TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BrockRiddickIFB
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Someone was clearly on their way to kill me, so I've required protective services essentially all the time. It is very troublesome to me, especially because they've involved my wife and my three daughters. How do I feel? Terrible.
Do I continue to receive threats today? Yes, I do. Every time someone gets up and says I'm responsible for the death of people throughout the world, the death threats go up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Someone who clearly was on their way to kill me. And it's required my having protective services essentially all the time. It is very troublesome to me. It is much more troublesome because they've involved my wife and my three daughters. At this moment, how do you feel?
Keep your mic on. Terrible. Do you continue to receive threats today? Yes. I do.
Every time someone gets up and says I'm responsible for the death of people throughout the world, the death threats go up.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed some concerning issues with my account. It seems like my views are being capped and even removed, which I find impossible. My follower count is stagnating and rolling back daily, despite gaining hundreds of new followers. I also have to refollow many of them every day, and my engagement is alarmingly low. Additionally, followers with notifications on aren't seeing my posts, and my articles are going unnoticed. I believe these tactics are a form of censorship, and I'm determined to expose this by sharing proof regularly.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Hey @elonmusk @Support @X @lindayaX sup... so. You guys have pulled up all the stops to try and slow me down... (i am delighted that you are scared... you should be.) but just so that your weak, underhanded and desperate tricks and tactics are out in the open: Your typical management mentality \ mindset has caused you to turn blind to the obviousness of your blind spots, Incapable of thinking... What is happening to my account is NOT only improbable. It is Impossible. Here goes. [i] I can LITERALLY SEE how you NOT ONLY cap my views but you LITERALLY REMOVE THE VIEWS... (View rollback) Ive seen it... daily... dont let me record this with a screen recorder... admit your deception. [ii] My follower count is not only stagnating, but is rolling back daily at an alarming rate. This is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE... (not only improbable) [iii] I gain hundreds of new followers, daily. You remove hundreds of followers, daily... Instantly. This can ALSO be proven. update: I have lost hundreds of followers within seconds of posting the first version of this ... here is my second version. 😉 (Calling it a bot purge won't cut it anymore) [iv] I am getting on average 2-3 replies per post. My reach is less than 1% as it was in 2023. (not 10%... i did not stutter.... 1%) ... this can be PROVEN [v] I have to refollow hundreds of my followers... EVERY SINGLE DAY. (not every second day). DAILY. Sometimes more than once ... PER DAY. Furthermore, i am told DAILY, that i have to be followed DAILY ... as X REMOVES THE FOLLOWS... DAILY. [vi] Adding hypothetical, inaccessible "labels" to an account is another deceptive form of DIRECT censorship. Each label must be visible, justified, and disputeable. [vii] followers with notifications ON... dont get my posts either (i have been informed various times). [viii] No one is seeing my published articles. And i mean no one. I know they are a threat to your reality... but wow... man up. [iX] Let's get real... your little ... free speech vs free reach mantra ... does not hold water... Your little semantic word games won't work. LET ME FIX YOUR EQUATION FOR YOU... "Limiting free speech IS CENSORSHIP" "Limiting reach IS CENSORSHIP" "No Reach = No Speech" [X] I am getting less than 800 views per post. Then it hits the roof. THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE. Ill be posting this... DAILY.... Also... i will start posting proof as well. 😉🖕
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Have you heard what Jean Ho suggested? He thinks Donald Trump should sign a law allowing anyone who faked their death to return without harassment from the media or others. This could benefit those who want to escape the pressures of fame, especially in showbiz, where many feel trapped.
Additionally, I’ve found something significant related to this topic, but I need to keep it in my subscription area for now to gauge how strict the platform will be. If you want to know more about the real situation, consider subscribing. I’ll likely share it eventually, but for now, I’m testing the waters. Remember, this is all for entertainment purposes, and there’s no hidden message here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you heard what Jean Ho said? Gino, who was this guy's personal photographer? Wait to hear this.
Speaker 1: But this is a law that I think Donald Trump should sign into law if he should become president again, and I think it's a pretty good idea. Imagine if Donald Trump signed into a law, something to the effect of that anyone who ever faked their death in the past come come back and not be harassed at all. The media couldn't contact him. People can't contact him unless they want to talk to them. They could just come back and live a peaceful life.
But the thing is and, again, I'm saying I'm not implying anything. But think about how wonderful this could be so that it extends to anyone that wants to retire from a certain profession. For example, look at all the people in showbiz or music or whatever that they just hate their lives because the fame wasn't what they thought it would be, and they just wanna leave, but they can't leave.
Speaker 0: That's a very interesting thought you have there, Jean, especially in light of what I've been posting lately. And not only what I've been posting lately, but what someone else has been posting lately. Now I'm not even gonna lie to you guys. I found my smoking gun. I really did.
The smoking gun that you won't have any doubt. But I gotta put it in my subscription area for the time being because I need to test the waters on how strict and censored they're gonna be about it. So if you wanna know the real deal that isn't him, that's just the decoy, you should go subscribe. And like I said, I'll probably release this eventually, but I just gotta test those waters and see how dangerous they are. But, of course, this is all for entertainment purposes.
I know that he's just having funsies, and there's no secret message there. Entertainment only.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently watched a documentary that revealed some surprising information. It discussed Germany's unique rules, such as no interest on loans, and highlighted that Germany has no debt, inflation, or unemployment. A shocking claim was made about concentration camps, stating that no poison gas was used; instead, typhus was the cause of death, exacerbated by bombings that led to starvation. The narrative also touched on post-war events under Soviet control and suggested that the Rothschilds orchestrated wars to control banks and keep people in debt. This perspective implies that World War II was manipulated for financial gain, with false narratives perpetuated about the events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other day, I watched this documentary, and I think everybody needs to watch it. 1st, it starts talking about this topic. This one kinda blew my mind. Then it goes into the rules of Germany. No charging interest on any loans.
That's an interesting one. Imagine that lifestyle. Then we get into this one. Germany has no debt, no inflation, and no unemployment. But then this one takes the cake.
No poison gas was ever used to kill prisoners in any of the concentration camps. So what actually happened? Typhus. That's why they're shaving everybody's head. And when all the supplies were bombed, guess what?
People started to starve. And here's a chart so you could see that, 1941. And remember this story from school, Anne Frank? Typhus. Then you got this rabbit hole, all the people who lied.
This is interesting. Then you got the things that happened after the war when the Soviets took over. Look at that. All of a sudden, these appear when they weren't there before. Then they forgot to talk about this after the war.
And then magically, it always leads back to the Rothschilds who started it all, who started all the wars because they're controlling the banks. When you get into who controls the banks, the Federal Reserve all leads back to the Rothschilds. So you orchestrate a war, put people in debt, make them your servant, make them pay you back for the rest of their life, and then say that they did something that they didn't do. That's World War 2.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fear of making mistakes can hinder creativity. Creativity is not a talent; it’s a way of operating and an ability to play. Playing involves experimenting and asking questions like, "What happens if I do this?" or "What if we tried that?" Embracing playfulness means being open to possibilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nothing will stop you being creative so effectively as the fear of making a mistake. Creativity is not a talent. It is not a talent. It is a way of operating, an ability to play. To play is experiment.
What happens if I do this? What would happen if we did that? What if the very essence of playfulness is an openness to anything
reSee.it AI Summary
A series of posts covering various topics, including but not limited to, current events, personal experiences, opinions, and discussions.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker marvels at the Grand Canyon and the mountain range in the distance. They question the globe theory and suggest there may be two realities at play. The speaker mentions supernatural beings and a flat earth perspective. They conclude by sharing an image from the infrared video clips and leave viewers to ponder its meaning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's the Grand Yeah. Look at that. There's the mountain range way out there. It's just adjusting countries. Oh my goodness.
Just look at that. Wow. Just wow. You know? Wow.
Goosebumps is what does this mean? You know our globe theory, it went so much. It's like, I don't wanna throw that out. Right? Seems like there's 2 realities we look up.
The supernatural beings want us to believe before chapter inside of this. Oh, don't. Because when we look down, it appears for a flat road. And that is gonna make up the whole planet. This is Anyway, I hope you guys have enjoyed these, infrared, video clips.
They're really incredible. So what does all this mean, folks? I'm gonna leave it with this image you'd extracted from the clips. You know?
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are on a fiber optic cable that will be laid from here to Brazil, not satellite. This cable will carry phone calls under the ocean, with robots burying it in the seabed. 95% of all telephone and data is transferred through submarine cables, not satellites.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is cable tank number 1. And what am I standing on right now? Not satellite. Not satellite. We're standing on fiber optic cable that's gonna be laid from here towards Brazil.
Not satellite. Not satellite. So the cable we're walking on right now will be under the ocean carrying my phone call? Yes. It will.
It's a good chance any call you make to South America in the future could be on this exact cable for the next 20, 25 years. Cable comes right off into the ocean from here.
Speaker 1: Robots take over from there, diving to a depth too deep for humans. The machines use water jets to create a trench, allowing the cable to sink into the seabed and become buried.
Speaker 0: 95% of all telephone and data is transferred over submarine cables, not satellite. Not satellite.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of the universe being a torus field with layers of firmaments. They compare the universe to a big apple, with Earth at the core called Idrisen. This central tree represents the North Pole.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And he has created this world, this cosmos, this universe, the outside of the torus field. This is what we call the firmament. So when you see those fixed stars precessing, it's crystalline in structure. This is moving and and turning. It's a big massive torus group.
This is the universe above a sphere. And inside then 3 layers of firmaments, which they call prim and promoting. 3 layers. 3 layers. 3 layers.
And so this is where we live. We live in a big apple. Have you heard the expression? This is right. An apple of a polar.
A massive, massive, massive, massive, massive, massive. And so we live inside the big apple. That's why, hence, the expression, the big apple. Everything is apples. In the center of the apple is the core, the heart, the fur, the car, the yak, the heart.
And so so welcome to the real world. You live on here. And when the moon turns around, this central tree This is called Idrisen Idrisen Idrisen. The hyperboloid center of our Earth, the North Pole.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Terrariums are like miniature earth models. Various cultures depicted earth as flat and enclosed, featuring a tree of life or Mount Meru. They didn't show a spinning globe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Terrariums are miniature working models of our earth. The water cycle of our earth matches one of a terrarium perfectly. This is a depiction of earth by the Navajo people. This is a depiction featuring the tree of life, AKA Mount Meru. This is the Norse depiction of earth featuring the tree of life aka Mount Meru.
This is the Egyptians' depiction. Ask yourself why they all featured a flat enclosed earth and why there isn't a miniature working model of the spinning globe.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
I see a daylight moon in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, while my friend in Essex, England sees a nighttime moon. We wonder why the moon appears flipped between our locations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the same time, I'm looking at a daylight moon, and he's looking at a nighttime moon. At the same time, I'm in I'm in, Bob Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He's in Essex, England. Why is the moon flipped?
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Infrared technology shows objects that should be hidden by Earth's curvature. Questions arise about Erastosthenes' shadow experiment proving Earth's roundness. The sun's size relative to stars and moonlight's coldness are discussed, along with shadows being warmer at night.
Translation: The video questions the curvature of the Earth based on infrared technology, Erastosthenes' experiment, the sun's size, moonlight's temperature, and shadow temperatures at night.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now with infrared technology, we are seeing things that should be miles below the horizon if we truly lived on a ball. If Erastosthenes proved the earth was a ball 1000 of years ago with an experiment using shadows, why do experts say that his results should actually be the same on a flat earth with a smaller local sun? If the sun barely looks bigger than the other stars from Saturn, why is it able to completely light it up so that we can see it from Earth? And if something merely the size of the other stars can do that, why is the backside of Saturn not lit up by the billions of stars on the other side? And why are there dark sides to any objects in the solar system?
If moonlight reflects the warm light of the sun, why is moonlight measurably cold? Why is it warmer in the shadows at night when it's the exact opposite of what we experience in the sunlight during the day?
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the curvature of the Earth, suggesting that if the Earth were curved, a plane would have to constantly drop in altitude to stay level. They propose the idea that the Earth may actually be a flat plane. They also mention their podcast for more topics of discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or meaning it goes 22100 miles in 1 hour. How much curvature do you think is over 22100 miles on a ball that has a circumference of 24 1,000? A pretty good amount of mileage probably. Here, let me tell you exactly. This plane would have to drop 9.5 miles every 60 second, Meaning, it would also have to drop 836 feet per second to stay at the same altitude if the Earth's surface were curved.
Cause think about it. It would fly off into space if this wasn't the case. Maybe the earth is a level plane. Think about it. And if you wanna think about more subjects other than this, check out my podcast.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
At 9.35 feet above the lake, a target 17.82 miles away was observed at 2.79 feet above the surface. Calculations show a hidden height of 131.9 feet due to curvature. Use this to debunk claims of lake curvature. Visit f e core dot org for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here again, 9.35 feet above the lake's surface, it was seen on the opposite shore, 17.82 miles away, 2.79 feet above the lake's surface. I wonder how much curvature should have been between those two points. 17.82 miles distance calculations based on the spherical model results in a target hidden height of the measurement for target 2 position of 40.21 meters, a 131.9 feet. The next time that somebody tries to tell you that there's curvature to lakes, go ahead and pull this video up and show them it or go to f e core dot org. Have a good day.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
You're called a "globetard" for believing the Earth is round, but I follow flat Earth theories. How can you prove it's flat? I see the curve. Astronauts never show a full 360-degree view in space. You're a globetard. Your name should be Luke the Duke, not Leek Doogie. This is silly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys keep calling me globetard so it seems like it. The earth is flat. I follow all the flat earth angles. Yeah. So okay.
I mean, it's not flat. You're a globe tard. You're a globe tard. You think this isn't flat? It's not.
Is the world round? Yes. It's a globe. Hello, Tar. Alright.
So how's it flat then? Prove to me it's flat. Look outside. I I see the curve. He does use shit.
I do. I see the curve. Tell tell him more Bruce. Oh, Bruce, did you know that not once in the history of space travel ever has any astronaut panned his camera around 3 of 60 degrees? No.
What? Why don't they? What do you mean? Full facial images. You get his images.
Yeah. You're a globed dar. Your name should be Luke the Duke. But it said your name is Leek. Doogie.
I'm gonna start calling learn. Lore. Lore. Is it Lore? This is stupid.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 greets Millie and mentions they are talking to YouTube. They discuss the topic of flat earth, acknowledging that some people may not be ready for it. Speaker 0 describes the view from their office window.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Away. What's good, Millie? Say hello.
Speaker 1: Who are we chatting to?
Speaker 0: YouTube.
Speaker 1: Oh, hello.
Speaker 0: Talk about flat earth.
Speaker 1: Nice.
Speaker 0: Some people aren't ready for it, so I'm just letting them know.
Speaker 1: It's a smart stream.
Speaker 0: It's not, but it will be up.
Speaker 1: Fine. We
Speaker 0: sit in this office, and we look out at that. Do you know what I mean?
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Look at this amazing video clip captured with a camcorder, showing smooth and clear footage while flying in the air. The background moves left while the foreground moves right, creating a confusing sense of direction. The Grand Canyon North is visible in the distance. Let's analyze the angles for clarity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have a look at this, folks. Isn't that incredible? Yeah. This is so awesome. This video clip has already been processed.
Notice how smooth it is and clear. This was captured, with my, camcorder, and, that one is usually noisy. Look. Wow. Now in the distance, notice the relative movement because we're in the air flying.
Isn't that trippy? Look at that. Wow. You see? That's bizarre.
Wow. That's bizarre. Can you figure out which way we're flying? It can be confusing because the background is moving to the left and the foreground to the right. And you may be thinking you're going to the right, but now we're flying to the left.
That weird North. Right? Right there. That's the Grand Canyon North. Right?
Right? Now let's try to do an angle analysis because, we have a lot of clarity here in
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Freemasons are asked if they know the Earth is flat. The book "Morals and Dogma" by Albert Pike, given to a 32nd degree Mason, discusses the square in relation to the Earth being a plane. Ancients believed the Earth was a flat, immovable plane.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And to answer a question that I get quite a bit, which is, are Freemasons, do they know that the Earth is flat? Are we told that the earth is flat? How many freemasons know that the earth is flat? Written by Albert Pike. This book I was given after becoming a becoming a 32nd degree, Mason.
So let's just see what is written in morals and dogma in the first chapter as it relates to the square. It says, the square is a right ankle formed by 2 right lines. It is adapted only to a plain surface and and belongs only to geometry, earth measurement, and trigonometry which deals only with planes and with the earth which the ancients supposed to be a plane. The square is for plane measurement. Okay?
The ancients understood that the earth was a plain fixed immovable set upon
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you multiply 69 by 20 degrees, it's only 1380 feet, less than half a mile from what they say. People need permission to visit Antarctica due to the 1959 treaty. There's a firmament hiding God's creation of separating the waters. Time to wake up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dude, if you multiply 69 times the 20 degrees, it's only 13 80 feet, guys. That's less than half a mile than what they're restricting from. And check this out, this is crazy. Look, why can't we explore Antarctica? Antarctica?
But look it up here. People can only visit Antarctica if they have permission from the authorities. And you guys need to look into all these. Check it out. But look, Antarctica treaty 1959.
Time to wake up, guys. There's a firmament. They're hiding it. And guess what? God put it there.
Separate the waters from the waters. Haven't
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bible states the earth is flat, with oceans, the sun and moon under a dome. It describes the earth as God's footstool, with Him above the clouds. The Bible is different from other works, urging readers to interpret it and break free from false worship. It mentions the earth as a circle with ends, set on pillars and not spinning. Embrace the truth of creation for an awakening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bible says the earth is flat and oceans. You heard it right? The word of god says the sun and moon are underneath the dome. The earth is his footstool. The god above the clouds affirmative.
If you heard of it, you should read every word of it. It's nothing like the lies in the works of affirmative. Pray for this affirmative, determine, you'll interpret it. Come up from the system of the things we use to worship it. The Bible says the earth is a circle and that it has ends.
Set inside of all corners on pillars and it never spins. Come and learn the truth of creation. It's an awakening. Open
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the nature of the moon, suggesting it is a disc based on the Book of Enoch. They mention a scientist who proposed the moon is plasma, reflecting Earth and unknown lands. The moon supposedly reflects our flat Earth and unknown continents beyond the poles, creating a plasma moon image.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're just heavily invested in the false narrative and it feels very unpleasant for you to go outside of what you've been told is reality, this channel is not for you. But for my followers and my new followers, thank you so much. I love you guys. Let's talk about it. The moon.
What the heck is it? We shouldn't be able to see the moon in daylight based on their model. And we only have ever seen one side of the moon, and that speaks volumes. So it's not a 3 d or a sphere. It is a disc as stated in the book of Enoch.
Chapter 17 6 verses 8. I saw the great rivers and came to the great river and to the great and went to the place where no flesh walks. I saw the mountains of the darkness of the winter and the place where all the waters of the deep flow. I saw the mouths of all the rivers of the earth and the mouth of the deep. Land beyond the South Pole?
What do you think? Before we get into it, there was a scientist that was interviewed. He was known as mister r Foster in 1965 who said the moon is plasma. His theories went against the indoctrination, which is why most of us are unfamiliar with this work. Imagine the moon is an x-ray map of our entire realm, the known land, which is Earth, and then the unknown land, which is the dark side of the moon, the land beyond the poles.
Take an x-ray, for example. It picks up the image of our bone and not our blood as they are dense. So the dense areas of what the moon is picking up while it reflects our land in which it meets the electromagnetic waves coming up parallel and polarized from below our flat Earth and then bouncing off the firmament, and then it hits our flat Earth, converting it into focus in the ionosphere, iodizing the noble gases, which lights into the plasma moon. So is the moon an image of our flat Earth surrounding the continents unknown to us that's
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shows a CD and draws an Oblate spheroid, separating it with a disc. A circle with a swastika inside turns black, emitting rays passing through a hole. The black circle represents the black sun. He adds reliefs and labels it as the North Pole. Inside the celestial vault, he draws the polar star, Polaris.
Translation: The speaker displays a CD and sketches an Oblate spheroid, separating it with a disc. A circle with a swastika inside turns black, emitting rays passing through a hole. The black circle represents the black sun. He adds reliefs and labels it as the North Pole. Inside the celestial vault, he draws the polar star, Polaris.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Beginning of the video he shows a CD or a disc. He immediately draws the geometric shape of an Oblate spheroid. We can see how he separates the oblate spheroid with a disc that has a hole in the center. Then, below, he draws a circle with a swastika inside and immediately paints it completely black. From this black circle, rays come out and 3 rays pass through the hole in the center.
Below he writes, still one of the possible meanings of this black circle may be the black sun. He draws reliefs on the edge of the hole and writes North Pole. And above this hole inside what would be the celestial vault, he draws a star, the polar star or Polaris.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antarctica should be covered in ice, but Google Maps shows something different. The speaker questions the lack of snow and strange features on the map. They urge others to check for themselves and express confusion and frustration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So for Antarctica to be completely covered in ice, that's what we've been taught all my life. Why, when you go on Google Maps, does it show this? Now I know I smoke a lot of weed, but this shit ain't adding up. I mean, it there where's where's the snow? Where's what the fuck is this?
Please go on Google Maps. Go on Antarctica. Look for the little circle. You'll see. Just does anybody else see this?
It's not just me, right? Look at it. What's the I quit. I'm done.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the moon is not a rock but a plasma, with less mass than thought. If proven, it would challenge current laws of nature, making moon landings impossible. Tides would be lower, and gravitational theories would be debunked. The speaker is confident in their theory due to accumulating evidence, dismissing plans for moon landings by Americans and Russians. They believe landing on Mars or Venus is possible, but not on the moon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now one thing you have a theory about the moon and that we expect to be able to get observable facts about the moon fairly soon. What is your theory?
Speaker 1: Well, it is by now rather more than this theory. 10 or 11 years ago, I stated to various scientists that the moon is not a piece of rock, but it is a plasma, a plasma phenomena, cosmic plasma, and that this fact will eventually be confirmed. I made certain predictions which were already confirmed in 1958, and the situation now is coming close to a complete confirmation.
Speaker 0: What will be the result if you are proved to be correct in your theories?
Speaker 1: The result will be, profound and decisive because it will give proof that a complete re reinvestigation of the laws of nature is necessary. Because if the moon is a plasma, no man will ever land on it. The self planning attempts will all fail. That means that the mass of the moon is less, far less than is currently assumed. It's in a different stage of energy, and it has far less mass.
That means there is no more explanation for the tides. If the moon, for example, had only a thousandths part of its current mass, then the tides would only be 2 inches high, and the conventional theory is instead of sometimes 13 feet. And that means that if it is proof that the moon is a plasma, then all gravitational theories are out and the new concept of the cosmos and of its laws has to be evolved.
Speaker 0: Aren't you being a bit adventurous though because, you know we're going to be able to test out your theory on the moon fairly soon?
Speaker 1: Well, not anymore. 11 years ago, of course, it was rather taking a risk. I was considered a lunatic, of course, but by now the evidence, accumulated evidence, is already so much in my favor and I'm not taking any risk anymore. On the contrary, there's scientific views expressed all over the world now that, the moon seems to be of a quite different nature of what was assumed. And then
Speaker 0: The Americans and Russians are thinking of landing men on it.
Speaker 1: Well that will never happen. Not on the moon. On Mars, on Venus, on other planets, yes. But the moon is definitely
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
"Blue to block the DEW": Alleged article on celebrities painting houses blue in Maui goes viral, deepens online conspiracy
Since a devastating wildfire hit Maui on August 8, the internet has been flooded with several bizarre conspiracy theories.
sportskeeda.com
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antarctica is supposed to be covered in ice, but on Google Maps, it appears differently. The speaker questions the lack of snow and strange features on the map, expressing confusion and disbelief. They urge others to check for themselves and see what they see. The speaker ultimately gives up in frustration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So for Antarctica to be completely covered in ice, that's what we've been taught all my life. Why, when you go on Google Maps, does it show this? Now I know I smoke a lot of weed, but this shit ain't adding up. I mean, it there where's where's the snow? Where's what the fuck is this?
Please go on Google Maps. Go on Antarctica. Look for the little circle. You'll see. Just does anybody else see this?
It's not just me, right? Look at it. What's the I quit. I'm done.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you need top-notch crisis actors for your staged attacks or globalist agendas, I'm your guy. With 18 years of medical experience, I can play a doctor or a grieving husband convincingly. I can handle tragedy and gun control issues with subtlety. I offer reasonable rates, green screen capabilities, and a lack of conscience. Just pick a card and I'll play the role on the world stage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are your staged attacks not going as planned? Are your globalist agendas failing because you're using subpar crisis actors? Well, then look no further. Hi. I'm Harrison Hanks, the ultimate crisis actor.
Need a medical doctor? In 18 years as a medical examiner, I've never seen anything like it. Yeah. Is this one able to, assist in Yeah. It's over the top.
33 children died. Do you need a grieving husband? Did a right winger set off a bomb? Bro, yeah. We're just milling about it, but then it had a massive explosion.
Then I'm your man. Tired of melodramatic acting? There is light away from the darkness. I'm just trying to figure out if he's okay. I lost my 20 year old, but I had 20 years with my son.
It's just tragedy, horror, and tragedy. Going for the guns takes subtlety like this. I don't know how many more need to die before president does something. Not this. Ed, please, could we do something with the assault weapons?
And every one of those hands is a reason why those weapons should not be out in the general public. Because in this kind of a situation, what what has changed? Have we learned nothing? I'm green screen ready, bonded, and insured. I can morph into a 1,000 different faces.
I offer reasonable rates, and I have no conscience. Just pick your card to play on the world stage.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
123 years ago at the 1900 World's Fair in Paris, there was an electric moving sidewalk on a 2.5-mile loop around the central square. It could carry up to 14,000 people and was a popular way to see the fair. Despite its success, like many other world's fair attractions, it was eventually destroyed. The speaker questions why such amazing structures are often demolished, leaving behind only the iconic landmarks like the Eiffel Tower.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know there was an electric moving sidewalk a 123 years ago at the World's Fair in Paris? Stretching 543 acres along the same river, the grounds of the 1900 Exposition Universal were the biggest in history. And just like all the other world's fairs, almost everything was destroyed afterwards, including this incredible electric moving sidewalk. It was elevated above the street on a 23 foot tall iron viaduct and consisted of 3 sections. 1 was stationary while the other ones moved continuously at 3 miles per hour and 6 miles per hour.
The 2 and a half mile loop was constructed around the perimeter of the central square using the 6 miles per hour walkway allowed visitors to circumnavigate the square in roughly 25 minutes all while standing still and sightseeing. The predecessor of this walkway was at an earlier Chicago World's Fair. Along the same roof but moving in the opposite direction was an elevated railway system that visitors could use to get around more quickly. However, an electric walkway could accommodate up to 14,000 people at one time. On its busiest day, it carried 70,000 people in one afternoon.
The gigantic scale of the exposition made it virtually impossible to see everything, which is why the Rudi Lavender was so popular. It was both convenient and entertaining. One visitor described it as a arboros of Paris, we are told that this structure was only temporary, but it had iron foundations just like the Eiffel Tower and many other masterpieces of architecture that were destroyed. Even the Eiffel Tower was supposed to be demolished. Most of these things would probably still be standing today and would be iconic landmarks like the Eiffel Tower turned out to be.
These events are the plot holes of history. You really have to ask yourself, why would they destroy such amazing things, and why is it the same story all over the world?
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi, I'm Dr. Gazzi Castillo, an OBGYN with 26 years of experience. I recommend my patients to get vaccinated against COVID-19, especially if they are trying to conceive now or in the future. There is no evidence suggesting any harm from the vaccine for those who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm doctor Gazzi Castillo. I have been practicing OBGYN for over 26 years. When my patient asked me whether they should get vaccinated against COVID nineteen, I tell them yes. If you're trying to try to become pregnant now and try to try in the future, you can get the COVID vaccine, there's no evidence that they need to be vaccinated.
Vaccine including COVID nineteen vaccine causes I send my I send my
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker starts by expressing that the United States is currently going through a difficult time. They then mention that they are ready to begin recording and ask for confirmation. The speaker briefly comments on the quality of the internet connection. They mention a beautiful view and a fire near a crater. The speaker then asks someone named John to be cautious. The transcript ends with the speaker mentioning the relevance of something to a person named Fred and questioning the use of clamp sticks. They conclude by saying "action" again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: United States. This is a hell of a time. That's right. We're a little deep now. Let me tell you.
Uh-huh. We're rolling. Marker? Yes. Right now, your net is better.
Forget it. Alright. The dirty. Okay. Boy, this is a beauty of this place.
It's Certainly incredible. There's another spectacular view. The fire who missed the crater. Watch out, John. Ready?
And action. Let's say it's relevant to Fred. I think that's awfully good. Did he use clamp sticks on this one? Be a mic tap hit.
Action.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by expressing that the United States is currently going through a difficult time. They then mention that they are ready to start recording and ask for confirmation. The speaker comments on the quality of the recording and mentions a beautiful view. They discuss a fire that missed a crater and warn someone named John to be careful. The speaker mentions that they are going to talk about something relevant to Fred and express their approval. They inquire about the equipment used and request a microphone tap. The speaker concludes by saying "action" again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: United States. This is a hell of a time. That's right. We're a little deep now. Let me tell you.
Uh-huh. We're rolling. Marker? Yes. Right now, your net is better.
Forget it. Alright. The dirty. Okay. Boy, this is a beauty of this place.
It's Certainly incredible. There's another spectacular view. The fire who missed the crater. Watch out, John. Ready?
And action. Let's say it's relevant to Fred. I think that's awfully good. Did he use clamp sticks on this one? Be a mic tap hit.
Action.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zoe asks what is the favorite thing about space. She also wonders why nobody has been to the moon in a long time. She thinks she knows the answer because we did go there before, but she wants to know why it stopped. Understanding why something stopped in the past is important if we want to continue doing it in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Zoe, favorite? What is your favorite thing about space? Go in there. Go in there.
Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time? That's not, an 8 year old's question. That's my make questions. I wanna know, but I think I know. Because we did Go there and and that's the way it happened.
And and if it didn't happen, it's Nice to know why it didn't happen. So in the future, if we wanna keep doing something, we need to know Why something stopped in the past that we wanted to keep
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Lets talk world leaders... Let's start with Actor #1: Obama (thread) https://t.co/Xja8VqbGPd
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
During Biden's inauguration, the speaker noticed that none of the military personnel had ranks or honors on their jackets, unlike previous inaugurations. They compared it to past inaugurations of Bush, Obama, and Trump, where military ranks were visible. They also pointed out that Biden didn't walk down the steps but approached the wreath from the left. The speaker questioned why there were no military ranks and why the military officers couldn't touch the wreath. They also mentioned the 21-gun salute, which was done differently during Biden's inauguration compared to previous presidents. The speaker found it strange and wondered about the reasons behind these differences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was looking at Biden's inauguration again, and I noticed none of the military had any ranks or honors on their jackets. So I decided to go back and look at other past inaugurations, and I noticed, Bush, they had their ranks on their jackets. I looked at Obama. This isn't actually the, the inauguration, but it is a lane of the wreath. For some reason, the video wouldn't wouldn't edit that I found for Obama's inauguration.
But you can see here, They all have their military rank on their jackets. And the next one you'll see with Trump. Trump has his. And I want you to notice too that all 3 of them were able to touch the wreath and kinda push it back on the stand. But I want you to notice Biden's on what with his here because this is different.
Because, remember, there's no military rank on any of the jackets anywhere. You can't find them, and you're gonna see he doesn't walk down the steps. He walks out from the left if you're facing the tomb, which is weird. So you see there's no military ranking on any military officer there. They don't get to touch the wreath for some reason.
They have to walk up to it and do this awkward, hey, buddy. How you doing? Kinda thing. And then they stand there, look at it, and then they turn around and walk back. So why?
I also wanna point out that they did the 21 gun salute with 2 guns actually at the cemetery when he arrived to the tomb of the unknown soldier. And then you got these 3 knuckleheads that showed up for some reason, which is weird too. And they showed up way before the family did because you can see the family walking in. But I figured out why they did the minute and 22 seconds of silence or awkwardness from my last video. It was because they were supposed to do the 21 gun Salute after the president got sworn in.
This is Trump's, 21 on salute directly after he got sworn in into office as president. Now you can go back and you can find videos where you can Hear Obama's going off. You can hear, Bush's going off, but Biden didn't do it for some reason, and the military didn't have their honors on or their ranks. And it kinda makes you wonder, doesn't it? Now I wanna read this about the 21 gun salute.
It says in accordance with the ceremonial standard operating procedure of the 3rd US infantry, I e the old guard, The various gun salutes are assigned as follows. Each round, any given salute is fired 1 at a time. The number of cannon used In a battery, depends upon the intervals between each round fired. I want you to notice that Trump had 4 Terry Code says they want a odd number firing, so this isn't all that awkward with 4 of them firing. But I want you to look back get Biden's inauguration when they're laying the wreath and he's pulling up, that there's 3 cannons there.
2 are actually firing every 6 seconds, which will bring it to 2 minutes and 6 seconds by the time it's all done. Now this is interesting here. A 3 gun battery firing 2 of its guns with 5 second intervals between rounds and 1 gun remaining at the ready in case of a misfire. Such a battery would be used at an armed forces full honors funeral or for a state arrival ceremony of a foreign Terry, at the tomb of the unknowns in Arlington National Cemetery. So they were firing 2 guns that is right on with this for a Arrival of a foreign dignitary.
What's up with that? I think you can figure that out now, can't
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The devil is a real person, not just a vague term for evil. Jesus took Satan seriously and gave him titles like "prince of this world" and "god of this world." Satan controls and manipulates various aspects of society, including science, education, and politics. Many people unknowingly worship Satan by seeking worldly desires instead of focusing on spiritual matters. God allows Satan to have power in this world because He values freedom and does not force anyone to follow Him. The devil hates the books of Genesis and Revelation because they expose his tactics and predict his ultimate defeat. Jesus taught us to pray for deliverance from the evil one. Evil is personal, just like love.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tell you a bit about the devil first so that you've got a clear picture in your mind of what we're praying against. First of all, the Bible does not paint him as a horned creature with a folktale. That's the sort of thing that makes us laugh at him, take him less than seriously. See, the Bible says he's a real person. The Bible never calls the devil it, always he.
Next, the Bible says that he has a heart and a mind and a will. And if a heart and a mind and a will don't make a personality, I don't know does talks about the devil's feelings, talks about his thoughts, and it talks about his motives. And that means to me a person. So the devil is not just a a kind of vague word to sum up all the forces of evil in the world. No.
He is a person in his own right. And if there were no human human beings at all, Satan would still exist. Now Jesus himself took Satan desperately seriously. He never made a joke about, he never laughed at him. He never caricatured him.
Here are some of the titles that Jesus gave Satan. He said, he is the prince of this world. When Satan offered Jesus all the kingdoms of the world, Jesus did not say they are not yours to give because he knew perfectly well they were Satan's to give. And it is a a horrible thought if you really realize it that the world in which we live is ruled over by Satan. He is the prince of this world, but let's take it a step further.
Do you know that another title Jesus gave to Satan? He said he's not only the ruler or prince of this world, he is the god of this world. The only other person beside his heavenly father to whom Jesus ever applied the word god was Satan. He said my heavenly father is god of everything, but of this world, Satan is God, which means very simply not only that Satan controls this world and is able to manipulate science and education and politics for his own ends. More than that, Satan is the real God whom most people on Earth worship whether they know it or not.
That behind so much religion behind so much activity. Satan is the one who's being worshipped. He's the person. And even by some who go to church and chapel on Sunday, in reality, he's their god. For they worship the things what he offers them.
They want the things of the world that he belongs to and rules over, rather rather than setting their mind on the things that are above where Jesus is. And if you want this world and if you want the things of this world, then I give you a piece of advice. Make Satan your god. If you want this world, he's a wonderful god to have because he'll give it to you. There's always a price to pay.
When when the bill comes in, you may not be quite so happy, but he'll give it to you. He can give you money. He can give you fame. He can give you anything you want because it's his to give. Where have you been Satan?
Says god in the book of Job. Well, I've been patrolling the Earth. I've been looking around my date and he had. Now let's get this clear. That doesn't mean that god is helpless in this world.
It does mean, and we've got to think this through that God is allowing Satan to be prince of this world and God of this world, he's allowed it. And people say, what does God think he's doing allowing that? Well, I would just I say my only answer to that one is what's he doing allowing you to be like you are? And why should you blame him for allowing Satan to rebel when he allowed you to. The answer is very simple.
He's a father and he will not force any of his creatures to go his way, and he gives you freedom to rebel. And we can't grumble about him giving the angels freedom though they have superior intelligence and strength because he gave us the same freedom and we've used it in the wrong way. Do you know there are 2 books in the Bible that the devil hates more than any other 2 books in the Bible? Out of all 66, there are 2 let's say more about him than any others and it's these that he has attacked more than any others. They are the 1 at the beginning and the 1 at the end.
Genesis and Revelation. And you know why he hates them? Because Genesis describes his devices and Revelation describes his doom, and he hates those 2 books. And there has been more scholarly attack come the book of Genesis than any other book and more attempt to turn it into myth and legend and away from fact than any other book in the Bible. Why?
Because Satan doesn't want you to believe that Genesis 3 ever happened. He doesn't want you to know how he got hold of Eve. He doesn't want you to believe that he said what he did to that 1st married couple. And he attacks the book of Genesis. But the other book which he hates more than any other is the Book of Revelation.
Because as you read through that book, you come to a point where it says that the devil himself will to cast into the lake of fire. Do you know that Jesus told us to pray every day about the devil? Do you know that? The original of all, prayer that he taught his disciples when they said, lord, teach us to pray. He said, pray like this.
Say, dad in heaven, then pray for the things he wants, his name, his will, his kingdom. Then he said, pray for the things you need. You need food. You need forgiveness. Then he said, finish by praying this.
Deliver us from the evil one. We've turned evil into a thing in our thinking. It's not a thing. It's person. There's no evil anywhere in the universe apart from persons.
Evil is an intensely personal thing. There's no love in the universe apart from persons one is the love. And so evil is personal. And Jesus said, pray daily. Deliver us from the evil one.
Start your prayer by thinking of your dad in heaven, but end your prayer by thinking of the devil on earth and go out to face
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Globe earth. Baal Worship https://t.co/PWLQ0tIfuO
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker shows photos of planet Earth that have been divided, copied, and reflected vertically. They point out that when you look at the images from the bottom, you can see a cat-like shape. As you continue to look up, more faces and shapes become visible, including a ram with a horn. The speaker encourages viewers to keep looking and ponder the meaning of these images.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Watch this. This is one of the photos of planet Earth that I extracted from, NASA or something. If you divide this photo okay, you divide it, and then you make a copy. Put a picture. Okay?
And then it firm and reflect it vertically and you'll have a photo like this Okay, that's just 1 so I thought I'll take another photo different photo. Okay. So I found this and do the same thing, divide it, photo, transform, reflect, vertical, and then you get this image here. It's like, look at it. What's going on here?
If you if you see it from the bottom, something is going on. You have this, like some sort of cat. Okay. You know what's going on here, but it gets interesting when you keep going up, you know, look. Just keep seeing it.
What's going on here? There's another face. That's a face, then you see something is getting off it all the way up. So if you keep going up, look, that looks like a what's more of a ram? Ram with a horn.
Okay, you just if you go up and you see this this where is this? Look at it.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Antarctic Treaty https://t.co/WGXDzh0zQ6
Video Transcript AI Summary
You can go to Antarctica without permission if you're a citizen of a country that signed the Antarctic Treaty, as long as you don't disturb the biodiversity. However, access is restricted for tourists, who can only visit certain areas on cruises. To have full access, you must be a designated observer by your nation or a researcher. Even famous YouTubers like mister Beast couldn't go due to COVID-19. Going beyond the 60th South Latitude without proper authorization is illegal and can result in fines and other penalties. This doesn't prove a flat Earth, so attacking these restrictions blindly is unwarranted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can go to Antarctica. Nobody's stopping you. Look at all these trips you can go on. It's just a simple Google search, but I guess it's more fun to lie to people.
Speaker 1: She called them a liar. Oh my gosh. Let's demolish this.
Speaker 0: So there's an Antarctic treaty that limits human access to areas of special scientific or environmental significance.
Speaker 1: If you had Google searched this, you would know that Antarctica It's defined by the Antarctic Treaty as anything beyond the 60th south latitude, not just the areas of scientific or environmental significance.
Speaker 0: And if you're a citizen of one of the countries that signed this treaty, you don't even need permission to go to Antarctica. You can just go as long as you agree you won't mess with the biodiversity.
Speaker 1: In article 6 paragraphs 1 through 6 that you cannot go if you're a member of a nation in the treaty. You must be a designated observer by your nation. If you are a designated observer, you clearly have complete freedom of access at any time to All areas of Antarctica. It's only tourists who are not designated observers that get restricted access on their cruise.
Speaker 0: You can just go as long as you agree you want that to the biodiversity. And if you really wanna go into a research facility, Become a researcher.
Speaker 1: Or a famous YouTuber like mister Beast.
Speaker 2: In South Africa as a pit stop because mister Beast invited Casey Neistat and I to come film a surviving 50 hours in Antarctica video with him. I've always wanted to go there, so I jumped at the opportunity. It's gonna be a long 50 hours, Boys. Unfortunately, all of the scientists, I think there was, like, 12 of them in Antarctica, tested positive for right when we were gonna go. So So we couldn't go, and unfortunately, the trip got canceled.
Speaker 1: So not even mister beast could make it there. Anything outside of a tour with limited access Or becoming a designated observer by your nation with full access is illegal, and people such as Jarlais Anhoy, Samuel Massey, the New Zealander, they have done this past the 60th South Latitude, gone to Antarctica. She paid tens of 1,000 of dollars in fines. They lost their yacht. They lost their voting license.
This is not like proof of a flat Earth, Which is why I think people just attack these things blindly.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
People from Ukraine are not evil. People from Germany are not evil. People from South Africa are not evil. People from Israel are not evil. People from USA are not evil. People from Russia are not evil. People from Palestine are not evil. People from China are not evil. Their governments... Are.
reSee.it AI Summary
Your enemy isn't driven by money or material possessions. They possess infinite wealth, surpassing trillions, quadrillions, quintillions, and even sextillions of dollars. Their power knows no bounds, as high as any number you can imagine. Tax is irrelevant to them.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Hint. They are not after money. They dont care about money or anything materialistic. Your enemy is FAR more powerful than that. They dont need your tax. They never did. They have INFINITE $. Not $ Trillions Not$ Quadrillions Not$ Quintillions Not $ Sextillions Infinite (as high a number you can type in a notepad)
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video questions the relationship between the government and the people, highlighting various scenarios where the government's power has expanded beyond its intended limits. It raises concerns about the erosion of constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and protection against unreasonable searches. The video also criticizes the government's use of military force domestically, the criminal justice system, and the influence of big government in politics. It suggests that loving one's country may sometimes require challenging or changing the government. The overall message is to question the government's actions and defend individual rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does the government work for us, or do we work for the government? Tonight, what if the Constitution no longer applied? What if the whole purpose of the Constitution was to limit the government? What if Congress's enumerated powers in the constitution no longer limited Congress, but were actually used as a justification To extend Congress's authority over every realm of human life, what if the president meant to be an equal to Congress has instead become a democratically That's a term limited monarch. What if the president assumed that everything he did was legal just because he's the president?
What if he could interrupt your regularly without a search warrant? What if he could kill you without warning? What if Supreme Court justices no longer looked to the constitution To determine the constitutionality of a law, but rather simply to what justices who preceded them thought about it. What if the rights and principles guaranteed in the constitution have been so distorted in the past 200 years as to be unrecognizable by the founders. What if the 50 states were no longer sovereign entities, equals to each other and parents of the federal government they voluntarily constituted?
What if the states were mere provinces of a totally nationalized And fully centralized government. What if the Constitution was amended stealthily, not by constitutional amendments What if the federal government decided if its own powers were proper and constitutional? What if the constitution were no longer the supreme law of the land? What if you needed a license from the government to speak, to assemble, or to protest against the government? What if the government didn't like what you planned to say and so it didn't give you the license?
What if the right to keep and bear arms only applied to the government? What if posse comitatus, the federal law that prohibits our military from occupying our streets were no longer in effect? What if the government considered the military an adequate dispenser of domestic law enforcement? What if cops looked and acted like troops and you couldn't distinguish the military from the police? What if you were not secure In your person, in your papers, and in your property.
What if federal agents could write their own search warrants and defiance of the constitution? What if the government could decide when you were and were not entitled to a jury trial? What if the government could take your property whenever it wanted? What if the government could continue prosecuting you until it got the verdict it wanted? What if the government could force you to testify against yourself the What if people running for president actually supported torture?
What if the government tortured your children to get to you? What if government judges and government lawyers intimidated juries into convicting the innocent? What if the government could send you to your death And your innocence meant nothing so long as the government's procedures were followed? What if America's prison population, the largest in the world, was a cruel and unusual way for a country to be free. What if half the prison population never harmed anyone but themselves?
What if the people had no rights except those the government chose to let them have? What if the states had no rights Except to do as the federal government commanded. What if our elected officials didn't really live among us, but instead all had their hearts and homes in Washington DC? What if the government could strip you of your rights because of where your mother was when you were born? What if the income tax was unconstitutional?
What if the states were convinced to give up their representation in Congress? What if the government tried to ban you from using a substance in your body that is older than the government itself? What if voting didn't mean anything anymore because both political parties stand for big government? What if the government could write any law, regulate any behavior, and tax any event, the constitution be damned. What if the government was the reason we don't have a constitution anymore?
What if you could love your country But hate what the government has done to it. What if sometimes to love your country, you had to alter or abolish the government? What if Jefferson was right? What if that government is best which governs least? What if I'm right?
What if the government is wrong? What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong? Is now.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the guise of pandemic preparedness and biosecurity. The World Health Organization (WHO) is leading this effort, with the director in the United States overseeing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, limit freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. The WHO aims to develop vaccines in a short timeframe and have the power to declare a pandemic without standards. They would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of "One Health" is being used to expand the WHO's jurisdiction to include climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing human life compared to animals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're undergoing a soft coup. And the idea is to create a whole new set of laws that ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness in the biosecurity agenda. The WHO is developing through all its nations but with the WHO director red in the United States in charge of pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that We'll remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs. We'll enforce surveillance, censorship, leadership, get rid of freedom of speech, require government to censor and only push a single whole narrative. Also, we will be sub subject if if they can make this work to vaccines developed in a 100 it days which the organization CEPI is planning to do.
And one of the people who founded CEPI words, Jeremy Ferrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO, to bring this forward. Other things that amendments due is to bind the state so there are no longer recommendations but enforceable edicts. Provide liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from 1 country to another, enforce digital passports, arts and the director general of who can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic fists. He can just declare it with no standards and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your Renation once a pandemic is declared.
Obviously, the budget will increase. One health is another part of this. One health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything things in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems are all central health. Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Introducing Harrison Hanks, the ultimate crisis actor. Whether you need a doctor, a grieving husband, or someone to push a political agenda, Harrison has got you covered. With 18 years of experience as a medical examiner, he can convincingly play any role. Tired of melodramatic acting? Harrison brings subtlety and light to his performances. He questions the need for assault weapons and calls for action. With the ability to morph into a thousand different faces, Harrison is ready to play his part on the world stage. Affordable rates and no conscience included. Just pick your card and let Harrison take center stage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are your staged attacks not going as planned? Are your globalist agendas failing because you're using subpar crisis actors? Well, then look no further. Hi. I'm Harrison Hanks, the ultimate crisis actor.
Need a medical doctor? In 18 years as a medical examiner, I've never seen anything like it. Yeah. Is this the name of the child? Yes.
Over the top. 33 children died. Do you need a grieving husband? Did a right winger set off a bomb? Right.
Yeah. We're just kneeling about it, and I had a massive explosion. And I'm your man. Tired of melodramatic acting? There's light no Away from the darkness.
I'm just trying to figure out if he's okay. I lost my 20 year old, but I had 20 years with my son. It's just tragedy. Horror is tragedy. Going for the guns takes subtlety like this.
I don't know how many more need to die before president does something. Not this. Please, could we do something with the assault weapons? And every one of those hands is a reason Why those weapons should not be out in the general public? Because in this kind of a situation, what now.
What has changed? Have we learned nothing? I'm green screen ready, bonded, and insured. I can morph into a 1,000 different faces. I offer reasonable rates and I have no conscience.
Just pick your card to play on the world stage.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Challenger shuttle disaster in 1986 resulted in the tragic loss of all 7 crew members. Some interesting coincidences were discovered by internet users, such as the identical name, age, and likeness of Judy Resnick, who was an engineer and pilot on the mission, and a law professor at Harvard Law School. Similarly, Michael J. Smith, another engineer and pilot on the Challenger, shared the same name as a professor of engineering at the University of Wisconsin. Sharon Christa McAuliffe, a teacher chosen to be an astronaut, also tragically lost her life in the disaster. There were also similarities found between the commander of the mission, Dick Scobie, and Richard Scobie, the CEO of Cows in Trees. Additionally, astronauts Ronald McNair and Ellison Onizuka had twin brothers, Carl McNair and Claude Onizuka, respectively. These coincidences have sparked theories, but no concrete evidence has been found. Rest in peace to the crew of the Challenger Space Shuttle mission.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After the launch, the shuttle exploded and all 7 crew members lost their lives. This is Judy Resnick, an engineer and pilot aboard the Challenger mission. In 2013, an eagle eyed Internet user found Judith Resnick, a law professor at Harvard Law School. Some people were a little taken aback by the identical name, age, and likeness, so they started digging. This is Michael J.
Smith, also an engineer and pilot aboard the Challenger Shuttle who passed away that fateful day in 1986 at the age of 39 years old. This is doctor Michael j Smith Professor of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin. This is Sharon Christa McAuliffe, arguably one of the most famous things about the Challenger mission. She was supposedly just a teacher that was picked at random to be one of the astronaut, which made it all the more tragic when she passed away due to the Challenger disaster in 18/86. This is Sharon a McAuliffe, also a law professor who received her degree shortly after the Challenger disaster.
Dick Scobie was the commander of the mission. Here's Commander Dick Scobie next to Richard Scobie, the CEO of Cows in Trees. Here's his company's original logo. It's a cow, but it's not in a tree. It's strapped to a rocket, and, gee, that jet stream kinda looks familiar.
In fact, just in case I wasn't making it clear, the top picture is the Challenger ship shortly after exploding, so, you know, astronauts Ronald McNair and Ellison Onizuka both passed away when the Challenger shuttle exploded. Miraculously, it was found out that they both had twin brothers, Carl McNair and Claude Onizuka, but ANSYS researchers were done for both Carl and Claude and there was no birth records found and the odds of 2 sets of identical twins and a crew of 7 are astronomical, but that's just a theory. Rest in peace to the crew of the Challenger Space Shuttle mission.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
If you get cancer now... Go to the place that FORCED YOU to "sanitize" your hands PERIODICALLY. Find the EXACT details of that sanitizer. Check its ingredients. If there is Benzene in it... SUE !! (If i get suspended... know it is THIS tweet)
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
I turned on my computer and immediately heard a loud explosion. I thought it was a bomb. Debris covered me and my son, who was thrown out of his stroller. Some floors collapsed, trapping people. When I left the Pentagon, I didn't see any airplane parts or evidence of a plane crash. There was no jet fuel on me, my son, or the people I helped. Others in the area also didn't see any plane debris. I believe there is a more sinister explanation than the official story. Those responsible should be held accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I sat down at the computer, to actually turn the computer on. As soon as I press the button, boom. So at that particular time, based off what happened, I thought I had triggered a bomb. I was covered from my neck all the way down to my back in debris. My son was completely blown out of his stroller, and some of the floors, had collapsed, within and people were trapped in between the floors.
And I came out in what is believed to be the entrance or the place of initial impact. While I was coming out of the Pentagon, I didn't see any evidence of metal, Airplane seats, you know, luggage, nothing that would give me any indication that It was a plane that had hit the building. I did not have jet fuel over my body. My son didn't have jet fuel over his body. The people that I helped didn't have flew on their body.
So again, I wouldn't there was nothing on the inside that would give me any indication that there was a plane. In speaking with everyone, it was conclusive that no one else in the area where I was located had seen any parts of planes or luggage or baggage or anything to that nature. Yes. I believe it's something part of, much more sinister. I mean, when you go out of your way to fabricate an official story when, obviously, the evidence shows that the official story couldn't possibly be true, then, yes, you should be brought to justice.