TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @CarlHigbie
@CarlHigbie - Carl Higbie
➡️7 foot walls and barbed wire around the capitol to protect Biden from Americans… no problem ➡️Walls and barbed wire on southern border to protect Americans… the Biden admin will sue you. https://t.co/M3Li4RBCQ0
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Supreme Court ruling on the border situation has caused tension between state and federal forces. The ruling allows the Biden administration to cut barbed wire, potentially opening the borders. The speaker uses an analogy of migrants breaking into a house to illustrate the situation. They question what actions Texas, represented by Amy Coney Barrett, should take to defend their home. The speaker criticizes the Supreme Court for not forcing the Biden administration to enforce the law. They argue that not enforcing the law is breaking the law. The speaker also highlights the hypocrisy of liberals and criticizes Republican politicians for proposing ineffective solutions to the border issue. The federal government's actions are pushing Texas to the breaking point.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This border situation is really bad, and the Supreme Court has literally just set us up for a showdown between state and federal forces. Both guys with guns, The ruling gives the Biden administration free reign to cut barbed wire, which the head of the border union even said would open our borders and be pretty bad. I mean, let's just put this in perspective, folks. This is Texas right now. This is how they feel.
Imagine this for a second. There's migrants breaking into your house, harming your family, giving your kids drugs, coming into your kitchen, eating the food out of your fridge. Now the homeowners association is coming around just unlocking your door willy nilly after you kept locking it. And the Supreme Court told you that it's totally legal for them to do that for the next 6 months while they litigate the merits of this case. So you have to let them keep unlocking your door.
They said the the they said nothing about these people illegally entering your house, though. They just ruled on your front door. Hey. What do you do? That's literally what's happening in Texas right now.
It's that simple. So you, the homeowner being Texas, what are your options? And I'll pose this question to you, Amy Coney Barrett. She was the tie breaking vote on that Supreme Court order. Imagine if a court told you, Amy, that the homeowners association can keep unlocking your door while they wait to hear your case maybe 6 months from now.
What do you do? Do you defend your house? Your kids are getting killed by Fentanyl. People are illegally entering your house, destroying your living room. Not all of them are bad, but they're taking over your office, your den, they're sleeping on the floor.
What do you do, Amy? Seriously. The homeowners association, in light of your court ruling, now has control over the ability to lock your front door. What is the breaking point for you to defy that court order, Amy Coney Barrett? Do you tell your husband to go get his gun, to call his friends, to stop the homeowners association from coming onto your property and unlocking your front door.
Do you tell your husband to start kicking these people out of your house? Do you call the cops? Oh, wait. They can't respond because they're so busy dealing with it with it at every other house because of the homeowners association, because of your order. They also have nowhere to put all these people.
You on the supreme court, that's what you just did. You set this in motion. I mean, I know what I would do. If the safety of my family was on the line, I'd tell the Supreme Court to pound sand. Kinda like governor Abbott is doing.
I would defend my family and my home because that's my right. It's not only in the constitution, it's backed up by a dozen other court decision, laws to self defense, and a ton of property rights litigation. That's how Texas feels. And and what I don't get is why the Supreme Court isn't forcing the Biden administration to actually enforce the law. Where's that ruling?
Oh, Carl. That matter is not in front of the court. Yes. It is. That is the root of this problem.
Not enforcing the law is breaking the law. I I get pulled over for a speeding ticket, then the cop sees. I don't know. Maybe my wait a minute. Car registration is expired.
I have to go to court to contest the speeding ticket that I got pulled over for. Guess what the court's gonna say? Carl, your registration has expired too. Can I tell the court that, oh, that's not why I was pulled over? Therefore, that issue is not in front of the court.
No. I can't do that. The court's gonna fine me for both things in the same hearing. The same thing should apply here. You can't address the concern of cutting barbed wire in a vacuum.
That's what they wanna do as the Supreme Court. But the border is not a courtroom. It's a real place where real bad things are actually happening. Now the law says article 4 section 4 of the connect the constitution says, the United States, shall guarantee at every state in this union a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion. Over 50 counties in Texas, have declared this an invasion.
You, Amy Coney Barrett, just ruled that doesn't matter. We I mean, we defend Ukraine's border 5000 miles away with a $130,000,000,000, Israel's border with 3 carrier battle groups, and who knows how many troops, Iraq and Afghanistan borders with 1,000 of American lives, 1,000,000,000 of dollars, 1,000,000 to build border walls in Oman and Jordan on the other side of the world. And for us, they sent a couple agents down there with bolt cutters to keep it open. Are you mad yet? I sure am.
And considering the federal government just shut down the entire country after COVID that killed only 50,000 people over 4 years when you adjust for comorbidities, by the way, they also shut down the border for that. But fentanyl, being brought across the southern border, it's killing more than 70 1,000 people a year. They wanna cut the barbed wire and let it in now. I mean, it's amazing the Biden approval rating is even in the Oh, you wanna put the barbed wire around your capital for your protection, by the way? No problem.
Southern border, though, they're gonna sue you so they can send down their agents to take it. I mean, my god. Hey. Here's a pro tip, by the way. If you're entering the country legally, there's a 0% chance of you getting injured by razor wire.
Maybe try that. I'm with Greg Abbott here. I think that Texas has the right to self defense, and so do the other half of the states in the nation. So much so that they're sending national they're sending ton of resources, national guardsmen, a ton of other aid down to Texas. DeSantis was one of the first to jump in on this.
Speaker 1: So so all of this is just nonsense what Biden's doing. Texas has every right to stand its ground. We've been in Florida. We've been sending people to help, for for many years now.
Speaker 0: Governor Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma, who's joining me in just a second, also one of the first states to step up their support for Texas. And liberals, they're losing their mind. Funny enough, also, they lose their mind when we ship those same illegals that they want us to let flow through. When we ship them up to their neighborhoods, they freak out. I mean, this shows you how illogical this party is.
But when the shoe was on the other foot and Trump was in charge, cities and states defied federal officials by refusing to cooperate with ICE, and the libs, they cheered him on. Now the shoe is on the other foot. Oh, Oh my god. Could you bow down to the great Joe Biden? Because he's shut up.
You how would you defend your own home? Because 0 of these liberal elites are inviting illegals to live in their homes. It's not in my backyard. The Dems spit in the face of the Supreme Court every chance they get on everything from gun laws to immigration. The Supreme Court said, hey, Joe Biden.
You can't forgive student loans. What happens? Biden goes ahead, does it anyway. Nothing happens. Biden administration, this the administrative state, particularly the EPA, they get smacked down by the Supreme Court.
What does Biden do? Try it again anyway. Another middle finger to SCOTUS. Same thing with the ATF, many other agencies. They just do whatever they want.
If the Supreme Court says no, they figure out another way to do it. The left has taken every single chance to defy or call the Supreme Court illegitimate. But when Texas says, no. Hey. People's lives are at stake, they lose their ever loving mind.
And then we got Mitch McConnell in the senate, wants to do some secret border deal. Why is anything in the senate regarding the border a secret. Oh, because he doesn't want us to know. Other Republicans are on board with this. Here are some of their stupid ideas.
Legally establish 5,000 illegal aliens entering the country per day as the new norm. No. Provide amnesty for documented dreamer class. No. Give quicker permits to illegal aliens.
Hard pass. Expand the already vast network of free benefits like legal service for illegal aliens. Guess what? We're gonna pay for that. I got an idea.
How about we enforce the laws that we already have, no work visas for illegal immigrants, and stop these people from sending all the money they make domestically out of the country via these cash transfer services. If you stop incentivizing this, they'll stop coming. But if history has taught us anything, And this is the lesson we need to learn good and fast. Because good order and discipline is only gonna last as long as people have more to lose than gain by revolting. The federal government is pushing Texas and its people to that brink.
@CarlHigbie - Carl Higbie
"What the hell was the point of taking the House back in the first place?”…. If we’re not going to act like actual conservatives! https://t.co/gNVwrYqMqs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Johnson is renegotiating a spending deal and may withdraw from a $1.7 trillion plan with Chuck Schumer. Conservatives are frustrated with the lack of wins in the new house and want a speaker who will prioritize border security. They argue that Republicans are not fulfilling their promises and are making the issue more complicated than it needs to be. Some Republicans are pushing to oust Johnson for going against his word. The debate centers around strong border security and the consequences of a government shutdown. Democrats are willing to support anything that annoys conservatives, and bills like this one drive conservatives crazy. The speaker urges a change in course with spending cuts and fiscal policy changes to avoid economic collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Speaker Johnson is reportedly renegotiating his spending deal with conservatives and, you know, maybe pulling out of this disastrous $1,700,000,000,000 spending extravaganza that he planned behind closed doors with Chuck Schumer. That I'm not even remotely clear on why he entered into the in the 1st place. It was not a win. Had no meaningful border security. Did not cut spending.
Nothing. But pulling out of this probably means there's gonna be another continuing resolution. There always is. Again, so far, 0 wins for conservatives in this new house. Is there some sort of secret oath that republicans take after the cameras go away?
To actually not do any of the things that they just promised to do? I mean, seriously, There's like maybe 6 people I trust to do the right thing in DC anymore. And I had really high hopes for Johnson. But now, replace him. Then replace the next guy, and the next guy, and the next guy until we get a speaker who won't give Democrats another dime until we stop letting 300,000 people a month illegally enter our country?
Why is this even a discussion at this point? A number of republicans agree with me on this. There's already this effort to oust Johnson because this is exactly what he said he wouldn't do. Your job, congress, the reason We The People, since you guys and gals to DC, gave you a $180,000 a year plus stabbing, is to advocate on our behalf. You're not doing that.
And I'm so tired of this argument. Well, Carl, it's a lot more complicated than that. There's a lot of fact no, there isn't. You're making it more complicated because that's what politicians do all the time. It's pretty binary.
You promised me this.
Speaker 1: Our first condition on any national security supplemental spending package is about our own national security first. The border is an absolute catastrophe. And this is because of the policies of this White House and this administration.
Speaker 0: There will be no legislation without strong border security.
Speaker 2: None of us want to shut down the government, but we all recognize the fact that every single penny that we are giving to homeland at this point that is not being used to secure our border, that is not being used to increase our national security, But it's doing the exact opposite. It is weakening it.
Speaker 0: This group has got together and said, we're not going to spend additional funding for the federal government Until we can see our border secure. Then they do the opposite and come running back to the cameras and try to sell us some crap deal. It's like, oh, we got as much as we could, but remember, we're only 1 third of the government. BS, congress single handedly holds the ability to not spend any of our money. And quite frankly, I'd rather have that than the I don't know, the status quo and an $11 cut for the National Art Museum or whatever dumb thing they champion as a some victory.
Oh, but we're set to grow budget by 3%, Carl, and we only grew it by 1%. That is not a cut. Increasing the budget by less is not a cut. I don't know where these people learn their math at. Oh, Carl, we would have chaos.
We would be blamed for the shutdown. Then we would lose the house. I don't care. At this rate, you're gonna lose the house anyway. 1, because people keep retiring.
And 2, because people like me, who went to war for your campaigns, we knocked on doors, we made phone calls, we donated our greatly diminished salaries under economics. We are not gonna do that next time around because you're not doing what you told us you would do. What is so hard for them to understand about this? I mean, we are not interested in you explaining away to us. We are interested in you sticking to your campaign promises, the ones we just listened to you 30 seconds ago.
Or shut down the government until you can. This is the greatest divide. Outside DC, most people don't care if the government shuts down? I certainly don't. In fact, a government shutdown is a de facto balanced budget.
Our debts will still get paid. That's mandated by the constitution. Yes. Unfortunately, many federal workers, including military members, won't get paid. And that sucks.
Trust me. I have been there. When I was a soldier, the government shutdown too. But any sector that has a huge swap labeled non essential should probably not get paid anyway. I don't even know what they're doing in the 1st place.
I'm I'm just saying, this is the real cost of our fiscal irresponsibility. It's coming home to roost right now. And I'm tired of these options that are either continue spending at current levels with no changes, which is what the democrats wanna do, or defund a post office in, like, Boise, Idaho. Neither of those work for me, and I'm not alone on this. If the only other option is to shut it down, fine.
Leave it shut down until the conservative agenda is implemented. Leave it shut down till November for all I care. That's what Democrats would do if they didn't get their way.
Speaker 3: We are not going to negotiate, Over, the debt limit. That is something that Congress should act on. That is their constitutional duty. We have always been very clear, Zeke. We have been very, very clear.
We are not Going to negotiate and we've been very clear, we're just not going to negotiate on that.
Speaker 0: But here's what the Freedom Caucus and the actual conservatives need to understand in this fight. And it's baffling to me that they haven't grasped this by now. Democrats will support literally anything, anything they know that will annoy the most conservative base. Okay? This bill, perfect example of that trap.
And Mike Johnson, God bless his soul. But he fell for this. And until his own party threatened him, he wouldn't pull out of it. Bills like this don't give democrats everything they want. But it does drive people like me crazy.
Clearly, I'm really angry tonight. But they're watching these shows. They're saying, okay, guys like Carl and Tucker and Hannity are all against this bill. We need only a handful of waffle republicans, which are easy to find nowadays, and they'll help us pass it. And like lemmings, they will peel off a few Republicans in this slim majority.
They'll all get in line and vote in lockstep while most Republicans vote against it. The democratically held the senate just rubber stamps it, sends it to Biden's desk and he does the same thing. Then people like me sit there. We are literally screaming at the TV, wondering the hell was the point of taking the house back in the 1st place? So we could kick Nancy Pelosi out of her office?
I mean, gee, thanks, Mike. Honestly, Trump, I I don't I don't think he learned this until after the midterms because he was new into politics, but man, he is aware of it now. We are at a fork in the road. We either head down the same road, crash the economy, get booted as a global currency and waste away to become a country like Canada or change course with massive spending cuts, drastic fiscal policy changes and taking a machete to government. There's no middle ground here anymore.
Anything but the 2nd road, it's a loss for you and I.
@CarlHigbie - Carl Higbie
“I can’t call someone the wrong pronoun on a college campus but at @Harvard you can support terrorists” https://t.co/JGVpNq5j03
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes universities, claiming that the younger generation is weak and overly educated with no grasp of reality. They argue that universities are teaching students misinformation about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and supporting terrorism. The speaker applauds billionaires and CEOs who are withdrawing funding and refusing to hire students who blame Israel for Hamas' actions. They mock students who ask for therapy after facing consequences for their actions and express frustration with the perceived lack of intelligence and life experience in the younger generation. The speaker concludes by stating that these students should be held accountable in the workforce.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our universities are a waste of money. Look, I I know some of you watching this are in this younger generation, maybe in college, but probably if you're watching the show, you're not an example of whom I'm about to talk about. I'm sorry that I'm not sorry. Consider the next 5 minutes as much therapeutic for me as it is probably entertaining for you. But this 18 to 25 year old generation is weak and overly educated with no concept of reality.
Period. We're seeing this play out across many universities with the support for Hamas. Oh, Carl, we support Palestine, not Hamas. It's pretty much the same thing. Look, for all these soft handed academics who wanna lecture me on geopolitical conflict, save it.
I spent 9 years enforcing US foreign policy in a bunch of countries that hate us. I know what I'm talking about here. There's a high probability that your pot smoking international studies professor is teaching you $60,000 a year worth of garbage. Hamas assumed political control of Gaza through elections and public support in 2006, then they won a brief civil war and assumed even more power in 2007. So spare me, the Hamas doesn't represent Palestine.
It does. Literally. They were elected to. These overly educated kids, they don't care about that because look who's teaching them. This guy.
If you have kids at Cornell, parents pull them out immediately. A professor there told students that he found the unprompted slaughtering of Israeli civilians, quote, exhilarating and energizing. And all the students are sitting around clapping like, oh, yeah. They joined in and chanting. From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
Palestine is well, it's about to be a parking a lot. But it was free until we sent paragliders to shoot up a music festival in Israel. You see, a good professor would show their students the Oslo Accords, where Israel gave a 2 state solution in exchange for peace. Now Palestine was actually so free that in fact, they're now cutting out the water pipes that Israel built for their infrastructure to turn into rocket launchers. This is what your kids are being spoon fed in college, folks.
It's not worth the money. I can't call someone the wrong pronoun on campus without getting thrown the heck out of the school. But you can chant in favor of terrorism. That's where we're at. We have a bunch of Greta Thunbergs running around lecturing us on stuff they know nothing about.
And thank God, thank God the private sector is finally noticing this stuff. Billionaires. They're dropping Ivy League funding over failure to condemn Hamas. Good job, billionaires. Even though most of these schools have 1,000,000,000 of dollars in endow endowments, but it's a good start.
And even more, a dozen CEOs backed Bill Ackman's call to not hire Harvard students who blamed Israel for Hamas' attack. And all these students were, like, my actions have consequences? You mean I can't say whatever I want? You can. But guess what?
Reality sets in. Companies are companies are free not to hire you if they think you're a petulant crazy child. Welcome to the real world. Weird, I know. Actions have consequences.
But students are now freaking out because they're scared they won't be hired. These protesters gotta learn fast. Stephen Davidoff Solomon, who teaches corporate law at UC Berkeley, is actually begging corporations not to hire his law students. He wrote his own op ed for the Wall Street Journal claims that the hate that some of these students prompted towards Jews should disqualify them in job searches. And and, of course, victimhood, here we come.
How are these social warriors responding? Oh, send me money so I can get therapy for my disagreement with my support for terrorism. I mean, like, these people are unbelievable. If you saw any footage of this, 80% of these people are wearing masks, by the way, which I find hilarious at this stage. Here's an idea.
Take your virtue signaling Harvard degree and earn the money for your own damn therapy. Oh, wait, you can't get a job because you say stupid things publicly. Like 80 years ago, people in the same age range quit their jobs and joined the military to storm the beaches in Normandy to fight fascism and Nazis. Now we have kids supporting terrorists that espouse the views that are almost the exact same as Nazis and fascists. Of them even held up a swastika on his phone at a protest here in America.
And this is all in between classes on microaggression, cultural insensitivity and inclusivity. They have majors in the absolute stupid least applicable garbage in the workforce. But the problem isn't what they spent the 4 year study. I really could care less what major you had to sign up for to play beer pong on the weekend. It's when they get to the workforce that their art history, their ethnic studies, their philosophy degree, or basket weaving, or whatever else they got.
And now they're forced to do work that actually matters, that affects a bottom line somewhere. And this new generation confuses being educated with intelligence and life experience, of which they have neither. They go these universities, they get this left wing b s rammed down their throat by some professor who's likely never worked a single day in the field that they're actually teaching. And then they get to the workforce and they proceed to demand accommodations and make policies that are a net value loss for the companies that they worked for. The the best example of this is Elisa Hinerstein, who was a Harvard graduate.
If you remember her, she was the young marketing genius who decided to put Dylan Mulvaney on a can of Bud Light. And when sales plummeted, she let her on a podcast and proceeded to lecture the world on why she was right and everybody else is a bigot. 0 self awareness. Look, I have no marketing degree. I don't even have a regular college degree.
But I can sure tell you that if you're the number 1 beer and you're on the hood of a NASCAR, running a marketing campaign to the transsexual community might alienate some of your drinkers. Just just a thought. Hey, this would be funny if thousands of people didn't lose their job over, but that's the cost of hiring this new academic generation. Oh, wow, Carl. You seem awful mad about this.
Yes. I am very mad about this. I told you, this is a deeply therapeutic monologue for me tonight. I hate academia. You wonder why I'm mad?
Because I'm paying for it. So are you. Both through Biden's ridiculous loan forgiveness for people who took out loans voluntarily, and through the problems that the stupidity of this generation is causing in the workforce. Look, life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid.
And unfortunately, people are getting 4 year degrees in stupid right now. You see my point? These people, they they must be held accountable when entering, if they enter the workforce at all. Please, I own a bunch of companies. Save me the trouble in my next round of hiring.