TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ChanceGardiner

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 28, 2021 at 11:47 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 2:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In December 2020, Bert Hubert wrote an article on reverse engineering the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine's mRNA code. Kira Smith highlighted issues with Pfizer's genetic code in March 2021. Professor Xuhua Xia published detailed evaluations of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines in July 2021. The spike protein created by Pfizer differs from SARS-CoV-2's spike protein. Misfolding proteins have been linked to neurodegenerative diseases. Pfizer's genetic code optimization raises concerns about long-term health risks. Pfizer's risk management plan and testing protocols have been questioned. Single mutations can cause diseases, and regulatory agencies do not require codon optimization testing.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Nel dicembre 2020 Bert Hubert ha scritto un eccellente articolo intitolato "Reverse Engineering the source code of the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine", dove ha spiegato la struttura del codice mRNA. https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/reverse-engineering-source-code-of-the-biontech-pfizer-vaccine/

Reverse Engineering the source code of the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine - Bert Hubert's writings Translations: ελληνικά / عربى / 中文 (Weixin video, Youtube video) / 粵文 / bahasa Indonesia / český / Català / český / Deutsch / Español / 2فارسی / فارسی / Français / עִברִית / Hrvatski / Italiano / Magyar / Nederlands / 日本語 / 日本語 2 / नेपाली / Polskie / русский / Português / Română / Slovensky / Slovenščina / Srpski / Türk / український / Markdown for translating / Fun video by LlamaExplains / Video version by Giff Ransom berthub.eu

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Kira Smith nel marzo 2021 ha pubblicato un documento che indica i problemi all'interno del codice genetico dei VACClNl Pfizer ("BNT162b2 vaccino: possibile lettura errata, errori nella sintesi delle proteine e le anomalie di splicing alternativo") https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161668243.35142344/v1

Open Research Collaboration and Publishing - Authorea Authorea is the leading platform to write, cite, collaborate, host data, and publish. authorea.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Professor Xuhua Xia, biologo evoluzionista all'Università di Ottawa (11.696 citazioni), pubblicato nel luglio 2021: "Dissezione dettagliata e valutazione critica dei VACClNl Pfizer/BioNTech e Moderna mRNA". https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fvaccines9070734

Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines The design of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines involves many different types of optimizations. Proper optimization of vaccine mRNA can reduce dosage required for each injection leading to more efficient immunization programs. The mRNA components of the vaccine need to have a 5′-UTR to load ribosomes efficiently onto the mRNA for translation initiation, optimized codon usage for efficient translation elongation, and optimal stop codon for efficient translation termination. Both 5′-UTR and the downstream 3′-UTR should be optimized for mRNA stability. The replacement of uridine by N1-methylpseudourinine (Ψ) complicates some of these optimization processes because Ψ is more versatile in wobbling than U. Different optimizations can conflict with each other, and compromises would need to be made. I highlight the similarities and differences between Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines and discuss the advantage and disadvantage of each to facilitate future vaccine improvement. In particular, I point out a few optimizations in the design of the two mRNA vaccines that have not been performed properly. mdpi.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Professor Xuhua Xia, biologo evoluzionista all'Università di Ottawa (11.696 citazioni), pubblicato nel luglio gennaio 2021: "Domini e funzioni della proteina Spike in SARS-Cov-2 nel contesto della progettazione del VACClNO". https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/1/109

Domains and Functions of Spike Protein in SARS-Cov-2 in the Context of Vaccine Design The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-2-S) interacts with the human ACE2 receptor to gain entry into a cell to initiate infection. Both Pfizer/BioNTech’s BNT162b2 and Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine candidates are based on stabilized mRNA encoding prefusion SARS-2-S that can be produced after the mRNA is delivered into the human cell and translated. SARS-2-S is cleaved into S1 and S2 subunits, with S1 serving the function of receptor-binding and S2 serving the function of membrane fusion. Here, I dissect in detail the various domains of SARS-2-S and their functions discovered through a variety of different experimental and theoretical approaches to build a foundation for a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of how SARS-2-S works to achieve its function of mediating cell entry and subsequent cell-to-cell transmission. The integration of structure and function of SARS-2-S in this review should enhance our understanding of the dynamic processes involving receptor binding, multiple cleavage events, membrane fusion, viral entry, as well as the emergence of new viral variants. I highlighted the relevance of structural domains and dynamics to vaccine development, and discussed reasons for the spike protein to be frequently featured in the conspiracy theory claiming that SARS-CoV-2 is artificially created. mdpi.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

La proteina creata da Pfizer è diversa dalla proteina spike di SARS-CoV-2. S-2P è una proteina instabile. I domini di legame del recettore (RDB) di S-2P non allenano correttamente il corpo. "Stabilizing the closed SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer", Nature, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20321-x

Stabilizing the closed SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer - Nature Communications The trimeric spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 is the primary focus of most vaccine design and development efforts. Due to intrinsic instability typical of class I fusion proteins, S tends to prematurely refold to the post-fusion conformation, compromising immunogenic properties and prefusion trimer yields. To support ongoing vaccine development efforts, we report the structure-based design of soluble S trimers with increased yields and stabilities, based on introduction of single point mutations and disulfide-bridges. We identify regions critical for stability: the heptad repeat region 1, the SD1 domain and position 614 in SD2. We combine a minimal selection of mostly interprotomeric mutations to create a stable S-closed variant with a 6.4-fold higher expression than the parental construct while no longer containing a heterologous trimerization domain. The cryo-EM structure reveals a correctly folded, predominantly closed pre-fusion conformation. Highly stable and well producing S protein and the increased understanding of S protein structure will support vaccine development and serological diagnostics. SARS-CoV-2 S protein prematurely refolds to the post-fusion conformation, compromising immunogenic properties and prefusion trimer yield. Here, Juraszek et al. present a stable SARS-CoV-2 S-closed protein variant with increased expression and correct folding, predominantly in closed prefusion conformation. nature.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Poiché la nostra cellula attacca il codice genetico estraneo, il codice mRNA di Pfizer ha sostituito tutte le lettere U (nucleotidi) con Ψ per nascondersi, aumentando la probabilità di interpretare erroneamente il codice e generare una proteina spike diversa da quella prevista.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Il misfolding delle proteine ​​"è stato collegato alla neurodegenerazione nell'Alzheimer e nel Parkinson e in molte altre patologie". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28441058/

Protein Misfolding Diseases - PubMed The majority of protein molecules must fold into defined three-dimensional structures to acquire functional activity. However, protein chains can adopt a multitude of conformational states, and their biologically active conformation is often only marginally stable. Metastable proteins tend to popula … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"I dati confermano che il ripiegamento errato delle proteine ​​(misfolding) con conseguente accumulo di PAO intracellulare è sufficiente a causare la morte dei cardiomiociti e l'insufficienza cardiaca". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18612262/

Protein misfolding and cardiac disease: establishing cause and effect - PubMed Numerous neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the accumulation of misfolded amyloidogenic proteins. Recent data indicate that a soluble pre-amyloid oligomer (PAO) may be the toxic entity in these diseases and the visible amyloid plaques, rather than causing the disease, may simply mark th … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Per quanto ne sappiamo, Pfizer è il più aggressivo nell'ottimizzazione del codice genetico, basta leggere Kira Smith: "BNT162b2 Vaccine: possible codons misreading, errors in protein synthesis and alternative splicing's anomalies." https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161668243.35142344/v1

Open Research Collaboration and Publishing - Authorea Authorea is the leading platform to write, cite, collaborate, host data, and publish. authorea.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"Possibili rischi a lungo termine per la salute umana. Oltre a non essere ottimizzata, la sequenza presenta forti dubbi sulla presenza di errori di utilizzo del codone. Un cambiamento eccessivo di espressione della proteina può essere la fonte di errori nel montaggio del mRNA."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"L'alterazione della disponibilità di tRNA può portare a malattie neurodegenerative (Ishimura, 2014 ). Si può dire che il codice è alterato in modo sbilanciato ... rischiando così di arrecare gravi danni alla salute umana a lungo termine, oltre alla mancata efficacia vaccinale."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"L'errata traduzione ha conseguenze molto gravi sulla fisiopatologia di una varietà di malattie: sclerosi, neurodegenerazione, miopatia mitocondriale, encefalopatia, acidosi lattica, episodi simil-ictus, Parkinson e cancro (genesi, accelerazione della crescita e metastasi)."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"Sono modifiche per aumentare l'espressione proteica di cui non si sa nulla sulla traduzione nell'organismo. Si è scoperto che un'alterazione nella sintesi proteica è causa dello sviluppo e della crescita di alcuni tumori e di altre malattie, senza alterare in alcun modo il DNA."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Pfizer fa menzione di tutto questo a EMA e FDA? No. Ecco il "Pfizer BNT162b2/Comirnaty Risk Management Plan per l'EMA". Sono state testate le varianti V8 e V9, l'unica differenza era l'ottimizzazione del codone, V8 aveva livelli elevati di gamma-glutamil transferasi (GTT), V9 no.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Pfizer ammette che l'ottimizzazione del codone può portare a un GTT elevato e sappiamo che "un GGT elevato è collegato a un aumento del rischio per una moltitudine di malattie: cardiovascolari, diabete, sindrome metabolica e mortalità per tutte le cause". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620378/

Gamma-Glutamyltransferase: A Predictive Biomarker of Cellular Antioxidant Inadequacy and Disease Risk Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) is a well-established serum marker for alcohol-related liver disease. However, GGT's predictive utility applies well beyond liver disease: elevated GGT is linked to increased risk to a multitude of diseases and conditions, ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

E anche se Pfizer ammette che l'ottimizzazione del codone ha un impatto sulla sicurezza non ha effettuato i test: "Gli studi di farmacologia di sicurezza, genotossicità e cancerogenicità non sono stati condotti in conformità con le linee guida sui vaccini dell'OMS del 2005". https://t.co/4LTXUZKlFC

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Il documento dell'OMS del 2005 afferma in realtà che tali test non sono necessari per la formulazione finale e l'approvazione di un NORMALE VACClNO, perché genotossicità e cancerogenicità vengono condotti durante gli STUDI ANIMALI, che per Pfizer sono stati praticamente saltati. https://t.co/ZnhKJvo8Yv

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Eppure EMA afferma che: "È importante indagare il potenziale di attività farmacologica indesiderabile in modelli animali appropriati e, ove necessario, incorporare un monitoraggio particolare per queste attività negli studi di tossicità e/o negli studi clinici." https://t.co/CjCFBmuOyo

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Katerina Alexaki della FDA spiega come una SINGOLA mutazione può provocare una malattia e che se si dispone di più sottostazioni ci sono buone probabilità che possa avere un effetto. https://t.co/SRGaBEWyfL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Current optimization, often considered harmless, has been shown to have effects on disease. Reports indicate that a single synonymous mutation can be linked to disease, although the exact reasons are often unknown. Factors such as translation rate and RNA structure have been implicated in some cases. It is important to note that many synonymous mutations, which do not change the translated amino acid, have been associated with disease. Therefore, if multiple substitutions occur through codon optimization, there is a likelihood of having an impact. This information has been reviewed multiple times.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna go back to, the effects of, the effects of current optimization. We, although most people think of them think of current optimization as harmless, it has been shown in several there have been several reports showing that a single synonymous mutation may be associated with disease. And in many cases, the reason is unknown. In other cases, the rate of translation has been implicated or the RNA structure has been implicated. But the fact is that a lot of synonymous mutations, and that's a mutation that does not change the amino acid that's being translated. A lot of these anonymous mutations have been associated with disease. So you can think that if one can cause disease, well, if you codon optimize a gene and you have now multiple, substitutions, then there is a good chance that you may have an effect. And this has all been reviewed several times. So what we

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Katerina Alexaki, rispondendo alla domanda se il regolatore (FDA) richieda ai produttori di testare l'impatto della loro ottimizzazione del codone, risponde di no. https://t.co/KkLF7rHoPQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks the regulator if they would request sponsors to conduct intensive analysis to anticipate any immunogenicity issues when reviewing a dossier with extensive optimization. The regulator responds that they understand the burden and do not require specific assays. They ask for protein characterization and perform an in silico analysis. If they identify any red flags, they may request further analysis. They typically ask for standard characterization and do not add extra detail. However, if adverse events related to codon optimized proteins arise, they may increase scrutiny. The conversation ends.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very interesting talk. I have a question for the regulator. So when you see, dossier and you review dossier and you see this kind of very intensive kind of optimization, would you be asking the sponsor say we are R and D, would you be asking the sponsor to go into this kind of analysis to try by an anticipate any immunogenicity issue. Speaker 1: So, no. So far, I mean, we understand that it's a huge burden to try to get that level of detail. We would I mean, We always ask to just to characterize your protein as as well as, you know, as as the sponsor can. We don't ask For specific assays, we we leave it up to the sponsor. We're not against cohort optimization. We know it's dossier We know that we wouldn't have all these drugs that we have if, you know, if you were always using the native product, which sometimes it's hard to express. A dossier, but it's we, we always ask for, you know, the the sequence. We do an in silico analysis is in our part. If we identify a specific, you know, issue that we think that's a red flag, we may go back and say, well, you know, Have you you know, could you try and do that? But otherwise, like, you know, we we ask for everything, you know, the standard characterization that we ask for non quarter optimized proteins. And, you know, we ask a lot of details there too. We do not add an an extra level of detail, but, You know, if, hopefully, it won't happen, but if we start seeing adverse events specific to codon optimized proteins, We might have to, increase our scrutiny. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Just, continuing
ChanceGardiner
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 9:01 AM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Candace Owens è la migliore amica di Charlie Kirk, che però "era razzista". Dice che è stato sottoposto a pressioni enormi da parte di Israele e che Netanyahu gli ha offerto $150 milioni per fare propaganda sionista, ma Kirk ha rifiutato. https://t.co/QvlRIIqv9E

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk faced mounting pressure about Israel debates. "I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian." He says "the sum of the mess" and that "my moral character is now being put into question" while insisting "I love Israel. I want Israel to win." He recalls "thousands of tweets" and a pattern "similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online?" as well as threats to "pull out money" and "nasty text messages." The discussion centered on Tucker Carlson and why Charlie would allow voices like "Dave Smith, who by the way is Jewish" on stage. Beebe Netanyahu allegedly staged "an intervention" by "Bill Ackman" with "threats" after which Charlie "denied that funding" and was invited to Israel, an invitation Charlie "said no to Bebe." "Just take the last step, Charlie." Charlie was praying the rosary. Charlie was going to mass.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can we bring in a clip of Charlie from a month ago speaking about the kind of pressure that he was under? Because I think that will also help to further contextualize this. Take a listen. Speaker 1: I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 0: No. It's very irritating. Speaker 1: It's it's it's been so unfair. Speaker 0: They they were coming after you after a turning point for among other things. And you had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was overrepresented. Speaker 1: No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, I you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Speaker 0: No. It's not defensible to be dumb, and he was under an increasing amount of pressure. Not just people telling him, oh, well, you know, I'm upset with who you're inviting, but flat out telling him that he was not allowed to invite certain people to his events. They were threatening to pull out money. Charlie was getting a lot of really nasty text messages. And many of them pertaining to Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. But Tucker Carlson was really the focus when it came to America Fest. How could Charlie allow these debates about Israel to take place? How could he allow Dave Smith, who by the way is Jewish, how could they allow, how could Charlie allow this other position to meet the stage? Because obviously when people start to hear the debates, what Dave Smith is saying sounds so rational, but it was up to Charlie to not allow those things to happen. And those that amount of pressure towards the end, as you see that conversation you had with Megan was just a month before he lost his life. Really, I would say reached a pinnacle of sorts on the matter of what Tucker Carlson actually said on that stage. Tucker Carlson while he was on that stage at Turning Point brought up Bill Ackman. Bill Ackman is a billionaire, obviously. He is also an extremely litigious billionaire. And Bill Ackman was on Charlie about comments that Tucker Carlson had made on that stage. Tucker Carlson specifically asked the question, where does Bill Ackman's money come from? Who is this guy? Actually, who is this guy that has this much influence? And like I said, Bill Ackman was not happy about this. And so I would like to contextualize Beebe again, these are things Beebe brought up publicly, which he didn't have to. He didn't have to bring up the letter. He didn't have to bring up the phone call, but he chose to do this less than twenty four hours after Charlie Kirk was shot. Personally, Beebee, I would have appreciated if you guys used all of your spyware, you'd spying on us for years to maybe track down the killer. But I guess this is where you thought it was best to do a little propaganda for Israel would be better than us helping us track down the killer. But anyway, so BB Netanyahu in that phone call, what took place was a couple of weeks ago before Charlie lost his life. Charlie was in the Hamptons and he had more than one event, but he had essentially what was staged an intervention was staged by Bill Ackman. Because Charlie's thoughts, Charlie's rational thoughts about Israel were a no no. This is not the route that you should be going on. And Charlie was surrounded by his friends, his quote unquote friends. Bill Ackman was very upset and threats were made. That is what I am told. And I will tell you that I am very happy for Bill Ackman to dispute this narrative. In fact, he was asked to dispute this narrative. Max Blumenthal went out to him today and Bill Ackman came back and said, I have receipts I can show you. And he did not provide the receipts. This is not how it went down. I know it went down this way. I'm waiting for one of them to go on record and to say that it didn't go down this way. It was at this time that BB Netanyahu was called and Charlie was invited to Israel. This was an under duress situation I would say, because I've been in these situations before. When I started asking very sensible questions about Israel, as someone who had dedicated her political life to supporting Israel many times alongside Charlie Kirk, I was met with the very same pressure. And just like Charlie was being invited to Israel, I was invited somewhere else. And when this arrived to me, it felt like a threat. I got it to that. It felt like a threat. Like not like, Hey, come here and we can educate you because you're my friend. More like, this is your last chance. That's how it felt to me. I can't speak to how it felt to Charlie. And I know that Charlie was offered a ton of money in this moment. A ton of money. BB would fund it. You know? Spend tons of money. And Turning Point, I guess, if it needed to go to a higher level, would would have gone to an even higher level than it already was at. And I know for a fact that Charlie denied that funding. That Charlie denied, and what Beebe didn't include there, he declined to go to Israel for I would I would describe this as like, you know, reeducation camp, you know. We've seen it. You made an utt oh, but we can help you. You know, we just need you to come out to Auschwitz and take a picture. Yeah. We just need you to come to the Holocaust Museum and take a photo. We just need you to go to Israel and we can make this better. Charlie said no to Bebe. Okay. Bill Ackman, you would like to dispute that, I would love to hear what you say happened because our sources and what we have, it's solid. Okay. There were conversations that took place, messages that were sent at that time and they are solid. So I decided another person that was there, and I am not surprised this person was there. If you've been listening to my show, Seth Dillon. I was going out to Seth Dillon, and I decided to message him last night about this Hamptons meeting. And Seth Dillon who was normally very quick with a response has not yet been able to respond. I'll show you this text message chain. And I wanna be clear, I am not someone who normally publicizes text messages. But my friend was shot in the neck. And I'm just not really in in the state right now to be polite when it comes to the answers that I am demanding. Okay. This is me out to Seth Dillon last night. I sent him Bill Ackman's tweets because he tweeted, I feel incredibly privileged to have spent a day and shared a meal with Charlie Kirk this summer. He was a giant of a man. I said, any comment on this one, Seth? He didn't answer last night. This morning I said, need a comment ASAP, please. He didn't answer. Then I followed that up and I said, trying again here you were present when Ackman lost his mind on Charlie and when BB invited him to Israel and Charlie refused. Text messages immediately following this meeting are circulating. I find Ackman's statement as though the meeting was somehow cordial to be incredibly disturbing. Are you at all disturbed by that tweet? Do you feel as I do that this tweet significantly betrays the defined purpose and mood of his and I presume your final meeting with Charlie Kirk? He was unable to speak to me, but he did place some frantic calls to Turning Point USA. Yeah. You see, I went out to Seth, but I also went out to two other people who were at this meeting and nobody is willing to go on record. They're all messaging each other trying to figure out a coordinated response to say that, no, this was all quite cordial, but no one wants to go on record and describe it as cordial because they know someone's leaking, because someone's got a guilty conscience about what happened at the Hamptons. So I will again put it out there, Seth, Bill Ackman, and to the other individuals who I have not yet named, but who are going to be named later this week, who are at the Hamptons when Charlie was put under pressure. When Bibi Netanyahu called him and invited him to Israel, again in a move that when it happened to me and it wasn't Bibi Netanyahu felt to me like a laced threat. I am inviting you guys, I will give you my platform actually to come clear matters up to tell us what really happened because I think Charlie was definitely on the brink of changing some of his perspectives. And I can tell you factually, Charlie was praying the rosary. Charlie was going to mass. One of my last conversations with Charlie was me joking with him saying, just make the last step. Said specifically, you're too smart to be a Protestant. Just take the last step, Charlie.
ChanceGardiner
Posted - February 18, 2024 at 4:09 AM
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 12:55 AM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Tucker Carlson: Lo stato di sicurezza nazionale è il principale motore della censura e dell’interferenza elettorale negli USA. Mike Benz: "Quello che sto descrivendo è un governo militare anti democratico". Citano Salvini che l'UE cerca di zittire. https://t.co/j2xUIKDe5q

Video Transcript AI Summary
The defining characteristic of the United States is freedom of speech, guaranteed by the First Amendment. However, this fundamental right is rapidly eroding due to censorship disguised as combating disinformation and malinformation. This censorship, directed by the US government, is not limited to the private sector. Mike Benz, an expert on this issue, explains how the foreign policy establishment and defense contractors manipulate this. Internet freedom, initially used for supporting dissident groups globally, has become a tool for censorship since 2014. NATO now views controlling media as crucial for political influence, targeting even domestic groups. This shift accelerated after the 2016 election, with Russiagate providing cover for domestic censorship. The 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic saw massive censorship, with government agencies and private entities working together to suppress dissenting voices. This system uses AI-powered tools to identify and remove content deemed harmful to "democratic institutions," effectively creating military rule disguised as democracy. The fight to preserve free speech is now centered on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), which are facing immense pressure from both governmental and international entities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The defining fact of The United States is freedom of speech. To the extent this country is actually exceptional, it's because we have the first amendment to the Bill of Rights. We have freedom of conscience. We can say what we really think. There's no hate speech exception to that. Just because you hate what somebody else thinks, you cannot force that person to be quiet because we're citizens, not slaves. But that right, that foundational right that makes this country what it is, that right from which all other rights flow, is going away at high speed in the face of censorship. Now modern censorship, there's no resemblance to previous censorship regimes in previous countries and previous eras. Our censorship is affected on the basis of fights against disinformation and malinformation. And the key thing to know about these is they're everywhere. And, of course, they have no reference at all to whether what you're saying is true or not. In other words, you can say something that is factually accurate and consistent with your own conscience, and in previous versions of America, you had an absolute right to say those things. But because someone doesn't like them or because they're inconvenient to whatever plan the people in power have, they can be denounced as disinformation, and you could be stripped of your right to express them, either in person or online. In fact, expressing these things can become a criminal act and is. And it's important to know, by the way, that this is not just the private sector doing this. These efforts are being directed by the US government, which you pay for and least theoretically own. It's your government. But they're stripping your rights at very high speed. Most people understand this intuitively, but they don't know how it happens. How does censorship happen? What are the mechanics of it? Mike Benz is, we can say, with some confidence, the expert in the world on how this happens. Mike Benz had the cyber portfolio at the state department. He's now executive director of Foundation for Freedom Online, and we're gonna have a conversation with him about a very specific kind of censorship. By the way, we can't recommend strongly enough. If you wanna know how this happens, Mike Benz, b e n z, is the man to read. But today, we just wanna talk about a specific kind of censorship, and that censorship that emanates from the fabled military industrial complex, from our defense industry in the foreign policy establishment in Washington. That's significant now because we're on the cusp of a global war, and so you can expect censorship to increase dramatically. And so with that, here is Mike Benz, executive director of Foundation for Freedom Online. Mike, thanks so much for joining us. And I and I just can't overstate to our audience how exhaustive and comprehensive your knowledge is on this topic. It's almost it's almost unbelievable. And so if you could just walk us through how the foreign policy establishment and defense contractors and and DOD and and just the whole cluster, the constellation of defense related publicly funded institutions strip from us our freedom of speech. Speaker 1: Sure. You know, one of the easiest ways to actually start the story is really with the story of Internet freedom and it switched from Internet freedom to Internet censorship because free speech on the Internet was an instrument of statecraft almost from the outset of the privatization of the Internet in 1991. We quickly discovered through the efforts of the Defense Department, the State Department and our intelligence services that people were using the Internet to congregate on blogs and forums and free speech was championed more than anybody by the Pentagon, the State Department and our sort of CIA cutout NGO blob architecture as a way to support dissident groups around the world in order to help them overthrow authoritarian governments as they were sort of build. Essentially, the Internet free speech allowed kind of insta regime change operations to be able to facilitate the foreign policy establishments State Department agenda. Google is a great example of this. Google began as a DARPA grant by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were Stanford PhDs and they got their funding as part of a joint CIA NSA program to chart how birds of a feather flock together online through search engine aggregation. And then one year later, they launched Google and then became a military contractor quickly thereafter. They got Google Maps by purchasing a CIA satellite software essentially. And the ability to track to use free speech on the Internet is a way to circumvent state control over media over in places like Central Asia or all around the world was seen as a way to be able to do what used to be done out of CIA station houses or out of embassies or consulates in a way that was totally turbocharged. And all of the Internet free speech technology was initially created by our national security state, VPNs, virtual private networks to hide your IP address, tour the dark web to be able to buy and sell goods anonymously, end to end encrypted chats. All these things were created initially as DARPA projects or as joint CIA NSA projects to be able to help intelligence backed groups to overthrow governments that were causing a problem to the Clinton administration or the Bush administration or the Obama administration. And this plan worked magically from about 1991 until about 2014 when there began to be an about face on Internet freedom and its utility. Now the high watermark of the sort of Internet free speech moment was the Arab Spring in twenty eleven, twenty twelve, when you had this one by one, all of the adversary governments of the Obama administration, Egypt, Tunisia, all began to be toppled in Facebook revolutions and Twitter revolutions. And you had the State Department working very closely with the social media companies to be able to keep social media online during those periods. There was a famous phone call from Google's Jared Cohen to Twitter to not do their scheduled maintenance so that the preferred opposition group in Iran would be able to use Twitter to win that election. So it was an free speech was an instrument of statecraft from the national security state to begin with. All of that architecture, all of the NGOs, the relationships between the tech companies and the national security state had been long established for freedom. In 2014, after the coup in Ukraine, there was an unexpected counter coup where Crimea and the Donbas broke away. And they broke away with essentially a military backstop that NATO was highly unprepared for at the time. They had one last Hail Mary chance, which was the Crimea annexation vote in 2014. And when the hearts and minds of the people of Crimea voted to join the Russian Federation, that was the last straw for the concept of free speech on the Internet in the eyes of NATO. As they saw it, the fundamental nature of war changed at that moment. And NATO at that point declared something that they first called the Gerasimov doctrine, which is named after this Russian military general, who they claimed made a speech that the fundamental nature of war has changed. You don't need to win military skirmishes to take over Central And Eastern Europe. All you need to do is control the media and the social media ecosystem because that's what controls elections. And if you simply get the right administration into power, they control the military. So it's infinitely cheaper than conducting a military war to simply conduct an organized political influence operation over social media and legacy media. An industry had been created that spanned the Pentagon, the British Ministry of Defense and Brussels into a organized political warfare outfit, essentially infrastructure that was created initially stationed in Germany and in Central And Eastern Europe to create psychological buffer zones, basically to create the ability to have the military work with the social media companies to censor Russian propaganda or to censor domestic right wing populist groups in Europe who were rising in political power at the time because of the migrant crisis. So you had the systematic targeting by our State Department, by our IC, by the Pentagon of groups like Germany's AfD, the alternative for Deutschland there and for groups in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. Now when Brexit happened in 2016, it was that was this crisis moment where suddenly they didn't have to worry just about Central And Eastern Europe anymore, it was coming westward, this idea of Russian control over hearts and minds. And so that was Brexit was June 2016, the very next month at the Warsaw Conference, NATO formally amended its charter to expressly commit to hybrid warfare as this new NATO capacity. So they went from basically seventy years of tanks to this explicit capacity building for censoring tweets that they were deemed to be Russian proxies. And again, it's not just Russian propaganda, this was these were now Brexit groups or groups like Matteo Salvini in Italy or in Greece or in Germany or in Spain with the Vox party. And now at the time, NATO was publishing white papers saying that the biggest threat NATO faces is not actually a military invasion from Russia, it's losing domestic elections across Europe in to all these right wing populist groups who, because they were mostly working class movements, were campaigning on cheap Russian energy at a time when The US was pressuring this energy diversification policy. And so they made the argument after Brexit, now the entire rules based international order would collapse unless the military took control over media because Brexit would give rise to Brexit in France with Marine Le Pen, to Speggxit in Spain with the Vox Party, to Italy exit in Italy, to Grexit in Germany, to Grexit in Greece, the EU would come apart so NATO would be killed without a single bullet being fired. And then not only that, now that NATO is gone, now there's no enforcement arm for the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, or the World Bank. So now the financial stakeholders who depend on the battering ram of the national security state would basically be helpless against governments around the world. So from their perspective, if the military did not begin to censor the Internet, every all of the democratic institutions and infrastructure that gave rise to the modern world after World War two would collapse. So you can imagine that we Speaker 0: We may ask you to pause later. Speaker 1: Donald Trump won the twenty sixteen election. Speaker 0: So you well, you just told a remarkable story that I've never heard anybody explain as lucidly and crisply as you just did. But did anyone at NATO or anyone at the state department pause for a moment and say, wait a second. We've just identified our new enemy as democracy within our own countries. I think that's what you're saying. They they feared that the people, the citizens of their own countries would get their way, and they went to war against that. Speaker 1: Yes. Now, you know, there's a rich history of this dating back to the Cold War. You know, the Cold War in Europe was essentially a a similar a similar struggle for hearts and minds of people, especially in Central And Eastern Europe Yes. You know, in these sort of, you know, Soviet buffer zones. And starting in 1948, the National Security State was really established then. You had the 1947 Act, which established the Central Intelligence Agency, you had this new world order that had been created with all these international institutions and you had the 1948 UN Declaration on Human Rights, which forbid the territorial acquisition by military force. So, you can no longer run a traditional military occupation government in the way that we could in 1898, for example, when we took The Philippines. Everything had to be done through a sort of political legitimization process whereby there's some ratification from the hearts and minds of people within the country. Now, often that involves simply puppet politicians who are groomed as emerging leaders by our State Department. But the battle for hearts and minds had been something that we had been giving ourselves a long moral license leash, if you will, since 1948, '1 of the godfathers of the CIA, George Kennan, at twelve days after we rigged the Italian election in 1948 by stuffing ballot boxes and working with the mob, we he published a memo called the inauguration of organized political warfare, where he said, listen, it's a mean old world out there. We at the CIA just rigged the Italian election. We had to do it because if the communist won, maybe there'd never be another election in Italy again. So, but it's really effective, guys. We need a department of dirty tricks to be able to do this around the world, and it's essentially a new social contract we're we're constructing with the American people because this is not the way we've conducted diplomacy before, but we are now forbidden from using the War Department. In 1948, they also renamed the War Department to the Defense Department. So again, as part of this diplomatic onslaught for political control rather than it looking like it's overt military control. But essentially what ended up happening there is we created this foreign domestic firewall, we said, that we have a department of dirty tricks to be able to rig elections, to be able to control media, to be able to meddle in the internal affairs of every other plot of dirt in the country, but this sort of sacred dirt in which the American homeland sits will they are not allowed to operate there. The State Department, the Defense Department and the CIA are all expressly forbidden from operating on U. S. Soil. Of course, this is so far from the case, it's not even funny, but that's because of a number of laundering tricks that they've developed over seventy years of doing this. But essentially, there was no moral quandary at first with respect to the creation of the censorship industry when it started out in Germany and in Lithuania and Latvia and Estonia and in Sweden and Finland. There began to be a more diplomatic debate about it after Brexit. And then it became full throttle when Trump was elected. And what little resistance there was, was washed over by the rise and saturation of Russiagate, which basically allowed them to not have to deal with the moral ambiguities of censoring your own people because if Trump was a Russian asset, you no longer really had a traditional free speech issue, it was a national security issue. It was only after Russiagate died in July 2019 when Robert Mueller basically choked on the stand for three hours and revealed he had absolutely nothing after two point five years of investigation that the foreign to domestic switcheroo took place where they took all of this censorship architecture spanning DHS, the FBI, the CIA, the DoD, the DOJ and then the thousands of government funded NGO and private sector mercenary firms were all basically transited from a foreign predicate, a Russian disinformation predicate to a democracy predicate by saying that disinformation is not just a threat when it comes from the Russians, it's actually an intrinsic threat to democracy itself. And so by that, they were able to wander the entire democracy promotion regime change toolkit, just in time for the twenty twenty election. Speaker 0: It it it I I mean, it's it's almost beyond belief that this has happened. I mean, my own father worked for the US government in this business in the information war against the Soviet Union and, you know, was a big part of that. And the idea that any of those tools would be turned Speaker 1: against Speaker 0: American citizens by the US government was, I I think, I wanna think, was absolutely unthinkable in, say, 1988. And you're saying that it's there really hasn't been anyone who's raised objections, and it's just it's absolutely turned inward to manipulate and rig our own elections as we would in, say, Latvia? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, as soon as the democracy predicate was established, you had this professional class of professional regime change artists and operatives. That is the same people who argued that we need to bring democracy to Yugoslavia to get and that's the predicate for getting rid of Milosevic or any other country around the world where we basically overthrow governments in order to preserve democracy. Well, if the democracy threat is homegrown now, then that becomes then suddenly, these people all have new jobs moving on The U. S. Side and I can go through a million examples of that. But one thing on what you just mentioned, which is that from their perspective, they just weren't ready for the Internet. 2016 was really the first time that social media had reached such maturity that it began to eclipse legacy media. I mean, this was a long time coming. I think folks saw this building from 02/2006 through 2016. Internet one point zero didn't even have social media. From 1991 to 02/2004, there was no social media at all. 02/2004, Facebook came out, 02/2005, Twitter, 02/2006, YouTube, 02/2007, the smartphone. And so and in that initial period of social media, nobody was getting subscriberships at the level where they actually competed with legacy news media. But over the course of being so initially, even these dissonant voices within The U. S, even though they may have been loud in moments, they never reached 30,000,000 followers. They never reached 1,000,000,000 impressions a year type thing as an uncensored, mature ecosystem allowed citizen journalists and independent voices to be able to outcompete legacy news media. This induced a massive crisis both in our military and in our State Department and Intelligence Services. I'll give you a great example of this. In 2019, at meeting of the German Marshall Fund, which is an institution that goes back to The U. S. Basically, I don't want to say bry, but essentially the soft economic soft power projection in Europe as part of the reconstruction of European governments after World War II to be able to essentially pay them with Marshall Fund dollars and then in return, they basically were under our thumb in terms of how they reconstructed. But the German Marshall Fund held a meeting in 2019. They held 1,000,000 of these, frankly. But where they where a four star general got up on the panel and said that the what happens he posed the question, what happens to the U. S. Military, what happens to the national security state when The New York Times is reduced to a medium sized Facebook page? And he posed this thought experiment as an example of we've had these gatekeepers, we've had these bumper cars on democracy in the form of a century old relationship with legacy media institutions. I mean, our mainstream media is not in any shape and form even from its outset independent from the National Security State, from the State Department, from the War Department. You had the initial all of the initial broadcast news companies, NBC, ABC and CBS were all created by Office of War Information Veterans from the War Department's effort in World War II. You had these Operation Mockingbird relationships from the 1950s to the 1970s. Those continued through the use of the National Endowment for Democracy and the privatization of intelligence capacities in the 1980s under Reagan. There's all sorts of CIA reading room memos you can read even on cia.gov about those continued media relations throughout the 1990s. And so you always had this backdoor relationship between The Washington Post, The New York Times and all of the major broadcast media corporations. By the way, Rupert Murdoch and Fox are part of this as well. Rupert Murdoch was actually part of the National Endowment for Democracy Coalition in 1983 when it was formed as a way to do CIA operations in an above board way after the Democrats were so ticked off at the CIA for manipulating student movements in the 1970s. But essentially, there was no CIA intermediary to random citizen journalist accounts. There was no Pentagon backstop. You couldn't get a story killed. You couldn't have this favors for favors relationship. You couldn't promise access to some random person with 700,000 followers who's got an opinion on Syrian gas. And so this induced and this was not a problem for the initial period of social media from 02/2006 to 2014 because there were never dissident groups that were big enough to be able to have a mature enough ecosystem on their own. And all of the victories on social media had gone in the way of where the money was, which was from the State Department and the Defense Department and the Intelligence Services. But then as that maturity happened, you now had this situation after the twenty sixteen election where they said, okay, now the entire international order might come undone. Seventy years of unified foreign policy from Truman until Trump are now about to be broken. And we need the same analog control systems we had to be able to put bumper cars on bad stories or bad political movements through legacy media relationships and contacts. We now need to establish and consolidate within the social media companies. And the initial predicate for that was Russiagate, but then after Russiagate died and they used a simple democracy promotion predicate, then it gave rise to this multibillion dollar censorship industry that joins together the military industrial complex, the government, the private sector, the civil society organizations and then this vast cobweb of media allies and professional fact checker groups that that serve as this sort of sentinel class that surveys everywhere on the Internet. Speaker 0: So can you give us and thank you again for this almost unbelievable explanation of why this is happening. Can you give us an example of how it happens? How just and just pick one among, I know, countless examples of how the national security state lies to the population, censors the truth, in real life? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, you know, we have this State Department outfit called the Global Engagement Center, which was created by a guy named Rick Stengel, who described himself as Obama's propagandist in chief. He was the Undersecretary for Public Affairs, which is essentially the which is the liaison office role between the State Department and the mainstream media. So this is basically the exact nexus where government talking points about war or about diplomacy or statecraft get synchronized with mainstream media. And may may Speaker 0: may I add something to that? Is someone I I know Rick Stengel. He was at one point a journalist, and Rick Stengel has made public arguments against the First Amendment and against free speech. And Speaker 1: so Oh, yeah. He wrote a whole book on it. And he published an op ed in 2019. He wrote a whole book on it. And he, you know, he made the argument that that we just, you know, went over here, that essentially, the Constitution was not prepared for the Internet, and we need to get rid of the First Amendment accordingly. And he described himself as a free speech absolutist when he was the managing editor of Time magazine. And even when he was in the State Department under Obama, he started something called the Global Engagement Center, which was the first government censorship operation within the federal government, but it was foreign facing, so it was okay. Now at the time, they used the homegrown ISIS predicate threat for this. And so it was very hard to argue against the idea of the State Department having this formal coordination partnership with every major tech platform in The U. S. Because at the time, there were these ISIS attacks that were and we were told that ISIS was recruiting on Twitter and Facebook. And so the Global Engagement Center was established essentially to be a State Department entanglement with the social media companies to basically put bumper cars on their ability to platform accounts and to and one of the things they did is they created a new technology, which is it's called natural language processing. It is an artificial intelligence machine learning ability to create meaning out of words in order to map everything that everyone says on the Internet and create this vast topography of how communities are organized online, who the major influences are, what they're talking about, what narratives are emerging or trending and to be able to create this sort of network graph in order to know who to target and how information moves through an ecosystem. And so they began plotting the language, the prefixes, the suffixes, the popular terms, the slogans that ISIS folks were talking about on Twitter. When Trump won the election in 2016, everyone who worked at the State Department was expecting these promotions to the White House National Security Council under Hillary Clinton, who I should remind viewers, was also Secretary of State under Obama, actually ran the State Department. But these folks were all expecting promotions on 11/08/2016 and were unceremoniously put out of jobs by a guy who was a 20 to one underdog according to The New York Times the day of the election. And when that happened, these State Department folks took their special set of skills coercing governments to for sanctions. And the State Department led the effort to sanction Russia over the Crimea annexation in 2014, these State Department diplomats did an international roadshow to pressure European governments to pass censorship laws to censor the right wing populist groups in Europe and as a boomerang impact to censor populist groups who were affiliated in The U. S. So you had folks who went from the State Department directly, for example, to the Atlantic Council, which was this major facilitator between government to government censorship. The Atlantic Council is a group that was one of Biden's biggest political backers. They build themselves as NATO's think tank. So they represent the political census of NATO. And in many respects, when NATO has civil society actions that they want to be coordinated to synchronize with military action in a region, the Atlantic Council essentially is deployed to consensus build and make that political action happen within a region of interest to NATO. Now the Atlantic Council has seven CIA directors on its board. A lot of people don't even know that seven CIA directors are still alive, let alone all concentrated on on the board of a single organization that's kind of the heavyweight in the censorship industry. They get annual funding from the Department of Defense, the State Department, and CIA cutouts like the National Endowment for Democracy. The Atlantic Council in January 2017 moved immediately to pressure European governments to pass censorship laws to create a transatlantic flank attack on free speech in exactly the way that Rick Stengel essentially called for to have The US mimic European censorship laws. One of the ways they did this was by getting Germany to pass something called NETTG in August 2017, which was essentially kicked off the era of automated censorship in The U. S. What NETs.gg required was unless social media platforms want to pay a $54,000,000 fine for each instance of speech, each post left up on their platform for more than forty eight hours that have been identified as hate speech, they would be fined basically into bankruptcy when you aggregate $54,000,000 over tens of thousands of posts per day. And the safe haven around that was if they deployed artificial intelligence based censorship technologies, which had been, again, created by DARPA to take on ISIS to be able to scan and ban speech automatically. And this was this gave I call these weapons of mass deletion. These are essentially the ability to censor tens of millions of posts with just a few lines of code and the way this is done is by aggregating basically the field of censorship science fuses together two disparate groups of study, if you will. There's the sort of political and social scientists who are the sort of thought leaders of what should be censored. And then there are the sort of quants, if you will. These are the programmers, the computational data scientists, computational linguistics, every university. There's over 60 universities now who get federal government grants to do this censorship, the censorship work and the censorship preparation work, where what they do is they create these codebooks of the language that people use the same way they did for ISIS. They did this, for example, with COVID. They created these COVID lexicons of what dissident groups were saying about mandates, about masks, about vaccines, about high profile individuals like Tony Fauci or Peter Daszak or any of these others protected VIP individuals whose reputations had to be protected online. And they created these codebooks, they broke things down into narratives. The Atlanta Council, for example, was a part of this government funded consortium, something called the Virality Project, which mapped 66 different narratives that dissidents were talking about around COVID, everything from COVID origins to vaccine efficacy. And then they broke down these 66 claims into all the different factual sub claims. And then they plugged these into these essentially machine learning models to be able to have a constant world heat map of what everybody was saying about COVID. And whenever something started to trend that was bad for what the Pentagon wanted or was bad for what Tony Fauci wanted, they were able to take down tens of millions of posts. They did this in the twenty twenty election with mail in ballots. It was the Speaker 0: same thing. May I ask you, I I'm sorry. I just gotta have to there's there's so much here, and it's so shocking. So you're saying the Pentagon, our Pentagon, the US Department of Defense, censored Americans during the twenty twenty election Speaker 1: cycle? Yes. They did this they oh, they did this through the so so there's the two most censored events in human history, I would argue, to date are the twenty twenty election and the COVID-nineteen pandemic. And I'll explain how I arrived there. So the twenty twenty election was determined by mail in ballots. And I'm not weighing into the substance of whether mail in ballots were or were not a legitimate or safe and reliable form of voting. That's a completely independent topic from my perspective than the censorship issue one. But the censorship of mail in ballots is really one of the most extraordinary stories in our American history, I would argue. What happened was is, you had this plot within the Department of Homeland Security. Now this gets back to what we were talking about with the State Department's Global Engagement Center. You had this group within the Atlanta Council and the foreign policy establishment, which began arguing in 2017 for the need for a permanent domestic censorship government office to serve as a quarterback for what they called a whole of society counter misinformation, counter disinformation alliance. That just means censorship, the counter misinfo. But the whole of their whole society model explicitly proposed that we need every single asset within society to be mobilized in a whole of society effort to stop misinformation online. It was that much of an existential threat to democracy. And so it but they fixated in 2017 that it had to be centered within the government because only the government would have the clout and the coercive threat powers and the perceived authority to be able to tell the social media companies what to do, to be able to summon a government funded NGO swarm to create that media surround sound, to be able to arm an astroturfed army of fact checkers and to be able to liaise and connect all these different censorship industry actors into a cohesive unified whole. And the Atlantic Council initially proposed with this blueprint called forward defense, it's not offense, it's forward defense guys. They initially proposed that running this out of the State Department's Global Engagement Center because they had so many assets there who were so effective at censorship under Rick Stengel's stead and under the Obama administration. But they said, oh, we're not going to be able to get away with that because we don't really have a national security predicate and it's supposed to be foreign facing. We can't really use that hook unless we have a sort of national security one. Then they contemplated parking it at the CIA. And they said, well, actually, there's two reasons we can't do that. CIA is foreign facing. We can't really establish a counterintelligence threat to bring it home domestically. Also, we're going to need essentially tens of thousands of people involved in this operation spanning this whole society model. You can't really run a clandestine operation that way. So they said, okay, well, what about the FBI? They said, well, the FBI would be great. It's domestic. But the problem is is the FBI is supposed to be the intelligence arm of the justice department, and we and what we're dealing with here are not acts of law breaking. It's basically support for Trump or if, you know, if if left wing populists had risen to power like Bernie Sanders or Jeremy Corbyn, I have no doubt they would have done in The U. K, they would have done the same thing to him there. They targeted Jeremy Corbyn and other left wing populist NATO skeptical groups in Europe. But in The U. S, it was all Trump. And so essentially, what they said is, well, the only other domestic intelligence equity we have in The US besides the FBI is the DHS. So we are going to essentially take the CIA's power to rig and bribe foreign media organizations, which is a power they've had since the day they were born in 1947, and we're going to combine that with the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI by putting it at DHS. So DHS was basically deputized. It was empowered through this obscure little cybersecurity agency to have the combined powers that the CIA has abroad with the jurisdiction of the FBI at home. And the way they did this, how did an obscure little cybersecurity agency get this power, was they did a funny little series of switcheroos. So this little thing called CISA, they didn't call it the Disinformation Governance Board, they didn't call it the Censorship Agency, they gave it an obscure little name that no one would notice called the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, whose founder said, we just security we care about security so much it's in our name twice. Everybody sort of closed their eyes and pretended that's what it was. But it was created by active Congress in 2018 because of the perceived threat that Russia had hacked the twenty sixteen election, had physically hacked it. And so we needed the cybersecurity power to be able to deal with that. And essentially on the heels of a CIA memo on 01/06/2017 and a same day DHS executive order on 01/06/2017, arguing that Russia had interfered in the twenty sixteen election and a DHS mandate saying that elections are now critical infrastructure, you had this new power within DHS to say that cybersecurity attacks on elections are now our purview. And then they did two cute things. One, they said mis, dis and malinformation online are a form of cybersecurity attack. They are a cyber attack because they are happening online. And they said, well, actually, Russian disinformation is we're actually protecting democracy in elections. We don't need a Russian predicate after Russiagate died. So just like that, you had this cybersecurity agency be able to legally make the argument that your tweets about mail in ballots, if you undermine public faith and confidence in them as a legitimate form of voting, was now you are now conducting a cyber attack on US critical infrastructure by by articulating misinformation on Twitter. And just like that now what they did then is they Wait. Speaker 0: So in other words bunch of see it. Complaining about election fraud is the same as taking down our power grid. Speaker 1: Yes. You could literally be on your toilet seat at 09:30 on on a Thursday night and tweet, I think that mail in ballots are illegitimate. And you were essentially then caught up in the crosshairs of the Department of Homeland Security classifying you as conducting a cyber attack on U. S. Critical infrastructure because you were doing misinformation online in the cyber realm and misinformation is a cyber attack on democracy when it undermines public faith and confidence in our democratic elections and our democratic institutions. They would end up going far beyond that. They would actually define democratic institutions as being another thing that was a cybersecurity attack to, to undermine. And lo and behold, the mainstream media is considered a democratic institution. That would come later. What ended up happening was, in advance of the twenty twenty election, starting in April of twenty twenty, although this goes back before, you had this essentially never Trump, neocon, Republican DHS working with essentially NATO on the national security side and essentially the DNC, if you will, to use DHS as the launching point for a government coordinated mass censorship campaign spanning every single social media platform on earth in order to pre censor the ability to dispute the legitimacy of mail in ballots. And here's how they did this. They aggregated four different institutions, Stanford University, the University of Washington, a company called Graphica and the Atlantic Council. Now all four of these institutions, the centers within them were essentially Pentagon cutouts. You had at the Stanford Internet Observatory, it was actually run by Michael McFaul. If you know Michael McFaul, he was The U. S. Ambassador to Russia under the Obama administration, and he personally authored a seven step playbook for how to successfully orchestrate a color revolution. That is and part of that involved maintaining total control over media and social media, juicing up the civil society outfits, calling elections illegitimate in order to and mind you, all of these people were professional Russiagaters and professional election delegitimizers in 2016. And then well, I'll get to that in a sec. So Stanford University, nominally, the Stanford Air Observatory under Michael McFaul was run by Alex Stamos, who was formerly a Facebook executive, who coordinated with ODNI and the with respect to, Russiagate, you know, taking down Russian propaganda at Facebook. So this is another liaison essentially to the national security state. State. And under Alex Stamos at Stanford Internet Observatory was Renee de Resta, who started her career in the CIA and wrote the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian disinformation. And there's a lot more there that I'll be I'll get to another time. But the next institution was the University of Washington, which is essentially the Bill Gates University in Seattle, who is headed by Kate Starbird, who is basically three generations of military brass, who got her PhD in Crisis Informatics, essentially doing social media surveillance for the Pentagon and getting DARPA funding and working essentially with the National Security State then repurposed to take on mail in ballots. The third firm, Graphica, got 7,000,000 in Pentagon grants and got their start as part of the Pentagon's Minerva Initiative. The Minerva Initiative is the psychological warfare research center of the Pentagon. This group was doing social media spying and narrative mapping for the Pentagon until the twenty sixteen election happened and then were repurposed into a partnership with the Department of Homeland Security to censor 22,000,000 Trump tweets, pro Trump tweets about mail in ballots. And then the fourth institution, as I mentioned, was the Atlantic Council, who's got seven CIA directors on the board. So one after another, it is exactly what Ben Rhodes described during the Obama era as the blob, the foreign policy establishment. It's the Defense Department, the State Department or the CIA every single time. And of course, this is because they were threatened by Trump's foreign policy. And so while much of the censorship looks like it's coming domestically, it's actually by our foreign facing Department of Dirty Tricks color revolution blob who are professional government toplers, who were then basically descended on the twenty twenty election. Now they did this. They explicitly said the head of this election integrity partnership on tape, and and and my foundation clipped them and it's been played before congress and it's in, you know, a part of the Missouri v Biden lawsuit now. But they explicitly said on tape that they were set up to do what the government was banned from doing itself. And then they articulated a multi step framework in order to coerce all the tech companies to take censorship actions. They said on tape the tech companies would not have done but for their pressure, which involved using threats of government force because they were the deputized arm of the government. They had a formal partnership with the DHS. They were able to use DHS's proprietary domestic disinformation switchboard to immediately talk to top brass at all the tech companies for takedowns. And they bragged on tape about how they got the tech companies to all systematically adopt a new terms of service speech violation ban called de legitimization, which meant any tweet, any YouTube video, any Facebook post, any TikTok video, any Discord post, any Twitch video, anything on the Internet that that, undermine public faith and confidence in the use of mail in ballots or early voting drop boxes or or or ballot tabulation issues on Election Day was a prima facia terms of service violation policy under this new delegitimization policy that they only adopted because of pass through government pressure from the Election Integrity Partnership, which they bragged about on tape, including the grid that they used to do this and and simultaneously invoking threats of government breaking them up or or government stopping doing favors for the tech companies unless they did this, as well as inducing crisis PR by working with their media allies. So and they said the government DHS could not do that themselves, and so they set up this this basically constellation of State Department, Pentagon, and and IC networks to run this pre censorship campaign, which by their own math had 22,000,000 tweets on Twitter alone. And mind you, they did this on 15 platforms. This is hundreds of millions of posts, which were all scanned and banned or throttled so that they cannot be amplified or they exist in a sort of limited state purgatory or had these frictions affixed to them in the form of fact checking labels where you couldn't actually click through the thing or you had to it was it was an inconvenience to be able to share it. Now they did this seven months before the election because at the time, they they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so called Red Mirage blue shift event. They knew the only way that Biden would be able to would win mathematically was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won by seven states in you know, and then three days later, it comes out actually the election switch. I mean, that that would put the election crisis of the Bush Gore election, on a level of steroids that the national security say said, well, the the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to in advance, we need to pre censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out Wait. Speaker 0: Wait. May may I ask you to pause right there? Speaker 1: Key influences, bro. Speaker 0: So what you're saying is what you're suggesting is they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held. Speaker 1: It looks very bad. Speaker 0: Certainly what they did. Yes, Mike. It does look very bad. Speaker 1: You know, and especially when you combine this with the fact that this is right on the heels of the impeachment, the Pentagon led CIA led impeachment. You know, it was, Eric Cimarello from the CIA, and it was the Vindman's from the Pentagon, who led the impeachment of Trump in late twenty nineteen over, you know, an alleged phone call around withholding Ukraine aid. This same network, which came straight out of the Pentagon hybrid warfare network military censorship network created after the first Ukraine crisis in 2014, were the lead architects of the Ukraine impeachment in 2019 and then essentially came back on steroids as part of the twenty twenty election censorship operation. But, you know, from their perspective, I mean, it certainly looks like the perfect crime. These were the people DHS, at the time, had actually federalized much of of the National Election infrast administration through this 01/06/2017 executive order from outgoing Obama, DHS head, Jed Johnson, which essentially wrapped all 50 states up into a formal DHS partnership. So DHS was simultaneously in charge of the administration of the election in many respects and the censorship of anyone who challenged the administration of the election. This is like, you know, putting essentially the defendant, of a trial, as the judge and jury of the trial. It was very Speaker 0: But but you're not describing democracy. I mean, you're describing a country in which democracy is impossible. Speaker 1: What I'm essentially describing is military rule. I mean, this is I mean, what what's happened with the rise of the censorship industry is a total inversion of the idea of democracy itself. Democracy sort of draws its legitimacy from the idea that it is ruled by consent of the people being ruled. That is, it's not really being ruled by an overlord because the government is actually just our will expressed by our consent with who we vote for. The whole push after the twenty sixteen election and after Brexit and after a couple of other social media run elections that went the wrong way from what the State Department wanted, like the twenty sixteen Philippines election, was to completely invert everything that we described as being the underpinnings of a democratic society in order to deal with the threat of free speech on the Internet. And what they essentially said is, we need to redefine democracy from being about the will of the voters to being about the sanctity of democratic institutions. And who are the democratic institutions? Oh, it's us. It's the military. It's NATO. It's the IMF and the World Bank. It's the mainstream media. It is the NGOs. And, of course, these NGOs are largely State Department funded or IC funded. It's essentially all of the elite establishments that were under threat from the rise of domestic populism that declared their own consensus to be the new definition of democracy. Because if you define democracy as being the strength of democratic institutions rather than a focus on the will of the voters, then what you're left with is essentially democracy is just the consensus building architecture within the within the democratic institutions themselves. And from their perspective, that takes a lot of work. I mean, I mean, the amount of work these people do I mean, for example, we mentioned the Atlantic Council, which is one of these big coordinating mechanisms for the oil and gas industry in a region, for the for the finance and the JP Morgans and and the BlackRocks in a region, for the NGOs in the region, for the media in the region. All of these need to reach a consensus, and that process takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of work and a lot of negotiation. From their perspective, that's democracy. Democracy is getting the NGOs to agree with BlackRock, to to agree with the with the Wall Street Journal, you know, to to agree with, you know, the the community and activist groups who are onboarded with respect to a particular initiative. That is the difficult vote building process from their perspective. At at the end of the day, a bunch of, you know, populist groups decide that they like a truck driver who's popular on TikTok more than the, you know, carefully constructed consensus of the NATO military brass, well, then from their perspective, you know, that is now an attack on democracy. And this is what this whole branding effort was. And, of course, democracy, again, has that magic regime change predicate where democracy is is our magic watch word to be able to overthrow governments from the ground up in a sort of color revolution style, whole of society effort to topple a a a a democratically elected government from the inside. For example, as we did in Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych was democratically elected by the Ukrainian people, like him or hate him, I'm not even issuing an opinion there. But the fact is, is we color revolution him out of office. We January 6 him out of office actually, to be frank. I mean, with respect to the you had State Department funded right sector thugs and, you know, dollars 5,000,000,000 worth of civil society money pumped into this to overthrow a democratically elected government in the name of democracy. And they took that special set of skills home and now it's here perhaps potentially to stay. And this has fundamentally changed the the nature of American governance because of the threat of, you know, one small voice becoming popular on social media. Speaker 0: May may I ask you a question? So into that that group of institutions that you say now define democracy, the NGOs, foreign policy establishment, etcetera, you you included the mainstream media. Now in 2021, the NSA broke into my private text apps and read them and then leaked them to the New York Times against me. That just happened again to me last week. And I'm wondering how common that is for the intel agencies to work with so called mainstream media like the New York Times to hurt their opponents? Speaker 1: Well, that is the function of these interstitial government funded nongovernmental organizations and think tanks like, for example, we mentioned the Atlantic Council, which is, NATO's think tank, but other groups like the Aspen Institute, which draws the lion's share of its funding from the State Department and other government agencies. The Aspen Institute was busted doing the same thing with the Hunter Biden laptop censorship. You had this strange situation where the FBI had advanced knowledge of the pending publication of the Hunter Biden laptop story. And then magically, the Aspen Institute, which is run by essentially former CIA, former NSA, former FBI and then a bunch of sort of civil society organizations, all hold a mass stakeholder censorship simulation, a three day conference. This came out and Joe Roth was there. This is a big part of the Twitter file leaks and it's been mentioned in multiple congressional investigations. But somehow, the Aspen Institute, which is basically an addendum of the national security state, got the exact same information that the national security state spied on journalists and political figures to obtain and not only leaked it, but then basically did a joint coordinated censorship simulator in in September, '2 months before the election, in order, just like with the censorship of mail in ballots, to be in ready position to pre censor anyone online amplifying Speaker 0: Wait a second. Speaker 1: Story that had not even broken yet. Speaker 0: The Aspen Institute? So, I mean, which is, by the way, I Yes. Spent my life in Washington. It's kind of a I mean, Walter Isaacson, formerly of Time magazine, ran it from former president of CNN. I had no idea it was part of the National Security State. I had no idea its funding came from the US government. Speaker 1: You know, this Speaker 0: is the first time I've ever heard that. But given assuming what you're saying is true, it's a little weird that Walter Isaacson left Aspen's to to write a biography of Elon Musk. Strange or no? Yeah. Speaker 1: You you know, I don't know. I I haven't read that book. I I from what I've heard from people, it's a relatively fair treatment. I, just total speculation, but I suspect that Walter Isaacson has struggled with this issue and may not even firmly fall in one particular place in the sense that Walter Isaacson did a series of interviews of Rick Stengel, actually with the Atlantic Council and in other settings, where he interviewed Rick Stengel specifically on the issue of the need to get rid of the First Amendment and the threat that free speech on social media poses to democracy. Now at the time, I was very concerned. This was between 2017 and 2019 when he did these Rick Stengel interviews. I was very concerned because Isaacson expressed what seemed to me to be a highly sympathetic view about the Rick Stengel perspective on killing the First Amendment. Now, he didn't formally endorse that position, but it left me very skittish about Isaacson. But what I should say is, at the time, I don't think very many people, in fact, I know virtually nobody in the country, had any idea how deep the rabbit hole went when it came to the construction of the censorship industry and how deep the tentacles had grown within the military and the national security state in order to buoy and consolidate it. Much of that, frankly, did not even come to public light until even last year. Frankly, some of that was galvanized by Elon Musk's acquisition in the Twitter files and the Republican turnover in the House that allowed these multiple investigations, the lawsuits like Missouri v. Biden and the discovery process there, and multiple other things like the Disinformation Governance Board, who, by the way, the interim head of that the head of that, Nina Jankowicz, got her start in the censorship industry from this exact same clandestine intelligence community censorship network created after the twenty fourteen Crimea situation. Nina Jankovic, when her name came up in 2022 as part of the Disinformation Governance Board, I almost fell out of my chair because I had been tracking Nina's network for almost five years at that point when her name came up as part of The UK inter cluster cell of a busted clandestine operation to censor the Internet called the Integrity Initiative, which was created by the UK Foreign Office and was backed by NATO's political affairs unit in order to carry out this thing that we talked about at the beginning of this dialogue, the NATO's sort of psychological inoculation and the ability to kill so called Russian propaganda or rising political groups who wanted to maintain energy relations with Russia at a time when The US was trying to kill the Nord Stream and other and other, pipeline relations. Well, Speaker 0: they did that. Speaker 1: Marine Le Pen imprint. They they Nina Jankovic was a part of this this outfit. And then who is the who is the head of it after Nina Jankovic went down? It was Michael Chertoff. And Michael Chertoff was running the the Aspen Institute cyber group. And then this and the Aspen Institute then goes on to be the censorship simulator for the Hunter Biden laptop story. And then two years later, Chertoff is then the head of the disinformation governance board after Nina is forced to step down. Speaker 0: Yeah. Our close friends are Speaker 1: Of course, Michael Chertoff was the chairman at bay. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Of course. Yeah. Michael Chertoff was the chairman of the yeah. The the largest military contractor in Europe, BAE, military is so So It's all connected. Speaker 0: You've blown my mind so many times in this conversation that I'm gonna need a nap directly after it's done. So I've just got two more two more questions for you. One short, one a little longer. Short one is for people who've made it this far an hour in and wanna know more about this topic, and by the way, I hope you will come back whenever you have the time, to explore different threads of the story. But for people who wanna do research on their own, how can your research on this, be found on the Internet? Speaker 1: Sure. So our foundation is foundationforfreedomonline.com. We we publish all manner of of reports on every aspect of the censorship industry from what we talked about with the role of the military industrial complex and national security state to what the universities are doing to, I sometimes refer to as digital MK Ultra. There's just the field of basically the science of censorship and how and the funding of these psychological manipulation methods in order to nudge people into different belief systems as they did with COVID, as they did with energy and every sensitive policy issue is what they essentially had an ambition for. But, so, my foundationforfreedomonline.com website is one way. The other way is just on x, my handle is mikebencyber. I'm very active there and publish a lot of long form video and written content on all this. I think it's one of the most important issues in the world today. Speaker 0: So it certainly is. And so that leads directly and seamlessly to my final question, which is about x. And I'm not just saying this because I post content there, but I think objectively, it's the last big platform that's free or sort of free or more free. You post there too. But, you know, we're at the very beginning of an election year with a couple of different wars unfolding simultaneously, in in 2024. So do you expect that that platform can stay free for the duration of this year? Speaker 1: It's under an extraordinary amount of pressure and that pressure is going to continue to mount as the election approaches. Elon Musk is a very unique individual and he has a unique buffer perhaps when it comes to the national security state because the national security state is actually quite reliant on Elon Musk properties, whether that's for the electrical, the sort of the green revolution when it comes to Tesla and the battery technology there when it comes to SpaceX. The State Department is hugely dependent on SpaceX because of its unbelievable sort of pioneering and saturating presence in the field of low Earth orbit satellites that are basically how our telecom system runs, the things like Starlink. There are dependencies that the national security state has on Elon Musk. I'm not sure he'd have as much room to negotiate if he had become the world's richest man selling at a lemonade stand. So there's and if the National Security State goes too hard on him by invoking something like CFIUS to sort of nationalize some of these properties, I think the shockwave that it would send to the international investor community would be irrecoverable at a time when we're engaged in great power competition. So they're trying to kill they're trying to sort of induce, I think, a sort of corporate regime change through a series of things involving a sort of death by a thousand paper cuts. I think there are seven or eight different Justice Department or SEC or FTC investigations into Elon Musk properties that all started after his acquisition of X. But then what they're trying to do right now is what I call the Transatlantic Flank Attack two point o. You know, we talked in this in this dialogue about how the censorship industry really got its start when a bunch of state department exiles, who were expecting promotions, took their special set of skills in coercing European countries to pass sanctions on themselves, to cut off their own leg to spite themselves in order to pass sanctions on Russia. They ran back that same playbook with doing a roadshow for censorship instead for sanctions. We are now witnessing, you know, transatlantic flag attack two point zero, if you will, which is because they have lost a lot of their federal government powers to do this same censorship operation they've been doing from 2018 to 2022, in part because the House has totally turned on them, in part because of the media, in part because Missouri v. Biden, which won a slam dunk case actually banning government censorship at the trial court and appellate court levels, is now between this before the Supreme Court. They've now moved into two strategies. One of them is state level censorship laws. California just passed a new law, which the censorship industry totally drove from start to finish around require they call it transform platform accountability and transparency, which is basically forcing Elon Musk to give over the kind of narrative mapping data that these CIA conduits and Pentagon cutouts were using to create these weapons of mass deletion, these abilities to just censor everything at scale because they had all the internal platform data. Elon Musk took that away. They're using state laws like this new California law to crack that open. But the major threat right now is the threat from Europe with something called the EU Digital Services Act, which was cooked up in tandem with folks like NewsGuard, which is run by which has a board of Michael Hayden, Head of the CIA, NSA, four star general. Rick Stengel is on that board from the State Department's Propaganda Office. Tom Ridge is on that board from the Department of Homeland Security. Oh, and Anders Fogh Rasmussen is on that board. He was the General Secretary of NATO under the Obama administration. So you have NATO, the CIA, the NSA, four star general, DHS, and the state department working with the EU to craft the censorship laws that now are the largest existential threat to x other than potentially x advertiser boycotts because there is now disinformation is now banned as a matter of law in in in the EU. And the EU is a bigger market for x than The US. There's only 300,000,000 some people in The US. There's 450,000,000 in Europe. X is now forced to comply with this brand new law that just got ratified this year, where they either need to forfeit 6% of their global annual revenue to the EU to maintain operations there or put in place essentially the kind of CIA bumper cars, if you will, that I've been describing over the course of this in order to have an internal mechanism to censor anything that the EU, which is just a proxy for NATO, deems to be disinformation. And you can bet with 65 elections around the around the globe this year, you can you can predict every single time what they're gonna define disinformation as. So that's the main the main fight right now is is dealing with the Transatlantic flank attack from Europe. Speaker 0: I've said this five times, but that's just one of the most remarkable stories I've ever heard, and I'm grateful to you for bringing it to us. Mike Benz, Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, and hope we see you again. Speaker 1: Thanks, Tucker. Speaker 0: Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not commit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue.
ChanceGardiner
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 1:34 AM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 8:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The DEFUSE project proposed modifying bat CoVs in the same way as SARS-CoV-2. DARPA rejected the proposal due to concerns about creating viruses not found in nature. However, research on gain-of-function (GoF) continued, with NIAID funding studies in Wuhan. Peter Daszak and his team were involved in multiple collaborations, including an article in Lancet dismissing lab origin theories. Evidence suggests the insertion of a Furin cleavage site, proposed by DEFUSE, led to increased viral titers. These findings raise questions about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Il progetto DEFUSE proposto a DARPA, la Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency della Difesa USA che sviluppa nuove tecnologie per uso militare, proponeva di modificare i CoV della SARS dei pipistrelli, esattamente nello stesso modo di SARS-CoV-2. Threat

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Nel 2018 Peter Daszak e la sua EcoHealth proposero il progetto DEFUSE a DARPA per creare un virus come SARS-CoV-2. DARPA rifiutò e Fauci finanzio il progetto di Daszak a Wuhan con Shi Zhengli. Nel 2020 Fauci e Daszak avviarono l'operazione di depistaggio. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal

DEFUSE proposal documentcloud.org

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. DARPA rifiutò la proposta perché DEFUSE proponeva di creare virus che non si trovavano in natura, con la consapevolezza che i loro virus avrebbero potuto legarsi meglio ai recettori umani ed entrare nelle cellule umane, quindi più trasmissibili e potenzialmente pandemici.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Sebbene la DARPA abbia rifiutato la proposta nel 2018, ciò non significa che la ricerca non sia andata avanti. Il NIAID di Fauci, ad esempio, ha approvato la ricerca GoF sul Guadagno di Funzione sulla SARS-CoV a Wuhan nel 2016.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Il contributo in questione “Comprendere il rischio dell’emergenza del coronavirus dei pipistrelli”. I contratti per Peter Daszak attraverso il NIAID hanno fornito un mezzo per sovvenzionare il guadagno relativamente poco costoso della ricerca funzionale proposta in DEFUSE.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Al di fuori di DEFUSE, vediamo questi autori collegati altre due volte. A ottobre 2019 per discutere di SARS CoV con il NIAID. A febbraio 2020 la cospirazione per organizzare un articolo su Lancet che le teorie di origine di laboratorio le definisce "teorie del complotto".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Nelle comunicazioni dell'aprile 2020 vediamo Peter Daszak sottolineare, con grande importanza, che i suoi collaboratori di virologia della fauna selvatica non pubblichino le "sequenze China Genbank" che facevano parte della sua sovvenzione NIH/NIAID revocata menzionata sopra.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Nel FOIA del rapporto sui progressi 2018 della sovvenzione NIH c'è la prova di un preoccupate Guadagno di Funzione sui CoV SARS dei pipistrelli. L'aumento dei titoli virali corrisponde all'effetto dell'inserimento del sito di Sito di Scissione della Furina proposto da DEFUSE.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. La situazione peggiora. Ecco il rapporto 2018 al NIAID sui progressi. Il team del WIV a Wuhan ha prodotto un CoV ricombinante della SARS con titoli virali 100-10.000x in topi *umanizzati* rispetto al ceppo di tipo selvatico. Questo è indiscutibilmente Guadagno di Funzione.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Entro 2 giorni dall’infezione il SARS CoV ricombinante del 2018 a Wuhan aveva titoli virali 100-10.000 volte superiori nei topi umanizzati.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. Quando si rimuove il Sito di Scissione della Furina da SARS-CoV-2, si hanno riduzioni 100-10.000 volte dei titoli virali nei topi umanizzati. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175039/

Loss of Furin Cleavage Site Attenuates SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis SARS-CoV-2, a novel coronavirus (CoV) producing worldwide pandemic[] , has a furin cleavage site (PRRAR) in its spike protein that is absent in other group 2B CoVs [] . To explore whether the furin cleavage site contributes to infection and pathogenesis, ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. DEFUSE fu scritto dopo che il rapporto sui progressi del 2018. DEFUSE proponeva di inserire un Sito di Scissione della Furina in un CoV della SARS.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. Nel 2018 avevano un CoV SARS ricombinante a Wuhan con un'infettività potenziata simile a quella ottenuta inserendo un Sito di Scissione della Furina in un SARS-CoV.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. Dr. Alex Washburne: "Mi è stato persino chiesto da persone del mio team DARPA PREEMPT di non menzionare mai il mio ruolo in un team. Penso che il comportamento di questa comunità sia stato molto deludente. Sento il dovere civico di utilizzare la mia scienza per informare."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

13. "Se morissi domani, morirei senza rimpianti. Se avessi tenuto per me le mie intuizioni e competenze e non avessi detto nulla sulla probabile origine di laboratorio di un virus che ha ucciso 20 milioni di persone, me ne pentirei per il resto della mia vita."

ChanceGardiner
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 2:03 AM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 3:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Prof. Ross McKitrick's coauthor, McIntyre, recently found tree ring data from climatologist Jacoby that had been hidden for 20 years. The data shows warmth in the 19th century but not exceptional temperatures in the 20th century. Jacoby, a key source for Mann, had sampled 36 sites but refused to share the data. These Jacoby series were used in Mann et al 1998 and formed the basis for MBH99. Jacoby repeatedly refused to archive the data. However, before his death, some of the data was archived by Columbia University. This hidden dataset has better replication in earlier periods compared to any Jacoby series used in Mann et al 1998, but lacks high medieval values. This discovery confirms suspicions of selective data choice.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Prof. Ross McKitrick: 20 anni fa il mio coautore McIntyre cercò di ottenere i dati sugli anelli degli alberi campionati nel 1979 dal climatologo Jacoby che li teneva nascosti. Li ha trovati solo ora. Mostra caldo nel 19° secolo, ma non eccezionale nel 20° secolo. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Stephen McIntyre: Jacoby, una delle principali fonti di Mann, aveva campionato 36 siti al limite del bosco settentrionale, da cui ne scelse 10, in base ai quali pretendeva di discernere la temperatura del 20° secolo. Jacoby rifiutò.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Le serie Jacoby (alcune in versioni obsolete) sono state utilizzate in Mann et al 1998. E sono state la base per il bodge MBH99 sezionato da Jean S al Climate Audit anni fa.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Chiesi alla rivista Climatic Change di richiedere a Jacoby di archiviare i dati per tutti i 36 siti. Jacoby rifiutò ancora. https://climateaudit.org/2023/12/12/discovery-of-data-for-one-of-the-other-26-jacoby-series/

Discovery of Data for One of the “Other 26” Jacoby Series We've long discussed the bias imparted by ex post selection of data depending on whether it went up in the 20th century.  Likening such after-the-fact selection to a drug study carried out only on survivors. The Jacoby and d'Arrigo 1989 network was a classic example: the original article reported that they had sampled 36 northern treeline… climateaudit.org

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Ha affermato: "Se otteniamo una buona storia climatica da una cronologia, scriviamo un articolo utilizzandola. Questa è la nostra missione finanziata. I dati rifiutati vengono messi da parte e non archiviati".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Era il 2004. La sua coautrice Rosanne D'Arrigo, utilizzando una diapositiva Powerpoint intitolata "Cherry-picking", disse al panel NAS nel 2006: "Devi raccogliere le ciliegie se vuoi fare la torta di ciliegie"

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Per molto tempo avevo dato per scontato che Jacoby fosse stato all'altezza dell'offuscamento dei dati che aveva escluso e in seguito nascosto. Nel 2004 aveva affermato: "Quindici anni non sono un ritardo. È il momento in cui i dati di qualità inferiore vengano trascurati".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Ma i dati erano di “qualità inferiore”? Si scopre che uno dei 26 set di dati "trascurati" è miracolosamente sopravvissuto. Jacoby è morto nell'ottobre 2014.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Pochi mesi prima della sua morte, la Columbia University ha archiviato dozzine di set di dati di misurazione accumulati da Jacoby nel corso degli anni, molti dei quali non erano stati archiviati.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. A quel punto, erano trascorsi 25 anni dalla pubblicazione di Jacoby e D'Arrigo 1989 e 8 anni da D'Arrigo et al 2006. Abbastanza a lungo perché la comunità paleo fosse "passata" al successivo oggetto brillante: PAGES2K.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. Ma sepolti nell'archivio finale di Jacoby c'erano i dati di misurazione per una delle serie "altri 26" a lungo nascoste. Presumo che i restanti 25 set di dati siano scomparsi da tempo.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. Il set di dati nascosto non è di "qualità inferiore" in alcun senso oggettivo. Al contrario, ha una replica molto migliore nei primi periodi rispetto a QUALSIASI serie Jacoby trasmessa per l'uso in Mann et al 1998. Il suo unico difetto: valori altomedievali, niente HS.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

13. Per essere chiari, ho a lungo criticato le cronologie degli anelli degli alberi in quanto proxy incoerenti e inutili. Quindi non sto dicendo che questa serie nascosta sia una sorta di verità. Solo che dimostra la scelta selettiva che sospettavamo e che D'Arrigo ha ammesso.

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 28, 2021 at 11:47 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 2:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In December 2020, Bert Hubert wrote an article on reverse engineering the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine's mRNA code. Kira Smith highlighted issues with Pfizer's genetic code in March 2021. Professor Xuhua Xia published detailed evaluations of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines in July 2021. The spike protein created by Pfizer differs from SARS-CoV-2's spike protein. Misfolding proteins have been linked to neurodegenerative diseases. Pfizer's genetic code optimization raises concerns about long-term health risks. Pfizer's risk management plan and testing protocols have been questioned. Single mutations can cause diseases, and regulatory agencies do not require codon optimization testing.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Nel dicembre 2020 Bert Hubert ha scritto un eccellente articolo intitolato "Reverse Engineering the source code of the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine", dove ha spiegato la struttura del codice mRNA. https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/reverse-engineering-source-code-of-the-biontech-pfizer-vaccine/

Reverse Engineering the source code of the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine - Bert Hubert's writings Translations: ελληνικά / عربى / 中文 (Weixin video, Youtube video) / 粵文 / bahasa Indonesia / český / Català / český / Deutsch / Español / 2فارسی / فارسی / Français / עִברִית / Hrvatski / Italiano / Magyar / Nederlands / 日本語 / 日本語 2 / नेपाली / Polskie / русский / Português / Română / Slovensky / Slovenščina / Srpski / Türk / український / Markdown for translating / Fun video by LlamaExplains / Video version by Giff Ransom berthub.eu

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Kira Smith nel marzo 2021 ha pubblicato un documento che indica i problemi all'interno del codice genetico dei VACClNl Pfizer ("BNT162b2 vaccino: possibile lettura errata, errori nella sintesi delle proteine e le anomalie di splicing alternativo") https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161668243.35142344/v1

Open Research Collaboration and Publishing - Authorea Authorea is the leading platform to write, cite, collaborate, host data, and publish. authorea.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Professor Xuhua Xia, biologo evoluzionista all'Università di Ottawa (11.696 citazioni), pubblicato nel luglio 2021: "Dissezione dettagliata e valutazione critica dei VACClNl Pfizer/BioNTech e Moderna mRNA". https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fvaccines9070734

Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines The design of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines involves many different types of optimizations. Proper optimization of vaccine mRNA can reduce dosage required for each injection leading to more efficient immunization programs. The mRNA components of the vaccine need to have a 5′-UTR to load ribosomes efficiently onto the mRNA for translation initiation, optimized codon usage for efficient translation elongation, and optimal stop codon for efficient translation termination. Both 5′-UTR and the downstream 3′-UTR should be optimized for mRNA stability. The replacement of uridine by N1-methylpseudourinine (Ψ) complicates some of these optimization processes because Ψ is more versatile in wobbling than U. Different optimizations can conflict with each other, and compromises would need to be made. I highlight the similarities and differences between Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines and discuss the advantage and disadvantage of each to facilitate future vaccine improvement. In particular, I point out a few optimizations in the design of the two mRNA vaccines that have not been performed properly. mdpi.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Professor Xuhua Xia, biologo evoluzionista all'Università di Ottawa (11.696 citazioni), pubblicato nel luglio gennaio 2021: "Domini e funzioni della proteina Spike in SARS-Cov-2 nel contesto della progettazione del VACClNO". https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/1/109

Domains and Functions of Spike Protein in SARS-Cov-2 in the Context of Vaccine Design The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-2-S) interacts with the human ACE2 receptor to gain entry into a cell to initiate infection. Both Pfizer/BioNTech’s BNT162b2 and Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine candidates are based on stabilized mRNA encoding prefusion SARS-2-S that can be produced after the mRNA is delivered into the human cell and translated. SARS-2-S is cleaved into S1 and S2 subunits, with S1 serving the function of receptor-binding and S2 serving the function of membrane fusion. Here, I dissect in detail the various domains of SARS-2-S and their functions discovered through a variety of different experimental and theoretical approaches to build a foundation for a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of how SARS-2-S works to achieve its function of mediating cell entry and subsequent cell-to-cell transmission. The integration of structure and function of SARS-2-S in this review should enhance our understanding of the dynamic processes involving receptor binding, multiple cleavage events, membrane fusion, viral entry, as well as the emergence of new viral variants. I highlighted the relevance of structural domains and dynamics to vaccine development, and discussed reasons for the spike protein to be frequently featured in the conspiracy theory claiming that SARS-CoV-2 is artificially created. mdpi.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

La proteina creata da Pfizer è diversa dalla proteina spike di SARS-CoV-2. S-2P è una proteina instabile. I domini di legame del recettore (RDB) di S-2P non allenano correttamente il corpo. "Stabilizing the closed SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer", Nature, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20321-x

Stabilizing the closed SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer - Nature Communications The trimeric spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 is the primary focus of most vaccine design and development efforts. Due to intrinsic instability typical of class I fusion proteins, S tends to prematurely refold to the post-fusion conformation, compromising immunogenic properties and prefusion trimer yields. To support ongoing vaccine development efforts, we report the structure-based design of soluble S trimers with increased yields and stabilities, based on introduction of single point mutations and disulfide-bridges. We identify regions critical for stability: the heptad repeat region 1, the SD1 domain and position 614 in SD2. We combine a minimal selection of mostly interprotomeric mutations to create a stable S-closed variant with a 6.4-fold higher expression than the parental construct while no longer containing a heterologous trimerization domain. The cryo-EM structure reveals a correctly folded, predominantly closed pre-fusion conformation. Highly stable and well producing S protein and the increased understanding of S protein structure will support vaccine development and serological diagnostics. SARS-CoV-2 S protein prematurely refolds to the post-fusion conformation, compromising immunogenic properties and prefusion trimer yield. Here, Juraszek et al. present a stable SARS-CoV-2 S-closed protein variant with increased expression and correct folding, predominantly in closed prefusion conformation. nature.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Poiché la nostra cellula attacca il codice genetico estraneo, il codice mRNA di Pfizer ha sostituito tutte le lettere U (nucleotidi) con Ψ per nascondersi, aumentando la probabilità di interpretare erroneamente il codice e generare una proteina spike diversa da quella prevista.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Il misfolding delle proteine ​​"è stato collegato alla neurodegenerazione nell'Alzheimer e nel Parkinson e in molte altre patologie". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28441058/

Protein Misfolding Diseases - PubMed The majority of protein molecules must fold into defined three-dimensional structures to acquire functional activity. However, protein chains can adopt a multitude of conformational states, and their biologically active conformation is often only marginally stable. Metastable proteins tend to popula … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"I dati confermano che il ripiegamento errato delle proteine ​​(misfolding) con conseguente accumulo di PAO intracellulare è sufficiente a causare la morte dei cardiomiociti e l'insufficienza cardiaca". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18612262/

Protein misfolding and cardiac disease: establishing cause and effect - PubMed Numerous neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the accumulation of misfolded amyloidogenic proteins. Recent data indicate that a soluble pre-amyloid oligomer (PAO) may be the toxic entity in these diseases and the visible amyloid plaques, rather than causing the disease, may simply mark th … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Per quanto ne sappiamo, Pfizer è il più aggressivo nell'ottimizzazione del codice genetico, basta leggere Kira Smith: "BNT162b2 Vaccine: possible codons misreading, errors in protein synthesis and alternative splicing's anomalies." https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161668243.35142344/v1

Open Research Collaboration and Publishing - Authorea Authorea is the leading platform to write, cite, collaborate, host data, and publish. authorea.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"Possibili rischi a lungo termine per la salute umana. Oltre a non essere ottimizzata, la sequenza presenta forti dubbi sulla presenza di errori di utilizzo del codone. Un cambiamento eccessivo di espressione della proteina può essere la fonte di errori nel montaggio del mRNA."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"L'alterazione della disponibilità di tRNA può portare a malattie neurodegenerative (Ishimura, 2014 ). Si può dire che il codice è alterato in modo sbilanciato ... rischiando così di arrecare gravi danni alla salute umana a lungo termine, oltre alla mancata efficacia vaccinale."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"L'errata traduzione ha conseguenze molto gravi sulla fisiopatologia di una varietà di malattie: sclerosi, neurodegenerazione, miopatia mitocondriale, encefalopatia, acidosi lattica, episodi simil-ictus, Parkinson e cancro (genesi, accelerazione della crescita e metastasi)."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

"Sono modifiche per aumentare l'espressione proteica di cui non si sa nulla sulla traduzione nell'organismo. Si è scoperto che un'alterazione nella sintesi proteica è causa dello sviluppo e della crescita di alcuni tumori e di altre malattie, senza alterare in alcun modo il DNA."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Pfizer fa menzione di tutto questo a EMA e FDA? No. Ecco il "Pfizer BNT162b2/Comirnaty Risk Management Plan per l'EMA". Sono state testate le varianti V8 e V9, l'unica differenza era l'ottimizzazione del codone, V8 aveva livelli elevati di gamma-glutamil transferasi (GTT), V9 no.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Pfizer ammette che l'ottimizzazione del codone può portare a un GTT elevato e sappiamo che "un GGT elevato è collegato a un aumento del rischio per una moltitudine di malattie: cardiovascolari, diabete, sindrome metabolica e mortalità per tutte le cause". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620378/

Gamma-Glutamyltransferase: A Predictive Biomarker of Cellular Antioxidant Inadequacy and Disease Risk Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) is a well-established serum marker for alcohol-related liver disease. However, GGT's predictive utility applies well beyond liver disease: elevated GGT is linked to increased risk to a multitude of diseases and conditions, ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

E anche se Pfizer ammette che l'ottimizzazione del codone ha un impatto sulla sicurezza non ha effettuato i test: "Gli studi di farmacologia di sicurezza, genotossicità e cancerogenicità non sono stati condotti in conformità con le linee guida sui vaccini dell'OMS del 2005". https://t.co/4LTXUZKlFC

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Il documento dell'OMS del 2005 afferma in realtà che tali test non sono necessari per la formulazione finale e l'approvazione di un NORMALE VACClNO, perché genotossicità e cancerogenicità vengono condotti durante gli STUDI ANIMALI, che per Pfizer sono stati praticamente saltati. https://t.co/ZnhKJvo8Yv

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Eppure EMA afferma che: "È importante indagare il potenziale di attività farmacologica indesiderabile in modelli animali appropriati e, ove necessario, incorporare un monitoraggio particolare per queste attività negli studi di tossicità e/o negli studi clinici." https://t.co/CjCFBmuOyo

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Katerina Alexaki della FDA spiega come una SINGOLA mutazione può provocare una malattia e che se si dispone di più sottostazioni ci sono buone probabilità che possa avere un effetto. https://t.co/SRGaBEWyfL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Current optimization, often considered harmless, has been shown to have effects on disease. Reports indicate that a single synonymous mutation can be linked to disease, although the exact reasons are often unknown. Factors such as translation rate and RNA structure have been implicated in some cases. It is important to note that many synonymous mutations, which do not change the translated amino acid, have been associated with disease. Therefore, if multiple substitutions occur through codon optimization, there is a likelihood of having an impact. This information has been reviewed multiple times.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna go back to, the effects of, the effects of current optimization. We, although most people think of them think of current optimization as harmless, it has been shown in several there have been several reports showing that a single synonymous mutation may be associated with disease. And in many cases, the reason is unknown. In other cases, the rate of translation has been implicated or the RNA structure has been implicated. But the fact is that a lot of synonymous mutations, and that's a mutation that does not change the amino acid that's being translated. A lot of these anonymous mutations have been associated with disease. So you can think that if one can cause disease, well, if you codon optimize a gene and you have now multiple, substitutions, then there is a good chance that you may have an effect. And this has all been reviewed several times. So what we

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Katerina Alexaki, rispondendo alla domanda se il regolatore (FDA) richieda ai produttori di testare l'impatto della loro ottimizzazione del codone, risponde di no. https://t.co/KkLF7rHoPQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks the regulator if they would request sponsors to conduct intensive analysis to anticipate any immunogenicity issues when reviewing a dossier with extensive optimization. The regulator responds that they understand the burden and do not require specific assays. They ask for protein characterization and perform an in silico analysis. If they identify any red flags, they may request further analysis. They typically ask for standard characterization and do not add extra detail. However, if adverse events related to codon optimized proteins arise, they may increase scrutiny. The conversation ends.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very interesting talk. I have a question for the regulator. So when you see, dossier and you review dossier and you see this kind of very intensive kind of optimization, would you be asking the sponsor say we are R and D, would you be asking the sponsor to go into this kind of analysis to try by an anticipate any immunogenicity issue. Speaker 1: So, no. So far, I mean, we understand that it's a huge burden to try to get that level of detail. We would I mean, We always ask to just to characterize your protein as as well as, you know, as as the sponsor can. We don't ask For specific assays, we we leave it up to the sponsor. We're not against cohort optimization. We know it's dossier We know that we wouldn't have all these drugs that we have if, you know, if you were always using the native product, which sometimes it's hard to express. A dossier, but it's we, we always ask for, you know, the the sequence. We do an in silico analysis is in our part. If we identify a specific, you know, issue that we think that's a red flag, we may go back and say, well, you know, Have you you know, could you try and do that? But otherwise, like, you know, we we ask for everything, you know, the standard characterization that we ask for non quarter optimized proteins. And, you know, we ask a lot of details there too. We do not add an an extra level of detail, but, You know, if, hopefully, it won't happen, but if we start seeing adverse events specific to codon optimized proteins, We might have to, increase our scrutiny. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Just, continuing
ChanceGardiner
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 9:19 PM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 11:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The leaked emails from Noël Wathion, EMA's deputy director, reveal the pressure from Ursula von der Leyen for immediate approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The political urgency clashed with EMA's obligation to ensure vaccine safety. EMA approved the vaccines based on political timelines rather than scientific ones. Concerns were raised about the approval process and the speed at which doubts were dismissed. The independence of FDA was also questioned due to Pfizer's access. Issues related to the vaccine's chemistry, production, and control were known to FDA. Concerns about mRNA integrity were raised, but safety implications were not prioritized. A leaked report showed Pfizer lowering the mRNA integrity threshold. The article concludes with the retirement and subsequent passing of Noël Wathion, making it impossible to inquire about the pressures on EMA from Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. 💥 L'email di Noël Wathion vicedirettore di EMA il 19 novembre 2020, prova le pressioni di Ursula von der Leyen per l'approvazione immediata dei VACClNl. Il giorno dopo firmò il contratto UE da 300 milioni di dosi in cui Pfizer che le conseguenze erano sconosciute. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Noël Wathion parla di un’atmosfera non solo “abbastanza tesa” ma “a volte anche un po’ scomoda”. Un ritardo di diverse settimane tra l’approvazione USA e quella UE “forse non è facile da accettare” per la Commissione UE perché “le conseguenze politiche” sarebbero elevate.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Wathion descrive questa enorme pressione temporale come un conflitto tra il processo di approvazione “accelerato” richiesto politicamente e l’obbligo della sua autorità di prendersi il “tempo necessario” per avere “solida certezza” sulla sicurezza del VACClNO.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. EMA approvò i VACClNl nei tempi politici invece che in tempi scientifici. Anche l'email di Alexis Nolte, capo di Human Medicines di EMA, sollevano perplessità sul metodo di approvazione e sulla rapidità con cui EMA si è liberata dei dubbi che aveva fino a pochi giorni prima.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. L'email di Evdokia Korakianiti, amministratore scientifico dell’EMA, spiega in modo più dettagliato quali fossero questi “problemi” e come fossero in realtà le principali preoccupazioni legate al VACClNO Pfizer-BioNTech. https://www.nius.de/corona/diese-dokumente-zeigen-den-impf-pfusch-bei-der-zulassung-qualitaet-derzeit-als-nicht-akzeptabel-befunden/72538f37-bf65-45f4-b4c2-b4394bf35d0a

Diese Dokumente zeigen den Impf-Pfusch bei der Zulassung: Qualität „derzeit als nicht akzeptabel befunden“ | NIUS.de Diese Dokumente zeigen den Impf-Pfusch bei der Zulassung: Qualität „derzeit als nicht akzeptabel befunden“ nius.de

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Marco Cavaleri, responsabile dei VACClNl di EMA, comunicava con urgenza come FDA statunitense "si precipiterà nell'Autorizzazione di Emergenza (EUA)". https://archive.is/sQYoE

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Wathion, scrive in modo scioccante, come "le ricadute politiche per un ritardo sembrano essere troppo elevate" e se i tempi non saranno rapidi come quelli di FDA "saremo travolti su tutti i fronti e ci troveremo nel mezzo della tempesta."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Ciò implica che la velocità a scapito della sicurezza era all'ordine del giorno per evitare "ricadute politiche". Chiaramente, è stata la politica a dettare il protocollo di autorizzazione, non la scienza.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Marco Cavaleri di EMA rivela che Albert Bourla CEO di Pfizer ha "fatto pressioni" su Peter Marks direttore del Center for Biologics Evaluation (CBER) di FDA. L'accesso della Pfizer a FDA solleva dubbi sull'indipendenza dell'agenzia federale.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. Cavaleri rivela che FDA era a conoscenza di "alcuni problemi" associati alla CMC (Chimica, Produzione e Controll) che dovevano essere risolti e che potrebbe "essere la parte difficile". LA CMC copre procedure garantire la sicurezza e la coerenza tra i lotti farmaceutici.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. Veronika Jekerle, responsabile della qualità della farmaceutica di EMA, scrive a Evdokia che la differenza nel livello di integrità dell'mRNA è stata nuovamente segnalata come una delle principali preoccupazioni e il suo "potenziale impatto sulla sicurezza".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

13. Marco Cavaleri scrive che il contenuto di mRNA non è la maggiore preoccupazione di FDA e afferma inoltre in modo scioccante: "non è chiaro se le ispezioni di GCP (Buona Pratica Clinica) siano mai state effettuate" e non sembra il maggiore interesse di FDA.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

14. Jekerle Veronika rivela che EMA, FDA, MRHA e Health Canada (HC) sono tutte infromate della bassa integrità del mRNA, ma nessuno sembra preoccupato per la sicurezza. https://www.nius.de/Corona/jetzt-ermittelt-sogar-der-us-bundesstaat-texas-die-chronik-der-pfizer-skandale/2029fe4b-e598-46d8-b82d-0cbce2b8f979

Jetzt ermittelt sogar der US-Bundesstaat Texas: Die Chronik der Pfizer-Skandale | NIUS.de Jetzt ermittelt sogar der US-Bundesstaat Texas: Die Chronik der Pfizer-Skandale nius.de

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

15. In un rapporto trapelato del'incontro di Pfizer e EMA il 26 novembre 2020, un giorno dopo l'email di Jekerle, rivela come hanno risulto il problema dell'integrità dell'mRNA: Abbassando il limite al 50%, inferiore alla soglia minima del 70% prevista da Acuitas Therapeutics. https://t.co/ru7WHyZrWT

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

16. "L'mRNA troncato dovrebbero essere considerato impurità legate al prodotto. Dovrebbe essere affrontata la possibilità che proteine ​​tradotte diverse dalla proteina sSpike prevista (S1 S2) risultino da specie di mRNA troncate e/o modificate". https://t.co/M1SdBlj4nG

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

17. Occorre ricordare che il trial Pfizer fu effettuato con lotti clinici speciali di alta qualità con un'integrità del 78%, prodotti con un processo diverso da quello industriale usato per i lotti commerciali. Nel trial solo 252 su 21.720 ricevettero il lotto commerciale. https://t.co/5kBy34cca4

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

18. Noël Wathion vicedirettore esecutivo di EMA fu mandato in pensione il 30 giugno 2021 dopo 25 anni di servizio ed è deceduto il 12 agosto 2023. Così nessuno può più chiedergli nulla sulle pressioni su EMA da parte di Ursula von der Leyen e probabilmente da parte di Pfizer. https://t.co/eJ0MLByaTG

ChanceGardiner
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 11:17 PM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 8:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The LUISS University's study against "dangerous" GattoThunberg is seen as propaganda and disinformation. StopFake collaborator Marko Suprun, along with EuroMaidan coup leaders, is linked to Ukrainian neo-Nazis. Another StopFake collaborator, Horodetskyy, helped cover up Ukraine's responsibility for Andrea Rocchelli's murder. The study focuses on "No-Vax" disinformation and Green Pass, but history has already disproven LUISS's claims. The article also promotes climate change propaganda and aims to suppress freedom of speech. Gianni Riotta, head of LUISS, is known for spreading propaganda and hatred. Accusations of disinformation come from Riotta, who falsely accused Trump of colluding with Russia. LUISS's reliance on StopFake, funded by Soros, raises concerns about whitewashing Azov Nazis.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. La LUISS conferma di essere una fogna della propaganda e della vera disinformazione di regime al servizio di NewsGuard, una probabile copertura della CIA, pubblicando uno studio contro il "pericolosissimo GattoThunberg. Giuro, non sto scherzando. https://esteri.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/LUISS-Come-individuare-e-contrastare-operazioni-coordinate-di-disinformazione-in-Italia.pdf

Pagina non trovata – Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale esteri.it

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Ecco Marko Suprun di StopFake con Steven Bandera nipote di bandera e con i golpisti dell'EuroMaidan ne 2014 e Stefan Romaniw presidente del Congresso Mondiale Ucraino, la potente lobby di neonazisti ucraini adoratori di Bandera alleato e spia di Hitler. https://t.co/Qm1TihLldS https://t.co/KzM4dqoAXs

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

43. I Suprun erano alle rivolte dell'EuroMaidan con Stevan Romaniw, capo dell'OUN di Bandera, che girava con il nazista Andrij Parubij leader del golpe dell'EuroMaidan e di Svoboda (ex Partito Nazionalsocialista), che dal 2016 al 2019 sarà il presidente del parlamento Ucraino. https://t.co/AVHT4Elu8E

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Altro collaboratore di StopFake che li aiutato a insabbiare le responsabilità dell'Ucraina e del loro Markiv per l'omicidio di Andrea Rocchelli in Donbass, è Horodetskyy che con Romaniw andò sulla tomba di Bandera e che tiene un ritratto di Bandera nel suo ristorante a Roma. https://t.co/O9Cv0GQDYn

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Gran parte di questa distopica propaganda della LUISS spacciata per studio, è incentrata sulla "disinformazione" dei "No-Vax" contro Green pass e VACClNl. Pubblicato nel giugno 2022, la Storia ha già ampiamente smentito la vera disinformazione che era solo quella della LUISA. https://t.co/I18QgyP1r9

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Basterebbe il passaggio "il Green Pass e le norme attuate dal governo per contenere il diffondersi del virus" per far vergognare il resto della vita i servi autori di questa schifezza, a meno che non siano così stupidi da pensare che il Green Pass abbia contenuto il virus. https://t.co/SETNc8ks4p

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Ovviamente non poteva mancare una sezione dedicata alla propaganda sul Cambiamento Climatico contro i cattivi negazionisti climatici. Naturalmente, come negli altri casi, senza mai dimostrare perché quella che sostengono loro sarebbe la verità e chi la nega è un negazionista. https://t.co/jGu4KiYewQ

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Non è un caso che abbiano scritto e pubblicato una schifezza del genere. Il fine ultimo si capisce alla fine, è spingere il DSA dell'UE per opprimere la libertà di parola stabilità dall'Art. 21 della Costituzione, dando solo a servi di regime la libertà di parola e di censura. https://t.co/74PO1jj1D5

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Ricordiamo che il capo di queste schifezze della LUISS è Gianni Riotta, il più colossale diffusore di propaganda, disinformazione e odio della Storia. Un patetico fallito, invidioso e carico d'odio che ritiene dei criminali il Premio Pulitzer Greenwald, Assange e Snowden.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. Quello che lancia accuse di disinformazione è il solito incapace Riotta che accusava Trump di aver rubato al presidenza aiutato da Putin con il RussiaGate, finché non abbiamo scoperto che il RussiaGate era stato inventato dalla Clinton con l'aiuto di FBI, CIA, Obama e Biden.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

*2. Quella fogna della LUISS imbianca i nazisti di Azov usando come fonte il "fact-checker" ucraino StopFake finanziato da Soros, certificato da IFCN sempre finanziato da Soros, e naturalmente gestito da neonazisti ucraini come Marko Suprun adoratori di Bandera alleato di Hitler. https://t.co/6MTdmDJUN6

ChanceGardiner
Posted - December 2, 2023 at 1:30 AM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 11:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer's Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 package insert, spanning 575 pages, reveals concerning details. Myocarditis and pericarditis, including fatal cases, are candidly acknowledged. After 3+ years, no data on genotoxicity/carcinogenic potential. Protection for all recipients uncertain. Duration of protection unknown. Possible vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia (VITT). Safety not evaluated in immunocompromised individuals. No data on pregnant or breastfeeding women. No studies on drug interactions. Reproductive toxicity tested only on rats, with incomplete reporting. 575 pages to say they know little.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Nuovo bugiardino di 575 PAGINE di Pfizer Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 🤣 "Miocardite e pericardite anche fatali" candidamente ammesse nel nuovo bugiardino Pfizer. Dopo oltre 3 anni, ammettono di non avere ancora nessun dato su "Genotossicità/Potenziale cancerogeno". Thread https://t.co/mWKVUX9ckD

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. "Potrebbe non proteggere tutti coloro che lo ricevono." 🤣 "Durata della protezione non nota" dopo oltre 3 anni di studi e utilizzo. Possibile Trombocitopenia (VITT) indotta da VACClNO. "Sicurezza non valutata in immunocompromessi." https://t.co/w1189cxTdD

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. "Dati su donne in gravidanza e allattamento non ancora disponibili". Non effettuati studi d’interazione con altri farmaci. Tossicità della riproduzione testata solo sui ratti e non riportata correttamente rispetto agli studi. 575 PAGINE per dire che non sanno nulla. 🤣 https://t.co/QkN6Qa3r0O

ChanceGardiner
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM
Saved - November 15, 2023 at 4:48 PM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Burioni 1: "In Italia rischio zero." Burioni 2: "In Italia il contagio è impossibile." Burion 3: "È lecito preoccuparsi solo dell'influenza." Burioni 4: "Come previsto il virus è arrivato." Burioni 5: "Mai detto rischio zero." Burioni è un clown 🤡 professionalmente fallito. https://t.co/0l7dNjv1rX

ChanceGardiner
Posted - November 11, 2023 at 1:51 PM
Saved - November 11, 2023 at 10:22 PM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Sbaglio o Brindisi per smentirlo ha confermato di essere un fascista? Nel dubbio sarà chiesto a un giudice. archive.ph/xX5BR https://t.co/l6OFqznWWU

@giusbrindisi - 𝙶𝚒𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚙𝚎 𝙱𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚒

@skybash_ @fratotolo2 Buahahah Comunque sì, hai ragione. Altro che diffamazione. Se qualche disagiato desse a me del fascista lo andrei a cercare io personalmente a casa con una mazza.

ChanceGardiner
Posted - November 6, 2023 at 12:26 AM
Saved - November 6, 2023 at 7:28 AM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Prof. Raoult Didier, 2022: Perché all'improvviso dovremmo essere riusciti a trovare dei VACClNl contro il Coronavirus che funzioni nell'uomo, quando da 30 anni non riusciamo a trovarne uno funzioni negli animali? https://t.co/H7EGYoZyD7

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have been studying epidemics for about forty years, particularly looking at the issue of legislation. Working with animals, such as chickens with bronchitis caused by coronavirus, has been somewhat simpler. Despite thirty years of trying various vaccines, we have not been able to control it effectively. So, why is it that we suddenly find a solution for humans when we have struggled to find one for the flu? How can we achieve this?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: En revanche, on peut écouter les choses s'occupent d'épidémie depuis une quarantaine d'années pour se poser la question de savoir si un problème comme incroyablement important pour lequel la législation est un peu plus simple, parce que quand vous travaillez sur les animaux c'est un peu plus simple comme la bronchite des poules qui est due à coronavirus où les gens se cassent les dents trente ans a essayé tous les vaccins pour essayer de contrôler ça et qui marche là, pourquoi brutalement chez l'homme on arriverait à trouver alors qu'on n'a pas réussi à trouver pour la grippe, comment faire
ChanceGardiner
Posted - November 26, 2022 at 1:49 AM
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 10:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The French Association of Vaccine Victims seeks a woman for a Lancet publication on side effects. Lancet previously faced fraud with hydroxychloroquine study. Surgisphere, the data provider, claimed data from 1,200 hospitals without sources. Researchers questioned the data's credibility, leading to the study's retraction. Ariane Anderson, responsible for Surgisphere, played a role in the false study. Lancet's scientific fraud with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin is concerning.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Associazione francese delle vittime dei VACClNl: "Cerchiamo questa signora per una pubblicazione su Lancet sugli effetti collaterali. Il governo dovrebbe reagire entro 24 ore dalla pubblicazione."😂 La storia della frode di Lancet sull'lDROSSlCLOROCHlNA. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Lancet il 22 maggio 2020 pubblicò lo studio che "ha dimostrato che con l'lDROSSlCLOROCHlNA aumentava la mortalità", spingendo l'OMS a bandirla. Coautore dello studio è il Dr. Sapan Desai, che ha fornito i dati della sua società medica Surgisphere. https://web.archive.org/web/20200522141513/https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext

Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis We were unable to confirm a benefit of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, when used alone or with a macrolide, on in-hospital outcomes for COVID-19. Each of these drug regimens was associated with decreased in-hospital survival and an increased frequency of ventricular arrhythmias when used for treatment of COVID-19. web.archive.org

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Surgisphere del Dr. Sapan Desai l'lDROSSlCLOROCHlNA ha anche la filiale Quartz Clinical. Surgisphere afferma di aver ricevuto i dati da ben 1.200 ospedali, ma senza fornire le fonti. Doveva bastare questo dato assurdo per far allarmare Lancet, ma se ne fregano e lo pubblicano.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Il 28 maggio 2020, oltre 200 ricercatori e medici tra cui il Prof. Didier Rault, scrivono a Lancet affermando che "sia il numero di casi e decessi che la raccolta di dati sembrano improbabili". Il "fact-checker" 🤡 francese prova subito a diffamare Rault scrivendo a Lancet.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forniti da Surgisphere dal Dr. Sapan Desai, sono probabilmente falsi e decidono così di ritirare lo "studio". https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Incredibilmente, neanche Amit Patel si sarebbe accorto che i dati di Surgisphere del Dr. Sapan Desai erano probabilmente falsi, nonostante risulterebbero sposati (tra loro).

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Eccoci alla signora della foto iniziale, Ariane Anderson, responsabile di Surgisphere del Dr. Sapan Desai e direttrice alle vendite della sua filiale Quartz Clinical (vedi tweet 3), con la passione della fotografia "artistica". https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/805464/viewall promotelive.com/talent-profile…

Ariane Anderson's photo portfolio - 0 albums and 16 photos | Model Mayhem Model Mayhem is the #1 portfolio website for professional models and photographers. Create a profile, upload your photos and connect with other professionals modelmayhem.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Ariane Anderson, responsabile di Surgisphere del Dr. Sapan Desai, fonte dei dati FALSI per lo studio FALSO contro l'lDROSSlCLOROCHlNA pubblicato da Lancet e poi ritirato, quando ormai si era consolidata la FRODE scientifica nel "consenso-scientifico™". Punto di non ritorno. https://t.co/FpH3G5GeSU

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. L'inchiesta del Dr. James Todaro sulla FRODE scientifica di Lancet contro l'lVERMECTlN: "La disinformazione è negativa. La disinformazione in medicina è peggiore. La disinformazione proveniente da una prestigiosa rivista medica è la peggiore." https://archive.is/2020.06.03-202746/https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a-study-out-of-thin-air

ChanceGardiner
Posted - October 28, 2023 at 4:02 AM
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 5:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this article, we expose a group of fanatical idiots responsible for abuse and identify the true instigator. The vice director of Open consistently denigrates and incites doxing. The executor threatens and intimates, while a global village idiot claims to have hacked or plans to hack my account. However, their attempts would only reveal our true thoughts about them. For months, the instigator, executor, village idiot, and a former news anchor have harassed me with denigrations, threats, and intimidation. Their actions culminated in the mistaken publication of a victim's photo, believing it to be my residence. The vice director of Open bears the most responsibility, as evidenced by intimidating tweets. Thankfully, the victim's friend, who is also connected to the abusers, intervened, preventing further harm. The cowardly instigator avoids accountability, offering feeble excuses. They should explain the coincidence of publishing the same photos without reporting them. It's clear they are friends working on the same "manhunt" without naming names. This incident highlights their method, as seen in their personal obsession with those who disagree, leading to a cyber attack on @RinaldoSidoli. The instigator retweeted the stolen data, spreading it further.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Riassumiamo come una banda di fanatici idioti sono arrivati a commettere un abuso e chi è il vero responsabile e istigatore. Il 5 aprile il vicedirettore e "fact-checker" di Open mi denigra, come sempre, e com'è nel suo metodo lancia l'esca per istigare il doxing. Thread https://t.co/UDQxA8XoqA

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Come vediamo, risponde il materiale responsabile dell'abuso, che il più furbo ha mandato avanti a farsi male, come l'idiota del villaggio in un campo di mine. Il mandante minaccia e l'esecutore aggiunge le intimazioni: "Ti ho mandato tutto su di lui." https://t.co/YLOKeplwik

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Si aggiunge l'idiota del villaggio globale che integra le intimidazioni facendo credere di avermi hackerato l'account o di volerlo fare. Peccato non l'abbia fatto perché l'unica cosa che avrebbe scoperto è cosa pensiamo realmente di loro ma non possiamo dire pubblicamente. https://t.co/r84WvzqtX7

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Per mesi, mandante, esecutore, idiota del villaggio e un (ormai ex) conduttore TG, mi hanno molestato con ossessive denigrazioni, minacce e intimidazioni, culminate con la pubblicazione della foto che credevano fosse la mia abitazione che invece era quella della vittima. https://t.co/mb3zoilSF9

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Che il vicedirettore di Open sia il maggiore responsabile di quello che è successo è dimostrato da questi tweet del 7 e del 21 ottobre in cui pubblica una particolare della foto della vittima a scopo intimidatorio. https://t.co/mBDZlafYlS

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Se non ci fosse stata l'incredibile coincidenza che l'amica della vittima è anche amica e collega dei responsabili dell'abuso, se non fosse intervenuta tempestivamente anche il mandante avrebbe probabilmente completato il suo progetto. https://t.co/fI2GhUzoCP

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Il mandate che oltre ad essere un incapace, un denigratore e un molestatore, è anche un grande codardo. Invece di assumersi le proprie responsabilità per la caccia all'uomo che aveva aperto, si defila con giustificazioni patetiche: Io non c'ero e se c'ero dormivo. https://t.co/paxcBFarjp

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Dovrebbe spiegare cosa significa "Quel nome, di fatto, non è mai stato segnalato a loro", dopo la coincidenza di aver pubblicato le stesse foto della stessa persona a distanza di pochi giorni. Sono amici, stanno lavorando alla stessa "caccia all'uomo" e non hanno "fatto nomi"? https://t.co/9PetR1QoeR

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. La prova che questo è il suo metodo: Per una sua personale ossessione contro chi non la pensa come lui, apre la caccia ai titolari di @UltimeNotizie citando @RinaldoSidoli. Gli hacker violano il sito di Sidoli, rubano i suoi dati e li pubblicano. Lui li ritwitta diffondendoli. https://t.co/d1UgWnY0hq

ChanceGardiner
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 5:00 AM
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 11:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
DLA Piper, a legal firm, is linked to Open, a fact-checking organization. They represent Pfizer in a fraud case. Open defends Heineken, and Facebook censors posts against Heineken based on Open's fact-checking. Giampiero Falasca of DLA Piper is a partner in Open and works for Calenda's Action. DLA Piper previously represented Pfizer in an acquisition. In 2023, DLA Piper and Pfizer form a pro bono partnership.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Open ha sede legale presso DLA Piper, che l'ha fatta nascere. Falasca di DLA Piper è socio di Mentana in Open. DLA Piper è lo studio legale che difende Pfizer nella causa per frode nello studio clinico, intentata da Brook Jackson, responsabile del trial di Pfizer. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Thread N° 1

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Si scrive Open di Mentana, ma si legge DLA Piper, lobby Dem finanziatore di Hillary e Obama. Si scrive Facebook, ma si legge Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet primi azionisti. Si scrive Pfizer e Moderna, ma si legge Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet primi azionisti. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Thread N° 2

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Approfittiamo dell'interessamento del Prof. @RicPuglisi per il curriculum di Dario Fabbri, direttore della rivista DOMINO di Open GOL di Mentana, per allegare altre domande su Open a cui il direttore di @FrancoBechis non ha ancora risposto. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Thread N° 3

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Si scrive "Open di Mentana" ma si legge "finanziata da Facebook". Se cercate l'indirizzo della sede di Open, ci trovate la DLA Piper. Se cercate i soci di Mentana, trovate "Giampiero Falasca della DLA Piper che ha versato 100 euro (CENTO euro) per l'1% delle quote." Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Thread N° 4

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. "Fact-checker" di Facebook di cui sono primi azionisti Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet, verifica e smentisce gli articoli scientifici contro i VACClNl di Pfizer, Moderna e Johnson & Johnson di cui sono primi azionisti Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet. 🤣 Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Thread N° 5 - "La lobby"

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Partendo dall'affermazione di @ElenaBasileIT sulla "lobby ebraica", facciamo un'analisi statistica sulle posizioni di vertice dei poteri indirettamente legati a Open. — È ½ ebreo Enrico Mentana capo di Open. — È ebreo Mark Zuckerberg per cui lavora Open. Thread

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why the American political situation is influenced by Israeli and Jewish lobbies. They suggest that Europe could potentially do something different.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Come mai siamo arrivati a questa situazione vogliamo chiederci se la politica americana è necessariamente così condizionata come il dottor Nisa benissimo dalle lobby israeliana, dalle lobby ebraiche. Sia pure l'Europa potrebbe scusi l'Europa fare qualcosa di diverso

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. DLA Piper rappresenta Heineken. Open difende Heineken. Facebook censura i post contro Heineken sulla base del "fact-checking di Open.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

DLA Piper rappresenta Heineken. Coincidenza, Open fa un "fact-checking" surreale su Heineken. 🤡 Sulla base del "fact-cheking" di Open, Facebook censura chi critica Heineken e la sua Birra Messina. https://www.dlapiper.com/en-eu/news/2023/10/dla-piper-advises-heineken-on-a-significant-minority-investment-in-served-drinks https://www.thelawyer.com/dla-piper-appointed-as-principal-legal-adviser-to-heineken-uk/ https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/dla-piper-advises-heineken-uk-on-proposed-acquisition-of-1900-strong-pub-portfolio

DLA Piper advises Heineken on a significant minority investment in SERVED Drinks | DLA Piper DLA Piper has advised Heineken UK on the acquisition of a significant minority stake in SERVED, an award-winning ready-to-drink cocktail and Seltzer brand. dlapiper.com
DLA Piper appointed as principal legal adviser to Heineken UK DLA Piper has been appointed as principal external legal adviser to Heineken UK in a first for the UK brewing and pub giant. The three-year appointment will see… thelawyer.com
DLA Piper advises HEINEKEN UK on proposed acquisition of 1,900-strong pub portfolio John McKinlay DLA Piper is advising HEINEKEN UK on its proposed acquisition of Punch Securitisation A, a portfolio of approximately 1,900 UK pubs owned by Punch Taverns plc (enterprise value £1.15 billion). scottishlegal.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper socio di Open di Mentana, responsabile del lavoro di Azione di Calenda.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper è diventato socio di almeno l'1% di Open versando 100 euro (cento) di capitale sociale. Fino all'agosto 2022 era Responsabile del Lavoro di Azione di Calenda. Falasca promuove "il rispetto della diversità di genere": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diQoP3rIwEM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper socio di Open di Mentana, responsabile del lavoro di Azione di Calenda, rappresentava Almaviva.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Quindi, Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper che ha fatto nascere Open di Mentana di cui Falasca è socio, ha lavorato per Almaviva per il contenzioso dei licenziamenti, mentre era il Responsabile del Lavoro di Azione di Calenda che aveva finto di trattare per non farli licenziare? 🤡

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Il "fact-checker" vicedirettore di Open, dispensatore di opere buone per Calenda.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

29. Sempre per sottolineare la sua lontanaza dai politici, trascorre il suo tempo registrando siti internet per Calenda, per cui Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper e socio di Open ricopriva il ruolo di Responsabile del lavoro di Azione.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. DLA Piper aveva già rappresentato Pfizer nel 2014 per l'acquisizione del ramo VACClNl di Baxter. https://ceelegalmatters.com/austria/861-dla-piper-confirms-role-in-pfizer-acquisition-from-baxter https://youtu.be/lldtGBo9zj8?si=9MyFkcLkOHRze01e

DLA Piper Confirms Role in Pfizer Acquisition from Baxter DLA Piper Confirms Role in Pfizer Acquisition from Baxter ceelegalmatters.com

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. — 2023: "DLA Piper – Pfizer, la partnership pro bono." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lldtGBo9zj8

ChanceGardiner
Posted - October 22, 2023 at 7:19 PM
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 10:58 AM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Open ha sede presso DLA Piper, che l'ha fatta nascere. Falasca di DLA Piper è socio di Mentana in Open. Brook Jackson, responsabile del trial di Pfizer, ha denunciato Pfizer per frode nel loro studio clinico. DLA Piper è lo studio legale che difende Pfizer nella causa. Thread https://t.co/UFXmgjCQqO

ChanceGardiner
Posted - September 28, 2023 at 3:41 AM
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 10:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fact-checking the safety of vaccines is crucial, but it's important to consider the sources. The fact-checker in question relies on EMA, funded by Big Pharma, which authorized vaccines. They downplay the risks, calling a 1 in 10,000 myocarditis case "rare." They also cite Pfizer's data, which underestimates adverse events. The study by Martina Patone is flawed, analyzing only 2021 data. In reality, myocarditis is more prevalent in young males. Even FDA's Dr. Offit is surprised by the high number of cases. It's clear that unbiased sources are needed, as FDA and EMA have financial ties to Big Pharma. The influence of pharmaceutical companies on regulatory bodies is concerning, with Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J's top shareholders being Vanguard, BlackRock, and StateStreet, who also invest in Facebook and fund fact-checkers. Reliable data from Korea shows a significant number of myocarditis cases. Trustworthy information is crucial when it comes to public health.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Il "fact-checker" di Open di @FrancoBechis, ripetendo la narrazione di EMA finanziata all'89% da Big Pharma a cui ha autorizzato VACClNl, dunque responsabile degli eventi avversi, definisce "molto RARE" una 1 miocardite su 10.000. 🤡 Certo, finché non è loro figlio. Thread https://t.co/DEf8M60lak

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Poi, come fonte "assolutamente imparziale" 🤡 cita pure i documenti di Pfizer che riporta dati largamente sottostimati anche rispetto a studi recenti con dati estremamente prudenti. Ovviamente parlano del proprio VACClNO e non di quello di Moderna con dati ancora peggiori. https://t.co/RKBRGToQXr

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Della serie "Oste, com'è il vino?", il "fact-checker" continua a citare EMA (e AIFA) come fonte imparziale, che ovviamente imparziale non può essere perché finanziata all'89% da Big Pharma e perché se avesse autorizzato dei farmaci pericolosi ne sarebbe responsabile. https://t.co/JtifPEFxzH

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Infine il "fact-checker" cita come prova lo studio della cara Martina Patone, che è quella che twittò: "Ho abortito e sto benissimo. Ma sarei stata meglio se non mi fossi dovuta alzare all’alba." https://t.co/WLTfEyNuev

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Lo studio della Patone analizza solo il 2021, dunque superato. Nella prima pubblicazione lasciarono credere che la miocardite non era così frequente, ma i dati erano falsati perché analizzavano l'intera popolazione, mentre la miocardite colpisce soprattutto i giovani maschi. https://t.co/NwmAETBjDG

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Nella precisazioni successive, scorporando i dati nei maschi sotto i 40 anni, scrivono chiaramente che la miocardite da VACClNO è molto più rilevante di quella da infezione, con 101 casi contro 7 dopo Moderna. https://t.co/hbK5MBbkd0

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Notate che anche nel documento AIFA citato dal "piccolo genio" del "fact-checking", che definisce "molto raro" 1 miocardite su 10.000, appare riferito al totale dai 12 anni e non scorporato per sesso ed età. Come fare una statistica sulle vaginiti includendo pure gli uomini. https://t.co/CMTej659Me

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Anche il Dr. Paul Offit di FDA che ha autorizzato i VACClNl e consigliato la VACClNAZlONE anche dei neonati dai 6 mesi, oggi si dice sorpreso dall'elevato numero di miocarditi e che gli esiti si potranno vedere solo tra 5, 10 o 15 anni. https://t.co/CNpAHJPEQe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker wants the CDC to provide more specific information about who is being hospitalized and dying from COVID-19, including their ages, comorbidities, vaccination status, and antiviral use. They also suggest studying the long-term effects of T-cell frequencies. The speaker shares their personal experience with vaccinations and T-cell frequencies. They express concern about the potential downsides of getting a different COVID booster every year, mentioning the rare possibility of adverse effects like myocarditis. They believe it is important to weigh the risks and benefits when the benefits of vaccination are not clear.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I mean, Speaker 1: I think what what what the CDC needs to do is they need to tell us who is getting hospitalized this year and specific and who's dying. What are their ages? What exactly are their comorbidities? Did they get a vaccine? If so, when was their last dose? Most importantly, did they take an antiviral? Which I think, doctor Griffin on, his clinical updates consistently makes that point about how we tend to overlook that. And, and who are they? And and then in in concert with academic immunologists, I would like to see a sort of a more longitudinal look and how frequencies of t cells, especially cytotoxic t cells are holding up over time. I mean, I'll take myself as an example. I've had 3 doses of the Wuhan one strain. My last dose was in November of 2021. I had a a mild two day infection in in, May of 2022 with what was probably a VA two strand because that was prominent time. I think I'm protected. I didn't get last year's bivalent vaccine. I'm not getting this year's vaccine because I think I have high frequencies of t cells. Maybe I'm wrong. I mean, will I would like the academic immunologists in concerts with CDC epidemiologists to answer those questions. Speaker 0: And also many people say, alright. I understand your arguments, but what's the downside for getting a different COVID booster every year. Is there is there any? Speaker 1: Right. And actually, that's that's one thing that kind of bothers me a lot is that when people say, well, there's no downside. First of all, any any time you take any medicine or any biological, there's a downside. If it has an upside, they'll have a downside. The downside may be rare. It may be, very rare, but nonetheless, there's always an answer. And we're gonna find out about this this vaccine over time. It is a novel strategy. We certainly were surprised by myocarditis in pericarditis. And we'll see whether or not over time, you know, when we're 5 years into this, 10 years into this, 15 years into this, whether there's any evidence of residual myocardial disease. Because the reason you have myocarditis is you're making immune response to your own heart muscle. I mean, it appears to be generally transient and short lived, but there's invariably a spectrum of disease, and and we'll find out about that over time. And and I think it's perfectly willing to do reasonable to take those risks if the benefits are clear. But when the benefits aren't clear, then it's not so reasonable to take risk, even rare

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. I ricercatori accusano FDA e EMA di aver autorizzato VACClNl non sicuri. Per smentirli i "fact-checker" citano FDA e EMA come fonte. 🤪 C'è ancora chi non capisce che chi è parte in causa e ha l'interesse di nascondere i propri errori e non può essere una fonte imparziale. https://t.co/k5Y7za7SMY

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. Big Pharma finanzia FDA al 65% e EMA all'89% che gli autorizzano i loro farmaci. I primi azionisti di Pfizer, Moderna e J&J sono Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet, che sono anche i primi azionisti di Facebook, che usa e certifica i "fact-checker" tramite IFCN che finanzia. https://t.co/HWgxhKtfnL

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. I dati di EMA sono inattendibili. Lo studio in Corea che con dati prudenti, riporta 1.533 miocarditi segnalate di cui 480 sicuramente correlate e 21 decessi al dicembre 2021 su 44,2 milioni di VACClNATl. Solo 5 decessi in tutta l'UE, anche se al maggio 2021, non è plausibile. https://t.co/krqrjGg7en

ChanceGardiner
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 10:32 PM
Saved - September 19, 2023 at 5:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fact-checkers funded by Vanguard, BlackRock, and StateStreet, who are major shareholders in Facebook, debunk scientific articles against Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines. These same shareholders also have significant stakes in Meta (formerly Facebook), Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Alphabet (Google). The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) certifies Facebook's fact-checkers, including Open and Facta in Italy, which are funded by Soros, Facebook, Google, Luminate, Pierre Omidyar, Biden, and the US State Department. Google, a funder of IFCN, promotes Open as the top fact-checking result, protecting its own interests. Open, led by Mentana, is associated with DLA Piper, a major supporter of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and has ties to Kamala Harris's husband. (499 characters)

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. "Fact-checker" di Facebook di cui sono primi azionisti Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet, verifica e smentisce gli articoli scientifici contro i VACClNl di Pfizer, Moderna e Johnson & Johnson di cui sono primi azionisti Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet. 🤣 Thread https://t.co/gxK44nZI09

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Primi azionisti di Meta/Facebook: Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet https://t.co/sfq3wuhdZG

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Primi azionisti di Pfizer: Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet https://t.co/42Kojy79Yd

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Primi azionisti di Moderna: Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet https://t.co/3vY3dxt2Bg

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Primi azionisti di Johnson & Johnson: Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet https://t.co/TfYXKZziDq

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Primi azionisti di Alphabet/Google: Vanguard, BlackRock e StateStreet https://t.co/mHr2RPouM8

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. IFCN (International Fact-Checking Network) di Poynter, che certifica i "fact-checker" di Facebook come Open e Facta in Italia, è finanziato da Soros, Facebook, Google, Luminate di Pierre Omidyar - tutti finanziatori di Biden e Dem - più il NED (Dipartimento di Stato USA). https://t.co/2qZ86zqLhl

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Google che finanzia IFCN che certifica Open, spinge il "fact-checking" Open come primo risultato per ogni argomento che colpisca gli interessi protetti da Google. https://t.co/i8rF3cQNqg

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Open di Mentana ha sede legale presso lo studio internazionale di consulenze DLA Piper, primo finanziatore di Hillary Clinton, 12° finanziatore di Barack Obama. DLA Piper ha tra i suoi soci Douglas Emhoff marito di Kamala Harris. Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper è socio di Open. https://t.co/k6l9ixxlLy

ChanceGardiner
Posted - September 3, 2023 at 1:56 PM
Saved - September 3, 2023 at 4:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Open GOL, a media outlet, faces scrutiny over its director and financial ties. Questions arise about the director's qualifications and the company's independence. Open claims its employees can't be affiliated with political parties, yet one of its directors was linked to a political figure. The fact-checkers' credentials are also questioned, as they lack relevant expertise. Open's funding sources, including Facebook, remain undisclosed. Concerns about its independence arise as it is certified by IFCN, funded by Soros and others. Open's affiliation with a network of fact-checkers raises ethical concerns about information manipulation. Additionally, financial ties to major corporations and political figures raise questions about its impartiality. The company's location at DLA Piper, linked to the Clintons and arms manufacturers, further adds to the potential conflicts of interest. Open's lack of transparency regarding these connections is troubling. (499 characters)

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Approfittiamo dell'interessamento del Prof. @RicPuglisi per il curriculum di Dario Fabbri, direttore della rivista DOMINO di Open GOL di Mentana, per allegare altre domande su Open a cui il direttore di @FrancoBechis non ha ancora risposto. Thread https://t.co/G647o4ghvC

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Perché Open GOL di Mentana ha sede presso DLA Piper e perché Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper è potuto diventare socio all'1% di Open GOL versando solo 100 euro su 10.000 euro di capitale sociale? https://t.co/WB6zGRTVQc

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Perché Open afferma che i loro dipendenti non possono essere iscritti a partiti, ma Giampiero Falasca di DLA Piper, socio all'1% di Open GOL, fino all'agosto 2022 poteva essere Responsabile del Lavoro di Azione di Calenda? https://t.co/mu66MeGdAF

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Quali sue qualifiche sono state determinanti per Alice Mentana per diventare CEO di Open GOL? Il liceo Quirino o il Lycée Chateaubriand? https://t.co/8UrqPAQcSZ

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. In che modo un GEOMETRA che non è riuscito a conseguire una laurea può essere il "fact-checker scientifico" di Open, e sulla base dei suoi "fact-checking" Facebook può CENSURARE e sospendere senza appello anche scienziati qualificati? https://t.co/f2QgUwoBBM

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. In che modo un diplomato all'Istituto d'Arte che ha impiegato 12 anni per conseguire una laurea TRIENNALE in Tecnologie Multimediali, può effettuare il "fact-checking" sullo scibile umano, e sulla base dei suoi "fact-checking" Facebook può CENSURARE e sospendere senza appello? https://t.co/tXnTXP4a7R

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. In che modo è garantita l'indipendenza di un "fact-checker" che è stato militante dell’Italia dei Valori di Di Pietro, dipendente grillino di Casaleggio, collaboratore della Presidente Boldrini e del Governo Conte 2, frequentatore dei meeting presso Open Society di Soros? https://t.co/6z3yTAeBGH

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. A quanto ammontano i finanziamenti di Facebook a Open? Dove possono essere consultati dei bilanci trasparenti di Open sulle proprie fonti di finanziamento? https://t.co/Ho3qkwjs8X

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. In che modo è garantita l'Indipendenza di Open che viene certificato come "fact-checker" da IFCN di Poynter, finanziato da Soros, Facebook, Google, Dipartimento di Stato USA, Luminate di Pierre Omidyar (ritenuta una copertura dell'intelligence USA) e altre "fondazioni" Dem? https://t.co/dPcJm5IXDx

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. In che modo Open ritiene etico fare "giornalismo indipendente" facendo parte di un enorme network di "fact-checker" che è a tutti gli effetti un colossale sistema lobbistico di pressione sull'informazione, per spingere determinate narrazioni e CENSURA quelle sgradite? https://t.co/J4ZvXzUKcw

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. BlackRock, Vanguard e State Street sono secondi azionisti di Facebook con il 19% e di Google con il 16,6%, che finanziano IFCN che "certifica" Open, ma anche di Pfizer con il 21,9%. In che modo Open garantisce l'indipendenza da chi gestisce un patrimonio decine di TRILIONI? https://t.co/9XBPXdjZtD

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. DLA Piper presso cui ha sede Open, è legata a Hillary Clinton, Fondazione Clinton e Clinton Global Initiative, che hanno tra i finanziatori i maggiori produttori di armamenti USA che si arricchiscono con la guerra in Ucraina. Perché Open non si libera da TUTTI questi legami? https://t.co/t6xHAY8ZpG

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

13. DLA Piper ha finanziato con $ 496.700 la campagna presidenziale di Bill Clinton nel 2008, con $ 700.530 le sue campagne al Senato, con $495.550 la campagna presidenziale di Hillary. Come mai Open ha così tanti potenziali conflitti di interessi ma non informa i propri lettori? https://t.co/z27lYRUovH

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 24, 2023 at 2:04 PM
Saved - August 30, 2023 at 10:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Weather stations with self-heating solar panels near the sensors are raising concerns. Examples include the Botanical Garden in Florence, Siena Botanical Garden, Gallarate Licei dei Tigli, Foligno Scarpellini, Forl Turoni, Piacenza Val Tidone, Asti CastellArfero, Asti CastellArfero, Asti Tanaro, and Asti Castagnole delle Lanze. These stations have solar panels placed close to the sensors, potentially affecting temperature readings. Additionally, some stations have sensors inside steel cages or on steel poles. The issue is observed in various regions, including Tuscany and Piedmont.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Faro alogeno. Posizionamento sulla strada. "Picco di 41,4°C all'Orto Botanico di Firenze." https://lanazione.it/firenze/cronaca/caldo-allorto-botanico-picco-di-414-siamo-a-un-passo-dal-record-del-luglio-83-e7564ab8 Stazione meteo di Firenze Orto Botanico⤵️

Caldo, all’Orto Botanico picco di 41,4 Siamo a un passo dal record del luglio ’83 L’ondata di calore non molla la presa: massima attenzione per gli anziani lanazione.it

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Stazione meteo di Siena Orto Botanico⤵️ https://t.co/4J1yXCjBGp

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Stazione meteo di Siena Orto Botanico⤵️ https://t.co/nx6Guk4KiB

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Dentro gabbia di acciaio da pollaio. Stazione meteo di Gallarate Licei dei Tigli⤵️ https://t.co/1UIDteOSAB

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Accanto al parcheggio. Stazione meteo di Foligno Scarpellini⤵️ https://t.co/b7Fehw405K

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Stazione meteo di Forlì Turoni⤵️ https://t.co/RvtsXhL1U8

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Stazione meteo di Piacenza Val Tidone⤵️ https://t.co/l7BKxIETsQ

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Stazione meteo di Asti Castell'Arfero⤵️ https://t.co/WXHRlH0qI0

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Stazione meteo di Asti Castell'Arfero⤵️ https://t.co/YxDRfQpLro

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Stazione meteo di Asti Tanaro⤵️ https://t.co/gvQWckSdPa

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con pannello solare vicino al sensore. Tutte le stazioni trovate di Arpa Piemonte hanno questa configurazione con pannello solare sopra il sensore. Stazione meteo di Asti Castagnole delle Lanze⤵️ https://t.co/9JusgEUROS

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. Speciale meraviglie della Truffa Climatica Stazioni meteo auto-riscaldanti con sensore su palo di acciaio. Stazione ufficiale della Regione Toscana. Stazione meteo di Arezzo Montecchio di Subbiano⤵️ https://t.co/lyGQEW5xVf

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 30, 2023 at 3:45 AM
Saved - August 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study on Ivermectin failed to demonstrate its effectiveness against COVID-19 symptoms. No adverse events were reported, even with higher doses. In comparison, Pfizer's Paxlovid must be taken within 5 days. The study recruited during a low Omicron positivity period, accepting rapid tests as proof of infection. However, the true number of COVID-19 cases and patients following the protocol remains uncertain. Trust is placed in the delivery of Ivermectin to patients.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. Un altro studio sull'lVERMECTlN progettato per FALLIRE. Data dopo 7 giorni di sintomi con punte di 11 giorni. Notate: Nessuno evento avverso in più rispetto al placebo anche con dose doppia/tripla di 600 μg/kg per 6 giorni rispetto allo standard. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2801827

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Per un confronto: Paxlovid di Pfizer va assunto entro 5 giorni. ACTIV-6 è uno studio "fai da te". Ti mandano i farmaci a casa e lo gestisci da solo. Ricercatori finanziati da Gilead che produce il Remdesivir, NIH di Fauci, Pfizer, Merck, AstraZeneca e mezza Big Pharma. https://t.co/rqofe1k0CR

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Lo studio ha reclutato durante un periodo di bassa positività al test omicron e ha accettato un test rapido positivo come prova sufficiente di infezione. Considerati i tassi di falsi positivi dichiarati per i RAT, molti pazienti potrebbero non aver nemmeno avuto il COVlD. https://t.co/u3NUhayahm

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. In altre parole: non sappiamo quanti pazienti hanno effettivamente avuto il COVlD. Non sappiamo quanti pazienti hanno effettivamente assunto il farmaco come descritto nel protocollo. Dobbiamo credere sulla fiducia che gli hanno veramente mandato l'lVERMECTlN.

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 28, 2023 at 5:00 PM
Saved - August 28, 2023 at 6:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Digital Services Act (DSA) regulates EU web censorship. During crises, online platform providers may need to urgently adopt specific measures. These measures include content moderation, algorithmic adjustments, and cooperation with reliable fact-checkers. The EU Commission can enforce rapid crisis response protocols. Platforms must inform authorities promptly about actions taken in response to injunctions. Immediate reporting of illegal activities to the EU is required. Suspension of services to frequent violators is necessary. Efficient cooperation and assistance to monitoring organizations are crucial. Access to necessary data for audits should be granted. Objective sources like recognized research studies should be utilized. Complaints regarding compliance can be filed with the service coordinator. The EU Commission has exclusive power to monitor and enforce systemic risk management obligations for large service providers. For a concise summary of the DSA, visit: [link].

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

67 pagine di Digital Services Act (DSA) che regola la censura UE del web. "In TEMPI di CRISI i fornitori di piattaforme online potrebbero DOVER adottare con URGENZA misure specifiche, oltre a misure che adottano per altri OBBLIGHI derivanti dal presente regolamento." Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. "Tali CRISI possono derivare da conflitti armati, terrorismo, disastri naturali, nonché pandemie e altre gravi minacce alla salute pubblica. La Commissione UE, dovrebbe essere in grado di IMPORRE di avviare una risposta urgente alla crisi."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. "Le misure possono includere: moderazione dei contenuti, adeguamento dei termini di servizi, sistemi algoritmici e cooperazione con SEGNALATORI affidabili (🤡), aumentare le misure, promuovere informazioni affidabili e adattare la progettazione delle loro interfacce online."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. "Oltre alla risposta alle CRISI, la Commissione UE può avviare protocolli di crisi per garantire una risposta rapida. Quando si abusa per la diffusione di contenuti illegali o DISINFORMAZIONE, o quando emerge la necessità di una rapida diffusione di informazioni affidabili."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. "Al ricevimento di un'ingiunzione, i prestatori di servizi informano l'autorità di emissione senza indugio, del provvedimento adottato in risposta all'ordinanza, specificando se e quando, il provvedimento è stato adottato."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. "Inoltre, se le piattaforme online vengono a conoscenza di persone che commettono reati o pubblicano contenuti illegali, dovranno avvisare immediatamente l'UE in modo che possa intraprendere azioni immediate."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. "I fornitori di piattaforme online sospendono per un periodo ragionevole, la fornitura dei loro servizi ai destinatari che forniscono frequentemente contenuti manifestamente illegali."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. "Per garantire che i controlli siano effettuati in modo tempestivo, efficace ed efficiente, i fornitori di piattaforme online dovrebbero fornire le risorse necessarie di cooperazione e assistenza alle organizzazioni che effettuano i controlli."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. "Dando al controllore l'accesso a tutti i dati necessari per svolgere correttamente il controllo, compresi, ove applicabile, i dati relativi ai sistemi algoritmici, e rispondendo a domande orali o scritte."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. "I revisori dovrebbero anche essere in grado di utilizzare altre fonti di informazione oggettive, come studi condotti da ricercatori riconosciuti. I fornitori di piattaforme online molto non dovrebbero ostacolare lo svolgimento dei controlli."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. "Per l'efficace applicazione degli obblighi previsti dalregolamento, le persone o organizzazioni rappresentative dovrebbero poter presentare un reclamo in merito all'adempimento di tali obblighi al coordinatore del servizio nel territorio in cui hanno ricevuto il servizio."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. "La Commissione UE dovrebbe avere il potere esclusivo di monitorare e far rispettare l’obbligo aggiuntivo di gestire il rischio sistemico imposto da questo regolamento ai fornitori di servizi di grandi dimensioni."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

13. SINTESI del Digital Services Act (DSA) che regola la censura UE del web. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022R2065

Page Not Found - EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu
ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 27, 2023 at 4:01 PM
Saved - August 27, 2023 at 4:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Factcheckers are accused of being regime servants, contributing to the decomposition of journalism. They are seen as globalists, politicians, and financiers disguising propaganda as independent verification. While claiming impartiality, they often confirm the regime's version, relying on regime sources. Factcheckers are deemed narcissistic, morally superior, and lacking critical thinking. They form a self-protective network, certified by IFCN and funded by Soros, Google, and Facebook. Their actions fuel censorship and disregard freedom of speech. Factcheckers defend established powers like the EU, NATO, and BigTech, aligning with mainstream narratives. They play a significant role in shaping public opinion and political decisions. Their decisions consistently favor the mainstream and puppet governments. Despite contorting reality, factcheckers conform to power, reminiscent of Judas Iscariot. They exhibit a tendency for denunciation, misinterpreting social media terms as criminal offenses.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

1. "Fact-checker" è il nuovo sinonimo per "servo di regime". Il giornalismo è morto, i "fact-checker" sono i batteri che lo stanno portando alla decomposizione. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Globalisti, grande finanza e politici che guidano la narrazione dei media di regime, consapevoli che i cittadini hanno smesso di credere alle loro narrazioni e bugie, si sono inventati la "verifica dei fatti" per travestire la loro propaganda da "verifica indipendente".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Immancabilmente i "fact-checking" si concludono confermando la versione del regime, salvo quelle rare eccezioni che gli servono per dare una parvenza di "imparzialità", quando un fatto è talmente enorme ed evidente da non poterlo nascondere perché già dimostrato da altri.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Il "fact-checking" non può che concludersi confermando la versione di regime, visto che come "fonte indipendente" usano quella del regime stesso, di media di regime, giornalisti di regime, scienziati di regime, professori di regime, organizzazioni di regime, etc. di regime.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. I "fact-checker" sono gli stessi narcisisti autoritari in ogni paese che affermano di avere poteri speciali per discernere la verità. Questo perché la caratteristica indispendabile per essere un "fact-checker" è essere un utile idiota con una cultura approssimativa.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. La prova evidente che i "fact-checker" sono degli utili idioti, è che se non lo fossero si renderebbero conto di servire e arricchire il regime per solo trenta denari. I "fact-checker" si dividono in due categorie: L'utile idiota puro e il fanatico globalista ideologizzato.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. I "fact-checker" sono fermamente convinti di essere moralmente superiore al resto dell'umanità. Di questa convizione se ne vantano spesso in pubblico, arrivando al punto di "provarlo" con "fact-checking" che fanno se stessi, confermando così che di essere degli utili idioti.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. I "fact-checker" vivono in un eterno circolo vizioso. Primi del pensiero critico che mette in dubbio le "fonti ufficiali, cercano le "fonti indipendenti" su Google che è quello che li finanzia e che le fonti indipendenti le censura, anche grazie ai loro "fact-checking".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Altre "fonti indipendenti" dei "fact-checker" sono gli altri "fact-checker". Sono a tutti gli effetti una loggia massonica in cui si proteggono l'un l'altro. Invece del grembiule massonico, amano esibire il logo di IFCN che li certifica, finanziata da Soros, Google e Facebook.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. Uno dei segni di riconoscimento dei "fact-checker" è l'enorme coda di paglia che si incendia per autocombustione quando giurano l'indipendenza dalle organizzazioni di Soros, nonostante lavorino eslusivamente per aver ricevuto la "certificazione" di IFCN finanziata da Soros.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. La coda di paglia gli si incendia quotidianamente quando giurano indignati minacciando querela, di non avere la responsabilità per la censura di Facebook, anche se gli forniscono i "fact-checking" che sanno che verrà utilizzato come scusa per censurare la libertà di pensiero.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. I "fact-checker" sono i paladini della libertà di pensiero, purché il pensiero corrisponda al loro. Conoscono a memoriale le regole dei social in cui si autorizzano a censurare chi vogliono, ma non hanno mai letto o capito l'Art. 21 della Costituzione sulla libertà di parola.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

13. Il "fact-checker" è un animale sociale che ama i meeting onanistici con altri "fact-checker". Pur di cercare la compagnia dei suoi simili, a volte è così distratto da ritrovarsi a propria insaputa a meeting presso sedi di organizzazioni di Soros, che poi giurerà di odiare.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

14. Il "fact-checker" di razza ha una vera e propria adorazione per tutto ciò che rappresenta il potere costituito di UE e NATO. Non c'è nulla di troppo sporco che provenga da UE e NATO, che il "fact-checker" non sia disposto a difendere con i propri "fact-checking".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

15. Il "fact-checker" adora difendere qualsiasi potere costituito. Si tratti di Biden, Hillary, Soros, Bill Gates, Fauci, Dem USA, WEF, ONU, OMS, EMA, FDA, CDC, BigPharma o BigTech, il "fact-checker" è sempre pronto sull'attenti a difenderli facendo scudo con il proprio corpo.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

16. Il potere costituito il "fact-checker" lo pagherebbe oro per le sue salvifiche difese, però siccome è un utile idiota, lo fa quasi gratuitamente. Il "fact-checker" non occorre corromperlo, perchè è nella sua intima natura conformarsi al potere come Fantozzi al mega direttore.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

17. "Il fact-checking ha assunto recentemente un ruolo importante nel pilotare le masse e le decisioni politiche. Innalzati al rango di "giudici" supremi della verità decidono cosa sia una fake news e cosa no. Cosa sia da tenere in considerazione e cosa sia da scartare."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

18. "Stranamente le loro decisioni convergono ineluttabilmente, con rarissime eccezioni, sempre con la visione del mainstream e del pensiero unico ovvero della politica mondiale fatta di governi fantoccio che eseguono semplicemente gli ordini ricevuti da altri."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

19. "Proprio come i governi fantoccio citati, anche i fact-checker identicamente si comportano, conformandosi anche a costo di dover fare i salti mortali per spiegare l'inverosimile, fino a raggiungere vette di ridicolaggine assoluta che rasentano la vergogna." - Sir Lancillotto

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

20. Il primo "fact-checker" noto si chiamava Giuda Iscariota. Per trenta denari d'argento confermò che Gesù non era il Messia, usando come fonte indipendente i sommi sacerdoti. A quel tempo i "fact-checking" venivano ancora pagati bene.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

21. Come Giuda anche il "fact-checker" contemporaneo ha la naturale propensione alla delazione. Crede che i Termini di Servizio dei social sia il Codice Penale, e si vanta di segnalare alle autorità tutti quelli "violano" quei reati immaginari che esistono solo nella sua testa.

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 26, 2023 at 11:14 PM
Saved - August 27, 2023 at 12:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Digital Services Act (DSA) of the EU violates fundamental rights enshrined in the Italian Constitution, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the US Constitution. These violations undermine freedom of expression and the right to communicate without interference. Ursula von der Leyen and Italy are accused of being dictators who fear freedom of thought.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Il Digital Services Act (DSA) dell'UE viola la Costituzione Italiana, la Carta dei Diritti Fondamentali dell'UE, la Dichiarazione Universale dei Diritti Umani e la Costituzione USA dove hanno sede i social. Chi viola i diritti fondamentali è un dittatore. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Costituzione Italiana, Art. 21 "Tutti hanno diritto di manifestare liberamente il proprio pensiero con la parola, lo scritto e ogni altro mezzo di diffusione. Si può procedere a sequestro soltanto per atto motivato dell'autorità giudiziaria."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Carta dei Diritti UE. Art. 10 e 11 "Ogni individuo ha diritto alla libertà di pensiero e di espressione. Include la libertà di opinione e di comunicare informazioni o idee senza che vi possa essere ingerenza da parte delle autorità pubbliche e senza limiti di frontiera."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Dichiarazione Universale dei Diritti Umani, Art. 18 e 19 "Ogni individuo ha diritto alla libertà di pensiero, opinione e espressione e di non essere molestato per la propria opinione. Di diffondere informazioni e idee attraverso ogni mezzo e senza riguardo a frontiere."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Primo Emendamento della Costituzione USA "Il Congresso non potrà emanare leggi per limitare la libertà di parola o di stampa o il diritto dei cittadini di riunirsi in forma pacifica e d’inviare petizioni al governo per la riparazione dei torti subiti."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Ursula von der Leyen, UE, Niden e Italia hanno sistematicamente violato questi diritti fondamentali dei loro cittadini, e ora stanno rendendo legge la violazione dei diritti costituzionali. Sono dei dittatori che come tutti i dittatori hanno paura della libertà di pensiero. https://t.co/L3r83AvXqN

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 26, 2023 at 6:46 PM
Saved - August 26, 2023 at 9:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On December 19, 1946, the Italian Constitution was approved. The President is elected for 7 years and cannot be reelected. Concerns arose regarding Enrico De Nicola's future election, so on October 22, 1947, the clause of non-reelection was removed. The President's role is not meant to be long-lasting, as it ensures their connection to reality and productivity. The term of 7 years was inspired by France's Constitution.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Quale Costituzione Italiana? Il 19 dicembre 1946 la Costituente votò e approvò: "Il Presidente della Repubblica è eletto per 7 anni e NON è rieleggibile." Thread https://t.co/mPg88teE2o

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Per la preoccupazione che ciò avrebbe creato problemi di interpretazione per la futura elezione a Presidente della Repubblica di Enrico De Nicola, che durante la Costituente era il Capo provvisorio dello Stato, il 22 ottobre 1947 cancellarono "NON è rieleggibile".

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Il Presidente Terracini specificò che comunque, "nella formula che è stata approvata, è implicito il criterio che NON possa essere MAI rieletto." https://legislature.camera.it/_dati/costituente/lavori/ii_sottocommissione_i_sezione/sed001/sed001nc.pdf

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Il 1º gennaio 1948 Enrico De Nicola viene eletto 1º Presidente della Repubblica Italiana, perchè, come puntualizzò Terracini il 19 dicembre 1946, De Nicola era stato solo il «Capo provvisorio dello Stato» dal 1º luglio 1946 e non aveva il titolo di Presidente della Repubblica.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Costituente, On. Nitti, 22 ottobre 1947: Le altre Costituzioni, oltre a fissare termini, ammettono o non ammettono la rielezione. Se si ammette che il Presidente possa essere rieletto, il termine di 4 anni è più che sufficiente. Noi vogliamo fare 7 anni perché c'è in Francia.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Nitti: La Francia volle adottare il termine di 7 anni, ma fece una Costituzione repubblicana con criteri monarchici, perché quella del 1875 fu una Costituzione scritta da monarchici, che lasciò al Presidente funzioni e attribuzioni piuttosto monarchiche che repubblicane.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Nitti: Credo anche che la scelta del Presidente debba essere fatta in tal modo da dargli sempre la sensazione che il suo ufficio non è duraturo, perché soltanto questa sensazione lo avvicina alla realtà. Più si allontana il Presidente dalla realtà e meno opere compie.

ChanceGardiner
Posted - August 13, 2023 at 2:28 PM
Saved - August 13, 2023 at 4:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: The Truth Behind Ukraine's Revolution: Unveiling the Manipulation and Hidden Agendas Introduction: In 2014, Ukraine experienced a significant turning point in its history, commonly referred to as a revolution. Contrary to the claims made by fact-checkers, it is crucial to understand the complex dynamics and hidden agendas that unfolded during this period. This article aims to shed light on the events surrounding the revolution, the role of various actors, and the manipulation of information by certain organizations. The People's Demand for Change: The Ukrainian government's actions in 2014 sparked widespread discontent among its citizens, who took to the streets in protest. These demonstrations were not a mere coup, as some fact-checkers suggest, but rather a genuine expression of the people's desire for change and a more democratic system. Propaganda Disguised as Truth: It is essential to acknowledge the influence of certain organizations, such as those financed by George Soros, in shaping the narrative surrounding the Ukrainian revolution. Fact-checkers, funded by Soros, disseminated propaganda disguised as truth, which aimed to manipulate public opinion and downplay the legitimate grievances of the Ukrainian people. The EuroMaidan Protests and Neo-Nazi Involvement: The EuroMaidan protests, a significant part of the revolution, witnessed the participation of various groups, including neo-Nazi militias and parties. While it is crucial to acknowledge their presence, it is equally important to avoid generalizations that overshadow the broader movement's goals and aspirations. The Orchestrated Massacre: One of the most tragic incidents during the revolution was the massacre that occurred. While the government was initially blamed for this violent crackdown, evidence has emerged suggesting the involvement of EuroMaidan snipers in orchestrating the bloodshed. This revelation challenges the prevailing narrative and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the events that unfolded. Foreign Backing and the Ousting of President Yanukovych: The opposition, supported by the United States and the European Union, played a significant role in the revolution's outcome. Their backing ultimately led to the ousting of President Yanukovych. It is crucial to acknowledge the involvement of these external actors, as their support had a profound impact on the revolution's trajectory. The Convenient Omission of NATO and Fact-Checkers' Involvement: While NATO and fact-checkers have been vocal in shaping the narrative surrounding the Ukrainian revolution, it is essential to question their own involvement in the uprising. The prevailing narrative conveniently ignores their role, which raises concerns about the impartiality and transparency of the information being disseminated. Conclusion: The Ukrainian revolution of 2014 was a pivotal moment in the country's history, driven by the genuine desire for change among its citizens. However, it is crucial to critically examine the events, actors, and narratives surrounding this revolution. By understanding the manipulation of information, hidden agendas, and the involvement of external actors, we can strive for a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of this significant chapter in Ukraine's history.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

Le balle del "fact-checker" con moglie ucraina di Open diretto da @FrancoBechis, certificato da IFCN finanziata da Soros, che scrive: "Ciò che è accaduto nel 2014 in Ucraina non fu un colpo di Stato, ma una rivoluzione (🤡) in quanto c’è stata una sollevazione popolare." Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

2. Prosegue 🤡: "Un azione civile che il governo Janukovyč tentò di reprimere con la forza, ottenendo come risultato ulteriori reazioni da parte dei cittadini ucraini. Furono le sue scelte a dare il via alle proteste di EuroMaidan, dopo aver interrotto le trattative con l’UE."

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

3. Abbiamo già visto le balle del "fact-checker" di Open GOL di cui è CEO Alice Mentana, che afferma: "In Ucraina è vietata la propaganda nazista". L'eroe nazionale dell'Ucraina è il leader dell'OUN Bandera, alleato e spia di Hitler. Thread

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

4. Open spaccia per "fact-cheking" il ripetere la propaganda dei media NATO spacciata per verità storica. Questo è il lavoro dei "fact-checker" di IFCN per ogni argomento che trattano: Rafforzare la narrazione usando quella stessa narrazione come fonte. https://www.open.online/2023/02/22/ucraina-2014-fake-colpo-stato-nazista-fc/

No! In Ucraina non c'è stato un colpo di Stato nel 2014 orchestrato sotto regia USA o Nato per instaurare un «regime nazista» A un anno dall'inizio dell'invasione su vasta scala della Russia in Ucraina, prosegue la narrazione fuorviante sull'origine del conflitto open.online

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

5. Prima di vedere cosa accadde nel 2014, vediamo cosa accadde nel 2017. Il 5 giugno 2017 la presidente Boldrini riceve Andriy Parubiy, leader dei nazisti ucraini di Svoboda a capo del golpe 2014 dell'EuroMaidan. Il 27 giugno 2017 il "fact-checker" collabora con la Boldrini.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

6. Cronologia del golpe 2014 in Ucraina dell'EuroMaidan Partiamo dalla fine: Nel febbraio 2018 la Corte Costituzionale Ucraina annullò la legge del 2012 del presidente Yanukovych che consentiva il russo come lingua ufficiale nelle regioni russofone di Donec'k e Luhans'k.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

7. Il 25 aprile 2019 il parlamento ucraino ratificò l'annullamento. Il 30 marzo 2012 l'Unione Europea e l'Ucraina avviarono un accordo di scambio commerciale. Il presidente Janukovyč esortò positivamente il parlamento ucraino ad adottare leggi che rispettassero i criteri UE.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

8. Il 14 agosto 2013 la Russia modificò le regole doganali sulle importazioni dall'Ucraina. Nel novembre 2013 l'ufficio di Statistica dell'Ucraina riferì di un calo del 4,9% della produzione industriale ucraina.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

9. Il premier ucraino Mykola Azarov riferì le condizioni estremamente severe di un prestito del Fondo Monetario Internazionale (FMI) presentate il 20 novembre 2013, che prevedevano grandi tagli al bilancio e un aumento obbligato del 40% delle bollette del gas degli ucraini.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

10. Il 21 novembre 2013 un decreto del governo ucraino sospese i preparativi per la firma dell'accordo di scambi commerciali con l'UE. Quella sera stessa del 21 novembre iniziarono in piazza Maidan a Kiev le proteste dell'EuroMaidan.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

11. Le proteste dell'EuroMaidan chiedevano le dimissioni del governo di Azarov e nuove elezioni presidenziali per cacciare il presidente Janukovyč, nonostante le nuove elezioni presidenziali si sarebbero comunque tenute regolarmente all'inizio del 2015, dopo poco più di un anno.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

12. A capo delle proteste dell'EuroMaidan si misero le milizie e i partiti neonazisti: Svoboda (ex Partito Nazionalsocialista da cui sono nate le milizie neonaziste di Azov), Settore Destro, insieme al partito di Julija Tymošenko che perse le presidenziali 2010 contro Janukovyč.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

13. Il 20 febbraio 2014 fu uno dei giorni più sanguinosi delle rivolte di Maidan: Un centinaio di morti tra cui 17 poliziotti addebitati senza prove al premier Azarov al presidente Janukovyč. Notate che la sentenza per i morti di Maidan ci sarà forse questo settembre dopo 9 anni.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

14. Secondo gli studi e le analisi forensi del Prof. Ivan Katchanovski: Il processo per il massacro di Maidan nel 2014 ha rivelato prove schiaccianti che i manifestanti di Maidan sono stati massacrati dai cecchini dell'EuroMaidan, non dalla polizia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369821533_The_Maidan_Massacre_Trial_and_Investigation_Revelations_Implications_for_the_Ukraine-Russia_War_and_Relations

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

15. @GianMicalessin, 2017: Ucraina, i cecchini di piazza Maidan confessano la sconcertante verità. Dietro la strage di dimostranti non c'erano gli uomini del presidente filo-russo Yankovich ma i capi dell'opposizione di EuroMaidan appoggiata dall'UE. https://t.co/dURBUfqVYY

Video Transcript AI Summary
At dawn, I heard the sound of bullets and whistles. We were ordered to shoot at both the police and the protesters without any distinction. The shots were coming from inside the Ukraine Hotel.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Era l'alba ho sentito il suono è il fischio dei proiettili ci avevano ordinato di sparare sia sui poliziotti sia sui dimostrati assistenza distinzioni I colpi provenivano dall'interno dell'hotel ucraina

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

16. Andriy Parubiy capo del partito neonazista Svoboda (ex Partito Nazionalsocialista) e leader dell'EuroMaidan, aveva stabilito la loro base nell'Hotel Ucraina che si affaccia su piazza Maidan su cui si svolsero le proteste con le vittime. Thread https://t.co/Wo0fULJNOy

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

17. Il nazista Andriy Parubiy leader di Svoboda, con i cecchini delle milizie neonaziste dell'EuroMaidan, sono stati filmati mentre escono dall'Hotel Ucraina in piazza Maidan. Svariate testimonianze concordano sui cecchini che sparavano sui propri manifestanti in piazza Maidan. https://t.co/OHCsOjFjFk

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

18. Tra i tanti nazisti a combattere per il golpe dell'EuroMaidan c'era anche il futuro comandante Dmytro Kotsyubailo di Settore Destro, nominato Eroe dell'Ucraina da Zelensky nel 2021 per la guerra al Dombass. Qui con il fedele amico e commilitone con la svastica nazista. https://t.co/LMkdrK22gK

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

19. Il comandante nazista di Dmytro Kotsyubailo di Settore Destro, celebrato da Zelensky con funerali di Stato dopo la sua uccisione nel marzo 2023, era un fedelissimo del Gen. Zalužnyj, comandante in capo dell'esercito ucraino, entrambi adoratori di Bandera alleato di Hitler. https://t.co/IiO7fssnJj

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

20. Il 21 febbraio 2014 il presidente Yanukovich e l'opposizione golpista firmarono un accordo per: Un governo di unità in 10 giorni; Riforme costituzionali; Elezioni anticipate. Il parlamento ha approvato il ripristino della Costituzione 2004 che toglieva poteri al presidente.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

21. L'accordo prevedeva: Riforme costituzionali entro il settembre del 2014; Elezioni presidenziali anticipate entro il dicembre 2014 invece che all'inizio del 2015; Nuova legge elettorali; Amnistia per tutti i manifestanti arrestati dal 17 febbraio 2014.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

22. L'accordo prevedeva soprattutto la modifica del codice penale per consentire dal giorno successivo la scarcerazione di Julija Tymošenko a capo delle proteste. La Tymošenko che perse le presidenziali 2010 contro Janukovyč e che ora cercava di destituirlo con violente rivolte. https://t.co/A2bHrsbmG1

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

23. Julija Tymošenko l'11 ottobre 2011 era stata condannata a 7 anni di carcere per malversazione di fondi pubblici per aver siglato con la compagnia russa Gazprom un contratto per la fornitura di gas naturale giudicato dal tribunale di Kiev inutilmente oneroso per il paese.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

24. I golpisti di opposizione che trattarono con Janukovyč furono: Arsenij Jacenjuk del partito della Tymošenko poi messo da Nulland e USA alla guida dell'Ucraina il 26 febbraio 2014, il pugile banderista Vitalij Klyčko sindaco di Kiev, il nazista Oleh Tjahnybok leader di Svoboda https://t.co/eZVSRu3eL3

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

25. L'accordo fu ratificato davanti a tre ministri degli Esteri UE: il polacco Radosław Sikorski, il francese Laurent Fabius e il tedesco Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Il ministro dell'Interno Vitalij Zacharčenko fu deposto e il pomeriggio la polizia lasciò subito piazza Maidan.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

26. Gli accordi furono respinti da Dmytro Jaroš, capo della milizia neonazista Settore Destro, nelle liste dei ricercati dell'Interpol. Insieme alle formazioni estremiste intimò al presidente Janukovyč di lasciare la presidenza ucraina entro le 10 della mattina successiva. https://t.co/GKxpWDv7Wj

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

27. Qui Dmytro Jaroš leader dei neonazisti di Settore Destro alla guida del golpe 2012, insieme a Oles Horodetskyy, adoratore di Bandera alleato di Hitler, infiltrato nei Radicali per far assolvere il comandate neonazista Markiv dall'omicidio di Rocchelli. https://t.co/NHOg82fhTl https://t.co/SxcGJ0uoQk

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

28. Dmytro Jaroš comandante neonazista di Settore Destro, inserito tra i ricercati 2015 dell'Interpol che rifiutò di far deporre le armi se il presidente Janukovyč non si fosse dimesso, qui con il Gen. Zalužnyj adoratore di Bandera e comandante in capo dell'esercito di Zelensky. https://t.co/3UvkPJCb8f

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

29. Nonostante gli accordi e le concessioni del presidente Janukovyč a la drastica riduzione dei propri poteri, i rivoltosi intendevano processare Janukovyč per la presunta "strage di piazza Maidan". Nella notte del 21 febbraio 2014 Janukovyč fu costretto a fuggire dall'Ucraina.

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

30. Nella narrazione NATO del "fact-checker", era perfettamente legittimo che il senatore USA McCain che poi spingerà il falso RussiaGate contro Trump, fosse all'EuroMaidan insieme ai partiti neonazisti a istigare la rivolta contro il presidente Janukovyč democraticamente eletto. https://t.co/tnculcnLU6

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

31. Nella narrazione NATO del "fact-checker", era perfettamente legittimo che Victoria Nuland portavoce del Dipartimento di Stato USA di Obama e Biden, fosse all'EuroMaidan insieme ai neonazisti a istigare la rivolta contro il presidente Janukovyč democraticamente eletto. https://t.co/vbA13R5Gke

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

32. Le organizzazioni di Soros in Ucraina spinsero le rivolte contro il presidente Janukovyč, come sta facendo in Bielorussia contro Lukashenko spingendo la Tsikhanouskaya con UE e NATO. Per questo nel 2015 l'ex presidente Porošenko ha insignito Soros con l'Ordine della Libertà. https://t.co/azB7yy02TK

@ChanceGardiner - Chance 🤺 Giardiniere 🍊 🔞

33. Soros finanzia IFCN che "certifica" i "fact-checker" come Open e l'ucraino StopFake che era direttamente finanziato da Soros, a cui collaborano Oles Horodetskyy, adoratore di Bandera alleato di Hitler, infiltrato nei Radicali finanziati da Soros, e l'ucrainista Mauro Voerzio. https://t.co/ms45zbIXuQ

View Full Interactive Feed