TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BrokenTruthTV
reSee.it AI Summary
Concern raised about DNA contamination, autopsies showing spike protein in tumors, and alleged vaccine–cancer links, tied to NIHGate and Senator Ron Johnson. A responder, MeasslainteIRL, replied several times with links to related content.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
"I'm highly concerned. The DNA contamination, the autopsies where they have spike protein inside tumors, the turbo cancer reports, no I'm highly concerned about this" Discussing the Covid Vaccine Cancer connection and http://NIHGate.com with Senator Ron Johnson.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 thanks the guest for advocating vaccine research and asks about alleged cancer increases since the COVID nineteen vaccine. Speaker 1 replies: "No. I'm I'm highly concerned. You know, the DNA contamination, the autopsies where they have spike protein inside tumors, you know, the turbo cancer reports." He says "nobody wants to admit they're wrong here" and claims that "the federal agencies... what they were pushing might have resulted in the adverse events that are undeniable, the deaths that are undeniable" and warns of "changing the human basic genome by integration of the cell or you know, fostering these turbo cancers." He cites "doctor Sun Shiang" on cancers in very young patients and says the issue is "not being reported because... it's just way too scary." Speaker 0 recalls a FOIA in 2021/22: "'NIH gate'—'National Cancer Institute employees were aware that there were cancers being enabled by the spike protein in the vaccine, and they covered it up'—with '490 pages of completely redacted documents.' " Speaker 1 notes redactions now are "a white piece of paper" and jokes "eco friendly," mentioning "Tom Wrens" and a military cancer increase "covered up," concluding, "the deep state does not give up its secrets."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One last thing. It's just a transition to a different topic. Your advocacy and willingness to spend your political clout on vaccine research and injuries and investigations has has made you a big fan from people like me, and also the families who've who suffered from these injuries. Have you heard anything about these supposed cancer increases since the COVID nineteen vaccine?
Speaker 1: Oh, I've heard about them for a number of years now. No. I'm I'm highly concerned. You know, the DNA contamination, the the autopsies where they have spike protein inside tumors, you know, the turbo cancer reports. No.
I'm I'm I'm highly concerned about this. Again, I I don't don't have a whole lot of information on it. I'm not a medical doctor myself, but, no, I've been following this very closely. I've been highly concerned about it. I know a limited number of people are concerned as well.
I mean, that's part of our problem is nobody wants to admit they're wrong here. The federal agencies, the the people that push the injections, doctors who push it on their patients, and nobody wants to admit that what they were suggesting, what they what they were pushing might have resulted in the adverse events that are undeniable, the deaths that are undeniable. They still don't want to be talking about how we we may be changing the human basic genome by integration of the cell or you know, fostering these turbo cancers. Mean, but you have doctor Sun Shiang, you know, highly alarmed about, you know, cancers in very young patients he's never seen before. I mean, it's it's getting to be kinda like the the unusual clotting that the coroners were seeing.
It's just like it's we know about it. It's just not being reported because quite honestly, it's just way too scary.
Speaker 0: Yeah. One of the my earliest alerts to this was in 2021, I submitted, I think. Maybe it's '22. I submitted a FOIA request for something that we call NIH gate. Basically, National Cancer Institute employees were aware that there were cancers being enabled by the spike protein in the vaccine, and they covered it up.
And the DOD was apparently involved, and I had 490 pages of completely redacted documents. They wouldn't even release the blacked out pages.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Now the the now way they're doing the redactions, they just give you a white piece of paper.
Speaker 0: Oh, that's nice.
Speaker 1: They don't even so you don't even know was this a, you know, bunch of paragraphs or just one thing redacted.
Speaker 0: Well, it's less ink, so it's eco friendly.
Speaker 1: Plus, you know, we had Tom Wrens, and I think this is my COVID nineteen second opinion event that talked about d med. And the whistleblower's there and then the, you know, all of a sudden there were apparently a glitch, but the initial data there showed a pretty significant increase in different types of malignancies as well within the military. But again, that's that's all been covered up. We have not got to the bottom of that. Again, it's it's even with the republican president in charge, even with people like Bobby Kennedy that is dedicated to radical transparency, the deep state does not give up its secrets.
You still have the partisan actors. Even if they're not partisan, the the you know, won't admit they're they were wrong, that what they pushed, that they're covered up. That they're gonna try and bury that truth as as for as long as they possibly can.
BrokenTruth.TV | Broken Truth | Substack
Broken Truth (BT) is an American online news and research website based in California. Broken Truth covers domestic, national, and international news, and publishes opinion pieces, investigative reports, documentaries, and interviews. Click to read BrokenTruth.TV, by Broken Truth, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
brokentruth.tv
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
🧬 DNA Contamination & mRNA Vaccine Biology Curated Reference Roadmap (all links are PubMed, PMC, DOI, or regulator FOI — stable, citable sources) 1️⃣ DNA Contamination & Quality Control McKernan et al. (2023) – Sequencing of Moderna & Pfizer bivalent mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram–microgram dsDNA per dose 🔗 OSF Preprint: https://osf.io/b9t7m/ König & Kirchner (2024) – Methodological considerations regarding DNA impurities in Comirnaty® 🔗 MDPI: https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/7/3/41 ⚠️ Expression of Concern: https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/8/4/68 Speicher, D.W. et al. (2023) – DNA fragments detected in Pfizer/Moderna mRNA vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose-response relationship with serious adverse events 🔗 OSF: https://osf.io/mjc97/ Kammerer, U. (2024) – BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/ Kaiser vs. König Debate (2025) – Recap of methodological flaws in Kaiser’s “no-DNA problem” rebuttal 🔗 Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/anandamide/p/the-konig-vs-kaiser-debate-continues TGA FOI Docs (2024) – Internal correspondence on DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines 🔗 FOI PDF: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-12/FOI%2025-0070.pdf 2️⃣ Persistence, Immunology & Oncogenic Risk Strayer et al. (2002) – Durability of transgene expression and vector integration: SV40-derived vectors 🔗 PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12161189/ Aldén et al. (2022) – BNT162b2 mRNA reverse transcribed into DNA in human liver cell line (Huh7) 🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073 Mörz, M. (2022) – Case report: Necrotizing encephalitis & myocarditis after BNT162b2, spike protein detected by IHC 🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101651 🔗 PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36298516/ Schwab, C. et al. (2023) – Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination 🔗 PMC: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702955/ 🔗 PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36436002/ (Optional supporting autopsies) Gill, J.R. et al. (2022) – Cardiac findings in 2 adolescents following second Pfizer dose 🔗 PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35157759/ Choi, S. et al. (2021) – Myocarditis-induced sudden death after BNT162b2 🔗 PMC: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524235/ Röltgen et al. (2022) – Immune imprinting and germinal center response in SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination 🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.018 Patterson et al. (2021) – Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein in CD16+ monocytes in PASC up to 15 months 🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.746021 Castrucci et al. (2019) – Clonal persistence of influenza B virus antibodies (comparative baseline) 🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00066-19 Irrgang et al. (2022/23) – Class switch toward IgG4 after repeated mRNA vaccination 🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798 🔗 PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36548397/ 3️⃣ Related / Corroborating Evidence Chakraborty (2023) – DNA vector fragments detected in bloodstream of vaccinated individuals 🔗 OSF: https://osf.io/hzyn3/ Buckhaults, P. (2023) – SC Senate testimony on plasmid DNA contamination in Pfizer vaccines 🎥 Video: https://www.scstatehouse.gov/video/archives.php?key=18538 📄 Transcript PDF: https://www.scstatehouse.gov/CommitteeInfo/SenateMedicalAffairsCommittee/PandemicPreparedness/Phillip-Buckhaults-SC-Senate-09122023-final.pdf EMA (ICH Q6B, 1999 / still current) – Specifications: Biotechnological/biological products → Residual DNA <10 ng/dose; no oncogenic sequences permitted 🔗 EMA Guideline: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q6b-specifications-biotechnological-biological-products_en.pdf Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada David J. Speicher,Jessica Rose &Kevin McKernan https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517 @Kevin_McKernan did I miss anything 🙏
DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.
Background: In vitro transcription (IVT) reactions used to generate nucleoside modified RNA (modRNA) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently rely on an RNA polymerase transcribing from a DNA template. Production of modRNA used in the original Pfizer randomized clinical trial (RCT) utilized a PCR-generated DNA template (Process 1). To generate billions of vaccine doses, this DNA was cloned into a bacterial plasmid vector for amplification in Escherichia coli before linearization (Process 2), expanding the size and complexity of potential residual DNA and introducing sequences not present in the Process 1 template. It appears that Moderna used a similar plasmid-based process for both clinical trial and post-trial use vaccines. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed this plasmid DNA at significant levels in both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA vaccines. These studies surveyed a limited number of lots and questions remain regarding the variance in residual DNA observed internationally.
Methods: Using previously published primer and probe sequences, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Qubit® fluorometry was performed on an additional 27 mRNA vials obtained in Canada and drawn from 12 unique lots (5 lots of Moderna child/adult monovalent, 1 lot of Moderna adult bivalent BA.4/5, 1 lot of Moderna child/adult bivalent BA.1, 1 lot of Moderna XBB.1.5 monovalent, 3 lots of Pfizer adult monovalent, and 1 lot of Pfizer adult bivalent BA.4/5). The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried for the number and categorization of adverse events (AEs) reported for each of the lots tested. The content of one previously studied vial of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was examined by Oxford Nanopore sequencing to determine the size distribution of DNA fragments. This sample was also used to determine if the residual DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and thus resistant to DNaseI or if the DNA resides outside of the LNP and is DNaseI labile.
Results: Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 - 24.87 and 18.03 - 23.83 and for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively. These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 - 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01 -0.34 ng/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively measured by qPCR, and 1,896 – 3,720 ng/dose and 3,270 – 5,100 ng/dose measured by Qubit® fluorometry for Pfizer and Moderna, respectfully. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori was only detected in Pfizer vials with Cq scores ranging from 16.64 – 22.59. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products. Size distribution analysis found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 base pairs (bp) and 3.5 kb, respectively. The plasmid DNA is likely inside the LNPs and is protected from nucleases.
Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing.
osf.io
BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law
Background: BNT162b2 RNA-based COVID-19 injections are specified to transfect human cells to efficiently produce spike proteins for an immune response.
publichealthpolicyjournal.com
The Konig vs Kaiser debate continues
And the Corruption Carries On.
anandamide.substack.com
Durability of transgene expression and vector integration: recombinant SV40-derived gene therapy vectors - PubMed
Many applications of gene delivery require long-term transgene expression. In dividing cells, this result necessitates vector genome persistence, usually by integrating into cellular DNA. Since recombinant gene delivery vectors derived from tag-deleted, replication-incompetent simian virus-40 (SV40) …
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19 - PubMed
The current report presents the case of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson's disease (PD) who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination. The patient was first vaccinated in May 2021 with the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vector vaccine, followed by two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in Jul …
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
Cases of myocarditis, diagnosed clinically by laboratory tests and imaging have been described in the context of mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Autopsy-based description of detailed histological features of vaccine-induced myocarditis is ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination - PubMed
Cases of myocarditis, diagnosed clinically by laboratory tests and imaging have been described in the context of mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Autopsy-based description of detailed histological features of vaccine-induced myocarditis is lacking. We describe the autopsy findings and common …
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose - PubMed
The myocardial injury seen in these postvaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a k …
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Myocarditis-induced Sudden Death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Korea: Case Report Focusing on Histopathological Findings
We present autopsy findings of a 22-year-old man who developed chest pain 5 days after the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and died 7 hours later. Histological examination of the heart revealed isolated atrial myocarditis, with neutrophil ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination
During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, novel and traditional vaccine strategies have been deployed globally. We investigated whether antibodies stimulated by…
sciencedirect.com
Frontiers | Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) up to 15 Months Post-Infection
The recent COVID-19 pandemic is a treatment challenge in the acute infection stage but the recognition of chronic COVID-19 symptoms termed post-acute sequela...
frontiersin.org
Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination - PubMed
RNA vaccines are efficient preventive measures to combat the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. High levels of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are an important component of vaccine-induced immunity. Shortly after the initial two mRNA vaccine doses, the immunogl …
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
South Carolina Legislature Video Archives
scstatehouse.gov
South Carolina Legislature Online - Error
scstatehouse.gov
Page or document not found | European Medicines Agency (EMA)
We are sorry, but the content you tried to access is unavailable at the link you used, which was either incorrect or out-of-date. To help you find what you are looking for, we have included some useful tips.
ema.europa.eu
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@BrokenTruthTV https://t.co/jKzHS52QIg
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@JillianMichaels DNA contamination with SV40 promoters, brewed in vats of E. coli poop soup. Sounds so “safe & effective.” 🤡 https://t.co/96OgCAHqMQ
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@BrokenTruthTV https://t.co/DNiBLgAkxQ
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@BrokenTruthTV https://t.co/iaMSVSxCgI
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@BrokenTruthTV https://t.co/ALQAS24QT7
@JesslovesMJK - Jessica Rose 🤙
"...mitochondria tend to be farther from [skin fibroblast] cell border[s] for patients who experience psychosis" Is that not the most fascinating observation ever?? https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.08.676630v1 https://t.co/JMGPk4Uhvv
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@BrokenTruthTV https://t.co/rgfUu4FNWt
@DJSpeicher - David J Speicher PhD DTM
Nice to see an updated table of all the studies on plasmid DNA. Reproducibility trumps publication.
@hudikaha - 藤川賢治（FUJIKAWA Kenji）@小金井市議 Koganei City Councillor
I have added a row for the brand-new peer-reviewed paper by @DJSpeicher @JesslovesMJK and @Kevin_McKernan to the table "Verifications of mRNA Vaccine DNA Contamination Worldwide (as of 2025-09-06)." https://t.co/zhfOpreF6E
@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III 🐺🐭🦝
@BrokenTruthTV https://t.co/F5KMVFxL42
@DJSpeicher - David J Speicher PhD DTM
New Study on Lipid Nanoparticles🎉 Congrats to @CanningPharm on her publication, "Complexity, unpredictability and safety challenges of lipid nanoparticles"‼️ This manuscript examines lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), tiny fat particles used in mRNA vaccines like those for COVID-19. This manuscript highlights several important items. Complex Behavior: LNPs are unpredictable due to varying structure and interactions in the body, affecting how well they work. Safety Risks: They can cause immune reactions or interact with drugs like clozapine, potentially leading to side effects. Delivery Issues: Only 1-15% of LNPs successfully deliver mRNA into cells, reducing vaccine effectiveness. Protein Coating: A protein layer forms on LNPs in the body, varying by person and impacting how they function. Need for Better Testing: The study calls for improved methods to study LNPs to ensure safety and effectiveness. This work highlights LNP risks and pushes for better designs and regulations to make mRNA vaccines safer and more reliable. The manuscript can be found here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396321059_Complexity_unpredictability_and_safety_challenges_of_lipid_nanoparticles_-A_multidisciplinary_narrative_review Congratulations Maria. You have worked tirelessly on this for the past several years and it's nice to see the document public. @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan @AdhesionsOrg @jimmy_dore @FLSurgeonGen @liz_churchill10 @natalimorris @NicHulscher @P_McCulloughMD @Double_Christ @MaryanneDemasi @hervk102 @TheRebelPatient @nzdsos @NG_Northgroup @cccalliance24 @SenseReceptor @VigilantFox @Fynnderella1 @IamBrookJackson @LynneBr37562004
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
Epidemic of Fraud Full Film. English. Watch Now. Right here on X. Please share and donate to support this work at https://www.paypal.com/donate?campaign_id=KQRQB6FPN8ED8
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, John, a storyteller, shares his experience in the media industry and his involvement in creating public service announcements during the COVID-19 pandemic. He discusses censorship, conflicts of interest, and the influence of pharmaceutical companies in medical research. John questions the integrity of scientific institutions and emphasizes the importance of unbiased research. The video also touches on genetic sequencing technology for monitoring the virus. The second part of the video discusses the funding and investigation of Illumina's spin-off, GRAIL, by Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos. It explores the concept of conditioning and negative responses associated with trigger words. The video mentions the toilet paper shortage, MK Ultra experiments, and controversies surrounding the use of remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 treatment. It highlights conflicting opinions and allegations of suppression of certain treatments. The discussion then shifts to a panel on vaccine technology with Anthony Fauci and Rick Bright, exploring the need for disruption in the current system and the importance of urgency. They discuss financial interests, censorship, and the role of the media in shaping public opinion. The speakers express concerns about the lack of early treatment options and the erosion of trust in medical institutions. They call for accountability and citizen activism for a more ethical approach to medicine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is John, and I am a storyteller. And this is kind of my story.
Speaker 1: Action.
Speaker 0: My life has been blessed. I have a beautiful, loving family. I've spent years as a director, producer, visual effects supervisor, and writer. And for a very long time, I was part of the media. You would have seen my work on Big Bang Theory.
I did marketing. I did coproducing for films. I directed. My life was awesome. Hey, cut.
And then 2020 happened. I began to prepare for COVID in January of 2020 so that when it hit, my company was ready to continue to make products for networks. But I didn't just stop there. I made public service announcements. I made some of the earliest videos telling you to stay home.
I made public service announcements telling you to wear masks. I even promoted vaccines. I was once a CNN editor. When health care workers were being censored, I had to investigate. I've interviewed doctors, nurses, vaccine injured, malpractice survivors, and even interacted with heads of the FDA.
And my work has been repeatedly censored. What I found is an unholy alliance of public, private, and political groups that seem hell bent on turning all of us into lab rats. Our journey starts with a class of medications that for 100 of years has decided the fate of nations, and it just may do it again.
Speaker 2: Americans ultimately always do the right thing, but only after they've tried everything else.
Speaker 3: Now there's an optimist. And,
Speaker 2: right now, we're trying everything else.
Speaker 4: Hydro hydro hydroxychloro hydroxychloro hydroxychloro hydroxychloro hydroxychloroquin. Chloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine. Leave this in.
Speaker 1: We knew these medications were safe. We treated these patients for that 5 day regimen. We gave them 400 milligrams of hydroxychloroquine twice a day on day 1. On days 2 through 5, we gave them 200 milligrams twice a day.
Speaker 0: You see it on
Speaker 5: TV. Chloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine.
Speaker 6: I use zinc, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin within the first 5 days of the onset of symptoms.
Speaker 0: You read about it on social media. Doctors from coast to coast are in a war with our medical establishment and research institutions.
Speaker 7: It's obvious that this drug works and would have saved 100 of thousands of lives.
Speaker 8: Like some doctors are saying, we use hydroxychloroquine and z packs, and I've had amazing success treating patients banned, video banned, and the dangerous information. My own doctor said hydroxychloroquine is fantastic if you catch it early. Yeah.
Speaker 9: A very, very safe drug can be taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers. It's got over 50 years of safety record. Cardiac events were never ever a major concern with this drug.
Speaker 10: It keeps people out of the hospital.
Speaker 11: I can't think of a single viral infection where the best advice is to wait 2 weeks before we start treatment in the hospital. That's the current NIH recommendations. Americans are appalled by this.
Speaker 0: But if you ask your doctors what's going on, they don't wanna talk about it. When patients would bring a prescription for hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin to a trained drugstore, the pharmacists were denying the treatment, which to me is outrageous.
Speaker 12: Many of the developed countries around the world that are actually prohibiting doctors and sanctioning them if it is prescribed to their patients. And such a violation, I have to stress, has never occurred before for any medication ever.
Speaker 0: What if you found out that most of doctors have not done the research they quote or even read the studies?
Speaker 13: This is medicine, and medicine should be based on data and science.
Speaker 0: What if you found out that the public doctors we trust were ignoring, and in some cases, hiding studies that hold the key to saving your life, the lives of the ones you love, and the fate of an entire nation?
Speaker 14: This is about science and data. There are randomized trials that show that it doesn't work. There are observational trials that show that it might work.
Speaker 15: There are some studies that suggest that it might work. There are other studies that show that it doesn't work at all.
Speaker 0: Changes to basic science methodology, threats from hospitals, and influence in every level of our medical establishment and government have rendered your doctors mute, blind, or worse, complicit. To the charge, you've been misleading the American public?
Speaker 15: I have not been misleading the American public under any circumstances.
Speaker 16: We're not treating the COVID, guys. For real, we're not treating the COVID. Nobody is listening.
Speaker 0: America outspends almost every other nation per person on medical care, yet we had the greatest number of COVID deaths compared to other countries. Our COVID response was abysmal. What did these countries know, and how can What is hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of Chloroquine, one of the first malarial drugs invented. Chloroquine was based off of a drug called quinine.
Quinine is also credited as the first chemical compound used to treat an infectious disease. Quinine was initially ground from the bark of a cinchona tree. It was given to settlers from Spain by Indians near Peru in the 1600s and brought to the Western world as a cure for malaria. Eventually, Jesuit priests traveled the world with cinchona bark, so much so that it was commonly known as Jesuits bark. In 17/51, the Spanish crown took control of all the sources of quinine, restricting access as a new form of scientific based imperialism.
At the beginning of the American Revolution, George Washington requested his political masters buy up as much cinchona bark and quinine powder as possible, a deciding factor in the fate of the new nation, because in 17/78, the Spanish crown restricted British access to quinine. In 18/20, quinine was officially isolated, reducing the need for cinchona tree bark. That development opened the door of European exploration to all of Africa, considered at the time the white man's graveyard, due to how many Europeans died from malaria on the continent. In the 18 sixties, during the American Civil War, southern states relied heavily on shipping for goods, services, and medications. So Honest Abe Lincoln and his advisors enacted the Northern blockade to block cotton shipments to Europe, weapons imports, and quinine.
Lincoln's goal with blocking quinine was to create as many sick and dead southern soldiers as possible because the sick soldier slows down an army and drains resources. This ultimately means that Abraham Lincoln could be considered by some a practitioner of biological warfare against men and women, young and old, free and slave. Things were so desperate for the south that John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's alleged assassin, smuggled quinine to friends and family. In their desperation, southern doctors searched for native plants and trees local to the south to replace Cinchona. The one that came up the most?
The bark of a dogwood tree. When the information was provided to doctors across the South that they had a potential alternative, the doctors didn't use it because they felt it hadn't had enough clinical trials and didn't want to be considered homeopaths. Where have we heard that before?
Speaker 15: The information that you're referring to specifically is anecdotal. It was not done in the controlled clinical trial, so you really can't make any definitive statement about it.
Speaker 0: The role of quinine in war doesn't stop there. In the 18 sixties, malaria was a major issue for English soldiers in India, so soldiers began combining the bitter tasting quinine with water and an alcoholic beverage to get their daily dose of the lifesaving medicine. Thus, the gin and tonic was born. The medicinal beverage was so important to the crown that Winston Churchill stated
Speaker 17: The gin and tonic drink has saved more Englishmen's lives and minds than all the doctors of the empire.
Speaker 0: With Africa opened up to exploration, European countries vied for colonies and power in Africa, creating rivalries that influenced World War I. By the 19 thirties, the primary locations for growing cinchona moved from South America to India and Indonesia, lands that would soon be cut off to the Allies. In World War II, the United States was desperate for a source of quinine in cinchona and returned to South America in a series of Cinchona missions to build a supply chain and protect Allied troops. At the same time, Nazi scientists weaponized mosquitoes with malaria. The Nazis then conducted experiments on prisoners with these mosquitoes at Dachau Concentration Camp.
Many of these prisoners were Jesuit priests. As World War II drew to a close, when United States and the United Kingdom troops advanced on Rome, the German troops cut window screens of all the homes in the region, confiscated quinine from the residents, and allegedly released their weaponized malarial loaded mosquitoes. The advancing allied troops were ready and protected with quinine, cinchona, and chloroquine. But the local population of Italians weren't so lucky. That year, there was a massive spike in civilian casualties from malaria, a parting gift from the fleeing Nazis.
Hydroxychloroquine and drugs like it continued to be important over the years. For decades, American troops overseas have taken Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and other derivatives of those drugs. One of those derivatives, mefloquine, has been implicated in causing post traumatic stress disorder and neurological issues with troops that were stationed in Iraq. The issues surrounding mefloquine are so great that the drug received a black box warning, the FDA's most stringent warning possible. For centuries now, the restriction of access to hydroxychloroquine, quinine, and drugs like them has been a standard tactic of warfare.
It was involved in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, World War II, countless smaller wars all across the planet, and most importantly, what one day may be remembered as World War 3. We've spoken with numerous pharmacists, doctors, and academics, and very few of them knew the history of hydroxychloroquine and quinine. It makes you wonder, who's really in control of our scientific institutions? And what are we teaching Our medical doctors. Our government officials, our educated academics tried to convince us that tonic water was deadly, and most of you believed it.
Throughout this film, you're going to see videos and clips taken from whistleblowers who tried to warn us about issues with our medical establishments. You will see how coordinated this medical establishment was at using certain catch phrases like anecdotal evidence, conspiracy theory, or randomized clinical trials. You'll also hear journalists use questionable negative connotations when used. When you hear these kinds of words, understand, you're not listening to news or science. You're listening to propaganda.
Rahm Emanuel once stated, you never want a serious crisis to go to waste with 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars ready to be spent to combat COVID, watch how all of our medical leaders bent over backwards to discredit one of the safest, cheapest, and most beneficial medications in human history. And they did it by manipulating science and data.
Speaker 18: Many Americans have read studies and heard media reports about this drug, Chloroquine, which is an antimalarial drug. It's already approved, as the President said, for the treatment of malaria as well as an arthritis condition. That's a drug that the President has directed us to take a closer look at as to whether an expanded use approach to that could be done to actually see if that benefits patients. And again, we want to do that in the setting of a pragmatic clinical trial to actually gather that information and answer the question that needs to be answered asked and answered.
Speaker 19: The Chinese study from Wuhan reflected statistically significant improvement in recovery from fever, from cough, and in pneumonia as well.
Speaker 15: That was not a very robust study. It is still possible that there is a beneficial effect, but the study that was just quoted in on a scale of strength of evidence, that's not overwhelmingly strong. It's an indication, a hint of it.
Speaker 20: A study released yesterday on hydroxychloroquine is shockingly irresponsible. Even the secretary of veteran affairs had to admit the weakness of this study.
Speaker 21: That's an observational study. It's not a clinical study. It was done on a small number of veterans. Sadly, those of whom were in the last stages of life.
Speaker 13: Basically, patients who are a few, steps from the morgue.
Speaker 0: Looking for a book to buy grandma this dark winter? Check out How to Lie with Statistics by Daryl Huff. It's recommended by Bill Gates and teaches you everything you need to know to commit genocide this sciency way, available at brokentruth.com.
Speaker 22: In May 11, 2020, the Journal of American Medical Association published a study by Rosenberg et al. That claimed hydroxychloroquine was examined and found to not have any difference in outcome versus patients who didn't receive it. It looks like a study that was designed to fail. What I then did was I analyzed their data with colleagues at prominent universities. When you took the groups out that have no benefit from an early stage treatment and just said, Well, let's look at the people who received the drug approximately in the timeframe they should have received it.
The study showed it worked. 85 to 90% was what I found versus a survival rate without the drug of under 53%. So there's a huge difference. Suddenly that confirmed studies out of Spain, Belgium, Switzerland, the Henry Ford study, pretty much every study that had been done showing hydroxychloroquine This study prevented people from taking up the drug. This study prevented people from taking up the drug.
My article was published in World Tribune. Just as the article was getting attention, boom, Twitter banned me and deleted the article and that was it. I was off Twitter. This is something that could have ended the pandemic if people had understood it and instead it's being suppressed. The authors of the study were Eli Rosenberg, and then the highest ranking author was Howard Zucker.
Howard Zucker was the health commissioner in the state of New York.
Speaker 0: Howard Zucker's role in the COVID pandemic in New York was notorious because he was directly involved in the policy of returning sick COVID patients to nursing homes where they could infect others. Howard Zucker also played a key role in hiding the actual death toll from nursing home patients who died from COVID in New York.
Speaker 23: So stay informed, and don't be misled by rumors and false information.
Speaker 0: Zucker was also involved in New York state's disastrous COVID 19 vaccine mandates. Zucker later resigned, but not before his health department hired Eli Rosenberg, his old coauthor, to work for New York State. It wasn't all bad for Howard. The Biden administration made him a top dog at the CDC. But trust them, it's totally not political.
During the Cold War, the CIA created something called Operation Mockingbird. This is where the CIA colluded and worked with journalists across all media to influence public perception. Are the journalists and scientists that you're about to see part of a modern day version of Operation Mockingbird? You be the judge.
Speaker 24: Breaking news this morning. A new study shows, and this is an expansive study, that the antimalaria drug that the president touted repeatedly
Speaker 25: This is a very, very large study.
Speaker 9: The largest study to date of its kind. Very large study.
Speaker 26: The size of this study.
Speaker 13: It was a massive study. This is
Speaker 27: a very, very large study.
Speaker 25: Much larger.
Speaker 24: Much larger than previous studies.
Speaker 26: It's a huge development. Huge.
Speaker 28: Large study published by The Lancet.
Speaker 13: In The Lancet, which is a very influential medical journal published
Speaker 29: in The Lancet. It's one of our clearest studies.
Speaker 22: This is
Speaker 27: a really powerful study.
Speaker 24: It's large, but shows real danger here. Increased risk of
Speaker 14: gas. Increased risk of dying.
Speaker 6: This is a dangerous drug.
Speaker 13: It's was dangerous.
Speaker 30: Hydroxychloroquine does more bad than good.
Speaker 0: It hurts.
Speaker 13: We're more likely to die. This is no cure. There is harm.
Speaker 0: 171 hospitals.
Speaker 25: 6 171 Hospitals.
Speaker 13: 600 Hospitals. Over 6 continents.
Speaker 9: Nearly 700 Hospitals.
Speaker 26: Tens of thousands of people.
Speaker 13: 96,000 seriously ill COVID 19 patients.
Speaker 1: 96,000
Speaker 13: patients. Almost a 100 patients. It is high quality evidence. The off label use of these medications in hospitalized patients with COVID should immediately stop.
Speaker 30: Is there any data that suggests that taking it before you're sick will keep you from getting sick?
Speaker 23: Not yet.
Speaker 10: Seems to
Speaker 31: debunk a lot of the miracle cure claim that's been peddled by president Trump.
Speaker 13: The president has been reckless in his promotion of this drug. Well, the president has promoted the drug, but touted by and taken by president Trump.
Speaker 32: Nancy Pelosi was bringing up that if you have a preexisting condition, and she was saying that the president fell into that range with his heart and his weight.
Speaker 0: This is in line with this Trump doctrine. But the president
Speaker 9: does not know what he's talking about when it comes to science.
Speaker 13: He is definitely not a doctor.
Speaker 17: He should probably acknowledge that he was wrong.
Speaker 25: Why not take it? Because you might die.
Speaker 26: How many people listened to him, and how many people took it?
Speaker 13: He also, claimed political bias. He's been taking it.
Speaker 25: Why is he taking it?
Speaker 33: The president will stop taking it too.
Speaker 13: Well, he stopped taking it yesterday.
Speaker 24: A risk to prescribe this to the sitting president?
Speaker 26: Absolutely.
Speaker 13: Fluoroquin and hydroxychloroquine, both are associated with a higher risk of dangerous heart arrhythmias and an increased chance of death.
Speaker 9: Science and facts be damned.
Speaker 20: Breaking news that we are following today. The World Health Organization has temporarily halted studying the Trump touted drug hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment for coronavirus, citing safety concerns. Officials made the decision after new findings linked it to a higher risk of death.
Speaker 25: The WHO had to act, but
Speaker 13: they have to pause this one now. That is not ethical to continue.
Speaker 20: Unethical to continue. I think that really encapsulates what's what is going on here.
Speaker 13: A paper published
Speaker 27: in The Lancet in May of 2020 that said hydroxychloroquine didn't work for COVID, was retracted after the authors were unable to confirm that any of the data was accurate.
Speaker 13: An influential article which found the drug hydroxychloroquine increased the risk of death in COVID 19 patients was retracted on Thursday.
Speaker 20: It was all fake.
Speaker 13: And its implications led several other COVID 19 studies to be halted.
Speaker 19: This study had, of course, triggered the suspension of h e q clinical trials around the world.
Speaker 34: That the WHO suspended the trials because of this study that was published in The Lancet.
Speaker 35: Used alone or with a macro, light, they estimated a higher mortality rate.
Speaker 13: The Lancet and new control medicine were party to, as was doctor Fauci was, they spiked the use of hydroxychloroquine.
Speaker 20: Doctor Fauci himself basically declared the drug a lost cause, and yet a deafening silence from doctor Fauci today.
Speaker 11: This is academic malfeasance published by individuals interested in doing evil to the world with respect to a beneficial treatment of hydroxychloroquine. They were scare papers to scare people on hydroxychloroquine. Since that time, there's been dozens of pile on scare tactics in academics. This isn't the government. This is people in my field, in academic medicine, who are committing academic fraud.
I'm a cardiologist. I reviewed a paper demonstrating that hydroxychloroquine causes a heart attack, that hydroxychloroquine causes a giant scar in the heart. I can tell you firsthand, hydroxychloroquine does not cause giant scars in the heart. So academic medicine is committing fraud, is committing, I think, a crime against humanity. There must be a motivation behind this that's much bigger than just Democrat versus Republican.
Speaker 22: So on May 11th, you've got the JAMA study. And then on May 22nd, you have the Lancet study. Now that was, of course, retracted because it was completely fraudulent. But how did the 2 studies work together in shaping a public imagination? Well, the JAMA study said drug doesn't do anything and the Lancet study said this drug could actually increase your fatality risk.
So, I think these two studies actually really worked together and I think their timing, I doubt that it was coincidental.
Speaker 13: But this is medical fraud for political purpose.
Speaker 20: Where are the mea culpas? From doctor Fauci, from all these medical journalists, from all of these media types who gleefully proclaimed this drug is dead.
Speaker 0: Despite the retraction, the faked SERGIOsphere study has been repeatedly cited as evidence in other studies. Mandeep Meera and Frank Ruschitzka continue to speak publicly and write studies. Amit Patel and Sapantaisai almost vanished. But Sipanda Sai has turned up in Massachusetts. While he's not currently practicing medicine, he is an expert witness for hire.
This is the study that made me question everything. So I tracked down one of Sapondasai's former employees. And on condition of anonymity, here's what this employee had to say, as dictated by this fake AI voice.
Speaker 33: It's crazy because he and his wife both worked in hospitals. Indian folks, always on the up and up with everything. He was a minimalist. His suits were old, briefcase falling apart. Their bedrooms only consisted of an old bed, a dresser and a shower and toilet, he was so frugal, lived minimally aside from his sports cars, he seemed more focused on performing his surgeries and seeing patients and developing the starter program, quartz clinical than reaping the financial benefits.
When I had last spoke to him, he said he was getting death threats and people knew where he lived, so they showed up at his house. From what I know, he had set up his own server in his house. I saw it so he could run his own software. He was really smart. He built the entire website and health care analytics platform himself and his wife and that was the last time I ever heard from him.
Speaker 0: The harm this fraud caused is unmeasurable. But if there's one thing you should take away from what you just heard, it's that somewhere out there is an email server that could tell us who Sapondesai was in contact with, who may have encouraged him to fake his data and promote remdesivir.
Speaker 13: We've identified several antiviral medications that seem to have a positive impact. There was, article published
Speaker 15: The recovery trial study protocol note is funded in part by the Wellcome Trust, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. We really don't know if we're giving the best care, and we need to get the evidence so that we can move forward with confidence.
Speaker 36: Why wouldn't we use this for something that's killing people?
Speaker 15: The dosages that you'll be using for coronavirus are far greater than the dosages that you use for malaria or that you use for autoimmune diseases such as lupus.
Speaker 36: The the dose is being used in both solidarity, the WHO trials, and the RECOVERY UK trials, 2 independent studies. They were both using, levels that were about 4 times the maximum dose for any medical condition. There are no medical conditions at which these doses would be prescribed. In fact, when Landry was kind of, confronted with these issues, it he apparently was making some kind of careless mistake, believing and maybe even misinterpreting, hydroxyquinolone or hydroxychloroquine.
Speaker 14: With the sort of doses that are used for amebic dysentery.
Speaker 37: Do you know what's the initial level of iDosecine?
Speaker 14: I don't remember off the top of my head, but it's something like 10 times last.
Speaker 36: The World Health Organization set these levels.
Speaker 9: The quantities that were being given in the Manaus Brazil study and in the recovery trial were excessive. And when you have a severely
Speaker 0: The trial was amended so that patients who were unconscious and had no family available could be placed without their consent by their physician into the trial. And later, the trial was amended to add children. This was an open label study. All of the hospitals, doctors, and nurses who participated all over the world knew what they were doing. This is a golden standard.
Speaker 36: This is a study designed by the World Health Organization that is not only designed to fail, it's designed to kill.
Speaker 0: Prophylaxis is any action taken to prevent disease or a biological event, condoms, or prophylaxis a prophylaxis was so concerning. Members of the political left also know how prophylaxis works. Just ask Scott Wiener, the former senator from California. He participated in a campaign for Retruvada, an HIV prophylaxis created by Gilead. Many medical officials also campaign for this drug, including doctor Anthony Fauci.
Later, Truvada was implicated in kidney failure among homosexual men who took it. Gilead was accused of creating 2 versions of their pill and releasing a more dangerous and toxic version for profit.
Speaker 26: The core is that Gilead, for profit reasons, decided to shell in 2004 to shell the safe drug, even though they knew it was safer, and wait until the patent life had expired on the less safe drug, and then launch it as new and improved.
Speaker 0: Now you know how Gilead works and how prophylaxis works.
Speaker 24: Doctor David Boulware is leading the trial, and he joins us now to tell us more about it. Doctor, good morning. Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 38: So we basically launched a clinical trial that's looking at prevention of COVID 19 disease in high risk people who have been exposed. In the next week to 10 days will be fully enrolled and will have a result back in about 3 to 3 and a half weeks.
Speaker 0: According to a July 2020 article for Marilyn Marchionne, doctor Boulware stated that he paid $5,000 of his own money to buy hydroxychloroquine to use in the trial. According to grant disclosures, the medications were donated by a company that 3 weeks later entered negotiations with Gilead to make generic forms of their more profitable remdesivir. When asked about the donations, Doctor. Boulware avoided admitting that he was ever reimbursed for his purchases. But more curiously, Boulware was unaware that there was a brand name version of hydroxychloroquine named Plaquenil.
How could a doctor conduct a study on a drug yet not know the brand name of that same drug?
Speaker 38: We conducted a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial, to try to eliminate by the best quality data that's possible. So what we found was that the, there was no effect of hydroxychloroquine. So in the hydroxychloroquine group, it was 12%, and in the SIBO group, it was 14%.
Speaker 0: Doctor Boulware's interpretation of the study was disputed by Marcio Watanabe, a PhD statistician out of Brazil. Marcio discovered that the study, in fact, did show a statistical benefit of hydroxychloroquine. Another interesting result of the study was that despite higher than recommended doses, no serious side effects were seen. The New England Journal of Medicine has still not published this update.
Speaker 38: The double blind. And so what that means is that neither the participants nor the investigators actually knew what they were receiving.
Speaker 7: All of those randomized controlled trials were not blinded. The people knew which medications they were taking because it was stamped on the pills. To the Bulwer studies and Skipper and all the others that Minnesota Group put out, their outcomes of importance, hospitalization, and mortality are exceedingly small numbers, and therefore, the randomization was worthless in those trials. They didn't adjust for anything in those trials to deal with the fact that they had weak randomization. And so this is all a sham.
Those studies are all sham. They have the look, the plausibility claim, oh, they're randomized trials, but what they are is sham evidence.
Speaker 0: The day after he announced his hydroxychloroquine study, doctor Boulware signed a deal with Revive Therapeutics, a pharmaceutical company developing bucilamine, a different drug, to treat COVID-nineteen. In October of 2019, Doctor. Boulware gave a speech where he disclosed a research grant from Gilead, maker of remdesivir. Once the damage was done and the drug was discredited, on July 6, 2020, Doctor. Boulware submitted a new disclosure form to the American College of Physicians.
As he states, doctor Boulware has no relevant relationship with any company which makes therapeutics for post exposure prophylaxis to coronavirus, unless you listen to former FDA commissioner Scott Godley.
Speaker 14: Remdesiviran, which blocks viral replication. You wanna get it in early before you have a lot of virus on board. You wanna get it in early before you have a lot of virus on board.
Speaker 0: Does that sound like prophylaxis? Doctor Boulware added new grant donors, acknowledged new relationships, including $17.79 worth of food and beverage funded by Gilead. While we admire his attention to detail, he neglected to disclose the $3,260,000 donation from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to the University of Minnesota for COVID nineteen research 2 weeks after his study began. As of October 2023, the 4 universities involved in the Boulware study have received over $360,000,000 in Gates Foundation donations. In October of 2023, a new study of actual patients who were treated with hydroxychloroquine showed the drug was very beneficial in reducing mortality in COVID patients.
Even with that evidence, doctor Boulware refused to acknowledge the benefit hydroxychloroquine, cleverly stating, hydroxychloroquine has not been shown to have any benefit in randomized clinical trials. If hydroxy Chloroquine was effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths, the fear based fountain of 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars for tests, genetic sequencing, vaccines, plasma, drugs, and research for COVID all based on emergency use authorization would end. Right after he gave the University of Minnesota 1,000,000 of dollars in April 2020, Bill Gates made his wishes abundantly clear to all the scientists and institutions that he funds.
Speaker 39: Bill Gates, who describes his foundation's role in helping fund vaccine efforts in a blog post. Every additional month that it takes to get the vaccine is a month when the economy cannot return to normal. There is a lot of discussion among governments, the World Health Organization, the private sector, and our foundation about how to organize these efforts.
Speaker 0: Unfortunately, for the University of Minnesota, fraudulent and scandalous behavior is par for the course.
Speaker 9: This was intentionally done, I believe, and others believe to make room for vaccines and highly expensive in hospital treatments such as remdesivir. You can't stop a pandemic of a rapidly mutating RNA virus by vaccination or by in hospital treatments. You have to do it on an outpatient basis. The patient comes in to see you. They fit the case definition.
You have an extremely safe drug. You treat on suspicion. You don't wait for testing. You send the patient home to quarantine, and you treat their family at home. This is how you stop a pandemic of this nature.
Speaker 3: I'm, doctor Sabine Hazen. I'm a gastroenterologist by trade, have been doing clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies for almost 3 decades. I'm not here to shake the beehive of the FDA. I'm here to make sure that the FDA is doing what it's supposed to do, which is assuring my safety and the safety of millions of Americans that are paying taxes.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: Because I spearhead the microbiome research, I started paying attention because of the genetic sequence of the virus. And we kinda joined forces with a lot of doctors in in America. And when we collected stool samples, we noticed the whole sequence of COVID in the stools. We basically started analyzing what is the best combination therapy to put out. Some of the doctors were saying, you know, vitamin c seems to be working in Italy.
Then the the protocol of Didier Raul came out. Hydroxychloroquine was interesting because millions of prescriptions. We've never had any problems. Azithromycin was another good solution, and zinc certainly seemed plausible. I said, I bet you hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin kill the virus, and then vitamin c, vitamin d, and zinc increase the microbiome.
Right? When we found the whole genome of COVID in the stools, we discovered that 2 people that were on hydroxychloroquine and Z Pak didn't have the virus anymore. So I started writing the protocol sometime in March, and the FDA says, you don't need to do a clinical trial, proceed. And that was, like, April 3rd. A couple days later, they said, I'm sorry, doctor Hazen.
You have to do a full on clinical trial. My protocol was seen by a lot of doctors on clinical trials dot gov. April 13th, I get a letter from the Gates Foundation.
Speaker 0: Now here's the quote. We are helping WHO, the World Health Organization, to track and monitor clinical trials evaluating pre exposure prophylaxis of health care workers. We were especially interested in those studies using either chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine.
Speaker 3: Right. Wasn't that interesting?
Speaker 0: The World Health Organization Yes. Was being coordinated with a private institution
Speaker 10: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: In the United States.
Speaker 3: So I wrote a long letter saying, you know, my family has been in the clinical trial business for years, and then I didn't hear back. April 19, 2020, 20. There was a tweet that went on on Twitter. Nick DeVito, 5 therapies at once on 600 patients in a single arm trial. What are we even doing?
How does this get approved, and who is he? Clinical Research Integrity, University of Oxford. University of Oxford that started the clinical trial that Monday. At the same time, retweet by Vinay Prasad, uncontrolled study of 5 drugs all at once for COVID, scientifically bankrupt, ethically bankrupt. COVID is pushing us to a new research flows.
First of all, it's not 5 therapies, It's zinc, vitamin c, and vitamin d, and there's only 2 medications. So I'm seeing this and I'm like, you actually are thinking of doing a placebo controlled trial in a pandemic where people are dying.
Speaker 0: The Gates Foundation has given over $329,000,000 to Nick DeVito's employer, the University of Oxford, and over $301,000,000 to Vinay Prasad's employer, the University of California, San Francisco.
Speaker 3: On Monday, there's a letter, that went out from STAT News to all the regulatory agencies, including the FDA that said, your thoughts on placebo in a pandemic. A new COVID 19 clinical trial is drawing up some attention on bio Twitter. Aside from the controversy surrounding hydroxychloroquine in the gut, demolishing potential of a 24 week of an antibiotic, we did have a question for you. Do placebo arms even have a place in a fast moving pandemic? So this was sent.
That day my protocol was put on hold. So they said, sorry, doctor Hazen. You need to do a placebo controlled trial.
Speaker 0: Reports indicate this stat news email was sent to the FDA and other regulatory officials, a select audience that would have the power to kill or delay doctor Hazen's study.
Speaker 3: I called the FDA and I said, okay. The placebo is gonna be vitamins. New England IRB takes 2 weeks and says, I'm sorry, doctor Hazen. We cannot take your protocol. Bottom line is I switched IRBs.
It took us another month to get started, and if you recall, there was a lot of talking about hydroxychloroquine in the media. By the time we were ready to recruit, it was too late. The media had destroyed hydroxychloroquine. People that were dying were afraid to take it because they were afraid of a heart attack, and essentially, here I am with a protocol. It was very difficult to enroll.
Doing clinical trial was never about the money for me. It was more important for me to see the data first because I wanted to make sure, like, what is going on right now? Right? Is this about money? Because if it's about money, then it's disgusting that we killed a person for the price of a stock.
Interference in research happened.
Speaker 0: The Gates Foundation allegedly invested $100,000,000 in COVID therapeutics, but the organization has devoted far more to vaccine research, with over $6,000,000,000 going just to GAVI, the vaccine alliance. Due to the legal requirements for emergency use authorizations, Gates' investments in vaccines would have been threatened by any drug proven to work against COVID. Luckily for the foundation, doctor Hazen's trial was delayed until after the fraudulent SERGISPhere study destroyed public confidence in hydroxychloroquine. We have begun submitting freedom of information act requests to find out what involvement Gates Foundation had with all of the other hydroxychloroquine trial researchers.
Speaker 3: Bill Gates said, you know, vaccine is the best investment I've ever made. I think we need to put the blame on whoever is controlling the FDA.
Speaker 0: How has the last 4 years affected your perception of medicine?
Speaker 3: It's really opened my eyes to the point that I say to myself, have I wasted 30 years of my life doing clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies?
Speaker 25: Financial conflicts of interest in medicine.
Speaker 0: In 2019, doctor Jason Fung gave a presentation to medical students about conflicts of interest in medicine. His words were highly prophetic.
Speaker 25: The universities are the most corrupted places in the world. These people are the people that are in the newspaper. They're the ones that are teaching medical students. They're the ones who are teaching the the dietitians, the pharmacists, everybody. These highly, highly corrupted people who don't even know it.
Speaker 13: The numbers are black and white.
Speaker 40: You they don't lie. They don't lie.
Speaker 28: We have questions that need answering before we can trust this data. Now here's a question. How much of our science is done badly this way?
Speaker 17: We depend on editors in peer review.
Speaker 25: Industry payments to editors. Look at the journal of the American College of Cardiology. On average, each editor is getting 470 $5,000 in that year. These are the people who are arguing to the FDA that drugs should or should not be approved for certain indications. How is it that the New England Journal of Medicine, our top journal, actually allows that?
It's so biased. This is why the insiders say evidence based medicine is largely useless or harmful. Selective publications, You have rigged outcomes, advertorials, people who work for the company, who write an editorial for the New England Journal of Medicine. Journal editors are on the take of the publication bias and then financial conflicts of interest like everywhere.
Speaker 6: Beginning of this year, the New England Journal published an absolutely horrific article where they concluded that only clinical trial data has any validity and anecdotal data or empirical real world evidence is not to be used, to set medical standard of care.
Speaker 41: The clinical trials is
Speaker 42: a big
Speaker 23: part of the content of
Speaker 42: The New England Journal. Jeff, Drazen, when he became the editor, said that he wanted to move the journal toward publishing more basic science and more clinical trials. He thought there was too heavy an emphasis on epidemiology, observational research.
Speaker 25: I trust the New England Journal of Medicine. That's my journal. It's like it's corrupt. That's what the insiders have said. The whole thing is a pile of crap.
Speaker 7: The journal that has to pay its editors and its editorial staff and so on that can't make all of its money on article submission fees has to raise money and does it by advertising and becomes addicted to the advertising. And once that happens, which happens fairly quickly, the publisher of the journal has to count out to the interests of pharma, and those interests are very clearly expressed and feed down into the editors themselves. And and Wharton at Lancet and Marsha Angel at New England Journal all talked about this in their books and comments about the effects of pharma on medical publishing.
Speaker 15: That the randomized placebo controlled trial is in fact the gold standard.
Speaker 7: We have a whole vast medical literature that that was not the triplet,
Speaker 42: the know, is your drug better than the drug I'm using now? But in order to get FDA approval, the company will do a placebo controlled trial,
Speaker 0: despite a $5,900,000,000 budget, why isn't doctor Fauci able to provide us with a study that shows whether or not hydroxychloroquine works early in tandem with zinc and Z Pak?
Speaker 25: Practicing physicians are going to rely on review articles in the New England Journal of Medicine, not realizing that they're actually written by the company.
Speaker 42: The clinical trial system is maybe broken. It's too strong a term, but it's definitely, underperforming.
Speaker 9: All the negative papers that have appeared showing hydroxychloroquine doesn't work demonstrate profound ignorance in the pathology of COVID 19 as a disease.
Speaker 7: Relying on a so called theoretical randomized controlled trial is a riparian because that is not the way the FDA works. It is not the way scientists work. It is not the way anybody works in real world.
Speaker 20: Well, of course, hydroxychloroquine, as we've said before, is very cheap. Big pharma does not make its money on cheap generics, but they do give a lot of money to NIH, CDC, and the WHO.
Speaker 43: The Food and Drug Administration is ending its emergency authorization for the use of hydrochloroquine to treat COVID 19, saying that the malaria drug carries too many risks without any apparent benefit.
Speaker 14: There's been a number of studies now that have come out that haven't shown a benefit. Some have shown a harm, as well as the information that it now could potentially interfere with the activity of remdesivir, a directly acting antiviral that we know does work against, against coronavirus.
Speaker 0: This accidental admission that hydroxychloroquine interferes with a patient's ability to get sick enough to need remdesivir is brought to you by former FDA commissioner Scott Godley. Scott's a board member for a company called Illumina. Illumina has been at the forefront of gene sequencing technology for companies like 23andme. On June 10, 2020, less than a week before the FDA revoked emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine, the FDA approved Illumina's application for COVID set, a gene sequencing test for COVID 19. It not only tests you for COVID, it also obtains your entire genetic code.
According to FDA Commissioner Steven Hahn, genetic sequencing information will help us monitor if and how the virus mutates, which will be crucial to our efforts to continue to learn and fight this virus. On June 17, 2020, Illumina acquired a company called BlueBee. BlueBee helps manage data like your genetic code. Perhaps that's why Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos led a $100,000,000 round of funding for Illumina's spin off called GRAIL in 2016. Illumina repurchased GRAIL in 2021 and is now under investigation by the SEC for conduct and compensation of certain members of Illumina and GRAIL management.
Should we be trusting our genetic blueprint to these people? According to Forbes, the biopharmaceutical industry provides 75% of the FDA's drug review budget. And now the story of a dog named Drew and his master, Pavlov. Every day, Pavlov would feed Drew. Drew's mouth would water every time he was fed.
One day, Pavlov rang a bell just before feeding time. Pavlov rang the bell each day just before feeding. One day, the bell rang, and Drew began to salivate, but there was no food. This involuntary reaction made Drew one of the most famous dogs in history. Together with his best friend Pavlov, Drew had proven the scientific theory of conditioning.
It turns out that a wide variety of reactions can be triggered in similar fashion. Now imagine that Pavlov is a news network and viewers are all dogs. By repeatedly delivering negative information in association with trigger words or names, the head of a news organization could poison the minds of 1,000,000 so that any mention of a person's name would instantly create negative, aggressive, or fear based responses. Psychologists call this emotional transference. In a time of calamity, one could influence purchase habits.
Remember the great toilet paper run of 2020? There was no real shortage of toilet paper, but the focus on toilet paper shortages by mass media resulted in hoarding, which created a real world shortage. On a more interesting note, across the United States, there was a dramatic increase in the installation and use of bidets, a European alternative to toilet paper. The mass transition to bidets due to the perceived shortage of toilet paper is called behavior modification. Behavior modification was the basis of a decade long series of CIA funded human experiments in the United States and Canada known as MK Ultra.
MK Ultra used drugs like LSD and amphetamines on sometimes unwilling subjects. Combined with isolation, fear, and bombardment of repetitious messages, MK Ultra pushed the limits of human experimentation and mind control. Consider, the FDA and our medical institutions have released massive amounts of amphetamines and opioids on the American people over the last 40 years, while simultaneously a smaller and smaller number of politically charged elites dictate what shows we watch, what news we see, and what messages we are allowed to hear. Many of these people put profit in politics over civil rights and the constitution. One has to wonder, did MK Ultra ever end, or did it take over the world?
With this kind of power, one could condition the world into believing a safe medication was deadly or a deadly treatment was safe and effective, all by transferring the triggered hatred of a political figure. And it all started with a dog named Drew.
Speaker 27: Our next presenter is, doctor Paul Merrick. He has written over 500 peer reviewed journal articles, 80 book chapters, and authored 4 critical care books, and has been cited over 48,000 times in peer
Speaker 37: December 12, 2019 in the New England Journal of Medicine and that date is particularly important because that signaled the beginning of COVID. Remdesivir increased the risks of death and renal failure. It was such a toxic drug, the Data Safety Monitoring Board terminated the use of remdesivir. The NIH and the ACT one study enrolled patients in a study looking at remdesivir for the treatment of COVID 19. The last patient was enrolled April 19 2020.
10 days later, 10 days later, before the study had actually terminated, doctor Fauci sat in the Oval Office of the White House, and he said the trial was good news. What doctor Fauci did not tell you was that the primary endpoint of the study was changed halfway during the study. We all know that is scientific misconduct because the study was not gonna be positive, they changed the primary endpoint. They invented a bogus endpoint called time to recovery, which they showed in this study was statistically significant. And based on this bogus endpoint, remdesivir was approved by the FDA on October 20, 2020.
Speaker 15: The The data shows that remdesivir has a clear cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery. It was 11 days compared to 15 days. This will be the standard of care.
Speaker 25: Standard of practice is on the take. But the problem is that people die.
Speaker 15: So we would have normally waited several days until the data gets further, dot the I and cross the t. But the data are not gonna change. Some of the numbers may change a little, but the but the conclusion will not change.
Speaker 25: If big pharma does a study that shows that its drug is no good, it has the option of not publishing it.
Speaker 14: If this was a study conducted in China, it was terminated early, and it failed to show any benefit for remdesivir versus the standard of care.
Speaker 37: Almost every single patient in this country is treated with the combination of remdesivir and low dose dexamethasone. But just to make the situation even more preposterous, the federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if they prescribe remdesivir to Medicare patients. The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic.
Speaker 27: The hydroxychloroquine cocktail, it's about $20. Right? Certainly no more than 50. Remdesivir, and we'll talk about that a little bit later in terms of the side effects of that. And and that studies, the science behind that cost over 3,000.
Could that maybe be one of the reasons why all the effort is put on these more exotic therapeutics that cost 1,000 of dollars versus something that's off the shelf that cost 20.
Speaker 44: We wanna thank all the collaborators that have brought Remdesivir to this point, and that certainly includes, NIH and doctor Fauci.
Speaker 18: We authorized Gilead's application for emergency use authorization. This was lightning speed in terms of getting something approved and from clinical trial to getting it authorized from the FDA, it's been, quite the speedy but also effective process.
Speaker 7: The FDA has a huge of drugs going into widespread use in the medical community for decades that have not been established in the basis of randomized controlled trials.
Speaker 38: I mean,
Speaker 1: the fact
Speaker 45: that it's an existing drug that helps, but you still you still gotta go through trials. You still gotta go through trials.
Speaker 2: The FDA makes a decision which is sometimes totally independent of any finding by by the advisory committee.
Speaker 46: Doctor Raiford Brown chairs the FDA opioid advisory committee. According to doctor Brown, the FDA is putting the interests of big pharma ahead of public health. They're proving the pain killer, OxyContin. The FDA didn't even require Purdue Pharma to undergo clinical trials. The FDA didn't even require Purdue Pharma to undergo clinical trials.
Speaker 25: Opioid company Purdue gave a lot of money to the doctors to say that, hey. If you, are in pain, you can't get addicted. It's like, that actually wasn't true at all, but that's what I was taught in medical school. If you're in pain, you can't be addicted.
Speaker 46: I'm quoting the FDA has a lack of transparency and uses the
Speaker 1: advisory committees as cover.
Speaker 46: The agencies turn to blind
Speaker 27: regulations, created no harm.
Speaker 15: According to the regulations, people who receive royalties are not required to divulge them even on their financial statement according to the Bayh Dole Act.
Speaker 0: The hydroxychloroquine FDA advisory committee list significant
Speaker 7: chemotherapy drugs used in cancer were were used without randomized control trial. The antibiotics, amoxicillin, for example, that parents use with their children all the time, day in, day out, was never established with a randomized control trial before it was used.
Speaker 14: China stopped the studies because they couldn't fully enroll them because they stopped accruing cases in China because their epidemic had subsided because their epidemic had subsided.
Speaker 0: This accidental admission that China has beaten the virus was brought to you by former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb. Scott's a board member of the company Pfizer. 4 months after this interview, Pfizer announced it was manufacturing Gilead's very expensive remdesivir. In 2019, Pfizer purchased a company called Mylan. Milon used to make hydroxychloroquine in West Virginia.
But after Pfizer got hold of it, they shut it down. In July of 2020, Milon announced it would make the generic version of remdesivir for Gilead. None of these conflicts of interest were disclosed by CNBC.
Speaker 9: I don't know why people weren't more positive all along about
Speaker 7: about Remdesivir. Remdesivir.
Speaker 41: It does not work. That is the bottom line. It is an ineffective drug. It is highly toxic, not just for the kidneys, but also for the liver, and it shouldn't be used. K?
It's just a failed drug. It was an antiviral agent that never had a good indication. Fauci figured, let's get this in to use for COVID. And it was his steamrolling that got it onto the standard now hospital protocol that is being reimbursed by government premiums. The hospital get extra money if they use remdesivir.
This is horrific. This is truly centrally driven medical care, and it is so harmful. Doctors should not go along with it. But, unfortunately, once you're in a hospital, you're an employee, and you either go along with it or you lose your job. Medical ethics out the window.
We should never be doing anything harmful to patients. And here is a drug that clearly harmful and has no benefit.
Speaker 47: How much will you pay to live? Because the answer is everything.
Speaker 20: The makers of the drug remdesivir have set a price for the medication.
Speaker 7: It's $3,200, but what you didn't say yet is that Health and Human Services has bought up the whole supply.
Speaker 5: No treatment until you go to the hospital. Then your treatment are 2 things that are bound to kill you, ventilators and remdesivir. And Tony Fauci knew that remdesivir would kill you. It is homicide. And if you look, how does it kill people?
Kidney failure, heart failure, and all organ collapse.
Speaker 16: They rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients for which we all saw it was killing the patients. And now it's the FDA approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States. As these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than 25% chance of survival if they get more than 2 doses. Now they're rolling it out on children as well and into the nursing homes or school nursing facilities as early intervention. And if you ask me, this isn't a hospital.
This is a concentration camp. Absolutely. It is.
Speaker 30: Because my mom was murdered on October 25th at Baylor Hospital. She was given remdesivir without our authority. We told them specifically not to give her remdesivir. 5 days later, all of my mom's organs shut down. We showed them the studies.
Over 30% of the people that were given remdesivir in the studies died. We told the doctor, the infectious disease specialist, do not give my mom remdesivir. Guess what they did? They gave her a 5 day cycle and my mom is dead.
Speaker 13: I'm so sorry, mom. I love you so much.
Speaker 17: Well, I just don't understand why I said I didn't want her remdesivir when you guys put her on remdesivir.
Speaker 25: I was the infectious disease doctors and she had already been on that
Speaker 17: and completed the course. But we I I'm talking about before the first day of the ring, I said we didn't wanna do that, and you guys did that anyway.
Speaker 25: So if you look at the studies right now Listen.
Speaker 17: I don't care about the studies. I asked you not to do something, and you did it. Okay? That's the problem.
Speaker 2: The Food and Drug Administration is under the direct control of congress. It's often, the captive of the industry that it is supposed to regulate because the industry, the drug industry has a powerful lobbying effect on congress.
Speaker 47: This is our fault. We don't have the fortitude to kick pharmaceutical lobbyists outside of our congressional offices.
Speaker 20: So what's driving this blind obsession to disprove the effectiveness of a drug that is being used right now, tonight, in medical centers across America.
Speaker 27: Now the studies I saw early on were designed to fail on hydroxychloroquine late in treatment when people basically ready to die or when their heart was already affected by the virus, of course, hydroxychloroquine does have an impact on arrhythmia at that late stage, but not early. Now that these other observational non randomized trials have been or studies have been conducted, 50% or 5 fold reduction in death and hospitalization versus the almost infinitesimal risk of hydroxychloroquine and zinc. This has made no sense to me whatsoever. The only explanation is the politicization of it.
Speaker 31: Do you think that this is about making you a scapegoat to deflect Of course. President Trump?
Speaker 15: Of course. You you have to be asleep not to figure that one out.
Speaker 31: Well, there are a lot of Republican senators, taking aim at this. That's
Speaker 15: okay. I'm just gonna do my job. And I'm gonna be saving lives, and they're gonna be lying.
Speaker 31: It seems another layer of danger to play politics around matters of life and death.
Speaker 15: Right. Exactly. Exactly. And to me, that's that's unbelievably bad because all I wanna do is save people's lives. And, I mean, anybody who's looking at this carefully realizes that there's a distinct anti science flavor to this.
So if they get up and criticize science, nobody's gonna know what they're talking about. But if they get up and really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci, well, people could recognize there's a person there, so it's easy to criticize. But they're really criticizing science because I represent science. They're not doing it because they say they don't wanna do it. They're Republicans.
They don't like to be told what to do. Right. And we've got a break that, you know, unpack that.
Speaker 1: The risk of seeing 15% of that nursing home die was just not an acceptable risk. All the patients have done well.
Speaker 6: I showed an 84% reduction in hospitalization and a 99.7% survival rate of my patient.
Speaker 13: The Henry Ford Health System in Michigan tonight is announcing 13% of COVID patients given hydroxychloroquine died, while 26% of non hydroxy patients succumbed to the disease. I think this makes remdesivir relevant.
Speaker 0: Despite this evidence, on August 13, 2020, the FDA denied Henry Ford Medical's emergency use authorization request for hydroxychloroquine. C19early.com maintains a database of all prophylactic studies of hydroxychloroquine. Despite the best efforts of the WHO and the National Institutes of Health, These studies demonstrate the benefit of pre exposure prophylaxis, post exposure prophylaxis, and early treatment with hydroxychloroquine.
Speaker 7: Has shown substantial benefit in reducing risks of hospitalization and mortality. Zero cardiac complication.
Speaker 48: The side effect is not the reason you should stop this drug, at this moment, and they want people to believe there is no drugs for COVID 19.
Speaker 0: On February 4, 2020, Nature published a letter to the editor from scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This in vitro study showed the positive effects of chloroquine taken at any point during infection. The study also showed the lack of benefit from remdesivir. They concluded, since these compounds have been used in human patients with a safety track record and shown to be effective against various ailments, we suggest that they should be assessed in human patients suffering from the novel coronavirus disease, which explains why chloroquine is a recommended treatment in China, and our medical leaders had this information from the beginning. The potential reality of what has happened is a nightmare.
How could so many doctors across the world be tricked and manipulated into something so horrible? Perhaps it's because our medical leaders don't think of you as human at all.
Speaker 45: What do you foresee as being the next big thing to change this field?
Speaker 1: I'd say the next frontier and this will show my bias as a software person is to think of DNA as much more of a program than as as a set
Speaker 13: set of constants. We have become a major producer of large datasets that are gonna be of incredible value for understanding how life works and how disease occurs. In the era where it is okay to basically sit on your own data set, for many years, trying to mine it and then re mine it and re mine it again. That era is over and I'm certainly speaking as the NIH Director here. We now have quite a lot of ways to encourage good behaviour in this regard.
Some of which are in fact less pleasant, some of which are in fact less pleasant, some of which are just that we've tried to provide appropriate incentives. I've often said that trying to manage the research community, many people have concluded is really like herding cats and it is like herding cats, but guess what? I've got a big bag of cat food. It's called the NIH budget. And if it's appropriately applied, it can actually encourage some pretty good things to happen.
Speaker 0: Instead of leading the charge to build factories to manufacture more of a drug we know is safe, our medical leaders wasted trillions to play with toys.
Speaker 16: So once and for all, should people be taking hydro hydroxychloroquine?
Speaker 18: So just to be clear, we revoked an EUA, an emergency use authorization, at the request of another government agency, BARDA, and this was for drug that was authorized for use in sick hospitalized patients.
Speaker 0: Hold up. Did the head of the FDA just throw somebody under the bus? Who's BARDA? BARDA is the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. It was created in 2006 by Armenian congressman Anna Ashoo.
The director of BARDA is Gary Dispro. BARDA was established in 2,006 to support the development of vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics, and innovative technologies that can be used when a public health emergency occurs. BARDA also helps maintain the Strategic National Stockpile, a collection of drugs, vaccines, and other supplies needed in case of a biological attack or a pandemic. Any director of BARDA should have intimate knowledge of any drug that can help defend against weapons like anthrax or cocciella burneti or every drug listed on the WHO's list of essential medications. In 2020, Gary reported to the assistant secretary for preparedness and response, Robert Kadlek, a former consultant to a company called Emergent Biosolutions.
When doctor Kadlek was nominated and confirmed in 2017, he failed to disclose his previous consulting and ties with Emergent BioSolutions and later awarded the company with a lucrative contract for a smallpox vaccine. But that story is not really a big deal. Experts hired in public office are expected to work with people that they know are professional. What is a big deal is that in the beginning of 2020, the head of BARDA was someone named Rick Bright. And now we're at the point where we have to identify some of the most important people responsible for working in the background to make sure that you couldn't have access to hydroxychloroquine when you needed the most.
BARDA appears to be staffed primarily by PhDs, not medical doctors. These are people who do not treat patients. So why did BARDA request a drug that was saving lives get removed from an emergency use authorization and do so in a way that terrorized doctors, hospitals, and pharmacies from prescribing it at any point in disease? To understand that, we need to go back in time to the beginning of the pandemic and the actions taken by the former director of BARDA, Rick Bright.
Speaker 49: You know, I wish I'd never heard of Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine,
Speaker 0: honestly. As head of BARDA, Rick Bright was responsible for developing new therapies and working with pharmaceutical companies. When the Trump administration miraculously obtained tens of millions of doses of hydroxychloroquine, Rick, his team at BARDA, and members of the FDA sabotaged efforts to release hydroxychloroquine to the citizens of the United States during a time of national emergency. When Rick Bright's efforts to obstruct the release of hydroxychloroquine failed, he leaked emails to the press and was subsequently removed from his position at BARDA. Rick then claimed he was a whistleblower and Anna Achiou, whose district is mere blocks away from Gilead, a company that stood to make 1,000,000,000 from Remdesivir.
Speaker 1: Madam chair, on April 23rd, CNN reported that you plan to call doctor Bright to testify. Doctor Bright did not actually file his whistleblower complaint with the off special counsel until Tuesday, May 5th. That same day, it was announced on social media that you plan to hold a hearing, but it was not officially noticed until 2 days later. Say this hearing is premature and it is a disservice to the investigations of doctor Bright's complaint, I think goes without saying. You crumbled on minority rights, you would have never tolerated that when you were in the minority.
Speaker 13: It will the witness be under oath.
Speaker 50: We don't swear people in.
Speaker 1: I'm hearing from a lot of doctors, my state, around the country, who have experience using hydroxychloroquine, and they're reporting significant benefit if it is used early enough in the course and may eliminate the need for hospitalization and ventilatory stress. Time is right. I think it's important enough that we should look into it and would just be interested if you did that as part of your duties at BARDA.
Speaker 50: The gentleman's time has expired.
Speaker 49: So I believe it's important. I've heard those anecdotal stories as well, and they were not conducted in the context of a randomized controlled clinical study. It's very difficult to understand data from those types of observational studies or anecdotal stories. So the drug might have some benefit in some populations, but we won't know that until we have that information from a truly randomized controlled clinical study.
Speaker 51: What happened to you? You were removed as
Speaker 49: a director of pharma. I believe part of the removal process for me was initiated because of of a push back that I gave when they asked me to put in place an expanded access protocol that would make Chloroquine more freely available to Americans that were not under the close supervision of a physician and may not even be confirmed to be infected with the coronavirus.
Speaker 52: When was the potential use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as treatment for the COVID 19 first brought to your attention, sir?
Speaker 49: I believe it's probably mid March, between March 10th March 17th, somewhere in that time frame.
Speaker 52: And not prior to that?
Speaker 49: Not that I recall. The first I heard of the drug itself was a call I received from Doctor. Woodcock at the FDA, asking if I had heard of the drug, and I hadn't heard of the drug, and I hadn't heard of its potential use for COVID 19 patients, and I hadn't heard of the drug.
Speaker 0: Did you hear that? He just admitted that he never heard of hydroxychloroquine. How was it that someone responsible for maintaining our response to a biological attack had never heard of the stroke.
Speaker 49: She said there might be something interesting to look at, and she forwarded a a a manuscript, a draft manuscript. And that's the first I learned of the drug itself.
Speaker 52: You weren't aware of any news articles and research papers in January discussing the potential benefits of the drug?
Speaker 49: I heard anecdotal stories and reports, sir.
Speaker 25: You had?
Speaker 49: I can't recall if I did specifically for Chloroquine, but I tried to track the media and the scientific journal as well. However, I rely on the guidance of the science within HHS, and the first I had heard of that was from my colleague, Doctor. Woodcock at the FDA, and then a summary report from our scientists at FDA, CDC, NIH, and BARDA, it indicated that the evidence for its benefit was weak, and the evidence for its safety concerns was stronger. And they did not believe at that point it was something that should be supported.
Speaker 52: What was your reaction personally? Did you think it was something worth pursuing initially when you heard it from doctor Woodcock?
Speaker 49: Initially, I said that I do believe I mean, I trust doctor Woodcock and her scientific judgment immensely. We have seen anecdotal heard of anecdotal data from different physicians that they believe they've seen benefit or patient improvement from use of this drug in either combination with antibiotic, isithromycin or combination with zinc or other vitamin C or other things. But there was never sufficient evidence from a randomized controlled study to show us benefit would actually outweigh the potential risk.
Speaker 45: There has been a lot of hype about cures for COVID that have been shown to be ineffective and even dangerous. We are now seeing the very real dangers and consequences of not making decisions based on science. Hydroxychloroquine, which Fox News, commentators, and then the White House repeatedly touted and actually encouraged people to use is exhibit a on this list.
Speaker 0: Meet congressman doctor Raul Ruiz. Doctor Ruiz is a medical doctor, and he knows exactly how safe tonic water is, yet he was happy to participate in the slander of a drug that could have saved his constituents' lives, if it meant hurting Donald Trump, in an election year. And to make matters worse, Raul participated in the promotion of remdesivir. According to Open Secrets, his major donors are in the health care industry.
Speaker 45: But there is one drug that appears to provide some therapeutic benefit, remdesivir. 2 weeks ago, doctor Fauci announced that remdesivir showed a clear cut significant positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery. More broadly
Speaker 50: So so
Speaker 53: was it because the president was encouraged by the use of this drug that you became discouraged by?
Speaker 49: It had nothing to do with politics, sir. I wanted to make sure that Americans were aware of the risk of this drug. It was only available under very specific
Speaker 53: But it is a drug that is indicated
Speaker 50: and has been used privately in the past. By almost 1 and a half minutes. You can finish your answer, doctor Bright, and then we're going to move to the next member.
Speaker 49: The drug had been used safely for malaria for a number of years. We didn't have a database.
Speaker 1: Of But
Speaker 53: it's being used in the same dosage as it was meant for malaria.
Speaker 50: Please. Please. And I I know that, I'm overly generous with both sides of the aisle.
Speaker 0: Speaking of generosity, as of 2020, congressman Anna Achiu was the number one recipient of pharmaceutical money in the House of Representatives.
Speaker 50: But I think that we need to move on. I mean, 2 minutes of extra time is 2 minutes of extra time.
Speaker 16: People died because you weren't listened to.
Speaker 49: People died because they didn't have appropriate protective equipment.
Speaker 26: And your statement that we need to be told the truth is probably the most important statement we've heard all day.
Speaker 50: I think that you are the finest ambassador in our country for scientists. Frankly, I'm tired of those who bear the responsibility accepting none of it while defect, deflecting blame on others. The previous administration, the World Health Organization, the Wuhan lab, anywhere but where the blame belongs. And we all have been, witnessed your integrity.
Speaker 22: Let me just say, doctor Bright, thank you for your courage.
Speaker 51: President has, sidelined our best scientists, pushed baseless conspiracy theories, and more recently prescribed unproven remedies like Lysol to suffering Americans.
Speaker 53: Because the president was encouraged by the use of this drug that you became discouraged by?
Speaker 1: And nothing
Speaker 49: new with politics, sir. And nothing new with politics, sir.
Speaker 0: On October 13, 2020, 2 weeks before the election, Rick Bright appeared in a documentary titled Totally Under Control.
Speaker 49: There was not a scientific reason to push either one of those drugs.
Speaker 0: No scientific reason aside from 400 years of human history.
Speaker 49: The reason they were pushing them so hard was because the president was claiming that they were a miracle drug. Someone had given him this advice. Nothing new with politics, sir. I lost it. I lost all respect for that chain of command, for that security.
And nothing to do with politics, sir. It's it's not easy to come forward in this administration. Okay? I I'm not trying to be soften here, but it is not easy. It was a very hard process to lay our careers on the line to push back.
Speaker 0: Keep in mind, he's basically crying about tonic water.
Speaker 49: And nothing to do with politics, sir. Whether it's right
Speaker 13: or not, data will show. But, you know, if 2 years from now, we have the studies and
Speaker 27: we say, hey, that stuff really would have worked.
Speaker 13: And the government stopped that from being used.
Speaker 8: If I was a family of
Speaker 13: a person that was stopped from getting hydroxychloroquine, I'd be pretty mad.
Speaker 0: So who came up with the idea to deny hydroxychloroquine for early treatment? According to Rick Bright's sworn whistleblower statement, on March 24, 2020, doctor Janet Woodcock called doctor Bright and strongly recommended that BARDA submit an application for an EUA instead of an expanded access IND protocol. The idea to deny early treatment came from the FDA. Rick Bright's complaint continues. Over the next several days, doctor Bright and doctor Woodcock urged their colleagues on the clinical and regulatory teams implementing the secretary's directive to secure an EUA for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine instead of a national expanded access IND protocol.
Implementing the EUA was a compromised position to rein in HHS leadership's initial campaign to make the drug available to the public outside of a hospital setting and without physician supervision, a tactic that guaranteed the drug would not be used early when it was needed.
Speaker 9: Peter Navarro had to go down and have a huge fight in the situation room just to get the tablets. And I don't know how he did it, but within a week or so, we had 62,000,000 doses. This was the answer. This would have halted the pandemic. It would have brought it under control.
52 other countries have used it successfully to keep their pandemic, their hospital admissions under control. We wouldn't have surged out into the number of cases we had and the deaths.
Speaker 0: At the time, Janet Woodcock was the head of the FDA Center For Drug Evaluation and Research, also known as CDER. In her role, as with Rick Bright, their jobs were primarily to streamline and facilitate the development of new drugs and new vaccines. They worked heavily with pharmaceutical companies and were probably the last people who should have been involved in getting approval for early use for one of the safest, cheapest, and most beneficial medications in human history.
Speaker 9: There was a single point failure in this entire pandemic plan which would have worked. Orders came down through secretary Azar at Health and Human Services, to Bob Cadlick at Pandemic Planning, to Janet Woodcock, and to Rick Bright. This needed an investigational new drug authority. All that is is a simple statement saying doctors can prescribe this for something that it wasn't originally designed for. It's done all the time.
It's called off label prescriptions. I think it's a doctor's right to be able to do that as long as it's an FDA approved drug.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 9: And and hydroxychloroquine been FDA approved for years.
Speaker 0: Decade.
Speaker 9: Janet Woodcock phoned Rick Bright that same evening, and this is from Rick Bright's own legal deposition. Phoned Rick Bright that same evening, head of bardan, said, oh, this is a very dangerous drug.
Speaker 0: Why did she say that?
Speaker 9: I don't know. Because she's a rheumatologist. She would have known how safe the drug was. She would have prescribed it herself.
Speaker 0: You we submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for communications between Rick Bright and Janet Woodcock and received a call from the FDA.
Speaker 13: A request for communications is considered a complex track request, and these requests are processed in date order priority, and there are currently 1100 in the
Speaker 14: queue. Okay.
Speaker 17: So you'd be looking at
Speaker 13: at least 24 months before this this comes up for for processing.
Speaker 0: And incidentally, in terms of safety, doctor Woodcock was also directly involved in the approval of all of the opioids including OxyContin and Fentanyl over the last 25 years, a class of drugs taken at home by average Americans and responsible for 1,000,000 of deaths. Additionally, Janet Woodcock was also on the editorial board of the New England Journal of Medicine when it published the fraudulent SERGIOsphere study.
Speaker 54: To make her head of the FDA, it's not just putting the fox in the hen coop. It's putting the devil in. I mean, I can't imagine a worse appointment than Janet Woodcock.
Speaker 0: When researching quinine through the federal register, we discovered that Janet Woodcock and the FDA have been actively working to restrict the United States citizens from access to quinine for at least 27 years. Claiming in 1995, the agency tentatively concludes that quinine is not safe for over the counter use and the treatment of malaria. Remember, Cinchona and quinine were crucial to nearly every military conflict in the history of American warfare. On August second, 1946, cinchona alkaloids were considered requirements for the defense of the United States. If the leaders of the FDA and BARDA had been alive during World War 2, the United States would have very likely lost the war.
Speaker 27: Each accused became a cogwheel in a monstrous smaller machine machine machine.
Speaker 17: We should have recognized that when treatment was being suppressed and by the way, not hypothetical treatment, published treatment, when that was being suppressed, we should have gone, hold on a minute.
Speaker 1: Sounds like there's a racket here. Somebody suppressing real
Speaker 17: treatment options. And then That
Speaker 15: can
Speaker 17: only be authorized if there are no treatment options. That can only be authorized if there are no treatment options. The CDC used to be before it became the center for disease control and prevention, the US malaria suppression program in Atlanta, Georgia, which did what advocate for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. This is one of those things where you sit back and you go, the audacity of the crime is what's surprising and how blind the public is to reading the information that is right in front of their face.
Speaker 55: The conspiracy between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright to make it so that physicians could not administer hydroxychloroquine
Speaker 4: outside of the hospital.
Speaker 8: Between the 2 of them,
Speaker 15: was there was some sort
Speaker 8: of a concerted effort to suppress the use of hydroxychloroquine?
Speaker 55: Rick Bright in in videotaped testimony has explicitly spoken about how they conspired to cook on a strategy using emergency use authorization to make it so that hydroxychloroquine could only be administered in the hospital, which, by the way, is too late for when hydroxy should be used.
Speaker 8: And why did they do that?
Speaker 55: That is what is the unknown. And and there's so many whys and hows behind this. I like to say there's a stack of stuff that doesn't make sense. It's about this high.
Speaker 49: When I heard from doctor Woodcock that it's something that we should try to investigate in a randomized controlled study, I even reached out to a company that was licensed and approved to make that drug in the United States to see if they could donate that drug to the NIH to conduct those clinical studies. It was only after I learned that, that supply that was being discussed was coming in from Pakistan and from India, from facilities that were not approved by the FDA, and the drug was not approved for use in the United States, they became increasingly alarmed of having that drug in the United States.
Speaker 0: There are risks in using drugs manufactured from facilities not inspected by the FDA. In a 2021 correspondence with doctor Woodcock in a question about the quality of the donated hydroxychloroquine, she told us, we tested the HCQ ourselves very intensively, which means there was no problem with the hydroxychloroquine from India and Pakistan. But more importantly, why were we forced to beg for a drug that should have been in our Strategic National Stockpile? Not having hydroxychloroquine in our Strategic National Stockpile was a major error. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have shown benefit for multiple bacterial weapons, like Coxiella burnetii, as well as anthrax.
Coxiella burnettii is very interesting in that it has many of the same symptoms of what we were told was COVID early on in the pandemic. When asked about coxiella, a known biological weapon, and why we weren't testing for it in the United States, Doctor. Woodcock simply stated, I'm not answering the questions about coxiella. The term gaslighting comes from the movie The Gaslight, a 1944 film which depicts a woman whose husband lies to her by claiming something is not happening when it actually is.
Speaker 13: And you had thought I was being cruel to you. Keeping people away from making you a prisoner.
Speaker 31: Oh, you're the kindest man in the world.
Speaker 0: Gaslighting is defined as manipulating someone using psychological methods into questioning their own sanity or powers of reasoning. Gaslighting is an insidious way of making a person doubt themselves. Gaslighters often claim your memory of events is incorrect They may withhold information Pretend to be confused by what you're saying or simply refuse to listen to you at all. They may trivialize your concerns or feelings, making you feel unimportant or irrational. Which leads us to a special category of manipulation known as medical gaslighting.
Medical gaslighting occurs when doctors, nurses, and healthcare workers dismiss symptoms from patients, especially female patients. Gaslit patients may have difficulty getting additional tests, are mocked for doing their own research, discouraged from obtaining a second opinion, obstructed from their own medical records, and ultimately feel talked down to by their doctors. Take the the case of 8 year old Riley Jones, a vaccine injured girl who we interviewed in 2022.
Speaker 10: At VCU, we had a nurse laugh at us. We had doctor laugh at us. We had a nurse tell us that when we were crazy. A nurse laughed at my mom. Why are you treating human beings like this?
Speaker 0: How does it make you feel when the daughter's a nurse and laugh and you know your mom and dad are worried?
Speaker 10: It makes me mad, upset, sad. But only thing I know is that it makes me very upset that nobody will believe me and just treat it.
Speaker 0: Gaslighting is typically employed by narcissists and those with similar personality disorders. What does it say about the practice of medicine? That there's an entire category of gaslighting just for doctors and nurses?
Speaker 27: Whistleblower, doctor, Rick Bright, who was asked by his superiors to work on establishing an FDA expanded access investigational new drug protocol. But his insubordination, he instead went to Janet Woodcock and people in the FDA and got the emergency use authorization, which sounds like, hey. We're we're gonna expand the use of this. No. He dramatically restricted the use of hydroxychloroquine only in hospital, but I think we all recognize it's probably not particularly effective, possibly dangerous, and only out of the national stockpile.
He knew what he was doing. That's what poisoned the well, That's what created that what I've called the prescription log jam here on hydroxylchloroquine. I think it affected all early treatment options. It took them off the table. We took our eye off the ball.
That's why I say our agencies failed us. These individuals in these agencies failed us.
Speaker 0: BARDA works close with Anthony Fauci. Anthony Fauci was funding gain of function research in Wuhan, China. Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins worked desperately in the early phases of COVID and later on to make certain that the public did not know these details.
Speaker 34: Catholics says was worried about protecting his own reputation, and that could be why he diverted attention away from the lab leak.
Speaker 56: That would be a natural reaction of him or anybody, you know, particularly, you know, I think for him to saying, you know, what what could this do to me and to my to our institute as a consequence if we were found to have some culpability or some involvement in this. And I think it would probably be ex you know, made that even more acute was the fact that they didn't have good visibility into what they were doing and what they were supporting, through the grants, through ECA Health Alliance that went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. I think that just that just probably magnified that concern.
Speaker 0: This is what Anthony Fauci's manipulation of the media and diverting attention looks like.
Speaker 13: If it may have been a lab, may have been nature, we're supposed to look forward, then why did doctor Fauci work so hard for just one of those theories?
Speaker 15: What do you say to that? I'm almost I have to laugh at that, Neil. I mean, that's totally bizarre. First of all, I wasn't leaning totally strongly one way or the other. I wasn't leaning totally strongly one way or the other.
Flashback. What I do feel strongly about is that this was a spillover from an animal species to a human. Strongly suggesting that in fact, it was a natural occurrence. Strongly indicating that it was a natural spillover. Strongly points to this being a natural occurrence.
Looking much more strongly? Pretty strong. It's a natural occurrence. Very, very strong. Strongly favors a natural occurrence.
I wasn't leaning totally strongly one way or the other. He is very, very strongly leaning towards this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated.
Speaker 34: Sir Richard Dearlove is the former head of the British spy agency, Mi 6. He says stifling of the debate around the origins of COVID was led by Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 4: We've now, through FOI, Freedom of Information, got pretty clear idea of what meetings took place, what happened. They put forward one side of the argument, which they, for reasons I don't fully understand, decided to support and made absolutely sure that the opposite view was not given any oxygen or media publicity.
Speaker 0: In the years leading up to 2020, the Trump administration was actively investigating Chinese and other foreign influence at the NIH, as well as academic institutions like Harvard. And by 2020, the noose was tightening around the NIH.
Speaker 1: The US is charging a top Harvard scientist along with 2 Chinese researchers over hiding and payments.
Speaker 15: The National Institutes of Health have 180 at least open cases on fraud, grant fraud. Also, the FBI, they say, working on a 1,000 cases related to China and grant fraud possibly, with China targeting these researchers. COVID was a threat
Speaker 0: to Donald Trump's reelection. If the pandemic then emergency mail in ballot protocols like the ones conveniently created in the state of Georgia in 2019 would be justified. A Biden administration might be less eager to investigate COVID origins, which is exactly what happened.
Speaker 34: There were scientists in the US intelligence agencies who were highly skeptical of the flimsy Proximal Origins paper that Fauci was promoting. Analysts at the National Center For Medical Intelligence came to the opposite conclusion. They believed the virus was more likely than not created in a lab, but they were censored and silenced. Confidential sources tell me their input was removed from US president Joe Biden's COVID origins probe.
Speaker 0: Could this be Anthony Fauci's motive to discredit any quick fix for COVID in early 2020?
Speaker 15: And and you are implying that what we did was responsible for the deaths of individual. I totally resent that. And if anybody is lying here, senator, it is you.
Speaker 0: On October 29, 2019, Anthony Fauci and Rick Bright appeared together on a universal flu vaccine panel discussing ways to improve our vaccine technology.
Speaker 57: Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously, we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine. We haven't given to anyone yet, but there must be some way.
Speaker 49: To make it sexy, I think we have to I like the concept disrupting this field. I think in parallel, there might be a need or even an urgent call for, an entity
Speaker 51: Right.
Speaker 49: Of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and and and processes.
Speaker 15: Well, as as as, Rick said, we're responsible for a variety of diseases making countermeasures, malaria, tuberculosis, Zika, Ebola. I'm in the middle of Ebola right now.
Speaker 0: Did you hear that? Malaria. BARDA is designed to help protect us from malaria. So how did Rick Bright not know about hydroxychloroquine?
Speaker 15: And and that's where the federal government comes in.
Speaker 57: Well, seriously.
Speaker 0: Is this next question the seed that was planted that caused all of the drama around COVID?
Speaker 57: If the 2,009 pandemic had been much more deadly, would that have ended up being a better thing for humanity?
Speaker 58: Come on.
Speaker 15: Would it have been no. No. Because if I mean, I we had a not certainly as serious as as as the 1918, but we had a pretty bad pandemic in 1957 and 1968. That didn't change didn't change much.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. I
Speaker 26: mean, the sad truth is that when there's a major crisis, it focuses attention and usually resources and some significant mobilization falls. It doesn't necessarily mean that we are using resources in the best way possible though, because it's done in the moment of crisis and there's, you know, throwing money at things that sound good without them being thought through and then there's what we used to call the U shaped curve of concern where there's the initial increase in interest and resources and then when the problem fades and other problems emerge instead then everything drops off. And, you know, I think we've been in that with with many different outbreaks of disease and and flu to some degree as well.
Speaker 0: Rick Bright's leaked emails show that very early into COVID, he and BARDA wanted more money before they would assist the government's response. The agency got what it wanted. Congress rewarded them with 1,000,000,000 in funds, 1,000,000,000 of dollars that BARDA then awarded to pharmaceutical companies like AstraZeneca. It seems the people involved in our government response had financial, personal, professional, and sadly, political reasons to ensure that hydroxychloroquine was not allowed as a treatment for COVID. With $11,000,000,000,000 on the line and the risk of Donald Trump being reelected if he were allowed to be right, Could you have stood up and said hydroxychloroquine works?
Speaker 25: All these doctors who are trying to, you know, point out the problem get shut down.
Speaker 13: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the stupidest news cycle we've ever faced.
Speaker 45: There are numerous studies, on this which show preliminary therapeutics.
Speaker 13: What are your qualifications to weigh in on medicines more than doctor Anthony Fauci?
Speaker 40: Everything in the news is BS. Everything. There there is nothing that I can consume on any legacy media that I can trust. That is shocking.
Speaker 37: Right wing media?
Speaker 0: Does the news industry need advertisers to exist?
Speaker 16: They do. As a viewer, you've gotta look at who is advertising on this TV station, and you've gotta realize that surely this TV station doesn't want to hurt its advertisers.
Speaker 13: Brought to you by Pfizer, CBS Healthwatch sponsored by Pfizer. What can doctors do?
Speaker 7: Hydroxychloroquine cuts risk of hospitalization in half.
Speaker 0: The leaders of our medical institutions have betrayed us all.
Speaker 15: We have to respectfully totally disagree with him.
Speaker 13: Has doctor Fauci ever called
Speaker 55: you and asked you your opinion and why you have the opinion that you do?
Speaker 0: No. Dark money is everywhere.
Speaker 59: The quarter $1,000,000,000 that the Gates Foundation has put into news and journalism. It's hard to really, overestimate these kind of financial conflicts of interest. The real issue at hand is the political influence that they're gaining over public policy through their charity. We read the headline about all the good that they're doing, but no journalist really take a step back and look backwards at what they've actually done.
Speaker 7: The committee is investigating an allegation that the house of representatives had received $10,000,000 to pass the controversial infectious diseases bill.
Speaker 37: We will leave no stone unturned. The foundation has not offered any financial incentives to any member of the Nigerian legislative branch.
Speaker 0: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has poured 1,000,000,000 of dollars across the world. We've mapped their donations. Their influence can be seen everywhere.
Speaker 3: Stop the media. K? That's the number one. Because media interference is huge.
Speaker 13: Pharma buys off the news, and the FDA can issue an order, tomorrow saying that we can't have pharma spending on TV news.
Speaker 41: There's a lot of what they have learned in medical school is junk science, sadly. So we have to get back to real science, get rid of the pharma based approach to medicine, and go back to more of a natural approach to medicine and an ethical approach.
Speaker 0: Speaking of ethics, Anthony Fauci's wife heads the NIH ethics department.
Speaker 20: Doctors being targeted now and being threatened.
Speaker 16: I know many doctors who've been targeted and threatened and sanctioned risk losing their job. Absolutely. They're brought up by the state medical board.
Speaker 60: Whenever you're relying on the fact that you think you're gonna be getting truth about a subject and you realize it's all on you to protect your patients and that you can't trust anything that's coming at you from the government or pharmaceutical companies, medical societies. That is so stressful. It has been a stressful last 3 years because of the fact that the burden of truth now lies on us individuals or physicians who are willing to to look for that truth.
Speaker 0: The United States spent over $11,000,000,000,000 on COVID and COVID response. Much of that money went to academics and pharmaceutical companies. What actions could an already corrupt industry justify for an $11,000,000,000,000 windfall?
Speaker 44: So why did this happen? And
Speaker 13: I talked to
Speaker 44: our kids about this. We've let it. Sorry. Our generation let this happen. We let the government overreach and overreach and overreach and overreach, And now we are so far into it that we don't know what to do.
We're not organized.
Speaker 3: What has really upset me in a way is the realization that medicine has become a corporate entity.
Speaker 58: And a lot of the doctors are saying that, oh, this doesn't work. They they all have, like, exotic specialties, like, you know, plastic surgery and, you know, and, like, you know, dermatology. They don't see patients. They don't see COVID patients. I've never seen any.
You know? So, of course, they are scared. They hear about they hear the the narrative of, oh, this medication will kill you, and then they are scared. But hydroxychloroquine is, like, one of the most, I would say is one of the most safest medications.
Speaker 23: My problem here is not so much that we have a differing reading of the literature, which we clearly do. It is this idea that there is this broad conspiracy across, you know, hundreds of thousands of doctors, the NIH, the CDC, all academic institutions, the Infectious Disease Society of America, we're all in on this conspiracy to prevent Americans from getting a life saving therapy. As you might imagine, pulling off a conspiracy like that would be extremely difficult. Doctors and academics are way too disorganized to pull off such
Speaker 1: a thing.
Speaker 27: I never use the word conspiracy. I
Speaker 13: sense. I
Speaker 27: don't think anybody so quit quit quit using that word.
Speaker 7: Okay. Okay?
Speaker 27: There's no Something something something has happened where we have not devoted any time or energy or resources to to doing what could have stopped this COVID crisis very quickly. And that's called early intervention, early treatment. As a human being, as an American citizen with the freedom, with a bill that that I helped pass, now, right to try, should have the right to access this without the interference of bureaucrats in the CDC, NIH, and the FDA. And, that is exactly what's happened. I I can't get it.
Millions of Americans can't access it because of the disinformation, the scaremongering, and the prescription log gen that has been created by bureaucrats.
Speaker 23: So could it be that I am wrong and doctor Rish is right? Well, sure. People can disagree. But when you look at the broad consensus in the American scientific community, basically, the scientific consensus is very clear that hydroxychloroquine is not affected.
Speaker 61: We were at war in this pandemic and we, my colleague, doctor Brian Tyson and I took an aggressive approach. And it implied using the art of medicine, principles that we'd learned. And I learned those principles 50 years ago, and I was lucky to have gone to Harvard. I I wonder if doctor Jha actually treats patients actually the way he talks.
Speaker 23: When there is no science or evidence on something, and if I'm gonna think about an off label use, I'm very careful about that because the history of medicine is one of often doing more harm than good. And my first oath as a practicing physician was to do no harm. And so I am very much driven by that. And I started off saying that all 3 of these gentlemen, strike me as both smart and committed and caring. I would appreciate a similar sort of respect back.
I do take care of patients and I try to do my best by them. Obviously, I'm not perfect, but I try to use science, as well as compassion to guide me.
Speaker 27: We appreciate that. Have you treated any COVID patients?
Speaker 23: I have not, sir.
Speaker 25: Okay.
Speaker 23: I have not, sir. Okay.
Speaker 27: Unfortunately, the Democrat witness, doctor Ashish Jha, began tweeting his negative viewpoint of early treatment before the hearing even began and continues his media blitz for days afterward. Most obnoxiously, and it was obnoxious, he penned an op ed that the New York Times ran and headline, quote, the snake oil salesman of the senate, unquote. The absurdity of calling doctor Jha as a witness or paying any attention to him in the media was demonstrated when I asked him during the hearing, have you treated any COVID patients? His reply, I have not, sir.
Speaker 0: The news censors and defames health care workers who speak out.
Speaker 11: How many of you personally have witnessed censorship, intimidation, or professional reprisal and damage as
Speaker 62: a result of your advocacy for patients. Many doctors are actually working in employed positions, and as time went on, they were told, in no uncertain terms, if you use these drugs, you probably will be fired.
Speaker 11: The politicians attacked them. This crazy woman he talked about last night about who's a absolute disgrace.
Speaker 0: How does the system stop the one that works as a therapy and pushes the one that doesn't work, which is the gene therapy. I think that's where people are having a hard time.
Speaker 9: Through use of the mass media.
Speaker 29: And you had Jimmy Kimmel saying the president's trying to kill himself by taking it. Joe Scarborough saying this will kill you. Neil Cavuto saying, what have you got to lose? One thing, you have to lose our our lives. I mean, you had Chris Cuomo saying the president knows that hydroxychloroquine is not supported by science.
Turns out that Chris Cuomo took a a less safe version of it.
Speaker 3: Didier Hout is a microbiologist with a long and respected career. His critics were very quick to point to possible dangerous side effects.
Speaker 58: Doctor Raul, a renowned virologist, published a data for over 4,000 patients. They've vilified him.
Speaker 0: They think you're dangerous.
Speaker 58: Of course, they think I'm dangerous because I'm speaking truth.
Speaker 0: Their faith is ridiculed.
Speaker 28: Doctor Estelle Emmanuel, who when she's not preaching about witches and natural sex and demon sperm and alien DNA, is part
Speaker 41: of a group of
Speaker 28: Tea Party sponsored doctors advocating for unproven and according to a number of legitimate medical studies, potentially dangerous COVID treatment.
Speaker 31: You saw how the president responded. I mean, he clearly wasn't aware of this woman's statements before, but then even after we had told him what she had said, you know, he stood by her.
Speaker 0: In case you were wondering, this is not the first medical doctor whose religious beliefs CNN has featured.
Speaker 8: Do you wanna cleanse your sins in the river?
Speaker 0: How did I come into this whole equation? Sorry, Sanjay. Just had to prove a point.
Speaker 35: This kind of racist remarks actually would not help.
Speaker 0: Finally, write about something.
Speaker 60: I think physicians in general have become so dependent on corporate employment that they're not willing to rock the boat in any way.
Speaker 27: Continue to prescribe it. I do so extremely carefully because I know the administration's looking over my shoulder. I know it.
Speaker 11: The drug is working, and it's working better when you give it earlier in the course of the disease.
Speaker 3: I have lost trust in humanity, in my government, in my agencies. Trust is very hard to get back.
Speaker 11: In Queensland's Australia, a doctor will be put in jail for prescribing hydroxychloroquine.
Speaker 58: And if you go over to
Speaker 11: India, they're gonna give it to you right away. They give it first line in their guidelines. The Greek guidelines give hydroxychloroquine, but in Queensland, you get put in jail. In the United States, we're caught up in this this flurry of of data and confusion. Something is going very wrong in this world.
Speaker 6: History is unforgiving. It will become very clear very soon who was on the right side of history, who was on the wrong side of history.
Speaker 27: I was contacted by a doctor who I think had written 4 prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine 4, and she was issued a grand jury subpoena by the Homeland Security Investigation department. Something's not right about that. There's something that has gone wrong here.
Speaker 0: We have a drug that is very safe. We're fighting for our patients.
Speaker 22: And I'm a pharmacist in New Jersey. In terms of a prophylaxis, I think hydroxychloroquine should be used widespread.
Speaker 0: I had to catch myself for a second and say, wait a minute. I'm breathing. I thought I was at the end of my rope.
Speaker 26: Politics needs to be put aside at a
Speaker 47: time like this. We're in a pandemic.
Speaker 13: In Ohio, Ohio, the state pharmacy board has reversed its decision to prohibit hydrochloroquine use for COVID 19 patient.
Speaker 24: Should the US ban hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID?
Speaker 0: In the years since the events of 2020, there has been a concerted effort across all media, medicine, and academia to whitewash what was done to our people. How many needlessly suffered and died alone in hospitals because of lack of early treatment? I hope you've learned how to recognize some of the tricks propagandists have been using against you in this psychological war that is still very active in 2024. For example, this French study released on January 2, 2024 claims hydroxychloroquine killed nearly 17,000 patients. The problem?
The study only looked at hospitalized patients. This is just another study that refuses to look at early use, the mechanism of action for Cinchona alkaloids for over 400 years. As Jim Ware from the New England Journal of Medicine told us, the studies don't answer the clinical question. Speaking of France, in France, hydroxychloroquine used to be sold over the counter. But in October of 2019, the French version of the FDA for some reason reclassified hydroxychloroquine as prescription only.
Perhaps someone should do a study into the unusual actions of other governments prior to 2020. In November of 2023, I sent a final email to Janet Woodcock. I wanted to give her a chance to explain what I saw. The email in part states, doctor Woodcock, reports indicate you were instrumental in ensuring that a drug that has played such a vital role in human history was not used to prevent COVID 19. Right now, it appears that members of the federal government played politics with science to remove a sitting president and pull off an $11,000,000,000,000 heist.
The consequences of those actions based on reports provided to me by doctors and nurses around the nation are scores of vaccine killed and injured that I have encountered in my last 2 years of reporting, all of whom have been denied compensation for their suffering and loss, untold suffering for patients and families who were killed in hospitals with improper care, 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars bled out from taxpayers, erosion of liberties across the nation, a massive wave of public distrust of science, medicine, the federal government, and research institutions. The National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute have been caught suppressing links between the COVID 19 vaccine spike protein and suppressed p53 induced cancers. I contacted you 2 years ago and discussed s v 40 in the polio vaccine. Now s v 40 components have been discovered in the Pfizer COVID 19 vaccine. I also asked you about Coxiella testing in the United States, and you refused to answer.
Vaccine injuries are significant and everywhere. Oncologists are telling me of massive spikes in new cancers. Health care workers are seeking me out to describe how they unnecessarily intubated patients diagnosed with COVID. Pharmacists are so ignorant that they refuse basic prescriptions because they saw an FDA tweet. ER workers are seeing teenagers present with strokes and children dying of heart attacks.
Clearly, the FDA's warning systems have failed. Doctor Woodcock's reply, I have no comment. 8 days after this email, doctor Woodcock announced her retirement from the FDA. I hope we've shown you how key people in our government media had the means, motive, and opportunity to pull off this epic heist. This may be the most profound scandal in human history.
If you have information that can help bring down this cartel of organized medical politicians support principled candidates across the nation. Journalists and podcasters are speaking truth to power and holding this beast of government accountable. Citizens around the world are awakening. And for all of you who have been fighting, this gin and tonic is for you. Cheers.
Speaker 13: Elton, where is it?
Speaker 63: I want you to know I've gone to corona prevention network dot org, and I've signed up for the trial. But if, I don't get in, I wanna know, hey. Can I get the vaccine anyway?
Speaker 13: If I were you, I'm not sure I would volunteer without a trial to learn from the circumstance because you might be sort of getting yourself injected with something that ultimately turns out, not to be very helpful.
Speaker 25: The public thinks that doctors are all crooked. Unfortunately, they're probably right. The reason we paint doctors was to help people, but we're not.
Speaker 13: Imagine there is no traffic. Everyone's at Just zoom in or the phone. Imagine all people wearing the masks outside. Imagine all the nurses, aids and doctors too, Imagine empty cafes. I wonder if you can.
I bet you can. Rediscovering your kitchen at 6 feet from your fellow men. Treatments that give us hope.
Speaker 15: Lots of tests to
Speaker 13: You're saving lives. And imagine we're gonna get through this
Speaker 15: because we will.
reSee.it AI Summary
Don't miss the full documentary "Epidemic of Fraud" tomorrow at 8PM ET, free for Broken Truth website subscribers. TikTok banned the video and its trailer. Sign up today to find out what they don't want you to know.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
WHY DID TIKTOK BAN THIS VIDEO? Tomorrow at 8PM ET don't miss the full documentary "Epidemic of Fraud", free for Broken Truth website subscribers. Find out what else they don't want you to know. Sign up today at http://BrokenTruth.com.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hydroxychloroquine, a derivative of Chloroquine, has a long history dating back to quinine, used to treat malaria. Quinine's scarcity led to conflicts in wars like the American Revolution and World War II. The gin and tonic drink was born from soldiers mixing quinine with alcohol. The drug's importance continued with American troops overseas, but derivatives like mefloquine have caused issues. Access to these drugs has been restricted in various wars. The history of hydroxychloroquine and quinine is not widely known, raising questions about control over scientific institutions and medical education.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of Chloroquine, one of the first malarial drugs invented. Chloroquine was based off of a drug called quinine. Quinine is also credited as the first chemical compound used to treat an infectious disease. Quinine was initially ground from the bark of a cinchona tree.
It was given to settlers from Spain by Indians near Peru in 1600 and brought to the Western world as a cure for malaria. Eventually, Jesuit priests traveled the world with cinchona bark, so much so that it was commonly known as Jesuits bark. In 17/51, the Spanish crown took control of all the sources of quinine, restricting access as a new form of scientific based imperialism. At the beginning of the American Revolution, George Washington requested his political masters buy up as much cinchona bark and quinine powder as possible, a deciding factor in the fate of the new nation. Because in 17/78, the Spanish crown restricted British access to quinine.
In 18/20, quinine was officially isolated, reducing the need for cinchona tree bark. That development opened the door of European exploration to all of Africa, considered at the time the white man's grave yard, due to how many Europeans died from malaria on the continent. In the 1860s, during the American Civil War, Southern states relied heavily on shipping for goods, services, and medications. So Honest Abe Lincoln and his advisors enacted the Northern blockade to block cotton shipments to Europe, weapons imports, and quinine. Lincoln's goal with blocking quinine was to create as many sick and dead southern soldiers as possible, because a sick soldier slows down an army and drains resources.
This ultimately means that Abraham Lincoln could be considered by some a practitioner of biological warfare against men and women, young and old, free and slave. Things were so desperate for the south that John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's alleged assassin, smuggled quinine to friends and family. In their desperation, southern doctors searched for native plants and trees local to the south to replace Cinchona. The one that came up the most? The bark of a dogwood tree.
When the information was provided to doctors across the South that they had a potential alternative, the doctors didn't use it because they felt it hadn't had enough clinical trials and didn't want to be considered homeopaths. Where have we heard that before?
Speaker 1: The information that you're referring to specifically is anecdotal. It was not done in the controlled clinical trial, so you really can't make any definitive statement about it.
Speaker 0: The role of quinine in war doesn't stop there. In the 18 sixties, malaria was a major issue for English soldiers in India. So soldiers began combining the bitter tasting quinine with water and an alcoholic beverage to get their daily dose of the life saving medicine. Thus, the gin and tonic was born. The medicinal beverage was so important to the crown that Winston Churchill stated
Speaker 1: The gin and tonic drink has saved more Englishmen's lives and minds than all the doctors of the empire.
Speaker 0: With Africa opened up to exploration, European countries vied for colonies and power in Africa, creating rivalries that influenced World War I. By the 19 thirties, the primary locations for growing cinchona moved from South America to India and Indonesia, lands that soon be cut off to the Allies. In World War II, the United States was desperate for a source of quinine in Cinchona and returned to South America in a series of cinchona missions to build a supply chain and protect Allied troops. At the same time, Nazi scientists weaponized mosquitoes with malaria. The Nazis then conducted experiments on prisoners with these mosquitoes at Dachau Concentration Camp.
Many of these prisoners were Jesuit priests. As World War II drew to a close, when United States and the United Kingdom troops advanced on Rome, the German troops cut window screens of all the homes in the region, confiscated quinine from the residents, and allegedly released their weaponized malaria loaded mosquitoes. The advancing Allied troops were ready and protected with quinine, cinchona, and chloroquine. But the local population of Italians weren't so lucky. That year, there was a massive spike in civilian casualties from malaria, a parting gift from the fleeing Nazis.
Hydroxychloroquine and drugs like it continue to be important over the years. For decades, American troops overseas have taken Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and other derivatives of those drugs. One of those derivatives, mefloquine, has been implicated in causing post traumatic stress disorder and neurological issues with troops that were stationed in Iraq. The issues surrounding mefloquine are so great that the drug received a black box warning, the FDA's most stringent warning possible. For centuries now, the restriction of access to hydroxychloroquine, quinine, and drugs like them has been a standard tactic of warfare.
It was involved in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, World War II, countless smaller wars all across the planet, and most importantly, what one day may be remembered as World War 3. We've spoken with numerous pharmacists, doctors, and academics, and very few of them knew the history of hydroxychloroquine and quinine. It makes you wonder, who's really in control of our scientific institutions? And what are we teaching our medical doctors?
Broken Truth
Broken Truth - Exposing Fraud and Corruption
brokentruth.com
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
From TIKTOK. Tiktok also banned the trailer we posted the other day. https://t.co/tNwhyIyRvR
reSee.it AI Summary
The FDA proposed a rule in 1995 stating that over-the-counter drugs containing quinine for malaria treatment are not safe. There were previous attempts to remove quinine dating back to 1982. Some argue this was cartel-like behavior. The FDA's claim of a lack of safety data for quinine in malaria treatment is seen as a disgrace to science and history. The FDA's delay in warning about the risks of mefloquine is also criticized. Quinine's historical importance was recognized in 1946. A successful expedition in South America during World War II produced enough quinine to treat the military for two more years.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
April 19, 1995 CDER, Janet Woodcock's division of the FDA made a power grab to make us all forget Quinine was an amazing miracle drug. A literal miracle drug. This is how an agency can exert authority it should never have had. Put it in the federal register and make it law without ever going to congress or court. Some could argue this was criminal behavior. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking that would establish that over-the-counter (OTC) drug products containing quinine for the treatment and/or prevention of malaria are not generally recognized as safe and are misbranded. FDA is issuing this notice of proposed rulemaking after considering data and information on the safety of quinine. https://govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1995-04-19/pdf/95-9701.pdf
Page Not Found
Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found. Please report this error to askGPO. Provide the following information to help us resolve this problem: the URL of the page you were trying to access, the steps you followed to produce the error, specific search or browse terms, and/or a screenshot of the page where the error occurred. Thank you for your patience. Homepage
govinfo.gov
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
It turns out that the FDA had been gunning for quinine removal for much earlier than 1995. The Federal Register story above reveals multiple attempts to shuffle it away from the public even as early as 1982, citing a lack of 'controlled studies'.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
A drug that had been used for HUNDREDS OF YEARS without prescription was suddenly forced off market and any sales would need to be forced to undergo new drug approval? This is cartel-level activity.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
Clinton signed executive order 12866 to make regulators assess the cost of proposed regulations. The FDA dodged it's responsibility here. I wonder if the FDA's assessment included concerns about the human costs of taking an ancient medication and memory holing it to the world. https://www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/executive-orders/pdf/12866.pdf
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
And the ultimate disgrace to science and 400 years of history, the FDA claimed there was a lack of data to establish safety of quinine in the treatment of malaria.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
2020 article in Science states: "So if you see someone confidently explaining just how chloroquine exerts whatever antiviral activity it may have, feel free to go read something else. No one's sure yet." Why didn't the FDA fund quinine studies since 98? https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/chloroquine-past-and-present
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
Mefloquine was approved in 1998. It took the FDA 15 years to black box warn patients about its significant risks, and only after untold soldiers were poisoned w this antimalarial by the government while serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/mefloquine-lariam.asp#:~:text=Mefloquine%20was%20approved%20by%20the,(FDA)%20in%20May%201989.
VA.gov | Veterans Affairs
Veterans who took mefloquine for protection against malaria while deployed should contact their health care provider if concerned about side effects.
publichealth.va.gov
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
1985 the FDA wanted labels on using Quinine for restless leg. Seemed reasonable all things considered. https://archives.federalregister.gov/issue_slice/1985/11/8/46594-46626.pdf
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
But the real miracle of Quinine and it's Cinchona origins in history can be seen in the Federal Register on August 2, 1946 when the drug and bark were considered "requirements for the defense of the United States." https://archives.federalregister.gov/issue_slice/1946/8/2/8348-8352.pdf
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
(5) Deliveryanduseofcinchonahark or cinchona alkaloids previously com pounded. Any person may deliver, ac cept delivery of, or use, without author ization from Civilian Production Admin istration: (i) Any quinine which had been com bined or compounded with other me dicinal agents on or before April 4,1942; (ii) Any totaquine or cinchona bark which had been combined or compounded with other medicinal agents on or before April 30, 1942; (iii) Any quinine and urea hydrochlo.- ride (USP) or quinine hydrochloride and urethane which had been combined or compounded with other medicinal agents on or before January 9,1943; (iv) Any cinchonine, cinchonidine or quinidine which had been combined or compounded with other medicinal agents on or before June 19,1942. (v) Any anti-malarial agent manufac tured on or before January 9, 1943. (6) Delivery and use of synthetic quinidine. Any person may deliver, ac cept delivery of or use synthetic quini- qine without authorization from the Ci vilian Production Administration.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
The 1942 US Cinchona Missions to South America: "Because of the rampant spread of this disease among soldiers, quinine was essential to the U.S. during World War II. Without it, the army would not survive the war." https://naturalhistory.si.edu/research/botany/about/historical-expeditions/cinchona-missions
Cinchona Missions
naturalhistory.si.edu
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
The expedition itself was a complete success. While in Colombia and Ecuador, the expedition members were able to produce enough quinine to treat the military for two more years.
reSee.it AI Summary
In November, a documentary titled "Epidemic of Fraud: Hydroxychloroquine" will be released. A long-form preview called 'The History of Hydroxychloroquine' is now available. The film explores the controversial drug's background. During the American Civil War, John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's assassin, may have befriended someone with access to medicines due to his involvement in smuggling quinine to the Confederate South. The documentary credits all donors.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
Please RT. In Nov, our documentary “Epidemic of Fraud: Hydroxychloroquine” will be released. Until then, we’re excited to share this long-form preview titled ‘The History of Hydroxychloroquine’. *All donors will be listed in the credits of the documentary. #EpidemicOfFraud
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of Chloroquine, which was originally derived from the bark of a cinchona tree and used to treat malaria. The Spanish crown restricted access to quinine, leading to the American Revolution's George Washington stockpiling cinchona bark. During the American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln blocked quinine shipments to the South, causing doctors to search for alternative treatments. Quinine played a role in European colonization of Africa and influenced World War I. In World War II, the United States sought quinine from South America while the Nazis weaponized mosquitoes with malaria. Hydroxychloroquine has been used by American troops overseas, but its derivatives have been linked to post-traumatic stress disorder. Access to hydroxychloroquine has been restricted throughout history, raising questions about scientific institutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Broken Truth presents a special preview of Epidemic of Fraud, Hydroxychloroquine, coming in November. To donate, visit brokentruth.com. What is Hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of Chloroquine, one of the first malarial drugs invented. Chloroquine was based off of a drug called Quinine is also credited as the 1st chemical compound used to treat an infectious disease.
Quinine was initially ground from the bark of a cinchona tree. It was given to settlers from Spain in the 1600 and brought to the Western world as a cure for malaria. Eventually, Jesuit priests traveled the world with cinchonabar, So much so, that it was commonly known as Jesuits bark. In 17/51, the Spanish crown took control of all of the sources of quinine, Restricting access as a new form of scientific based imperialism. At the beginning of the American Revolution, George Washington requested his political masters Buy up as much Cinchona bark and quinine powder as possible, a deciding factor to the fate of the new nation.
Because in 17/78, the Spanish crown restricted British access to quinine. In 18/20, quinine was officially isolated, reducing the need for Cinchona. That development opened the door of European exploration to all of Africa, considered at the time, the white man's graveyard, Due to how many Europeans died from malaria on the continent. In the 18 sixties during the American Civil War, Southern states relied heavily on shipping for goods, Services and medications. So honest Abe Lincoln and his advisers enacted the Northern Blockade to block cotton shipments to Europe, weapons imports, and quinine.
Lincoln's goal with blocking quinine was to create as many sick and dead southern soldiers as possible, Because a sick soldier slows down an army and drains resources, this ultimately means That Abraham Lincoln was a practitioner of biological warfare against men and women, young and old, free and slave. Things were so desperate for the South that John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's assassin, smuggled quinine to friends and family. In their desperation, Southern doctors searched for native plants and trees local to the South for replacement. The one that came up the most? The bark of a dockwood tree.
When the information was provided to doctors across the South that they had a potential alternative, the doctors didn't use it because they felt it hadn't had enough clinical trials and didn't want to be considered homeopaths. Where have we heard that before? The information that you're referring to specifically is anecdotal. It was not done in the controlled clinical trial, so you really can't make any definitive Statement about it. The role of quinine in war doesn't stop there.
With Africa opened up to exploration, European countries vied for colonies and power in Africa, creating rivalries that influenced World War I. By the 19 thirties, the Primary locations for growing Cinchona moved from South America to India and Indonesia, lands that would soon be cut off to the allies. In World War 2, the United States was desperate for a source of quinine in Cinchona and returned to South America to build a supply chain and Allied troops. At the same time, Nazi scientists weaponized mosquitoes with malaria. The Nazis then conducted experiments on prisoners When United States and United Kingdom troops advanced on Rome, the German troops cut window screens of all the homes in the region, confiscated quinine from the and release their weaponized malarial loaded mosquitoes.
The advancing Allied troops were ready and protected with Quinine, Cinchona, and Chloroquine, but the local population battalions weren't so lucky. That year, there was a massive spike in civilian casualties From malaria, a parting gift from the fleeing Nazis. Hydroxychloroquine and drugs like it continued to be important over the years. For decades, American troops Overseas have taken Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, or other derivatives of those drugs. One of those derivatives, Mefloquine, has been implicated in causing post traumatic stress disorder issues with troops that were stationed in Iraq.
The issues surrounding Mefloquine were so great The drug received a black box warning, the FDA's most stringent warning possible. For centuries now, the restriction of access to hydroxychloroquine, quinine, And drugs like them has been a standard tactic of warfare. It was involved in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, World War II, Countless smaller wars all across the planet, and most importantly, what one day may be remembered as World War III. We've spoken with numerous pharmacists, doctors, and PhDs, and very few knew the history of Hydroxychloroquine and quinine. It makes you wonder, Who's really in control of our scientific institutions?
And what are we teaching our medical doctors? Broken Truth presents Epidemic of fraud, Hydroxychloroquine, coming in November. To donate, visit brokentruth.com.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
"It was then the middle of the American Civil War (1861–1865), and Booth was involved in smuggling quinine to the Confederate South. Perhaps he cultivated a friendship because of Herold’s access to medicines." The pharmacist who helped Lincoln’s assassin https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/opinion/the-pharmacist-who-helped-lincolns-assassin
The pharmacist who helped Lincoln’s assassin
The Pharmaceutical Journal from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society
pharmaceutical-journal.com
reSee.it AI Summary
@BrokenTruthTV plans to release a documentary titled "Epidemic of Fraud: Hydroxychloroquine" in November. However, they are currently selectively sharing a pilot version with subject matter experts to ensure accuracy. The documentary aims to be powerful, though potentially upsetting to some. @Jikkyleaks believes it will be groundbreaking.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
Please RT. In Nov, our documentary “Epidemic of Fraud: Hydroxychloroquine” will be released. Until then, we’re excited to share this long-form preview titled ‘The History of Hydroxychloroquine’. *All donors will be listed in the credits of the documentary. #EpidemicOfFraud
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of Chloroquine, which was originally derived from the bark of a cinchona tree and used to treat malaria. The Spanish crown restricted access to quinine, leading to the American Revolution's George Washington stockpiling cinchona bark. During the American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln blocked quinine shipments to the South, causing doctors to search for alternative treatments. Quinine played a role in European colonization of Africa and World War I rivalries. In World War II, the United States built a supply chain for quinine in South America, while the Nazis weaponized mosquitoes with malaria. Hydroxychloroquine has been used by American troops overseas, but its derivatives have been linked to post-traumatic stress disorder. Access to hydroxychloroquine has been restricted throughout history as a tactic of warfare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Broken Truth presents a special preview of Epidemic of Fraud, Hydroxychloroquine, coming in November. To donate, visit brokentruth.com. What is Hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of Chloroquine, one of the first malarial drugs invented. Chloroquine was based off of a drug called Quinine is also credited as the 1st chemical compound used to treat an infectious disease.
Quinine was initially ground from the bark of a cinchona tree. It was given to settlers from Spain in the 1600 and brought to the Western world as a cure for malaria. Eventually, Jesuit priests traveled the world with cinchonabar, So much so, that it was commonly known as Jesuits bark. In 17/51, the Spanish crown took control of all of the sources of quinine, Restricting access as a new form of scientific based imperialism. At the beginning of the American Revolution, George Washington requested his political masters Buy up as much Cinchona bark and quinine powder as possible, a deciding factor to the fate of the new nation.
Because in 17/78, the Spanish crown restricted British access to quinine. In 18/20, quinine was officially isolated, reducing the need for Cinchona. That development opened the door of European exploration to all of Africa, considered at the time, the white man's graveyard, Due to how many Europeans died from malaria on the continent. In the 18 sixties during the American Civil War, Southern states relied heavily on shipping for goods, Services and medications. So honest Abe Lincoln and his advisers enacted the Northern Blockade to block cotton shipments to Europe, weapons imports, and quinine.
Lincoln's goal with blocking quinine was to create as many sick and dead southern soldiers as possible, Because a sick soldier slows down an army and drains resources, this ultimately means That Abraham Lincoln was a practitioner of biological warfare against men and women, young and old, free and slave. Things were so desperate for the South that John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's assassin, smuggled quinine to friends and family. In their desperation, Southern doctors searched for native plants and trees local to the South for replacement. The one that came up the most? The bark of a dockwood tree.
When the information was provided to doctors across the South that they had a potential alternative, the doctors didn't use it because they felt it hadn't had enough clinical trials and didn't want to be considered homeopaths. Where have we heard that before? The information that you're referring to specifically is anecdotal. It was not done in the controlled clinical trial, so you really can't make any definitive Statement about it. The role of quinine in war doesn't stop there.
With Africa opened up to exploration, European countries vied for colonies and power in Africa, creating rivalries that influenced World War I. By the 19 thirties, the Primary locations for growing Cinchona moved from South America to India and Indonesia, lands that would soon be cut off to the allies. In World War 2, the United States was desperate for a source of quinine in Cinchona and returned to South America to build a supply chain and Allied troops. At the same time, Nazi scientists weaponized mosquitoes with malaria. The Nazis then conducted experiments on prisoners When United States and United Kingdom troops advanced on Rome, the German troops cut window screens of all the homes in the region, confiscated quinine from the and release their weaponized malarial loaded mosquitoes.
The advancing Allied troops were ready and protected with Quinine, Cinchona, and Chloroquine, but the local population battalions weren't so lucky. That year, there was a massive spike in civilian casualties From malaria, a parting gift from the fleeing Nazis. Hydroxychloroquine and drugs like it continued to be important over the years. For decades, American troops Overseas have taken Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, or other derivatives of those drugs. One of those derivatives, Mefloquine, has been implicated in causing post traumatic stress disorder issues with troops that were stationed in Iraq.
The issues surrounding Mefloquine were so great The drug received a black box warning, the FDA's most stringent warning possible. For centuries now, the restriction of access to hydroxychloroquine, quinine, And drugs like them has been a standard tactic of warfare. It was involved in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, World War II, Countless smaller wars all across the planet, and most importantly, what one day may be remembered as World War III. We've spoken with numerous pharmacists, doctors, and PhDs, and very few knew the history of Hydroxychloroquine and quinine. It makes you wonder, Who's really in control of our scientific institutions?
And what are we teaching our medical doctors? Broken Truth presents Epidemic of fraud, Hydroxychloroquine, coming in November. To donate, visit brokentruth.com.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
Update. The documentary pilot is being selectively released at this moment to key subject matter experts. While I’d love to give it a full release this month, the reality is we must check every fact twice. These are steps that must be taken for the documentary to be in film festivals and also available to theatrical and/or network television release. The information in it will be powerful for many. Pointless to some. Upsetting to others. I apologize for not being able to share with the world just yet but honestly, if I did it would likely be censored. Even on Twitter. It deserves the best shot it can get. Thanks for your patience!
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
@BrokenTruthTV This is going to be a world shattering documentary. Worth the wait. https://x.com/BrokenTruthTV/status/1728718900811157977?s=20
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Todd Wolynn led a digital army against fellow doctors and Americans, silencing dissent and promoting vaccines. The group Shots Heard, founded by Wolynn, used tactics like banning commenters and disabling Facebook ratings. Public Good Projects took over management of the group, actively working to silence dissenting voices. The group's political leanings and censorship efforts raise concerns. Wolynn's involvement with Sorry Antivaxxer, a website celebrating the death of the unvaccinated, is unclear. The need to investigate and dismantle the censorship system is crucial. Freedom of speech must be protected.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
BROKEN TRUTH ARTICLE “Banning Works”: Dr. Todd Wolynn’s War on Bodily Autonomy & Speech Pittsburgh Dr. Todd Wolynn led a digital army, including foreign nationals, in a civil war against fellow Doctors & Americans. Article originally posted at https://brokentruth.com/todd-wolynn/ Sharing here because for some reason the algorithm doesn't like when you out the censors who collaborated with Twitter. Editor’s note: This is a series of stories documenting the tactics and lawfare used against Americans who rebelled against the medical tyranny and money grab of the COVID wars. These documents and screen grabs were obtained from whistleblowers in various private online communities, often at great risk, in order to show the world what traditional news outlets refuse to cover and explain why so many doctors were afraid to speak out at the height of COVID. See all our reporting on these online harassment groups here. Meet the “Vaxx-Man” When waves of his fellow humans cried out in anguish from the ongoing disaster that is our COVID response, Todd Wolynn, co-founder of a vaccine lobbyist-linked group called Shots Heard, unleashed his group on doctors, nurses, clergy, students, victims, and families of children who died with unexplained links to COVID vaccines. Despite signs his minions were going too far, General Todd was silent. The masses of blocked and banned American victims grew with nowhere to turn. Born from a negative social media response The story goes that Wolynn’s office published a video promoting vaccines and then the video was shared in a closed Facebook group called “Vaccine Choices – Fact VS Fiction”. Over the next six days, he said, the video drew more than 10,000 anti-vaccine comments. Negative reviews dropped the practice’s Google rating from 4.6 to less than one star, Hermann said. “We’re in WW3,” said one anti-vaccine commenter, likening the immunization debate to a world war. “The militaries around the world need to get together and stop this insanity.” Hermann said most of the commenters didn’t live in Pennsylvania, and some didn’t even live in the United States. The biggest concentrations were from California, the Florida Panhandle, Ohio, Texas and Oregon, Hermann said. “They’re coordinating attacks and sending the troops,” Hermann said. Anti-vaccine activists have doctors ‘terrorized into silence’ with online harassment, March 18, 2019 https://web.archive.org/web/20190319043519/https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ln-vaccine-attacks-20190317-story.html https://brokentruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/E34983B2-D698-41F1-B290-AEA24A54782E.jpeg A welcome banner to the group. It seems nice! The group “Vaccine Choices – Fact VS Fiction” was organized by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. Dr. Tenpenny’s license was recently stripped from her by Ohio medical license officials – the same body that drug its feet in punishing exposed fraudster Sapan Desai. In May 2020, Sapan Desai forged study data in a manner that was used by the WHO, FDA, and NIH to claim Hydroxychloroquine was dangerous to patients, opening the way for Emergency Use Authorizations for the experimental mRNA vaccines that clearly don’t work against COVID. Angered by the lack of respect for his authority, Wolynn, who has received hundreds of thousands of dollars for conducting vaccine research with the Merck and Sanofi pharmaceutical companies, founded “Shots Heard Round the World”. Shots Heard “includes tips on how to ban commenters, disable Facebook ratings and call in reinforcements — people who will post pro-vaccine information.” https://brokentruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/E34983B2-D698-41F1-B290-AEA24A54782E.jpeg Reported payments from pharmaceutical companies to Todd Wolynn MD via OpenPayments. Enter Public Good Projects In a country with First Amendment protections for freedoms of speech and religion, organized medical professionals supporting each other would seemingly be a good thing. Then Public Good Projects (PGP) took over management of the group. PGP is a far-left non-profit organization that at minimum received $883,000 in 2021 from BIO, a pharmaceutical lobbyist. PGP’s CEO Joe Smyser is linked to USAID, CDC and other US government entities. PGP appears to have received millions in federal grants that we are attempting to nail down. Shots Heard has become an 1100+ member-strong organization monitored by at least one Democrat campaign manager and Todd’s daughter. Rishanne Golden Reported Somewhere along the way, Shots Heard went rabid, attacking doctors whose early treatment protocols threatened pharmaceutical company profits and exposed holes in the knowledge of the medical world. Rather than review the information provided, the group labeled anyone they didn’t agree with – especially anyone conservative – an anti-vaxxer and bombarded those people online with attacks. Todd’s Shots Heard acolytes actively worked to cover the mouths of vaccine-injured and their families in their grief. Rishanne Golden’s daughter died after receiving the meningococcal vaccine. Keith Law, a sportswriter and member of Shots Heard was active in silencing doctors using their rights to prescribe as well as silencing ‘antivaxxers’, even when those ‘antivaxxers’ had proven their children were harmed and/or killed by the vaccines. You can view Rishanne’s testimony about her daughter’s death from a vaccine to the State of Ohio Congress here. Read more about Keith Law‘s atrocious actions inside and outside of the group here. Bad ideas came from above Rather than reading the room and reviewing new data as concerns with the vaccines and hospital protocols came in, Todd and co were eager to exploit the censorship collaboration with social media that PGP could provide. In this video, Todd discusses the benefits of banning and de-platforming the ‘other side’. This is how the mass medical gaslighting of the United States really took off. https://twitter.com/BrokenTruthTV/status/1705317773013086688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1705317773013086688%7Ctwgr%5Ed8bc48ea5d8cd11d784ea9c4ae8f2ae94bf4c04e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fbrokentruth.com%2Ftodd-wolynn%2F… PGP’s primary goal was mind control PGP under Joe Smyser was actively working with the forces behind the growing censorship movement to silence all dissenting voices on Twitter and all other major platforms, including Facebook. PGP was so proactive at silencing critics that they were even featured in Lee Fang’s ‘Twitter Files’ for routinely demanding Twitter accounts be censored or deleted for what they considered ‘misinformation’. What’s worse is these people have actively researched ways to ‘innoculate the mind’ of their targets, much like Nazis did in 1930s Germany, so that no evidence, no news, and no persuasion could penetrate the cloud of delusion the government creates. Terrifying. You can read more about Joe Smyser and PGP’s role in the incredible censorship and propaganda campaigns across the world starting in 2020 on Broken Truth. PGP and Joe Smyser Group post where Todd et al were collaborating with Facebook Doctors are ignorant of medical history The problem for Todd and scores of medical doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other medical executives is that their institutions of education are not teaching them the dark histories they may have been part of. Patients entrust doctors to be educated but as has been exposed over the past few years, doctors are routinely untrained in the history of medicine and medications. In this clip of an interview featuring Todd Wolynn and co, Beth Hoffman admits that doctors aren’t taught about the Cutter Incident in medical school. https://x.com/BrokenTruthTV/status/1705343318715179311?s=20… The cutter incident was one of the worst confirmed pharmaceutical disasters in history. According to Wikipedia: In what became known as the Cutter incident, some lots of the Cutter vaccine—despite passing required safety tests—contained live polio virus in what was supposed to be an inactivated-virus vaccine. Cutter withdrew its vaccine from the market on April 27 after vaccine-associated cases were reported. The mistake produced 120,000 doses of polio vaccine that contained live polio virus. Of children who received the vaccine, 40,000 developed abortive poliomyelitis (a form of the disease that does not involve the central nervous system), 56 developed paralytic poliomyelitis—and of these, five children died from polio. The exposures led to an epidemic of polio in the families and communities of the affected children, resulting in a further 113 people paralyzed and 5 deaths. The director of the microbiology institute lost his job, as did the equivalent of the assistant secretary for health. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare Oveta Culp Hobby stepped down. Dr William H. Sebrell Jr, the director of the NIH, resigned Wikipedia, The Cutter Incident Medical schools should be ashamed for not teaching this and many other atrocities performed by medical and academic institutions on an unsuspecting public. We have compiled them into an easily reviewable map. For our government, medical, and academic institutions to experiment on us without proper consent is a significant violation of the Nuremberg code, a set of rules designed to protect humans on Earth after WWII. Take this example in Philadelphia. In 1908, three Philadelphia researchers infected dozens of children with tuberculin at St. Vincent Orphanage in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, causing permanent blindness in some of the children and painful lesions and inflammation of the eyes in many of the others. In the study, they refer to the children as “material used”. In this interview segment, Todd implies that all concerns regarding mistrust of medical doctors or government intrusion into your bodily autonomy is crazy. If Todd doesn’t know about all the atrocities committed by his colleagues and predecessors, how can his statement be trusted? Map of Unethical Experiments in the US https://google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1tTQgtLcxdcKvNTO_PDLYw6tvmOun0hU&usp=sharing… Good old-fashioned delusion Todd and Shots Heard’s goal is vaccination. There is no evidence or concern that will change their opinion. It’s why members of the group like Richard Pan and Dorit Reiss spend their lives attempting to erode your freedoms. In this clip, Todd and Jaime Sidani discuss how they sit down with people to address their fears about the vaccine. What they actually mean is, anti-autonomy promoters should pretend to hear you and then repeatedly wear down your resistance until you take their useless shot. It’s all political Repeatedly we came across severely leftist members of this group. The political aspect of this group is impossible to ignore and we can’t help but wonder if that should affect their non-profit status as a 501c3. Check out this Santa Clara contact tracer who is also part of Shots Heard. I wonder how she’s gonna vote? Read Nancy’s story on http://BrokenTruth.com. For example, Peter Hotez is the most embarrassing pro-vaccine advocate online. Check out this hilarious montage of Peter Hotez’s pathetic public statements around COVID-19 and vaccines over the years. When it benefitted Democrats and hurt Trump, vaccines weren’t safe. When a vaccine would benefit Biden, all aboard the vaccine train! https://x.com/0rf/status/1669030822215655436?s=20… https://x.com/SKMorefield/status/1672612901524316161?s=20… This shows how political science has become. How far would these people go to remove a sitting president? It should come as no surprise that when Hotez needed help, here comes the digital cavalry! If you want to dig deeper into Peter Hotez and his painfully deep links to pretty much everything wrong in medicine right now, check out this impressive thread (and don’t forget to follow) Champagne Joshi on Twitter. https://twitter.com/JoshWalkos/status/1701999722976760071 As far as Todd’s political leanings, perhaps this will illuminate you to how anti-republican he is. When did doctors become so political? https://x.com/BrokenTruthTV/status/1705351985288053019?s=20… We now know the lab leak theory was quite legitimate. Why was Todd so quick to discredit it? What else is Todd wrong about? The silver lining? Kids prefer pediatricians that are fun and not scary. It sucks that Todd couldn’t just play that role and be satisfied being a great doctor. The kind of doctor who reads the room and listens to the patients in America desperate to be heard. There is more than enough evidence that the United States academic and medical institutions were willing to lie, forge, steal, and commit medical fraud to ensure the pandemic looked as terrible as possible. Todd’s own statements indicate he and others were looking at the silver lining of COVID, which was renewed faith in vaccines. American’s faith in medicine is going out the window. Good riddance. The worst part is as the group became more and more unhinged, we see no evidence of Todd attempting to rein them in. Todd created that which he claimed to hate – an online mob. https://x.com/BrokenTruthTV/status/1705351985288053019?s=20… Some have linked Todd to the sickening website http://SorryAntivaxxer.com, an inhuman page that celebrates the death of the unvaccinated. The only evidence that Todd is involved with the site is that in some interviews and articles about Todd he is referred to as “vaxx man” . “Vaxman” is the name of the ringleader on Sorry Antivaxxer. As of press time, we have no other evidence that he is connected to the site in any way. Whoever is behind “Sorry Antivaxxer” is a despicable person. If anything that website gives credence to claims that unvaccinated individuals are treated poorly in hospitals increasing the likelihood of death. We already have unvaccinated being denied organ transplants and other care – is it that difficult to imagine the unvaccinated’s health care could be sabotaged? Especially when websites like “Sorry Antivaxxer” exist which seem to encourage mistreatment? A darker truth Todd wanted to be on camera. He seemed to crave the limelight and was rewarded for toeing the line for one of the largest media advertising industries in the world. Todd has been featured in articles in all the big papers, networks, and websites. Todd was also part of Team Halo, a UN-endorsed group created to fight ‘misinformation’ with its own share of problems. More and more information is coming to light regarding the Chinese lab leak. Because such efforts were made to conceal it, we must now also consider that this was an intentional release upon the world, targeted at the United States. The system of censorship that was put in place in 2019 has to be investigated and dismantled. Were the active, vocal, foreign nationals in Shots Heard just a bunch of assholes, or was there something else going on? HHS letter to Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), 09/19/23: "NIH determined that..WIV conducted an experiment that violated the terms of the grant regarding viral activity, which possibly did lead..to..unacceptable outcomes" https://x.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1704641787380298152?s=20… Freedom of speech exists to protect Americans from people like Todd who lose their way. http://BrokenTruth.com/donate
“Banning Works”: Dr. Todd Wolynn’s War on Bodily Autonomy & Speech
“Banning Works”: Dr. Todd Wolynn’s War on Bodily Autonomy & Speech
brokentruth.com
reSee.it AI Summary
NIH emails reveal communication between Eric O Freed and Oliver Schildgen from August 2021 to May 2022, as well as emails containing the phrase "expression of concern" or the name "Jiang." An amendment was made to include emails with the word "Jiang" and any of the words "paper," "expression," "concern," "retract," or "retraction." Gorka Garcia's use of racism with Ray Epps and Rep Raskin to cover up Chinese involvement in US research is also exposed.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
@Jikkyleaks @NIH Nothing to hide here...... (1) All email communications between Eric O Freed and Oliver Schildgen for the time period 20th August 2021 to 31st May 2022. (2) All email communications from/to Eric O. Freed containing the phrase "expression of concern" or the name "Jiang" in the body of the email. In an email dated on 8/31/22, you amended and perfected item (2) to “any emails containing the word “Jiang” and any of the words “paper,” “expression,” “concern,” “retract,” or “retraction”.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
@Jikkyleaks @NIH It appears Gorka Garcia was also using racism with Ray Epps apologist Rep. Raskin to cover up other investigations into Chinese involvement in US research as well. https://www.apajustice.org/uploads/1/1/5/7/115708039/foia2nih_20210802.pdf
