TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Chicago1Ray
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
The ultimate FAFO 🚨 Reach around and give yourselves a big pat on the back folks... you did it, they heard you @AGJamesUthmeier (FL) announced that Erik Martindale is no longer a registered nurse Play stupid games, and win stupid prizes BRAVO 👏 THE POWER OF X IS REAL 🔥
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Oh look another nurse who wants to be famous... meet Erik Martindale, he says he has a right to not administer anesthesia to MAGA patients @AGJamesUthmeier @FLNursingBoard (RP) if you want this guy terminated, the AG is tagged, he'll see this if we get a good response https://t.co/G0Ne9oSaj1
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
HOLY F'CK 🚨 TikTok'r went to Columbus, Ohio & found empty daycare centers like Nick Shirley did in Minneapolis He asks neighbors across the street, if they've ever seen kids there... one man said no Who else wants every Somali daycare center in the country to be shutdown https://t.co/pZxXP68C2t
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Columbus, Ohio, in front of the Great Minds Learning Academy, one of several day care centers associated with the Somali community, speakers discuss a report by Nick Shirley about fraudulent daycare facilities in Minneapolis. They note this is the second-largest Somali community in the United States and intend to investigate further. The team attempts to visit the first center, knocking and ringing the doorbell, but no one answers and the door is locked.
They speak with a local man who says the daycare is owned by Somalians and mentions that he has never seen children there, noting that the center “use[s] the back door,” so they don’t see anyone coming in or out. He lives in the same building and confirms that he has not seen kids at the location. Another speaker reiterates, “I’ve just seen it the building itself. I’ve never seen nobody come out the building or go into the building.”
The group proceeds to the back of the building, as suggested, but finds nothing there. They decide to move on, noting there are many more centers to visit, and plan to go around the city to speak with people at additional locations. They sign off with a plan to continue the investigation and stay tuned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a day case center owned by Somalians and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Have you ever seen any kids in this place here?
Speaker 2: No. Not that I know of.
Speaker 3: I've just seen it the building itself. I've never seen nobody come out the building or go into the building.
Speaker 1: You've never seen anybody over there? No. Not at all. So right now, we are in front of the Great Minds Learning Academy. This is one of the many day care centers, learning centers here in Columbus, Ohio that are associated with the Somali community.
As you know, Nick Shirley put out a bombshell report about all these fraudulent daycare facilities in Minneapolis, Minnesota. So we wanted to come out to Columbus, Ohio and investigate what might be going on in the second largest Somali community in The United States Of America. So this place here is the first place we're gonna knock, and we're gonna see if anybody picks up or answers the door. Let's see. So it's locked.
We're ringing the doorbell here. Knocking on the door. Nobody's picking up. So we're not sure what the hell is going on here, but we're gonna we're gonna get out of here. Now there's somebody over there.
How you doing, sir? I'm sure you see the reports over the weekend about all the daycare centers in Minnesota. We just wanted to see what was going on. Did you you know anything about this place here?
Speaker 0: It's a daycare center owned by, Somalians and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Do you ever see any kids there?
Speaker 0: Not because they use the back door, so I wanna know if they Oh,
Speaker 1: they use the back door?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I never seen nobody come in here, but they use the back door.
Speaker 1: But but have you ever seen any kid? You live around here?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. On this building right here.
Speaker 1: Oh, you're
Speaker 0: in this building? Yeah.
Speaker 1: You're in this building too. Let me ask you. Have have you ever seen any kids in this place here?
Speaker 2: No. Not that I know of.
Speaker 3: They use the back, so I've never seen nobody come out the front.
Speaker 1: You've never seen anybody over there?
Speaker 0: No. Not at all. I've just seen
Speaker 3: it the building itself. I've never seen nobody come out the building or go into the building.
Speaker 1: So we came to the back just like those guys suggested and there's nothing here. You know, we could keep poking around, but there's so many of these centers to go to. We're just getting started. So we're gonna go around the city. We're gonna go to a few more of these places.
We're gonna see if we can get anybody to talk to us. Stay tuned.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
(RP) @RandPaul needs to see this 🚨 Antonio Gracias found (20M) dead people on Social Security, (2.4M) Illegals were issued SS numbers Elon ~ there was a massive program to ultimately change the voting map of the U.S People cannot be rewarded when they come here Illegally https://t.co/7MdJ8hNICX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antonio explains that they are reviewing Social Security to understand fraud, and they found that twenty million people marked as alive are actually dead in the Social Security database. He notes a striking trend: how many Social Security numbers were issued, from 270,000 in 2021 to about 2.1 million in 2024, and identifies these as noncitizens receiving Social Security numbers.
He emphasizes that this finding came while mapping the entire Social Security system to identify fraud, and he credits government workers who pointed them in this direction and took risks to share information. He states that the work is not political and that his family background motivates a focus on the country’s future.
Regarding how noncitizens enter the country, Antonio describes several paths. One pathway is arriving at a port of entry, requesting asylum, and undergoing an asylum interview, after which legal status can be pursued. Another pathway involves crossing the border, where, according to his account, border patrol officers can charge a misdemeanor or felony under 13-25 or issue an administrative offense, effectively a “parking ticket.” After crossing, individuals are released on their recognizance and given a Notice to Appear (NTA), with wait times for immigration judges averaging about six years; he notes there are 700 immigration judges and a population of about 5,500,000 people.
Once in the country, he says, asylum or other statuses allow individuals to apply for a document. They file Form I-765, the work authorization form, and the Social Security Administration automatically sends the person a Social Security number by mail, with no interview and no ID required.
Antonio reiterates that this is not about a particular administration being asleep at the switch; he claims it was a large-scale program intended to import as many illegals as possible to change the voting map and create a permanent one-party state. He asserts that the defaults in the system—from Social Security to benefit programs—have been set to “max inclusion, max pay for these people and minimum collection.”
He reports finding 1.3 million individuals in Medicaid, and notes that, across all benefit programs, groups from this 5,500,000 population appear. To understand the motivation, they took a sample of voter registration records and found people from this population registered to vote, and some who did vote. They have referred those cases to prosecution at the Home Ed Secure Investigation Service. This action, according to Antonio, is already underway. He credits Elon and others for confirming these findings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, Antonio, can you tell us what what you Antonio is helping out with Social Security. So just trying to review Social Security where you may have heard that we found twenty million dead people marked as alive in the Social Security database. This is too so crazy. And then you'll notice there's a strange trend here where how many Social Security numbers were issued? It's do you want to
Speaker 1: Yeah. So let me tell you what happened here. We we started at the top of the system.
Speaker 0: You want to talk about a lot of it.
Speaker 1: We started at the top of the system mapping the whole system of Social Security to understand where all the fraud was. And there's a lot of great people there that showed us really a lot of waste. And so that came with a big list of stuff they're working on. You've heard some of that already. But this is what jumped out at us.
When we saw these numbers, we were like, what is this? In 'twenty one, you see two hundred and seventy thousand people goes all the way to two point one million in '24. These are noncitizens that are getting Social Security numbers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. This this is a mind blowing chart.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just this this literally blew us away. Like, we went there to find fraud, and we found this by accident. And this isn't political, by the way. My parents are immigrants.
Yeah. This country's been great to us. My brother and sister are all born in Spain. I'm pro legal immigration. This is not this is not political.
This is not political. This is about America and the future of America. And there are a lot of good people in the system that pointed this in this direction. I wanna I wanna honor them right now that work in the government today who took risk to show us these numbers and tell us what's going on. Yeah.
So I want to stop for a minute. Want to I want to honor those people today. Very good people. Very good people. I have been from DC to Social Security offices to the border to track this down.
And very good people have helped us along the way. I wanna thank them.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: This number, what this is, is when you come in the country, if you're illegal, there's a couple ways to come in. You come in through a port of entry and you can tell them you're afraid. You'll get they'll give you an asylum asylum case. You'll get an interview, then you get in. That's one way to do it.
Another way to do it is to just go to the border. Literally, this happened. I talked to border patrol myself. Elon was there too. I went to Laredo, and I went to Brownsville.
Elon went to Eagle Pass. You walk up to a border patrol officer, and you tell them you wanna come in. They have a couple of choices. They could charge you with a misdemeanor or a felony under thirteen twenty five, or they can make an administrative offense, like a parking ticket, basically. They were told to do that, make an administrative offense under the last administration.
And you go walk across the border, they do what's called a release your neurocognizance, and they give you an NTA, notice to appear, which to appear to judge. The wait times on judges are like average six years. Look at Grock, you'll see it on immigration judges. There's only 700 of them. This is 5,500,000 people.
Okay? So what happens then? Once you're in the country, and you've got asylum through one of these pathways, and we've mapped the whole thing out, you can apply for a document. You file a seven six five, it's the work form. You get this form called the seven six six, That's the authorization.
And then Social Security Administration automatically sends you in the mail your Social Security number. No interview. No ID.
Speaker 0: This is worth like just reiterating. It it it's not that it's not people sometimes think that under the Biden administration that that he was simply asleep at the switch. He wasn't asleep. They weren't asleep at the switch. It it it was a massive large scale program to import as many illegals as possible, ultimately to change the entire voting map of The United States and disenfranchise the the American people, and make it a permanent, deep blue, one party state from which there would be no escape.
Speaker 1: Look, if I hadn't seen this myself, I'm not sure I believed it. I went through it myself and mapped it. And Elon is right. This is true. The defaults in the system from Social Security to all of the benefit programs have been set to max inclusion, max pay for these people and minimum collection.
That's what's happening. We found one point three million of them already on Medicaid, as an example. We've gone through on every benefit program we went through, we found groups from this particular group of people, this 5,500,000 people, in those benefit programs. And then what was really, really disturbing us was why. We're asking ourselves why.
And so we actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records. And we found people here registered to vote in this population. Yes.
Speaker 0: And who did vote?
Speaker 1: And we found some by sampling that actually did vote. And we have referred them to prosecution at the Home Ed Secure Investigation Service. Yeah. Already. Already.
That is already happening.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
LOVE THIS BEATDOWN 🚨 You understand that Barack Obama had the same policies on immigration that (R's) have, yet your sitting here saying that we're gestapo the gestapo Anna Paulina-Luna says any state participating in the No Kings Rally will have funding withheld LOVE THIS 👇 https://t.co/SUcbzbghrY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The session centers on evaluating past presidential performance and contemporary immigration politics. The speaker argues that the movement’s criticisms of immigrants and open borders would have appeared during Barack Obama’s presidency as well, pointing out that Obama is sometimes labeled “the deporter in chief.” When asked if Obama was a good president, the participants largely affirm that he did a good job: Governor Walts, Governor Pritzker, Governor Hochul, and Perryman all express the view that Obama’s presidency was good.
The speaker then contends that Obama’s immigration policies were largely the same as the policies Republicans are currently opposing, noting that “Barack Obama had the very same policies for the most part on immigration that Republicans are parroting today.” The speaker contrasts this with charges that current protesters are labeling as Gestapo-like, arguing that those who advocate for open borders actually harm both Americans and those who are unauthorized immigrants, asserting that the policies do not arise from understanding or sympathy but have the opposite effect.
A crucial part of the argument accuses those in power of exploiting racial identities for political ends. The speaker claims that “when you use brown people, just like they use black people with BLM and Marxists during BLM to usher that in,” money travels “back to the communist party,” and that elected officials’ platform is being used to usher in communism rather than defend American values. The speaker admonishes the audience not to roll their eyes, saying the topic is serious and that money is involved.
The speaker emphasizes that the information being provided should inform decisions and asserts that if a person truly upholds American ideologies and constitutional perspectives, they should not be speaking at the rally. A formal action is announced: the speaker “authorized a letter to be sent to my office to the president of The United States to rescind millions of dollars in funding that we know are going to the no kings protest that were authorized and basically given under the last administration.” The claim is that Congress should act to protect the American people from foreign interests, foreign governments, and also the communist influence, rather than simply pointing fingers or blaming others.
The statement ends with “Well, general lady yield,” signaling a procedural transition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And they're not about immigrants. If they did, would have been protesting under Barack Obama, who's also dubbed the deporter in chief. And frankly, think many of you would say that Barack Obama was a good president. Are you gonna say that Barack Obama wasn't a good president? Yes or no.
Governor Walts, do you think he was a good president? Do I think Barack Obama was Correct. President? I think he did a good job. Okay.
How about you, governor Pritzker? I think he did a good job. Hochul? Hochul? Hochul.
Hochul. And yes, he did do a good job. Okay. Next. Perryman.
I think president Obama did a good job. So then you would understand that Barack Obama had the very same policies for the most part on immigration that Republicans are parroting today, and yet you guys are sitting here saying that we're Gestapo. And what I would tell you is that what happens with open borders is that the real people that are coming here, the ones that are exported, actually hurts people on both sides, not just Americans but the illegals. Some of you had said here to the to the actual committee that you are doing what you can to assist these people, but what I would say is that your policies aren't actually done from a place of understanding and and and sympathy. I would say that it's actually doing the exact opposite.
And when you use brown people, just like they use black people with BLM and Marxists during BLM to usher that in, when you use brown people and you put Mexican flags with them saying that you stand up for illegal immigrants, you follow the money and it's going back to the communist party, What you're essentially doing is using your platform as elected officials, the trust the American people have put in you, essentially to usher in communism. You're not actually fighting for American values. Don't roll your eyes because it's a serious topic and that's where the money's coming from. So now I'm informing you. So now you guys can make your decisions, but please be informed, sir, mister Walls, that if you truly do uphold the American ideologies and perspectives on the constitution, you should not be speaking at that rally.
I've given you the correct information. And as of right now, I've authorized a letter to be sent to my office to the president of The United States to rescind millions of dollars in funding that we know are going to the no kings protest that were authorized and basically given under the last administration. That is what congress is supposed to do, not point fingers, not blame people, but actually ensure that the American people are protected and not fighting for foreign interests, foreign governments, and also the communist. Well, general lady yield
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Wait a minute... the media told us that black people didn't want Trump to send the National Guard into D.C It's actually pretty dope to see people making videos sharing how peaceful D.C is since Trump cleaned up the streets Boy were they wrong https://t.co/NuZCFCB48b
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 notes it's encouraging to see videos from the DC area showing peace since Trump cleaned up the streets, observed across DC and not just the nice areas, and says 'a lot of people who are really happy with the streets being cleaned up.' They reference PG County critics who call it 'unnecessary' and argue biased media, asserting 'No one has been racially profiled in DC.' They credit critical thinking, stating 'I became a free thinker, and I'm so glad that he did,' and admit 'I was carnal minded. I was lukewarm I was a lukewarm Christian because of the area where I'm from.' They share proximity to DC and conclude with 'shout out to our president of United States, for real' and 'shout out to my hometown, the DMV, for feeling safe.' 'Amen.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's actually pretty dope to see people make videos from the DC area sharing how peaceful it is now since Trump cleaned up the streets. It's really dope to see and witness. And it's, like, all over DC, not just the nice areas in the Washington DC area. When I shared on my Facebook page and my IG, how there's a lot of people who are really happy with the streets being cleaned up. Oh, a lot of people that I know where I'm from, which is PG County, they are like, no.
It's unnecessary. No. It's this. It's that. And it's just, you know, for anyone that thinks that this isn't necessary, it really does sadden my heart for people who think like that.
It's like you just wanna think the worst of the worst, just the negative, negative, nasty, nasty mindset. And like a lot of these people that have moved like this, they claim they're Christians. They claim they are believers of Christ Jesus, and they are moving like that. Literally going by what the media says, claiming they've seen reports. I've read articles too.
And a lot of those articles that I've read about what's going on in DC are very biased, and all they are doing is just promoting fear. No one has been racially profiled in DC. No one has. And I'm not sure where people are getting these reports from besides false media. You know, I'm so glad I became a free thinker, and I'm so glad I have used critical thinking.
Yeah. Because if I didn't start doing this, I would have been like everybody else from my hometown because I used to think like that. But the Lord delivered me, and I'm so glad that he did. I was carnal minded. I was lukewarm I was a lukewarm Christian because of the area where I'm from.
Because when you're living up there, folks just think you just go to church, say, hallelujah, praise the Lord, speak in tongues, but I could go to concerts. I could do this and do that, whatever. It causes confusion within the mind, like and that doesn't please God. So, again, I know I just went and left with my conversation, but my whole point is I'm happy for everyone in the DMV that feels safe because y'all y'all deserve to feel safe too. And on the road, that's one of the reasons why I moved away from home because of the crime that was happening there.
Because where I used to live, I used to live not that far from DC. I used to live ten minutes away from Southern Avenue Southeast because I lived in Super Hills. So to see what the president is doing and how folks are just like happy, I'm happy for y'all. I am. I am extremely happy.
And as much as I would love to focus on my other socials, I'm not because all they're gonna do is reject it. And you know what? That's on them, not me. So, anyway, shout out to our president of United States, for real. And shout out to my hometown, the DMV, for feeling safe.
And, yeah, y'all continue to enjoy the city and enjoy the peace that y'all deserve too. Amen.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
HOLY F'CK 🚨 John Bolton was under investigation during the first Trump admin for publishing Classified Doc's in his book..he violated his NDA...which is a federal crime Hit that like button if this is exactly what you voted for on Nov 5th 👍 No one's above the law anymore https://t.co/5aKY47GIkA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion notes a probe during President Trump's term related to John Bolton's book and alleged NDA violations, with the probe reportedly dropping when Joe Biden became president. It suggests it could be picking up where that left off. Bolton’s security clearances were stripped earlier this year by President Trump, with Tulsi Gabbard removing them and concerns about Bolton still accessing documents. Bolton also lost his government-paid security detail and must rely on private security. At Bolton’s Bethesda, Maryland home, the FBI arrived early Friday; Bolton is cooperative and not under arrest. The process involves more than the FBI: a judge must sign off, and others at the Justice Department would be involved, presumably Attorney General Pam Bondi. No comments yet from the Justice Department or the FBI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did not, realize this, but there was a probe going on when president Trump was in office last time because John Bolton wrote a book, and the president he violated his NDA, the president said, in doing it. And they he felt as though there were classified information in that book. The probe dropped when Joe Biden became president. So is this picking up where that left off, David?
Speaker 1: It's possible. I don't know with a 100% certainty, but it is notable, guys, that John Bolton, ambassador Bolton's security clearances were stripped earlier this year by president Trump. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, took that security clearance away. They had concerns. The administration had concerns about ambassador Bolton still being able to access some of these documents and have some of those security clearances.
It's also notable that John Bolton had a security detail as well because of the threats from Iran on his life. That security detail, that government federal paid security detail was also taken away, by president Trump. So Bolton was to have to get some private security. So we're looking outside his home right now in Bethesda, Maryland. We're told that ambassador Bolton's being cooperative.
He's not under arrest, not in custody at this point, but still notable, 07:00 on a Friday morning, that the FBI, all of a sudden, is knocking on the door of John Bolton's home. And I also will say it's important that, you know, this is not just the FBI able to do this. A judge has to sign off on this. There are other layers involved here. It's not just the FBI says, let's go to John Bolton's house tomorrow morning and see if he has any classified documents.
There are certainly more procedures in there. A judge and others would have had to sign off on this as well as people at the justice department, presumably attorney general Pam Bondi. No comment right now, though, from the justice department. No comment from the FBI as well.
Speaker 0: So this start
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
HOLY F'CK 🚨 (Rep) Andy Ogles wrote a letter to Pam Bondi asking for denaturalization proceedings on Zohran Mamdani On the grounds that he gained citizenship thru misrepresentation and concealment of material support for terrorism THIS SHOULD HAPPEN https://t.co/P1L942LjrX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congressman Andy Ogles said Mamdani should be deported and that he has a letter to Attorney General Pambani demanding an investigation into whether Mamdani should be subject to denaturalization proceedings on the grounds that he may have procured US citizenship through willful misrepresentation or concealment of material support for terrorism. He argued that naturalization forms require disclosure of activities; in 2018, when he was naturalized, he failed to disclose some of the things he had been doing, one of which was joining the Democrat Socialists of America. "That's a communist organization," he said, which would have disqualified him from becoming a United States citizen. He added that if true, the process could begin with denaturalization, and that even if they can't prove it, it could create a template for other individuals. "They’re sleeper cells. They wanna undermine our way of life. They wanna take advantage of our generosity."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congressman Andy Ogles has said that this man should be deported. And he actually joins us now from a actual moving car. That's a busy politician right there. Congressman, good to have you on. You say Mamdani should be you you have a letter to to attorney general Pambani demanding investigation into whether Mamdani should be subject to denaturalization proceedings on the grounds that he may have procured US citizenship through willful misrepresentation or concealment of material support for terrorism.
Give us your claim here, sir.
Speaker 1: Well, so part of the the process when you fill out the naturalization forms, which, you know, here's a copy of one here, is you've gotta disclose your activities. So, like, communism, anti American activities. And so in 2018, when he was naturalized, he failed to disclose some of the things that he had been doing, one of which was joining the Democrat Socialists of America. That's a communist organization, which quite frankly, at that time, would have disqualified him from becoming a United States citizen. So what we're encouraging to do is the justice department to look into the timing of his joining that organization.
It would have been anti American. It would have fit the definition of what he would have been required to disclose and, quite frankly, would have made him most likely ineligible to become a naturalized citizen. So if that's true, then the process could begin with him being denaturalized. Now that being said, even if we can't prove or dot the i's and cross the t's and and get this guy on this and create the template for these other individuals who come to this country. They're sleeper cells.
They wanna undermine our way of life. They wanna take advantage of our generosity. Enough is enough. Look. I'm a proud American.
I love my country, love my flag, I love my god, and I love my family, And I'm tired of us being taken advantage of by the rest of the world.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's it's it's something to see this. You know, we we've we've gotten so complacent with the with the threat of what this ideology can bring to this country. And it really is scary how it's just celebrated in the streets now. It used to not be that way.
Congressman, we appreciate you coming on. Thank you,
Speaker 1: sir. Absolutely. Thank you.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
FLASHBACK 🚨 Obama denied knowledge of Hillary's server Bongino ~ someone in the (W.H) staff had to give Hillary's private email to the White House Communications agency..it had to be vetted first, they had to know Arrest Hillary Clinton.. LOCK HER UP https://t.co/XmrB2O1jXd
Video Transcript AI Summary
In March 2015, President Obama said he learned about Hillary Clinton's private email server through news reports. He stated his administration encourages transparency and that his own Blackberry emails are available and archived.
Dan Bongino claims Obama was not telling the truth, because emails to Obama's Blackberry had to be vetted and whitelisted in advance. Bongino states someone in the White House staff had to give Hillary Clinton's private email to the White House communications agency that handles the security of that device, therefore they had to know. He believes this provided an incentive for Obama's Department of Justice to make the Hillary Clinton email investigation disappear because Obama would have been a witness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, when did you first learn that Hillary Clinton used an email system outside the US government for, official business while
Speaker 1: she was secretary of state? At the same time, everybody else learned it through news reports.
Speaker 0: Were you disappointed? The policy
Speaker 1: of my administration is to encourage transparency, and that's why my emails through Blackberry that I carry around, all those records are, available and and archived. And I'm glad that, Hillary has instructed that, those emails, that had to do with official business need to be disclosed.
Speaker 2: So that was former president Obama in March 2015 being asked about what he knew about Hillary Clinton's private server. Let's bring in Dan Bongino, former NYPD officer, former Secret Service agent, host of the Dan Bongino show. Dan, good morning. So from part of what we learned from Michael Horowitz report is that, of course, president Obama was emailing one of a few people who had the private email address of Hillary Clinton, back and forth off of the official server, yet he claims he didn't know she had a private email.
Speaker 3: Pete, that's nonsense. And and, you know, now you you sense the frustration of large swaths of America who feel like, you know, there's two justice systems out there. You know, one for the elites and one for the rest of us who have to live under this. People are upset because Obama's clearly not telling the truth here, Pete. Let me let me debunk this thing for you immediately.
Barack Obama's BlackBerry, his personal BlackBerry, the emails that came into it had to be vetted in advance. They had to be white listed, the opposite of being blacklisted. Right? Somebody in the White House staff had to give Hillary Clinton's private email to that DWACA, the White House communications agency that handles that, the security of that device. They had to know.
He was not telling the truth. It's I mean, it's unbelievable what this administration got away with. And by the way, one more thing. That provides a perfect incentive for Barack Obama's Department of Justice to make the Hillary Clinton email investigation go away like an Alka Seltzer tablet and water because Barack Obama would have been a witness.
Speaker 2: Alright. Dan, you're a Trump supporter. You
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
The (CIA) had a secret binder on Trump, which has suddenly come up missing People's lives were ruined, bc of this Russia Collusion hoax....Obama's CIA illegally spied on Trump.... which is Treason John Brennan must stand trial for his crimes https://t.co/4RY5zKcM8L
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to Michael Schellenberger, the CIA asked the Five Eyes Alliance to spy on 26 Trump associates, initiating what became known as the Russia collusion hoax. This is based on information from multiple credible sources close to the House intelligence investigation. The CIA allegedly prompted interactions with these individuals, then flagged them as suspicious to the FBI.
Schellenberger claims details of this operation are stored in a top-secret binder, which Trump ordered declassified. There is speculation that the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago was an attempt to retrieve the binder. If the binder contains raw intelligence showing the US government initiated the Russia collusion hoax, it would contradict the official narrative, including the Durham investigation. Schellenberger suggests that weaponizing the intelligence community against a political candidate with the help of foreign allies is a uniquely dramatic event in US history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Former CIA director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates to be targeted by the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance, and then those interactions were the targets and were targeted by the FBI as suspicious. And that's how the FBI launched the Russia collusion hoax. The details of this entire operation have been stored in a top secret binder in a secret room in Washington. Trump ordered the whole thing declassified, and now the rumor is that the binder might be missing. Joining me now, one of the reporters who broke the story, Michael Schellenberger.
Michael, explain how this all started with the CIA picking these 26 Trump people.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Good to be with you, Jesse. Well, obviously, this is an extremely serious story and serious allegation by multiple credible sources that public and racket, that's Matt Taibi's publication, have spoken to. These are people that are close to the house intelligence investigation of how the Russia collusion hoax began. The story, as you mentioned, was that, oh, we were just informed by foreign intelligence about this.
Our sources tell us a very different story, which is that this was initiated by the US government. It came from within the US government's intelligence community, the CIA, that they asked the so called Five Eyes Nation's intelligence agencies, that's the other English speaking nations including Britain and Australia, to spy on 26 Trump associates or at least they had a list of the 26 associates that were identified. This is new information. Some people have theorized about this and speculated about it. We feel very confident that our sources were in a position to know and are very credible in this report.
It's obviously a very serious allegation because this is illegal spying and it's illegal election interference.
Speaker 0: Okay. So you're reporting that the CIA got these allies to bump these 26 Trump associates, create interactions, and then call these interactions suspicious and let the FBI know they were suspicious, and that starts the whole thing. What about this binder that encapsulates this whole thing and no one knows where it is right now or Trump has it? What's that?
Speaker 1: Well, Jesse, we'll have a piece tomorrow that is specifically about the binder, but, as a friend of, of the show and of yours on this, I'll say that there has been widespread speculation that this binder was the was the reason or a reason for the FBI raid of Mar A Lago, and we'll be discussing that tomorrow. But obviously, if this binder contains what we have been told that it contains, which may include raw intelligence, information showing that the US government, the CIA and the intelligence community of the US government initiated the Russia collusion hoax, that it did not occur in the way that the official story, including the Durham investigation, had portrayed it, then that's extremely serious information. And it may be if the FBI then went to go get it in order to continue the cover up of this information, that obviously adds an even more dramatic wrinkle to this. Again, we'll have more to say about it tomorrow, but this is a huge, huge story. I mean, I can't I've been thinking about it in the history of The United States Of America.
Have we ever had something like this where the intelligence community was weaponized against a political candidate and weapon and using our foreign allies to do it, I I can't think of a more important or dramatic story.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And then
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
HOLY F'CK 🔥 ICE agts show up unannounced to a construction site in Orlando Florida and arrested (33) illegals, those who didn't have legal ID were fingerprinted on site ICE went to local businesses warning of consequences for hiring any illegals HOW BOUT A HELL YEAH FOR ICE https://t.co/5rCDbbRMQn
Video Transcript AI Summary
ICE agents conducted a worksite enforcement operation at a new home development site near The Villages in Central Florida following concerns from community members about hiring practices. Agents questioned workers about their legal status, and those without valid documentation were fingerprinted to verify identities.
The operation, the first of its kind in Florida, involved approaching workers and initiating what ICE described as consensual conversations. Agents collected license plates and company names to launch further investigations.
Out of 361 construction workers spoken to, 33 were arrested, including four with felonies for re-entering the U.S. after deportation. Over 30 workers ran away. Agents also visited local businesses to announce upcoming inspections. Officials stated that this operation will not be the last.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is exclusive. Our team goes on a ride along with ICE agents as they carry out one for their first job site visits at a new home development site near a fast growing retirement community in Central Florida. And Dana Marie McNichol, she got to go along. She is live in Orlando this morning. Hi, Dana Marie.
Good morning.
Speaker 1: Hi, Dana. Good morning. Construction is booming in Florida, especially in and around the area of The Villages, as you mentioned, the world's largest growing retirement community. So we joined ICE as they went to this housing development unannounced after they opened an investigation.
Speaker 2: We're talking to everybody out here. Are you a citizen of The US?
Speaker 1: Agents moved from house to house approaching workers. ICE describes the interaction as a consensual and optional conversation since they didn't have a warrant. Agents questioned their legal status, and those who couldn't provide valid immigration documentation were fingerprinted on-site, part of a process to verify identities through a national immigration database. ICE says they opened an investigation after concerns from community members.
Speaker 2: We've received a lot of tip line reporting on the, you know, hiring practices of a lot of companies in the area, and so that's what we're doing today. We're obtaining a lot of license plates, company names to be able to follow-up on a lot of investigations we're gonna launch as a result of today's actions.
Speaker 1: This marks the first worksite enforcement operation of its kind in the state of Florida. Officials made it clear it will not be the last. Most workers did comply with officers' requests, but over 30 ran away. According to HSI Tampa, agents talked to 361 construction workers yesterday, but arrested 33. Four of them have a felony for coming back to The US after being deported.
And, Dana, the operation, it didn't end there. Agents also visited local businesses to let them know that in inspections are on the way.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Holy Sht 🔥 (MTG) is calling for the Censure of Ilhan Omar, says she's a foreign agent working in the interests of Somalia not America Most Americans think she should be expelled from Congress for marrying her brother to help him gain citizenship...this should happen https://t.co/WHMEbiqnQa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Ilhan Omar is accused of treasonous statements made at a Minneapolis event on 01/27/2024. It is claimed Omar told Somalians she would pressure the US government into certain actions, assuring them the US government will only do what Somalians in the US tell them to do, and that Somalia will never be in danger as long as she is in US Congress.
The resolution states that Omar said she is there to protect the interest of Somalia from inside the US system. Referencing George Washington's warning against pretended patriotism, the resolution asserts Omar's statements violate her oath to defend the US Constitution and reveal her as a foreign agent acting on behalf of Somalia.
The resolution calls for the censure of Ilhan Omar, her presentation in the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure, a public reading of the resolution by the speaker, and her removal from the Committee on the Budget and the Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Follows. Recognized. Centuring representative Ilhan Omar of Somali I mean, Minnesota. Whereas elected members of congress take an oath to bear true faith and allegiance to The United States without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. Whereas representative Ilhan Omar took an oath of allegiance to The United States upon becoming a citizen declaring, I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen.
Whereas on 01/27/2024, representative Omar gave remarks at an event in Minneapolis in which she made treasonous statements. Whereas representative Omar said she has spoken to many Somalians who asked her to intercede for the Somali government by pressuring the United States government into certain actions. Whereas representative Omar assured the Somalian she spoke to, the US government will only do what Somalians in The US tell them to do. They will do what we want and nothing else. They must follow our orders and that is how we will safeguard the interest of Somalia.
Whereas representative Omar continued, for as long as I am in US Congress, Somalia will never be in danger. Its waters will not be stolen by Ethiopia or others. Sleep in comfort knowing I am here to protect the interest of Somalia from inside The US system. Whereas George Washington warned in his farewell address of 1796 to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism and further declared citizens by birth or choice of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.
Whereas these statements by representative Omar clearly violate the oath she took as an elected member of congress to defend and protect The United States constitution. Whereas representative Omar has exhibited the treasonous tendencies George Washington warned about. And her actions must be condemned by all members of congress who adhere to the oath they took upon assuming office. And whereas by openly admitting her efforts to advance Somalia's interest using her position as a United States Representative, Representative Omar has revealed herself to be a foreign agent acting on behalf of a foreign government. Now therefore be it resolved that representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota be censured.
Representative Ilhan Omar forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure. Representative Ilhan Omar be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the speaker and representative Ilhan Omar be and is hereby removed from the committee of the budget and the committee on education and the workforce.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
WOW 🚨 @FBI had (26) agents who infiltrated the J6ers and may be responsible for some of the crimes the J6ers went to prison for Do you want @FBIDirectorKash Patel to give the DOJ the names of those FBI agents for prosecution This cannot go unpunished https://t.co/tvi5wM3AYU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Justice Department released a report revealing the FBI had 26 confidential human sources in DC on January 6th, with four entering the Capitol and 13 entering the restricted area. Questions arose regarding the discrepancy between this information and previous testimonies given under oath by FBI Director Ray.
Concerns were raised about whether these sources instigated events, similar to the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot. The media is accused of downplaying the report's significance, while Republicans claim the events were an inside job.
The report's implications for January 6th defendants are discussed, particularly regarding potential pardons and whether confidential human sources are exempt from prosecution. Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley questioned why the confidential human sources who entered the capital were not charged. Trump may pardon January 6th defendants. Tulsi Ganford may become the next DNI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert. The Justice Department just released the bombshell report that we've been waiting for. What actually happened on January 6? The FBI had 26 confidential human sources there that day. 26.
A confidential human source is a guy the FBI pays to spy for them. Of the 26 confidential human sources who were in DC on Jan sixth, four entered the capital during the riot. An additional 13 entered the restricted area around the capital. So more than a dozen FBI spies participated in the so called insurrection. A bunch of them broke into the capital.
Their own inspector general says this is what happened, but that's not what they told you when they testified under oath.
Speaker 1: Those who were there in an undercover capacity on January 6, how many were there?
Speaker 2: Again, I'm not sure that I can give you that number as I sit here. I'm not sure there were undercover agents on scene.
Speaker 1: I thought I heard you say you didn't know whether there were FBI agents or informants or human sources in the capital or in the vicinity on January 6. Did I misunderstand you? I thought that's what you said.
Speaker 2: Well, I referred very specifically to undercover agents.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And so are you acknowledging then there were undercover agents?
Speaker 2: As I sit here right now, I do not believe there were undercover agents on scene.
Speaker 0: Director was hiding something so congress asked the question a different way. Listen.
Speaker 3: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capital on January prior to the doors being opened?
Speaker 2: Again, I had to be very careful.
Speaker 3: It should be a no. Can you not tell the American people no? We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital. Gentlemen's time has expired.
Speaker 2: Read anything into my decision not to share information
Speaker 1: Director Ray.
Speaker 2: Confidential human
Speaker 3: Gentlemen's time.
Speaker 0: Ray's right. The FBI didn't have undercover agents at January 6. They had confidential human sources. So what's the difference? Well, a confidential human source doesn't get health insurance or a pension.
They're just freelancing for the feds. Rats and MAGA hats. They're basically paid informants that the FBI runs out of headquarters. A lot of these FBI rats get picked up on some other charge. They get sat down and the FBI says, You're going to work for me now.
And if you don't, you're looking at twenty years to life. So these guys say, Yes, sir. And they cozy up to people like the Proud Boys and anyone the Feds wants to watch and control from the inside. And these confidential human sources are under pressure to deliver. What does deliver mean?
It means intelligence and big busts that get the FBI good headlines. According to the Inspector General report, the spies were feeding the FBI intel that said January 6 was going to get a little hairy. But FBI headquarters did nothing about it and then lied to Congress and said they did. So why did headquarters let January 6 get so out of hand? And what were all these FBI spies doing that day and the days before?
Were they riling everyone up like they did in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot? In that case, the FBI informants instigated the plot. They even used an FBI credit card to buy the ammo supplies in hotel rooms. Did the FBI pay for Gen six hotel rooms? We don't know.
Remember, the media and the democrats said this whole thing was a conspiracy.
Speaker 4: Where do you think this idea comes from? That this was somehow done by the feds?
Speaker 5: I heard that that one of the debaters said it was an inside job. What? Is an inside job on the part of Donald Trump and his henchmen?
Speaker 6: Republicans have blamed the FBI and said it was an inside job. It certainly was not, an inside job by FBI agents or Antifa. They go around blaming it on Antifa and FBI agents.
Speaker 0: Well, how did the media know it wasn't an inside job when the FBI had 26 of their people on the inside? January 6 certainly benefited the media, the FBI and the Democrats. Fifteen hundred arrests humiliated Trump, got him impeached, criminalized the MAGA movement. Trump got indicted over January 6, remember? They tried to throw him in prison over this.
The January 6 committee. It's all Democrats did for two years. Why didn't the committee find any of these snitches? They did a one-sided investigation and teed up Garland to charge Trump so they could run against a convicted felon. So the media is going to apologize, right?
No. The media today is cherry picking the report to say there were no undercover agents there on January 6. The whole thing is a conspiracy. These aren't articles. They're FBI press releases.
And they wonder why their ratings are trash and no one trusts them. It's because of this. They don't want the truth. They want to hide it if it hurts the left. And they can't admit they were wrong because it's too embarrassing and they were a part of the cover up.
But the FBI is worse than the media. The FBI knew what was in this report. They covered it up before the election, and then the director says he's resigning the day before it comes out. Give me a break. This kind of sliminess is why Trump nominated Cash Patel.
I wonder what else Cash is gonna find in the bureau when he looks under the hood.
Speaker 4: As a former federal prosecutor and a public defender who defended a lot of these types of cases, What you need to show is whether or not the FBI and government agents were using undercover operatives and informants on the day of January 6. Once you prove that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI's own documentation.
Speaker 0: And what does this report do to the January 6 defendants? None of the confidential informants were arrested or charged. These guys were right alongside everyone walking into the capital. But you're in prison for years? Now if you're a defense attorney for a Jan Sixer and this drops after the case was decided, that could change everything.
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley says this, There is a question of why the confidential human sources who entered the capital were not charged as part of an operation that the Justice Department described as an effort to shock and awe targeting everyone involved that day. This report does not find specific wrongdoing or direction from confidential human sources in the writing. Congress, however, is likely to seek more information on these sources and their conduct on the day. Are you allowed to commit crimes as a spy for the FBI and not get charged? Because they said this was the greatest attack on democracy ever.
So it was up there with nineeleven. Traitors, they said, seditionists, They're off scot free. You can try to overthrow the government if you're an FBI rat and just walk away. Congress has to find out. And what does this mean for pardons?
I mean, the Hunter Biden pardon already greased the runway for Trump, but this reports all the ammo Trump needs. He told Time Magazine, It's going to start in the first hour, maybe the first nine minutes. Now if I were President, I don't think I'd pardon J-sixers who were slugging cops, but if you were wandering around peacefully, come on. And it's not just Kash Patel that's going to clean house, Tulsi's on deck.
Speaker 7: I'm here with Tulsi Ganford. She's here on the hill, meeting with my colleagues. She's gonna be a a great DNI, director of national intelligence. It's a really important job. It oversees all of our intelligence agencies, and and it's in need of reform.
I think everybody would admit that. And so we need to bring in a reformer.
Speaker 0: Now the deep state's never been this backed into a corner, ever. We have Trump assassination files that we wanna release, JFK assassination files, COVID files, Epstein, Diddy. What about that pipe bomb? Is the FBI still working on that one? Who planted that?
It's just another conspiracy theory that you were right about. The lab leak, the laptop, and now Jan six. No wonder Biden's under pressure to dish out more pardons.
Speaker 3: Who
Speaker 0: knows how high this thing goes?
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Trump calls into a Byron Donalds rally Byron Donalds says 89 yr old woman from Fort Meade came up to him said, I love President Trump Donalds took a selfie with her and sent it to Trump, 20 minutes later he called and told her. " i love you too " Meet the next Governor of Florida
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man recounts meeting Dorothy Gordon, an 89-year-old woman from Fort Meade, Florida, who said she loves President Trump and that he has been trying to meet her. The man took a selfie with her and sent it to President Trump with a message stating Dorothy loves him. Subsequently, the man received a call from President Trump. During the call, Trump inquired about the man's campaign for governor, and the man said it was going great. Trump then asked where he was, and the man replied he was in Hardy County with 500 people who all love him. Trump then asked to be put on speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dorothy comes over and she goes, sir, I love President Trump, and he's been trying to meet me for a long time. So I said, you know what? Here's what I'm gonna do here. I said, because of it because of what you said, I said I'm a I said, let's take a picture. So I took the picture.
I took the selfie, and I said, I'm gonna send it to president Trump. And I did. And so she probably thought I was just being nice but I really did send the picture. So I sent it to President Trump. This is a copy, this is what I sent to her and it reads Mr.
President Dorothy Gordon from Fort Meade Florida is 89 and loves you. So then the funny thing happened. So I'm over there at the phone line and my phone is ringing. And I'm like, well, wait a minute. Daniel's standing right there.
So it's not him. I'm like, uh-oh. And I text you I sent you the text that I sent to him. So I sent it to you. So then we're talking like, you know, because presidential goal, once he's once he's there, he'll talk to you, ask you about a bunch of different things.
He asked how the campaign for governor was doing. I said, mister president, it's going great. It's going wonderful. He goes, looks like it's going really good for you. I'm like, sir, we're working really hard.
And then he goes, where are you now? And I said, sir, I'm I'm in Hardy County. I said there's 500 people in this room and they all love you. And he goes, oh yeah? He goes put me on speaker right now.
So I come running over You know what? He called because he's here.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
HOLY SMOKES 🔥 Sam Antar brings the actual receipts He's the one who did the investigation into Letitia James and this scandal involving mortgage fraud It took him (7) months to do the forensic analysis of all these crimes, then he turned it over to the Govt WATCH THIS, IT'S WORTH YOUR TIME
Video Transcript AI Summary
Leticia James is accused of falsely claiming a Virginia property as her primary residence in 2023, potentially violating public officers law and vacating her NY AG position. This occurred shortly before her civil fraud case against Donald Trump. The motivation was allegedly to obtain lower interest rates.
Additionally, James is accused of misrepresenting her Brooklyn townhouse as a four-unit dwelling instead of five to secure lower mortgage rates and insurance. Complaints were reportedly filed but dismissed as a minor error, while other landlords face fines for similar violations.
In 1983, James allegedly filed a $30,000 loan with her father, falsely claiming to be married to him to get different underwriting terms.
Between 2021 and 2022, James spent $42,000 in taxpayer money on private jets through a vendor called Venture Jets, which no other government agency has used since 2014. Some trips coincided with campaign events.
The speaker attributes his investigative skills to his past as a criminal and the training he received from the FBI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of this up on Leticia James. He's the source of all this information. Sam, thank you so much for joining us on this
Speaker 1: for having me on, sir.
Speaker 0: You're a New Yorker. You live right down the street, and this is some fantastic work here. I wanna start and get into the just the specifics first. Starting with this Virginia property that she claimed as her primary residence while she was I mean, this is Norfolk, Virginia. This is probably five, six hour drive, claiming it's her primary residence while she's the AG of New York.
From your report, you say James signed a specific power of attorney declaring her intent to make 604 Sterling Street in Norfolk, Virginia, her principal residence, a legally binding statement that may have automatically vacated her position as New York attorney general under public officers law 30, a declaration that came just forty five days before she launched her case, her civil fraud case against Donald Trump. Tell us more about what happened in Virginia here.
Speaker 1: She purchased a property with a relative. This is in 02/2023, a few she closed Yeah. Right.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: She closed on it right before the Trump trial. And in the filed documents with the county clerk's office, she there was a power of attorney that she gave her cousin or niece to to close the mortgage. Yep. And on the power of attorney, she represented I intend to use this property as my primary residence. Now, there's there's two problems with that.
The first problem is she lied on her power of attorney. Do you does any would anybody really believe that she was gonna move to Virginia in the middle of the Trump trial? Second part is this section this section six of the mortgage that states that the borrower, meaning her and her niece, have to occupy the property as their primary residence within sixty days. Not one or the other, both. Wow.
She never she
Speaker 0: she at least had to occupy
Speaker 1: it. Right.
Speaker 0: That's bad. And why what was the what was the motivation to do this? Why lie?
Speaker 1: Low lower interest rates.
Speaker 0: Lower interest rates.
Speaker 1: I'd call her a petty thief.
Speaker 0: A petty thief. This is I mean, this this is when you look at the allegations she made against Trump, is this act worse, better, sane?
Speaker 1: Well, no. Listen. Trump Trump is not a real felon. I'm a real felon. Okay?
So let's let's so Trump didn't do anything wrong.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You don't think you don't see anything wrong in the case you made against Trump? You think I mean, obviously, the jury here thought that he did something wrong.
Speaker 1: Well, listen It
Speaker 0: seems like what every developer has
Speaker 1: ever done. Listen to the appellate arguments because the appellate, judges seem to be, they're gonna they're it seems like they're gonna write an opinion that's gonna vacate the entire case.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. Yeah. It's because, I mean, it obviously was we were all astounded by what they charged him for that. That that that penalty was ridiculous.
I wanna move on here. Let's talk about Brooklyn, New York. This is her actual main residence. She walked out of this house this morning, a townhouse she owns. It's a multifamily home.
You discovered James has been claiming that her townhouse is a four unit dwelling when it actually has five units. Why would she do this?
Speaker 1: To obtain lower mortgage rates.
Speaker 0: Same motivation.
Speaker 1: If if one one to four units has different underwriting guidelines and also insurance too by the way Mhmm. Insurance for it. Whereas if it's five or more units, it's considered a commercial property and also subject to different insurance guidelines. Right. She repeatedly lied because there's a certificate of occupancy that states that it's five units.
And in New York, that rules. And it's unbelievable that the that complaints were filed with the Department of Buildings, and they wrote it off as a minor problem, minor minor error. Where every other landlord in New York, if you pull that stunt Right. Legal conversion, having a building that's that's different from the the certificate of occupancy Yep. They will fine you.
They will make you alter the building.
Speaker 0: She's flat out lying on these documents. She didn't she didn't deny anything about it. 1983, she takes out a $30,000 loan with her dad. She files it as a husband and wife. She's married to a father.
Why?
Speaker 1: First of all, that was discovered by Joel Gilbert, not me. I don't wanna take credit for anybody's work.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: Alright. That was 1983. What he found was that she she bought the house as daughter and mother father and daughter. Mhmm. And then she when they did the mortgage, it was husband and wife.
Speaker 0: As husband and wife.
Speaker 1: Also, you get different underwriting as husband and wife than as you buy it as, you know, partners or Yeah. Or two family members.
Speaker 0: We have And
Speaker 1: now this is different from the Brooklyn home. This is different property. I think it was in Queens.
Speaker 0: In Queens. Yeah. It's a long time ago. This is Yes. Forty one years ago, forty two years ago.
We have allegations of flying private on taxpayer money, almost $42,000 to places like Martha's Vineyard, Puerto Rico. We have luxury hotels with mischaracterized unofficial filings. What can you tell us here?
Speaker 1: Let's break it down. Between 2021 and 2022, she used private jets to get around, spent $42,000 of taxpayer money. The vendor she spent the money on was called Venture Jets. No other government agency, because the the information is out there, back to 02/2014 ever used Venture Jets or for private jet travel. Period.
Yeah. Then in 2022, when the government stops paying for it, her campaign starts paying for it. Now let's go back to to this stuff that the taxpayers paid for. If you align the payments for the for Venture jets in those trips because you you you don't pay jet travel net thirty days. You pay COD, cash on delivery.
Yeah. Okay? They'll some of those trips align with major campaign events that she was attending. That's a problem
Speaker 0: for That's a big She has a lot of problems here. Right. It's unbelievable reporting. We've dug through, think, the bulk of what you have found, I believe. Real quick before I let you go.
You have a past. Yes. And and and tell us how you got so good at at what you just did with what you I mean, you worked on this for seven months. How'd you get so good at this?
Speaker 1: Because I was a criminal for twenty years, and I was very good at doing what I did as a criminal. Morality aside Yeah. The FBI saw a talent in me and they helped me out going forward after the after the Crazy Eddie case. The FBI taught me thing when I was being investigated, the FBI taught me how investigations are done. All of the beatings that the FBI gave me when I was doing crime made me into a better human being.
Speaker 0: That's amazing. And you're just you you said you like to figure out puzzles.
Speaker 1: You like solve puzzles. I love numbers. Listen. Yeah. This is not the
Speaker 0: I am not the Trump
Speaker 1: administration. I don't work for the Trump
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
This is the lawyer representing Karmelo Anthony, his name is Dominque Alexander He's got history of beating women and failed to submit his finances to the IRS Can you say the race card defense in 3-2-1 https://t.co/UL3PZSQlDx
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Letitia James falsified records to meet lending requirements, even put an application that she was married to her father Mortgage fraud is a crime and Letitia James is facing 30 yrs in prison and up to $1M in fines No one's above the law... that includes you Letitia James ⚖️ https://t.co/aCqBPSMrM5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges listeners to enforce the rule of law, stating that the president is not above it and requesting legal action. They claim they will sue and be a "real pain."
The Trump administration has allegedly made shocking allegations against New York Attorney General Leticia James. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has sent a criminal referral to the DOJ accusing James of mortgage fraud. Director Bill Pulte, in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, claims James appears to have falsified records to meet lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms. He cites a Virginia property allegedly claimed as her principal residence and a New York property claimed as a four-unit structure instead of five.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presenting our respective states. Stand up and enforce the rule of law. The president of These United States is not above the law. No matter how rich, powerful, or politically connected you are, everyone must play by the same rules. Please sue him for us.
Oh, we're gonna definitely sue. We're gonna be a real pain in the And now the Trump justice department may be a pain in her you know what. The angle has obtained shocking allegations leveled by the Trump administration against New York attorney general Leticia James. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has sent a criminal referral to the DOJ accusing James of mortgage fraud. In a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi, director Bill Pulte says James appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms.
He cited a property in Virginia that she's allegedly claimed as her principal residence and a property in New York that she claimed as a four unit structure instead of the required, instead of a five, which Pulte says means she was able to get a different type
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Using donated funds for personal enrichment constitutes fraud and that's exactly what the family of Karmelo Anthony just did Do you think @KenPaxtonTX should get involved and force them to return those funds to GiveSendGo... this is disgusting https://t.co/z6oSK6ckmk
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
JB Pritzker removed all the toilets from his mansion to make it uninhabitable, lowering the from ($6M to $1M) giving him a $330K dollar tax break This report says Feds are investigating Federal tax evasion is a crime for you and me and Pritzker is guilty of it, lock him up https://t.co/mk6tlljws5
Video Transcript AI Summary
J.B. Pritzker, his wife, and brother-in-law are reportedly under federal criminal investigation for allegedly avoiding taxes using toilets. Pritzker purchased a Chicago mansion in 2007 that remained vacant for years.
In October 2015, all toilets were allegedly removed, classifying the home as uninhabitable and reducing its property assessment from $6,000,000 to $1,000,000. Pritzker allegedly profited about $330,000 in tax breaks and savings.
Pritzker maintains that he followed all the rules and is confident that a review will confirm this. He says his opponents raised the issue last October, making it a political subject. The governor says he has not been contacted by law enforcement and pledged to repay the money last October.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: J. B. Pritzker, his wife, and his brother-in-law are now under federal criminal investigation. They allegedly used toilets to avoid taxes. Governor Pritzker purchased this mansion in Chicago back in 02/2007.
It remained vacant for years. According to the Chicago Tribune, all the toilets were removed from the home in October 2015. Doing that allowed the home to be classified as uninhabitable. It changed the property assessment value from 6,000,000 to 1,000,000. Pritzker profited about $330,000 between tax breaks and tax savings.
Today, he maintained that he followed the rules. I'm very confident that any review of this matter will show that all the rules were followed. Last October, the my opponents raised this issue, and it became a political subject last October. The governor says he has not been contacted by any law enforcement. Back in October, the governor pledged to repay that.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2006, Lou Dobbs reported on Smartmatic electronic voting machines used in Venezuelan elections. These machines, made in China and controlled by the Venezuelan cartel, pose a threat. I believe the US needs to ban them globally to prevent dictators like Maduro from staying in power.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
@elonmusk @MarioNawfal In (2006) the late Lou Dobbs did a special report on Smartmatic electronic voting machines in Venezuelan elections These machines are made in China and controlled by the Venezuelan cartel The US has to ban these machines worldwide or dictators like Maduro will remain in power https://t.co/tngs36OEX1
Video Transcript AI Summary
A firm primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen, Smartmatic, bought the US company Sequoia, which makes electronic voting machines. Concerns arose because Smartmatic has ties to the Venezuelan government, including a $91 million contract and a government minister on the board of directors of a related company. Critics suggest the Venezuelan government could manipulate US elections.
Smartmatic's structure involves international holding companies, and the US government didn't review the sale when Smartmatic bought Sequoia. Experts claim Smartmatic machines were used to manipulate Venezuelan elections, reversing exit poll results that favored Hugo Chavez's opponent.
Smartmatic also built a production facility for electronic voting equipment hardware just outside Beijing, China, and then shipped the hardware to a warehouse in Taiwan. The hardware was marked as manufactured in Taiwan and shipped to both Smartmatic and Dominion for use in US elections. Dominion voting systems manages elections in almost all the swing states in The US, which determines who wins the presidency. Dominion moved its research and development and servers which store swing state voting information to its office in Belgrade, Serbia, where Venezuelan, Chinese, and Serbian software engineers maintain system administrative status over swing state elections.
Three Smartmatic executives were indicted in Florida for bribery during the 2016 Philippines election, allegedly to alter election results. The Venezuelan mafia, with assistance from China and Iran, has been rigging elections in 72 nations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A firm owned by Venezuela could be allowed to take over one of this country's top voting machine firms. Venezuela, of course, led by Hugo Chavez, working to, change, the, the views of most South American countries moved to the left. Critics of the deal say our nation's very democracy is now for sale without anyone doing a thing about it. Gideon Pilgrim reports.
Speaker 1: The use of some 19,000 electronic voting machines in the city of Chicago and Cook County primary on March twenty first of this year is now under intense scrutiny. The US company that makes the machines, Sequoia, was bought in 02/2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen. When Chicago had problems with the machines, a dozen Venezuelan employees were there to help with the election. Chicago Officials are outraged.
Speaker 2: I think that American elections ought to be run by American companies and ought to be run by American citizens, not Venezuelan nationals.
Speaker 1: Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida. But the president of the company, Jack Blayne, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela. Watchdog groups question why US voting machines would be under the control of citizens of another country, especially a country whose own election process is highly suspect.
Speaker 3: We believe this is a national security issue. There is no way that companies belonging to non US corporations should have access to our elections.
Speaker 1: The Treasury Department is supposed to monitor sales of US companies to overseas investors where there is a question of national security, such as in the Dubai Ports deal, the so called CFIUS review process. Some in congress are demanding an investigation.
Speaker 4: In the case of, Smartmatic, there are a number of unanswered questions. That's why I wrote to the secretary of the treasury and asked them to review the ownership. It's offshore. It's murky. No one seems to know who owns it.
Certainly, our government should know.
Speaker 1: A potential risk to the democratic process. Antonio Mujica and his partner Alfredo Enzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government only months before the recall election. These corporate registration documents from Venezuela show the Venezuelan government owned 28% of the stock of another company they started, Bizta, which adapted voting software for the Smartmatic machines in the February. The same document shows a Chavez government minister, Omar Montillo, was on the board of directors. The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the two thousand and four election.
The next year, the owners of Smartmatic, primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen, bought Sequoia, one of the top electronic voting system companies in The United States, for $16,000,000. Smartmatic is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen. Smartmatic Group NV of Curacao, Netherlands Antilles owns Smartmatic International BV of Amsterdam Netherlands owns Smartmatic Corporation of Florida, which bought Sequoia Voting Systems of California USA. When Smartmatic bought The US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale. Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory.
Exit polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%. But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote.
Speaker 5: Everything was computed in the favor of the government. So the the only explanation is that the smart mathematic machines had been programmed in that way.
Speaker 1: A Harvard mathematician crunched the numbers on the Venezuelan election.
Speaker 6: It had had to be the smart mathematic system. All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results. And in in that in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything.
Speaker 1: Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida. But the president of the company, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela.
Speaker 7: Smartmatic built a production facility for electronic voting equipment hardware just outside Beijing, China, and then shipped the hardware to a warehouse in Taiwan. In violation of US law, the hardware was marked as manufactured in Taiwan and shipped to both Smartmatic and Dominion for use in US elections. Dominion voting systems manages elections in almost all the swing states in The US, which determines who wins the presidency. We have evidence and witnesses that can prove the source code. Operating the election machines of both Smartmatic and Dominion and other election companies are owned by the Venezuelan Narco regime.
We have evidence and witnesses proving the machines are manufactured in the People's Republic Of China. Every citizen needs to be asking, where is the DOJ, FBI, CISA, and where is the CIA? Is anyone in the national security apparatus defending our democracy or enforcing the law? And if that isn't enough to convince you there's a major problem, Dominion, an additional step to conceal its manipulation of US elections, moved its research and development and servers which store swing state voting information to its office in Belgrade, Serbia. In the Belgrade office, Venezuelan, Chinese, and Serbian software engineers maintain system administrative status over swing state elections and alter elections as directed by the Cartel del Sol, the Cuban DGI, and the Chinese CCP.
The facility and its personnel are protected by Serbia's counterintelligence service. Swing state voter information is saved on Huawei servers in Dominion's Belgrade office. These servers are linked to Huawei servers in Hong Kong, China. For years, the US National Security apparatus has identified Huawei and its technology as a threat to US National Security. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, CISA, a component of the United States Department of Homeland Security is responsible for cybersecurity and infrastructure across all levels of government.
CISA has 3,100 employees and a $2,900,000,000 budget. In 02/2020, when faced with calls to address election irregularities, CISA did a conference call with Smartmatic and Dominion in order to better able to address the public's concerns and assure everyone that there have been no irregularities. Yes, it's shocking. CISA decided to consult the criminals in order to respond to the American public's outcry. In August 2024, '3 current and former executives of Smartmatic were indicted in Florida Florida in connection with bribery during the twenty sixteen election in The Philippines.
Among those arrested executives is Roger Penate, one of the three founders and current president of Smartmatic. Roger Pinatte paid $8,500,000 in bail. What the public will soon learn is that the bribery paid in the case was not to obtain a contract. The bribery was paid to alter election results. We have the CNE source code, the source code employed by Smartmatic, Dominion and others.
We will surrender it to appropriate authorities. Source code like DNA can easily be matched with other systems to prove that they are from the same family. In this particular case, it is a family of altering elections. Two years ago, we briefed a senior FBI agent in Washington DC. That agent, after seeing our three hour presentation with corporate ownership documents, engineering specifications, and witness statements, told us to flee Washington DC that the FBI would actively work to destroy our efforts and seek ways to prosecute us in order to stop our investigative efforts.
That was a stunning moment hearing those words from a twenty year veteran of the FBI. Over the last twenty years,
Speaker 8: the Venezuelan mafia, with the assistance, direction, and funds from China and Iran, has been rigging elections at various levels from mayors and prosecutors to governors and congressmen and senators and presidents and judges in 72 nations across Asia, Africa, Europe, and The Americas. This is so Chinese. The ultimate victory is to win a victory without firing a shot. They've changed the China and the Venezuelan communist dictators, have changed the arc of history across 72 nations over twenty years through this technology and we just see the world changing out from under our feet and don't understand why. That's why.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Cornyn seems to think the @RNC should fund his campaign and ignore AG Paxton @KenPaxtonTX is a good and decent man but Cornyn calls him a con man and a fraud When you start slinging mud at your opponent that's a tell tale sign you're in big trouble https://t.co/aD8meTU0ez
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern that Paxton running to the right in the primary could negatively impact President Trump's agenda. The speaker claims that the race in Texas could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, diverting funds from key states like Michigan, New Hampshire, and Georgia in the midterm elections.
The speaker accuses Paxton of being a "con man and a fraud" and states that this will be a key issue in the campaign. The speaker emphasizes their own record of effectiveness and support for President Trump's agenda, citing a 92% voting record. The speaker questions Paxton's motivations, suggesting they are driven by "vanity and personal ambition."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Leave. Just wondering quickly. What's your do you have any level of concern about Paxton running to the right of you in this primary?
Speaker 1: Well, the biggest potential loser is president Trump's agenda. I've been a supporter of the president during his first term of office, and that's continued during his current term. But we're going to end up spending hundreds of millions of dollars potentially on this race in Texas because we can't lose the seat in Texas. And that is money that can't be used in places like Michigan, New Hampshire, and and Georgia in the midterm elections. And, obviously, mister Paxton has a checkered background.
He is a con man and a fraud, and I think the people of Texas know that. But this is what will be litigated during the course of this campaign. I am not going to turn over the senate seat that was once held by Sam Houston to somebody like him. We will fight this to the end, and we will win.
Speaker 0: Are you considering plan on you on making those legal and ethical issues an an issue in the primary? And how much of a liability do you think that would be in general?
Speaker 1: Well, he's a known con man in fraud, and I don't know how you cannot make that an issue because people need to be able to trust their elected officials and their senators. I'm proud of the fact that my team has produced the we've been rated the most effective senator and for many years now. And I'm proud of my record and, frankly, worked hard to help president Trump pass his agenda in 20 in his previous term with a 92% voting record with president Trump. So, it's unclear to me exactly what, is motivating, mister Paxton other than, vanity and, personal ambition.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
When Trump came down the escalator, the days of Rinos like John Cornyn were numbered Cornyn stands with the globalists and people like McConnell, @KenPaxtonTX will go to the Senate to work for the people in Texas The choice is easy https://t.co/mGKEMgbqjL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Texas Senator John Cornyn believes Donald Trump can't win the 2024 election because he can't appeal beyond his base, stating Trump's "time is passed." Cornyn won't support Trump and thinks other Republicans shouldn't either. He stated that in politics, you're irrelevant if you can't win.
Cornyn believes a wall is not the answer to securing the border, calling it an "immorality" and ineffective. He advocates for a "virtual border," stating a giant wall "makes no sense whatsoever."
Cornyn helped pass gun violence prevention legislation, working with Democrats. The legislation includes a red flag law, which allows the government to confiscate firearms. Cornyn admitted the focus wasn't on gang violence and inner-city murders. Some Republicans, including Trump, criticize the deal, claiming it's the first step to taking away guns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I fully expect, unless there's some surprise that none of us know anything about right now, that, Joe Biden will be the next president.
Speaker 1: Strong words from US senator John Corden out of Texas. The Republican says former president Donald Trump can't win the twenty twenty twenty four general election for president. He also says the GOP needs to find a candidate who actually can. This was all in a call with Texas reporters. Cornyn saying I think President Trump's time is passed him by and he adds I don't think.
President Trump understands that when you run-in the general election, you got to appeal to voters beyond your base.
Speaker 0: Mister President, I rise today to mark an important milestone for our friend, Senator Mitch McConnell. Senator McConnell has done it the old fashioned way. He earned it. He earned this role as our leader and the respect certainly that goes along with it. But more than that, he's a rare example of us what a senator ought to be.
So thank you, senator McConnell, for your example. Thank you for your mentorship and for your friendship.
Speaker 1: Words from US senator John Cornyn out of Texas. The Republican says former president Donald Trump can't win the twenty twenty four general election for president. Cornyn saying, I think president Trump's time is passing by.
Speaker 2: Are you saying don't vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 3: You know, it's too important to to to, to gamble. I do think it's very important that we have a candidate who can win in 2024, and I'm not sure, president Trump is that candidate.
Speaker 4: You've said that, you think it's time for the Republican party to move on from president Trump.
Speaker 0: You know, in politics, unless you could win an election, you're pretty much irrelevant.
Speaker 2: The senator didn't say who he intends to support, but he didn't double down on who he believes the Republican Party should not nominate, and that is former president Donald Trump. Tornan told Fox twenty six, he won't be supporting former president Trump and neither should other Republicans.
Speaker 4: Wanted to ask you about, the indictment and the
Speaker 0: charges against, former president Trump. Unfortunately, he's created the circumstance for himself.
Speaker 3: Texas senator John Cornyn says a wall is not the answer to securing our border.
Speaker 5: Reported the other day saying you're not for a wall and the people of Texas are not for a wall. What gives you that impression?
Speaker 0: A wall, I have to tell you, Tucker, is not gonna stop illegal immigration.
Speaker 3: A wall is an immorality.
Speaker 0: What we need is a virtual border. This giant wall from sea to shining sea makes no sense whatsoever.
Speaker 2: The walls do not make us safer.
Speaker 4: I have a problem with the wall, period.
Speaker 0: The idea of a wall is, somewhat off putting to a lot of people.
Speaker 3: You are in favor of something called a virtual border. I mean, do you see when people hear that, they go, Yeah.
Speaker 0: It needs some explanation.
Speaker 6: John Cornner has decided to take guns from lawful gun owners.
Speaker 7: The rights granted by the second amendment are not unlimited.
Speaker 0: President Biden said do something. I found that if you want to get something done in congress, working with a democrat is pretty good idea. Matter of fact, it's the only way. I am proud that for the first time in thirty years, we passed a sum gun violence prevention. Senator Cornyn helped lead in the senate.
Speaker 7: I also wanna thank the bipartisan group of senators who worked so hard
Speaker 5: to get this done, especially senators Murphy, Sinema, Cornyn. I hope I don't get you in trouble mentioning your name.
Speaker 6: So the backbone is something called a red flag law. Red flag law would allow the government to confiscate your firearms without even charging you a crime, much less convicting you of one. The lead is John Cornyn. And the amazing thing about John Cornyn is he admits he doesn't care about gun crimes claimed by actual criminals. Senator John Kennedy asked Cornyn during one lunch, quote, are we focused on gang violence and inner city murders?
And their response was, no. We're not focusing on that. John Cornyn has decided to take guns from lawful gun owners. And if there's one reason you vote Republican, it's prevent that.
Speaker 7: Now there are some Republicans, including former president Trump, who are ripping this and ripping you as well. The deal on gun control currently being and pushed in the senate by the radical left democrats with the help of Mitch McConnell, RINO senator John Porter of Texas, and others will go down in history as the first step of the movement to take your guns away.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Florida (AG) says Biden admin was stonewalling the investigation into Ryan Routh for (200) days People need to go to prison for it, this is Treason We need to know who in Bidens camp is responsible https://t.co/MxFDcsQlBD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier says Ryan Ruth is charged with attempted first-degree murder and terrorism, charges he says were delayed due to the Biden administration's "stonewalling." Uthmeier claimed Florida law enforcement had trouble accessing the crime scene, and his office met major roadblocks in prosecuting the case.
He stated the Biden administration and Democrats "did everything they could to drag their feet and refuse to cooperate with the state of Florida," contrasting this with the Trump administration's transparency and cooperation.
Uthmeier says the federal government has now made its evidentiary folder available. Ruth also faces a state charge for attempted felony murder related to a traffic accident where he injured a six-year-old girl after fleeing Trump International Golf Club. The federal case against Ruth will take precedence, with the state trial to proceed after the federal trial scheduled for September.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The state of Florida is charged and failed Trump assassin suspect Ryan Ruth with attempted first degree murder and terrorism.
Speaker 1: Dana Marie McNicol is live in Miami with the latest for us. Hey, Dana Marie. Hey, Ainsley. Good morning. Florida attorney general James Uthmeyer says these charges of attempted murder and terrorism are a long time coming.
He tells Fox News that the Florida's investigation into Ryan Ruth was delayed more than two hundred days because of what he described as stonewalling by the Biden administration. Now Uffmeyer says that Florida law enforcement, they had trouble even accessing the crime scene, and the attorney general's office was met with major roadblocks in trying to prosecute this case. Here's what he told us.
Speaker 2: We want a justice system that is willing to pursue justice no matter what party is in charge. And Joe Biden and the Democrats did everything they could to drag their feet and refuse to cooperate with the state of Florida. Under Attorney General Bondi and the Trump administration and our new FBI director, it's been a breath of fresh air, very different. They've been transparent, cooperative.
Speaker 1: Collaborative investigation. The federal government, he says, has made their evidentiary folder available to his office, and they plan to do the same. He also mentioned that more evidence about the case will become public very shortly. Now Ruth is already facing a state charge for attempted felony murder related to a traffic accident that injured a six year old little girl after he fled the scene at Trump International Golf Club. Now Uthmeyer also confirmed that case is still ongoing.
And back out here live, guys, this federal case, the federal charges that Ryan Ruth are facing will take precedent. So of course, they will have to wait until that trial is over, scheduled to start in September until the state of Florida can proceed with their trial.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Kash Patel has assigned additional FBI agents to protect Dan Bongino even before being sworn in This hit piece by NBC News insinuates Bongino should just protect himself by carrying a gun I'm willing to spend a little more of my tax dollars to protect Bongino.. how bout you 👍 https://t.co/qrMqSOZnPD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI is creating a multi-agent bodyguard team for its number two, Dan Bongino. This has never happened before because previous deputy directors were career agents. Bongino is a former podcaster who criticized the FBI and has no experience working there.
The FBI declined to comment on why Bongino needs a security detail. A notice sought field agents willing to work temporarily at headquarters protecting Bongino. Twenty-four/seven protection could require up to 20 agents, requiring temporary housing.
Some question the need, given Bongino's Secret Service and NYPD background, which would allow him to carry an FBI weapon. It also contradicts the FBI director's desire to move agents from headquarters to the field. Bongino has not commented directly but stated he knew he couldn't fully explain some decisions due to legal and ethical constraints.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is creating a multi agent bodyguard team to protect the bureau's number two, Dan Bongino. NBC's Ken Delaney and has the reporting. Ken, this has never happened before. I think, why now?
Speaker 1: Good afternoon, Chris. Yes. It's never happened before because every previous deputy director of the FBI was a career agent with a badge and a gun. And so none of them ever felt the need for a full security detail. Bongino, of course, is a former podcaster with lots of experience criticizing the FBI, but no experience working there.
Now the FBI declined to answer our questions, so we don't know why it was decided that Bongino needed a full security detail. We do know that a notice went out inside the bureau looking for field agents who would be willing to leave their jobs temporarily and work for thirty days at headquarters protecting Bongino. Uh-huh. The current and former officials tell me this is going to be expensive because twenty four seven protection will require as many as 20 agents who will have to be put up in temporary housing. And many people I talked to question the need for it given that Bongino is a former Secret Service agent and New York police officer who could easily qualify to carry an FBI service weapon.
They also point out that it runs contrary to FBI director Cash Patel's desire to get FBI agents out of headquarters and into the field. This still says they can do more to fight crime. What's happening here is obviously the opposite. Dan Bongino is recruiting crime fighters to come back to headquarters and protect him at taxpayer expense. Bongino hasn't said anything about this, but in a recent post on X, he said he realized when he took this job that he was, quote, never going to be able to fully explain some decisions we make due to legal and ethical constraints.
He added, that's a pill I agreed to swallow. Chris?
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Nayib Bukele ~ We were the murder capitol of the world, and we turned it into the safest country in the Western hemisphere In six yrs Bukele has eradicated MS-13 and has joined Trump in the war against terrorist gangs Bukele is a good friend to America https://t.co/nfdViFPGmz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The President of El Salvador discusses the international attention his inauguration received, attributing it to a "critical mass" of interest. He states El Salvador was once the murder capital of the world but has become the safest country in the Western Hemisphere in three years. The official formula involved building up police and army forces, but the real formula was a "miracle" that involved praying for wisdom and low civilian casualties during gang crackdowns.
He explains that MS-13 started in Los Angeles and evolved into a satanic organization involved in human sacrifice. The President believes the real battle is between good and evil and that El Salvador's victory was winning the spiritual war. He says his economic plan starts with seeking God's wisdom.
He notes the country faced condemnation for arresting gang members, even from human rights organizations. The President suggests other governments may be afraid of El Salvador's example. He believes governments choose to have violent crime due to evil people, misguided ideologies, and wrong incentives. Western civilization is in decline due to a failure to maintain its systems. He states democracy works until it doesn't and politicians have incentives to give away the treasury. He suggests the system is rigged, but Trump can still get elected. He says if there is no way to stop him from competing in the election, all the things that they do to him will just give him more votes.
He addresses criticism from a US congressmen regarding the placement of a painting. He notes many Americans and Salvadoran immigrants are moving to El Salvador. Several heads of state have called him for advice on security issues. He plans to stay president for five years, as the constitution allows.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, thank you for having us.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Tucker. At your
Speaker 0: Camp David, which is beautiful. So you were inaugurated two days ago. This is a small country, and yet your inauguration was international news was everywhere. Why? Why do you think that is?
Speaker 1: Well, was a shock for for us too. I mean, we know we knew that a lot of people were was were coming and and I mean, that will draw some attention, of course. We have we had big delegations from a lot with 110 countries. So of course that would draw news because if a chancellor comes from a country then he brings his media team and that. That will create some news over there.
And if a president comes or a king comes, that will create some news. Even you you came, so that creates some news.
Speaker 0: Why were they coming? Well,
Speaker 1: I I don't know. Different reasons, of course. I could ask you, why did you come, right?
Speaker 0: I came because I think something remarkable is happening here. That's why. But I'm interested in why you think people came.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I different reasons. Definitely different different reasons. For example, the US government sent a big delegation. But then we had also a delegation from Congress.
Yes. That started as a Republican delegation, but then Democrats jumped in the wagon, and we had a bipartisan delegation from Congress. So, you know, it was like so it adds up. I don't know at the end what happened, but I think that it's like how a star, you know how stars are born. They say that debris starts joining up and become an asteroid.
But if more debris joins up it becomes a planet because of the gravitational pull. The more debris comes up it becomes a star because then the gravitational pull is too big. So that's called critical mass. So I don't know, sometimes just because God wants it like that, or just by stroke of luck or whatever, you get some critical mass in something you're doing, and then it becomes bigger than what you than the sum of all of its parts. So, I don't know, probably it got some critical mass that we didn't we didn't foresee.
Speaker 0: My guess is that of all the countries in the hemisphere, El Salvador seemed in the toughest shape or close to the bottom in the rankings Definitely. For everything.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 0: Lacking abundant natural resources,
Speaker 1: As if the country was born.
Speaker 0: Is that true?
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, the country has been poor since it was born. Yeah. Lacking everything, basically.
Speaker 0: Lacking everything. With a dense population, a lot of people packed in. Yeah. So what do you how did you change it? I guess, I'll cut right to it.
If you can fix El Salvador, what are the lessons for the rest of us? What did you do first?
Speaker 1: Well, of course, you cannot do anything if you don't have peace. Right? And when I say peace, I I include wars, civil wars, invasion, crime. I mean, you need to have peace. You need to be able to move freely, to have your basic rights respected, starting with the right to live, the right to move, the right to have property.
So you need your basic rights to be respected, so you need peace. That's the first thing a society will struggle to achieve. And once you achieve peace, then you can struggle for all the other things. Like infrastructure, wealth, well-being, quality of life. But you have to start with peace.
So we had to start with peace. And in the case of El Salvador, we were literally the murder capital of the world. Yes. And we turned it into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere. Safer than any other country in the Western Hemisphere, is, you know, it was if would have said that five years ago, they would have said that I was crazy, right?
Yes. Because this was literally the most dangerous country in the whole world. Your capital is now safer than our capital in Yes. A lot safer. And the country is safer than The United States as a whole.
Yes. The US murder rate is around six murders per 100,000 inhabitants, and our murder rate is two. So we're safer than Canada, safer than Chile, safer than Uruguay, safer than The US, safer than any country in the Western Hemisphere. There are countries in the other hemisphere that are safer than El Salvador, but not in Western Hemisphere.
Speaker 0: So you did that in just a couple years?
Speaker 1: Yes, we did that in basically in three years.
Speaker 0: So what, just bottom line it for us. What's the formula?
Speaker 1: Well I can tell you the official formula and the real formula.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: So the official formula is that we did a plan. I mean we did a plan. It's not that. When I say official, I mean it's a lie. It's just you know, the official We did a plan that was comprised of phases.
So we rolled up the first phase, then the next one, then the next one. And then gangs started attacking back, so we need to we had to roll up everything at once, like in a in a hurry. So and it it worked. It worked. In a couple of weeks we we the country was transformed.
Because the gangs were were not yet arrested, but they were on the run. So we had we basically in the roll up of phase six, we basically pacified the country in a couple of weeks.
Speaker 0: How do you do that? How do you pacify a country?
Speaker 1: Well, the phases included building up of the police forces, the army. We doubled the army. We literally doubled the army to fight crime, to use the army to fight crime. And we equipped them before, like soldiers who didn't have useful guns or vehicles, drones. You know, basic things that an operation of that magnitude would need.
So Yeah. We rolled up the faces and then we we we went after them.
Speaker 0: That's the official that's the official
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's the official one.
Speaker 0: What what's what's the real
Speaker 1: It's a miracle.
Speaker 0: It's a miracle.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a miracle.
Speaker 0: I love that. What do you mean?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a miracle, you know. When when gangs started attacking us back, basically, they they killed 87 people in three days. Which for a country of 6,000,000 people, it's crazy. Would be the equivalent 60 times, would be the equivalent of having five thousand deaths in three, five thousand murders in The US in three days.
Wow. Yeah. So we were in a meeting and, well when this started, not when it ended, but when started we were in a meeting my office 3AM, four AM, just watching you know, what was happening and trying to figure out what to do. Because the problem with gangs is that they don't don't only attack their objectives. When they wanna create terror, they can attack anyone.
So they can actually kill their grandma. Yes. And it's your victim. Yes. Because they don't care about their grandma.
You care about their grandma, so it's your victim. If they kill their grandma, you have one death, and they have you know, they achieved the the terror the terror that they wanna create. So they can kill any anybody. A woman walking by, a guy working in the street, a taxi driver. You know, they can kill anybody.
And if the if the if the state goes after them, the state has no intention of of killing or harming anybody but the gang members. So you have you have 70,000 objectives, which were the 70,000 gang members. But they have 6,000,000 possible targets. So it was almost an impossible task. It's a guerrilla war, really.
Yes. It is but it was an impossible task because you you have to go after them. They were intertwined with the population. They were everywhere, and they were killing randomly. So you stopped them.
So we really were trying to figure out what to do. And and I I basically said, well, we I mean, it's we we we are we're looking at into an impossible impossible mission here. So we pray. And and we and we You prayed in the meeting? Yes.
Yes. Of course. Several times. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. What did you pray for?
Speaker 1: To wisdom, to to win the war, to have I thought at the time that we will have civilian casualties. So we we said, we pray that the civilian casualties will be as low as possible. And we didn't have any civilian casualties.
Speaker 0: And was everyone in the meeting comfortable with that?
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. They every all my security cabinet are believers. They all believe in God. We're we're a secular country, of course, but we all believe in God.
Speaker 0: MS thirteen is one of the major gangs.
Speaker 1: And they are satanic also.
Speaker 0: That was my question.
Speaker 1: So very little sorry.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. No. No. But I I I would hope you will explain it because very little has been written in the West about this.
Speaker 1: They're satanicists.
Speaker 0: But but actually, literally Yeah. Can you explain?
Speaker 1: Well, they didn't start as a satanic organization. They they MS thirteen started in in in Los Angeles, in The US, because Salvadorans weren't allowed to sell drugs by the Mexican gangs. So they created a gang that was called the eighteenth Street Gang because they basically wanted to sell drugs in in a street that was Eighteenth Street over there. But then the division started to to create to they started dividing themselves and started infighting, so they created the MS thirteen. And and then MS thirteen started outgrowing the other gangs, and they started, you know, exporting the organization to other parts of The US.
And when Bill Clinton decided to deport those guys, he didn't tell our government at the time, I'm deporting this criminal. They just, you know, send them here. And they came, they were few, but unchecked. At the same time, some laws were passed to protect minors from imprisonment. And of course, the gangs used that to recruit 15 year olds, 16 year olds, 17 year olds.
So at the beginning it was some youth causing harm, assaulting, trying to control their territory, selling drugs. Things that are bad, but probably not critical. But they grew, they grew, they grew. And they started controlling territories. A few later, they were actually a huge international criminal organization that they had bases in Italy, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, The US.
Basically, a lot of major cities in The US will have strongholds of
Speaker 0: Right outside Washington DC.
Speaker 1: Yes, of course. You have in Long Island, you know, in LA. It's a huge criminal international organization. So they grew and they started you know, killing more people just to get territory or to fight against rival gangs, or to, you know, collect debts or money or whatever. But as the organization grew, they became satanic.
They started doing satanic rituals. I don't know exactly when that started, but it well documented. Yes. And we now we're at rescue. We've even found altars and things like that.
Speaker 0: Yes, I've seen them.
Speaker 1: And so they became a satanic organization. And even when when you sometimes when you interview gang members that are in prison, they will say, I'm out of the gang. Of course, they're in prison, but they will say, I'm I'm not a member of the gang anymore. And when you ask them why, I remember one I remember the news outlet that made this this But it's a, you know, a very well known news outlet that made this interview with a gang member in person. We allowed them to go into prisons and do the interviews.
And the guy that They asked him how many people have you killed? And he said, I don't remember. Didn't remember how many. Probably ten, twenty. He didn't remember.
And then they asked him, and are you in what is your position in the gang? He explained how he went up in positions, but I left the gang. I said, how why did you left the gang? And he said, well, because I was I mean, I was I was used to kill the I was used to to kill people. But I killed for territory.
I killed for to collect money. I killed for extortion. But I came to the you know, to this house, and they were they were about to kill a baby. And he, the killer that had killed tens of people, said, oh, wait. Wait.
What are we doing? Why why why are we gonna kill that baby? And they told him because the beast asked for a baby, so we have to give him the baby. So he said that he couldn't resist that, so he left the gang. He's in prison because, you know, he's a killer.
But he left the gang because he couldn't tolerate what he was seeing.
Speaker 0: So human sacrifice was Yes.
Speaker 1: A part. Well, in the in The United States a couple of weeks ago, or a couple of days ago, I don't remember exactly, I saw the news that they were they were gonna kill a young girl, or they killed a young girl, and they don't exactly remember because it was a it was a satanic ritual. It happened in The US A Couple Of Weeks ago.
Speaker 0: You may have come to the obvious conclusion that the real debate is not between Republican and Democrat, or socialist and capitalist, right, left. The real battle is between people who are lying on purpose and people who are trying to tell you the truth. It's between good and evil. It's between honesty and falsehood. And we hope we are on the former side.
That's why we created this network, the Tucker Carlson Network. And we invite you to subscribe to it. You go to tuckercarlson.com/podcast. Our entire archive is there. A lot of behind the scenes footage of what actually happens in this barn, when only an iPhone is running.
Tuckercarlson.com/podcast. You will not regret it. So that's almost never described in English language press as clearly as you just described it.
Speaker 1: No. Which is weird. Right?
Speaker 0: Well, you sort of wonder why. Yeah. If there's a spiritual component that's driving it, why not just say so? Yes. But I guess my point is you saw it as that.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes, of course. There's a spiritual war, and there's a physical war. And the physical war could be that's the that's the unofficial.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: That's the unofficial version. The spiritual if you win the spiritual war, it will reflect into the physical war. So our I think our I I don't know what I have to call it. Our impressive victory was because we won the spiritual war. Very, very fast.
Speaker 0: Well, that leads me didn't
Speaker 1: Because you didn't have competition. I mean, they were satanic. I think they made it easier.
Speaker 0: In your inaugural, and I was listening on headphones for the translations, I just wanna check this. You said, we have achieved this great victory and made this a safe country, and that's the predicate for everything that follows. And the next thing we're going to do in this term is to is to work in the economy to make it Yeah. Grow the economy. Yeah.
And you said I have a if correct me if I'm wrong. Said I have a three point plan, and I'm thinking, I wonder what that is. I don't know. Start a Federal Reserve Bank? And you said the first the first point of my plan is seek God's wisdom.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: That is what you said.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I said that. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Why why would that be the first point of an economic
Speaker 1: Why wouldn't it be? Why should it be the first part of the plan?
Speaker 0: Well, I think it should be.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But I can't And most people would think that. Right?
Speaker 0: I just I've never heard any leader of any country
Speaker 1: say that. Because they're they Probably they forgot to represent the people that elect them. That elect them, yeah. It's like you ask most of the people that elect the politicians, they'll say, yeah, that's that's fine. Yeah, I believe that.
But then you ask the politician, and he will say, no, no, no. That's not So, who is he trying to pander into? I mean, it doesn't make sense, right?
Speaker 0: Do you think
Speaker 1: It's a common sense thing to seek God's wisdom. Of course.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's a prerequisite for wise decision making, I would Yes.
Speaker 1: Exactly. So that's the first part of our plan.
Speaker 0: It really makes me laugh. Do you think that that's one of the reasons that your successes, which are just measurable, I'm not saying this for ideological reasons, but just a fact that you've transformed the country in a good way and that you're literally the most popular elected leader in the world, again, not speculation, provable fact, you'd think that would be greeted in the hemisphere as this amazing thing, like, what's going on in El Salvador? And instead, there's been this, what's going on in El Salvador? Yeah. There's been hostility.
Speaker 1: Yes. Do you think that's why? I'm not sure. But one of the reasons is that we don't pander to them. So probably they don't like that.
It's probably a reason. It's like, there's I'm not gonna go into conspiracy theory. I'm gonna go into provable facts, right? Like you said. So there's worldwide agendas, right?
These are provable facts, right? They have benchmarks that they need their countries to follow and they need their countries to do. This is out there. But sometimes if you work on those things, you're probably neglecting the important things for your people. The things that your people are really asking for.
I'll give you an example. When we arrested the gang members that were killing were killing so much people that we were the murder capital of the world. Literally the most dangerous place in the whole world. More dangerous than Haiti. More dangerous than Iraq.
This was literally the most dangerous country in the world. We have triple the the amount of the murder rate that Haiti has right now. With all the mayhem that they have, we have tripled that here. So what what do we have to what do you have to do? You have to stop that, right?
I mean, it's like it's a no brainer. I mean, you have you don't have to even you you don't even need to have a big thought process. You just you have to stop that. That's the first thing you have to do. When we did when we did that, we got huge condemnations.
You name it. Say in an organization, we got a condemnation from them. So, and they were and they and and a lot of them were human rights organizations. And you would ask, but the human what what about the human right of a woman not to be raped? I mean, what about the human right of kids to, you know, to to to play or to be free or to, you know, go to the park?
And what about the human right to live? Or the human right to walk in the street? Right? And but no. They were they were worried about the human rights of the of the killers.
Which, you know, they have human rights. I I don't say they don't. They're humans. But but if you have to prioritize, what what would you prioritize? Yes.
Right? The human rights of the honest, hardworking, decent people. Not the not the not the human rights that they do have. But you will not you won't prioritize the the human rights of the killers and rapists and murderers. And so we we secured the country.
And we did it with no help from any other country. And with huge, huge condemnation in everything that we were doing. Everything. I mean, we changed the attorney general. We we got so much condemnation because we changed the attorney general.
That we need to change to prosecute the murderers. So we we basically, we they tried to block every step of what we were doing. And now the results are there, that they're tangible, measurable, undeniable. Now they they don't know what to do. Because a lot of other countries are saying, maybe a lot of other countries similar to ours, have similar problems.
They are saying maybe we should do that too. But they don't want that because that's not in their agenda.
Speaker 0: But I I guess that that's why I came here, to be totally honest, is what your success says about the country that I live in or other countries in the Hemisphere or in Europe, where people are killed by the thousands every year.
Speaker 1: And
Speaker 0: what you've proven with very little money and no help from anyone else is it's not that hard to fix. Therefore, all that killing must be a voluntary decision that my government and many other governments are making about their own citizens.
Speaker 1: You can make that that logical.
Speaker 0: Well, I don't know what other conclusion to reach. If El Salvador can do it, what are we what's going on here?
Speaker 1: Yes. You can make that logical conclusion. I I think that's probably what they are afraid of. Because, I mean, we don't have weapons of mass destruction. Right?
No. So we why are they afraid? Why would they take so much time and make condemnations to El Salvador? Right? It doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 0: Well, you didn't send a man to the moon.
Speaker 1: Exactly. Yeah. I think they're afraid of the example. Because a lot of people might say, hey, we want that too. If they can do it with no money, with very few resources, and with a huge problem because I heard some people say, oh, the subway could do it because the problem was not that big.
We're literally the murder capital of the world. How big it, how bigger can it get, right? We were literally the most dangerous place in the world. Three times more dangerous than Haiti right now. So I mean, what bigger can it, how bigger can the problem get?
And at the same time, we had little, very few resources, And we were able to do it with no civilian casualties. We started the war on gangs, we had no civilian casualties. And we we aid between police officers and soldiers. And we basically eradicated all crime. So And we arrested 70,000 gang members.
Which the number is not the number that just came up. That's the official number that all the organizations said we had of gang members. And you can watch the World Bank reports, etcetera. They said El Salvador has around 70,000 gang members, 500,000 collaborators. So we spared the collaborators, basically, and we only got the gang members.
Why? Because most of the collaborators were just family members, or the woman that sell tortillas, and she had to tell, oh, the police is coming, because if not, she would have she would probably have been killed by the gangs. So most of the collaborators were not really criminals, but just people living in a society that was controlled by gangs. The government was really was the real government was the gangs. Just like in Haiti, you have a you have a fake government, and you have the real government.
The government in Haiti is the gangs. It was it was like that. You had you had a formal government, of course, with offices and everything, but you have the real government in the territory, which were the gangs.
Speaker 0: So, I mean and I know you wanna stick to the facts, but I mean, at some point you do have to I mean, this is a really important question. Why would a government that has the means to end violent crime not all there's always gonna be crime, people breaking laws, but violent people murdering and raping each other
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Is a voluntary decision that a government makes. Why would a government choose to have that?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't I don't know. I I can I can make up theories, but I really
Speaker 0: But do have a gut instinct about it?
Speaker 1: I think it's a combination of factors, like everything. Yes. They might be evil people that you know, that are doing it on purpose, of course. And probably planning stuff, I don't know. Yes.
Possible. Yeah, possibly. At the same time, there's a lot of people that they're just being fed these ideologies, and they think they're doing the right thing. Yes. Right?
Like allowing allowing shoplifting, for example. Yes. That's the most stupid thing you can think of.
Speaker 0: But they do it. Oh, you don't allow shoplifting here?
Speaker 1: No, of course not. So, but you would think, how Why would anybody think allowing shoplifting would be a good idea?
Speaker 0: I don't know.
Speaker 1: Why? Why? I mean, that's the stupidest thing to think, right? Or giving away drugs. I said this
Speaker 0: my Yes.
Speaker 1: Or giving away drugs. Let's give away drugs, right? It's like very stupid things. And you would guess that some of the people doing and enacting these policies are not necessarily evil. They're just, you know, they've been fed this ideology.
They think they're doing the right thing. It's like, I'll give you an example. I think a month ago or something like that, yeah like a month, the Spanish police arrested a gang member that had fled El Salvador. So the gang member escaped, He flew. He went to Spain.
And with an international operation between the police, our police and the Spanish police in Interpol, they were able to arrest the guy. So in those cases you need to do an extradition because it's an automatic international operation, so they just got the guy, you know, process him and send him. Yes. Send him to the original police before they filed the claim. So the Spanish police was very proud of the of the arrest.
So they put it up they put it up in Twitter. So they said, we just arrested this gang member. So I I, you know, quoted the tweet and I said, great, send them, we'll take care of it. Right? So that was used in his court hearing in Spain as a proof that he wouldn't get a fair trial here.
So he was protected by Spanish laws, and he stayed there in Spain.
Speaker 0: Maybe they don't have enough gang members in Spain.
Speaker 1: Exactly. So I mean, I don't care if they wanna keep him. It's a mouth that we don't have to It's mouth that we don't have to feed, right? But, so they can keep it. But the thing is that you would think, why would this Spanish government want an extra gang member?
Yes. And it's not necessarily out of evil. It's just that the laws, the system, the things that are being fed to the judge, to the prosecutor. So they think that my tweet was too mean, and this gang member, his rights would be not respected, or he wouldn't get a fair trial in Los Alamos, so he had to stay in Spain to be protected. I mean, they know a killer.
They actually arrested him because of that. It was an international operation And everything they know is that, you know, he probably murdered dozens of people. But they they need they feel the need to protect them.
Speaker 0: So what's sad about that is that that's a sign that your defense mechanism no longer works.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And that your society is dying.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And Spain is a wonder in my opinion
Speaker 1: Western civilization is is reaching a point into it. It's just it will start failing.
Speaker 0: I think that's obvious to those of us with great sadness, to those of us who live here.
Speaker 1: Unless things are done, of course. You can you can you can always you can always do do do
Speaker 0: two part question. Why do you think that's happening? Because it is recognizably happening in real time before us. And what can be done at this point to reverse it?
Speaker 1: Well, know, everything erodes and degrades. I mean, that's just a loss of nature. Yes. I mean, we do, that's why we die. We age and we die.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: You can slow it, right? You can, you know, stay fit, diet. Yeah. I mean, you're eventually gonna age and die. Yes.
You cannot avoid that. Same happens with anything, infrastructure. You know, I had an argument with my at the beginning of the government, had an argument with my ministry of public works, my minister of public works. Because there was a there was this neighborhood that was built in an area that you shouldn't build things over there. It was a mountain almost.
The the soil was basically flour. So it was, you know, the mountain was falling and the houses were falling with the with the mountain. So to to save the people, the Ministry of Public Works started building a huge wall, you know, to stop the houses from falling. Right? So they they were building this huge wall.
And, of course, I can't I can't micromanage everything. So when I saw the wall being built, I called my minister, said, what are you doing? I mean, you won't stop the mountain. And I said, you should build let's build houses for for the people somewhere else. It's it would be cheaper.
And, you know, he said, no, no. The the the wall will the wall will be fine. We have, you know, engineers from, you know, international corporation and everything. It it will be fine. So they finished the wall.
They narrated it didn't didn't fall. Don't worry. Don't wait for that, don't wait for that plot twist. But I was still angry because I thought that it was huge waste of money and a lot of risk. That if in the future the wall falls Yes.
It'll be on us because we built it. Right? Of course. So, I started pressuring him. Why do you build that wall?
Well, do you build that wall? If the wall falls in the future it'll be on our it would be our fault. And I thought he grew tired of me as the pressuring. He said, well, everything that is made by humans needs maintenance. I mean, of course, if we just leave the wall there, it'll fall in ten, twenty, thirty years.
But if we give maintenance to the wall, the wall won't fall. Right? So that stuck on me. Not because of the wall itself, but because everything is like that. Yes.
In a relationship.
Speaker 0: Yes, that's right.
Speaker 1: A plant, at home. I mean, everything. I mean, haircut. You need, if you wanna maintain it, you need to spend time and resources and effort in maintaining it. So, western civil because you know, civilization goes like this.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: So, western civilization reached the peak. I cannot point exactly where the peak is. It's like timing the market, right? Yes. I'm gonna buy in the bottom, and I'm gonna sell at the top.
Nobody can do that, right? And so, I don't know exactly where it was the peak, but we can all agree that we're in the decline. Yes. So that is happening because we're not maintaining we're not giving the correct maintenance to the civilization. Why what made the West the leader in the world at the time we're living right now?
What what caused that to happen? A lot of things like, you know, importing the scientific process, starting developing science.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Focusing, a lot of money into art, into science, into trying to build the best things, the you know, as fastest and as best and as great as possible. And you know, importing wisdom and technology, and trying to develop new technology, and trying to you know. But suddenly, when you get wealthy, happens with families too.
Speaker 0: Yes, it does.
Speaker 1: Then people probably get spoiled, or they get, you know, I want more things. Want that, I want this. You have to provide me that. And, you know, politicians, the problem I mean, democracy is great. Right?
We The US has proven that democracy can work. But the problem with democracy, because everything has pros and cons, the problem with democracy is that politicians have a great incentive to offer, to give away the treasury. Yes. So if I say, no, I'm gonna keep the treasury, because we need might need it, you know, for an emergency or something, nobody would like that. People would like, oh, I'm gonna give away the treasury.
So they would vote for him. Then another politician would want, you know what? I'm gonna give the treasury plus another treasury. So we're gonna go into debt. Right?
Everybody will say, great. Let's receive more money from the treasury. And when I say treasury, mean anything. Building stuff, giving free stuff, sending checks to people. COVID relief.
Yeah, exactly. You know, getting, you know, stimulus, whatever. So, the politicians are have the incentives of, you know, just giving away the treasury and entering huge amounts of debt. And that doesn't not only destroys the structure of the government, but it also destroys the structure of society. Because if you give, for example, money okay, you don't work, I'll give you I'll give you money.
Right? Or if you you can shoplift $1,000 a day and still get some money from the government for food, you know, housing, why would you In that store it would be shoplifted and probably get in trouble. Right? So the incentives are wrong. But it's not only because, you know, there's maybe they are, but I'm not gonna go into conspiracy theories.
It's not only because there are evil politicians or evil people planning everything, which might be the case, but I won't go into that. But just because things, you know, the incentives are wrong. Yes. So even a even a normal, not evil politician has the incentive to give away the treasury because he needs the votes. I mean, he needs to be elected.
That's what he needs. Right? He needs the votes. It's the nature of the system. Yes.
It's the nature of the system. So the problem is that democracy works. Nobody can say it doesn't because it worked in The United States. Right? But if you don't maintain, if you don't give maintenance to the system, it will fall like a wall if you don't give maintenance to it.
Because it would the same system will degrade itself. So what you're having right now is a huge erosion of of Western civilization. So we have governments pandering to to their basis, what you know, to their ideology because they mobilized the vote or whatever. Seek looking at what would happen in in the election, what we can do to get more votes in the election. I don't wanna get into US politics because, you know, it's not mine.
But
Speaker 0: Well, I agree.
Speaker 1: So we had this we have this huge voter group. Let's give them something to get their vote. Let's give them, I don't know, a hundred thousand dollars each. It makes sense, right, to get their votes. But it doesn't make sense for a country.
Mean, would you give a hundred thousand dollars to each member of a voting group? Should be illegal. But it's not because who makes the loss? Right? It's the government.
So the system is eroding. And if maintenance, if the maintenance team doesn't go in and fix all the things that have been, you know, degrading the last, you know, fifty, seventy years, it will, of course, will eventually fall.
Speaker 0: So if the West doesn't continue to maintain systems, which you have said, I think correctly, have worked really well for a
Speaker 1: couple hundred years Exactly.
Speaker 0: They will degrade just like anything else
Speaker 1: made by human hands.
Speaker 0: If you don't maintain it, it will fall like your house. The question is, does anyone in the West, do its leaders have the will to fix the system that is clearly failing? Do you think that will happen? And if it doesn't, what is the message about democracy to the rest of the world?
Speaker 1: Well, you know you know the the fun thing about about anything, about any concept like democracy, that it works until it doesn't. Right?
Speaker 0: Right. That's right.
Speaker 1: It happened with monarchies. It happened with you
Speaker 0: know Right.
Speaker 1: Anything. Right? They say things like, oh you know, we have to separate religion from state. It worked. It really worked.
But it also worked well in union with the state at their time. Yes. Very well. Yes, very well, until they didn't. So the thing is that things work until they don't, right?
So the problem is not democracy. I mean, not the concept of democracy. The concept of democracy is great. I mean, the power of the people. Why would the people have the power to decide their own things?
It's like the most, I mean, I really like the concept. And it's not only a theoretical concept like communism, right? It works. I mean, has been proven to work. George Washington could have been a king if he wanted to.
He could have been King George the First, right? Yes. But he decided, well not he, but you know, the founding fathers decided that The US and United States would be a democracy. And it worked. Nobody can say it didn't.
It worked. But, So the fact that democracy appears to not be working, I don't think it's because the concept doesn't work, like church separated from a state or a church conjoined with a state.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: It's just that things work until they don't. So the problem, I think, is not the concept of democracy itself, but the state of the democracy, of democracies in the world right now.
Speaker 0: Have we reached the end of the democratic period?
Speaker 1: I don't know, but it's maybe the beginning of the end. If not, if a huge maintenance team doesn't come and fix things. It's like, this is not about geopolitics or anything. I'm not gonna even mention the countries. But I saw somebody showed me the 600 meter railway that was built in California.
And it cost like, I don't know, $15,000,000,000 or something like that to build the 600 meter piece of railway that they were building.
Speaker 0: It's a lot per meter.
Speaker 1: Yes. So, I mean, you have to You cannot go on. I mean, it's like obvious. Like somebody eats too much, right? I mean, you can be a little fat, right?
It's fine. But then if somebody's morbidly fat, it's the time somebody will come and say, okay, you mean, you have to stop, right? Because you know, your heart would your heart can't take it anymore, right? You have to stop. Or somebody that drinks, I don't drink, but if somebody drinks, the doctor might say, you know, your liver can't take that anymore.
Look your liver, how it is right now. Or the lungs for a smoker, whatever. When you see things like that, 600 meter of railway, dollars 15,000,000,000, 10 years. There's no other possible diagnosis. I mean, have to stop that path now.
Because if not, decline is inevitable. It's inevitable. I mean, it's already there. It's not like I'm I'm telling you I foresee no. No.
I mean, it's there. I mean, it's $15,000,000,000 to make a 600 meter piece of railroad that's not even working in ten years. The Empire State was built in a year. One year. They built Empire State.
That's where Things were working, right? I don't know how were things back then. Don't know. But they built Empire State in one year. What happened with the World Trade Center Freedom Tower that was changed the name later to World Trade Center.
How long did it take? Forever. Yeah. And it was, you know, the whole country united to build it. There was no budgetary, I mean, know it was private, it was no, if it needed budgetary It it was not a problem with budget or investors willing to pour money on it or engineers.
I mean, why would it take over a decade to build something that was so significant for the whole country? I mean, you could build the tallest building in the world. You didn't. You could have built the tallest building in the world and said, okay, we're coming back bigger and stronger. We're gonna build you know, yeah, we got ahead, but now we're gonna build back better and stronger.
Build back better and stronger, right, or whatever. And build a two mile high skyscraper. I'm not a fan of No. Two mile high skyscrapers, but you know, you could have done that. Mean, you have the money, have the resources, you have the engineers, you have the the market.
Because if I built a, you know, a mile skyscraper, I I I couldn't fill with offices. Because I I don't have enough of market to fill with residences and offices or whatever. You do have the market in New York to, you know Yeah. To build offices and you want hotel rooms. I mean, people feel like this.
But you didn't. You took over a decade to build a very unimpressive building. So and that was twenty three years ago?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Now you're building 600 meter railways with $15,000,000,000. So how long it it would take to build to rebuild the Baltimore Bridge? It should take a year. How long would it take here? Here?
Yeah. A year. Two years. And we're a small poor country. I mean, we're the one of the poorest nations in in in the in the world.
Right?
Speaker 0: I know. That's why this is so shameful and interesting.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I mean, The US has some they have still unlimited amounts of resources. Because you can just print money. Right? That's another topic, but you can just print whatever.
How much it's worth? I mean, would you want to do it, but we want to build it made of gold? I mean, you can do anything, right? You just How much is it?
Speaker 0: Do it. So that sounds like a systemic failure. Doesn't
Speaker 1: sound like It's a systemic failure. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So what you're describing maybe can't be, you know, maybe that's something that you like have to level and rebuild or something. Maybe that's beyond maintenance. I don't know. What is the answer to that?
Speaker 1: I don't know, but but you need leadership. But I I I'll tell you something. If you see the mess that we were leaving here
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: It's a bigger mess than what you have over there. Yeah. So Oh, yeah. I mean, so Well, just the fact that a third of our population fled the country I know. And went to The United States I know.
Gives you an example that the mess we were living here and that we still have in other areas that, you know, not safety. We're the safest country in the Western Hemisphere, but we have problems in other areas, like the economy, for example.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So but our problems were bigger than your problems in relative sizes.
Speaker 0: So you said
Speaker 1: that So you can if you can, I mean, if you can fix a mess like this with, in The US, with a limited amount of wealth, with, you know, scientists, the innovation like no other country in the world? Still, the innovations coming from The US is more than any other country still. Right? Even not because of the government, but, you know, still, it has the best innovators, AI.
Speaker 0: For sure.
Speaker 1: I mean, anything. So you still have the best innovators. You still have the biggest companies. You still have the biggest the world reserve currency, the biggest wealth, the biggest GDP, the the the availability to hire talent from anywhere, you can bring whatever talent you you need to fix any gaps. You can, you know, pick pick any.
You get it. You get you get what you you want. You still can get what you want. You can't get attacked because you're you're Too far away. You are too far away from anyone that wants to attack you because Mexico or Canada are not going to attack The US.
So your enemies are too far away, and you still have the biggest army. The disarmed forces. Biggest energy reserves in the world? Yes. And yeah.
And The US, like like Russia, they were built as superpowers. So it's not like For example, if you see the economy the economy in Spain, it's very good. It's it's a robust economy. It's big. G seven.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: But they are like how do you call how you say in English, turon, nugget? They sell nuggets. Right? Yeah. Or they sell Iberic ham.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So, it's very good. Expensive. But you don't actually need that. Right. Luxury goods.
Luxury goods. So if you sanction Spain, you'll you'll break their economy. But if you sanction Russia, you can't break Russia because they are built as a superpower. Yes. So they have wheat, they have energy, they have natural gas, oil.
Yes. Because they were built like that. Industrial capacity. Industrial capacity. Factories, you know, workers.
So The US is is like that too. Was built as a superpower. So you have wheat, you have corn, you have workers, you have blue collar workers, you have trained skilled factory workers, you have colleges, you have universities, you have a school system, you have infrastructure, you have cities, tourism, the Mississippi River. I mean, you have everything. Have ships.
You have warehouses. Agriculture. Fertile lands. You what you didn't have before you got, right, you took from Mexico or whatever. So The US was built to be a superpower.
Right? Acquire land, acquire fertile lands, acquire I mean, Texas was part of Mexico, but it's part of The US and you have all the oil there. So, I mean, and then you have California. I mean, The US is built as a superpower. So The US has everything to go on for a thousand years.
It's not like it's doomed to fail. But apparently, the leaders, or most of them, you have probably very good leaders, but most of the leaders, they are not seeing. Either they are evil, or this is not conspiracy theory, it's just the options you have. Either they're evil and they want to destroy The US because of some evil reason, or they are puppets, and they are being handled by people that need The US to be destroyed for some reason. Or they're incompetent, and they're just, you know, doing wrong stuff because they're not capable of doing the right stuff.
Or, sorry I said three, the incentives, right? I mean, changing a country and changing a lot of things that are badly done probably will anger some people, right? Some groups, some lobbies, some interests. I mean, if you say, okay, we're gonna stop the railway that's costing us $15,000,000,000 per 600 meter, a lot of companies will be angry, a lot of, I don't know, mayors. I mean, you have a system that that needs to be needs to be handled.
So and that needs leadership, and it needs a clear a clear mandate that is probably a little hard to get in The US because, you know, the opposite views and Yes. Know, the bipartisanship and but but you need to do it.
Speaker 0: Well, you know, ultimately, as you well know, since you've succeeded in it, so so thumpingly, the instrument for all of that is the ballot, is the election itself. Like, how many votes do get? That's your mandate. Mhmm. But I think there is a sense among a lot of non conspiracy minded voters in The United States that that part of the system is itself corrupt.
Speaker 1: Yes. And that
Speaker 0: it is actually hard to affect change through voting because it's it's it's rigged. And so with that in mind, do you think Trump he's ahead in the polls. Do you think he can get elected?
Speaker 1: Well, yes. Yes. He can get elected. Yeah. I'll give you an example.
We, in 02/2019, the system was totally derailed. I mean, they canceled our party. I mean, we we we were running with a party and they canceled it. I mean, they annulled our party. So I stayed, I was party less.
So I we went to a small party and said, you don't have any candidates, you're very small. You wanna win the election? So we got that party registration and they canceled that party. And they canceled that party in the last day that you can file the candidacies. So we got a medium sized party at 11:11 p.
M. And we were able to file our candidacy. So it was not like it was easy or the system wasn't rigged. It was just so fair that we just, know, we put up our our proposals and the people just voted. It was very hard to win.
And then when we won, we since we didn't have simultaneous parliamentary elections, we actually went to the executive branch, totally opposed to the to the legislative branch and the and the judicial branch. So they control the Supreme Court, and they control 90% of the legislative body. So I had to veto everything, and they override my vetoes, and they enact they approved over 70 laws that I veto. Yes. And everything that we do, Supreme Court is unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional. Unconstitutional. Yeah. So we went to the people and said, you know, we cannot work like this. We need a majority in in congress.
We need a huge majority in Congress because we not only need to approve laws, need to get all these people out. And the only way to get it out democratically and respecting the rules of the system is if we get a huge immense majority in Congress, right? Because Congress can fire anybody, even the president.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: So people gave us the huge majority. And it was hard because they controlled, they still controlled the electoral tribunal as of today. That's why our election was recognized by all the countries in the world, because they know the electoral tribunal is controlled by the opposition still.
Speaker 0: It's the only thing that's controlled by
Speaker 1: It's the only thing. And we have we have we have liberalized SO, you know, that that validates and legitimizes everything else. So they but the thing is that in 2021, when we went to when we went to congressional elections, we carried a supermajority that they say they they said it was impossible because the system was designed so you cannot get a supermajority. But we got we got it even more than that. And then we, with that super majority, there's an article in constitution that allows the super majority in Congress to fire the Supreme Court justices.
So our party fired the supreme court justices when they got the they got the majority. They fired the attorney general, which I couldn't I mean, the states, the president appoints the attorney general. Here is congress. Congress elects the attorney general. Congress fires the attorney general.
But you need two thirds of Congress to fire an attorney general. So we got 75% of Congress
Speaker 0: But you stay within the rules the whole time.
Speaker 1: We we we have never not respected a single rule. That's that's also a narrative that they want to They they they cannot point out a single thing that was done by not respecting the the rules that were written by them. Because the rules are written by people. They're it's not like, oh, these rules were, you know, these rules are not given by God. These rules were written by people.
But still we respected all the rules that were written by them. And yeah, we got the the I I just I just saw an interview the president of Costa Rica gave in Costa Rica because he came also, like many other world leaders, he came to the to the inauguration. So they asked him over there in Costa Rica and they said, but do you think that Bukele is like doing things that are not within the constitutional limits that he has? And this interview was today, earlier. And president of Costa Rica said, well in a soccer game or in a football game, you have the rules and you have the score.
Right? And the rules are made so the score will be like that. But sometimes you get a super score in one side. Right? So are you angry at the rules or are you angry at the score?
Because the president of El Salvador, the only thing he can be criticized for is to getting a huge score in his favor with the rules of the game that they lay out lay out for him. So, yes.
Speaker 0: But it was enormously disruptive to the people who ran the country before you. Obviously.
Speaker 1: Of course. Obviously, yeah.
Speaker 0: Did you ever worry they would try and put you in jail?
Speaker 1: Well, they did. Even when even when I was president. I mean, even I already in being already in presidency, they they tried to to impeach me. They they say I wasn't There's an article in the constitution that says congress can actually fire the president if he's not fit to lead to to lead. So they say that I I wasn't fit to lead, and and they were They they they they tried to impeach me because of that.
But there was such a I mean, the people were like they they feared that the people were like, you know what advice would Rise up against them or something.
Speaker 0: Well, it's a fair concern given your Yes. Majority. Exactly. What advice would you give to another former democratically elected leader seeking office who is facing jail time? Anyone, just
Speaker 1: if there was a way to stop the candidacy, then he's he's probably in trouble. But if there's no there's no way to stop him from competing in the election, all the things that they do to him will just give him more votes.
Speaker 0: Right? That seems to be happening.
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, either you stop the candidacy or you you let him be. But just you know, hitting him with you just get him you're making the the greatest campaign ever. I mean Do you think they know that? Some of them they should they yeah.
They they I think they some of them do, but of course the ones that don't or they think that that's the that's the problem with endogamous groups, right? Because they all like, you know, yeah, so we're so great. Yeah, let's do it. And you know, they're they're making a huge mistake. Huge huge mistake.
Huge huge mistake.
Speaker 0: If if you're a country like El Salvador, really any other country in the hemisphere, including Canada, your eyes are on The United States because it's the dominant power.
Speaker 1: Yes. Obviously.
Speaker 0: But it puts you in a weird position if you're being criticized from The United States. So there's a congresswoman from Massachusetts, a pro communist congressman called Jim McGovern, literally pro communist, not an attack, just an observation, who attacked you the other day for daring to move a painting of Oscar Romero as a Catholic priest who was murdered here more than forty years ago in your airport, I think?
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. What did you make of that? It seemed like a pretty minute criticism, pretty small.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And we actually moved it to a nicer place in front. It's not like, you know, we moved it from a very nice place and we put it in some warehouse, you know, or whatever, someplace that nobody
Speaker 0: But what if you did? It's your country.
Speaker 1: No. Well, of course. Course. What? But you can make the case as an art connoisseur Yeah.
That he didn't like, you know, the the place we put the painting. But but the fact that he protested or he expressed his concerns, his deep concern on Twitter and not, you know, call, if he would have called here and said, hey, did you move the painting? They would have no, no, it's right here, mister congressman. So, of course, he can even he can even come and and see it from himself. But, of course, he was doing an attack.
Right? So but it backfired because first, the the painting was right in front. So, yeah, just to move the camera, it was on the other side. So it's it's was you know, he he he misfired. But also, the fact that a US Congressman is trying to micromanage where art is being displaced is being displayed in another country.
Just, you know, gives you an example of how out of touch they are.
Speaker 0: Feels like colonialism to me a little bit.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. And and and it comes from the from the Democratic Party, which you would guess
Speaker 0: The anti colonial party.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yeah. But you know, at the at the end it's like, you know, sometimes sometimes the guy that's called racist is is not really the racist. Right? So the guy that is called, you know, the colonialist is not really the colonialist.
Right? Sometimes it's it's weird how narratives work sometimes.
Speaker 0: Are you getting a lot of Americans moving here?
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. I mean, probably in numbers it it won't be significant to you, but yes, we you can see it. I mean, you see it everywhere. And we're also getting something that's very meaningful to us, is that we're getting a lot of our diaspora, a lot of our immigrants, the people that emigrate El Salvador because of the war, because of the gangs, or because of the economical issues that that have always happened here, a lot of them are coming back.
And there's a study made that the IOM and USAID sorry. I'll send you the link. Yes. There's a study made by the IOM and the USAID that says that 6062% of Salvadorans living in The United States want to come back to live here. Amazing.
62%. And 18% are already making plans to come. That's over half a million Salvadorans coming back. So that's super significant because, I mean, we expelled we expelled them from their their homes. Right?
Because of crime, because of a war, because of lack of opportunities. And the fact that they're coming back is, I mean, is the is the is the biggest proof that we're doing things the right way. We have a long way to go, but we're doing things the right way.
Speaker 0: So after
Speaker 1: So we have a lot of Americans, American born Americans coming, but we have also a lot of Salvadoran Americans with American citizenships coming here.
Speaker 0: Do you have the space?
Speaker 1: Well, it's it has created a housing bubble because, you know, we we we don't produce as much houses that are being bought are being bought right now. But that would create a temporary problem, which is the housing bubble. But then, which is not actually a bubble. It's just, you know, the offer and Yes.
Speaker 0: Finding its own level.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So now, of course, construction companies know that the amount of houses they will build, they will sell them. So construction has become 20% of our GDP, and it's growing. So this is gonna be a huge construction boom, and they have the clients, so it's not built in a bubble or speculation. But it it feels like a bubble, but it's built in, you know, people coming back home.
Has any other head of state called
Speaker 0: you for advice on how to improve this country?
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Yes. Yeah. Yeah.
Several. Some of them have said it in public, of course. And they have we have meetings, mostly security issues. We we're we're talking with a lot of Latin American leaders. They have come.
They have sent their security ministers to meet here with our security ministers. They have sent people to see our jail jail system. Because sometimes people see our jail system, and they try to compare it to the The United States jail system. And so all over the main, they don't have gyms, they don't have Netflix. You know?
But but you shouldn't compare El Salvador's jail system with The US jail system. You should compare El Salvador's jail system with Latin American jail systems. So if you go and see most of Latin American countries, the jails are run by the the by the gangs. Yes.
Speaker 0: As they were here. I remember that.
Speaker 1: Yes. They run the they had they had parties, prostitutes, They were
Speaker 0: it was autonomous here. Mean, had to get their permission to
Speaker 1: go in. Yes. Have to get the permission to go in. They only had permission to get in food, medicine, but they controlled they controlled the jails. Not only in the suburbs, they do it in most of Latin American countries.
So gangsters or narcos, they will control the jails. Right? It's their operation. They even go out and bag get Yeah. Yes.
We totally control that. And we have 100% control in our jail system. So that in American countries look to our jail system and and to see if they can they can fix their their own. So we do a lot of cooperation in security issues, jail jails, army, training. Do you know of Even more powerful in bigger countries, of course, in
Speaker 0: in that environment. Have you ever You know a lot of heads of state, because you are one. Have you ever met a head of state who when faced with a serious problem, a threat to his own country would, in the middle of a cabinet meeting, pause and say a prayer?
Speaker 1: I I don't I don't recall, but yeah. Probably.
Speaker 0: Do you know anyone who would do that, do you think?
Speaker 1: Yes. Probably. Probably. I don't I don't recall right now, but I think No. But that's
Speaker 0: just so far from the mindset of any leader I've ever interviewed. Anyone who would admit, I'm not sure what to do. Let's ask God.
Speaker 1: I I yeah. Probably probably not that common, but I I would guess some some some leaders do it.
Speaker 0: How long do you plan to stay president?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Five years. Five years. That's that's as as much as the constitution allows me to. Thank you for talking to us.
Thank you, Tucker.
Speaker 0: Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not permit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue. Thanks for watching. You can go to TuckerCarlson.com for our entire library of everything we've done, and we hope you will.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
COMPROMISED: Mike Benz details how concerning it is for Chief Justice Roberts to have spent a week at the estate of Norm Eisen in the Czech Republic The media has ignored this story from day one, so you folks know exactly what to do https://t.co/bqZFhxmdX9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Norm Eisen stated that Supreme Court Justice John Roberts is not corrupt. While Eisen was the US Ambassador to the Czech Republic, Roberts stayed with him for a week to collaborate on American and European rule of law issues.
The speaker claims that "rule of law" is a euphemism for controlling judges, prosecutors, courts, and law schools. They suggest that programs like the one involving Roberts and Eisen are used to control the law and, consequently, everything. The speaker connects this to district court judges allegedly nullifying actions taken by Trump.
Eisen lived in a 150-room mansion in Prague. The speaker wants to know the specific American and European rule of law issues that Eisen and Roberts worked on during that week, and calls for the declassification of all "rule of law" programs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This incredible sixteen seconds pulled up by the researcher. Norm Eisen said his good friend, supreme court justice John Roberts was not corrupt and that John went to the Czech Republic for a week so that they could spend more time working on American rule of law issues together.
Speaker 1: John Roberts is not corrupt. I know the chief justice well. He stayed when I was ambassador, stayed under my roof, came and spent a week with us. We worked on American and European rule of law issues together.
Speaker 0: Did you hear that? John Roberts, while Norm Eisen was The US Ambassador to The Czech Republic, Chief Justice of the supreme court, John Roberts. Yes. That John Roberts stayed under Norm Eisen's roof, stayed with him for a week as Norm Eisen and chief justice John Roberts rigged the judicial system in Europe, worked on European rule of law issues. Now, again, rule of law is their weasel word phrase for saying it's not a rule of kings where, you know, no one is above the law.
So the, you know, the the law has rule. The law rules over you, not not man, not a king, not a president. It's all about the law controls all controls all. So if you control if you control the law, if law rules all, and then you have these programs like this John Roberts Norm Eisen program in The Czech Republic to control the law, then you control everything. So having a program, a rule of law program, sometimes what we call governance programs or anti corruption programs, but they're all about control over the judges, the prosecutors, the courts, the law schools.
So this is what we're running into right now with all these district court judges who are nullifying everything Trump does, blocking him from shutting down agencies, blocking him from firing people. This is what it looks like when you've got these rule of law programs in a foreign country and they try to change their laws or they try to clean up their country. And I actually wanna get into some of these documents, in a bit here. But now Norm Eisen lived in a very peculiar place in the Czech Republic. He had a special house.
Here you go. Prague Palace. Norm Eisen with the former president of the Czech Republic in October 2000. The last palace in the next battle. Norm Eisen tells the epic story of democracy's long victory in Europe through a house's history.
Seven years ago, as the new US ambassador of the Czech Republic, again, of the state department for all things Czech Republic, Norm Eisen moved into one of Prague's most beautiful homes, a 150 plus room Beaux Arts mansion with a sweeping curved facade. He soon heard fascinating tales about its previous residence. A German general, one of Czechoslovakia's richest men. Okay. So he stayed in a 150 plus room mansion.
So when he goes on and he says.
Speaker 1: I know the chief justice well.
Speaker 0: I know the chief justice of the supreme court, John Roberts, well.
Speaker 1: He stayed when I was ambassador. Stayed under my roof. Can't
Speaker 0: He stayed under my roof. So he stayed in Norma Eisen's a 50 room mansion.
Speaker 1: Came and spent a week with us. We worked on
Speaker 0: He he came and spent a week with us. We worked on
Speaker 1: American and European rule of law issues to
Speaker 0: We worked on American and European rule of law issues. I wanna know what exact issues they worked on. What issues what American and European rule of law issues did Norm Eisen and John Roberts staying at Norm Eisen's house work on for a week? Was it rule of law issues in Romania, in France? Obviously, in The Czech Republic because if you remember, Norm Eisen was effectively doing this, like, regime change operation through arresting all the political opponents.
But he said American and European rule of law issues. I want every single one of these rule of law programs completely declassified. This is one of my one of my side quests right now.
reSee.it AI Summary
Karmelo Anthony won't be getting out of jail soon, as GoFundMe returned the donations due to his violent crime accusation. It seems the family was hoping to use that money for a public defender at our expense. Justice for Austin Metcalf.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
KARMA:->Looks like Karmelo Anthony isn't getting outta jail anytime soon, GoFundMe just returned the money to the senders GoFundMe doesn't allow those accused of violent crimes to use it's services Justice for Austin Metcalf ⚖️ https://t.co/3aWEmmpJx6
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Who thinks the family was ready to pocket that money and get that punk a public defender on our dime
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
We have evidence of metro police and Capitol police entering rooms in uniform and coming out as Trump supporters People have to go to jail for what they did to those J6ers.... this can not go unpunished https://t.co/Ie4rL7inqU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims there is video evidence of men dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol, separated from the outside crowd by police officers and closed doors. According to the speaker, videos show doors being opened, officers allowing Trump supporters to enter without resistance, and people inside directing them further in. The speaker believes this indicates a coordinated effort by law enforcement, possibly the FBI, to facilitate entry.
The speaker also claims there's evidence of uniformed officers entering rooms and emerging dressed as Trump supporters or construction workers. They suggest that individuals familiar with the Capitol's layout were leading groups of Trump supporters, implying coordination with FBI agents embedded within the crowd, possibly for months. The speaker asserts the American people deserve to know this truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Moment that I'm I'm able to to to reveal that stuff, I will. Yes. I mean, if you clearly have men dressed as Trump supporters walking around inside the Capitol on the other side of police officers who are, to one extent or another, not engaged with them. Like, they're not concerned about them. Then you have Right.
A a set of closed doors, like exterior doors and interior doors closed, and you have police officers positioned outside and then in between the two doors and then on the inside of the second set of doors, doors won't open yet. What time was this? This was a a couple of videos that, like, Trump was still speaking. And then on the inside, looked like Trump supporters walking around in groups of five or six. So these were clearly separated physically and by doors and by police officers from the guys on the outside.
So any reasonable man would come to the conclusion when you have videos of the doors being opened and police officers allowing Trump supporters that had gathered at the door to now answer, no violence, just walking in, just come on in, some fist bumps and and come in at second set of doors open. And then there's a group of Trump supporters on the steps, the interior steps saying, come on this way. This way. What does that sound? Any reasonable man would look at that and say, this was a coordinated effort by law enforcement to have these people come in.
Who was that? That had to be, you know, think it's nefarious forces and part of the whole agenda of the of of the FBI with their involvement of this whole thing. We have other evidence, specific observations of police officers, Capitol Police, or Metro, or both entering rooms and here in the Capitol in uniform and coming out as Trump supporters and construction workers. So You've seen that. Yeah.
So Why has that video not been released yet? One would say that's a pretty good clue. Yeah. The the other reason that we believe it's just practical to have someone that knows how to get around. I mean, you know yourself.
You can't walk around this place and know where you're going. Have to be here for years and years. The capital is a maze. That's right. And it's incredibly difficult to get around.
You have to know where you're going. So you had to have people that that were very familiar with the the capital itself in order to lead some random groups of citizens that have come from every corner of the country. In many cases, never been to DC before, less walked around in the capital. So it it just makes sense that the Trump supporters that were leading the way and were clearly already inside the capital before the doors were opened were working in coordination with the FBI agents and assets that were embedded into the crowd. In some cases, in these groups had been embedded for months.
This is ugly stuff we're discussing, but the American people deserve to know the truth, and I intend to see that it happens.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Breaking 🚨 Elon Musk says he knows who's funding these attacks on Tesla....we know who the Generals are Do you know who they are..? ... we do Raise your hand ✋️ if you want whoever is behind these attacks to be charged with Domestic terrorism https://t.co/YZKRAjEgn6
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is fundamentally a case of widespread domestic terrorism with the purpose of intimidation, harming innocent people. The focus needs to be on the people organizing and paying for these attacks and protests, not just the foot soldiers throwing Molotov cocktails. The president has made it clear that those paying for and organizing these violent attacks will be pursued. Attorney General Bondi has said the same thing.
The organizers, the generals, will be targeted. They are known. Prosecution will hopefully be for RICO and an organized criminal enterprise, which carries more serious penalties. The organizers and pushers of mass violence will go to prison for a very long time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is fundamentally a case of terrorism. It's it's widespread wide scale domestic terrorism with the purpose of intimidation, and and it's harming innocent people. It's it's really terrible. And I think what we actually have to get to are the people who are organizing and paying for these attacks and protests. That's who we really need to go after because the the people at the who who are actually throwing the Molotov cocktails, They they are the foot soldiers.
Right. But we need to go after the generals, and we're going to do so. The president has made it very clear that that we're gonna go after those that are paying and organizing these these violent attacks. And and attorney general Bondi has said the same thing. I I believe that that is exactly what will happen.
Do you know who they are? We're coming for them. Do you know who those generals are? We know we do. Yes.
And, hopefully, the prosecution will be for Rico and an organized criminal enterprise, which makes the penalties even more serious. And now to Jessica. This yes. The the this yes. Absolutely.
These these are these are serious crimes where the organizers and pushers of mass violence will go to prison for a very long time. That's right. Okay. Hope they see this segment.
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk commented on Judge Boasberg's $247K salary versus his $2.4M home in a wealthy DC neighborhood. Chicago1Ray noted Boasberg's family connections to Soros through NGOs funded by USAID and suggested involving AG Pam Bondi for further investigation.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
@elonmusk Elon said it was " interesting " that Judge Boasberg earns $247K annually, yet lives in a $2.4M dollar house in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in (DC) His wife and daughter are linked to Soros through NGO's funded by USAID (RP) if you want @AGPamBondi to look into this https://t.co/h5ArgRtKJx
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared news about Sheriff Deltoro and USSS agents arresting a man for making threats against President Trump. It seems the legacy media isn't covering it, so I felt it was important to highlight. We need to hold those inciting and committing violence accountable.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
BOOM 💥 Sheriff Deltoro Port St Lucie alond with (USSS) agents arrested a 42 year old man making threats against President Trump Since we're the media now and the legacy media's not reporting this you know what to do https://t.co/tklDSAcUPw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sheriff Richard Del Toro reported the arrest of 42-year-old Todd, a white male, in the 3400 block of Southwest Metzger Road. The arrest was the result of a search warrant executed by the SWAT team, United States Secret Service, and the Port St. Lucie Police Department. Todd was taken into custody for making written threats against the President of the United States on a Facebook account. According to Del Toro, Todd was already under a risk protection order and had been monitored for several days due to continuous threats to harm the president. Del Toro affirmed his commitment to protecting the President, the community, and keeping St. Lucie County safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm sheriff Richard Del Toro around the 3,400 block of Southwest Metzger Road regarding a search warrant that was executed by our SWAT team, United States Secret Service, and the Port St. Lucie Police Department. Today, we took into custody white male, forty two years old, mister Todd, regarding threats to the president of The United States, written threats that were made on Facebook account. We had a risk protection order for mister Todd that we've been watching him for several days. He has made continuous threats to harm our president, who I had the opportunity to meet with last night.
And I just wanna say to mister president Donald Trump, we're here to protect you, protect this community, and keep St. Lucie County safe. Thank you all. We appreciate it. And job well done by all the deputies here at St.
Lucie County Sheriff's Office.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
You want this stopped.... make those people inciting violence and committing it accountable to the fullest extent
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
FAFO 🚨 NYPD is arresting these tyrants at Trump Tower who support Hamas sympathizer Mahmoud Khalil Raise your hand ✋️ if you want them detained until ICE can determine if any are on visas, so they can expelled from this country https://t.co/dyldNtsatv
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Letter to the people of Ukraine Remove Zelensky, and give President Trump a call and apologize to him, our (VP) JD Vance and to us the American people Then send someone here to sign the minerals deal I'd take that deal bc that's the only deal you're getting Signed MAGA https://t.co/MHlZjJyL3X
Video Transcript AI Summary
I see the hatred for Putin, making a deal tough. I want peace and am aligned with the world. I can be tough, but deals require more than that.
Previous chest-thumping didn't work, diplomacy is needed. Trump's engaging in diplomacy.
Russia occupied parts of Ukraine, nobody stopped them. Ceasefires were signed but broken, prisoners weren't exchanged. What kind of diplomacy are we even talking about?
I'm trying to end the destruction of your country, but don't come here and start a fight. You're forcing conscripts to the front lines. Be thankful I'm trying to resolve this conflict. You should be appreciating the country that's backing you far more than a lot of people said they should have, and has given you billions of dollars in military equipment. Be thankful. You don't have the cards. If we get a ceasefire, you'd want to take it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This thing over with. You see the hatred he's got for Putin. It's very tough for me to make a deal with that kind of hate. He's got tremendous hatred. And I understand that, but I can tell you the other side isn't exactly in love with, you know, him either.
So it's not a question of alignment. I have to I'm aligned with the world. I wanna get the thing set. I'm aligned with Europe. I wanna see if we can get this thing done.
You want me to be tough? I could be tougher than any human being you've ever seen. I'd be so tough, but you're never gonna get a deal that way. So that's the way it goes. Alright.
One more question.
Speaker 1: Well, that hey. I I will respond to this. So look. For four years in The United States Of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy.
We tried the pathway of Joe Biden of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of The United States' words mattered more than the president of The United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what president Trump is doing. Can I ask you? Sure.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Okay. So he occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of East and Crimea. So he occupied it on 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those time was Obama, then president Obama, then president Trump, then president Biden, now president Trump, and god bless. Now president Trump will stop him.
But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the contact was?
Speaker 0: 2015.
Speaker 1: 20 14. 20 14 to
Speaker 0: 2015. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So I was I was not here.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But That's exactly right.
Speaker 2: Yes. But during 2014 till 2022, you know, the well, the situation the same, that people are been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know, that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversation, my bilateral conversation, and we signed him, me, like a new president. In 2019, I signed with him the deal.
I signed with him, Macron and Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Seasefire, all of them told me that he will never go. We signed him with gas contract. Gas contract.
Yes. But after that, he broken the ceasefire. He killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about?
What what do you what do do you mean?
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country. Yes. But if you Mister president mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conflict.
Speaker 2: Ever been to Ukraine? Did you say what problems we have?
Speaker 1: I have been to
Speaker 2: The come ones.
Speaker 1: I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems What? Bringing people into your military?
Speaker 2: We have problems.
Speaker 0: And do
Speaker 1: you think that it's respectful Obalon. To come to the Oval Office Of The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country.
Speaker 0: A lot
Speaker 2: of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now, but you will feel it in the future.
Speaker 0: God bless. You don't know that.
Speaker 2: God bless. You're not You gotta war.
Speaker 0: Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel.
Speaker 2: I'm not telling you
Speaker 0: position to dictate that. Remember this. You're no dictating. No position to dictate what we're gonna feel. You will influence.
We're gonna feel very good and very strong.
Speaker 2: You will feel influence.
Speaker 0: You're right now not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position and he's happy to be right about it.
Speaker 2: The very beginning of the war
Speaker 0: You're not in a good position.
Speaker 2: I was
Speaker 0: about the cards right now. With us, you start having cards. Right now, you don't you're playing cards. Mister president. You're playing serious.
You're gambling with the lives of millions of people.
Speaker 2: You're thinking
Speaker 0: You're gambling with World War three.
Speaker 2: What's your
Speaker 0: You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.
Speaker 1: Have you
Speaker 0: said thank you once in
Speaker 1: the entire meeting? No. In this entire meeting,
Speaker 0: have you said thank today.
Speaker 1: You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country. Please, you're saying that if you will speak
Speaker 2: very loudly about the war you
Speaker 0: He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble.
Speaker 2: Can I ask No?
Speaker 0: No. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble. I know. You're not winning.
I know. You're not winning this. I You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of
Speaker 2: Mister president, we are staying in our country, staying strong from the very beginning of the war. We've been alone, and we are thankful.
Speaker 0: I said thanks You have a blowout.
Speaker 2: This cabinet. They're not alone. This cabinet
Speaker 0: We gave you the stupid president three hundred and fifty billion dollars. You won't give me your president. Equipment. You voted for but they had to use our military If you didn't have our military equipment You invited me to our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.
Speaker 2: In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days. This is something less. In two weeks.
Of course, yes.
Speaker 0: It's gonna be a very hard thing to do business like this. I can
Speaker 1: tell you. Thank you.
Speaker 2: I said a lot of
Speaker 1: times to American people. That there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong.
Speaker 0: But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I understand, sir. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful.
You don't have the cards. Thankful. You're buried there. You you people are dying.
Speaker 2: Telling you
Speaker 0: You're running low on soldiers. Listen. Don't place You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn thing. And then you then you tell us, I don't want a cease fire.
I don't want a cease fire. I wanna go and I wanted this. Look. If you could get a cease fire right now, I'd tell you you'd take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed.
Speaker 2: Of course, we want to stop the war.
Speaker 0: You're saying you don't want a ceasefire?
Speaker 2: I said to you
Speaker 0: I want a ceasefire. Guarantees. Because you get a ceasefire faster than any greater.
Speaker 2: Ask our people about ceasefire. What they think?
Speaker 0: That wasn't me. For you. What That wasn't with me. That was with a a guy named Biden who was not a smart person. That was your that was with Obama.
Speaker 2: It was your president.
Speaker 0: Excuse me. That was with Obama who gave you sheets, and I gave you javelins.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 0: I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins. You gotta be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards.
But without us, you don't have any cards. One more question to my mister vice president. I'm sorry. He's Gonna be a tough deal to make because the attitudes have to change. What if Russia breaks his fire?
What if Russia
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Just a quick reminder, that Elizabeth Warren was caught diverting funds intended for victims of the LA fires to ActBlue... incredible Media's ignoring this scandal so you know exactly what to do, we are the media now https://t.co/QmsV6Q9ykE
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
This is how everyone who for voted Trump feels, now that Kash Patel is our FBI Director https://t.co/9HrkOLVKjc
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Join me in giving a big round of applause 👏 to the New Yorkers who called Robert DeNiro a piece of trash and a " MOOK"...... I love it This is what pushback 👇 looks like folks https://t.co/PynKW6Yg0F
Video Transcript AI Summary
You're a mook, a traitor to Italian Jews. You're a fucking cunt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're a fucking mook, m o o k, mook. You're a traitor to Italian Jews. You're a traitor to Italian Jews, you fucking cunt. You're a cunt.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
What.... Hyundai auto plant in Alabama caught using children as young as 12 years old per (Reuters) This can not go unchecked @AGPamBondi https://t.co/sHYFfJ6gv1
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a February 24 letter to shareholders, Hyundai CEO Jae Hoon Chang announced the company will give up a 72% controlling stake in Smart Alabama LLC in Luverne, Alabama. This direct Hyundai subsidiary was found to have employed children as young as 12, according to a Reuters investigation last year.
The company also stated that recent audits at 29 of its direct suppliers across Alabama have made them confident that they are now in full compliance with underage labor laws, after working with the US Department of Labor.
Following a 2022 Reuters investigation that revealed several suppliers to the automaker's Montgomery, Alabama vehicle plant used underage migrant workers to make parts for its US-made cars and SUVs, these changes were pledged to shareholders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What they were doing to line the pockets of that car maker. It is despicable. In a February 24 letter to shareholders from the Hyundai chief executive, Jae Hoon Chang, The company will divest a 72% controlling stake in Smart Alabama LLC in Luverne, Alabama, a direct Hyundai subsidiary where Reuters last year documented children as young as 12 were working. 72% control. Do you think they had no idea?
This man, wonder how much money he makes. Company also said recent audits at 29 of its direct suppliers across Alabama made it confident they are now, he just now audited everybody, in full compliance with underage labor laws after working with the US Department of Labor. That statement is full of nonsense. It's just there was no just words. Those are just words that this company released.
We're now fully compliant. We're confident after working with the Department of Labor. How many people have to work with the Department of Labor to not hire 12 year olds to illegally do their bidding and their work? This is a ridiculous statement from that guy, Mr. Chang.
Monday pledging to its shareholders. It comes after a 2022 Reuters investigation showing several suppliers to the automaker's massive Montgomery, Alabama vehicle plant used underage migrant workers to make parts for its popular US made cars and SUVs. Gotta roll them out. Gotta roll them out.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Maxine Waters lives in a $4.6M dollar mansion, has a net worth of over $5.3M on a Govt salary of $174K a year, and paid her daughter $100K a year for (10) yrs Do you think Pam Bondi should look into how she managed this while representing one of the poorest dist in California https://t.co/MUZccFSiJb
Video Transcript AI Summary
A lot of people are willing to accept a dishonorable person, someone convicted of felonies, openly racist, and who has expressed admiration for controversial leaders.
Why has America voted for him? It boils down to racism. People don't like discussing it, but the majority of votes come from whites who believe in "taking the country back" from minorities who are succeeding and closing the wealth gap. It's about white versus other, not the economy.
I believe that the majority of Americans will buy into anything that gives them an advantage and ensures they don't have to worry about others being equal. Regarding claims of an expanded base including more black and Latino voters, I'm skeptical, especially about the increase in black votes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The majority are basically whites in this country willing to accept a dishonorable human being, someone who has been convicted, of 34 felonies, someone who has been openly and brazenly racist, someone who has, you know, talked about, his love for Putin and, Kim Jong un and made some statements favorable to Hitler. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: This is all why you don't like him, but why has America voted for him?
Speaker 0: Racism is the the basic point. People don't like to talk about racism. But the fact of the matter is the majority of his votes are going to come from whites. And that's who has been talking to all campaign about taking the country back, taking it back from whom, taking it back from too many minorities who are doing too well, who are succeeding, who are closing the wealth gap, and something has to be done in his, estimation. And so that's what it's really all about.
It's not about the economy and all that, you know, people would like to basically hide behind. It's about white versus other.
Speaker 2: Just a quick reminder in between this rage, guys. Don't forget to like the video if you haven't already. It does help me enormously. And if you haven't subscribed to the channel already, you're welcome to do so. Let's get back to it.
Speaker 1: But, yeah, you know, it's looking possible tonight that Donald Trump has won the popular vote. Are you are you saying that the majority of Americans are racist?
Speaker 0: I'm saying the majority of, the Americans will buy into anything as long as they believe that somehow they will have more advantage, they will have more ownership, that they don't have to worry about others who will be equal to them. You can call it what you want, but that's the way it is.
Speaker 3: It looks, congressman Walters, as if he's expanded his base to include more black voters, more Latino voters, more people of color this time around. I mean, not more than Harris, but more than last time around. Doesn't that fight your theory?
Speaker 0: Well, I don't know. We've gotta wait and see. I don't know what the expansion is. There may be some expansion in the Latino community, but, all this talk about getting black votes, I don't think it's true.
Speaker 4: I I I just say really quickly too. Democrats need to be mature, and they need to be honest. And they need to say, yes. There is there's misogyny. But it's not just misogyny from white men.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 4: It's misogyny from Hispanic men. Right. It's misogyny from black men. Things we've all been talking about who do not want a woman leading them. Might be race issues with
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Remember the look on Tom Hanks face when Ricky Gervais said Jeffrey Epstein was their friend Tom Hanks is a washed up loser who won't be available for SNL if it's learned he visited Epstein Island Arrest everyone on the Epstein client list @AGPamBondi https://t.co/8S6UbiCoDq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here we are with the most important TV and film execs in the world, and you're all terrified of Ronan Farrow.
It was a big year for pedophile movies like Surviving R Kelly, Leaving Neverland, Two Popes. But nobody cares about movies anymore. Everyone's watching Netflix. I could just say, "Well done, Netflix. You win. Good night."
This show is so long, you could binge watch the entire first season of afterlife instead. That's a show about a man who wants to kill himself because his wife dies and it's still more fun than this. He didn't kill himself, just like Jeffrey Epstein.
If you win an award tonight, don't make a political speech. You're in no position to lecture the public. You know nothing about the real world. Accept your award, thank your agent and your god, and get off the stage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In this room are some of the most important TV and film executives in the world. People from every background, but they all have one thing in common. They're all terrified of Ronan Farrow. He's coming for you. He's coming for you.
Look, talking of all you perverts, it was a big year it was a big year for pedophile movies. Surviving R Kelly, Leaving Neverland, Two Popes. Shut up. Shut up. I don't care.
I don't care. No one cares about movies anymore. No one goes to the cinema. No one really watches network TV. Everyone's watching Netflix.
This show should just be me coming out going, well done Netflix. You win everything. Good night. But no. No.
We gotta drag it out for three hours. You could binge watch the entire first season of afterlife instead of watching the show. That that's a show about a man who wants to kill himself because his wife dies of cancer and it's still more fun than this. Okay? Spoiler alert, season two is on the way.
So in the end, he obviously didn't kill himself. Just like Jeffrey Epstein. Shut up. I know he's your friend, but I don't care. You like to make your own way here in your own plane, didn't you?
So if you do win an award tonight, don't use it as a a platform to make a political speech. Right? You're in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg.
So if you win, right, come up, accept your little award, thank your agent and your god, and off. Okay?
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Turns out the FBI had evidence that Ilhan Omar did in fact marry her brother which is in violation of immigration laws and did nothing Calls for her to be expelled from Congress & deported are growing, this should happen https://t.co/nsSYS8XCQp
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's been known for a while that Ilhan Omar allegedly married her brother to help him enter the country illegally, which violates immigration law. The FBI reportedly had evidence confirming this but took no action.
Republican operatives in Minnesota spent significant money on private investigators to determine if Ilhan Omar was a DNA match to her second husband. They collected DNA samples from different continents and found a conclusive match, indicating that her second husband was a sibling.
The FBI arrested one of the involved individuals, Anton Lazaro, on separate charges right before the information was to be released. The FBI was allegedly uninterested in the information and said the statute of limitations had expired. The story was reported after viewing the website before it was taken down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's been known for quite a while that Ilhan Omar apparently married her own brother to help him gain entry illegally into the country. That's a violation of immigration law. That actually happened, it turns out. And now we're learning the FBI had evidence to confirm it, but didn't do anything about it. Randa Devine is an actual journalist.
She works at the New York Post where she writes a column. She joins us tonight to explain what exactly happened. Randa, thanks so much for coming on.
Speaker 1: Pleasure, Taka. Well, some, basically, Republican operatives, up in Minnesota decided to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on private investigators to really find out if Ilhan Omar was a genetic match, the DNA match to, the man who was her second husband. They went to three continents. They found a cigarette butt and a drinking straw, which, they decided. They sent it to an a DNA laboratory and found conclusively, that the DNA matched that the second husband was a sibling, according to this DNA sample.
So, the the very day that they were going to unleash this on the world, and in fact, I was interviewing one of the people involved, the FBI swooped on, the the gentleman, Anton Lazaro, from this, this Republican, pack up in Minnesota, and arrested him on some different charges. Who knows whether, you know, he's guilty or not guilty. I mean, he's not guilty until, proven, but he's in jail. And so his story never got to see the light of day. I mean, luckily, he'd he'd, told the FBI they were not interested.
They told him the statute of limitations had run out. We managed to see the website before he took it down, before he was arrested, and managed to report the story such as it was.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
The Amish built 300 homes for the folks in NC, free of charge in a week Trump is saying it's time to abolish FEMA Raise your hand ✋️ if you agree with Trump that it's time to abolish FEMA & let states handle their disasters on their own.. https://t.co/zhceGmnOII
Video Transcript AI Summary
Twelve tiny homes are being built in the parking lot of Cornerstone Summit Baptist Church for families displaced by Hurricane Helene. An Amish crew, led by Aaron, constructed the homes in just two days, completing about 90% of the work. A local man from Pennsylvania initiated the project after witnessing the damage and organized support from his Amish community to raise funds and modify the homes to meet local codes. Each shelter will be fully furnished with beds and propane heaters. Senior pastor Reggie Hunt noted that interest in the homes has surged, and plans are in place for more construction in January to help those still living in tents in areas like Pensacola, Burnsville, and Elk Park, as the cold weather approaches. The Amish builders demonstrated an impressive and efficient system throughout the process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What he's talking about is the 12 tiny homes located in the parking lot of Cornerstone Summit Baptist Church. Henry says when he saw the homes being built, he had to come by and find out who was doing it.
Speaker 1: I was talking to, Aaron was the name of the Amish gentleman leading the crew that was here. And Aaron explained to me, you know, that they are here to build these temporary housing units for, people displaced by hurricane Helene. However, they had to leave at the end of the day.
Speaker 0: He says there were about 50 men building 12 homes in 2 days, and they got them about 90% done.
Speaker 1: They actually erected everything from the outside in. They built these foundations. They, you know, framed out the walls, framed out the roofs, insulated everything, ran the electrical.
Speaker 0: Henry says it all started with a man who came to the area from Pennsylvania and saw the damage. That man went to his local Amish community and asked for help. He then raised the money to get them here and build the sheds.
Speaker 1: Found a local shed company, to modify the plans to make these sheds habitable, bring them up to local code with installation, outlets, light fixtures.
Speaker 0: Now Henry is working hard to finish the shelters to get them ready for families.
Speaker 1: It will come fully furnished with beds and propane heaters.
Speaker 0: And senior pastor Reggie Hunt says they aren't done yet.
Speaker 2: The phone has been ringing hot because people have been driving by and seeing, that these were being built.
Speaker 0: So they plan to build more
Speaker 2: This crew's gonna come back from Pennsylvania in January and make more.
Speaker 0: To try to get as many out as possible. These 12 will be going to areas where people are still in tents.
Speaker 2: Pensacola, Burnsville, Elk Park.
Speaker 0: Because he says people in the high country deserve to get out of the cold and indoors as the weather keeps setting in.
Speaker 2: The Amish builders are everything amazing. I mean, they were teenagers and older men, that they had a system that I've never seen before that was able to build this.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Unconstitutional Discharge... Did all of you liberals bookmark my post when I told you that Trump won't see a minute of jail time Raise your hand ✋️ if you want Pam Bondi to investigate how Judge Merchan's family profited by this fake prosecution of Trump https://t.co/RChk4jNVKX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The court session has concluded, and the judge has imposed an unconditional discharge. Mark Levin comments that Judge Bershaun has not assigned any jail time, fines, or discernible punishment. However, Donald Trump is now labeled as a convicted felon, which carries significant implications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out that court is over. The sentence has been imposed in unconditional discharge. And as we bring in Mark Levin for his commentary on this, Mark, judge Bershaun, imposed no jail time, no fine, no punishment, that anyone can discern with the exception that he is now branded, Donald Trump with a scarlet letter of a big f on his forehead that he is a convicted felon.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Good morning to everyone who wants to know why Pence was given a handful of gold coins just b4 certifying a contested election https://t.co/ssJuQljxI5
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Raise your hand ✋️ if you want Elon Musk to remove Joni Ernst from being Chair of D.O.G.E if she votes against anyone of Trumps appt's https://t.co/eusDnXExP9
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Raise your hand ✋️ if you want Kash Patel to instruct the FBI to investigate the role Adam Schiff played in the Russia Collusion hoax https://t.co/YTZdFU9xMX
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Breaking ..... Putin says he's ready to enter into peace talks.... says Trump is intelligent and experienced, and said Trump acted like a real man after the assassination attempt in July https://t.co/eztlwEbpEa
Video Transcript AI Summary
President-elect Trump is described as intelligent and experienced, with potential for future talks. However, Russia has recently attacked Ukraine's energy infrastructure, raising concerns about possible escalations before Trump takes office. Dan Hoffman, a former CIA station chief in Moscow, is asked about Putin's compliments towards Trump, particularly regarding Trump's response during a July assassination attempt. The discussion centers on the implications of Putin's flattery and what it might mean for U.S.-Russia relations moving forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That president-elect Trump is, quote, intelligent and experienced while speaking to reporters. He seemed to leave the door open for talks. But just yesterday, Russia attacked Ukraine's energy infrastructure and warned more could come. So could we see an escalation from both sides before Trump takes office? Let's bring in Dan Hoffman, former CIA station chief in Moscow and Fox News contributor.
Dan, great to have you in on this today. So what do you make of this flattery, coming from Putin of Donald Trump? He also said that he thought Trump acted like a real man during the assassination attempt in July. What's with the flattery here?
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Explosive recorded audio 🚨 Earlier this year, Kari Lake was offered a bribe to stay out of AZ politics for 2 yrs by AZ GOP chair Jeff Dewitt.... but she refused Now it appears she can't get a fair election THERE'S RACES STILL PENDING, PAY ATTN RNC https://t.co/tBsiMIv5CR
Video Transcript AI Summary
A controversial phone call recording has surfaced involving Arizona Senate candidate Carrie Lake and GOP chair Jeff DeWitt. In the audio, DeWitt allegedly offers Lake money to stay out of politics for two years. Lake responded, emphasizing that the issue is not about money but about the country. She firmly rejected the idea of being bought, stating, "I can be bought, that's what this is about," and reiterated her commitment to her political ambitions. Lake has called for DeWitt's resignation, claiming he is corrupt and compromised. The GOP office has not yet commented on the situation, which appears to bolster Lake's campaign for the Senate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meantime, an alleged phone call is at the center of some political controversy in the state of Arizona.
Speaker 1: Correspondent Sarah Williamson live in our New York newsroom. She has details on this one. Sarah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Sean, Emma, this explosive, recorded audio has gone viral basically since it was released and rightfully so. Now Arizona senate candidate Carrie Lake and many others are calling for the state's GOP chair, Jeff DeWitt, to resign. Now speaking to a reporter from NBC in New Hampshire last night at former president Trump's victory party, Lake said, quote, he's gotta resign. We can't have somebody who is corrupt and compromised running the Republican party.
The recording, which was first reported to the Daily Mail, purports to capture DeWitt offering Lake money in exchange for her staying out of politics for 2 years. Now here is part of that 10 minute conversation, which reads, DeWitt saying first of all, so the ask I got today from back east is where is is there any companies out there or something that could just put her on the payroll to keep her out? Carrie Lake responded saying this is about defeating Trump and I think that's a bad bad thing for our country. DeWitt then says just say is there a number at which she then cuts him off and says I can be bought, that's what this is about. DeWitt replies you can take a pause for a couple of years.
You can go back right back to where you are going after that. Lake then rebutted this many times saying it's, she will not accept 1,000,000,000 of dollars even to stay out. She then says this is not about the money, it's about our country. Now Jeff DeWitt and the state's GOP office are yet to comment on the issue, but if anything, Sean and Emma, this, certainly does bode well for Kari Lake, and her run for senate.
Speaker 1: Sarah Williamson live in the newsroom with the details on that. Yeah. Certainly has gone viral. Many have already seen that again, the news there with Carrie Lake and, again, the GOP party chair caught on tape.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Breaking 🚨 Letitia James comes unglued with a bazaar rant on Trumps victory just now " We're ready to respond to any attempt to roll back our rights," (RP) if you want Trump to ask his AG to look into how Letitia James has ($15M) in the bank while making ($103K) annually https://t.co/XZR1PcMCl4
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have thoroughly analyzed potential challenges to our rights and developed contingency plans. No matter what the next administration attempts, we are prepared to counter any attacks or funding cuts affecting New York. Despite national events, we will remain steadfast against injustice and protect our most vulnerable and marginalized communities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To respond to any attempt to roll back our rights. So here we are. We studied their platforms. We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns. We've created contingency plans.
So no matter what the next administration throws at us, we're ready. We're ready to respond to their attacks. We're ready to respond to any attempts to cut or eliminate any funding to the great state of New York as the governor outlined. So so despite what has happened on the national stage, we will continue to stand tall in the face of injustice, revenge, or retribution. We will continue to protect and our most vulnerable and marginalized amongst us.
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
The internet is forever... This is what Liz Cheney thought about Kamala after Biden selected her as VP Trump campaign ad..? I'm Donald Trump And I approve this message https://t.co/18u9IzFZFG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the vice-presidential candidate's voting record is to the left of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. The speaker believes the American people will examine her past stances and primary election statements, concluding she is a radical liberal. The speaker asserts she advocated spending $32 trillion on Medicare for All. The speaker also states that, as Attorney General in California, she essentially banned gun sales via executive action and threatened to do so again if elected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Case, as somebody who is a centrist. And, in one fell swoop here, he has put somebody on the ticket whose voting record in the senate is to the left of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. So I think that, you know, the American people are gonna look at the substance of this. They're gonna look at what she stood for in the past. They're gonna look at what she she said during the the primary election.
And it's very clear. She is, a radical liberal. She's somebody that, has said we ought to spend $32,000,000,000,000 on Medicare for all. If you look at her record as well in California, she did in fact, essentially ban gun sales with executive action. And she threatened during the primaries to do the same thing if she's elected.
If she
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
@realDonaldTrump Kamala kicked Christians out of her rally in Wisconsin, for saying Jesus is Lord and Christ is King You guys are at the wrong rally.... Watch how Luke Polaake and Grant Beth describe their harrowing experience Christians need to get to the polls and vote their conscience https://t.co/Y09cjFIXbN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris allegedly ejected individuals from a rally for disagreeing with her on abortion rights or expressing Christian beliefs.
According to one individual, Harris waved and smirked at him after he held up a cross while being asked to leave. He had yelled out to the crowd that abortion is the sacrament of Satan. Two young men, Luke Pulaski and Grant Beth, who proclaimed "Christ is King, Jesus is Lord" at the rally, were interviewed about the incident.
It is claimed that Harris intentionally alienated people who disagree with her views on abortion. It is also claimed that a Kamala Harris presidency would alienate over 50% of the US population that is Christian.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kamala Harris is trying to shrink the tent by kicking people out of her rallies because they disagree with her on abortion rights.
Speaker 1: Or Jesus.
Speaker 0: Or Jesus. Exactly. Either way, at the very least, on abortion rights.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Listen to this.
Speaker 1: We remember Donald Trump hand selected 3 members of
Speaker 2: the United States Supreme Court with
Speaker 1: with the intention that they would undo the protections of Roe v Wade, and they did as he intended. Oh, you guys are at the wrong rally. No. I think you meant to go to the smaller one down the street. That's the brat girl coming out.
Pretty big moment.
Speaker 3: So earlier today, we had those 2 young men, Luke Pulaski and Grant Beth, those you just heard in that rally, those who yield Christ is king, Jesus is lord. Earlier we had them on Fox and Prince.
Speaker 4: I'm sure she talked about overturning Roe v Wade and Donald Trump. I yelled out to the crowd that abortion is the sacrament of Satan. And when I said that, I deeply do believe that as a Christian. And about 10 seconds go by, and that's when the video of, my friend Grant and I, proclaiming that Christ is Lord and Jesus is King. See on the video, she waves she waves.
She was actually waving to me. I, took this cross off my neck that I wear, and as we were getting asked to leave, I held it up in the air and waved at her and pointed to her. She looked directly in the eye, kinda gave me an evil smirk.
Speaker 5: This is what you are gonna get with a Kamala Harris presidency. You are going to get the Kamala Harris that alienates over 50% of the US population that is Christian.