TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @CharlieK_news

CharlieK_news
Posted - February 10, 2026 at 7:26 PM
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 1:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Sen. Joni Ernst says IRS employees owe about $50 million in unpaid taxes, with nearly 6,000 workers—roughly 10%—carrying balances averaging $8,000. Some debts span years or aren’t filed. The claim argues this creates a credibility crisis and raises fraud risk inside the agency. It asks if Scott Bessent should place IRS staff with unpaid taxes on probation, like other federal workers.

@CharlieK_news - Charlie’s Voice Rising

🚨 BREAKING: IRS SCANDAL BLOWS WIDE OPEN 🚨 This one’s unreal. Sen. Joni Ernst just exposed a jaw-dropping fact: IRS employees owe roughly $50 MILLION in unpaid taxes. Read that again. The very people tasked with enforcing tax law… aren’t paying their own taxes. Almost 6,000 employees — nearly 10% of the agency — are carrying serious unpaid tax balances. Average debt? About $8,000 each. Many of these aren’t new bills. Some go back years. Some didn’t even file. This isn’t a paperwork mix-up. It’s a credibility meltdown. These employees know the system inside out — what triggers audits, what slips through, where enforcement is soft. That’s not just hypocrisy. That’s fraud risk sitting inside the tax authority itself. So here’s the real question: Should Scott Bessent put Internal Revenue Service employees with unpaid taxes on probation, the same way any other federal worker would be treated? Because if the IRS won’t enforce the rules on itself… why should the public trust its enforcement on anyone else? 👇 Drop your take in the replies and SHARE THIS so people see it.

CharlieK_news
Posted - January 3, 2026 at 12:00 AM
Saved - January 3, 2026 at 6:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reveal Democrats using NGOs to influence elections, not just immigration. Benson says voter data is secret but hands it to NGOs and gets paid. Michigan sends data to ERIC, then CEIR, led by David Becker. In 2020 CEIR sent $12M to Benson’s nonprofit right before the vote. Zuckerberg funneled roughly $400M into CEIR, reshaping elections nationwide. Benson’s dormant Michigan nonprofit exploded in 2020 and now sits ready as she runs for governor with the same playbook.

@CharlieK_news - Charlie’s Voice Rising

🚨 HERE IT IS. CONNECT THE DOTS. Turns out Democrats weren’t just coordinating with NGOs on illegal immigration. They were doing it on elections too. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson claims voter data is a “state secret.” Yet she hands that data to NGOs. And then pays them. With your money. Here’s how the pipeline works. Michigan sends voter data to ERIC. ERIC passes it to another nonprofit called the Center for Election Innovation & Research, CEIR. The same man sits at the center of both. David Becker. Founder. Executive Director. партий hack. And then it gets ugly. In 2020, Becker’s CEIR sent $12 MILLION to Benson’s own nonprofit right before the election. Read that again. A sitting Secretary of State. Receiving millions through a nonprofit. On the eve of the election she helped oversee. Welcome to November 3, 2020. This is why people are furious. NGOs aren’t “independent.” They’re government-funded political weapons. A racket Congress built and refuses to dismantle. ⸻ Now the money trail. David Becker runs CEIR. Mark Zuckerberg routed roughly $400 MILLION into CEIR in 2020. That cash didn’t just appear. It was used to reshape election operations nationwide. ⸻ The Zuckerbucks Explosion Benson’s nonprofit, the Michigan Center for Election Law and Administration, was basically dormant for years. It usually raised under $50,000. So small it only had to file a basic IRS postcard. Then 2020 hits. Suddenly, it receives $12 MILLION from CEIR. CEIR, funded by Zuckerberg. The stated goal: “fortifying” the election through mass mail-in voting. Funny timing. The nonprofit was founded back in 2010 when Benson first ran for Secretary of State. She lost. Later, she wins the office in 2018. The nonprofit quietly sits on ice. Until 2020. This time, Benson is in government. The nonprofit is active again. And almost nobody questions the conflict. Michigan Public Radio called it a “nonpartisan statewide initiative.” NPR praised it. Time Magazine framed the Zuckerbucks operation as necessary and heroic. Every attempt to ban private money in Michigan elections failed. Now here’s the kicker. Benson is running for governor in 2026. As Secretary of State. Overseeing the election. And that nonprofit? Still there. Dormant. Waiting. Same players. Same playbook. Same money pipeline. This isn’t oversight. It’s a system.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Michigan voter data is described as a state secret that Jocelyn Benson is safeguarding from the federal government, with the speaker claiming she told authorities they can’t have it and contrasting this with the idea of not wanting the federal government to have your social security number. The speaker then alleges that Benson “gives our voter data away” to a nonprofit, and that she has done so since taking office in 2019. The nonprofit identified is the electronic registration information center, ERIC. The claim is not that Benson gives data away to ERIC per se, but that she spends taxpayer money to provide data to ERIC. The speaker contends that on television Benson presents herself as the guardian of voters’ data, while, in reality, she uses public funds to share it. After ERIC receives the voter data, the speaker says it is sent to another nonprofit, the Center for Election Innovation and Research, or CEIR. The common thread alleged between ERIC and CEIR is a liberal operative named David Becker, who is said to have founded both organizations. The speaker asserts that in 2020, Becker’s CEIR gave Benson’s nonprofit $12,000,000 on the eve of the election. The claim continues that Benson used part of this funding to purchase Jocelyn Benson campaign ads. The speaker notes that this year, Lansing Republicans attempted to pull Michigan out of ERIC, as eight other states had already left, but the Republicans could not secure the votes to do so. The transcript suggests that Republicans facing Benson in the governor’s race should make this a campaign issue. It is presented as an easy story on the campaign trail: Jocelyn Benson’s friends obtain Michigan voter data and are paid to manage it, while Michigan taxpayers fund both sides of the lawsuit between Benson and the U.S. Department of Justice. The speaker connects the financial support from CEIR to Benson’s nonprofit with the broader political dynamic involving Benson and the DOJ.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And tell it. Michigan voter data is a state secret, and she's safeguarding it from the federal government. I told them they can't have it. Because god knows you wouldn't want the federal government to have your social security number. But what if I told you Benson gives our voter data away to a non profit and that she has for years since taking office in 2019? This is the electronic registration information center or ERIC. And it's not quite right to say Benson gives our data away to ERIC. Actually, she spends taxpayer money to do this. She spends our money to give away your data. Then on TV, Benson play acts as the guardian of your data. I told them they can't have it. Once Eric gets the voter data, it sends it out to another nonprofit. This one is called the Center for Election Innovation and Research or CEIR. The common thread between Eric and CEIR is a liberal operative named David Becker. He founded both. In 2020, Becker's CEIR gave Benson's nonprofit $12,000,000 on the eve of the election. Naturally, Benson used it to buy Jocelyn Benson ads. I'm secretary of state Jocelyn Benson. This year, Lansing Republicans smelled a rat. They tried to pull Michigan out of Eric as eight other states have already left, but they didn't have the votes. Republicans facing Benson in the governor's race would be smart to make this a campaign issue. On the campaign trail, this is an easy story to tell. Jocelyn Benson's friends get Michigan voter data and they get paid to take it, while Michigan taxpayers get to fund both sides of the lawsuit between Benson and the US Department of Justice.
CharlieK_news
Posted - January 1, 2026 at 1:15 PM
Saved - January 1, 2026 at 3:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m highlighting a once-in-a-generation betrayal. HUD exposed over $5.2B in fraudulent housing payments in 2024 under Biden, with an 11% error rate. $5.2B sent to inactive accounts, $77M to people who are dead, $150M wired to nonexistent SSNs, $288M inflated rents. This wasn’t a mistake; it’s systemic rot. We need full audits, freeze the money, fire the people responsible, and refer cases for criminal prosecution. Imagine all four. UNACCEPTABLE.

@CharlieK_news - Charlie’s Voice Rising

🚨 BREAKING. This is a once-in-a-generation betrayal of the American people. HUD just exposed over $5 BILLION in fraudulent housing payments in 2024 alone under Joe Biden. Let that sink in. An error rate above 11%. In a single year. Read it again. • $5.2 BILLION sent to inactive accounts • $77 MILLION paid to people who are dead • $150 MILLION wired to nonexistent Social Security numbers • $288 MILLION flushed on wildly inflated rent This wasn’t a mistake. This wasn’t oversight. This was systemic rot. We need to DOGE Housing immediately. Full audits. Freeze the money. Fire the people responsible. Refer cases for criminal prosecution. That’s just one year. Now imagine all four. UNACCEPTABLE.

Video Transcript AI Summary
HUD identified robust improper payments in rental assistance programs. About $77,000,000 in payments to around 30,000 dead tenants, about $150,000,000 paid to people with nonexistent Social Security numbers, and around $288,000,000 paid to support excessively high rent. According to HUD, the vast majority of these incorrect payments, $5,200,000,000.0 of them, were made to people with inactive sam.gov accounts—the government website where people can register for assistance. The payments under scrutiny fall under two programs: tenant-based rental assistance and project-based rental assistance. Project-based rental assistance subsidizes housing units so low-income individuals can afford them with the government paying the property owner, and tenant-based rental assistance goes directly to the person in need. In total, HUD sent down around $50,400,000,000.0 in rental assistance payments in 2024 to more than 204,000 individuals. The potential error flagged by HUD would make up for around 11.5% of these payments. Secretary Turner said in a statement, HUD will continue investigating the shocking results and will take appropriate action to hold bad actors account.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About $77,000,000 in payments to around 30,000 dead tenants. About 150,000,000 was paid out to people with nonexistent Social Security numbers, and around 288,000,000 was paid to support excessively high rent. But according to HUD, the vast majority of these incorrect payments, 5,200,000,000.0 of them, were made to people with inactive sam.gov accounts, the government website where people can register for assistance. The payments that are being scrutinized here fall under two programs, tenant based rental assistance and project based rental assistance. Project based rental assistance subsidizes housing units so low income individuals can afford them with the government paying the property owner, and then tenant based rental assistance goes directly to the person in need. In total, HUD sent down around 50,400,000,000.0 in rental assistance payments in 2024 to more than 204,000 individuals. The potential error flagged by HUD would make up for around 11.5% of these payments. Secretary Turner said in a statement, HUD will continue investigating the shocking results and will take appropriate action to hold bad actors account
CharlieK_news
Posted - November 16, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Saved - November 17, 2025 at 5:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m summarizing a post that claims 2 minutes of surveillance show a city minivan delivering boxes labeled “CCP Bidens” to and from a building, with Gretchen Whitmer driving. It alleges Benson and Nessel hauled in more boxes late at night, and asserts turnout numbers dropped from 155,508,985 in 2020 to 140,306,875 in 2024, implying ballots were flipped and Barr & Wray ignored it.

@CharlieK_news - Charlie’s Voice Rising

🚨 TWO MINUTES OF SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE THEY HOPED YOU’D NEVER SEE. Conspiracy Day — Nov 3–4, 2020 Detroit, Michigan • TCF Center Roughly 7 hours after polls closed, security cameras capture something wild: A city-registered minivan pulls up… and out step Jocelyn Benson and Dana Nessel, unloading boxes labeled for “CCP Bidens.” Gretchen “Whitbag” is behind the wheel. At 3:53 a.m., Whitmer leaves the building. At 4:30 a.m., she comes back — and Benson & Nessel haul in another round of those same boxes. Then look at the numbers they don’t want you thinking about: 2020 turnout: 155,508,985 2024 turnout: 140,306,875 → 15,202,110 voters… vanished. Mail-in ballots flipped the country — and Barr & Wray looked the other way instead of blowing the whistle.

CharlieK_news
Posted - November 15, 2025 at 5:45 PM
Saved - November 16, 2025 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Mike Benz claim on Rogan that during the Obama years USAID funneled $1.2B through Cayman Islands accounts as “aid for Pakistan,” but the money funded ZunZuneo, a Cuban Twitter-like project to spark rent-a-riots and topple governments.

@CharlieK_news - Charlie’s Voice Rising

🚨WOW… Mike Benz just dropped a wild bombshell on Joe Rogan’s podcast. During the Obama years, USAID pushed $1.2 BILLION through Cayman Island accounts, pretending it was “aid for Pakistan”… …but the cash actually funded ZunZuneo — a Cuban Twitter-clone built to spark rent-a-riots and topple governments around the world. You can’t make this up.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a scandal during the Obama-era USAID operations in Cuba, stating that rogue activities were run and that the aim is to reveal to the American people where tax dollars are going and how programs are structured to fool Congress and the White House. Key points: - Zunzanillo was an online social networking microblogging service created by USAID and marketed to Cuban users. It was a Twitter-like platform with the same user interface and like/retweet features, referred to in Cuban slang as the “bird.” The operation spanned roughly 2009–2014. - USAID invested about $1,200,000,000 in promoting Arab Spring–style social media revolutions, funding activist groups and civil society organizations to learn to use Facebook, Twitter, hashtags, and to coordinate street protests to topple governments. - Because Cuba did not allow US social media, the operation recreated a Cuban-looking Twitter-like service. The project began in 2010, using funds concealed as humanitarian aid for Pakistan, even though Cuba is not near Pakistan. The main contractor was Creative Associates International (CAI), with CAI designing the network. - The funds were concealed in the budget as humanitarian aid for Pakistan, routed through front companies using Cayman Islands bank accounts, and recruiting business executives who were not told of ties to the US government, according to the AP. - The network reached about 60,000 Cuban subscribers. The initiative reportedly included a surveillance dimension, building a vast database of Cuban subscribers (gender, age, political tendencies) that could be used for political purposes. The data were to be used for micro-targeting anti- and pro-government users. - Initial content would be noncontroversial, focusing on sports, music, and hurricane updates. The internal plan was to lure users in with these topics, then, once a critical mass was reached, gradually introduce political messages via social bots to encourage dissent and organize “smart mobs” or rental riots. - The strategy mirrored tactics used in Egypt and Tunisia, aiming to trigger a Cuban spring and “renegotiate the balance of power between state and society.” The Guardian has a detailed piece on this, describing the internal files that outlined luring Cubans with music, sports, and hurricane updates before pushing political content. - To conceal involvement, the operation reportedly used Cayman Islands front companies and designated funds as humanitarian aid, raising questions about US fingerprints. The discussion suggests this approach raises diplomatic blowback concerns and implies a preference for formal intelligence agencies in such operations. The speaker emphasizes that the material shows how the programs were structured to influence Cuba, how funds were misrepresented, and how data collection and targeted messaging were planned for political outcomes, reminding listeners of the broader implications for US statecraft.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was a scandal during Obama the Obama USAID era. Now we were running a number of of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. By the way, I have to say for the record, I'm no fan of the Cuban government. I I I'm and I'm not even weighing in on whether it's the right or wrong thing to do, you know, in terms of regime change there or, you know, liberating people there from autocratic excess by that government. I'm simply showing the American people where your tax dollars are going and how these things are structured in order to systematically fool you and to fool congress and to fool the White House. So for example so this is this is and and and I'll I'll show a couple other things in a second here, but it so this is Zunzanillo. If yeah. So if you just scroll for a second, we'll start with this. Right? So it was an online social media just scroll up one second. We'll start at the top It was an online social social networking microblogging service created by USAID and marketed to Cuban users. This was a a Twitter knockoff. See, the background of this is this is 2009, 2014, that period. The state department in USAID were gangbusters gung ho on the promise of Arab Spring style social media revolutions to topple other governments. You know, that the Arab Spring was a Facebook revolution and a Twitter revolution. USAID pumped $1,200,000,000 in, you know, and we we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, lose learn how to use hashtags, learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knows where to go, what street to show up on, you know, what kind of slogans to, you know, to to use in order to create the pro democracy, you know, predicate for it. The problem was at the time Cuba did not allow US social media in. So they said, so they're not allowing Twitter in. How can we get a Twitter there but without calling it Twitter, without making it look like it's coming from The US? So what they did is they took the exact same thing as Twitter. Same user interface, same like and retweet button. Is is the Cuban slang word for for hummingbird. So just it means it's it's bird. It was the the Twitter bird, the whole thing. But the whole trick about it was you have to make it look like it's coming from the Cubans if you're going to do this operation. So what you'll see is it began running so this is 2010. This is right, you know, during the Arab Spring. And what you'll see is they took funds, millions of dollars of funds that were concealed as humanitarian funds designated for Pakistan. Now I don't know if, Joe or or the audience, if you looked at a map lately, but Pakistan is not exactly a next door neighbor of Cuba. Right? So and this is the this is the Wikipedia whitewashing, and we can get into the deeper layers of this. But contractors funded by USAID, I should note the main contractor was Creative Associates International, who's a frequent one. It's CAI CAI, not CIA. I promise. So they they concealed in the budget from senate, from congress, from the White House National Security Council. They said that that these were humanitarian funds for Pakistan, And then they ran that to their contractor, CAI, to, quote, set up a Byzantine system of front companies using Cayman Islands bank accounts and recruiting unsuspecting business executives who would not be told of the company's ties to the US government according to the AP. Private companies like Creative Associates International designed the network. The idea arose after they were given 500,000 stolen Cuban cell phones that are available on the black market. And then what you'll see if you scroll down is okay. The network dubbed the the Cuban Twitter reached about 60,000 Cuban subscribers. The initiative appears to also have had a surveillance dimension allowing a, quote, vast database of Cuban Zunzanillo subscribers, including gender, age, and receptiveness and political tendencies to be built with the Associated Press noting such data would could be used in the future for political purposes. By the way, these are all in quotes from the internal documents, and we can go through that. The data would then be used for micro targeting efforts towards anti and pro government users in Cuba. The developers aim to, at first, use noncontroversial content such as sports and music and hurricane updates, by the way. They they used hurricane updates in the internal things. You know, basically, a humanitarian front that if you sign up to this app, you'll you'll know about natural disasters in the area. Meanwhile, what was the plan the whole time? Once they built up enough subscribers, they would begin to introduce political messages through social bots and encourage dissent in this in this astroturfing. There's a great Guardian write up on this. If you if you go to Guardian Zunzanillo, you can see see how crazy just type in Zunzanillo smart mob Guardian. You'll see the internal files explicitly said, we're gonna lure them in with music, sports, hurricane updates. You have to join you have to join, you know, this you know, Twitter in Cuba if you want, you know, to be relevant in the culture and see what's trending in sports and music. If you wanna safe in your homes, if you wanna know where hurricanes are going, Twitter you know, Cuban Twitter is the the fastest place to get this. It's humanitarian work for you know, that's we're saving lives by doing this. But the whole point is once they hit a critical mass, they would create rental riots. And and they would use this the same way they used it in Egypt and Tunisia to topple those governments under the Obama administration. They would organize smart mobs, rental riots. And if and if you if you scroll down, there's some you know, this this is a fantastic article. Highly recommend. There's a lot more there. But but okay. Stop right there. Scroll up a little bit. Scroll up a little bit. Okay. Documents show the US government plan to build a subscriber base through noncontroversial news content, news messages on soccer music and hurricane updates. This is in The Guardian. Later, when the network reached a critical mass, perhaps hundreds of thousands, operators would introduce political content aimed at inspiring Cubans to to organize, quote, smart mobs. Mass gatherings called at a moment's notice that might trigger a Cuban spring or as one USA document put it, quote, renegotiate the balance of power between state and society. And, you know so one more thing if you if you wanna look up on this to see how they how they conceal it. If you just type in USAID, Zunzanillo, and the word and discrete or or discrete action. And you'll see how USAID when when this scandal popped off, everyone said, what the hell? How did this happen? This is classic CIA work. You're using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You're saying it's you're earmarking it for Pakistan you know, Pakistani aid. This has clear implications for US statecraft if this gets busted. Is This what the c this why we tasked the CIA to do this. Plausible viability. If something has diplomatic blowback and we don't want US fingerprints on it, we need a formal intelligence agency because there's diplomatic blowback if US fingerprints are revealed.
CharlieK_news
Posted - June 3, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Saved - June 4, 2025 at 3:56 AM

@CharlieK_news - Charlie Kirk 🇺🇸 Commentary

🚨 INSANE: Democrat Rep. Laura Friedman admits that about 70 House Democrats in a ‘shadow government’ meet weekly to block President Trump's agenda. Why do these people hate America so much? https://t.co/9zOoDORStl

Video Transcript AI Summary
A litigation working group of around 75 House members meets weekly with Attorneys General to discuss legal strategy. This happens consistently behind the scenes. There is nonstop discussion and introduction of bills and legislation. They are also consistently active on social media, navigating throttling and complex analytics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every single week, we have a a litigation working group where a large group of us, and I'm talking there's maybe 75 members of the house sit down every single week with the AGs to talk about legal strategy. This is all going on every single week behind the scenes. The it is nonstop. Nonstop talk. Nonstop introduction of bills and legislation. Nonstop being on social media as much as we can without being throttled and without the, you know, crazy analytics and doing all these things.
CharlieK_news
Posted - June 1, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Saved - June 2, 2025 at 1:02 PM

@CharlieK_news - Charlie Kirk 🇺🇸 Commentary

🚨 BREAKING NEWS : CIA Director John Ratcliffe DROPS BOMBSHELL 💥 Confirming Sen. Adam Schiff ORCHESTRATED a SHADY PLOT with Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella to IMPEACH Trump! 😡 https://t.co/Lbsf36XYiP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The inspector general for the intelligence community cannot provide information about contacts between the "Hipsey majority" and the whistleblower before the whistleblower's involvement. Therefore, that information can only come from the "Hipsey majority" themselves. These individuals are fact witnesses in the same investigation they are running. It is claimed that nowhere else in the United States can someone be both a fact witness and the investigator, especially in an investigation to remove a president. It is asserted that Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I can tell you one thing that we've learned very clearly, and that is that the inspector general for the intelligence community can provide no information about the contacts between the Hipsey majority and the whistleblower prior to his involvement. So the only way that we'll be able to get that information is from the Hipsey majority themselves. They are fact witnesses in the same investigation that they are now running. Nowhere else in The United States Of America can you be both a fact witness and the prosecutor or investigation in anything, much less an investigation to remove a president from office. It's entirely inappropriate, and chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation where his, committee, members or staff, are fact witnesses about contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process.
CharlieK_news
Posted - May 22, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Saved - May 23, 2025 at 12:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A massive scandal is unfolding in D.C. as DOJ Pardon Attorney Ed Martin reveals that Ron Klain, Anita Dunn, Steve Ricchetti, Bob Bauer, and Jill Biden are implicated in Joe Biden’s autopen scandal. This situation is being called 100 times bigger than Watergate, raising serious questions about forged pardons and abuse of power. The nation is demanding answers and accountability.

@CharlieK_news - Charlie Kirk 🇺🇸 Commentary

BREAKING 🚨 MASSIVE SCANDAL EXPLODES IN D.C. DOJ Pardon Attorney Ed Martin drops bombshell: Ron Klain, Anita Dunn, Steve Ricchetti, Bob Bauer, and even Jill Biden named by WHISTLEBLOWER in Joe Biden’s AUTOPEN SCANDAL! 100x BIGGER than WATERGATE Forged Pardons? Abuse of Power? The Nation DEMANDS ANSWERS. Where are the ARRESTS?!

CharlieK_news
Posted - May 7, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Saved - May 8, 2025 at 9:02 PM

@CharlieK_news - Charlie Kirk 🇺🇸 Commentary

HOLY COW🚨 Ilhan Omar RAN AWAY as she was confronted about her r*cist rhetoric towards White People just based off their skin TIME TO REVOKE HER CITIZENSHIP AND DEPORT ILHAN OMAR https://t.co/pXwVpxAa3M

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person asked a congresswoman if she would apologize for racist rhetoric inferring that white men should be put on a terror watch list solely based on their skin color. The person asked if she truly thinks white men are the greatest terror threat facing America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman, real quick, will you apologize for your racist rhetoric inferring that white men should be put on a terror watch list just solely of the basis of their color of their skin? You don't wanna apologize for your racist rhetoric, congresswoman, calling for white men to be profiled? Do you truly think white men are the greatest terror threat facing America?
View Full Interactive Feed