@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
🚨 Less than a week ago, the US Coast Guard said they were investigating a series of HOAX DISTRESS CALLS that began February 17 near BALTIMORE. They said at least 16 hoax calls were transmitted and “consist of an individual calling out for help with no location or description of their vessel or nature of distress” https://www.news.uscg.mil/Press-Releases/Article/3713180/videoaudio-release-coast-guard-continues-to-investigate-hoax-distress-calls-nea/
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
@LauraLoomer @RepSantosNY03 Assuming you took more screenshots before her acct went private- but here’s some good ones! https://x.com/catthegreat_/status/1722270962895421907?s=46&t=DtI-ALvvgA2qc_6ffPh3NQ
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
Oh boy. Dr. Jan talking about PEADs
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
Trump’s famous claim “we caught the swamp, we caught them all!” after the 2020 election… Did that really happen? Is there any EVIDENCE we might really “have the goods”?!? It’s all coming back up NOW because of the DOJ’s case against Trump for January 6th… but interestingly enough, a document unearthed by the J6 “Un-Select Committee” may just be a CLUE into how Trump could’ve done it… 🧵
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
Remember that “draft Executive Order” to seize voting machines that the J6 Committee thought was a huge “gotcha moment”? If you look closely, it was curiously NOT titled an EO, but “Presidential Findings” This matters! https://t.co/SxYbnevMYW
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
“Presidential Findings” deal with the President being able to authorize covert action in the name of national security. According to 50 US Code 3093: “The President may not authorize the conduct of a covert action by departments, agencies, or entities of the United States Government unless the President determines such an action is necessary to support identifiable foreign policy objectives of the United States and is important to the national security of the United States…” Foreign (or domestic?) interference in the election = national security, obviously.
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
Presidential Findings must be in writing “unless immediate action by the United States is required and time does not permit the preparation of a written finding, in which case a written record of the President’s decision shall be contemporaneously made and shall be reduced to a written finding as soon as possible but in no event more than 48 hours after the decision is made.” Presidential Findings authorize COVERT action, and can be created AFTER a time-sensitive operation has commenced. So technically, these Presidential Findings could’ve been created AFTER a clandestine operation involving the collection/seizure of “machines, equipment, ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION , and material records”
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
The Findings claim witnesses and cyber experts found foreign interference in the election BEFORE, DURING & AFTER it happened. “Multiple expert witnesses and cyber experts identified acts of foreign interference in the election prior to November 3, 2020 and continued in the following weeks. In fact, there is probable cause to find a massive cyber-attack by foreign interests on our crucial national infrastructure surrounding the election” (Hello! Solarwinds!)
@CatTheGreat_ - CatTheGreat
Obviously the voting machines and physical records were not seized, but could the Findings have justified PART of the actions that actually took place? Space Force’s defense and collection of data from the “hackable” voting machines AFTER IT WAS ALREADY DONE? End 🧵