TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ClownsOfCSPAN

Posted - November 11, 2023 at 8:37 PM

Saved - November 12, 2023 at 1:10 AM

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

FYI - Robinette fumbled today's Veterans Day ceremony because there isn't anything else left for him to destroy. Our country is in societal ruins. IMPEACH, INDICT, & CONVICT JOE BIDEN! https://t.co/zaA1zPl7Tx

@ClownsOfCSPAN — ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

Posted - May 14, 2023 at 10:59 PM

Saved - May 15, 2023 at 1:46 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Some Twitter users are wishing for Trump's death, sparking controversy. DarkBrandon highlights a double standard in the country, where it's acceptable to wish death upon someone if your political party is in power. Trump supporters are concerned about the lack of support from Elon Musk, who is now CEO. This behavior is attributed to a major problem with psychosis in the country, even among Republicans.

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

TWEETERS WISHING TRUMP WAS DEAD (THREAD).... @elonmusk 👀 Twitter has some 'splainin to do. This tweet inspired the thread, so let's start with Oscar first: #Unredacted #ImWithOscar #BuydensRemorse🎻

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

These tweets showcase the world of #DarkBrandon and the major double-standard going in this country. Here it's OK to wish death upon someone, if your political party's in power - so if Biden voters want Trump dead, then what do they wish for his supporters? #americanpsyop

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

For 4 brilliant years Donald J. Trump gave his heart & his soul to this nation. You'd think that @elonmusk would have his back & not allow this kind of crap to show up on peoples timelines, but noooooooo! The new CEO is comin'! #ExtremeSWAMPDemocrats

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

We truly have a major problem with #Psychosis in this land. Even Repubs are brainwashed beyond belief. These people want Trump to die. @elonmusk Now we know how Hitler did it with such ease. #TDS #GetTrump

@ClownsOfCSPAN — ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

Posted - May 6, 2023 at 10:41 PM

Saved - May 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

BREAKING - ALLEN, TEXAS Unsuspecting shoppers shot multiple times by an 'unknown' gunman at a premium outlet mall. Multiple injuries & fatalities reported. This isn't Trumps America. Biden brings bodies AND bloodstains to brainwash us beyond belief! #OperationLockstep

@ClownsOfCSPAN — ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

Posted - April 20, 2023 at 5:11 PM

Saved - April 20, 2023 at 6:45 PM

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

If American taxpayers aren't funding the Wuhan lab, who is? 👀 Secretary Anthony Blinken gets grilled about The Wuhan Institute of Virology. PT. 1

Video Transcript AI Summary

In a discussion about China's compliance with chemical and bio weapons treaty obligations, Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1's knowledge on the matter. Speaker 1 expresses concerns about compliance but cannot confirm whether China was in compliance in 2005 or currently. Speaker 0 further asks about China's offensive biological weapons program and the collaboration between the Academy of Military Medical Sciences and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Speaker 1 acknowledges the collaboration and mentions the involvement of private organizations and the Chinese military. Speaker 0 inquires about the CDC's presence in Wuhan, but Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. So in 2005, when you were director of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, did you know that China was not in compliance with the chemical and bio weapons treaty obligations for which it was supposed to comply? Speaker 1: We've had concerns over many years about the compliance of the number That Speaker 0: that's not the question I tube. Were you aware that they're not in they were not in compliance since 2005? I mean, I just kinda went through your resume here a little bit. I mean, You're deeply in at that point. Were you aware? Did you know? I I would have to Speaker 1: go back and and look. That's almost 20 years ago. I can't tell you at that particular point. Speaker 0: Do you know now? Speaker 1: We have real concerns about the compliance. Speaker 0: Have concerns. I'm asking if you know. Speaker 1: I'm telling you that we have that we have real concerns about their compliance, the compliance. Speaker 0: So are they in compliance or aren't they? Speaker 1: So this is something that we can take up in, in a different setting, but we have real concerns about compliance. Speaker 0: Did you know about China's offensive biological weapons program and the CCP's Academy of Military Medical Sciences? Speaker 1: I can't speak to individual institutions, and I would have to go back and Sure. Speaker 0: You're the the Secretary of State. This is important stuff. You can't tell if this is CCP is currently complying with the bioweapons treaty obligations. You can't tell us whether you know about China's offensive biological weapons program. Are you familiar with the fact that that the Academy of Military Medical Sciences worked with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, We received money from the United States of America, particularly the state department, the defense department, the, USAID, the NIH. Are you familiar with that? Speaker 1: As I said, congressman, I'm familiar with the fact that, as a practical matter, there is little difference between, purportedly private organizations and the state, and the fact there is collaboration or would be collaboration between this particular institute in the state, including the Chinese military, is certainly no surprise. By the way, one of the Speaker 0: reasons Okay. So Speaker 1: one of the reasons it's particularly helpful that we actually had programs to give us. Are you familiar with the fact that the CDC and into places like Wuhan, Precisely to have a better understanding of what's going on. Speaker 0: Wanna understand. I know you're concerned. Are you

@ClownsOfCSPAN - ᴛʜᴇ 𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐄 ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ ™

Perry confronts Secretary Anthony Blinken about the CCP💥 Bogus Blinken can't answer a simple straight-forward question just like Bogus Biden. PT. 2

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 1 asks the Secretary of State if he is aware that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) announced collaboration on chimeric viruses and declared coronaviruses as genetic weapons. The Secretary of State says he cannot speak to the specifics but expresses ongoing concerns about compliance. Speaker 1 questions whether American taxpayers should fund research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, considering reports of double billing by the CCP and their alleged bioweapons program. The Secretary of State clarifies that the US is not currently funding such research, but mentions past programs that aimed to gain better understanding and ensure safety and security. Speaker 1 concludes by thanking the Secretary of State.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Is like sure. Sure. Precisely to have a better understanding of what's Speaker 1: going on. Understand. I know you're concerned. Are you familiar with the fact that they the Chinese Communist Party announced that they were collaborating on chimeric viruses and that the CCP declared coronaviruses were the leading edge of genetic weapons warfare? Fair? Do you know that? Again The Secretary of State. Speaker 0: I'm I'm happy to look at each of those statements, the documentation behind them, I can't speak to the specifics. I can tell you, that, again, we have had for a long time, continue to have, real concerns about, compliance I Speaker 1: know you have concerns, sir. Do you know that during your time during your time, sir, in all these lofty positions contracts including ones with the state, this Department of State, DOD, USAID, etcetera paid for research research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences and there are reports that the CCP may have double billed the US? Since we have declared that the c p CCP has an illicit bioweapons program? Should a mac American taxpayers be funding this? Number 1. Number 2, should we trust that China will do the right thing in its part with this WHO proposed convention? Speaker 0: We should not trust, we should verify. That is Speaker 1: What about paying? Do the American taxpayers pay for this? Speaker 0: I'm not sure whether this is, congressman. Speaker 1: The the the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in collaboration with the Academy of Military Medical Sciences for Biological Weapons? Speaker 0: We're not we're not paying for that. As I said, in the past, we have had programs where our scientists as well as our embassy have had the ability, to have eyes and ears in some of these places precisely so that we would have a better understanding of what was going on and, in particular, to see if there were any safety, or security concerns. There was 1 program that was before my time that ended in 2019 that USAID was engaged in. That as I said, that program ended in twenty wasn't involved in so called gain of function, research, but, as a general proposition, the benefit of these programs is to give us greater visibility on what's going on in places that we otherwise don't have eyes and ears on? Speaker 1: Thank you, mister Secretary.