reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @CY_Chauprade
@denisrancourt - Denis Rancourt
My talk, with slides, at ICS4, parliament building, Bucharest, Romania, is now also available at rumble and bitchute. ➡️ https://rumble.com/v3xza31-denis-rancourt-at-ics4-all-cause-mortality-woldwide-and-romania-18-nov-2023.html ➡️ https://www.bitchute.com/video/TGRNhBxmsXkM/
Denis Rancourt at ICS4 - All-cause mortality woldwide and Romania (18 NOV 2023)
Denis Rancourt's presentation for ICS4, in the parliament building, Bucharest, Romania, on 18 November 2023. Source: https://www.internationalcovidsummit.com/
rumble.com
Denis Rancourt at ICS4 - All-cause mortality woldwide and Romania (18 NOV 2023)
Denis Rancourt's presentation for ICS4, in the parliament building, Bucharest, Romania, on 18 November 2023.
Source: https://www.internationalcovidsummit.com/
bitchute.com
@CY_Chauprade - Chauprade Christophe
The Elephant in the Room: C-19 Vaccines & Unprecedented All-Cause Mortality :
The Elephant in the Room: C-19 Vaccines and Unprecedented All-Cause Mortality
Prof Denis Rancourt, PhD discusses his new 180-page paper on the Covid-19 vaccine and unprecedented all-cause mortality in the global south.
worldcouncilforhealth.org
reSee.it AI Summary
Professor Brendan Murphy, former Chief Medical Officer for the Australian Government, clarifies that the TGA did not endorse vaccine mandates. They only supported mandates in specific high-risk settings. The TGA authorized Moderna's vaccine for children with health conditions, although the study is ongoing. The TGA relies on sponsor data and does not require patient-level information. Independent scrutiny is now being called for. Mortality figures for cancer have increased since the introduction of vaccines, as they were not tested for carcinogenic properties. Pfizer's dossier justified its authorization in Australia.
@MRobertsQLD - Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺
Professor Brendan Murphy, former Chief Medical Officer for the Australian Government and now Health Secretary, rejected the suggestion that the TGA ever took a position on vaccine mandates. He said that the government only supported mandates in limited circumstances earlier in the COVID injection roll-out - health, disability and aged care settings, due to their high vulnerability. Murphy claims that everyone, including other departments and jurisdictions, took their own position. The TGA did not promote the COVID injections or mandates. Incredible! The TGA authorised Moderna's injection for young children with co-existing health conditions despite the fact the study is only being conducted in healthy children. That study is also not yet completed. ATAGI's guidance is that the 'vaccine' is recommended ONLY for high-risk children with a comorbidity. Under questioning, the TGA admits it does not require patient level data and relies on a dossier from the sponsor (the pharma company). The #ATAGI advice was that this shot be reserved for use in 'at-risk' children, i.e those with immuno-compromising pre-existing conditions. I asked the TGA about reporting performances in the DAEN database of adverse events including fatalities. I wanted to know whether adverse event notifications were higher in those parts of the country where reporting is required compared to those without mandatory reporting. Strict independence of scrutiny for these products is clearly needed and is now being called for by a highly regarded epidemiologist. #Mortality figures for cancer are higher since the injections were introduced. The COVID products were not tested for carcinogenic properties simply because those responsible have taken the position that the substances involved don't warrant such studies. The TGA did review #Pfizer product on paper only for genotoxic and carcinogenic potential. In its dossier, #Pfizer justified the absence of studies into cancer risk based on the exposure threshold concept. However, there is an absence of repeat dose toxicity data and the assessment of the stimulation of cytokine release. Pfizer's dossier, as sponsor of the product, adequately justified the authorisation of its use in Australia by the TGA and so we joined what former Minister for Health, Greg Hunt, called the largest human trial and the largest vaccination trial that the world has ever engaged in. @TGAgovau #Senate #COVID19 #VaccineInjuries
Video Transcript AI Summary
The TGA approved the Moderna COVID pediatric vaccine for high-risk children based on the results of the KidCOVE clinical trial. The trial evaluated the vaccine's effectiveness in healthy children aged 6 months to 12 years. The TGA relied on clinical data provided by the vaccine sponsor and did not require patient-level data. The TGA's approval was based on interim clinical data, as part of the provisional pathway. The TGA does not have exact numbers on the reports of deaths or adverse events waiting to be checked. There is no evidence of a vaccine-associated increase in cancer risk. The TGA does not support vaccine mandates, but some agencies and states have implemented them. The TGA rejects any suggestion of misfeasance and has not taken a position on vaccine mandates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, chair. Let's talk about approval of pediatric COVID vaccine. The TGA approved the Moderna COVID pediatric vaccine on the 19th July last year for children 6 months to 5 years. This was based according to your website on the results of the Kid COVE clinical trial run by Moderna in the U. S.
A. And Canada. The approval was for all children, but ATAGI's guidance is the vaccine is recommended only for high risk kids having one of a list of serious comorbidities. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: I believe so, Senator, I'd have to check the current target guidance. I can, vaccine.
Speaker 0: The KidCurve thank you. The KidCurve clinical trial is listed on clinicaltrials dot gov as, quote, a study to evaluate the effectiveness of Moderna's vaccine in Healthy Children Healthy Children aged 6 year 6 months to 12 years. Healthy Children on what basis did TGA authorise the use of a vaccine tested on healthy kids for use in Australia on high risk kids with serious comorbidity.
Speaker 1: Ms. Prime Minister Robertson, I think What we've learned throughout the pandemic is that the disease of COVID is most damaging to those with other comorbidities and particularly people who have immune systems that don't work well, and so our our recommendation or the recommendation of Otagi and the recommendation of the TGA would have been to be able to support young children with precisely those conditions, by demonstrating that the virus was safe and efficacious in a healthy population.
Speaker 0: But the the the study was to evaluate effectiveness of Moderna's vaccine in healthy children, yet you approved it for children with comorbidities. On no basis.
Speaker 1: Again, it's a sort of thing that can be extrapolated, and it was very important to be able to provide, a protective therapy for young, Australians who were at risk of serious illness from COVID nineteen.
Speaker 0: So you just extended the study into a completely different field without testing.
Speaker 2: Sir, you can't do the clinical trials in those those trials have to be done in healthy children. You wouldn't be able to do that first first in population trial in people with severe underlying diseases. You'd have to get healthy volunteers and that is a good way of showing that the But then the Ahtagi advice is then considers all the other risks of COVID as well so the safety can be shown in in healthy people, but then the Aetaghi advice is relevant to the risk of severe COVID.
Speaker 0: So there's no disconnect there. Your approval was in July 2021. That clinical trial finishes in November 2023. So it is not even finished yet. The TGA must have worked from interim documents.
Did the TGA evaluate the patient level data? Or did you just take Moderna's word for it like you took Pfizer's word for
Speaker 3: Senator Nick Henderson, acting for Assistant Secretary of Medicines Regulation Division. The Moderna vaccine was approved through the provisional pathway, which is a well established pathway. It was an established pathway before the pandemic, that allows for approval based on interim clinical data, and data would be supplied on a rolling basis, over a period of time.
Speaker 0: Did you evaluate the patient level data before you made approved it?
Speaker 3: Senator, I think we've we've answered questions that are in relation to patient level data. The TGA, we do not require patient level data. We do require clinical data that is sufficient evidence from the sponsor of the vaccines.
Speaker 0: So you relied on relying on the sponsor of the vaccines?
Speaker 3: Test? We relied on, a dossier provided by the sponsor with, a full with clinical data provided.
Speaker 0: So would this be misfeasance on the TGA?
Speaker 3: Sorry, Stena, I'm not sure
Speaker 0: let's move on. Quality of reports in the DANE. The Dane reports can come from medical practitioners and also the general public. How many of the reports of deaths from COVID vaccines recorded by Dane, recorded by Dane came from members of the public and amni from medical practitioners.
Speaker 3: I don't have those exact numbers on me, Senator, take it on notice.
Speaker 0: And why is the first question you ask when a person makes a report. Are you a medical practitioner or a member of the public?
Speaker 3: I guess it's, to allow us to have a I guess, as a richer data set as we can, Senator.
Speaker 0: Why is the first question that way, though?
Speaker 1: Sandra, it it allows the triaging of the subsequent questions
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: As you go through the form.
Speaker 0: Just checking these reports, my staff have checked the reports, suggests there is a waiting room at the Dane database holding reports that have been made but not yet checked and registered, which seems logical. How many reports of COVID vaccine harm are waiting to be checked and how many of those are reports of death or permanent injury, serious injury?
Speaker 3: Again, sir, I don't have those numbers on me, but I'll take that on notice.
Speaker 0: Thank you. With more reports to Dane made by states with mandatory adverse vaccine effect notifications, which I think is New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australia, which is only 62%, as against states without mandatory reporting of vaccine harm. Was there a higher proportion of, reports of adverse events from states with mandatory adverse vaccine effect reporting notifications.
Speaker 3: 1st again, Senator, I'll have to take that detailed question Thank you.
Speaker 0: There's now a call for a vaccine safety office from a epidemiologist, I won't I was going to go into that, but clearly he's calling for he's pretty highly regarded in my understanding. He's calling for independence in the scrutiny. When we have a provisionally approved medication, surely, that's all the more important to have a very strict reporting of adverse events.
Speaker 3: We've got a very comprehensive and rigorous, safety monitoring system at the TGA. We with a number of mechanisms to to look for safety signals, as well as, you know, talking to our international regulator colleagues, and sharing information in relation to safety issues with the vaccines.
Speaker 0: Have you done any testing on whether or not doctors and the public are what percentage of them are reporting at adverse events?
Speaker 3: No, we haven't No. Okay. That say but,
Speaker 0: I'm not sure Let's count on the carcinogenicity of the vaccine. The European Medicines Agency, EMA, a 140 page assessment report for the Pfizer vaccine. On page 55, it says, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided. Then it says the components of the vaccine are lipids and then RNA which are not expected to have genotoxic potential. The carcinogenicity part of that statement was catered straight over, and I want to ask you about that.
Did you receive any genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies in support of the Pfizer application?
Speaker 3: I do not believe we did, Senator.
Speaker 0: No. The words carcinogenicity and cancer do not appear in your 42 page assessment report. Did you review the did you review the Pfizer product from the perspective of cancer?
Speaker 3: I believe there was, a no need for that, Senator, but I'll take None,
Speaker 0: according to the data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics in their latest release of the provisional mortality statistics, which we know underrepresented deaths. This was from the head of the, of the ABS the other night, he told us by 15% because it does not include autopsy reported deaths, only doctor reported. The figure for provisional mortality from cancer was as follows: based on average for January, February over the last 4 years, 3,637. January February, cancer deaths in 2023 was 3,803, plus 15%. And for 2021, it was 3,816.
Both years are above trend. Remembering, trend includes autopsy deaths and the provisional mortality figures do not. Yet the provisional mortality figures for cancer are above the, the other the, past. So the problem is worse than these figures suggest. So let's review, we have injections that were approved without carcinogenicity testing, We had now have a spike in cancer.
Can you please show me where you have investigated this spike and ruled out it being from the COVID injections? Have you even considered that?
Speaker 2: There's no evidence in the sense that that increase in cancer risk is vaccine associated. As Professor Langan said there have been many billions of doses of these vaccines administered. If there were a significant association with cancer. I think the international the World International Data would have shown it. We the there's no evidence that there's an association.
Speaker 0: Liquid nanoparticles. The reference to liquid lipid nanoparticles, sorry, in earlier conversations around COVID vaccines suggested the nanoparticle stayed near the injection site and passed out of the body. Am I remembering them correctly?
Speaker 1: Senator, that's correct and we've dealt with this on a number of occasions on other questions on notice as well.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Documents released in the Pfizer Gate Court ordered document dump showed that Pfizer knew at the time of seeking approval for their product that the lipid nanoparticles not only collected at the injection site but significant concentrations were also recorded in the adrenal glands. From a table in the Pfizer test data accumulated in the ovaries, the liver, the kidneys, the brain, they go all over the body and and the adrenal glands. Did you know that did you know at the time of the Pfizer application that lipid nanoparticles collected across the body?
Speaker 1: Senator Roberts, what you're describing is a particular aspect of the preclinical studies by which an element of the lipid nanoparticles was labelled with a fluorescent label and so what's seen in those studies is the fluorescent label and not necessarily the lipid nanoparticles.
Speaker 0: Is it still your position then that this build up does not have an adverse health effect?
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 0: Why did former minister Greg Hunt say the world quote, the world is engaged in the largest clinical vaccination trial? Why did he say that as Health Minister?
Speaker 1: I can't speak for, Minister Hunt's comments, I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: We've dealt with other agencies and employers who relied upon you as a TGA. They cite your advice for the basis of their policies, their decisions. CASA Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Fair Work Commission, Fair Work Ombudsman, Department of Employment, Work and and Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, the Fair Work Commission Judiciary, the Home Affairs Department, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Department, the New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties, state and federal health ministers and, and chief medical officer and the chief health officer. All drove vaccine mandates. The National Cabinet cited you guys.
Millions of people have been gutted based on this horrendous vaccine injuries. Ball pointing their finger at you. Does your board do the members of the board of the TGA understand the concept of misfeasance in public office.
Speaker 2: There is no board of the TGA. The TGA is a department,
Speaker 0: do the heads of the TGA understand the concept of misfeasance?
Speaker 2: [SPEAKER PRIME SAENZ DE TEJADA:] Very much understand the concept of misfeasance, and we totally reject any suggestion that that has taken place the TGA I should point out the TGA has never taken a position on vaccine mandates the TGA's remit initiatives to assess the safety efficacy sorry
Speaker 0: do you support them or not
Speaker 2: I think that I think the commonwealth department has supported them in limited circumstances, particularly early on when transmission, production was was much more beneficial. We certainly supported them in aged care workers and aged care and disability workers. We the Commonwealth Department has not taken a strong position on community wide mandates but some of the states and territory
Speaker 0: Who advised from your senior leadership position, who advised the former Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, to buy the injections at 1,000,000,000 of dollars to then give them to the States, to indemnify the States, to also then, provide the the health monitoring data so that vaccine mandates could be introduced. Who who who then the the state premiers then said that they mandated vaccines on the basis of the National Cabinet which the chief medical officer is associated with, I understand. And then we saw the former prime minister mandate vaccines in defence, the Australian electoral commission, aged care and then we see the former Prime Minister said repeatedly, daily for 2 weeks, we have no injection, no vaccine mandates in this country. It was a blatant lie. Did you do anything to stop him lying?
Speaker 2: Prime Minister, I can't comment on what the former Prime Minister I know supported vaccine mandates in aged care and disability that was very much a national cabinet position because of the high vulnerability of the residents and the workforce in those settings, I don't believe national cabinet took a community wide mandate approach but various agencies, state and territory, commonwealth and private sector agencies made their own decisions about that but I don't think it's fair to say that the TGA has been promoting vaccine mandate it's not their remit and they've never done anything to stop it.
@CY_Chauprade - Chauprade Christophe
The Elephant in the Room: C-19 Vaccines & Unprecedented All-Cause Mortality :
The Elephant in the Room: C-19 Vaccines and Unprecedented All-Cause Mortality
Prof Denis Rancourt, PhD discusses his new 180-page paper on the Covid-19 vaccine and unprecedented all-cause mortality in the global south.
worldcouncilforhealth.org