maxwell, the daughter of Robert Maxwell, one of the greatest crooks in the world who was an Israeli Mossad operative. When he died in 1991, he was either killed or he died. He was one of the biggest contributors to Israeli national security than anybody else. So his daughter was the control operative of Jeff Epstein. At the same time, we had Nexium in New York City, which was run by a non Jew named Renier, but controlled by two Jewish women, the Bronfman family. And they in turn were propagating pedophilia. Now why is pedophilia so lethal? From an intelligence point of view, from my point of view, as an intelligence operative and a counterintelligence operative, one of the most disgusting things that you can do in the intelligence world is to double you up or co op you through the use of a honey trap, but not only an adult honey trap, but a child. When you use a child, you pretty much terrorize that child so that you know anybody who's gotten involved with pedophilia cannot speak out, the child can't say anything, and it's a legitimate way to denigrate both the operative and the problem itself to children. Nevertheless, the Mossad incurred so many operatives that were involved with pedophilia under the Epstein ring and under the Nexium ring with the two Bronfman daughters that you're talking about thousands of people. Now it also goes all the way up into the presidency. It goes into the Bush family, Bush junior, Jeb. It goes into Clinton's, as we know Hillary, Bill Clinton, who's a pathological liar to the nth degree, to Obama, who had a history of homosexuality and pedophilia, all the way down to the Bushes and beyond that. So what the Israelis did under the tutelage of two brilliant Mossad chiefs, Kalevi and Yatom, both of whom used pedophilia as a honey trap to encapsulate any one of our operatives in America. Jeff Epstein was a willing operative. He willingly was involved in pedophilia. The Israelis knew that. They created his storyline. They may believe he was a billionaire. Wexner was the theoretical backup man to him, and ironically, he was in Bairstjens, which was another corrupt Jewish firm that went under along with Drexel Burnham, another corrupt Jewish firm. So we have a lot of corruption here.
Saved - May 16, 2025 at 12:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard manage $20 trillion in assets, influencing corporate decisions through shareholder voting. When individuals invest in ETFs or mutual funds from these firms, they relinquish their voting rights, allowing BSSV to control significant corporate policies and board elections. Despite owning around 15% of many companies, their influence is magnified due to the indifference of other shareholders. This control extends into various sectors of society and politics, shaping corporate ideologies and actions. It's crucial to recognize and challenge this cycle of influence.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard collectively manage $20 TRILLION of assets. The entire GDP of the U.S. is only $23 trillion. Now here's how BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard control you with those assets. First, we need to understand that owning a stock means you own a portion of the corporation the stock is issued based on. And with that ownership comes one very important right: the right to vote your shares to determine what the corporation does. Shareholder voting within a corporation is exactly as it sounds: you vote on certain issues and proposals put forth by the corporation. The more shares you have, the more votes you get — so if you own 30% of all the shares of the company, you get 30% of the votes. Results of votes are generally decided by simple majority. Pretty straight forward, right? Now what gets voted on at these shareholder meetings? The voting determines the major changes to how the corporation will maintain or change the way it interacts with the world around it as well as how the corporation is managed internally. These votes can determine big things, to name a few: - diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives - executive compensation - board of director's policies - the political policies of the corporation However hands down the biggest decision made by the shareholder vote is who sits on the board of directors. The board of directors decides: - the objectives and goals of a company - the management and senior executives of a company - the company policies (including political policies) - brand image and advertising Yes — there is some overlap between what the board of directors does and what the shareholder vote determines. Responsibilities differ from company to company. Now that we have the basics out of the way, how does voting shares of a corporation play in to BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard (I'll call them "BSSV" from now on) controlling you? Let's first look at how each of BSSV's ownerships are structured (all three are basically structured the same). What BSSV generally does is pretty simple: they buy stock shares of a specific company (Apple, Tesla, etc.) and package those stock shares with similar stock shares in to something called an ETF or a Mutual Fund. Then they sell a piece of resulting pool of those stocks to you so you can own a bunch of stocks without having to buy each of them individually (this is simplified but the basics hold true). For instance, let's say you want to buy technology companies but don’t know which specific company you want to buy or you can't afford to buy a bunch of different companies. In that case, BSSV would simplify the process for you by buying stocks of a whole bunch of different tech companies that they then package in to an ETF or Mutual Fund which you can then buy shares in allowing you to get ownership to all those companies at a fraction of the cost and effort! And these bundles can be created with any industry, sector, or with any other group of companies — from tech to oil to the entire S&P 500. So it seems like a win-win, right? You get to own a bundle of a bunch of different stocks you couldn’t otherwise get access to and BSSV gets a very small fee for helping you get that exposure. They seem like such nice guys, right? How on earth could this be sinister? Not so fast — when you buy these stocks through BSSV in ETFs and Mutual funds you give up one very important thing: you give up your right to vote at the shareholder meeting for each of those individual companies. You give up the right to choose the board of directors who determine the course of actions the company will pursue and you give up the right to vote on those political and policy decisions directions the company will take. But most importantly: YOU GIVE THAT VOTING RIGHT TO BSSV. “So what, BSSV can vote a few shares of a company? There must be way more shareholders out there that also vote”. For this, I'd ask you to do an experiment. Pick any major company. Now google who its largest Shareholders are The largest shareholders will almost always include or be composed of BSSV. Of all the stocks in the S&P 500 at least one of the members of BSSV is the largest shareholder in 88% of the companies. “But on average they only collectively own around 15% of most of these companies, that's not 50% control”. True, but a 15% difference in voting for board members or policies where most other shareholders are indifferent or uneducated on the policies (thus their votes are closer to a 50/50 split) is enough to sway almost every item that's voted on. “Well at least the three of them must have differing views? They all must compete for different shareholder vote outcomes, right?” Wrong. The unique thing about BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard is that their own largest shareholders are: Each Other. So they all decide each other's boards of directors and all control each other's shareholder votes. Then once BSSV's own boards are chosen they choose the boards of the companies they control. Now how is this control actually exerted? What are the manifestations of it that actually impact us? I'll keep this succinct so this doesn't run too long but corporations exert control over our society in a number of ways. On the social front this means BSSV can control almost every intersection of our lives with corporations. Our news, our social media, our financial institutions, our cinema and television, our retailers, our clothing stores, and even our food are all subservient to BSSV and the boards of directors they appoint. In the political landscape this control can be exerted through campaign contributions, lobbying, PACS, issue advocacy, regulatory capture, think tanks, revolving doors, trade associations, policy development, and campaign advertising amongst others (to name a few). This is also why every corporation appears to be move in lock-step in their support of things like ESG investing, Black Lives Matter, and other social causes: because behind the scenes BSSV purposefully elects boards that champion their values and beget their interests. The players on each board are different but their ideologies are the same…because their ideologies are BSSV's ideology. For many years now BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have controlled almost every aspect of our lives without us knowing. It's time to break that cycle.

Saved - May 7, 2025 at 6:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new generation of AI bots has emerged, significantly smarter than their predecessors. I've explored a case study revealing over 100 distinct social media personas created using AnthropicAI's Claude. These bots operate across platforms, maintaining consistent political viewpoints and adapting their interactions to fit their assigned personas. They can generate and evaluate AI images and cleverly deflect accusations of being bots. While their agendas vary widely, identifying them remains possible through hollow profiles and generic content. However, their increasing sophistication poses a challenge for detection.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵A new generation of AI bots have arrived on X ...and they're much smarter than they used to be In this short thread I'll go over some of the characteristics of these new AI bots So we know what to look for when they infiltrate our side...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

First, I'm just looking at one case study here. There are undoubtedly other bots similar to these that exist that haven't been exposed yet However, these case studies can show us both capabilities and characteristics of the new generations of bots as well as how they're used

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

So what happened? Recently, AI company @AnthropicAI uncovered over 100 distinct social media personas that were using their Large Language Model (AI), named Claude, to interact with real-life X and Facebook users to push certain political narratives

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now, I say "personas" instead of "accounts" because these personas had social media accounts across different social media platforms (primarily Facebook and X) These weren't isolated accounts on X or Facebook, these were entire across-platform personas meant to replicate a human

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

What are the characteristics of the bots? 1. The bots not only maintained the political viewpoint assigned to them but even made sure that any content drafted by their personas aligned with the political views and writing style of their persona (Actual bot pictured below)

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

2. The bots not only interacted with other users but maintained the political beliefs, persona, and native language for that specific persona in their interactions Just contrast the persona differences between the "American" bot here to the "Polish" bot from the previous slide https://t.co/4l6Q24kIWf

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

3. The bots were even able to create prompts for AI image generation tools AND THEN EVALUATE the resulting AI-generated image to see if the image aligned with their assigned persona These are not your average X porno bot with one picture ...these are something very different

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Another interesting point and something else to look our for is that the bots were programmed to respond to allegations of being bots with humor or sarcasm This means that to the average user they'd generally be pretty effective at deflecting any accusations of being inorganic

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

What agenda were these bots pushing? The assigned political causes for the personas of the bots were kind of all over the place: From energy initiatives in the EU to business in the UAE to Albanian and Kenyan politics, there were multiple political causes the bots were pushing

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Do we know who was behind the bots? We don't know who was behind the bots but based on the disparate themes the bots supported it seems to me it may well have been a private actor instead of a state one This video by The Guardian is a great piece on how these private bot contractors operate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UheOilps2zQ

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

To summarize: These aren't your grandpa's bots... Bots have come a long way and with the assistance of AI they're beginning to be very hard to differentiate from real people In my experience there are still ways to spot them though Here are a few things to look for:

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

When you find these bots their profiles often seem hollow The older versions of these bots have a lot of redundant images and responses and their Facebook profiles are usually barren without much interaction There's an element of interaction that is still hard to replicate

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

The other way to spot the bots is that their profiles just feel generic Their content will feel largely unoriginal or redundant and their posting seldom breaks from the political persona assigned to them They're all work and no play...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

So yes, bots are much more effective than they used to be and their effectiveness is only increasing by the day And while there are still ways to spot them, it will become more difficult the more intelligent the bots become Stay safe everybody ...and keep an eye out for bots

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Here's the link to Anthropic's full report on the bots: https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/45bc6adf039848841ed9e47051fb1209d6bb2b26.pdf

Saved - May 6, 2025 at 12:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Since Auschwitz is trending, I want to share perspectives often overlooked in mainstream discussions about the Holocaust. I highlight claims from Holocaust Revisionists, including David Cole's observations on gas chamber inconsistencies and the lack of documented orders for mass extermination. I also discuss the conditions in camps, the inaccuracies in survivor stories, and the propaganda surrounding the Holocaust narrative. Ultimately, I believe in the necessity of open dialogue about historical events, emphasizing that the truth can withstand scrutiny.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵Since Auschwitz is trending let's talk about something you won't hear about on the official Auschwitz tour: The perspective of the Holocaust Revisionists (aka Holocaust "Deniers") These are all facts they didn't teach you in grade school about the Holocaust...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

First, here’s a jewish man named David Cole on the inconsistencies of the gas chambers (ie. wooden doors and other illogical constructions) David is surprised “how little evidence there is" for many of the events https://t.co/oyRbuPVxPs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Claims are made that proofs of the Holocaust are few, consisting mainly of eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions, but no wartime documents detailing homicidal gas chambers. Evidence like piles of human hair, shoes, and clothing are explained as normal byproducts of camp conditions. Zyklon B was used for disinfection against typhus. Aerial photos of Auschwitz taken during the alleged period of nonstop killings do not show gassings or bodies being burned. Auschwitz's gas chamber appears to have been reconstructed after the war. Allied aerial photos contradict claims that Nazis camouflaged the gas chambers. Forensic examinations of gas chambers at Auschwitz showed almost no Zyklon B residue, unlike disinfestation chambers. An expert examined the facilities and determined they were incapable of supporting hydrogen cyanide gas executions due to design flaws: no gasketed doors, windows, or explosion-proof features. The design of the facilities made gassing impossible without killing the operators. Alleged eyewitness reports lack valid descriptions of gassings, suggesting there were no gassings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the holocaust are few. Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews. And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz. The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as proofs. Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation. For example, these exhibits are said to be the material proofs of exterminations. There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove? It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem. That's not denied. So why wouldn't there be piles of human hair? What about the piles of shoes and clothing? Is that a proof? It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes. So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing? It doesn't prove anybody was killed. What about the canisters of gas? No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings. Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time. It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them. The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures. So what other proofs are offered? Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the groundbreaking thesis that people got sick in the camp. Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths. Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children. But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber. And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept. For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz by the Allies during the war. They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost nonstop. Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building. Obvious marks on the walls and floors where apparently walls had been knocked down, equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been. We maintain that unlike the large hollow chamber we now see. This room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom. Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage, four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand. It is said that through these four holes, cyclone B crystals were dropped. And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them. Do these holes prove homicidal gassings? Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber. Let's start again talking about this building here. Speaker 1: Notorium gas chamber. Speaker 0: But this is a reconstruction. Speaker 1: It is in original state. Speaker 0: Original? Speaker 1: Original state. It is in original part. Original. It is original. Original in through this chimney was from cyclone beam. Speaker 0: Are those the original holes in Speaker 1: the ceiling? Speaker 0: They've been rebuilt? Yes. Okay. After the war? After the war. Yes. This is Auschwitz Birkenau in an allied aerial photo from September 1944. The train that would come up carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp. This was a spectacle that nobody at the camp could miss. They would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out. These were gas chambers that were not isolated from anyone. And indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late seventies, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau. Another question that should be asked, is there any Zyklon b residue in the gas chamber knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue? In 1988, execution equipment expert Fred Lucher conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question. He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B. Now the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale. In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Lucher's findings, and their own tests got back the same results. Speaker 2: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide gas. Speaker 3: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities? Speaker 2: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design fabrication of these facilities, the requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed. We are talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 3: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of the things Speaker 2: that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset, so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, let's take a look at how German confessions were obtained through torture, the infamous human lampshade and soap claims, and one of the more interesting Holocaust facts: No document has ever been found showing Hitler ordered any systematic mass exterminations https://t.co/bOLWqwZMXG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cyclone B was dropped into the death chamber, killing people in 3-15 minutes. The screaming stopped when they were dead. Special commandos removed rings and extracted gold from teeth. Children were exterminated because they couldn't work. Rudolf Herr's confession was obtained by the British through torture before he was turned over to the Soviets and Poles. This was confirmed in "Legions of Death" by Bernard Clark, who bragged about torturing Herr and threatening his family. The speaker wishes the Fuhrer had taken responsibility for his commands, stating he was their sovereign. The speaker would rather die than see the sovereign subjected to humiliation in a foreign court, believing the Fuhrer would have taken responsibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work. Is that all true and correct, witness? Yes. Speaker 1: It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. It was here that Hearst was hanged. Speaker 0: I rather wish the Fuhrer had stood by his followers and taken the responsibility for his command. Think of his position. Oh, sure. His position is chief war criminal. Right? He was our sovereign. It would be intolerable for me to have him standing before a foreign court. You men knew the furor. He would be the first one to stand up and say, I gave the orders, and I shall take full responsibility. And I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now, let’s take a look at the evidence against the gas chambers and mass graves as well as some of the numeric anomalies of the Holocaust The first clip is Fred Leuchter who wrote an infamous report called The Leuchter Report that comprehensively examined Auschwitz

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to multiple experts, the facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Lublin were not capable of supporting mass executions using any lethal gas. Germa Rudolf's chemical analysis allegedly concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in buildings claimed to be homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. Walter Liftel's report stated that homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons. William B. Lindsay affirmed that no one was purposefully killed with cyclone B in that manner. Reports from the Krakow Forensic Institute and others corroborate these findings. Ground-penetrating radar at Treblinka allegedly revealed no ash or disturbance, suggesting mass graves never existed there. Charles Larsen found no evidence of death by poison gas in autopsies performed in German camps. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers, only in delousing chambers. The Auschwitz Museum curator allegedly admitted that the Soviets altered a German bomb shelter after the war to create a homicidal gas chamber. The building presented as a gas chamber has features inconsistent with that purpose, such as a manhole escape hatch, a door that opens inward, and locks on the inside. Le Express acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is a deceitful postwar reconstruction. Olga Vorum Sarnikot stated Auschwitz had no gas chamber, and a fake chimney was built by the Soviets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet. Speaker 1: Germa Rudolf is a chemist who knew winter of nineteen ninety-ninety one while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter Report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Liftel's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Loister. The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible. The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, Jan Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon, and many others who also have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Creek, a qualified electronics engineer, and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash. The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass graves never even existed in Triplinka or Belzec. There are, in fact, many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor Charles Larsen, one of Americans leading pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas. If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright sherry red. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz Museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter. In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber. Speaker 2: Yeah. Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war. It was a bomb shelter. They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Wash Woods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, you go inside it, they they they chop holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building. So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in. It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building. Speaker 3: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in 'ninety two, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word, of of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot. It was a open two camera shoot in his office. It was me and my camera woman. And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls. There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon B. The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities. You can still see the drains in the floor. You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas Speaker 2: chamber. Yeah. Speaker 3: A manhole that any adult, even a fairly heavy set adult can go down into. Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case rubble or anything else prevented the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in '91, Auschwitz had been open to the the West for over a decade. No one ever noticed the damn manhole, and it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in. In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there. In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a 200, three hundred bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which which is just kind of a a silly thing to think of. Speaker 1: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine, Le Express, acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were Speaker 0: also

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, David Irving discusses the lack of sufficient combustibles for cremations, the Germans making no references to gas chambers in private or public documents, and the fact the gas chambers on the Auschwitz tour are “reconstructions” and not original https://t.co/v9a0A8b9PV

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to a reader's letter, calling a gas chamber a fake is wrong because it's a reconstruction. The speaker equates the reconstructed gas chamber to a fake $20 bill. The speaker claims authorities have been showing a reconstruction to schoolchildren for 50 years without disclosing it's not original, which he believes is deceptive. He was fined for pointing out this embarrassment. The speaker questions why the fake building is shown when genuine ruins are nearby. He suggests people might question the crematorium's true purpose, possibly for typhus victims. While acknowledging crimes against Jews, he argues about the scale and intent. He questions how 1,000,000 people could be cremated in Auschwitz, citing the implausibility of the required coke supply being absent from aerial photos and records. He claims archives haven't been properly researched and it would have been impossible to remove all gas chamber references from records at the end of the Third Reich. British intelligence read German secret messages, including those from the commandant of Auschwitz, which detailed prisoner statistics but contained no reference to gassings. He dismisses eyewitness evidence as insufficient without archival support, referencing the John Demianuk case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By academics around the world. He then goes on in his readers letter to say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago. To which my to which my response is to which my response is, a fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel. That is a fake. If this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed, a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews. And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I'm fined $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the schoolchildren the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruins just down the road three or four miles away? Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins of a gas chamber, but I think according to maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Four crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problems. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing me an injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime. But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the how how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to do. This is what questions like, how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz? If cremating one person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to cremate 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60,000 tons of coke. And where are those 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs, nor are there truckloads of coke being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the wagon loads of coke. So that is, pre opacity by itself, improbable. And anyway, these four crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at a time. We know they couldn't have cremated more than tops seventy, eighty, 90 thousand people in the four or five years that the camp was in existence. These are the technical questions that people ask. And not only that, you have the problem that people say, no doubt the Nazis destroyed all the records. At the end of World War two, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like. They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for fifty years in the archives, and those archives have still not been properly researched. They're still in total disarray. And believe me, it would not have been possible in the last one or two weeks of the collapsing Third Reich for somebody to go around all the archives taking out all the references to gas chambers if they were in it, or all the references to the final solution if there were any, and destroying. They couldn't defend it. And even if they could have destroyed all the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber, so that there aren't any left in the archives now in Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British files. Because you see, we British were reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp sent a message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the camp at midnight, how many had died. We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz, we know what he reported. And the chief historian of the British Secret Service who printed this in volume two of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states, it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting. And then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams and the top secret SS code, and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. And that is why when people say, but what about all the eyewitness evidence? I say eyewitness evidence baloney. Tell that to John Demianuk about eyewitness evidence, the man, the Cleveland Auto Worker, who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, this Israeli Supreme Court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Denyano, admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough, and that the eyewitnesses had erred and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here we have to say there is no such evidence. The Auschwitz record

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

With so many Holocaust survivors telling stories of the camps many have turned out to be inaccurate From the infamous Elie Wiesel to the lady who claimed to be raised by wolves, here’s just a few of the Holocaust claims that have turned out to be flawed https://t.co/CYo2SSoypX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Captured Nazi officials and Jewish survivors gave Holocaust testaments, including claims of gassings, Jew-eating animals, vaporizing Jews with atomic energy, torture to the "Tango of Death," steaming Jews, electrocution, musical camp dogs, tickling homosexuals to death, blood gazers, Jews made into lampshades and soap, and Nazi masturbation machines. Herman Rosenblatt gained fame for his story about a girl throwing him apples in a concentration camp, which led to a book and movie deal, but the story was false. Rosenblatt maintained it was his "imagination" and remained unrepentant. Other false Holocaust narratives include Mitig Grocer plagiarizing from fiction, Josef Hurt fabricating an escape from Auschwitz, Otto Utkinant lying about his experiences, and Misha DeFunsheca's fabricated memoir about being raised by wolves. Misha had to repay $22.5 million. Miklos Gruner claims Elie Wiesel stole the identity of Lazar Wiesel and that Wiesel's claims about burning babies are scientifically impossible. Paul Rasinier and other camp survivors denied knowledge of gas chambers or mass murder. Benedict Kochsky stated he never saw gas chambers in any camp, including Auschwitz. Marika Frank, an Auschwitz internee, testified she saw nothing of gas chambers. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin called the Holocaust "the biggest lie in history." Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang said the Holocaust deflects criticism of Israel. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman called the Holocaust a "successful historical fiction." Jewish professor Roger de Margo claims gassing with cyanide acid is impossible and that the numbers of Jews killed are inaccurate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death. Steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous. Speaker 1: The one thing Speaker 2: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us. For every man that ran to the wire. They they took a hundred inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody. The greatest love story we've ever told on Speaker 0: this show. Oh my goodness. Speaker 3: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot. Speaker 2: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have in my jacket and a piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow. Speaker 3: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long? Speaker 4: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it. That she was there, and she threw the apple to me. Speaker 3: How how can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true. Speaker 4: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true. Speaker 3: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years of lying. Speaker 4: I pronounce my love for you forever. Speaker 3: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do? Speaker 4: Yeah. Speaker 3: And and and while you were up on the stage there with all these people, in the back of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would? Yes. Speaker 2: I simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true. Speaker 3: He said he made up he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world. Speaker 2: And his son says, tried to stop him? Yes. Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan. Pleasure. Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele. He had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie. Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFunsheca wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust. Her story was published almost twenty years ago as Misha, a Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, leaving out stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 02/2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie. The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that it is not the true reality but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and my inner world. Misha will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712, but a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor. Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number eighty seven thousand seven hundred thirteen actually belonged to. First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number 8700712 actually were given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers. Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches. Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred. In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm. Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklus also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary. Neither Elie Wiesel nor his father, Shlomo Wiesel, are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald. After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book Night brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda. But of course, not all Jews are lying. Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration Camps. Rasinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps. Rysigner said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by deceased and particularly typhus, and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers. A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the second world war. That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie. Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman says, the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction. Jewish professor Roger de Margo said Speaker 1: I know that the problem, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English. Hydrocynic Hydrocynic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known, and, even the most important American Jewish newspapers, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they So I think anybody can see that. I I listed in 1944. I see. I listed for three years, nineteen forty four. It was in the world. The world finished in 1945. But I was in the army 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and say when you read these books, what maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when declared I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been there now for fifty years. So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my my lecture, it's absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Meigumpf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. As to what's happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us. What what he did in Germany. And the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about Hitler. But when you really know that this what he did, what he actually did in Germany, well, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled to use a Speaker 0: mild

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, what was life was like inside the “death” camps? Well, surprisingly, the camps had theaters, swimming pools, soccer leagues, orchestras, and even plays But don’t take my word for it, let some Holocaust survivors tell you themselves: https://t.co/Samxwpo3Au

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cultural activities occurred in Auschwitz, including theater performances in Block 1. A grand piano was brought in, and a stage curtain was sewn with inmate assistance. One inmate helped transcribe music for the orchestra, finding the work peaceful. There was a library, newspapers, and violin quartets. Movies, mostly German, were shown in the evenings for a fee. Inmates could receive money from outside and buy items like cigarettes and weak beer at a canteen. Soccer teams were formed, with games organized even in Gross Rosen as the war progressed. Civilians sometimes helped, even playing soccer with inmates. Weddings and maternity wards existed, with over 3,000 live births in Auschwitz and no infant deaths during German rule. A nursery was established, and an inmate painted a mural in the children's barracks, depicting a Swiss chalet scene and, at the children's request, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. The children then created a play based on Snow White. A brothel, hospitals, and dental facilities also existed in the camp. Camp authorities tried to keep inmates alive and healthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also had an orchestra where some of the musicians stood together and one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes. So later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was, of course, helping us. You know, we also did plays and stuff. Speaker 1: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz? Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that new Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also with the stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture. He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage. I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage. And that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my room mate is in charge of work assignments. And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra. I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes. He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper. So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines. We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz. But then she saw me work there, I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time. That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz. And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves. And from these leaves, they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz. Speaker 2: How did you entertain yourselves? Speaker 3: Well, there were at that at at the beginning of those days, there was a library where you people could get books to read. There were newspapers that we could get. And that and also among ourselves sometimes we had a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoners said said, only you must be crazy. They're make a movie for us in in in the camp. And then it happened. They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack. We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening. They brought movies in to the in the evening. And Speaker 2: What kind of movies would they show? Speaker 3: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to ride home. Once a postcard and once a letter. Speaker 2: They gave you the materials? Speaker 3: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, and we could Speaker 2: How did Speaker 1: you get the stamps? Speaker 3: Stamps. We could buy stamps. Speaker 2: Could You had money? Speaker 3: Yeah. We got my we still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us. Everybody, you some money. Speaker 2: And and in the camp you could have currency? Speaker 3: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah. But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes. Speaker 2: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay? Speaker 3: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then. Speaker 2: Paid for your work? Speaker 3: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then. Speaker 0: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was about a little later where we Speaker 4: played soccer. It's amazing that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be Speaker 3: enough energy left to do something like that. Speaker 0: Well, I don't think we were quite as energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off these, of the problems we had. Speaker 5: Especially the Germans started losing the war, 1943, '19 '40 '4. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we organized very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized a soccer team and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer in the assembly line and assembly place. In Rosen. In Gross Rosen. So, you know, that much free it was in there, but it was like the 44. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side, so there they have to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves. Speaker 6: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things? Speaker 5: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from Markside civilians. But that Speaker 3: was Speaker 5: strictly under the cover. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost all of us. They didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted assessment decided he wants to play for the Polish team. So we say okay, you can play for us. And then the commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So, he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy. Speaker 6: How did you feel about that? Speaker 5: And the funny part of it, we said, you just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close. Speaker 6: So, what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than becoming more cool? Speaker 5: In our camp, you did feel the pressure made up. Speaker 7: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children. Speaker 8: Freddie Hirsch called me to the children's barracks he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him. And he asked me what I need. So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints, so any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes. Anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me, and I started painting. At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab. It was kind of olive colored like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff, and I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows, and then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me. So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White. And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything. And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses. I made almost all the dwarfs standing around. Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that. Speaker 9: When you were in the process of doing that Speaker 8: Yeah. Speaker 9: What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children Speaker 8: on on an emotional level. Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie. Speaker 9: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz? Speaker 8: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me. Speaker 7: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick bays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities foremost the garrison physician doctor Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy. The Holocaust Speaker 0: is

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Here's David Irving again, this time he discusses Hitler’s apprehension against using nerve gas on Allied soldiers This is unique because it apparently shows Hitler had a double standard for using nerve gas in the camps... https://t.co/uS94qkuQSv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hitler embargoed the use of poison gas, as evidenced by a document signed by him, references in the German high command vows, verbatim references by him, and shorthand records of meetings. If Churchill had used poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because they possessed nerve gases like sarin and tabun. In 1944, Germany had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of these nerve gases. Had Hitler used them in Normandy, it would have ended the Allied bridgehead because Allied gas masks were ineffective against German nerve gases. Hitler, despite being able to gain a strategic advantage by using nerve gas, did not because he signed the Geneva Gas Protocol, which forbade him from using gas first.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And embargoed anywhere the use of poison gas. It's it's there. The actual document signed by Hitler, the references in the vows of the German high command, the verbatim references by him and the shorthand records of his meetings, the shorthand records of meetings in the German air ministry. The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours. The reason being, the reason that makes this yardstick so extraordinary is that if Churchill had done what he was threatening and dropped the poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun, the famous nerve is being used even now by the Russians in Afghanistan and in Iraq and in Angola and elsewhere where the Russian troops are fighting. The nerve gases sarin and tabun, Hitler already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons, and nobody found out till the war was over, which is just as well because if Hitler had ever used it in Normandy, fighting the Allied, the American, the French, the British troops in Normandy, the Canadians as well, it would have been the end of the bridgehead because we didn't have a gas mask. We had no gas mask which would have stopped the German nerve gases. It would have been the end of the bridgehead. And isn't it strange that Adolf Hitler, the devil incarnate, had the means whereby he could have secured an immediate strategic advantage, which would have turned the war because he would have pulled the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front. And with those high grade divisions, he would have wiped the floor with the Russians and ended the war by Christmas nineteen forty four. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Ok, we're almost done... This next clip discusses the propaganda after WWII, the rising and falling Auschwitz death tolls, and the history of the 6 million number But most importantly: It shows the tactics of violence and intimidation used against Holocaust "Deniers" https://t.co/UYbRl3kmQZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts. One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true. The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective. You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart, and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives as well as everybody else to speak ill of the departed communist state. But it was not always that way. During World War two, the Soviets were more than just a military ally. Their anti Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other allies because it served all of their purposes. The point is that as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact. With the 2020 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland, Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information. Speaker 1: I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a president of Iran and as a scholar, do you believe that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true? Speaker 2: But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany. I hope that's not your intention.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And last but not least, let's take look at how the Holocaust narrative is still used to this day and why it's so important that it not be questioned: https://t.co/zDl7ZXvIQu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims there was no gas chamber in Dachau or other German concentration camps. It alleges that Holocaust revisionists are punished for challenging the "official" Holocaust narrative, citing examples like Robert Farison, Jurgen Groff, and Horst Mahler. The speaker states that the Holocaust narrative is used to manipulate white Europeans with guilt, strengthen Jewish identity, promote globalism and multiculturalism, and delegitimize white European identity. They claim critics of Jewish people or Israel are outlawed. The transcript asserts that Jewish and Zionist organizations censor the internet and suppress information that contradicts the accepted Holocaust narrative, alleging that Wikipedia and Google are monitored to fit a "politically correct" narrative. It also claims that "third world invaders" receive lenient sentences for crimes against Europeans, while Holocaust deniers face severe penalties. The speaker concludes that Holocaust denial laws are a gross infringement on freedom of expression and that such laws exist to protect a lie.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement: I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany. Speaker 1: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with. Speaker 2: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, Holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farison, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis, has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Forrestin has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year February, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile. There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Mahler. In 02/2009, Mahler was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes. One of them being Mueller's assertion that the official version of the Holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history. Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past. Speaker 3: Give them the guilt, man. Speaker 4: That's yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 5: We need to Speaker 4: play on that guilt. Speaker 6: You always Speaker 4: I bring up everything from the past. Fifty years. Speaker 3: The Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot. Speaker 7: Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore. It's basically the same as quoting Hitler. Speaker 3: There's a bunch of Speaker 8: opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term. Speaker 5: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions. Speaker 9: Very racist and antisemitic things. This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. Sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person. Bliten the Jews. This is literally my grandpa. Speaker 5: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay? When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past. Speaker 6: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera. Speaker 3: The 6,000,000. Six million. Speaker 6: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker, brother Speaker 3: 6,000,000. You're never sick, but I don't know. It was it was 6,000,000. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon weapon against all white Europeans. I have done my research. Shane. I have done my research. Speaker 3: Shane. Shane. Shane. Shane. Speaker 5: Shane. Speaker 10: Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that? Speaker 8: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed. The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and signist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies. Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population. Speaker 6: Moet Zetiash in conjunction with My Israel has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature. Speaker 10: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that? And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, you just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs, so Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four-two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine. Speaker 3: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is. Speaker 4: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That says the truth. And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into the sources for They are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do. Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy. And therefore I say I use this freedom. Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter, with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on Article 19 in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie. The truth stands on its own legs.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

A final note: As you can see, Holocaust Revisionism doesn't "deny" the Holocaust It believes many of the events that constitute what we collectively know as "The Holocaust" did take place But it also understands, we need to be able to have an honest discussion about historical events, especially when those events are used to this day to exemplify the evils of White collectivism and to solicit reparations for those evils Holocaust Revisionism merely seeks to have an honest and open discussion about the events of the Holocaust and firmly believes this statement to be true: The truth fears no investigation

Saved - April 20, 2025 at 8:42 PM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

For the first time on X: The Untold Weimar Republic This video will answer every question you've ever had about the Weimar Republic ...and the massive jewish influence behind it

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic, established after Germany's WWI loss, faced economic devastation due to war debts, causing hyperinflation, unemployment, and a high suicide rate. Foreigners exploited the cheap prices, leading desperate Germans to the sex industry in urban hubs like Berlin, where prostitution flourished in a legal gray area. Child prostitution, homosexual acts, and sexual perversions were rampant. Art, music, and film were overtaken by sexual revolution and anti-authoritarianism. Homosexual films and German Expressionist cinema gained prominence, with Jewish influence noted in film production. The Dadaist movement opposed authority, and architecture shifted towards repulsive designs. Jews, comprising less than 1% of the population, held significant influence in politics, the press, the arts, and the sex industry, leading to the perception of a "Juden Republic." Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Research contributed to gender theory. After Hitler's rise, homosexual bars were shut down, Hirschfeld's institute was pillaged, and books on transsexual ideology were burned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The decay of moral values in all areas of life, the period of deepest German degradation coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany. The Weimar Republic is the unofficial name that was popularized by Adolf Hitler of the German nation state that existed from November of nineteen eighteen to March of '19 '30 '3. It was named for the city of Weimar, Germany, where the constitutional assembly that established the new German Republic met. The official name of the republic was the German Reich. The Weimar Republic was established after Germany's loss in World War I. Germany was forced under the Treaty of Versailles to accept full responsibility for the war and pay the debts of all the allied countries. Being forced to pay these massive debts devastated the German economy and skyrocketed inflation, unemployment, and suicide within Germany. At one point, 40 percent of Germans were unemployed and many were homeless. In 1932, the German suicide rate was more than three times that of Great Britain. And in one two year period, Germany had more suicides than there had been deaths of American soldiers in all of World War one. The German currency became the most worthless currency in Europe. A loaf of bread in Berlin that cost around a hundred and 60 German marks at the end of nineteen twenty two cost 200,000,000,000 German marks by late nineteen twenty three. The German people's life savings and purchasing power had melted away over the course of a few months. With a single US dollar being worth 4,200,000,000,000.0 German marks by November of nineteen twenty three, foreign currencies had much greater buying power in Germany. So naturally, foreigners flocked to Germany to take advantage of the cheap prices. With these foreigners arriving en masse, Germans desperate for work turned to one of the primary industries the foreigners flocked to Germany for: the sex industry. Germans began flocking to urban hubs in search of work, and no urban hub was more popular than Berlin. Prostitution in Berlin wasn't explicitly legal, but existed in a kind of legal gray area where certain aspects of the sex trade were regulated while others remained unregulated. However, enforcement of any laws restricting prostitution were lax to nonexistent. On any given night, up to 100,000 prostitutes would line the streets of Berlin. Every type of prostitute was available. Midgets, pregnant prostitutes who lined up on the street according to how pregnant they were, prostitutes that purposely tried to be ugly, prostitutes with acid scarred faces, prostitutes with missing limbs, mother and daughter prostitute pairs, dominatrixes, even hunchback prostitutes, Interracial, intergenerational, forced or abusive sex acts were all available for the right price. There was also a large male prostitution industry and homosexual men from across Europe came to Germany to pay for homosexual sex. And unlike most cities, Berlin boasted having not a single red light district, but multiple. Child prostitutes were bought and sold in Weimar Berlin in a booming industry. Advertisements for child prostitutes were even placed in German magazines and newspapers. A person could order a child, or any other type of prostitute for that matter, over the phone and have them a few short minutes later. British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Bryant adds, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts, were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. There were homosexual, lesbian and even transsexual bars where, occasionally, public masturbation and orgies took place. These homosexual bars weren't isolated or rare one off outliers either. There were over 50 lesbian bars in Berlin and around 100 homosexual bars total. Drag shows and cross dressing were commonplace in these bars. Sexual acts involving torture or acts bringing a victim close to death or even, in some instances, to death were performed in Weimar, Germany, called Lustmord. As often happens when violent sexual perversions arise, so too do serial killers playing out their fetishes in reality. I refuse to name serial killers in my videos because I think it glorifies them, but you can look them up for yourself. German newspapers devoted entire sections to the violent sexual crimes of these serial killers and fictionalized accounts of murders sold very well on German bookstands. Serial killers had a romanticized lore around them, very similar to what we see in western society today. Alongside prostitution and homosexual clubs, porn also enjoyed a golden age during the Weimar Republic. Like prostitution, porn existed in a kind of legal gray area where enforcement of any regulations on it were lax to nonexistent. Images could be purchased under the counter at most street media kiosks. According to one report, there were as many as 30 homosexual publications on any given Berlin media kiosk. Above all, pornography featuring models who bore a resemblance to the biggest stars of the day, such as Marlene Dietrich or Greta Garbo, were in the highest demand. Fashion began to blur the lines between masculine and feminine. The female image began to experiment with a more strong willed, independent tone and some women began to dress in masculine clothing. Similarly, male fashion began to experiment with feminization and cross dressing amongst men began to rise. Berlin's women began to question the need for a man in their lives and many Berlin women had no desire to start or raise a family. Drug use in the Weimar Republic also ran rampant, and Berlin gained a reputation as a drug dealing hub around Germany and Europe. Cocaine was the most popular drug in the Weimar Republic and only required a simple prescription from a doctor. That said, opium morphine and amphetamines were all readily available and extensively used as well. The drug usage was so pervasive there was even experimentation with using drugs for scientific sexual purposes. One of the chief scientists behind this experimentation with sex was a man named Magnus Hirschfeld. Magnus Hirschfeld was a homosexual Jew and one of the thought leaders behind the sexual debauchery overtaking Berlin. Hirschfeld had founded political organizations that fought for the rights of homosexuals in Germany well before the Weimar era and as far back as 1896. He led the campaign to overturn a statute of German law called Paragraph 175 which forbid homosexuality in Germany. Hirschfeld would later go on to write a 1914 book called The Homosexuality of Men and Women in which he attempted to prove homosexuality occurred in every society around the world. Hirschfeld's crowning achievement of debauchery, however, occurred in July of nineteen nineteen when he opened the Institute of Sexual Research in Berlin. The institute's stated purpose was to establish the sexual sciences and establish the sexual sciences the institute did. It was at the Institute of Sexual Research where the initial rubric for the innumerable genders we see in leftism today originated. At the institute, Hirschfeld developed a system which categorized 64 possible types of sexual intermediary aka genders and it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transvestite in 1910 and the term transsexual in 1923. The institute even performed one of the first sex reassignment surgeries. The Institute of Sexual Research also housed a large library for any and all homosexual, transsexual and erotic literature. The institute had places for homosexuals to stay overnight as well as some of the first counseling services specifically tailored to homosexuals. Homosexual specific medical services were provided in the institute as well. The institute also housed the Museum of Sex, an educational resource for the public which was reported to have been visited by schoolchildren. I think the writer Luigi Barzini most succinctly summarized the rampant debauchery that was Weimar Berlin when he said, quote, I saw pimps offering anything to anybody. Little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious frisgin of all, as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, and sadism at one stroke. End quote. A debaucherous infestation had overtaken Berlin, and nowhere was that more evident than in the arts. Art, music, and film in Berlin were overtaken by the sexual revolution and a move toward a Jewish influenced anti authoritarianism as well. The Berlin film industry started releasing risque and homosexual films. The world's first known homosexual film, Ander's Al's Die Andern came out in Berlin during the Weimar era and is the story of a man falling in love with one of his male violin students. The film was written by and featured none other than Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Another film, called Machen in Uniform, is about a schoolgirl who falls in love with her female teacher. The two commence a forbidden love and eventually even share an on screen lesbian kiss on the mouth. The film ends when this lesbian love is exposed and the protagonist attempts suicide. German expressionist cinema also came to prominence in the Weimar Republic. This form of cinema emphasized depicting the artist's inner emotions, no matter how crude those emotions may be, rather than attempting to replicate reality. Two of the three key figures for the German Expressionist movement were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. The expressionist film Metropolis was one of the biggest films of the Weimar era. Metropolis' content is emblematic of the anti authoritarian and communist messages of German expressionist cinema. The film takes place in a futuristic city where a beautiful and cultured utopia exists above a bleak underworld populated by mistreated workers. When a privileged young man discovers the grim scene under the city, he becomes intent on helping the workers. He befriends a rebellious teacher which puts him at odds with his authoritative father. The film was directed by the Jew Fritz Lang and produced by the Jew Eric Palmer. The credits of the films of the Berlin movie industry were also littered with Jews. In fact, in 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jews. In the art scene, a thoroughly anti authoritarian and communist movement called Dada arose. The Dadaist movement was comprised of artists who rejected the logic, reason, and aestheticism of modern capitalist society instead expressing nonsense, irrationality, and anti bourgeoisie protests in their works. Dadaist works opposed any type of authority and made fun of far right figures including Hitler himself. According to Wikipedia, some sources claim the Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist artists. In music, one of the most popular singers of the day was a woman who was largely regarded as the first official lesbian of Berlin named Claire Waldof. Waldof dressed masculine and made no secret of her sexuality while actively trying to convert other culturally important women to become lesbian. One culturally important woman Waldorf succeeded in converting to bisexuality was one of the biggest movie stars of the day, Marlene Dietrich. Marlene was famous for pushing social norms and sometimes wore a tuxedo, helping to erode the image of traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine roles. Marlena credits Claire Waldoff as introducing her to lesbian love. Marlena was openly bisexual and an icon for homosexual women around the world when no other homosexual icons existed. One newspaper dubbed Marlena perhaps the busiest and most passionate bisexual in theatrical Berlin. Anita Berber was one of the most popular nude dancers of the Weimar Republic and danced to songs with titles like Suicide, Morphium and Madhouse. One of her husbands was also openly homosexual. In one famous story about Anita, she was being ignored by one of the tables she was dancing for, so she went over to the table, stood on top of it, and started peeing on the table while drinking their champagne. What a gal. One aesthetic element I think tends to be overlooked in most writings on social decay is architecture. It should come as no surprise that the principal architecture movement of the Weimar Republic, called expressionist architecture, also took a turn from an aesthetic focused on beauty and perfection toward an aesthetic that focused on, quote, distortion of form to create an emotional effect. This architecture is generally perceived as hideous or repulsive. I'd also argue there's a larger psychological component to this expressionist architecture. This ugly architecture contributes to social decay by glorifying the more disgusting elements of society and humanity. It subconsciously undermines the idea that society should strive for perfection and instead is a call to accept society's more heinous elements. This repulsive architecture is, in my view, anti authoritarian and destructive to social norms. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. One of the key factors in Hitler's rise to power was his opposition of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. As such, this video would be incomplete without looking at the Jewish influence that existed inside Berlin or possibly more importantly, the German public's perception of the Jewish influence inside Berlin. Here are some of the figures I think best illustrate the Jewish over representation in the Weimar Republic. All these figures should be viewed in consideration of this fact: Jews made up less than 1% of the German population in the years of the Weimar Republic. In politics, the author of the 1919 German constitution was the Jew Hugo Preuss. One quarter of the members of the eight person Council of the People's Deputies that established the Weimar Republic were Jews, Otto Landsberg and Hugo House. The main competing faction against the official Weimar government was headed by the Jew Kurt Eisner. The S. P. D. Or Social Democratic Party of Germany was the political party that primarily ran the Weimar Republic. 20 2 Percent of the entirety of the S. P. D. Were Jews. The SPD's main political theorist was a Jew, Edward Bernstein. Two of the political thinkers most respected by the SPD were Jews, Ferdinand LaSalle and Leopold Sonneman. SPD's foremost theoretician of this century was the Jew Rudolf Hilferding. SPD key figure, industrialist and political thinker Walter Rathenau was a Jew. The vice president of the Berlin Police was the Jew Bernhard Weiss. In the first Weimar administration, Vice Chancellor Eugene Schiffer was Jewish, as was Weimar Interior Minister, Eric Koch Wesser. Fifteen Percent of the members of the Reichstag, or the German Parliament, were Jewish. In addition to all this, a large number of the members of the political elite of the Weimar Republic were Jews. To name a few: Rosa Luxembourg, Paul Levy, Ernst Toller, Eric Musam, Gustav Landauer, Eugene Levine and Karl Radick. In the press, the Osteen Press was the publisher of many of the largest German newspapers and was owned by the Jew, Osteen. The Berliner Allostriete Zeitung was one of the largest German newspapers. It was published by the Olstein press and its chief editor was the Jew, Kurt Korf. The Waushicher Zeitung was another of the largest German newspapers and was published by the Olstein Press. Its chief editor was the Jew George Bernhard. One of the other largest newspaper publishers was the Jew Rudolf Maas. The Berliner Taggeblat was the largest of Rudolf Maas's newspapers and its chief editor was the Jew Theodor Wolff. Editor in chief of the SPD's party paper Vorwarts, was the Jew Friedrich Stamper. In the arts, the Jew Eric Palmer was a German born film producer and executive. According to Wikipedia, quote, Palmer was perhaps the most powerful person in the German and European film industries in the nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties. In 1931, over 60% of German films were produced by Jews and 82% of film scripts were written by Jewish writers. Two of the three key figures for the largest film movement of the Weimar era, the German expressionist movement, were the Jews Fritz Lang and Robert Wein. Two of the key architects of the expressionist architecture movement were the Jews Bruno Tout and Eric Mendelson. Some of the most influential producers, directors and actors in Weimar cinema were Jews as well. To name a few, Paul Davidson, Joseph Mandel, Jules Greenbaum, Max Reinhardt, Joseph von Sternberg, Fritz Koen, Otto Wallberg, and Peter Lowenstein. To conclude the arts, some claim the anti authoritarian and thoroughly communist Dadaist movement was founded by a group of Jewish modernist students. In the sex industry, Magnus Hirschfeld was Jewish. He was dubbed the Einstein of sex. He was president of the World League of Sexual Reform and, of course, founder of the Institute for Sexual Research. Ivan Block was Jewish and is often called the first sexologist. And finally, as quoted by Sir Arthur Bryant earlier, quote, most of them, the nightclubs and vice resorts were owned and managed by Jews, and it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in the after years. End quote. A quick note on these next five points. These are not official numbers and are from an NSDAP piece that was distributed in Weimar Germany. I'm including these numbers because, although I can't be completely sure of their accuracy, I think they most likely do generally represent the amalgamations of Jewish power in Weimar society. And, at the very least, these numbers represent the German public's perception of the Jewish amalgamations of power in Weimar society. 56% of notaries were Jews. Fifty two percent of doctors were Jews. Forty five percent of hospital directors were Jews. Forty eight percent of lawyers were Jews. And 35% of dentists were Jews. And finally, one last note on the Jews of the Weimar Republic. Many Weimar Jews actively tried to conceal their Jewish identity and even went so far as bragging to other Jews when Gentiles were unable to identify them. This is one of the reasons that, to this day, it's somewhat difficult to identify who the Jews of the Weimar Republic were. What this means is that, although the identity of every Jew I listed is verified, there are undoubtedly other prominent and non prominent Jews I was unable to identify. The provided list should not be viewed as wholly representative of the Jewish influence within Weimar Germany. But even just considering the list provided, you can see the Jewish influence was substantial for a race of people comprising less than 1% of the total German population. This Jewish overrepresentation is even more substantial when you consider that many of the Jewish amalgamations of overrepresentation occurred within many of Germany's most important social, political, and economic institutions. The Weimar Republic was often referred to as the Juden Republic or the Jews Republic by Germans. I think it's easy to see why. After Hitler's rise to power in 1933, Goebbels and the brown shirts began shutting down the homosexual dive bars that had risen to prominence during the Weimar Republic. They made one of the most popular homosexual bars in Berlin their headquarters after shutting it down. They pillaged Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute for Sexual Research and Hirschfeld's books on transsexual ideology were some of the first books the National Social Socialists burned. From Wikipedia itself, the books the National Socialists burned were: writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus destroy the principles of race in bulk. Pornography and explicit literature, pacifist literature, all books degrading German purity, literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field, popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner based on a bourgeoisie or upper class view of life. The works of traders, immigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany. The literature of Marxism, communism and Bolshevism. Literature with liberal democratic tendencies and attitudes and writings supporting the Weimar Republic. And finally, all historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses and which seeks to drag them through the mud. Very quickly after Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the chief purveyors of the degeneracy that had overtaken Berlin would leave the city, and national socialist Germany would rise from its ashes. The rest, as they say, is history.
View Full Interactive Feed