TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BowesChay
reSee.it AI Summary
I note how, as more theories turn out true, we should spare a thought for Udo Ulfkotte, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung journalist who died after alleging Western journalists are bought and paid for by the CIA and MI6.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
As more and more "Conspiracy Theories" turn out to be just the opposite- Spare a thought for Senior German journalist for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Udo Ulfkotte, who died soon after revealing how Western "Journalists" are bought and paid for by the CIA and MI6 https://t.co/tVNcp8m2CB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The interviewee describes a long career in journalism spanning about 25 years and asserts that he was educated to lie, betray, and not tell the truth to the public. He claims that German and American media have been pushing war in Europe and toward Russia, and he states that he is leaving behind past practices of manipulating readers and promoting propaganda. He says he is fed up with propaganda and asserts that journalists are bribed to betray people, not only in Germany but across Europe. He emphasizes that war does not come from itself and that there are people behind it, including journalists.
The interviewee explains that he wrote a book to reveal what goes on behind closed doors and to warn against another war in Europe. He recounts a history of misrepresentation and suppression of atrocity stories, noting that in 1988 he witnessed the Kurdish gas attack in Iraq and was sent to Zubaydad near the Iraqi-Iranian border to photograph Iranians allegedly gassed with German-made poison gas (mustard gas, Zyklon-like agents). Upon returning to Germany, he says only a small photo and a minimal article appeared in the Frankfurter Allgemeine, with little emphasis on the brutality and the long-term suffering caused by German poison gas, making him feel misused.
He discusses his role with intelligence agencies, describing himself as non-official cover (a journalist who also works for intelligence agencies). He claims that many foreign journalists are in the same situation and that the process is more prevalent among British journalists, and to a broader extent among Israelis, French, Australians, New Zealanders, and journalists from Arab countries, who may be intellectual puppets for the CIA. He provides an example with the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND), stating that the BND once asked him to write an article about Libya and Muammar Gaddafi, providing him secret information to publish under his own byline. He says the article claimed that Libya and Gaddafi secretly tried to build a poison gas factory, a story he printed that originated with the intelligence agency and appeared worldwide two days later.
The interviewee recounts consequences of resisting intelligence services, such as a colleague who refused to cooperate with the BND and was dismissed from his job as a Yellow Angels helicopter pilot. He recalls multiple police searches of his home—six times—on accusations of leaking state secrets, and he notes that these pressures would intensify if he continued to resist. He claims that he has had three heart attacks, has no children, and suggests that if the authorities jail him, it would be worse for the truth he seeks to reveal. He asserts that Germany remains a colony of the United States, with American nukes on German soil, and that transatlantic organizations influence media to push pro-American and anti-Russian narratives, steering journalists toward compliance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I I've been a journalist for about twenty five years, and I was educated to lie, to betray, and, not to tell the truth to the public. But seeing right now within the last months how how far, how how the German and American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe, to bring war to Russia, this is a point of no return. And I I stand I'm going to stand up and say, it is not right what I have done in the past to to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do and have done in the past because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany, all over Europe. The reason writing this book was that I I am very fearful of a new war in Europe and I don't like to have this situation again because war is never coming from itself. There is always people behind it to push for war And this is not only politicians, this is journalists too.
And I just have written in the book how we have betrayed in the past our our readers just to push for war and because I don't want this anymore. I'm fed up with this propaganda. We live in a banana republic and not in a democratic country where we have press freedom, where we have human rights, when we if if you see the German media, especially my colleagues who day by day right against the Russians who are in transatlantic organizations and who are supported by The United States to do so, Well, people like me, I became an honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma in The United States. Just why? Just because I write pro American.
I wrote pro American. I was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency, by the CIA. Why? Because I should be pro American. I I'm fed up with it.
I don't wanna do it anymore and so I I've just written a book not to earn money. Now it will cause a lot of trouble for me just to to give the people in this country, in Germany, in Europe and all over the world just to give them a glimpse of a view what goes up behind the closed doors. Yes, there is many examples for that. If we go just back to history, if you go into the year 1988, if you go to your archives, you will find in March 1988 that there was in in Iraq, in in Iraq, the Kurdish people have been have been gassed with poisoned gas. That is known all over the world.
But in July 1988, they sent me to a town called Zubaydad. That is on on the Iraqi Iranian border. There was war between the Iranians and the Iraqis, and I was sent there to photograph how the Iranians have been gassed with poisoned gas, with German poisoned gas. You call it lost and zarin, mustard gas, made by Germany. They have been gassed.
And I was there to make photographs how these people have been killed by poison gas from Germany. When I came back to Germany, there was just one small photo in a newspaper, in the Frankfurter Allgemeine, and there was one small article not writing how impressive brutally, how unhuman, how terrible it was to kill half to kill decades after the end of the Second World War, people with German poisoned gas. So this was a situation I I feel misused for for for having been there and just to give a documentary what has been done, but not being allowed to cry out to the world what we have done behind closed doors. Up to today, it's not well known in the public that with German public gas, there have been hundreds or thousands of people gasped in this city of Zubaydad. Now you ask what have I done for intelligence agencies?
So please see, most of the journalists you see in foreign countries, they claim to be journalists and they might be journalists, European or American journalists, but many of them, like me in the past, are so called non official cover. That's what the Americans call that. I have been a non official cover. Non official cover means what? It means you you too work for an intelligence agency.
You help them if they want you to help them, but they will never never when when you when you are you are locked or when they find when they find out that you are not only a journalist but a spy too, they will never say, oh, this was one of our guys. They will not know you. That means non official cover. So I have helped them in several situations and I feel ashamed for that too now. Like I feel ashamed that I have worked for very recommended newspaper like the Frankfurter Allgemeine because I was bribed by billionaires, I was bribed by the Americans, not to report exactly the truth, but, I just imagined on in my car while I was driving to this interview.
I I just tried to work out in my brain what would have happened if I would have written a pro Russian article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine. Well, I don't know what would have happened, but we were all educated to write pro European, pro American, but please not pro Russian. So I'm very sorry for that, but this is not what I understand for democracy and for press freedom. I'm very sorry for that. Well, germ yes.
I understand your question very well. Germany is still a kind of a colony of The United States. You'll see that in many points. Like, the majority of the Germans don't want to have nukes in our country, but we still have American nukes. So we we are still a kind of a colony of the Americans.
And being a colony, it is very easy to approach young journalists through what is very important here is transatlantic organizations. All journalists from really respected and recommended big German newspapers, magazines, radio stations, TV stations. They are all members or guests of those big transatlantic organizations. And there in in these transatlantic organizations, you are approached to be pro American and there there is nobody coming to you and say, well, we are the central intelligence agency. Would you like to work for us?
No. But this is not the case how it happens. What they do, these transatlantic organizations, is they invite you they invite you for seeing The United States. They pay for that. They pay all your expenses and everything.
So you are bribed. You get more and more corrupt because they make you good contacts. You won't know that those good contacts are, let's say, nonofficial, non official covers or officially people working for Central Intelligence Agency or other American agencies. So you make friends. You think they are friends and you cooperate with them.
They ask you, well, could you do me this favor? Could you do me that favor? And so your brain more and more is brainwashed through these guys. And your question was, is this only the case with German journalists? No.
I think it is especially the case with British journalists because they have a much closer relationship. It is especially the case with Israelis, of course, with French journalists far apart, not that big as with German or with British journalists. It is a case for Australian journalists, for for journalists from New Zealand, from Taiwan, from well, there is there is many countries, countries in the Arab world like Jordan, for example, like Oman, the Sultanate Of Oman. There is many countries where this happens where you where you find people to claim they are respected journalists, but if you look behind them, you'll find they are puppets on a string of the Central Intelligence Agency. I'm I'm sorry in interrupting you.
I'll give you one example. Some sometimes the intelligence agencies, they come to your office and want you to write an article. I I give you an example not from strange other journalists, from me myself. I've just forgotten the year. I just remember that the German foreign intelligence, Bundes Nachischen Dienst, it is just a sister organization of the Central Intelligence Agency.
It was founded by the American Intelligence Agency. So one one day, the BND, this German foreign intelligence agency, came to my office at the Frankfurter Allgemeine in Frankfurt, and they wanted me to write an article about Libya and about Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. I had I had absolutely no secret informations regarding colonel Muammar Gaddafi and Libya, but they gave me all the these secret informations and they just wanted me to write to to sign the article with my name. I did that, but it was an article that was published in the Frankfurt Algemeine that originally came from the from the German Foreign Intelligence Agency. So do you really think that this is journalism intelligence agencies writing articles?
Oh, yes. That article, I I I have reprinted it partly in in my book. That article was how Libya and colonel Muammar Gaddafi, how he secretly tried to build a poison gas factory, a sink in raptor was the name. Yeah. And I got all those informations.
It it was a story that was printed worldwide two days later, but it it I had no information on that. It was the intelligence agency that wanted me to write this article. So but this is not the way journalism should work, that intelligence agencies that they decide what is printed and whatnot. If I say no, I give you an example from a very good example if you say no. Well, we have a rescue unit in Germany with helicopters for traffic accidents.
It's called they they call themselves the yellow angels. There was one guy who who didn't want to cooperate and he was a pilot of the helicopter service of the Yellow Angels in Germany. This guy said no to the foreign intelligence service, Bundes Nachersendienst, when they approached him and wanted him as a nonofficial cover to work for, the German intelligence agency and, like, just to pretend to be somebody from, the yellow angels. So what what what happened was that he lost his job, and the court in Germany, they the judge decided that they were right because the such a guy could not be trusted. He was kicked off his job because he didn't cooperate with the foreign intelligence service.
So I knew what would happen if I would not cooperate with intelligence services. Well well, I have had let me say, one, three six times my house was house searched because I was accused by the public prosecutor, the German public prosecutor. I was accused of leaking states leaking secrets of states. Six times house searched. Well, they they they hoped that I wouldn't do that ever again, but I I think it's it's worse that the truce will come out one day.
The truce won't die. And I don't mind what will happen. I've had three heart attacks. I have no children. So if they wanna bring me to court or to prison, so it's worse for the truce.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that in August 2019, hours after Epstein’s death, Barr announced suicide with no investigation. Barr’s father headed Dalton School, where Epstein taught in the 1970s despite no degree. Before becoming AG, Barr worked at Kirkland & Ellis, the firm that represented Epstein in 2008. “I am shocked… the investigation into his accomplices will continue.” Barr is a former CIA employee and a Bush family protege, present in the Epstein files.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
In August 2019, only hours after Epstein was found dead in his "high security" prison cell, then Attorney General William Barr announced he'd killed himself? No investigation, but the premature statement was made. Interestingly, Bill Barr's father, Donald Barr, just so happened to be the headmaster of the exclusive Dalton School, who inexplicably, hired Epstein to teach there in the 1970s, despite his complete lack of a college degree? And it gets better, before becoming Attorney General, Barr worked for Kirkland & Ellis, the very law firm that represented Epstein during his 2008 Florida plea deal. "I am shocked by the apparent suicide of Jeffrey Epstein, which occurred at a time when he should have been under stricter supervision. We will get to the bottom of what happened. The investigation into his accomplices will continue." Dont forget, Bill Barr is also a former CIA "employee" and a protege of the Bush family, whose members also feature in the Epstein files
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expressed that the entire department was appalled and angry about the MCC's failure to adequately secure the prisoner, and noted serious irregularities at the facility that are deeply concerning and require a thorough investigation. The FBI and the Office of the Inspector General are conducting the investigation to get to the bottom of what happened, and there will be accountability. The case will continue against anyone who was complicit with Epstein, and coconspirators should not rest easy. The victims deserve justice, and they will get it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was appalled, and indeed the whole department was, and frankly, angry to learn of the MCC's failure to adequately secure this prisoner. We are now learning of serious irregularities at this facility that are deeply concerning and demand a thorough investigation. The FBI and the office of inspector general are doing just that. We will get to the bottom of what happened, and there will be accountability. But let me assure you that this case will continue on against anyone who was complicit with Epstein.
Any coconspirators should not rest easy. The victims deserve justice, and they will get it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that in 1953, the US and Britain ousted Iran’s democratically elected Mossadegh in Operation Ajax/Boot after his oil nationalization threatened British interests. CIA’s Kermit Roosevelt led the plan; propaganda, bribery, and staged riots followed, and the Shah was reinstated with US backing. Mossadegh was jailed, then confined for years. The coup set a precedent for later regime changes and long‑term instability, shaping Iran’s view of Western “freedom.”
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
As the world watches Iran, its worthwhile reminding you of an event thats always convieniently "left out" and ignored, when it comes to Western calls for "Freedom and Democracy" in Iran. It just so happens those very same countries, now calling for "Liberty" in Iran, were instrumental in crushing Iranian Democracy in the early 1950's In 1953, the United States and Britain orchestrated the covert overthrow of Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in a secret operation that would reshape the Middle East and fuel decades of anti-Western resentment and conflict. Mosaddegh, an Iranian nationalist leader who rose to power in 1951, had nationalized Iran's oil industry (very bad idea) seizing control from the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, which was majority owned by the British government (later became BP) This move to put Irans national assets to work for Iranians "threatened British economic interests" and prompted an immediate embargo on Iranian oil, this British action led to the crippling of the economy and created serious societal instability that the West of coursec exploited. The coup, codenamed "Operation Ajax" by the CIA and "Operation Boot" by MI6, was driven by fears that Mosaddegh's policies could inspire similar nationalisation elsewhere and potentially align Iran with the Soviet Union during the Cold War. US President Dwight D Eisenhower approved the plan after British Prime Minister Winston Churchill appealed directly to him for "help", with the CIA allocating one million dollars for the effort. Leading the operation on the ground was Kermit Roosevelt Jr., a CIA officer (and grandson of Theodore Roosevelt) who coordinated the dirty work from Tehran. The plot unfolded in stages. First, propaganda campaigns in Iranian media, funded by the CIA, portrayed Mosaddegh as corrupt and incompetent, while bribing journalists, clerics, and politicians to turn against him, (sounds familiar right?) In August 1953, an initial attempt failed when remarkably popular Mosaddegh's supporters arrested the coup plotters, but Roosevelt persisted, even resorting to organizing paid mobs to stage riots in Tehran ( sounds familiar again right?) They were "instructed" to pose as communists to insure justification for western intervention. Military units loyal to the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had fled the country briefly, then moved in, bombing Mosaddegh's residence and arresting him on August 19. Mosaddegh was then tried in a military court, convicted of treason, and spent three years in prison before house arrest until his death in 1967. The Shah was "reinstated" with expanded powers, ruling as an autocrat backed by US aid until the 1979 Islamic Revolution overthrew him. The CIA's own declassified documents revealed all of the above in detail in 2013, admitting the coup was undemocratic and contributed to long term instability, including the rise of anti US forces in Iran. Of course this entirly illegal intervention set a precedent for US led regime changes, from Guatemala in 1954 to Chile in 1973, often justified as being to defend from communism but in truth rooted in protecting grubby corporate and strategic interests. Iran's vastly valuable oil remained under Western influence until the Islamic revolution which deposed the Shah, a revolution whose government are today fighting for survival on the same streets Mossadegh was dragged through. So, as you watch the events unfold in Tehran, you now know its not the first time Western powers have called for the heads of an Iranian government. When next you hear talk of "Freedom and Democracy" in Iran, maybe now you'll recall the fate of Iran's democratic government in 1953 at the hands of the same agencies" now undoubtedly on the streets of Tehran once again. Thank for reading, I hope it sheds some light on lesser known history. Maybe consider subscribing. Chay.
reSee.it AI Summary
I portray Ursula von der Leyen as a privileged figure, daughter of Ernst Albrecht, tied to European elites and a noble marriage, whose career spans Germany’s defence minister (2013–2019) to EU Commission president. The text accuses her of corruption, including McKinsey links, “Pfizergate,” missing phones, inflated ship refurbishments, and plagiarism, and argues she’s shielded by lineage while pushing anti-Russian policies. It claims she’s untouchable and elite-backed.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Who is Ursula Von Der Leyen? The woman so desperate for the continuation and escalation of the War in Ukraine? Ursula was born into great privilege, and her rise absolutely reeks of nepotism, its also marked by numerous scandals shes done a good job of insuring her client media keeps hidden from the public. Her father, Ernst Albrecht, a CDU politician (the same party thats just taken power in germany) and Lower Saxony Minister /President from 1976 to 1990, used huge inherited aristocratic wealth to secure European Economic Community posts, sending Ursula to elite schools populated by the young and up and coming European elites, he laid the geoundwork for her Brussels connections and lucrative insider access. Just like his daughter, his anti-Russian mantra was a West German Cold War standard, pro-NATO, anti-Moscow, Her grandfather, Carl Albrecht, a famous wealthy psychologist, lived off Bremen cotton riches and plantation ties. With a family thriving under Hitler’s shadow, passing Ursula a loaded name. She married Heiko von der Leyen in 1986, joining a noble silk dynasty with estates like Bloemersheim Castle. a Nazi relative, Joachim Freiherr von der Leyen probably isn't the only dark secret from the period. Her wealth from her paternal side is Albrecht trade cash, von der Leyen land, plus a €300,000 EU salary, all keeping her seven kids in luxury.none of whom will ever see a battlefield. She’s fiercely anti-Russian, pushing to expand Germany’s military and NATO as Defence Minister (2013–2019), then trying to choke Russia with sanctions as Commission Chief. Her defence tenure in Germany was a cesspool, the “consultant scandal” where associates lined their pocmets funnelled €150 million to McKinsey and pals like Katrin Suder, flouting rules with only €2.9 million declared. She had two phones from that era, subpoenaed in 2019, but they were wiped clean “for security” as she bolted to the EU from Germany with no support from the German state, a blatant cover up. MPs like Tobias Lindner and Alexander Müller called her a criminal. The Gorch Fock ship refurb soared from €10 million to €135 million, waste she calmly shrugged off while German troops drilled with broomsticks. Then theres “Pfizergate” In 2021, she texted Pfizer’s CEO for a €35 billion vaccine deal, 1.8 billion doses, no oversight. The texts? “Lost,” she says. The EU Ombudsman investigated, the EPPO probes corruption, and €4 billion in doses rot unused. She’s seemingly untouchable, she plagiarized her thesis, but that's ignored, she insured the audits were buried, evidence basically torched. Von der liars career is corruption incarnate. She's in the top job due to vast privilege and her father’s clout, her grandfather’s cash, and her husband’s title. She serves as a stooge figurehead, Anti-Russian rhetoric, not brains. Her Wealth? Inherited, not made. The Scandals, defence theft, missing phones, and vaccine rip-offs all prove she’s a career crook, shielded by lineage, sadly Europe’s crippled with a rotten aristocrat as a "leader" None of her wealthy relatives or political elite friends will die in the War they are so desperate to start with Russia, That will be your and your families privilege, as is paying her huge salary and pension.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
US envoy to Ukraine and father of influential pro Ukrainian NGO chief based on Kiev, Keith Kellogg, tells Fox News Trump greenlights Ukraine to strike deep inside Russia https://t.co/3ZGDHK3xjm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia overnight launched a drone strike on Kyiv. Zelenskyy announced a $90,000,000,000 arms agreement with the US, as President Trump appeared to reverse his position on Ukraine’s chances of turning the tide. Gen. Keith Kellogg says the war began in 2014 and in 2022; “This is not president Trump’s war in the sense he has inherited this war, and he's done everything he possibly can do to bring this war to a conclusion.” “From talking to two major principals, from talking to allies, and he's done a wonderful job doing it, but he's really trying really hard.” Trump’s UN General Assembly remarks “changed the landscape.” Intelligence shows Russia is not winning: “If they were winning this war, they'd be in Kyiv, they'd be in Odessa, they'd be over the Dnieper River.” NATO added Finland and Sweden; Ukraine needs “the armament and the ability and the authority to use it,” and they don’t want US troops on the ground. Zelensky asked for Tomahawks; decision not yet made. Masutaka Okano says this is internationalized.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russia overnight launching a massive drone strike on Kyiv. This after Ukrainian president Zelenskyy announced a $90,000,000,000 arms agreement with The US as president Trump appeared to reverse his position on Ukraine's chances of turning the tide in this three and a half year war. For the latest, let's bring in special envoy for Ukraine, general Keith Kellogg. General, thank you for joining us this morning. I wanna go first to the president's post on Truth Social.
It really stunned the world. He said, with time, patience, the financial support of Europe, and in particular NATO, the original borders from where this war started very much an option. Why not? Ukraine will be able to take it back their country in its original form, and who knows, maybe even go further than that. That last line, maybe go further than that.
Are we talking about long range strikes into Russia soon?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Jack. First of all, Jackie, thanks for having me. Congratulations on the new program. It's really great. Look, one predicate before we start.
You know, this war actually started in 2014 under president Obama when the Russians went into, into Crimea, and then 2022 when they went in under president Biden. This is not president Trump's war in the sense he has inherited this war, and he's done everything he possibly can do to bring this war to a conclusion. From talking to two major principals, from talking to allies, and he's done a wonderful job doing it, but he's really trying really hard. His comments this week that came after UN General Assembly were and you said kind of changed the landscape. He's always been very, very positive about trying to get to a conclusion.
But I think what's happened is the the constant information he gets, which is really good, from the intelligence agencies, from secretary of state, all the way down the line kind of shows him that Russia is not winning this war. If they were winning this war, they'd be in Kyiv, they'd be in Odessa, they'd be over the Dnieper River. We added two new NATO allies. One of them, Finland, had doubled the size of the border. The Russians have to protect.
We added Sweden, which is a technologically advanced nation, especially when it comes to armament. So, this is where I think they have an opportunity to challenge Russia much more aggressively. If they pick and do it, they get the weapon system to do so. They've never asked for US troops. They don't want US troops on the ground.
But what they do want is the armament and the ability and the authority to use it. And if they do that, I think it's pretty gonna be pretty well received.
Speaker 0: Do they have the authority to use it?
Speaker 1: Well, it's mixed. Sometimes they get some of the authority, sometimes they don't. And I think very carefully everybody should follow what the president says. He's the commander in chief by the constitution and everybody falls in line. When the president says, go, you left, you go left.
If he says, you go right, you go right. That's the president. The last time I checked, none of us got electoral college votes. He did. So when the president says to do something, we just need to complete to do that and complete the action.
Look, I think out of it we need to understand the seriousness of this war. This war is the largest war in Europe since the end of World War Two. It's between the two geographically largest countries in Europe with Ukraine and Russia. The casualties are well over a million. We're talking hundreds of thousands.
They're using the most advanced systems in the world, bombers, missiles, the drone technology. It's advanced, and sometimes I think we don't think we realize how serious this is. My biggest concern is that something can a mistake can happen, and that causes for a larger escalation, be it the attacks by the drones into Poland or the aircraft that are overflying Estonia. Whatever it's going to be, you have to be very, very careful about it. And I I was at when I was up at the UN this last week, I talked to, the, national security adviser for the Japanese, Masutaka Okano, and he said, hey.
Hey. By the way, make sure you understand this is internationalized. Yeah. And what he meant by that is he said, in our neck of the woods, the Chinese are being very, very aggressive about it, as are the North Koreans. So this is just not only a European issue.
This is a global issue. And I think sometimes we forget that, and we should react accordingly.
Speaker 0: I just want to clarify. Are you saying, though, that it is the president's position that Ukraine can conduct long range strikes into Russia, that that has been authorized by the president?
Speaker 1: I think reading what he has said Mhmm. And reading what Vice President Vance has said, as well as Secretary Rubio, the answer is yes. Use the ability to head deep. There are no such things as sanctuaries. That's one of the reasons I believe that this last week, and it has been confirmed, that, President Zelensky asked President Trump to allow to get Tomahawk missiles, which give you a depth.
They're really good systems. America makes the best systems in the world.
Speaker 0: Are we giving them the Tomahawks?
Speaker 1: Well, that decision has not been made, but he's asked Well, I know that President Zelensky did, in fact, ask for them, which was confirmed by a social media post by Vice President Vance. That's gonna be up to the President to do it.
Speaker 0: Okay. General Keith Kellogg, thank you very much for your time. Always a pleasure talking to you, sir.
Speaker 1: Thanks, Jackie. Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Thank you. Well, coming up next, Turning Point USA's White House correspondent on free speech and political violence. That's coming up.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
A Russian reconnaissance drone tracked a Ukrainian tank back to its lair. A fibre optic drone then destroyed it, detonating its ammunition and fuel, sending the turret, which weighs several tons hundreds of feet into the air. https://t.co/BAybFAsLMg
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Vladinir Putin personally gifted an Alaskan man a brand new Russian built Ural motorcycle After Russian TV spotted his ageing Soviet-era bike in Anchorage during the Presidents meeting “I’m speechless, it’s amazing.” https://t.co/WBKm3Qcatf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Just this is a personal gift from the president of the Russian Federation.
"Absolutely. I thought it was a hoax because they don't know me. I don't know them. There is no reason why they could have should give me a bike."
"I haven't done anything for them or to them, and I don't know anybody. So, yeah, it's it's so absolutely astronomically random that it was hard for me to understand why this happens."
"I think the fact that it's in a public place. When you meet someone and there's it's in a public busy hotel lobby, I think the anticipation of danger is pretty low."
"I don't think it if if I was accepting this gift for some nefarious purpose or for some favor or something else that I had to do to interact with them, I would definitely not do it."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think? What do you think it is? Looks like a
Speaker 1: It does
Speaker 0: look like a bike. Looks like a churro. Show me. Yeah. Let's take a look at it.
It's wow. Look at that.
Speaker 1: Just this is a personal gift from the president of the Russian Federation
Speaker 0: Very good. To you. Very good. You're it's just a It's kinda crazy.
Speaker 1: What was your reaction when you were told that they were gonna give you this bike? Was this like did you think this is a hoax? What was going through your mind?
Speaker 0: Absolutely. I thought it was a hoax because they don't know me. I don't know them. There is no reason why they could have should give me a bike. I haven't done anything for them or to them, and I don't know anybody.
So, yeah, it's it's so absolutely astronomically random that it was hard for me to understand why this happens. Matter of fact, I still don't know why.
Speaker 1: What kind of got you the courage to be like, okay, I'll take this bike. I'll go down there and meet you.
Speaker 0: I think the fact that it's in a public place. When you meet someone and there's it's in a public busy hotel lobby, I think the anticipation of danger is pretty low.
Speaker 1: Did you ever have any second guesses of maybe I should not accept this gift? No. Why so?
Speaker 0: I don't think it if if I was accepting this gift for some nefarious purpose or for some favor or something else that I had to do to interact with them, I would definitely not do it.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
US President Richard Nixon "Let me explain to you about something known in this country as the Jewish Lobby" https://t.co/5oOVSdXWgK
Video Transcript AI Summary
American Jews support Israel, and Jewish prime ministers have historically enlisted their support to pressure American presidents, which is understandable. American Jews prioritize Israel's survival due to the Holocaust and believe America's security is directly related to Israel's. They believe that supporting Israel does not mean putting America second.
However, an American president must prioritize what is best for America, whether dealing with Israelis, Irish, or other groups. Usually, what benefits America also benefits Israel, and vice versa. But sometimes, a president must avoid giving Israel a blank check.
One example is the decision to seek good relations with Egypt and other neighbors of Israel. Some Israeli friends preferred a special relationship with Israel only. However, it is better for the U.S. to be a friend to Israel's neighbors, rather than allowing a vacuum to be filled by a country such as the Soviet Union.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fact is that American Jews support Israel, and I understood that. And the fact is that every Jewish prime minister that I have known has enlisted American Jews to bring as much pressure as possible in the political process on American presidents. That's understandable. I don't object to it. Now, a president must not go along with it on occasion because some Let let me let me explain something about what is called the Jewish lobby in this country.
In the first place, Jews understandably in The United States, because of what happened in World War two, because of the Holocaust, are going to be put first priority on the survival of Israel. Now, as good Americans as they are, they believe that America's survival and security is directly related to Israel's. In other words, their belief is that being for Israel first means that that does not mean you're putting America second because they think it goes together. An American president, however, has to approach it in a different way, in my opinion. He's got always to think first of what is best for America, and that's true whether it has to do with the Israelis or whether it has to do with the Irish or the Germans or what have you or the Poles, etcetera.
Usually, what is best for America is also best for Israel and vice versa. But on occasions, for example, an American president must make a decision that does not in effect give the Israelis a blank check. And one example of that is a decision that I made. I decided early on in our administration that we were going to seek good relations with Egypt and other others of Israel's neighbors. Many of my Israeli friends didn't like that because they wanted a special relationship with Israel and Israel only.
But I have always said that Israel's interests are better served to have The United States a friend of Israel's neighbors and potential enemies than to leave a vacuum which the Soviet Union would fill. I still believe that, and I think that should be American policy to
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
🚨This Weeks Moscow Mules🚨 The "United" Kingdom doesn't seem too United at the moment We visit old Blighty and cast an eye over the fantastic political legacy of Boris the Butcher Johnson The ever popular Starmerfuhrer makes an appearance And dont forget Piers Enjoy. https://t.co/OsTxrbongO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The UK is in decline, resembling a third-world country due to poor political decisions. Boris Johnson is criticized for his role in prolonging conflict. Social media is blamed for societal problems, while crime rises due to prisoner releases, including violent offenders. London streets are unsafe, with broad-daylight machete attacks.
David Lammy is mocked for past statements and poor performance on a quiz show. Keir Starmer is criticized as unpopular and propagandistic, accused of being overly focused on Ukraine while neglecting domestic issues. He's also accused of hypocrisy regarding gender issues.
George Galloway is highlighted for confronting Piers Morgan on his coverage of the Ukraine war. The British army is shrinking and ill-prepared, with ridiculed training exercises. Scottish independence is discussed as a potential solution to the UK's problems, as the current leadership is seen as suppressing dissent and pushing for war with Russia as a distraction from internal issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Oddie. I'm actually in the old soggy UK. Scotland, actually. It's very like Ireland. Irish weather.
A lot of people like a drink, like a fight. Redheads. You know, I'm in my absolute element. So we've decided to do a little compilation. Talking about The UK.
Sadly, Scotland's still part of The UK for now. Maybe not for too long the way the show is going.
Speaker 1: So we put this together for the viewers.
Speaker 0: Of course, The UK's had its fair share of politicians, just like Ireland, just like most of the world. But one that comes to mind more than anybody else is Bojo, the butcher, the man who dragged the little Nacofure away from the table when peace was in grasp. He told him, no. Get back in the trenches. Time to die for the, you know, Euro fantasy, the NATO fantasy.
We all know how it's all worked out. Let's have a little look at our friend Boris Johnson.
Speaker 1: It's who turns up. Yes. He returned from Ukraine. The narco fuhrer's, you know, buddy in chief, the catastrophic clown, Bojo the butcher, the serial liar, fraud, and generally unpleasant character, Boris Johnson, and he wants you to blame anything but his own incompetence and the incompetence of the British government for this shit show that has erupted in the old UK. Correct, doggy?
Run the video.
Speaker 2: More time on what Look at the
Speaker 1: state of this fucking He's like something on a mental hospital.
Speaker 2: I'm told that younger people, generations and millennials, whatever, they're spending so much time on social media that they're no longer going to parties. They're not
Speaker 1: Going to church.
Speaker 3: As much as my generation. None of them are
Speaker 2: going to parties. They don't produce enough Enough slaves. Enough meat for the British warmers Is WhatsApp killing this western civilization? You
Speaker 4: see, WhatsApp is killing western civilization, not Bojo.
Speaker 1: WhatsApp. I knew it was WhatsApp. It was WhatsApp that dragged Zelensky away from the table in 2022 and, you know, caused a million deaths. It was WhatsApp. I knew it was WhatsApp.
WhatsApp? Wanna get you WhatsApp, goddamn it? WhatsApp, my ass. What's a ass? Look like not WhatsApp.
Look at this clown with a silly hat. I'd love to get that for a lift. Well,
Speaker 0: Oggie, you know, all this politicking and crap policy making, it comes at a bit of a cost, doesn't it? It's hardly surprising that The UK now looks like something out of the third world. Right? Win the video.
Speaker 1: And on top of that, they decided to let loads of people out of jail. Crime rates are up, Huggie, assaults are, you know, up. We've got a big problem. So what would you do? What would be the right thing to do?
The right strategy to to your career? So you would just keep releasing prisoners from jail. Recently a 100 more were let out, but at least we know, right Aggie, that these dudes were, you know, they were all in there for parking tickets or you know, drink driving or something. Not that that's not a serious offense, but you know, kind of not paying their TV license or their electricity bill, know, there was nothing serious. Right?
Not exactly, Che. One man, one among those released, told reporters that he had served seven years
Speaker 4: for kidnap and grievous bodily harm of someone who owed money to his friend.
Speaker 1: Just a bit of kidnap, yeah. But look, the main thing is that the streets of London are basically safe. Right? You're not gonna run into a sort of machete melee in the middle of the day in the capital city with a lot of dudes hacking each other with massive zombie style knives and hatchets. Right?
In the clown world, you will. Oh, run the video. So this is like middle of the day on the street, they don't give a. That's a sword one of them has. One of has a samurai sword and one has a machete.
Like hell. India and China up in the Himalayas, it ain't. It's London. And while it all goes to in London in the old imperial capital of the British Empire, the senior diplomat, a man of great intellect and knowledge and balance, mister Lammy, he has also decided not his government has decided not to give reparations for slavery. He just wanna talk about that despite the fact that the UN, he did wanna talk about slavery and the fact that he was a black man.
I didn't know the Soggy. Now, mister Lamy has an interesting history. He once told Donald Trump that he was a Nazi basically, and that he would slap him, you know, but he had to then crawl, I'd say, to the big dome when he met him in New York. Let's have a look at mister Lamy's previous interactions with the press before he became the top diplomat in The United Kingdom. Remember illustrious people like Liz Truss, the lettuce in a skirt, she also occupied the role, famously, called, an idiot by, mister Lavrov.
Run the video.
Speaker 2: It's probably the case that only, that trans women don't have ovaries, but a cervix, I understand, is something that you can have, following various procedures and treatment and all the
Speaker 3: rest of
Speaker 1: mean, this is what it's come to. You can have a cervix. What the fuck use is a cervix? Like putting a gate in a wall, there's nothing beyond the gate. There's nothing there.
It's pointless. It's just retarded. It's this cult of absolute vokery and sanity. But it doesn't get any better because mister Lamy decided to appear on a very famous quiz show back at home called Mastermind. You sit in a chair, it kind of reminds me of myself, and you answer questions and, you display your knowledge to the world.
Didn't go down too well for old Dave when he took, the famous chair from the video, Huggie.
Speaker 5: Who acceded to the English throne at the age of nine on the death of his father Henry the eighth in 1547?
Speaker 1: Henry the seventh.
Speaker 5: Edward the sixth. Which country's so called rose revolution of two thousand and three led to the resignation of its president, Edward Shevardnadzek?
Speaker 3: Yugoslavia.
Speaker 5: No. It was Georgia. You had five passes.
Speaker 1: And by the way, he also thought that Marie Antoinette, who famously lost her head over a bit of cake, won the Nobel Peace Prize. Mhmm. Nice one, Dave.
Speaker 0: Well, looking at the phone here, Oggie, reminding myself of how he ripped the piss out of Bojo and, you
Speaker 1: know, sir Queer Starmer sorry, sir Kier Starmer. Not Queer Starmer.
Speaker 0: Of course, he's not gay. Nothing to do with those three Ukrainian boys. But he was, like, crawling around on the floor in front of the big Don, grovel tapping. Yeah. I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: Oh, here we go. Where has Keir Starmer, the Starmer fuhrer, the most unpopular prime minister in history in The UK? Yeah. Check out the numbers. He is the most unpopular new prime minister in history in a quagmire of controversy and corruption allegations, has released a heroic video.
Right, Oggy? This is the real Kir. I mean business. Yes, I say. I'm over in Kiev with my little narco fuel buddy.
What a load of repellent, you know, abject propaganda drivel. Absolutely disgusting. It's really, really something. Sorry about this. Run the video, Auggie.
Edgy, edgy camera shots. Auggie? Come on. Let's get into this. Auggie, get that neck moving.
It's we need that sort of yeah. It's this what what the Ben Stiller movie? You know. We'll talk about that in a moment. I mean, what is this?
It's a cocaine fueled propaganda at fest. But what exactly is the message here? What are they meant to have done? Look, they did a lot of this. Look.
It's like fucking Zoolander. Zoolander.
Speaker 3: Like, what the
Speaker 4: I think the message here is that he stands with Ukraine, but And?
Speaker 1: I stand with Ukraine, but I am also not gay. Right. I'm absolutely not gay.
Speaker 4: It it's such a masculine clip. I think I have some more hair growing on me after
Speaker 1: watching it. Now, I wonder why mister Starmer is absolutely sure that he's not gay. I don't think he's gay. Don't care if he's gay. Who cares if he's gay?
Rumors about Lord Ali, rumors about lots of things about people. Nobody gives you what you do in your own bedroom. No one cares.
Speaker 4: Right? As long as you pay the Ukrainian prostitutes you hire.
Speaker 1: Okay. I didn't say that. Notice it wasn't me that said that. It was Oggie, and I have his name and address. It was the email for the prosecution.
No. But in fairness, lots of rumors swimming around about poor old mister Starmer. I always find it very difficult for the people's wives in this instance, you know, all this stuff's washing and washing around. Three Ukrainian male models. Where did you spend last night, Auggie?
I was just hanging around with a few of my friends. My my male model friends. Mhmm. What happened? Well, I just slipped on a a cherry, and I just my clothes all fell off, and I ended up in the bathtub with the two of them.
Real story, guys. I don't know about that. We don't have any evidence of that, but that's what is being sort of, you know, suggested, that there may have been some sort of extracurricular activities, maybe. I went for a picnic, and I met two young men in the bushes. I did not know them.
I slipped, and my clothes fell off, and I landed inside one of them.
Speaker 4: You never know who landed inside who, though, Shane.
Speaker 1: You don't know. But
Speaker 4: we always know that mister Starmer likes to release the sausages.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. He loves to release the sausages. Roll the video. I call again for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The return of the sausages.
Speaker 4: I'll just try and whack it. Yes. This is good. And again,
Speaker 3: that's it. Come again. Try
Speaker 1: In The UK, one of the stalwarts of the anti war movement, a great man, great politician, great orator, and a great truth teller, The much maligned, but also much heroized George Galloway, great friend of mine, great friend of the Moscow Mules, really did humanity a service, would say, Elgy. He took the perennially nasty Piers Morgan, the professional eavesdropper who hacked people's phones, caused terrible trauma to people's lives by doing so, and a judge said he'd broken the law himself. He he denies he did it at all. Basically, a gutter press editor. Piers Morgan, cheerleader in chief for Zelensky, the corrupt Narko Fuhrer, cheerleader in chief for what's going on in Gaza too, who was taken to task by the bald George, the Scotsman.
The bald George struck Pierce's head down the toilet of truth for the whole world to observe. Run the video, Ogie.
Speaker 3: You have been up his ass all of these two decades. You've kissed his feet.
Speaker 1: Really?
Speaker 3: You've licked his boots. Really? Oh, yes. Upon him. Really?
You have been his super fan, and now on this fundamental question of our age, he's entirely wrong. You've you've got a lot of Ukrainian blood on your hands. You have lied about this war from the beginning. Actually, Vladimir Putin caused Actually, Vladimir Putin has the blood on his hands of Ukrainians. You could have a more you like.
It was Vladimir Putin had a monologue if you like. Three years ago. On a guest. Three years ago. Guest speak.
Three years ago. Speak. Years
Speaker 4: gonna if you're gonna libel me.
Speaker 3: If you're gonna libel me, I
Speaker 1: will hold you to account. You have lied
Speaker 3: about the origin of this war, about the duration of this war, about the course of this war, and now having caused you and your war party the death of a million Ukrainians while claiming to love Ukrainians, you're now calling for British lives to be lost.
Speaker 1: What a
Speaker 3: load of absolute bullshit. That constitutes that constitutes close to a war crime. What's a load of you are talking about? Listen. Listen.
Get off your Putin fanboy Answer it. Pat for
Speaker 1: a moment.
Speaker 3: Well, you see, there you go. I'm gonna I'm gonna respond to what Reagan said. I'm gonna respond to anybody who disagrees with family's Putin fanboy. Can I respond, please? Why don't you listen to Donald Trump?
Can I respond? You yesterday. Can I respond? Donald well, I'll respond or not. Donald Trump No.
You can't.
Speaker 1: Can I and take your medicine?
Speaker 3: Joining Ukraine, forget about it.
Speaker 1: Beautiful. Beautiful. But fear not, you know, the man in charge, the Starmor Fuhrer, really is a quality guy. He's a man who sticks
Speaker 6: to his guns when he says something, he continually sticks to it and he keeps repeating the same thing again and again. Release the sausages. So when the Starmor Fuhrer decides something, you know you can counter. We will stand with your crowd for
Speaker 1: a thousand years, which means by the end of next year, no one will know in the British government where the Ukraine is. Just like when the Sturmefuhrer basically agreed with the British Supreme Court who, you know, surprise surprise, shock horror, declared that a woman is a human being with two fucking ovaries and a womb. Yeah. That's where you came from jerks. And now he's in trouble because he has basically betrayed the global homo by accepting the ruling of the most supreme court in the land.
Yeah. What a shit show. Run the video, Oggy.
Speaker 7: This is a about moral courage, mister speaker. Yeah. About doing the right thing even when it
Speaker 1: is difficult.
Speaker 3: What a loadie.
Speaker 7: And the truth is he doesn't have the balls.
Speaker 4: Oh. And
Speaker 1: guess who else doesn't have the balls? A woman. That's right. According to the supreme court, it's all complete global homo distraction bull No one gives a fuck about some dude in a dress with a mental health problem calling himself a lady. Get the fuck out on the streets, clean shit up, and get the prices down, you idiots.
Speaker 4: But you know what? You gotta give it to the lady. She's right about one thing. Star mister Starmer doesn't really have any balls.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Ask Lord Ali. He knows all about Starmer's balls.
Speaker 0: Of course, Oggie, as we know, who they gonna blame for all this? Not crap economic policy, terrible immigration policy. Who could you blame for the boats coming across the sea, for every ill, every problem, the basic decay of UK society? It's gotta be the Russians. Right, Oggs?
Let's not forget our foreign specialist friends, Oggy. The immigrants, the migrants, those looking for a better life for coming to The
Speaker 1: UK and making shit of it properly. You know, good old care, as people freeze in in The UK, you know, as a report comes out with 5,000 nurses saying that people are dying, hidden under coats in hospitals that the whole health service is going to Now where's Keir? He's over in of course Kiev with his little micro friend. So the Starmafjord has visiting the Narcofjord while The UK goes to, but maybe part of his plan, Aggie, is this, I was thinking, maybe Sir Keir Starmefuhrer wants to bring The UK back to medieval times, you know, medieval levels of medical care, medieval levels of heating houses, but also medieval levels of entertainment on the streets. Let's have a look at what can only be described as a medieval conflict, like the good old days of old when knights were bold, where the boys are basically going at each other with swords.
What amounts of swords? This is real. This is not made up by the Moscow Muleans. This is the real deal, Rolodaghi.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Check this out. Sir Arthur fights with Sir Lancelot.
Speaker 1: There we go. Yes. Welcome to The UK. Let's do this. Oh, oh no.
Yeah. It's it's What is this? This is real. This is a sword fight in the middle of London. Yeah.
Go on. Have it. What? Just like
Speaker 4: the siege of Camelot.
Speaker 1: Oh, stop, chop. It's like something out of Gladiator. Right?
Speaker 0: Sadiator. Crazy.
Speaker 1: They're carrying these things around in public. Right? They're just carrying these giant cheddies around in their coats. Right?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, you don't go around English countryside without the sword Uh-huh. And a shield.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Good old Kirsch, Tharman Fuhrer, top man.
Speaker 3: But it doesn't
Speaker 1: get any better out on the streets. So that's it. Right, Oggy? They're they're they're having sword fights in the cafes and in the shops. There's running battles out on the streets, so it is becoming a medieval society again, and that's it.
They're not There's no mounted element to this. There's no cavalry element, right? You need a bit of cavalry, Braveheart. Oggie?
Speaker 4: Of course, there is. They even have jousts riding bikes and bikes.
Speaker 1: Jousting, come on. This is great. Let's have a bit of jousting UK style. Let's see. Wait.
So this is the on the mop. No.
Speaker 3: Stop the bike. Get the Marcello.
Speaker 1: So they're they're they're knife fighting on motorbikes. Right?
Speaker 4: Too bad the guy had the magical spray.
Speaker 1: He he's he's got sort of like spray? Pepper spray. Pepper spray. Okay.
Speaker 4: Should be forbidden. There was no pepper spray in middle
Speaker 1: ages. That's insane, right? It's it's really gone, isn't it? You know, and of course, where is Starmer? He's at this at his desk working hard signing a one hundred year deal to commit to ending crime, immigration, fixing the NHS.
He's signing a one hundred year pledge to no. He isn't. He just signed a hundred year deal to give billions to the NARCOF euro. Yeah. No.
Speaker 0: They now are talking very tough about war, war with Russia, the coming war with Russia. Mister Starmer seems obsessed with that, not with paying pensioners money for fuel, not with trying to clean up the streets or stopping crime. And while you're at it, why don't you try and build up your army? Because if you're gonna have one of these wars, you're gonna need someone to fight it for you. And that's not gonna happen if you let a bunch of hippies in sandals break into your airbase and spray all over your airplanes, is it?
Speaker 1: Well, sticking with the defense of Europe, but, you know, what are we actually defending Europe from? The Russians don't wanna invade Europe. They don't give a Russia is a continental landmass at 12 times, sounds like a 160,000,000 people. They don't need any more territory. They certainly don't need a little island in the middle of the Atlantic called Britain, Great Britain, full of actually retarded super soldiers.
Oggie, the British Army is in a little bit of trouble. Right?
Speaker 4: Yes, It it actually is in a lot of trouble
Speaker 3: Uh-huh.
Speaker 4: Because it keeps shrinking. Ah. Back in 2010, fifteen years ago, the great British army was just a 100,000 people strong.
Speaker 1: That's
Speaker 4: okay. These days, in the middle of the World War two three crisis, it's just 73,000 strong, and it seems like nobody wants to join it anymore.
Speaker 1: So the logic is when, you
Speaker 6: know, Russia is coming to our invaders and eat our grandmother and pick on your babies, We must turn off the hate for the pensioners. Well, Starmorfuhrer is
Speaker 1: saying that the thing to do is to reduce the army, slash the amount of tanks and warships you have, and give the ones you do have, you challenge your tanks. You had about 200. You gave a big chunk of them to Ukraine, and the Russians demonstrated, yeah, that they make great barbecues right here. So let's have a look at the British army. Let's have a look at, you know, these men used to patrol the world, rule Britannia.
Britannia rules the waves. Some people in my old family actually served in the British Army back in the day when there really was a British Army. We hadn't got off our knees yet in Ireland. Let's have a look at what's gonna defend you when Sir Keir, the starmer fuhrer, actually manages to start a war with Russia with the help of his Estonian Chihuahua friends. Run the video, Oggie.
Speaker 4: Behold, the Anglo super soldier.
Speaker 1: What?
Speaker 0: High bar.
Speaker 1: He's angry
Speaker 3: with his mom. His mother
Speaker 1: turned off the Internet. Me. Bro, you need to have a a massage and a lie down. What was that?
Speaker 4: Well, at least we know for sure that they're trained to stab the lying motionless figures, I guess.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Because, you know, when the Russians do invade, they're just gonna lie in a black sack on the beach and invite you over to stab them with your big mom turned off my Internet face. It's it's gonna be fine. It's all gonna go so well.
Speaker 0: So that's the end of our little compilation. Shedding a bit of light on what we've said and what we've shown you about The UK, and a clue is in the name. It's on the tin. United Kingdom. Is The United Kingdom united right now?
The Welsh want independence, essentially. We know the story in Northern Ireland, at least the Irish do. And, of course, the Scots, who had a chance for independence and kinda blew it. And now, even people like our old friend, George Galloway, the mentor, the master, he's starting to talk as if maybe Scotland is actually better off on its own. That's a man that backed unity with England for a long, long time.
So as we see people like Starmor, the Starmor fuhrer clamping down on public opinion, clamping down the right to disagree, and of course beating the drums of war. We all know why. It's a distraction therapy. Okay? The UK has a lot of problems, and we're not gonna stop telling you about them because the starmer fuhrer is down on his knees for the big Don trying to distract anyone with a war of false fear against the Russians.
So join us next week, same time, same place, not exactly the same place. We'll be in the studio, don't tell Oggie, and we'll continue to narrate the reality of what's going on. No one's gonna tell us not to. We'll see you then.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
These are the people massacred in the Orthodox Church Damscus Syria. Just an hour before they were killed. Christians are being hunted like animals, 1 in 7 Christians worldwide face persecution, and many pay with their lives. It's a hidden holocaust. https://t.co/4x0z1JNFdO
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Im on the ground in Bryansk Russia. I managed to get access to the site. Exclusive footage. 7 dead. Dozens injured, including children. Utter devastation. https://t.co/26Pp3HwBTq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is looking at something and suggests that someone from the main railroad company can provide commentary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Look at this. What? You can from the main railroad company. Uh-huh.
He can give us some commentary. You think that
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
As Germany greenlights the use of Taurus missiles inside Russia Heres a recording a year ago of Senior German officers planning an assault on the Crimean Bridge The US started this conflict in the shadows, and NATO is now fighting it from the shadows. https://t.co/pk9s1SpGuB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Es wird diskutiert, wie man der Ukraine bei der Zerstörung einer Brücke helfen kann, wobei die Größe der Brücke ein Problem darstellt, da möglicherweise viele Flugkörper benötigt werden. Es wird erörtert, ob man die Pfeiler der Brücke angreifen sollte, aber selbst das könnte schwierig sein.
Man müsse der Ukraine Missionsplanungsdaten und Zielinformationen zur Verfügung stellen, insbesondere für kleine Ziele. Es wird die politische Sensibilität der direkten Beteiligung deutscher Kräfte betont. Eine direkte Verbindung zwischen MBDA und der Ukraine wäre weniger problematisch als eine direkte Verbindung deutscher Kräfte. Jegliche Beteiligung Deutschlands an der Missionsplanung könnte eine rote Linie darstellen.
Es werden verschiedene Ausbildungsoptionen für ukrainische Soldaten in Betracht gezogen, darunter ein Fast Track und ein Long Track. Alternativ könnte man die Briten bitten, die Ausbildung in der Übergangsphase zu übernehmen. Direkte Beteiligung, wie z.B. die Planung in Deutschland und der Transport der Daten nach Polen, wird als inakzeptabel angesehen. Wenn keine direkte Beteiligung gewünscht ist, würde die Ausbildung länger dauern und die Komplexität des Einsatzes wäre reduziert.
---
The discussion revolves around how to assist Ukraine in destroying a bridge, with the bridge's size posing a challenge as it may require many missiles. Attacking the bridge's pillars is discussed, but even that could be difficult.
Providing Ukraine with mission planning data and target information is necessary, especially for small targets. The political sensitivity of direct German involvement is emphasized. A direct connection between MBDA and Ukraine would be less problematic than a direct connection of German forces. Any German involvement in mission planning could be a red line.
Various training options for Ukrainian soldiers are considered, including a Fast Track and a Long Track. Alternatively, the British could be asked to take over the training during the transition phase. Direct involvement, such as planning in Germany and transporting the data to Poland, is considered unacceptable. If no direct involvement is desired, the training would take longer and the complexity of the operation would be reduced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kann da
Speaker 1: noch mal schnell ergänzen wegen der Brücke, weil wir die uns intensiv angeguckt haben und die Brücke ist leider aufgrund ihrer Größe wie 'n Flugplatz. Das heißt, es kann durchaus sein, dass ich dafür 10 oder 20 Flugkörper brauche. Wir haben uns
Speaker 0: wohl 'n Geschäft, wenn jetzt da wo's aufklappt, wenn Du die Pfeiler nimmst.
Speaker 1: Ja, und selbst der der Pfeiler, da machen wir unter Umständen nur 'n Loch rein und dann stehen wir da.
Speaker 2: Ja, ja. Also, jetzt sag mal,
Speaker 1: da eine valide Aussage zu haben, müssten wir's wirklich selber mal
Speaker 0: Nee, ist fein. Ich wollt auch nicht die Brücke widmen. Ich will nur sagen, das quasi der tragmatischer Ansatz. Was wollen die Worte?
Speaker 2: Aber Genau.
Speaker 0: Stimmen die das hin und wie schnell könnt ich die dafür ausbilden? Und am Ende
Speaker 2: Ah ja, absolut.
Speaker 0: Was bleibt, ist, dass wir denen die image zentralisierten Missionsplanungsdaten geben müssen. Wir müssen denen grundsätzlich die geben, wenn sie sie nicht selber haben. Und die Targetdaten, die haben wir ja, aber das müsste man denen auch irgendwie zur Verfügung stellen. Weil wenn's so kleine Ziele geht, dann muss der halt 'n bissel genauer ausgeplant werden als nur aufm Satz Picture. Wenn's auf gehärtete Ziele geht, dann ist das fair wie easy und relativ schnell geplant.
Wenn man vor allem dann exploit, dass der in zweistelliger Food für fliegen kann.
Speaker 2: Oh, ich
Speaker 3: und ich meiner Facebook, ja? Das fängt jetzt ja
Speaker 2: schon ganz gut aus dem Punkt. Wir alle wissen ja, dass sie die Brücke, dass sie die Brücke rausnehmen sollen. Ja, das ist klar, 'n bisschen mehr auch, was das am Ende bedeutet, ne. Wenn wenn dann dann hast Du, dann ist die Versorgung dieser so wichtig, nicht nur nicht nur militärisch, strategisch wichtigen, auch son bisschen politisch ist die, ist die gute Insel da ja ihr Herzstück. Jetzt nicht mehr ganz so ganz so fatal, wo sie ja quasi ihre Landbrücke mehr oder weniger dahin haben.
Aber und und da hat man eben Angst, wenn da die direkte Links der Streitkräfte in die Ukraine geht. Und da wär halt dann immer die Frage, kann man im Grunde genommen den Trick pullllen, dass man dass man unsere Leute abstellt zur MBDA, das nur eine direct Klein zwischen MBDA und der Ukraine ist. Dann ist es weniger schlimm, wie wenn wenn die direct Klein unserer Sofappe zu ihnen ist, ja.
Speaker 3: Oder wo Und ich
Speaker 2: glaub, das macht Nein,
Speaker 3: ich glaub, das macht keinen Unterschied, Also wir müssen halt aufpassen, dass wir nicht gleich zu Beginn im Zielkriterium formulieren. Und ich mein, wenn wir dem Minister jetzt sagen, ich überspitze mal 'n bisschen, wir planen die Daten und fahren die dann von Polen aus vom Auto rüber, damit keiner mitkriegt.
Speaker 2: Das ist 'n Killkriterium. Ja, ja, ja.
Speaker 3: Also wir werden das nicht schaffen, dass wir mit 1 irgendwie gearteten Beteiligung von uns das Ganze umsetzen.
Speaker 2: Auch es
Speaker 3: macht Also erst mal in dem, wenn wenn das von der Firma kommt, müsst ihr erst mal die MWDR dem ganzen zustimmen, ob
Speaker 2: die das machen wollen. Ja, dann macht
Speaker 3: das auch keinen Unterschied, ob wir unsere Leute in Büschelers planen lassen oder oder in Schrobenhausen. Beteiligt ist beteiligt. Und ich glaube, über die Hürde werden wir nicht rüberkommen. Ja, okay. Und dann jetzt noch mal
Speaker 2: auf die auf die, wenn man
Speaker 3: das mal als rote Linie, als Grundlage voraussetzen, dann kommen wir doch mal drauf zurück, was ich dann am Anfang meinte. Entweder wir müssen die Ausbildung aufteilen, dass wir sagen, wir machen einen Fast Track und einen Long Track und in den Long Track, dann sind die halt da 4 Monate und lernen es komplett richtig mit, wie mach ich's mit 'ner Brücke? Und in dem Fast Track geht es erst mal den schnellen Einsatz nach 2 Wochen, wie weiß ich, was ich mit dem Minitionsniveau mache? Oder die andere Option, wir fragen, ob in dieser Phase, bis die selber komplett komplett ausgebildet sind, fragen wir die Briten, ob's in der Phase übernehmen. Aber ich glaube, eine irgendwie geartete Versuch 1 Zwischenlösung, stell
Speaker 2: dir mal vor, das kommt an
Speaker 3: die Presse. Wir haben unseren Leute in Schrobenhausen oder wir fahren irgendwie mit dem Auto gespulen, sind, glaube ich, beides keine akzeptablen Lösungen. Man Man
Speaker 2: man kann's natürlich so drehen, dass man sagt, also wenn der politische Wille jetzt mal da ist, dann müssen wir ja erst mal sagen, so, dann gehören wir 1 aus der Ukraine hier hinkommen. Ja. Und dann müssen wir mal wissen, ist der ist die politische Vorgabe keinerlei direkte Beteiligung mehr an der Missionsplanung? Dann muss klar sein, die Ausbildung dauert schon etwas länger. Und die Komplexität und auch am Ende der Einsatz erfolgt nimmt natürlich ab, aber ist auch nicht unmöglich.
Weil ist ja nicht so, dass sie jetzt nicht schon eine gewisse Erfahrung darin gesammelt haben. Und wir sehen ja selber, was wir grade sonst alles für Hightech Ja. Zeug einsetzen. Und und und dann müsste man sehen, wenn wenn's die Vorgabe ist, es gibt hier keine direkte Beteiligung, wir können nicht die Missionsplanung in Büsche machen und sie rüberstecken. Da könnt ich mir fast vorstellen, dass das für Deutschland eine rote Linie ist.
Ja, da muss halt klar sein, man muss ja etwas länger ausbilden, dann geht's halt 'n paar Monate. Und man kann auch nicht alles damit machen. Aber ist nicht so, dass man sagt, man kann nichts damit machen und man kann dann eher da
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a photo of four children from 1938 in Klushino, USSR. In 1941, during the Nazi occupation, a German soldier cruelly hung the smallest boy, Boris, from a tree, but his mother saved him just in time. In 1942, the older siblings, Valentin and Zoya, were taken to Germany for forced labor but managed to escape. The boy sitting in the chair grew up to be Yuri Gagarin, who famously exclaimed "Let's go!" as the first human in space on April 12, 1961. The stories of the Gagarin siblings are both harrowing and inspiring.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
A picture of four children taken in 1938 in the village of Klushino, Smolensk region, USSR. In 1941, the village was occupied by the Nazis, and for "fun" a German soldier would hang the smallest child in the picture, Boris, from a tree using his own scarf. The boy's mother managed to save him, taking advantage of the moment when the Nazi went to get his camera to take a photo of the "fun scene." In 1942, the Germans would abduct the two older children in the photo, Valentin and Zoya, to work in Germany. However, both of them managed to escape (separately). As for the little kid sitting on the chair , he would grow up and train as a pilot, then, on the morning of April 12, 1961, he would shout "Let's go!" (Poyekhali!) and become the first human being in space. The Gagarin brothers, Valentin, Boris, Zoya, and of course the now immortal Yuri.
reSee.it AI Summary
The April 5th "Hands Off!" Protest is not an organic grassroots movement but a well-funded initiative backed by George Soros and various Democratic NGOs. It targets cuts to the Department of Government Efficiency associated with Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Organizations like MoveOn and Indivisible are orchestrating the protest, with significant financial support from Soros’ Open Society Action Fund and other left-leaning groups. This effort aims to undermine Trump's administration, revealing a coordinated strategy against him.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 The so-called "Grassroots" April 5th "Hands Off!" Protest isn't some organic people's movement It's a massive coordinated and well-funded operation backed by George Soros and a network of Democratic NGOs. They're Targeting @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk's Department of Government Efficiency cuts. The protest is orchestrated by MoveOn and Indivisible, with a staggering $1 million from Soros’ Open Society Action Fund alone. Other left-leaning groups like the Tides Foundation, Sixteen Thirty Fund, and Clear Choice Action(previously used to block @SecKennedy Jr.’s ballot access), are also funnelling millions into this blatantly anti-Trump campaign. This isn’t a people’s movement; it’s a calculated, Soros-driven effort to undermine Trump’s administration, exposing the Left’s deep pockets and anti democracy agenda. Thanks to @realTimaV for collaboration on this.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
It's a pity this Ghoul wasn't worried about "Ukrainains dying" in 2014 when she masterminded the Coup that overthrew the elected President of Ukraine Nuland spends most of her time these days agitating agianst the elected US Government https://t.co/U1Fj4ZMIwz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Europe must quickly increase support for Ukraine as artillery shells, air defense interceptors, and drone production capabilities dwindle. Europe could use proposals and potentially collateralize frozen Russian assets to act fast.
The speaker is concerned about the cutoff of intelligence streams from the U.S. and pressure on allies like the UK not to use US intelligence for their own weapons. The primary purpose of US intelligence has been to help Ukrainians see Russian attacks coming and have advanced warning.
Key weapon systems require U.S. satellite queuing and the military GPS system to hit targets. Without these, more Ukrainians will die, and Europe cannot replace this capability quickly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. It is, really, very, very important that in this period, that Europe not only be able to step up, but step up fast. Because, as the artillery shells run out, as the air defense interceptors run out, as the ability to produce drones at scale, which have made the difference for Ukraine on the battlefield, gets harder, Europe has the capacity not only with these proposals, but conceivably collateralizing against frozen assets that they are holding of Putin's, at least for a short time, to do more and to do it fast. The thing that's concerning me most today is the cutoff of intelligence streams from The United States and pressure on allies like The UK not to use US intelligence for their own weapons. The primary purpose of US intelligence has been to help the Ukrainians see Russian attacks coming and have advanced warning.
There are also key weapon systems that do not queue and do not hit their targets without support from US satellite queuing and the military GPS system. So people are gonna die. Ukrainians are gonna die, more of them, if this pause lasts significantly longer. And it's it it is it is dangerous, and it's not a capability that Europe can replace with any kind of speed.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
A French video is circulating alleging Zelenskys offshore company was involved in buying a French Bank The unverified report says Milleis Banque was bought via his offshore Co. Maltex for approx €1.2B Rumours abound that Zelensky's new exile destination is Macron’s France https://t.co/7UXV6d2X0l
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm standing in front of Millize Bank's office in Paris, the third largest independent wealth management firm in France, holding thirteen billion euros in assets. Recently, Maltex Multicapital Corp acquired our group.
Maltex is linked to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and registered in the British Virgin Islands. Documents show that before becoming president, Zelensky ceded his shares of Maltex to his business partner, Sergi Sheffir, while ensuring dividends continued to go to Zelensky’s wife. Our chairman, Chantal Laurie, supports Ukraine. After consecutive negative balances, Millize Bank finally showed a positive balance in 2023 and sought a buyer in 2024. The acquisition by Maltex occurred in early February 2025 for over a billion euros. Rothschild Co, Emmanuel Macron's former employer, was involved in finding a buyer. This acquisition happened shortly before the White House advised Zelensky to resign and relocate to France.
Financial experts believe this acquisition will significantly impact the French banking sector.
**Translation to English is not necessary since the text is already in English**
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Je me trouve actuellement dans le centre de Paris devant l'un des bureaux du groupe Milize Bank troisième acteur indépendant français de gestion de patrimoine avec treize milliards d'euros d'actifs. Comme nous l'avons appris début février le groupe a été repris par maltex multicapital corporative
Speaker 1: maltex multicapital corp est une société étroitement liée au président ukrainien volodymyr zélensky elle est enregistrée dans les îles vierges britanniques et se trouve au coeur de l'empire offshore de zélensky comme l'a rapporté l'o ccrp les documents montrent que juste avant d'être élu président zélensky a cédé ses parts de la société maltex multicapital korp à son partenaire commercial Sergi Sheffir qui a ensuite été nommé premier assistant du président malgré la cession de ses parts un arrangement était conclu pour permettre à Maltex de continuer à verser des dividendes à l'épouse de Zelenski Chantal Laurie est la présidente du conseil d'administration de Millé Bank. Elle le cogne pour son soutien à l'Ukraine. Elle était auparavant présidente du directoire de la Banque Postale. Une banque a exprimé sa solidarité avec l'Ukraine en deux-mille-vingt-deux. Il n'est pas courant que les banques expriment directement leur soutien à l'une ou l'autre des parties du conflit militaire.
La banque Millé, après un bilan négatif successif pendant sept ans, affiche enfin un bilan positif sur ses activités en deux-mille-vingt-trois. Et en deux-mille-vingt-quatre, elle se met en quête d'un repreneur selon le site web adjefi point f r. L'acquisition par Maltex Multic Capital Corp a eu lieu au début du mois de février deux-mille-vingt-cinq. Montant est estimé entre un milliard cent millions et un milliard deux-cent-cinquante millions d'euros. Selon le prêt ou dit d'acquisition demandé par Maltex, la banque Millé gère treize milliards d'euros d'actifs et sert environ soixante-dix-mille clients.
Il convient de noter que la société Rothschild Co a été mandatée pour trouver un acheteur pour mille banques, la même société qu'Emmanuel Macron a rejoint en deux-mille-huit. Il a travaillé pour les Rothschild pendant quatre ans, gagnant deux-millions-neuf-cent-mille euros. Pendant cette période, il a obtenu le surnom de Mozart de la finance pour son rôle de conseiller auprès de Nestlé lors de l'acquisition de Pfizer en deux mille douze pour un montant de neuf milliards d'euros. On ne sait toujours pas si le président français a joué un rôle dans l'acquisition de mille et banques. L'acquisition d'une banque française par une société affiliée au président Zelenski s'est produite quelques semaines avant que la Maison Blanche n'avertisse Wolodimir Zelenski qu'il devait quitter son poste et s'installer en France et mettre en place une nouvelle personne qui dirigera l'Ukraine.
Speaker 0: Les experts de la finance estiment que l'acquisition de mille et une groupes aura un effet durable sur le secteur bancaire français. Toutefois des questions se posent quant à la stratégie que mettront en place leur nouveau propriétaire.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
The breathtaking Cathedral of the Resurrection outside Moscow The floors are cast in Steel from melted down defeated German Panzers It was built to pay homage to the millions of soldiers and civilians who have fought and died for their country https://t.co/PgTJgIuEbc
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm taking you inside this incredible, beautiful, and powerful building, notable for its remarkable construction. The floor we're standing on is made of steel from melted-down German Panzer tanks. Visitors walk across the vanquished tanks, a symbolic act of victory while remembering the dead of that terrible conflict.
Now, let's go inside to witness the magnificence and splendor of the main basilica. It's absolutely stunning. I won't try to narrate it; see for yourselves. Within this church, Soviet standards recall the Soviet Red Army, mixing two elements of Russian history. Saint Michael is here as well. This film can't do it justice, but it's an incredible place to visit if you have the chance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'm gonna take you inside this incredible building. Some remarkable feats almost of of the construction of it. Such a beautiful so evocative and powerful. The floor here that we're standing on is made of steel, plate steel, and the steel comes from melted down German tanks, German Panzers. So as people come here to remember the dead of that terrible terrible conflict, they walk as victors, if you like, across the vanquished tanks.
So I'm gonna take you inside now and just show you the magnificence of this place, the splendor of it. Quite remarkable. And this is the main basilica. It's absolutely stunning. Wow.
Very difficult to sort of narrate this. So I won't try. Just you guys decide for yourselves. Absolutely astounding. And within a church, Soviet standards recalled the Soviet Red Army.
This mixture of two elements of Russian history combined here. Saint Michael. Such an incredible place. If you get a chance to visit it, because a film like this can do no justice, of course, but an incredible, incredible place.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
John Kirby accepts that 40,000 portable, easily concealed weapons, including anti-aircraft and anti-tank systems sent to Ukraine, have disappeared. I'm sure @rtenews will now amend their article covering my speech to the UN Security Council last year, confirming I was right? https://t.co/M25ukNWBXS
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a new report out from the Defense IG stating that American defense officials didn't fully account for nearly 40,000 weapons that the U.S. provided to Ukraine. These are sensitive materials, small enough to be bartered or put on the black market.
I'd refer you to the Defense Department for a more detailed reaction. Speaking broadly, we've been interested in improving accountability over the end use of the material provided to Ukraine for many months now. We've discussed this with our Ukrainian partners, and they share our concerns about accountability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a new, report out from the defense IG that says that American defense officials, didn't fully count for nearly 40,000 weapons Yeah. That The US provided to Ukraine sensitive, material, small enough to be, barter put on the black market. Does the White House have any reaction, any concern about that report?
Speaker 1: Certainly, I'd refer you to the defense department for a more detailed reaction. But just let me broadly say, we have for many, many months now, been interested in improving accountability over the end use of material that is provided to Ukraine. We have had that conversation with our Ukrainian partners, and they share our concerns about, accountability. Now
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Russia is an Energy Super Power. Thats why the EU and US actually funds NGOs focused on the "Breaking up of Russia" they want access to Trillions in Energy. The scale of its Gas reserves alone are hard to visualise. Here you go. https://t.co/ttUj7IyGlN
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Exactly a year ago, Ukraine massacred 65 of its own POWs by shooting down the Russian transport plane carrying them to freedom. I was there, and won't forget what I saw. Kiev still hasn't said why it killed its own. They were fully aware of the flight paths. Here's the story https://t.co/Ya5v5l5GtY
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm back in Belgorod, where I previously witnessed the impact of conflict. Sadly, I'm here to report on the recent downing of a Russian transport plane carrying Ukrainian prisoners of war, leaving behind a scene of devastation. The local people are shocked, especially with the ongoing artillery sounds nearby. I spoke to a woman whose nephew is in hiding after being summoned to serve in the Ukrainian military, highlighting the human tragedy unfolding. Civilians here are bewildered by the targeting they face, with many casualties reported. The situation reflects a grim reality, as ordinary people suffer amid escalating tensions and violence. The targeting of civilians seems particularly pronounced, raising concerns about the motivations behind these actions. I’ll continue to provide updates from the ground in Belgorod.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everybody, just wanna give you a little update. I'm down in Belgorod again. I was here, in the summer last year, when I was in Shebekanoe, not far from here, which was being shelled by the Ukrainian army. I spent a lot of time with the people then, and I'm delighted to be back talking to them again. But very sadly, I'm here to cover a shooting down of a Russian transport plane, which unfortunately also carried Ukrainian prisoners of war.
And it's really been shocking. We just left the the site. Not at all far from here, and it's a scene of absolute devastation. You you couldn't really describe it. I've also been talking to some of the local people here as well.
We're very close to the fighting here, of course, as well, hence, all the gear, which we have to wear, and we often hear the sounds of the artillery and the air defense systems here as well. So it's quite tense, but, also, the stories are remarkable. I've just spoke to a lady this morning not not long ago about her experiences. I mean, Kharkov is very close to here, and these two cities, Belgorod and Kharkov, would have been very close to each other. She was telling me about her sister, and her nephew.
She she can't see it all now. She's the oppression of, anybody with links into Russia and Kharkov as well. And, of course, our friend, Gonzalo Lyra, was in Kharkov, and he met a very gruesome end as well. So, it's just the when you're very close to this, you see the the graphic nature of what's happening here and the destructive nature of it, particularly what the Ukrainians are doing targeting civilians. Just here in Belgorod where we're we're based at the moment, more than 2 dozen civilians torn to pieces by artillery shells, on New Year's.
And, again, we've seen and witnessed and spoken to the people here, and they're just absolutely amazed at why they're being targeted this way. And whatever you hear in the media, whatever you hear about the Russian military, they just simply don't target civilians willfully like this. Of unfortunately, civilians do die in conflicts, and that's happening. But it's usually the result of, air defense system shooting down munitions, which are targeting military bases, but this is willful targeting of civilian populations. This lady I was speaking to this morning was telling me that her nephew was, served a summons to serve in the Ukrainian military, and they consider themselves Russian, her sister's son.
So he has had to now go into hiding, where they're based. He's they're trying to get him across the border here into Belgorod, but that's very difficult as well. So it's this human tragedy of what's happening in Ukraine as Vladimir Zelensky continues to push his people to these extremes, these ordinary people suffering. And, also, it's like Donetsk. I mean, only a couple of days ago, my friend, Steve Sweeney, was in Donetsk, at this market that was targeted on a Sunday morning.
People selling mushrooms and pickles as you see people here in Russia doing all the time. And they're just targeted by these NATO weapons. The weapons MLRS multiple launch rocket systems from the Czech Republic. This is NATO money and NATO aggression, in the hands of really radicalized people who are willfully targeting civilians. There's a big difference between civilians being the collateral of a war.
All civilian lives, of course, lost is tragic, but this willful targeting of civilians seems to be uniquely Ukrainian, specialty, if you like. And I don't believe that the vast majority of Ukrainian soldiers either want to be involved in this. This is probably based on some sort of horrendous, you know, hatred. And, of course, when Avdiivka is becoming surrounded when the, momentum swings towards Russia, these attacks happen as well. And this killing of these 65 Ukrainian men, I on top of the crew and the escort that were with them, And believe me, it's a very gruesome sight.
These men were hours away from seeing their families again, so it's all the more poignant here to see that. So I just wanted to get you up to date on that. Hopefully, I'll be bringing you some more reports, from what's going on here on the ground in Belgrade in southern Russia. Take care of yourselves.
reSee.it AI Summary
The U.S. is investing billions in international conflicts, notably in Ukraine and Israel, while domestic needs are starkly unmet. Since 2022, nearly $175 billion has been approved for Ukraine, primarily for military support, while Israel has received $310 billion since WWII. Redirecting these funds could have rebuilt infrastructure, ended homelessness, and improved education and healthcare. As natural disasters strike, the government allocates minimal aid for relief compared to foreign military support. This raises questions about priorities and the potential impact of investing in American society.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
As the United States continues to funnel billions into international conflicts, the contrast between foreign aid and domestic need has never been more glaring. In what can now only be described as a fiscal misallocation of epic proportions, the U.S. has committed staggering sums to Ukraine and Israel, while its own citizens grapple with critical services shortages. Since Russia's intervention in Ukraine in 2022, the U.S. has approved nearly $175 billion in "aid", with a significant portion earmarked for military support. This is not an isolated case; Israel has been the recipient of $310 billion in U.S. aid since World War II, with $3.8 billion annually in recent years under a defence memorandum agreement. Imagine this: the $175 billion sent to Ukraine could have transformed the American landscape. For instance, if redirected, this sum could have: Rebuilt Infrastructure: With estimates suggesting that $2.5 trillion is needed over the next decade to repair America's crumbling infrastructure, this amount could have directly addressed roads, bridges, and public transportation in numerous states. Housing for the Homeless: With a rough estimate of $10 billion to end homelessness in the U.S., the aid to Ukraine alone could have housed every homeless person multiple times over, offering not just shelter but also support services to ensure stability. Education and Healthcare: Investing in education could mean smaller class sizes, better school facilities, and teacher salaries that reflect the importance of their role. In healthcare, it could have covered uninsured Americans or improved mental health services, which are critically underfunded. Instead, as hurricanes and wildfires ravage communities, leaving devastation in their wake, the U.S. government finds itself allocating a mere fraction of these foreign aid budgets to disaster relief. For example, Hurricane Helene saw the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) offering aid of just $750 per affected individual, while over $60 billion was sent to Ukraine for weapons alone for a War its obviously been losing since day one. Meanwhile, Israel's aid, particularly in military support, continues unabated. The $3.3 billion annual aid handed to Tel Aviv could have: Funded Mental Health: With mental health issues on the rise, this amount could fund nationwide programs to provide accessible mental health support, potentially saving lives and reducing the burden on emergency services. Enhanced Cybersecurity: With cyber threats increasingly targeting U.S. infrastructure, this could significantly bolster national cybersecurity, protecting everything from personal data to critical utilities. This isn't just about numbers; it's about priorities. The U.S. has the resources to support both its international commitments and its domestic needs, yet the scale of foreign aid suggests a misalignment where American lives hang in the balance. The shock isn't just in the disparity but in the potential of what could have been if these funds were invested in the very society they're meant to serve and protect?
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
⏰️ Moscow Mules Election Special 🚨 So here it is, We look back at the US Election, who spent what? Who said what and who should have kept their mouths shut (Kamala) And of course, the delicious Liberal Democrat meltdown when the Big Don won Enjoy. https://t.co/95Py7fHqBw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome back to Moscow Mules! It’s been an eventful week with the US election results surprising many, especially the mainstream media who backed Kamala Harris. Despite heavy spending by Democrats, Trump emerged victorious, showcasing a shift in voter demographics, including increased support from women and minorities.
The aftermath has led to a meltdown among Democrats, with figures like Jimmy Kimmel expressing despair. Meanwhile, the media's bias against Trump was evident, as they painted Harris positively while downplaying Trump’s chances.
As the dust settles, the Democrats are scrambling to assign blame, with some even questioning their own supporters. The conversation around the election highlights the disconnect between the media narrative and the actual voter sentiment. We’ll keep an eye on how things unfold in the coming weeks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Welcome back to the Moscow Mules. Welcome back to Moscow. I'm Shay Bowes, and I'm joined as per usual by my sidekick, Auggie, and we're gonna get stuck in. It's been a hell of a week, of course.
The big election in the US, an outcome not determined by the client media that really got behind miss Harris. They really had it in the bank. Right? Now we don't know what exactly is going to happen in the next 4 years, you know. Was it a case of maybe the best loser win?
Possibly. We're going to be looking at all that. But right now, we're just bathing in the ecstasy of the client media in the west, getting it all so wrong, and managing to convince all the libtards that, their woman was gonna get into the, presidential seat. Wrong. Run the video, Auggie.
Speaker 1: All I can say is how fucking dare you.
Speaker 2: How dare you? Idiot.
Speaker 0: This is just so good.
Speaker 1: How dare you put this man into office for another 4 years.
Speaker 3: The dumbest people in the whole world.
Speaker 0: These are Democrats with a big problem with democracy. Right? You sat there.
Speaker 2: Democrats And you voted for Trump. A felon artwork, Kamala, because she was open. Oh, they're disgusting. Look at them. You're just The
Speaker 0: green hair brigade. The blue hair
Speaker 3: brigade. We're ruining you.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. But listen, it doesn't just end there. A lot of the time on the mules here, we talk about, money. How big money can get you into politics, how it can start a war, can end a war, and this election, was probably one of the most expensive in history. Right, Auggie?
Speaker 4: That's right. Together, Cuomo and Trump spent around 3,500,000,000 to get into the White House.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 4: And, of course, of course, the Democrats got more, 2,300,000,000 and spent around 1,900,000,000 while Trump got 1,800,000,000 and spent 1,600,000,000. So Trump spent less,
Speaker 0: but he won. Another kick in the nose for the Limbtown Brigade. Oh, so sweet. And much like in the build up to this election, remember when the client media were telling us that, you know, Kamala had it in the bag. It was all a done deal.
You know, Trump was on the ropes. There's a bad mood in his camp. All complete bull. Much like the build up to the election, the build up to the crescendo, the orgasm of hatred and anger that's currently, rapturing its way through the, Democrat public, it's really something to behold. Check out this, African American lady making her feelings known about the big Don's win.
Run the video, Auggie.
Speaker 3: No. No. No. No. Why?
Why? Why? Why? Why? Do you really hate me that bad?
Speaker 0: Oh, sweet. And, of course, we have to reflect all races, sizes, shapes, and, mental capacities here on the Moscow Mules. But Auggie and I have decided that the king of the half wits when it comes to the anti Trump meltdown, the king of the Democrats what is that what is the term Democrat all about, Auggie? It's about a thing called democracy right. And that means when you vote and more people want, red and, than want blue, if more people vote for it, it's red, right?
And everything's okay. You shake hands, you walk away. No. The king of the turbo turds, the half wits and the meltdown brigade is a, let's say, weight challenged gentleman, who likes to do a bit of podcasting. Well, the video, Auggie.
Speaker 3: Can't believe Trump's actually gonna win this thing. Jesus Christ. I'm so pissed off. Oh, what the Goddamn it.
Speaker 0: Is it is it gone? Oh, Jesus. Come on, bro. That was just awful. You know, you might expect a couple of sort of incels trapped in their mother's bedrooms to have a meltdown.
You know, fruitcake in a car, dude that looks like, you know, a loaf of bread that got milk spilled on it. You know, you'd expect that. But it doesn't end there. The mainstream media, the, you know, the ones that propped up to Kamala, the ones that told us, by the way, that, you know, Sleepy Joe was as sharp as attack. Remember these people?
Well, it was Jimmy Kimmel, you know, all lined up behind Harris, you know, the best thing since sliced bread. And now that the American people, you guys have decided, that you, want the big Don back in charge. People like Jimmy, are not that happy with you. And you got it wrong. Even though you made your own choice, you got it wrong.
How dare you? And Jimmy even shed a tear. Roll the video, Huggy.
Speaker 5: Let's be honest. It was a terrible night last night. It was a terrible night for women, for children, for the hundreds of thousands of of hardworking immigrants who make this country go.
Speaker 0: I don't think so.
Speaker 5: For health care, for our climate, for science, for journalism, for justice, for free speech. It was a terrible night for poor people
Speaker 0: I don't think so. For the
Speaker 5: middle class, for seniors, for rely on Social Security What? For our allies in Ukraine.
Speaker 0: Allies in Ukraine.
Speaker 3: What about Ukraine? And decency.
Speaker 5: And it was a terrible night for everyone who voted against him. And guess what? It was a bad night for everyone who voted for him too. You just don't realize it yet.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Yeah. You and your democracy both how dare you? How dare you? You know, speaking of Jimmy Kimmel, you know, these people are very influential, at West.
And this client media, they're all up to their tits in this sort of message management. But Jimmy's not on his own. A whole gang of celebrities like Bono, what a tool, etcetera, De Niro. A lot of them said that they would actually leave the US. I mean, hella hallelujah.
It's great news, right? A hell of a lot of people, check this out. They're all gonna jump in their Cadillacs and get out of they'll get out of dodge. We're all gonna be watching to see, where they are in the departure lounge. Mhmm.
Looks like the state's gonna be a much better place without them. And something else, you know, that's, doing the rounds now in the Libtard Media, who are just having a complete meltdown. It was just a joy to watch. Right? Doesn't matter who you support it.
You know, when you see how, you know, you know, impactful it's been on them, they really believe their own bull. They're high on their own supply. Right? And that goes as far as suggesting that it was Trump only got elected by a bunch of white dudes. Well, we know that the Democrats spent ton more money than Trump.
We know that the whole client media in the US was completely arraigned against Trump. And in reality, it wasn't, you know, rich white dudes, Auggie, who got Trump elected. It was ordinary people and a ton more women the last time. Right?
Speaker 4: Exactly. Compared to 2020, there has been a strong shift to the right with young women, plus 14% of them voted for Trump. Young men, plus almost 30% voting for Trump. Mhmm. Even more, it's a African Americans and mass worth voted for Trump.
Hispanic Americans voted for Trump.
Speaker 0: Everybody voted for Trump.
Speaker 4: And you know what? In terms of income, Trump gained support among all groups except the wealthiest voters.
Speaker 0: Uh-huh. I wonder why. I wonder why. And, you know, given the landslide win, it really did. It was just it turned the whole map red.
You gotta wonder. Remember, remember all sleepy Joe stuck on the make America great again hat, you know? Was that a pivotal moment in this election? Was a sleepy Joe, the self propelled granddad, trying to tell us something? Maybe he had secret plans to give, the big Don a little boost.
Roll the video, Augie. Did Joe vote for Trump? Oh, check it out. Oh, oh, yeah, baby. You never know.
And the inevitable autopsy, you know, the post mortem is now underway with the Democrats, you know, clawing each other's eyes out, getting stuck in, looking for someone to blame. They're even trying to blame, you know, Hispanics and black people for along with the wrong people. Another thing on the list of reasons why the Democrats got it so wrong and why they might have lost, you know, we know who's been in the background pulling the strings, you know, mister Obama and Mike Obama. They've been very busy. Hillary Clinton, very influential woman in the democratic, sort of world.
She's also been up to her tits, giving advice to Kamala, apparently. Run the video, Augie.
Speaker 6: So what is your assessment of the stakes of this election? I mean, you are in a very exclusive club of people who've ever run for president, let alone run against
Speaker 0: Very exclusive club of people who've killed the leaders of Libya.
Speaker 6: Offer counsel, or do you speak with Kamal Harris about how to run against Donald Trump, who, as you've said, is a different candidate now, a darker candidate. Are you a
Speaker 0: darker candidate? Is that racist?
Speaker 3: Is that racist?
Speaker 7: That's not true, Willie. You know, I've talked with Kamala, a few times. I've talked with her before the debate.
Speaker 0: We talked with her quite a lot as we're gonna see in a minute.
Speaker 7: He is, more incoherent. Uh-huh. He is angrier.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 7: He is lashing out all the time.
Speaker 0: Millions and millions of Americans voted for him, you stupid cow. And guess what, Ogie? I think Hillary may have had a lot more to do with this campaign than we're being told in the mainstream media.
Speaker 4: Karl Souchi.
Speaker 0: Well, if you look at the, you know, defeat speech of Kamala when she finally came out of her bunker and accepted that the big dot had won, probably one of the biggest victories in, in political history. When she finally arrived out on the stage, she said exactly the same thing that Killary said, when she admitted defeat to the Big Don. Run the video.
Speaker 8: Come of this election is not what we wanted, not what we fought for
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 8: Not what we voted for.
Speaker 7: This is not the outcome we wanted or we worked so hard for.
Speaker 8: Earlier today, I spoke with president-elect Trump and congratulated him on his victory. I also told him that we will help him and his team with their transition.
Speaker 7: Last night, I congratulated Donald Trump and offered to work with him on behalf of our country.
Speaker 8: Over the 107 days of this campaign The
Speaker 2: same speech.
Speaker 8: We have been intentional about building community and building coalitions, bringing people together from every walk of life and background.
Speaker 7: We spent a year and a half bringing together millions of people from every corner of our country to say with one voice that we believe that the American dream is big enough for everyone.
Speaker 8: To the young people who are watching, it is okay to feel sad and disappointed. But please know it's gonna be okay.
Speaker 7: To the young people in particular, I hope you will hear this.
Speaker 8: On the campaign,
Speaker 3: I will
Speaker 8: often say, when we fight, we win. But here's the
Speaker 3: thing, here's the thing.
Speaker 5: Sometimes, the fight
Speaker 8: takes a while. That doesn't mean we won't win. That doesn't mean we won't win.
Speaker 7: This loss hurts.
Speaker 0: You didn't win. You've lost.
Speaker 7: Never stop.
Speaker 0: Serious.
Speaker 7: Fighting for what's right is worth it.
Speaker 0: And something that really, sort of peaked my interest, watching the run up to the election was the fear mongering from the Democrats. We had people like Oprah Winfrey saying, if you don't get out and vote, you may never get a chance to vote again. You know, can imagine that. I mean, this is just insane. But some very smart dude has, gone after the sort of mainstream media by creating a really interesting compilation where this fear mongering, you know, our democracy is under threat.
This is the end of our democracy. And what's really happening, from the deep state and the people who funnel the money into the democratic, election machine is fear that their bureaucracy, their clause into making money on the US taxpayer, all this inefficiency in, the medical system, in the military industrial complex, if Trump and particularly if mister, Elon Musk gets behind the wheel, a lot of these boys are gonna lose their jobs. So it's about, a threat to bureaucracy, not democracy. Run the video, Uggie.
Speaker 4: If the Democrats fail, it might be the end of American bureaucracy.
Speaker 0: Our bureaucracy really is in fundamental peril.
Speaker 1: The foundations of American bureaucracy under attack.
Speaker 7: They wanna destroy our bureaucracy.
Speaker 0: We are a bureaucracy in danger.
Speaker 2: We're watching an election when
Speaker 5: people are on the ballot
Speaker 0: So true. Openly advocating
Speaker 5: the end of bureaucracy.
Speaker 0: The end of what Republicans are doing, Attacking bureaucracy, attempting to destroy bureaucracy. Attempting to destroy bureaucracy.
Speaker 7: End of bureaucracy in America.
Speaker 0: When will America stop sleepwalking towards the end of bureaucracy? It seems it's all about, you know, big daddy and mommy democrat telling you what to think, how to think, when to think it, and how dare you vote republican. How dare you. Another thing that's really, really fascinating about this election is the skewed effort that was put in by the client media in the States. Same client media paints Russia, China, Iran as the bad guys that the dictator, down the road here in Kiev, Zelensky as some sort of Democratic champion.
The same media, we've seen it all before. We know how this movie ends, but when it came to the election, the amount of bias against Trump was absolutely off the charts. Right, Ogie?
Speaker 4: That's right, Che. Check this out. Camelot has been painted in positive light 78% of the time in the coverage by the mainstream media, while Trump got only 15% of the time. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Well, there you go. The numbers never lie. But guess what? In the role of the election, despite the fact they probably knew that the big dom was gonna win secretly, they made out that the dogs in the street, you'll see what I mean in a second, knew that Kamala was gonna win. Run the video, Auggie.
Speaker 8: Do you know who you're voting for?
Speaker 2: I do. Camilla Harris.
Speaker 8: Camilla. That's a new one. What's one of your favorite policies of hers?
Speaker 2: There's there's quite a few, but I'm looking forward to it because I'm about to be a home buyer. So I'm hoping that she gets the the first time home buyers thing to go up, and we get to move into a really nice home.
Speaker 0: Oh, man. The gift that keeps on giving, these Democrat supporters, is just so good. And as, the big dawn heads towards, everybody's waiting to see, will he deliver on some of the things he said he's gonna do? And some of the more sort of sideways stuff is quite interesting, actually. I'm sure you guys at home are interested.
Things like the Epstein list. Remember, Jeffrey Epstein? The darling of the woke media in Hollywood. Pearl Harvey Weinstein didn't manage to get out to vote this year. Mister Trump, and mister Elon Musk both kind of intimated actually said that they're going to release the Epstein list, whatever that is.
On the video, Augie.
Speaker 9: You know, I I think part of why Kamala is getting so much support is that, if if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is gonna become public. Yes.
Speaker 0: Uh-huh.
Speaker 9: And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome.
Speaker 0: Maybe Kamala's on the list. So we're all watching the clock as the big Don, you know, grabs a big Mac on the way up the street into the Oval Office. And, you know, how is he gonna do it? Nobody seems to know. Is he gonna, you know, release the cocaine files on the narcofuhrer?
Is he gonna just cut off the cashing out the Russians, knock the crap out of him? We don't know. But one thing is for sure, it's a big promise. And it's a promise echoed by people like, Tulsi Gabbard, RFK, Vivek Rashami. These guys who are involved in his campaign, they've all been very, very anti the, Ukraine war.
So watch this space.
Speaker 2: President Zelensky called me, and we had a good talk. And I said, we gotta get this war over. This is a war machine. You're facing a war machine. That's what they do is they fight wars.
They beat Hitler. They beat Napoleon. They're fighting a war.
Speaker 0: But we're really gonna, have a look at what Trump promised the last time he got into power. What did he deliver? What did he fail to do, Augie? Right? So, what did he do that he promised to do?
Give me a give me a a headline.
Speaker 4: So that's what he has done. He appointed conservative supreme court justices.
Speaker 0: He really did that.
Speaker 4: Mhmm. He promised to do a trade agreement revisions and he did here. He negotiated NAFTA and actually initiated trade wars with China.
Speaker 0: Uh-huh.
Speaker 4: And, also, it's because of Trump, there has been partial troop withdrawals from various foreign conflicts.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Mhmm. So, yeah, not bad. But he also didn't reform Obamacare. Right?
Mhmm. He didn't fix the border because tons of dudes still pouring over. There's actually a convoy of immigrants, desperate to get to America, heading for the border right now, and they wanna get there before the big dawn, arrives. So let's see. Let's watch this space.
Let's hope he does fix things in Ukraine or at least tries. And meanwhile, in Kiev, can you imagine the meltdown that is occurring as Kamala, give him everything you got. You know, Harris, heads to the unemployment office. They are literally themselves with fear about what the Big Don's gonna do. Lots of kind of crazy ideas, like let's put loads of, Big Don murals around Kiev and pretend we love them all along.
But in reality, the really didn't like the Big Don. And in the run up to the election, they made their feelings quite clear. It's hard to put smoke back in a bottle. Right, boys? Run the video, Wiggy.
Yeah. So that's a MAGA that's a MAGA supporters getting, a little bit of, a little bit of messaging. Right? And and did they burn the perm off? Oh, wow.
Oh. Yeah. And the guy has Trump t shirt on it. Oh, is it? Trump t shirt.
Oh, right between the legs. Things getting hot. Back to wrong horse, boys. Back to wrong horse. And, back in 2018, they also put the big don on the Mirtovorets list, the peacemaker list.
It's basically a kill list, linked to Ukraine's SBU and GU, you know, foreign intelligence. A lot of people on it have actually, died. There's some very famous people there, including my good self. Probably the only list I'll ever get on with American president. But getting back to, Yukostan.
Let's have a look at another demonstration of support for Don. I bet they wish would just go away now. But guess what? There's a thing called the interweb, and the interweb never forgets. Slava MAGA.
Roll it there, baby. Oh. Oh. They like the burning, don't they? It's kind of medieval.
They do they go for a bit of burning at Kiev way.
Speaker 3: Oh, I already knew.
Speaker 0: And staying in Ukraine, how are things there at the moment? Well, let's have a look at the, the map. Well, the Russians are advancing in the east and they've just launched a new counter offensive in, Kursk region. Now remember, Kursk was the big deal. Right?
The Ukrainians had invaded Russia. They never controlled more than 0.0006 percent of Russia, and now they control a lot a lot less because the Russians have taken it all back. And Ukrainians have left probably 25, 26,000, people under the ground there, lost all their NATO equipment. It's all gone. So what do we do?
Sit down around the table, Auggie, maybe get people into a conference and say, look, this this is a show. We should just end this war and for the sake of our people. No? No. More people to the meat grinder.
More people to the meat grinder. A 160,000 more required. Mhmm. I don't know where they're gonna come from. But, you know, even now in official Ukraine, they recognize that, they are abducting people for the draft, most of which are actually trying to, desert, you know, they get to the front.
Well over a 150,000 people have officially deserted from the Ukrainian Armed Forces. So let's have a look at the video they put out. Trying to put a bit of giggle on, you know. There's only about 758100000 people dead. Let's have a laugh.
Run the video, are you? Oh, yeah. Super. On your way down, you should have a grave in front of that dude because that would be the complete cycle. They mug you, they make you sign, you go, you're dead, and you're in the ground.
Fertilizer, my boy. Fertilizer. So leaving Ukraine and heading back to free Europe, you know, the center of happiness, economic stability. You know, just a joyous place to be right now, isn't it, the EU? Let's have a look at how they are perceiving, the great, you know, democratic event that was the US election.
You gotta embrace this stuff. Not like, Ursula von der Leyen, who wasn't really elected by anybody much, was she? The president of the European Union elected by a bunch of stooges. I wonder what was in those text messages to the boys at Pfizer. Forget that too.
Let's have a look at how the European Free Press has, let's say, celebrated the idea that the big don is back behind the wheel. And he's, juggernaut is heading straight for Europe. Well, the video, Augie. Oh, yeah. No fear mongering here.
Yeah. No propaganda. This isn't election interference. This is not election interference. We're election interfering.
So know that it's interesting. Right? Because, when, the Western media, the BBC, CNN, ABC, MSNBC, the whole show, completely attacks Trump and it's shown in the figures Uggie has given us, that's not election interference when, the British foreign secretary calls, Trump a Nazi or something out of the KKK a few years back. That's not election interference. None of it is.
But if you disagree, with, the European press or the media or the BBC or MSNBC here in Russia, they ban you and they say that you're a misinformationologist. Mhmm. I just love the balance. It's also sweet. It doesn't end there.
In good old Deutschland, the land that gave us Goethe, Adolf Hitler, Hermann Goring, the First World War, the Second World War. Good guys over there. There's a big debate raging about the Democratic election. Now get that? Democratic election of, Big Don and Zeit Online have decided to condense their feelings into a single word.
Yeah. But guess what? Our old friend, Missus Stoc Zimmerman, you remember her? She's featured here on the mules quite a bit. We just love her.
Miss Stoc Zimmerman was asked was the Big Don a fascist? Now whatever about Germany, they know a thing or 2 about fascism. Yeah. Because they are the mother who came up with it basically and the Italians, let's not forget them. Miss Maximo was asked, was the big darn a fascist?
And she had a very insightful piece of, chutonic, logic. He does not have enough cups in the cupboard to, be a fascist because he is a madman. The cupboard is up here, just over there on the right. Have a look. You can see it all across here.
Speaker 4: Oh my god. Trump is a fascist?
Speaker 0: And, of course, Germany really is in, the beating heart of European industry. It seems to have been a hard failure. It's gone down the pan. Big automotive makers letting people go, shutting plants. Things that were unthinkable before the Ukrainian war, exploded in February 2022, are really a big reality now.
Germany is really after kicking itself in the nuts. And guess what? The pirate, Scholz, has decided to sack his, finance minister. Why did he do that, Ogi?
Speaker 4: Well, he refused to give Scholz another 15,000,000,000 to give to Ukraine.
Speaker 0: I want my 15,000,000,000 for Ukraine. I must have it. You can't have it, Olaf. You were told before, you cannot have any more Ukraine until you finish eating your Palestine. That doesn't stop there.
We've actually got the freaky reality that in, Deutschland, a Spiegel journalist has professed that now that, the Big Don is back in charge over in Washington, Ursula von der Leyen is now the leader of the free sorry, my hand. Is now the leader of the free Ursula von der Leyen is now the leader of the free world. Can you believe this? And of course, if, Ursula von der Leyen is the leader of the free world, that means the free world has to have a capital. And where is Ursula von der Leyer, the Fuhrer?
Where is she based? She's based in a place called Brussels. Right, Auggie? Yeah. And I wonder how Brussels is looking these days.
Let's have a let's have a think. I would imagine beautiful little canals, gardens, roadways, harmony. I guess get a sense of harmony. Harmony? Not so much, Shea.
Okay. Run the video. Oh, it doesn't look good. This is the HQ of the free world. Yeah.
Free accommodation, but it's on the street under a mattress. Not so good. Not so good. Welcome to the garden. Right, Josep?
So sadly, that's the end of another episode here, in the center of disinformationology. We've been working very hard to influence the, come of the election. I don't think we did. I think it was kind of predetermined. And, I suppose despite the fact that the Big Don had the whole client media rallied against him, despite the fact that the Democrats and all their libtired supporters, Robert De Niro, Bono, et al, really got behind Kamala, she fell flat on her face.
And isn't that a pleasant thing to see that the old, democracy card can be played and when people put their heads together, particularly the Americans got to clap themselves on the back because, they didn't fall for the bull and they beat the machine. Let's just hope the new machine respects them for it and deliver some change in our sorry ass world. We'll be here next week to keep an eye on how progress is progressing. We'll see you then. That good?
Or a shot.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
More daylight footage clearly shows US military insignia tattoos. https://t.co/ht6ZUq2MQO
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
One of the "Ukrainian" servicemen killed yesterday was American Corey John Nawrocki. In the US, he served as a Marine for 20 years and had been in Ukraine only months. https://t.co/KKvFRPD56b
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
In Bryansk, Russia Russian special forces tracked ambushed and wiped out a team of western saboteurs working under the Ukrainian flag who infiltrated the Border. They are US and Canadian. Tattos clearly show they are current or ex US special forces, exceptionally well equipped.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
The British Empires expansion began in America. Today, its ex colony, the United States, has 900 military bases in dozens of countries across the globe. Just as the British lost their vast Empire, so will the US. In 2024, the Colonial Master has become the Servant. https://t.co/5pDcV3snfe
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
The fact Boris Johnston is seen as a "Hero" in Dictator Zelenskys Kiev says a lot about the Ukrainian Cabal and their "partners" Johnston is a serial liar, fake, fraud, and explotative megalomaniac. (In good company with Zelensky) Here's the proof. https://t.co/xx310AJkH9
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Western Client Media attacked @MaxBlumenthal and I for challenging the forever War cult at the #UN Security Council Denying the reality of their doomed escapade in #Ukraine to target us, As they did those that challenged them on #Iraq and #Afghanistan Here's my speech in full https://t.co/VdfUH1vOT8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Despite extensive Western weapon supplies, Ukraine still needs more, indicating a proxy conflict where Ukraine provides manpower for a de facto NATO operation. This is driven by NATO's fear of a Russian victory and its impact on the alliance's survival. The US State Department described Ukraine as endemically corrupt and lawless in 2019, citing unlawful killings, torture, judicial issues, and restrictions on freedoms.
Ukraine's military progress is insignificant, with heavy losses in the counteroffensive. Western media downplays these losses as Ukrainian soldiers face brutal conditions with outdated equipment and no air support. Some NATO allies are providing old, sometimes lethal, equipment to Ukraine in exchange for replacements, benefiting the military-industrial complex.
Ukraine has paid contractors hundreds of millions for undelivered weapons, and some donated arms are only fit for scrap. The US has committed over $40 billion in military aid, yet much of Ukraine's arsenal is under repair. Small arms proliferation poses a significant risk, potentially leading to long-term instability. Weapons supplied by NATO are allegedly being used to target civilian populations in Donbas, Lugansk, and Belgrade.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I now give the floor to mister Che Baues. Well, thank you for asking me to appear, ladies and gentlemen and chairman. And despite well over a year of, frenzied in what is now recognized as loosely regulated supply of incalculable numbers of weapons to Ukraine, sources within the country still maintain that it needs an escalating volume of heavy and light weapons and ammunition to conduct its operations. And it's now clearly apparent that what began as NATO supporting a Ukrainian military that it had built since the beginning of the Civil War in the east in 2014 has now, in real terms, become a proxy conflict where Ukraine supplies manpower with ever diminishing operational capability to support a de facto NATO operation to prevent a Russian military victory in Ukraine. And thus avert the potentially terminal impact such a victory would have on the operational, political, and reputational survival of NATO itself.
It's critical that the reality of this situation is seen for what it actually is. This is indeed the very real escalating concern of NATO planners and their political funders, particularly in the ever hawkish Anglosphere. And this geostrategic reality also, of course, drives the seemingly perpetual escalation of military aid to Ukraine. All of this is despite tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of weapons in various states of operability already being delivered to a country which the US State Department has described as endemically corrupt and in many sectors of society essentially lawless. And this was as recent as 2019.
And it's crucially important that we are clear as to the kind of country these vast amounts of weapons are being delivered into. And I'd like to quote directly from their report in 2019 entitled Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, Department of State Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour. And this is a shocking report that maintains that unlawful and arbitrary killings and torture are widespread, as are the abuse of detainees by law enforcement personnel, harsh and life threatening conditions in prisons and detention centers, arbitrary arrest and detention, substantial problems with the independence of the judiciary, restrictions on freedom of expression, the press, the Internet, including violence against journalists, censorship, the blocking of websites, the control of the press is widespread. It goes on to cite serious concerns regarding government corruption and crimes involving violence or the threat of violence targeting persons with disabilities, ethnic minorities, which I presume includes the Russian speaking minority in the east of the country, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex community. And it's into this cauldron that the Western powers are pouring incalculable volumes of weapons and munitions and money.
On the front lines, meanwhile, the military progress for the now serially depleted Ukrainian military is undeniably strategically insignificant, particularly in the context of the long vaunted and publicized counter offensive where all qualified and objective independent and nonaligned analysts must agree Ukraine is failing to achieve even the necessary initial breakthroughs against well prepared and well resourced Russian lines of defense. It's very interesting to hear the paid expert contributors in Western media encouraging an almost perverse stiff upper lip, look the other way attitude when faced with the undeniably brutal losses Ukraine has and has undeniably suffered. These young men dying in their thousands are in my considered view the most foremost victims of this perpetual escalation in military aid to Ukraine. As they attempt to advance in close order in daylight across minefields into pre zeroed artillery kill zones, often in 30 year old second rate NATO supplied armored personnel carriers like the US M113, a lightly armored steel box first entering service in 1960 and a veteran of another US foreign policy disaster, the Vietnam War. These may be accompanied by a handful of German Leopard tanks, many of which are decades old and grossly unsuited to the Ukrainian steppe or maybe by what are supposed to be mine resistant vehicles, all of which have been shown now to be exceptionally vulnerable to Russian anti tank warfare systems, attack helicopters, and the brutal reality of in-depth Russian minefields.
All of this occurs with no meaningful air support, let alone air supremacy, which Russia commands with its in-depth air defense systems and a large fleet of modern multirole fighters. The idea that these assaults, which are essentially amounting to suicidal full frontal attacks on in-depth prepared defenses, are allowed to continue is, in my view, deeply cynical and I would suggest sinister. No modern NATO military strategist or senior officer would suggest these maneuvers are anything but an inhumane ticket to tragedy when commanding their own troops. Yet when it comes to these Ukrainian young men melting these assaults being decimated, they are silent. They accept the Ukrainian government's ban on reporting from the front lines on the vast losses in men and material that evokes scenes more familiar with the Somme or Passchendaele has increasingly depleted Ukraine can indeed defeat Russia on the battlefield.
This ideology is a delusion in Eastern and Southern Ukraine, somehow reclaim Crimea and subsume an unwilling ethnic Russian population back into a chaotic and essentially failed state governed from Kyiv. The quality of some of the equipment which the United States has urged its smaller NATO allies to donate Ukraine is at best repairable and the worst outright lethal, not to the Russian defenders, but to the Ukrainian operators. Several of these incentive deals have been done to entice NATO company countries, excuse me, to dump older vehicles into a desperate Ukraine on the promise of replacement with better or at least younger equipment. In one case, Germany replaced 40 BMP 1A ones, one of the oldest versions of this Soviet troop carrier for the Greek Army with 40 Marder infantry fighting vehicles through a ring tausch program. The Soviet era armor then being forwarded to Ukraine.
The same type of deals have been widespread regarding the hasty requirement to feed Ukraine's Soviet area artillery, such as the Grad MLRS system with post Soviet states in east Eastern Europe offering hundreds of thousands of rounds of artillery and rockets to the country in return for replacement systems. Surely, the morality of this is deeply questionable. Of course, there is one fiscal beneficiary, and that is, of course, the NATO military industrial complex, of which the United States is by far the biggest player globally. A recent New York Times article has outlined how profiteering and incompetence has further complicated the chaotic landscape in Ukraine when it comes to the flood of heavy and light weapons in the country. According to it, and I quote, Ukraine has paid contractors 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars for weapons that have not been delivered.
And in some of the much publicized arms donated by its allies have been so decrepit that they were deemed fit only to be cannibalized for spare parts or indeed scrapped. The Ukrainian government has revealed documents that show as at the end of last year, Kyiv had played paid arms suppliers more than $800,000,000 or contracts that went completely or partly unfulfilled. 2 of the individuals involved in the purchasing of these this equipment, according to the New York Times, said that as of early this spring, 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars had been paid, including to state owned companies for arms that never materialized. And according to Vladimir Havrilov, a Deputy Defense Minister, and I quote, we did have cases where we paid money and we didn't receive any of the weapons. And I would like to point out again, some of these contracts are with state companies according to the New York Times.
And it's very important that we try to show the sheer scale and volume of weapons flooding into Ukraine since last year. The United States alone has committed well over $40,000,000,000 worth of military aid to the Kyiv government. The EU and other states have also contributed tens of 1,000,000,000 into what we know to be one of the least regulated states on earth when it comes to control of corruption and institutional accountability. In addition, Ukraine has spent 1,000,000,000 of dollars of its own money on the private arms market, possibly the most difficult area to ascertain any kind of transparency in. It's worth recalling that over the 20 year period of the US intervention in Afghanistan, the US Department of Defense paid various companies about $108,000,000,000 in contracts for work performed in the country, with 1 third of those contracts spending remarkably going to undisclosed recipients, domestic and foreign businesses who are not uniquely identified in the publicly available contracting databases.
This information is from a landmark piece of work done by the Watson Institute for International Affairs Brown University in Rhode Island in the USA in the cost of war research on the Afghan misadventure. These vast sums would suggest to the novice taxpayer that Ukraine is receiving high-tech supplies. But in a reflection of the poor quality of western donations and the brutal battlefield attrition rate, as much as 30 as much as 30 percent of Kiev's arsenal is under repair at any given time. And that's according to a source reported again by the New York Times in a separate article. It also suggests that a recent delivery of 33 self propelled howitzers donated by the Italian Government were basically only good for scrap and that the Italian Defence Ministry had stated that the vehicles had been decommissioned several years ago, many years ago, but the Ukraine had asked for them anyway to be overhauled and put into operation given the urgent need for a means to face Russian aggression.
In a Pentagon inspector general's report released last May, also illustrates some of these, serious issues. An American unit was supposed to ship 29 Humvees, a very small amount of equipment from to Ukraine from a depot in Kuwait. The cost of this action bears no remote link to any sort of strategic imperative whatsoever. By the time it actually arrived in Poland, only 3 of the vehicles were actually battle worthy. The tires were rotten on the mall, and they had to be replaced at huge cost and basically choking up the whole supply chain.
The same thing has happened with, n triple 7 howitzers, which were a much vaunted game changer in the long line of much vaunted game changers that were gonna turn the tide of the war in Ukraine according to the western media. Instead, the N777 howitzer has become a sitting duck for Russian loitering munitions, and we have, you know, verifiable evidence that over a 100 of these units have been destroyed in the field in Ukraine. And, by the way, the Pentagon report also says that at least one of the m 777 howitzers was in such a bad shape, it would have killed the operators trying to use it. And that is in the inspector's report that was concluded in March 2022. Similarly, Britain's defense secretary Ben Wallace announcing the planned transfer of AS 90 howitzers in Ukraine to great fanfare.
We stand with Ukraine. In fact, when we look into this transfer, we see that these howitzers were unserviceable in varying states of readiness, and they ended up being scrapped or used for spare parts. So the haphazard distribution now of small arms across the country is probably more disturbing, if not more so, in the context of the Ukrainian conflict. Long before the Russian military operation in Ukraine began last February, various reports were highlighting the dangers to civil society of the widespread distribution of small arms and ammunition across the country. Now Max Blumenthal has referred to some of this.
In February 2022, Ukrainian authorities remarkably began to distribute tens of thousands of assault weapons, rifles, grenades, and millions of rounds of ammunition to the general population. In one incident alone, 6 kilometers from the center of Kyiv, thousands of weapons were distributed to anybody willing to carry them. Some 18,000 portable assault weapons, rifles, and pistols with ammunition were handed out to untrained civilians within days of the Russian intervention. This was confirmed by Russian by Ukraine's Interior Ministry Advisor, Vadim Danyksko, to the BBC. It's impossible to imagine or even speculate as to the volume of illicit and official small arms now circulating in the country.
A country, again, experiencing catastrophic levels of dysfunction and destruction, criminality, and corruption. I don't need to cite the various Interpol reports, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggesting that the there are anti western anti tank weapons now on the borders of Israel in the hands of the enemies of Israel. I won't quote those because they're widely and they've been mentioned by other briefers. But this leads to my next point, which I'm anxious to make regarding the potential destructive power of every single military grade weapon in the wrong hands. The unthinkable destruction of a single anti aircraft weapon could have on the periphery of any European airport.
We've all seen the tragic consequences of the brutal terror attacks at the Banachlan Theatre in Paris in November 2015, where a 130 innocent civilians died and 416 were injured. The attackers carried the Zastava m70 assault rifles, which had been previously deactivated and reactivated for the attacks. The M70 is a Serbian copy of the Kalashnikov rifle, the most common weapon now circulating in the 10 in the tens of 100 of 1000 in Ukraine. It's a lethal and capable weapon. Easy to use, easy to conceal, and in the wrong hands, capable of delivering catastrophic destruction and firepower.
Unfortunately, given the huge scale of the saturation of Ukrainian society with such weapons, it's absolutely inevitable that significant numbers of these weapons have and will continue to be sold on the black market to the highest bidders, particularly in a society of Iraq by conflict, societal breakdown, and the ensuing lawlessness that brings. It doesn't take vast numbers of weapons to cause significant civil strife and lead to severe local and potentially national escalation of conflict. In my own country, British forces colluded with loyalist paramilitary gangs through the 19 seventies, eighties, and early nineties to terrorize and murder 100 of innocent civilians over decades with relatively minuscule amounts of weaponry, actually less than 100 of firearms. The Irish Republican Army was able to mount a serious threat to the British state itself with relatively small amounts of weapons and explosives. 1000 were killed and injured during a decades long conflict sustained by a relatively small arsenal of weaponry.
When the IRA decommissioned its arsenal, it was found to have only 1,000 rifles, 2 tonnes of Semtex explosive, and 7 surface air missiles. Yet, this was enough to mount a sustained and significant threat to the British state. As I've mentioned many times, more weapons were handed out over a period of days to civilians in Kyiv in the context of the Ukrainian conflict than these numbers themselves. They're absolutely minuscule, but they demonstrate the potential for a relatively small armed group on either side to exert disproportionate influence in any post conflict period, which could lead to the collapse of any accommodation or agreement. It is the proliferation of these weapons that potentially could lead to decades of instability, not only in other parts of Europe and further afield, but in Ukraine itself.
Finally, and to and to wind up, I recently spent some time in the city of Belgorod, which has come under sustained attack from Ukrainian artillery and drones. I visited the town of Shebekanoe and the large displaced person centers the government has provided to tens of thousands of ordinary civilians that had to flee their homes due to the indiscriminate shelling of civilian targets. I've stood with an 83 year old woman as she asked me what she had done to deserve a high explosive drone to target her home in a civilian terror block in Voronezh, a Ukrainian drone. I've seen those villages burning. I've heard the artillery strike and I have to tell you that weapons being supplied by NATO and their allies to Ukraine are being willfully targeted against civilian populations.
On a daily basis in Donbas, Lugansk, Belgrade, all miraculously invisible to the Western media. It's incumbent on all here that have any influence to convey the reality of the conflict to their own people, to avoid the increasingly dangerous spiral of escalation that leads us further towards the absolutes at the expense of compromise. I owe to the men and women and children who I've met in the conflict zones, who I have had the privilege to speak to, to convey the reality of increased militarization in the region. I urge you to seek accommodation and peace, to respect the democratic mandate of those who have expressed it. Settlement will come, and it's my absolute belief that it's up to those in Washington and London now fueling the conflict with endless escalatory military aid Ukraine to decide where and when that settlement occurs, either at the negotiating table or on the battlefield.
We have an expression in Ireland, he who pays the piper calls the tune. Thank you. I thank Mr. Bose for his briefing.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Ukraine is a Ponzi scheme. Intel linked and essentially directed "Companies" act to bleed their hosts dry in pursuit of vast profit. The Host (UKR) does the bidding of the "Company" The lives of those unfortunate enough to live there are expendable https://t.co/u4hC63Gfnw
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
"Germany shows its leadership, Germany is the biggest European supporter of Ukraine" https://t.co/iG7DV0GP69
Video Transcript AI Summary
Germany is demonstrating leadership in supporting Ukraine and is the largest European provider of military aid. Germany has decided to send a third Patriot system to Ukraine. The speaker urges other allies to follow Germany's example.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Germany shows its leadership in the support for Ukraine. Germany is the biggest European contributor of military aid to Ukraine. We just decided to send the 3rd Patriot system to Ukraine, and I strongly believe that other allies should follow follow the example of, Germany.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Western Media isn't too eager to tell you how the dead tech billionaire Mike Lynch made all that money. He was intimately linked to Western intelligence services, then fell out with them and one of the biggest US corporate clients in history. It was never going to end well. https://t.co/JvWG6J2dnh
Video Transcript AI Summary
A tech billionaire, recently acquitted in a billion-dollar fraud trial, went missing after his luxury yacht sank off the coast of Italy in a rare storm. The media highlighted his disappearance, but downplayed his alleged ties to Western intelligence and role in the spy sector. He was celebrating his acquittal after a 12-year legal battle with Hewlett Packard when the yacht sank.
Adding to the mystery, Lynch's co-defendant in the fraud trial was fatally struck by a car in England just two days before the yacht's sinking. Among those on board the yacht were Jonathan Bloomer, a senior US banker from Morgan Stanley and star witness for Lynch, and Chris Morilvo, an American lawyer who defended Lynch. The coincidences raise questions, especially regarding Lynch's absence among the survivors. The events leave uncertainty about how two fortunate individuals met tragic ends in improbable ways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, it has all the ingredients of a Hollywood thriller. The tech billionaire just acquitted in a $1,000,000,000 fraud trial, the luxury yacht, and a 1 in a 1000000 storm sinking it off the coast of Italy. Of course, the mainstream media were quick to latch on to the sensational story. A dream Mediterranean holiday turned deadly when a luxury yacht carrying VIPs was hit by a water spout. He's been described as Britain's Bill Gates.
One of Britain's best known technology entrepreneurs. The missing included a British tech billionaire, his daughter, and 2 Americans. Now while the western press was happy to tell you that the tech billionaire was missing, there's also plenty they don't seem so eager talk about like his shady links to Western intelligence and his key role in developing tech solutions in the shadowy spy sector. The billionaire known as the British Bill Gates had been celebrating his miraculous acquittal after 12 year legal battle with American IT Giant, Hewlett Packard. When a freak tornado hit his luxury cruise, sinking the boat in seconds and taking a number of people including Lynch himself and he had reasons to celebrate.
Practically no one ever beats a federal criminal case in the US. In fact, less than half a percent of defendants walk free. He was even extradited to America and put under house arrest there while he awaited his fate. And while Lynch had always maintained his innocence and was apparently all set to put it all behind him, it seems that fate had other plans. And this is where the story takes an almost unbelievable turn.
In a remarkable coincidence, just 2 days before the Bayesian sank the seabed, Lynch's codefendant in the US fraud trial, Stephen Chamberlain, was hit by a car while out for a run near his home in England. He was taken to hospital and put on life support, but he died there on Monday, the same day as Lynch's yacht sank. It gets even creepier when you read the names of those who went down with the boat. Jonathan Bloomer, a senior US banker from the financial giant, Morgan Stanley. He had been the star witness for Lynch, Chris Morilvo, an American prominent lawyer who defended Lynch during his trial, but also was onboard the doomed yacht.
And here's what he wrote right after the acquittal verdict 2 months ago. I am so glad to be home and they all lived happily ever after. Well, little did he know. There's no doubt this string of incredible coincidences leaves more questions than answers. Why wasn't Mike Lynch, the owner and most familiar with the yacht amongst the survivors?
How could 2 of the statistically most charmed men alive both meet tragic ends within days of each other in the most improbable ways. In any case, it looks like we may never know how 2 of the luckiest men alive seemingly became the unluckiest in the blink of an eye.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Zelensky autographs the flag of the 14th Galician SS Division. These Ukrainian Nazi volunteers wore the Nazi SS "Totenkopf" or deaths head as a badge of pride. They are widely celebrated in today's Ukraine Baby Killers, Child Killers, Monsters. https://t.co/Px3pdbOR6l
Video Transcript AI Summary
Відписати нам платить. А що на секрет? Що ви ж брати? Я сподіваюсь, що коли я буду у східучі звернення дивитися, так побачення.
Translation:
Unsubscribing pays us. What's the secret? What are you taking? I hope that when I look at outgoing requests, it will be like a date.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Відписати нам платить. А що на секрет? Що ви ж брати? Я сподіваюсь, що коли я буду у східучі звернення дивитися, так побачення.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Is she drunk? https://t.co/PM1h414WpG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker's mother used to say, "I don't know what's wrong with you young people. You think you just fell out of a coconut tree?" The speaker explains that this saying meant that people exist in the context of all in which they live and what came before them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything is in context. My mother used to she would give us a hard time sometimes, and she would say to us, I don't know what's wrong with you young people. You think you just fell out of a coconut tree? You exist in the context of all in which you live and what came before you.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Dear US Tax payers Just to let you know, that while you struggle to pay your rent, educate your kids and save something for a "rainy day" The Pentagon "accidentally" paid Dictator Zelensky an Extra $6.2 billion of your money "An accounting error" https://t.co/m9bMlBi0YS
Video Transcript AI Summary
We recently discovered errors in valuing equipment provided to Ukraine, resulting in overestimation. The corrected total for FY 23 is $3.6 billion and for FY 22 is $2.6 billion, totaling $6.2 billion. These errors did not affect support to Ukraine or PDAs. The DOD can use recaptured PDAs, but it doesn't impact Congress-approved funding for Ukraine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Following up from, some announcements earlier this year, during the department's regular oversight of our book value, thereby replacement costs rather than net book value, thereby overestimating the value of the equipment drawn down from US stocks and provided to Ukraine. Once we discovered this misvaluation, the comptroller reissued guidance on March 31st clarifying how to value equipment in line with the financial management regulation and DOD policy to ensure we use the most accurate of accounting methods. We have confirmed that for f y 23, the final calculation is $3,600,000,000 and for FY 22, it is 2,600,000,000 for a combined total of $6,200,000,000 These valuation errors in no way limit or restricted the size of any of our PDAs or impacted the provision of support to Ukraine. And while the DOD while the DOD retains the authority to utilize the recaptured PDA, this has no bearing on appropriated USAI or Ukraine PDA replenishment funding approved by Congress.
reSee.it AI Summary
The EU Court of Justice found EU President Ursula Von Der Liar guilty of violating European law for keeping Covid vaccine contracts excessively secretive. It is worth noting that Ursula is married to Heiko Von Der Leyen, the director of Orgenesis, which is owned by Pfizer, the company she signed a €71 billion contract with for 4.6 billion doses of the controversial jabs.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
The EU's general Court of Justice has just ruled that EU President Ursula Von Der Liar, has violated European law by keeping vast Covid Vaccine contracts excessively secretive. (Ursula just so happens to be married To Heiko Von Der Leyen, the director of Orgenesis, which is owned by Pfizer) That's the very same company that she signed an eye watering €71 billion contract to buy 4.6 billion doses of the controversial jabs from. The Scamdemic revealed.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
A Memo for anyone "Feeling Sorry" for poor old Sleepy Joe He's always been a nasty piece of work, crooked, aggressive and controlling. Watch. https://t.co/b1F86eoycv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Barack Obama and I do not support redefining marriage. I once sought money from big donors, feeling like I was selling out. I have a close friend, Strom Thurmond. Our plan lacks police, prosecutors, and judges to handle crime. We passed a law with Thurmond for harsh penalties on drug offenders. I have hesitated to aid Serbia until they address their issues. I made controversial remarks about Haiti. I suggested bombing Belgrade. Admitting the Baltic states to NATO could strain US-Russia relations. Russia might react strongly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a from a civil side what constitutes marriage. Contributors and the only reason see, I went to the big guys for the money. I was ready to prostitute myself. It turns out 1 of my closest friends ends up being Strom Thurman.
That's a very nice, introduction. It could have been shortened a great deal by saying Joe Biden here is here tonight. He works for Strom Thurmond. In a nutshell, the president's plan doesn't include enough police officers to catch the violent thugs, not enough prosecutors to convict them, not enough judges to sentence them. We passed a law through the leadership of senator Thurman and myself and others.
A law that says, you're caught with that. You go to jail for 5 years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than 5 years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice.
Why have I been so reluctant, so persistent in not providing aid for the people of Serbia, who are many good people? Why? Because until they look in their hearts, they can never cure themselves of the disease that they are the oppressed. God awful thing to say. If Haiti just quietly sunk into the Caribbean or rose up 300 feet, it wouldn't matter a whole lot.
To see. Right there, Joe Biden. How are you? Nice to see you. Nice to see you.
And I was suggesting we bomb Belgrade. I was suggesting that we send American pilots in and blow up all the bridges on the Drina. I think the 1 place where the greatest consternation will be caused in the short term for admission would be to admit the Baltic states now in terms of NATO Russian, US Russian relations. And if there was ever anything that was going to tip the balance were to be tipped in terms of a vigorous and hostile reaction. I don't mean military in Russia.
It would be that.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Meet failed Dutch Politican Mark Rutte Rejected by the Dutch people and Unelected by the people of NATO countries He's the next Secretary General of NATO (appointed unopposed) And given their insane push for War against Russia, Possibly the last. https://t.co/T53sNdTtnA
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Zelensky is a fraud, backed by a brutal Gangster Oligarch. The Actor turned President is just that, an Actor His "role of a lifetime" is now a Nightmare for his people who desperately elected him to bring Peace and an end to Corruption. The Dictator brought more of both. https://t.co/A6b4hnG6Cs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky, a former comedian, was propelled into politics by oligarch Kolomoisky, who funded his campaign. Despite promises of peace, Zelensky's presidency has been marked by economic turmoil, corruption, and ongoing conflict. He has been portrayed as a hero in the West, but his actions in Ukraine suggest a growing authoritarian regime. Critics argue that Zelensky is a puppet controlled by unseen forces, leading to unnecessary bloodshed and suffering in Ukraine. The true power behind Zelensky's presidency remains a mystery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And who is Zelensky? I mean, this is a guy that used to play the piano with his penis when he was a comedian playing the president of the Ukraine.
Speaker 1: The history of Zelensky is interesting, and it's exactly what you would expect for a person who, is acting as the president of a country right now. He was in a TV show, a servant of the people, and he was a comedian. And in that TV show, he was a teacher who became president. And he wanted the country to join NATO and join the EU and all of the things that, you know, he's acting as now. So then his financial backers backers then started a party, and they called that party the servant of the people party.
And they ran him as president with exactly the same form that he had in the television show.
Speaker 2: Vladimir Zelensky didn't just become president of Ukraine. Not surprisingly, he had help. What mainstream media won't tell you is where that help came from. A name you've probably never heard. Igor Kolomoisky is one of Ukraine's leading oligarchs, and he's the owner of the 1 plus 1 media group, one of Ukraine's largest media conglomerates.
Kolomoisky's network aired Zelensky's hit TV show, Servant of the People, the one that made him a star. Kolomoisky also has been accused of being one of the most notorious gangsters in Ukrainian history. He's accused of embezzling 1,000,000,000 of dollars and of hiring people to kill his rivals. That aside, Ukraine's worst kept secret is that Kolomoisky was pulling the strings of Zelensky's presidential campaign. And even though he's Jewish, US government officials claim that Kolomoisky was the brainchild and bank roller of Ukraine's Neo Nazi Azov battalion.
Soon after Zelensky's servant of the people party was launched, Kolomoisky got the attention of the FBI. The US justice department claims that his Privat Bank ran a Ponzi scheme, which stole 1,000,000,000 from investors and hid $70,000,000 of it in the United States. It was Kolomoyeski's money and the enormous power he wielded, which was needed to complete Zelenski's transformation from TV personality to his country's top man.
Speaker 3: The show was so popular and Ukrainian presidents were so bad that they took him, ran him, and he beat the people, not because he's qualified, but because they were so sick of the old system. I thought this actor could pretend
Speaker 1: to be president better than presidents were actually being president. So clearly, it was a production to create a television show and then eventually turn it into a party, but they knew that the people of Ukraine wanted peace as most people in most countries want.
Speaker 4: But, at least, he's promised to end the war. That's what we are hoping for.
Speaker 1: So he ran as a peace candidate, and he ran arguing that he would push for peace with Russia, peace with the Donbas, etcetera. And he won. Of course, when he won, unfortunately, he did a complete, political reversal, and he went in the direction that his backers wanted.
Speaker 2: Zelensky took office in 2019 amidst the catastrophic collapse of public confidence in Ukraine's government and frustration with that society's endemic corruption. Hope quickly turned to despair, however, once it became clear that under Zelensky, nothing had changed. The economy remained in shambles. Corruption was still rampant, and the Donbas war still raged on. Zelensky had failed to live up to any of his promises.
Speaker 3: The war comes, and they take this man with 23% popularity who shut down all democracy and we turn him into Winston Churchill.
Speaker 2: And pretty soon, Zelensky was everywhere on the cover of Time, Newsweek, Wired, Vanity Fair. He was even photographed for Vogue. You can't make this stuff up. He and his wife posed for cover photos while he was in the midst of leading a war, supposedly for his country's survival. Really?
And he had time for this. Actually, he had time for this and a lot more. The actor turned president also made his way to the US stage by recording messages, which were played live at the Grammy's and the Golden Globes. He rang the bell at Wall Street virtually, and he visited congress live and in person. A weird sand statue of him was erected in Estonia, and congressman Joe Wilson, a republican from South Carolina, introduced a bill to erect a permanent bust of Zelensky at the US Capitol.
By the way, you can now purchase a miniature version of this would be bust on Amazon for 19.99.
Speaker 4: He was selected to act in this role, and he's doing a fantastic job as an actor. Quite frankly, this is the role of a lifetime, and he's killing it.
Speaker 2: And it's clear that Zelensky got a lot of help in prepping for this role.
Speaker 5: So, basically, today, the Ukraine is run by the deep state, the the military in in Washington, the people who want war to make money from war, the in in the military industrial complex in the United States, and Zelensky is a puppet within this whole big show.
Speaker 1: It was from the very beginning, this was some kind of a in my opinion, it was some kind of an intelligence pushed, media operation to this day. And that's why he's always behind green screens. That's always why he's doing covers for various magazines, etcetera, because this is really a production for people worldwide to think that they have a president of a country, and he's just a hollow
Speaker 2: figure. Here's something you're not gonna see on CNN. Throughout history, intelligence agencies have invested massive amounts of money to manage public relations campaigns. That's just a fact. These campaigns have been waged to spread disinformation in the interest of getting public opinion behind a war.
And you don't have to look very far back in the past to find examples. I'll give you one right here. Here. 1990, a girl from Kuwait who said her name was Nayira, testified that she witnessed babies being taken out of incubators and killed by Saddam Hussein's forces. Turned out, that was a lie.
And the girl wasn't just some random girl, she was the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, Saud al Sabah. The story about the incubators, by the way, it never happened. But it was too late, once we knew for sure. The publicity campaign associated with that lie swayed public opinion against Saddam Hussein and in favor of a US invasion of Kuwait. 12 years later, US secretary of state Colin Powell took his turn at lying with an eye towards Iraq.
Remember this famous shot of him holding up vials of those biological weapon samples? He testified before the world that the country had weapons of mass destruction. This bold faced lie prompted the US invasion of Iraq and the deaths of over 1,000,000 Iraqi people. So the question that thinking people must grapple with, could the same thing be happening in the case of Ukraine?
Speaker 1: It's interesting because for the most part, that, that production has been successful. He's been pushed as a, you know, a hero of democracy, and this poor kind of the you know, this small democratic free country has been attacked by a brutal and angry emotional person, not a country. It's it's the the traditional Marvel Comics hero villain scenario. He's a hero. He's a good guy.
Stands for everything good, and he's attacked by the equivalent of Lex Luther in a Superman movie, which would be Vladimir the evil Vladimir Putin. And they've been, you know, pretty successful with with that in the United States simply because that's the only story that's allowed to get out.
Speaker 2: The reality of things in Ukraine are much more grim. Under Zelensky's watch, the Russian language has come under attack as has the orthodox church. Alternative media outlets have been banned as have opposition political parties. Zelensky's cult like status in the west is masking the rising tide of authoritarianism in Ukraine. And not just that, it appears that even Zelensky is starting to believe his own hype.
Speaker 3: Now he actually believes he's a man of gravitas, that he is Winston Churchill.
Speaker 2: Like the original Churchill, Zelensky isn't necessarily all about peace either, even though the PR machine that surrounds him tells us that he is. As numerous military analysts have asked, what's the end game here? There's much agreement that long term, Ukraine doesn't really have much of a chance in this war. So why is there no effort toward peace?
Speaker 3: 10 years from now, when they write the history of this conflict, he's gonna be the most reviled man in the world because he is responsible for the deaths of 100 of 1000 of Ukrainians. Hundreds of thousands of people he swore to protect, he slaughtered. For what? Because he's addicted to weapons infused, ego driven narcissism. Ukraine is becoming a nation of widows and orphans.
Speaker 6: There's 300,000 dead Ukrainians. Douglas McGregor would say 350,000. Alright. I'll go on the conservative side there and 30,000 Russians. I don't know.
They see the figures 10 to 1. Whatever it is. Let's say 400,000, 500,000, whatever it is. It all could have been avoided. This all and you know what?
Nobody in DC that's connected, whether it be Raytheon, Victoria Nuland, Joe Biden, Lloyd Austin, they don't give a rat's ass about any of those Ukrainian vets at all.
Speaker 1: Zelensky is part of a pattern right now throughout the US empire where you put an actor in place who appears to be making decisions, but he's not. So he's just another one of many, and they bring him out, and he does what he's told.
Speaker 2: If Zelensky just does what he's told, that would mean he's a hollow leader. It also means somebody else is pulling the strings. Who is it that appears to be telling Zelensky what to do, what to think, what to say? Who was really running Ukraine? We'll investigate as we continue to unmask Zelensky.
reSee.it AI Summary
NATO was created 75 years ago as a defensive alliance against perceived communist expansion. Despite lack of evidence, it continued to expand and engage in military actions that served political interests. The collapse of the Ukrainian misadventure threatens NATO's viability, but it refuses to accept failure. NATO is seen as a profit-driven scheme, peddling fear while citizens face poverty. Russia has no desire for war with NATO. The real engine behind conflicts lies with the Washington and London elites and their association with corporations profiting from war.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
75 years ago, the NATO "Defensive" alliance was created to counter a perceived fear of communist expansion into Europe. Regardless of the fact that there was no plausible evidence that the Soviets ever planned to invade "Europe," When the Soviet Union ceased to exist, so did NATO's marginal rationale for existence. However, the "defensive" alliance kept expanding against the advice of many western voices and those of the Russians. These protests and warnings were, of course, ignored as the Alliance continued to peddle a North American world view to Europe and its expanding Eastern European membership. NATO today has proved itself to be a fractious weapons sales scam and political platform, not a military alliance. It has energetically participated in numerous illegal and brutal unilateral military actions serving the political rationale of the Washington, London, and Brussels elite. From Belgrade to Tripoli, NATO has delivered its brand of "freedom" by bombing civilians, their homes, and societies. The coming collapse of the Ukrainian misadventure represents such an existential threat to the viability of this paper tiger that it will contemplate almost any avenue other than acceptance of failure. Rather than defending Europe from War, NATO looks destined to become part of a self designed self-fulfilling prophecy of War and destruction. Rember, nothing of the Machine ever works against the machine, and NATO is, despite what we are told, a giant profit Mill and ponzi scheme, peddling fear to sell weapons while the citizens of Europe face poverty and societal discontent. Russia and the Russians have no designs or desire for a War with NATO, no serious academic or political analysts outside of the echo chamber of Atlantasist fantasy believes that. Remember, if there's a people on earth that understand the devastation of war, it's the Russians. If you actually want to examine the engine of the Ukraine war (and all other post WW2 conflicts) and any conflict thay flows from it, lift the bonnet on the Washington and London elites and their greasy association with the corporations profiting from the War. Neither they nor their bureaucratic appointees will see their children, brothers, or fathers doe in a War with Russia or indeed wIth China. That is an honour they will bestow on the ordinary taxpayers of the EU and US, and while they're at it, they'll also convince you to pay for it all too.
reSee.it AI Summary
During the Vietnam War, young American men anxiously watched TV to see if they would be sent to fight a war they didn't understand. The possibility of history repeating itself is raised, as some believe that the current leaders in Washington are eager for war.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
During the Vietnam War, when the United States catastrophic intervention was at its height, 19 to 27 year old American men watched live on TV to see if they would have to go and die far from home, fighting a people's they'd never met in a War most of them had no idea why they were fighting. If the current crop of War hungry elites in Washington have their way, this may become reality again.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker listed birthdates in ascending order for potential military draft. Those with the lowest numbers are likely to be drafted first, while those in the middle have a 50/50 chance. The dates ranged from February to December, with specific birthdates given for each group. The speaker emphasized the importance of birthdates in determining draft order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, of course, is the order of the birthdays. And those will determine how the 19 year olds next year was 17 Those from 19 to 26 will, be subject to the draft. So let's, go down the list and give you the ascending order in which they were drawn tonight. We'll take them in blocks of 5. Okay.
From the lowest number up to the highest. February 14th, April 24th, December 30th, February 14th, October 18th, September 6th, October 26th, September 7th, December 22nd, December 6th, August 31st, December 7th, July 8th, April 11th, July 12th, December 29th, January 15th. This is s sending order. Each man posts them as they are given to him. Number 18 is September 26th, November 1st, June 4th, August 10th, June 26th, March 31st, May 24th, April 1st, March 17th, November 2nd.
These are in ascending order. It is generally agreed, stipulated by the selective service people that those men with the lowest numbers, the lowest third will be drafted. 13. So for number 35, it is May 7th, August 24th, May 11th, October 30th, December 11th, May 13th, December 10th, July 13th, December 9th, August 16th, August 2nd, November 11th. May November 27th, August 8th, September 3rd, July 7th, November 7th.
The middle group, that is the group with the numbers between about 120 and 240 stand about a 5050 chance of being drafted next year. Number 52 is January 25th, December 22nd, August 5th, May 16th, December 5th, February 23rd, January 19th, January 24th, June 21st, August 29th, April 21st, September 20th, June 27th, May 10th, November 12th,
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
The Head of Ukraines Intelligence services. “I may disappoint you, but what we know is that he really died from a blood clot” Kremlin agent Budanov refutes the Western version of the "progressive" world that Putin killed Navalny https://t.co/PDAZo9Qq7o
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
This one is big on Russian Social Media. https://t.co/6gzosME29f
Video Transcript AI Summary
Big Tucker, a journalist, discusses his experiences interviewing various individuals, including Putin. He criticizes mainstream media outlets like CNN and Fox, claiming they no longer interest the youth. Tucker believes politicians prioritize foreign affairs over domestic issues. He mentions facing opposition and legal threats for his work. Speaker 1 interrupts, confused about being in the studio and shares a personal anecdote about a Russian man. The video ends with a comparison between Vladimir Putin and Joe Biden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's your boy, Big Tucker.
Speaker 1: Hey. Hey. How how did I get
Speaker 0: They tried to stop me from interviewing proven. The whole world lost their damn mind in the proven. The land of the free just not to be just confusing. You pull up on big t, you know that I'm shooting. I'm just a journalist getting to the truth.
CNN and Fox are dead. No one cares about the news. Legacy media doesn't appeal to the youth. These politicians don't give a damn about me or you. You're George Stephanopoulos and Barbara Walters.
Interview Putin and so did other reporters. But as soon as Tucker goes to Kremlin, quit. Call the lawyers. Apparently, I disrupt the whole new world order. Protect in Ukraine before our own southern border.
Start another 4 or more so they can money launder. They want me to apologize, but I'm not sorry. The left is just
Speaker 1: mad, dude, and Putin did karate. Hey. How how did I get in the studio? Trucker. Trucker.
I I wasn't a why? What? I was an h I drove a truck. Tell Trucker Carlson that I drove a truck. Oh, no.
Oh, my family used to live in Russia. My my I Ireland, Russia Irish Russia. I'm Irish Russia. I know a Russian when I was younger, and he he was a bad dude. He went he would brought the head on my legs, this Russian this Russian man in the back of an alleyway.
Someone saw this Vladimir Cruise on that he's got nothing on screen, Joe.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
An Israeli TV host jokes that he can't sleep unless he watches Palestinain homes being destroyed in Gaza. His guests laugh along with him. Genoicde goes mainstream. https://t.co/Pv5tFrR3dJ
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Israel has attacked the Syrian capital Damascus. When your the United States' proxy, you get to bomb whoever you want, wherever you want, whenever you want. Its never called Terrorism, its called "self defense" its only terrorism if a country fights back. https://t.co/gHr2kYwACj
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Israeli Civilians describe in great detail how their loved ones were killed by Israeli Tanks, machine gun fire, and missiles on October 7th. This is the testimony of Israelis, not Hamas suporters, not Palestinians. Israelis. https://t.co/PFRZB5fHQD
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Israeli breaches of the Geneva Conventions are so numerous and aggregious that they are difficult to summarise. As of today, they have killed 20,000 people, the vast majority non combatants, bombed fleeing refugees, attacked hospitals, and targeted the innocent. A Rogue State https://t.co/sJaUCSc5iH
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Since its foundation in 1776, the United States has been at War for all but 16 years of its existence. Millions Dead, Trillions wasted, Nothing learned. https://t.co/PV7JZv53AC
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
On Sky news ex Israeli PM Naftali Bennett was asked- "What about the babies in incubators in Gaza who's life support has been turned off because the Israelis have cut off the power" His answer - Are you serious asking about Palestinian civilians? What's wrong with you?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks about Palestinians in hospitals and babies on life support in Gaza whose power has been cut off by Israelis. Speaker 1 dismisses the question, saying they are fighting Nazis and don't target civilians. Speaker 0 tries to have a conversation, but Speaker 1 interrupts and raises their voice. Speaker 0 asserts their role as the host and asks Speaker 1 to address the situation, but Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of shame. The conversation becomes heated and Speaker 1 refuses to engage further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what about those Palestinians in hospital who, are on life support and babies and incubators whose, life support and incubator will have to be turned off because the Israelis have cut the power to Gaza.
Speaker 1: Are you seriously keep on asking me about Palestinian civilians? What's what's wrong with you? Have you not seen what happened? We're fighting Nazis. We don't target them.
Now the world can come and bring them anything they want. If you wanna bring them electricity, I'm not gonna feed electricity or water They're my enemies. If anyone else wants, that's fine. We're not responsible
Speaker 0: for them. This is the point.
Speaker 1: This is the point. You know, I I wanna tell you you though, Emendo, listen.
Speaker 0: You listen to me to your voice, and we're trying to No. No. I understand. I'm trying to when we're trying to no. No.
I understand. We're trying to have a conversation here. Listen. This is my program. This is my show, and I am asking the questions.
You're raising your voice, and I've asked you. And we've already we've already stopped, please. Let me finish. We've already distinguished between Hamas.
Speaker 1: I wanna tell you you shame on you.
Speaker 0: You're trying to speak over no.
Speaker 1: I We are not Shame on you.
Speaker 0: It's nothing about shame. We're trying to have a conversation about a very serious situation here, and you are refusing to address it.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Welcome to the George Orwell show. Where, according to Trudeau, its Vladimir Putin's fault he applauded a Nazi SS grenadier in the Canadian Parliament, And according to Netanyahu, the Holocaust was caused by the Muslims.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hitler initially wanted to expel the Jews, not exterminate them. However, Khad Amin al Husseini approached Hitler and expressed concern that if the Jews were expelled, they would come to his region. In response, Hitler suggested burning them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews. And Khad Amin al Husseini went to Hitler and said, if you expel them, they'll all come here. So what should I do with them? Yes. He said, burn them.