TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ClassicLearner

Saved - December 16, 2025 at 3:33 PM

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

The public school system is designed to indoctrinate children into: -CRT (Critical Race Theory) -Gender ideology -Climate ideology -Feminism, & -Atheism & everyday more parents realize that if you want to protect your child from the woke mind virus you have to start young. https://t.co/U6w2AtWNfz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the crooked foundation of the public school system makes university indoctrination possible, asserting that everything in school is filtered through a Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors. The speaker claims schools introduce gender ideology, with opponents framed as intolerant; introduce critical race theory, with opponents framed as racist; introduce feminism, with opponents labeled misogynist or part of the patriarchy; and introduce socialism, with opponents described as privileged. The speaker contends that this influence is often subtle rather than overt, embedded in curriculum. An example given is how slavery is taught in elementary school. The speaker acknowledges general agreement that slavery was bad but argues that curricula omit broader historical context. Specifically, they state that The United States banned slavery in seven states while the rest of the world had bans in seven countries; in seventeen seventy six, 92–95% of the world was actively practicing slavery and it was the norm on every continent. The speaker also notes that Thomas Jefferson tried to get slavery abolished in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, that England abolished slavery in 1833, the United States in 1865, and that the rest of the world followed that example in Africa and Asia. The claim is that within proper historical context, the American story is one of liberation. The speaker asserts that the Marxist lens requires the oppressed versus the oppressors, and that if these arguments were made in school, a student would be failed, shamed in front of the class, and possibly sent to the principal’s office. The claim is that the system is designed to keep America divided so it could be easily conquered. Addressing critics, the speaker mentions the Frankfurt School, stating it expanded the ideas of Marxism, developed the oppressed-versus-oppressor framework, and aimed to use race, gender, and sexuality to usher in cultural Marxism. The speaker contends this infiltration began in academia in the nineteen-sixties, and attributes today’s situation to those developments. Note: Promotional content at the end has been omitted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone worries about the university indoctrination that happens up here, but it is the crooked foundation of the public school system that makes university indoctrination possible. Everything in school is filtered through the Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors. So schools introduce gender ideology and anyone who's against it is framed as intolerant. They introduce critical race theory and anyone who's against it is framed as racist. School introduces feminism and if you go against it you're a misogynist or part of the patriarchy. And they introduce socialism, and anyone who's against that is privileged. Now more often than not, in fact, most of the time, this isn't happening overtly, but it's subtly embedded into curriculum. So for example, when they teach about slavery, and they do this in elementary school, they teach that The US had slavery, that people were stolen from their homes, that there was abuse, mistreatment. And we all know this. Everyone agrees that slavery was a really bad thing and there shouldn't be slavery. But they don't teach that The United States had banned slavery in seven states when the rest of the world had only banned it in seven countries. So in seventeen seventy six, ninety to 95% of the world was actively practicing slavery, and this was the norm on every continent. And in spite of this, Thomas Jefferson tried to get slavery abolished in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence. And in 1833, England abolished slavery, The United States did in 1865, and the rest of the world followed that example. Africa, Asia. So within proper historical context, the American story is one of liberation. But the Marxist lens requires the oppressed versus the oppressors. So if you were to make these arguments in school, you would be failed, shamed in front of the class, and probably sent to the principal's office. Because this is designed to keep America divided so that we could be easily conquered. And to all the Marxists who love to tell me that I'm wrong, you really need to look up the Frankfurt School as it expanded the ideas of Marxism, developed the oppressed versus oppressor framework, Its aim was to use race, gender, and sexuality to usher in cultural Marxism. It started infiltrating academia in the nineteen sixties. And the result is what you see today. And our kids and our country deserve so much better. Check out my private homeschool community and cubs to bears books. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - December 5, 2025 at 11:50 PM

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

Why is that the Presidents who take on the banks are framed as historical villains but the Presidents who serve the banks are framed as great reformers? https://t.co/Bf5WXtoz7t

Video Transcript AI Summary
Andrew Jackson is one of the most important figures in American history, and all schools teach is he was bad because the Trail of Tears. They don't teach that he was the only president in US history to pay off the national debt, reducing America's debt by 99%. It was known as the bank wars. It goes back to the War of 1812, which was ended by then General Andrew Jackson with his victory at the Battle of New Orleans. But the war left America in debt. So in 1816, the federal government gave a charter to the Second Bank of the United States. But just like the Federal Reserve, the bank was privately owned by investors in the Netherlands and England. And when Jackson became president, he vowed to take on the corrupt banking aristocracy, which he did in 1832 when he canceled the charter of the Second Bank of the United States, which means he ended the Fed before the Fed was a thing. Real battle has always been against the banks, has always been against interest on debt, but they don't want you to know that. It's why I wrote a book on the history of the banking system and teach courses on how the system really functions. Oh, and if you're wondering why Andrew Jackson is on the $20 bill, it's because they're mocking him, and they're mocking us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Andrew Jackson is one of the most important figures in American history, and all schools teach is he was bad because the trail of tears. They don't teach that he was the only president in US history to pay off the national debt, reducing America's debt by 99%. It was known as the bank wars. It goes back to the war of eighteen twelve, which was ended by then general Andrew Jackson with his victory at the Battle of New Orleans. But the war left America in debt. So in 1816, the federal government gave a charter to the second bank of the United States. But just like the Federal Reserve, the bank was privately owned by investors in The Netherlands and England. And when Jackson became president, he vowed to take on the corrupt banking aristocracy, which he did in 1832 when he canceled the charter of the second bank of the United States, which means he ended the Fed before the Fed was a thing. Real battle has always been against the banks, has always been against interest on debt, but they don't want you to know that. It's why I wrote a book on the history of the banking system and teach courses on how the system really functions. Oh, and if you're wondering why Andrew Jackson is on the $20 bill, it's because they're mocking him, and they're mocking us. Check out my books on how they control information, the right to bear arms, banking, fake news, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - November 2, 2025 at 3:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall that when I exposed the banking powers behind the Federal Reserve Act, they burned the books and destroyed the printing plates. I warned: this Act creates the most gigantic trust on Earth, legalizes an invisible government by the Monetary Power, and though the people may not see it now, a day of reckoning is near—the worst legislative crime of the ages.

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

When Charles Lindbergh wrote two books exposing the banking powers behind the federal reserve act they didn’t just burn the books… they destroyed the printing plates. Here is what Lindberg had to say about the federal reserve act: "This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on Earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized, the people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed ... The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charles Lindbergh Sr. is quoted criticizing the Federal Reserve Act, calling it “the most gigantic trust on earth.” He says, “When the president signs this bill, the invisible government by the monetary power will be legalized,” and that “the day of reckoning is only a few years removed.” He labels the act as “the worst legislative crime of the ages” and asserts that “the system we’re under today” stems from this banking bill. He notes he is not blaming what happened to his grandson on this alone, but points out that “they did some pretty messed up things to him,” including federal agents destroying the printing plates of the two books he tried to publish, not just burning the books. The works mentioned are “Banking and Currency” and “the Money Trust,” described as about “the bankers that hijacked our system,” and another book about “how and why those bankers tried to get us into World War One.” Lindbergh recalls that his grandfather “got them all investigated in 1912 with the Pujo Committee,” which “named names that JPMorgan controlled almost all of Wall Street. Warburg, Schiff, Peabody, Rockefeller, Strong.” He says they silenced him. He concludes by inviting listeners to “look into” why their money is worth less today. He also promotes his books about how the money system was conquered, how to become an entrepreneur, how information is controlled, fake news, a food system, and more, directing readers to Classicallearner.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a real quote from Charles Lindbergh Sr. About our current financial system. This act, the Federal Reserve Act, establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the president signs this bill, the invisible government by the monetary power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed. The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill. And that's the system we're under today. And don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that's why what happened to his grandson happened. I don't think it is. But they did some pretty messed up things to him. Like having federal agents destroy the printing plates of the two books that he tried to publish. They didn't just burn the books, they destroyed the printing plates. Banking and Currency and the Money Trust, which is about the bankers that hijacked our system. And this book, which is about how and why those bankers tried to get us into World War one. And he wasn't just anyone. He got them all investigated in 1912 with the Pujo Committee. And it named names that JPMorgan controlled almost all of Wall Street. Warburg, Schiff, Peabody, Rockefeller, Strong. He called them all out, so they silenced him. And if you wanna know why your money's worth less today, look into that. And get your kids my books on how the money system was conquered, how they could be an entrepreneur, how information is controlled, fake news, a food system, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 7:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I wonder why schools focus solely on Andrew Jackson's Trail of Tears when there’s so much more to his story. He challenged the banks, was a hugely popular president, and even paid off the national debt. We need to reclaim our history from this biased narrative.

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

Why is it that when schools teach about Andrew Jackson you only hear about the trail of tears? Why aren’t students taught that he took on the banks? That he was one of the most popular presidents in American history? That he was the only president in American history to fully pay off the national debt? There has been an insidious agenda to turn Americans against our roots. It’s time we take our history back.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why schools focus on the Trail of Tears and not that Andrew Jackson was "the last president to successfully take on the banks," noting "the banks were trying to him" and that "the assassin missed and Jackson beat him with his cane." They claim he "canceled the charter of the second bank of the United States," the "modern equivalent of ending the charter of the Federal Reserve Bank," hence he was known as "the people's president." They say he was "one of the most popular and beloved presidents in American history," who "extended seventeen seventy six by eighty one years" and who "fully pay off America's debt." They warn of an "insidious agenda" to turn us from our roots and announce a second audiobook on Andrew Jackson. Check out The Life of Andrew Jackson at Classicallearner.com for information control, rights, fake news, banking system Jackson beat back.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is it that when schools teach about Andrew Jackson, you only hear about the Trail of Tears and not that he was the last president to successfully take on the banks? Or that he famously said the banks were trying to him. And then someone took two shots at him. But the assassin missed and Jackson beat him with his cane. That he not only went to war with the banks, but he canceled the charter of the second bank of the United States, which would be the modern equivalent of ending the charter of the Federal Reserve Bank, which is why Jackson was known as the people's president. He was one of the most popular and beloved presidents in American history, and he extended seventeen seventy six by eighty one years. And Jackson not only balanced the budget, he is the only president in US history to fully pay off America's debt. But there has been a well funded and insidious agenda to turn the American people against our roots, against our history, and against our interests. That's why I just released our second historical audiobook, this one on Andrew Jackson. Because we're not only going to bring back the history they've tried to take from us, but we're going to teach our kids as well. So check out The Life of Andrew Jackson and get your kids my books on how information is controlled, our rights, fake news, the banking system that Jackson beat back, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question why Thomas Jefferson's name is often linked solely to slavery. It's important to note that he initially called for the end of slavery in the Declaration of Independence and enacted the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which prevented slavery's expansion into the northwest. Additionally, he signed the bill that abolished the North Atlantic slave trade. These significant contributions to American and human history seem overlooked in education. I wonder why this information isn't more widely taught.

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

Why have schools made Thomas Jefferson’s name synonymous with Slavery? Did you know Jefferson called for the end of slavery in the original draft of the declaration of independence? Did you know Jefferson’s Northwest ordinance of 1787 stopped the spread of slavery to the northwest? Did you know that President Thomas Jefferson signed the bill that ended the North Atlantic slave trade? These are some of the greatest achievements in not only American, but human history… Yet most Americans aren’t taught any of it. Now, why do you think that is?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Declaration of Independence originally called for the end of slavery, referring to it as a cruel war against human nature, but this is not taught in schools. According to the speaker, only South Carolina and Georgia refused to sign it. The speaker says Thomas Jefferson ended the North Atlantic slave trade as president, yet schools associate his name with slavery. The speaker states Abraham Lincoln cited Jefferson's Declaration of Independence and Northwest Ordinance of 1787 as justification for ending slavery. The Northwest Ordinance is presented as the reason there was no slavery in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. The speaker believes there is an agenda to separate Americans from the history that has liberated them and encourages reading primary writings of historical figures. The speaker promotes courses and books on the second amendment, the history of fake news, and the corruption of the banking system at Classicallearner.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The declaration of independence you read growing up wasn't the original. The original draft called for the end of slavery. In fact, it referred to slavery as a cruel war against human nature, and only two of the 13 colonies refused to sign on, South Carolina and Georgia. Yet American schools have made Thomas Jefferson's name synonymous with slavery. They don't teach that as president of The United States, Thomas Jefferson signed the bill that ended the North Atlantic slave trade. He put an end to the importation of slaves from Africa, yet they loved to lionize Abraham Lincoln. But if you read Abraham Lincoln, nearly all of his justifications for ending slavery were citations of Jefferson, specifically the Declaration of Independence and Jefferson's Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which was the reason there was no slavery in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Why didn't they teach you that in school? There is a massive agenda to separate Americans from the history that has liberated them, and this is why I always tell people that reading the primary writings of historical figures is so important and why I work so hard to teach young people how information is controlled. Get your kids in my courses and my books on the second amendment, the history of fake news, the corruption of the banking system, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
When Charles Lindbergh authored two books critiquing the banking powers behind the Federal Reserve Act, the response was extreme; they not only burned the books but also destroyed the printing plates. Lindbergh expressed that the Act created an immense trust, legalizing an invisible government by monetary power. He warned that while the public might not recognize it immediately, a reckoning would come, labeling the banking bill as one of the worst legislative crimes in history.

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

When Charles Lindbergh wrote two books exposing the banking powers behind the federal reserve act they didn’t just burn the books… they destroyed the printing plates. Here is what Lindberg had to say about the federal reserve act: "This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on Earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized, the people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed ... The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charles Lindbergh Sr. said the Federal Reserve Act "establishes the most gigantic trust on earth" and legalizes an invisible government by monetary power. He called it the "worst legislative crime of the ages." Lindbergh's books, Banking and Currency and the Money Trust, and another about bankers pushing the U.S. into World War I, had their printing plates destroyed by federal agents. In 1912, the Pujo Committee, led by Lindbergh, investigated and named names, alleging JPMorgan controlled almost all of Wall Street, including Orberg, Schiff, Peabody, Rockefeller, and Strong. He claimed they silenced him. The speaker suggests looking into this history to understand why money is worth less today. They promote their books for kids on topics such as the money system, entrepreneurship, information control, fake news, and the food system, available at Classicallearner.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a real quote from Charles Lindbergh Sr. About our current financial system. This act, the Federal Reserve Act, establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the president signs this bill, the invisible government by the monetary power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed. The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill. And that's the system we're under today. And don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that's why what happened to his grandson happened. I don't think it is. But they did some pretty messed up things to him. Like having federal agents destroy the printing plates of the two books that he tried to publish. They didn't just burn the books. They destroyed the printing plates. Banking and Currency and the Money Trust, which is about the bankers that hijacked our system. And this book, which is about how and why those bankers tried to get us into World War one. And he wasn't just anyone. He got them all investigated in 1912 with the Pujo Committee. And it named names that JPMorgan controlled almost all of Wall Street. Orberg, Schiff, Peabody, Rockefeller, Strong. He called them all out, so they silenced him. If you wanna know why your money's worth less today, look into that. And get your kids my books on how the money system was conquered, how they could be an entrepreneur, how information is controlled, fake news, a food system, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - March 29, 2025 at 6:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1913, I wrote about Charles Lindbergh's book that exposed the Federal Reserve, which was later removed from circulation and its printing plates destroyed. Similarly, in 1966, Carol Quigley faced the same fate with his book on the Federal Reserve. I see a pattern where the deep state uses corporations for censorship, evident today with congressional hearings for Facebook and Twitter CEOs, the arrest of the Telegram CEO, the TikTok ban, and organizations like the ADL and SPLC labeling individuals with derogatory terms.

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

In 1913 Charles Lindbergh wrote a book exposing the federal reserve bank… The book was taken out of circulation, and the printing plates were destroyed. In 1966 Carol Quigley wrote a book exposing the federal reserve bank… The book was taken out of circulation, and the printing plates were destroyed. The deep state has always leveraged corporations to carry out their censorship… & today it happens through calling the CEOs of Facebook and Twitter in front of Congress, arresting the CEO of telegram, passing the Tik Tok ban, & draconian organizations such as the & labeling people derogatory terms.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1913, Charles Lindbergh wrote a book exposing the people behind the Federal Reserve Bank, but the book was taken out of circulation and the printing plates destroyed. In the 1960s, Carol Quigley wrote a similar book that met the same fate. Today, those in power pressure social media companies to censor information, as seen with Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Telegram, and the TikTok ban. This is how the "shadow government" behind the Federal Reserve gains leverage over these companies. It's important to teach people their rights and how these systems function. The speaker writes books on free speech, social media censorship, the Federal Reserve Bank, the history of fake news, and the corrupted food system to prevent people from being deceived.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1913, Charles Lindbergh wrote a book exposing the people behind the Federal Reserve Bank, but the book would be taken out of circulation and the printing plates would be destroyed. Then in the nineteen sixties, Carol Quigley would write a book exposing the people behind the Federal Reserve Bank. But the book would be taken out of circulation, and the printing plates would be destroyed. Well, in the modern world, those in power and the government pressure social media companies to censor for them. It's why Mark Zuckerberg gets called in front of congress, why the CEO of Telegram was arrested. It's the reason for the TikTok ban because it's how the people behind the Federal Reserve, the shadow government, get leverage over these companies. And that's why it's so important that we not only teach people their rights, but show them how this stuff functions from a systems level. It's why I write books on not only free speech, but social media censorship. Because you don't have to wake people up if you prevent them from going to sleep in the first place. So check out my books on how information is controlled, our rights, the Federal Reserve Bank, history of fake news, how the food system was corrupted, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 10:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
With the release of the JFK files, I’m reminded that the term “conspiracy theorist” was coined by the CIA after the Kennedy assassination. The same tactics persist today, labeling those who question official narratives to isolate them and discourage others from engaging with their ideas.

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

With the release of the JFK files, let’s not forget that the term “conspiracy theorist” was popularized by the CIA in response to the Kennedy assassination. The same tactics are still used today. Create a category: -Conspiracy theorist -Racist -Sexist -Xenophobic -Woke right -Anti-Semitic & link people who question official narratives to those categories, so that other people do not want to be associated with them and do not listen to and share their ideas.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the CIA popularized the term "conspiracy theorist" to discredit those questioning the JFK assassination. A leaked 1970s document, "Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report," allegedly detailed tactics to discredit truth speakers, including portraying them as obsessed conspiracists or linking them to communist propaganda. The speaker asserts these tactics are still used today, labeling people "foreign propagandists" and "conspiracy theorists" to discredit them. Negative labels like "racist," "xenophobic," and "antisemitic" are used to discourage association. The speaker says that "they" manufacture boogeymen and create caricatures, then associate people like Candace Owens and Ian Carroll with them to discredit them. The speaker concludes that these tactics were perfected after JFK's assassination and promotes Classicallearner.com, which helps parents teach their kids about information control, the history of fake news, the banking system, the corrupted food system, and morality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The JFK files have finally been released. But let's not forget that the term conspiracy theorist was popularized by the CIA to discredit anyone who questioned the Kennedy assassination. In fact, in the nineteen seventies, a document titled Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report was leaked, and it included 50 plus pages of how to discredit truth speakers, including making them look like conspiracists obsessed with their theories or linking them to the Soviet Union and claiming that they're repeating communist propaganda. And of course, they still use the same tactics today to discredit anyone who dares to question things like this situation as they label people foreign propagandist and conspiracy theorist to discredit them. Because creating negative categories is a tactic. Conspiracy theorist, racist, xenophobic, woke right, antisemitic. Because they know if they label you that, other people won't want to associate with you. Or they manufacture boogeymen, create caricatures of them, and then say Candace Owens is associated with this person. Ian Carroll is associated with that person. And because of that, you shouldn't listen to them. And these are the tactics that they perfected after they took out JFK. And that's why I help parents teach their kids how information is controlled, about the history of fake news, how the banking system was conquered, and the food system was corrupted, our rights, morality, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - September 1, 2024 at 6:06 AM

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

Pepsi is in $44 billion of debt. Nike is in $11 billion of debt. Starbucks is in $29 billion of debt. These corporations don’t push woke nonsense by accident. They are completely leveraged by firms like Blackrock. What do you think @elonmusk? Did I get it right? https://t.co/cwqIXqdUzg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Publicly traded companies like Pepsi, Nike, and Starbucks are in billions of dollars of debt. To maximize profit, CEOs take on debt to open new markets, then make more stock available to the public. Investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street buy the stock, gaining enough ownership to influence corporate boards. Board members are aware that firms like BlackRock can replace them if they don't comply. BlackRock demands companies practice ESG, pushing climate change and social agendas. Failure to comply can result in the removal of board members and the CEO. Private companies like X and Bass Pro Shop are protected from this influence. Elon Musk made X a private company, preventing firms like BlackRock from leveraging it. Bass Pro Shop, controlled by its founder, doesn't promote social agendas. The speaker advocates supporting private companies and promotes his private homeschool community and books on topics like the Bill of Rights, free speech, and ESG.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pepsi is in $44,000,000,000 of debt. Nike is in $11,000,000,000 of debt. And Starbucks is in $25,000,000,000 of debt. And this is true of virtually every publicly traded company. And here's how it happens. Companies like Pepsi bring in a CEO who has an MBA from business school and has been trained to maximize profit. And in order to do this, the company takes on debt to open up new markets, which requires more and more stores and more and more factories. They then make more of their stock available to the public to help pay off that debt, and this makes them vulnerable because investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street come in and buy the stock. And each of these firms own about 5 to 15% of every major company. So why that number? Because it's enough to get their people on the corporate board and these companies vote who will be on the corporate boards every 1 to 3 years. So the board members are very aware that BlackRock could have them replaced, and these are high paying jobs. And then the board chooses the CEO, and it's his job to maximize profits and serve the corporate board. And now we get into why all of these corporations seemingly push the same agendas because BlackRock can demand that these companies practice ESG, which stands for environmental social governance. Push the climate change agenda, push the social agenda, or be governed. And by governed, they mean removing members of the corporate board and replacing the CEO. And none of these people want to lose their multimillion dollar bonuses. And this is why supporting private companies is so important. So take Twitter as an example. Elon Musk and the investors he partnered with purchased the company for $44,000,000,000 and they transformed it into a private company, which means you can't buy stock in x. And this protects it from being leveraged by firms like BlackRock. And this is why they've had to find a 1,000 other ways to threaten Musk, but they haven't been able to leverage him enough to shut down x and because of that free speech has been allowed and the Overton window of American politics has shifted. Another company I like is Bass Pro Shop. Look how they embrace the American flag. And just like x, you can't buy their stock. They're a private company which is why you've never seen them promote any of the social agendas because they're still controlled by their founder, Johnny Morris, who has dedicated his life and his earnings to wildlife conservation and they don't give in to political correctness, which is why his son, Johnny Morris junior, could post legendary pictures like this. And I think if they knew about my books, the right to bear arms and on free speech in the modern world, they would carry them in Bass Pro Shops. So tag John Junior so he sees this post, and let's teach the next generation what it means to be free. Because like Johnny Morris, I started and run a private company. So I could teach courses on the bill of rights, the founding fathers, the constitution, real civics. I could teach courses on ESG and teach our kids how the world functions from a systems level. People give BlackRock their 401 k. BlackRock buys stocks in large companies. They get their people on the corporate board. The board appoints a CEO. The CEO serves the shareholders and board. BlackRock demands ESG. And if the CEO and board don't play ball, they lose their jobs. So check out my private homeschool community and my books on how information is controlled, the right to bear arms, the history of fake news, the corruption of the banking system, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
Saved - July 6, 2024 at 8:02 PM

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

This video got my Tik Tok channel with 80K followers nuked today. I guess the powers that be don’t want people to know the fraudulent roots that started the climate movement. https://t.co/tBjf8FWZlM

Video Transcript AI Summary
The environmental movement traces back to the 1971 UN Stockholm conference and the "Only One Earth" report by Maurice Strong. Strong, a Rockefeller man, faced legal issues related to water exploitation and land development. Despite controversies, he inspired figures like Al Gore. Visit the speaker's private homeschool community and Cubs to Bears books.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where did all of this start? We have to go back to the 1971 UN Stockholm conference and the release of the only 1 earth report. It was commissioned by Maurice Strong. And 1 year later, Strong would be made the first ever president of UNIT. But who was the man behind this movement? As it turns out, he had made his money in oil. A Rockefeller man who lost a 1986 court case after he tried to profit from water, when a judge ruled it would cause significant environmental damage. Who got in trouble after he tried to build a $35, 000, 000 luxury hotel on restricted land in Costa Rica, who had to resign from the UN's oil for food program after he got caught taking dirty money from Jordanian bankers. It's said that strong is the man that inspired Al Gore. And after reading about the man, that makes sense. Check out my private homeschool community and Cubs to Bears books.
View Full Interactive Feed