TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Breeauna9
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
🚨🚨🚨The Sunrise Movement Strikes Again—using "the full force of the federal government" to end private property rights.🚨🚨🚨 FEMA's latest rule change, finalized on September 9, 2024 - days before Helene hit - prevents homeowners from rebuilding yet provides zero compensation for this federalist taking/rezoning of residential areas as wetland projects. This administrative rule change stems from the Sunrise Movement's role in the Biden/Harris WH, which seeks to expand "public" lands. In case you missed it, there's ONLY 5 reasons why FEMA will help rebuild public facilities - "FEMA shall take no action unless and until the requirements of this regulation are complied with" - and private homes do NOT make the cut: 1. If an estimate, created by FEMA, using the "Climate-Informed Science Approach" calculator determines the total cost of repairs is LESS THAN $364,000 total, AND FEMA determines its liable for less than 50% of that $364k total. This only applies to public "facilities" such as police, fire, city hall, roads, bridges etc... Government property. 2) The facility is not located in the newly zoned floodplain or a coastal high hazard area; 3) The facility is not a new structure, and meets the criteria for a historic building (for public benefit); 4) The facility has not been rebuilt as the result of sustained structural damage in a previous Presidentially declared flooding disaster area or emergency; and 5) The facility is not a hospital, generating plant, emergency operations center, or a facility that contains dangerous materials). FEMA "intends" to provide assistance for the restoration of these facilities, roads, culverts, and bridges to their pre-disaster condition, but ONLY IF new climate-smart building codes are adhered too. For everything, and everyone else, relocation is eminent as FEMA is now declaring that .1% floodplains are effectively wetlands—the two words are used interchangeably. Going forward, these floodplain areas will be rewilded and restored back to nature to the greatest extent practicable as new federally protected wetlands. IF you have flood insurance through FEMA's NFIP, the same exact zoning requirements apply. Policy holders should review the "how high, how wide" rule changes and check to see if rebuilding in place is even possible or not... According to SC Senator Tim Scott, during a Jan. 25, 2024 hearing: "The program is financially insolvent with over $20 billion in debt,” Scott said. “Instead of educating communities and homeowners on the risks they face, the program’s outdated flood maps and lack of transparent data often obscures the risks.” "The NFIP pays out about 30% of its 'resources' to roughly 1% of 'properties that consistently and repeatedly are flood victims again and again and again,'” Scott said. https://www.floods.org/news-views/policy-matters/u-s-senate-hearing-discusses-major-changes-needed-to-nfip/ Amid this federal taking, it's unclear where people are supposed to go, or how they'll be compensated for the inability to rebuild or pay off a mortgage on a home no longer standing—as homeowners insurance does not cover losses due to hurricane or natural disaster flooding. Worse, in June of 2022, the Federal Banking Agencies issued a Force Placement directive for flood insurance that requires loan servicers to add the cost of flood insurance onto the escrow amount of a mortage when private property is the collateral backing the loan. This means that the Biden/Harris Sunrise administration requires banks to purchase NFIP (FEMA) insurance and charge homeowners for the cost, IF a lapse occurs in flood insurance at ANY time during the loan, OR, IF the private property is mapped into a floodplain!!! See next post https://www.fema.gov/fact-sheet/frequently-asked-questions-about-femas-implementation-federal-flood-risk-management https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-44/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-9
@Andreafreedom76 - Andrea Shaffer, Employment/Labor Law
FEMA's 50% rule explained; Will your flood damaged home get bulldozed? My fear is for the many communities that have been completely flooded and/or completely destroyed in the hurricane(s) --FEMA will require/force residents and businesses to move their location to higher ground. The FEMA regulations require eligible FEMA assistance recipients to comply with the new regulations in order to recieve federal disaster recovery funds. Please turn on my notification🛎️, share with your community, and comment below with your thoughts as we navigate through our new reality together post hurricane Helene and Milton. 👇 New FEMA regulations effective September 9, 2024, expanded floodplain zones including new rules to mitigate future flood damage to areas situated in the revised floodplains. In addition, the floodplains calculations have been updated and more stringent when assessing construction, mitigation and whether flood damaged buildings will be rebuilt based on the new regulations. According to the FEMA fact sheet: Individuals, communities, businesses and government agencies will have to follow the new FEMA Floodplain rule on how buildings damaged from a disaster are rebuilt and repaired. Rebuilding after a disaster provides an opportunity to make buildings stronger and safer. The primary goal is to reduce risk of loss from future disasters. If local officials determine that a residential structure has been substantially damaged – meaning the cost of total repair to the home is equal to or greater than 50 percent of its market value before the disaster damage – the owner generally has three options to bring the structure into compliance. 🔺Elevate the building to a height determined by local officials. 🔺Relocate the structure outside the floodplain. 🔺Demolish the structure. FEMA has authority to require application of the FFRMS as a condition of funding in its grant programs based on the grant programs' authorizing statutes. Congress granted FEMA the authority to provide Federal assistance through multiple grant programs under the Stafford Act, the NFIA, the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977, and various other appropriations acts. Under the FFRMS, a Federal agency may establish the floodplain for actions subject to the FFRMS using any of the following approaches: 🔺Approach 1: Climate-Informed Science Approach (CISA): Utilizing the best-available, actionable hydrologic and hydraulic data and methods that integrate current and future changes in flooding based on climate science; 🔺Approach 2: Freeboard Value Approach (FVA): Freeboard (1 percent annual chance flood elevation + X, where X is 3 feet for critical actions and 2 feet for other actions); 🔺Approach 3: 0.2-percent-annual-chance Flood Approach (0.2PFA): 0.2 percent annual chance flood (also known as the 500-year flood); or Approach 4: the elevation and flood hazard area that result from using any other method identified in an update to the FFRMS. 🔺Approach 4: the elevation and flood hazard area that result from using any other method identified in an update to the FFRMS. The Revised Guidelines state that for riverine flood hazard areas, agencies may select either the FVA or 0.2PFA (or a combination of approaches, as appropriate) when actionable science is not available, and an agency opts not to follow the CISA. The proposed FFRMS policy outlined the FFRMS approach FEMA would use for actions subject to the FFRMS. FEMA's final rule FFRMS policy will be applicable to actions in the FFRMS floodplain where FEMA funds are used for new construction, substantial improvement, or to address substantial damage. Picture: The French Broad River rises above its banks in the River Arts District on Sept. 26 in Asheville, N.C.
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
THREE DAYS AGO, WHILE MSM DEBATED TIKTOK, carefully steering the narrative to the Spooky CCP... THREE DAYS AGO, while the so-called "TIKTOK BAN" sailed through the House, after the RULES WERE SUSPENDED to pass it that quickly... Once you realize that TikTok and its parent company Bytedance have been working WITH the Biden Administration and CFIUS for the last three years to become compliant, once you realize that On January 19, 2021, one day before President Biden assumed office, the US Department of Commerce (Commerce) published an interim final rule implementing its sweeping new authority to block, unwind, or condition "transactions" involving information and communications technology and services (ICTS), once you realize that TikTok's servers are in Texas, and then understand that the company already has an American board, and has already turned over ALL records of shareholders to the satisfaction of our federal government - then you start to understand the REAL target isn't TikTok - it's YOU via "X," Rumble, Gettr, Crypto, and so on down the line of non-compliant, divergent thought, content hubs and decentralized financial mechanisms. Don't think it's possible? I have news for you. All it takes is an Executive Order declaring a National Security threat exists and invoking IEEPA (economic sanctions), like the Biden Administration did on Feb. 28, 2024—days before H.R 7521 passed out of the House. The seizure or freezing of assets can happen WHILE an investigation is being conducted, AND all an investigation requires is mere hearsay, or a small amount of evidence such as this below, in order to begin. And so here we are. This is how it starts, saying the quiet parts out loud and laying the foundation for what comes neXt—the truth behind "the so-called TikTok ban" (H.R 7521). Because, the ultimate and uncomfortable truth is that the Free Market is the enemy of stakeholder capitalism, and stakeholder capitalism IS Economic Fascism!!! A system that exists to financially starve out dissenters, and those who fund "them" as opposed to "us." Economic Fascism explained; https://fee.org/articles/economic-fascism/ Time saver; https://youtu.be/YXh0gpMxiXo
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
A letter sent to the SEC related to Natural Asset Companies, by U.S. Senators @MikeCrapo@SenatorRickettsand Senator James E. Risch details multiple points of concern and demands answers no later than tomorrow, November 30, 2023 - http://Risch.senate.gov https://risch.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/2/6/26ede68e-ff87-4f69-b00d-789beab76417/FD5F7F980A061BC97348F90EDE03593D.letter-to-sec-natural-asset-companies-final.pdf
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
Further down the "mitigation ruse," rabbit hole. Meanwhile, NEPA (National Environmental Protection Agency) has determined that Green Energy Technologies pose no inherent risk to human life or the environment and therefore certain infrastructure is categorically excluded from having to produce Environmental Impact Statements. Meaning the Biden Administration is continually making executive and unilateral decisions about climate change mitigation (AKA "bold actions"), picking winners and losers in an emerging non-competitive, monopolistic industry, backed by the full-weight of the federal government. This is insane given the amount of evidence we currently have, showing the negative impacts upon avian life due to solar farms—now categorically excluded under recent NEPA rule changes. "In this proposed rulemaking, DOE proposes to add a categorical exclusion for certain energy storage systems and revise categorical exclusions for upgrading and rebuilding transmission lines and for solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, as well as make conforming changes to related sections of DOE's NEPA regulations." https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/16/2023-25174/national-environmental-policy-act-implementing-procedures
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
Concluding thoughts: As the Biden Administration continues down this path of taking more land, both private and public, without the means to properly manage it resulting in devastating fires that dump billions of CO2 PPM into our atmosphere annually, along with reducing grazing rights to the point of the US becoming a net importer of meats from other countries using billions of gallons of fossil fuels annually, and continues to prioritize untested technologies exempt from having to prove they're better for the environment or actually mitigating global emissions - perhaps it's time for more Americans to start asking questions and requesting their own Senators to follow the example set by Senators Risch, Ricketts and Crapo.
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
🚨Extremely Urgent Update🚨 @ASL_Liberty has published an executive briefing on the proposed SEC rule that would allow for the creation of NACs, and add 100 Trillion dollars annually to America's balance sheet—expropriating private and public property to corporations traded on the NYSE. “NACs will be corporations that hold the rights to the ecological performance (i.e., the value of natural assets and production of ecosystem services) produced by natural or working areas, such as national reserves or large-scale farmlands, and have the authority to manage the areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. These rights can be licensed like other rights, including ‘‘run with the land’’ rights (such as mineral rights, water rights, or air rights), and NACs are expected to license these rights from sovereign nations or private landowners.” (Fed. Reg. Vol. 88, No. 191, 10/4/2023, page 68812) “These assets can be areas that are publicly owned, such as a national park, or tracts of privately owned property held by individuals or corporations.” (IEG Framework, SEC Proposed Rule Exhibit 3, page 7) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H-2CsTXwEpKhkYKsqxwRX-8HsblxjxIA/view?usp=drivesdk We will be addressing this proposed rule, along with the Restrict Act, the FCC rule change, and updates to 702 today @AmericaMission_ 5pm est. Please join us here https://x.com/i/spaces/1OwxWYBdlkQGQ
@Breeauna9 - Breeauna Sagdal
@RaffyPindaHouse I had the exact same questions back in July... “There is a lot of confusion surrounding digital assets. Our bill establishes a functional framework to fill the gaps in the regulatory process between the CFTC and the SEC," said Chairman of the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development, Dusty Johnson (SD). "This is not only beneficial for digital asset firms, but for consumers and digital asset owners. I’m grateful for the teamwork of the Ag and Financial Services Committee on this bill and to ensure America remains the leader in financial and technological innovation." After reading how EO 14008 has gone through the Federal Register, directing the creation of "Climate-Smart Commodities," and the Commodities Corporation for a carbon credit index, along with the USDA proposal on chipping cattle and bison for tracking and compliance, I'm trying to wrap my brain around this framework as new information comes to light. Like I said, it might be completely unrelated... I'm not a web3 expert by any means. Please tag and share with those who are, though. There's zero attention on this right now, but if my limited understanding is correct, we could see some big changes coming.