reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @COVIDSelect

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - January 18, 2024 at 6:25 PM

Saved - September 3, 2025 at 6:40 AM

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Dr. Fauci's testimony revealed deep systemic failures in our public health system. ❌"6 feet apart" was not based on science. ❌NO oversight of foreign labs. ❌Million $ grants were approved without his review. 1.2 million Americans died. We must do better in the future. https://t.co/gFeAn3sk3T

Video Transcript AI Summary

Asked about the six-foot distance, he said, 'it just sort of appeared and then they went with it.' On masks, 'there was really no scientific data, no no study behind it.' 'One point two million Americans lost their lives.' Regarding origins, NIH grants went to EcoHealth Alliance for gain-of-function research in China; Fauci said, 'when they weren't doing the reporting back to NIH... there was no oversight coming in saying we want your reports per se.' He added, 'that's not my lane. That's over in compliance.' He claimed he wouldn't know how to oversee a foreign lab and acknowledged discussion of a lab leak as a theory, not a conspiracy. On schools, 'the mandates were a bad idea overall,' with 'no scientific data behind it.' He stated he had said 'I don't recall' many times; the public messaging should rely on doctors treating COVID patients, not politicians.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I want to go through what you learned from doctor Fauci piece by piece. When he was asked about where the idea about six feet distance came from, what did he say? Speaker 1: He said it just sort of appeared and then they went with it. So you can see that there's not a real good process. We asked the same question about masks. He said, well, there was really no scientific data, no no study behind it. We just kinda put that out there. Look. Doctor Fauci was the face of the pandemic for America. One point two million Americans lost their lives. We're going through a process of what decisions they made and why they made their decisions. But you look into the origins of COVID, there were grants being distributed by NIH with taxpayer dollars to a company called EcoHealth Alliance to do research in China, gain of function research, and most people are familiar with that term. There's virtually no oversight over that. Doctor Fauci said, well, when they put in their request for a research grant, a board looks at it, and once they look at it, then I just sign off on it, and I'm done. When they weren't doing the reporting back to NIH about what they were doing, There was no oversight coming in saying we want your reports per se. Doctor Fauci said, well, that's not my lane. That's over in compliance. So the process is is terrible when you when you take a look at this. And then we asked about oversight of foreign labs. Does NIH have any oversight over the bio security of a foreign lab? He said, I wouldn't even know how to do that. When everyone was saying what they're doing in China is a lab that wasn't safe, it should have been in a higher level. All the scientists have been saying that. So, you need to talk about a lab leak, theory. Now, doctor Fauci is saying that he doesn't think that's a conspiracy theory. Speaker 0: Wow. Okay. That's a lot in one big answer. Let me let me just slow it down a little bit. You asked him about wearing masks, what was his answer as to where that came from? Speaker 1: Well, where it came from is basically they thought that that would be a good idea, but remember he said it won't make a difference, and then he started mandating it, and that's the problem. The mandates were a a bad idea overall, but he admitted that there was no scientific data behind it. Look, Americans wanna be educated, and that's not what was taking place there. Speaker 0: Doesn't seem like there was any data behind any of his answers. What did he tell you about closing schools and the impact that would have on kids? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I can tell you that over a 100 times even on the first day, he said he didn't recall. He he does recognize now that it was a terrible impact on kids, but he didn't address that. So he shouldn't have been the spokesperson on everything that was taking place. He seemed to say, well, that's in somebody else's lane, but then why was he the one out there talking about it? Look, the teachers union wanted six feet, you know, in that in that regard, that means they don't have to teach because there's no way you can keep your kids six feet apart. Is it Speaker 0: true that he said I don't remember a 100 times? Speaker 1: Just on the very first day. He said it more times on the second day. So, you know, the the messaging has been terrible. We need a process where America can trust our public health officials and understand they're getting the true story. Look. I said early on, even under the Trump administration, America needed to hear from the doctors treating COVID patients, not the politician and not the person in the lab, but the ones that are really have boots on the ground and are studying in all this.

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - December 2, 2024 at 5:32 PM

Saved - December 2, 2024 at 8:16 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The final report from the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic provides a comprehensive review of COVID-19, highlighting accountability and future preparedness. It identifies a lab-related incident in China as the likely origin and critiques the federal and state governments for poor coordination and oversight of relief funds. The report argues that policies neglected vulnerable populations, vaccine mandates infringed on freedoms, and school closures led to significant learning loss. It also notes the economic fallout, with over 160,000 businesses closing permanently and high unemployment rates.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨FINAL REPORT🚨 The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic’s final report is the most thorough review of the pandemic conducted to date. This report ensures COVID-19 accountability and serves as a roadmap for the U.S. to prepare for and respond to future pandemics.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

The full report titled “After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward” can be found here: https://oversight.house.gov/report/after-action-review-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-the-lessons-learned-and-a-path-forward/ A summary of the 525 pages🧵👇

After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 ORIGINS A lab-related incident involving dangerous gain-of-function research in China is the most likely origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. EcoHealth Alliance Inc. used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. READ MORE⬇️ https://t.co/yUKNQZ6IwF

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 RELIEF FUNDING Federal and state governments had significant lapses in coordination, lacked proper oversight functions, and were unprepared to oversee the allocation of COVID-19 relief funds. READ MORE⬇️ https://t.co/CQSj7osTdM

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 LAWS & REGULATIONS Rather than prioritizing the protection of the most vulnerable populations, federal and state government policies forced millions of Americans to forgo crucial elements of a healthy, happy, and financially sound life. READ MORE⬇️ https://t.co/A6YpkQGKry

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 VACCINE Contrary to what was promised, the COVID-19 vaccine did not stop the spread or transmission of the virus. Vaccine mandates trampled individual freedoms and harmed military readiness. READ MORE⬇️ https://t.co/3i8m3a4Zop

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 ECONOMIC IMPACT More than 160,000 businesses closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic — with 60% of those closures classified as permanent. Unemployment rates surged to levels not seen since the Great Depression. READ MORE⬇️ https://t.co/QQKArdJ70E

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 SCHOOL CLOSURES The “science” never justified the prolonged closing of schools. Children experienced historic learning loss, higher rates of psychological distress, and decreased physical well-being. READ MORE⬇️ https://t.co/tl5hVBUNhU

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

COVID-19 OVERSIGHT NONCOMPLIANCE The Biden Administration repeatedly obstructed @COVIDSelect's investigations. Dr. Fauci’s Senior Advisor — Dr. David Morens — violated multiple @NIH policies and likely lied to Congress. READ MORE⬇️ https://t.co/rqITzxn400

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - May 31, 2024 at 5:07 PM

Saved - May 31, 2024 at 10:12 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Fauci's testimony revealed key points: social distancing was arbitrary, no evidence for masking children, support for travel restrictions, concerns about vaccine mandates, acknowledgment of lab leak theory, playing with definitions of gain-of-function research, potential conflicts of interest, lack of oversight in grant approval process, and feigned ignorance on various issues. Additional transcripts from interviews with public health officials were also released.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨DR. FAUCI TRANSCRIPT RELEASE🚨 Today, @COVIDSelect released the transcript from Dr. Anthony Fauci's two-day, 14-hour transcribed interview. On Monday, Dr. Fauci will testify publicly for the first time since retirement. Key takeaways from his closed-door testimony🧵👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️SOCIAL DISTANCING: The “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation forced on Americans by federal health officials was arbitrary and not based on science. Dr. Fauci testified that this guidance “sort of just appeared.”

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️MASKING: Dr. Fauci testified that he did not recall any supporting evidence for masking children. Mask-wearing has been associated with severe learning loss and speech development issues in America’s children.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS: Dr. Fauci unequivocally agreed with EVERY travel restriction issued by the Trump Administration at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️VACCINE MANDATES: Dr. Fauci admitted that vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic could increase vaccine hesitancy in the future. He also claimed that these mandates were not sufficiently studied.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️LAB LEAK THEORY: Dr. Fauci acknowledged that the lab leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. This comes roughly four years after he prompted the publication of “Proximal Origin” — a paper which attempted to vilify and disprove the lab leak hypothesis.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH: Dr. Fauci repeatedly played semantics with the definition of “gain-of-function” research. This appears to be an effort to avoid conceding that the NIH funded this dangerous research in China.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Dr. Fauci claimed his staff had no conflicts of interest regarding the origins of COVID-19. Yet, his Senior Advisor was “best-friends” with the disgraced President of EcoHealth Alliance. It is highly unlikely Dr. Fauci was unaware of this relationship.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️GRANT APPROVAL PROCESS: Dr. Fauci testified that he signed off on every foreign and domestic NIAID grant without reviewing the proposals. He was also unable to confirm if NIAID has ANY mechanisms to conduct oversight of the foreign labs they fund.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️FEIGNED IGNORANCE: Dr. Fauci claimed he “did not recall” numerous issues & events surrounding the pandemic more than 100 times. For example, Dr. Fauci testified that he did not recall details about EcoHealth Alliance's controversial grant, which operated under his jurisdiction.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Read @COVIDSelect’s staff memo highlighting key takeaways from the transcribed interview here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FINAL_Fauci-Memo.pdf Read the full transcripts from Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview below: ▪️ Dr. Fauci's Day 1 Transcript: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Fauci-Part-1-Transcript.pdf ▪️ Dr. Fauci's Day 2 Transcript: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Fauci-Part-2-Transcript.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨Today, @COVIDSelect released FOUR additional transcripts from transcribed interviews with leading public health officials. See below: ▪️ Dr. Fauci's Chief of Staff, Greg Folkers: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Folkers-Transcript.pdf ▪️ Former Acting NIAID Director, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Auchincloss-Transcript.pdf ▪️ Deputy Director for Clinical Research at NIAID, Dr. Cliff Lane: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Lane-Transcript.pdf ▪️ Associate Director for International Affairs at NIAID, Gray Handley: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Handley-Transcript.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - May 29, 2024 at 9:33 PM

Saved - May 31, 2024 at 7:30 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

New evidence suggests that Dr. Fauci used a "secret back channel" for COVID-19 communication. Dr. Morens referenced this channel and expressed concern about using Dr. Fauci's personal email to evade FOIA. @COVIDSelect aims to hold Dr. Fauci accountable. Read the letter to Dr. Fauci from Chairman @RepBradWenstrup for more details.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨NEW🚨 Today, @COVIDSelect requested access to Dr. Fauci's personal email account and cellphone records. New evidence suggests that Dr. Fauci used a "secret back channel" to communicate about official COVID-19 information. New evidence🧵👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

1. Dr. Fauci’s Senior Advisor — Dr. David Morens — wrote to disgraced EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak... “I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work…He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

2. Then, Dr. Morens references the "secret back channel" he would use to communicate with Dr. Fauci outside the public eye... "I suggested Arthur try to interview Tony directly and connected him to our 'secret' back channel."

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

3. During his public testimony last week, Dr. Morens concerningly testified he “may have” used Dr. Fauci’s personal email to evade the Freedom of Information Act.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

This new evidence raises serious concerns about public health officials behaving as if they are unaccountable to the American people they serve. @COVIDSelect plans to hold Dr. Fauci and his team accountable. Read Chairman @RepBradWenstrup's letter to Dr. Fauci here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024.05.29-Letter-to-Fauci-Re.-Gmail.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - May 29, 2024 at 9:33 PM

Saved - May 30, 2024 at 3:53 PM

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨NEW🚨 Today, @COVIDSelect requested access to Dr. Fauci's personal email account and cellphone records. New evidence suggests that Dr. Fauci used a "secret back channel" to communicate about official COVID-19 information. New evidence🧵👇

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - May 16, 2024 at 12:27 PM

Saved - May 18, 2024 at 11:03 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Former NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins's transcribed interview was released by @COVIDSelect. Dr. Collins questioned the scientific basis of the "6 feet apart" social distancing recommendation and acknowledged the legitimacy of the lab-leak hypothesis. He also expressed unawareness of NIH policies for oversight of foreign labs, potentially compromising taxpayer funds. Dr. Collins supported enforcement actions against EcoHealth Alliance and contradicted Dr. Fauci's statements regarding the February 1, 2020 conference call. For more details, read the staff memo and full transcript provided by @COVIDSelect.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨TRANSCRIPT RELEASE🚨 Today, @COVIDSelect released the transcript from former National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Francis Collins's transcribed interview. Dr. Collins helped lead America's COVID-19 pandemic response. Key Takeaways🧵👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins testified that the “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation promoted by federal health officials was likely not based on any science or data.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins stated that the COVID-19 lab-leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins testified that he was unaware of ANY @NIH policies that ensure proper oversight of foreign labs. This means that NIH often lacks the necessary expertise to ensure U.S. taxpayer funds are spent safely.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins supported every enforcement action against EcoHealth Alliance that was executed by @NIH.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins claimed that Dr. Fauci invited him to attend the infamous February 1, 2020 conference call that "prompted" the public narrative suppressing and vilifying the lab leak hypothesis. This statement directly contradicts Dr. Fauci's previous statements.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Read @COVIDSelect’s staff memo highlighting key takeaways from the transcribed interview here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024.05.16-SSCP-Staff-Memo.pdf Read the full transcript from Dr. Collin’s transcribed interview here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Collins-Transcript-5.16-Release.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - May 7, 2024 at 10:59 PM

Saved - May 8, 2024 at 7:45 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

State Department documents suggest COVID-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China and the CCP covered it up. Chairman Wenstrup requested the State Department to declassify and share the truth about the origins of COVID-19 with the American people. Links to the redacted documents are provided.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨BREAKING🚨 NEW State Department documents reviewed by @COVIDSelect suggest COVID-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China and the CCP covered it up. These classified documents were previously released in an unclassified and highly redacted FOIA production to @USRightToKnow. Today, Chairman @RepBradWenstrup requested @StateDept rapidly declassify the documents and share the truth about the origins of COVID-19 with the American people👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Read Chairman Wenstrup’s letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024.05.07-SSCP-Letter-to-State-Department.pdf View the highly redacted State Department documents below: Part 1: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FL-2022-00075-April-2023-Production-ccp.pdf Part 2: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FL-2022-00075-April-2023-Production-cable-1.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - May 1, 2024 at 11:48 AM

Saved - May 2, 2024 at 2:27 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Today, @COVIDSelect released a report calling for the investigation and debarment of Dr. Peter Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance. The report highlights weaknesses at the National Institutes of Health that allowed funding for risky research in Wuhan, China.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨NEW 🚨 Today, @COVIDSelect released a staff-level report recommending EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak be formally debarred and criminally investigated as a result of his actions prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The report also exposes serious, systemic weaknesses at the National Institutes of Health that enabled EcoHealth to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. KEY FINDINGS🧵👇

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - April 24, 2024 at 9:41 PM

Saved - April 25, 2024 at 1:51 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Anthony Fauci will testify publicly for the first time since retiring at a @COVIDSelect hearing. Important takeaways from his closed-door testimony include the questionable origins of social distancing guidelines, gaps in his memory, lack of personal review of grant proposals, acknowledgment of the lab-leak hypothesis, potential negative impact of vaccine mandates, and concerns about oversight of foreign laboratories. @COVIDSelect appreciates his willingness to appear and looks forward to his honest testimony.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨BREAKING🚨 Dr. Anthony Fauci will testify publicly for the FIRST TIME since retiring from public service at a @COVIDSelect hearing on Monday, June 3, 2024.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

In January, @COVIDSelect completed a two-day, 14-hour transcribed interview with Dr. Fauci that revealed serious, systemic failures in our public health systems. Here are the most important takeaways from his closed-door testimony🧵👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✖️Dr. Fauci testified that the “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation — that was used to shut down small businesses and schools across America — “sort of just appeared."

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✖️Dr. Fauci “did not recall” COVID-19 information and conversations relevant to @COVIDSelect’s investigations more than 100 times.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✖️Dr. Fauci testified that he signed off on every foreign and domestic NIAID grant without personally reviewing the proposals. Any negligent spending of U.S. taxpayer dollars deserves immediate oversight.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✖️Dr. Fauci acknowledged that the lab-leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. This comes nearly four years after he “prompted” the publication of the now infamous “Proximal Origin” paper that attempted to "disprove" the lab-leak hypothesis.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✖️Dr. Fauci admitted that America’s vaccine mandates — which he promoted from his position of power at the White House — could increase vaccine hesitancy in the future.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✖️Dr. Fauci was unable to confirm if NIAID has ANY mechanisms to conduct oversight of the foreign laboratories they fund.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Wenstrup Releases Statement Following Day 1 of Dr. Fauci’s Testimony - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

Wenstrup Releases Statement Following Dr. Fauci’s Two-Day Testimony - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

As the face of America’s public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Fauci’s closed-door statements raise serious concerns that warrant public scrutiny. @COVIDSelect appreciates Dr. Fauci's willingness to appear voluntarily and looks forward to his honest testimony.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Read Chairman @RepBradWenstrup’s letter to Dr. Fauci memorializing the public hearing date here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024.04.24-SSCP-Letter-to-ASF.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - April 4, 2024 at 5:51 PM

Saved - April 7, 2024 at 12:03 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak will testify at a public hearing regarding COVID-19 origins and his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. There are concerns about dangerous gain-of-function research funded by taxpayer dollars. Evidence suggests that COVID-19 may have originated from a Wuhan lab. Dr. Daszak's closed-door interview with Congress raised questions about his honesty. Lying to Congress is a federal crime, and the public expects Dr. Daszak to be forthcoming during the public hearing. The truth about the origins of COVID-19 is important for the families who lost loved ones.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨BREAKING🚨 EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak will testify at a public hearing on May 1, 2024. Dr. Daszak must answer questions about COVID-19 origins, dangerous gain-of-function research, and his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Dr. Daszak and his colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology used taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research. Mounting evidence continues to show that COVID likely originated from a Wuhan lab. Ironically, @EcoHealthNYC's mission is to prevent pandemics.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

During his closed-door transcribed interview on November 14, 2023, Dr. Daszak appears to have lied to Congress. Dr. Daszak made numerous claims that were inconsistent with documents and evidence reviewed by @COVIDSelect, @GOPoversight, and @HouseCommerce.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Lying to Congress is a federal crime. Dr. Daszak was reminded of this before his interview began. Still, he proceeded to directly contradict previously uncovered evidence about his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology & his oversight of gain-of-function research.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

We urge Dr. Daszak to be more forthcoming and honest during his public hearing than he was during his private interview. The more than one million American families who lost loved ones during COVID-19 deserve the truth about how this deadly crisis began.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Read the full letter to EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024.04.04-SSCP-Oversight-EC-Letter-to-Daszak.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - January 10, 2024 at 11:41 AM

Saved - January 15, 2024 at 6:17 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Fauci's testimony revealed important takeaways. He admitted that the "6 feet apart" social distancing recommendation was not based on data. He acknowledged that the lab-leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. Dr. Fauci also admitted that vaccine mandates could increase hesitancy in the future, while advising universities to impose them. He played with the definition of a "lab-leak" to cover up inaccuracies in the "Proximal Origin" paper. He agreed with President Trump's travel restrictions and systemic failures in our public health system were highlighted.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨DR. FAUCI TESTIMONY TAKEAWAYS🚨 @COVIDSelect has completed a two-day, 14-hour transcribed interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci. Here are the most important highlights from DAY 2 of his testimony👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Fauci claimed that the “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation promoted by federal health officials was likely not based on any data. "It just sort of appeared."

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Fauci acknowledged that the lab-leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. This comes nearly four years after prompting the publication of the now infamous “Proximal Origin” paper that attempted to vilify and disprove the lab-leak hypothesis.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Fauci admitted that America’s vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic could increase vaccine hesitancy in the future.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Fauci advised American universities to impose vaccine mandates on their students.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Fauci played semantics with the definition of a “lab-leak” in an attempt to cover-up the inaccurate conclusions of “Proximal Origin.” It is impossible for him to defend "Proximal Origin" as definitive while simultaneously acknowledging that a lab-leak is possible.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Fauci agreed with President Trump’s order that restricted travel from China and supported his further restrictions on travel from EU countries and the United Kingdom.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview revealed systemic failures in our public health system and light on serious procedural concerns with our public health authority. @COVIDSelect looks forward to speaking with Dr. Fauci further during a public hearing this year.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Chairman @RepBradWenstrup's statement following Dr. Fauci's two-day testimony⬇️ https://t.co/VcSPsMv6fn

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - January 13, 2024 at 3:51 PM

Saved - January 13, 2024 at 7:29 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Francis Collins, former NIH Director, echoed Dr. Fauci's claims on social distancing, gain-of-function research, and the lab leak theory. He agreed that the "6 feet apart" recommendation lacked scientific basis and that the lab-leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. Dr. Collins also attempted to hide NIH's involvement in funding risky research in Wuhan, similar to Dr. Fauci. He criticized the Great Barrington Declaration and his attendance at a conference call raises concerns about the U.S. government's role in suppressing the lab-leak hypothesis.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨BREAKING🚨 @COVIDSelect questioned Dr. Fauci's former "boss" — Dr. Francis Collins — about his role as @NIH Director during COVID-19. His testimony echoed Dr. Fauci's claims about social distancing, gain-of-function research, and the lab leak theory. Important takeaways🧵👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins agreed with Dr. Fauci that the “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation promoted by federal health officials was likely not based on any science or data. Previously, Dr. Fauci claimed the unscientific guidance "sort of just appeared."

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins agreed with Dr. Fauci’s concession that the COVID-19 lab-leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins minced words over the definition of gain-of-function research in an effort to hide the @NIH's involvement in funding the risky research in Wuhan. This mimics Dr. Fauci's attempt to skirt accountability.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins doubled down on his previous statements attacking the Great Barrington Declaration. In a 2020 email to Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins stated that a “quick and devastating published takedown” of the declaration was necessary.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

✔️Dr. Collins acknowledged that Dr. Fauci invited him to attend the infamous February 1, 2020 conference call that prompted the “Proximal Origin” publication. This raises concerns about the U.S. government’s direct role in suppressing and vilifying the lab-leak hypothesis.

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - December 13, 2023 at 7:18 PM

Saved - December 14, 2023 at 3:01 AM

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

The World Health Organization bowed to political pressure from the CCP instead of prioritizing global health during COVID-19. ❌Ignored scientific evidence ❌Propped up CCP propaganda ❌Politicized COVID origins @RepBradWenstrup opens today's hearing on reforming the @WHO👇 https://t.co/C1EN0PoID5

Video Transcript AI Summary

The select subcommittee is examining the future of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States' relationship with it. The WHO, known for its role in eradicating smallpox and reducing polio cases, failed to serve all members equally during the COVID-19 pandemic. It prioritized politics over global public health, ignoring facts and echoing Chinese government statements. The WHO's lack of independent investigation allowed the pandemic to worsen. Reforms are needed to ensure transparency, verifiability, and accountability. The WHO should not be influenced by politics and must hold its members accountable. The United States should set the standard for best practices and ensure American interests are protected in any new international health regulations. The goal is to strengthen the WHO for the future.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Today, the select subcommittee is holding a hearing to examine the future of the World Health Organization and our relationship as the United States with the WHO, the World Health Organization is supposed to be the preeminent organization that governs just that, the world's health. Played a key role in eradicating smallpox and significantly reducing the cases of polio around the globe. Yet when the world was faced with the outbreak of COVID-nineteen, the pandemic, we saw that the WHO does not always serve all of its members equally. We saw it's not an organization that serves all of humankind, but instead perhaps an organization that became beholden to or entrapped in politics. When it was most essential that the WHO be able to step up and help everyone, it seems to have bowed to political affiliations over global public health. When the WHO should have been conducting independent investigations into the origins of COVID nineteen, and presenting the global community with verified information to help keep them safe, we instead saw that they ignored some facts and parroted back statements that came from the Chinese Communist Party. We saw the WHO deny that COVID nineteen was spread via human to human transmission based entirely on the word of the Chinese government. The WHO delayed naming COVID-nineteen a public health emergency of international concern, a World Health Organization procedure that, amongst other things, would have allowed for the procurement and distribution of scarce supplies, all because the Chinese Communist Party told them the spread was under control. The WHO delayed serious measures to counter the global spread of COVID-nineteen Yeen, because the CCP was only worried about their own bottom line. When the WHO produced a report evaluating the possible origins of COVID nineteen, it became unquestionably evident that the entire report was nothing or but Chinese propaganda. Even doctor Fauci was worried about the report stating there was a lot of restrictions on the ability of the people who went there to really take a look. I have some considerable concerns about that. The CCP was so entrenched in influencing the WHO's investigation into the origins of COVID that they even contacted me. With unanimous consent, I wish to submit for the record an email sent to me by the Chinese Embassy. The order. This email from the Chinese Embassy is another attempt to interfere with the investigations of COVID. The letter stated, we express our grave concern regarding the COVID-nineteen origins hearing. We firmly oppose it. This kind of communication and action hardly expresses a clear conscience. The WHO's lack of independent investigation potentially allowed the beginning of the pandemic to be worse and spread further than it could have been. All in all, we saw the WHO more influenced by politics than public health, not necessarily their fault. There's no denying it. The WHO stumbled out of the gate. The subcommittee is as much about looking back as it is looking forward in preparing for the future, we must be better prepared when the next pandemic surfaces, and the scientifically focused WHO is paramount to that. It's evident the WHO is in need of some reform. It. So why not take an opportunity to ask the very people who are in the trenches how we can help them? Why not ask direct sources what we can do right now to equip future generations. Should there be an independent body that is able to conduct oversight? How can the ideal methods of data sharing and development be implemented across the world. What we do know is that the WHO needs to be reestablished with raised expectations of transparency, verifiability, an accountability, accountability amongst its members as well. Running any public health organization in a political manner destroys the organization's credibility. The WHO needs to police its members and not cower behind bullies. The WHO should have been in a position to tell the world that China was lying if they were lying. The fact that it didn't do so until later is very telling. Honesty is always non negotiable, especially during a once in a generation public health emergency. The WHO is currently drafting a new pandemic accord and new international health regulations that will apply to all its members. These changes must ensure American interests are protected. They must not violate international sovereignty, and they must hold China and others accountable. Further, any accord or treaty must be presented to Congress for approval. Anything else is wholly insufficient, especially in the minds of the American people. Let's use this opportunity to ensure that the WHO can actually protect the world's global health and not just the political interests of a few of its members. The United States should be setting the gold standard in incentivizing best practices. And we should be doing everything we can to force the WHO to listen to American interests. Nothing is more important than global public health, improperly forming the WHO is the first step to that protection so that our officials and our providers can better care for our citizens and establish best practices, not only for here, but perhaps around the world. We're holding this hearing to look at the current circumstances surrounding the WHO and see how we can make it better and stronger for the future.

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - November 30, 2023 at 12:12 PM

Saved - December 12, 2023 at 1:21 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the renowned health expert, will testify before Congress for the first time on January 8 and 9, 2024. He has also agreed to appear at a public hearing next year. Despite his retirement, he remains accountable to the American people. Some of his pandemic-era failures include downplaying the lab leak theory and being aware of dangerous research in Wuhan without taking action. He also admitted to using vaccine mandates as a coercion tactic. His inconsistent guidance on masks further eroded trust. These upcoming testimonies aim to hold public health officials accountable. Stay tuned for more updates.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨BREAKING🚨 Dr. Anthony Fauci will appear before the 118th Congress for the FIRST TIME for a two-day transcribed interview on January 8, 2024 and January 9, 2024. He has also agreed to testify in front of @COVIDSelect at a public hearing next year.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Thankfully, Dr. Fauci’s retirement from public service does not shield him from Congressional oversight nor accountability to the American people. Let’s take a look back at a few of his most egregious pandemic-era failures🧵👇

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Dr. Fauci prompted the drafting of the now infamous “Proximal Origin” publication in an attempt to disprove the COVID-19 lab leak theory. Then, he cited "Proximal Origin" from the White House and slid the paper to members of the press. More on this: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.05-SSCP-Memo-Re.-New-Evidence.Proximal-Origin.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Dr. Fauci was aware of dangerous gain-of-function research occurring in Wuhan, China prior to the emergence of COVID-19. He did nothing to stop it or warn the American people. https://t.co/RBrVQjpxQn

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

In a recently surfaced interview, Dr. Fauci admits that COVID-19 vaccine mandates were used as a coercion tactic: “It’s been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bulls**t, and they get vaccinated.” https://t.co/iBzmsvdQ41

Video Transcript AI Summary

Once people feel legally empowered and protected, schools, universities, and colleges will require vaccinations for enrollment. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook will also mandate vaccinations for employment. It has been shown that when obstacles are placed in people's lives, they abandon their ideological beliefs and choose to get vaccinated.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you were gonna have schools, universities, and colleges. They're gonna say, you wanna come to this college, buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated. Lady, you're gonna get vaccinated. Yeah. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and and and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us to get vaccinated. And it's been proven that When you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Dr. Fauci's flip-flopping public guidance about masks harmed Americans' trust in their health authorities. In February 2020, Dr. Fauci said, "there is no reason to be walking around with a mask." As recently as September 2023, Dr. Fauci defended masking. https://t.co/cjhAs2PXvo

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

...and these are just a few examples of Dr. Fauci’s loose relationship with the truth. His upcoming testimonies will aid @COVIDSelect's ongoing effort to hold American public health officials accountable for pandemic-era failures. Stay tuned. More coming soon!

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - December 1, 2023 at 8:56 PM

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 11:18 AM

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨🚨🚨 Dr. Anthony Fauci admits to forcing vaccine mandates on Americans: "It's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bulls**t, and they get vaccinated." We agree @IngrahamAngle. Despicable! https://t.co/pVfyZxTl5F

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker expresses frustration with the mandates imposed by leftist leaders and Democrat mayors and governors, questioning who can be trusted and what information is true. They specifically mention Saint Fauci and a newly resurfaced interview that reveals his intentions behind the COVID mandates. Another speaker suggests that when people feel legally protected, schools and colleges will require vaccinations, as it has been shown that making it difficult for individuals leads to increased vaccination rates. The speaker concludes with a negative remark.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: But what we were actually hurt by was, you know, look, all the mandates that the leftist leaders and the Democrat mayors and governors put into place and kept in place. That's one of the big problems, though. You don't know really who to trust. You hear this information. You don't know what's fact and what's fiction. Because so many of these individuals have proven themselves not to have your best interests at heart, like Saint Fauci. Now this newly resurfaced interview reveals what he really wanted out of all those COVID mandates. Speaker 1: Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are going to have schools, universities, And colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college, buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated. It's been proven that when you make it Difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bull and they get vaccinated. Speaker 0: Despicable.

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - September 26, 2023 at 11:26 PM

Saved - September 27, 2023 at 12:04 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

New allegation: CIA secretly escorted Dr. Fauci to influence COVID19 origins investigation. Concerns arise as whistleblower claims CIA rewarded analysts to change conclusion. Does it matter if pandemic originated in lab or nature? Read Rep. Wenstrup's letter to HHS Inspector General Grimm.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨BREAKING🚨 New allegation: @CIA secretly escorted Dr. Anthony Fauci into Agency Headquarters to "influence" its COVID-19 origins investigation.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Dr. Fauci’s suspicious moments are especially concerning in light of recent whistleblower testimony alleging @CIA rewarded six analysts with significant financial incentives to change their COVID-19 origins conclusion from a lab-leak to zoonosis.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

What difference does it make to @CIA whether the pandemic originated at a Chinese lab or in nature?🤔 Now, same question for Dr. Fauci.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Read Chairman @RepBradWenstrup’s letter to @HHSgov Inspector General Christi Grimm here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023.09.26-SSCP-Letter-to-HHS-OIG-Re.-AF-Movements.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - September 12, 2023 at 2:25 PM

Saved - September 13, 2023 at 3:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A whistleblower claims that the CIA allegedly rewarded six analysts with financial incentives to alter their COVID-19 origins conclusion. The analysts reportedly changed it from a lab leak to zoonosis. COVIDSelect and HouseIntel are investigating the matter. Chairman Rep. Brad Wenstrup and Rep. Mike Turner have written letters to CIA Director Burns and former CIA COO Makridis, seeking clarification. [499 characters]

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨BREAKING🚨 New testimony from a highly credible whistleblower alleges @CIA rewarded six analysts with significant financial incentives to change their COVID-19 origins conclusion from a lab-leak to zoonosis.

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨@COVIDSelect and @HouseIntel are on the case! Read Chairman @RepBradWenstrup's and @RepMikeTurner's letters to CIA Director Burns and former CIA Chief Operating Officer Makridis👇 Director Burns: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023.09.12-SSCP-HPSCI-Letter-to-CIA-Re.-Origins-of-COVID.pdf Former COO Makridis: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023.09.12-SSCP-HPSCI-Letter-to-Makridis-Re.-COVID.pdf

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

@COVIDSelect — Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

Posted - March 28, 2023 at 4:21 PM

Saved - March 29, 2023 at 1:07 PM

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

.@RepJamesComer: “The mask guidance was not scientifically sound?” Dr. Tracy Hoeg: “Correct. It wasn't science based and the six feet of distancing was arbitrary.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker questions the effectiveness of universal masking and 6 feet of physical distancing in schools. They argue that there is no new high-quality evidence during the pandemic to support the use of masks as a mitigation strategy. Observational studies, including those published by the CDC, are flawed and do not provide evidence for masking children. The speaker also criticizes the arbitrary nature of the 6 feet distancing rule, stating that there is no correlation between distancing measures and case rates in schools. They believe that these non-evidence-based strategies have harmed children and that schools should have remained open without them.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: That document that I've referred to recommended schools require the universal masking with children and 6 feet of physical distancing, were those necessary to keep schools open? Speaker 1: So we we had evidence prior to the pandemic that masks We're, largely ineffective at preventing, community transmission, of influenza and other upper respiratory viruses. And we did not Obtain any new, high quality evidence during, the COVID nineteen pandemic that masks are effective mitigation strategy in schools or outside of schools. We have a number of confounded observational studies, many of which were actually published by the CDC, that have serious flaws in them that I think unfortunately led people to believe that masking children was going to be and actually necessary to keep children in schools. But the highest quality data that we have, for example, from, a Cochrane review of randomized studies has not Found evidence of masks. Speaker 0: So that wasn't scientifically said. Effective The mask guidance was Speaker 1: not science based. And the six feet of distancing has was arbitrary. You know, that was based on, basically just looking at how, on that COVID nineteen was predominantly aerosolized in airborne transmission. So we we ended up getting some pretty good observational data not Finding correlation between amount of distancing, 6 versus 3 feet, and, case count case rates in schools. So it wasn't necessary, and it wasn't evidence based. We should have, by default, been keeping our schools open, but instead, we were sort of requiring these non evidence based mitigation strategies, as a prerequisite for getting our children back in school that ended up being very, harmful prerequisite. So