TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ChildrensHD

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 9:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe glyphosate is extremely toxic and should be treated that way. My assessment of the research is that it’s very problematic. There’s chronic exposure data showing harmful shifts in the gut microbiome, potential weakening of the blood–brain barrier, and liver inflammation from fatty liver—a new epidemic. I think it’s a major problem.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo says glyphosate is extremely toxic and should be treated that way. “My assessment of the research that I’ve seen is that it’s very problematic.” “You’ve got a compound here that people are exposed to chronically and there’s good data that shows that it alters the gut microbiome in ways that are harmful.” “There’s good data that indicates that it may be weakening the blood brain barrier, which is obviously a very big deal.” “There’s good data for liver inflammation from fatty liver, which is a new epidemic.” “I think it’s a major problem.” @FLSurgeonGen

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 2:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling for urgent action on the 2026 Farm Bill. Please contact the House Agriculture Committee at (202) 225-2171 and urge them to strike sections 10202, 10204, 10205, 10206, and 10207. The sections allegedly grant pesticide immunity, delay reviews by five years, expand spraying in water, exempt pesticide-infused GMOs from regulation, and erase local restrictions. If you can, take this action today.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 URGENT ACTION NEEDED 🚨 The 2026 Farm Bill is out of control. The government is trying to slip in extremely damaging policies for American health, and we need your help. Step 1: Contact the House Agriculture Committee Main Office: (202) 225-2171 Step 2: Urge them to strike sections 10202, 10204, 10205, 10206, 10207. ⚠️ These sections... ▶︎ Give pesticide companies immunity ▶︎ Delays pesticide reviews for 5 years ▶︎ Allows for more pesticides to be sprayed in our water, makes pesticide infused GMOs exempt from regulations ▶︎ Erases state and local restrictions on spraying (around schools) and preempts court decisions. If there's one action you take today, please let it be this one. @teacher_choice

Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking from Elizabeth Kucinich, the farm bill is worse than you thought. States’ rights are under siege, federal preemption is at issue, corporate liability shields are a focal point, and there are fiscal risks embedded in the 2026 farm bill. CHD has issued an action alert specifically about the liability shield. The action will be linked in the show notes. If you have not completed it, please complete it ASAP and promote it because Congress is going to be doing the markup of the farm bill starting today, I believe, at 5 PM Eastern Time. Markups usually last three days, and there is a lot to go through. This action focuses specifically on getting rid of the liability shield. But if you read Elizabeth Kucinich’s Substack, you’ll see there’s so much more that is horrible about this bill. There is so much that is happening. I even had some people from the EMR community reach out to me speaking specifically about problems around different smart technologies that were in the farm bill too. It’s a monster. So I’m going to be meeting with my team today, to see if we might be able to get out another action alert about this tomorrow, but at least complete the liability shield side of this. We need to see that go. The other aspects of it, read Elizabeth’s amazing Substack to understand all the issues and call your congressperson and tell them the farm bill is a beast. It’s a monster. We need to get this under control. Hi.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking from Elizabeth Kucinich. The farm bill is worse than you thought. States rights under siege, federal preemption, corporate liability shields, and the fiscal risks embedded in the 2026 farm bill. Now you might know that CHD has put out an action alert specifically about the liability shield. Here is that action. It will be linked in the show notes. If you have not completed it, please complete it ASAP and promote it because congress is going to be doing the markup of the farm bill starting today, I believe, at 5PM eastern time. I think that's what I saw. It starts usually the markups last three days. There's a lot to go through. We this action focus specifically on get rid of the liability shield. But if you read Elizabeth Kucinich's substack, you're gonna see there's so much more that is horrible about this bill. There is so much that is happening. I even had some people from the EMR community reach out to me speaking specifically about problems around different smart technologies that were in the farm bill too. It's a monster. So I'm gonna be meeting with my team today, see if we might be able to get out another action alert about this tomorrow, but at least complete the liability shield side of this. We need to see that go. The other aspects of it, read Elizabeth's amazing substack to understand all the issues and call your congressperson and tell them the farm bill is a beast. It's a monster. We need to get this under control. Hi.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

For more information on the 2026 Farm Bill, courtesy of @EJKucinich: https://kucinichreport.substack.com/p/states-rights-under-siege-federal https://t.co/G8NJ6brRGO

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@22NamB Thank you for taking action!

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@McFaddens28 Thank you!

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@plantparadise7 Well said. We couldn't agree more!

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 4:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Swedish scientists documented that after 5G towers were installed in residential areas, residents within 150 feet developed headaches, sleep disruption, severe fatigue, and nosebleeds, even though radiation levels were within safety limits. Free access to the EMF Hazards Summit.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

📡 BREAKING: Swedish scientists documented what happened when 5G towers were installed in residential areas. The findings? Within days, residents within 150 feet developed: • Unexplained headaches • Sleep disruption • Severe fatigue • Even nosebleeds The most disturbing part? These radiation levels were "within safety limits." Get your FREE access to the #EMFHazardsSummit ↓ https://theemfguy.com/op/summit/?oprid=86626&ref=43489

Saved - January 13, 2026 at 9:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Cece Doucette warns wearable tech radiation is dangerous: headaches, nosebleeds, anxiety, depression, insomnia; a neurotoxin pulsing billions of times per second beyond Earth's field; it disrupts circadian melatonin, suppressing sleep and repair; harms the blood–brain barrier, letting toxins in; red blood cells clump (rouleaux), blocking oxygen delivery; she says the truth is terrifying.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨Cece Doucette just EXPOSED how dangerous electromagnetic radiation from wearable tech really is: “Here are some things that people may notice right away: headaches, nosebleeds, anxiety, depression, insomnia.” “This is a neurotoxin that is pulsating our biological system many, many times per second more than the Earth’s natural electromagnetic field.” “With our circadian rhythm, in the middle of the night, it’s supposed to be dark.” “That’s our brain’s signal to release melatonin to regulate our sleep and to go in and help do the cell repair and regeneration and clean up from the day’s debris.” “So that melatonin suppression is one big thing.” “Another thing is the blood-brain barrier.” “That membrane helps to keep toxins from getting into sensitive areas like the brain.” “What the science has shown is that when we constantly pulse ourselves with this manmade microwave radio frequency, it opens up or it permeates the blood-brain barrier.” “When the blood is escorting toxins out of the body, it can take a left turn and go right into the brain—which helps us to understand why we have so much more neurotoxicity today than we have had in previous generations.” “And then there’s something called rouleaux formation.” “Our red blood cells are supposed to be free-floating one by one and bringing oxygen to all of our systems and organs.” “When we expose ourselves to this constant bombardment of microwave radio frequencies, it is ruining that little system on the red blood cell that keeps them separated and now they start magnetizing and glomming together.” “Now you’ve got this chain of red blood cells that look like a stack of coins and they can’t get to where they need to go to bring the oxygen to all of our systems and organs.” The truth about the dangers of wearable tech and electromagnetic radiation is terrifying. Watch our full CHDTV segment with Cece Doucette: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/childhood-vaccine-schedule-changes--answering-emr-questions--unvaccinated-wv-student-kicked-out-of-school/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lou shows an image of a guy running with ear pods and checking a device like an Apple Watch, asking how much that is doing inside his body and noting many people are likely using them. Speaker 1 says we’ve all been sold sexy products that are fun, but the risks aren’t being shared. They offer a free public education webinar every month, two hours, to walk through the science, and for cliff notes they provide the following immediate observations people may notice: - Headaches - Nosebleeds - Anxiety - Depression - Insomnia They describe this as a neurotoxin that pulsates our biological system many, many times per second, more than the Earth’s natural electromagnetic field. The brain perceives this invisible light energy as the lights are on, which disrupts the circadian rhythm in the wee hours of darkness. Melatonin suppression is singled out as a major consequence, affecting sleep and the nighttime cell repair and regeneration processes. The blood-brain barrier is a membrane surrounding the brain that helps keep toxins out of sensitive brain areas. The speaker claims that constant pulsing with man-made microwave radiofrequency opens up or permeates the blood-brain barrier, allowing toxins to accompany blood into the brain and contributing to increased neurotoxicity today. The speaker also mentions something called rouleaux formation. When radiating devices like a phone are held, the pinky finger tingles. Citing Dr. Magda Havas and Dr. Rob Brown, they say this exposure leads to rouleaux formation. The speaker explains rouleaux as red blood cells that are normally free-floating and deliver oxygen throughout the body being affected by microwave radiation, causing red blood cells to become magnetized and stick together, forming chains like a stack of coins that cannot efficiently reach tissues and organs to deliver oxygen. Rouleaux formation is described as a very serious concern.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lou just put up an image of a guy running. He had ear pods in, and he was checking his whatever he what Apple Watch or whatever it is. How much I mean, what is that doing inside his body? And I bet loads of people are probably doing that. Speaker 1: Yeah, and we've all been sold these sexy products. They're really fun, right? We get to do amazing things with us, but they're not sharing the risk. So, I do a free public education webinar every month, two hours, and I'll really walk you through the science. But if you want the cliff notes right now, because we have a minute or two here, here are some things that people may notice right away. Headaches, nosebleeds, anxiety, depression, insomnia. This is a neurotoxin that is pulsating our biological system many, many, many times per second, more than the Earth's natural electromagnetic field. And so, what happens? We know that the brain sees this invisible light energy form as the lights are on. So, the wee hours of darkness with our circadian rhythm, in the middle of the night, it's supposed to be dark. That's our brain signal to release melatonin to go in and regulate our sleep and to go in and help do the cell repair and regeneration and cleanup from the days to breathe. That melatonin suppression is one big thing. Another thing is the blood brain barrier is a membrane that surrounds our brain, and that membrane helps to keep toxins from getting into sensitive areas like the brain. And what the science has shown is that when we constantly pulse ourselves with this man made microwave radiofrequency, it opens up or it permeates the blood brain barrier. So now when the blood is escorting toxins out of the body, it can take a left turn and go right into the brain, which helps us to understand why we have so much more neurotoxicity today than we have had in previous generations. And then there's something called rouleaux formation. So Mitel, if I'm holding a radiating device like a phone, my pinky finger starts to tingle. And as Doctor. Magde Havas and Doctor. Rob Brown will tell us through their studies, we're doing something that's creating rouleaux formation. In my little brain, that sounds like the candy Rolos, right? You know how it's stacked up chocolate caramels? Well, our red blood cells are supposed to be free floating one by one and bringing oxygen to all of our systems and organs. When we expose ourselves to this constant bombardment of microwave radio frequencies, it is ruining that little system on the red blood cell that keeps them separated, and now they start magnetizing and glomming together. And now you've got this chain of red blood cells that look like a stack of coins, and they can't get to where they need to go to bring the oxygen to all of our systems and organs. That Roulet formation is another very serious concern.
Childhood Vaccine Schedule Changes + Answering EMR Questions + Unvaccinated WV Student Kicked Out of School We’ve had Andy Wakefield on our shows many times before, but this time is special. Not only has he seen recent vindication for many years of slander, but And... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - January 8, 2026 at 11:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched Cece Doucette demonstrate the dangers of wireless earbuds. I heard her explain the meter targets—under 10 microwatts—and saw cases near 200,000, with a single earbud hitting 3.18 million. I hear her warn that we’re putting these devices next to our brains, and that some people sleep with them at night.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨Cece Doucette just demonstrated the dangers of wireless earbuds. This should terrify you: “We want to be in the green on this meter.” “I'm going to show you what happens when I open up this ear pod [case].” “We are flying into the flashing red here—as bad as it gets.” “We want to be at 10 [microwatts)] or less.” “If I take them out of the case … just like we would put it right up to the brain … in the case, it was just shy of 200,000.” “This single earbud topped off my meter at 3.18 million microwatts.” “We want to be under 10.” “Not 10,000—10.” “We have a whole generation putting these ear pods up to their brains.” “Some of them are probably falling asleep with them at night when their bodies need to be doing cell repair and regeneration.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that they want to keep the meter in the green band. They turn the meter on and note that in their own home, they have control of all wireless and can bounce the reading into the green area. They demonstrate what happens when they open up an earbud case, describing that the reading immediately shifts into the screaming red, which they say is as bad as it gets. They report that at home, their typical baseline is about two to three microwatts. Just by opening the earbud case, the reading jumps to 130,000 microwatts, then 152,000 microwatts, and it continues to climb. The speaker emphasizes that the goal is to be at 10 microwatts or less. They reiterate that it is not 10,000, but 10. Next, they simulate removing the earphones as if they were going to use them, noting that they don’t use them at all. They mention that they “just topped off my meter” by exposing the earbud, and they acknowledge some camera-related awkwardness. They report that with the earbud in the case, the reading was just shy of 200,000 microwatts. However, when they take the single earbud out and bring it up to the meter or “right up to the brain,” the reading reaches 3,180,000 microwatts. They reiterate the target of being under 10 microwatts and contrast it with the readings shown, indicating that a single earbud can produce a reading in the millions of microwatts. They state that this is a concern related to exposure levels. Finally, they remark that now there is a whole generation putting these ear pods up to their brains. They suggest that some people are likely sleeping with them at night, even though their bodies would be doing cell repair and regeneration during sleep, implying a potential clash between usage and natural biological processes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We want to be in the green on this meter. I'm going to turn it on. In my home, I've taken control of all of the wireless and I bounce right around green here. I'm going to show you what happens when I open up this ear pod thing. We are flying into the screaming red here. Flashing red is as bad as it gets. So in my home, I'm usually like two or three microwatts. Just by opening up this case, we are now at, and it's still climbing, a 130, a 152,000 microwatts. A 152,000 microwatts. And we want to be at 10 or less. And then if I take them out of the case, as if we were going to, I don't even know how to get these things out. I don't use them at all. We just topped off my meter just by putting this little earbud. Sorry, I know these camera things get goofy. But just by putting this little earbud right up to the meter, just like we would put it right up to the brain. In the case, it was just shy of 200,000. This single earbud topped off my meter at 3,180,000 microwatts. 3,000,000, and we want to be under 10. Not 10,000, 10. And so now we have a whole generation putting these ear pods up to their brains. Some of them are probably falling asleep with them at night when their bodies need to be doing cell repair and regeneration.
Saved - January 3, 2026 at 4:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I warn Congress plans to strip our right to sue pesticide companies in a new spending bill. Section 453 blocks updated health warnings and grants immunity when people are harmed—cancer, Parkinson’s, infertility. 57,000+ products, zero accountability. Pull it now before it reaches the floor.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨URGENT: Congress is about to wipe out your right to sue pesticide companies, quietly, tucked in a new spending bill. Section 453 blocks updated health warnings and gives chemical manufacturers immunity even when people are harmed. Cancer. Parkinson’s. Infertility. 57,000+ products. Zero accountability. This must be pulled NOW before it reaches the floor.

Saved - October 18, 2025 at 3:36 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

HEARTBREAKING: Triplets Regress Into Autism Within Hours of Vaccination “They were no longer engaged in anything or anyone. They lost their smiles.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a six to eight-year-old child who is not potty trained and, at 2:00 or 4:00 in the morning, fills their diaper. They explain that the child removes the diaper, and soon it’s all over the child, the bed, and eventually them and the other parent. They note they are snapping at each other, while the child remains the only innocent party in the scenario, and they point out that the one thing conspicuously absent is anyone telling them that the shot was safe. Speaker 1 recalls daily life as a party, with the children holding hands, smiling, and laughing, looking at each other. They say they brought the children in at nine months and four days to do one vaccine at a time. On 06/25/2007, they brought them in for the pneumococcal shot—“So just that shot? One shot.” The daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot. They proceeded with the boys as well. By noon, Richie clearly shut off. At 2:00, they watched Richie shut off. All his raspberry blowing, and mama dada and the furniture walking, and everything just shut off. All the giggles, all the smiles, and, again, failure to thrive. Speaker 0: here we go. Speaker 1: The worst is when they saw the final one shut down. Robbie looked like he was hit by a bus. Robbie, from that moment on, had a stunned look on his face. If you asked or said his name, he still acted deaf and acted like he couldn't hear, although they did have normal hearing. I had it all tested. Speaker 0: Three months after the shot. Speaker 1: Three months after the shot. They were no longer engaged in anything or anyone. They lost their smiles. They just were in their own little separate worlds. They never held hands again. They never looked at each other again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you got, say, a six or seven or eight year old child who's not potty trained. And at two or three or 04:00 in the morning, they fill their diaper. Well, you assume that's pretty uncomfortable, so they take it off. Pretty Pretty soon it's all over them. It's all over the bed. In short order, it's all over me. It's all over her. Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Speaker 0: I'm snapping at her. She's snapping at me. We're both snapping at the kid who is the only innocent party in the whole scenario. And the one thing that's conspicuously absent from that scenario is is anybody who told you that shot was safe. Speaker 1: Every day in our life was a party. Every single day, they were holding hands and smiling and laughing and looking at each other, engaging in each other. And we brought them in at nine months and four days to do we were doing one vaccine at a time. On 06/25/2007, we brought them in for the pneumococcal shot. So just that shot? One shot. My daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot. She was the first one to get it, and she screamed and never really stopped screaming after that. But we continue we didn't know. We did the boys as well. By noon, clear shut completely off. 02:00, we watched Richie shut off. All his raspberry blowing and mama dada and the furniture walking and everything just they just shut off. All the giggles, all the smiles, and, again, failure to thrive. But the Speaker 0: here we go. Speaker 1: The worst is when we saw the final one shut down. Robbie looked like he was hit by a bus. Robbie, from that moment on, had a stunned look on his face. If you asked or said his name, he still acted deaf and and acted like he couldn't hear, although they did have normal hearing. I had it all tested. But he lost his happiness. This is a first first ear picture? First birthday. Speaker 0: Three months after the shot. Speaker 1: Three months after the shot. They were no longer engaged in anything or anyone. They lost their smiles. They just were in their own little separate worlds. They never held hands again. They never looked at each other again.
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 3:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note thousands of studies on the extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. I warn that people aren’t listening. If you’ve got a kid, never let them put a phone to their head, or carry it in a front pocket. For girls, don’t carry it in a breast pocket near ovaries. The farther from the head when talking, the better. I’m alarmed that many kids sleep with it beside their heads.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 “Tens of thousands of studies show the EXTREME DANGERS of cell phone radiation.” Watch RFK Jr. sound the alarm about cell phone radiation: “People are not paying attention.” “If you’ve got a kid, don’t ever let him put his cell phone near his head.” “Don't let him carry it in one of his front pockets.” “If it's a girl, don't let them carry the cell phone in their breast pocket. Don't let them carry them anywhere near your ovaries.” “The farther the cell phone is from your head when you're talking, the better off you are.” “A lot of our kids sleep with the cell phone right next to their heads … don't let them do that.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a legal victory, stating that they won a major suit against the Federal Communications Commission in the court of appeals for lying to the public about cell phone radiation and cell phone safety. He claims that, as a result, the FCC must go back and redo all of its regulations concerning cell phones. He presents this as a corrective action prompted by the truth about radiation and safety, implying that prior rules were incorrect or misleading. Moving to specific cautions, he asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head, and you should not let the phone be carried in a front pocket. He adds that, if the user is a girl, you should not allow the cell phone to be carried in a breast pocket. He further warns against carrying the device anywhere near the ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head when you are talking, the better off you are, framing distance as a key factor in reducing exposure. The speaker reinforces his position by claiming a vast body of scientific support, stating that there are tens of thousands of studies that show the really extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. He contends that these dangers are not receiving adequate attention from the public. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he urges listeners not to allow this practice. He asserts that this proximity at night is a common and troubling habit that increases exposure. Finally, he offers a practical nighttime precaution, suggesting that you should try to get the phone away from children at night so they can obtain eight hours of sleep without the device near them. He frames this as an important safety measure, implying that reducing overnight exposure is a simple and essential step. Throughout, the overall message is presented as a safety-focused stance grounded in legal action and cited studies, urging immediate adherence to the proximity and placement guidelines to minimize cell phone radiation exposure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just won a big suit against the FCC in the in the court of appeals for lying to the public about cell phone radiation, about cell phone safety. And see, FCC now has to go back and redo all of its regulations on, you know, on your cell phones. Cell phone if you you got a kid, don't ever let him put his cell phone near his head and, you know, don't let him carry it in one of their his front pockets. You know? But if it's a girl, don't let him carry the cell phone in their breast pocket. Don't let him carry them anywhere near your their ovaries. And the farther the the cell phone is from your head when you're talking, the better off you are. So and I you know, there's tens literally not this is not a hyperbole when I say tens of of thousands of studies that that show the really extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. And and, you know, people are not paying attention. A lot of our our kids sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads. They fall asleep with them on the bed. Don't let them do that. Get that cell phone. And if you can get away from them at night so that they get eight hours without it, anywhere near them, that that is really important.
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 7:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that ex-Big Pharma insider James Li and Jillian Michaels claim vaccines became a culture war, not a science issue, with media collusion to label critics as “anti-vax.” They argue Pharma profits drive broad vaccination, not healing, and highlight alleged gaps in safety data—especially for Hep B—calling for scrutiny, transparency, and support for CHD. They urge readers to donate to fund continued scrutiny.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Ex-Big Pharma insider turned independent journalist James Li just dropped bombshell revelations with Jillian Michaels. We’re about to reveal one of the most comprehensive breakdowns of Pharma’s inner workings you’ve ever seen. This is how Pharma turned vaccines into a culture war, silences critics, forces risky shots on healthy babies, and covered up the total lack of safety data or true placebo studies: 🧵THREAD

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

James Li and Jillian Michaels opened with a point rarely discussed: Big Pharma has made vaccines a cultural issue—not a vaccine issue. Li: “It’s a lot easier for Big Pharma to do their thing if people aren’t really talking about it, if they’re worrying about various culture war issues.” “They try to make it a cultural issue.” “Vaccines to me are not really a cultural issue. It’s a scientific, medical situation.” Michaels: “We should be able to ask … has the schedule gotten too aggressive?” “Does a newborn really need hepatitis B?” “What are these adjuvants in these vaccines—like aluminum—do we need these things? Are there safer alternatives?” “And if you just say that, suddenly you’re an anti-vaxxer, a pejorative that makes you a kook and not trustworthy.” @5149jamesli @JillianMichaels

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "the major problem in our government right now is that it's one with corporations." "corporate corruption collusion with the government" drives a lot of content. "it's easier for big pharma to do their thing if people aren't really talking about it." "they... try to make it a cultural issue." "vaccines to me is not really a cultural issue. It's a scientific medical situation." "It's insane." They discuss: "Does a newborn really need hepatitis b? What are these adjuvants in these vaccines like aluminum? Do we need these things? Are there safer alternatives?" "If you just say that, then all of a sudden, you're an anti vaxxer. That's a pejorative that's placed on you, and now you're a crazy kook, and you're not trustworthy." "If there's people out there to demonize you, that means you are pushing against something that there's a barrier that they don't want you to cross." "It's almost like China's social."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what they want to do because I think the major problem in our government right now is that it's one with corporations. That's the biggest problem, and that's the stuff that drives a lot of my content is looking into this kind of corporate corruption collusion with the government. And it's a lot easier to do that. It's a lot easier for big pharma to do their thing if people aren't really talking about it, if they're worrying about various culture war issues that are going on. Right? Then you can't unite on saying, hey. Whatever, you know, the opioid crisis that that's happened and that's wrecked a lot of America or vaccines or all these things, they they try to make it a cultural issue. Right? Because vaccines to me is not really a cultural issue. It's a scientific medical situation. Right? Speaker 1: It's insane. Speaker 0: And we should be able to look at it. We should be able to say, hey. Is this vaccine appropriate at this particular time? And that shouldn't make you gotten too aggressive? Right. Speaker 1: Does a newborn really need hepatitis b? What are these adjuvants in these vaccines like aluminum? Do we need these things? Are there safer alternatives? Speaker 0: And that and that makes you if you just say that, then all of a sudden, you're an anti vaxxer. That's a pejorative that's placed on you, and now you're a crazy kook, and you're not trustworthy. Bye bye. Exactly. Speaker 1: Yep. That's man, I have I have all those pejoratives. Now I have amassed quite a few, which is probably why you got dragged just for talking to me, but that's also part of it. Right? It's like, hold on. Speaker 0: Well, that means maybe you're saying something valuable. Right? If if there's people out there to demonize you, that means you are pushing against something that there's a barrier that they don't want you to cross. Speaker 1: It's so true. And it's almost like China's social.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

This is Big Pharma’s primary weapon for SILENCING their critics: Pharma colludes with the media to label people “anti-vaccine” for raising even a single question about their “safe and effective” narrative. “They’re using ‘anti-vax’ as a pejorative to shut down conversation.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss whether "anti vaxx" is used as a pejorative to shut down discussion. "I think they you know, I think the pejoratives, right, the anti vaxx, they're using that as a pejorative to I shut down." Speaker A argues that such labels are deployed to silence conversation. Speaker B replies, "never once said that, by the way. And I don't think I've ever seen you say that. And yet, I know I've been called it. I've simply said, can we not" These lines reveal a tension over how labeling shapes dialogue and whether criticism is being dismissed through shorthand insults. The exchange ends with the single word "have", suggesting an unfinished point or request.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think they you know, I think the pejoratives, right, the anti vaxx, they're using that as a pejorative to I shut down Speaker 1: never once said that, by the way. And I don't think I've ever seen you say that. And yet, I know I've been called it. I've simply said, can we not Speaker 0: have

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Before you continue through this thread, here’s how you can join our fight to SAVE OUR CHILDREN: Donate to CHD: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate-x/ We’re making progress that would’ve been unimaginable 10 years ago—but we need your help to keep it going.

Donate from X Support our work. childrenshealthdefense.org

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Next, Jillian and James EXPOSED how little safety data we actually have on the Hep B vaccine: Michaels: “There is not one longitudinal safety study on hepatitis B against unvaccinated kids versus vaccinated kids, inert placebo.” “Does not exist.” “The two studies they cite most often? One’s for MMR. Hep B’s not even involved. The other’s about thimerosal.” “The reality is it’s not settled science. But to even say that—anti-vaxxer.” “It’s bizarre.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"There is not one longitudinal safety study on hepatitis b against unvaccinated kids versus vaccinated kids, inert placebo, does not exist." "The two studies that are cited most often, one is for MMR." "Hep B is not involved." "They're like, we did a huge study about this. No autism." "And I'm not suggesting there's a link. I'm simply saying that huge study is only MMR." "The other study they love to talk about involves thimerosal." "Not everything else about the hepatitis B vaccine." "There the there the reality is it's not settled science. Just it's okay." "Vaccines have like, we could but to even say that, anti vaxxer."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have have b. Right? That's just the best example of The perfect example. There is not one longitudinal safety study on hepatitis b against unvaccinated kids versus vaccinated kids, inert placebo, does not exist. The two studies that are cited most often, one is for MMR. Hep B is not involved. They're like, we did a huge study about this. No autism. And I'm not suggesting there's a link. I'm simply saying that huge study is only MMR. The other study they love to talk about involves thimerosal. Mhmm. Not everything else about the hepatitis B vaccine. There the there the reality is it's not settled science. Just it's okay. Vaccines have like, we could but to even say that, anti vaxxer. It's And the because I just laid

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

James Li then broke down the corrupt mindset of Big Pharma: They don’t push vaccines to heal you—that was NEVER the goal. They push vaccines because there’s a lot more money to be made in forcing medical interventions on healthy people than there is in healing people. “Would you rather create a drug only used when someone gets sick, or one for everybody to ‘prevent’ that sickness?” “Therapy might apply to 1%.” “Or you have 90% of the people.” “One’s gonna make way more money.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Just laid out the facts and that, hey, we don't the the fact is that this vaccine does not apply to eighty percent of the people." "But if you know the status, then you don't need to get that vaccine." "But that's, like, eighty percent of the people, so that's a lot less revenue." "Merck was like, we're not really making a lot of money." "We will put this or not Congress, but the FDA was like, oh, we're gonna put this on the childhood schedule so then it more could" "get the World Health Organization," "so it went global." "Would you rather create a drug that's only used when you get sick and you need it?" "Or one for everybody to quote unquote prevent that sickness?" "Therapy is gonna apply to what? One percent, half a percent of people." "Now you have 90% of the people."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just laid out the facts and that, hey, we don't the the fact is that this vaccine does not apply to eighty percent of the people. Because you could say, okay, if a mother is at risk, we don't know her status. Okay. Get that vaccine. But if you know the status, then you don't need to get that vaccine. But that's, like, eighty percent of the people, so that's a lot less revenue. And the history of that vaccine is that not very many people take it, because it was only recommended for at risk people. Speaker 1: Sex workers and intravenous drug And Speaker 0: Merck was like, we're not really making a lot of money. Then so they went to Congress, and Congress said, okay. No problem. We will put this or not Congress, but the FDA was like, oh, we're gonna put this on the childhood schedule so then it more could Speaker 1: get the World Health Organization, Speaker 0: so it went global. And that's the as I mean, me as a former big pharma consultant, this is exactly what happens. There's a reason if you look at all the different business units, vaccines is one that they're really putting more money in and more investment behind. Because if you if you look at just how revenue can be captured, would you rather create a drug that's only used when you get sick and you need it? Or one for everybody to quote unquote prevent that sickness? Right? Would you rather have the therapy for it or just the vaccine? Therapy is gonna apply to what? One percent, half a percent of people. Now you have 90% of the people. Speaker 1: Yep. One's gonna make way more money. A 100%. It's odd that people don't wanna hear not people, but some people are incapable of hearing this. Like, the Tylenol thing Speaker 0: is Oh, I

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Finally, Jillian Michaels EXPOSED that the viral “200 vaccine placebo studies” PDF—the one CNN and the NYT sent her to debunk RFK Jr.—is a complete sham. She called pediatrician and epidemiologist Dr. Joel Warsh to go through it line by line. Here’s what she found: “Number one: the vast majority of these are not even on the CDC schedule.” “Once you remove all that, we’ve got like 25% of these studies that pertain to vaccines that are even on the schedule.” “Next: how many of them are using an inert placebo?” “In many of them, they were looking at active comparables—a previous version of the vaccine.” “If that previous version caused 10 seizures and the new one causes 10 seizures, there’s no difference with placebo.” “Once we get rid of the active comparables and you just have inert placebo, you’re at 5% of what’s on the list.” “Of all these, how many are longitudinal safety studies—not efficacy, not immunogenicity, but safety?” “ZERO.” “How many were done pre-licensing of the vaccine?” “ZERO.” “You don’t have to be a scientist—you just have to do the homework, talk to experts, and investigate. That’s the job of a journalist.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
A PDF crowdsourced document that I believe CNN put out was sent to me by a New York Times reporter researching me, citing 200 different studies on vaccines that supposedly used placebo. I spoke with Dr. Joel Worsch, a pediatrician with an MS in epidemiology who wrote a book and is credible, neutral, and honest, and he says we don't know. There's not enough data to know. He breaks it down: the vast majority of these studies are not on the CDC schedule; many used active comparables, not inert placebo. After filtering, 25% of these studies pertain to vaccines on the schedule. Of those, inert placebo is used in about 5% of items. Longitudinal safety studies are zero; perhaps one or two were prelicensing. Journalists do their job: I spoke to doctor Joe; here's what I found. Cognitive dissidence is described as insecurity about flaws in the party.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A some sort of PDF crowdsourced document that I believe CNN put out. And this was sent to me from a New York Times reporter who was doing a piece on me, and I and she was actually totally fair and great. And she's like, well, what about if Kennedy is telling the truth, what about this? I found this. And it was, like, 200 different studies on vaccines that supposedly used placebo. Right? And they're like, look at him. Bananas. Liar. So I called doctor Joel Worsch, who's a pediatrician and has his MS in epidemiology, and wrote a book about this and is totally credible, totally neutral, totally honest in every single engagement or interaction I have had with him. On top of the fact that I read the book, and there's no bias. There's no conclusion. He he comes to the conclusion that we don't know. There's not enough data to know. So I said, doc, what is this? Right? And I'm I'm not able to to read through the he goes, okay, Jill. Let me break this down for you. Number one, the vast majority of these are not even on the CDC schedule. Like, this one could be for a toenail fungus that comes from, you know, the the the river in The Congo. This isn't even relevant to our conversations. Once you remove all that, we've got 25% of these studies that pertain to vaccines that are even on the schedule. Next is how many of them are using an inert placebo? So in other words, they're previously looking at what were called or not previously. In many of them, they were looking at active comparables, so a previous version of the vaccine. So if that previous version caused 10 seizures and the new one causes 10 seizures, there's no difference with placebo. Once we get rid of the active comparables and you just have inert placebo, you're like at 5% of what's on the list. Now when you've got like just a handful of studies left, he goes, okay. Of all these, how many are longitudinal safety studies? Not efficacy, meaning does it still stop you from getting this the hepatitis B or whatever the hell it is? Not immunogenicity. Is your immune system still mounting a response against this x amount of years later? But safety, zero. How many were done prelicensing of the vaccine is when you get to zero? I think there was, like, maybe one or two of those studies, that had longitudinal safety for things like an MMR, for example. But when it's prelicensing now, now you're at zero. And you don't have to be a scientist to do the homework and do the investigating and talk to the experts then say, okay. I spoke to doctor Joe, but that's what journalists do. And that's I try I try to explain to people. Is the point. That is the job of a journalist. I got this information. I spoke to experts. Here's what I found. And this is this is cognitive dissidence. This is like, I you know, see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. You know, my party is perfect. I am perfect. And there's a very bizarre kind of insecurity of if there's a flaw in the party, there's a flaw in in me. Mhmm. I'm so

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Before you go, we need your help—now more than ever. We’re finally winning against Pharma’s sprawling propaganda machine, but we didn’t get here by accident. We got here thanks to YOUR support. Donate to CHD: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate-x/

Donate from X Support our work. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 3:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that during a live debate, Dr. Pierre Kory asked why life-insurance reported a 40% death spike among the healthiest Americans in late 2021 if no one’s dying from the vaccine, and there was silence. Watch the full segment with Pierre Kory and teacher_choice on CHDTV.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

During a live debate, Dr. Pierre Kory asked one simple question that stopped his opponents cold. “If no one’s dying from the vaccine, why did life-insurance executives report a 40% spike in deaths among the healthiest Americans in late 2021?” No answer. Just silence.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 recounts pushing back on the claim that 'no one's ever died from the vaccine' by asking, 'explain to me why.' He then describes being invited onto a Zoom call by executives from the life insurance industry with '20 representatives of various large life insurance industries' who discussed 'a massive explosion in the youngest, healthiest Americans dying to the point that it hadn't happened ever.' They note that 'a ten percent rise in mortality year to year is a one in two hundred year event' and discuss a 'forty percent rise in the 2021.' He asks, 'what happened in the 2021 suddenly all the youngest and healthiest in society were dying at rates we've never seen out of wartime?' and then boom, silence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take our audience through that because you did it did it expertly about excess mortality and the life insurance numbers. It was fantastic. Speaker 1: So I was trying to, like, answer with questions, like, when they would say something ridiculous, like, no one's ever died from the vaccine. I said, well, then explain to me why. And then I gave them a really granular example, which I think, intimidated them a little bit. So I told them about how come executives from the life insurance industry invited me onto a Zoom call. And we had 20 representatives of various large life insurance industries that wanted to talk about the fact that there was a massive explosion in the youngest, healthiest Americans dying to the point that it hadn't happened ever. They you know, a ten percent rise in mortality year to year is a one in two hundred year event. They were talking about a forty percent rise in the 2021, and I just put that out to him. I said, what do you think happened in the 2021 suddenly all the youngest and healthiest in society were dying at rates we've never seen out of wartime? And then boom, silence.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Watch the full segment with (@PierreKory) and (@teacher_choice) on #CHDTV https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/moment-of-truth-chd-conference-in-austin--cbs-exposes-vaccine-court-failures/

Moment of Truth: CHD Conference in Austin + CBS Exposes Vaccine Court Failures? Meryl Nass, M.D. and Michael Kane will be hosting today’s show again this week, to share their thoughts on a recent news segment that exposed the failures of... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 4:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently shared that I am in constant management of vaccine injury symptoms, four years after the rollout of Covid-19 shots. My spike protein antibody levels remain in the thousands. To detox, I use a combination of sauna, cold exposure, red light therapy, and as much morning sunlight as possible. I also focus on vascular movement and lymphatic drainage. My regimen includes bathing in magnesium, taking organic elderberry syrup for immune support, and enjoying vitamin C from my calamansi tree, which I sweeten with raw honey.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Nicole Shanahan just revealed she is in “constant management of vaccine injury symptoms.” It’s been 4 years since Covid-19 shots were rolled out—and her spike protein antibody levels are still “in the THOUSANDS.” This is her detox regimen: “I do sauna, cold, red light, morning sunlight, direct sunlight as much as possible, some vascular movement, lymphatic drainage in sunlight.” “I bathe in magnesium.” “I take organic elderberry syrup, just to boost my immune system.” “I have a calamansi tree … the amount of vitamin C I get from this little fruit is incredible.” “It is so sour, so I dump a huge amount of raw honey in it.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm in constant management of vaccine injury Yeah. I get flare ups, and I have a regimen. I have a go to, and like, thank God they're still working, and we should talk about God next. But I’ll keep it concise: regimen includes sauna, cold, red light, morning sunlight, direct sunlight as much as possible, some, you know, vascular movement, lymphatic drainage in sunlight. I do lymphatic gua sha. I do the spike detox, Tollpike detox. I also take vitamin d three and magnesium, elderberry syrup, and occasionally zinc. I have a calamansi tree; calamansi is a tiny citrus between kumquat, orange, and a tangerine. Vitamin C from this fruit is incredible, though it’s very sour, so I add raw honey. On good days I feel glowing and surfing for three to four hours, but the flare up is always there. The spike protein be in the thousands; a paper measured antibody levels after COVID or three shots; production of spike continues for years. Five years, inflammatory; hugely inflammatory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm in constant management of vaccine injury Yeah. Symptoms. Constant. Yeah. I get flare ups, and I have a regimen. I have a go to, and like, thank God they're still working, and we should talk about God next. But, know, like, thank God, like, I do sauna, cold, red light, morning morning sunlight, direct sunlight as much as possible, some, you know, vascular movement, lymphatic drainage in sunlight. I do lymphatic gua sha. Speaker 1: What about supplements that will upregulate your innate immune system? Speaker 0: I do some, so I do the spike detox, Tollpike detox, which is just the Speaker 1: The wellness company. Yeah. Like Speaker 0: that one. It doesn't hurt my tummy too much, so because I have And it kinda covers the spectrum. Speaker 1: And then of course vitamin d three and magnesium, I hope you take. Speaker 0: So I bathe in magnesium, I don't Oh, take talk Speaker 1: about it. Yeah. Speaker 0: Right? Speaker 1: I think that's fine. It goes through the skin. Speaker 0: Three makes me a little nervous. I don't process d three so well because I'm trying to get it I'm pushing it so naturally. But the one that I do take is elderberry, organic elderberry syrup just to boost my immune system. Then I have interestingly, I sometimes take some zinc but not regularly. I have a calamansi tree. What's that? Calamansi is a tiny citrus that is somewhere between a kumquat and an orange and a tangerine. Speaker 1: So vitamin c? It's insane. So is Speaker 0: vitamin c I get from this this little fruit is incredible. Does it taste good? It is so sour, so I dump a huge amount of raw honey in it. Speaker 1: That's great. Honey is also good for you. Speaker 0: Yeah, and raw honey. And and then, you know, I'll have days where it's like I am, you know, glowing, health is through the roof, I'm surfing for three to four hours and I'm doing great, but the flare up is always there and you're just like, I wish I could just unhook this brokenness that's stuck in my body, you know? Speaker 1: Right. The spike protein Speaker 0: The spike protein. Speaker 1: You know, it's be in the thousands. Oh, yeah. And I did see, like, a paper that came out recently where they were measuring the antibody level to spike among people that either had had COVID naturally or had three three shots. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And, you know, it's it's again, can be individual, but for some people, the production of spike continues for so far years. Right? Speaker 0: Five years. Speaker 1: Inflammatory, you know, and so It's hugely inflammatory.
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 9:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tylenol, marketed as a safe painkiller for decades, has a troubling history rooted in a lab mistake involving a toxic chemical. Initially celebrated for its fever-reducing effects, it was later found to have dangerous side effects. Despite being reintroduced as acetaminophen in the mid-20th century, scientists still don't fully understand its mechanism. Recent studies have raised concerns about its link to autism when used during pregnancy, leading to a class action lawsuit. The evidence against Tylenol has been ignored for years, prompting urgent calls for reevaluation of its safety.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

TYLENOL: Marketed as “safe” for decades while warnings were raised—then buried. The kicker? Scientists still don’t fully understand how it even works. Now exposed again for its link to autism in pregnancy. The question is: will people finally listen? Here’s the shocking history of the world’s most “trusted” painkiller. 🧵👇

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

In the 1880s, doctors were hunting for new treatments for malaria and intestinal worms. One researcher was accidentally given the wrong chemical: acetanilide. It didn’t kill worms. But it did one thing really well — it lowered fever.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Doctors were thrilled—until they realized acetanilide was toxic. It damaged red blood cells and made patients turn blue. Doctors loved the fever-reducing effect, but the side effects were too dangerous. Clearly not a safe option.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Scientists dug deeper. They discovered the body could metabolize acetanilide into a safer compound: acetaminophen (aka paracetamol). Fun fact: acetaminophen had actually been first synthesized in 1852… then forgotten.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

By the mid-20th century, acetaminophen was resurrected as a safer option. In 1955, McNeil Laboratories launched a children’s elixir under a new brand name: Tylenol. It was sold as the trusted, gentle option for fevers and pain. It became a household name—especially for kids and pregnant women. It quickly exploded into one of the most trusted household drugs worldwide.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Here’s the twist: Even after billions of doses, scientists still don’t know exactly how acetaminophen works. It seems to work mainly in the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord), not the rest of the body. One theory is that it works through COX-3 enzymes, serotonin, or the endocannabinoid system. But no one really knows. Unusual for such a widely used drug.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Fast forward to today: after decades of being pushed as “safe,” Tylenol is not recommended in pregnancy due to links to autism. The same drug that started as a lab mistake is now under fire for harming the next generation.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

But the warning signs were there all along—just buried along the way. Numerous studies released over more than a decade—all ignored.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Even mainstream news covered the topic. CBC Newsroom from 2020: "..prenatal exposure to acetaminophen might alter fetal development, which could in turn increase the risks of certain neurodevelopment.."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The statement is backed by nearly 100 scientists and doctors from around the world. They insist a higher level of caution is needed when pregnant people use fever and pain meds that contain acetaminophen, Tylenol. The authors don't have any new evidence showing the drug harms a developing fetus, but their statement does say a growing body of experimental and epidemiological research suggests that prenatal exposure to acetaminophen might alter fetal development, which could in turn increase the risks of certain neurodevelopmental, reproductive, and urogenital disorders. It cautions pregnant women about using acetaminophen. And that is the active ingredient in Tylenol and many other medications that so many of us use to relieve pain or fever.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Medical health experts has released an important statement on pregnancy and pain medication. It's part of a study in the British scientific journal Nature and here's what it does. It cautions pregnant women about using acetaminophen. And that is the active ingredient in Tylenol and many other medications that so many of us use to relieve pain or fever. CBC Health and Science reporter Christine Birak has the details. Speaker 1: The statement is backed by nearly 100 scientists and doctors from around the world. They insist a higher level of caution is needed when pregnant people use fever and pain meds that contain acetaminophen, Tylenol. The authors don't have any new evidence showing the drug harms a developing fetus, but their statement does say a growing body of experimental and epidemiological research suggests that prenatal exposure to acetaminophen might alter fetal development, which could in turn increase the risks of certain neurodevelopmental, reproductive, and urogenital disorders.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

CBC News from 2021: “Medical experts urge caution over use of acetaminophen during pregnancy. Ingredient found in hundreds of pain-relief drugs, including Tylenol, may impact fetal development…”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"As if pregnancy weren't complicated enough, researchers are now cautioning acetaminophen including Tylenol might affect fetal development." "Experts advise anyone using those meds daily for two weeks or longer to see their doctor." "But it's okay to take Tylenol for a day or two as medically directed." "We still need to remember that it is still the safest medication to use for pain and fever in pregnancy and not treating those conditions in pregnancy also have the risks." "The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada tells CBC News the evidence for harm is based mainly on animal studies and encourages more research." "pregnant people should take acetaminophen in the lowest dose possible for the shortest period of time necessary." "Tanesha now has a happy, healthy one month old, but she feels doctors should make patients aware of the risks." "When you're pregnant, you really don't wanna take chances."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As if pregnancy weren't complicated enough, researchers are now cautioning acetaminophen including Tylenol might affect fetal development. Speaker 1: I found in my second trimester that I was in pain. Speaker 0: Priyanka Taneja went online. She knew most pain meds were off limits, but Speaker 1: Word on the street was that Tylenol was just fine, and it wasn't until I googled it that I read, you know, that actually there is a limit. Speaker 0: In a new consensus statement, international scientists insist there's a growing body of research suggesting acetaminophen could increase the risks of certain neurodevelopmental, reproductive, and urogenital disorders, adding the drug could be linked to conditions such as ADHD and fertility issues. Speaker 2: It's important to realize that acetaminophen is a drug like any other drug. Speaker 0: Along with Tylenol, acetaminophen is in more than 600 pain medications. Experts advise anyone using those meds daily for two weeks or longer to see their doctor. But it's okay to take Tylenol for a day or two as medically directed. Speaker 2: We still need to remember that it is still the safest medication to use for pain and fever in pregnancy and not treating those conditions in pregnancy also have the risks. They're not really calling for Tylenol not to be used in pregnancy and I think we need to make that really clear. Speaker 0: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada tells CBC News the evidence for harm is based mainly on animal studies and encourages more research. But all of the doctors and researchers do agree on one thing, that pregnant people should take acetaminophen in the lowest dose possible for the shortest period of time necessary. Tanesha now has a happy, healthy one month old, but she feels doctors should make patients aware of the risks. Speaker 1: When you're pregnant, you really don't wanna take chances. Speaker 0: There's simply too much at stake. Christine Birak, CBC News, Toronto.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

In 2023, there was a class action lawsuit against the maker of Tylenol by families alleging use during pregnancy led to birth disorders and autism. A federal judge blocked the evidence from being presented, effectively ending the case.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox Business Alert, take a look at shares of Kenview. They are up about 1.6%. Kenview is the consumer products unit J and J spun off back in August. Shares hitting a one month high at this hour after it received a favorable court ruling related to a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit claimed that exposure to Tylenol during pregnancy caused birth disorders. The federal judge in the case issued an order that will not allow the plaintiffs to present evidence for a link between prenatal exposure to Tylenol and autism or ADHD. JPMorgan added Kenview to its focus list, saying the ruling effectively collapses the plaintiff's case in this litigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox Business Alert, take a look at shares of Kenview. They are up about 1.6%. Kenview is the consumer products unit J and J spun off back in August. Shares hitting a one month high at this hour after it received a favorable court ruling related to a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit claimed that exposure to Tylenol during pregnancy caused birth disorders. The federal judge in the case issued an order that will not allow the plaintiffs to present evidence for a link between prenatal exposure to Tylenol and autism or ADHD. JPMorgan added Kenview to its focus list, saying the ruling effectively collapses the plaintiff's case in this litigation.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

In August 2025, just weeks before RFK Jr. and President Trump’s announcement, Harvard researchers raised red flags about Tylenol. Jay Lau of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health published a systematic review of 46 studies using the Navigation Guide methodology. The conclusion: multiple studies show a significant association between prenatal acetaminophen use and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism (ASD) and ADHD. Study: https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/using-acetaminophen-during-pregnancy-may-increase-childrens-autism-and-adhd-risk/

Using acetaminophen during pregnancy may increase children’s autism and ADHD risk | Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health When children are exposed to acetaminophen—also known by the brand name Tylenol or as paracetamol—during pregnancy, they may be more likely to develop neurodevelopmental disorders including autism and ADHD, according to a new study. hsph.harvard.edu

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Tylenol wasn’t born from brilliance—it was born from a lab mistake, built on a toxic chemical, and pushed forward while red flags were ignored for decades. It has been handed out casually —to babies, to moms, to pregnant women—all while scientists admit they still don’t fully understand how it works. Now, with mounting evidence linking prenatal use to autism, the truth can no longer be buried. TYLENOL: The most “trusted” painkiller? Or one of medicine’s biggest gambles?

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@45RebelRo Great point! Tylenol has a very long history - none of it good.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@NickieVeroExpat 100% accurate. It's sadly all about money. We're hoping the house of cards falls soon.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@CynFarmGirl By doctors and pediatricians.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@askrsb Spot on.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@wallflower_v It's a small part of the bigger picture.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@ShareawareCdn Not in any way a distraction. Just an easy win to help pregnant women right this minute. Unraveling Pharma capture around vaccines is much more complex and purposely buried and bought. We're not stopping here until all vaccines are exposed.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Tylenol is the low-hanging fruit—one chemical, one product, easier to expose with proven contribution. Vaccines are tied to an entire ecosystem of Pharma, regulators, and legal shields, which is why unraveling that corruption will take longer and will cut much deeper. We won't stop until every vaccine is exposed.

Saved - September 23, 2025 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump and RFK Jr. sparked intense discussions about autism, linking it to Tylenol use during pregnancy and vaccine practices. Trump emphasized the alarming rise in autism rates and called for immediate changes, including halting Tylenol recommendations and spacing out vaccines. He highlighted the Amish community's low autism rates and criticized toxins in vaccines. RFK Jr. supported these claims, stressing the need for further investigation into vaccines and their potential links to autism. CHD's leadership echoed the urgency of addressing these issues and called for public support.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

President Trump and RFK Jr.’s autism announcement just set the Internet on fire. Tylenol use in pregnancy is linked to autism. Mixing and overloading vaccines is linked to autism. Mercury, aluminum, Hep B at birth—Trump and RFK Jr. held NOTHING back. And they made clear this is only the beginning. Thread 🧵

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

CHD has fought for years to defend our children’s health—and we’re not stopping now. This fight is far from over. It’s just beginning, and we can’t win without YOUR help. Support CHD today: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate-x/

Donate from X Support our work. childrenshealthdefense.org

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

President Trump didn’t sugarcoat it. He opened by calling autism what it is: an epidemic RIPPING through America. “The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history.” “There’s never been anything like this.” “Just a few decades ago, 1 in 10,000 children had autism.” “Now it's 1 in 31.” “Since 2000, autism rates have surged by much more than 400%.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker cites a rapid rise in autism: "one in ten thousand children had autism" in the distant past, then "one in twenty thousand," then "one in ten thousand," and now "one in thirty one" overall, with boys at "one in twelve" in some areas, notably California. "Since February, autism rates have surged by much more than four hundred percent." He questions why and argues researchers should be appreciated rather than attacked for seeking answers. On stage were doctors, and he said, "this is what we gotta we have to find out." He adds, "Because when you go from 20,000 to 10,000 and then you go to 12, you know there's something artificial. They're taking something."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history. There's never been anything like this. Just a few decades ago, one in ten thousand children had autism. So that's not a long time. And I've always heard, you know, they say a few, but I think it's a lot less time than that. It used to be one in twenty thousand, then one in ten thousand, and I would say that's probably eighteen years ago. And now it's one in thirty one, but in some areas, it's much worse than that, if you can believe it. One in thirty one. And I gave, numbers yesterday. For boys, it's one in twelve. I was told that's in California where they have a, for some reason, a more severe problem. But whether it's one in twelve or one in thirty one, can you imagine? That's down from one in twenty thousand and one in ten thousand, and now we're at the level of one in twelve, in some cases, for boys. One in thirty one overall. So since February, autism rates have surged by much more than four hundred percent. Instead of attacking those who ask questions, everyone should be grateful for those who are trying to get the answers to this complex situation. And the first day, all of these great doctors behind me were there. I I told them this is what we gotta we have to find out. Because when you go from 20,000 to 10,000 and then you go to 12, you know there's something artificial. They're taking something.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Then, Trump said the quiet part out loud. The Amish don’t take vaccines or pills—and have virtually no autism. “By the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don’t take vaccines and don’t take any pills that have no autism.” “The Amish, virtually none.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. 'Does that tell you something? That's currently is that a correct statement, by the way?' He adds, 'There are some studies that suggest that, yeah, with the Amish, for example.' 'The Amish.' 'Yeah. Virtually I hear no I I heard none.' He concludes, 'See, Bobby wants to be very careful with what he says, and he should, but I'm not so careful with what I say.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And by the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. Does that tell you something? That's currently is that a correct statement, by the way? There are some studies that suggest that, yeah, with the Amish, for example. The Amish. Yeah. Virtually I hear no I I heard none. See, Bobby wants to be very careful with what he says, and he should, but I'm not so careful with what I say.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Next came the big news. Trump announced that the FDA will IMMEDIATELY stop recommending Tylenol during pregnancy—after evidence showed it’s linked to much higher autism rates. “Effective immediately, the FDA will be notifying physicians that the use of … acetaminophen during pregnancy can be associated with a very increased risk of autism.” “They are strongly recommending that women limit Tylenol use during pregnancy unless medically necessary.” “And you shouldn't give the child a Tylenol every time he goes. He's born and he goes and has a shot.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
First, effective immediately, the FDA will be notifying physicians that the use of Acetaminophen during pregnancy can be associated with a very increased risk of autism. So taking Tylenol is not good. For this reason, they are strongly recommending that women limit Tylenol use during pregnancy unless medically necessary, in cases of extremely high fever that you feel you can't tough it out. If you can't tough it out, you'll take a Tylenol, but it'll be very sparingly. It can be something that's very dangerous to the woman's health—a fever that's very, very dangerous and, ideally, a doctor's decision. I think you shouldn't take it, and you shouldn't take it during the entire pregnancy. They may tell you that toward the end of the pregnancy, you shouldn't take it during the entire. And you shouldn't give the child the Tylenol every time he goes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First, effective immediately, the FDA will be notifying physicians that the use of well, let's see how we say that. Acetaminophen. Acetaminophen. Is that okay? Yes. Is. Which is basically commonly known as Tylenol during pregnancy can be associated with a very increased risk of autism. So taking Tylenol is not good. Alright. I'll say it. It's not good. For this reason, they are strongly recommending that women limit Tylenol use during pregnancy unless medically necessary. That's, for instance, in cases of extremely high fever that you feel you can't tough it out, you can't do it. I guess there's that. It's a small number of cases, I think. But if you can't tough it out, if you can't do it, that's what you're gonna have to do. You'll take a Tylenol, but it'll be very sparingly. It can be something that's very dangerous to the woman's health. In other words, a fever that's very, very dangerous and, ideally, a doctor's decision because I think you shouldn't take it, and you shouldn't take it during the entire pregnancy. They may tell you that toward the end of the pregnancy, you shouldn't take it during the entire. And you shouldn't give the child the Tylenol every time he goes. He's born and he goes and has a shot. You shouldn't give a Tylenol to that child.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

But President Trump went even further. He made clear that it’s not just Tylenol driving autism. He said mixing vaccines is also a MAJOR CAUSE — and urged parents to space shots out over years. “The other thing that I can tell you that they will maybe say at a little bit later date, but I think when you go for the shot … take it in smaller doses, and spread it out over a period of years.” “They pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies. It’s a disgrace.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that vaccines should be administered in smaller doses over several years: "when you go for the shot, you do it over a five time period. Take it over five times or four times, but you take it in smaller doses and you spread it out over a period of years." They describe the process as "they pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies, it's a disgrace" and say, "they pump it looks like they're pumping into a horse." They claim, "you have a little child, little fragile child, and you get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess, 80 different blends, and they pump it in." The speaker further states, "ideally, a woman won't take Tylenol." And suggests, "instead of one visit where they pump the baby, load it up with stuff. You'll do it over a period of four times or five times."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other thing that, I can tell you that I'll say that, they will maybe say at a little bit later date, but I think when you go for the shot, you do it over a five time period. Take it over five times or four times, but you take it in smaller doses and you spread it out over a period of years. And, they pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies, it's a disgrace. I don't see it. I don't I think it has I think it's very bad. They're pumping it looks like they're pumping into a horse. You have a little child, little fragile child, and you get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess, 80 different blends, and they pump it in. So, ideally, a woman won't take Tylenol. And on the vaccines, it would be good instead of one visit where they pump the baby, load it up with stuff. You'll do it over a period of four times or five times. I

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Then, President Trump zeroed in on toxins in vaccines. He said mercury and aluminum have no place—and called for the MMR to be taken separately. “We want no mercury in the vaccine. We want no aluminum in the vaccine.” “The MMR, I think, should be taken separately … there's no downside in taking them separately.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "we want no mercury in the vaccine. We want no aluminum in the vaccine." - "The MMR, I think, should be taken separately." - "And it seems to be that when you mix them, there could be a problem." - "So there's no downside in taking them separately." - "In fact, they think it's better, so let it be separate." - "The, chickenpox is already separate because when that got mixed in, I guess they made it four for a while, it really was bad." - "Individually, they're okay." - "When you mix them, something maybe happens." - "So there's no downside in doing it." - "It's only good side." - "And it may not have that much of an impact, but it may have a big impact." - "So let those be taken separately."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I also, and we've already done this. We want no mercury in the vaccine. We want no aluminum in the vaccine. The MMR, I think, should be taken separately. This is based on what I feel the mumps, measles, and and it all the three should be taken separately. And it seems to be that when you mix them, there could be a problem. So there's no downside in taking them separately. In fact, they think it's better, so let it be separate. The, chickenpox is already separate because when that got mixed in, I guess they made it four for a while, it really was bad. So they make chickenpox. Individually, they're okay. When you mix them, something maybe happens. So there's no downside in doing it. It's not like, oh, if you do it, bad things. No. It's only good side. And it may not have that much of an impact, but it may have a big impact. So let those be taken separately. And

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

And he still wasn’t finished. President Trump also called out the Hepatitis B shot at birth. He said giving it to a newborn is insane and argued it should wait until much later. “There’s no reason to give a baby that's almost just born hepatitis B.” “I would say wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed and take hepatitis B.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, 'And then hepatitis b is sexually transmitted.' The speaker argues 'There's no reason to give a baby that's almost just born hepatitis b.' The recommendation is to 'wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed and take hepatitis b.' The speaker concludes that 'if you do those things, it's gonna be a whole different it's gonna be a revolution in a positive sense in the country.' These statements frame a proposed policy shift regarding Hepatitis B vaccination timing and its perceived national impact. The quotes reflect a view on vaccination policy and public health strategy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then hepatitis b is sexually transmitted. There's no reason to give a baby that's almost just born hepatitis b. So I would say wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed and take hepatitis b. And I think if you do those things, it's gonna be a whole different it's gonna be a revolution in a positive sense in the country.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

RFK Jr. stepped in and made clear there is NO evidence that acetaminophen during pregnancy is safe. He said the FDA is finally admitting the risks—from autism and ADHD to liver toxicity and even prolonged illness in children. “First, HHS will act on acetaminophen.” “The FDA is responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism.” “Today, the FDA will issue a physician's notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change.” “Thanks also to the politicization of science, the safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated.” “Strong evidence also has associated it with liver toxicity. Some studies also found the use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
- First, HHS will act on acetaminophen. - The FDA is responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism. - We have also evaluated the contrary studies that show no association. - HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. - HHS wants therefore to encourage clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use of acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. - Some studies have also found the use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. - FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we are announcing two important findings from our autism work that are vital for parents to know as they make these decisions. First, HHS will act on acetaminophen. The FDA is responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism. Scientists have proposed biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to altered brain development. We have also evaluated the contrary studies that show no association. Today the FDA will issue a physician's notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change. HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. FDA also recognized that acetaminophen is often the only tool for fevers and pain in pregnancy as other alternatives have well documented adverse effects. HHS wants therefore to encourage clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use of acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. Furthermore, thanks to also to the politicization of science, the safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated. Prudent medicine therefore suggests caution that acetaminophen use by young children especially since strong evidence also has associated it with liver toxicity. Some studies have also found the use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, families.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Next, RFK Jr. highlighted that there is a treatment option for symptoms of profound autism. He pointed to research showing folate deficiency plays a key role in autism—and leucovorin can help. “Our research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child's brain can lead to autism.” “Peer-reviewed literature has documented that up to 60% of folate-deficient children with ASD can have improved verbal communications if given leucovorin.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child's brain can lead to autism. We have also identified an exciting therapy that may benefit larger numbers of children who suffer from autism. Peer reviewed literature has documented that up to sixty percent of folate deficient children with ASD can have improved verbal communications if given Leukavorin. I have instructed NIH, FDA, and CMS to help doctors treat children appropriately. Jay will help tell that story, which started with sound science, the kind that restores faith in government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child's brain can lead to autism. We have also identified an exciting therapy that may benefit larger numbers of children who suffer from autism. Peer reviewed literature has documented that up to sixty percent of folate deficient children with ASD can have improved verbal communications if given Leukavorin. I have instructed NIH, FDA, and CMS to help doctors treat children appropriately. Jay will help tell that story, which started with sound science, the kind that restores faith in government.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Finally, RFK Jr. declared that Tylenol is only part of the story. He vowed to investigate vaccines—and blasted the hypocrisy of those who ignored mothers while preaching “believe all women.” “One area that we are closely examining, as the president mentioned, is vaccines. Some 40 to 70% of mothers who have children with autism believe that their child was injured by a vaccine.” “President Trump believes that we should be listening to these mothers instead of gaslighting and marginalizing them like prior administrations.” “Research on the potential link between autism and vaccines has been actively suppressed in the past.” “We will be uncompromising and relentless in our search for answers. We will perform the studies that should have been performed 25 years ago.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Autism is a complex disorder with multifactorial ideology. We are continuing to investigate multiplicity of potential causes with no areas of taboo. One area that we are closely examining, as the president mentioned, is vaccines. Some forty to seventy percent of mothers who have children with autism believe that their child was injured by a vaccine. President Trump believes that we should be listening to these mothers instead of gaslighting and marginalize them marginalizing them like prior administrations. Some of our friends like to say that we should believe all women. Some of these same people have been silencing and demonizing these mothers for three decades because research on the potential link between autism and vaccines has been actively suppressed in the past.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Autism is a complex disorder with multifactorial ideology. We are continuing to investigate multiplicity of potential causes with no areas of taboo. One area that we are closely examining, as the president mentioned, is vaccines. Some forty to seventy percent of mothers who have children with autism believe that their child was injured by a vaccine. President Trump believes that we should be listening to these mothers instead of gaslighting and marginalize them marginalizing them like prior administrations. Some of our friends like to say that we should believe all women. Some of these same people have been silencing and demonizing these mothers for three decades because research on the potential link between autism and vaccines has been actively suppressed in the past. It will take time for an honest look at this topic by scientists. But I want to reassure the people in the autism community that we will be uncompromising and relentless in our search for answers. We will perform the studies that should have been performed twenty five years ago. Whatever the answer is, we will tell you what we find.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

CHD CEO Mary Holland warned today: “We cannot let this go.” She declared in no uncertain terms: “Tylenol is not what’s driving the autism epidemic. Vaccines are driving this epidemic.” “Tylenol is toxic to the liver, and babies can’t metabolize it, [but] vaccines are what needs to be focused on.” “Vaccines have aluminum, they have mercury, they have polysorbate 80, they have all kinds of things, formaldehyde, that they cannot metabolize, they cannot detox.” “This is not over … we’re not gonna let this go.” “We’re gonna keep pushing that we have to keep going until we get the real data.” “The Vaccine Safety Data Link is the repository of information, and that has not yet been opened up.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asserts that a report will be released and emphasizes Bobby Kennedy, "whom I've worked with for many years is really about data. He really is about science and they haven't gotten all the data they need." She states, "I believe the data is gonna show overwhelmingly that vaccines are the driver for vaccine induced brain injury." She also says, "Tylenol is not the primary cause. Vaccines are the primary cause." She adds, "we know that from lots of different sources of information" and notes CHD is about ending the epidemics of chronic disease as Bobby Kennedy is. They vow not to let this go, insisting they will push until they get the real data. Finally, she cites, "The vaccine safety data link is the repository of information and that has not yet been opened up."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But to do it today and then you're never gonna see a report, it's just gonna kinda fade into memory. Make me feel better, Mary Holland. Speaker 1: Well, I don't I don't believe that, Steve. We're gonna see a report. And Bobby Kennedy, you know, whom I've worked with for many years is really about data. He really is about science and they haven't gotten all the data they need. I believe the data is gonna show overwhelmingly that vaccines are the driver for vaccine induced brain injury. But I agree with you today may be something of a sideshow. Tylenol is not the primary cause. Vaccines are the primary cause. We know that from lots of different sources of information and we cannot let this go. And let me assure you CHD is about ending the epidemics of chronic disease as Bobby Kennedy is. And if this is a sideshow, we're not gonna let this go. We're gonna keep pushing that we have to keep going until we get the real data. The vaccine safety data link is the repository of information and that has not yet been opened up.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

We have been on the front lines of the fight to EXPOSE the TRUTH about autism for years. We’re winning the narrative war—but we can’t do this without you. Support CHD today: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate-x/

Donate from X Support our work. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - September 5, 2025 at 7:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
RFK Jr.’s recent Senate testimony has sparked significant attention as he exposed what he claims are lies surrounding vaccines, Covid-19, and the CDC's practices. He confronted Senators about vaccine injuries, criticized the Covid narrative, and highlighted the lack of proper testing for many vaccines. Kennedy also revealed a CDC study linking MMR vaccines to autism, alleging data manipulation. He questioned the safety of administering the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns, emphasizing the need for reform in vaccine approval processes.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

RFK Jr.’s Senate testimony just BROKE the Internet. “We were lied to about EVERYTHING.” Kennedy spent 3 hours EXPOSING the TRUTH about vaccines and autism, the CDC’s coverup of vaccine injuries, and why Trump just FIRED corrupt CDC leadership. And he named names—he called out corrupt Senators to their faces for taking Pharma money. Bookmark this thread. You’ll have to see this to believe it: 🧵THREAD

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

First, RFK Jr. broke down the TRUTH about Pharma’s Covid-19 coverup: “We were lied to about everything.” Democrats accused him of “politicizing” HHS—but he exposed that EVERYTHING about Pharma’s Covid narrative was a lie. “The whole process was politicized.” “We were lied to about natural immunity.” “We were told again and again the vaccines would prevent transmission, they’d prevent infection.” “It wasn’t true.” “Probably the most famous scientist on ACIP was Martin Kulldorff from Harvard … and he criticized the Covid booster mandates.” “President Biden came in, he mandated it, and then he fired the two top health officials at FDA, Dr. Gruber and Dr. Krause,” for their REFUSAL to bow to Covid orthodoxy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that 'the trustworthiness of the information that we actually receive from the news media' is a major problem and notes that 'the easiest thing for our democratic colleagues to do is to scare people.' He asks, 'COVID nineteen was politicized?' Speaker 1 answers, 'the whole process was politicized' and says 'we were lied to about everything... the vaccines would prevent transmission' and 'they prevent infection'—claims he says are contradicted by 'the animal studies and the clinical trial showed.' He accuses the CDC of letting 'the teachers union' write school-closure orders that 'hurt working people all over the country, and then pretend it was science based.' He adds examples: 'Martin Koldor from Harvard' was 'ejected [from COVID]... because he wasn't in the orthodoxy'; 'FDA during COVID' officials 'Gruber and Krausz' criticized Biden mandates; Biden said, 'I would never take that vaccine, the Trump vaccine' then mandated it and fired top FDA officials who said it had not been properly tested.' The exchange ends with 'Yes.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Seems to me one of the biggest problems that we have in America today is the trustworthiness of the information that we actually receive from the news media and from any other source. And obviously, the easiest thing for our democratic colleagues to do is to scare people, because that is a powerful emotion no matter what the, what the, what the facts may be. Do you believe COVID nineteen was politicized? Speaker 1: Yeah. The whole process was politicized. Senator, I mean, we were lied to about everything. We were lied to about about natural immunity. We were lied to about you know, we were told again and again the vaccines would prevent transmission. They prevent infection. It wasn't true. They knew it from the start it wasn't true because that's what the animal studies and the clinical trial showed. We were told that there was science behind cloth masks. The, the CDC allowed the teachers union to write the order closing our schools, which hurt working people all over the country, and then pretend it was science based. All of these issues, and then I can show you, like, for example, Chairman Wyden was talking about me politicizing ASIP. During COVID, the the probably the the most famous scientist on ASIP was Martin Koldor from Harvard, the great renowned world renowned epidemiologist and vaccinologist. And he criticized the COVID booster mandates. They ejected him from COVID because he wasn't in the orthodoxy. The two biggest health officials at FDA during COVID, Doctor. Gruber and Doctor. Krausz, criticized the Biden mandates vaccine. You know, president Biden said in August, I would never take that vaccine, the Trump vaccine. And he came in, he mandated it, and then he fired the two top health officials at FDA who said, hey, this thing has not been properly tested. So the whole process was politicized even today. Speaker 0: So let me I'm fifteen seconds. So I think you answered yes. It was Yes.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Then, RFK Jr. held Sen. Michael Bennet accountable for REFUSING to acknowledge Covid-19 vaccine injuries. “Are you saying, Senator, that the mRNA vaccine has never been associated with myocarditis or pericarditis in teenagers?” Sen. Bennet: “I am simply trying to say that the people that you have put on that panel, after firing the entire—” RFK: “You’re evading the question.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The record that they're gonna rely on to make these decisions? Will you make it transparent for the American people? All the evidence is transparent. All evidence is transparent for the first time in history. You can characterize it any way you want. I quoted them today. What I said was accurate. What you said were lies. Are you saying that the mRNA vaccine has never been associated with myocarditis or pericarditis into I am simply trying to say that the people that you have put on that panel after firing the entire You're evading the question. The senator, they deserve the truth and that's what we're gonna give them for the first time in the history of that agency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The record that they're gonna rely on to make these decisions? Will you make it transparent for the American people? Speaker 1: All the evidence is transparent. Speaker 0: Will you make it in advance transparent for the American people so they can comment on it? Speaker 1: All evidence is transparent for the first time in history. And you were never there complaining when the pharmaceutical companies were picking those people and then running their products through with no safety Speaker 0: You can characterize it any way you want. I quoted them today. What I said was accurate. What you said were lies. Speaker 1: You just you saying senator Speaker 0: Moving the titanic. Speaker 1: Are you saying that the mRNA vaccine has never been associated with myocarditis or pericarditis into Speaker 0: I am simply. Is Alan Speaker 1: here trying to tell you? Speaker 0: I am simply trying to say that the people that you have put on that panel after firing the entire Speaker 1: You're evading the question. Speaker 0: No, I'm asking the question seriously. Speaker 1: You're evading that question. Speaker 0: I'm asking the questions. I'm asking on the questions for mister behalf of parents and schools and teachers all over The United States Of America who deserve so much better than your leadership. That's what this conversation is about, senator chairman. Speaker 1: The senator, they deserve the truth and that's what we're gonna give them for the first time in the history of that agency.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

RFK Jr. looked Senator Hassan in the eye and called her out for lying. Sen. Hassan: “People who want to exercise their freedom of choice (on vaccines) are being denied that because you are citing data you won’t produce to the public.” RFK Jr: “You’re making things up to scare people—and it’s a lie.” “You are lying right now, Senator.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
And so there are two hepatitis vaccines, and one of them was had a safety study that lasted for four days on a 143 kids, a product that's gonna be given to the seventy six million kids. The risk profile prior to the introduction of the vaccine, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was one in seven million. That means you need to give 7,000,000 hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death if you're gonna give seven million. So, mister Sikh, and guess before the press labels me wrong, I'm not anti vaccine either either. Think I MMR has been a great vaccine. The DPT has been a great vaccine. Polio has been a great vaccine. Small pot so there are great but it's it's the measured approach that we're after, the transparency you're trying to impal
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so there are two hepatitis vaccines, and one of them was had a safety study that lasted for four days on a 100 and forty three kids, a product that's gonna be given to the seventy six million kids. The risk profile prior to the introduction of the vaccine, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was one in seven million. That means you need to give 7,000,000 hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death if you're gonna give seven million. Speaker 1: So, mister Sikh, and guess before the press labels me wrong, I'm not anti vaccine either either. Think I MMR has been a great vaccine. The DPT has been a great vaccine. Polio has been a great vaccine. Small pot so there are great but it's it's the measured approach that we're after, the transparency you're trying to impal

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

RFK Jr. exposed the TRUTH about the CDC vaccine schedule that no Democrat would admit. “Only one of those vaccines have been tested against an inert placebo.” “When I was a kid, I got three vaccines … today's children have to get between 69 and 92 vaccines.” Here’s the major reform that RFK Jr. is pushing for: “Any new vaccine, before it’s approved, will have to demonstrate safety against an inert placebo.” “And we’re gonna go back and do observational studies on the existing vaccines to see if they’re linked to any of these chronic disease epidemics.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
If we're gonna make America healthy again, we can't allow public health to be undermined. So could you explain what steps you're gonna be taking to ensure vaccine guidance is clear, evidence based, and trustworthy? We're going to make it clear evidence based and trustworthy for the first time in history. Only one of those 19 vaccines, 92 doses, only one of those vaccines has ever been tested against an inert placebo. And what we're doing now is any new vaccine that before it's approved and licensed will have to show demonstrate safety against inert placebo. And we're going to go back and do observational studies on the existing vaccines to see if they're linked to any of these chronic disease epidemics so that people can understand the risk profile of those products and make good assessments for their own health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If we're gonna make America healthy again, we can't allow public health to be undermined. So could you explain what steps you're gonna be taking to ensure vaccine guidance is clear, evidence based, and trustworthy? Speaker 1: We're going to make it clear evidence based and trustworthy for the first time in history. For most right now you know when I was a kid I got three vaccines I was fully compliant. Today's children have to get between sixty nine and ninety two vaccines in order to be fully compliant, between, maternity and eighteen years. Only one of those 19 vaccines, 92 doses, only one of those vaccines has ever been tested against an inert placebo. And what we're doing now is any new vaccine that before it's approved and licensed will have to show demonstrate safety against inert placebo. And we're going to go back and do observational studies on the existing vaccines to see if they're linked to any of these chronic disease epidemics so that people can understand the risk profile of those products and make good assessments for their own health.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Senator Ron Johnson dropped the biggest truth bomb of the day. You’re not going to see this part in corporate media coverage… His team has over 8 million pages of information about Pharma’s Covid-19 coverup. “Here’s the facts … ” “Somebody in the federal health agencies … admitted there was a signal on myocarditis and they hid it.” “They didn’t warn the public. They didn’t warn doctors. So that’s just one instance of corruption and lies told by the CDC.” “VAERS shows that there have been 30,742 deaths reported on VAERS worldwide associated with the Covid vaccine.” “9,252 of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days.” “This is hard evidence.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says his committee now has over 8,000,000 pages of information and that federal health agencies hid the signal about myocarditis, claiming "CD somebody in the federal health agencies, interagency communication, hid the signal. Admitted there was a signal on my architis and they hid it. They didn't warn the public. They didn't warn doctors." He calls this "one instance of corruption and lies told by the CDC" and says more will be rolled out. He notes "our first hearing in permanent subcommittee investigation on that hiding of the signal myocarditis." He asserts science has been "thoroughly corrupted" and presents "data" to enter into the record. Citing censorship during the Biden administration, he cites VAERS: "thirty eight thousand seven hundred and forty two deaths reported on VAERS worldwide associated with COVID vaccine. Thirty eight thousand seven hundred forty two. Nine thousand two hundred fifty two of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination within one or two days." He adds, "There's not any good study on that. This is hard evidence."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My committee has got now over 8,000,000 pages of information. Just in the first tranche, by the way, what we discovered is that CD somebody in the federal health agencies, interagency communication, hid the signal. Admitted there was a signal on my architis and they hit it. They didn't warn the public. They didn't warn doctors. So that's just one instance of corruption and lies told by the CDC. We've got a lot of others will be rolling out. Okay? So we held our first hearing in permanent subcommittee investigation on that hiding of the signal myocarditis. We've heard a lot of studies. Okay? As I've looked into science, it's been thoroughly corrupted. Here's data, and I'd like to enter this sheet into the record. I've been publishing this chart for, you know, since really early twenty twenty one. When I'm on, for example, talk radio shows and they talk about this. They get deplatformed that they were, you know, because all the censorship during the Biden administration. Here's the facts. The VAERS system that was touted in October 2020, this great safety surveillance system on COVID. Few months later when they didn't like the results, they started denigrating their own system. But VAERS shows that there have been thirty eight thousand seven hundred and forty two deaths reported on VAERS worldwide associated with COVID vaccine. Thirty eight thousand seven hundred forty two. Nine thousand two hundred and fifty two of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination within one or two days. Again, I agree with you. Nobody knows how many COVID deaths were because the information was completely corrupted. Nobody knows how many lives were saved by the I think most people Okay, if you're vulnerable, raise your antibodies, reverse severity. Fine. There's not any good study on that. There's just information out there, just claims being made. This is hard evidence.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Then, RFK Jr. blew open the TRUTH about vaccines and autism. The CDC itself found a link between MMR vaccines and autism. Then, they “destroyed” the data. Kennedy: “In 2002, CDC did an internal study of Fulton County, Georgia children, and looked at children who got the MMR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later.” “The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a 260% greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.” “The chief scientist on that, Dr. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety scientist at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co-authors by his boss, Frank DeStefano, who’s the head of the Immunization Safety Branch, in order to destroy that data.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
the corruption of science, which I believe you just said. That is almost your number one goal. Right? Is try to bring integrity and credibility back to science, which has been corrupted by the people who pay for it, by federal health agencies being captured by pharmaceutical industries, by big pharma, by big food. In 02/2002, CDC did an internal study of Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia children looked at children who got the MLR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later. The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited. The chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co authors by his boss, Frank DeStefano, who’s the head of the immunization safety press, ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies. And we're going to change that right now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna just talk about what you've witnessed in terms of the the capture of the agencies that you're now in charge of, the corruption of science, which I believe you just said. That is almost your your number one goal. Right? Is try to bring integrity and credibility back to science, which has been corrupted by the people who pay for it, by federal health agencies being captured by pharmaceutical industries, by big pharma, by big food. I want to give you, I'm sorry, just the last minute to defend yourself, but talk about the corruption of science that you're having to deal with and trying to correct. Speaker 1: Yeah, I'll just tell you one example. Could sit here and give you thousands. In 02/2002, CDC did an internal study of Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia children looked at children who got the MLR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later. So in other words kids who got them before thirty six months and kids who got them afterward. The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited. The chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co authors by his boss, Frank DeStefano, who's the head of the immunization safety press, ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact. So you know that story. I know that story And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies. And we're going to change that right now.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

RFK Jr. closed the hearing by EXPOSING the insanity of giving newborns the hepatitis B vaccine. “There are two hepatitis vaccines, and one of them had a safety study that lasted for four days.” “It was on 143 kids… a product that's going to be given to 76 million kids.” “The risk profile for babies prior to the introduction of the vaccine from hepatitis B, was one in seven million.” “That means you need to give 7 million hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two hepatitis vaccines exist, and one of them had a safety study that lasted for four days on a 100 and forty three kids, a product that's gonna be given to the seventy six million kids. The risk profile prior to the introduction of the vaccine, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was one in seven million. That means you need to give 7,000,000 hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death if you're going to give seven. This statement emphasizes that the risk of infant death from hepatitis B was one in seven million. So, Mr. Sikh, and I guess before that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so there are two hepatitis vaccines, and one of them was had a safety study that lasted for four days on a 100 and forty three kids, a product that's gonna be given to the seventy six million kids. The risk profile prior to the introduction of the vaccine, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was one in seven million. That means you need to give 7,000,000 hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death if you're going to give seven So, Mr. Sikh, and I guess before that

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@mo52192803 So well said! It speaks volumes about them.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@LeeHoneyb5446 Thank you for tuning in! We’re so glad you’re here.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@caudleme17Q 100%

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@DanaC206 You can find it here: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/committee-hearings/hearing-rfk-jr-health-care-agenda-testimony/

Hearing with RFK Jr.: The President’s 2026 Health Care Agenda Witness: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr — Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) testifies in... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - August 28, 2025 at 12:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that our government invested $30 million in a study revealing that cell phones can cause cancer and DNA damage. The Ramazzini Institute in Italy corroborated these findings regarding cell towers. In 2011, the World Health Organization classified man-made radio-frequency as a possible human carcinogen. Despite this clear evidence, which warrants urgent public policy changes to protect families, there has been silence on the issue. I wonder how long the truth will continue to be ignored.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

FACT: Our own government spent $30 MILLION on a National Toxicology Program study. The result? Cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage. Italy’s Ramazzini Institute confirmed the same from cell towers. And back in 2011, even the World Health Organization classified all man-made radio-frequency as a possible human carcinogen. Now we have clear evidence of cancer — the HIGHEST warning category. That should’ve triggered public policy to protect families. Instead? Silence. How long will they keep ignoring the truth? Watch the full segment with Cece Doucette on #CHDTV 👇 https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/pfizer-vs-astrazeneca--four-autistic-siblings--pregnancy--wireless-radiation/

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "We have our own government." - "The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage." - "Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more." - "So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from." - "The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from." - "All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen." - "What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer." - "Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned." - "That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have our own government. The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage. Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more. So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from. The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from. All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen. What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer. Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned. That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't.
Pfizer vs AstraZeneca + Four Autistic Siblings + Pregnancy & Wireless Radiation The adverse events associated with COVID shots are being studied, in depth, by scientists across the world. In a reanalysis of a handful of studies comparing... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - August 27, 2025 at 6:28 AM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

President Trump: ‘I think we maybe know the reason.’ 1 in 12.5 boys have autism. 1 in 19 kids in CA have autism. From 1 in 10,000 just decades ago. The epidemic is here. The question is: What’s driving it? https://t.co/1NUHvo5mV3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids. It's probably actually much worse than that because California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen American children. As odds as one in every twelve point five boys. So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys those numbers. There has to be something artificially causing this, meaning a drug or something. We will. So one in ten thousand, and now it's one in thirty one or thirty four or twelve if it's a boy. Can you imagine that? One in twelve. That's for a boy. On average, 12.5 boys. It's not even believable that that could be. I've been hearing these numbers that and they get worse and worse every year. This there's gotta be something. I think there's nothing, including favored nations and everything else, there's nothing that can be if you can find out the reason that that's happening, and I know we're gonna do some things. I think it's I think we think we maybe know the reason, and I look forward to that press conference, to be with you in that press conference. That's gonna be a great thing. Thank you, Bob. You're doing a great job.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids. It's probably actually much worse than that because California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen American children. As odds as one in every twelve point five boys. So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys those numbers. Speaker 1: So there has to be something artificially causing this, meaning a drug or something. And I know you're looking very strongly at different things, and I hope you can come out with that as soon as possible. Speaker 0: We will. Speaker 1: So one in ten thousand, and now it's one in thirty one or thirty four or twelve if it's a boy. Can you imagine that? One in twelve. That's for a boy. Speaker 0: On average, 12.5 boys. Speaker 1: It's not even believable that that could be. And that was one in ten thousand not so long ago. I've been hearing these numbers that and they get worse and worse every year. This there's gotta be something. I I think there's nothing, including favored nations and everything else, there's nothing that can be if you can find out the reason that that's happening, and I know we're gonna we're gonna do some things. I think it's I think I think we think we maybe know the reason, and I look forward to that press conference, to be with you in that press conference. That's gonna be a great thing. Thank you, Bob. You're doing a great job.
Saved - August 19, 2025 at 4:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pediatrician Paul Thomas and Physician Kenneth Stoller have filed a lawsuit against the CDC, claiming that the agency's childhood vaccination schedule of over 72 doses has not been studied for long-term safety. They aim to shift the decision-making around vaccines back to parents and doctors, rather than enforcing mandates. This lawsuit seeks to hold the CDC accountable for its practices. For more details, I recommend watching the full episode featuring Rick Jaffe, Esq. on CHDTV.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Pediatrician Paul Thomas & Physician Kenneth Stoller just filed suit against the CDC. They argue the agency’s 72+ dose childhood schedule was never studied for long-term safety and want courts to force vaccines into parent-doctor choice — not mandates. It is time to hold them accountable, and that is exactly what this lawsuit seeks to do. Watch the full episode with Rick Jaffe, Esq. on #CHDTV https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/new-lawsuit-challenging-cdc-schedule---conflicts-of-interest--the-peoples-study--mothers-2b/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says that "'the entire schedule has never been tested' and that 'the government's own advisers have been telling telling them to do it.' They add that this lawsuit 'hopefully will get wide circulation, and it'll cause the public to demand safety testing and accountability of the CDC.' They describe the approach as 'It's just aggressive is very, very euphemistic. I'd call it much worse, but it just oh, I I think it's crazy.'"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think most people would be shocked to find that the entire schedule has never been tested and, you know, that the government's own advisers have been telling telling them to do it. This lawsuit hopefully will get wide circulation, and it'll cause the public to demand safety testing and accountability of the CDC. It's just aggressive is very, very euphemistic. I'd call it much worse, but it just oh, I I think it's crazy.
New Lawsuit Challenging CDC Schedule + Conflicts of Interest + The People's Study + Mothers 2B The CDC has never studied the cumulative effects of the pediatric vaccine schedule despite calls from parents and practitioners for decades. It is time to ho... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - August 15, 2025 at 6:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A Danish study claiming aluminum in vaccines is safe has been revealed as fraudulent. Even with their manipulated data, it indicates that higher aluminum levels correlate with increased rates of autism, ADHD, and neurodevelopmental issues. The researchers published incorrect statistics, allowing the media to spread misinformation, then quietly corrected the numbers, hoping to avoid scrutiny. We noticed this deception, and I believe this flawed research needs to be retracted. For more insights, check out Mary and Polly's breakdown on CHDTV.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

CAUGHT RED-HANDED A Danish study claiming aluminum in vaccines is “safe” has been exposed as fraudulent — even using their manipulated data, the truth still shows: more aluminum = higher rates of autism, ADHD & neurodevelopmental problems. They published the wrong stats, let the media run wild with the lie, then quietly swapped in the “correct” numbers — hoping no one would notice. We noticed. And now, this junk science must be retracted. Watch Mary and Polly's breakdown, only on #CHDTV 👇 https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/this-week-with-mary--polly/designer-babies-pediatric-incentives-and-back-to-school-vaccines-show-page/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Danish study on aluminum in vaccines should be retracted, scientists say. The article by doctor Hvid, an apologist for aluminum in vaccines from Denmark, was caught. The first appendix published with the journal was not the right one; after press hoopla, the correct statistics were published. Senior scientist Collie Blanowski analyzed and said, 'they lied.' There is a 'statistical correlation between higher doses of aluminum' in their data, showing that people who got more aluminum had higher rates of autism, ADHD, and other neurodevelopmental problems, and it should be retracted. If you remember back in COVID, the surgosphere study was 'completely laced with fraudulent data, and it was retracted.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think we've caught them red handed on this one, Polly. This one is a big deal. Danish study on aluminum in vaccines should be retracted, scientists say. This article by this apologist for aluminum in vaccines, doctor Hvid, who's been, you know, an apologist for decades for vaccines from Denmark, they were caught, Polly. Right? The first appendix that they published with the journal was not the right one. They published after the all the hoopla in the press, the correct statistics. And our senior scientist, Collie Blanowski, analyzed and was like, they lied. There is a statistical correlation between higher doses of aluminum even in their data that was manipulated showing that the people who got more aluminum had higher rates of autism, ADHD, all kinds of neurodevelopmental problems. It should be retracted, Polly. And, you know, if you remember back in COVID, we talked about the surgosphere study. It was completely laced with fraudulent data, and it was retracted. And so it is possible that this can and should be retracted.
Designer Babies, Pediatric Incentives & Back to School Vaccines We’ve got a lot to cover, today — try to keep up! “This Week” hosts, Mary Holland, Esq. and Polly Tommey, share their thoughts on the following headlines: V... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - August 13, 2025 at 4:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Stillbirths have surged dramatically, from 4 per year before 2021 to 4 per week after. Whistleblower nurse Michelle Spencer claims this rise among COVID-vaccinated mothers is being covered up by the hospital. Despite attempts to silence her, she feels compelled to share the truth.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 STILLBIRTHS SKYROCKETED 🚨 📉 Before 2021: 4 per year 📈 After 2021: 4 per week 💉 What happened in 2021? Whistleblower nurse Michelle Spencer reveals a deadly rise in stillbirths among COVID-vaccinated mothers — and a hospital covering it up. Instead of listening, they tried to silence her. “I was born for this… to share the truth. To wake people up.” — Michelle Spencer

Video Transcript AI Summary
She worked all of 2020 on the postpartum floor, noting that “we would have maybe four fetal demises per year in the hospital out of, like, ten thousand births every year. So it's a very small number.” Prior to 2021, there were four per year, but after springtime 2021 deliveries with babies who had “passed away inside” rose to “one per my shift,” “averaging out, like, four per week.” In 2022 she received “an email from one of the educators at work that went out to all these nurses, like, at maybe 200,” describing an “increase in fetal demises,” and in August there were “twenty two of them, and that's a record number for the hospital.” She forwarded the letter to a friend who works with CHD; she “sent it to RFK. And from there, he sent it to a team and said, take care of this.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I feel like I was really born for this to to share this truth to wake people up. I worked all of 2020 on the postpartum floor. And in that year and all the years prior, we would have maybe four fetal demises per year in the hospital out of, like, ten thousand births every year. So it's a very small number. And then when 2021 rolled around, you know, springtime, these mothers started coming in to deliver their babies, and their babies had passed away inside. And prior to 2021, there were four per year. Now after the springtime, there we begin having one per my shift. So it was averaging out, like, four per week. And this is based observation only. So there's no way for me to know the actual numbers except for what I've seen myself. I went through twenty twenty one. I saw all these babies being born, dead, basically. And then in 2022, I received an email from one of the educators at work that went out to all these nurses, like, at maybe 200. And it said, as you all know, there's been an increase in fetal demises. And in the month of August, there were twenty two of them, and that's a record number for the hospital. And so I sent that letter to my friend who is an advocate. She's worked with CHD before. She sent it to RFK. And from there, he sent it to a team and said, take care of this.
Saved - August 1, 2025 at 5:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2002, a significant study in The New England Journal of Medicine stated there was no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. However, a recent reanalysis by CHD has revealed a notable link between MMR uptake and autism, suggesting that the original authors manipulated statistics to obscure this finding. This reanalysis provides the correction that has long been needed. I appreciate Integrative Medicine: A Clinician’s Journal for publishing this important work. You can read the reanalysis for more details.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨In 2002, a major study in The New England Journal of Medicine claimed no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. But a new reanalysis just exposed the truth: Using the original data, CHD found a significant relationship between MMR uptake and autism. The original authors used statistical tricks to bury it. This is the correction they never wanted you to see. Thank you to Integrative Medicine: A Clinician’s Journal for publishing it. 📖Read the reanalysis that sets the record straight. https://imjournal.com/oa/index.html?fid=25-109 @BrianHookerPhD

Integrative Medicine - A Clinician's Journal - Home Integrative Medicine: A Clinician's Journal provides clinicians with peer-reviewed, scientifically accurate, practical information about the integration of conventional and natural medicine. - Home imjournal.com
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 7:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a reality check about the financial incentives related to vaccinations in pediatric practices. Sen. Johnson raised a question about whether pediatricians are incentivized based on their vaccination rates. Dr. Brian Hooker confirmed that they often are, with HMOs incentivizing pediatricians between $200 to $600 for each fully vaccinated patient. This can lead to some pediatricians earning over a million dollars annually from these incentives alone.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 REALITY CHECK: Vaccines keep your pediatrician's office in business. Sen. Johnson: “Do pediatricians get incentivized with percent vaccination of their (practice)?” Dr. Brian Hooker: Yeah, they’re typically incentivized directly by HMOs. HMOs buy and sell vaccines. So vaccines are big business for HMOs. But the incentivization is anywhere from $200 to $600 per fully vaccinated patient as long as their vaccines, a certain percentage of their practice is fully vaccinated. So some pediatricians can make upwards to a million or more a year just in those incentives.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pediatricians are often incentivized by HMOs based on vaccination rates, with incentives ranging from $200 to $600 per fully vaccinated patient, provided a certain percentage of their practice is fully vaccinated. Some pediatricians can earn up to a million dollars or more annually through these incentives. HMOs buy and sell vaccines, making vaccines a significant business for them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do pediatricians get incentivized with percent vaccination of their Yeah. They're typically incentivized directly by HMOs. HMOs buy and sell vaccines. So vaccines are big businesses for HMOs. But the incentivization is usually anywhere from $200 to $600 per fully vaccinated patient as long as their vaccines a certain percentage of their practice is fully vaccinated. So some pediatricians can make upwards to a million or more a year just in those incentives.
Saved - June 18, 2025 at 7:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion arose regarding claims made by Dr. Suzanne Humphries about the Pfizer COVID vaccine, suggesting it transforms under a microscope into structures resembling circuit boards. Some participants questioned why this wasn't headline news, while others dismissed the claims as discrediting legitimate vaccine concerns. Dr. Humphries expressed frustration with critics and emphasized her commitment to uncovering the truth, mentioning her upcoming revelations. Others suggested consulting experts who have analyzed vaccine contents, highlighting ongoing debates about vaccine safety and transparency.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 WOW: STRAIGHT OUT OF A SCI-FI MOVIE 👇 The @pfizer COVID shot under a microscope transforms from circles and squares to long wires and then finally appears to resemble a “circuit board,” according to @DrSuzanneH7. @ShannonJoyRadio

Video Transcript AI Summary
Under a darkfield microscope, the speaker examined the Pfizer vaccine liquid and observed circular and square particles floating around, which they did not see in older vaccines like measles and flu shots. After the liquid sat overnight, long wires appeared to form. Later, the speaker observed what looked like the image of a circuit board. The speaker was freaked out by this and worried about potential repercussions, given prior death threats. They questioned what these microscopic observations might imply and what potential problems could arise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I looked at the Pfizer vaccine liquid under a microscope, a darkfield microscope, and what I saw initially were particles. They were like circles and squares kind of floating around, and I was like, woah, that's really interesting. And I looked at some older vaccines like measles and flu shots, and I didn't see any of that. And then if you left that liquid sit overnight, what you would see would be like, almost like long wires starting to form. And then if you come back a little while later, there were what appears to be, and I'm not saying that's what it is, but it looks like the image of a circuit board. And I was a bit freaked out by it and I kind of backed away from it. I was like, I don't even want to get here because this is the kind of thing that could get me killed. Like, I've already had enough death threats. I don't need, like, this vaccine company coming after me. So I just think, well, what's going on here? If that's what happens under a microscope, what's happening? What's what's the potential problem?

@JenniferTw63046 - MamaT

@ChildrensHD @pfizer @DrSuzanneH7 @ShannonJoyRadio Why isn’t this headline news?

@oldsmokindragon - Truthfanboi

@JenniferTw63046 @ChildrensHD @pfizer @DrSuzanneH7 @ShannonJoyRadio Because is false. There's a lot wrong with these shots but this is just well poison that discredits those challenging them as kooks as you can see from some of these comments.

@ShannonJoyRadio - Shannon Joy

@oldsmokindragon @JenniferTw63046 @ChildrensHD @pfizer @DrSuzanneH7 I think there is more to be discovered. that's why I have multiple viewpoints on my show. You are welcome to come on and defend your point of view on this. DM me and we can set up an interview! @Jikkyleaks is welcome to come on too ...

@DrSuzanneH7 - Dr Suzanne Humphries

@ShannonJoyRadio @oldsmokindragon @JenniferTw63046 @ChildrensHD @pfizer @Jikkyleaks I find the gaslighting very interesting. It's kind of making me even more sure that there is something very significant about what I found. I'm going to reveal the full story and images with Catherine Austin Fitts in a few days.

@oldsmokindragon - Truthfanboi

@DrSuzanneH7 @ShannonJoyRadio @JenniferTw63046 @ChildrensHD @pfizer @Jikkyleaks The gaslighting isn't those challenging this. It's frustration that these types of conversations derail the credibility of covid dissenters and deflect from the know mechanisms of harm.

@DrSuzanneH7 - Dr Suzanne Humphries

Says who? And look who all the gaslighting is coming from… People without actual names and faces, like you. I'm over this. I'm over doctors who won't show themselves and people who are afraid of this that and the other thing. Do you think I didn't lose everything when I walked away from the medical system? Do you think I didn't lose everything financially? Do you think I give a rip about my reputation Today given that I've never given a rip about it before? Only the truth has always mattered to me. So all you faceless wonders mean nothing to me. Why is your income so much more important than mine was? Why is your reputation so much more important than mine was? Why is your safety so much more important than mine? Do you think I've not had all kinds of actual real threats both physically and online? And why should the likes of you be dictating to me how I should run my life out in the open?

@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski

@DrSuzanneH7 @oldsmokindragon @ShannonJoyRadio @JenniferTw63046 @ChildrensHD @pfizer @Jikkyleaks Suzanne, please speak with @KevinMcCairnPhD and @Kevin_McKernan, both of whom have done extremely in-depth analysis of vaccine contents - they know better than anyone on Earth what's in them, and what's not. We're worried because the allegation that 'circuit boards' and 'nano'-

@DrSuzanneH7 - Dr Suzanne Humphries

I am fully aware of Kevin McKernon's research. I have communicated with him numerous times. I have high regard for what he has done. I don't believe he will have any answers about the pictures that I just posted nor the videos that I have. Nor would he know very much about the New Zealand vaccine which is the one that I did my research on. Also, I hope everyone is aware that there was a huge issue with homogeneity from vaccine lot to vaccine lot.

@53v3n0fn1n3 - 🕯Seven of Nine, MD 🏴‍☠️

@DrSuzanneH7 @BlackTomThePyr8 @oldsmokindragon @ShannonJoyRadio @JenniferTw63046 @ChildrensHD @pfizer @Jikkyleaks @KevinMcCairnPhD @Kevin_McKernan Dear Dr Humphreys, do you know about the work of Professor Arne Burkhardt and the german http://Expertcouncil.one? Starting in 2021 they saw these crystals, then reviewed Autopsies with histology and biophysical methods. Surprizing result was Cholesterol crystals. Gaslighting?

Expertcouncil - der Expertenrat für Corona, Impfungen & Co. Der Expertcouncil bietet Dir kostenlosen Zugang zu Fakten, wissenschaftlichen Studien und Musterbriefen zu Corona, Impfung, 5G und mehr expertcouncil.one
Saved - May 17, 2025 at 5:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that many baby formulas have alarmingly high aluminum levels, which can impact children's memory and IQ. I collaborated with experts like Michelle Perro, M.D., and shared insights from an interview with Paul Thomas, M.D. on this crucial issue.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Most baby formulas on supermarket shelves contain insanely high levels of aluminum (which is known to affect memory, learning, and IQ in children!) With the help of @stephanieseneff and @zenhoneycutt, here’s Michelle Perro, M.D. (@GMOScience) who conducted the study. https://t.co/66M3angRN8

Video Transcript AI Summary
After seeing a 2022 study showing 100% of school lunches tested positive for toxic metals, the speaker revisited the work of Dr. Renee Jo Dufault, an FDA whistleblower who claimed there was undisclosed mercury in high fructose corn syrup. The speaker hypothesized that infant formulas, which often contain high fructose corn syrup, might also contain undisclosed mercury. Collaborating with Zen Honeycutt from Moms Across America, the New MDs podcast, and Dr. Stephanie Senov, they tested 20 formulas purchased from various stores, testing each twice. All formulas tested positive for aluminum and lead. Aluminum levels were reportedly 1,000 times higher than the other metals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I saw her school lunch study back in October of twenty twenty two, and I saw that one hundred percent of school lunches were positive for heavy metals or toxic metals because aluminum is not heavy by weight, but it's toxic. Toxic. And I thought, Okay. Simultaneously, I reread the work of Doctor. Renee Jo Dufault, who in 2017 wrote a book called Unsafe at Any Meal. She was a FDA whistleblower. She worked for the FDA and then had to leave when she found out there was undisclosed mercury in high fructose corn syrup. Now, you take these two disparate pieces of information, and I said, oh, wait a minute. The main ingredient in the majority of infant formulas produced in The US is high fructose corn syrup. Is there undisclosed mercury? Because mercury, of all the toxic metals, is probably the most toxic for children. Memory, learning, IQ. We picked a whole bunch of formulas. So I collaborated with Zen Honeycutt from Moms Across America and the new MDs, our podcast, myself, Zen, and Doctor. Stephanie Senov. We looked at 20 formulas. We tested each twice. We selected them from stores that folks shop at, Amazon, Target, Walmart, Costco. And we had a super duper lab tested for those toxic metals. And frankly, I was flawed. I was shocked because all of them tested positive for aluminum and lead. And the aluminum was in the 1,000 times range higher than the other metals.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@stephanieseneff @zenhoneycutt @GMOScience Full interview by Paul Thomas, M.D (@Paulthomasmd) https://t.co/p3cGs2FoHc

Saved - May 13, 2025 at 1:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is currently in court facing charges of "incitement of the masses" and "trivialization of the Holocaust" due to his comments comparing COVID vaccination to 1930s Germany. The defense successfully requested that the indictment not be read publicly, arguing that the prosecution acted prematurely. The judge has indicated that the current charges may not be upheld. The prosecution presented a selectively edited 90-minute interview of Dr. Bhakdi as evidence. Updates will continue as the verdict is announced.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

BREAKING: Verdict for Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in Process - Here’s What We Know So Far Germany - As Dr. Bhakdi faced court for his charges of “incitement of the masses” and “trivialization of the Holocaust” for statements he made comparing the COVID vaccination to 1930s Germany. The session began at 9:12 am in Germany with a spectacular move by the defense, who issued an appeal NOT to have the indictment be read publicly, the reason because the public prosecutor had been accused of issuing the inditement BEFORE all evidence had been observed and investigated. So far, so good for Dr. Bhakdi, as the court DID rule in the motion of the defense NOT to allow the inditement of the charges to be read. The hearing is still ongoing, but it is a SIGNIFICANT development that the judge has indicated that “it is already clear” that AS OF NOW - the charges, as they are brought by the prosecution, are NOT going to be able to be upheld. Our German correspondent Uwe Alschner (@klartext_blog) tells us from the courtroom that the prosecution has played a ‘cherry-picked’ 90-minute interview of Dr. Bhakdi as part of gathering the evidence. The Verdict is happening NOW. Stay with us for updates + also follow CHD Europe reporter Taylor Hudak (@TaylorHudak) on Twitter for more on this story.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hundreds of supporters gathered in Germany as Dr. Bakti faced court on charges of incitement and Holocaust trivialization for comparing COVID vaccination to 1930s Germany. The defense appealed to prevent a public reading of the indictment, alleging the prosecutor issued it prematurely. The court ruled in favor of the defense, disallowing the reading. The judge indicated the charges, as brought by the prosecutor, are unlikely to be upheld. A 90-minute interview of Dr. Bakti is being played as evidence. The hearing is ongoing with a lunch break.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This morning, hundreds of supporters gathered in Germany as doctor Bakti faced court for his charges of incitement of the masses and trivialization of the Holocaust for statements he made comparing the COVID vaccination to nineteen thirties Germany. The session began at 09:12AM in Germany with a spectacular move by the defense who issued an appeal not to have the indictment be read publicly. The reason is because the public prosecutor had been accused of issuing the indictment before all evidence had been observed and investigated. So far so good for doctor Bhakti as the court did rule in the motion of the defense in favor of the defense to not allow the indictment of the charges to be read. The hearing is still ongoing, but it is a significant development that the judge has indicated that it is already clear that as of now as of now, the charges, as they are brought by the prosecutor, are not going to be able to be upheld. Our German correspondent, Uwe Alschner, tells us from the courtroom that they are currently playing a cherry pick ninety minute interview of doctor Bakhti as part of the gathering of evidence, and they have taken a lunch break but will convene shortly. Stay tuned with us for updates and also follow CHD Europe reporter Taylor Kudak on Twitter for more on this story.
Saved - May 13, 2025 at 1:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I felt incredibly relaxed during my court proceedings, focusing more on the larger issues at hand than my own situation. My concerns revolve around the WHO and the implications of gene-transforming vaccines, which overshadow my personal case. I was acquitted of the charges against me in just nine hours, and I’m grateful to the judge and my supporters for upholding the integrity of German law.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

‘My Case Was Trivial’: Dr. Bhakdi’s Criminal Charges Took a Backseat to His Concerns About the WHO + the Shots “I said during the day that I was probably the most relaxed person in court because I was never worried about myself,” professed German microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi. “There were other worries that were so much greater that my personal situation really recedes into — it’s nothing. We’re worried about the WHO. We’re worried about the gene-transforming, so-called vaccinations. Everything else just becomes trivial,” he remarked. Dr. Bhakdi was acquitted of the two charges against him, incitement of the masses and trivialization of the Holocaust, in only nine hours. He sent his thanks to the judge and his supporters for saving “the face of honor of German jurisdiction.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they were relaxed in court due to greater worries about the WHO and gene-transforming vaccinations, making their personal situation trivial. The case against them was based on three minutes taken out of a 90-minute period, which, when viewed in full, showed the charges were out of context. The speaker read a letter from Holocaust survivors comparing vaccinations to a second Holocaust, which was used against them, accusing them of trivializing the Holocaust. The judge acquitted them after a nine-hour meeting. The speaker felt gratitude towards the judge for upholding the honor of German jurisdiction by going against the mainstream. The speaker believes the acquittal was a good day for the world and hopes it sets an example.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I said during the day that I was probably the most relaxed person, in court because, I, you know, I was never worried, about myself. There were other worries that were so much greater that my personal situation really recedes into its nothing. We're worried about the WHO. We're worried about the gene transforming so called vaccinations. Everything else just becomes trivial. My case was also trivial to me because it was so construed. It was so clearly construed and and artificial. There were two charges against me. The thing is that they took three minutes out of 90 and they did not show the other ninety minutes. And that's what happened in court. Everyone watched the full ninety minutes. And after that, it was clear that these three minutes had been taken out of the whole context. I read a letter that was written by Holocaust survivors who themselves said that this is a second Holocaust coming upon us, the vaccination. And that was used against me, to say that I was trivializing the holocaust. The judge made up his mind very, very quickly, but it was a public prosecutor who was embarrassingly enough going on and on, saying the same thing that was completely senseless. So in the end, it took nine hours for this whole meeting to end with my acquittal. If you want to know what my feelings were at the end, my feelings were feelings of gratitude. I was grateful first to the judge because he saved, I think, the face and the honor of German jurisdiction. He went against, you know, main stream and dared to stand up and just say, will end this whole thing and acquit him. So all in all, it was a good day. It was a good day for the world, I think. And it should give others around the world hope that the wonderful example set in Plurm could be followed elsewhere.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Watch the full episode with Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi on #CHDTV: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/financial-rebellion-with-catherine-austin-fitts/not-guilty-with-sucharit-bhakdi--taylor-hudak/

NOT GUILTY With Sucharit Bhakdi & Taylor Hudak A historic battle faces a critical tipping point — Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. found to be ‘not guilty’ after appearing in court with charges of “incitement of the... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - May 12, 2025 at 7:19 AM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Baby Who Died 34 Hours After Vaccines Had Toxic Levels of Aluminum in Blood https://t.co/NlRxszuLLU

Saved - May 12, 2025 at 1:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I found Dr. Liz Mumper's insights on autism fascinating. She highlights five commonalities among many children with autism: gut dysregulation, immune issues, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired detoxification, and chronic oxidative stress. Check out the full episode on CHDTV.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

INTERESTING: Dr. Liz Mumper says many children with autism have these FIVE things in common 👇 1️⃣ Dysregulation of gut function. 2️⃣ Immune dysregulation. 3️⃣ Problems in mitochondrial function. 4️⃣ Impaired detoxification pathways. 5️⃣ Chronic oxidative stress. Watch the whole episode only on CHDTV: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/real-solutions-for-childrens-health/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Children with autism or complex chronic illness often share five common issues. These include dysregulation of gut function impacting the brain, immune dysregulation affecting the ability to fight infections while increasing allergies or autoimmunity, and problems in mitochondrial function, which are important for both power and regulation. Impaired detoxification pathways and chronic oxidative stress, similar to rusting or browning, are also frequently observed. MAPS focuses on these five areas, emphasizing the importance of good nutrition. Some children respond positively to the removal of certain foods from their diets, such as casein found in milk products and gluten found in wheat products.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over the years, we've discovered that there are about five different things that many children who either have autism or in many cases complex chronic illness have in common. One is a dysregulation of gut function, which in turn affects the brain because of the gut brain connection. We find that a lot of kids have immune dysregulation where they tend to be not as good at fighting off various infections or funguses and more tending toward allergies or autoimmunity. They need that to be balanced. They often have problems in their mitochondrial function. The mitochondria are the powerhouses of the cell, but they also have these very important regulatory functions. Detoxification pathways are often impaired. Children often live in a state of chronic oxidative stress, which as an analogy is very much like the process where an automobile rusts or an apple turns brown over a couple of days once you cut it. So in MAPS, we take a deep dive into all of those five areas. And we try to emphasize the importance of having good nutrition. There are children who respond very well to removal of certain foods in their diets, like casein, which is in milk products particularly, and gluten, which is in various types of wheat products. The list goes on and on.
Real Solutions For Children's Health Real solutions for children’s health problems — is it possible? This powerful “Doctors & Scientists” panel have been hard at work, trying to crack the c... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - May 12, 2025 at 12:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned from @zenhoneycutt that all five childhood vaccines tested positive for glyphosate, with the MMR vaccine showing levels 25 times higher than the others. Glyphosate is a toxic chemical linked to cancer, raising serious questions about its legality in vaccines. I encourage everyone to watch the full interview for more insights.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 FIVE childhood vaccines ALL test positive for glyphosate According to @zenhoneycutt, all five childhood vaccines she sent off to be tested came back POSITIVE for glyphosate, with the levels in the MMR vaccine being 25 times higher than the other vaccines. As a reminder, glyphosate is a toxic chemical that has been shown to cause cancer — how is this legal? Watch the whole interview with @zenhoneycutt on #CHDTV 👇 https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/trending-news-segments/get-the-toxins-out-zen-honeycutt/

Video Transcript AI Summary
A lab owner who previously worked at Monsanto tested five childhood vaccines for glyphosate. All five vaccines tested positive for glyphosate. This is considered statistically significant because when 20 Pediasure feeding tube liquid samples were tested for glyphosate, only six came back positive. The levels for the MMR vaccine were 25 times higher than the other vaccines. This is believed to be because the MMR vaccine is a live virus vaccine, and 25% of it must be gelatin to stabilize the live virus. The gelatin comes from pigs fed GMO grains containing glyphosate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I sent five childhood vaccines off to be tested to a very brave lab owner, and the lab owner happened to have also worked at Monsanto in his past. And so he knew all about Monsanto, he knew the shenanigans that they were up to, and he was a part of creating the methodology which tested for glyphosate. So he knew how to test for glyphosate. He tested these five childhood vaccines, and they all came back positive, every single one of them. And this is statistically very important because when we tested 20 Pediasure feeding tube liquid samples for glyphosate, only six came back positive. So we were thinking if they come back positive at all, maybe it'll be one of them. But no, it was every single one of them. Now the levels for the MMR vaccine were 25 times higher than the other vaccines. And we believe this is because that vaccine is the only one that's a live virus vaccine. And that means it has to have 25% of the vaccine has to be gelatin to stabilize the live virus. And that gelatin, of course, comes from pigs fed GMO grains, droopoglyphosate.
Get the Toxins Out - Zen Honeycutt This is a catastrophe of immeasurable proportions. Our food supply has been compromised, and chronic disease is on the rise. With so many factors at play, it... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 6:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Less than 1 in 2 million deaths are caused by whooping cough, while the risk of death from the DTaP vaccine is over 1 in 76,000. This alarming statistic highlights concerns raised by Dr. Paul Thomas about vaccine safety. For more insights, check out Paul Thomas and Polly Tommey on CHDTV.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

👉 FACT: Less than 1 in 2 million deaths occur from whooping cough. 👉 FACT: The risk of death from the [DTaP] vaccine is greater than 1 in 76,000. If these alarm you, it’s because they should. Quite literally, as Dr. Paul Thomas points out, “the vaccine is killing far more kids.” Let that sink in…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the risk of death from whooping cough is less than one in 2.3 million, while the risk of death from the vaccine is greater than one in 76,000. They state the vaccine is killing far more children than the disease itself, estimating potentially 20 to 40 times more deaths from the vaccine. Another speaker emphasizes that any vaccine, specifically DTaP, carries the risk of death for a child.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The risk of death from whooping cough, from pertussis, is less than one in two point three million. Okay? It's less than one in two million. The risk of death from the vaccine is greater than one in seventy six thousand. It's orders of magnitude different. The vaccine is killing far more kids. I mean, I didn't do the math ahead of time, but we're talking twenty, forty, I don't know, times more deaths from the vaccines than from the disease for which we have the vaccine. Speaker 1: So this is really important that people understand that if you take your child for of any vaccine, by the way, but we're talking about the DTaP at the moment, your child could die. Now who knew that?

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Watch more of Paul Thomas and Polly Tommey on CHDTV👇 https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/new-media-fear-of-whooping-cough--get-the-toxins-out/

New Media Fear of Whooping Cough + Get the Toxins Out We are being told to fear all the wrong things. According to public health “experts,” whooping cough is of great concern, but chemicals in our food are nothi... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 12:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently wrote a letter to Secretary Kennedy, organized by the KAW Coalition, urging him to end the routine use of antibiotics on factory farms. This practice is linked to millions of deaths each year due to antimicrobial resistance. We are also asking for national targets to reduce antibiotic use and to implement tracking in animal agriculture. It's crucial to address this issue for public health.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 WHOA: Widespread Use of Antibiotics on Factory Farms Linked to Millions of Deaths Every Year A letter to @SecKennedy on April 24, organized by @KAWcoalition, calls on him to stop the routine use of antibiotics on industrial farms. It also requests that he set national targets to curtail use and track use in animal agriculture. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/antibiotics-factory-farms-antimicrobial-resistance-deaths-rtk/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20250430

Widespread Use of Antibiotics on Factory Farms Linked to Millions of Deaths Every Year — Will HHS, FDA Take Action? Excessive use of antimicrobials, including antibiotics, in farm animals contributes to the development of antimicrobial resistance, also known as antibiotic resistance, a problem that killed 1.14 million people globally in a single year. Will recent layoffs at HHS affect efforts to curb antibiotic use in industrial farming? childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 12:12 AM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Who’s to Blame for the COVID Ventilator Disaster? “Well, 80% of the people they put on ventilators died … this is actually what is damaging the lungs, not Covid. The cure is worse than the disease.” @elonmusk ⬇️ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-ventilator-disaster/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20231107

Who’s to Blame for the COVID Ventilator Disaster? Despite China being the first to make widespread use of ventilators, evidence suggests that the Chinese may have been following U.S. policy. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 11:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights about the MMR vaccine, highlighting that it can shed and pose risks to immunocompromised individuals who might contract vaccine-associated measles from vaccinated people within 28 days. I also encouraged watching the “Vaccine of the Week” segment on CHDTV for more information.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Bet your doctor didn’t tell you this about the MMR ⬇️ The MMR vaccine sheds, creating great risk in immunocompromised individuals. “Individuals can contract vaccine-associated measles from those who were vaccinated within 28 days prior to exposure … If individuals who the vaccine is contraindicated for are exposed… it could put those individuals at risk.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
MMR2, a live virus vaccine, is contraindicated for pregnant or immunocompromised individuals, those with a fever, those on certain medications, or those with sensitivities/allergies to vaccine components. Individuals can contract vaccine-associated measles from recently vaccinated people within 28 days of exposure. Breakthrough infections of vaccine-associated measles can mimic wild-type measles symptoms. Exposure to vaccine-associated measles breakthrough cases or outbreaks could put individuals for whom the vaccine is contraindicated at risk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because MMR2 is a live virus vaccine, it's contraindicated for people who are pregnant, immunocompromised, who have a fever, or are on certain medications, or have sensitivities or allergies to any component of the vaccine. We know individuals can contract vaccine associated measles from those who are vaccinated within twenty eight days prior to exposure, and that breakthrough infections in vaccine associated measles can mimic the same exact symptoms as the wild type virus. If individuals who the vaccine is contraindicated for are exposed to a breakthrough case or an outbreak of vaccine associated measles, it could put those individuals at risk.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Watch the whole “Vaccine of the Week” segment on CHDTV https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/trending-news-segments/mmrii-vaccine-of-the-week/

MMRII - Vaccine Of The Week Let’s learn about the MMR vaccine and the viruses it claims to protect from! Heather Ray, CHD’s science and research analyst, presents on facts pertaining to... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 8:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve reviewed the hospital records regarding the measles death in Texas. It’s clear that the child did not die from measles; she actually passed away from pneumonia, which was compounded by a medical error. This situation is more complex than initially reported.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨BREAKING – Hospital Records in Texas Measles Death Released to CHD After analyzing the medical records, @PierreKory concludes that this child “did not die of measles.” “She did not die of measles by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, she died of pneumonia. But it gets worse than that, because she didn't really die of pneumonia. She died of a medical error.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that a child did not die of measles, but of pneumonia, which was worsened by a medical error. The error was an inappropriate and insufficient antibiotic administered upon admittance to the hospital. The speaker says that standard procedure is to administer two antibiotics to cover all possibilities. The child declined for several days without the correct antibiotic, and after realizing the error, it took ten hours to administer the appropriate one. By then, the child was on a ventilator and died less than 24 hours later. The speaker surmises the child died of a catastrophic pulmonary embolism. The speaker believes the child would have survived with a routine, appropriate antibiotic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This case was tragic and really had nothing I shouldn't say nothing to do with measles, but she did not die of measles by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, she died of a pneumonia, but it gets worse than that because she didn't really die of pneumonia. She died of a medical error. And that error was a completely inappropriate antibiotic. It was an insufficient antibiotic. When you admit someone to the hospital for pneumonia, what you'd need to do is you treat what's called empirically, meaning you put them on antibiotics that you think will cover the most common organism. And that's why this case is absolutely enraging. It's infuriating because she died because she got an inappropriate antibiotic. I mean, this is like medicine 101. You put them on two antibiotics to cover all the possibilities. It's a really, it's a grievous error and it's an error which led to her death. Not only did you have several days delay of decline without the appropriate antibiotic, but then when they realized that they were missing the appropriate antibiotic, it took them as far as I can tell ten hours to administer it. And by that time, she was already on a ventilator and approximately twenty four hours later, actually less than twenty four hours later, she died. And she died rather catastrophically. As she was declining, she was in a state of what's called shock, and she needed medicines to maintain her blood pressure. And suddenly her blood pressures crashed and she arrested. And that kind of suddenness in an infection suggest some other cardiac event. And in a child like that, with that amount of inflammation, infection, and disturbances in the bloodstream, I I can only surmise that she died of a a catastrophic pulmonary embolism. It's disturbing when I review the the chart because I'm seeing that she's missing a really critical antibiotic that would have turned her around. I believe that with high confidence. This was an otherwise healthy child as I understand, who came in with a common pneumonia and and a routine appropriate antibiotic would have, I I believe, changed that trajectory, from what it unfortunately and tragically became.
Saved - January 8, 2025 at 2:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Less than a day after we asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear our censorship lawsuit against Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg seems to have embraced free speech. While I appreciate this newfound clarity on our fundamental rights, I will keep holding Facebook accountable until their actions align with their statements. Until all our accounts are restored, Facebook continues to engage in censorship. It's not enough to propose a new path; they must also rectify the damage they've caused.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Less than 24 hours after Children’s Health Defense asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear our censorship lawsuit against Facebook, Mark Zuckerburg has apparently become a free speech proponent. We appreciate Zuckerburg’s sudden moment of clarity regarding our fundamental right to engage in free speech, but we will continue to hold Facebook accountable until their actions match their words. Until Facebook restores all of our accounts, they are still engaging in censorship. It’s not enough for Facebook to create a new path forward, they must also fix what they've broken.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're refocusing on free expression on Facebook and Instagram. While we've implemented complex content moderation systems, they often lead to mistakes and excessive censorship. To address this, we will replace fact checkers with community notes, simplify our enforcement policies, and prioritize high-severity violations while reducing reliance on automated filters. Civic content will be reintroduced based on user feedback. Additionally, our trust and safety teams will relocate to Texas to enhance transparency and reduce perceived bias. We will also collaborate with the U.S. government to combat global censorship trends. Our goal is to simplify our systems and restore the original mission of giving people a voice while still addressing illegal content. Exciting changes are ahead!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. I wanna talk about something important today because it's time to get back to our roots around free expression on Facebook and Instagram. I started building social media to give people a voice. I gave a speech at Georgetown 5 years ago about the importance of protecting free expression, and I still believe this today. But a lot has happened over the last several years. There's been widespread debate about potential harms from online content. Governments and legacy media have pushed to censor more and more. A lot of this is clearly political, but there's also a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there. Drugs, terrorism, child exploitation. These are things that we take very seriously, and I wanna make sure that we handle responsibly. So we built a lot of complex systems to moderate content. But the problem with complex systems is they make mistakes. Even if they accidentally censor just 1% of posts, that's millions of people. And we've reached a point where it's just too many mistakes and too much censorship. The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech. So we're gonna get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms. More specifically, here's what we're gonna do. 1st, we're gonna get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to x starting in the US. After Trump first got elected in 2016, the legacy media wrote nonstop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy. We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth. But the fact checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the US. So over the next couple of months, we're gonna phase in a more comprehensive community What started What started as a movement to be more inclusive, has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and it's gone too far. So I wanna make sure that people can share their beliefs and experiences on our platforms. 3rd, we're changing how we enforce our policies to reduce the mistakes that account for the vast majority of censorship on our platforms. We used to have filters that scanned for any policy violation. Now, we're gonna focus those filters on tackling illegal and high severity violations. And for lower severity violations, we're going to rely on someone reporting an issue before we take action. The problem is that the filters make mistakes, and they take down a lot of content that they shouldn't. So by dialing them back, we're gonna dramatically reduce the amount of censorship on our platforms. We're also going to tune our content filters to require much higher confidence before taking down content. The reality is that this is a trade off. It means we're gonna catch less bad stuff, but we'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down. 4th, we're bringing back civic content. For a while, the community asked to see less politics because it was making people stressed. So we stopped recommending these posts. But it feels like we're in a new era now, and we're starting to get feedback that people wanna see this content again. So we're gonna start phasing this back into Facebook, Instagram, and threads while working to keep the communities friendly and positive. 5th, we're gonna move our trust and safety and content moderation teams out of California, and our US based content review is gonna be based in Texas. As we work to promote free expression, I think that it will help us build trust to do this work in places where there is less concern about the bias of our teams. Finally, we're gonna work with president Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies and pushing to censor more. The US has the strongest constitutional protections for free expression in the world. Europe has an ever increasing number of laws institutionalizing censorship and making it difficult to build anything innovative there. Latin American countries have secret courts that can order companies to quietly take things down. China has censored our apps from even working in the country. The only way that we can push back on this global trend is with the support of the US government. And that's why it's been so difficult over the past 4 years when even the US government has pushed for censorship. By going after us and other American companies, it has emboldened other governments to go even further. But now we have the opportunity to restore free expression, and I am excited to take it. It'll take time to get this right. And these are complex systems. They're never gonna be perfect. There's also a lot of illegal stuff that we still need to work very hard to remove. But the bottom line is that after years of having our content moderation work focused primarily on removing content, it is time to focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our systems, and getting back to our roots about giving people voice. I'm looking forward to this next chapter. Stay good out there, and more to come soon.
Saved - December 12, 2024 at 11:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Moderna has halted its mRNA RSV vaccine trial for babies after the FDA revealed that the vaccine may have led to increased rates of severe RSV illness among participants. An internist commented that the FDA appears to be trying to protect itself from negligence claims, noting that similar issues occurred in past RSV trials and are also seen with COVID vaccines, which can increase the likelihood of contracting COVID after a few months.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 Moderna Shuts Down mRNA RSV Vaccine Trial in Babies After Shots Linked to Severe Side Effects, FDA Document Reveals The @US_FDA disclosed this week in a briefing document that rather than protecting babies as anticipated, the vaccine likely caused higher rates of severe RSV illness among the vaccinated babies enrolled in the Phase 1 clinical trials. Commenting on the briefing document, @NassMeryl, an internist, told The Defender: “FDA is trying to cover itself, to avoid claims of negligence. It should have anticipated VAERD, because it happened before in RSV trials — and killed babies — and because it is happening now with the COVID vaccines, which, after roughly 6 months, depending on age and dose, make the recipient more likely to get COVID.” READ MORE ⬇️ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/moderna-stops-mrna-rsv-vaccine-trial-babies-side-effects-fda/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20241211

Moderna Shuts Down mRNA RSV Vaccine Trial in Babies After Shots Linked to Severe Side Effects, FDA Document Reveals The FDA’s vaccine advisory committee will meet tomorrow to discuss concerns about the vaccine, which the agency fast-tracked in 2021. Meanwhile, trials for investigational RSV vaccines for babies and some children are now on hold. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - November 22, 2024 at 8:01 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

“Stand firm. You will be compensated.” Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan was recently ordered to pay $10 million in punitive damages alone to a long-time (remote!) employee they fired because she declined to accept a COVID jab.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Employers are legally required to make reasonable accommodations, as affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2023, unless it poses a substantial cost. In this case, a remote worker with sincere religious beliefs was denied accommodation after submitting a letter from her priest, stating her objection to products linked to aborted fetal cell lines. The jury awarded $10 million in punitive damages against Blue Cross Blue Shield for their refusal to accommodate her. This case, along with others, sends a clear message to employers about the consequences of religious discrimination. The lawyers noted that a reasonable settlement was offered but rejected by the employer, leading to the trial and victory for the employee. It's a reminder that standing firm in the face of discrimination can lead to compensation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Employers have an obligation under the law to make reasonable accommodations. And the Supreme Court in 2023 said that the employer has to do it unless it's a substantial cost. This is one of these cases where the employer did zip to try to accommodate this woman. She's a completely remote worker during COVID. She has sincere religious beliefs. She sends in a letter from her priest. She's Catholic. She doesn't want any product that involves the use of aborted fetal cell lines. And they just rejected it out of hand. No explanation. The jury awarded punitive damages. They awarded $10,000,000 to punish Blue Cross Blue Shield, a medical insurance company. And all of these cases, the Bart case of the metro operators, the the train operators, where they each got a $1,000,000, these are sending a signal to employers. Don't you ever do this again. Don't you ever think that you can just fire people who've been your loyal employees for 30 years because they have religious objections to an experimental shot. You can't discriminate against people based on their religion. I spoke to the lawyers in this case. They said that, you know, they they were happy to make a reasonable settlement. And, the the employer just wouldn't consider it. So that's why it went to trial and that's why she won. Speaker 1: Right back in the day, you told everyone to stand firm. They will be compensated if they fight back. You I remember you saying that and you were right. Look at this Speaker 0: It's happening. Again, it's happening, Polly.
Saved - November 6, 2024 at 5:39 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

The founder and chairman-on-leave of Children’s Health Defense is now in the West Wing. https://t.co/8n5ILAMpxL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bobby Kennedy is set to play a significant role in making America healthier, as indicated by President-elect Trump. Kennedy, the founder of Children's Health Defense, has authored several books addressing critical health issues, including vaccine safety and mandates. His views, supported by extensive research, have not yet gained mainstream attention. However, there's optimism that new media, including independent journalists and podcasters, will bring these important topics to light. The long-hidden data from the vaccine safety data link is expected to become accessible, allowing for a fresh perspective on vaccine-related issues. This shift represents a growing awareness and change in public discourse surrounding health and safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And he's going to help make America healthy again. And now he's a great guy, and he really means it. He wants to do some things. Go have a good time, Bobby. Speaker 1: Mary, that's our chairman on leave that he's talking about. The founder of Children's Health Defense, and, he has a spot in the West Wing. We don't exactly know what role he's gonna play, but we can see there from president-elect Trump that he's serious about giving Bobby Kennedy wide leeway. And we know from Bobby Kennedy's books that he wrote in the last few years through Children's Health Defense and Skyhorse Publishing, the real Anthony Fauci, letter to liberals, the Wuhan cover up. We know what Bobby knows. We know what he thinks about issues issues like gain of function and mandates and vaccine injury and the connection between vaccines and the chronic health epidemic. We know the public can know exactly what he thinks and the thousands of references that he's used to support those opinions. They haven't yet honestly probably hit the mainstream, but I think as John and Michael were saying, one of the most exciting things to me is that the data that's been hidden in the vaccine safety data link becomes open, and this information gets to the new press. The old press has totally failed us, yet sort of the new press, the podcasters, the independent journalists on the Internet, I think they're going to start covering these issues in a whole new way. I think that's what the zeitgeist is, finally. You know? 20 years and counting, but that's what the zeitgeist is.
Saved - November 4, 2024 at 3:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I questioned how a clinical study on one-day-old infants could be approved, only to find out it wasn’t. The 1991 introduction of hepatitis B vaccines for newborns made me, pediatrician Ken Stoller, reflect deeply on the implications of such decisions.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

“How the hell did they get an IRB to do a clinical study on one-day-old infants?” “They didn’t.” The 1991 rollout of hepatitis B vaccines for newborns gave pediatrician Ken Stoller pause. With a devil on one shoulder and an angel on the other, here’s what he concluded. https://t.co/HF7hcgoEpb

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1990, when the hepatitis B vaccine was introduced, I questioned the justification for administering it to one-day-old infants. My research revealed that the clinical studies supporting the vaccine involved older children, not infants, and lacked proper safety assessments. I found no credible evidence to support giving this vaccine to newborns, leading me to conclude that it was primarily driven by profit motives rather than health needs. With only about 200 women annually giving birth with chronic hepatitis, the rationale for widespread vaccination seemed flawed. This prompted me to investigate other vaccines, and I discovered that they also lacked proper placebo trials and comprehensive safety evaluations, raising concerns about their validity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was just like you and all the other pediatricians, but 1990, the hepatitis b vaccine came out. And, you know, I originally wanted to go into research, and I had tried to get an IRB on one day old infants, and it's virtually impossible to get an IRB on 1 day old infants for anything. So the first thing that crossed my mind was, how the hell did they get an IRB to do a clinical study on 1 day old infants? Well, they didn't. They didn't. The clinical study they did had nothing to do with 1 day old infants. It had to do with children. The oldest one was 11, and there was, like, a 140 subjects, which they followed for 4 days. That was their safety study, which is obviously not a safety study. I thought it was my duty to obtain informed consent for this new vaccine. So I remember spending about 3 months on and off trying to find anything in the medical literature that justified giving this vaccine to a one day old infant, and I couldn't find anything. And then one day, you know, the little devil on my shoulder said, so you think you're such a good researcher. You can't find anything. You're not such a good researcher. And then the little angel said, well, may maybe he can't find anything because there's nothing to find. And suddenly, you know, the light bulb goes off. Oh my god. There is nothing to find. There's no justification for giving this to all one day old infants. This vaccine is a scam. What about if the kid becomes a paramedic, a nurse, a firefighter, or a through IV drug abuse or a prostitute? That vaccine will help them. No. It won't. Those antibodies that you give the infants and children, those antibodies are gone by the time they they're teenagers. So you can't even use that as a rationale. So the reason the vaccine is given to one day old infants is only about money. Yep. There are about 200 women a year who give birth with chronic active hepatitis. Theoretically, those are the only babies who might need the hepatitis b vaccine. You can't make a gazillion dollars just selling 200 vaccines a year. So somehow they got approval to sell it to everybody. And so what happened with me was, well, if that vaccine's a scam, are these other vaccines that I've just been blindly given? Are they scams? So 1 by 1, I started researching these vaccines, and I realized they're all scams too. Speaker 1: Not a single one has a proper placebo trial. The trials are short. The trials only look at prespecified outcomes. So if if the vaccine causes something that they're not looking for, it's just written off as coincidence.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Full video: https://t.co/6QX0E761Xz

Saved - October 30, 2024 at 7:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to clarify that vitamin K shots for newborns do not have high aluminum levels, contrary to some claims. However, they do contain Polysorbate 80, which has raised concerns. In 2016, the American College of Pediatricians linked Polysorbate 80 in Gardasil HPV vaccines to premature menopause. Interestingly, vitamin K shots contain 200 times more Polysorbate 80 than Gardasil. Additionally, I shared a full interview of @RealVaxTruth by @maryhollandnyc for more insights on this topic.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

No, the vitamin K shots that are supposed to be great for newborns do not contain high amounts of aluminum like you may have heard. But they do contain something else, says scientist Marcella Piper-Terry. In 2016 the American College of Pediatricians made a public statement expressing concern that the amount of Polysorbate 80 in Gardasil HPV vaccines was linked to the development of premature menopause in young women. As a side note, Polysorbate 80 is also often used to induce INFERTILITY in lab rats. Now … guess what contains 200x the amount of Polysorbate 80 as Gardasil? Vitamin K shots.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Gardasil vaccine contains 50 micrograms of polysorbate A per injection, totaling 150 micrograms for a three-shot series or 100 micrograms for a two-shot series. Despite this, the vitamin K shot given to nearly all newborns in the U.S. contains 10 milligrams of polysorbate 80, which is 200 times more than what's in Gardasil. This discrepancy raises concerns, especially considering the position statement issued regarding polysorbate in vaccines. While I previously dismissed the idea of a depopulation agenda, the data now makes it difficult to ignore the implications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just shocking to me because the amount of polysorbate a v that is in the Gardasil vaccines is 50 micrograms per injection. So if you if it's a 3 shot series, that's a 150 micrograms total. If it's a 2 shot series, that's a 100 micrograms total. And they were concerned enough about it to issue this position statement, yet the vitamin k shot that we're giving universally to almost every every hospital born baby in the United States has ten milligrams of polysorbate 80. That's 200 times the amount of polysorbate 80 that's in a Gardasil vaccine. People used to ask me, you know, is this a depopulation agenda? And as a scientist, for me, I I just couldn't go there. You know, I'm like, I I'm I'm trying to be objective here. I am looking at the data, but when I saw that, it was like, you know, I can't really say that it's not, and it's it's pretty, pretty pretty damning, I think.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Full interview of @RealVaxTruth by @maryhollandnyc: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/dangers-of-vitamin-k-shot--free-speech-violation/

Dangers of Vitamin K Shot + Free Speech Violation Marcella Piper Terry, Renata Moon, M.D. and attorney Karen Osborne are today’s special guests on “Good Morning CHD.” This episode, hosted by Mary Holland, Esq. live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - October 28, 2024 at 1:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlight Brianne Dressen's unique situation as a COVID jab-injured individual, as she has a signed contract with AstraZeneca promising compensation for any harm caused during the clinical trial. Despite suffering significant injuries, she feels she hasn't received proper compensation. With her legal team, including attorney Michael Connet, she believes her case could potentially challenge the PREP Act and make significant legal strides. Additionally, there's a full video featuring Brianne and Jillian Michaels discussing her experience.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

What sets Brianne Dressen apart from nearly every other COVID jab-injured person out there? She has a signed contract with AstraZeneca saying that they would pay for any harm their product caused her during the COVID shot clinical trial she signed up for. Brianne says she suffered a disastrous injury from the trial shot, and was never properly compensated. So for this reason, she and her lawyers — including attorney Michael Connet of the recent federal fluoride win — believe that her case may have what it takes to go all the way. Even past the mighty PREP Act.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to be the only person in the U.S. with a viable lawsuit against the PREP Act, which has shut down approximately 100 other lawsuits. The speaker's lawyer, Michael Connet, believes a loophole exists because the lawsuit is based on a contract with specific commitments that were allegedly not met. The court date is set for October 29th. The drug company's defense relies on the PREP Act. The speaker argues that because they were in a vaccine trial, the initial contract should hold the company responsible. The speaker believes this case could set a precedent and is fighting for all Americans who could face similar situations with vaccines or pharmaceuticals. They contend that fundamental constitutional rights, such as free speech and fair jury trial, should not be suspended for public health or pharmaceutical profits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am the only person in the United States right now that has a lawsuit that may actually go somewhere. There are a 100 lawsuits going after this PREP Act, which is the this incredible protection. Speaker 1: Got it. Speaker 0: Every one of them has been shut down. Speaker 1: Why would yours go somewhere? Speaker 0: My lawyer is actually Michael Connet, who is behind the latest major win with the fluoride, getting fluoride out of the water. He believes that because it's a contract and they've committed to doing specific things in that contract that they didn't do, the contract is the loophole. Speaker 1: I knew it. I knew it. Speaker 0: So yes. So October 29th, we're going to go into court, and my lawyer is going to face the judge. And the drug company already has put in their defense, and their entire defense is, well, PrepAct. Speaker 1: Bingo. Speaker 0: So we can we can do what we want. Speaker 1: Which they've done to everybody else who wasn't in a vaccine trial. Speaker 0: Correct. Speaker 1: You happen to be, so you have this loophole of the initial contract that said we would take responsibility. Speaker 0: It's obviously a precedent setting case. Right? Because it's something that hasn't happened, hasn't been brought to court yet. And the importance of making sure that this goes in the way of We The People, because that's how I feel all of these lawsuits are. I feel that we're fighting for every single American, not just ourselves. We're fighting for every single American that could accidentally end up in this spot. Speaker 1: Which happens with all different vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. All pharmaceuticals. The time Dude, you know, it's this this doesn't need to be held to a different standard than every other product ever implemented in the United States. It doesn't. We should have those appropriate checks and balances in place. It's insane to think that just because you have a biological event happen in your body, that all of a sudden your right to free speech, your right to fair jury trial, your right to assemble, right, because your support groups get shut down, and your right to prompt legal representation, that all those constitutional fundamental rights are gone for the sake of public health or, as I see it, for the sake of profit. Pharma profit. Right.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Full video with @BrianneDressen and @jillianmichaels: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKDOhR6tIl4

Saved - October 25, 2024 at 4:03 AM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

A House Resolution has passed in Louisiana asking their Department of Health to look into the past 10 years of Sudden Infant Death (SIDS) incidents in the state and compare each report to the infant’s vaccination history. https://t.co/W507opu2kU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Louisiana Department of Health is requested to study the last 10 years of death certificates of infants who died suddenly and without explanation, as defined by statute, and compare this data to the infants' immunization history. This resolution is a strategic move by Health Freedom Louisiana and supporting legislators after failing to mandate vaccine data on death reports. It exemplifies persistence in pursuing alternative approaches to achieve their objectives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It requests the Louisiana Department of Health to perform a study to look at the last 10 years of death certificates of infants who died suddenly and without explanation that's defined in our in our statute and compare that to the infant's immunization history. Speaker 1: While this isn't the most ideal situation since it's a resolution and it's just requesting the Department of Health, it was a really good play by Health Freedom Louisiana and the legislators that supported this because they lost the bid to require the data to go into the death reports, the vaccine data and stuff. So, you know, you can do that. If you don't make it out on the first try, you swing again, and you try for something else, and you keep going. And this is a perfect example of that.
Saved - October 15, 2024 at 12:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some unsettling findings from @DrAnaMihalcea, who examined blood samples under a 4000x microscope. She discovered blinking lights in the blood of both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, alive and deceased. Check out the full interview by @maryhollandnyc for more details.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

This is easily one of the most disturbing things we have ever had the misfortune to post. There are blinking lights in peoples’ blood. @DrAnaMihalcea uses a 4000x microscope to examine the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people, alive and deceased. Here's what she's found. ⬇️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents microscopic images of the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 injection, claiming that at 100x magnification, self-assembling microchips are visible. These microchips allegedly emit a MAC address. The speaker identifies flashing dots as nano and micro robots communicating via light signals, collaborating to assemble microchips, which they describe as self-assembling nanotechnology. They claim to have observed similar swarming activity in human blood. Analysis of the COVID-19 injection purportedly revealed 54 undeclared chemical elements, including fluorescent graphene oxide. The speaker also presents images of embalmed blood from a vaccinated individual deceased for 8 months, noting filaments and micelles filled with blinking lights similar to those observed in the COVID shots, suggesting ongoing self-assembly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what you see here is a Pfizer BioNTech COVID-nineteen injection when it was first put on a slide. And and in the background, you see all of these blinking lights and extreme activity. This is a 100 times magnification. And here you see that something is self assembled, that we call microchips because we have done studies that, these microchips are actually emitting what's called a MAC address phenomenon. Tell us what the flashing dots are in the background. This is what's called nano and micro robots that are communicating with each other via light signal, and they are collaborating to self assemble these larger structures that are microchips. And so this is in the realm of self assembling nanotechnology. Here you see a micro robot emitting blue light. Here's another one. This background swarming is what I've seen in the human blood, and I will show you later images of that. They did analysis of COVID-nineteen injection and found 54 undeclared chemical elements, including fluorescent graphene oxide. And I have documented the fluorescent embalmed blood of a vaccinated individual who had been deceased for 8 months, before. I got these vials in June of 2023, and you can see here the same filaments. And this is a video of ongoing self assembly within this embalmed blood. And what you see here are these micelles, and they're filled with the same blinking lights that I showed you earlier in the COVID shots.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Full interview by @maryhollandnyc https://t.co/qTPV2yJDam

Saved - September 4, 2024 at 9:51 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 CONTENT WARNING: Did you know that transgender surgery on children began in the 1960s? And that its pioneer was a staff member of @JohnsHopkins who was later discovered to be a child abuser? Background: Bruce Reimer was the elder of infant twin boys born in 1965. When Bruce was seven or eight months old, his parents Janet and Ron had him circumcised. The physician botched the procedure and the infant's penis was burned off. Bruce’s parents Janet and Ron then approached John Money, a professor of pediatrics and medical psychology at Johns Hopkins University, to inquire whether Money’s recently published theories on “gender roles” and “sexual orientation” — both new terms invented by Money — might provide some help for their injured son. Money told them, in short, that the answer was to raise their injured son as a girl. They proceeded to have Bruce castrated, administered feminizing hormones, and brought in for office visits to Money throughout childhood wherein “therapies” were given to Bruce that involved pornography and “sexual rehearsal play” with his twin brother. At the age of 13, Bruce (who’d been called “Brenda” since infancy) was so distraught that his local psychotherapist insisted that his parents tell him the truth about himself. As soon as Bruce learned the truth, he insisted on living as a male, and even re-named himself “David” (as in David-against-Goliath). Decades later as an adult, David publicly revealed what happened to him in childhood. Several books and articles were published about his testimony — a comprehensive list is available from the Intersex Society of North America: https://isna.org/faq/reimer/. Sadly, David’s story came to an end when he committed suicide at the age of 38. No one knows these kinds of stories better than @Miriam_Grossman, M.D., a 40-year child psychiatrist who encounters gender dysphoria as the dominant complaint at her busy practice.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a 5000% increase in adolescents suddenly expressing discomfort with their bodies, which parents report seems to appear "out of the blue." This rapid onset gender dysphoria is often found in kids with conditions like autism, depression, anxiety, trauma, or abuse, and in difficult family situations. This phenomenon tends to happen in clusters, with many kids identifying as transgender or non-binary having friends who also identify that way. This suggests an element of social contagion, where feelings, behaviors, or beliefs spread within a friend group. Some children's social lives are primarily online, where they are influenced to question their identity and assume a new one, sometimes by older individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are dealing now with this epidemic, 5000% increase of kids who never before adolescents who never before expressed discomfort with their bodies and it's rapid onset because it develops the parents say that it seems to them to be out of the blue. That they were that their child for many years was happy, content with being a boy or a girl, and then there's a change. It is found in kids who have comorbid conditions such as autism, depression, anxiety, a history of trauma, of being molested, of being abused, and, all all sorts of family situations and difficulties. Also, it it tends to happen in clusters. So most of the kids that are coming now and identifying as being transgender or non binary, if you ask them, they have someone in their friend group, at least one, commonly a few of their friends who are also identifying in that way and there have, you know, new names, new pronouns. So there's an element of contagion. Social contagion is a well known phenomenon in mental health. What it means is that feelings or behaviors or beliefs can spread within a friend group. It's very common now to be best friend have a whole group of friends that are online. You never met them. You may not know, you know, where they're from. And I've had a number of cases of kids coming into my office in which their social life is primarily online. And that they have been influenced, to to question who they are and to assume a new identity only because of people that have they have met online. Sometimes older individuals who are bringing them into this belief system.
Who was David Reimer (also, sadly, known as John/Joan)? | Intersex Society of North America David Reimer was born an identical (non-intersex) twin boy in 1965. At the age of 8 months, David and his brother each had a minor medical problem involving his penis, and a doctor decided to treat the problem with circumcision. The doctor botched the circumcision on David, using an inappropriate method and accidentally burning off virtually all of David’s penis. At the advice of psychologist John Money at Johns Hopkins University, David’s parents agreed to have him “sex reassigned” and made into a girl via surgical, hormonal, and psychological treatments—i.e., via the system Money advocated for intersex children. isna.org

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Full interview with @maryhollandnyc + @Miriam_Grossman: https://t.co/wFSkkxnxlB

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Doctors Medical Certification Revoked + Lost In Transnation https://t.co/57VWqM4JPe

Saved - August 31, 2024 at 11:11 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Vaccine injuries + death. Deadly hospital protocols. Learn the truth ... before history repeats itself. #VXD3 TICKETS ⬇️ https://vaxxed3.org

Vaxxed 3 A revelatory new film revealing true accounts of injury and death from COVID-19 vaccines. This documentary details the findings of how emergency use authorization was used to promote and execute COVID-19 vaccines and COVID hospital protocols with devastating results. vaxxed3.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - August 31, 2024 at 11:09 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

☣️ The Nuremberg Code Prohibits Unethical Experiments on Humans. Maybe It Should Also Prohibit Gain-of-Function Research? "Our next question is who gets to decide whether species-endangering research should be done, and on what basis?" @ConversationUS https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/nuremberg-code-prohibits-unethical-experiments-humans-it-gain-of-function-research/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240831

The Nuremberg Code Prohibits Unethical Experiments on Humans. Maybe It Should Also Prohibit Gain-of-Function Research? Species-endangering research should require multinational, democratic debate and approval to make the survival of our own endangered species more likely — and ensure we can celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Nuremberg Code. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - August 31, 2024 at 4:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed that news articles from various publications often sound strikingly similar, using the same language and missing key details. Paul Bond, a reporter who was recently fired from Newsweek for challenging this trend, sheds light on the issue. In my interview with him, we explored media bias, the influence of organizations like Media Matters, and how narratives frequently take precedence over the truth.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Ever notice how news pieces by different publications sound eerily similar to each other? They use the same phrasing, terms, and angles. And they make the same omissions. Why? Reporter @WriterPaulBond knows exactly why because he lived it, and he was recently fired from @Newsweek for going against it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
What's new about misinformation is that narrative trumps the truth, and stories against the narrative get killed. Organizations like Media Matters for America tell reporters what to report, or they will smear them as haters and go after their advertisers. Before being fired, the speaker received instructions on framing stories, like the one about the Algerian boxer in the Olympics, advising to portray anyone against the boxer as part of the hateful right and providing specific language to use. NewsGuard ranks reporters and news outlets, influencing where advertisers spend money. Deviating from their approved narrative results in a lower grade, similar to a credit rating, and fewer advertisers. They rank and rate stories, providing direction on the "right" course.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've been in this role for decades. This idea of misinformation, is this new? Speaker 1: Yes. Okay. Yes. It yeah. Yeah. Of course, reporters wanted to tell the truth. What's new is that, the narrative trumps the truth. If you're going against the narrative, then you'll get your stories killed. You'll get your stories watered down. You know, there are also organizations out there that tell us what to report. You know, Media Matters for America is one of them. You know, if you don't report this story this way, we will smear you as a hater and go after your advertisers. They send out press releases to journalists Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And research reports saying how awful, everybody is that doesn't agree with them, basically. And they say how to report this. Like, one of the last ones I got just before I was fired was, this is how you should frame the, the stories about the, the boxing the women's boxing in the Olympics where there's rumors that, you know, this one this female boxer was actually a man. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And, Yeah. Speaker 0: The Algerian boxer, Speaker 1: I Speaker 0: believe it was. Yeah. Speaker 1: This is how you should frame it, and this is how you should portray anybody who's who is against this this boxer. You should call them part of the hateful right. And and it tells you how to frame things. And it tells you the language you should use. I know some people have done deep dives into NewsGuard, which is one that Newsweek uses. They, like, rank you and rate you. You are Reporters? Speaker 0: They rank reporters? Speaker 1: They rank, reporters and news outlets. Mhmm. And they say, this is a safe news outlet for you to spend your advertising dollars are on. But if you deviate too much from their approved narrative, then you're no longer approved. Your grade goes down. It's like it it Speaker 0: it. Holy smokes. This is insane. Speaker 1: It's it's it's like a a credit rating. You know, you can you you can go buy a house if you have a good credit rating. Speaker 0: You the stories. Speaker 1: They're rating they're ranking your they're ranking and rating your stories. Speaker 0: They're ranking and rating it, but they're also providing you direction on what the right course is. Speaker 1: Yes. And if you deviate from the right course, then you get a lower grade and fewer advertisers will place ads with you.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Full interview with @NicoleShanahan: https://t.co/qgtsNJCUCK

@NicoleShanahan - Nicole Shanahan

I spoke with Paul Bond, a veteran reporter who was fired by Newsweek after exposing tech censorship. We discussed bias in the media, what role groups like Media Matters play, and how narratives often overshadow the truth. https://t.co/naJl1jjt9M

Saved - August 30, 2024 at 11:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to highlight a crucial point: the U.S. government has disbursed over $5.22 billion to vaccine victims through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). As of June 28, 2024, there have been 48,101 reported deaths and over 2.6 million adverse events logged in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. For more detailed statistics, you can check the VICP government statistics. Additionally, there's a full video available that discusses these issues further.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

If you take away nothing else from our X account, take this: “The United States government has paid out more than $5.22 billion to vaccine victims through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, or the VICP. And as of June 28th, 2024, there were 48,101 deaths, and over 2.6 million adverse events reported to the U.S. government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.” — Dawn Richardson, @NVICAdvocacy VICP government statistics: https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vicp/vicp-stats-07-01-24.pdf Full video: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/taking-a-stand-against-censorship/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US government has paid over $5.22 billion to vaccine victims via the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). As of June 28, 2024, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reported 48,101 deaths and over 2.6 million adverse events. These figures are verifiable facts, accessible through government links.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States government has paid out more than $5,220,000,000 to vaccine victims through the national vaccine injury compensation program, the VICP. And as of June 28, 2024, there were 48,101 deaths and 2 point over 2,600,000 adverse events reported to the US government's vaccine adverse events reporting system. Those are not opinions. Those are verifiable facts. You can go to the references for the show. You can go click on those links and see those government pages that verify these numbers.
Taking a Stand Against Censorship Censorship has become a well-debated issue in legislative hearings, at dinner tables, on social media posts, during college lectures. Yet, it is without a do... live.childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 9:15 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

HEARTBREAKING: 23-year-old Trent Lieffring received 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in 2022. About 8 to 9 months later, Trent experienced cardiac arrest and subsequent brain damage, apparently due to blood clots. He died on Aug. 24, 2023. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/trent-lieffring-student-died-after-pfizer-covid-19-shot/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240724

‘He Suffered Greatly’: Parents of Student Who Died After Pfizer Shot Speak Out Believing it was the right thing to do, 23-year-old Trent Lieffring received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in 2022. About eight to nine months later, Trent experienced cardiac arrest and subsequent brain damage, apparently due to blood clots. He died on Aug. 24, 2023. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - July 24, 2024 at 12:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A South Korean study analyzed data from over half a million residents aged 65 and older, revealing a concerning link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Specifically, those vaccinated showed a 22% higher incidence of cognitive decline within three months compared to unvaccinated individuals. The authors highlighted that such rapid development of Alzheimer’s is significant, raising important questions about the long-term effects of these vaccines on cognitive health.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 COVID Shots Linked to Increased Risk of Alzheimer’s In the South Korean study, researchers analyzed data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service from more than half a million residents of Seoul, South Korea, age 65 and older. Those in the vaccinated group received either an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and/or a cDNA vaccine. However, the researchers later looked at just those who had received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and found there to be an especially high incidence of cognitive decline when compared to the unvaccinated. The authors of the South Korean study reported that after three months of receiving the vaccine, the mRNA vaccine group showed a roughly 22% increase in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (odds ratio: 1.225, p-value = 0.026) compared with the unvaccinated. “This is significant because developing Alzheimer’s disease over three months is a very rapid development of Alzheimer’s disease,” @Johnincarlisle said. WATCH ⬇️ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/alzheimers-disease-covid-vaccines-john-campbell/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240723

Watch: COVID Shots Linked to Increased Risk of Alzheimer’s Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., analyzed a South Korean peer-reviewed study that found statistically significant increases in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment in people who received a COVID-19 vaccine — particularly mRNA vaccines — within three months of post-vaccination. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 10:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent investigation by Canadian researchers revealed that the global patterns of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be solely attributed to the virus itself. Instead, the study, which analyzed data from 125 countries, concluded that the public health response, including lockdowns and COVID-19 vaccines, significantly contributed to the deaths. The researchers argued that without the pandemic declaration and its subsequent actions, mortality rates would not have been notably different.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 Vaccines Caused 17 Million Deaths During Pandemic A major investigation by Canadian researchers into excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic found that patterns of excess death globally could not be explained by a pandemic respiratory virus. Instead, the authors concluded the major causes of death globally stemmed from the public health establishment’s response, including lockdowns, harmful medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccines. The study by researchers from the nonprofit Correlation Research in the Public Interest analyzed excess mortality in 125 countries — about 35% of the global population — during the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning with the March 11, 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic declaration and ending on May 5, 2023, when the WHO declared the pandemic over. The investigation concluded that “nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared and had the declaration not been acted upon.” 4 More Takeaways ⬇️ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccines-17-million-deaths-covid-pandemic-excess-mortality/?utm_source=x&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240723

Vaccines Caused 17 Million Deaths During Pandemic Plus 4 More Takeaways From Largest Excess Mortality Study to Date A years-long investigation by Canadian researchers into excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic found that patterns of excess death globally could not be explained by a pandemic respiratory virus. Here are the data and logic behind some of the key findings. childrenshealthdefense.org
View Full Interactive Feed