reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @CatchUpFeed
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Serena Williams calls out New York hotel for cotton plant décor in corridor — all while wearing a blonde wig https://t.co/ooppLvckny
Video Transcript AI Summary
How do we feel about cotton as decoration? Personally, for me, it doesn't feel great. So, actually, it feels like nail polish remover cotton, natural.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, everyone. How do we feel about cotton as decoration? Personally, for me, it doesn't feel great. So, actually, it feels like nail polish remover cotton, natural.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. https://t.co/i6mcA7c8zf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I'd done this whole forest.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Victoria Nuland does not want peace and calls on Trump to keep feeding the Ukrainians intelligence and weapons. “Ukrainians are going to die, more of them, if this pause lasts significantly longer.” https://t.co/VCqGg85AFy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Europe must quickly increase its support for Ukraine, especially as artillery, air defense, and drone production become more challenging. Europe could use proposals and potentially leverage frozen Russian assets to provide immediate assistance.
The speaker is concerned about the cutoff of intelligence streams from the U.S. and pressure on allies not to use U.S. intelligence. U.S. intelligence has been vital for providing Ukrainians with advanced warning of Russian attacks.
Additionally, certain weapon systems rely on U.S. satellite queuing and GPS for targeting. A prolonged pause in this support will result in more Ukrainian deaths, and Europe cannot rapidly replace this capability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. It is, really, very, very important that in this period, that Europe not only be able to step up, but step up fast. Because, as the artillery shells run out, as the air defense interceptors run out, as the ability to produce drones at scale, which have made the difference for Ukraine on the battlefield gets harder, Europe has the capacity not only with these proposals, but conceivably collateralizing against frozen assets that they are holding of Putin's, at least for a short time, to do more and to do it fast. The thing that's concerning me most today is the cutoff of intelligence streams from The United States and pressure on allies like The UK not to use US intelligence for their own weapons. The primary purpose of US intelligence has been to help the Ukrainians see Russian attacks coming and have advanced warning.
There are also key weapon systems that do not queue and do not hit their targets without support from US satellite queuing and the military GPS system. So people are gonna die. Ukrainians are gonna die, more of them, if this pause lasts significantly longer. And it's it it is it is dangerous, and it's not a capability that Europe can replace with any kind of speed.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
California is instituting a new equity-based system for speeding tickets. How much you pay is based on who you are. https://t.co/iAecRHUbMu
Video Transcript AI Summary
San Francisco is launching a speed safety pilot program, supported by California Governor Gavin Newsom, where speeding ticket costs vary based on the offender's identity, aiming for equity. The city transportation authority states speed cameras will be distributed equitably.
Low-income offenders may qualify for up to half-off speeding fines, while homeless individuals could receive up to an 80% discount.
A speaker questions why there are discounts on speeding tickets in high-injury areas where pedestrians have been killed, arguing that all lives are equal and everyone should understand the importance of safe driving in such zones. Another speaker expresses disbelief and questions if this could extend to other crimes like burglary, suggesting that everyone should be equal in the eyes of the law, paying the same fines and serving the same sentences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: San Francisco is launching a new speed safety pilot program backed by Democratic California governor Gavin Newsom, where how much you pay for a speeding ticket depends on who you are, and it's all in the name of equity. On its website, the city transportation authority goes out of its way to explain that speed safety cameras will be dispersed across San Francisco in a quote, equitable fashion. But not everyone will have to pay the same if they get a ticket. Get this, Low income offenders qualify for steep fine discounts, guys, up to half off. And if you're homeless but speeding in your vehicle, you can get up to 80%
Speaker 1: discount.
Speaker 0: Jerry, here's just one of the many problems I have with this. The reason for this program, for the speed cameras, was reportedly because of high injury areas, meaning where pedestrians have been hit and killed. So since all lives are equal, why are we getting discounts on speeding tickets when everyone should understand how serious it is to drive safely where people have died?
Speaker 1: I couldn't believe this when I read this. I was like, is this really true?
Speaker 0: We are all equal in the eyes of
Speaker 1: the law. Oh, no, we're not all equal in the eyes of the law. Okay, so might this get extended eventually? So maybe if I commit a burglary and I don't have a lot of money, maybe that's okay or maybe I get a reduced sentence, or I just don't understand the logic operating here. I think we should all be equal in the eyes of the law, and everybody should pay the same fine, serve the same sentence.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
NPR’s CEO Katherine Maher on the truth. https://t.co/ipGbi3kePR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wikipedia's model works well in contentious areas like politics and religion because contributors focus on the best of what we can know right now, not necessarily on "the truth." After working with Wikipedia contributors, the speaker believes that seeking the truth and convincing others of it might not be the right approach for tricky disagreements.
Reverence for the truth may distract from finding common ground. The speaker is not saying the truth doesn't exist or isn't important, but that different people have different truths. Truth is often what happens when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world. These differing truths are based on factors like background, upbringing, and how others perceive us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The hard things, the places where we are prone to disagreement, say politics and religion. Well, as it turns out, not only does Wikipedia's model work there, it actually works really well. Because in our normal lives, these contentious conversations tend to erupt over disagreement about what the truth actually is. But the people who write these articles, they're not focused on the truth. They're focused on something else, which is the best of what we can know right now.
And after seven years of working with these brilliant folks, I've come to believe that they are onto something. That perhaps, for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking to convince others of the truth might not be the right place to start. In fact, our reverence for the truth might be a distraction that's getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done. Now, that is not to say that the truth doesn't exist, nor is it to say that the truth isn't important. Clearly, the search for the truth has led us to do great things, to learn great things.
But I think if I were to really ask you to think about this, one of the things that we could all acknowledge is that part of the reason we have such glorious chronicles to the human experience in all forms of culture is because we acknowledge there are many different truths. And so in the spirit of that, I'm certain that the truth exists for you and probably for the person sitting next to you. But this may not be the same truth. This is because the truth of the matter is very often, for many people, what happens when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world. So we all have different truths.
They're based on things like where we come from, how we were raised and how other people perceive us.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
“You have to be thankful. You don’t have the cards.” Trump puts Zelensky in his place as he tries to argue that Ukraine is winning the war against Russia. https://t.co/S9X5eUuIzk
Video Transcript AI Summary
I came here seeking diplomacy to end my country's destruction, but I am being attacked for it. We have problems, yes, but everyone does during war. You may not feel it now, but you will.
Don't tell us what we're going to feel; you're not in a position to dictate that. You're gambling with the lives of millions, even risking World War III.
We've been strong from the start, thankful for the support, but we were alone. I said thanks. We want to stop the war, of course, but we need guarantees for a ceasefire. Ask our people what they think about a ceasefire.
You gave us javelins, unlike Obama, who gave us sheets. Be more thankful; without you, we have no cards. One more question, Mr. President.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. Quantum. Yes. But after that, he broke the ceasefire. He killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners.
We signed the exchange of police, but he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy? JD, you're asking me about. What what what what do you mean?
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country.
Speaker 0: Yes. But if
Speaker 1: you Mister president mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come in the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for you to bring him into this conference.
Speaker 0: Been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have.
Speaker 1: I have been to The convuls. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems? What? Bringing people in your military?
Speaker 0: We have problems.
Speaker 1: And do you think that it's respectful to come to the Oval Office of The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country?
Speaker 0: A of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now.
But you will feel it in the future.
Speaker 2: God bless. You don't know that. God bless. You don't know that. You don't don't know that.
Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. I'm not telling you that. Because you're in no position to dictate that.
Remember this. You're not You're in no position to dictate what we're gonna feel. We're gonna feel very good. We're gonna very good and very strong. You're right now not in a very good position.
You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position, and he happens to be right about it.
Speaker 0: From the very beginning of the
Speaker 2: war You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards. But right now, you don't yeah. You're playing cards.
You're playing cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War three. You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country.
It's back to you far more than a lot of people said they should have.
Speaker 1: Have you said thank you once in entire meeting? No. In this entire meeting,
Speaker 0: you said thank you. You went to
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October, offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country. Please,
Speaker 0: you think that if you will speak very loudly about the war you
Speaker 2: He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble.
Speaker 0: Can I ask
Speaker 2: Wait a minute? No. No. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.
Speaker 0: I know.
Speaker 2: You're not winning. I know. You're not winning this. I You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of us.
Speaker 0: Mister president, we are staying in our country, staying strong from the very beginning of the war. We've been alone, and we are thankful. I said thanks. You have a bill on. We
Speaker 2: gave you through this stupid president three hundred and fifty billion dollars. We gave you military equipment and your men are brave, but they had to use our military equipment. If you didn't have our military equipment You invited me to our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.
Speaker 0: In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days. This is something
Speaker 2: Maybe less. In two weeks.
Speaker 0: Of course, yes.
Speaker 2: It's gonna be a very hard thing to do business like this. I'm gonna tell you.
Speaker 1: Just say thank you.
Speaker 0: I said a little bit. I'm saying American people.
Speaker 1: That there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong.
Speaker 2: But you see, think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I understand. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful.
You don't have the cards. You're buried there. You're your people are dying. I'm telling you. You're running low on soldiers.
Listen. You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing. Then you then you tell us, I don't wanna cease fire. I don't wanna cease fire.
I wanna go, and I wanted this. Look. If you could get a ceasefire right now, I tell you you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed.
Speaker 0: Of course, we want to stop the war.
Speaker 2: You're saying you don't want a ceasefire? Want a ceasefire. Guarantees. Because you'll get a ceasefire faster than it agrees.
Speaker 0: Ask our people about a ceasefire. What they think?
Speaker 2: Wasn't with me. For you. What That wasn't with me. That was with a a guy named Biden who was not a smart person. That was your that was with Obama.
Speaker 0: It was your president.
Speaker 2: Excuse me. That was with Obama who gave you sheets, and I gave you javelins. Yes. I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets.
In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins. You gotta be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards. But without us, you don't have any cards. One more question to my mister Mike's
Speaker 0: president.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
The View hosts called Elon Musk an "illegal immigrant", adding the world's richest person was "pro-apartheid." https://t.co/NbBGdrgTA3
Video Transcript AI Summary
I can take a nap while this guy, who wasn't born in the U.S. and grew up under apartheid in South Africa, does my job. He might even be a foreign agent or an enemy of the United States.
I'm getting some flack for saying Musk was pro-apartheid. I don't really know for sure, but he grew up during that time, so maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. He might have been young. So, Elon, please don't sue me!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He can take a nap while the guy was not born in this country, who was born under a apartheid in South Africa. Mhmm. So has that mentality going on. He was pro apartheid as I understand it. This is just Right.
Perfectly wonderful for Trump. He's Right. Can take a nap and let this foreigner foreign agent, you know Right. An enemy of The United States do his job. Now, I'm getting some flack because I said that Musk was pro apartheid.
I don't really know, but for sure if he was. He grew up at that time. Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. He might have been a young guy too. Might have been.
So don't be suing me. Okay, Elon?
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Jamie Raskin claims that the notion of the Biden Department of Justice vilifying parents at school board meetings is baseless propaganda with no factual foundation. https://t.co/Cq3pNDBKml
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been hearing about the prosecution and vilification of parents, and as a father who sent his kids to public school, I wanted to understand what was happening. After looking into it, the memo from Attorney General Merrick Garland addresses a disturbing increase in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, teachers, board members, and staff. However, the words "mother," "father," or even "parent" are not even mentioned. The propaganda suggesting prosecution of parents appears to be completely unfounded. I will submit this memo for the record.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we talk about it, then I hear about the prosecution and vilification of parents, of mothers and fathers, and hey, I'm a father, my kids went to public school, that doesn't sound very good to me, so I try to get to the bottom of this because I've been hearing about it for five years now, and I ask myself what are they talking about, so I get the memo which was from Attorney General Merrick Garland, and it begins, I don't have time to read the whole thing, there's been a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, teachers, board members, and staff. The word mother or father don't appear, the word parent doesn't appear here, there's all of this propaganda about some prosecution of parents is based on absolutely nothing. This is just made up out of thin air. So I will submit this for the record. The memo though of this goes back to Mr.
Chairman. Thanks so much.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
The vast majority of Democrats—not just Republicans—support DOGE’s budget cuts. https://t.co/TyOTdTNYtW
Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent poll reveals that 67% of people believe the US federal debt is unsustainable, and 60% think Doge is helping make major cuts in government expenditures.
Robert Blouie notes that people are fired up about Elon Musk making cuts that politicians have only promised. Dan Turrentine agrees, stating Democrats are too focused on how Musk is doing it. The poll shows 72% of Democrats want reduced government expenditures, but creating that change can be chaotic.
Turrentine believes Democrats need to be more open to cuts and not just raising taxes. Blouie thinks Musk could be more aggressive given the massive deficit, as it is a spending problem, not revenue. Turrentine says the real test will come when Congress starts trying to pass the reconciliation bill because it is the only way to get real deficit and debt reduction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brand new polling, which shows overwhelming support for the Doge cuts. When asked if the US federal government debt is unsustainable, 67% say, heck, yeah, it is. It's unsustainable. 33%, no, man. We got this.
But when asked if DOGE is helping make major cuts in government expenditures, 60% say, heck, yeah, it's helping. 40% say, no, it's not helping. And finally, when asked if Doge should have access to the sensitive data, remember that one? 50 eight percent say, heck, yeah, give him the access, compared to 42% who say, no. Don't give them the access.
So we wanna dive further into this now with Robert Blouie. He's president and executive director of The Daily Signal and also Dan Turrentine, cohost of Morning Meeting. Also, Dan served as chief of staff for then congressman Jared Polis, who's now the governor of Colorado. Thank you both for being here. So, Robert, it seems like Elon's doing what Trump promised, but it's really who's doing it and how it's being done that has people all fired up.
Am I wrong?
Speaker 1: This time around is you actually have somebody who is serious about cutting spending in Washington DC. For years, politicians have made promises. They have not followed through on those promises, and Elon Musk is doing that. He's doing so at the direction of Donald Trump, which as the exec the commander in chief and the CEO of the executive branch has the authority to designate an individual in his under his direction to do exactly what Elon is doing. So I think that American people should get used to this.
We're not going to see the end of it until DOGE has finished its work.
Speaker 0: Dan, what are your thoughts?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, I think you said it well. There's been, I think, too much focus by Democrats on who's doing it and and how he's going about it. Right? You know, he didn't give him thirty days notice, so it's like a footfall in tennis.
But I I think, look, there is polling that shows that people have concerns with Musk. So I think to some extent, you're going to hear more about it. And I think at times it's coming across as a little chaotic like today. I think this evening, the office of personnel management put out word that people don't have to follow what Musk said. But Yep.
Look, I I think as as Robert just said, overall, Trump ran on this, and common sense tells everyone there is some spending that shouldn't be happening. And where they find it, democrats should say, you know, good on them, and let's fix it.
Speaker 0: Well, let let's talk about the poll I just referenced. Alright? It also asked respondents take a look. Walk with me here. I wanna show you.
It asked respondents, should US reduce debt by increasing taxes or reducing government expenditures? Simple question. Right? Take a look at what Democrats had to say. Reduce government expenditures.
72% of Democrats say, heck, yeah. No surprise. 94% of the GOP said that as well. So so, again, think think about that, guys. When when you see that, Dan, and how are we supposed to reduce government expenditures, which 72% of the Democrats in this poll say, yep, we want done, without creating chaos, without having issues when you're bucking the norm?
Speaker 2: Look. That that's the that's the the the the million dollar question. And I think this is where democrats have made a mistake because every time Musk says anything, we scream about him. We scream about the process, and we scream about every single cut. When there is something legitimate, then people don't hear us, right?
Because we're constantly complaining. And I think what that survey shows is every household has to make cuts at varying points, you know, in the arc of its lifetime. Every business has to make cuts. So Americans understand this. So for the Democratic party to always say, just raise taxes is crazy.
It's one of the reasons we find ourselves where we are in the minority. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Robert, president Trump posted on True Social that he wants Elon to be more aggressive. So my question to you is, is there a world where Elon could could maybe go too far with this?
Speaker 1: Not with the massive debt problem that we have. And and as we we all know, in in talking about this issue, the government is running a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit, and there is a lot of work just to be done. This is not a revenue problem as Dan was just talking about. This is a spending problem. And so I think that there is a lot that Elon can do.
There are 2,400,000 federal employees. There are a lot of government programs that just haven't delivered on they don't match the return on investment that you would have in the private sector. And so I think that there is a lot more that Elon Musk can do, and I would hope that Democrats can work collaboratively with Republicans to try to streamline and make government more efficient. At the end of the day, I think that is a goal that hopefully most Americans can get behind.
Speaker 0: Wouldn't that be something, Dan? I mean, why why won't democrats say, we saw what the voters said in November, and we agree there is waste that needs to be cut. Let us work with you to make that happen.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think this is where a little bit of kind of how Musk has gone about it. He he he didn't endear himself, you know, very early on with some of his taunts and and and brash statements. Now you can make the argument that's what was needed to get this done. But look, the rubber's gonna meet the road here for both parties when congress starts trying to pass, this reconciliation bill.
Because the only way you'll ultimately get the type of deficit, and debt reduction is to look at entitlements and defense. And that, you know, even Republicans are saying, wait a second. We're a little nervous about Medicaid or Medicare. And I think Democrats will, you know, sit there and say, is that the trade off that you wanna make? The country may say yes, but I think we're about to have that conversation.
Speaker 0: We're having the conversation now. Robert Bluhey, Dan Turrentine, thank you both for sharing your thoughts with us tonight. We do appreciate it. You know, as as Elon chips away at this excess spending, Doge hasn't gotten it all right every step of the way, something Elon admits isn't realistic. Listen here.
Speaker 1: Some of the things that I say will be incorrect and and should be correct.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Joy Behar goes on a tangent, calling Elon Musk a foreign agent, wrongly asserting he supported apartheid, and wondering aloud if he immigrated legally. https://t.co/hX8dI4KBh5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk, with all the attention he gets, wasn't born in this country. He grew up under apartheid in South Africa, and some say he supported it. Now, he's a naturalized citizen. He didn't sneak across the border. He allegedly overstayed a visa. It's convenient for Trump to let this foreigner, maybe even an enemy of the U.S., do the work. I don't like Elon. Though, I won't call him an enemy of the state just yet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And and Elon Musk kisses his butt and strokes his his tiny ego or big ego, whatever it is. And and he doesn't get to do he can take a nap while the guy was not born in this country, who was born under apartheid in South Africa, so has that mentality going on. He was pro apartheid as I understand it. He's a naturalized citizen. Right.
He's a naturalized citizen. Now he's a naturalized citizen. Oh, really? How did he do that? Did he come over the border illegally?
An h one b visa, I He flew in. Yeah. He allegedly overstayed that visa. I think this is just perfectly wonderful for Trump. He's gonna take a nap and let this foreigner foreign agent, you know Right.
An enemy of The United States do his job. Anybody else? I just I don't like you on. I wouldn't go as far as to necessarily call him an enemy of The United States yet. Let's give a little bit of a I
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
FBI Director James Comey confesses to his wrongdoing and boasts about ensnaring officials in the Trump White House by taking advantage of the novice administration's lack of experience. https://t.co/fTIABAbKPJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. In a more organized administration, like Bush or Obama, you'd have to work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought it was early enough in the administration to just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of guys over and hoped he'd talk to them. He said, sure. Nobody else was there. They interviewed him in a conference room in the White House situation room, and he lied to them. That's what he pled guilty to. I don't think he knew why they were coming over. We just told him we were sending a couple of agents over to ask some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to sit down and talk to them. And he said, sure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's hard to imagine two FBI agents ending up in the sit room. How did that happen?
Speaker 1: I sent them. Something we I probably wouldn't have done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, a more organized administration, in the George w Bush administration, for example, or the Obama administration. The protocol, two men that all of us have perhaps increased appreciation for over the last two years. And in both of those administrations, there was process. And so if the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House itself to interview a senior official, You would work through the White House counsel, and there'd be discussions and approvals and who would be there.
And I thought it's early enough. Let's just send a couple guys over. And so we placed a call to Flynn, said, hey. We're sending a couple of guys over. Hope you'll talk to them.
He said, sure. Nobody else was there. They interviewed him in a conference room at the White House situation room, and he lied to them. And that's what he's now plead guilty to.
Speaker 0: What did he think they were coming over there for?
Speaker 1: I don't think he knew. I no. We didn't tell him. Just said we got a cup sending over a couple of agents. I wanna ask you some questions.
I didn't have this conversation. My deputy director did. But hope hope you got a few minutes. You can sit down and talk to them. And he said, sure.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
NYC Mayor Eric Adams says he's like a martyr with "negroes axing me to step down." https://t.co/kqgDoiArTg
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a biblical moment, like when Jesus on the cross said, "God forgive them, for they know not what they do." All these people are asking me to step down, and I say, God forgive them. Are you stupid? I'm running my race right now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is a biblical moment. You know, when Jesus was on the cross, he said, God forgive them for they know not what they do. All these Negroes were asking me to step down. God forgive them. Are you are you stupid?
I'm running my race right now.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Always remember that prior to his death in Ukraine, American journalist Gonzalo Lira detailed precisely how Zelensky received his funding. https://t.co/ywvSAJkPP9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky's rise to power is not as organic as you might think. He was essentially manufactured by Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoyski, who owns OnePlusOne Media. Kolomoyski funded Zelensky's TV show, "Servant of the People," where he played the president. The show's popularity catapulted Zelensky into the political arena.
Kolomoyski then created a political party with the same name and backed Zelensky as their candidate, despite his lack of political experience. Kolomoyski's money turned Zelensky into a billionaire.
Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden, paying him $50,000 a month to sit on the board of Burisma. The Washington establishment has been using Ukraine as a piggy bank, exploiting the country's resources. The West is afraid the truth about Ukraine's corruption will come out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see, Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, well, the cokehead of Kyiv, because he is a cokehead, the cokehead of Kyiv is actually a manufactured political figure. He was manufactured by a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch called Igor Kolomoyski. Now, Igor Kolomoyski was the man who owns OnePlusOne Media here in Ukraine, OnePlusOne Media is the company that financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People. Servant of the People hired Zelensky, a well known actor in Ukraine, an actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, well, they hired him to play the role of the President in this show Servant of the People. Servant of the People had huge ratings, but a lot of people say that it was really weird the amount of propaganda and PR that was done for the show.
It was disproportionate to any other show of any channel. The amount of PR positive press and all the rest of it, it was really pushed on the people. Some people say it was completely astroturf. Some people who know how to speak Ukrainian and who have watched the show have told me that it's a mildly enjoyable show, but no big deal. But anyway, the show was hugely popular, and it ran from 2015 to 2018, and almost seamlessly, Kolomoisky, the oligarch, created a party called Servant of the People, same name as the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky, a man with no previous political experience and indeed no previous political interest.
Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. How many actors do you know are billionaires? I don't think that Tom Cruise is a billionaire and he's the most successful actor in the world, if he's just an actor. Zelensky is more than just an actor. He's the finger puppet of Kolomoisky, this oligarch.
And do you know who Kolomoisky also financed, to the tune of $50,000 a month, plus additional benefits of different sorts? Hunter Biden, yes. In 2014, Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company gas company, excuse me, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors to the tune of $50,000 a month. Who do you think controls Burisma? Kolomovsky, the same guy who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine.
Yeah, I bet you didn't know that. Zelensky and Hunter Biden are spiritual cousins. They are bankrolled by the same guy. It's funny because both of them have drug addictions, pretty serious ones, both of them get their money from Kolomovsky, and both of them are intimately involved in Ukraine. But here's the difference, of course: Zelenskyy doesn't have a dad, who's President of The United States, now does he?
Why do you think the White House is freaking out so badly over Ukraine? In Ukraine, there are all kinds of secrets. In Ukraine, well, see, the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. They have financially raped Ukraine, stripping it of monies and assets needed by the people of Ukraine. And this is part of the reason that Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, if not the poorest country in Europe, of the corruption, because of how Westerners have exploited it, Western politicians have exploited it.
Hunter Biden? Fifty thousand dollars a month. And you say to yourself, well, 50,000 isn't that much. Yeah, but $50,000 a year is the median household income in The United States. In Ukraine, a much poorer country, dollars 50,000 a year would easily solve the problems of a good four or five families in Ukraine, the financial problems of those four or five families in Ukraine, for a year.
And Hunter Biden was getting that money per month, just for himself. Although, of course, in the Hunter Biden emails there's talk that seems to be true that the old man would get a 10% kickback of whatever Hunter Biden was getting. That was in the laptop. Oh, yeah. Look it up.
You don't have to take my word for it. Don't have to take my word for any of what I'm telling you. Look it up yourself and you'll find it. It's very easy to find. Kolomovsky, the Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch, was financing Zelensky, was financing Joe Biden.
God alone knows who else he was financing, And he was just one. There's a whole rotten bunch of these people here in Ukraine. And they were all busy paying off the West so that they could carry on their little evil deeds and whatnot. If you want to know why the West is freaking out over Ukraine, you have to understand that they are all terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Adam Schiff attacks JD Vance for his speech in Munich, calling his criticism of Europe’s crackdown on free speech as a gift to Russia. The world is upside down. https://t.co/ZmD6MzAZbh
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was very disappointed by the speech given by Vice President JD Vance at the conference yesterday. Our allies needed to hear a renewed commitment from America to NATO and our European partners. They needed to know that we are willing to stand up to the Kremlin and provide Ukraine with the help it needs to fight Russia's war. Instead, they got a condescending lecture that attacked our allies. The speech sent the wrong message and I believe it was enthusiastically greeted in the Kremlin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like first, sir, to get your response to vice president JD Vance's speech at the conference there yesterday, where he berated European leaders on a whole host of issues. What do his comments reveal about the Trump administration and our commitment to NATO?
Speaker 1: They were really shocking and so disappointing when what I think our allies needed to hear was a renewed commitment by America to NATO, to our European partners, a willingness to stand up to the Kremlin and make sure that we provide Ukraine with all of the help that it needs to fight this war of aggression by Russia. But instead, what Europe got was a lecturing, a condescension, a demeaning speech that, really, I think just attacked our allies. It was greeted, I think, enthusiastically in one place, and that was the Kremlin. Exactly the wrong message right now.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Adam Schiff is terrified of Kash Patel being confirmed because he will have to answer for his role in the Russiagate hoax. https://t.co/KsMRXlB2z3
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe Adam Schiff is the most responsible person for spreading disinformation on Russiagate. He claimed he had evidence of Donald Trump colluding with Russia, feeding lies to the mainstream media to push a false narrative for four years. As someone who ran the Russiagate investigation while Schiff was the minority leader on the House Intel Committee, he had access to the same information.
The released deposition transcripts prove Schiff knew there was no factual basis for the Russiagate narrative. So, when he tweets about being scared that Twitter will be a landing ground for disinformation, it's hypocritical. Twitter has been a place where people spread defamation and attack others, with clear hypocrisy on who they allow on the platform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He, Adam Schiff, the single most in the person who is responsible for spreading disinformation on Russiagate, saying he had evidence Donald Trump colluded with Russia, saying the intelligence community had all this information, and then going out to the mainstream media and feeding them these lies because they were in bed with him to spread a false narrative for four years and bamboozle the world into believing that Russiagate actually happened and Donald Trump conspired with Russia. It was a total falsehood. Adam Schiff knew it at the time. I was running the Russiagate investigation. He was the, leader of the minority on the House Intel Committee.
Devin Nunes was the then chairman. He had access to all the information we had access to. The transcripts are the best example, the 60 some odd transcripts that I took at depositions of of of cabinet secretaries, intel officials, DOJ, FBI, Fusion GPS, the all the like. We finally forced those deposition transcripts to light, and what do they show? The headline, Adam Schiff knew the entire time there was no factual basis to perpetuate the Russiagate narrative.
So when a guy like that issues this tweet, I just think it's America should pause and say the King Kong of disinformation is now coming up and saying he's all of a sudden scared that Twitter is going to be, the the the landing ground for disinformation. When you and I have been talking about it, right, Lisa, over the last few years, Twitter has been, the ground where people spread defamation, where people attack others mercilessly. And Twitter's hypocrisy on who they let on their platform and who they kick out has been on full display for years. They've suspended folks like, obviously, president Trump, Babylon b, and all these other journalists who are actually doing fact based reporting because they had the audacity to say
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
John Bolton received an interesting parting gift from USAID following his service with them. https://t.co/5cQ9FEdcXq
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have personal experience with fixing USAID. As someone in charge of policy and budget at USAID during the Reagan administration, we took on a major effort to fix it. I even have a farewell present from AID. It's a hand grenade that says, "John R. Bolton, truest Reaganaut, AID 1983." This represents the style of government that we embraced at the time and it reflects our approach to the job.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I might say I've I've got some personal experience here. I was, in charge of policy and budget at USAID during the Reagan administration when we undertook a major effort to fix it. And I'm gonna show you my farewell present from AID. You can see it's a hand grenade, and it says on it, John r Bolton, truest Reaganaught, AID nineteen eighty three. This is a style of government, and, and that's the way we approached it.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says that the war in Ukraine must end, but he warns that a return to its borders pre-2014 is not realistic. https://t.co/sEvCgvZIIm
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
FEMA workers fired after huge payment for NYC migrants revealed. https://t.co/75I4kgyIQG
Video Transcript AI Summary
FEMA employees have been terminated for allegedly sending $59,000,000 to house illegal migrants in luxury hotels, sparking public outrage. Critics are pointing out the contrast of this situation with the treatment of citizens affected by natural disasters who did not receive adequate assistance.
The funds, allegedly sent through a program separate from the disaster relief fund, have done little to quell public anger. Some feel the money could have been used to address homelessness and create housing for American citizens instead. Some are calling for FEMA to be shut down completely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FEMA employees have been fired for sending huge sums of money to illegal migrants.
Speaker 1: This is how the government is spending your money, and it has to stop.
Speaker 0: $59,000,000 allegedly went to luxury hotels for migrants. This has sparked outrage online with many recalling how people affected by natural disasters were not given the help they deserved.
Speaker 1: And then they hid the fact until just today that your money was going from FEMA, pay to house illegals in a fucking hotel while you got to sit with your family in a tent after losing everything and almost freezing to death and starving to death because Biden was a piece of shit.
Speaker 0: New York City Hall said they never paid for the luxury hotels, and the money was sent through a different program that is separate from the disaster relief fund, which still hasn't won any sympathy from angry Americans.
Speaker 1: We could have been using that money to help the homeless and create housing for them. FEMA just needs to close. Like, the whole organization just needs to be shut down.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Jesse Waters highlighted a two year old clip of Jon Stewart slamming Biden's Deputy Secretary of Defense over the DOD's repeated inability to pass an audit. Why are liberals now mad that Elon Musk is getting those answers? https://t.co/v6BSEuZsIW
Video Transcript AI Summary
If I give an organization a billion dollars, I need to know where it went. Otherwise, that's wasteful and irresponsible. If you can't account for it, what am I supposed to think?
Now, I'm not saying anyone is directly responsible for this. However, giving an $850 billion budget to an organization that can't pass an audit and explain where the money went seems like waste, fraud, or abuse to most people. They would naturally wonder why the money isn't properly accounted for.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I give you a billion dollars and you can't tell me what happened to it, that to me is wasteful. That that means you are not necessary. Responsible. But if you can't tell me where it went, then what am I supposed to think? And when there has been reporting I mean, this is not look.
I'm not I'm not saying this is on you and that you caused this, but I think it's it's a tough argument to make sure that cause it. An an $850,000,000,000 budget to an organization that can't pass an audit and tell you where that money went, like, I think most people would consider that somewhere in the realm of waste, fraud, or abuse because they would wonder why that money isn't well accounted for.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Guest just ENDED Bill Gates and destroyed Whoopi’s USAID spin at the same time: https://t.co/B69Dv4PfOe
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm concerned about the scrutiny USAID is facing. It's an organization that promotes national security, human rights, and global health. But, some USAID projects are questionable uses of taxpayer money. For example, millions of dollars have gone to tourism in Egypt, a Democratic Party propaganda arm, transgender opera in Colombia, sex changes in Guatemala, bat research in Wuhan, and even a new Sesame Street show in Iraq. These expenditures raise serious questions about how taxpayer money is being spent. We need to take a closer look at these allocations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, Elon, I'm a little worried particularly with this USAID stuff.
Speaker 1: And let's not forget, USAID advances national security, works to protect human rights and improve global health. So why they're going after that?
Speaker 2: Well, let let me first Bill, frankly, I think you should rather be worried about the Epstein client list. Okay? To your question, Whoopi, why are they going after USAID? How about I pull up a list? This one is not as famous as the list that you're familiar with, but this is a list of the taxpayer funded US aid projects.
$6,000,000 to fund tourism in Egypt. Eight Million Dollars to political, a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party just like this show. $47,000 for transgender opera in Colombia. What is that about? $2,000,000 for sex changes in Guatemala.
You will love this one, Bill. One million dollars for batch research in Wuhan, China. 20 Million Dollars on a new Sesame Street show in Iraq. Like, it's US taxpayers' responsibility to bring fucking Cookie Monster to Iraq. And the I'm gonna
Speaker 1: we're gonna go to break.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
“The current state of Great Britain is that it does not look like a country that won a war. It looks like a country that lost a war.” — Tucker Carlson https://t.co/mdsSEJMbnY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The current state of Great Britain raises questions about its post-war recovery, suggesting it resembles a nation that lost rather than won. The alliance with Stalin during World War II is particularly troubling, especially after urging sacrifices to protect Poland, only to hand it over to him. This raises moral concerns about leadership decisions. While acknowledging the necessity of opposing Hitler, the discussion emphasizes the failure to maintain Western civilization's integrity post-war. Despite defeating the Nazis, the decline of British influence and values is evident. The conversation highlights the need to reassess historical actions and their long-term consequences on Western civilization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's my problem with Churchill. Again, the current state of Great Britain does not look to me like a country that won a war. Looks like a country that lost a war badly and was degraded. How did that happen? Why?
You're not allowed to ask that because people are like, oh, that's holocaust denial. The country of a lot of my ancestors looks like it lost a war. How did that happen? I think it's a totally fair question. And anyone who says it's not a fair question is a liar, and I'm not gonna be intimidated because I'm part English.
So buzz off. What's the answer? And so I don't think that you can You can't
Speaker 1: put it on Churchill. Well,
Speaker 0: I don't put it entirely on Churchill.
Speaker 1: You can't put any of it in Churchill because they Well, so you're If you look at if you look at the sixties, you would say that that Britain was absolutely roaring post war. Right? It Oh, really?
Speaker 0: Your manufacturing was dying. Well, you rationing until the fifties. Like, how did this work?
Speaker 1: Well, because we've just been in the World War.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm saying that's an awfully slow recovery for a winning nation. Mhmm. If you won, why did you have rationing for 10 years after? But here's here's the real problem to be much more specific. I don't know how you could say to the English people, it is essential that your sons go die to preserve the territorial integrity of Poland, and then hand Poland to Stalin of all people.
I don't know how you could be in an alliance with Stalin, the greatest mass murderer in history. I don't know how Roosevelt could be in an alliance with Stalin. Once you're in an alliance with Stalin, you lose all moral authority.
Speaker 1: So what do you do about that?
Speaker 0: Not allowed to lecture me about anything. Let me You're in a military alliance with those of Stalin.
Speaker 1: Let me take you back. Who murdered all the let me make you president.
Speaker 0: Tens and millions of people. Alright.
Speaker 1: Let me make you president of the United States at the time.
Speaker 0: I'm not against fighting World War 2. I'm not I'm not. I'm only saying specifically with reference to Churchill. You can't go to your country, your countrymen, and say go ahead and die to preserve the dignity of Polish territorial integrity, the dignity of Poland, the nation of Poland, and then give it to Stalin. And it languishes under an iron curtain, and people are murdered and rounded up and tortured to death for 40 years.
Speaker 1: That wasn't what Churchill did.
Speaker 0: Yes. It is what Churchill did.
Speaker 1: Because he came in after the war started. No. No.
Speaker 0: At Tehran, Pazda, and Yalta, he they made a deal to hand Eastern Europe, which he had brought his country to war to protect to Stalin. There is no getting around the fact that Stalin is maybe the worst person in all human history, but certainly in the running.
Speaker 1: And I I don't disagree.
Speaker 0: So you're in a military alliance with Joseph Stalin? You shut the fuck up. You have no right to lecture me about anything. Okay? That that's where we start.
And that's been sort of elided over. The Roosevelt administration armed Stalin in lend lease. Tell me how that's defensible. It's not defensible.
Speaker 1: But that's what the a question I was asking.
Speaker 0: What But to hand Poland, which you went to war protect
Speaker 1: I I hear you.
Speaker 0: To Stalin. Like, why doesn't someone answer that question? They're like, oh, we had no choice. Really?
Speaker 1: But what my question though is Then
Speaker 0: you're a failed leader.
Speaker 1: But what would you have done about Hitler?
Speaker 0: I would have opposed him. Of course. How? I I certainly wouldn't arm Stalin. I certainly So how would you murdering Christians and
Speaker 1: But what would you?
Speaker 0: To be
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm genuinely serious.
Speaker 0: No idea what I would have done. I would have been opposed to him. I am opposed to him. I mean, it's not so I love this conversation. So it's like, there's no way to reassess anything without getting right to so you're for you're for Hitler.
Right? Or you would just let Hitler expand on to Europe or something like that.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that. I'm just curious. If you don't do what Churchill did, I'm curious what you think we should have done.
Speaker 0: Act on behalf of your country. That's your job.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't think you can.
Speaker 0: A theologian, we certainly didn't look at it. Have you been there?
Speaker 1: Well, my country. Of course. I live in my country.
Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Right. So you know. No one looked after Great Britain. It ran the world.
Now it's degraded. Now you have Sadiq Khan, like, giving the finger to Christianity in your capital city. It's like, what? This is the seat of Protestantism globally. Or even in downtown Berlin, the war is the effort to save Western civilization, and I agree with you that Hitler was a great threat to Western civilization.
As Dietrich Bonhoeffer. But that was lost. So where's the victory?
Speaker 1: Yeah. But it wasn't lost.
Speaker 0: Really? Really? Where's it? Where's western civilization thriving?
Speaker 1: What has happened is you've seen Britain's power in the world diminishing ever since. That is true.
Speaker 0: What is Western civilization?
Speaker 1: Well, that's an interesting question. I would say that for for example, I would say one of the reasons that well, the three reasons Trump It's Christianity
Speaker 0: is what it is.
Speaker 1: Well, that's okay. I I know you believe that strongly.
Speaker 0: Well, what okay. I'm the Catholic I'm the Catholic.
Speaker 1: Your preaching is acquired literally.
Speaker 0: No. But if it's not Christianity, what is it? It's Christianity. That's what it is. It's the political legacy of Christianity, and that's dying.
And I'm not saying Churchill was its assassin. I'm just saying I'm just saying, like, he didn't save it because it's dying. And
Speaker 1: Well, can we agree he saved us from the Nazis?
Speaker 0: I I guess, but I'm saying it was a pure victory. I mean, beating the Nazis is always good. You wanna beat the Nazis. Okay? I'm I'm for beating the Nazis, to be clear.
The Nazis were a threat to western civilization. They were a threat to Christianity. But if Churchill saved it, where is it?
Speaker 1: Well, I think that's a that's a perfectly legitimate question.
Speaker 0: No. I know. Yeah. And they call me a holocaust denier for bringing that up.
Speaker 1: I don't call you that.
Speaker 0: Well, no. But I'm just saying, like, I got so attacked. But that's not only a legitimate question, it's the question. And I'm very upset about it because I think Western civilization is the best thing this world has ever produced.
Speaker 1: Can can I ask you about something that happened big in the American election which we're now wrestling within our country? Woke
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Keir Starmer asserts that the primary issue Britain must tackle is Islamophobia. https://t.co/fOzR5fOdtb
Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a troubling rise in Islamophobia, making many feel unsafe in their own country. Women in hijabs are afraid to use public transport, and Muslim families face abuse after attending mosques. This surge is particularly affecting Muslim women and girls, leading to increased security at mosques. British Muslims are unjustly questioned as if they are terrorists. It is crucial for Britain to be a place where Muslims can fully express their identities without fear or discrimination. The contributions of British Muslims should be recognized and celebrated. As leader of the Labour Party, I appreciate the vital role of Muslim members, activists, and organizations in our community and their efforts to combat Islamophobia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've seen a devastating rise in Islamophobia, leaving people feeling fearful and unsafe in their own country. I've heard firsthand of women wearing hijab who are too scared to travel by public transport, of Muslim families being abused as they leave the mosque. The surge in Islamophobia is simply appalling. Muslim women and girls disproportionately targeted. Mosques forced to ramp up security.
And British Muslims questioned as if they are terrorists. I do not want Britain to be a place where British Muslims are not able to be their whole selves, where they feel they must hide or tone down who they are for fear of being attached to views that are not their own, where they're asked to apologize for the actions of people who do not act in their name. Our Britain is one where the enormous contributions of British Muslims are recognized and celebrated, their stories heard, their lives free from discrimination. As leader of the Labour Party, I am indebted to the contributions of Muslim members, activists and politicians who make our party what it is today. I'd like to thank Muslim organizations and mosques who work tirelessly to raise awareness and shine a light on the scale of Islamophobia.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
The View's geniuses get reality-checked by guest after claiming women aren't paid the same as men, and that's what makes one a feminist. https://t.co/iuq6Y8AHOB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dolly Parton initially hesitated to identify as a feminist but eventually acknowledged her support for equal pay for women. It's important to note that, by law, women must earn the same as men for the same job. However, the uncontrolled pay gap often overlooks factors such as maternity leave, the tendency for women to work part-time, less aggressive salary negotiations, and more time off for family responsibilities. When these factors are considered, it shows that pay is equal under the same conditions. Therefore, while the issue is complex, the legal framework ensures equal pay for equal work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've had people like Dolly Parton, and I think you asked her Are you a feminist? Are you a feminist? And she said I said, I don't think so. Think so. But then you pushed her and she said, yeah.
I guess I am. Well, I said to her, do you believe that women should make the amount of money as men? Well, I guess I am a feminist. Yeah. And she said, I guess I am a feminist.
So I I mean I'm sorry. But doing the same job, women do earn the same as men. It's illegal for companies not to pay equal wages for equal work. But since Logic always take a back seat on this show, will be, you're looking at the uncontrolled pay gap, which does not take into account things like, I don't know, women often take pregnancy leave. Women opts for part time work more frequently.
Women negotiate less aggressively for salary increases. And women take more time off for personal travel and other family responsibilities. And when you analyze these factors, you find out that for the same work, under same conditions, pay is equal by law. So, I wish you were as right as your confidence implies.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Guest brutally humbles The View hosts following Trump’s victory. https://t.co/fLMf5zdFvt
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're still here. I saw people living their lives today—mailmen, families, just everyday activities.
But what you witnessed seems contradictory. For years, you and the media have painted Trump as a dictator, comparing him to Hitler and his supporters to Nazis. Now, after his election, you're saying Americans are moving on with their lives?
Joy, you mentioned that if elected, Trump would jail you and Whoopi for being comedians, which is absurd. Yet, here you all are, seemingly unaffected. If you truly believed what you claimed about Trump, this wouldn't be the case. I don't understand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're still here. People I I when I got out of the car today, I saw mailmen, people with their kids. I saw people living their lives, and that's what we have to do.
Speaker 1: Well, Wolfie, what you saw with your own eyes is pretty much impossible because at least for the past 4 years, every single one of you on this show, including your friends in the mainstream media, you told Americans that Trump is like Hitler. You compared his supporters to Nazis. You called him a fascist, a racist, a dictator. And now that he is elected, you're telling me that Americans are going on with their lives? Like, why are you even sitting here?
Joy, you said if elected, Trump will put you and Whoopi in jail for being comedians, unfunny comedians, I should add. Maybe that should be a crime. I don't know. But all of you are sitting here, and you are just fine. And that should not be the case if you really believed what you said about Trump.
I don't understand.
reSee.it AI Summary
In the heart of New York City, the case of Daniel Penny, a former Marine charged with manslaughter after a subway incident, has sparked a national debate on justice and personal responsibility. This video examines the complexities and differing viewpoints surrounding the case. Join the conversation.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Amidst the pulsing underbelly of New York City, the case of Daniel Penny, a former Marine facing manslaughter charges after a subway altercation, has ignited a national conversation on justice and personal responsibility. This video delves into the complexities of the case, exploring the diverging perspectives and the societal implications at play. Join the discussion and share your thoughts on the complex landscape of law enforcement and public opinion.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Pro-Palestinian protestors have stormed the US capital in protest of America helping Israel. https://t.co/bsfDWgsnoc
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This trans woman was stalking this lady who then pulled out her phone and threatened to call the cops on him. Now he’s a victim. https://t.co/rMpCeCRAug
Video Transcript AI Summary
You hit me on the sidewalk, calling the cops on a trans man. I have PTSD and anxiety. I will sue you. You need therapy. You assaulted me, and I looked better than you. You have internalized misogyny and homophobia. I wish we could be friends, but that doesn't excuse your actions. Please leave me alone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ran into me because you're a transphobe and you're having
Speaker 1: a bad life. I have trans friends.
Speaker 0: So why did you walk into me like that?
Speaker 1: You're looking for problems, and you're purposely antagonizing me.
Speaker 0: Am I?
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna give you a minute, and then I'm gonna call the cops. Because you're you was going in that direction, and now you're following me to this location.
Speaker 0: Because you
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna stand here for 1 minute. You antagonize me. Okay. What's your name?
Speaker 0: You're a black woman calling a cop and a trans woman. And I just want you to
Speaker 1: think What's your name?
Speaker 0: I want you to think about that.
Speaker 1: Okay. I I
Speaker 0: You're a black woman calling a cops
Speaker 2: Go ahead.
Speaker 0: On a trans man.
Speaker 1: Continue to go out.
Speaker 0: I want you to think about that.
Speaker 1: We're at 37 seconds. I'm gonna
Speaker 0: pray for you.
Speaker 1: I'm going to hang Because I pressed. I'm gonna stop recording at 1 minute, and I'm gonna call the cops if you're still in my area. I haven't offended you in any way.
Speaker 0: Be on the sidewalk with your boss.
Speaker 1: Me. You hit me. It honey.
Speaker 0: It's not honey anymore, bitch. It's not honey. It's not honey, bitch.
Speaker 1: We're just gonna patiently wait wait for the cops. Yes. We are. This is getting You're a hypocrite.
Speaker 0: It's getting
Speaker 1: a little bit more aggressive. Bitch.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I am aggressive. I have PTSD, bitch.
Speaker 1: Okay. You fucked with
Speaker 2: the broad tranny today, bitch.
Speaker 1: I apologize.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry. What you should be doing, and you should be deleting that fucking video. No.
Speaker 1: I will not. And because I feel
Speaker 0: I'm a lawyer. I have 2 and 3 lawyers, honey.
Speaker 1: I will sue your pants off. Speak anymore. Okay? I will sue your pants off. I'm not speaking anymore.
Speaker 0: Good. I risk my life every day getting ready in the morning, and you have the the temerity to hit me with your butt.
Speaker 1: Don't know if you guys noticed, but my hands are shaking because I have anxiety currently because of this individual who's not
Speaker 2: You need me alone.
Speaker 0: You need therapy. And you know what? You'd be better off in the hood because the hood people,
Speaker 2: they know how to act.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: They know how we treat each other. You went you went to Bard. You have a master's. You have an MBA.
Speaker 1: I am currently starting to say more because this individual would not leave me
Speaker 2: alone. Fuck you.
Speaker 0: I have PTSD from being assaulted by people like you. And by that, I mean insecure assholes. I'm not a racist in case that's where you're gonna you know, racist trans woman attacks me on sidewalk. You assaulted me on the sidewalk, and then
Speaker 2: you called me on the sidewalk.
Speaker 1: Lights coming down. Good.
Speaker 0: It's taking so long. I looked better than you, and you couldn't handle it because you have internalized misogyny, internalized femtophobia, internalized homophobia. You're an angry young lady. You're an angry young woman, and I I I really wish you could be friends. But that does not give you the right to hit me on the sidewalk, which is what she did.
You assaulted me, ma'am.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Please.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
“Why would you be happy that someone like Hitler is safe?” Guest grills The View and the mainstream media for vilifying Trump: https://t.co/mQB60E9f1F
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm glad Trump is safe and condemn political violence. People believed media's extreme claims about Trump, leading to violence. Media should reflect on their role in spreading fear and misinformation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I'm I'm very happy Donald Trump is safe. Full stop. Period. And I condemn all forms of political violence.
Speaker 1: Well, Anna, why would you be happy that someone like Trump is safe? Because for years, every single one of you and your friends in the media said Trump is the biggest danger to democracy. You said he's going to take away your freedom. You said he's going to end America if he becomes president again. All of you compared him to Hitler.
So either you're lying when you say you're happy that someone like Hitler is safe. Why would you be happy that someone like Hitler is safe? Or you didn't actually believe the things that you said about him. But here's reality. There are people out there who believed when you said Trump is going to take away their freedom.
They believed you when you compared him to Hitler, and one of them step up and did something about it. So no matter how you look at this, what happened here is on you and your friends in the mainstream media. And I hope you can reflect, and from now on, make sure to take your emotional outbursts to the mirror, and not on TV.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This is a young boy who has a rare incurable brain and spine cancer who has been sworn in as an honorary officer by the police. https://t.co/jVs20DFeqW
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Trump Derangement Syndrome. https://t.co/iAPAXlema8
Video Transcript AI Summary
A convicted felon can run for president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my god. Some questions that some of you might have. Can a convicted felon run for president? The answer is Oh my god. Oh my god.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
BREAKING: While speaking Klaus Schwab gets an unexpected response from guest at the WEF Davos conference. https://t.co/BlYYH9Nrwt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their belief that the biggest threat to the world is the fake news media and the World Economic Forum. They criticize the organization, referring to it as a communist party that was not elected by the people. They conclude by expressing their strong disagreement and using offensive language.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned that the biggest threat to a cohesive and sustainable world was security.
Speaker 1: Mister Schwab, I'm sorry, but the biggest threat to the world is the fake stream news media. And the second biggest threat to the world is this very organization, the World Economic Forum, which is the communist party that was not elected by the people. And that's why I keep telling you, y'all should go fuck yourself.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
BREAKING: WEF guest who crashed the Davos conference apologizes https://t.co/sOfZFtDSG8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yesterday, the speaker admitted to making inappropriate remarks on stage but refused to apologize to anyone. They criticized the audience for not being elected to dictate how others should live and called them out for using private jets while discussing the environment. The speaker expressed their refusal to eat insects and dismissed the audience's climate agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so yesterday, I stood on this stage and said some things that I should not have said. But we all deserve a second chance, so I would like to apologize to absolutely no one. None of you were elected to show us how we should live our lives. All of you mother Fuckers took your private jets to show up to this meeting so don't lecture us about the environment. I ain't eating bugs.
You can eat these nuts. And once again, You and your fake climate agenda can go
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Who’s in the right? https://t.co/yeOwxUtcn1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 confronts Speaker 0 about their doorbell camera, expressing concern over the recording of their comings and goings without permission. Speaker 0 insists it is just a doorbell and not recording them specifically. Speaker 1 argues that the camera invades their privacy, but Speaker 0 claims it is for safety. Speaker 1 questions how they know when the camera is recording, and Speaker 0 explains it is triggered by movement. Speaker 1 argues that it still invades their privacy and threatens to gather neighbors to petition for its removal. The conversation ends with Speaker 1's frustration over being recorded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right there, Laura.
Speaker 1: This this thing, it records. Is that right?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: You're recording the entire neighborhood. And every morning, you're recording me coming in and out of my property, and I have not given you permission to record me.
Speaker 0: No. I'm not recording you. This is this is a doorbell.
Speaker 1: Do not like. I do not like.
Speaker 0: This is a doorbell.
Speaker 1: This is an invasion of privacy. That's what this is.
Speaker 0: No. No. No. No. This is my doorbell.
No. No. It's my doorbell.
Speaker 1: Yes. It's a doorbell, but a normal doorbell just has a bell. This has a camera. This thing here is a camera. Am I not correct?
Right. And is this This it is recording 24 hours a day. Is it not?
Speaker 0: Yeah. But, like, it's like it's like it's like a safety record.
Speaker 1: My house, and you shouldn't be recording the house.
Speaker 0: Recording your house. Your house is just there. Your house is just there.
Speaker 1: When I come in and out of my house. You are recording me, and you have not got my permission.
Speaker 0: This is an information. It's not recording you. It's recording you right now because you're by my house.
Speaker 1: And when I come out of my house
Speaker 0: because you buy my house. But, like, what I'm saying recording
Speaker 1: when I walk out my house or walk into my house?
Speaker 0: It's not it's not recording you there.
Speaker 1: Oh, really? But it can see me.
Speaker 0: Yeah? Triggered the if you triggered the sensor recording.
Speaker 1: How do you know it's not recording when when I haven't or somebody hasn't pressed the doorbell or when when somebody does press the doorbell, it records everything. And I could be standing there when somebody has pressed the doorbell. Is that not right?
Speaker 0: Well, yeah, it's right. But I'm saying, like, that's just your
Speaker 1: It's invading it's invading my privacy. It's invading my space, that is not correct. That has to be against the law.
Speaker 0: Well, it's not against the law because it's it's a safety feature.
Speaker 1: What if
Speaker 0: you don't have anything to happen? I'm at
Speaker 1: your Labor, whether I like the idea of being recorded. Don't you think you should have asked me? This is my place. Recording? I mean, you don't have permission.
Speaker 0: But the thing is though yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't want you to record me.
Speaker 0: No. No. No. No. No.
No. No. The thing is, like, I don't need your permission because it's, like, You're just there. As in, like, I've not installed it to purchase just to film you.
Speaker 1: Excuse me. Let me set up a tripod right in front of your door. And if you happen to come out of it, oh, well, you're just there. Right? Yes.
Speaker 0: If you're putting it in front of my door, like, I'm not putting it in front of your door. It's by my Sure.
Speaker 1: No. This is in front of my door. Okay. You might be
Speaker 0: just walking right
Speaker 1: away, but you are in
Speaker 0: front of
Speaker 1: the door. You are invading my privacy. I do not like it. I want you to remove it.
Speaker 0: Well, I will
Speaker 1: get a petition to get it removed.
Speaker 0: A petition?
Speaker 1: Yes. I will get all the neighbors and ask them.
Speaker 0: Your head just fell off, love.
Speaker 1: Oh, really? You see? And now you've recorded that. That's just
Speaker 0: wrong.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
This is just painful. https://t.co/cbXQSkN7SU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The UN secretary general expresses concern over the high number of children affected in Gaza. The US has provided significant aid to Israel since World War 2. Many Americans struggle financially, with about 62% living paycheck to paycheck. The focus should be on advancing technology for improved happiness, safety, and quality of life. Protests for a ceasefire have been taking place. Contrary to rumors, the US marines are not sponsoring gaming streams on Twitch. Mold issues persist in barracks, according to comments from marines. A significant number of American households faced food insecurity in 2022. Bed bugs have been around for a long time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The UN secretary general says Gaza is becoming a graveyard for children with over 4,000 gone and over 1,000 missing under the rubble. Ohio, America Chan. Since World War 2, the United States has given over $200,000,000,000 to Israel and aid adjusted for inflation. As of September, about 62% of Americans are living from paycheck to paycheck. There's no point in advancing technology if it doesn't lead to increased happiness, safety, and quality of life, Tens of thousands of people have been marching for a ceasefire saying, no ceasefire, no votes.
The US marines are not sponsoring gaming streams on Twitch, but marines in my comments say there's still mold in the barracks. 6,800,000 American households had very low food security in 2022. Bed bugs have been around since the time of the dinosaurs. My best
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
68-year-old Delaware store owner Chang Suh was struck over a dozen times with a hammer by suspect Calvin Ushery. Today, the court declared a mistrial after the jury couldn’t come to a verdict following two days of deliberations.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Just do whatever you want, all of the time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
While street performing, someone did something terrible to me. Although I usually ignore such incidents and continue playing, this time I had to stop. It happened during my last song of the night, and I want to clarify that I perform to bring joy to people, so please don't harass the person in the video. I want to give a shoutout to the person who tipped me afterwards and all the others who came to help. Their actions truly restore my faith in humanity. Don't worry, I captured the incident on camera. We now have TikTok content.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is one of the worst things somebody's probably ever done to me while street performing. So this kind of stuff happens here and there, so I usually just keep playing through it, but After what's about to happen, I had to stop. This was also the last song of the night, and side note, I do this to see people happy, so please don't harass a person in this video. Shout out to the guy that tipped me after and all of the people that came and helped out after seeing what happened. It really restores my faith in humanity.
Hey. Don't worry. I got a camera. Oh, I don't know what. Yeah.
We got TikTok content now.