reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @ChanelRion
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
Don’t be naive. Venezuela isn’t some “independent” nation. We’re not sending 10k troops and 8 warships over drug dealers…. Trump is going after CHINA. Trump’s Venezuela offensive is a THIRD BLOW to Xi: Iran - Gaza - Venezuela. Just WATCH… https://t.co/ftYoMLtWo1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump is officially three in o with China. Here's what nobody's talking about. China had a heavy investment in Iran. Trump neutered them. China had a heavy investment in Gaza. Trump secured a regional firewall. China straightforwardly controlled Venezuela for two decades. Trump's moving in and China's blinking for a third time. And that's why everyone is asking the wrong questions when it comes to Venezuela. The cover story is this: Trump's military buildup toward Venezuela is about countering narcoterrorism and targeting drug cartels like Trend Agua, which are tied to the president Nicolas Maduro's regime. But analysts go a step further and they still miss the mark when they say, well, this is really about regime change. It's neither of these things. I mean, yes, we've got a drug problem, but it's actually ties to a much bigger issue. Trump's Venezuela offensive is much bigger.
It's his proxy war against China, and he's the only president in history who was actually fighting China where it hurts. As of this week, Trump has positioned over 10,000 US troops and eight warships in the region. We have helicopters and Reaper drones taking out narco boats. We have F-35s, and Venezuela has scrambled their jets. And this week, Trump has authorized the CIA to carry out lethal operations in Venezuela.
We'll dive into that one a little deeper in the next segment. All this to ostensibly go after drug boats and fight narco terrorism. Yet everyone is taking this at face value. Listen. Why not have the coast guard stop them, which it is empowered by law to do?
So Trump answers question as asked. Because we've been doing that for thirty years, and it has been totally ineffective. Even the ostensibly right-leaning National Review gets it wrong by musing that this is all about regime change. Here's why this whole Venezuela offensive is really about China, and this is a shadow war against Beijing. The first in history that looks like it will actually work.
You see, attacking Maduro is attacking Xi Jinping. To think that Maduro is some independent agent is naive and foolish. Why is Venezuela basically China? Well, follow the money, the oil money. Again, remember what I said yesterday about why China is likely the biggest force behind the Gaza war in promoting Palestine and Hamas protests around the globe?
Remember, it's about taking advantage of bad leadership that sits over cheap oil and cheap resources. China sweeps in, buys out the leadership, gets free gas, essentially. Venezuela is the poster boy of this predatory China oil game. Beijing is Venezuela's largest creditor by far. Venezuela has over 60,000,000,000 in debt to Beijing since 02/2007.
It pays Beijing back in, you guessed it, oil. Venezuela is economically paralyzed by sanctions. The only country supporting Venezuela meaningfully is Beijing because they're the primary buyers. This forces Venezuela to sell their oil for next to nothing, meaning they'll forever be indebted to Beijing. That's the whole game.
That's the way China plays. In May 2025, at the China CELAC Forum, Beijing gave Venezuela an additional billion dollars in new oil investments, solidifying Venezuela's position as the front lines of The US China shadow war. But China's interests in Venezuela go far beyond cheap oil and economics. Chinese companies are neck deep in modernizing Venezuela's ports and telecom infrastructures. And in all things related to Chinese companies, you're a fool to think the Chinese Communist Party does anything without making it a dual military civilian use project.
I'll say it again. China does not allow its companies to operate in the world unless it could also be used for their national security purposes. So don't be fooled when Trump is using all this force and manpower and CIA expertise in Venezuela. This is Trump taking the war to China. He's doing what no other president before him was even remotely capable of accomplishing.
Trump is declaring war on China's most valuable assets, Iran, Venezuela, Gaza. What do these tin pot dictatorships have in common? They'd be nothing without the Chinese Communist Party. And China would be nothing in the geopolitical stage without them. And now Trump is taking them, Iran, Gaza, and now Venezuela.
Three strikes, and you're out, Xi.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump is officially three in o with China. Here's what nobody's talking about. China had a heavy investment in Iran. Trump neutered them. China had a heavy investment in Gaza.
Trump secured a regional firewall. China straightforwardly controlled Venezuela for two decades. Trump's moving in and China's blinking for a third time. And that's why everyone is asking the wrong questions when it comes to Venezuela. The cover story is this.
Trump's military buildup toward Venezuela is about countering narcoterrorism and targeting drug cartels like Trend Agua, which are tied to the president Nicolas Maduro's regime. But analysts go a step further and they still miss the mark when they say, well, this is really about regime change. It's neither of these things. I mean, yes, we've got a drug problem, but it's actually ties to a much bigger issue. Trump's Venezuela offensive is much bigger.
It's his proxy war against China, and he's the only president in history who was actually fighting China where it hurts. As of this week, Trump has positioned over 10,000 US troops and eight warships in the region. We have helicopters and Reaper drones taking out narco boats. We have f 30 fives, and Venezuela has scrambled their jets. And this week, Trump has authorized the CIA to carry out lethal operations in Venezuela.
We'll dive into that one a little deeper in the next segment. All this to ostensibly go after drug boats and fight narco terrorism. Yet everyone is taking this at face value. Listen. Why not have the coast guard stop them, which it is empowered by law to do?
So Trump answers question as asked. Because we've been doing that for thirty years, and it has been totally ineffective. Even the ostensibly right leaving leaning national review gets it wrong by musing that this is all about regime change. Here's why this whole Venezuela offensive is really about China, and this is a shadow war against Beijing. The first in history that looks like it will actually work.
You see, attacking Maduro is attacking Xi Jinping. To think that Maduro is some independent agent is naive and foolish. Why is Venezuela basically China? Well, follow the money, the oil money. Again, remember what I said yesterday about why China is likely the biggest force behind the Gaza war in promoting Palestine and Hamas protests around the globe?
Remember, it's about taking advantage of bad leadership that sits over cheap oil and cheap resources. China sweeps in, buys out the leadership, gets free gas, essentially. Venezuela is the poster boy of this predatory China oil game. Bed Beijing is Venezuela's largest creditor by far. Venezuela has over 60,000,000,000 in debt to Beijing since 02/2007.
It pays Beijing back in, you guessed it, oil. Venezuela is economically paralyzed by sanctions. The only country supporting Venezuela meaningfully is Beijing because they're the primary buyers. This forces Venezuela to sell their oil for next to nothing, meaning they'll forever be indebted to Beijing. That's the whole game.
That's the way China plays. In May 2025, at the China CELAC Forum, Beijing gave Venezuela an additional billion dollars in new oil investments, solidifying Venezuela's position as the front lines of The US China shadow war. But China's interests in Venezuela go far beyond cheap oil and economics. Chinese companies are neck deep in modernizing Venezuela's ports and telecom infrastructures. And in as in all things related to Chinese companies, you're a fool to think the Chinese Communist Party does anything without making it a dual military civilian use project.
I'll say it again. China does not allow its companies to operate in the world unless it could also be used for their national security purposes. So don't be fooled when Trump is using all this force and manpower and CIA expertise in Venezuela. This is Trump taking the war to China. He's doing what no other president before him was even remotely capable of accomplishing.
Trump is declaring war on China's most valuable assets, Iran, Venezuela, Gaza. What do these tin pot dictatorships have in common? They'd be nothing without the Chinese Communist Party. And China would be nothing in the geopolitical stage without them. And now Trump is taking them, Iran, Gaza, and now Venezuela.
Three strikes, and you're out, Xi.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
Here she is. BRENNAN’S HANDMAIDEN hidden in plain view? Obama CIA chief John Brennan handpicked Gina Haspel to oversee the London station - she was there during creation of Steele dossier. Kash said she blocked Russiagate evidence. Are we taking bets? https://t.co/EBPfROiRVn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kash Patel and Devin Nunes concluded that Russiagate was a hoax. They created a 17-page classified report exposing corruption within the intelligence community that fueled the hoax. John Ratcliffe and Patel intended to release the report when they were Trump's DNI and deputy DNI, but the CIA locked it up.
According to the transcript, then-CIA Director Gina Haspel did not allow the report to be released, allegedly protecting her predecessor, John Brennan. Russiagate was a politically funded operation involving lying to a secret court to illegally surveil a political opponent. Gina Haspel was allegedly one of the leading Russiagate architects and was the CIA station chief for England when Russiagate was launched in 2016. With Patel at the FBI and Ratcliffe at the CIA, Haspel could be in trouble.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of you have wondered if now CIA director John Ratcliffe is releasing all this intelligence about how Obama and his army just whole cloth pushed a hoax to take down Trump, and we knew about it for years, why didn't Radcliffe release any of these details back when he was Trump's director of national intelligence in the first term? Well, there is a very clear answer. It leads back to the CIA. Seven years ago in 2018, Kash Patel and then chairman Devin Nunes released the single most important document on in unraveling the entire Democrat Russiagate hoax, the Nunes memo. Remember that?
330 pages long, some 65 depositions, and two years in the making. The conclusion from the Nunes memo was crystal clear. Russiagate was a hoax. To the public, it was this complicated story about mixed intelligence, unclear sourcing, potential Russian propaganda. And back then, Democrats maintained this sort of plausible ambiguity.
They were able to blur the lines for the confused public between what was real and what was clearly fake and what they knew about these distinctions. Turns out, Cash and Nunes knew. The reality was a much darker one. One, only the deepest swamp could execute. Obama, his team, Susan Rice, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, all knew the Trump is a Russian asset story was absolutely fake.
They pushed the investigation through. It was a purely political hit job using government resources to take down a political opponent. Cash and Nunez's evidence, well, they had it. Unbeknownst to the general public at that time, Cash and his team put together a 17 page classified report. They tried to get it out during Nunez's memo days, and then later when John Radcliffe was picked to serve as Trump's first term director of national intelligence, Cash Patel became Trump's deputy DNI.
Remember? And together, Radcliffe and Patel were intent on using their positions to expose the cabal. They wanted to publish this 17 page classified report showing there was corruption from the very top inside the intelligence that fueled the Russiagate hoax. But somehow, they were not able to. Why?
Well, because the report had to be handed over to the CIA, and the CIA proceeded to lock it up. Trump's then CIA director, Gina Haspel, did not allow that report to see the light of day. She seemed to be playing cover for her predecessor, Obama CIA director John Brennan. Cash laid all this out over a year ago in an interview. And even then, he was still not allowed to completely reveal what it was he saw.
But he made it clear in public and even to me personally, there was a reason none of this came out during Trump's first term, and it all leads back to one person.
Speaker 1: Russiagate, as we all know, was a politically funded operation into our intelligence and law enforcement communities to go to a secret court and lie about a political opponent to illegally surveil him. I mean, that took us two years to unpack. Right? It's a big deal. But then you gotta ask, wait a second, how did that happen?
And who are the players behind it? And I've always said Gina Haspel is one of the leading Russiagate architects who's remained behind the scenes. She would go on to become Trump's director of the Central Intelligence Agency. But if you rewind the clock back, and this is something I've told Schellenberg and Tybee about and many others, in 2016, when Russiagate was launched in England, Gina Haspel was the CIA station chief for England, the number one intel officer in The United Kingdom.
Speaker 0: Haspel was station chief in London at a critical time in the creation of the Russia gate hoax, and this, it turns out, is a very important detail, a piece of the puzzle no one is talking about as this month. The Trump administration sets to work dismantling the real culprits behind Russiagate. And now that cash is at FBI and Ratcliffe is at CIA, things could get extremely interesting for former CIA director Gina Haspel.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
Vindication. FBI agent and liberal darling who called my ACCURATE Ukraine-Biden investigation with Rudy Giuliani a “Russian operation…” This week: CAUGHT trying to flee the country with classified docs. The rats are jumping ship. We’re not letting them. @KyleSeraphin. https://t.co/XMW6yP8gB7
Video Transcript AI Summary
A top FBI official, Jonathan Bulma, was apprehended at JFK Airport while allegedly attempting to flee the country. Bulma, a 15-year FBI veteran, is accused of mishandling classified information, including printing 130 pages of files from the FBI's internal network and sharing them with associates, potentially for a book.
Bulma, who the left celebrated as a whistleblower, claimed in 2023 that Rudy Giuliani was paid $300,000 by a Ukrainian oligarch in 2017, suggesting Giuliani was a Russian asset. This was framed as a counter-narrative to Giuliani's work in Ukraine, which Bulma alleged was a Russian intelligence operation to discredit Joe Biden.
The CIA is reportedly concerned about ex-spies selling secrets, especially after mass firings. Former FBI whistleblower Kyle Sarrafan has questioned Bulma's narrative, calling it "bizarre." Sarrafan notes the media's contrasting treatment of whistleblowers, with Bulma being immediately heralded as one, unlike others who faced being labeled as problematic employees.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, well, more rats at the FBI are getting handcuffed. ABC News is reporting last night that a top FBI official who resigned a few days ago has been nabbed at JFK Airport. He was caught trying to flee the country, allegedly. Apparently, Jonathan Bulma, a fifteen year veteran of the FBI, a Trump hater, is being accused of mishandling classified information. Court documents reveal Bulma printed about 130 pages or files from the FBI's internal network.
Some were stamped with clear warnings, quote, protect this info. Bhumma allegedly passed them around like party favors to associates, even weaving them into a book he was writing about his career. But there's more to this story. Bouma was celebrated by the left as this brave FBI whistleblower, someone who was standing up to the corruption of Donald j Trump.
Speaker 1: Name is Jonathan Buma, and I'm a FBI special agent.
Speaker 0: Buma came forward in 2023 under Biden and claimed that mayor Rudy Giuliani in 2017 was paid by Ukrainian oligarch Pavel Fuchs the sum of $300,000 for consulting services, and that this meant that Rudy was likely a Russian asset. That the work I did under OAN with Rudy Giuliani in Ukraine, uncovering exclusive evidence of Biden family corruption was all a product of a massive Russian intelligence operation to discredit Joe Biden and boost Trump during the 2020 campaign. Keep in mind, every minute of my reporting on Ukraine with Rudy Giuliani and all the recordings I brought back have not only been proven to be absolutely true, but later, when Hunter Biden's laptop was dissected and disseminated, we were even more affirmed. But Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation too. Remember?
Now across the way, the CIA is sweating bullets, wondering which of its ex spies might be shopping secrets on the black market. CIA told CNN in February it was concerned about Doge. Quote, current and former intelligence officials say that mass firings could offer a rich recruitment opportunity for foreign intelligence services like China or Russia who may seek to exploit financially vulnerable or resentful former employees. A statement framed as fear but sounding much more like a threat. Is this what Bhumma was up to?
Fleeing the country with classified information to sell to the highest bidder? He says he was flying to London to pitch a book idea. Former FBI whistleblower Kyle Saraffin has publicly questioned Buuma's narrative, describing Buuma's story from the start as, quote, bizarre and his public interviews as strange. Here to explain what he means by this is the man himself, Kyle Sarrafan of The Kyle Sarrafan Show. Kyle, again, you call Buuma's story bizarre.
What about Buuma's case strikes you as odd, and does it align with what you saw inside the FBI?
Speaker 1: I think you hit on it very, very clearly. You you you mentioned the media coverage. I do a lot of meta dissection of the way the media looks at things. When I brought forward credible information that the attorney general may have lied to the American public, which I think is a real big problem, perjury from the top law enforcement official, I wasn't listed as a whistleblower. In fact, that was a problem.
I was a problematic employee. When my buddy Garrett O'Boyle pointed out that they were going after parents at school board meetings, and they were in fact, you know, identifying specific, individuals that were being investigated, you know, under first amendment grounds and not underneath, some sort of actual FBI, parameters. That was listed as problematic, but not really the issue that we all look at. And then you see this guy, and Jonathan Buuma, who was out of the Los Angeles field office, was immediately heralded as a whistleblower. He was described as such.
There's an article I found from the New Yorker going back to August of twenty twenty three. They were very, very excited about how he was pointing out the counter narrative and maybe he was being ignored simply because it wasn't convenient
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
Here’s @ChadRobo explaining how US intelligence agencies—including Special Forces—utilize disenfranchised people like Thomas Crooks to target dangerous people. Does the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT consider Donald Trump their enemy? Tonight on Fine Point @OANN https://t.co/B20uvzccTw
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have manuals and SOPs on how to use individuals to stir up rivalries between tribes in places like Afghanistan. Special operations can manipulate someone with radical ideologies to incite violence between villages. This tactic is not uncommon and has been successful worldwide. Utilizing individuals as "village idiots" to create chaos is a known strategy in our government. Former members agree with this approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go for it and we we use. This isn't like something that's just the idea that I'm saying. This is that we have manuals and SOPs on how to do this. We'll use the village idiot in a in a in and to to stir up the rivalries between, between tribes. We'll go into a place like Afghanistan, find someone that has a radical ideology.
He's very malleable and fluent influenceable, and we'll talk him into killing a village, the next village leader and and turn those villages against each other. Or we'll, you know, it we will radicalize them. When I say we, you know, in my in my job in special operations, we do things like this. So, to think that, to think that that's not possible for someone in our government to take a guy like this and utilize him as, again, the village idiot. And, this is what we do all the time overseas.
This isn't a crazy idea. We have a pattern of doing this and we do it successfully all the time all over the world. And so it's not a Farfetch. Totally agree. You're not the only former, you know, former
reSee.it AI Summary
The author claims to be under FBI investigation for exposing alleged corruption involving Biden in Ukraine. They believe it signifies a battle between the free press and the government, comparing it to a second revolution. No further information is provided in Post 2.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
The FBI was investigating me because I exposed Biden corruption in Ukraine. When the government is going after individual members of the free press that’s when you know it’s us against the federal government. Not a Civil War - a second Revolution. #FinePoint on @OANN https://t.co/HHVmbSuADR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our government is radical and dangerous. The FBI is investigating me for looking into Biden corruption in Ukraine. Special Agent Bracco questioned my sources about me, a member of the free press. I wonder why the Bidens live in luxury on a civil servant's salary. They would imprison me if they could.
Translation: The government is dangerous and investigating me for probing Biden corruption in Ukraine. The FBI questioned my sources about my work as a journalist. I question how the Bidens afford lavish lifestyles on a government salary. They would arrest me if possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our current government is radical and dangerous. Hell, the FBI is investigating me. FBI special agent Elizabeth Bracco was at the door of one of my sources. Special agent Bracco was grilling them on me, a member of the free press. Why?
Because I was investigating Biden corruption in Ukraine. I was asking how the Bidens live in beach houses in Delaware and estates in Bel Air and are worth 1,000,000 on a civil servant's salary. They'd throw me in jail if they could.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: OANN claims to have been censored by the DNC and Congress for being ahead of the curve. They refused to stop reporting on Ciaramella, unlike Congress. This is why there is a conflict.
Post 2: OANN encourages viewers to watch their Biden Bribe Tapes Investigation, which they consider groundbreaking.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
THIS is why @OANN was censored. We were YEARS ahead of everyone. So when the DNC decided OAN needed to be silenced, Congress went right along. Big Tech told us to stop reporting on Ciaramella, OAN didn’t cave. But Congress caves daily. That’s why we are at war. https://t.co/LeeabMJSfM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two weeks after Trump's win, Biden warns Poroshenko not to make Trump think he needs to bail out Ukraine financially. Biden suggests closing Pravat Bank to secure an IMF loan for economic and physical security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2 weeks after Donald Trump's victory, Joe Biden is on the phone with Poroshenko. His voice tenser now than before.
Speaker 1: This is getting very, very close. What I don't want to have happen, I don't want Trump to get in the position where he thinks he's about to buy onto a policy where the financial system is going to collapse and he's gonna be looked to to pour more money into Ukraine. That's how he'll think about it before he gets sophisticated enough to know the detail.
Speaker 0: In other words, Biden does not want Ukraine asking for more money from Trump. Doing so would cause Trump to look into the details.
Speaker 1: So anything you can do to push the the the Pravat Bank, to closure so that the IMF loan comes forward, I would respectfully suggest is critically important to your economic as well as physical security.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
Watch all three of our groundbreaking Biden Bribe Tapes Investigation: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaJp7NK1-socko47mDU7P4RGv0a61bYa2&si=Mjt98tprzTkR2MG1
reSee.it AI Summary
In June 2020, a staggering $6 million in 100-dollar bills was discovered as a bribe at the Ukrainian Prosecutor General's office, linked to Burisma. But that was just the beginning. An additional $44 million was involved, implicating Biden, Archer, and RosemontSeneca. The question remains: where did the rest of the bribe money go before Biden intervened? These revelations were part of the OANN BidenBribeTapes series, first aired in 2020.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
THE REST OF THE BRIBE? June 2020: $6 MILL in $100 bills bundled on desks of Ukrainian Prosecutor General's office - SEIZED BURISMA BRIBE $$$. But there was more... $44 MILL more. And Biden, Archer, Rosemont-Seneca were IMPLICATED by Prosecutor General's office. Where did the rest of Burisma Bribe cash go before Biden had the Prosecutor General fired? From the @OANN #BidenBribeTapes series. First aired 2020.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In October 2019, Prosecutor Konstantin Kulik confirmed that the Ukrainian prosecutor general's office implicated the Bidens and Devin Archer's Rosemont Seneca company in the $36 million Burisma case. However, this document and the reported $44 million in bribe money from 2019 no longer exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Prosecutor Konstantin Kulik confirms. As of October 2019, the Ukrainian prosecutor general's office signed off on a document that listed the Bidens and Devin Archer's Rosemont Seneca company as implicated in the $36,000,000 Burisma case. This document simply ceased to exist along with the $44,000,000 in additional bribe money reportedly waived about back in 2019.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
HERE IT IS. GA code allows Trump and the 18 defendants to SUE @FaniforDA for Malicious Prosecution and Abusive Litigation. https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-51/chapter-7/article-3/section-51-7-40/ @OANN
2022 Georgia Code :: Title 51 - Torts :: Chapter 7 - False Arrest, False Imprisonment, Malicious Prosecution, and Abusive Litigation :: Article 3 - Malicious Prosecution :: § 51-7-40. Right of Action for Malicious Prosecution
Justia Free Databases of US Laws, Codes & Statutes
law.justia.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Former Ukraine Prosecutor General Victor Shokin claims that the truth about Joe Biden's alleged bribery will be revealed in the transcripts of his phone conversations with Poroshenko. Shokin believes that Biden illegally influenced foreign officials to protect his son Hunter and shield illegal money laundering activities. Shokin confirmed the authenticity of the recordings and reported on it a year after his interview in Kiev. The contents of the Biden-Poroshenko phone call were also confirmed by Shokin.
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
Fmr Ukraine Prosecutor Gen. Victor Shokin on #BidenBribery: “The transcripts of Biden’s telephone conversations with Poroshenko is where the truth will show itself. Americans must demand it. And if they do, they will see, broad as day, Joe Biden was illegally influencing foreign officials in order to protect his son Hunter and shield illegal money laundering activities.” Just 1 yr after this interview in Kiev, I found the recordings and reported on it. Shokin confirmed their authenticity. @OANN Watch the 2019 interview here: https://youtu.be/8n2qmPGTrqk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden and the media claimed that Shokin was corrupt and had to be dismissed, but no charges of corruption have been proven against him. Shokin believes the truth lies in the transcripts of Biden's conversations with Poroshenko. He alleges that Biden illegally influenced foreign officials to protect his son and engage in illegal money laundering. One American News verified Shokin's claims with a sworn affidavit to an Austrian court, accusing Biden of interfering with ongoing investigations. To learn more, watch part 3 of One America News investigates debunking the Adam Schiff case for impeachment. I'm Chanel Bian reporting from Washington.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden and leftist media claim Shokin was corrupt and inept and had to be dismissed despite the fact that not a single charge of corruption has ever been raised or proven against Shokin to date. To this, Shokin shrugs. Shokin says people don't have to believe him. Just look at the transcripts. Biden's transcripts that is.
The transcripts of Biden's telephone conversations with Poroshenko, says Shokin, is where the truth will show itself. Americans must demand it. And if they do, they will see. Broad as day, Joe Biden was illegally influencing foreign officials in order to protect his son, Hunter, and shield illegal money laundering activities. One American news verified on camera what Shokin has stated for months when he issued a stunning 12 page of sworn affidavit to an Austrian court stating how Joe Biden was directly involved in interfering with active cases under investigation.
For more, be sure to watch part 3 of our One America News investigates special debunking the Adam Schiff case for impeachment. I'm Chanel Bian. One American News, Washington
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
The Biden-Poroshenko Phone Call: Shokin confirmed the contents of this call… he had the transcripts matching it all up. From the @OANN #BidenBribeTapes Series, 2020.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this conversation, dated February 18, 2015, Poroshenko seems to admit that Shokin did nothing wrong but was forced to resign at Biden's request. The call starts with some technical difficulties, but they eventually connect. Poroshenko expresses his happiness and mentions positive and negative news. He then informs Biden that he met with the general who is facing corruption charges, but they don't have any information about him doing something wrong. Poroshenko specifically asked the general about this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The following conversation, dated February 18, 2015, appears to show Poroshenko admitting Shokin did nothing wrong, but was forced to resign anyways at Biden's request.
Speaker 1: The situation remains Hello? Hello? Hello? Hello? Hello?
Thank you, mister vice president. Your call is reconvened. Petter, can you hear me? Yeah. I can I can hear you better too?
I'm sorry. I'm sorry. You were saying. I didn't I missed what you were saying. Yeah.
So first of all, I'm very happy here. I need you, man. I tell you what, I'd like to be with you instead of Minnesota right now, but go ahead. The 3rd, I have some positive and negative news. Well, good.
Joe, I have a second positive news for you.
Speaker 2: Yesterday, I met meet with the general any corruption charges, we don't have any information about this he doing something wrong. I especially ask him no. It was I especially ask him to
@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN
DNC CRIMES EXPOSED by @HouseGOP: - Human Trafficking at Border - CCP payoffs to #BidenCrimeFamily - Big Tech collusion to kill 1A YET Dems STILL control narrative using Abortion. GOP haven't a clue how to respond. Take notes from Trump. Hit abortion where it hurts. @OANN
Video Transcript AI Summary
House Republicans have uncovered various issues in their first 100 days in power. These include a border crisis with millions of illegal aliens entering the country, including unaccompanied children who are now missing. They have also revealed bank records showing the Biden family receiving money from the Chinese Communist Party. Republicans have confronted big tech executives about censorship on platforms like Twitter. Additionally, they have criticized the Pentagon for funding drag queen story hours on military bases. Democrats, on the other hand, have focused on abortion as their main messaging strategy. They argue that it is a constitutional right and fight to keep the abortion pill readily available. Republicans struggle to effectively respond to this issue, while Trump takes a more aggressive approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This week marks 100 days in power for house republicans. As the GOP digs and exposes, the democrats ignore and pivot with stunning success. I'm Chanel Rian, and this is Weekly Briefing. Here's what Republicans have uncovered in their 1st 100 days in power. A border crisis where over 6,000,000 illegal aliens have disappeared into our country since Biden took office.
This includes more than three 100,000 unaccompanied children. 85,000 of those kids are unaccounted for now. Many forced into slave labor and trafficked. We've learned that in 2023 alone, border protection encountered 80 individuals at our southern border on the terrorist watch list. Under Trump in 2019, that number was 0.
Speaker 1: Does DHS have operational control of our entire border?
Speaker 2: No, sir.
Speaker 0: After 100 days of subpoena power, House Republicans showed How the Biden crime family goes deeper than just a drugged out hunter funneling money back to chairman Joe. The House Oversight Committee has revealed bank records showing 9 Biden family members receiving 1,000,000 of dollars from senior members of the Chinese Communist Party, All while Joe Biden was the China point man under Obama. They're sifting through 2,000 pages of suspicious activity reports related to the Bidens at the Treasury Department.
Speaker 1: House oversight says they've got bank records showing a Chinese energy company paying 3 Family members through a third party, what were they paid for?
Speaker 3: Look, I'm I'm just not gonna respond to that from here.
Speaker 0: Then, of course, we have the Twitter files. We watched Republicans haul in big tech execs to testify what we knew all along.
Speaker 4: Did you shadow ban my account? Yes or no?
Speaker 5: Again, not to the best of my recollection.
Speaker 4: So the answer is, mister Roth, yes, you did. I found out last night from Twitter staff That you suppressed my account for this tweet. It's a freaking joke about Hillary Clinton being angry that she couldn't rig her election. It's a joke. But in response, being the Sinister overlords that you all are, you placed a 90 day account filter so I could not be found.
And now we see here that Twitter staff said the visibility filter on my account excluded me from top searches, prevented notifications for non followers, and much more. This It's considered an aggressive visibility filter. You silenced members of Congress from communicating With their constituents.
Speaker 0: And remember when people lost jobs or found themselves canceled if they dared question the medical prowess of geniuses like Twitter head, Vijaya Gadi.
Speaker 6: Where did you go to medical school?
Speaker 5: I did not go to medical I'm
Speaker 6: sorry.
Speaker 5: I did not go to medical school.
Speaker 6: That's what I thought. Why do you think you or anyone else at Twitter had the medical expertise to censor A doctor's expert opinion.
Speaker 5: Our policies regarding COVID were designed to protect Individuals, we were seeing
Speaker 6: You guys censored Harvard educated doctors, Stanford educated doctors, doctors that are educated In the best places in the world, and you silence those voices.
Speaker 0: Republicans also unveiled the incompetence of our pentagon, engrossed with societal perversions and asleep at the wheel.
Speaker 1: I guess my question is, how much taxpayer money Should GOtvund drag queen story hours on military bases?
Speaker 7: You know, drag drag queen story hours is not something that, the department funds.
Speaker 1: Wait a second. That's actually not what the record seems to suggest. You were going to fund 1 at Ramstein Air Force Base. That one got canceled, but that's DOD insignia. That's a drag queen Story hour for children, then also at, Malmstrom Air Force Base outside of Great Falls, Montana, you had a a drag queen story hour for kids.
At the joint base Langley Eustis, you put on a drag queen story hour on a Saturday for the 1st ever kid friendly diversity equity inclusion summer festival. And at Nellis Air Force Base, you had the drag UNellis on June 17th. Who funded these things, mister secretary?
Speaker 7: Listen. Drag shows, are not something that the Department of Defense supports or funds.
Speaker 1: But why why are they happening on military bases? I just I just showed you the evidence.
Speaker 2: Can I get copies of those? Because I I'd like to take a look at those myself, actually. Take a look And and find out what actually is going on there because that that's the first I'm hearing about that kind of stuff.
Speaker 0: All of this exposed out in the open on the record. And what have Democrats to say in response? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Instead, they've taken to the typical strategy of debaters who find themselves caught in a corner.
They change the subject altogether. Their entire messaging strategy going into 2024 is abortion. I know. What a shocker. Right?
They've been jumping through Asylum quality mental hoops to defend abortion because it's all they have. A DC judge argued a woman's right to abortion is grounded in the constitution tuition through the 13th amendment because pregnancy is to a woman what slavery was to African Americans. Biden's DOJ finds itself on the same side as the church of Satan, which is now arguing abortion is a religious liberty. Then of course, the Biden administration is fighting to keep Mifepristone, one of the 2 drugs used in the abortion pill, Readily available for women everywhere. They're fighting for this because it's the easiest way to bypass state laws restricting abortion.
It's the easiest way to snub the Supreme Court's overruling of Roe v Wade last summer. It's the easiest way to change the subject. But to do this, they must lie like their agenda depends on it, starting with the whopping lie that the abortion pill is perfectly safe.
Speaker 8: Methopristone has been legal and in the market for
Speaker 9: 23. And it's not as if there's some new study that has come out and Ted, oh my gosh. This is actually
Speaker 8: This is like someone coming out and a and a judge just coming out and outline Claritin or aspirin or or plan b because they felt like it.
Speaker 3: Mifepristone is safe, and there's no question about That we know that because it's been around for 2 decades.
Speaker 0: Lies. All lies. The pill is 500% more dangerous than surgical abortion. 1 in 10 women who take the chemical abortion route land in the emergency room. Alliance Defending Freedom, the group that Sued the FDA regarding Mifepristone.
Dismantled the argument that the abortion pill is as mundane and safe as Ibuprofen. When the FDA approved Mifepristone in 2000, they added a black box warning. This warning label is only required when a drug may lead to serious injury or death, But Ibuprofen has no black box warning on its label. Even the 5th circuit recognized this, writing that Ibuprofen, unlike Mifepristone, Says nothing about REMs, surgery, emergencies, emergency rooms, or death. Around 54% of all abortions in America are now chemical abortions, a relatively new practice.
In 2000, Memphis Sit onto the scene, and the FDA, under Clinton, decided they would ignore major safety protocols in order to rush the pill to market.
Speaker 10: They're not diagnosing whether or not she's r h a rh negative, which affects her future reproductive health. It it they're not telling her it's there's there's sepsis involved and hemorrhaging and all sorts of terrible things, And she's gonna be alone without medical care in her home taking these dangerous drugs. There's a reason why these drugs were put on the REMS list, risk evaluation and mitigation strategy list, Because they are just that dangerous. They have been dubbed, I'm not kidding you now, the chemical coat hanger. That's how bad these things are.
This move by the FDA was was not to protect women or give them access to medical care. This was about protecting the abortion industry.
Speaker 0: And the abortion industry is the Democrats' life raft. All the astounding scandals for all the work House Republicans have put in and exposed about the less Failures in power, the border, Afghanistan, crushing free speech, covering up illegal Biden business deals. None of it matters because the Democrats Pivot with the graphic flare of a propaganda poster. Democrat house minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, tweeted The extreme MAGA Republican assault on abortion care is spreading across America like a malignant tumor. Using this visual language, the left not only changes the subject, but also pushes a petrified GOP back on defense.
The only one standing on stage not falling for this tactic is Donald Trump.
Speaker 9: What Hillary is saying in the 9th month, you can Take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby. Now you can say that that's okay, and Hillary can say that that's okay, but it's not okay with me. Because based on what she's saying and based on where she's going and where she's been, you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb in the 9th month, On the final day
Speaker 0: Trump plays the DNC's own game against them. He goes on offense by zeroing in on their extremes and getting It's horrifying and brilliant, but this is how truth emerges. The Trump tactic is how to win against subject changing charlatans. So Republicans dig and expose, Democrats ignore and pivot, and this is where the GOP is totally lost. They have No idea how to actually respond to abortion.
They're lost on how to talk about it, how to respond to it. It's so bad. The party on the side of protecting babies is somehow the party that lacks compassion. And instead of punching back, the Republicans continue to get jostled into their corner. And this is why Republicans will lose the war despite winning on the battlefield of facts.
They're afraid. Trump isn't. And this is why Trump is leading in the polls, and this is why Democrats can't face him in 2024. Republicans would do well to take Trump's lead again on this. Go on offense.
Be blunt. Be graphic. And charge forward knowing you're on the right side of Tree. Up next, someone familiar with taking the battle to Biden's doorstep. He's filed dozens of lawsuits against the Biden White House.
Texas attorney general Ken Paxton joins us in studio.