reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @CarineKnapen

Saved - January 16, 2026 at 5:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ik beschrijf een aanstaande ZDF-documentaire over Dutroux, die nooit werd uitgezonden in Duitsland of België. Waarom werd die uitzending tegengehouden? Ik geloof dat Dutroux en Nihoul slechts pionnen zijn in een grootschalig kinderhandelnetwerk, dat nooit doorgraven werd. Carine Hutsebaut heeft 30 jaar aan het dossier gewerkt, meldt bedreigingen en onderduiken, en bewaart bewijzen op geheime plaatsen. Iedereen zwijgt. Hieronder de documentaire; oordeel zelf.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

HET SPOOR VAN DE KINDERVERKRACHTERS - DUTROUX EN DE DODE GETUIGEN Op 28 november 2001 was er op de Duitse tv-zender ZDF, een documentaire voorzien over de affaire Dutroux. Straffe onderzoeksjournastiek die het een en ander bloot legde. Dit programma werd ook aangekondigd in Belgische dag-en weekbladen. De documentaire werd niet uitgezonden. Niet in Duitsland en ook niet in België. Tot op de dag van vandaag niet. Waarom niet ? Wie heeft de uitzendingen tegen gehouden? En waarom ? Het was voor iedereen die van ver of van dichtbij betrokken was bij de zaak ab initio duidelijk dat Dutroux en Nihoul slechts pionnen waren in een groot netwerk van kinderhandel. Waarom is dat netwerk nooit bloot gelegd ? Is er ooit grondig naar gezocht ? Carine Hutsebaut heeft zich 30 jaar lang in het dossier verdiept en onderzoek verricht. Zij verleende eertijds bijstand aan de ouders van Julie en Melissa en is van dichtbij betrokken geweest bij het onderzoek. Ik heb veel gesprekken gehad met Carine. Wat zij met mij gedeeld heeft tart alle verbeelding. Zij beschikt over een grote hoeveelheid bewijzen die zij, voor haar eigen veiligheid, opgeslagen heeft op verschillende geheime plaatsen. Carine heeft veel doodsbedreigingen gekregen ( waarom ? ) en leeft ondergedoken, ver weg van alle schijnwerpers. Iedereen die weet, zwijgt, uit angst of omdat hij/of zij gechanteerd of bedreigd wordt. Er wordt geen enkele inspanning onbenut gelaten om het deksel op de pot te houden. Dit geeft een idee van de magnitude en het belang van het hele gebeuren. Kinderhandel, kinderorgaanhandel, kinderprostitutie, kinderporno ... is een miljardenbusiness en bestaat al zeer, zeer lang. Zolang de bevolking de ogen blijft dicht knijpen, het niet wil weten en het beschouwt als een ver-van-mijn-bed-show, " niet mijn probleem ", zal dit kwaad nooit uit de wereld geholpen worden. Hieronder vindt u de documentaire. Oordeel zelf.

Video Transcript AI Summary
On 7 April 1998, in Liège, Belgium, a woman's body was recovered from a river during the cleaning of a waterworks; autopsy revealed she had been beaten and strangled. The victim was Anna Conjevoda. In the Du Tru case, at least 27 witnesses died, several under suspicious circumstances. Questions surrounded whether Anna Conjevoda had been killed for knowing too much. In Brussels, inmate Christian Kunraths was interrogated about his links to Du Tru and his accomplices, but he escaped during a court session and was found murdered a month later in a Brussels suburb. Brigitte Genard, a dentist who was allied with one of the accused, Michelle Niul, was considered an important witness; a year after the affair began she died, officially listed as suicide. Hubert Massa, the senior public prosecutor, was found shot dead in his office at the peak of his career, with no note left for his wife or children. Bernard Rutemant, a filmmaker who dealt with porn tapes, was suspected of abducting a girl; a house search uncovered children’s belongings, suggesting involvement in a child sex network. After extensive questioning, he called police to confess by phone, but his car crashed into a wall en route to the appointment, killing him. Martue Putrux, a child molester, had already died in August 1996 after a protracted interrogation of his associates, including Michel Le Lievre and Michel Nioul, who presented themselves before the judge as the leaders of the Brussels gang. Du Tru finally led investigators to a basement vault behind a shelf: a two-square-meter cell where he allegedly imprisoned his victims. In the ensuing years, girls Letizia (14) and Sabine (12) were found alive after being missing for eight days and 80 days, respectively; Sabine had spent 80 days in a cellar. Authorities suspected a wider trafficking ring. Subsequently, the bodies of two more missing girls, Julie and Melissa (ages 8 and 9), were discovered after 14 months of searching, and they had perished from starvation in the dungeon. Belgium mourned with the families. Parents demanded a full accounting, and public sentiment shifted against the justice system, prompting large demonstrations—the White March—in Bossière and later in Arlon. The case proceeded to trial years later, with Du Tru and his co-accused entering the courthouse under heavy media presence. The jury faced persistent questions: Was Du Tru a perverse lone actor or part of a larger child-pornography and trafficking network? What role did Michel Nioul play, and were powerful figures protecting the operation? Witnesses and variables proliferated, including Regina Luff (Zeugin x1), who described a ring of powerful men who raping, torturing, and sometimes killing young girls at sex parties. The judiciary ultimately did not prosecute her for lack of conclusive evidence, declaring her unfit to stand trial. Other witnesses died mysteriously or under questionable circumstances, including a 86-year-old woman who could not be questioned due to dementia, and a social worker, Gina Pardans, who had received death threats and was found dead in a suspected murder. In the end, four suspects—Michel Nioul, his associate Michel Le Lievre, the ex-wife Michel Martin, and Marc Du Tru—stood before a jury in Arlon. After three months of trial, the jurors were left with few answers about who abducted Julie and Melissa, what happened to Anne and Evje, or the fates of Sabine and Letizia. The four individuals knew what transpired, but a definitive public accounting remained elusive. A parent of Julie and Melissa and others expressed that, even after the verdict, the truth might never be fully known.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Die Mars bei Lüttich. Hier wird am siebten April 98 beim Säubern des Wasserwerks eine Frauenleiche aus dem Fluss gezogen. Die Autopsie zeigt, sie wurde geschlagen und gewürgt. Es ist die Zeugin Anna Conjevoda. Mindestens 27 Zeugen im Fall Du Tru starben, davon mehrere auf suspekte Weise. Wurde auch Anna Conjevoda umgebracht, weil sie zu viel wusste? Der Häftling Christian Kunraths soll im Brüsseler Gefängnis über seine Beziehung zu Dutru und dessen Komplizen verhört werden. Am Tag davor gelingt ihm während 1 Gerichtstermins die Flucht. Einen Monat später wird er in einem Brüsseler Vorstadtviertel ermordet aufgefunden. Die Zahnärztin Brigitte Genard war befreundet mit Du Truus Mitangeklagtem, dem Brüsseler Geschäftsmann Michelle Niul. Sie gilt als wichtige Zeugin. Ein Jahr nach dem Beginn der Affäre ist sie tot. Selbstmord, heißt es. Hubert Massa ist Oberstaatsanwalt und auf dem Höhepunkt seiner Karriere. Er arbeitet erst seit Kurzem am Fall Dutru, da findet man ihn erschossen in seinem Büro. Mysteriös die Umstände. Er hat keinen Brief für seine Frau und seine Kinder hinterlassen, trotzdem entscheidet die Selbstmord. Bernard Rutemant ist Filmemacher und handelt mit Pornokassetten. Er wird der Entführung 1 Mädchens verdächtigt, es soll eine Verbindung zum Fall Du True geben. Außerdem findet man bei 1 Hausdurchsuchung Kindersachen und Spielzeug. Nachdem er schon mehrfach ergebnislos verhört wurde, meldet er sich 1 Tages telefonisch bei der Polizei. Er möchte auspacken. Auf dem Weg zu diesem Termin rast er mit seinem Auto gegen eine Hauswand. Tot. Rückblick, der Kinderschänder Martue Putrux. Als er im August neunzehnhundertsechsundneunzig vom Haftgericht ins Gefängnis geführt wird, schreien Schaulustige ihren Hass heraus. Auch sein Helfer Michel Le Lievre wird verhaftet und seine Frau Michel Martin. Gelassen lässt sich der als Chef der Bande verdächtige der Brüsseler Geschäftsmann Michel Nioli dem Haftrichter vorführen. Erst nach zweitägigen Verhören war Du Tru bereit, die Ermittler zu einem Kellerverlies zu führen. Hinter einem Regal verbirgt sich der 2 Quadratmeter große Raum, in den er seine Opfer eingesperrt hatte. Bilder aus den Gerichtsakten. Die Mädchen Letizia, 14 Jahre alt und seit 8 Tagen verschwunden, und Sabine, 12 Jahre alt, werden lebend wiedergefunden. Sabine hat 80 Tage im Keller verbracht. Man befürchtet, dass auch andere verschwundene Mädchen Opfer des Kinderschänders wurden. In den folgenden Tagen werden alle Häuser von Marc Du Trux durchsucht. Schon werden erste Vermutungen laut, dass er kein perverser Einzeltäter sein solle, sondern einem Kinderhändlerring angehöre. Schließlich findet man die Leichen von 2 vermissten Kindern, Julie und Melissa, 8 und 9 Jahre alt. 14 Monate hat man nach ihnen gesucht. Auch sie waren in dem Verlies eingesperrt und sind am Ende grausam verhungert. Belgien trauert mit den Familien. Wie konnte es passieren, dass die Mädchen nicht rechtzeitig befreit wurden? Trauer und Fassungslosigkeit stehen den Eltern ins Gesicht geschrieben. Das Haus 1 ermordeten Duutre Komplizen wird ebenfalls auf den Kopf gestellt. Dann die Nachricht, die Leichen von 2 weiteren vermissten Mädchen sind gefunden, Evje und Anne. Wir brauchen nicht mehr zu suchen, sagt Anns verzweifelter Vater. Das schwere Schicksal führt die Eltern der Opfer zusammen. Sie fordern die schonungslose Aufklärung der Verbrechen. Der Volkszaun kehrt sich gegen Ermittlungspannen und Vertuschungsmanöver der belgischen Justiz. Über 300000 Menschen ziehen beim weißen Marsch durch Bosse. Siebeneinhalb Jahre später, Anfang diesen Jahres im südbelgischen Städtchen Arlo. In einem gepanzerten Fahrzeug werden Du True und seine Mitangeklagten zum Prozessbeginn ins Gerichtsgebäude gefahren. Die versammelte Presse belagert den Justizpalast, in dem das Geschworenengericht eine Antwort finden soll auf die Fragen nie jeden beschäftigen. War Wutru ein perverser Einzeltäter oder entführte er die Mädchen für einen Kinderschänderin? Wurde er von wichtigen und einflussreichen Personen gedeckt Und welche Rolle spielte Michel Niaul? Speaker 1: Wenn er allein war, hätten die Ermittlungen doch schneller zum Ergebnis führen müssen. Aber auf die wesentlichsten Fragen hat man noch immer keine Antwort. Unverständlich für mich, wenn nicht noch mehr dahintersteckt. Wir Speaker 0: treffen uns mit jemandem aus der Unterwelt von Charles Leeroy. Er lernte Du True im Gefängnis kennen. Speaker 2: Es ist nie die Rede davon gewesen, Lösegeld von den Eltern der Mädchen zu verlangen. Die Mädchen waren Handelsware, ganz klar. Da muss man nicht lange grübeln. Es gibt einen ganz klaren Grund dafür. Die Mädchen sind verschwunden. Die Eltern haben gleich gesagt, wenn es ein Vergewaltiger gewesen wäre, hätte man sie wiedergefunden. Der Lebensstil von Dudeaux, das Geld und die Häuser, die er besaß. Er hat sich das alles nicht verdient, indem er selber die Mädchen vergewaltigte. Das bringt kein Geld. Bei ihm muss man sich dieser eine Frage stellen, woher hatte er das Geld? Von Speaker 0: diesen 5 Häusern weiß man, dass sie dem Sozialhilfeempfänger Marc Du Truu gehören. Außerdem hatte er noch einige Garagen und Lagerräume gemietet. Ermittlungen haben ergeben, dass er regelmäßig Aktien kaufte und über mehrere Bankkonten verfügte. Nach der Entführung von Ann und Evje wie auch nach der Entführung von Sabine waren darauf große Geldsummen in bar eingezahlt worden. Woher das Geld kam, weiß man bis heute nicht. In einem von Du Truus Häusern fanden die Ermittler nicht nur größere Mengen Baumaterial, man entdeckte einen unterirdischen Gang, der zu mehreren halb fertigen Kellerverließen führte. Trotzdem hielt der Untersuchungsrichter an seiner These fest, Du True habe die Mädchen nur für den eigenen Bedarf entführt. Untersuchungen in Richtung 1 Netzwerkes wurden von ihm gar nicht erst begonnen. Speaker 2: Und Speaker 3: ganz zufällig sterben Leute auf unerklärliche Weise. Sie haben zum Beispiel einen Autounfall, als sie als Zeuge aussagen wollten oder man findet sie verbrannt zu Hause. Anscheinend beunruhigt das unsere Justiz nicht. Speaker 0: Zum Beispiel. Auf diesem Gelände fand man die Leichen von Ann und Efien. Hier wohnte der Dutru Komplize Bernard Weinstein. Dutru soll seinem früheren Helfer zunächst das Betäubungsmittel Rohhypnol gegeben und ihn dann lebendig begraben haben. Man vermutet, dass Weinstein aussteigen wollte. Wurde er deshalb ermordet? Wollte Dutrux verhindern, dass sein Helfer zum Gefährlichen zeugen würde? Weinstein nahm die Antwort mit in dieses fast anonyme Grab. Auf einem anderen Friedhof in Charles LeRoy finden wir das Grab 1 weiteren Zeugen. Hier liegt Jose Step. Jose Step war ein Mann aus einfachen Verhältnissen, aber Zeit seines Lebens in ganz Charleaurois bekannt. In seinem Viertel galt er als wichtige Vertrauensperson für die Bewohner. Wenn in Charles Leeroy etwas passierte, Stepp wusste es immer. Einige Wochen nach der Verhaftung von Dutrux meldet er sich telefonisch bei einem befreundeten Journalisten und bei der Gendarmerie, er habe wichtige Informationen über Dutrux. Was er wusste, wird man nicht mehr erfahren. 2 Tage vor seinem Termin bei der Polizei fällt er plötzlich Speaker 4: Der Herr hier ist noch dorthin gerannt. Wir haben einen Krankenwagen gerufen, aber es war schon zu spät. Er konnte nicht mehr atmen. Er ist in unseren Armen gestorben. Speaker 2: Neben ihm lag sein Beatmungsgerät. Er hatte öfters Atemprobleme, eine Form von Asthma. Das Gerät habe ich selbst gesehen, als ich hierherkam. Sein Sohn hat es mir gezeigt. Innen drin befand sich eine Packung Rohhypnol. Speaker 0: Rohhypnol, von dem Kasper Nabe uns erzählt, ist ein Betäubungsmittel. Es wird niemals in einem Beatmungsgerät benutzt. Aber Dutru bediente sich mit Vorliebe dieses Mittels, seine Opfer zu betäuben. Für den zuständigen Staatsanwalt ist Stepps Tod unverdächtig. Eine Autopsie wird nie vorgenommen. Gy Göbels war Gendarm in Gras Hologne, dem Ort, an dem Julie und Melissa verschwanden. Er arbeitete von Anfang an an dem Fall. Seine Kollegen finden ihn 1 Tages tot in seiner Wohnung, mit der Dienstwaffe erschossen. Offiziell beging Giegöbels Selbstmord, doch auch hier gibt es Zweifel. Familienangehörige sagen, er habe keine größeren Probleme gehabt, nichts, was eine solche Tat rechtfertigen könnte. Das Dorf Cumier bei Charles Le Roi. Polizisten suchen hier nach Spuren im Zusammenhang mit dem Tod von Bruno Tagliaferro, ein Schrotthändler und Bekannter von Dutreau. Seine Frau Fabieenne behauptet, er wurde umgebracht. Speaker 2: Seit Speaker 1: seinem Tod kämpfe ich verzweifelt darum, dass die Wahrheit ans Licht kommt. Bis zum Schluss. Speaker 0: Was hat er ihnen vor seinem Tod gesagt? Speaker 1: Dass alles vorbei sei, dass er zu viel wüsste und dass er bald sterben würde. Das Speaker 0: Ergebnis 1 nachträglichen Autopsie gibt Fabienne recht. Ihr Mann Bruno Tagliaferro wurde vergiftet. Speaker 3: Er war im Weg. Bruno hat Mist gebaut, ich weiß nicht was. Man erpresste ihn mit seinen Kindern und hat ihn krumme Sachen erledigen lassen. Speaker 4: Fabienne sagte mir, dass Bruno ein Auto zerlegt hatte, das bei 1 Entführung von 2 kleinen Mädchen benutzt worden war. Nichts davon würde man mir wiederfinden. Viel später erst habe ich es geschnallt. Es ging Julie und Melissa. Speaker 2: Wollte Thalia Ferro umbringen lassen, aber weshalb, sagt er mir nicht? Ihn umbringen? Ja, ihn und seine Frau. Er hat dafür 50000 belgische Francs und die Waffe geboten. Speaker 0: Wann haben Sie das Speaker 2: gehört? Ich saß bei DuTrux im Auto. Da hat er's mir gesagt. Als Speaker 0: auch Fabiene Joopard bedroht wird, bittet sie vergeblich Polizeischutz. Sie glaubt, wichtige Unterlagen ihres Mannes entdeckt zu haben. Kurz danach findet ihr Sohn sie tot im Schlafzimmer, halb verbrannt neben ihrem Bett. Die Matratze wurde mit Methanol überschüttet. Die Justiz geht von Selbstmord oder Unfall aus. Speaker 4: Wissen Sie, jemand, der sich umbringen will, lässt nicht die Waschmaschine laufen, setzt nicht Kartoffeln mit Salz zum Kochen auf. Speaker 0: Auch ein Unfall ist unwahrscheinlich. Auf den Polizeifotos vom Tatort, die wir einsehen konnten, stand die leere Methanolflasche zugeschraubt auf dem Nachttisch. Sie Speaker 4: war keine Spinnerin. Sie wusste ganz genau, was sie tat. Sie war auch nicht verrückt. Sie wusste nur nicht mehr, wem sie noch vertrauen konnte. Speaker 0: Wir besuchen Zeugin X1. Als die Du True Affäre beginnt, meldet sich Regina Luff, verheiratet 4 Kinder, 1 Hundepension als anonyme Zeugin beim Untersuchungsrichter und bekommt das Aktenzeichen x 1. Während der tagelangen Verhöre erzählt sie von grauenvollen Erlebnissen über reiche und mächtige Männer, die bei Sexfeten junge Mädchen vergewaltigen, foltern und manchmal töten. Die Ermittler überprüfen einige ihre Aussagen und meinen, es gäbe genügend Grund, sie ernst zu nehmen. Ihre Aussage, Dutrux sei Zulieferer und Michel Nihoule der Organisator 1 Kinderpornorings gewesen. Speaker 1: Ich kannte Nihool Ende der Siebziger-, Anfang der Achtzigerjahre. Er hat sich kaum verändert. Sein Äußeres ist gleich geblieben. Ich erkannte ihn dann auch sofort als einen der Zuhälter, die Kinder missbrauchten und für Sexpartys ausbildeten. Der Speaker 0: zwielichtige, aber einflussreiche Geschäftsmann Michel Niaules ist der einzige Angeklagte im Du tru Prozess, der bis zum Urteil frei herumlaufen darf. Speaker 3: Ich bin dieser Frau nie begegnet. Ich sage Frau, weil sie mittlerweile verheiratet sein soll und Kinder hat. Außerdem spricht sie kein Wort Französisch und ich kein Wort Niederländisch. Sie werden vielleicht sagen, dass man die Sprache nicht sprechen muss, jemanden zu vergewaltigen. Aber wenn man an Gruppensex teilnimmt, spricht man doch die Sprache derer, die das organisieren. Speaker 1: Es gibt eine Sache, die er nicht mehr herumkommt. Er hat Gruppensex gehabt, ganz klar. Ich sage, dass er auch mit Minderjährigen Gruppensex hatte. Es wäre natürlich besonders dumm von ihm, wenn er das jetzt zugeben würde. Speaker 3: Diese Frau gehört in eine psychiatrische Einrichtung. Speaker 4: Sie wurde auf Bitte der Justiz von einem Team der Universität Löwen untersucht, unter Vorsitz des Professors Igot, der einen guten Ruf auf diesem Gebiet hat. Diese Experten haben bestätigt, dass Regina Luff ohne jeden Zweifel in ihrer Kindheit massivem sexuellen Missbrauch ausgesetzt war. Professor Égotte präzisiert, dass es sich lohnt, zu untersuchen, was sie erzählt. Davon sind sie alle überzeugt. Und wenn das, was sie sagt, auch nicht als juristischer Beweis genutzt werden kann, sollte trotzdem aufgrund ihrer Aussagen ermittelt werden. Dennoch Speaker 0: beschließt die belgische Justiz, die Aussagen von Regina Luff, Zeugin x 1, nicht weiter zu untersuchen. Sie wird für unzurechnungsfähig erklärt. Die Akte geschlossen. Eine weitere Zeugin stirbt, als sie nachts auf dem Weg nach Hause mit 80 Stundenkilometern gegen die Brückenrampe kracht. Ein Unfall, sagt der Gerichtsexpert. Gina Pardans ist Sozialarbeiterin und betreut Opfer 1 Kinderpornorings. Einige Tage vor dem Unfall schreibt sie einen Brief. Sie habe im Zusammenhang mit ihrer Arbeit Todesdrohungen bekommen. Sie fürchte ihr Leben. Der Polizei meldet sie, man habe ihr mit einem Autounfall gedroht. Speaker 3: In dieser Zeit wird Gina regelmäßig mit dem Tod bedroht. Sie wird beobachtet und verfolgt. Wir stellten auch merkwürdige Probleme an ihrem Telefon fest. Im Zug wurde sie von einem Mann angesprochen, der ihr sagte, dass sie besser mit ihrer Arbeit aufhören sollte, sonst würde sie nicht mehr lange leben. Speaker 1: Sie wurde zu oft bedroht, als dass so ein blöder Autounfall noch einigermaßen glaubwürdig wäre. Für mich ist das ausgeschlossen. Ich glaube, dass böse Absicht im Spiel war. Speaker 0: Dass sie umgebracht wurde? Speaker 1: Ja. Ich glaube, sie wurde ermordet. Speaker 0: Vor ihrem Tod erzählte sie Freunden von einem Videoband, auf dem ein Mädchen bei 1 Sexväter umgebracht wird. Sie glaubte, einen der Täter erkannt zu haben. Es sah ein Bekannter von Niúl. Zurück nach Charles Le Roi, das Revier von Marc Duutrux. Am Stadtrand wohnt Frau Delon, auch ihr Sohn Jean Paul Tamignon wurde umgebracht. Speaker 4: Das ist nicht sein Zimmer, als er erwachsen war. Das ist sein Teenagerzimmer aus der Zeit bevor all das passierte, nachdem er seinen Wehrdienst geleistet hatte. Speaker 0: Jean Paul Tamignot verschwindet, kurz nachdem er einem Freund erzählt hat, dass er wichtige Informationen erhalten habe. Speaker 4: Dieser Freund, der ihn am Tag vor seinem Verschwinden noch gesehen hat, ist einige Wochen später zu mir gekommen. Er sagte, für mich ist er nicht tot, er versteckt sich. Er hat Angst für irgendetwas. Die Polizei macht ihm Schwierigkeiten. Er hat Angst. Ich will mich kurz fassen. Wenn es keinen privaten Grund gab, dann wurde mein Sohn von denen umgebracht, die Du Trux schützen wollten. Speaker 0: In diesem Hinterhof mietete Jean Tamignot eine Garage. Den Hangar gegenüber nutzte Du True für seine illegalen Geschäfte. Fast ein Jahr nach dem Verschwinden fischt ein Angler einen Fuß aus dem Kanal. Es ist der Fuß von Jean Paul Tamignot. Seine Leiche hat man nie gefunden. Der achtundzwanzigjährige France War Reißkens soll als Zeuge aussagen. Die Gendarmerie will von ihm hören, was er über das verschwundene Mädchen Melissa weiß. Das Verhör findet nie statt. Bahnarbeiter finden seine Leiche neben den Gleisen. Er wurde von einem Zug überfahren. Speaker 2: 1 Tages hat er mich auf der Straße angesprochen. Er wollte mit mir reden. Es sei etwas Schlimmes passiert. Ich sagte, schlimm oder nicht schlimm, Du kannst es mir sagen. Komm zu mir, setz dich und ich werde dir zuhören. Ich will versuchen, mich genau zu erinnern. Er sagte, ich möchte mit dir über das Mädchen Melissa sprechen. Speaker 0: Francois Raiskens Vater hatte eine eher problematische Beziehung zu seinem Sohn, der zur Drogenszene gehörte und den kriminellen Kreisen zu Hause war. Wie konnte Francois Informationen über Melissa haben, noch bevor die Öffentlichkeit von der Affäre Du Tru wusste? Speaker 2: Ich habe nachher zu meinen Freunden gesagt, es sind nicht Leute wie wir aus unserem Milieu, aus unseren Kreisen, die in einem solchen Fall an Informationen herankommen. Das konnte nur eine wie Francois sein. Speaker 1: An dem Tag, als die Anhörung von Francois Raiskens angesetzt war, kamen Gendarmen zu uns ins Haus und sagten, dass sie nicht stattfinden konnte, dass Francois Raiskens am Morgen unter einen Zug geraten war. Speaker 3: War's wirklich ein Unfall? Ich weiß nicht. Speaker 0: Und so wird man wohl niemals erfahren, was Francois Reißgens genau gesehen hatte. 3 Monate nach der Verhaftung von Du Trux wird der Nachtklub und Bordellbesitzer Michel Pirot nachts kaltblütig auf einem Parkplatz erschossen. Michelle Pirot kennt sich bestens aus in der Unterwelt und dem Prostitutionsmilieu von Charles Le Roi. Kurz vor seinem Tod nimmt er Kontakt auf zu den Familien der ermordeten Mädchen Julie und Melissa. Er bittet sie ein Treffen. Speaker 4: Michel wollte einen Abend organisieren und dabei einiges enthüllen. Worum es genau ging, kann ich nicht sagen. Wir wissen es nicht, weil er vorher umgebracht wurde. Speaker 0: Wir fahren nach Monts im Süden Belgiens, uns mit Guiponcelet zu treffen. Sein Sohn Simon war Polizist und ermittelte im Autoschiebermilieu rund Du Trux. Er wurde während des Nachtdienstes in seinem Büro erschossen. Der Mord ist bis heute ungeklärt. Vater Poncelet ist ein ehemaliger Oberstaatsanwalt. Seit dem Tod seines Sohnes ist die Aufklärung der Du True Affäre sein Lebensziel. Und er macht sich Sorgen. Speaker 3: Nicht nur sind viele Zeugen unter fragwürdigen Umständen gestorben, manche Zeugen sind alt geworden, wie ich. Und das Gedächtnis lässt nach. Was zunächst ganz klar war, 15 Tage oder 3 Monate nach dem Geschehen, ist es 8 Jahre später nicht mehr. Man fängt an zu zweifeln. Das ist der Nachteil, wenn ein Prozess erst so spät nach dem Geschehen stattfindet. Speaker 2: Wie Speaker 0: die Zeit gegen die Wahrheitsfindung arbeitet, zeigt sich auch am Beispiel 1 anderen wichtigen Zeugin. Frau Henrod ist möglicherweise die einzige Person, die gesehen hat, wie Julie und Melissa hier entführt worden. Aus einem Interview von vor 6 Jahren. Speaker 4: Es war ein dunkles Auto mit 4 Türen. Und dann? Nichts, das Auto war dort und die Mädchen sind eingestiegen. Speaker 0: Was hat er gemacht? Speaker 4: Nichts. Er hat ganz einfach die Tür aufgemacht und die Mädchen sind hinten eingestiegen und er ist losgefahren. Obwohl Speaker 0: sie noch immer auf der Zeugenliste im Du trux Prozess steht, konnte Frau Henrote nicht mehr vor Gericht befragt werden. Die Sechsundachtzigjährige lebt heute in einem Pflegeheim. Sie leidet unter Altersdemenz. Eine ganze Reihe weiterer Zeugen konnte nicht aussagen, weil sie nicht mehr leben. Nadeige Renard, Alexandre Goslin, Michel Binon, Christoph Gregoir, Joseph Tussin, Gregorie Antipin, Henriette Pürs, Klaus Bar, Jean Jacques Feron, Pierre Paul de Railleque, Sandra Clais, Virginie Pinon, Gerard Vanaise, Philipp de Loes. Mussten sie sterben, weil sie zu viel wussten? Welche Informationen nahmen sie mit ins Grab? Was wussten sie über diesen Mann, Marc Du Trux, der heute vor Gericht steht? Noch beraten die Geschworenen über Schuld oder Freispruch. In den 3 Prozessmonaten haben sie jedoch kaum Antworten bekommen auf die wesentlichsten Fragen. Wer hat Julie und Melissa entführt und was ist mit ihnen passiert? Wie sind Anne und Evje umgekommen? Warum wurden Sabine und Letizia entführt? In Arlan warten 4 Angeklagte auf das Urteil. Der Geschäftsmann Michelle Niaul, der Komplize Michelle Le Lievre, die Ex Frau Michelle Martin und natürlich Marc Dutrux selbst. Nur diese 4 wissen, was wirklich geschehen ist. Speaker 3: Ich habe keine Worte für meine Gefühle. Es war immerhin meine Tochter, die mit ihrem Leben bezahlen musste. Ein kleines Mädchen von 8 Jahren. Speaker 1: In unserem Fall werden wir uns an den Gedanken gewöhnen müssen, dass man die Wahrheit über unsere Töchter wohl niemals erfahren wird. Die Justiz wird uns die Antwort nicht liefern und wir werden uns damit abfinden müssen.
Saved - January 18, 2024 at 6:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The European Union is developing a fast vaccine, known as "Vaccelerate," in preparation for future pandemics, including the mysterious "Disease X." The program aims to develop a vaccine before the pathogen is publicly known. Scientists associated with Vaccelerate have published a study on predicting the next pandemic. The initiative received significant funding from the German government and the European Commission. The EU believes future vaccines should be rolled out faster and with less regulatory oversight than COVID-19 vaccines. Some people question the development of vaccines for a non-existent disease and express concerns about the accuracy of pandemic predictions.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

VACCELERATE De Europese Unie (EU) heeft toegegeven dat ze met spoed een geavanceerde "fast vax" ontwikkelt in afwachting van "pandemieën aan de horizon", waaronder de mysterieuze "Ziekte X" die is opgenomen op een lijst van "geanalyseerde ziekteverwekkers". Onder de noemer " voorbereiden om te voorkomen" heeft de VN al in december 2021 openlijk toegegeven dat er "Pandemie bestrijdende vaccins tegen "Ziekte X" ontwikkeld worden" ! No joke. https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/prepare-prevent-developing-pandemic-busting-vaccines-against-%E2%80%9Cdisease-x%E2%80%9D In de voorhoede van dit initiatief staat het innovatieve Duits-EU "Vaccelerate" programma, dat actief werkt aan de ontwikkeling van een vaccin voor de volgende pandemie nog voordat de ziekteverwekker (Ziekte X) bij het publiek bekend is gemaakt. https://www.glopid-r.org/members/german-federal-ministry-of-education-and-research-bmbf-pt-dlr/ Wetenschappers verbonden aan het Vaccelerate-programma hebben hun plan voor een snel vaccin onthuld in een studie artikel met de titel "De volgende pandemie voorspellen". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38061408/ Het artikel gaat in op een uitgebreid onderzoek dat werd uitgevoerd onder de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap van de EU, waarbij werd gezocht naar inzichten in de ziekteverwekker die het meest waarschijnlijk de "volgende pandemie" zal veroorzaken of als de volgende "potentiële pandemiegenerator" zal dienen. De wortels van het Vaccelerate-programma gaan terug tot het European Vaccine Trial Accelerator Platform (EUVAP), dat in 2020 met een genereuze subsidie van €600.000 van de Duitse regering aan de Universiteit van Keulen van start ging. Dit initiatief raakte in een stroomversnelling tijdens de aanvankelijke haast om een COVID-19 vaccin te ontwikkelen, zoals gedocumenteerd onder "Vaccelerate". https://www.glopid-r.org/members/german-federal-ministry-of-education-and-research-bmbf-pt-dlr/ Begin 2021 werd Vaccelerate een groot EU-project, dat uitgroeide tot een pan-Europees netwerk met aanzienlijke steun van de Europese Commissie. Volgens de pagina over EU-financiering heeft het programma tot nu toe een indrukwekkend totaal van €26,5 miljoen aan EU-financiering ontvangen. Volgens de EU moeten toekomstige vaccins nog sneller en met minder regelgevend toezicht worden uitgerold dan de rampzalige Covid-19 mRNA-vaccins. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/leaked-eu-files-reveal-elites-developing-fast-vax-for-next-pandemic-caused-by-disease-x/ Dus... er worden vaccins ontwikkeld ( ook in de UK - zie vorige post met BBC reportage ) voor een ziekte die niet bestaat en zich nog niet voordoet ? Hoe gek gaan ze het nog verzinnen ? Hebt u hier ook zo'n slecht gevoel bij en de idee dat het plaatje niet klopt ? In anders wel, temeer nu de WHO voorspeld heeft dat de volgende pandemie 20 x dodelijker zal zijn. Hoe weten zij dit nu al zo zeker ? Wie door al die info denkt dat er iets " man made " in de maak is, is dus zeker niet gek.

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) / DLR-PT – Global research collaboration for infectious disease preparednessGLOPID-R glopid-r.org
Predicting the next pandemic: VACCELERATE ranking of the WorldHealth Organization's Blueprint forAction toPreventEpidemics - PubMed Influenza, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and Ebola virus were found to be the most concerning pathogens with pandemic potential, characterised by transmissibility through respiratory droplets and a reported history of epidemic or pandemic outbreaks. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) / DLR-PT – Global research collaboration for infectious disease preparednessGLOPID-R glopid-r.org
Leaked EU Files Reveal 'Fast Vax' In Development For 'Next Pandemic' Caused By 'Disease X' The European Union (EU) is developing a cutting-edge "fast vax" in anticipation of "pandemics on the horizon" including the mysterious "Disease X." thepeoplesvoice.tv
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 9:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A group of Japanese doctors have conducted a systematic review of thousands of articles on COVID vaccine side effects. They found that the vaccines have been reported to cause adverse effects in various organs, including the eyes, general medicine, and psychiatry. The doctors also highlighted medical censorship and obstacles faced by Japanese doctors in reporting vaccine damage. They emphasized the toxicity of spike proteins and lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines, which can lead to severe genetic reactions. The doctors called for immediate cessation of the vaccines and presented their findings as solid scientific evidence.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

NA THAILAND STELT NU OOK JAPAN DE ERNSTIGE BIJWERKINGEN VAN DE COVID VACCINS AAN DE KAAK Persconferentie van de Japanse "Vaccine Issues Study Group", 11 januari 2024. Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima van de Universiteit van Kyoto: Een systematisch overzicht van de literatuur heeft enkele verrassende feiten aan het licht gebracht. In duizenden artikelen wordt melding gemaakt van bijwerkingen na vaccinatie, die zonder uitzondering elk orgaan treffen. Van oogheelkunde tot algemene geneeskunde tot psychiatrie. Deze documenten zijn eerst onderzocht door een groep vrijwillige artsen. Zij hebben onderzocht hoeveel gevallen er zijn gemeld door Japanse academische verenigingen. Dit soort rapportage over bijwerkingen van medicijnen en dergelijke is ongekend. Het voor leeftijd gecorrigeerde sterftecijfer voor leukemie is bijvoorbeeld gestegen. En er zijn significante bevindingen voor borstkanker, eierstokkanker, enzovoort. We zullen de relevante informatie met iedereen delen terwijl we de regering adviseren en verzoeken hoe verder te gaan. Wat betreft de medische censuur met betrekking tot de vaccins: Japanse artsen doen hun best, maar ze worden geconfronteerd met verschillende obstakels. Er heerst een negatieve stemming van "Waarom zou je zoiets als vaccinatieschade melden?". Er zijn belemmeringen. Dergelijke acties belemmeren de academische vrijheid en op sommige academische afdelingen vindt censuur plaats. Zoals bij presentaties van conferenties en publicaties. Dit gebeurt wereldwijd. Sommige tijdschriften oefenen in feite censuur uit. Met betrekking tot hersengerelateerde ongewenste voorvallen: geestelijke stoornissen, psychiatrische symptomen, depressie, manie, angst...enz. Over de spike-eiwitsequentie in de genen, waarschuwde hij (Luc Montagnier) dat als er een prionachtige sequentie is, dit zeer gevaarlijk zou kunnen zijn. Veel wetenschappers waarschuwden. Ook ik zei dat het gevaarlijk kon zijn vanwege de mogelijkheid van prionen. Ik besprak het met prionexperts. Professor Yasufumi Murakami van de Universiteit van Tokyo: Over de bijwerkingen van de vaccins: Wat ik in eerste instantie wil zeggen is dat het duidelijk is hoe de bijwerkingen ontstaan, die vandaag de dag nog steeds veel slachtoffers maken. Ik vind dat het onmiddellijk gestopt moet worden. Het mechanisme waardoor de bijwerkingen ontstaan is goed bekend; de spike is giftig. Het is heel duidelijk wat er gebeurt als je een giftig gen aan een mens toedient. Een ander punt is dat de Lipide nanoparticles ook zeer heftige reacties opwekken, dus dit is ook giftig. Het grote probleem is dat we twee giftige stoffen in mensen injecteren, waarvan er één menselijke cellen spike-eiwitten produceert. Aangezien het immuunsysteem dit aanvalt, veroorzaakt dit zeer heftige genetische reacties. Er zijn gevallen die binnen één of twee weken na de injectie optreden, maar er zijn ook veel gevallen die pas na één of twee jaar optreden. Wat betreft het IgG4-antilichaam: Normaal gesproken wordt bij vaccins een IgG4-antilichaam als een mislukking beschouwd, maar bij de huidige messenger-vaccins wordt een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid IgG4 geïnduceerd. Wanneer dit gebeurt, speelt het met verschillende immuunfuncties. Daarom willen we grondig onderzoeken welk percentage van de Japanners dit induceert, en we willen zorgvuldig onderzoeken welk niveau van IgG4 dat reageert met het spike-eiwit bij elk individu aanwezig is. Wat betreft de mislukte vaccins: Vaccins die mislukt zijn worden nog steeds toegediend, en het Ministerie van Gezondheid, Arbeid en Welzijn erkent deze mislukte vaccins. Dus ik wil dat ze onmiddellijk stoppen, maar ook al spreek ik me op verschillende plaatsen uit, ze stoppen helemaal niet, dus we zullen duidelijk bewijs presenteren en het één voor één als artikelen publiceren. Professor Masayasu Inoue, emeritus hoogleraar aan de Osaka City University School of Medicine: We werken samen met Dr. Fukushima om deze database te creëren, en tot nu toe zijn er ongeveer 201 soorten ziekten en 3.071 artikelen over bijwerkingen gerapporteerd. Het is ongekend in de geschiedenis van de mensheid dat er over één vaccin zoveel literatuur beschikbaar is. Hiermee zijn we van plan om het aan de natie en de Japanse regering te presenteren in de vorm van solide wetenschap die niemand kan betwisten. U zal ziekten vinden van het hart, de nieren, de schildklier, diabetes, lever, huid, ogen, bloed, zenuwen, systemische ziekten, hersenen, longen. Ziekten op alle medische gebieden zijn gerapporteerd, en zoals professor Fukushima verklaarde, is dit het kenmerk van de bijwerkingen van dit vaccin. Wat de gegevens betreft, wanneer ziekten zoals die van het hart, de nieren, de hormoon huishouding en de lever tegelijkertijd samen worden bekeken,blijkt dat er een enorm aantal studies over vele pagina's wordt gerapporteerd. -- Voor de non-believers : hebt u nog zand nodig ?

Video Transcript AI Summary
A press conference was held to report on the results of the Vaccine Issues Research Association, which was established six months ago. The speaker expressed condolences to those who have suffered health damage and offered sympathy to those who continue to suffer from symptoms. The speaker mentioned that thousands of papers have reported vaccine side effects across various organs, including mental health issues. They also discussed the lack of patterns in the adverse effects caused by the COVID-19 vaccine and the potential impact on the freedom of academic research. The speaker emphasized the need for further investigation and research to understand the risks and effects of the vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 警告 となりました ので 去 る 20 2 3年 6 月16日 に 捨て てしまった 一般 社 団 法人 ワクチン 問題 研究 会 設立 後 6 か月 の 成果 報告 に関する 記者会見 を 開催 いたします 改 め まして 私は 本日 回 を 務め させていただきます 竹 口 と申します まずはじめに この 場 をお 借り して 新型コロナ ワクチン接種 後の 健康 被害 により 亡くなり に な られた 方々 に 慎 んで お 悔 や み 申し上げます また そういった 健康 被害 を受けた 方 現在 も その 症状 に 苦 しま れている 方々 に対し まして 心 より お 見 舞い 申し上げます それで Speaker 1: その 件 に関して 文 献 を 系統 的に 調査 しました ところ 驚 愕 する 事実 が 話 します 数 千 に 上 る 論文 が ワクチン接種 後の 副 作用 として 報告 されている とその 数 は 去 ること な かっ すべての 臓 器 に 渡って もう あの なんか から それから 一般 の中 から それから 精神 精神 そこで それを 論文 に まとめて 昨日 公開 されました 有 志 医師 の 会 が 事前に 調査 しました 日本の 会 回 で どれだけ の 症 例 が 報告 されている こういうこと は 今まで 薬 の 副 作用 とか でも 一切 なかった です 私が 癌 の 専門 ですから 抗 がん 剤 というのは 副 作用 の 嵐 に 思われ るわけ ですけども まぁ パターン は 決まって る し し れて るわけ この ワクチン による 特 措 法 の パターン が 決まって ない 全身 に 起こる 複数の 疾患 が 同時に 起こる 見たこと がない というのが 医者 の 率 直 な 意見 です 日本の 先生方 も 頑張って いろいろな 邪魔 が 入っ そんな 悪 人の 被害 なんか 防 護 服 して どうする んだ とかね 邪魔 が入る んですよ こういうこと 自体が やっぱり 学問 の 自由 を 障害 する 話 ですし それから ある 教室 では 検 閲 が 行われる んですよ 学 会 発表 とか 論文 を 発表 これが 全 世界 的に 起こ っています ジャー ナル によっては もう 事実 上 検 閲 が 行われ ます 朝 日 新聞 全面 的に ラフ な 調査 で 過剰 強化 死亡 ということを 一度 やってます けども ちゃんと 年齢 調整 で きちっと 統計 的に 評価 に 耐え る 形に します と ですね 驚く べき ことは 実は 特定の ガン が 超 過 死亡 が ワクチン の 3回目 接種 以降 に 起こっている という ことがわかります 今 論文 にして さ ぞ くり 回って ますが 大阪 から 緊急 ループ パ ブ すること になります Speaker 0: 続きまして 検査 方法 開発 ワー キング グループ 担当 率 の 村 上 遊ぶ により 検査 法 開発 の 進捗 状況 と 今後の 見通し についてご説明 いたします 皆さん よろしくお願いします Speaker 2: そしたら 初めに 僕は 言って おきたい の は どういう 仕 組 で 副 作用 が発生 する かなと 明確に なくて 大 須 大勢 飛 来 者 が出ている もの ですね 今 で 持ってる ってこと です 今 すぐ や める 時 だと思います じゃあ どういう 風な 組織 見て ですね 感 の 腐 敗 を 発生 するか っていうのも 話は そっと 上がって まして スパイ ク は 有 毒 なんですよ 養 徳 の 遺伝子 帰 依 へと 取り 憑 依 を 汚 く どうなるか っていうのは 非常に 明確 です もう一つ は 施 術 等の 自粛 です 非常に 安心して 誘導 するということ ですので これも 有 毒 なんですよ で あの 二つの 有 毒 なもの を 一人で 打って る って言う こと なんですが 能 次 な 大きな 問題は ヒ ト 細胞 で スパイ ク 蛋 白 質 を作って いること ですこれは 免疫 系 が ですね 痩せ ようと アップ いたします ので 非常に 反射 現象 する ということなんです ね で もう一つ は 打って から 1週間 2週間 達成 するっていう かかります が 1年 2年 経過 してから ですね 現れる という 風な 部分 も お およそ あと もう一つ はですね とても 優秀な 交代 と 悪い 抗 体 という 理由 を 伝わり まして IGG 4 T の 抗 体 は 免疫 を むしろ 抑え る 働き を持っています 普通の ワクチン だと ですね IGG 4 抗 体 誘導 した の が 失敗 だ というふうに 言われます ところが 今回の セン チャー Speaker 0: ・ Speaker 2: ファンタジー ・ ワクチン では すごい 量 の IGG 法 が 誘導 されています それが 誘導 されます と いろんな 免疫 に ですね いた ずら をする わけです ということです ので それが 日本人の どういう 風な 比率 で 誘導 されている と しっかりと 調べて いこう と 我々 が スパイ ク 蛋 白 質 と 反応 する I G 4 が 一人一人 で どういう レベル で 存在 を 試して か を しっかりと 調べて います もちろん です 問題 なのは ですね こういう あたり まで もう わかって る わけですよ いっぱい ドラッグ 失敗 した ワクチン を 今でも 打って いて この 功 労 者 認めて る わけです 失敗 してほしい よ だから これは ここ 言えば すぐ ですね 思ってます し いろんな ところで そういう 発信 発言 をして も ですね 一 向 に 辞め ないと いうこと ですので 我々 の 明確に 夢 で 育てて いって 一個 一個 やっていく 一つ一つ 論文 として 発表 を 買っ の 知って として 行きたいと思います Speaker 3: そういうこと でこの データベース を作ろう ということで 福島 先生 と一緒に やって おります が 今のところ の だいたい 200 を 1 種類の 疾患 と そして の 副 作用 の 報告 数 として 30 7 1本 の 論文 が出ている ということで 一つの ワクチン で こん だけの 論文 が出ている と ねこれ 人類 史上 初めて でございます まあ そういうこと で これを きちっと した 科学 として 誰も 反論 できない ような形で 国 と 日本の 意思 に 提 唱 しようと思って ます 次の スライド を ね そういうこと でこの 右 にある の はちょっと 細 か くて 恐 縮 ですが お 手 元の ハンド アウト のデータ が 見て いただきます 心臓 の 病気 腎 臓 の 病気 甲 状 腺 の 病気 糖尿病 肝 臓 岐 阜 の 病気 目の 手 血液 の 病気 そして 神経 の 病気 全身 の 病気 脳 の 病気 肺 の 病気 パリ と あらゆる 医学 の 全 ジャンル に わ たる 病気 が 報告 されている ということで 福島 代表 が おっ しゃ った ように 前 科 が 一 斉 に パッと 発症 するのが 今回の ワクチン の 副 作用 の 特 色 です そういうこと で 次の スライド お願いします そういうこと で パート それぞれの データを 心臓 腎 臓 内 分 泌 感 度 というふうに 病 名 で 取る と同時に どういう 風な の 範囲 で 言ってる 過程 の 常 打って あります と ものすごい 何 ページ にも わ たる 論文 が 報告 されている ということで これは Speaker 1: 精神 障害 精神 症状 うつ病 抑 うつ 不安 心 って やっぱり 精神 病院 いっぱい 出てくる わけですけど もう キリ がない んだね なんで こうなる の っていうこと ですけどね これ だから 実際 もっと いろいろ あの キーワード ね 例えば 今 のような あの コピー と ナイ ティ ワクチン じゃなくて サー ズ コ ブ 2 熱 線 で r na ワクチン とか いろんな キーワード に分けて やっていく かね どんどんどんどん もっと 出てきます だから これは 一部 です 先ほど 日 野 根 先生 紹介した ベース も あくまで パ ズ メ ロ という データベース で 一部 なん タブ メ ド で 引っ かからない の が だから ヤコブ 病 が 引っ かかって ないんです ところが こういう 歴史 とした 論 語 が モン ター に 果たして HIV ね エース の ウイルス と して 農業 して もらった 先生 も これは 遺 言 的な と 本 文 ですよ あれ 亡くなった んです 彼は ものすごく 最初から 警戒 してた んです この スパイ ク ダン パー の ス イ プ レン ス の中に 遺伝子 の中身 ですよ プリ オン リー ジョン が 副 業 と 同じような で あの 配列 があると これは 非常に 危険 だということ 警告 してた んですよ かなり の 学生 が 警告 して ました だから 筋肉 注射 すれば それが 周辺 の それに 取り 込まれて いい だろう って ものすごい ア バ ウ ト な 医学 生物 学 を 全く 知らない 人は そういうこと 考え ないから メ ッ セン ジャー レイ デン ワクチン じゃないか っていう わけです ところが 生物 学 医学 知って たら そんな スペ シ フィ ック のことを 起こ らない 得意 的な つまり オフ ターゲット って言う んですよ 目標 とする ところ 以外 に オフ ターゲット について ou t of コントロール だね どこに いく か わかんない 血 流 に 塗った ら 行ったら さ それは 脳 にも 行く し 彼女 にも 行く し ね 腎 臓 に そこ ら じゅう で 作 っちゃった ら どうなる の ってこと が 思い 浮か ば ない わけだ から それは ものすごく ア バ ウ ト な 話 でしょ で オフ ターゲット の話 だから それ 解決 できて ないんですよ だから それが 解決 できたら どうか つ って も まだ 問題は いっぱい ある んですよ というような ナ ノ パーティクル っていうのが これが ス ケ ス ケ ス ケ で さっき 炎 症 性 だって けど ナ ノ パーティクル は プラスチック ナ ノ パーティクル 世界中 で 問題 になっている 環境 性 脳 に入る んですよ ところが 何 にも 知らない 人は ね プラスチック だから そんな 消化 されない から これ 食べ たって いい でしょ って いかに も ねあの 知った ふり して その 消化 されない です そうした 全く トーン が ナ ノ パーティクル の 表面 に どれだけ ね 有 毒 の 有 機 物質 がついている か わかんない わけですよ だから そういう 知識 の 断 片 で ね 物事 を 心 証 膨 大 に ね 拡大 して これで いける わかった これで いい んだ そういう 感じ だね だから 全く トーン まで まああの 正直 もう もう一度 ね 学校の 生物 学 から 高校 大学の 入 試 まで や やり直し て もらった ら そういう 人は そういうこと 言ってる 人 まだ さっき 言ったように 威 圧 もある 家族 まだ 未 熟 なんですよ 基本的に 我々は 生命 原理 について ほとんど わかって ない それが 今 今回 こういうこと が 起き ちゃって だから 災 い 転 じ てる ここで もう一度 学び 直 すべき なん 何が 起こった の? そう じゃなくて は ワクチン それ 行け それ 行け っていうのは ね それは あの ちょっと もう 無 知 蒙 昧 とか さ もう そういう 世界 ですよ だから もう そういう ね 信仰 になっちゃって るから ワーク 人 協 って 邪 教 ですよ で もう それ だから 無限 中国 に 陥 っちゃった り な 基本 的 だから そういう 単純に そういうこと で 知識 の 断 片 で 物事 全体 を理解 できた と思う の は 間違い
Saved - January 8, 2024 at 12:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bayer's Head of Pharmaceutical Department, Stefan Oelrich, revealed during the 2021 World Health summit that mRNA vaccines are actually cell and gene therapy. This information was deliberately hidden from the public, as Oelrich believes that 95% of the population would have refused vaccination if they knew. He nonchalantly states that the Covid pandemic has provided new possibilities previously unimaginable. Bayer, originally founded by the Rothschild family, has a long history in the pharmaceutical industry. Further posts will explain the details of mRNA gene therapy.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

BAYER TOPMAN : MRNA-VACCINS ZIJN CEL- & GENTHERAPIE Tijdens de World Health top van 2021, verklaarde Stefan Oelrich, Hoofd van de Pharmaceutische afdeling van BAYER, dat mRNA vaccins cel- en gentherapie zijn maar dit voor de wereld verborgen is gehouden omdat, als ze zouden geweten hebben dat het cel-en gentherapie is 95% van de bevolking de vaccinatie zou hebben geweigerd. De man vindt het de normaalste zaak van de wereld om deze essentiële informatie verborgen te houden voor het publiek en stelt doodleuk dat de Covid pandemie nieuwe mogelijkheden heeft geboden die voorheen ondenkbaar waren. In deze link vindt u zijn volledige toespraak met bovenstaande ( vanaf 08:45 min ) en hieronder een video van het desbetreffende fragment. https://youtube.com/watch?v=IKBmVwuv0Qc… Wie de geschiedenis van BAYER kent weet dat deze gigant oorspronkelijk opgericht is door de Rothschild's en sedert vele jaren haar tentakels heeft in de belangrijkste marktsegmenten, waaronder pharmaceuticals. In navolgende posts zal duidelijk uitgelegd worden wat mRNA via gen therapie precies is.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Our company is embracing cell and gene therapy, which has the potential to make a significant impact. The mRNA vaccines are a prime example of this. Just a couple of years ago, if we had asked the public if they would be willing to undergo gene or cell therapy, the majority would have refused. However, the pandemic has changed people's perspectives and made them more open to innovative solutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're really taking that leap, us as a company buyer, in cell and gene therapy, which to me is one of these examples where really we're going to make a difference hopefully, moving forward. There are some, ultimately, the, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that, cell and gene therapy. I always like say, if we had surveyed 2 years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take, gene gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body? We would have probably had a 95% refusal rate. I think, this pandemic has also opened many people's eyes to to innovation in the way that, was maybe not possible before.
Video Not Available youtube.com

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

vanaf 08:45 min https://t.co/mqHtJpDBsI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stephan Uhlrich, a member of the board at Bayer and president of the pharmaceutical section, speaks at the World Health Summit. He commends the summit for its growth and impact over the years. Uhlrich highlights the importance of collaboration, transparency, and accountability in the pharmaceutical industry's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. He emphasizes the need for equitable access to healthcare innovations and mentions initiatives aimed at improving access to contraception and cardiovascular disease management. Uhlrich also discusses the role of innovation and the importance of translating academic knowledge into practical applications. He calls for global collaboration and joint efforts between government, science organizations, industry, and civil society to achieve health for all.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I now have the great pleasure to announce Stephan Uhlrich. He's member of the board, of management at Bayer, And he's also president for the pharmaceutical section of Bayer. Stephan, please come up. You don't have to wait. And, I know him from quite a few interactions, and I know that he's a very globally thinking and research and development and innovation minded person, and therefore, I'm very interested to hear what Stephan has to tell us now. The floor is yours. Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you, Axel. Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. First of all, it's really an honor and a privilege to be up here talking to you. Indeed, Excellent. I, share a lot of time during the year, at least on the board of Charite where I have the honor to also serve. But I've also been a close, follower and also active participant in the World Health Summit over the last 10 years at least. And, Daedalus, it's, It's not only a privilege to be up here, but it's really amazing what you've created over the last 13 years because what started as a small idea, with a big vision Today is much more than a small idea, but you truly live up to, the name World Health Summit because it has become A true reference, every year and a fixture in everybody's calendar, so congratulations for that. This past year, the life science have really emerged as a light in the darkness Of the COVID nineteen pandemic. Its value to society recognized to a degree rarely seen before, certainly not During my lifetime or at least working in this industry. We have many reasons to be proud of, and you've heard it, and it's really hard to speak after all these people. I think unprecedented, collaboration, transparency, but also taking accountability for health Across all different, sectors and stakeholders. We've heard about the breathtaking speed of discovery, Regulatory approval. Also manufacturing and getting vaccines and other highly effective medicines, to patients In, in a time we've never seen before. And hopefully, I think this all will serve as a foundation, The foundation to a more sustained, partnership to tackle some of the other health crises, that, We've heard about, because this very disruptive pandemic is still just a small piece Of all the remnants of health that we need to tackle. So while we may be celebrating, We as global players cannot ignore one simple fact. Not everybody could benefit From the breakthroughs and collaboration that we've seen. And, Bill, you I think you said it very nicely. It feels good For me, like for everyone else in this room, to have benefited over the past year From innovation that helped us to be today, again, in this room in person rather than to be all behind screens Even though I, I applaud the fact that you made this a hybrid, a hybrid conference, which I think is gonna be most of the conferences in the world regardless of Pandemics anyway. So I am not really interested in the health for a lucky few. I'm interested in health for all. Our successes over these 18 month, should embolden us to really focus Much more closely on access, innovation, and collaboration to unleash health for all, especially As we enter, on top of everything that's happening, really into a new era of science, a lot of people talk about the bio revolution in this context. So we've heard from Bill a lot about access. So I'm not going to repeat, some of, some of the examples that, Bill has rightfully, I think, has given. But, health for all definitely means patients around the world that get access to medicines, At a price that they can afford and making use of partnerships to ensure our efforts are sustainable over the long term. I could give you countless other examples, maybe also outside of Europe where we are today, where it is already difficult enough to get access and equitable access Across all countries. Because I can guarantee you, there's a difference between having access to novel, medicines in Berlin, than it is in Bucharest Or in in the Ukraine, for example. We also need to focus on what is socially responsible outside of Europe, and, ensure sustainable action there. We pledged this past year to give an additional 100,000,000 women access to The contraception in the world, we've invested 400,000,000 this year into new plants that are dedicated to just produce, long acting contraceptives, for for women in low and middle income countries. We had Bill, Bill Gates this week in Berlin. I'm sure many of you have met him, this week. Together with, with him and and, Melinda Gates, we're working very closely on, family planning initiatives as as an example for that. One of my preferred, projects, and we're a leader in heart health as a company, and we've been invested in this for a long time. And And I hope, one of the anticoagulants that, you had to take maybe came from us. So, well, he raises his thumbs, so so glad to to help you out there, Bill. And, today, I must say for the first time, I didn't feel bad about never having to having tried to skateboard. In terms of, of one of the things that that I feel very strongly about is is our, because it's a nice example, is our Ghana health heart initiative, sorry, where we partner with the with the German, development initiative, the so the, German Institute for Collaboration, to improve risk assessment and management of cardiovascular disease on-site in public health facilities. Because I think this is exactly it's not just about donating medicines or giving medicines at a lower price. It's also being on-site to, to help put this into practice, which I feel, is a nice example. We've heard a lot about innovation tonight. Health for all It's certainly also embedding innovation into all facets of the life sciences ecosystem, making use of the current momentum To tackle issues beyond COVID nineteen. We've seen the vaccines as the perfect example, during this crisis, But innovations in the field of biotech, also radically upend, our view on many other diseases, especially NCDs. We can now think of curing many of those disease, not just treating symptoms as we think forward. Innovation, and we tend to forget that, especially in the rich countries, is also, sustainability at a totally different level. Because Those that take the leap to drive innovation in a really meaningful way and invest And take the risk to invest in r and d will also, attain sustainability by creating job security and Creating prosperity for those that take the investment. I think this is really important also for, for these, latitudes here. And, for us, therefore, we're really taking that leap, us as a company buyer, in cell and gene therapy, which to me is one of these examples where really we're going to make a difference hopefully, moving forward. There are some, ultimately, the, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say if we had surveyed 2 years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take a gene gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body? We would have probably had a 95% refusal rate. Think, this pandemic has also opened many people's eyes to to innovation in the way that, was maybe not Possible before. But it's not just the industry that has to innovate. It's, across all, all the value chains starting with academia and university. And again, the World Health Summit, and I can only applaud the initiative, is a perfect example for that because, Ditlev, like nobody else, I think you've created a network of university medicine. It started with very few. And today, I think it's somewhere here behind me. You can see the example, of of all those that participate. We need to make sure That the knowledge that's created in our universities, in our academia is translated, translated Before it goes into shiny paper publications, it's translated ideally into patents and into applications, And that results in new treatments, medicines, devices, but also medical procedures. That's what we need if we want to keep up with, with innovation. For us, at Bayer, innovation means, collaborating early And closely with those partners, and making sure no one is left behind. So for everyone to benefit from breakthrough in science, we require innovation friendly policy, Regulatory and economic frameworks. We've heard about this also in, in Bill's talk that really understand the urgency of acting now As the ground swell of the Bayer Revolution picks up, sustainable health innovation must be further elevated. There is an opportunity here during Germany's g 7 presidency in 2022. Normally, Jens Baan, I would have, direct this at you. We now need to also talk to the incoming government in Germany about this specific responsibility, to put health, and innovation and sustainability sustainable health firmly on the agenda. Health for all, means also recognizing that a global multi partner effort is required and that collaboration will be key. No industry player can do this alone. No NGO can do this alone. No government can do this alone. We can only do it together. And we've already seen over the past, pandemic what can happen when everyone in the healthcare ecosystem is united by a joint purpose. So what's new this time, I think, is how society at large views the life sciences and our collaborations. We gave people around the world new hope. We inspired New generations of innovators. I can imagine that many young people that graduate now from high school and that decide for a college education, they want to go into science again Because they see what science can move and how important science is in our lives. We inspired our community to think more boldly. Collaboration will be key for achieving health for all. In my vision, I see a joint effort of government Working hand in hand with science organizations, industry, and civil society. And I can say as an example because, minister Spann and I, I think, we've talked quite Quite often over the last 2 years, he will say not, more often than he would have liked probably. But, it's been that type of collaboration that I would, that I would hope for to preserve as we move forward. We're at the beginning Of a marvelous era in science, and we should be emboldened, as I said before, to make health for all possible through access, Innovation and collaboration. Thank you for your attention.
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 5:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A study published on August 17, 2023, titled "Spikeopathy: COVID-19 spike protein is pathogenic, both from the virus and the mRNA vaccine," provides evidence of widespread damage caused by COVID-19 mRNA and adenovector DNA vaccines. The study explores the pathogenicity of spike proteins and their potential to affect various organs. It discusses the inflammatory properties of the nanoparticles used to deliver mRNA, the widespread distribution of mRNA and DNA codes, and the autoimmune response caused by the production of foreign proteins. The article highlights the need for reevaluation and suggests using vaccines with well-tested recombinant proteins, weakened or inactivated virus technologies, instead of gene-based vaccines.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

SPIKEOPATHIE - HET ONOMSTOTELIJK BEWIJS VAN VACCIN SCHADE Wat we reeds wisten is door grondig onderzoek van 7 ervaren experten andermaal bewezen. Op 17 augustus 2023 werd - onder verwijzing naar 253 andere onderzochte studies - een studie gepubliceerd met de titel : " Spikeopathie': COVID-19 spike-eiwit is pathogeen, zowel van het virus als van het mRNA van het vaccin" https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/11/8/2287 Samenvatting: De COVID-19 pandemie veroorzaakte veel ziekte, veel doden en een ernstige ontwrichting van de samenleving. De productie van "veilige en effectieve" vaccins was een belangrijk doel voor de volksgezondheid. Helaas hebben ongekend hoge percentages ongewenste bijwerkingen de voordelen overschaduwd. Dit verhalende overzicht in twee delen presenteert bewijs voor de wijdverspreide schade van het nieuwe product COVID-19 mRNA- en adenovectorDNA-vaccins en is nieuw in de poging om een grondig overzicht te geven van de schade die het gevolg is van de nieuwe technologie in vaccins die vertrouwen op menselijke cellen die een vreemd antigeen produceren dat aantoonbaar pathogeen is. Dit eerste artikel onderzoekt peer reviewde gegevens die in tegenspraak zijn met het 'veilige en effectieve' verhaal dat aan deze nieuwe technologieën kleeft. De pathogeniteit van spikeiwitten, ook wel 'spikeopathie' genoemd, of ze nu afkomstig zijn van het SARS-CoV-2 virus of geproduceerd zijn door gencodes van vaccins, verwant aan een 'synthetisch virus', wordt steeds beter begrepen in termen van moleculaire biologie en pathofysiologie. Farmacokinetische transfectie door lichaamsweefsels ver van de injectieplaats door lipide-nanopartikels of virusvector-dragers betekent dat 'spikeopathie' veel organen kan aantasten. De ontstekingseigenschappen van de nanodeeltjes die gebruikt worden om mRNA over te brengen; N1-methylpseudouridine dat gebruikt wordt om de werking van synthetisch mRNA te verlengen; de wijdverspreide biodistributie van de mRNA- en DNA-codes en vertaalde spike-eiwitten, en auto-immuniteit via menselijke productie van vreemde eiwitten, dragen bij aan schadelijke effecten. Dit artikel bespreekt auto-immuun, cardiovasculair, neurologisch, potentiële oncologische effecten en autopsiebewijs voor spikeopathie. Nu er veel gen-gebaseerde therapeutische technologieën gepland zijn, is een herevaluatie noodzakelijk en opportuun. 9. Conclusies In dit studie overzicht hebben we de rol van het SARS-CoV-2 spike-eiwit, vooral de S1-subeenheid, als pathogeen aangetoond. Het is nu ook duidelijk dat wijdverspreide spike-eiwitten, geproduceerd door mRNA- en adenovectorDNA-gencodes, een grote verscheidenheid aan ziekten veroorzaken. De onderliggende pathofysiologische en biochemische mechanismen worden momenteel opgehelderd. De lipide-nanopartikeldragers voor de mRNA- en Novavax-vaccins hebben ook pathologische ontstekingsbevorderende eigenschappen. Het hele uitgangspunt van op genen gebaseerde vaccins die vreemde antigenen in menselijke weefsels produceren, brengt risico's met zich mee voor auto-immuunziekten en ontstekingsziekten, vooral als de verspreiding niet sterk gelokaliseerd is. De klinische implicaties die hieruit volgen, zijn dat clinici op alle gebieden van de geneeskunde bedacht moeten zijn op de verschillende mogelijke presentaties van COVID-19 vaccin-gerelateerde ziekte, zowel acuut als chronisch, en de verergering van reeds bestaande aandoeningen. We pleiten ook voor de opschorting van op genen gebaseerde COVID-19 vaccins en lipide-nanopartikel-draagmatrices, en andere vaccins op basis van mRNA of virale-vector-DNA-technologie. Een veiligere koers is het gebruik van vaccins met goed geteste recombinante eiwitten, verzwakte of geïnactiveerde virustechnologieën, waarvan er nu veel bestaan voor vaccinatie tegen SARS-CoV-2. ( maw klassieke vaccins )

‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA The COVID-19 pandemic caused much illness, many deaths, and profound disruption to society. The production of ‘safe and effective’ vaccines was a key public health target. Sadly, unprecedented high rates of adverse events have overshadowed the benefits. This two-part narrative review presents evidence for the widespread harms of novel product COVID-19 mRNA and adenovectorDNA vaccines and is novel in attempting to provide a thorough overview of harms arising from the new technology in vaccines that relied on human cells producing a foreign antigen that has evidence of pathogenicity. This first paper explores peer-reviewed data counter to the ‘safe and effective’ narrative attached to these new technologies. Spike protein pathogenicity, termed ‘spikeopathy’, whether from the SARS-CoV-2 virus or produced by vaccine gene codes, akin to a ‘synthetic virus’, is increasingly understood in terms of molecular biology and pathophysiology. Pharmacokinetic transfection through body tissues distant from the injection site by lipid-nanoparticles or viral-vector carriers means that ‘spikeopathy’ can affect many organs. The inflammatory properties of the nanoparticles used to ferry mRNA; N1-methylpseudouridine employed to prolong synthetic mRNA function; the widespread biodistribution of the mRNA and DNA codes and translated spike proteins, and autoimmunity via human production of foreign proteins, contribute to harmful effects. This paper reviews autoimmune, cardiovascular, neurological, potential oncological effects, and autopsy evidence for spikeopathy. With many gene-based therapeutic technologies planned, a re-evaluation is necessary and timely. mdpi.com
Saved - January 4, 2024 at 6:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the importance of informed consent in medical interventions and highlight concerns regarding the rapid development and rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. They mention the lack of transparency and information provided to the public about the vaccines, as well as the potential risks and side effects. The posts also mention the availability of alternative treatments, such as a COVID-19 pill, which has received less attention. The author emphasizes the need for open discussion and the dissemination of accurate information to protect people's well-being.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

INFORMED CONSENT Ok, ik ga het nog eens proberen. Vanaf het begin. Het is voor velen namelijk nog altijd niet duidelijk. Art. 8 van de wet op de patiëntenrechten van 2002 bepaalt dat een patiënt het recht heeft om voorafgaandelijk iedere (medische) tussenkomst geïnformeerd te worden en hij vrij moet toestemmen met de voorgestelde interventie of behandeling. De inlichtingen die aan de patiënt moeten verstrekt worden, met het oog op het bekomen van zijn toestemming zijn het doel, de aard, de graad van urgentie, de duur, de frequentie, de voor de patiënt relevante tegenindicaties, nevenwerkingen en risico's, de nazorg,de mogelijke alternatieven en de financiële gevolgen. https://www.health.belgium.be/sites/default/files/uploads/fields/fpshealth_theme_file/wet_22-08-2002_betreffende_de_rechten_van_de_patient.pdf Goed. Even terug in de tijd. In december 2019 werd in China een uitbraak vastgesteld van een novel corona virus dat Sars-Cov2 genoemd werd omdat het maar in 2 sequenties verschilde van Sars-Cov1 dat in 2002 wereldwijd 8.000 doden had veroorzaakt. Naar verluidt bestond er geen enkele behandelingsmethode tegen dit nieuw virus, wat een pertinente leugen was, maar dit even terzijde. Het feit dat er formeel geen behandelingsmethode bestond en de kwestie dringend was, liet pharmabedrijven toe om beroep te doen op de verkorte vaccinprocedure van 2 jaar in plaats van de klassieke procedure die minstens 10 jaar duurt. Op 25.02.2020 schonk de Gates Foundation 725.000 dollar en 40.000 medicijnstalen aan de K.U.L. om op zoek te gaan naar een vaccin. Zij heeft relatief snel een zeer efficiënt vaccin ontwikkeld dat gebaseerd was op het vaccin tegen de gele koorts. Eén inenting volstond voor levenslange bescherming maar, eigenaardig genoeg, is dat vaccin in een schuif beland en nooit gecommercialiseerd. ( zie eerdere post ). In juni 2020 ofwel 5,5 maanden na de in vitro ( niet in vivo ) isolatie van het virus, maakte Pfizer kenbaar dat zij een vaccin gevonden had. Niet veel later ook Moderna en Astrazeneca. Voor HIV is na 40 jaar nog steeds geen vaccin gevonden maar voor Sars-Cov2 had men minder dan 6 maanden na de uitbraak al een vaccin gevonden. Vreemd. Niet veel later verklaarde Albert Bourla, de CEO van Pfizer, dat ze de productie van hun product al hadden opgestart in april 2020 omdat ze anders nooit tegen het eind van het jaar 1 miljard vaccins zouden kunnen produceren en dat, als tijdens de testfase op mensen zou blijken dat het vaccin niet voldeed, zij het risico op zich nam en in dat geval alles zou vernietigen. Wat er mis is met dit plaatje is voer voor een later debat. In juli 2020 heeft Pfizer protocollen opgesteld voor het testen op mensen ( fase 3 ). Uit die protocollen bleek dat Pfizer strenge criteria had opgesteld voor de kandidaat-proefpersonen die 1.200 euro ontvingen voor hun deelname. Proefpersonen moesten in goede gezondheid verkeren, +18 tot maximum 65 jaar oud. Zwangere vrouwen, vrouwen die borstvoeding gaven en personen met onderliggende aandoeningen en ziekten waren uitgesloten, de proefpersonen mochten na de inenting niet zwanger worden en gedurende 28 dagen geen sex hebben. Onrustwekkend. Vanaf augustus 2020 is Pfizer begonnen met het testen op mensen. Het testen is tot 2x toe opgeschort omdat er ernstige bijwerkingen vastgesteld werden : oa ontstekingen aan het ruggemerg. Overigens ook bij Astrazeneca waar bloedklonters vastgesteld werden. Onrustwekkend. Onder druk van de Europese Commissie heeft het EMA op 21.12.2020 -ofwel amper 4 maanden na de aanvang van het testen op mensen - aan Pfizer een voorlopige voorwaardelijke toelating tot commercialisatie van haar mRNA vaccin verleend " for emergency use only ". Die toelating is opgesteld in de Engelse taal en telt 143 bladzijden. In het document staat uitdrukkelijk vermeld dat er op dat tijdstip nog veel onbekende elementen waren, dat er niet getest was op heel wat categoriën van personen, dat Pfizer niettegenstaand herhaald verzoek geen enkele informatie had verstrekt over de 2 lipiden die zij als hulpmiddel had gebruikt en er een hoog risico op ernstige bijwerkingen bestond die ook werden genoemd : myocarditis en pericarditis. Pfizer diende haar laatste onderzoeksrapport in te dienen op 31.12.2023 waarna EMA zou beoordelen of Pfizer in aanmerking zou komen voor een definitieve licentie. Het was dus duidelijk dat het product nog in een experimentele fase verkeerde. Dat kon ook niet anders na amper 4 maanden testen. Onrustwekkend. Vanaf januari 2021 zijn alle deelnemende landen begonnen met massa vaccinatie van hun bevolking. Overheden en zelfverklaarde experten beweerden dat de vaccins veilig en efficiënt waren. Pierre Van Damme beweerde dat je na 12 dagen niet meer besmettelijk bent. Iedereen werd aangespoord op zich te laten vaccineren met dit experimenteel product dat nog nooit eerder was toegepast op de mens en waarover zo goed als niets geweten was. " Je doet het voor een ander " was de teneur. Zeer onrustwekkend. Alle informatie van EMA werd achter gehouden. Mensen werden niet geïnformeerd over de mogelijke risico's en gevaren. Er werden enkel achteloos beweerd dat ze na de inenting wat last konden hebben van hoofdpijn, spierpijn en koorts. Bijzonder onrustwekkend. Er werden reclame campagnes opgezet met ronkende slogans zoals " hier krijgt u uw vrijheid terug ". De bevolking was zo bang gemaakt voor dit dodelijk virus dat ze in lange rijen aanschoven in vaccinatie centra. Het was bandwerk. Geen enkele arts of verpleegkundige heeft de moeite genomen om uit te leggen wat er in het spul zit en de mogelijke risico's zijn. De mensen vroegen er ook niet naar want ze waren bang en, de overheid had gezegd dat het vaccin het grote redmiddel was dus ze dachten er niet verder over na. Zet maar gauw die spuit, dan ben ik vrij en kan ik op vakantie gaan, naar festivals enz.. Als 70% van de bevolking gevaccineerd is, maakt het virus geen kans meer, klonk het. 70%, werd 80%, 90% tot zelfs 100%. Natuurlijke immuniteit bestond plots niet meer. Hebt u kanker ? Zeker doen. Zwanger ? Zeker doen. Terwijl er op dat ogenblik geen enkele informatie beschikbaar was wegens niet getest. Ontzettend onrustwekkend. Het overgrote deel van de bevolking heeft zich laten inenten met de eerste 2 spuiten zonder te weten met wat ze precies ingespoten zijn, noch wat de mogelijke risico's zijn. Er is hen ook niet uitgelegd hoe het product is gemaakt en wat het precies doet. Niet bij spuit 1 en 2, en ook niet bij spuit 3, 4, 5, 6 en 7. Ze zijn niet afdoend geïnformeerd. Hun toestemming is gebrekkig. Artikel 8 van de wet op de patiëntenrechten werd ernstig geschonden. Enkel ingewijden, die de materie grondig hebben bestudeerd, weten dat mRNA eigenlijk gen therapie is en dat, als je een product binnen een tijdsbestek van minder dan 3 jaar 7 x moet laten inspuiten dit in geen enkel geval onder de noemer van een vaccin valt, maar in werkelijkheid een voortdurende medische behandeling is die krachtens de wet op de patiëntenrechten moet worden opgevolgd, wat echter ook niet gebeurt. Wat de beweerde efficiëntie betreft weten we ondertussen allemaal dat hierover staalhard gelogen is. Het vaccin beschermt niet preventief tegen besmetting, besmettelijkheid en ziekte en werkt uiteraard ook niet curatief. De bevolking is ook over dit niet geïnformeerd. Er wordt nog steeds staalhard gelogen met beweringen zoals " je wordt minder ernstig ziek " en " 70% minder kans op ziekenhuisopname " wat niet bewezen is en ook niet te bewijzen valt. In april 2022 heeft Pfizer een "coronapil " op de markt gebracht die beschermt tegen ernstige ziekte. Paxlovid. In december 2023 zijn er miljoenen pillen vervallen en in februari 2024 zullen nogmaals miljoenen pillen moeten vernietigd worden hoewel de vervaldatum verlengd werd. Kostprijs 4,5 miljard euro. De pers heeft weliswaar een artikel gepubliceerd over de toelating tot commercialisatie van Paxlovid maar nadien is het oorverdovend stil gebleven. Mensen hebben niet de keuze gekregen tussen een spuit of de pil. De meesten weten niet eens dat er ook medicatie in pil vorm bestaat, net zo min als andere efficiëntie medicatie die sinds dag 1 voorhanden was. Het is niet voor niets dat wereldwijd honderdenduizenden artsen, wetenschappers en academici ( waaronder ikzelf ) zijn recht gestaan om de mensen te waarschuwen en onvermoeibaar informatie blijven verstrekken over alles wat zij moeten weten en eigenlijk door de artsen, verpleegkundigen, overheid, experten en media had moeten verstrekt worden maar doelbewust verzwegen is. Dit hebben we niet voor " ons plezier " gedaan maar uit menslievendheid. Ik houd van de mensheid. Ik wil mensen beschermen. Dit is de enige drijfveer van iedereen die op de barrikades staat. Ondertussen regent het wereldwijd studies die de bijwerkingen in kaart hebben gebracht en bewezen. Duizenden studies. Wie zich aan de analyse waagt verdrinkt erin. Maar ook dit wordt wijselijk verzwegen. De gewone mens weet helemaal niets en wil helaas ook niets weten. Was dit voorspelbaar ? Uiteraard. Als je een experimenteel product dat nooit eerder toegepast is op de mens zonder voorafgaandelijk langdurig testen en onderzoek op grote massa's van alle leeftijden, met of zonder een veelheid van onderliggende aandoeningen, gebruikt, vraag je om problemen. Dat is de logica zelve. Het is Russische roulette. Finale noot ter attentie van azijnpissers : ALLES wat in deze post vermeld is, is een vaststaand feit, bewezen, niet voor discussie vatbaar en zeer omstandig gedocumenteerd.

Saved - November 16, 2023 at 1:49 AM

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

Change the world. Break the chains. ❤️ https://t.co/loBbegF4bC

Saved - September 4, 2023 at 1:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Extensive data dump reveals shocking details of adrenochrome trafficking: names, blood types, ages of kidnapped children, torture methods, and more. US army's involvement in housing and disposing of children exposed. Adrenochrome, a billion-dollar business, uses tens of thousands of children as commodities. Authenticity of documents confirmed. Watch "Eyes of the Devil" for a deeper understanding.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

ADRENOCHROME - THE LEAKED DOCUMENTS Deliberate extensive data dump on a USB stick (by an insider or a whistleblower ?) which ended up in the hands of a German woman who ordered USB sticks on Amazon and who forwarded it to other instances ( 2022 ). Were you disturbed when you watched the documentary of the Polish investigative journalist Patryk Vega about child trafficking, child organ trafficking, child prostitution, child porn etc... ? Well, now you will throw up. For those in doubt that this business really exists : the data dump contains thousands of pages of a paper trail which reveal everything from a to z : - the full data of the companies and network who exploit adrenochrome harvesting sites and sell the " product ". - the names, the blood type and the age of children who have been kidnapped, country of origin,time in custody, type of torture, number of daily taps of blood ... - the high implications of the US army in the lodging of all the children in supposedly closed army facilities and the disposal of children when they are no longer useful, - the price at which adrenochrome is sold ( 1280 dollar/mg), - the price of each child, - the data of all the staff members of the harvesting sites - the traffic to and in Germany and the list of German Hospitals who are involved - the calendar for the year 2022 of man hunting parties in many places in the US ( with the names of the children who are listed for those parties ) - .... and on and on. The sale of adrenochrome ( or the eternal youth substance ) is also a billion dollar business for which tens of thousands of children are used as commodities. There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the documents. The information contained in those thousands of pages is so extensive and in accordance with official data ( it has been checked ) that it only can be truthful. https://rumble.com/v2v2apn-documentary-adrenochrome-the-data-dump-parts-1-and-2.html (as from 01:15 min ) or : https://rumble.com/v2t2kig-data-dump-adrenochrome-paper-trail-part-1.html https://rumble.com/v2t2lc0-adrenochrome-large-data-dump-paper-trail-part-2.html PS. If you have not yet watched the documentary " Eyes of the Devil " please do so for a good understanding

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

THE EYES OF THE DEVIL The video below shows a report from a couple of years ago by Patryk Vega, a Polish investigative journalist, who spent years digging in the very dark world of child organ trafficking, child prostitution, child pornography, child rape ending in death and…

Video Transcript AI Summary
This chilling and disturbing video sheds light on the dark world of child trafficking and organ harvesting. The speakers discuss the process of finding and selling children, the conditions in brothels, and the use of drugs to control them. They also reveal the profit-driven nature of the industry and the demand for specific body parts. The video shares personal experiences and emotions, including the desire to save a child from being sold. It also highlights the challenges faced by a mother searching for her kidnapped son. Despite the darkness of the topic, the speaker remains determined to save as many children as possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If anyone causes one of these little ones that believe in me to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. This is the only passage in the Bible in which Jesus Christ says that a man who corrupts a child around. He should better Speaker 1: kill himself. Speaker 0: Around. Would it make any difference to you whether your child ended up with a sex, around pedophiles or an organ donor, or it doesn't matter at all. Speaker 2: Around Pedophiles is the worst option I guess. Otherwise Speaker 0: Why? Speaker 2: Around Because it's evil. Right? So if the person who wants to sell their child, I'm in no position to judge. Around. No. I guess it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter after all. Honestly, I I Speaker 1: just wanna get rid of a problem. Speaker 0: Someone from the criminal underworld around got in touch with me, told me about a girl willing to sell her child to a brothel or as an organ donor. Around. I decided to save that child and make a documentary about it. Around. I began by removing the girl from a criminal environment and finding her a place to stay in a different town. Speaker 2: Around. Speaker 0: Around. The sale of the child was foiled by the COVID nineteen pandemic and the restrictions on cross border traffic. Around. What happened when you found out you were pregnant? What were your first thoughts? Speaker 2: I started looking for a solution. Around. I immediately knew I couldn't pass the child, so I was looking to resolve the problem. I believe I made the best decision I around Speaker 0: Although I managed to relocate the girl to a different town, she was still controlled by an agent who wanted to sell her child. Speaker 1: Around. When we already knew she was pregnant, I contacted my colleague, around A well known person in the criminal underworld, and simply told him I had a child for sale. Around. I wanted to sell that child for spare parts to brothel, to pedophiles. I didn't give a fuck where to go. Speaker 3: Around. I just wanted Speaker 1: to sell it and make money. Speaker 4: You don't need So Speaker 1: he said he'd help me. Speaker 0: What do you mean to a brothel? Around. Such small kids are used in brothels too? Speaker 1: Of course. It's pretty common in Germany. Around. Meaning Meaning, such small kids are first put up with a family that raises them until they turn 3 or 4, around. And then there's central brothel. Speaker 0: The sale of a newborn baby is carried through in such a way that in the hospital, the mother signs the child erector in as the father, then he takes the baby abroad. No one will ever look for them as the baby is officially somewhere in Europe with its father. Around. Do you have any emotional attitude for the baby? No. Speaker 2: No. No. Around. I'm trying to think practically. Speaker 0: And when you learn the baby's gender, around. Could that little person become more real in your head? Speaker 2: No. No. Speaker 0: Around. What do you feel when you look at your belly? Speaker 2: Nothing. Disgust. I don't like it at all. Around. Speaker 1: I'd like to get rid of it. Speaker 4: Why do Speaker 0: you think your life would be over if you had the baby? Speaker 2: Around. Because it's slavery. It's as high. Around. It's sleepless night. A baby is not a dog. He can teach to be alone for several hours or so. Around. It's not like A cat, for example, but you can leave it with a litter box, a bowl Speaker 1: of water, some food, and go around. For a Speaker 2: few days. Speaker 1: Which is more profitable? Around, Speaker 0: selling the child to organs or to a brothel. Speaker 1: For the mother, selling the child as an organ donor. Speaker 0: Around. Do you know the final price of the organs? How much a child like that cost in Europe? Around. Speaker 1: Yes. I do. Speaker 0: All in all, how much is the heart, for example? Speaker 1: I know the liver cost 70,000. Around. It's a black market. So it's obvious only wealthy people who have a lot of money are involved. Around. If their child is ill, this is their way to ensure it's longer life. What's the greatest demand? Around. The liver, the heart, the retina, the eyes, the retina. Around. Speaker 4: Do you Speaker 0: know the price of the retina or the heart? Speaker 1: The heart is worth almost €70,000 €1. Speaker 0: Around. What's your approach to selling a child? Speaker 2: Honestly, if it wasn't for this child who is merchandise, I wouldn't be able to Speaker 1: do it. Around. But Speaker 2: the thing is, if there's a possibility to earn quite good money on it, why not? Around. They offer 50 to a 150,000. Speaker 4: Around. It depends. Speaker 0: Do you believe it's a good price? 50 for a child? Speaker 2: Around. Without intermediaries, I'd say it's enough. Speaker 4: For sure. Just for chance. Speaker 0: Enough for what? Speaker 2: Around To make up for those 9 months. Around. Where else could a young person like me earn 50,000 in 9 months? Speaker 0: Around. Have you thought what you'd buy with that money? Speaker 2: No. No. But if I could afford it, perhaps a nice car? Speaker 0: Around. Children. Clothes. Speaker 2: A phone. Speaker 1: Around. No shoes. Speaker 0: Did you get any offers? Around. Speaker 1: We are offered 80,000. Was that offer attractive? It seems so at the beginning. Around. Especially since I knew she'd have to bear that child and then go through a recuperation process. Around. So I knew she'd need money. Therefore, it seemed attractive. But around. Later I did more research and figured out someone was trying. Push the stone. To con us in a way that instead of giving us the price in Euros, around. They did it in Polish bodies. Speaker 0: What's the name of the portal? Speaker 1: Its name is sperm donors, let's make babies. Around. It's a website where different people post their ads. Women who want to give away or sell their children. Around. Women seeking co parenting. Oh, Speaker 4: for for people? Speaker 1: I posted an ad in which I offered a child for money. Around. Around. After I've done that, I received replies from 4 families, around. But I also read other posts. I liked 2 of them because they were looking for girls. Speaker 4: Around. How did Speaker 0: you figure out it was trading? Speaker 1: Every time a little baby is involved, we know these ads have been posted by people around who want to get rid of such Speaker 4: a baby. Speaker 1: Around. And they don't care where the baby will end up. Our post was among them. Around. All I cared about was that somebody took the child and paid so that I could share the money with the mother. Speaker 0: So you didn't care much about the children's fate? Speaker 1: Around. No. I don't really. I care about my own child. My child is most important to me. Speaker 0: Do you believe in god? Speaker 1: Around. No. I don't believe in God. Speaker 0: Do you believe people get punished for doing such things later in life? Around. Speaker 1: No. I don't. If that was the case, I would have gotten punished long ago. Hundreds of times. Speaker 0: Around. So as to not think of the unborn baby as an object and treat it like a human being, I gave it a name. Speaker 4: Around. Do you think your baby has feelings? Speaker 0: Do you identify yourself with it? Speaker 2: No. No. No. I don't. Around. I think it's too small. A baby like that around. Can't understand pain, fear, or happiness. Speaker 4: We have changed it. Speaker 2: At least that's what I think. Around. I don't identify myself with it at all. Speaker 0: I guess, you know Do you know if you can hear your voice now? Speaker 2: Around Yes. But I'm not giving a thought. Speaker 0: And the beating of your heart? Speaker 2: I'm not thinking about it. Speaker 0: Why not? Around. Speaker 2: Why would I? I don't feel a need for that. There's no point in thinking about it. Speaker 1: There's no point at all. Speaker 2: Around. I'm here and the baby is there. We are 2 completely different worlds. At least, that's how I see it. Speaker 4: Around. Did you Speaker 0: give your baby a name? Speaker 2: No. Speaker 0: What name will you give it in hospital then? Speaker 1: Around. I Speaker 2: don't know. Perhaps I'll ask a midwife to come up with something. I have no idea. Around. I'm not thinking about those things yet. Speaker 4: Around. My Acadia, Speaker 1: that's why. Speaker 0: Once I got involved in all this, I gave the baby a name. Speaker 1: Around. What is it? Marcelino. Speaker 2: Very nice. Let it be Marcelino then. Speaker 0: Around. I thought I'd like to think and perceive him around or her as a human being and not as a dehumanized object. So that around. I could communicate with it in my head as with a concrete person. Speaker 2: I believe that giving it a name would, around. In a way, cause you to show interest in the whole process and how it should look around. And some things like preparing a layout for the hospital. I guess it might have a huge impact on my head. Speaker 4: Around. That's Speaker 2: why I avoid such situations. I haven't given it a name. Speaker 1: I haven't thought about Speaker 2: a name. Around. I don't do such things. Speaker 1: I'm just supposed to bear this child. Speaker 0: Around. Do you consider a possibility that your emotions might change and you'll regret it? No. Around. I was afraid they might open the borders at any time and the mother would flee abroad to sell the child there. In order to have control over this, around. I had to get to the trafficker. Do you think it's possible for me to talk to someone from Germany who specializes around in child brothels Speaker 1: You know what? Or transplants. I guess it is possible that someone would have to set you up with around. Even more so since those child brothels for pedophiles are mainly run by Muslims. Speaker 0: Around. Why? Speaker 1: Their religion and culture does not prohibit them from having sex with children. Around They have wives or husbands who are 5 or 10 years old. Food's not a problem for them. Around. Therefore, it's the Arabs sitting in one of those places. I have the. Speaker 0: How can such an interview be arranged? Speaker 1: I'd have to ask around. Around. Speaker 0: Do it then. Speaker 1: I will. Around. Speaker 0: For over a month, I was trying to get in touch with a trafficker. What did the child trafficker say? Help me understand what I need to do. Speaker 1: Around. Hold on. Speaker 0: Go on Skype and then what? Speaker 1: Yes. Go on Skype. Enter your login. Around Your login is an email address that has been set up for the sake of this conversation. What's the address? The address is gray ass 2020@hotmaildot around. Then you need to enter a password to your Skype account. It starts with a capital letter, demoralization, around. And you're in. Your nickname. Your fixed type first and last name is Grey Zone. Around He will. On? Speaker 0: Gray zone has already been set up? Yes. I don't have to do anything? Speaker 1: Exactly. Around. This is your first and last name, Grayzone. You will receive an invitation from him. Around. Speaker 2: You won't Speaker 1: see this log in. Only his Nick, imminent Germany. Around. The guy needs to feel safe. He's also afraid. Speaker 0: Just go in at the Weeks passed, but the Skype conversation didn't come through. Around. Why does he keep postponing our interview? Is it so hard to set up? Speaker 4: Around I Speaker 1: received a message. It was on Sunday or Saturday. Was it Friday? I can't remember exactly. On Friday around On Saturday, he sent me a message that he was very sorry, but he had to go away to pick up some merchandise. Speaker 4: Around. I Speaker 1: figured he wasn't going to pick up a cardboard of smokes or vodka, but he was going to pick up a child. Around. For him, a living child, a living human being is merchandise. He doesn't even call a child a child. He calls it merchandise around Because that's what it is for him. It's an object that can be monetized. Speaker 3: Around. He'd sell his Speaker 1: own mother for organs if she wasn't so old. No one wants her organs anymore. Around. Does he have his own child? Yes. A son. Speaker 0: Do you think he has any human feelings for him? Speaker 1: Around. No. Because for what I know, his son cooperates with him. So around. It's more of a business partnership rather than a father son relationship. Speaker 0: So his son kidnaps children too. Speaker 1: Around. He delivers them despite the fact the whole thing takes place in Germany or in the Netherlands. Around. There are organized rings here that work nonstop like ants to track those women. Speaker 2: To get Speaker 1: to know their daily routines and habits. Around To see what they do, where their children are, where they leave them. Around. Therefore, I believe this practice is meticulously planned and carried through. Speaker 0: It's a whole around. Speaker 1: It's a whole process. Speaker 0: It's a whole team of people that look for those women. Right? Speaker 1: Of course, it is. When I talked to him, around. He told me he comes to Poland, for example, and very often looks for the gold himself. Around Allegedly. Where? In parks, stores, restaurants, cafes. Around. Allegedly, after so many years in the business, around. He has an 80% chance to successfully identify a pregnant girl around Who'd at least be willing to talk to him? Speaker 0: He identifies them like police officers are taught around to identify criminals. Yes. As they walk the streets to identify thugs, so does he find his victim? Speaker 1: To find the right girl. Around. He told me it depends on a number of factors, clothes, behavior, or appearance. Around. Bayer, when he's already talking to the girl, he told me that pretty soon, around. Over a cup of tea or something. He's able to tell whether he's wasted his time or could take it a step further. Around. Speaker 0: How much do those girls charge for this? Speaker 1: Around. About 2 or €3,000, €5,000 if they are resistant. Around. But it often happens Speaker 2: around. They get no money at all. Speaker 0: You mean they're conned? Or are they still keen to get rid of the problem? Speaker 1: No. They are conned. It does happen. Speaker 0: Around. They are told they'll get paid in arrears, so they give their child away and are left with nothing? Speaker 1: Yes. Or they get €100 to keep him smiling. Around. Just to have them get a glimpse of cash. Speaker 0: So he doesn't even have to bother to kidnap the children as it would be a serious thing around including the police hunt and everything. Yes? Speaker 1: No. He doesn't. But if there is demand, as he puts it, around. If there is demand for a particular commodity it is sometimes a matter of hours around. Then the whole machine he's involved with focuses on delivering a specific child at a specific age, so they have to kidnap it. Speaker 0: Around. How many brothels do they have? Speaker 1: Around. 4. Speaker 0: How many children are in each of them? Speaker 1: Last time I asked, around. There were 7 of them in one of the German brothels. Speaker 0: Do those children live there? Yes. Around. Do they even leave the brothel? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: So they never go out for a walk. Right? Speaker 1: Around. They do go outside with a chaperone that watches them, but they never go beyond the wall or the fence. Speaker 0: Around. So it happens inside a house. Right? Speaker 1: Yes. In a house. A regular house. Speaker 4: Around. So a Speaker 0: child ends up there at the age of about 4? Speaker 1: Yes. About 4. Speaker 0: Why 4? Around. Speaker 1: It depends on what the clients want. Speaker 0: And then the child is stuffed with drugs? Speaker 1: Around. Yes. They're stuffed with drugs, cocaine or amphetamine. Around. But the child usually has intercourse with a pedophile about once a week only. Around. That's why there are so many of them, to stay in business. There must be a lot of children. Speaker 0: Why only once a week? Speaker 1: Around. A child can't be kept on cocaine or amphetamine all the time because it might kill them. Speaker 0: Around. So they're given drugs only during an intercourse? Speaker 1: Before an intercourse, whenever the need arises. Around. It's such a hermetic world that they know even several days earlier when and which will come and ask for a child. Speaker 0: Around. To what age does a child remain in a brothel? Speaker 1: Until the age of 12 or 13. Then what? Around They are sent to a regular brothel because such a child is no longer able to change their life. Their mind is so fucked up and around So is there a world that the only thing they can do is go to an adult brothel? Speaker 0: And how long do they stay there? Speaker 1: As long as they can. Around If they're good at what they do Can Speaker 0: they go out or do they remain locked up? Speaker 1: Around. They may go out just like in the brothels in Poland, but a child like that generally becomes a social misfit. Around. They suffer from social phobias. They have never gone to school. They're taught on the spot what to say or how to sign their name at the most. Speaker 0: Around. After many weeks, the agent told me the trafficker would contact me by phone that night. Around. I'm really glad you finally called me and we can talk directly. Because with intermediaries, intentions are never around fully clear and so on. That really we can pursue. That'd be great. Around. Just tell me when we could do it. Do you have any idea? Do you have any plans, or is it still up in the air? Around. Speaker 4: I have to stay here for a few days. I have some business to attend to. Speaker 0: The trafficker broke off contact with me and it seemed we'd never get to meet. Around. No. Nothing. What do you think might have happened? Speaker 4: And I was afraid it was some sort of setup. Around. Do you know how many Polish children have no graves? So fucking many. Speaker 0: Around. The trafficker would change the time of our meetings several times. Finally, 30 minutes before the interview, Speaker 1: around. Speaker 0: Around. What kind of words did those guys use? Do they say merchandise and stuff? Around How does it work? Speaker 4: That's the way. That's the way. What's the term? A Dali, usually. Speaker 0: Around. Does the gender matter? Or are boys called that too? Speaker 4: It matters. Around. Merchandise is usually used for the boys and dolly for the girls. For him, around. A 10 year old boy is too old. A very little child, a 3 or 4 years old boy around Or a 3 or a 4 years old girl likes to touch around And lick a little weenie. Around. And the intercourse is between the thighs and the bones. Speaker 0: Around. What does the child's day look like? How many times a day or a week do they have sex? Speaker 4: Around. It depends. You can't have a job for an hour. It's a whole day or a whole night event. Around. At least for several hours. Speaker 0: Does it go on day after day? Around. Or are there any breaks because of the drugs they're given? No. No. No. Or does it basically depend on the number of clients? Speaker 4: Around. If 1 child is exhausted, there is another one. Speaker 0: Around while the first one is recuperating, right? Yes. Speaker 4: The child must eat something. They're also given some vitamins, something nutritious. Speaker 0: Around. Are they drip fed? Yes. Do they get vaginal abrasions or something? Around. Speaker 4: They get some medical care. Around. Someone takes care of them so they function and look well. Speaker 0: Around. So it's kind of breeding, human breeding. Speaker 4: Yes, exactly. Sometimes the children refuse to eat, around. Then they get injections. Speaker 0: It's something like a PTSD? Speaker 4: Kind of. Speaker 0: Around. Are they injected with nutrients or drugs? Speaker 4: There may be drips or it may be injections. Around. The women that look after them are kind of good around. Some of them are not that good. Around. As one of them pulls their hair until they do what she wants or respond when she calls out their names. Around. Because at the beginning, they don't respond to anything, not even their names, as if the kids completely turned off. Speaker 1: Around. How Speaker 0: many of those brothels do you think there are in Europe? Speaker 4: I know of about 4. In which countries? Around Belgium, Germany. Around. Poland. Speaker 0: Around. Where is the Speaker 1: one in Speaker 4: Poland? Tri City. Speaker 0: Around in a regular house as well? Yes. Speaker 4: Around. Those intercourses take place before a child is taken away for organs. Speaker 0: Around. Does the client have to pay more for that? Speaker 4: Of course. I believe the price amounts to around I mean, really, the whole team is engaged. So it must be around around Half a €1,000,000. And he's aware the child becomes useless after that. Around. Speaker 0: Do those 4 year olds live together with 7 or 8 year olds, or do they go somewhere else? Speaker 4: Around no. 7 or 8 years old are good for regular sex. Around. And those little kids are separated. Speaker 0: From what age can you have an intercourse with a child without risking tearing them apart? Around Speaker 4: Well, I'd say around. They can have regular sex from the age 6 or 8 and early. That is when recycling begins. Recycling? Around. Yes, at a VIP price. Around. VIP entertainment. He likes it when he shows his dick in. Around. He massacres the child. Speaker 0: Around. Does he murder the child or leave it to die? Speaker 4: Whatever turns him on, but then around. The child is a wreck anyway. That's cool. Speaker 0: How long can a child survive in such conditions? Around. Speaker 4: If there's a client for the VIP, around. Satisfaction, then they won't survive. Around. Children who are 6 around. Over. You pull through. Speaker 0: Around. How long do they stay in a brothel? Speaker 4: Those kids are hooked on drugs, so I'm not sure. Around Until they turn 14. What then? They get disposed of. Speaker 0: Around disposed of or sent to another brothel. Disposed of. Speaker 4: They're usually disposed of because they're no longer eligible for transplants. Speaker 0: Around. Due to drug related body exhaustion? Yes. Speaker 4: Around. When the child is no longer attractive, when it's useless, can't be used for spare parts any longer, they make movies around. Post them on the dark net. The dark net. Speaker 0: What exactly have you seen? Speaker 4: Around. Suffocation during sex is a standard thing. It is a common fantasy. Speaker 0: Around. To be Speaker 4: doing it to the very end. Speaker 0: What about nonstandard things? Around. The nonstandard thing Speaker 4: is to simply fuck everything up with your dick. Speaker 0: Around. In order to get to the truth, I spent several dozen hours talking to him. Speaker 4: A kid that already has some understanding of what's going on around them because around. To some extent. A 12 year old is aware of certain things. Around. This had such a vision of life. Around. For death, actually. That in a way, around. His reality becomes totally messed up. Around. As there are perversions, when they get turned on by pushing sex to the insane limit around so that the kid takes their own life during an intercourse. Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 4: For example, some kids slash their wrists around or beg to be choked to death. They grab their hands and around. Put them on their neck and squeeze them by themselves. That's what turns them on. Speaker 0: Around. Do they have any sophisticated toys, or are there no toys? Speaker 4: Around. You know, I guess. Around. All of them have their favorite fluffy toys. Some have their favorite pillows. Around. The kids often fight over their fluffy toys. Kids don't hug each other. Around. They're afraid of being touched. They are. Around They seem to know. They're even afraid to touch their own bodies. Speaker 1: Around I Speaker 4: don't know any more cold blooded woman than those from that brothel. Speaker 0: The ones that take part in all of us. Speaker 4: The ones that allegedly around look after the kids. Speaker 0: Are they ordinary women? Do they have children, husbands, their own homes, around. Or are they young individuals? No. No. More mature? Speaker 4: They're also European. And around. At least 2 of those that I have personally seen have brought their own children around. I'll send you a picture. Around. I look pretty worn out because I've been traveling. Mhmm. There are 2 girls there sitting on my lap. Around. Those kids stick to me so much, and I love children dearly. When I entered, they got pretty scared of around. Somehow, they caught my attention and my eyes smiled at them. Around. My eyes, not my face. You just can't put it in words. Around. 1 grabbed my leg. The other grabbed my other leg. I sat on the bed. Speaker 0: Around. How old were they? Speaker 4: Roughly? About 10. They around. They started singing songs for me. Both of them. And both were jealous of each other. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 0: How did they manifest their jealousy? Speaker 4: Around. They just wanted to be saved, something I couldn't do. Speaker 0: Around. When talking to the trafficker, I knew I around looking at the devil in the eye. Do those people believe in Satan? How do they worship him? Are they deep in that ocular shit? Speaker 4: Around. It's a sect. Those people don't even greet each other when they greet each other. I mean, they don't greet each other around. By just saying hello or good morning or gluten around. Or whatever normal people say when they greet each other. That's not what they say. Around. So what do they say? Are they fucking Satan or what? No. No. Around. They use completely different 2 words. What words? No. I'm not going to utter them. Speaker 0: That's it. Why? Speaker 4: Around. I promised myself I'd never save them. Speaker 0: What if I turn the camera off? Speaker 4: Around. Turn the camera off, and I'll tell you. Speaker 0: Around. Have you ever seen any Satanist artifacts when you went to visit those individuals? Around any ocular objects like pentagrams, inverted crosses, or something. Speaker 4: There is a pentagram under that inscription. Around. Really? No. It's fucking there, man. Speaker 0: The dude has a pentagram in his house? Speaker 4: Yes. Around. There are those words I told you they use to greet each other. That kind of our good morning. Around. Yeah. There's a pentagram under them. Speaker 0: There is the evil one behind the children's suffering. Around. It's obvious. Speaker 4: Working on a girl. Around. It's not a quick and easy process. It doesn't take a day or a week. Speaker 0: From around. Speaker 4: From my experience, I can tell you, it took us 18 months to work on a mother. She didn't know about it, around. But there was always someone watching her whether she was taking good care of her child, whether everything was okay. Around. At the same time, we pressed her relentlessly to abandon that bastard. Speaker 0: Around. Did she sell her child to a brothel? Speaker 4: She didn't fucking care. She took the dough, around. And that Speaker 0: was it. How much did she get? Speaker 4: She got around €10,000 in cash. Speaker 0: How old was the child? Around. Speaker 4: 4 or 5. Speaker 0: And she stole the kid? Speaker 4: Around. Yes. She was happy. Everyone had left her fucking alone, including the kid. Around. She thought the kid was up for adoption by a good family abroad. Speaker 0: Around. Where did it go? Speaker 4: The kid was not ready. Around. It wasn't very beautiful. And generally, she treated it in such a way around, but even I got to detest the care as a result, around. But they gladly accepted it. She thought the kid was adopted, yet in fact, around. They went for spare parts. Whatever comes to Speaker 0: light becomes known. I wanted the devil to reveal himself and show his true faith. Speaker 4: Around. How much Speaker 0: would I have to pay for a donor kit if I wanted to buy one from you? Speaker 4: Around. Well, you know, I just get my cut. I can't really tell. Speaker 1: How Speaker 0: much do you get? Speaker 4: Around. I get €15,000 for abroad with a kiss. Speaker 0: Around for carrying through the whole process of adoption? Yes. So if I ordered a child from you, how long would I have to wait? Speaker 4: Around. Do you have any special requests? A boy? A girl? Speaker 0: Around. Let's say I do or don't. It'll be faster if I don't. Speaker 4: So just a child. Right? Yes. 2 weeks. Around Contrary to what you might think, it's hard work. So I don't get a hard on when I think about those girls. I'm not in a hurry, around But I do get pressed. Every day, in the morning, I try to go by the book. Around. And use the power of positive thinking. Then I can see the nose and the eyes of a cute little doe before my face. Around. Those little pets look so sweet. Speaker 0: How long does it usually take to bring a girl around? Around Speaker 4: Bring a girl around. Speaker 0: I mean, from the moment you meet her to when she decides to hand the child over. Speaker 4: Around 2 or 3 meetings? Speaker 0: Around. Unbelievable. How long are those meetings? Speaker 4: There's a party. I take her to a party, then I'll work on her death. Around. A tester, but not only me. There are several of us. We help each other. I get help. Around. We support each other and do the job. There's a reason why we're there. Around. The girl decides not to fuck me on the 1st day, but I'll give a fuck about fucking her. Speaker 0: Around. Okay. So what are the options from there? Around brothel or spare parts? Speaker 4: It depends. If there's demand, they will even pull a child out of the brothel. Speaker 0: Around from the brothel for spare parts? Yes. So the parts are Speaker 4: a priority. Yes. Absolutely. Around. They bring in huge money quickly. I posted ad that I'm a businessman working abroad. Around. I visit Poland once a month and I need company. I want to be a sponsor. And girls reply. There are lots of replies. Around. You test them. It depends on what you're after. Whether after the organs or a child. Around What her living conditions are, and so on. Then you go and hunt the girl down. Around. It sometimes happens, those children are handicapped in some way. Around. So you start working on. Those girls are not particularly educated nor intelligent. Around. The child stands in their way. Taking a child away from them is not a problem. Speaker 0: Around. So what qualities should an ideal child dealing girl possess? Speaker 4: Around. First of all, she must be selfish. Around. You can see right away, she's ready to kiss your ass and do anything you want. Around. Since it's all about children, you begin by asking, do you have any children? Yes? Speaker 0: Around. What age? Speaker 4: Let's say she's got a 6 year old girl. Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 4: And you immediately offer a trip to, let's say, Mazari to sail in a boat there. Around. She's on cloud 9. You take her there for 2 or 3 days. Watch her whether she calls the child or her mother. Usually, it's around her mother that stays with the child and keeps calling. Mhmm. And when she answers her mother's calls, around. You hear what she says and how she says things and whether she's pissed off. Then her mother calls again, and she's yours. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 4: You pretend you're having fun. We talk. I tell her she's got a cute daughter. Of course, I am proud of her. Around. I took after. It turns out she has children. And that's when he cut this. Around Children, what the fuck do you need children for? Why would you take that on your shoulders? We kinda talk like a friend to a friend. Speaker 2: Around. Speaker 4: And of course, we watch her reaction. If there's anything we can do at all, Speaker 1: around. Speaker 4: We work on her. Speaker 0: Let's say she agrees. Speaker 4: Around. Yes. It sometimes happens when the girl tells you. You trust, I believe. You know, that fucking kid, around. It's just fucking trouble. And I don't know what to do with this shit and so on. Speaker 0: Around. Do you think it'll be over once you bear the child? Speaker 2: Yes. I think it'll be all over once I have that child. Around. Once it gets out of my body for good, I will go to its world while I remain in line. Around. I'm not going to see it ever again. I won't feel it. I won't hear it. Around. Many people won't understand it, but Speaker 1: most of them have Speaker 2: never been in such a situation. Around. Carrying a child you don't want is so devastating to your mind that it's hard to imagine. Speaker 0: Around. Despite what the women were planning to do after the child was born, the agent brought a layette for Marcelino. Speaker 1: Around. Pads for you. Speaker 4: What do Speaker 2: you like stuff? I don't care about Speaker 1: the child. His pants look fucking worthless. Around They're awesome. This is a puppy's paw. Do you know why it's here? Around. Because underneath it says I love my mom. Speaker 0: Why have you covered it? Speaker 1: Because the child won't have a mom. But I'm not covered I love my dad. Speaker 0: Around. We needed a midwife to help with the delivery. I set up a consultation, which due to the COVID nineteen had to be done online. Speaker 1: Have you been pregnant before? Speaker 2: No. Speaker 1: Whom are you carrying? A girl. Speaker 2: Around. What is her name? Marcisia. Marcelino. Speaker 0: I hope that conversation would stir some emotions in the mothers. Speaker 1: Around. You'll have contractions every 5 minutes. You'll watch them for an hour to see if they're getting stronger. Around. The next hour. Speaker 2: Once again, please. She got distracted. I got distracted. I'm basically trying to around give you a patchwork of specific information. Speaker 4: Use whatever we got right from the pages from our feet. Speaker 2: It's difficult. Around. I'm not getting attached. It's not difficult. I don't care whether it's difficult or not. I just don't form any sort of attachment. Around. I just wanna learn some basic stuff and go and bear that child and end my adventure with it. I don't want to elaborate on that. Speaker 1: Around. I'm not even asking you to. Speaker 0: I approached my interview with the trafficker as if it was a police interrogation around where you often go back to the same issues in order to establish the truth. Speaker 4: I found about 500 such girls on the Internet. Around. If a mother goes abroad to give her child up for adoption, the mother ends up in a brothel, around. And she gets hooked on drugs. And just call it. And so does the child. Around. A child is a kind of merchandise that brings pure profit as it requires no investments Speaker 1: around Speaker 4: And earns its living by working in a brothel. And when there's a bed for an organ, it goes on an operating table. For disassembly, around. The mother also goes for spirit parts. Speaker 0: Were you afraid of meeting such a person? Speaker 4: No. How come? Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 2: I believe a person should be approached in a holistic manner. Speaker 4: Around. Speaker 2: There's a task to be done. Speaker 1: Since he's a professional, Speaker 2: I also try to be professional without asking unnecessary questions. Around Restatements, short questions. Whatever I need Speaker 1: to know. Whatever is essential. Speaker 0: Did he make a good impression on you? Speaker 2: Around. He won me over with his approach and composure. Speaker 4: Those girls think they'll return to Poland with a lot of money. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 4: They think they'll get rich, but are unaware they're on their way to a brothel. I don't know what'll happen to them. Around. Or that they'll get hooked on drugs or lose their freedom. Around. Do you know what I felt while recruiting those girls? I didn't give a shit about those girls and their kids. All I cared about was the money. Around. The adoption of a child is carried through in such a way that the girl gets married to an Arab, a Muslim. Around. The Muslim law allows marrying even underage girls. Around. Then he gets to adopt the child. He takes the child away to his country, a motherfucker. Around in a legit way. Around In Muslim countries, papers are easy to get. For 50 local dollars, you can get any document you want. Around. Changing the first or last name is not a problem. And so any trace of the child is lost. Speaker 0: What then? Around. Speaker 4: They go to Egypt for a couple of days. They get new papers through some formal correction of the name and the last name in a matter of hours. Around. And the child returns as a completely different person. It returns to Europe, to the brothel, around. And no one is ever looking for that child again. The trace is lost. A child had left. It had a name and a last name, around. And a different person came back to Europe later. I will. Speaker 0: And the mother? She goes to a brothel around Speaker 4: In Europe. Speaker 0: What does it look like when they bring you kids for sale from Ukraine? Speaker 4: When a child comes from Ukraine, around. It gets new papers here in Poland. These are another child's papers with an identical ID. Only the photo of the imported kid is swapped, around. And practically, the trace is lost here. The child goes abroad with its new Polish ID. Speaker 0: Around. So you need the ID in case of inspection. Speaker 4: Yes. While crossing the border, just in case. Speaker 0: Around. Then there are no more problems because the real child stays in Poland while the other one is officially nonexistent. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 4: Around. And what happens with kidnapped children? Children are kidnapped only in urgent cases. Around. If there's an emergency, someone got ill, there's a problem, and an urgent transplant is needed, around. That's when kidnapping takes place. Speaker 0: Why is kidnapping so rare? Speaker 4: Because it's dangerous. Around. Dangerous for the organization. It doesn't pay to keep a kidnapped child in a brothel. Around because things may happen and there may be trouble. Around. It would be a total disaster if such a kid was found. Speaker 0: What's the difference whether they find a kidnapped around or a regular child in a brothel because you may pretend it's not really a brothel. Speaker 4: No one is going to admit it's a brothel, around. But there's a difference. Because if the child is being searched for by Interpol, it's a serious shit. Around. But he can always account for a regular child. Whether the child has been adopted and went through the adoption process with an Arab father, around. Or in any other way, rather than admitting the child's been sold or kidnapped. Around. The client doesn't have to come to the brothel in his own car. He is brought there. Around. The meeting spot is established early. It's different with different clients. Even the clients can't see each other. Around. It happens that they even tear infants apart with their dicks. Around. The baby dies. Speaker 0: In that room, yes? Speaker 4: Yes, in that room. Around. The moment the client informs he wants to kill the child, around. A whole group is immediately set up to pick up the organs. We schedule it so that everything overlaps around So that we have a recipient ready. Speaker 0: I think Whatever we can do. Is the child still alive when it's being taken to the operating room? It's done on the spot, around the villa. Is that where the organs are retrieved? Speaker 4: Yes. There's a special sterile room there. When they torture those children, around. The children get broken. Their arms get broken. Their legs their legs get pulled out of the hips. Around. They often get beaten up. Around. Torn apart. Organs, buttholes. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 0: Do you mean those little babies get their legs pulled out? Yes. Speaker 4: So it's sadism? Around. Yes, state it. Infants always suffer, they all do. Around. Later that child is useless. Speaker 0: Do you ever think you might get punished for that at some point of your life? Speaker 2: Around. No. I never do. I believe if you do not think about such things, Speaker 4: around. Speaker 2: They never happen. Speaker 4: Older children are exploited for a while. Around. They're addicted to the drugs they're sedated with. But infants become useless. Around. They go for spare parts. Older kids. Around. Can't take it mentally. Also because of the drugs, around. They ration them out to make the cost as low as possible because the kids are nothing more than just merchandise. Around. That also has an impact on their mental state. 1 boy slashed his wrists. He couldn't take it. Around. All that manhandling and the kind of life he had there. They did save him, of course, around but he was sent for spare parts. Speaker 2: Around. Speaker 4: The drugs put children in such extreme psychotic state around. That they hurt themselves. The kids' clients are very rich. Around. They even come in their own private jets and helicopters from fuck, who knows where. They are picked up at different locations. Around. Tilted Ridge. They pay a fortune to spend time with the child. Everything's arranged with the medical team. Around. They know the child will not survive. And if it becomes crippled for life, nobody's going to look after it. Around. So it immediately becomes an organ donor. Has branches all over the world. Around. With operating rooms, there are high security sites. Around. Few people know about this. Around. There are no regular brothels. We're talking about huge money here. So, around. They are perfectly organized. It's not just some dude or madam sitting there. Around. It's all professionally set up. Like a corporation? Yes. Like a corporation. Around. As complex as a corporation, there must be a medical team on standby. Someone must look after those kids. Around. Someone must organize the transplants and everything. Around. There must also be someone that helps. Around. Search clients for the organs out. Not alone. They will continue. The demand is huge and around. They won't change. To stop me from saving the child, the devil struck at the mother. Speaker 0: The darkness that the mother polluted with around, turned against her, and pushed her into depression. At some point, the mother told us she wanted to kill herself and the baby. Speaker 1: Around What if Speaker 2: they say November 9th? Speaker 0: Then you'll know it's going to happen. What's the problem? I guess November 9th around. It may sound stressful to you, and you'd wanna get rid of the baby sooner. Speaker 2: I can't promise that I won't hurt myself. It's starting to around. Press my head Speaker 1: up. Speaker 0: Are you having suicidal thoughts? Yes. I do. Around. Where did they come from? Speaker 2: From all this. Speaker 0: How could suicide help? Speaker 2: It'd give me peace of mind. Speaker 0: Around. Do you think killing yourself would rid you of the problem? Around. Do you know what impact it will have on you if the USG guy tells you're due sooner? Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: Around. But it may be delayed too. Right? And I can't predict. I'm not around. Able to how I'll behave in such a situation. I just can't. Speaker 1: We need a good USG test result. Around Once she has it, perhaps it'll show that she do on, say, 20th or 27th or even 9th, November around for the 5th November. Once she has the results in her hand, it may be easier for her. Speaker 0: Around. Are the suicidal thoughts getting worse? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 0: Have you already pictured in your mind how you're going to do it? Speaker 2: I have a friend who's acquainted with those things. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: He wouldn't say what kind of substance it is, but I know it's effective. Around It prepares specific med cocktails and for the right price, around He provides you with a package. Speaker 0: A suicide package? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 0: How do you find her? Speaker 2: Through a friend who had problems before and around. Wanted to commit suicide? She used his services and he's no longer here. Speaker 0: How much is such a suicide package? Around. Speaker 2: 380 zelatis? Speaker 0: Are you going to kill yourself and the child just because you can't wait around 12 days. Speaker 2: That's why I need that paper. I need the c section because I can't promise I won't hurt myself. Speaker 0: Around. Doesn't it thinking about her health? Doesn't she give you any motivation or relief? Speaker 2: This child gives me nothing, around. Absolutely nothing at all. I want to get rid of it. I'm not identifying myself with it. I'm not thinking about it. I'm not looking at it. Around. I'm not talking to it. I don't pay attention to it moving. I just don't think about it. I don't want it. I just don't want it. Around. For me, every day, when I get up in the morning and look at myself, at my belly and stuff, it is around. Just another day filled with pain. Speaker 0: Around. I wanted to be at Marceline's birth, around. But it turned out the mother couldn't wait until her due date. Fearing for the child's life, the only solution was a day to day c section. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: It's my bed. Around. The bed of a lady I share a room with. I've already signed all the papers. Around. Some kind of anamnesis for the anesthesiologist. I've had dinner. I got my supper. Around Typical hospital food, not too tasty. You can't have everything. I'm not around alone in the room. There's another lady, but she tried to talk to me about the baby about my situation. Around. Is it a Speaker 1: boy or a girl? Speaker 2: The lady's having her 2nd child. I don't know if it's Speaker 1: a boy or a girl. Speaker 2: Around. Anyway, she tried to have a conversation with me. I told her the truth about my situation and she never spoke to me again. Around. As for the baby's test results, they were good. Almost 3 kilos of a girl. Around. My mental state is getting better. Speaker 1: I feel more relieved, but I'm getting stressed around. Speaker 2: About the very surgery. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: Around 540. I don't really know what it means. After CTG, I'm supposed to get washed and put on a shirt Speaker 1: around. For the c section and Speaker 2: come see the midwife. Speaker 4: Around. Around. Speaker 2: I'm pretty stressed out, but only about the surgery rather than all this. I have no thoughts about the child. Speaker 0: Around. Do you have any doubts? Speaker 2: I don't think so. No. I don't have any. Around. I don't because Speaker 0: I Speaker 2: have no doubts for now. I'm not sure about tomorrow though, but around. Common sense will prevail over them anyway. Speaker 0: Have you thought whether you'll ever have children again? Around. Speaker 2: Generally, yes. But for now, after reaching this point around. And considering what's going on, I don't think I wanna have a child at all. I'm horrified to see how underdeveloped my Speaker 0: around. Around. Marcelino was born at 12 PM. Healthy, she scored 10 points and weighed 3 kilograms. Speaker 2: Around. Okay. Let me get up slowly. Speaker 0: How are you feeling? Speaker 1: Good. It hurts, around. But I guess it's normal. Speaker 0: Around. Have you seen the baby or haven't you? Around. Speaker 2: No. I had a screen in front of my face. There was a screen. Around. But generally, it was so nerve wracking for me that around. I can't even describe it. Speaker 0: Nerve wracking in what sense? Because of the childbirth or because of the surgery? Around. Speaker 2: I don't know. Everyone in the whole atmosphere were kind of kind of grave a bit. Speaker 3: Around. It Speaker 2: took 40 minutes. It was horrible at the beginning because I couldn't breathe and my heart was rushing. Around. Then it got so serene night. I almost drifted away. Around. I didn't feel anything. I didn't know you feel nothing at all. 1st, I could feel some jerking in my stomach and after that, around Basically nothing at all. Speaker 0: How do you feel about getting rid of the baby? Around. Do you feel relieved after the baby's been removed from your body? Speaker 2: Yes. I feel greatly relieved. Around. The c section was yesterday. Today, I feel way better. Around. Last night was a disaster. I couldn't sleep. I was being fed meds through a drip and some oral pills plus around. Hydroxyzine because I couldn't sleep due to the pain. Do I think about my kid? Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 2: I did dream about her, but I can't. I'm still I'm too dopey to wrap my head around it. Around. I don't really miss her, but I would like to see her. But I know it did do no good. Speaker 0: Around. We need to see that child. Speaker 2: I'm not sure I can take it. I mean, maybe in the evening, but I around. I can't promise it won't mess up my head. Speaker 0: Okay. You'll see how you'll feel. Speaker 2: Around. Later, when I'm able to go there myself, do what I've gotta do, film her, take some pictures, and leave, around. I think I'll be good. But to lie with her in the patient recovery room? Speaker 4: In fact, I'll I get it. But could Speaker 0: you spare her 10 minutes? Speaker 2: Couldn't you? Around. What am I supposed to do with her for 10 minutes? I asked Speaker 0: the mother to show me the baby as I wanted to see Marceline at least once. Around. The mother wanted no contact with the baby whatsoever. Around. She told me the worst moment came when Marcelino suddenly sneezed and looked her in the eye. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: I don't know how she's doing. I just wanna get out of the hospital as soon as possible to cut myself off. Around. I'm alone in the room. Around. I mainly sleep and watch TV. I walk around a little. Nothing special. So I'm sitting here. Around. Thank you. That does me no good. I'm I must occupy myself with something. Around. Speaker 0: I asked myself if the police were able to save that child and give me 100% guarantee she'd be safe. Around. While delving into the topic, I came across a moving appeal of another mother to the kidnapper of her child. I decided to get in touch with her. Speaker 2: Around. On the day you Speaker 3: came into my life and changed it into a nightmare, around. That day you kidnapped my son. Although so many years have passed by, my pain and my longing for him have grown even bigger. Around. Finding to mock is the sense of my life. Do you know how it hurts to be separated around. For such a long time, do you know the pain of losing such a young child? Speaker 1: Around. My husband was upstairs, and we were Speaker 3: in the course of building our house. Around. The first thing I did when I entered our property was asking where Tomac was. Speaker 2: Around. He said he had seen him Speaker 3: playing 10 or 15 minutes before. Around. I looked around, but he was nowhere to be seen. I put down my shopping bag with groceries Speaker 2: around and walked back outside. Speaker 3: I called out to him to no avail. Speaker 2: Around. I remained outside the house. I sat Speaker 3: on the steps not knowing what to do with myself. Around. I didn't know where to go. In the dark, I stumbled into the worst and the darkest places around Despite being a total coward. On such occasions, you feel no fear. Speaker 1: Around. You do not fear for yourself. Speaker 3: It's your priority to find the missing child. Around. While sitting on those steps, I began to pray. Speaker 2: I said, god, around. If you need Speaker 3: to punish someone, punish me and spare the child. Speaker 1: Around. Come on. Speaker 3: Don't let him feel the pain of separation. Around Because the child is not an object that we throw away once we get bored with it. Speaker 1: It's a living being. Speaker 3: You've got to fend for it. Around. You can't give up. So 30 years later, I'm still fighting around. And I believe my son is alive. Speaker 0: There is an age progression image of Tomek in his twenties. Speaker 1: Around. I hope this progression Speaker 3: shows exactly what Tomahawk would look like at the age of 22. Around. In 2015, we set up a Facebook profile around. Tomac's profile, a missing person. The moment my appeal to the kidnapper came out, around until Mach's age progression was publicized. Around. We got a message with a photo from what later turned out to be a fake account. That Tomac that missing Tomac was now Ryan Pitt. Around. It also included his whereabouts. When I opened that photograph, I almost passed out. Around. I sat on a stool and said, god almighty, this is my. Speaker 0: Around. The 2 men were so similar that the Polish police decided to contact the FBI. Around. Do you think the FBI did all they could? Speaker 3: They checked it around Just to get us off their back so we leave them alone. I know our side was putting pressure on them. Speaker 0: Around. The FBI said they check Ryan Pitt's birth certificate. Speaker 3: Because he got married there, around. Speaker 2: He had to have a valid copy Speaker 3: of his birth certificate. Right? Around And they sent us information that his birth certificate was checked and that it was an original document, and that was it. Around. There was no prior information about him. No place of birth. Around. Even his date of birth differs on different sites on the Internet. So it really makes me wonder. Around. And all the information that you can find about him starts from the age of 5. Speaker 0: In my opinion, FBI failed. Around. They dropped the case too early and didn't explain the kidnapping. Speaker 3: Doing the research on that family's path, around. Speaker 1: Doctor Speaker 3: We found information that Ryan's grandparents were patrons of an orphanage around located in their town. I guess switching 1 kid with another wouldn't be difficult at all. Around. Speaker 0: Ryan Pitts was a soldier decorated by president Obama. Speaker 3: Around. When he was decorated by president Obama, several interviews appeared, and there was an interview with his grandmother. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 3: Who told Ryan's story. Speaker 2: Around. And Speaker 3: in that interview, she made it clear that Ryan had to fight for himself around. Since his early childhood. Around. My husband's DNA and mine are in the general database, and they are available for verification. Around. It's generally known that all the US army soldiers submit their DNA. Around. So the DNA results are available in the US military database, but no one wants to give us access to it. So there is a possibility to verify that. Around. Ryan himself doesn't want to give his consent. He doesn't agree for DNA verification, around And we cannot force them to do that. Around. Only the court would be able to do it. Speaker 0: Ryan Pitts lives in the USA. Around. He has a wife and a child there. If it turns out that he's the kidnapped boy, Thomas, within a day, would lose the rights of an American citizen around and would be deported to Poland. Speaker 3: He wouldn't have the right to stay there because it would mean that all the documents of his origin around has been forged. He'll do everything to avoid these tests around. Because they would mean the end of this family. Around. I'm afraid that I'll die without knowing the truth and the ending to this place. Speaker 0: Around. I came to the conclusion that in order to have 100% guarantee that Marcelino would be safe, around. I had to save her by myself. I moved to the negotiation phase, and I asked the evil ones what I had to do to save a child. Wants to sell a child for organs around or to a brothel through you. Around. What deal do I have to make with you to stop it from happening? Speaker 4: Oh, fuck. Around. Then we would be taking money. Speaker 0: Around. What money? 1st of all, Speaker 4: you wouldn't be talking to me. I doubt Speaker 0: around because Speaker 4: It would be I think that around. It would be mister Speaker 0: Is there anything apart from money that could motivate them? Speaker 4: Around. You'd have to come up with some sort of deal with them. But you work in a different sector, around. So you won't make a deal with them. They only care about money. What? Speaker 0: What type of a deal? Speaker 4: Some sort of exchange? Around. A slut for a slut? A body for a body? Speaker 0: So I'd have to give them some girl. Speaker 4: Around. You'd have to do something bad. Speaker 0: Sell a girl for a kid. Speaker 4: You'd have to do something bad. Speaker 0: Or another kid for a kid. Exactly. Or what if I exchanged an adult person Speaker 4: for that around. 100%. That would also work? 100%. Speaker 0: It would work for sure? Speaker 4: Yes. But for what you want, you'd have to pay additionally. Around. So here, there would be some amount to pay around or an exchange or barter. Speaker 0: So if I offered a guy or a woman, around and have to pay additionally because they would be worth less than a Speaker 4: child? You'd have to pay additionally one way or another. But around. But if someone was in an urgent need for organs, he wouldn't afford such a deal. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: If we Speaker 1: made a deal with those people that we'd sell them a child around And they'd give us money. We wouldn't be able to back out because for those people, too much money is at stake. They don't give a shit about us and that child. Around. They only care for real American dollars and nothing else. These people are devoid of human emotions. Around. So if they are able to sell an alive child's organs, they will not think twice to cut our throats. Around. It won't be a problem for them whatsoever. Speaker 0: I solved that problem. I took the baby over from the traffickers around, and I saved it from being sold, and no one cut anybody's throat. Soon, the mother came to a decision to give the baby up for a legal adoption. Around. The mother didn't care what would happen to the baby. Taking into consideration the set of circumstances, around. I recommended to her that a Catholic facility should take care of the adoption. Speaker 1: You have to fill in the application. If you want, around. I can tell you which adoption facility she will be taking. It will be Speaker 2: a Catholic one. Yes. I really want a Catholic facility. Speaker 1: Around Then you'll have to write a few sentences. The reason? Speaker 2: I don't Speaker 1: expect you to describe anything in Speaker 0: detail, around But Speaker 1: it must be here for sure. You have to put it in words somehow. I cannot tell you what to write. Around. You have to come up with it yourself. Speaker 0: I was waiting for the date of the court hearing during which the mother was to around if she was actually giving her baby up for adoption. In the meantime, she went to a Catholic adoption center. Speaker 2: Around. How's baby? Do you have any information? She's healthy. Pretty. Speaker 1: Is she Everything is really good. Around. I have one picture. Could I see that picture? I have it somewhere in my phone. Okay. Speaker 4: Now you really fucked me up, Patrick. Around. You fucking smash me in a small pizza. Speaker 0: At one point, the trafficker realized that during our meetings, he told me too much. Around. Speaker 4: You fucked me up. Really fucked me up. Because I see the way you look at me that I see in your eyes. Around. You know what? I don't wanna see you anymore. I don't want it. I saw your eyes. The stuff we talked about, I do it. I do it too. Around. Do you know that I've already called all my friends? And I asked them if they can imagine me as a pedophile. Around. Do you know how fucking bad I feel about that? Speaker 0: Around. A man has no chance to win with a devil because the devil is 1000000 times more intelligent than we are. What we deal with is horrible, manipulative, around merciless power. But when a man is close to god, then devil doesn't stand a chance, and it roars angrily like a lion around because it knows that it has already lost. Unable to get to me, the devil attacked the child trafficker. Speaker 4: Around. Do you know I wanted to fucking end my life? I really wanted to fucking do it. I called my kid. I called my son. And I told him, around. These are the last words you'll hear from me. I already cut my wrist. You know? Around. Because of our conversations, I cut my wrists. I fucking cut my wrists. Around than sorry. Speaker 0: Finally, the day of the court proceedings came during which the mother was supposed to confirm her consent to give Marcelino up for adoption. I wanted to have proof this would happen. Speaker 2: I'll start recording. We've been waiting here for Speaker 1: around. Around. Do you agree to that around Statement? Yes. I do. And this consent is given in full conscience, isn't it? Uh-huh. Okay. Let's print the protocol. Around. Speaker 2: Thank you very much. Goodbye. Goodbye. Speaker 1: Around. If Speaker 0: I managed to save 1 child, around. Together, we're able to save 1,000.
Saved - September 1, 2023 at 1:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Investigative journalist Patryk Vega delves into the horrifying world of child organ trafficking, prostitution, pornography, rape, and Satanic rituals. Uncovering a billion-dollar industry, Vega exposes the global network involved. Germany and Belgium serve as hubs, while Ukraine and Poland are among the suppliers. Shockingly, 8 million children vanish annually, yet little action is taken. The lid must be lifted on this sickening reality.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

THE EYES OF THE DEVIL The video below shows a report from a couple of years ago by Patryk Vega, a Polish investigative journalist, who spent years digging in the very dark world of child organ trafficking, child prostitution, child pornography, child rape ending in death and Satanic (sex) rituals where children are murdered and then their organs removed for sale. It is a billion-dollar business that is protected and shielded. Patryk Vega was able to gradually penetrate deeper into the network and eventually managed to interview a child trafficker. Germany and Belgium are mentioned as hubs. Ukraine and Poland, among others, are suppliers of babies and small children. The trafficking however is a worldwide problem. 8,000,000 children disappear every year. This is well known since many, many, years but nothing is done about it. Why not ? Fill in the blanks yourself. The answer is obvious. Not for sensitive viewers. It is sickening. This is the first video in a series. The lid must come off the stinking pot.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This disturbing video provides a chilling glimpse into the dark world of child trafficking and exploitation, as well as organ harvesting. The speakers discuss the process of finding and selling children, the conditions in brothels, and the use of drugs to control them. They also reveal the involvement of a trafficker and the sect-like nature of the operation. The high demand for organs and the prices they can fetch are also discussed. The lack of empathy and regard for the well-being of the children is evident throughout. The video includes interviews with a mother considering giving up her child for adoption and a mother searching for her kidnapped son. Despite the difficulty of fighting against these evil forces, the speaker expresses hope that collective efforts can make a difference and save children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If anyone causes one of these little ones that believe in me to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. This is the only passage in the Bible in which Jesus Christ says that a man who corrupts a child around. He should better Speaker 1: kill himself. Speaker 0: Around. Would it make any difference to you whether your child ended up with a sex, around pedophiles or an organ donor, or it doesn't matter at all. Speaker 2: Around Pedophiles is the worst option I guess. Otherwise Speaker 0: Why? Speaker 2: Around Because it's evil. Right? So if the person who wants to sell their child, I'm in no position to judge. Around. No. I guess it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter after all. Honestly, I I Speaker 1: just wanna get rid of a problem. Speaker 0: Someone from the criminal underworld around got in touch with me, told me about a girl willing to sell her child to a brothel or as an organ donor. Around. I decided to save that child and make a documentary about it. Around. I began by removing the girl from a criminal environment and finding her a place to stay in a different town. Speaker 2: Around. Speaker 0: Around. The sale of the child was foiled by the COVID nineteen pandemic and the restrictions on cross border traffic. Around. What happened when you found out you were pregnant? What were your first thoughts? Speaker 2: I started looking for a solution. Around. I immediately knew I couldn't pass the child, so I was looking to resolve the problem. I believe I made the best decision I around Speaker 0: Although I managed to relocate the girl to a different town, she was still controlled by an agent who wanted to sell her child. Speaker 1: Around. When we already knew she was pregnant, I contacted my colleague, around A well known person in the criminal underworld, and simply told him I had a child for sale. Around. I wanted to sell that child for spare parts to brothel, to pedophiles. I didn't give a fuck where to go. Speaker 3: Around. I just wanted Speaker 1: to sell it and make money. Speaker 4: You don't need So Speaker 1: he said he'd help me. Speaker 0: What do you mean to a brothel? Around. Such small kids are used in brothels too? Speaker 1: Of course. It's pretty common in Germany. Around. Meaning Meaning, such small kids are first put up with a family that raises them until they turn 3 or 4, around. And then there's central brothel. Speaker 0: The sale of a newborn baby is carried through in such a way that in the hospital, the mother signs the child erector in as the father, then he takes the baby abroad. No one will ever look for them as the baby is officially somewhere in Europe with its father. Around. Do you have any emotional attitude for the baby? No. Speaker 2: No. No. Around. I'm trying to think practically. Speaker 0: And when you learn the baby's gender, around. Could that little person become more real in your head? Speaker 2: No. No. Speaker 0: Around. What do you feel when you look at your belly? Speaker 2: Nothing. Disgust. I don't like it at all. Around. Speaker 1: I'd like to get rid of it. Speaker 4: Why do Speaker 0: you think your life would be over if you had the baby? Speaker 2: Around. Because it's slavery. It's as high. Around. It's sleepless night. A baby is not a dog. He can teach to be alone for several hours or so. Around. It's not like A cat, for example, but you can leave it with a litter box, a bowl Speaker 1: of water, some food, and go around. For a Speaker 2: few days. Speaker 1: Which is more profitable? Around, Speaker 0: selling the child to organs or to a brothel. Speaker 1: For the mother, selling the child as an organ donor. Speaker 0: Around. Do you know the final price of the organs? How much a child like that cost in Europe? Around. Speaker 1: Yes. I do. Speaker 0: All in all, how much is the heart, for example? Speaker 1: I know the liver cost 70,000. Around. It's a black market. So it's obvious only wealthy people who have a lot of money are involved. Around. If their child is ill, this is their way to ensure it's longer life. What's the greatest demand? Around. The liver, the heart, the retina, the eyes, the retina. Around. Speaker 4: Do you Speaker 0: know the price of the retina or the heart? Speaker 1: The heart is worth almost €70,000 €1. Speaker 0: Around. What's your approach to selling a child? Speaker 2: Honestly, if it wasn't for this child who is merchandise, I wouldn't be able to Speaker 1: do it. Around. But Speaker 2: the thing is, if there's a possibility to earn quite good money on it, why not? Around. They offer 50 to a 150,000. Speaker 4: Around. It depends. Speaker 0: Do you believe it's a good price? 50 for a child? Speaker 2: Around. Without intermediaries, I'd say it's enough. Speaker 4: For sure. Just for chance. Speaker 0: Enough for what? Speaker 2: Around To make up for those 9 months. Around. Where else could a young person like me earn 50,000 in 9 months? Speaker 0: Around. Have you thought what you'd buy with that money? Speaker 2: No. No. But if I could afford it, perhaps a nice car? Speaker 0: Around. Children. Clothes. Speaker 2: A phone. Speaker 1: Around. No shoes. Speaker 0: Did you get any offers? Around. Speaker 1: We are offered 80,000. Was that offer attractive? It seems so at the beginning. Around. Especially since I knew she'd have to bear that child and then go through a recuperation process. Around. So I knew she'd need money. Therefore, it seemed attractive. But around. Later I did more research and figured out someone was trying. Push the stone. To con us in a way that instead of giving us the price in Euros, around. They did it in Polish bodies. Speaker 0: What's the name of the portal? Speaker 1: Its name is sperm donors, let's make babies. Around. It's a website where different people post their ads. Women who want to give away or sell their children. Around. Women seeking co parenting. Oh, Speaker 4: for for people? Speaker 1: I posted an ad in which I offered a child for money. Around. Around. After I've done that, I received replies from 4 families, around. But I also read other posts. I liked 2 of them because they were looking for girls. Speaker 4: Around. How did Speaker 0: you figure out it was trading? Speaker 1: Every time a little baby is involved, we know these ads have been posted by people around who want to get rid of such Speaker 4: a baby. Speaker 1: Around. And they don't care where the baby will end up. Our post was among them. Around. All I cared about was that somebody took the child and paid so that I could share the money with the mother. Speaker 0: So you didn't care much about the children's fate? Speaker 1: Around. No. I don't really. I care about my own child. My child is most important to me. Speaker 0: Do you believe in god? Speaker 1: Around. No. I don't believe in God. Speaker 0: Do you believe people get punished for doing such things later in life? Around. Speaker 1: No. I don't. If that was the case, I would have gotten punished long ago. Hundreds of times. Speaker 0: Around. So as to not think of the unborn baby as an object and treat it like a human being, I gave it a name. Speaker 4: Around. Do you think your baby has feelings? Speaker 0: Do you identify yourself with it? Speaker 2: No. No. No. I don't. Around. I think it's too small. A baby like that around. Can't understand pain, fear, or happiness. Speaker 4: We have changed it. Speaker 2: At least that's what I think. Around. I don't identify myself with it at all. Speaker 0: I guess, you know Do you know if you can hear your voice now? Speaker 2: Around Yes. But I'm not giving a thought. Speaker 0: And the beating of your heart? Speaker 2: I'm not thinking about it. Speaker 0: Why not? Around. Speaker 2: Why would I? I don't feel a need for that. There's no point in thinking about it. Speaker 1: There's no point at all. Speaker 2: Around. I'm here and the baby is there. We are 2 completely different worlds. At least, that's how I see it. Speaker 4: Around. Did you Speaker 0: give your baby a name? Speaker 2: No. Speaker 0: What name will you give it in hospital then? Speaker 1: Around. I Speaker 2: don't know. Perhaps I'll ask a midwife to come up with something. I have no idea. Around. I'm not thinking about those things yet. Speaker 4: Around. My Acadia, Speaker 1: that's why. Speaker 0: Once I got involved in all this, I gave the baby a name. Speaker 1: Around. What is it? Marcelino. Speaker 2: Very nice. Let it be Marcelino then. Speaker 0: Around. I thought I'd like to think and perceive him around or her as a human being and not as a dehumanized object. So that around. I could communicate with it in my head as with a concrete person. Speaker 2: I believe that giving it a name would, around. In a way, cause you to show interest in the whole process and how it should look around. And some things like preparing a layout for the hospital. I guess it might have a huge impact on my head. Speaker 4: Around. That's Speaker 2: why I avoid such situations. I haven't given it a name. Speaker 1: I haven't thought about Speaker 2: a name. Around. I don't do such things. Speaker 1: I'm just supposed to bear this child. Speaker 0: Around. Do you consider a possibility that your emotions might change and you'll regret it? No. Around. I was afraid they might open the borders at any time and the mother would flee abroad to sell the child there. In order to have control over this, around. I had to get to the trafficker. Do you think it's possible for me to talk to someone from Germany who specializes around in child brothels Speaker 1: You know what? Or transplants. I guess it is possible that someone would have to set you up with around. Even more so since those child brothels for pedophiles are mainly run by Muslims. Speaker 0: Around. Why? Speaker 1: Their religion and culture does not prohibit them from having sex with children. Around They have wives or husbands who are 5 or 10 years old. Food's not a problem for them. Around. Therefore, it's the Arabs sitting in one of those places. I have the. Speaker 0: How can such an interview be arranged? Speaker 1: I'd have to ask around. Around. Speaker 0: Do it then. Speaker 1: I will. Around. Speaker 0: For over a month, I was trying to get in touch with a trafficker. What did the child trafficker say? Help me understand what I need to do. Speaker 1: Around. Hold on. Speaker 0: Go on Skype and then what? Speaker 1: Yes. Go on Skype. Enter your login. Around Your login is an email address that has been set up for the sake of this conversation. What's the address? The address is gray ass 2020@hotmaildot around. Then you need to enter a password to your Skype account. It starts with a capital letter, demoralization, around. And you're in. Your nickname. Your fixed type first and last name is Grey Zone. Around He will. On? Speaker 0: Gray zone has already been set up? Yes. I don't have to do anything? Speaker 1: Exactly. Around. This is your first and last name, Grayzone. You will receive an invitation from him. Around. Speaker 2: You won't Speaker 1: see this log in. Only his Nick, imminent Germany. Around. The guy needs to feel safe. He's also afraid. Speaker 0: Just go in at the Weeks passed, but the Skype conversation didn't come through. Around. Why does he keep postponing our interview? Is it so hard to set up? Speaker 4: Around I Speaker 1: received a message. It was on Sunday or Saturday. Was it Friday? I can't remember exactly. On Friday around On Saturday, he sent me a message that he was very sorry, but he had to go away to pick up some merchandise. Speaker 4: Around. I Speaker 1: figured he wasn't going to pick up a cardboard of smokes or vodka, but he was going to pick up a child. Around. For him, a living child, a living human being is merchandise. He doesn't even call a child a child. He calls it merchandise around Because that's what it is for him. It's an object that can be monetized. Speaker 3: Around. He'd sell his Speaker 1: own mother for organs if she wasn't so old. No one wants her organs anymore. Around. Does he have his own child? Yes. A son. Speaker 0: Do you think he has any human feelings for him? Speaker 1: Around. No. Because for what I know, his son cooperates with him. So around. It's more of a business partnership rather than a father son relationship. Speaker 0: So his son kidnaps children too. Speaker 1: Around. He delivers them despite the fact the whole thing takes place in Germany or in the Netherlands. Around. There are organized rings here that work nonstop like ants to track those women. Speaker 2: To get Speaker 1: to know their daily routines and habits. Around To see what they do, where their children are, where they leave them. Around. Therefore, I believe this practice is meticulously planned and carried through. Speaker 0: It's a whole around. Speaker 1: It's a whole process. Speaker 0: It's a whole team of people that look for those women. Right? Speaker 1: Of course, it is. When I talked to him, around. He told me he comes to Poland, for example, and very often looks for the gold himself. Around Allegedly. Where? In parks, stores, restaurants, cafes. Around. Allegedly, after so many years in the business, around. He has an 80% chance to successfully identify a pregnant girl around Who'd at least be willing to talk to him? Speaker 0: He identifies them like police officers are taught around to identify criminals. Yes. As they walk the streets to identify thugs, so does he find his victim? Speaker 1: To find the right girl. Around. He told me it depends on a number of factors, clothes, behavior, or appearance. Around. Bayer, when he's already talking to the girl, he told me that pretty soon, around. Over a cup of tea or something. He's able to tell whether he's wasted his time or could take it a step further. Around. Speaker 0: How much do those girls charge for this? Speaker 1: Around. About 2 or €3,000, €5,000 if they are resistant. Around. But it often happens Speaker 2: around. They get no money at all. Speaker 0: You mean they're conned? Or are they still keen to get rid of the problem? Speaker 1: No. They are conned. It does happen. Speaker 0: Around. They are told they'll get paid in arrears, so they give their child away and are left with nothing? Speaker 1: Yes. Or they get €100 to keep him smiling. Around. Just to have them get a glimpse of cash. Speaker 0: So he doesn't even have to bother to kidnap the children as it would be a serious thing around including the police hunt and everything. Yes? Speaker 1: No. He doesn't. But if there is demand, as he puts it, around. If there is demand for a particular commodity it is sometimes a matter of hours around. Then the whole machine he's involved with focuses on delivering a specific child at a specific age, so they have to kidnap it. Speaker 0: Around. How many brothels do they have? Speaker 1: Around. 4. Speaker 0: How many children are in each of them? Speaker 1: Last time I asked, around. There were 7 of them in one of the German brothels. Speaker 0: Do those children live there? Yes. Around. Do they even leave the brothel? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: So they never go out for a walk. Right? Speaker 1: Around. They do go outside with a chaperone that watches them, but they never go beyond the wall or the fence. Speaker 0: Around. So it happens inside a house. Right? Speaker 1: Yes. In a house. A regular house. Speaker 4: Around. So a Speaker 0: child ends up there at the age of about 4? Speaker 1: Yes. About 4. Speaker 0: Why 4? Around. Speaker 1: It depends on what the clients want. Speaker 0: And then the child is stuffed with drugs? Speaker 1: Around. Yes. They're stuffed with drugs, cocaine or amphetamine. Around. But the child usually has intercourse with a pedophile about once a week only. Around. That's why there are so many of them, to stay in business. There must be a lot of children. Speaker 0: Why only once a week? Speaker 1: Around. A child can't be kept on cocaine or amphetamine all the time because it might kill them. Speaker 0: Around. So they're given drugs only during an intercourse? Speaker 1: Before an intercourse, whenever the need arises. Around. It's such a hermetic world that they know even several days earlier when and which will come and ask for a child. Speaker 0: Around. To what age does a child remain in a brothel? Speaker 1: Until the age of 12 or 13. Then what? Around They are sent to a regular brothel because such a child is no longer able to change their life. Their mind is so fucked up and around So is there a world that the only thing they can do is go to an adult brothel? Speaker 0: And how long do they stay there? Speaker 1: As long as they can. Around If they're good at what they do Can Speaker 0: they go out or do they remain locked up? Speaker 1: Around. They may go out just like in the brothels in Poland, but a child like that generally becomes a social misfit. Around. They suffer from social phobias. They have never gone to school. They're taught on the spot what to say or how to sign their name at the most. Speaker 0: Around. After many weeks, the agent told me the trafficker would contact me by phone that night. Around. I'm really glad you finally called me and we can talk directly. Because with intermediaries, intentions are never around fully clear and so on. That really we can pursue. That'd be great. Around. Just tell me when we could do it. Do you have any idea? Do you have any plans, or is it still up in the air? Around. Speaker 4: I have to stay here for a few days. I have some business to attend to. Speaker 0: The trafficker broke off contact with me and it seemed we'd never get to meet. Around. No. Nothing. What do you think might have happened? Speaker 4: And I was afraid it was some sort of setup. Around. Do you know how many Polish children have no graves? So fucking many. Speaker 0: Around. The trafficker would change the time of our meetings several times. Finally, 30 minutes before the interview, Speaker 1: around. Speaker 0: Around. What kind of words did those guys use? Do they say merchandise and stuff? Around How does it work? Speaker 4: That's the way. That's the way. What's the term? A Dali, usually. Speaker 0: Around. Does the gender matter? Or are boys called that too? Speaker 4: It matters. Around. Merchandise is usually used for the boys and dolly for the girls. For him, around. A 10 year old boy is too old. A very little child, a 3 or 4 years old boy around Or a 3 or a 4 years old girl likes to touch around And lick a little weenie. Around. And the intercourse is between the thighs and the bones. Speaker 0: Around. What does the child's day look like? How many times a day or a week do they have sex? Speaker 4: Around. It depends. You can't have a job for an hour. It's a whole day or a whole night event. Around. At least for several hours. Speaker 0: Does it go on day after day? Around. Or are there any breaks because of the drugs they're given? No. No. No. Or does it basically depend on the number of clients? Speaker 4: Around. If 1 child is exhausted, there is another one. Speaker 0: Around while the first one is recuperating, right? Yes. Speaker 4: The child must eat something. They're also given some vitamins, something nutritious. Speaker 0: Around. Are they drip fed? Yes. Do they get vaginal abrasions or something? Around. Speaker 4: They get some medical care. Around. Someone takes care of them so they function and look well. Speaker 0: Around. So it's kind of breeding, human breeding. Speaker 4: Yes, exactly. Sometimes the children refuse to eat, around. Then they get injections. Speaker 0: It's something like a PTSD? Speaker 4: Kind of. Speaker 0: Around. Are they injected with nutrients or drugs? Speaker 4: There may be drips or it may be injections. Around. The women that look after them are kind of good around. Some of them are not that good. Around. As one of them pulls their hair until they do what she wants or respond when she calls out their names. Around. Because at the beginning, they don't respond to anything, not even their names, as if the kids completely turned off. Speaker 1: Around. How Speaker 0: many of those brothels do you think there are in Europe? Speaker 4: I know of about 4. In which countries? Around Belgium, Germany. Around. Poland. Speaker 0: Around. Where is the Speaker 1: one in Speaker 4: Poland? Tri City. Speaker 0: Around in a regular house as well? Yes. Speaker 4: Around. Those intercourses take place before a child is taken away for organs. Speaker 0: Around. Does the client have to pay more for that? Speaker 4: Of course. I believe the price amounts to around I mean, really, the whole team is engaged. So it must be around around Half a €1,000,000. And he's aware the child becomes useless after that. Around. Speaker 0: Do those 4 year olds live together with 7 or 8 year olds, or do they go somewhere else? Speaker 4: Around no. 7 or 8 years old are good for regular sex. Around. And those little kids are separated. Speaker 0: From what age can you have an intercourse with a child without risking tearing them apart? Around Speaker 4: Well, I'd say around. They can have regular sex from the age 6 or 8 and early. That is when recycling begins. Recycling? Around. Yes, at a VIP price. Around. VIP entertainment. He likes it when he shows his dick in. Around. He massacres the child. Speaker 0: Around. Does he murder the child or leave it to die? Speaker 4: Whatever turns him on, but then around. The child is a wreck anyway. That's cool. Speaker 0: How long can a child survive in such conditions? Around. Speaker 4: If there's a client for the VIP, around. Satisfaction, then they won't survive. Around. Children who are 6 around. Over. You pull through. Speaker 0: Around. How long do they stay in a brothel? Speaker 4: Those kids are hooked on drugs, so I'm not sure. Around Until they turn 14. What then? They get disposed of. Speaker 0: Around disposed of or sent to another brothel. Disposed of. Speaker 4: They're usually disposed of because they're no longer eligible for transplants. Speaker 0: Around. Due to drug related body exhaustion? Yes. Speaker 4: Around. When the child is no longer attractive, when it's useless, can't be used for spare parts any longer, they make movies around. Post them on the dark net. The dark net. Speaker 0: What exactly have you seen? Speaker 4: Around. Suffocation during sex is a standard thing. It is a common fantasy. Speaker 0: Around. To be Speaker 4: doing it to the very end. Speaker 0: What about nonstandard things? Around. The nonstandard thing Speaker 4: is to simply fuck everything up with your dick. Speaker 0: Around. In order to get to the truth, I spent several dozen hours talking to him. Speaker 4: A kid that already has some understanding of what's going on around them because around. To some extent. A 12 year old is aware of certain things. Around. This had such a vision of life. Around. For death, actually. That in a way, around. His reality becomes totally messed up. Around. As there are perversions, when they get turned on by pushing sex to the insane limit around so that the kid takes their own life during an intercourse. Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 4: For example, some kids slash their wrists around or beg to be choked to death. They grab their hands and around. Put them on their neck and squeeze them by themselves. That's what turns them on. Speaker 0: Around. Do they have any sophisticated toys, or are there no toys? Speaker 4: Around. You know, I guess. Around. All of them have their favorite fluffy toys. Some have their favorite pillows. Around. The kids often fight over their fluffy toys. Kids don't hug each other. Around. They're afraid of being touched. They are. Around They seem to know. They're even afraid to touch their own bodies. Speaker 1: Around I Speaker 4: don't know any more cold blooded woman than those from that brothel. Speaker 0: The ones that take part in all of us. Speaker 4: The ones that allegedly around look after the kids. Speaker 0: Are they ordinary women? Do they have children, husbands, their own homes, around. Or are they young individuals? No. No. More mature? Speaker 4: They're also European. And around. At least 2 of those that I have personally seen have brought their own children around. I'll send you a picture. Around. I look pretty worn out because I've been traveling. Mhmm. There are 2 girls there sitting on my lap. Around. Those kids stick to me so much, and I love children dearly. When I entered, they got pretty scared of around. Somehow, they caught my attention and my eyes smiled at them. Around. My eyes, not my face. You just can't put it in words. Around. 1 grabbed my leg. The other grabbed my other leg. I sat on the bed. Speaker 0: Around. How old were they? Speaker 4: Roughly? About 10. They around. They started singing songs for me. Both of them. And both were jealous of each other. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 0: How did they manifest their jealousy? Speaker 4: Around. They just wanted to be saved, something I couldn't do. Speaker 0: Around. When talking to the trafficker, I knew I around looking at the devil in the eye. Do those people believe in Satan? How do they worship him? Are they deep in that ocular shit? Speaker 4: Around. It's a sect. Those people don't even greet each other when they greet each other. I mean, they don't greet each other around. By just saying hello or good morning or gluten around. Or whatever normal people say when they greet each other. That's not what they say. Around. So what do they say? Are they fucking Satan or what? No. No. Around. They use completely different 2 words. What words? No. I'm not going to utter them. Speaker 0: That's it. Why? Speaker 4: Around. I promised myself I'd never save them. Speaker 0: What if I turn the camera off? Speaker 4: Around. Turn the camera off, and I'll tell you. Speaker 0: Around. Have you ever seen any Satanist artifacts when you went to visit those individuals? Around any ocular objects like pentagrams, inverted crosses, or something. Speaker 4: There is a pentagram under that inscription. Around. Really? No. It's fucking there, man. Speaker 0: The dude has a pentagram in his house? Speaker 4: Yes. Around. There are those words I told you they use to greet each other. That kind of our good morning. Around. Yeah. There's a pentagram under them. Speaker 0: There is the evil one behind the children's suffering. Around. It's obvious. Speaker 4: Working on a girl. Around. It's not a quick and easy process. It doesn't take a day or a week. Speaker 0: From around. Speaker 4: From my experience, I can tell you, it took us 18 months to work on a mother. She didn't know about it, around. But there was always someone watching her whether she was taking good care of her child, whether everything was okay. Around. At the same time, we pressed her relentlessly to abandon that bastard. Speaker 0: Around. Did she sell her child to a brothel? Speaker 4: She didn't fucking care. She took the dough, around. And that Speaker 0: was it. How much did she get? Speaker 4: She got around €10,000 in cash. Speaker 0: How old was the child? Around. Speaker 4: 4 or 5. Speaker 0: And she stole the kid? Speaker 4: Around. Yes. She was happy. Everyone had left her fucking alone, including the kid. Around. She thought the kid was up for adoption by a good family abroad. Speaker 0: Around. Where did it go? Speaker 4: The kid was not ready. Around. It wasn't very beautiful. And generally, she treated it in such a way around, but even I got to detest the care as a result, around. But they gladly accepted it. She thought the kid was adopted, yet in fact, around. They went for spare parts. Whatever comes to Speaker 0: light becomes known. I wanted the devil to reveal himself and show his true faith. Speaker 4: Around. How much Speaker 0: would I have to pay for a donor kit if I wanted to buy one from you? Speaker 4: Around. Well, you know, I just get my cut. I can't really tell. Speaker 1: How Speaker 0: much do you get? Speaker 4: Around. I get €15,000 for abroad with a kiss. Speaker 0: Around for carrying through the whole process of adoption? Yes. So if I ordered a child from you, how long would I have to wait? Speaker 4: Around. Do you have any special requests? A boy? A girl? Speaker 0: Around. Let's say I do or don't. It'll be faster if I don't. Speaker 4: So just a child. Right? Yes. 2 weeks. Around Contrary to what you might think, it's hard work. So I don't get a hard on when I think about those girls. I'm not in a hurry, around But I do get pressed. Every day, in the morning, I try to go by the book. Around. And use the power of positive thinking. Then I can see the nose and the eyes of a cute little doe before my face. Around. Those little pets look so sweet. Speaker 0: How long does it usually take to bring a girl around? Around Speaker 4: Bring a girl around. Speaker 0: I mean, from the moment you meet her to when she decides to hand the child over. Speaker 4: Around 2 or 3 meetings? Speaker 0: Around. Unbelievable. How long are those meetings? Speaker 4: There's a party. I take her to a party, then I'll work on her death. Around. A tester, but not only me. There are several of us. We help each other. I get help. Around. We support each other and do the job. There's a reason why we're there. Around. The girl decides not to fuck me on the 1st day, but I'll give a fuck about fucking her. Speaker 0: Around. Okay. So what are the options from there? Around brothel or spare parts? Speaker 4: It depends. If there's demand, they will even pull a child out of the brothel. Speaker 0: Around from the brothel for spare parts? Yes. So the parts are Speaker 4: a priority. Yes. Absolutely. Around. They bring in huge money quickly. I posted ad that I'm a businessman working abroad. Around. I visit Poland once a month and I need company. I want to be a sponsor. And girls reply. There are lots of replies. Around. You test them. It depends on what you're after. Whether after the organs or a child. Around What her living conditions are, and so on. Then you go and hunt the girl down. Around. It sometimes happens, those children are handicapped in some way. Around. So you start working on. Those girls are not particularly educated nor intelligent. Around. The child stands in their way. Taking a child away from them is not a problem. Speaker 0: Around. So what qualities should an ideal child dealing girl possess? Speaker 4: Around. First of all, she must be selfish. Around. You can see right away, she's ready to kiss your ass and do anything you want. Around. Since it's all about children, you begin by asking, do you have any children? Yes? Speaker 0: Around. What age? Speaker 4: Let's say she's got a 6 year old girl. Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 4: And you immediately offer a trip to, let's say, Mazari to sail in a boat there. Around. She's on cloud 9. You take her there for 2 or 3 days. Watch her whether she calls the child or her mother. Usually, it's around her mother that stays with the child and keeps calling. Mhmm. And when she answers her mother's calls, around. You hear what she says and how she says things and whether she's pissed off. Then her mother calls again, and she's yours. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 4: You pretend you're having fun. We talk. I tell her she's got a cute daughter. Of course, I am proud of her. Around. I took after. It turns out she has children. And that's when he cut this. Around Children, what the fuck do you need children for? Why would you take that on your shoulders? We kinda talk like a friend to a friend. Speaker 2: Around. Speaker 4: And of course, we watch her reaction. If there's anything we can do at all, Speaker 1: around. Speaker 4: We work on her. Speaker 0: Let's say she agrees. Speaker 4: Around. Yes. It sometimes happens when the girl tells you. You trust, I believe. You know, that fucking kid, around. It's just fucking trouble. And I don't know what to do with this shit and so on. Speaker 0: Around. Do you think it'll be over once you bear the child? Speaker 2: Yes. I think it'll be all over once I have that child. Around. Once it gets out of my body for good, I will go to its world while I remain in line. Around. I'm not going to see it ever again. I won't feel it. I won't hear it. Around. Many people won't understand it, but Speaker 1: most of them have Speaker 2: never been in such a situation. Around. Carrying a child you don't want is so devastating to your mind that it's hard to imagine. Speaker 0: Around. Despite what the women were planning to do after the child was born, the agent brought a layette for Marcelino. Speaker 1: Around. Pads for you. Speaker 4: What do Speaker 2: you like stuff? I don't care about Speaker 1: the child. His pants look fucking worthless. Around They're awesome. This is a puppy's paw. Do you know why it's here? Around. Because underneath it says I love my mom. Speaker 0: Why have you covered it? Speaker 1: Because the child won't have a mom. But I'm not covered I love my dad. Speaker 0: Around. We needed a midwife to help with the delivery. I set up a consultation, which due to the COVID nineteen had to be done online. Speaker 1: Have you been pregnant before? Speaker 2: No. Speaker 1: Whom are you carrying? A girl. Speaker 2: Around. What is her name? Marcisia. Marcelino. Speaker 0: I hope that conversation would stir some emotions in the mothers. Speaker 1: Around. You'll have contractions every 5 minutes. You'll watch them for an hour to see if they're getting stronger. Around. The next hour. Speaker 2: Once again, please. She got distracted. I got distracted. I'm basically trying to around give you a patchwork of specific information. Speaker 4: Use whatever we got right from the pages from our feet. Speaker 2: It's difficult. Around. I'm not getting attached. It's not difficult. I don't care whether it's difficult or not. I just don't form any sort of attachment. Around. I just wanna learn some basic stuff and go and bear that child and end my adventure with it. I don't want to elaborate on that. Speaker 1: Around. I'm not even asking you to. Speaker 0: I approached my interview with the trafficker as if it was a police interrogation around where you often go back to the same issues in order to establish the truth. Speaker 4: I found about 500 such girls on the Internet. Around. If a mother goes abroad to give her child up for adoption, the mother ends up in a brothel, around. And she gets hooked on drugs. And just call it. And so does the child. Around. A child is a kind of merchandise that brings pure profit as it requires no investments Speaker 1: around Speaker 4: And earns its living by working in a brothel. And when there's a bed for an organ, it goes on an operating table. For disassembly, around. The mother also goes for spirit parts. Speaker 0: Were you afraid of meeting such a person? Speaker 4: No. How come? Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 2: I believe a person should be approached in a holistic manner. Speaker 4: Around. Speaker 2: There's a task to be done. Speaker 1: Since he's a professional, Speaker 2: I also try to be professional without asking unnecessary questions. Around Restatements, short questions. Whatever I need Speaker 1: to know. Whatever is essential. Speaker 0: Did he make a good impression on you? Speaker 2: Around. He won me over with his approach and composure. Speaker 4: Those girls think they'll return to Poland with a lot of money. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 4: They think they'll get rich, but are unaware they're on their way to a brothel. I don't know what'll happen to them. Around. Or that they'll get hooked on drugs or lose their freedom. Around. Do you know what I felt while recruiting those girls? I didn't give a shit about those girls and their kids. All I cared about was the money. Around. The adoption of a child is carried through in such a way that the girl gets married to an Arab, a Muslim. Around. The Muslim law allows marrying even underage girls. Around. Then he gets to adopt the child. He takes the child away to his country, a motherfucker. Around in a legit way. Around In Muslim countries, papers are easy to get. For 50 local dollars, you can get any document you want. Around. Changing the first or last name is not a problem. And so any trace of the child is lost. Speaker 0: What then? Around. Speaker 4: They go to Egypt for a couple of days. They get new papers through some formal correction of the name and the last name in a matter of hours. Around. And the child returns as a completely different person. It returns to Europe, to the brothel, around. And no one is ever looking for that child again. The trace is lost. A child had left. It had a name and a last name, around. And a different person came back to Europe later. I will. Speaker 0: And the mother? She goes to a brothel around Speaker 4: In Europe. Speaker 0: What does it look like when they bring you kids for sale from Ukraine? Speaker 4: When a child comes from Ukraine, around. It gets new papers here in Poland. These are another child's papers with an identical ID. Only the photo of the imported kid is swapped, around. And practically, the trace is lost here. The child goes abroad with its new Polish ID. Speaker 0: Around. So you need the ID in case of inspection. Speaker 4: Yes. While crossing the border, just in case. Speaker 0: Around. Then there are no more problems because the real child stays in Poland while the other one is officially nonexistent. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 4: Around. And what happens with kidnapped children? Children are kidnapped only in urgent cases. Around. If there's an emergency, someone got ill, there's a problem, and an urgent transplant is needed, around. That's when kidnapping takes place. Speaker 0: Why is kidnapping so rare? Speaker 4: Because it's dangerous. Around. Dangerous for the organization. It doesn't pay to keep a kidnapped child in a brothel. Around because things may happen and there may be trouble. Around. It would be a total disaster if such a kid was found. Speaker 0: What's the difference whether they find a kidnapped around or a regular child in a brothel because you may pretend it's not really a brothel. Speaker 4: No one is going to admit it's a brothel, around. But there's a difference. Because if the child is being searched for by Interpol, it's a serious shit. Around. But he can always account for a regular child. Whether the child has been adopted and went through the adoption process with an Arab father, around. Or in any other way, rather than admitting the child's been sold or kidnapped. Around. The client doesn't have to come to the brothel in his own car. He is brought there. Around. The meeting spot is established early. It's different with different clients. Even the clients can't see each other. Around. It happens that they even tear infants apart with their dicks. Around. The baby dies. Speaker 0: In that room, yes? Speaker 4: Yes, in that room. Around. The moment the client informs he wants to kill the child, around. A whole group is immediately set up to pick up the organs. We schedule it so that everything overlaps around So that we have a recipient ready. Speaker 0: I think Whatever we can do. Is the child still alive when it's being taken to the operating room? It's done on the spot, around the villa. Is that where the organs are retrieved? Speaker 4: Yes. There's a special sterile room there. When they torture those children, around. The children get broken. Their arms get broken. Their legs their legs get pulled out of the hips. Around. They often get beaten up. Around. Torn apart. Organs, buttholes. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 0: Do you mean those little babies get their legs pulled out? Yes. Speaker 4: So it's sadism? Around. Yes, state it. Infants always suffer, they all do. Around. Later that child is useless. Speaker 0: Do you ever think you might get punished for that at some point of your life? Speaker 2: Around. No. I never do. I believe if you do not think about such things, Speaker 4: around. Speaker 2: They never happen. Speaker 4: Older children are exploited for a while. Around. They're addicted to the drugs they're sedated with. But infants become useless. Around. They go for spare parts. Older kids. Around. Can't take it mentally. Also because of the drugs, around. They ration them out to make the cost as low as possible because the kids are nothing more than just merchandise. Around. That also has an impact on their mental state. 1 boy slashed his wrists. He couldn't take it. Around. All that manhandling and the kind of life he had there. They did save him, of course, around but he was sent for spare parts. Speaker 2: Around. Speaker 4: The drugs put children in such extreme psychotic state around. That they hurt themselves. The kids' clients are very rich. Around. They even come in their own private jets and helicopters from fuck, who knows where. They are picked up at different locations. Around. Tilted Ridge. They pay a fortune to spend time with the child. Everything's arranged with the medical team. Around. They know the child will not survive. And if it becomes crippled for life, nobody's going to look after it. Around. So it immediately becomes an organ donor. Has branches all over the world. Around. With operating rooms, there are high security sites. Around. Few people know about this. Around. There are no regular brothels. We're talking about huge money here. So, around. They are perfectly organized. It's not just some dude or madam sitting there. Around. It's all professionally set up. Like a corporation? Yes. Like a corporation. Around. As complex as a corporation, there must be a medical team on standby. Someone must look after those kids. Around. Someone must organize the transplants and everything. Around. There must also be someone that helps. Around. Search clients for the organs out. Not alone. They will continue. The demand is huge and around. They won't change. To stop me from saving the child, the devil struck at the mother. Speaker 0: The darkness that the mother polluted with around, turned against her, and pushed her into depression. At some point, the mother told us she wanted to kill herself and the baby. Speaker 1: Around What if Speaker 2: they say November 9th? Speaker 0: Then you'll know it's going to happen. What's the problem? I guess November 9th around. It may sound stressful to you, and you'd wanna get rid of the baby sooner. Speaker 2: I can't promise that I won't hurt myself. It's starting to around. Press my head Speaker 1: up. Speaker 0: Are you having suicidal thoughts? Yes. I do. Around. Where did they come from? Speaker 2: From all this. Speaker 0: How could suicide help? Speaker 2: It'd give me peace of mind. Speaker 0: Around. Do you think killing yourself would rid you of the problem? Around. Do you know what impact it will have on you if the USG guy tells you're due sooner? Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: Around. But it may be delayed too. Right? And I can't predict. I'm not around. Able to how I'll behave in such a situation. I just can't. Speaker 1: We need a good USG test result. Around Once she has it, perhaps it'll show that she do on, say, 20th or 27th or even 9th, November around for the 5th November. Once she has the results in her hand, it may be easier for her. Speaker 0: Around. Are the suicidal thoughts getting worse? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 0: Have you already pictured in your mind how you're going to do it? Speaker 2: I have a friend who's acquainted with those things. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: He wouldn't say what kind of substance it is, but I know it's effective. Around It prepares specific med cocktails and for the right price, around He provides you with a package. Speaker 0: A suicide package? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 0: How do you find her? Speaker 2: Through a friend who had problems before and around. Wanted to commit suicide? She used his services and he's no longer here. Speaker 0: How much is such a suicide package? Around. Speaker 2: 380 zelatis? Speaker 0: Are you going to kill yourself and the child just because you can't wait around 12 days. Speaker 2: That's why I need that paper. I need the c section because I can't promise I won't hurt myself. Speaker 0: Around. Doesn't it thinking about her health? Doesn't she give you any motivation or relief? Speaker 2: This child gives me nothing, around. Absolutely nothing at all. I want to get rid of it. I'm not identifying myself with it. I'm not thinking about it. I'm not looking at it. Around. I'm not talking to it. I don't pay attention to it moving. I just don't think about it. I don't want it. I just don't want it. Around. For me, every day, when I get up in the morning and look at myself, at my belly and stuff, it is around. Just another day filled with pain. Speaker 0: Around. I wanted to be at Marceline's birth, around. But it turned out the mother couldn't wait until her due date. Fearing for the child's life, the only solution was a day to day c section. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: It's my bed. Around. The bed of a lady I share a room with. I've already signed all the papers. Around. Some kind of anamnesis for the anesthesiologist. I've had dinner. I got my supper. Around Typical hospital food, not too tasty. You can't have everything. I'm not around alone in the room. There's another lady, but she tried to talk to me about the baby about my situation. Around. Is it a Speaker 1: boy or a girl? Speaker 2: The lady's having her 2nd child. I don't know if it's Speaker 1: a boy or a girl. Speaker 2: Around. Anyway, she tried to have a conversation with me. I told her the truth about my situation and she never spoke to me again. Around. As for the baby's test results, they were good. Almost 3 kilos of a girl. Around. My mental state is getting better. Speaker 1: I feel more relieved, but I'm getting stressed around. Speaker 2: About the very surgery. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: Around 540. I don't really know what it means. After CTG, I'm supposed to get washed and put on a shirt Speaker 1: around. For the c section and Speaker 2: come see the midwife. Speaker 4: Around. Around. Speaker 2: I'm pretty stressed out, but only about the surgery rather than all this. I have no thoughts about the child. Speaker 0: Around. Do you have any doubts? Speaker 2: I don't think so. No. I don't have any. Around. I don't because Speaker 0: I Speaker 2: have no doubts for now. I'm not sure about tomorrow though, but around. Common sense will prevail over them anyway. Speaker 0: Have you thought whether you'll ever have children again? Around. Speaker 2: Generally, yes. But for now, after reaching this point around. And considering what's going on, I don't think I wanna have a child at all. I'm horrified to see how underdeveloped my Speaker 0: around. Around. Marcelino was born at 12 PM. Healthy, she scored 10 points and weighed 3 kilograms. Speaker 2: Around. Okay. Let me get up slowly. Speaker 0: How are you feeling? Speaker 1: Good. It hurts, around. But I guess it's normal. Speaker 0: Around. Have you seen the baby or haven't you? Around. Speaker 2: No. I had a screen in front of my face. There was a screen. Around. But generally, it was so nerve wracking for me that around. I can't even describe it. Speaker 0: Nerve wracking in what sense? Because of the childbirth or because of the surgery? Around. Speaker 2: I don't know. Everyone in the whole atmosphere were kind of kind of grave a bit. Speaker 3: Around. It Speaker 2: took 40 minutes. It was horrible at the beginning because I couldn't breathe and my heart was rushing. Around. Then it got so serene night. I almost drifted away. Around. I didn't feel anything. I didn't know you feel nothing at all. 1st, I could feel some jerking in my stomach and after that, around Basically nothing at all. Speaker 0: How do you feel about getting rid of the baby? Around. Do you feel relieved after the baby's been removed from your body? Speaker 2: Yes. I feel greatly relieved. Around. The c section was yesterday. Today, I feel way better. Around. Last night was a disaster. I couldn't sleep. I was being fed meds through a drip and some oral pills plus around. Hydroxyzine because I couldn't sleep due to the pain. Do I think about my kid? Speaker 0: Around. Speaker 2: I did dream about her, but I can't. I'm still I'm too dopey to wrap my head around it. Around. I don't really miss her, but I would like to see her. But I know it did do no good. Speaker 0: Around. We need to see that child. Speaker 2: I'm not sure I can take it. I mean, maybe in the evening, but I around. I can't promise it won't mess up my head. Speaker 0: Okay. You'll see how you'll feel. Speaker 2: Around. Later, when I'm able to go there myself, do what I've gotta do, film her, take some pictures, and leave, around. I think I'll be good. But to lie with her in the patient recovery room? Speaker 4: In fact, I'll I get it. But could Speaker 0: you spare her 10 minutes? Speaker 2: Couldn't you? Around. What am I supposed to do with her for 10 minutes? I asked Speaker 0: the mother to show me the baby as I wanted to see Marceline at least once. Around. The mother wanted no contact with the baby whatsoever. Around. She told me the worst moment came when Marcelino suddenly sneezed and looked her in the eye. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: I don't know how she's doing. I just wanna get out of the hospital as soon as possible to cut myself off. Around. I'm alone in the room. Around. I mainly sleep and watch TV. I walk around a little. Nothing special. So I'm sitting here. Around. Thank you. That does me no good. I'm I must occupy myself with something. Around. Speaker 0: I asked myself if the police were able to save that child and give me 100% guarantee she'd be safe. Around. While delving into the topic, I came across a moving appeal of another mother to the kidnapper of her child. I decided to get in touch with her. Speaker 2: Around. On the day you Speaker 3: came into my life and changed it into a nightmare, around. That day you kidnapped my son. Although so many years have passed by, my pain and my longing for him have grown even bigger. Around. Finding to mock is the sense of my life. Do you know how it hurts to be separated around. For such a long time, do you know the pain of losing such a young child? Speaker 1: Around. My husband was upstairs, and we were Speaker 3: in the course of building our house. Around. The first thing I did when I entered our property was asking where Tomac was. Speaker 2: Around. He said he had seen him Speaker 3: playing 10 or 15 minutes before. Around. I looked around, but he was nowhere to be seen. I put down my shopping bag with groceries Speaker 2: around and walked back outside. Speaker 3: I called out to him to no avail. Speaker 2: Around. I remained outside the house. I sat Speaker 3: on the steps not knowing what to do with myself. Around. I didn't know where to go. In the dark, I stumbled into the worst and the darkest places around Despite being a total coward. On such occasions, you feel no fear. Speaker 1: Around. You do not fear for yourself. Speaker 3: It's your priority to find the missing child. Around. While sitting on those steps, I began to pray. Speaker 2: I said, god, around. If you need Speaker 3: to punish someone, punish me and spare the child. Speaker 1: Around. Come on. Speaker 3: Don't let him feel the pain of separation. Around Because the child is not an object that we throw away once we get bored with it. Speaker 1: It's a living being. Speaker 3: You've got to fend for it. Around. You can't give up. So 30 years later, I'm still fighting around. And I believe my son is alive. Speaker 0: There is an age progression image of Tomek in his twenties. Speaker 1: Around. I hope this progression Speaker 3: shows exactly what Tomahawk would look like at the age of 22. Around. In 2015, we set up a Facebook profile around. Tomac's profile, a missing person. The moment my appeal to the kidnapper came out, around until Mach's age progression was publicized. Around. We got a message with a photo from what later turned out to be a fake account. That Tomac that missing Tomac was now Ryan Pitt. Around. It also included his whereabouts. When I opened that photograph, I almost passed out. Around. I sat on a stool and said, god almighty, this is my. Speaker 0: Around. The 2 men were so similar that the Polish police decided to contact the FBI. Around. Do you think the FBI did all they could? Speaker 3: They checked it around Just to get us off their back so we leave them alone. I know our side was putting pressure on them. Speaker 0: Around. The FBI said they check Ryan Pitt's birth certificate. Speaker 3: Because he got married there, around. Speaker 2: He had to have a valid copy Speaker 3: of his birth certificate. Right? Around And they sent us information that his birth certificate was checked and that it was an original document, and that was it. Around. There was no prior information about him. No place of birth. Around. Even his date of birth differs on different sites on the Internet. So it really makes me wonder. Around. And all the information that you can find about him starts from the age of 5. Speaker 0: In my opinion, FBI failed. Around. They dropped the case too early and didn't explain the kidnapping. Speaker 3: Doing the research on that family's path, around. Speaker 1: Doctor Speaker 3: We found information that Ryan's grandparents were patrons of an orphanage around located in their town. I guess switching 1 kid with another wouldn't be difficult at all. Around. Speaker 0: Ryan Pitts was a soldier decorated by president Obama. Speaker 3: Around. When he was decorated by president Obama, several interviews appeared, and there was an interview with his grandmother. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 3: Who told Ryan's story. Speaker 2: Around. And Speaker 3: in that interview, she made it clear that Ryan had to fight for himself around. Since his early childhood. Around. My husband's DNA and mine are in the general database, and they are available for verification. Around. It's generally known that all the US army soldiers submit their DNA. Around. So the DNA results are available in the US military database, but no one wants to give us access to it. So there is a possibility to verify that. Around. Ryan himself doesn't want to give his consent. He doesn't agree for DNA verification, around And we cannot force them to do that. Around. Only the court would be able to do it. Speaker 0: Ryan Pitts lives in the USA. Around. He has a wife and a child there. If it turns out that he's the kidnapped boy, Thomas, within a day, would lose the rights of an American citizen around and would be deported to Poland. Speaker 3: He wouldn't have the right to stay there because it would mean that all the documents of his origin around has been forged. He'll do everything to avoid these tests around. Because they would mean the end of this family. Around. I'm afraid that I'll die without knowing the truth and the ending to this place. Speaker 0: Around. I came to the conclusion that in order to have 100% guarantee that Marcelino would be safe, around. I had to save her by myself. I moved to the negotiation phase, and I asked the evil ones what I had to do to save a child. Wants to sell a child for organs around or to a brothel through you. Around. What deal do I have to make with you to stop it from happening? Speaker 4: Oh, fuck. Around. Then we would be taking money. Speaker 0: Around. What money? 1st of all, Speaker 4: you wouldn't be talking to me. I doubt Speaker 0: around because Speaker 4: It would be I think that around. It would be mister Speaker 0: Is there anything apart from money that could motivate them? Speaker 4: Around. You'd have to come up with some sort of deal with them. But you work in a different sector, around. So you won't make a deal with them. They only care about money. What? Speaker 0: What type of a deal? Speaker 4: Some sort of exchange? Around. A slut for a slut? A body for a body? Speaker 0: So I'd have to give them some girl. Speaker 4: Around. You'd have to do something bad. Speaker 0: Sell a girl for a kid. Speaker 4: You'd have to do something bad. Speaker 0: Or another kid for a kid. Exactly. Or what if I exchanged an adult person Speaker 4: for that around. 100%. That would also work? 100%. Speaker 0: It would work for sure? Speaker 4: Yes. But for what you want, you'd have to pay additionally. Around. So here, there would be some amount to pay around or an exchange or barter. Speaker 0: So if I offered a guy or a woman, around and have to pay additionally because they would be worth less than a Speaker 4: child? You'd have to pay additionally one way or another. But around. But if someone was in an urgent need for organs, he wouldn't afford such a deal. Speaker 1: Around. Speaker 2: If we Speaker 1: made a deal with those people that we'd sell them a child around And they'd give us money. We wouldn't be able to back out because for those people, too much money is at stake. They don't give a shit about us and that child. Around. They only care for real American dollars and nothing else. These people are devoid of human emotions. Around. So if they are able to sell an alive child's organs, they will not think twice to cut our throats. Around. It won't be a problem for them whatsoever. Speaker 0: I solved that problem. I took the baby over from the traffickers around, and I saved it from being sold, and no one cut anybody's throat. Soon, the mother came to a decision to give the baby up for a legal adoption. Around. The mother didn't care what would happen to the baby. Taking into consideration the set of circumstances, around. I recommended to her that a Catholic facility should take care of the adoption. Speaker 1: You have to fill in the application. If you want, around. I can tell you which adoption facility she will be taking. It will be Speaker 2: a Catholic one. Yes. I really want a Catholic facility. Speaker 1: Around Then you'll have to write a few sentences. The reason? Speaker 2: I don't Speaker 1: expect you to describe anything in Speaker 0: detail, around But Speaker 1: it must be here for sure. You have to put it in words somehow. I cannot tell you what to write. Around. You have to come up with it yourself. Speaker 0: I was waiting for the date of the court hearing during which the mother was to around if she was actually giving her baby up for adoption. In the meantime, she went to a Catholic adoption center. Speaker 2: Around. How's baby? Do you have any information? She's healthy. Pretty. Speaker 1: Is she Everything is really good. Around. I have one picture. Could I see that picture? I have it somewhere in my phone. Okay. Speaker 4: Now you really fucked me up, Patrick. Around. You fucking smash me in a small pizza. Speaker 0: At one point, the trafficker realized that during our meetings, he told me too much. Around. Speaker 4: You fucked me up. Really fucked me up. Because I see the way you look at me that I see in your eyes. Around. You know what? I don't wanna see you anymore. I don't want it. I saw your eyes. The stuff we talked about, I do it. I do it too. Around. Do you know that I've already called all my friends? And I asked them if they can imagine me as a pedophile. Around. Do you know how fucking bad I feel about that? Speaker 0: Around. A man has no chance to win with a devil because the devil is 1000000 times more intelligent than we are. What we deal with is horrible, manipulative, around merciless power. But when a man is close to god, then devil doesn't stand a chance, and it roars angrily like a lion around because it knows that it has already lost. Unable to get to me, the devil attacked the child trafficker. Speaker 4: Around. Do you know I wanted to fucking end my life? I really wanted to fucking do it. I called my kid. I called my son. And I told him, around. These are the last words you'll hear from me. I already cut my wrist. You know? Around. Because of our conversations, I cut my wrists. I fucking cut my wrists. Around than sorry. Speaker 0: Finally, the day of the court proceedings came during which the mother was supposed to confirm her consent to give Marcelino up for adoption. I wanted to have proof this would happen. Speaker 2: I'll start recording. We've been waiting here for Speaker 1: around. Around. Do you agree to that around Statement? Yes. I do. And this consent is given in full conscience, isn't it? Uh-huh. Okay. Let's print the protocol. Around. Speaker 2: Thank you very much. Goodbye. Goodbye. Speaker 1: Around. If Speaker 0: I managed to save 1 child, around. Together, we're able to save 1,000.
Saved - August 25, 2023 at 8:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: The EU's Digital Services Act: Striking a Balance Between Regulation and Freedom of Speech Introduction: The European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA) has recently come into effect, bringing about a comprehensive set of regulations for large online platforms and search engines. This legislation aims to define and combat illegal content while ensuring the protection of freedom of speech. In this post, we will explore the key provisions of the DSA, its impact on public discourse, and the ongoing debate surrounding its implementation. Defining Illegal Content and Crisis Protocols: Under the DSA, the definition of "illegal content" is broad, encompassing any material that violates EU or national laws. This includes but is not limited to hate speech, terrorist propaganda, and copyright infringement. Importantly, the EU now has the authority to order platforms to remove or hide such content, even in the absence of a crisis. Additionally, crisis protocols can be implemented to enable swift action during extraordinary circumstances. User Accountability and Reporting: To ensure accountability, platforms are required to ban users engaged in illegal activities and report them to the EU. This measure aims to deter individuals from participating in unlawful online behavior. Furthermore, users who frequently share illegal content may face reasonable suspensions, encouraging responsible online conduct. Obligations and Oversight: The DSA imposes strict obligations on large online platforms and search engines. These entities are now obligated to promptly remove any illegal content and cooperate with independent auditors. By doing so, the aim is to create a safer online environment while maintaining the integrity of the digital space. The European Commission will oversee the management of system risks, ensuring compliance with the DSA's provisions. Critics' Concerns and Elon Musk's Compliance: Critics argue that the DSA's regulations may curtail freedom of speech and stifle open debate. They express concerns that the broad definition of illegal content could lead to overreach and the suppression of legitimate expression. However, it is worth noting that prominent figures like Elon Musk have confirmed their compliance with the regulation, signaling its enforcement and the need for responsible digital practices. Impact on Public Discourse: The implementation of the DSA has significant implications for public discourse. While the regulation aims to combat illegal content, it also raises questions about the balance between safeguarding online spaces and preserving freedom of expression. Striking this delicate balance is crucial to ensure that legitimate debates and diverse opinions continue to thrive in the digital realm. Conclusion: The EU's Digital Services Act represents a comprehensive effort to regulate large online platforms and search engines, aiming to combat illegal content while upholding freedom of speech. By defining illegal content broadly and implementing crisis protocols, the EU seeks to ensure swift action against unlawful material. However, concerns about potential limitations on freedom of expression persist. As the DSA takes effect, it is essential to monitor its impact on public discourse and strive for a harmonious coexistence between regulation and the preservation of open dialogue.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

VERORDENING (EU) 2022/2065 VAN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT EN DE RAAD van 19 oktober 2022 betreffende een eengemaakte markt voor digitale diensten en tot wijziging van Richtlijn 2000/31/EG ( beter gekend als DIGITAL SERVICES ACT ofwel DSA ) Sinds vandaag, 25.08.2023, is de Europese DSA wettelijk van kracht voor alle zeer grote online platformen en - zoekmachines, hostingdiensten en online bedrijven ( met uitzondering van kleine en micro bedrijven die krachtens art.29 van de Verordening uitgesloten zijn ). Via deze link kan u de 67 pagina's tellende Verordening raadplegen. Ze is beschikbaar in een veelheid van talen. Dit is de NL versie : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022R2065… Het is onbegonnen werk om alle aspecten van de DSA toe lichten. Ik zal mij dienvolgens beperken tot de meest relevante punten met betrekking tot de zeer grote online platformen zoals X, FB, Instragram... en de grote online zoekmachines zoals Google, Modzilla, Edge ... De EU heeft er bewust voor gekozen om de term " illegale inhoud " ruim te definiëren. De omschrijving van de term, in de tekst van de Verordening zelve laat niet vermoeden wat haar werkelijke intenties zijn. Art.3 h) bepaalt de term als volgt : “illegale inhoud”: alle informatie die op zichzelf of in verband met een activiteit, waaronder de verkoop van producten of het aanbieden van diensten, indruist tegen het Unierecht of tegen het met het Unierecht in overeenstemming zijnde recht van een lidstaat, ongeacht het precieze voorwerp of de precieze aard van dat recht Art.3 k) geeft ook een definitie van “verspreiding bij het publiek”: het op verzoek van de informatieverstrekkende afnemer van de dienst beschikbaar stellenvan informatie aan een mogelijk onbeperkt aantal derden. In punt 12 van de Preambule zegt de EU dienaangaande het volgende : Om de doelstelling van een veilige, voorspelbare en betrouwbare onlineomgeving te waarborgen, moet het begripv“illegale inhoud” voor de toepassing van deze verordening in grote lijnen de bestaande regels in de offline-omgeving weergeven. Meer bepaald moet het begrip “illegale inhoud” ruim worden gedefinieerd zodat het ook informatie met betrekking tot illegale inhoud, producten, diensten en activiteiten omvat. De werkelijke intenties van de EU zitten verscholen in punt 83, 91 en 108 van de Preambule van de Verordening : Punt 83 : Een vierde categorie risico’s vloeit voort uit soortgelijke zorgen over het ontwerp, de werking of het gebruik, onder meer door manipulatie, van zeer grote onlineplatforms en van zeer grote onlinezoekmachines met een feitelijk of voorzienbaar negatief effect op de bescherming van de volksgezondheid, minderjarigen en ernstige negatieve gevolgen voor het lichamelijke en geestelijke welzijn van een persoon, of op gendergerelateerd geweld. Dergelijke risico’s kunnen ook voortvloeien uit gecoördineerde desinformatiecampagnes in verband met de volksgezondheid,of uit online-interface-ontwerp dat gedragsverslavingen bij afnemers van de dienst zou kunnen stimuleren. Punt 91 : In crisistijden kan het gebeuren dat aanbieders van zeer grote onlineplatforms dringend bepaalde specifieke maatregelen moeten nemen, bovenop de maatregelen die zij in het licht van hun andere verplichtingen uit hoofde van deze verordening nemen. In dit verband moet een crisis worden geacht zich voor te doen bij buitengewone omstandigheden die kunnen leiden tot een ernstige bedreiging van de openbare veiligheid of de volksgezondheid in de Unie of aanzienlijke delen van de Unie. Dergelijke crises kunnen het gevolg zijn van gewapende conflicten,opkomende conflicten, terroristische daden, natuurrampen zoals aardbevingen en orkanen, alsook pandemieën en andere ernstige internationale bedreigingen voor de volksgezondheid. De Commissie moet op aanbeveling van de Europese Raad voor digitale diensten (“de digitaledienstenraad”) kunnen eisen dat aanbieders van zeer grote onlineplatforms en aanbieders van zeer grote zoekmachines met spoed een crisisrespons initiëren. Maatregelen die die aanbieders kunnen identificeren en eventueel toepassen, kunnen bijvoorbeeld het volgende omvatten: het aanpassen van inhoudsmoderatie procedures en het vergroten van de aan inhouds-moderatie gewijde middelen, het aanpassen van de algemene voorwaarden,relevante algoritmische systemen en reclamesystemen,het verder intensiveren van de samenwerking met betrouwbare flaggers, het nemen van bewustmakingsmaatregelen, het bevorderen van betrouwbare informatie en het aanpassen van het ontwerp van hun online-interfaces. Er moetworden voorzien in de noodzakelijke voorschriften om ervoor te zorgen dat dergelijke maatregelen binnen een zeer kort tijdsbestek worden genomen, dat het crisisrespons mechanisme alleen wordt gebruikt wanneer en voor zover dat strikt noodzakelijk is, en dat alle in het kader van dit mechanisme genomen maatregelen doeltreffend en evenredig zijn, naar behoren rekening houdend met de rechten en legitieme belangen van alle betrokkenen. De EU kan zelfs zonder dat of voor dat er sprake is van een crisis , crisisprotocollen opleggen die moeten nageleefd worden : Punt 108 In aanvulling op het crisisresponsmechanisme voor zeer grote onlineplatforms en zeer grote onlinezoekmachines kan de Commissie het initiatief nemen tot het opstellen van vrijwillige crisisprotocollen om een snelle, collectieve en grensoverschrijdende reactie in de onlineomgeving te coördineren. Dit kan bijvoorbeeld het geval zijn wanneer onlineplatforms worden misbruikt voor de snelle verspreiding van illegale inhoud of desinformatie of wanneer de behoefte ontstaat aan een snelle verspreiding van betrouwbare informatie. In het licht van de belangrijke rol van zeer grote onlineplatforms bij de verspreiding van informatie in onze samenlevingen en over de grenzen heen, moeten aanbieders van dergelijke platforms ertoe worden aangemoedigd specifieke crisisprotocollen op te stellen en toe te passen. Dergelijke crisisprotocollen mogen slechts voor een beperkte periode worden geactiveerd en de vastgestelde maatregelen moeten daarnaast beperkt blijven tot wat strikt noodzakelijk is om de buitengewone omstandigheid aan te pakken. Wat betekent dit in de praktijk ? Dat de EU voor eender welke materie die zij kwalificeert als een crisis ( pandemie, klimaat, een oorlog ... ) en zelfs zonder dat er sprake is van enige crisis aan zeer grote online platformen en dito zoekmachines het bevel kan en zal geven om elke informatie die zij aanmerkt als illegaal ( lees : elke informatie die in gaat tegen een gekozen narratief ) te weren, de posts te verwijderen of onzichtbaar te maken en de profielen die dergelijke informatie verspreiden te bannen, indien zij dit niet spontaan doen ( zoals Meta bijvoorbeeld die de EU regels al sinds oktober 2022 spontaan toepast hoewel zij toen nog niet afdwingbaar waren en miljoenen profielen permanent shadowbanned en om de haverklapt blokkeert ). Shitposting en blabla post die bepaalde personen of situaties publiek belachelijk maken is toegelaten zolang ze niet raken aan een specifiek narratief. Correcte informatie verspreiden die een narratief weerlegt of het leugenachtig karakter ervan aantoont mag niet, wegens gelabeld als " illegaal " De zeer grote online platformen en dito zoekmachines moeten onmiddelijk gevolg verlenen aan een bevel van de EU en alle gepaste maatregelen treffen op straffe van zware boetes : Art.9 :Bevel om op te treden tegen illegale inhoud 1. Bij ontvangst van een door de bevoegde nationale gerechtelijke of administratieve autoriteiten uit hoofde van het toepasselijke Unierecht of met in het Unierecht in overeenstemming zijnde nationaal recht uitgegeven bevel om tegen een of meer specifieke illegale inhoudselementen op te treden, stellen aanbieders van tussenhandeldiensten de beveluitvaardigende autoriteit of een andere in het bevel genoemde autoriteit onverwijld in kennis van het gevolg dat aan het bevel is gegeven, met vermelding of, en zo ja wanneer aan het bevel gevolg is gegeven. Meer nog, als de zeer grote onlineplatformen en dito zoekmachines kennis krijgen of hebben van personen die strafbare feiten plegen of illegale inhoud publiceren, moeten zij dit meteen melden aan de EU zodat zij meteen actie kan nemen ( zwarte lijst, bannen op alle platformen ... ) : Artikel 18 : Kennisgeving van vermoedens van strafbare feiten 1. Een aanbieder van hostingdiensten die kennis krijgt van informatie die aanleiding geeft tot een vermoeden dat een strafbaar feit is, wordt of waarschijnlijk zal worden gepleegd waarbij het leven of de veiligheid van een persoon of personen wordt bedreigd, brengt de rechtshandhavings- of gerechtelijke autoriteiten van de betrokken lidstaat of lidstaten onverwijld op de hoogte van zijn vermoeden en verstrekt alle beschikbare relevante informatie. De zeer grote online platformen en dito online zoekmachines MOETEN de profielen van gebruikers gedurende een redelijke tijd bannen. De redelijke tijd werd niet gedefinieerd. Artikel 23 Maatregelen en bescherming tegen misbruik 1. Aanbieders van onlineplatforms schorsen voor een redelijke periode en na een voorafgaande waarschuwing de aanbieding van hun diensten aan afnemers van de dienst die frequent kennelijk illegale inhoud verstrekken. 2. Aanbieders van onlineplatforms schorsen voor een redelijke periode en na een voorafgaande waarschuwing de verwerking van meldingen en klachten die via de in de artikelen 16 en 20 bedoelde meldings- en actiemechanismen en interne klachtenafhand elingssystemen zijn ingediend door personen of entiteiten of door klagers die regelmatig meldingen doen of klachten indienen die kennelijk ongegrond zijn. Er is krachtens de verordening geen algemene verplichting tot monitoring of actief feitenonderzoek maar, om vrijgesteld te worden van aansprakelijkheid moeten zij ook alle content verwijderen van zodra zij er kennis van hebben : Om in aanmerking te komen voor de aansprakelijkheidsvrijstelling voor hostingdiensten moet de aanbieder, wanneer hij daadwerkelijk kennis of besef heeft van illegale activiteiten of illegale inhoud, snel handelen om die inhoud te verwijderen of ontoegankelijk te maken. De EU voorziet in een zeer sterke controle op zeer grote onlineplatforms en dito zoekmachines. Gezien de noodzaak om te zorgen voor een controle door onafhankelijke deskundigen, moeten aanbieders van zeer grote onlineplatforms en van zeer grote onlinezoekmachines door middel van onafhankelijke controles verantwoording afleggen over de naleving van de in deze verordening vastgelegde verplichtingen en, in voorkomend geval, over eventuele aanvullende toezeggingen die zij hebben gedaan in het kader van gedragscodes en crisisprotocollen. Om ervoor te zorgen dat controles tijdig en op doeltreffende en efficiënte wijze worden uitgevoerd, moeten aanbieders van zeer grote onlineplatforms en van zeer grote onlinezoekmachines de nodige samenwerking en bijstand verlenen aan de organisaties die de controles uitvoeren, onder meer door de controleur toegang geven tot alle relevante gegevens en gebouwen die nodig zijn om de controle naar behoren uit te voeren, waaronder indien toepasselijk tot gegevens met betrekking tot algoritmische systemen, en door mondelinge of schriftelijke vragen te beantwoorden. De controleurs moeten ook gebruik kunnen maken van andere objectieve informatiebronnen, zoals studies van erkende onderzoekers. Aanbieders van zeer grote onlineplatforms en van zeer grote onlinezoekmachines mogen de uitvoering van controles niet in de weg staan. Controles moeten worden uitgevoerd volgens de beste praktijken in de sector en met grote beroepsethiek en objectiviteit, naar behoren rekening houdend, waar toepasselijk, met de controlenormen en gedragscodes. De EU heeft ook voorzien in een verklik systeem. Punt 118 : Met het oog op een doeltreffende handhaving van de in deze verordening vastgestelde verplichtingen moeten personen of vertegenwoordigende organisaties een klacht over de naleving van die verplichtingen kunnen indienen bij de digitaledienstencoördinator op het grondgebied waar zij de dienst hebben ontvangen, onverminderd de bepalingen van deze verordening inzake de toewijzing van bevoegdheden en onverminderd de toepasselijke regels voor de afhandeling van klachten overeenkomstig de nationale beginselen van behoorlijk bestuur. De EU trekt alle macht en bevoegdheden naar zich toe wat tot voordeel heeft dat de zeer grote online platforms en dito zoekmachines weten wie hun aanspreekpunt is. Punt 124 : Daarom moet de Commissie exclusief bevoegd zijn voor het toezicht op en de handhaving van de aanvullende verplichting om systeemrisico’s te beheren die door deze verordening wordt opgelegd aan aanbieders van zeer grote onlineplatforms en zeer grote onlinezoekmachines. Deze verordening betekent het einde van de vrijheid van meningsuiting. Niemand zal nog vrij zijn mening kunnen verkondigen in materies die door de EU aangemerkt zijn of worden als illegaal of schadelijk voor de volksgezondheid, het klimaat, een oorlog of eender welke andere maatschappelijke crisis. Zelfs als er geen crisis is. Het tegensprekelijk debat is voortaan voorgoed uitgesloten. Kritiek op een beleid niet meer mogelijk. De EU bepaalt wat wij wel en niet mogen zeggen. X voert de bevelen uit. Elon Musk had reeds op 18 juli 2023 aan Politico kenbaar gemaakt dat hij de DSA zou naleven en dit werd vandaag door X News Daily, met één zin, bevestigd. Eerder op de dag heeft de woordvoerder van de EU, hier op X, een video gepost met de mededeling dat de DSA sinds vandaag van kracht is. Musk was er als de kippen bij om onder die post te bevestigen " wij zijn er hard aan het werken ". Hiermee is alles gezegd.

Saved - August 23, 2023 at 8:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the face of mainstream media conveniently erasing Ukraine's corruption and neo-Nazism, the internet has proven to be an invaluable resource in preserving the truth. Thanks to the diligent efforts of Christophe Vandaele, a comprehensive list of deleted news articles has been compiled, shedding light on Ukraine's deeply entrenched corrupt practices. This compilation reveals a wide range of damning evidence, from election fraud to human trafficking, painting a grim picture of the country's state of affairs. It is crucial for the public to be aware of these revelations, even if the media attempts to hide them. Ukraine's corruption problem remains persistent and demands immediate attention. Despite receiving funding from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and facing international pressure, the battle against corruption is far from over. One prominent example of this ongoing struggle is the halted trial against former President Yanukovych, which showcases the vicious cycle of impunity that plagues the country. Additionally, the freezing of assets belonging to businessman Kolomoisky further highlights the deeply rooted nature of corruption in Ukraine. Despite promises and efforts, progress in combating corruption has been frustratingly slow, leading to growing dissatisfaction among international partners such as the European Union (EU) and the IMF. Nevertheless, Ukraine is not backing down in its fight for a corruption-free society. Recent dismissals and reforms demonstrate the country's determination to tackle this issue head-on. However, it is important to acknowledge that the battle against corruption is a long and arduous one, and there is still much work to be done. The persistence of corruption in Ukraine serves as a stark reminder that the public's right to know the truth should never be compromised. The efforts of individuals like Christophe Vandaele, who compile and preserve deleted news articles, play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability. Only by acknowledging and addressing the deep-rooted corruption can Ukraine hope to build a brighter and more prosperous future.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

MSM HEEFT ALLE NIEUWSARTIKELEN OVER DE CORUPTIE EN NEONAZISME IN OEKRAINE VAN VOOR FEBRUARI 2022 VERWIJDERD Kolonel Macgregor zei eergisteren bij Tucker Carlson dat Oekraïne het meest corrupte land ter wereld is, erger dan Mexico. Dat is juist en weet de MSM natuurlijk ook. Zij hebben er in het verleden genoeg over bericht. Overigens ook over groeiend probleem van extreem neonazisme. Maar ... dat mag het publiek sinds de invasie van Rusland in Donbas niet meer weten. Acteur Zelensky wordt neergezet als een halve en zelfs een volle heilige terwijl hij een regelrechte crimineel van de ergste soort is. Dus ... wat hebben de MSM gedaan ? Ze hebben alle negatieve persartikelen over Oekraïne die voor 2022 gepubliceerd zijn van het net gehaald ! Weg! Foetsie ! Van desinformatie gesproken : er is geen beter voorbeeld van hoe zeer de pers het volk bedot, beliegt en bedriegt. Het internet vergeet echter nooit. Met speciale tools kan alles terug gevonden worden. Hieronder de lijst van verwijderde nieuwsartikelen ( met grote dank Christophe Vandaele @christoph123 die wekenlang heeft zitten graven en een groot deel van de persartikelen terug gevonden heeft wat geresulteerd heeft in 16 pagina's A4 links die individueel kunnen geraadpleegd worden ) "Oekraïne: gesjoemel met de verkiezingen" (De Standaard, 2004): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf21032004_030 "Oekraïne blijft corrupt" (De Morgen, 2006): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraine-blijft-corrupt~b2a2f5df/… "Oekraïne is Europa's tweede meest corrupte land" (Knack, 2007): https://knack.be/nieuws/wereld/oekraine-is-europa-s-tweede-meest-corrupte-land/article-normal-27654.html "Oekraïne, het land van corruptie en chaos" (De Standaard, 2009): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20091104_067 "Corruptie ondermijnt democratie in Oekraïne" (VRT NWS, 2010): https://vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2010/02/03/corruptie_ondermijntdemocratieinoekraine-1-719166/ "Oekraïne wordt hofleverancier van mensenhandel" (De Morgen, 2011): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraine-wordt-hofleverancier-van-mensenhandel~bfb2d30d/… "Oekraïne op rand van burgeroorlog" (Knack, 2014): https://knack.be/nieuws/wereld/oekraine-op-rand-van-burgeroorlog/article-normal-125939.html "Oekraïense politie slaat betoging tegen corruptie neer" (De Standaard, 2015): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20151115_01973363 "Oekraïense president Porosjenko wist van corruptie in eigen kring" (De Morgen, 2017): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraiense-president-porosjenko-wist-van-corruptie-in-eigen-kring~bca5f8db/… "Corruptie kost Oekraïne 2 miljard euro per jaar" (VRT NWS, 2018): https://vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2018/04/18/corruptie-kost-oekraine-2-miljard-euro-per-jaar/ "Oekraïense oppositie hekelt corruptie en machtsmisbruik" (De Morgen, 2010): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraiense-oppositie-hekelt-corruptie-en-machtsmisbruik~b8638ccf/… "Oekraïense ex-premier Timosjenko opnieuw beschuldigd van corruptie" (De Standaard, 2011): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20110518_030 "Oekraïne moet corruptie bij politie en justitie aanpakken" (De Morgen, 2011): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraine-moet-corruptie-bij-politie-en-justitie-aanpakken~b9208a2a/… "Oekraïne wil corruptie wegwerken" (De Tijd, 2012): https://tijd.be/politiek-economie/internationaal/europa/oekraine-wil-corruptie-wegwerken/9250806.html "Oekraïne schort gesprekken met EU op wegens politieke druk en corruptie" (De Standaard, 2013): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20131122_00848363 "Corruptieproces tegen oud-premier Timosjenko gaat van start in Oekraïne" (De Morgen, 2013): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/corruptieproces-tegen-oud-premier-timosjenko-gaat-van-start-in-oekraine~bcf51d1e/… "Oekraïne vraagt hulp EU bij bestrijding corruptie" (VRT NWS, 2013): https://vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2013/11/07/oekraine_vraagt_hulp_eubijbestrijdingcorruptie-1-1774608/ "Oekraïense regering schuift corruptieschandaal in schoenen oppositie" (Knack, 2014): https://knack.be/nieuws/wereld/oekraiense-regering-schuift-corruptieschandaal-in-schoenen-oppositie/article-normal-129050.html "Corruptieschandaal in Oekraïne: verdachten op vrije voeten" (De Standaard, 2014): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20140918_01217246 "Oekraïense minister van Justitie neemt ontslag omwille van corruptie" (De Morgen, 2014): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraiense-minister-van-justitie-neemt-ontslag-omwille-van-corruptie~b8a3fb3c/… "Oekraïense minister van Financiën afgetreden om corruptie" (De Standaard, 2010): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20100111_041 "Oekraïne start onderzoek naar corruptie op hoog niveau" (De Morgen, 2011): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraine-start-onderzoek-naar-corruptie-op-hoog-niveau~bb7b6775/… "Europa en IMF blijven Oekraïne pushen tegen corruptie" (De Tijd, 2012): https://tijd.be/politiek-economie/internationaal/europa/europa-en-imf-blijven-oekraine-pushen-tegen-corruptie/9295513.html "Oekraïense oud-premier aangeklaagd voor corruptie" (De Standaard, 2013): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20130814_00729248 "Oekraïense president: 'Er is geen plaats voor corruptie'" (De Morgen, 2013): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraiense-president-er-is-geen-plaats-voor-corruptie~b9b86c11/… "Corruptie blijft welig tieren in Oekraïne" (Het Laatste Nieuws, 2013): https://hln.be/nieuws/buitenland/corruptie-blijft-welig-tieren-in-oekraine~a6c65f6e/… "Oekraïense ex-premier Tymosjenko in hongerstaking uit protest tegen corruptie" (Knack, 2013): https://knack.be/nieuws/wereld/oekraiense-ex-premier-tymosjenko-in-hongerstaking-uit-protest-tegen-corruptie/article-normal-109675.html "Oekraïne: EU houdt druk op de ketel over corruptie" (De Tijd, 2014): https://tijd.be/politiek-economie/internationaal/europa/oekraine-eu-houdt-druk-op-de-ketel-over-corruptie/9492319.html "Oekraïne vraagt hulp bij aanpak corruptie" (De Morgen, 2014): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraine-vraagt-hulp-bij-aanpak-corruptie~b6f219de/… "Corruptie tast geloof in Oekraïne aan" (Het Nieuwsblad, 2014): https://nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20140722_01114955 "Oekraïense president Zelensky moet meer doen tegen corruptie" (De Morgen, 2022): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraiense-president-zelensky-moet-meer-doen-tegen-corruptie~b2066f20/… "Oekraïense president Zelensky vraagt steun in strijd tegen corruptie" (VRT NWS, 2022): https://vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2022/02/14/oekraiense-president-zelensky-vraagt-steun-in-strijd-tegen-corru/ "Oekraïne opnieuw opgeschrikt door groot corruptieschandaal" (Knack, 2022): https://knack.be/nieuws/wereld/oekraine-opnieuw-opgeschrikt-door-groot-corruptieschandaal/article-news-1819289.html "België levert miljoenen aan Oekraïne in strijd tegen corruptie" (De Tijd, 2022): https://tijd.be/politiek-economie/belgie/federaal/belgie-levert-miljoenen-aan-oekraine-in-strijd-tegen-corruptie/10431656.html "Corruptie in Oekraïne blijft de burgerluchtvaart teisteren" (De Standaard, 2022): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20220123_93889350 "Oekraïne krijgt geld van IMF voor bestrijding van corruptie" (Het Laatste Nieuws, 2022): https://hln.be/buitenland/oekraine-krijgt-geld-van-imf-voor-bestrijding-van-corruptie~a76c0c0b/… "Oekraïne komt maar niet af van corruptie in de politiek" (Knack, 2021): https://knack.be/nieuws/wereld/oekraine-komt-maar-niet-af-van-corruptie-in-de-politiek/article-longread-1761889.html Vervolg van de lijst in de comments

404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank verwerpt voorlopige vrijlating Michelle Martin (Belga) De strafuitvoeringsrechtbank van Bergen heeft donderdag de aanvraag van Michelle Martin, de ex-vrouw van Marc Dutroux, om een voorlopige vrijlating verworpen. knack.be
Scoutsleiders die maandenlang in brievenbus plasten, krijgen opschorting De Leuvense correctionele rechtbank heeft woensdag twee scoutsleiders uit Leuven en Bierbeek de gunst van de opschorting verleend. Het tweetal was vervolgd voor stalking omdat ze tussen augustus 2005 en januari 2008 regelmatig in de brievenbus van een Leuvens koppel gingen plassen. standaard.be
Pagina niet gevonden vrt.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
In beeld: onweer zorgt voor vernieling De hevige onweerszone van gisteravond heeft een spoor van vernieling veroorzaakt over West-Vlaanderen en een deel van Oost-Vlaanderen. Het ging om een erg hevige buienlijn, gepaard met forse windstoten, bakken regen en zware hagelbuien. Daken werden beschadigd, ramen sneuvelden en bomen werden ontworteld. knack.be
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
Pagina niet gevonden vrt.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
'Leterme blijft premier, N-VA schaakmat' Wat zou u doen mocht u Elio Di Rupo zijn? Het programma De Ochtend op Radio 1 vroeg het aan Dirk Van Poucke, professor in onderhandelingstechnieken aan de Universiteit Gent en de Flanders Business School. Zijn antwoord is onthutsend: links CD&V verleiden, Leterme het premierschap aanbieden, de MR en de N-VA uit de formatie knikkeren en dat terwijl de financiële transfers van noord naar zuid groter worden. standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
'Film is kunst én commercie' Het was 'an offer he couldn't refuse'. tijd.be
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
Pagina niet gevonden vrt.be
Pagina niet gevonden - Knack knack.be
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
Directiecollege VRT wordt gehalveerd De raad van bestuur van de VRT heeft unaniem de nieuwe samenstelling van het directiecollege goedgekeurd. In het nieuwe college zetelen vanaf nu vier in plaats van acht directieleden. standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
404 tijd.be
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
Er ging iets fout HLN - Het Laatste Nieuws - Volg het nieuws op de nr1 nieuwssite in België, HLN.be brengt je het allerlaatste nieuws 24/24 en 7/7, uit binnen - en buitenland, evenals dichtbij met nieuws uit je eigen regio. hln.be
Bourgeois moet niet-benoemde FDF-burgemeester 40.000 euro De Brusselse rechtbank van eerste aanleg heeft Vlaams minister Geert Bourgeois (N-VA) veroordeeld tot 40.000 euro schadevergoeding aan de niet-benoemde burgemeester van Kraainem Véronique Caprasse (FDF). Bourgeois gaat in beroep. knack.be
VS buigen zich over toekomst kijkgedrag Na Uber, Airbnb en andere start-ups staat in de VS de volgende 'disrupter' klaar die een gevestigde industrie kan verstoren: de online tv-dienst Aereo. Ook hier rijzen vragen over de legaliteit. tijd.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
404 pagina niet gevonden - Het Nieuwsblad nieuwsblad.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
Pagina niet gevonden vrt.be
Pagina niet gevonden - Knack knack.be
404 tijd.be
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Er ging iets fout HLN - Het Laatste Nieuws - Volg het nieuws op de nr1 nieuwssite in België, HLN.be brengt je het allerlaatste nieuws 24/24 en 7/7, uit binnen - en buitenland, evenals dichtbij met nieuws uit je eigen regio. hln.be
Coronavirus - Aantal besmettingen schiet verder de hoogte in (Belga) Het aantal besmettingen met het coronavirus is tussen 26 december en 1 januari met 79 procent toegenomen, naar een dagelijks gemiddelde van 11.132. Dat blijkt woensdag uit voorlopige cijfers van gezondheidsinstituut Sciensano. knack.be

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

Lijst van verwijderde artikelen ( 2) "Oekraïne stopt proces tegen oud-president Janoekovitsj wegens corruptie" (De Morgen, 2021): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/oekraine-stopt-proces-tegen-oud-president-janoekovitsj-wegens-corruptie~b28365ab/… "Oekraïne: de vicieuze cirkel van corruptie en straffeloosheid" (De Wereld Morgen, 2020): https://dewereldmorgen.be/community/oekraine-de-vicieuze-cirkel-van-corruptie-en-straffeloosheid/ "Corruptie in Oekraïne blijft een hardnekkig probleem" (De Standaard, 2019): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20190319_04268022 "Oekraïne: van brekebeen naar corruptiestaat" (NRC, 2005): https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2005/03/26/oekraine-van-brekebeen-naar-corruptiestaat-3435585-a1305647 "Oekraïne gaat niet aan corruptie ten onder" (Volkskrant, 2006): https://volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/oekraine-gaat-niet-aan-corruptie-ten-onder~b1b073dd/… "Oekraïne belooft einde aan corruptie" (NRC, 2007): https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2007/03/07/oekraine-belooft-einde-aan-corruptie-11284630-a302579 "Nederland scherpt sancties tegen corruptie in Oekraïne aan," NRC Handelsblad, 2014. Link: https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2014/03/07/nederland-scherpt-sancties-tegen-corruptie-in-oekraine-aan-a1431966 "Oekraïense elite weer in opspraak wegens corruptie," De Volkskrant, 2016. Link: https://volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/oekraiense-elite-weer-in-opspraak-wegens-corruptie~b8a8111c/… "Oekraïne is corrupt, maar dat hoeft niet zo te blijven," Trouw, 2018. Link: https://trouw.nl/nieuws/oekraine-is-corrupt-maar-dat-hoeft-niet-zo-te-blijven~be66b53e/… "Corruptie is terug in Oekraïne, want er zijn geen keuzes gemaakt," NRC Handelsblad, 2019. Link: https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/05/23/corruptie-is-terug-in-oekraine-want-er-zijn-geen-keuzes-gemaakt-a3964787 "Nederland onderzoekt verdenkingen van corruptie bij hulp aan Oekraïne," Trouw, 2018. Link: https://trouw.nl/nieuws/nederland-onderzoekt-verdenkingen-van-corruptie-bij-hulp-aan-oekraine~b9f7116e/… "Oekraïense president schort omstreden ant-corruptiewet op," De Volkskrant, 2017. Link: https://volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/oekraiense-president-schort-omstreden-ant-corruptiewet-op~be49b0af/… "Nederland bevriest tegoeden Oekraïense zakenman Kolomoisky vanwege verdenking van corruptie," NRC Handelsblad, 2020. Link: https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2020/06/11/nederland-bevriest-tegoeden-oekraiense-zakenman-kolomoisky-vanwege-verdenking-van-corruptie-a4009697 "Oekraïense rechter neemt ontslag uit protest tegen corruptie," De Volkskrant, 2016. Link: https://volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/oekraiense-rechter-neemt-ontslag-uit-protest-tegen-corruptie~b018e1f1/… "Corruptieonderzoek Oekraïne breidt zich uit naar Nederlands bedrijf," NRC Handelsblad, 2019. Link: https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/09/18/corruptieonderzoek-oekraine-breidt-zich-uit-naar-nederlands-bedrijf-a3975563 "Oekraïense advocaat slachtoffer van aanslag in Kiev," Trouw, 2018. Link: https://trouw.nl/nieuws/oekraiense-advocaat-sl "Oekraïne is niet te redden van corruptie" (NRC, 2008): https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2008/04/17/oekraine-is-niet-te-redden-van-corruptie-11500299-a1216553 "Corruptie Oekraïne frustreert lidmaatschap NAVO" (Volkskrant, 2008): https://volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/corruptie-oekraine-frustreert-lidmaatschap-navo~bcbb2b7e/… "Oekraïne weer op de bres tegen corruptie" (NRC, 2010): https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2010/09/01/oekraine-weer-op-de-bres-tegen-corruptie-11943073-a1010838 "Oekraïne vecht tegen corruptie en oude politieke cultuur" (Volkskrant, 2014): https://volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/oekraine-vecht-tegen-corruptie-en-oude-politieke-cultuur~b72edf69/… "Corruptie Oekraïne, EU verhoogt de druk" (NRC, 2016): https://nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/12/15/corruptie-oekraine-eu-verhoogt-de-druk-5777737-a1534999 "Oekraïne begint aan rechtsstaat en corruptiebestrijding" (Trouw, 2017): https://trouw.nl/nieuws/oekraine-begint-aan-rechtsstaat-en-corruptiebestrijding~bd33f3e3/… "Oekraïne's nieuwe leider belooft anti-corruptiebeleid" (NOS, 2018): https://nos.nl/artikel/2235826-oekraine-s-nieuwe-leider-belooft-anti-corruptiebeleid.html "Oekraïne ontslaat hoofdaanklager vanwege traagheid in corruptiebestrijding" (De Standaard, 2022): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20220121_95110316 "Oekraïense president ontslaat minister vanwege corruptiebeschuldigingen" (VRT NWS, 2022): https://vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2022/02/08/oekraiense-president-ontslaat-minister-vanwege-corruptiebeschuld/ "Oekraïne verscherpt wetgeving tegen corruptie" (De Tijd, 2021): https://tijd.be/politiek-economie/internationaal/europa/oekraine-verscherpt-wetgeving-tegen-corruptie/10313752.html "Oekraïne vraagt hulp aan België in strijd tegen corruptie" (Knack, 2021): https://knack.be/nieuws/belgie/oekraine-vraagt-hulp-aan-belgie-in-strijd-tegen-corruptie/article-news-1744541.html "Oekraïne hervormt justitieapparaat in strijd tegen corruptie" (Het Laatste Nieuws, 2021): https://hln.be/buitenland/oekraine-hervormt-justitieapparaat-in-strijd-tegen-corruptie~a3f746cc/… "Corruptiebestrijding Oekraïne te traag: IMF stelt lening uit" (De Morgen, 2021): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/corruptiebestrijding-oekraine-te-traag-imf-stelt-lening-uit~be3878f3/… "Oekraïense president Zelensky gaat hard optreden tegen corruptie" (Het Nieuwsblad, 2021): https://nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20210113_94369518 "Oekraïne pakt corruptie aan en raakt daarbij ook gevoelige snaar in het Westen" (Knack, 2019): https://knack.be/nieuws/wereld/oekraine-pakt-corruptie-aan-en-raakt-daarbij-ook-gevoelige-snaar-in-het-westen/article-longread-1432145.html "Oekraïne vraagt VS om hulp bij bestrijding van corruptie" (De Standaard, 2018): https://standaard.be/cnt/dmf20180531_03542957 "Corruptiebestrijding in Oekraïne is een tragisch gebed zonder eind" (De Morgen, 2016): https://demorgen.be/nieuws/corruptiebestrijding-in-oekraine-is-een-tragisch-gebed-zonder-eind~bcb4a8d4/… "Corruptie in Oekraïne: 'Het probleem is nog lang niet opgelost'" (NOS, 2022): https://nos.nl/artikel/2425404-corruptie-in-oekraine-het-probleem-is-nog-lang-niet-opgelost "Oekraïne hervormt justitie, maar corruptie blijft een groot probleem" (Volkskrant, 2022): https://volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/oekraine-hervormt-justitie-maar-corruptie-blijft-een-groot-probleem~bf0dfb8a/…

Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Deutsche Telekom verkoopt kabel Deutsche Telekom heeft gisteren zijn kabelbelangen in Duitsland voor 5,5 miljard euro (12,1 miljard gulden) verkocht aan Libery Media, het Amerikaanse… nrc.nl
Volkskrant - Nieuws, achtergronden en columns Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door de Volkskrant. volkskrant.nl
Ecuador verlaat OPEC; Iran boycot akkoord ROTTERDAM, 18 SEPT. Ecuador heeft gisteren bekendgemaakt het oliekartel OPEC te zullen verlaten wegens de hoge kosten. De olieministers van de dertien… nrc.nl
Hoe zien dingen eruit als ze doormidden zijn? Bekijk het @HalfPics Je ooit afgevraagd hoe granaten er van binnen uitzien? Of een tube tandpasta of kop koffie? Het Twitteraccount @HalfPics plaatst dagelijks foto’s van… nrc.nl
Volkskrant - Nieuws, achtergronden en columns Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door de Volkskrant. volkskrant.nl
Trouw | Nieuws en Verdieping Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door Trouw. trouw.nl
Ze verdienen een plek, alleen niet hier Paasbergflat: De bewoners van een flat in Arnhem hebben extra zorg nodig. Dat vinden omwonenden ook, zolang het maar niet in hun wijk is De stilte aan de… nrc.nl
Trouw | Nieuws en Verdieping Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door Trouw. trouw.nl
Volkskrant - Nieuws, achtergronden en columns Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door de Volkskrant. volkskrant.nl
Tim den Besten: ‘Ik schiet al vol bij een Merci-reclame’ Openhartig: Vanaf 10 september presenteert Tim den Besten (33) voor de VPRO een nieuw seizoen van De outsiders. Hij beantwoordt acht vragen, vrij naar… nrc.nl
Volkskrant - Nieuws, achtergronden en columns Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door de Volkskrant. volkskrant.nl
In zijn nieuwe boek onderzoekt P.F. Thomése zijn voorouders P.F. Thomése: In zijn nieuwe boek onderzoekt P.F. Thomése wie zijn voorouders eigenlijk waren. Zo ontleedt hij de mythe van de adellijke afstamming van de… nrc.nl
Bluf van Balkenende De Tweede Kamer staat aan de vooravond van een cruciaal debat met het Kabinet over het voornemen om de Nederlandse missie in Uruzgan te verlengen. Die… nrc.nl
Volkskrant - Nieuws, achtergronden en columns Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door de Volkskrant. volkskrant.nl
Campagne vol seks en achterklap Oppositiepartij MHP lijdt onder een seksschandaal. Het zou een strategie van regeringspartij AKP zijn om na de verkiezingen de grondwet te veranderen. Aan… nrc.nl
Volkskrant - Nieuws, achtergronden en columns Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door de Volkskrant. volkskrant.nl
FidelLaatste rustplaats De Cubaanse president Raúl Castro plaatst de urn met de as van zijn broer Fidel zondag in diens tombe op de begraafplaats Santa Ifigenia. Hier, in Santiago… nrc.nl
Trouw | Nieuws en Verdieping Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door Trouw. trouw.nl
Andere Tijden Sport: WK '78, 'Dwaze Moeders' en de paal Veertig jaar na de verloren finale tegen Argentinië keren Ernie Brandts en Arie Haan terug naar het land waar het WK werd gehouden. Het levert indrukwekkende ontmoetingen op. nos.nl
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Pagina niet gevonden vrt.be
404 tijd.be
Coronavirus - Aantal besmettingen schiet verder de hoogte in (Belga) Het aantal besmettingen met het coronavirus is tussen 26 december en 1 januari met 79 procent toegenomen, naar een dagelijks gemiddelde van 11.132. Dat blijkt woensdag uit voorlopige cijfers van gezondheidsinstituut Sciensano. knack.be
Er ging iets fout HLN - Het Laatste Nieuws - Volg het nieuws op de nr1 nieuwssite in België, HLN.be brengt je het allerlaatste nieuws 24/24 en 7/7, uit binnen - en buitenland, evenals dichtbij met nieuws uit je eigen regio. hln.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
404 pagina niet gevonden - Het Nieuwsblad nieuwsblad.be
Pagina niet gevonden - Knack knack.be
404 - pagina niet gevonden - De Standaard standaard.be
Nieuws | De Morgen Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door De Morgen. demorgen.be
NOS.nl - De pagina kan helaas niet worden gevonden Mogelijk bestaat de pagina niet meer of is de URL onjuist. nos.nl
Volkskrant - Nieuws, achtergronden en columns Het laatste nieuws met duiding van redacteuren, achtergronden, columns, opinie, wetenschap, en recensies van kunst & cultuur door de Volkskrant. volkskrant.nl
Saved - August 22, 2023 at 2:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukraine's agricultural land is being consolidated by oligarchs and Western financial interests, while the Ukrainian people suffer. Financial institutions support this consolidation, threatening the rights of Ukrainians who have lost everything. The country's largest landowners include Ukrainian oligarchs, foreign interests, and even American pension funds. Western financial institutions have provided significant funding to these large landholders, while Ukrainian farmers receive little support. This concentration of land and industrial agricultural practices financed by international institutions undermines local food security and perpetuates ecological and social devastation. However, small-scale farmers in Ukraine show resilience and potential in leading a different agricultural model based on agroecology and healthy food production. The country's debt burden and the influence of creditors further drive privatization and liberalization. The situation in Ukraine goes beyond the surface, revealing the cruel machinations of geopolitics and economic plundering that disregard national borders and the plight of ordinary citizens.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

OEKRAINE WORDT DOOR HET WESTEN OPGEKOCHT EN LEEG GEPLUNDERD Op 13 mei 2023 is er in de krant Off Guardian een artikel gepubliceerd met een analyse die een duidelijk zicht verschaft op de werkelijke situatie in Oekraïne. https://off-guardian.org/2023/05/13/sowing-seeds-of-plunder-a-lose-lose-situation-in-ukraine/ Hieronder de meest relevanten elementen van dit artikel : "Het is een verlies-verlies situatie voor de Oekraïners. Terwijl zij sterven, steunen financiële instellingen op slinkse wijze de consolidatie van landbouwgrond door oligarchen en westerse financiële belangen," zegt Frédéric Mousseau, beleidsdirecteur van het Oakland Institute, een onafhankelijke denktank. Professor Olena Borodina van de Nationale Academie van Wetenschappen van Oekraïne zegt: Vandaag vechten en sterven duizenden plattelandsjongens en -meisjes en boeren, in de oorlog. Zij hebben alles verloren. De processen van vrije verkoop en aankoop van land worden steeds meer geliberaliseerd. Dit bedreigt echt de rechten van de Oekraïners op hun land, waarvoor zij hun leven geven." Borodina wordt geciteerd in het rapport van februari 2023 van het Oakland Institute War and Theft: The Takeover of Ukraine's Agricultural Land, waarin wordt onthuld hoe oligarchen en financiële belangen de controle over Oekraïnes landbouwgrond uitbreiden met hulp en financiering van westerse financiële instellingen. De steun die de afgelopen jaren aan Oekraïne is verleend, is gekoppeld aan een drastisch structureel aanpassingsprogramma dat de oprichting van een grondmarkt vereist via een wet die leidt tot een grotere concentratie van land in de handen van machtige belangen. Het programma omvat ook bezuinigingsmaatregelen, bezuinigingen op sociale vangnetten en de privatisering van belangrijke sectoren van de economie. Frédéric Mousseau, co-auteur van het rapport, zegt: "Ondanks het feit dat het land centraal staat in de nieuwscyclus en het internationale beleid, is er weinig aandacht besteed aan de kern van het conflict - wie controleert de landbouwgrond in het land dat bekend staat als de graanschuur van Europa ? Het antwoord op deze vraag is essentieel om de grote belangen in de oorlog te begrijpen. Uit het rapport blijkt dat de totale hoeveelheid land die in handen is van oligarchen, corrupte personen en grote landbouwbedrijven meer dan negen miljoen hectare bedraagt - meer dan 28% van de landbouwgrond van Oekraïne (de rest wordt gebruikt door meer dan acht miljoen Oekraïense boeren). De grootste grondbezitters zijn een mix van Oekraïense oligarchen en buitenlandse belangen - vooral Europese en Noord-Amerikaanse en het soevereine fonds van Saoedi-Arabië. Een aantal grote Amerikaanse pensioenfondsen, stichtingen en schenkingen van universiteiten investeren ook in Oekraïense grond via NCH Capital - een in de VS gevestigd private-equityfonds, dat de vijfde grootste grondbezitter van het land is. President Zelenskyy zette de landhervorming in 2020 om in een wet tegen de wil van de overgrote meerderheid van de bevolking, die vreesde dat het de corruptie zou verergeren en de controle door machtige belangen in de landbouwsector zou versterken. Het Oakland Institute merkt op dat, terwijl de grootgrondbezitters op grote schaal financiering krijgen van westerse financiële instellingen, de Oekraïense boeren - essentieel voor de binnenlandse voedselvoorziening - vrijwel geen steun krijgen. Dit verschil in behandeling op de grondmarkt, te midden van grote economische spanningen en oorlog, zal leiden tot meer grondconsolidatie door grote agro-ondernemingen. Op één na zijn alle tien grootste grondbezitters in het buitenland geregistreerd, voornamelijk in belastingparadijzen zoals Cyprus of Luxemburg. In het rapport worden veel prominente investeerders genoemd, waaronder Vanguard Group, Kopernik Global Investors, BNP Asset Management Holding, NN Investment Partners Holdings, eigendom van Goldman Sachs, en Norges Bank Investment Management, dat het Noorse staatsfonds beheert. De meeste agribusinessbedrijven hebben aanzienlijke schulden bij westerse financiële instellingen, met name de Europese Bank voor Wederopbouw en Ontwikkeling, de Europese Investeringsbank en de International Finance Corporation - de particuliere tak van de Wereldbank. Samen zijn deze instellingen belangrijke kredietverstrekkers geweest aan de Oekraïense agro-industrie, met bijna 1,7 miljard dollar aan slechts zes van de grootste grondbezitters van Oekraïne in de afgelopen jaren. Andere belangrijke kredietverleners zijn een mix van voornamelijk Europese en Noord-Amerikaanse financiële instellingen, zowel publieke als particuliere. In het rapport wordt opgemerkt dat dit de schuldeisers financiële belangen geeft in de werking van de agro-industrieën en hen een aanzienlijke invloed geeft. Ondertussen hebben de Oekraïense boeren moeten werken met beperkte hoeveelheden land en financiering, en velen staan nu op de rand van armoede. Internationale financiële instellingen subsidiëren in feite de concentratie van land en een destructief industrieel landbouwmodel dat gebaseerd is op het intensieve gebruik van synthetische inputs, fossiele brandstoffen en grootschalige monocultuur. Veel van wat er in Oekraïne gebeurt, maakt deel uit van een bredere trend: private-equityfondsen worden overal ter wereld in de landbouw geïnjecteerd en gebruikt om boerderijen goedkoop te leasen of op te kopen en samen te voegen tot grootschalige, industriële graan- en sojaconcerns. Deze fondsen maken gebruik van pensioen fondsen, staatsfondsen, schenkingsfondsen en investeringen van overheden, banken, verzekeringsmaatschappijen en vermogende particulieren (zie het rapport "Barbarians at the Barn" uit 2020 van http://Grain.org). Door de landbouw op deze manier te financieren, verschuift de macht naar mensen die geen band hebben met de landbouw. In de woorden van Larry Fink van BlackRock: "Go long agriculture and water and go to the beach." Fondsen investeren meestal voor 10 tot 15 jaar, wat resulteert in goede rendementen voor beleggers, maar op lange termijn een spoor van ecologische en sociale verwoesting kan achterlaten en de lokale en regionale voedselonzekerheid kan ondermijnen. Volgens het Oakland Institute daarentegen tonen kleinschalige boeren in Oekraïne veerkracht en een enorm potentieel om leiding te geven aan de uitbreiding van een ander productiemodel dat gebaseerd is op agro-ecologie en de productie van gezond voedsel. Terwijl grote landbouwbedrijven zich richten op exportmarkten, zijn het de kleine en middelgrote boeren in Oekraïne die de voedselzekerheid van het land garanderen. Dit wordt onderstreept door de Staatsdienst voor de statistiek van Oekraïne in zijn rapport "Main agricultural characteristics of households in rural areas in 2011", waaruit blijkt dat kleine boeren in Oekraïne 16% van de landbouwgrond exploiteren, maar 55% van de landbouwproductie leveren, waaronder 97% van de aardappelen, 97% van de honing, 88% van de groenten, 83% van het fruit en de bessen en 80% van de melk. In juni 2020 keurde het IMF een leningsprogramma van 5 miljard dollar voor 18 maanden met Oekraïne goed. Dat jaar nam de Wereldbank ook maatregelen met betrekking tot de verkoop van openbare landbouwgrond op als voorwaarden in een lening van 350 miljoen dollar voor ontwikkelingsbeleid (COVID "relief package") aan Oekraïne. Dit omvatte een vereiste "voorafgaande actie" om "de verkoop van landbouwgrond en het gebruik van grond als onderpand mogelijk te maken". Volgens het Oakland Institute: Oekraïne is nu de op twee na grootste schuldenaar ter wereld bij het Internationaal Monetair Fonds en zijn verlammende schuldenlast zal waarschijnlijk leiden tot extra druk van zijn schuldeisers, obligatiehouders en internationale financiële instellingen over de manier waarop de naoorlogse wederopbouw - die naar schatting 750 miljard dollar gaat kosten - moet plaatsvinden." Financiële instellingen gebruiken de verlammende schuld van Oekraïne om verdere privatisering en liberalisering te stimuleren - door het land in een hoek te drijven en het een aanbod te doen dat het niet kan weigeren. Sinds het begin van de oorlog is de Oekraïense vlag buiten de parlementsgebouwen in het Westen gehesen en zijn iconische monumenten in de kleuren van de vlag verlicht. Een beeldhap die wordt gebruikt om gevoelens van solidariteit en steun voor die natie op te roepen en die dient om de aandacht af te leiden van de wrede machinaties van geopolitiek en moderne economische plundering die zich niets aantrekt van nationale grenzen en weinig oog heeft voor de benarde situatie van gewone burgers." Tot slot vindt u in onderstaande video nog verderevduiding over de wet die Zelensky er door geduwd heeft en die buitenlandse ondernemers toelaat om landbouwgronden zonder beperking op te kopen. Wat een held, die Zelensky ( not ). Er is hier veel meer aan de hand dan we zelfs in onze wildste fantasie kunnen bevroeden.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, a decision was made that could have long-lasting consequences for Ukraine. The government has allowed foreign individuals and corporations to freely buy agricultural land without any restrictions. This means that Ukrainians will not be able to compete in auctions without money. Essentially, foreign citizens and corporations will have the power to own vast amounts of land, potentially for generations to come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Розберемося, що проголосували сьогодні і чого позбавили по суті справи Україну на сотні років. Якщо реально ми не зупинимось з вами цей процес. Що вони зробили? Перше, що вони зробили. Вони прийняли рішення, що сільська землі можуть без будь-якого обмеження продавати з іноземним ю і фізичним особам. Що це означає? Це означає, що українці не будуть конкурентами в аукціон без грошей. Це означає, що по суті на корпорації іноземні громадяни, у яких синам не обмеження будуть мати у власності у землю.
Sowing Seeds of Plunder: A Lose-Lose Situation in Ukraine Colin Todhunter It’s a lose-lose situation for Ukrainians. While they are dying, financial institutions are insidiously supporting the consolidation of farmland by oligarchs and Western financial i… off-guardian.org
Saved - August 22, 2023 at 11:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Ukrainian army is virtually non-existent, with only a few thousand troops before 2014. To bolster their forces, President Poroshenko recruited Nazi militants from the Azov battalions, known for their extreme brutality. These militants were trained by Canada, the USA, and the UK. After eight years of bombardments, Luhansk and Donetsk declared independence in 2022, recognized by Putin. Zelensky escalated attacks on civilians, leading to a Russian invasion. Ukrainian men were forced to fight, lacking proper training, weapons, and supplies. Zelensky recruited foreign mercenaries, promising high pay and citizenship. The opposition was silenced, media banned, and funds from the West financed the war, including salaries and corruption.

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

HOE IS HET OEKRAÏNS LEGER SAMENGESTELD EN WIE FINANCIERT HET ? Tijdens het interview met Tucker Carlson zei Kolonel MacGregor dat er sinds de aanvang van de invasie langs de zijde van het Russische leger al zo'n 50.000 slachtoffers te betreuren vallen en langs de zijde van het Oekraïns leger meer dan 400.000. Is het Oekraïns leger dan zo immens groot dat zij niettegenstaande een verlies van 400.000 manschappen toch nog kan blijven doorvechten met een voldoende groot contigent militairen ? Neen. Totaal niet. Het Oekraïns leger is virtueel onbestaande. Wie zijn dan die 400.000 doden langs Oekraïnse zijde ? En hoeveel " militairen " blijven er nog over ? Even terugspoelen in de tijd, waarbij ik u vraag om zelf ook even terug te graven in uw geheugen. Oekraïne had voor 2014 weinig geïnvesteerd in Defensie. Haar leger was beperkt tot een paar duizend manschappen. Om haar troepen te verstevigen heeft de toenmalige president Poroshenko de nazi militanten van de Azov battalions, die gekend stonden om hun extreme gruweldaden, officieel gerecruteerd in het leger. Tussen 2014 en 2022 zijn zij militair getraind en voorbereid door onder andere Canada, de USA en de UK. Daarvan bestaan een veelheid van beelden. Op 08.02.2022 hebben de Provincies Luhansk en Donetsk zich, na 8 jaar aanhoudende bombardementen door vooreerst Poroshensko en vervolgens Zelensky - die de haat tegen alles wat Russisch is heeft aangewakkerd - opnieuw onafhankelijk verklaard. Dit hadden beide republieken in 2014 al eens gedaan - rond hetzelfde tijdstip als het Krim - maar dat is toen niet aanvaard door de internationale gemeenschap die op dat moment de handen vol had met het Krim. Deze keer was het echter anders. Op 12.02.2022 heeft Putin de onafhankelijkheid van Luhansk en Donetsk bij Decreet erkend. De officiële erkenning van de onafhankelijkheid en de benoeming van de Presidenten van beide onafhankelijke republieken is uitgezonden op alle tv zenders behalve in het Westen die de gebeurtenis heeft doodgezwegen. Waarom ? Omdat de internationale rechtsregels bepalen dat wanneer één land de onafhankelijkheid van een natie aanvaard, dit als een voldongen feit moet beschouwd worden. Vanaf 12.02.2022 heeft Zelenksy de bombardementen en de aanvallen van de Azov militairen op de burgers van de Donbas aanzienlijk verhoogd. Er zijn veel burgerslachtoffers gevallen. Op dat tijdstip waren er tussen Rusland enerzijds en de USA en Nato anderzijds al maandenlang onderhandelingen gaande omtrent de naleving van de Minsk I en Minsk II akkoorden van 2015. Putin eiste tevens waarborgen dat de USA en Nato Rusland nooit zouden aanvallen. Zijn eisen zijn genegeerd. Op 22.02.2022 heeft Putin een laatste waarschuwing gegeven en te kennen gegeven dat als het Westen zijn redelijke eisen zou blijven negeren hij het probleem op zijn manier zou oplossen. De USA en Nato hebben het ultimatum naast zich neergelegd. Dienvolgens is het Russisch leger, op verzoek van de Presidenten van de onafhankelijke republieken Luhansk en Donetsk en volledig conform de internationale regels inzake oorlogsvoering op 24.02.2022, binnen gevallen in de Donbas voor een " speciale militaire operatie " ( lees : de grote opkuis ) Op 25.02.2022 heeft Zelensky, bij Decreet, alle Oekraïnse mannen tussen 18 en 65 jaar opgeroepen om de wapens op te nemen tegen Rusland. Wie weigerde werd opgepakt en belandde in de gevangenis. Wie het land probeerde te ontvluchten werd door de Azov battalions genadeloos neergeschoten . Daarvan bestaan veel bewijzen en getuigenissen. Alle mannelijke burgers die zich aangemeld hebben, hadden nog nooit een wapen in hun handen gehad. Er was geen tijd om ze fatsoenlijk op te leiden. In de beginperiode waren er trouwens niet voldoende wapens voorhanden. Tijdens hun opleiding van amper een paar dagen moesten ze oefenen met houten stokken. Vervolgens kregen ze een wapen in hun handen geduwd en naar het front gestuurd om te dienen als kanonnenvoer. Ze werden niet aangestuurd en hadden geen munitie en andere noodzakelijke uitrusting zoals bijvoorbeeld zo iets simpel als benzine of diesel. Ze werden overigens ook niet gevoed. De goederen geraakten niet aan het front. Ze werden letterlijk aan hun lot overgelaten. Dit is sterk gedocumenteerd. Wie durfde te desserteren ( en zo zijn er wel wat,de wanhoop nabij ) werd zwaar gestraft. Zelensky heeft de toepasselijke dessertie wet een paar maanden geleden nog meer verstrengd en rechters de mogelijkheid uit handen genomen om rekening te houden met verzachtende omstandigheden en mildere straffen uit te spreken. Simultaan heeft Zelensky ook een oproep gelanceerd in het buitenland om ex-militairen, huurlingen en burgers te recruteren waarbij een hoge verloning voorgespiegeld werd. Velen hebben precies omwille van die hoge verloning gevolg verleend aan die oproep. Voor anderen ging het vooral om de kick. En zo gebeurde het dus dat Oekraïne overspoeld werd door vers aangeworven burger-militairen van vele nationaliteiten. Britten, Australiërs, Amerikanen, Duitsers, Afrikaners.... You name it. Overigens ook Belgen en Nederlanders. Probleem is dat de werkelijkheid ver af stond van de droom en al wie zich had laten inlijven niet meer weg mocht. Er is mij een video bij gebleven van een Brit die in tranen relaas uitbracht van zijn ervarigen en iedereen opriep om niet naar Oekraïne te trekken. In maart/april 2020 waren er in Mariupol zware gevechten tussen het Russisch leger en de Azov battalions die de kwalijke gewoonte hadden om zich te verschuilen in scholen, ziekenhuizen, materniteiten en civiele woonsten en die burgers gebruikten als schild. Ook dit is ten overvloede gedocumenteerd. Mariupol was voor Oekraïne een belangrijk bastion waar al vele jaren in de ondergrondse bunkers van de staalfabriek Azovstal een biolab gevestigd was waar ware verschrikkingen hebben plaats gevonden. Ook dit is sterk gedocumenteerd. Het Russisch leger heeft de Azov battalions en de buitenlandse huurlingen kunnen terugdringen tot in Azovstal waar ze weken lang in de ondergrondse bunkers hebben verbleven zonder voedsel, water of enige hulp van buitenaf. Zelensky heeft ze aan hun lot over gelaten. Putin heeft gewacht tot ze vanzelf naar buiten zouden komen en een veilige corridor beloofd aan al wie zich zou overgeven. Ze hebben het uiteindelijk allemaal gedaan, zijn door Rusland goed opgevangen en hebben conform de internationale regels inzake oorlogsvoering de status van oorlogsgevangene gekregen. Ook dit is goed gedocumenteerd. Vanaf dat moment was het Oekraïns leger gedecimeerd. Zelenksy is daaropvolgeend volop blijven verder recruteren in het buitenland, onder de belofte van een hoge verloning en andere voordelen. Hij koos zijn doelgroepen zeer secuur. Zo rekrureerde hij onder meer onder de daklozen en armen in de USA ( zie bijlage ). En hij niet alleen. Ook de EU recruteerde burgers in het Midden-Oosten en Afrika voor militaire jobs in Oekraïne, met de belofte dat naast een hoge verloning, bij de afloop van het contract ook nog eens versneld burgerschap in het Verenigd Koninkrijk of de EU zou toegestaan worden. De deelnemers die akkoord gaan, moe(s)ten alle risico's begrijpen en afstand doen van enig recht op verhaal of klachten. ( zie bijlage ). Velen hebben hieraan gevolg verleend maar kunnen het helaas niet meer na vertellen. Zij maken deel uit van de 400.000 doden.... Als u zich afvraagt hoe Zelenksy dit allemaal voor mekaar heeft gekregen ? Simpel. Er is in Oekraïne geen oppositie meer. Minder dan een maand na de aanvang van de invasie heeft Zelensky alle oppositiepartijen bij wet verboden, zijn tegenstanders laten oppakken, opgesloten of vermoord. Ook leden van zijn eigen partij ( enige partij in het land ), parlementsleden en ministers hebben er aan moeten geloven. Ofwel storte " toevallig " een helicopter neer waar " toevallig " 2 ministers en nog een paar andere politici in zaten ofwel werden ze " toevallig " aangetroffen met een kogel door hun hoofd. Dit was onder andere het geval van de Oekraïnse afgezant in de onderhandelingen met Rusland. Hierover meer in een navolgende post. Zelensky duldt in eigen land geen tegenspraak. Hij wordt hierin volop gesteund door het Westen. Daarnaast heeft Zelensky ook alle media die hem niet gunstig gezind was ( tv- en radiozenders, kranten .. ) verboden en opgeheven. De Russische taal werd verboden, niet alleen in het onderwijs maar ook in de handel en tussen burgers onderling. Alle Russische boeken werden verbrand. En wie heeft dit allemaal gefinancierd ? Het Westen. De EU heeft in 2022 maandelijks 1,5 miljard euro op de rekening van Oekraïne gestort. Zelensky heeft een zelfde gunst gevraagd en bekomen voor 2023. De US heeft ondertussen ook al meer dan 150 miljard dollar gestort aan Oekraïne. Daarnaast hebben tal van landen, waaronder België en Nederland, ook al meermaals in hun geldbuidel getast en ettelijke honderden miljoen gestort. Hierover later meer in een navolgend artikel. Niemand heeft Zelensky ooit om rekenschap gevraagd wat er met al deze gelden gebeurt, voor wat ze worden gebruikt. Er bestaat geen open boekhouding van inkomsten en uitgaven. Waarschijnlijk bestaat er zelfs helemaal geen boekhouding. Waarom niet ? Omdat het Westen weet waarvoor het overgrote deel van de fondsen gebruikt wordt : voor de betaling van personeel en alle ingehuurde burger-militairen ( en een aardig procentje verdwijnt natuurlijk ook in de zakken van Zelensky en de zijnen ). Het Westen financiert de oorlog van a tot z inclusief de lonen van de ingehuurde militairen en houdt op die manier de oorlog doelbewust in stand. Nog meer stuitend nieuws in navolgende artikelen.

View Full Interactive Feed