TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @CaryKelly11

Saved - February 21, 2026 at 12:55 AM

@CaryKelly11 - Cary Kelly

Environmentalist claims you can drink a whole quart of glyphosate and “it won’t hurt you.” The interviewer calls his bluff and offers him a glass of glyphosate. The interview ends 22 seconds later. https://t.co/zp9TyfK8oo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on the safety of glyphosate. Speaker 0 says, “I do not believe that glyphosate in Argentina is causing increases in cancer,” and adds, “You can drink a whole quart of it and it won't hurt you.” They even offer, “It's here. I'd be happy to actually,” and insist, “Not really? I know it wouldn't hurt me.” The other person resists, insisting that glyphosate is dangerous, and asks about drinking one glass, to which the response is, “I'm not an idiot,” followed by, “I know so.” The discussion touches on the claim that glyphosate is not dangerous to humans, while also noting that “People try to commit suicide, but then it fail fairly regularly,” implying a different perspective on the danger. The exchange continues with a push-pull about the reality of the risk, as the other participant asks for a direct interview about golden rice, and the response shifts to, “Interview me about golden rice. That's what I'm talking about.” The interaction ends with the statement that the interview is finished and a closing insult: “You're a complete jerk.” The overall exchange juxtaposes denial of cancer risk from glyphosate with provocative offers and counterpoints, culminating in a switch to a topic about golden rice and a dismissive closing remark.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I do not believe that glyphosate in Argentina is causing increases in cancer. You can drink a whole quart of it and it won't hurt you. It's You want to drink some? We have some here. I'd be happy to actually. Yeah. Not not really. But Not really? I know it wouldn't hurt me. If if if you say so. I I have some glyphosate. I'm not stupid. Oh, okay. So you you you No. But I know So it's dangerous. Right? No. People try to commit suicide, but then it fail fairly regularly. Tell the truth. It's not dangerous to humans. No. It's So you're ready to drink one glass of No. I'm not an idiot. Interview me about golden rice. That's what I'm talking about. Okay. Then it's finished. Except Then the interview is finished. Let's say that's a good way to solve things. Yeah. You're a complete jerk.
Saved - February 18, 2026 at 3:49 AM

@CaryKelly11 - Cary Kelly

Want to break your 6-year-old’s addiction to Oreos? Have them watch this. https://t.co/m1aw1mLXAa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the cream in an Oreo cookie isn’t real cream at all, but rapeseed oil mixed with emulsifiers, which are used to glue oil and sugar together so it stays smooth even when it isn’t real food. The cookie part isn’t chocolate either; it’s stripped cocoa and chemical stabilizers. They remove most of the cocoa fat, then rebuild the powder with stabilizers and conditioners so they last forever. The speaker asks what happens when you try to burn these long-lasting ingredients, noting that it doesn’t burn and instead glows. They say, “What kind of natural food do you know of that does this? Food doesn’t usually do that, but materials do. You’re already infected.” The segment ends with “Brain rot reels.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ever wonder what the cream in an Oreo cookie is actually made of? Better sit down for this one. That cream isn't cream at all. It's rapeseed oil mixed with emulsifiers. Emulsifiers are used to glue oil and sugar together so it stays smooth, even when it isn't real food. The cookie part isn't chocolate either. It's stripped cocoa and chemical stabilizers. Fake never looked so real. They remove most of the cocoa fat, then rebuild the powder with stabilizers and conditioners so they last forever. And if these things were made to last forever, what happens when you try to burn it? Notice how it doesn't burn? It glows. What kind of natural food do you know of that does this? Food doesn't usually do that, but materials do. You're already infected. Brain rot reels.
Saved - February 1, 2026 at 4:56 AM

@CaryKelly11 - Cary Kelly

The Amish don't use solar panels or windmills to heat barns. They use their brains and a little propane. This is absolutely genius. Source: alexandrafasulo (IG) https://t.co/5btU9HotWv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes installing an energy-efficient heating system in a barn: floor radiant heat with hot water underneath the surface, installed in March. The speaker turned the heat on for only one hour yesterday, and due to the system, the barn remains warm for twenty-four to thirty-six hours after activation. As a result, the speaker believes it is the most energy-efficient heating form they have seen, since one hour of operation can heat the barn for days. The system is powered by propane. The speaker filled the propane tank half a year ago, and the installers estimated that this setup should power the barn for at least a year. The heat produced is moist and rises from the ground, which the speaker notes makes it ideal for growing plants inside the barn. Plants mentioned as thriving under this heating method include a fig tree and aloe vera. The speaker contrasts this system with blown hot air, which they say dries out the sinus, and emphasizes that the radiant floor heat provides a pleasant environment. The setup includes a water heater that powers the in-floor radiant system. The speaker explains that turning a thermostat control is all that is needed, and the rest happens automatically. The propane tank is located outside the barn, and the speaker expresses that the system has been amazing in their experience. Overall, the speaker highlights three main advantages: exceptional energy efficiency (one hour of use yields heat for days), moisture-rich heat that is beneficial for indoor plant growth, and a comfortable, pleasant climate compared to traditional forced-air heating. The combination of a concrete or surface-mounted radiant system with a water-based heat source and propane fueling is presented as a reliable and long-lasting solution for maintaining a warm barn environment, with the added benefit of supporting indoor horticulture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Amish installed what I am convinced is the most energy efficient form of heating ever in my barn. I turned my heat on for just one hour yesterday, and it was in the low thirties last night. And I turned it off around 3PM. The floor radiant heat, which is hot water underneath the surface here that they installed back in March, keeps the structure warm twenty four to thirty six hours after I turn it on. Meaning I only have to turn that thing on for one hour for it to heat my barn for days after I turned it on, which makes it to me the most energy efficient heating form I've ever seen. And the heat is powered by propane. So I filled up my tank half a year ago and these guys estimated it should power this barn for at least a year. It's also a moist heat that comes up out of the ground, which makes it ideal for growing plants inside, like my fig tree and aloe vera are thriving. Plus, it's just pleasant. Like, I don't like that blown hot air that dries out your sinus. Here's the water heater that powers the in floor radiant and then all I need to do is turn on a thing on that thermostat and the rest is history. There's my propane tank outside and it's just been amazing.
Saved - August 20, 2025 at 4:58 PM

@CaryKelly11 - 💯 Cary Kelly 💯

Firstly, I am so glad I don't have to deal with canned vegetable drama. But I thought this video was interesting so here it is. What's wrong with Walmart's canned corn? Let her count the ways... Source: TheCaroleJones (IG) https://t.co/q9sQIQBLbV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts Walmart has made major changes to their canned corn, comparing an older can to a newer one. The older can is described as 'picked and grown on the same day' with a green 'great for you' label, 'from Arkansas', '45 calories', and 'it's gluten free'. The newer can is 'a product of Thailand', with '90 calories', 'more sodium', and 'more carbs', and is 'no longer picked and packaged on the same day', 'it's no longer gluten free', and it 'lost that great for you tag'. A health warning on the new can states: 'Warning: Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals, including lead, which are known in the state of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harms.' The speaker urges viewers to check their pantry and, if ticked off, let Walmart know.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you shop at Walmart, you're about to be really pissed at them, and let me tell you why. They have made some major changes to their canned corn. I'm gonna point out five of these things, and the fifth one, you might never shop at Walmart again. So here's an older can of corn from my pantry, and we're gonna compare the two with this newer can of corn. Okay? Number one, it says that it is picked and grown on the same day. It has this green little great for you label here. Over here, it says that it's from Arkansas, has 45 calories, what else is it? Oh, and it's gluten free. Okay? Let's compare that to the second can. Right away, the biggest difference, the second can is a product of Thailand. Looking at the nutritional information, we went from 45 calories to 90 calories. There's more sodium, there's more carbs. Apparently it's no longer picked and packaged on the same day like this one, and it's no longer gluten free. It also lost that great for you tag. Let me tell you why. On this new can of corn from Walmart, there's a health warning. Let's read it. Warning: Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals, including lead, which are known in the state of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harms. I guess that's reason enough to lose the great for you symbol that was on this can. So go into your pantry, check out your canned corn. If you're ticked off as much as I am, let Walmart know.
Saved - July 20, 2024 at 5:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe eczema is more than just a skin issue; it’s a deeper problem, possibly related to gut health. After a 100-day all-meat diet, a man in a video claims his eczema disappeared, transforming his life. If you know someone with eczema, they should hear about this.

@CaryKelly11 - 💯 Cary Kelly 💯

Saying eczema is a skin problem is like saying lava is a volcano problem. The problems lies much deeper. The man in the video below believes his eczema was a gut problem and he kind of has the receipts to prove it. He ate nothing but meat for 100 days, his eczema went away and his life changed forever. If you know someone with eczema, they deserve to know about this. Source: bradleymarshallofficial on IG

Video Transcript AI Summary
For 23 years, dermatologists prescribed steroid creams, UV therapy, and antibiotics for eczema. When those failed, Dupixent injections were suggested. But healing naturally without drugs is possible by addressing the root cause in the gut. Chemicals in food can trigger eczema by irritating the gut lining and immune system. By changing diet, the speaker went from severe eczema to optimal health in 100 days, proving that healing without medication is achievable. Born with eczema, now free.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For 23 years, all dermatologists could offer me steroid creams, UV therapy, and antibiotics. When they stopped working for me, they offered me Dupixent injections, a lifetime dependency on drugs. What if I told you you could heal yourself naturally? No drugs. No medicine. This was me a 100 days before healing. This is me today. You see, western medicine doesn't address the root cause of the eczema. Steroid creams and DUPIXENT are just masks, band aids. The problem lies in the gut. The chemicals and the antinutrients in the food you are eating are penetrating your gut lining, alarming your immune system, which is causing the eczema on your skin. In 100 days, by changing my diet, I went from dying to the most healthy I've ever been in my life. I was born with eczema. Today, I am free.
View Full Interactive Feed