TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Cousin_Swen

Cousin_Swen
Posted - September 10, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Saved - September 12, 2025 at 2:24 AM

@Cousin_Swen - 🏴‍☠️CHEF Ƒʉͫcͧкͭιͪηͣ SꪜΞN🏴‍☠️

@TitFoilTheory https://t.co/bXZrG7ESqI

Cousin_Swen
Posted - May 28, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Saved - May 30, 2025 at 2:31 AM

@Cousin_Swen - 🏴‍☠️CHEF Ƒʉͫcͧкͭιͪηͣ SꪜΞN🏴‍☠️

Hey @loopringorg I have an idea. How about you airdrop your token to LSW users to help with the transition? Since its gonna cost some bucks to transfer over everything to a new wallet @macro_diary 'Be Your Own Bank' my ass. This is SO lame.

@loopringorg - Loopring💙

Loopring Wallet will be officially ceasing its operations by the end of June 2025📢 We deeply appreciate the support of all current wallet users and hope to make the transition as easy as possible. All details for current Loopring Wallet users here ↓ https://medium.com/loopring-protocol/loopring-wallet-closure-announcement-287400ff621b

Loopring Wallet Closure Announcement The best projects are never frozen in time. They evolve, double-down on what users love most, and gracefully sunset what no longer serves the mission. Today, we’re sharing some difficult but… medium.com
Cousin_Swen
Posted - May 26, 2024 at 2:34 PM
Saved - May 26, 2024 at 6:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UBS theory circulating lacks any evidence. Firstly, the 45 million shares were not privately sold but offered through an ATM. Secondly, UBS would not benefit from selling at market price. They could easily buy shares from the market to close their position. Thirdly, there is no need to pay a premium for call options when they could be bought from the market. Lastly, if the initial sale of 45 million shares did not cause significant price action, it cannot be considered the catalyst. This theory can be disregarded.

@Cousin_Swen - 🏴‍☠️MF'N CAP’N ⏻ SꪜΞN🏴‍☠️

I have seen this UBS theory being passed around and discussed. This theory makes 𝘼𝘽𝙎𝙊𝙇𝙐𝙏𝙀𝙇𝙔 𝙉𝙊 𝙎𝙀𝙉𝙎𝙀 whatsoever. Here's why. 1️⃣ - GameStop 𝘿𝙄𝘿 𝙉𝙊𝙏 agree to 'privately sell' 45 million shares. It was an ATM offering. 𝘈𝘵-𝘵𝘩𝘦-𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 literally means that it was not a private sale. I doubt it would even be legal without disclosures to do so, but it also does not logically make sense, as UBS saw no benefit from this transaction. Which brings me to... 2️⃣ - We know the shares were sold for around $20 (market price at the time) So how would that have even helped UBS, if they didn't get a better price? If they wanted to close out their position using shares at market price, they could simply go buy them at the market. No need for a secret deal. 3️⃣ - Why pay a premium for call options to close out the rest of the position? See point 2. Just buy them from the market if you aren't getting a deal. Infinite liquidity and all that. 4️⃣ - How could this have been the first domino, if it didn't create any real price action? Why switch to options for the rest of the closing activity, if the initial purchasing of 45 million did not create any extreme volatility? This bunk theory can be safely discarded 🗑️

Cousin_Swen
Posted - May 9, 2024 at 9:10 PM
Saved - May 9, 2024 at 11:05 PM

@Cousin_Swen - 🏴‍☠️MF'N CAP’N ⏻ SꪜΞN🏴‍☠️

.@scenicnights How did this go? Why did you delete the tweet https://t.co/GgZOxXNH0J

View Full Interactive Feed