TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @CultivateElevat
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Wisdom teeth removal? Scam by the rockefeller dentists. Teeth become overcrowded when you drink pasteurized dairy and eat. processed foods. Keep the teeth healthy: Pearl powder, Clove, and Coconut oil. https://cultivateelevate.com https://t.co/eXWnagh2dJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I actually had my wisdom teeth removed when I was 20. I had no idea. The insurance company had a $5,000 reward for removing my wisdom teeth. And then I learned about how your wisdom teeth are connect to your heart. Well, there's actually no reason to remove the wisdom teeth.
They actually just pull them out so they could get a from the and then mess with your meridian line, which if you think of wisdom, you think of your brain, and then the the wisdom teeth are also connected to your heart. So a lot of times when people get their wisdom teeth removed, they actually start developing heart issues. You see how this goes? The meridians of the wisdom teeth are connected not only to the brain but also to the heart. So then people start developing heart issues and then can't figure it out, but it was because they had a procedure in which was never supposed to happen, never needed to happen.
And remember, the dentist industry is a break off of the industry. They're fluoridating people's mouths, taking teeth out of them, x raying them, and all of your teeth are meridian lines. So if you mess with those meridian lines, you mess with all the pathways of the body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I actually had my wisdom teeth removed when I was 20. I had no idea. The insurance company had a $5,000 reward for removing my wisdom teeth. And then I learned about how your wisdom teeth are connect to your heart. Well, there's actually no reason to remove the wisdom teeth.
They actually just pull them out so they could get a from the and then mess with your meridian line, which if you think of wisdom, you think of your brain, and then the the wisdom teeth are also connected to your heart. So a lot of times when people get their wisdom teeth removed, they actually start developing heart issues. You see how this goes? The meridians of the wisdom teeth are connected not only to the brain but also to the heart. So then people start developing heart issues and then can't figure it out, but it was because they had a procedure in which was never supposed to happen, never needed to happen.
And remember, the dentist industry is a break off of the industry. They're fluoridating people's mouths, taking teeth out of them, x raying them, and all of your teeth are meridian lines. So if you mess with those meridian lines, you mess with all the pathways of the body.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Tiny hat 🎩 newspapers? Seems I found who made all the racist content https://odysee.com/@CultivateElevate:e2/slaveryandtinyhats:6 https://t.co/ch01ad2e5X
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that all newspapers are owned by “the tiny hats,” and then invites the audience to consider all of the racist content that used to appear in newspapers. The core claim is that the tiny hats produced the racist material found in newspapers, and that when they own the entire newspaper industry, they are responsible for what gets produced and shown to the public.
They extend this claim to assert that the tiny hats also owned the slave trade, were the merchants, and owned the stores and marts, and then owned the newspapers. From there, they assert that the tiny hats own all information or production that goes into the newspapers containing racist content, describing this as twisted and highlighting a perceived coherence in who controls what the public sees.
The speaker then discusses a divide and conquer tactic aimed at “the people” of the country. They claim that ordinary people, who are “the people of the country,” are the ones being screwed by the tiny hats. The argument presented is that owning the entire media—newspapers, radio, television, and movies—enables this group to influence public perception and prevent unity among the populace.
According to the speaker, this ownership leads to the creation of division, with groups of people across America failing to unite against the alleged core manipulators. The speaker contends that the tiny hats control both the right and the left, as well as the media and politicians, and thereby hold sway over the entire information ecosystem (newspapers, televisions, radios, and the whole system).
Finally, the speaker asserts that these powerful groups—Rothschilds, Lehman Brothers, Warburgs, and bankers who run the system—are the ones ultimately being opposed, but that the public remains divided because these groups own the media and the political landscape. The overarching claim is that control of media and information by these financiers and elite groups enables ongoing manipulation and division, preventing unity against the perceived centralized power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if all the newspapers are owned by the tiny hats, I want you to think about all of the racist things that used to be in newspapers right there. Okay? So think about this. You used to see all these very racist things that were in the newspapers. Then who produced all the racist content that was in the newspapers?
The tiny hats. Because when the tiny hats own the entire newspaper industry, you start to understand who's making this stuff and putting in front of the people so that people would then respond to it. This is just this is crazy. Like, this is just when you think about how crazy this actually is, that the tiny hats own the slave trade, they were the merchants, they own the stores, they own the marts, they own that, then they own the newspapers, and then they own all of the information or the production that goes into the newspapers of all the racist things that used to be on there. Think of how twisted that is.
Think of how twisted that actually is. And then they created the divide and conquer tactic against all of us. We, the people, right? Because we, the people of the country, we're all in here together, are the ones who are really getting screwed by the tiny hats. Because when you own the entire media, when you own all the newspaper, you own the radio, you own the television, you own the movies, do you kinda see what happens?
So they put all of the stuff out here and then it creates divide and conquer. And then the groups of people, of all the people, of everybody who lives in America do not unite because they see all of this stuff and then they don't unite against these Rothschilds, Lehman Brothers, Warburgs, and bankers, and and the people who run this system because they own the right side, they own the left side, they own the media, they own the politicians, they own the newspapers, the televisions, the radios, the whole thing. And then it just creates division.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Elders of Zion by Henry ford 1921: something to look into 👇relates to today https://t.co/ix6p3vwOQI
Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript features a speaker discussing The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The speaker says, “Everybody should look into these protocols. They are pretty twisted, and they talk about that they believe that they're the chosen people, and they're so chosen that they must destroy all other religions. And if people become atheists, that's fine.” The speaker asserts that the text also “talks about calling everybody Gentiles who's not the chosen people and all the Gentiles should be wiped from the earth.” The speaker suggests people might want to investigate this material: “Some stuff to look into.” The speaker adds another claim: “We will so wear out and exhaust the Gentiles that all of this that they will be compelled to an international authority.” The speaker then asks, “Doesn't that sound like a one world government?” The transcript continues with claims that “educational system and the Gentile society will lose its brains.” It references “Rockefeller's Rothschilds. Nothing by chance.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is interesting. This is from the elders of Zion. Everybody should look into these protocols. They are pretty twisted, and they talk about that they believe that they're the chosen people, and they're so chosen that they must destroy all other religions. And if people become atheists, that's fine.
It also talks about calling everybody Gentiles who's not the chosen people and all the Gentiles should be wiped from the earth. People might wanna look into this. Some stuff to look into. And then I got one more for you. We will so wear out and exhaust the Gentiles that all of this that they will be compelled to an international authority.
Doesn't that sound like a one world government? Also, will only educational system and the Gentile society will lose its brains. Rockefeller's Rothschilds. Nothing by chance.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Tiny hats 🎩 and slavery: now you know who Christopher Columbus was.. https://t.co/dyFQdIdl4X
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker discusses a new book titled Tiny Hat Selling the Slaves, asserting that it reveals information not covered in mainstream sources. The speaker claims the book shows rabbis, referred to as “tiny hats,” were involved in selling slaves and running slave auctions, with pages detailing auctions and slave sales conducted by rabbis.
Key claims highlighted include:
- The term layaway originated from rabbis selling slaves.
- Jacob Cohen owned a plantation and was described as the president of the synagogue, with the assertion that plantations were run by the “tiny hats.”
- Charleston in 1825 is identified as the original center of the slave marts, with ownership of the merchants and ships attributed to these groups.
- Charleston’s “tiny hat slave traders” are cited, with claims that because the tiny hats supposedly owned newspapers, they could control runaway slave ads and also supposedly owned the police, implying they controlled both sides of fugitive ads.
- The speaker asserts that only two people spoke up about this hidden history, suggesting widespread suppression or omission.
- The discussion extends to Christopher Columbus, linking the presented narrative to a broader explanation of who Columbus was and to claims that “tiny hats” or “charsarians” were expelled from various countries as a result.
- The overall narrative is presented as revealing a hidden or suppressed history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade, and the speaker asserts that understanding these points clarifies why certain groups were expelled and how power was exercised in historical contexts.
The speaker emphasizes that the information is sourced from the book and suggests readers verify through research, including references to Charleston in 1825, the role of rabbis in plantations and slave markets, and the alleged control of media and police by those groups. The overall framing is that this perspective explains historical events and expulsions by attributing significant power and influence to the so-called “tiny hats.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there's a new book I'm reading, Tiny Hat Selling the Slaves. Oh, yeah. They forgot to mention all of this in the Rockefeller schools. And people say that's not true. Well, you should read this one.
This guy was a rabbi who wrote this one. And you know the term layaway? That came from when rabbis were selling slaves. Yes. And this has pages and pages of all the auctions and the rabbis selling the slaves.
Check this. Jacob Cohen, okay, owned a plantation. Yes. All the plantations were ran by the tiny hats. 02/1994 enslaved Africans.
He was the president of the synagogue. You can just look this stuff up. And what got even deeper is I found Charleston 1825. That was the original place of the slave marts, and they owned the merchants. They owned the ships.
They owned everything. And look at this. Charleston tiny hat slave traders. Now since the tiny hats own all the newspapers, if they tried to run away, they put an ad up trying to get the slaves back. Then it got deeper when I found out that the tiny hats own the police too.
So people tried to run away, they owned both sides. It's wild because there was only two people who actually spoke up about this. That's why it's hidden from you. And, also, when Christopher Columbus came over here, now you understand who Christopher Columbus was. And this is why the tiny hats, the charsarians, had been kicked out of all these countries.
Now you start to understand.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Birth control and Planned Parenthood? Both made by Margaret Sanger. 📖 Google the negro project by Margaret Sanger. Also, she was friends with Magnus Hirschfield who pushed the trans agenda in 1933. Germany decided to burn the books as it was "non german literature". https://t.co/V2GjoN3a8B
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes birth control as something created by Margaret Sanger and connects her to the “tiny hats.” He claims Sanger was attempting population control and that her project aimed to “get rid of one group of people and then get rid of everybody else,” calling the birth control movement “poison.” He asserts that birth control involves taking synthetic estrogen and a synthetic steroid, “poisoning your body,” and reiterates that Sanger was a demonic figure who “can expect to” receive retribution from the tiny hats. He asserts that the tiny hats funded Planned Parenthood and the birth control movement, with funding from the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and labels the entire matter a “deep rabbit hole.” He argues that birth control and clinics were part of a broader scheme leading to depopulation, and ties the issues to Marxism, feminism, and the involvement of the Rothschilds, describing a conspiratorial network behind these movements.
Speaker 1 counters that birth control could help keep the population more or less static until resources can be increased, suggesting that preventing starvation depends on either birth control or resource acquisition, and framing the question as choosing between the two: “birth control or picking up the resources.” He concedes there is a limit to increasing resources, implying that there is a trade-off between controlling population growth and expanding resources, but he does not take a firm stance beyond recognizing a resource limitation.
Overall, the transcript presents two perspectives: Speaker 0 advances a conspiratorial critique linking birth control to Sanger, “tiny hats,” and powerful financiers, portraying it as poison and part of a depopulation agenda connected to Marxism and feminism. Speaker 1 raises a pragmatic ambiguity, suggesting that birth control could stabilize population while resources are improved, but notes that resource limitations impose a constraint.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think of birth control? Well, birth control was created by Margaret Sanger. Margaret Sanger is connected back to the tiny hats. She was doing trying to do population control, and actually her whole project was trying to get rid of one group of people and then get rid of everybody else. So the whole birth control thing, it's just poison.
That's all it is. You're taking synthetic estrogen. You're taking a synthetic steroid in your body, and you're poisoning your body. And that came from Margaret Sanger who was friends with Magnus Herschel. Magnus Herschel was the person who pushed transgender three genders and was kicked out of Germany in 1933.
So the whole birth control thing, poison. That's all it is. Margaret Sanger, she is a demonic lady. And she can expect to this, the tiny hats, because the tiny hats funded that. The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers funded the Planned Parenthood and the birth control and all the clinics, if you didn't know.
It's quite a deep rabbit hole. That's why they started putting them all over the country, and then they've led to depopulation. It's crazy. And then Marxism, feminism, Rothschilds as well.
Speaker 1: Do you feel that birth control is essential to keep millions of people across the world from starving? Well, I think the birth control, where you keep the population more or less static until you pick up your resources, certainly you'll keep prevent their starving. But what's more important, birth control or picking up the resources? Well, picking up the resources, there's there's just a limit to that too.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Uranium glassware: run and hide big harma says . ☢️ I wonder why? https://t.co/pVuHwMmaHG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes uranium water bottles from the 1920s, explaining that you would pour water in and drink it the next day because the uranium would turn it into spring water and into sulfur, claiming “that’s radium and uranium is sulfur.” He then says he decided to test something with food. He put bananas in the uranium water bottle to see what would happen to food. He observed that the uranium water bottles preserve food for up to a month; bananas usually change quickly, but when placed in the bottle, the banana stayed yellow permanently for three weeks. He then left the experiment running, not touching it.
After six weeks, the banana developed only a pinch of mold on top and began turning black dots and other signs, but he ate the banana anyway. He says the banana became radioactive and “off the charts” on the Geiger counter, with energy levels described as cranked up. He then ponders what radiation is and notes that humans are radioactive beings, suggesting that perhaps we were meant to consume certain things to bring energy back, but governments have changed this narrative with a scare story.
He mentions a government story where a man drank radium water and allegedly his jaw fell off. He emphasizes that this is “no joke” and claims it was just one person, while thousands of others were reportedly doing it. He adds another claim about the imagery used in newspapers: the photo of the man whose jaw supposedly fell off was not him; it was a different person with a disabling disease, used to scare people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of these uranium water bottles. Okay? From the nineteen twenties. So you used to pour water in there and you would drink it the next day because the uranium would turn it into spring water and into sulfur. Because that's radium and uranium is sulfur.
So you would pour it in there and then you drink it. So what I did was I was like, you know what? I'm gonna take a test. I took bananas and I put them in there. Because I was like, you know what?
I'm gonna see what happens with food. And I noticed that the uranium water bottles preserve the food for up to a month later, you know, because bananas usually change pretty fast. You take off the little thing off the top and then they start oxidizing and whatever. And I put this banana in there. It stayed yellow, permanently yellow for three weeks.
And I'm like, okay. This is a pretty big deal. You know? So then I was like, I'm just gonna leave it. Like, I'm not even gonna touch it.
I'm just gonna keep letting them do it. So after six weeks, it took for that banana to even grow just a pinch of mold, like, on top. Just a pinch. And it started turning black dots and all this other stuff. But I decided to do because, you know, I've done a lot of crazy things.
I decided to eat the banana. So I cut it and whatever. Now it's radioactive. It's off the charts. The Geiger counter's off the charts, whatever.
I was just cranked up out of my mind that day of energy. And I started to think, you know, what happens? Like, you know, we're depleting this this radiation. What are we? Radiation.
Like, we are radioactive beings. So it's like, if you think about it, it's almost like we were meant to consume certain things to also bring that energy back. And they've changed all of that. Government scared everybody with this one story where this guy drank radium water and allegedly his jaw fell off. This is this is no joke, And what they it was one person, you know, just one, but all these other people are doing it.
Thousands and thousands of people are doing it. And I found out, this gets even better, the picture that they used for the guy whose jaw fell off isn't even the guy. It's they used a different picture of another person who had some debilitating disease and just put it in the newspaper so that they could scare people.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Henry ford 1921: and the tiny hat takeover 👇 https://rumble.com/v76st8a-fake-history-fake-jews-and-israels-war-matt-roeske.html https://t.co/ozjDr0xaWe
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker references a recent video about The International Jew by Henry Ford, published in 1921. The organizer asserts that Ford’s book argues the Bolsheviks seized control of nearly every aspect of society. The speaker notes that, according to the book, when Christopher Columbus came to the Americas in 1492, he was expelled from Europe and was part of the Bolsheviks, and that 300,000 more were sent with him, suggesting long-standing infiltration of the country. The speaker claims that during George Washington’s era there were 3,000 Bolsheviks in the United States, and within about thirty to forty years this number grew to 3,300,000. It is stated that Bolsheviks “own the tobacco industry, they own the steel, they own the newspapers, they own every industry you could possibly [own], the slave trade.” The speaker adds that there is a narrative in which white people are described as slaves or slave owners, and that it was the Jewish people who were the slave owners and were described as white people. The speaker concludes by saying the book blew their mind and emphasizes the perceived breadth of influence attributed to these claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Recent video about the book, The International Jew by Henry Ford. And this is one book that was written in 1921 because Henry Ford realized that everything was taken over by this this the Bolsheviks. And this book goes crazy into it because what I've started to realize is when Christopher Columbus came over here in 1492, he was actually expelled from Europe, and he was part of these Bolsheviks. And when they sent him over, they also sent over 300,000 more. So our country itself has been infiltrated for a long time.
During George Washington's time, there were 3,000 Bolsheviks in in this country at George Washington's time. And within about, I think he said, thirty to forty years, they had 3,300,000. They own the tobacco industry, they own the steel, they own the newspapers, they own every industry you could possibly the slave trade. You know, they always target people and they're like, oh, you know, the the the white people were the slaves or holding the slaves. It was the Jewish people who were the slave owners and they were descripted as white people.
So this it just this book blew my mind and
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Why’d they attack Iran? Eustace Mullins was right 👇 https://t.co/QtwYlDzJk3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Iran released a new cartoon featuring Trump, the devil, Epstein, and “the head of the tiny hats,” and they get mad because Iran exposed all of this the day before they were attacked. The speaker notes that the day before the attack, statues relating to Epstein and “nasty people in our society” were being burned, and claims that now others will be attacked because these people, described as “tiny hats,” are trying to blow up their country. The speaker mentions discussing this topic previously and asserts that the only reason they’re going in there is that there’s no Rothschilds Bank there. When asked what Iran looks like, the speaker says it looks like every other city to me, describing walking tours that show “regular people doing their thing.” The speaker asserts that every war ties back to the Federal Reserve, referencing Eustace Mullins and his work, and says Mullins’ book connects the dots. The transcript concludes by stating that this is an important book to read to be aware of what is taking place with every invasion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Iran released this new cartoon. See that Trump and the devil, Epstein, and the head of the tiny hats. And they get mad because Iran exposed all of this the day before they were attacked. My homeland is my life. And someone's gonna say, what do you mean they left that out?
Well, the day before they were attacked, they were burning the statues that relate to the pedophiles, Epstein, and all the nasty people in our society. So now they're going to attack everybody else because these people, tiny hats, are trying to blow up their country. And it's interesting because I was talking about this. The only reason they're going in there, there's no bank in there, the Rothschilds Bank. And someone might ask, well, what does Iran look like?
Well, looks like every other city to me. It's interesting. And I went through all these different walking tours, and I found the same thing. Looks like just regular people doing their thing. And since every war ties back to the Federal Reserve, Eustace Mullins cover that.
That's ran by the Rothschilds, and you've now kinda connecting the dots. This is important book to read so you are aware at what is taking place with every invasion.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Eye exam scam. Quite a funny world we live in. 🌞🌞 Book: Take off your glasses and see. https://cultivateelevate.com/ https://t.co/Jy5IglaK5x
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker rails against eye professionals, saying they laugh at natural remedies and then sell thicker glasses, never truly fixing eyes. They describe the typical eye exam as just checking whether the eyes have changed and deciding if a thicker prescription or insurance charges are needed, implying that insurance is a scam and that exams don’t improve vision. They argue that people go to eye professionals to be told what they already know about their eyes and vision, rather than to improve them. The speaker notes that instinctively people know they need to take care of their eyes and nourish their bodies, but claims professionals respond by recommending progressively weaker or thicker glasses (referred to as “Coke bottles”) and bifocals that aren’t helping.
In contrast to conventional care, the speaker promotes internal nutrition as a remedy, asserting that consuming a little pearl powder can benefit the eyes. They also mention topical uses, suggesting rubbing a little organic coconut oil or organic castor oil around the eyes before bed and then wiping it off before going to bed. The overarching message is that the eyes require 25% of the day’s nutrition, and if not fed, they will fall apart.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The eye professional begins to laugh at them when they're like, I'm taking pearl powder to help my eyes. And then they go and they look at their their eye results and it goes from negative three to negative two to negative one. This is what we live in. We live in a circus of nonsense where we have professionals who laugh at natural remedies but will sell you thicker and thicker glasses and never fix your eyes. I mean, of the average eye checkup or eye exam.
What are you doing? They're looking at your eyes to see if they've changed. That's it. They're like, oh, should we get you should we get a a thicker pair in there? Should we charge your insurance?
Which insurance is a scam. But should we charge your insurance? That's that's what you go to an eye exam for. They sit and put the little things over your eyes and then they pretend. So if you think about it, you're never actually going to an eye professional to improve your eyes.
You're just going back every single year for them to tell you the things you already know. Right? The things you already know. And that's why I say this because you instinctively know, I need to take care of my eyes. I need to feed them.
I need to take care of my body. I need to nourish myself. But in reality, you keep going to this person and they're like, well, Jan, I think your eyes are getting a little weaker. It's like, yeah, because you give me thicker glasses and I got bifocals on and I can't see anything. So it's like, yeah, like, you know, like, like, Coke bottles, you know, Coke bottles on your eyes or whatever, and it's like, yeah.
You can't see anything because those glasses are so thick. So it's so silly. But what you can do is you can take a little bit of pearl, just consuming it internally. We've also talked about topical uses using a little organic coconut oil or organic castor, rubbing a little bit around the eyes before bed and then wiping it off before you go to bed. But you're just feeding the eyes.
That's what you're supposed to do. And once again, like I said, our eyes require 25% of the nutrition for the day. So if you don't feed them, they fall apart.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
HPV? Made up illness like EBV to sell vaxxines. The HPV vax was linked to death like all the rest. Book: The poisoned needle by Eleanor Mcbean https://t.co/O6a5LWw0jX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Gardasil vaccine for HPV, asserting that after the age of 26, if Gardasil is administered, it causes death. They claim that studies were conducted to determine if a person had HPV, which they describe as fake, and that giving them the Gardasil vaccine after age 26 results in death. They state that this was done to scare young people into believing that the virus is widely spreading and that they need to get the vaccine before 26. The speaker recalls growing up with the belief that “everybody’s got HPV,” calling it all nonsense. They extend the claim to broadly dismiss viruses, saying that all viruses are nonsense and that the real aim is to promote poisons and sell poison, with nothing “jumping all over and gonna get you.” They attribute sickness to personal actions and describe it as detoxification, asserting that what you do to your own body causes illness and that the body’s process is a purge of toxins.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Somebody said they gave people the Gardasil vaccine for HPV. Yeah. The Gardasil vaccine, okay, after the age of 26, if it is administered, causes death. They did all these studies where they found out if a person had the HPV, which is fake, and they gave them the Gardasil vaccine after the age of 26, they die. So what they did was they scared people, like young people, into making them believe that this virus is jumping all over even though it's fake and that they need to get this vaccine before the age of 26.
They did that. When I was growing up, they were like, everybody's got HPV. Oh my gosh. Yeah. It's all nonsense.
All viruses are nonsense. All they wanna do is promote poisons and sell you poison. That's it. Nothing's jumping all over and gonna get you. It's what you do to your own body that causes anything, and sickness is just a detox.
Your body is trying to purge things from the body. That's it.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Old books give the truth: but the school system is owned by the tiny hats 🎩 https://t.co/eJbxGP1e8U
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that history gets deep when examining tiny hats and slavery, claiming this was left out of history books because “the history books” are owned by “tiny hats.” They state that those who owned slaves, were slave traders and auctioneers, also owned newspapers, and played a role in creating social division. They claim it becomes interesting to uncover the exploitation of slaves and the way people were treated, noting that those who defended slavery would be exposed as supporting it, and that slave dealing was “an extremely profitable business.” They connect these ideas back to the Rothschilds, saying this is a recurring topic they have discussed, and mention Malcolm X as another figure who talked about it, urging others to look into it.
Speaker 1 contends that a Black person is not antisemitic when he says that the man exploiting him in his community is white, because it is a white man who owns all the stores. They question whether it is an accident that the whites who own these stores are Jewish, and assert that if it is an accident, then the statement that “the Jew on the corner is exploiting me” is not antisemitic but merely a description of the man exploiting him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So things get really deep when you look into the tiny hats and slavery. Yes. This was left out of the history books because guess who owns the history books? Those tiny hats over here. And when we look at who owned all the slaves and were the slave traders and the auctioneers?
Tiny hats. And who owned the newspapers? Tiny hats. And then who also created the division? Oh, I think you're starting to understand it.
And then you also find about the exploitation of the slaves and how they treated people. Obviously, they're not gonna tell anybody this part. And then, yeah, it also gets interesting when you find out that the tiny hats were defending that they should stay slaves. Isn't that interesting? And people would say, no.
That would never happen, really. Slave dealing was an extremely profitable business. And this is where it always ties back to the Rothschilds, like I've always talked about. Even Malcolm x talked about this. People should look into this.
Speaker 1: And a Negro is not antisemitic when he says that the the man who's exploiting him in his community is white because it is a white man who owns all the stores. Now is it an accident that these whites who own these stores are Jewish? If it's an accident, then the fact that he says the Jew on the corner is exploiting me isn't an antisemitic statement. It's just more descriptive of the man who's exploiting him.
reSee.it AI Summary
Herpes is a non-contagious lack of collagen, like eczema, shingles, and other rashes. The body may detox toxins from the area. Solutions I suggest: Sunshine, raw butter, raw eggs, pearl powder, dragon's blood, raw meat with the fat, or chicken feet.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
What is herpes ? A non contagious lack of collagen. Same with eczema, shingles, and other rashes. Additionally, the body may be detoxing toxins from that area. Solutions: Sunshine, Raw butter, Raw Eggs, Pearl powder, Dragons blood, raw meat with the fat, or chicken feet. https://t.co/V0LlCgnd64
Video Transcript AI Summary
Matt explains herpes as a lack of collagen. “Herpes is just lack of collagen. It’s a frequency of lack of collagen.” He says when you are missing collagen in your body, you develop open wounds. He extends this to eczema and shingles, stating they are also “lack of collagen,” and that when two people are making friction, they may develop herpes if they don’t have enough collagen; it could also be winter and they haven’t had enough sun, causing their skin “to rip apart.” He notes that many people get herpes on the lips because “your lips are ripping apart. You have no collagen inside the body.” He summarizes that herpes is not contagious in the way it’s often described.
Regarding what to do for collagen, he lists several items: “pearl powder,” dragon’s blood, raw cream, and raw butter. He emphasizes bringing fats into the body, saying, “you need fats. That’s it. And if you don’t have fat, your skin rips apart.” He reiterates that eczema is really just skin ripping apart, or from another angle, the body purging toxins and selecting that area to purge those toxins. When someone asks about raw meat, he confirms it as well, stating, “Yes, of course. You can do raw meat with the fat on there. Very good too as well.”
In summary, Matt posits that herpes, eczema, and shingles all stem from a deficiency of collagen, leading to skin that rips and open wounds. He ties recurrences to friction, sun exposure, and lack of collagen, particularly on the lips. For remedies, he advocates increasing collagen-supporting inputs through substances like pearl powder, dragon’s blood, raw cream, raw butter, and dietary fats, including raw meat with fat. He characterizes eczema as skin ripping or toxin purging, depending on the perspective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Matt, can you explain herpes? Yeah. Herpes is just lack of collagen. It's a frequency of lack of collagen. When you are missing collagen in your body, you develop open wounds.
Eczema is also lack of collagen. Shingles is lack of collagen. You're just missing the collagen in your body so you develop open wounds. When two people are making friction, right, they start to make friction and they don't have enough collagen, they could develop the herpes which is really just lack of collagen. Or it could be winter time and they haven't had enough sun and their skin begins to rip apart.
That's why a lot of people get them on the lips. They always talk about, oh, I got it on the lips. Yeah. Your lips are ripping apart. You have no collagen inside the body.
So that's what it really comes down to. Herpes is not jumping all over. You know, people aren't getting anything contagious fake. And people are asking what can you do for collagen. You can do things like pearl powder.
You can do things like dragon's blood. You can do things like raw cream. You can do things like raw butter. You can those are the things you need to bring into your body. You need fats.
That's it. And if you don't have fat, your skin rips apart, and that's what eczema really is. You know, it's really just your skin ripping apart. Or if we flip it another angle, it's just your body purging toxins and that's the area that it decided to purge those toxins. And someone said raw meat too?
Yes, of course. You can do raw meat with the with the fat on there. Very good too as well. But yeah, that's all herpes is.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Chernobyl? Giant steam explosion nothing nuclear. But fear sells more windmills... https://t.co/7Xr62F9UGe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims that Chernobyl was fake and that it was a steam power plant, describing it as “steam energy” and saying the nuclear or nuclear, whatever, is fake. He asserts that all of this is just steam energy and that Galen Windsor “basically explain[ed] about how they’re just giant steam plants,” and asks how dangerous a nuclear reactor plant is.
Speaker 1 responds by saying a nuclear reactor plant is “just a way to boil water” and calls it “the cleanest, neatest, most economical way to boil water that you’ve ever seen.”
Speaker 0 continues, claiming he has held uranium in his hand and radium in his hand, and that he literally holds stones while he works out, insisting it’s all giant steam plants. He states that when a steam plant explodes, it can explode “just kinda like if you think of trains and and cars back in the day,” and reiterates that there is no radiation. He asserts that there is no radioactive anything and that “you are a radioactive being,” explaining that your heart beating is radiation, and asks where the beating of the heart comes from, implying it is radiation. He concludes with a reiterated association of Chernobyl to this viewpoint.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Explain 1986 if Chernobyl was fake nukes. Yeah. That's so simple. Chernobyl was a steam power plant. That's what all the of the nuclear or nuclear, whatever, the goofy word because it's fake.
But anyways, that is all just steam energy. That's all it is. And Galen Windsor just debunked all of this, basically explaining about how they're just giant steam plants. And how dangerous is a nuclear reactor plant?
Speaker 1: A nuclear reactor plant is just a way to boil water that's the cleanest, neatest, most economical way to boil water that you've ever seen.
Speaker 0: That's why you always see steam just coming out of them. And I have myself have held uranium in my hand and radium in my hand. I actually have stones that I literally hold while I work out. So basically, it's just giant steam plants. And when a steam plant explodes, it can cause an explosion just kinda like if you think of trains and and cars back in the day, same exact thing.
That's it. There's no radiation. There's no radioactive, any of that. You are a radioactive being. You are a radioactive being in which your heart beats as we speak.
Where do you think your heart comes from the beating? That's radiation right there. So that's Chernobyl.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Former US Marine Sgt Brian McGinnis says “No one wants to fight for Isra3l!” Henry ford said the same thing in 1921. The US has been taken over since the beginning. Guess who came here in 1492. The tiny hats - hang all those politicians in on it 📕 https://t.co/RdLR3Y4eNE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker invokes Henry Ford’s 1921 book as a source and then launches into a sweeping conspiracy alleging that “tiny hats” (a pejorative term for Jews) have controlled civilization for centuries. The key points asserted are:
- In 1492, Christopher Columbus was expelled from Spain and allegedly brought over 300,000 tiny hats; New York is described as the center of the tiny hats.
- George Washington is claimed to have had 4,000 tiny hats; these individuals were “the traders” who controlled all trade.
- Within fifty years, the tiny hat population supposedly grew to 3,300,000.
- The tiny hats allegedly owned every major sector: grains, cotton, oil, steel, magazines, theaters, liquors, loan businesses, and every industry; their philosophy is said to be “not to make money, but to get money. Take your money.”
- The schools are claimed to be owned by “the communist Bolsheviks,” and those who are not tiny hats are labeled as “gentiles.”
- The reference to “the fifth protocol” is included in connection with their alleged plans.
- Regarding Palestine, the claim is that the issue exists because “the Palestinians don’t have a tiny hat bank.”
- Presidents allegedly kiss the wall, and Ford supposedly knew all of this by 1921.
- The tiny hats are said to own the media and to create all social divisions.
- Attacks on Christianity and removing religious elements from schools are attributed to them, as are various vices said to be introduced by them.
- Questioning the narrative allegedly results in being labeled “anti tiny hat.”
- The claim is pressed that “where do think all the slaves came from?”—attributed to the tiny hats; they supposedly changed their names so people wouldn’t know.
- The ADL is described as protecting all of this, and anyone who goes against it is said to be arrested “just like that veteran.”
- The speaker concludes with the assertion that “No one wants to fight for Israel.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No one wants to fight for Israel. Let me read you something from Henry Ford in 1921. So this is the book written in 1921 by Henry Ford. You can look into this. It is a deep dive.
So check this, in 1492 when Christopher Columbus was expelled from Spain he brought over 300,000 tiny hats and then we find out New York is the center of the tiny hats. Oh, it gets deeper when George Washington was here, 4,000 tiny hats. They were all the traders. They controlled all the trade. In fifty years, the tiny hat population increased to 3,300,000.
They owned the grains, the cotton, the oil, the steel, the magazines, the theaters, the liquors, the loan businesses, and every industry. The American businesses, that's what they were disguised as. The philosophy of the tiny hats is not to make money, but to get money. Take your money. And someone goes, well, I didn't learn any of this in school.
Yeah. Because guess who owns the schools? The communist Bolsheviks. And they refer to the people who are not the tiny hats as gentiles, and we will wear them out and take over their government, the fifth protocol. Now about that whole thing with Palestine.
Yeah. That's because the Palestinians don't have a tiny hat bank. And then what about all the presidents who are out kissing the wall? Yep. Henry Ford knew 1921.
They were owned by the tiny hats. And then who creates all the division with the people? Tiny hats with the media. Then you get into the attacks on Christianity and taking all of the things related to religion out of schools. Then you get into all the vices that people have.
Guess who brought all that in? So when you question the narrative, they label you as an anti tiny hat. And we'll hit on one last one. Where do think all the slaves came from? See right here?
Tiny hats. And then they changed their names so that people didn't know. Isn't it wild when you start to dig into history? Then you get into the ADL, which is protecting all of this. Anybody who goes against it, they arrest just like that veteran.
No one wants to fight for Israel.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Henry Ford 1921 and the tiny hats : Everything goes back to 1492. What was left out of the rockefeller history books. https://t.co/yYNTi7JLzJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker references Henry Ford’s 1921 book as a deep dive and presents a series of conspiratorial claims about “tiny hats.” They state that in 1492, Christopher Columbus brought over 300,000 tiny hats to Spain and that New York became the center of the tiny hat population. They claim that when George Washington was here, 4,000 tiny hats were traders who controlled all trade, and that within fifty years the tiny hat population grew to 3,300,000, owning grains, cotton, oil, steel, magazines, theaters, liquors, loan businesses, and every industry in American business, though disguised as legitimate business.
The philosophy ascribed to the tiny hats is “not to make money, but to get money” and “Take your money.” The speaker asserts that schools are owned by “the communist Bolsheviks,” and that people who are not tiny hats are called “gentiles,” with the aim to wear them out and take over their government, invoking “the fifth protocol.” On Palestine, the speaker claims the issue exists because Palestinians “don’t have a tiny hat bank.”
The claim is made that presidents have interacted with “the wall” in the context of tiny hats, and that Henry Ford knew in 1921 that they were owned by tiny hats. They allege that tiny hats create division through the media, and that there have been attacks on Christianity and the removal of religion from schools. They accuse tiny hats of introducing various vices into society. They assert that questioning the narrative labels you as “anti tiny hat.”
The speaker asks where all the slaves came from, answering “Tiny hats,” and claims they changed their names to conceal this. They describe a broader historical dig into these forces, mentioning the ADL as protecting all of this and stating that anyone who goes against it is arrested, giving the example of “that veteran.” The overall narrative ends with a claim that no one wants to fight for Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is the book written in 1921 by Henry Ford. You can look into this. It is a deep dive. So check this. In 1492, when Christopher Columbus was expelled from Spain, he brought over 300,000 tiny hats.
And then we find out New York is the center of the tiny hats. Oh, it gets deeper when George Washington was here, 4,000 tiny hats, they were all the traders, controlled all the trade. In fifty years, the tiny hat population increased to 3,300,000. They own the grains, the cotton, the oil, the steel, the magazines, the theaters, the liquors, the loan businesses in every industry. The American businesses, that's what they were disguised as.
The philosophy of the tiny hats is not to make money, but to get money. Take your money. And someone goes, well, I didn't learn any of this in school. Yeah. Because guess who owns the schools?
The communist Bolsheviks. And they refer to the people who are not the tiny hats as gentiles, and we will wear them out and take over their government, the fifth protocol. Now about that whole thing with Palestine. Yeah. That's because the Palestinians don't have a tiny hat bank.
And then what about all the presidents who are out kissing the wall? Yep. Henry Ford knew 1921. They were owned by the tiny hats. And then who creates all the division with the people?
Tiny hats with the media. Then you get into the attacks on Christianity and taking all of the things related to religion out of schools. Then you get into all the vices that people have. Guess who brought all that in? So when you question the narrative, they label you as an anti tiny hat.
And we'll hit on one last one. Where do think all the slaves came from? See right here? Tiny hats. And then they changed their names so that people didn't know.
Isn't it wild when you start to dig into history? Then you get into the ADL, which is protecting all of this. Anybody who goes against it, they arrest just like that veteran. No one wants to fight for Israel.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Nukes are fake, the atom model came from a dream, and nuclear power is a steam plant. ☢️ We live in the wizard of OZ and the land of make believe. Book: Death Object the nuclear hoax by Akio Nakatani and the work of Galen Winsor https://t.co/Pd2aYjPy1S
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that without their current actions, a nuclear war would have occurred.
Speaker 1 asserts that nukes are fake and that there are no nukes. They claim they have covered this many times. If nukes were real, they would have been used a long time ago. Instead, the behavior resembles firebombing: they firebomb places like Iran, dropping about 1,000 bombs, mirroring the World War II devastation of Tokyo, where on the night of March 9 Americans dropped 1,700 tons of incendiary bombs, destroying about 16 square miles. They compare this to Gaza, suggesting a similar destruction pattern.
Speaker 1 continues: what they do is they place 1,000,000 pounds of TNT in the desert, explode it, and display a mushroom cloud as if it were a nuclear explosion, then claim it as a nuke. They advise putting on “glasses” like DuPont eclipse glasses because the explosion will be big, then finish with the claim that there are no nukes.
They state, “There’s no nukes,” and contend that the alleged nuclear threat is used to justify invasions—“we’re gonna nuke them.” They question what they would nuke them with, arguing it would be with “invisible nukes,” implying a deception if nuclear capabilities were real. They argue that, if nuclear capability existed, it would have already been used to level an entire country in one second.
Speaker 1 uses a Wizard of Oz analogy: we live in the Wizard of Oz, with a man hiding behind something who is not what he pretends to be; in reality, none of that is true. The same applies to germs, bioweapons, and lab leaks, which they claim are all nonsense and fear-based.
Overall, Speaker 1 asserts that nukes do not exist, that the public is misled by demonstrations intended to simulate nuclear explosions, and that fears about germs and bioweapons are likewise unfounded. The dialogue emphasizes that claims of nuclear capability and bioweapons are deceptive fears used to justify actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But if we didn't do what we're doing right now, you would have had a nuclear war and they would have
Speaker 1: They don't have nukes. Nukes are fake. I've covered that many times. There's no nukes. If nukes were real, they would have used them a long time ago.
All they did was they firebomb places like they're doing to Iran right now, and they just dropped, like, 1,000 bombs on their place just like they did in Japan. On the night of the March 9, the Americans dropped 1,700 tons of incendiary bombs. Some 16 square miles of Tokyo were destroyed. And they just level it. Kinda like Gaza.
That's kinda what they did too. There's no nukes. What they do is they take 1,000,000 pounds of TNT. They put it out into the middle of the desert. They explode it.
They show a mushroom cloud because it's an explosion, and then they say that was the nuke. And they say put on your glasses just like those DuPont eclipse glasses. Put on your glasses because that explosion is gonna be pretty big. That's it. There's no nukes.
I hate to say it. There's no nukes, and all they do is they pull that whole thing. Every time they wanna invade a country, they're like, we got we're we're gonna nuke them. With what? With your invisible nukes.
Otherwise, they would've did it already. Think about it. It would've been used. If you could just level an entire country in one second, you they would do it. The thing is is what we live in is like the Wizard of Oz.
Okay? We live in the Wizard of Oz. And in the Wizard of Oz, you have this man hiding behind this thing, pretending to be this thing that he's allegedly is. But in reality, they're not any of that. They have no access to any of that.
Same with germs and bioweapons and lab leaks. That's all nonsense. There's no germs or viruses or anything that are jumping all over to come get you. There's no bioweapons and lab leaks in any of that. It's fear.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Atoms are make believe like viruses and moon landings 💪 https://t.co/OEAqOuz5jf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they make many videos claiming atoms and nukes are fake, and that no one has seen an atom. They point to a book about the physicists who discovered the atom, stating they had a dream and then made the model of the atom. The speaker asserts that they never saw an atom, yet they created the model, implying the whole idea comes from a dream rather than real life. They claim people should be aware that “they lied to you about atoms.” They extend the claim to viruses and the moon landing, saying they lied about those as well, and recommend looking into the book mentioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I do a lot of videos on how atoms are fake. Same with nukes. They never split an atom because they've never seen an atom. Now check this out. In this book, it talks about the physicists who discovered the atom, had a dream, and then made the model of the atom.
They never saw an atom, but they made the model, and that's where it all comes from, a dream. Nothing in real life, so people are aware. So it's important to realize that they lied to you about atoms. They lied to you about viruses. They lied to you about the moon landing, and here's a book to look into.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Iran war? Rothschilds aka tiny hats start all the wars for their banking agenda. Eustace mullin has some great resources on the topic. 🌞️️️️️️ https://t.co/Y5snQX9fOY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript argues that the primary reason the United States would invade countries like Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan is because those countries do not have a Rothschild banking presence. It claims that “if they don’t have their banks, the Rothschilds don’t have their banks in the country, then they go in it,” and that these invasions are about establishing a banking system rather than helping the local population. The speaker asserts that the stated rationale is “democracy and saving them and all these other things,” but contends the real motive is banking control. The speaker extends this logic to a broader pattern, stating that the government’s refrain of “we are the government, and we’re here to save you” is a cue to run, and cites Reagan as having said that quote.
The argument continues by urging people to be aware of the banking system as the core driver of foreign interventions. It credits Eustace Mullins with explaining and putting this perspective into focus, claiming Mullins described how invasions are carried out to install a banking system in those countries. The speaker then shifts to a geopolitical critique, arguing that current actions are contributing to World War III.
Additionally, the transcript references Albert Pike, describing him as a “demonic freemason” who allegedly predicted all of the wars. It is claimed that Pike predicted a third world war where people would fight against each other, and that in the end “the tiny hats” would win, implying a conclusion about Jewish influence or control.
Overall, the main points assert that:
- Invasions of certain countries occur to install banking systems, not to promote democracy or save people.
- The supposed recurring line “we are the government, and we’re here to save you” signals a manipulative motive, with Reagan cited as having said it.
- Eustace Mullins is credited with explaining this banking-focused perspective on interventions.
- The actions are framed as contributing to World War III.
- Albert Pike is invoked as having predicted wars, with the claimed outcome that “the tiny hats” win.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The only reason they're going in Iran is because they don't have a Rothschild bank in there. That's it. That that's all it comes down to. If they don't have their banks, the Rothschilds don't have their banks in the country, then they go in it, And they invade it for democracy and saving them and all these other things. Same with Venezuela, same with Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, you know, all the countries they went into.
If they go in there, it's just because they don't have a banking system. That's it. It has nothing to do with helping those people and saying, oh, we're here to help you. The biggest quote you ever hear is we are the government, and we're here to save you. And Reagan actually said that.
So think about that. If the government says I'm coming to save you, you better run. Like, that's it. Or you better, you know, second amendment because that's kinda what that's there for. So people need to be really aware of this.
Like, it really comes down to the banking system, and Eustace Mullins explained all of that. Eustace Mullins put it all into perspective. They go into these places to put a banking system in there. And right now, they're starting to cause World War three. If you look at Albert Pike, Albert Pike was this demonic freemason who predicted all of the wars.
And since he predicted all of the wars because he already knew the third war comes where you have the, the the the people fighting against each other, and then who wins in the end? Well, the tiny hats because that's what it always comes down to.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Fact check LOL: Pearl powder healing moles. Comment "pearl" and tag/share 5 friends for your chance to win a big pearl for the eclipse. Good luck. https://cultivateelevate.com/freshwater-pearl-powder-200grams/ https://t.co/jTfxPINqCI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker announces a happy eclipse and a giveaway for pearl powder, noting they were fact-checked and shown that Cultivate Elevate makes unverified claims about moles being rubbed off with pearl powder. Viewers are instructed to comment the word “pearl” and share the video with five friends for a chance to win a big bag of Pearl.
The speaker references a video about them that discusses the lack of evidence that natural substances can remove moles, which are described as a buildup of toxins. They read testimonials from individuals claiming success with pearl powder. One person named Andrea says a raised mole on her chest was bothersome; doctors confirmed it was not a concern, but after applying pearl powder with a little castor oil, it dried up at the base and came off. The speaker highlights this as a positive solution.
Another claim cited is that pearl powder is loved for many uses around the house, and that someone used castor oil to get rid of a mole. The speaker notes being six days into the combination and seeing it almost completely gone, and mentions using pearl powder orally and as toothpaste.
The speaker questions professionals, suggesting they lie and that dermatologists don’t tell you these remedies because they charge insurance. They present another testimonial about removing moles with dragon's blood and castor oil, implying a similar outcome. A third testimonial mentions dragon’s blood and castor oil achieving mole removal. The speaker repeats the giveaway call to action: comment “Pearl” and share with five friends for a chance to win the big bag of Pearl.
Towards the end, the speaker comments on the video’s framing, noting it ends by calling Pearl a trendy product. They claim Pearl dates back about four thousand years. They add a provocative assertion that professionals work for the Rockefellers and speculate on motives to “sell you poisons.” The overall message centers on promoting pearl powder as a remedy for moles, supported by personal testimonials, while contrasting this with alleged professional concealment and industry motives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we say happy eclipse and we're gonna do a giveaway for it about pearl powder. And it's interesting I got fact checked. Look at this. Cultivate Elevate makes unverified claims about moles can be rubbed off with pearl powder. So what I want you to do is I want you to comment the word pearl and share this with five friends for your chance to win.
Now, what's funny is they even made a video about me, and they talk about how there's no evidence that any of these natural things can get rid of moles, which are a buildup of toxins. Let me read you this from Andrea. I've had a raised mole on my chest for years. The docs confirmed it was not a concern, but I always thought it was bothersome. I've been applying pearl powder with a little bit of castor oil and literally dried up at the base and came off.
That's a positive solution. How about this one? We love our pearl powder on our house. Great for so many uses. Most recently, I used castor oil to get rid of a mole.
I'm only six days into the combo, it's almost completely gone. I also use it orally, and I've been using it as toothpaste. Isn't it interesting how the, professionals lie? And it's funny too because we've even had people get rid of moles with dragon's blood and castor oil as well too. Isn't it funny how the dermatologists don't wanna tell you this?
Because they charge your insurance. And here's just another one with dragon's blood and castor oil getting rid of moles. So on that note, comment Pearl, share this with five friends for your chance to win. Big bag of Pearl, baby. And it was funny because at the end of the video, they just said it's a trendy product.
It's funny. Pearl dates back about four thousand years, and it's interesting. These professionals work for the Rockefellers. What do they wanna do? Sell you poisons.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Quite a deep dive on the control of every nation except Iran and N Korea. The only 2 without a “private central bank” 💰💰 https://t.co/4cDXgH9WxB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses books and hidden perspectives on economic power. He says the Federal Reserve runs the economy, noting they “increase the interest rates and tank the economy whenever they feel like.” He links Social Security, income tax, and Karl Marx, suggesting origins of Social Security. He questions why all parties are taking over in complete control of policy based on the Federal Reserve, calling attention to a “great one” about the sudden death of 1928 leading to the Great Depression by bankers, president of Banker Trust.
He lists prominent banking families and firms—Rothschilds, Lazards, Loebs, Warburgs, Lehmans, Goldman Sachs, Rockefeller family—and includes a check of JP Morgan, stating that all books like this came out and were burned. He asks, “Why is your country at war?” and claims Woodrow Wilson ordered government agents to seize and destroy the printing plates and copies of this book in 1918.
He mentions “the price of gold is set by the Rothschilds” and refers to “their plan of action” with “10 steps to destabilize economies and create … a new world order under one government.” He recalls Germany and the arrest of the Rothschilds, then references the Bolshevik revolution, claiming it was “orchestrated by bankers,” naming a specific banker, and continues to discuss who has stock in the Federal Reserve by listing names. He notes that many of these are connected to the Rothschilds and the Bank of England.
Overall, the speaker asserts that a network of prominent banking families controls the Federal Reserve and global policy, alleges historical manipulation of economic events (including the 1928 crash and the Bolshevik revolution), and points to a coordinated plan involving well-known financial dynasties to destabilize economies and establish a new world order under a single government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I really like to read books because they tell you a different side. They tell you something that, yeah, maybe you weren't told about. But it's interesting when you get into the Federal Reserve, you realize that the Federal Reserve runs the economy. They increase the interest rates and tank the economy whenever they feel like. Then we get into Social Security income tax and good old Karl Marx.
That's where Social Security came from. Then someone's like, what do you mean all the parties are taking over in complete control of the policy based on the Federal Reserve? Look at that. This is a great one too. The sudden death of 1928 leads to the Great Depression by bankers, president of Banker Trust.
People might ask, well, who runs it all? The Rothschilds, the Lazards, the Loebes, Warburgs, Lehmans, Goldman Sachs, Rockefeller family, and check that JP Morgan. All books like this came out and they burned them. Why is your country at war? Woodrow Wilson ordered government agents to seize and to destroy the printing plates and copies of this book in the 1918.
Wonder why that is? And you got this fun one, the price of gold is set by the Rothschilds. We go to the Rothschilds and their plan of action. These are 10 steps to destabilize economies and create, interesting, a new world order under one government. Remember in Germany when they arrested the Rothschilds?
You get into the Bolshevik revolution. Remember that whole thing? Orchestrated by bankers, this banker specifically, and And then we go to who has stock in the Federal Reserve. Look at the names. You might know a couple of them.
There's a couple more, and they're all connected to the Rothschilds and the Bank of England.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Best ways to detox heavy metals: 🌞🌞 Shilajit, Dragons blood, Turpentine, Baking Soda, Borax, Organic Raw cream, Raw meat, Moldy berries, Ginger, Horseradish, Cilantro, Raw honey, and Garlic. https://cultivateelevate.com/ https://t.co/eNl5zn8Zzr
Video Transcript AI Summary
We discussed various approaches to detox heavy metals. The speaker says shilajit is loaded with fulvic acid, which will help pull metals out and cleanse out the body, and it can be taken with a source of fat. Dragon's blood is claimed to clean up your blood so that you can clean out your blood because your blood is all thick and polluted with chemicals and toxicity. Turpentine, described as coming from pine trees and basically taking pine sap, will cleanse out the gut lining, cleanse out the metals, and clean out the body. Baking soda and borax are described as salt to help cleanse out all the heavy metals and pull things out of the body. Then the speaker mentions moldy berries, stating that mold eats metals, so consuming a small portion of mold, organic mold from organic berries or strawberries, will cause that mold to pull out the heavy metals from the gut lining.
Raw cream is then discussed; the work of Agianus in the book We Want to Live is cited, claiming raw cream is a detox because the fat is very crucial. The speaker asserts that to pull heavy metals out of the body, fat is needed to pull things out, noting that many toxins store in fat, making raw cream potentially beneficial for detox. Raw meat is also mentioned as beneficial; the speaker references Tartaria and the Tartars and various cultures who reportedly ate raw meat, arguing that cooking meat introduces metals from the cooking process, and heating releases metals into the food, so eating raw meat can be beneficial.
Other detox methods listed include cilantro, celery juice, horseradish, ginger, garlic, and raw honey, with the assertion that there are many ways to detox heavy metals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We said what's the best way to detox heavy metals? Shilja is loaded with fulvic acid, so it will help pull metals out and cleanse out the body. You can take it with a source of fat. Dragon's blood will clean up your blood so that you can clean out your blood because your blood is all thick and polluted with chemicals and toxicity. Turpentine, which comes from the pine trees.
You're basically taking pine sap. That will cleanse out the gut lining, cleanse out the metals, and clean out the body. Then you have baking soda and borax, which is salt to help cleanse out all the heavy metals and pull things out of the body. Then you move into moldy berries. Mold eats metals.
You can look this up. Mold eats metals. So if the person consumes a small portion of mold, organic mold from organic berries or strawberries, then that mold will actually pull out the heavy metals from their gut lining. Then you could get into raw cream. If you look into the work of Agianus in the book, we want to live, he talks about raw cream is a detox because the fat fat is very crucial.
If you're trying to pull heavy metals out of your body, you need fat because you need the fat to pull things out of you. And this is why like a lot of the toxins store in the fat. So raw cream can be a very beneficial for that. And then I've talked about raw meat as well too because when you look into Tartaria and the Tartars and all the different races and cultures who were eating raw meat, they were eating raw meat because when you're cooking your meat, what you're doing is you're inducing it with metals from when you're cooking it. And if that meat has any metals, when you heat it up, it releases it into the food and then you eat the metal.
So raw meat can actually be very beneficial. But those are all great ways to just detox heavy metals. You know, you can go into cilantro too, celery juice, horseradish, ginger, garlic, raw honey. I mean, there are many ways to detox heavy metals.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Shilajit doesn't fix anyone? Quite a statement... let's talk about it https://cultivateelevate.com/shilajit/ https://t.co/0pQUUa2k0s
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a video in which someone claims Shilajit is a scam and that it never fixed anybody. The speaker notes that the same person previously warned that eggs would harm them. Despite that, the speaker presents several anecdotes about Shilajit tablets and their effects.
Two weeks after starting Shilajit, the speaker says they stopped all their pain, pointing to visible “right there” pills and describing their mind as clear and the condition subsiding, calling it a “Miracle.” They cite another claim: after beginning Shilajit during menopause, they started feeling better and feel like they’re in their thirties. The speaker also mentions their son, who was anemic with kidney stones, and says that after trying Shilajit, his levels have “now balanced out.”
The speaker notes goats and other animals eating Shilajit and “they're feeling great.” They address hair loss as a big concern, stating that after taking Shilajit religiously for three weeks, hair shedding stopped and clumps of hair stopped falling out. They reference studies on Shilajit that indicate it pulls heavy metals out of the body, suggesting this could explain some of the criticisms or “attacks” on it.
Finally, the speaker responds to a question about how they feel on the new Shilajit they rolled out, saying they feel “kinda good” and “Pretty darn good,” and wishes the listener a great day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So a lot of people have been sending me this video. This guy is saying Shilajit is a scam. You've got Shilajit never fixed anybody. It doesn't. Never fixed anybody.
He's the same guy who told me eggs are gonna take me out. Think about that. So he said it didn't fix anybody. Right? Shilajot tablets.
Two weeks after starting Shilajot, I stopped all my pain. See those right there? Big hormone pills? And feel better. My mind is clear, and the condition is subsiding.
Miracle. How about this one? Had menopause, started taking Shilajat, started feeling better. Feel like I'm in my thirties. My son was anemic with kidney stones, looking anemic.
I asked him to try the Shilajat. His levels have now balanced out. Interesting, And it's funny too because we even got goats and animals eating shiloh jean and they're feeling great. Anytime someone tells you something, you might wanna look into it. How about hair loss?
That's a big one because all the Wi Fi, right? My hair randomly began shedding like never before. I was losing clumps of it. Took Shiloh Jat religiously for three weeks into it taking daily. My hair has completely stopped falling out.
And it's wild too because when you look at the studies for Jot and you see that it pulls heavy metals out of the body, you know, things like boosters and all that, kinda could see why it gets attacked. And someone was asking me, Matt, how do you feel on the new Shiloh Jot that you just rolled out? Well, I mean, you know, kinda good. Right? Kinda good.
Pretty darn good. That's for sure. Have a great day.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Galen winsor debunks nuclear fear nonsense. He used to swim in the reactors. Radiation is every living thing, but hey buy a windmill 🥜 https://t.co/itGDryUzkY
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Can a nuclear plant explode? It could experience a steam explosion like any other steam plant (e.g., a coal-fired plant in Laughlin, Nevada where six men were killed last year), but there is no possibility of an atomic explosion: “as far as an atomic explosion, good heavens no. No way.”
- How dangerous is a nuclear reactor plant? A nuclear reactor plant is “just a way to boil water” and is described as “the cleanest, neatest, most economical way to boil water that you’ve ever seen.”
- Insurance perspective: nuclear reactors ought to be insured under the same policy as any other steam boiler plant or power generating plant.
- Price Anderson Act: having special consideration under the Price Anderson Act means that “the insurance industry has already paid off the Congress.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can a nuclear plant explode? Only like any other steam plant like Laughlin, Nevada had a steam explosion, it's coal fired plant but six men were killed there last year. That could happen at a nuclear plant, but as far as an atomic explosion, good heavens no. No way. Then how dangerous is a nuclear reactor plant?
A nuclear reactor plant is just a way to boil water that's the cleanest, neatest, most economical way to boil water that you've ever seen, and so in my estimation, nuclear reactors ought to be insured under the same insurance policy as any other steam boiler plant, power generating plant. And to have special consideration under the Price Anderson Act means that the insurance industry has already paid off the Congress
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Apricot seeds vs cancer. Same as the original almond, cherry seeds, apple seeds, and plum seeds. Never forget: Kemo aka torture grants the doc a 6% commision check. Book: World without Cancer story of b17 by G Edward Griffin https://t.co/qNZK7IsMvC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes almonds being changed in America from bitter to sweet to remove B17, which is contained in bitter seeds. They say bitter seeds like apricot seeds, cherry seeds, and apple seeds contain B17, and claim the original almonds used to be bitter but were replaced with sweet almonds so people don’t get B17 anymore.
Speaker 1 says they posted a video about The World Without Cancer, The Story of B17, which discusses apricot seeds, and notes that people commented that cyanide will get them. They question who told people about cyanide, saying it was the FDA, the same people who want to vaccinate. They then mention the Hunzas eat 100 to 200 apricot seeds a day and that their diet is mostly apricot seeds. They argue that discussions about illness and danger from nature are a way to scare people away from nature.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is another rabbit hole. The almonds are now sweet almonds. They have changed the almonds in America to get rid of all the bitter almonds. You ever eaten a a an apple and you go to eat the seed and it almost tastes like a cherry? That's the bitter in there.
That bitter contains b 17. There's a book called The World Without Cancer, The Story of b 17, and it talks about all the bitters are the ones that heal the body from that illness right there. And apricot seeds, you got cherry seeds, you got apple seeds, and then you have the original old almonds which used to be bitter, but the government switched all those out to be the sweet almonds. So now people don't get that b seventeen anymore because they get that sweet almond.
Speaker 1: So I posted a video about the world without cancer, the story of b seventeen, which is apricot seeds, and everybody started commenting, the cyanide is gonna get me. Really? Who told you about cyanide? The FDA, actually. Same people who wanna vaccinate you.
Now here's another thing. The Hunsas, they eat a 100 to 200 apricot seeds a day. Their diet is mostly apricot seeds. So when they talk about this illness right here that allegedly is going to get you, they scare you into being afraid of nature. Think about it.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Nukes are fake ☢️ and nuclear energy is steam. That’s all https://t.co/1ePnvPM4aw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the concept of nuclear weapons is a fabrication. They claim “nukes are fake” and that what people saw on television was manufactured by Hollywood. The speaker asserts that when nukes were allegedly exploding, buildings remained standing and trees stayed perfectly still, implying that nuclear blasts did not occur. They present a photo-like zoomed-in claim to illustrate that “buildings were still perfectly standing” and proceed to assert that Japan was firebombed with napalm and mustard gas instead of nukes.
According to the speaker, nukes are used as a pretext to invade different countries and then impose a banking system there. They state that the focus on nuclear weapons as instruments of mass destruction is part of a broader manipulation. The speaker links this to the idea of invading seven countries after events like 9/11, with the aim of introducing a particular banking influence, then reiterates that “that’s the nukes. No such thing.”
The speaker describes a method by which such theatrics might be carried out: staging TNT demonstrations to frighten the public into believing in nuclear weapons. They challenge viewers to search for an image of an atom on Google, claiming that there is no actual photo of an atom, and suggesting that the absence of a photo allows for the creation of drawings of mushroom clouds and the use of Hollywood to scare people into compliance. This, they say, demonstrates a pattern of deception and manipulation, portraying the situation as a “rabbit hole” and a widespread culture of make-believe.
The speaker references a specific book, Death Object, by Akio, as a notable example of the type of content they’re discussing. They emphasize that the described dynamics involve extensive fabrication and shifting narratives, labeling much of what is seen as “make believe” in modern discourse. The overall message is a skeptical, conspiratorial view that discards the reality of nuclear weaponry in favor of a narrative that emphasizes staged demonstrations, manipulation by media and elite interests, and systemic deception.
In closing, the speaker characterizes the situation as a “whole bunch of make believe,” urging readers or listeners to recognize and question the supposedly orchestrated depictions of nuclear threats and related geopolitical actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Object exploding the fake nukes. That's this book. Okay? Because nukes are fake. You didn't know that all that stuff you saw on television was all made by Holly Weird?
That's what it is. All fake nukes. And let me just show you a little picture right here. The nukes were were so fake that what happened was was when nukes were going off, buildings were still standing. That's what it is.
See that right there? Let me just zoom right in there. Buildings were still perfectly standing and all the trees were all perfectly still there because what they did was they firebombed Japan. That's what it was. Japan was firebombed with napalm and mustard gas.
That's what they did. There were no nukes. Nukes is just so that they can invade different countries and then bring their banking system into that country. That's what the nuke is. You know, they're always talking about those weapons of mass destruction.
Remember that? 09/11, we gotta invade those seven countries and then bring our bank into there. Yeah. That's that's the nukes. No such thing.
I got one more for you guys. So here's how they would do it. They would stage TNT right there. Big TMT demonstrations to scare the people into believing in nukes. It's funny because when you look up an atom, I want people to do this.
Go to Google and look up an atom. Look up the photo of an atom. Oh, wait. There isn't a photo. So how can you split the atom if there's no photo of the atom?
Well, you can make up things, you can draw pictures of mushroom clouds, and you can use Hollyweird to scare people into believing that if they don't comply, they're gonna get nuked. You kinda see how this goes. It's quite a rabbit hole. And this is just one great book, Death Object, right here by Akio. One good thing to just go through, just like I said, just making up stuff, and that's what we live in.
Whole bunch of make believe.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Fake Eggs in 1897? 🥚🥚 What’s new under the sun? https://t.co/63y6ZPePaP
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1897, Scientific American discussed fake foods and mentioned that artificial eggs were to be made in a laboratory. The whites were described as a mixture of sulfur, carbon, and beef fat, and the yolks as beef blood, magnesia (magnesium), and colored with chrome yellow. The transcript notes that fake eggs in 1897 were made in a lab. It then connects this to modern discussions of lab-made foods in 2025, mentioning Billy Boy Gates and “all the other stuff,” and asserts that Rockefeller’s and Rothschild’s influence has involved making fake foods for a long time.
The speaker claims that in 1897 many people appeared ill and unhealthy because they were eating fake food, and that this fake food was coated with super phosphate because John D. Rockefeller was supplying all the chemical fertilizers, which were burning up people’s feet. The speaker states that this is why people were told they had worms because they were being burned by the fertilizer. The transcript reiterates the point that in 1897 there were fake foods.
It is further mentioned that the average person should be a carnivore, noting that this narrative has flipped over time. The speaker observes that Netflix no longer presents that story and suggests looking up information not covered by Netflix, specifically pointing to the Maasai tribe. The Maasai are described as having a certain diet, but the transcript notes that they don’t eat their natural diet anymore because foods have been shipped in and vaccines have been introduced. The speaker adds that Netflix isn’t going to tell anyone this because they have a story to tell.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now what was interesting was in Scientific American in 1897, they also talked about how they're making fake eggs. Artificial hens eggs are to be made in a laboratory. The whites being a mixture of sulfur, carbon, and beef fat, and the yolks of beef blood, magnesia, which is magnesium, and colored with chrome yellow. Fake eggs in 1897 made in a lab. So when they're talking about all this lab made food in 2025 by Billy Boy Gates and all the other stuff, they've been doing it for a long period of time.
These Rockefeller's Rothschild scummy people have been making fake foods for a long time. This is why when you look back in time at about 1897, a lot of people are ill, they look ill, they don't look healthy, they're eating fake food. And it's coated with super phosphate because John D. Rockefeller at that time was supplying all the chemical fertilizers which was burning up all the people's feet and that's what they were trying to tell him that they had worms because they were getting burned by the fertilizer. So 1897, they have fake foods.
And it was interesting too because they also talked about in here that the average person should be a carnivore. And it's interesting because that whole narrative is flipped. We don't hear much of that anymore because Netflix wants to tell a different story. But if you wanna look up some interesting things that are not talked about on Netflix, you should look up the Maasai tribe. The Maasai tribe and what they eat.
And now they don't eat their natural diet anymore because they've been shipped in foods and shipped in vaccines. So people should be aware of that one, but Netflix isn't gonna tell anybody that because they got a story to tell people.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Vaxxines poisoning the people since 1626. Books: The peanut allergy epidemic, Murder by Injection, The poisoned needle, and Forty-five years of Registration Statistics, proving Vaxxination to be both Useless and Dangerous. https://t.co/kwmyp32Z1f
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Vaccines date back to 1626 poisoning the people. Okay? Poisoning the people since 1626. This is not new. They're not like, oh, we got some new stuff, and it's not the snake venom or anything else. It's just poison is what it is. They've been poisoning the people since 1626 with vaccines. So no child, no adult, no grandma, no grandpa, no mother, no nothing needs any shots, whether it be tetanus, whether it be rabies, whether it be anything. You do not need to put any shots into your animal, your grandma, your father, your mother, your children. That's it. It's straight poison. And there's a great picture from 1885, and it says, vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There is money in the side effects. That's it. That is all vaccines. Money in the side effects for the pharmaceutical companies to poison the people and just keep making money off of them. You go back into the nineteen hundreds and doctors used to claim there were no cases of cancer in an unvaccinated person. How about the Amish? The Amish don't put a single vaccine into their body, And you notice that the Amish look pretty darn healthy. Well, altogether. Why? They're not injecting themselves with poison. It makes no sense. So there's all these cultures who didn't use this garbage. And then as they now become like modernized and they start putting this garbage into them their body, then all of a sudden, people start coming down with all the same illnesses. I got autoimmune, lupus. I got allergies. I got this. I got that. Right? Right? All those things. Where do you think they're all stemming from? They get you as you're young because you don't have the ability to consent. Right? Tell that tell the doctor to take the needle and stick it in themselves. Give themselves their own boosters and vaccines. You don't need to do that. And I think people need to stand the ground with that because there has never been a single vaccine that has ever helped helped anybody.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vaccines date back to 1626 poisoning the people. Okay? Poisoning the people since 1626. This is not new. They're not like, oh, we got some new stuff, and it's not the snake venom or anything else.
It's just poison is what it is. They've been poisoning the people since 1626 with vaccines. So no child, no adult, no grandma, no grandpa, no mother, no nothing needs any shots, whether it be tetanus, whether it be rabies, whether it be anything. You do not need to put any shots into your animal, your grandma, your father, your mother, your children. That's it.
It's straight poison. And there's a great picture from 1885, and it says, vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There is money in the side effects. That's it. That is all vaccines.
Money in the side effects for the pharmaceutical companies to poison the people and just keep making money off of them. You go back into the nineteen hundreds and doctors used to claim there were no cases of cancer in an unvaccinated person. How about the Amish? The Amish don't put a single vaccine into their body, And you notice that the Amish look pretty darn healthy. Well, altogether.
Why? They're not injecting themselves with poison. It makes no sense. So there's all these cultures who didn't use this garbage. And then as they now become like modernized and they start putting this garbage into them their body, then all of a sudden, people start coming down with all the same illnesses.
I got autoimmune, lupus. I got allergies. I got this. I got that. Right?
Right? All those things. Where do you think they're all stemming from? They get you as you're young because you don't have the ability to consent. Right?
Tell that tell the doctor to take the needle and stick it in themselves. Give themselves their own boosters and vaccines. You don't need to do that. And I think people need to stand the ground with that because there has never been a single vaccine that has ever helped helped anybody.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Mold eats heavy metals: book the primal diet. 👇 https://t.co/L8ZArAnVr3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses provocative ideas from the book We Want To Live regarding mold and detoxification. They claim that mold can eat heavy metals, and that moldy substances can play a detoxifying role in the body. The speaker notes that, in younger years, people were injected with penicillin, which allegedly makes you allergic to mold so that you won’t eat mold to detox heavy metals from those injections. They describe this as mind-blowing and reference the book to support the idea that mold can detoxify the body by consuming heavy metals.
The speaker cites passages from We Want To Live about people consuming moldy berries to eliminate heavy metals inside the body, suggesting mold eats candida and cleanses metals and related toxins. They argue that moldy fruit such as a moldy strawberry or moldy blueberry, which many would discard, is actually detoxifying and connected to the amoxicillin, penicillin, and other penicillin-like injections used to induce allergies to mold. This, they say, is tied to the broader claim that those injections were used to make people allergic to substances that would otherwise pull metals from the body and thereby heal it.
Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the emotional reaction to the book, describing it as the kind of read that makes you want to punch somebody in the face. They use the book's ideas to explain why someone might be wondering why they are allergic to something. The narrative suggests a causal chain: injections were administered to people to induce allergies to certain substances, which would otherwise facilitate detoxification by pulling metals out of the body and promoting healing. The speaker asserts that the system injected people with substances to make them allergic to others, implying a deliberate design behind such allergies that impacts detoxification processes.
Overall, the speaker presents a controversial and conspiratorial interpretation of how mold, heavy metals, antibiotics, and allergic responses are linked, drawing on We Want To Live as the source for these claims. The central assertions are that mold can detox heavy metals, that moldy foods participate in this detox, and that medical injections (penicillin/amoxicillin) were used to generate mold allergies to prevent detoxification. The discussion centers on the provocative implications of these ideas and the emotional reaction they provoke.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everybody goes on the tangent about the mold. There's a great book called We Want To Live, and that book goes into talking about how mold can eat heavy metals. So check this. When you were younger, they injected you with penicillin, which makes you allergic to mold so that you couldn't eat mold to detox the heavy metals from the injections. Truly mind blowing.
That's for sure when I was reading through this book and the book, We Want To Live, where he was talking about people consuming moldy berries to eat up the heavy metals inside the body. And people can look into this. Mold eats candida. It eats heavy metals. It eats all of those things.
Whenever you see like a moldy strawberry or moldy blueberry, people are like, oh, I'm gonna I'm gonna throw that one away. That's the one that's detoxing you. That's the one that's connected to the amoxicillin, the penicillin, and all those other sillins that they were injecting people with to make them allergic to it because then they wouldn't wanna eat the counter, which pulls the metals out of the body and heals the body. Yeah. That's that's a deep one.
This is one of those books where you read and you wanna punch somebody in the face. That's the best way to describe it. You read this book and you wanna punch somebody in the face. Because when you're sitting there wondering why am I allergic to something? Oh, okay.
I got it. Got it. Now it makes sense. You injected me with something. These this system injected me with something to make me allergic to something.
reSee.it AI Summary
I ask about peanuts; the best option, raw in-shell Virginia peanuts. I say aflatoxin was used to distract from vaccines, glyphosate, and ultraprocessing, and that “analytic shock” didn’t exist until 1988. Book: Heather Fraser, The Peanut Allergy Epidemic.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
🥜Do you eat peanuts? Best option: Raw in the shell peanuts from Virginia. The term aflatoxin was used to distract the people from the vaxxines, glyphosate, and ultraprocessing...The term analytic shock didn't exist until 1988 Book: 📕Heather Fraser The peanut allergy epidemic https://t.co/RxvepoQ5rr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker makes a series of claims about peanuts, vaccines, and Pfizer. First, they assert that in the 1960s vaccines contained peanut oil, and that this was done so that when injected, people would become allergic. They state, “in the nineteen sixties they put peanut oil into the vaccines. Yes, that was Pfizer.” They further claim that Pfizer owns the EpiPen for peanut allergies, and that “not only did they inject the people to make them allergic, then they also own the solution that all the schools need to carry and all the things that need to go with that.”
The speaker then discusses possible reasons for peanut allergies beyond oil in vaccines. They say that if someone isn’t allergic due to the peanut oil, it could be because the peanut has been processed with pesticides or sprayed with pesticides, since peanuts are in the ground when they grow. They add, “you might be allergic to the pesticides.” They suggest another factor is the processing of the peanut, noting that most peanut butters have been boiled and roasted, meaning they have been cooked twice before consumption, so they are not in their raw form. They offer guidance that if one desires raw peanuts, Virginia grows all the raw peanuts in the shell and claims they are “absolutely beautiful.”
Additionally, the speaker asserts health benefits of peanuts, stating that the peanut “is really good for the prostate, ovaries, for the brain, for your testosterone, for your estrogen. It’s great for you pushing food through your stomach because you’ve got too much build up inside your stomach.” They then mention cancer contexts, claiming that peanuts can help with “the big C” and specify prostate cancer, breast cancer, and “intestinal cancers.”
In summary, the speaker presents a narrative connecting vaccine peanut oil to peanut allergies and Pfizer’s ownership of the EpiPen, discusses potential allergy causes including pesticides and processing, promotes Virginia raw peanuts as an option, and asserts broad health benefits of peanuts for various organs and several cancers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see that right there? That's a peanut. Do you know why people are allergic to peanuts? Because in the nineteen sixties they put peanut oil into the vaccines. Yes, that was Pfizer.
They put peanut oil into the vaccines so that when a person was injected with the peanut oil they would become allergic. Guess who owns the EpiPen for the peanut allergies? Pfizer, actually. In this book, it explains about how Pfizer owns the EpiPen for the peanut allergies. So not only did they inject the people to make them allergic, then they also own the solution that all the schools need to carry and all the things that need to go with that.
That's Pfizer. So people are aware. Now what's also interesting is a lot of people go, well, when I eat peanuts, I have allergic reactions. So if it wasn't the peanut oil that made you allergic, it's the fact that that peanut has been processed with some sort of pesticides or chemicals or sprayed with pesticides because it is in the ground when it grows. But that's the other thing.
You might be allergic to the pesticides. Now if you're not allergic to the pesticides and you haven't had a peanut injection or vaccine into your body, the last culprit is the processing of the peanut. Most peanut butters have already been boiled and they've been roasted, which means that they've been cooked two times before you go to eat them, so they are not in their raw peanut form right here. And if you do want raw peanuts, you should look into Virginia. Virginia grows all the raw peanuts in the shell and they're absolutely beautiful.
But if you notice the peanut right in there is really good for the prostate, ovaries, for the brain, for your testosterone, for your estrogen. It's great for you pushing food through your stomach because you've got too much build up inside your stomach. It is phenomenal. And when you get into all of the, you know, the big C, we'll say, all the different cancers, you see that it can help with prostate, it can help with breast cancer, it can help with all of these different body parts such as the intestinal cancers. That was the peanut.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Eating organic mold? The rabbit hole https://t.co/GDLedi6dhO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a series of claims about mold, heavy metals, and vaccines, framing them as interconnected health dangers and detox strategies. They begin by describing eating a moldy organic beet and claim that mold was used to make someone allergic to it because “the mold pulls out the heavy metals.” They state, “Mold and parasites eat heavy metals,” and claim that “worms growing in your body to eat the metals” and “mold growing in your body to eat the metals” can be found, with healing occurring once heavy metals are eliminated.
The speaker asserts that vaccinations contain heavy metals. They then say, “what’s also interesting on the mold situation is it’s connected to a spore,” and claim that “if you go to the Cancer Institute, they talk about how spores heal cancer, but I guess they don’t wanna tell people that.” The discussion deepens with the claim that most vaccines also contain yeast, “a form of mold,” which is being injected into the body to make people allergic to it so they can’t eat it to detox the metals.
When addressing cautions about food, someone asks about citric acid, described as “the one to avoid.” The speaker asserts it is “a Monsanto product grown on soy and canola and aluminum,” implying heavy metals enter the body through this product.
The speaker then offers detox alternatives for heavy metals, listing: dragon’s blood, organic papaya seeds, fasting, baking soda, borax, spirits of turpentine, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. They conclude with a brief historical note: “1986, they put a rule in place to protect the vaccines,” suggesting it was due to lawsuits that could bankrupt vaccine makers, and sign off with “Have a great day.”
In summary, the transcript presents a chain of claims that mold and parasites target heavy metals in the body, vaccines contain heavy metals and possibly yeast, spores are linked to healing cancer, citric acid from Monsanto products is a heavy-metal source, and a set of natural and chemical detox methods is proposed. It also asserts a regulatory measure in 1986 intended to shield vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today, we're eating a moldy organic beet because we talked about this yesterday. You were injected with mold to make you allergic to it because the mold pulls out the heavy metals. Think I'm gonna live. Then we find this one. Mold and parasites eat heavy metals.
Look at this. You got worms growing in your body to eat the metals, and you have mold growing in your body to eat the metals. Once you eliminate the metals, the body begin to heal. Vaccinations contain heavy metals. What's also interesting on the mold situation is it's connected to a spore, which if you go to the Cancer Institute, they talk about how spores heal cancer, but I guess they don't wanna tell people that.
And it gets deeper when you find out that most of the vaccines also contain yeast, a form of mold, which is being injected into the body to make people allergic to it so they can't eat it to detox the metals. Then someone says, what about citric acid? This is the one to avoid. It's a Monsanto product grown on soy and canola and aluminum. Heavy metals going into the body.
See what they're doing? So someone might say, don't know if I wanna eat organic moldy berries or anything like that. What can I do instead? Here's some additional heavy metal ways to detox, dragon's blood, organic papaya seeds, fasting, baking soda, borax, spirits of turpentine, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. And let's just leave it at this.
You know, 1986, they put a rule in place to protect the vaccines? This is why. Because lawsuits, when people find out the truth, could bankrupt them. Have a great day.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Verifast? Scan your face to rent an apartment or buy a home? Like movie minority report. I'll pass. Discord and Etsy following the same path. Boycott them. Link🤔https://www.verifast.com/about-us https://t.co/5qVjwWRaVY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a program called VERIFAST, describing it as facial recognition that requires users to scan their face when applying for an apartment or buying a house. They claim you must move your face left and right and have the biometrics uploaded into a database in order to rent or purchase a property. The speaker notes that in Arizona, many apartment complexes are rolling this out, questioning why there is a need to scan faces and suggesting it’s concerning that politicians or people who defend them are not being scanned while ordinary citizens are.
The speaker also mentions Discord as discussing this with kids, calling that sickening, and claims Etsy is doing something similar to process payments, requiring a face scan that involves moving the face left and right. They compare the situation to a concept from the “mark of the beast,” expressing concern that voluntary consent without objection could lead to a troubling future. The speaker urges listeners to look up VERIFAST and to resist if someone tries to impose this practice, using a defensive, PG-friendly phrasing.
Overall, the main points are:
- VERIFAST is described as a facial-recognition system requiring a face scan with left-right movement to access housing-related transactions, with biometrics uploaded to a database.
- In Arizona, the technology is allegedly being rolled out by apartment complexes.
- The speaker questions why politicians’ faces aren’t scanned and highlights perceived inconsistencies in who is subjected to the system.
- Discord is mentioned as discussing this issue with children, and Etsy is claimed to be implementing a similar facial-scan payment verification.
- The speaker draws a controversial parallel to the mark of the beast and warns that consent without vocal objection could lead to a troubling future.
- listeners are urged to look up VERIFAST and push back if pressured to participate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a deep rabbit hole if people wanna look into. It's called VERIFAST. VERIFAST. And what it is is it's a facial recognition that you have to scan your face when you go to apply for an apartment or you go to buy a house. You have to have facial recognition and move your face left and right and have it uploaded into this database for some biometrics thing in order to rent an apartment or buy a house.
And here in Arizona, all of these apartment places are actually rolling that out. Now why would they want to have your face scanned into something? What's weird is they don't scan the faces of any of these politicians and these people who defend, you know, the pedos, but they want your face for biometrics and George Orwell. Discord also is talking about this with kids, which is truly sickening, that's for sure. And then I also heard that Etsy is doing something similar, Where in order to get your payment on Etsy, you need to scan your face and move it left and right so that you can get your payment system.
This is kind of like that whole thing with the mark of the beast. I mean, I don't know if anybody's ever read that story, but that's kinda what that is. So if people consent to these things and don't say something, we're moving into a real weird place. That's what it is. So very fast, I want everybody to look that up.
And if anybody tries to make you do that garbage or anything else, you can go tell them to we're just gonna say it that way because that's that's the, that's the PG way of saying it right now as I hold my emotions back.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Trump signs EO protecting cancer causing pesticide company? It gets deeper when I found out bayer is owned by the rothschild. Support organic farmers: Amos miller, Poly face, and white oak pasture. Toss in some electroculture into your garden and boycott the toxicity. https://t.co/zKW7ZEjkIk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines a sequence of political and corporate protections related to litigation and public health. He states that a Trump executive order will federally protect pesticide companies, such as Bayer, from lawsuits related to $7,200,000,000 in cancer. He contrasts this with Clinton’s protection of cell phone tower companies from lawsuits and Reagan’s protection of vaccine companies, implying a pattern across administrations.
He then deepens the claim by alleging that all three presidents supported “the tiny hats, the Rothschilds,” and cites Murder by Injection to assert that Bayer was owned by the Rothschilds. Based on this, he advises against spraying pesticides on land and suggests boycotting as a strategy, noting that some farmers practice organic methods without pesticides. He names Amos Millers, Polyface, and White Oak Pastures as examples of farms that can operate without chemicals.
The speaker contends that chemicals are used because if people aren’t poisoned, big pharma doesn’t make money, and the medical system is “ran by the Rawls Childs.” He mentions having delivered hundreds of talks on electroculture, which he says demonstrates that it’s possible to avoid using any pesticides, and asserts that those talks were deleted by YouTube for the topic. When asked what electroculture does, he promises it would bring “abundance”—“lots and lots and lots and abundance, all without chemicals.”
Throughout, he repeatedly urges listeners to question everything and connects pesticide use to broader conspiratorial claims about corporate and financial control, as well as the influence of the Rothschilds on health and agriculture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the whole make the country healthy again, what is this? Trump executive order is going to federally protect pesticide companies such as Bayer from lawsuits related to $7,200,000,000 in cancer. Isn't that odd? It kinda reminds me of when Clinton protected the cell phone tower companies from lawsuits. See that?
And then Reagan protected the vaccine companies from lawsuits. Now what got deeper about this is all three of those presidents supported the tiny hats, the Rothschilds, And when you read Murder by Injection, you find out that Bayer, right there, that company, was owned by the Rothschilds. Wow. So on that note, you might not wanna spray this stuff all over your land. You know, that's the way that people boycott things.
They just stop buying it. Same with farmers. If you wanna contribute to the poisoning society, you're part of the problem. And if you didn't know, there's plenty of farms who do it the organic way without pesticides. Amos Millers, Polyface, White Oak Pastures.
We can do it without chemicals. The only reason they put the chemicals is because if the people aren't poisoned, big pharma doesn't make any money and also the medical system which is ran by the Rawls Childs. And it's funny because I've done hundreds of talks on electroculture, how you don't have to use any pesticides at all, and all of those are now deleted because YouTube didn't like that topic. But someone's gonna say, what do you what do you mean? What does electroculture do?
Well, won't be without abundance. Lots and lots and lots of abundance, all without chemicals. I want to question everything, my friends.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Electroculture Gardening vs glyphosate: I’ll take electroculture 👇👇Manipulating the aether with copper resulting in abundance at every angle of nature. https://cultivateelevate.com/electroculture/ https://t.co/2y63mXmIYK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, the discussion centers on boosting your garden with electroculture. The speaker recalls initial skepticism from many gardeners, calling it “woo woo,” but shares anecdotal results to illustrate potential. A friend decided to try electroculture and produced a 46-pound watermelon. Another friend in Ireland tried it and produced noticeable differences in garlic size. There is also mention of a cucumber and generally “everything gets bigger with electroculture,” alongside impressive examples of melons growing together.
The speaker notes that this is why some people don’t tell others about electroculture, implying a mindset of food scarcity. Then, attention shifts to striking examples: a cucumber, a garlic, and notably large melons. The idea presented is that things start to multiply when one considers nature, leading to questions about what is taking place.
To illustrate the phenomenon, the speaker references Carolian photography of pyramids, suggesting that while you can’t see anything happening with the naked eye, the photography reveals beams emanating from the pyramids. The speaker interprets this as evidence that the beams are manipulating the environment, and draws a parallel to electroculture—implying that similar unseen forces are at work in gardening through electroculture.
Despite some inevitable skepticism from others who might question the claims, the speaker points to historical use and government interest as supporting evidence. The Royal Agricultural Society is mentioned as having engaged with electroculture in 1845 and 1873, suggesting that those in authority recognized abundance through the technique. The government is also said to have practiced electrification in agriculture in the 1920s. The speaker emphasizes this combination of royal and governmental engagement as support for the idea that abundance is within reach through electroculture.
The message concludes with a persuasive prompt: given these indications of abundance and institutional involvement, why aren’t you doing electroculture? The speaker ends with a closing question intended to provoke the audience to consider adopting electroculture in their own gardening practice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we're gonna talk about how to boost your garden with electroculture. And it was funny when I first started talking about all these gardeners were telling me it was woo woo. So a friend decided to try electroculture, and he grew a 46 pound watermelon. And then another friend tried it in Ireland, and look at that garlic. Look at the size difference.
Obviously, this is why they don't tell people because they want people to be in a food scarcity mindset. And then how about a cucumber? I mean, everything gets bigger with electroculture. And this was the best. Check out these melons.
This is pretty wild, all growing together. It's interesting because things start to multiply when you think of nature. So someone's gonna say, well, what is taking place? Well, check this out. This is Carolian photography of pyramids.
Now when you look at pyramids, you can't see anything happening, but when you look at the photography, see those beams coming off? It's manipulating the and that's what's happening with the electroculture. And there's always gonna be those ones who are like, oh, no. No. It's not true.
Really? Why on earth would the Royal Agriculture Society be doing this in 1845 and 1873? Seems like the royals know how to have abundance and then the peasants don't have abundance. And it gets deeper when you find out that the government was doing the electric culture in the nineteen twenties. So you got the Royal Agriculture Society, you got the government, and you have abundance at your fingertips with the electric culture.
So why aren't you doing it? Questions of the day.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
1893 firmament map 👇 as we never went to the moon 🌝 https://t.co/Yc8LfZhI1Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a 1893 firmament map you can type in. It's on the Library of Congress. So it's on a government website, like it's straight up right on the government website, and it's called the firmament map. And you can just look that one up. It says 1893.
You just type it in. It's not even hidden from the people. So, you know, when they're trying to talk about where they're going and we're going to Mars and, you know, going to space, they're not going anywhere. And a perfect example of this, the India moon landing. The India moon landing looks like an Atari graphics moon landing.
You see, like, this little pixelated thing, and it lands on allegedly the moon, and the Indians are just they're just clapping away. They're like, they they've done it. It's crazy that you can make people believe that. Right? Like, if somebody believes that, they watched that, they watched Atari graphics, and they thought they went to the moon.
Oh oh, goodness. Imagine what else you can make them believe. You know? You can make them believe to take a whole bunch of and put them in their body. You could also make them believe that they need to wear 64 masks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a 1893 firmament map you can type in. It's on the Library of Congress. So it's on a government website, like it's straight up right on the government website, and it's called the firmament map. And you can just look that one up. It says 1893.
You just type it in. It's not even hidden from the people. So, you know, when they're trying to talk about where they're going and we're going to Mars and, you know, going to space, they're not going anywhere. And a perfect example of this, the India moon landing. The India moon landing looks like an Atari graphics moon landing.
You see, like, this little pixelated thing, and it lands on allegedly the moon, and the Indians are just they're just clapping away. They're like, they they they've done it. It's crazy that you can make people believe that. Right? Like, if somebody believes that, they watched that, they watched Atari graphics, and they thought they went to the moon.
Oh oh, oh, goodness. Imagine what else you can make them believe. You know? You can make them believe to take a whole bunch of and put them in their body. You could also make them believe that they need to wear 64 masks.
Like, something like that.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Covid and 5g? Open the eyes to the towers outside https://www.antennasearch.com https://t.co/7dN7Wccmb8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a series of claims linking COVID-19 to radio waves and 5G, and denying conventional ideas about viruses and contagion. The key points include:
- COVID is described as radio wave sickness caused by cell phone towers and the rollout of 5G. The speaker asserts that “the COVID situation” was triggered by 5G, not a virus.
- It is claimed that the loss of senses and other symptoms (loss of smell and taste, diminished ability to think, hair loss) are ("radio wave sickness"), and that this condition was diagnosed in 1919 as the Kansas flu when radio was rolled out. The speaker says, “one hundred years later, guess what they pulled? Same exact playbook.”
- The so-called playbook is outlined as follows: wear your mask, get your booster, take this, inject this, stay indoors. The speaker notes a comparison to the past: “If you have a Bell radio or a Bell telephone, you could stay at home and chat with friends.” The implication is that the same approach was reused in covid times.
- The speaker denies that viruses or contagion exist. They claim that coughing or sneezing does not cause illness; illness results from what a person puts into their body. Factors listed as causing illness include microwaving with radio wave signals, poisons and pesticides, negative thoughts, stress, and lack of sun.
- Several book references are provided to support these views: The Invisible Rainbow; Farewell to Virology; Can You Catch a Cold?; and The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan. The speaker also notes “10,000 studies on how viruses are fake,” suggesting a body of literature opposing mainstream virology.
- Throughout, the narrative contrasts traditional germ theory with a belief that illness is driven by environmental exposure to radio frequencies, toxins, mindset, and lifestyle factors, rather than contagion from pathogens.
In summary, the speaker contends that COVID-19 is a product of 5G and radio wave exposure, that the 1919 Kansas flu was similarly linked to radio rollout, and that conventional germ-based explanations are invalid. Illness is attributed to body inputs such as radiation, poisons, stress, and lack of sun, while promoting alternative literature that disputes contagion and viruses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Somebody thought thought I said COVID. No. That's radio wave sickness. That was caused by the cell phone towers. All the five g that rolled out, that's what caused the COVID situation.
The COVID was just the rollout of five g. All the cell phone towers, people lost their sense of smell, lost their sense of taste, they lost their ability to think, they started losing their hair, that is radio wave sickness. That was diagnosed in the 1919 with the Kansas flu when they rolled out the radio. So one hundred years later, guess what they pulled? Same exact playbook.
Just same exact playbook. Wear your mask, get your booster, take this, inject this, stay indoors. You could stay at home. If you have a Bell radio or a Bell telephone, you could stay at home and chat with friends. Same playbook.
That was 1919. Kansas flu. 2020, same exact thing. That's what it is. Somebody said I don't think COVID was five g.
There's no such thing as viruses or contagion. If I coughed on you, you don't get ill. If somebody sneezed on you, you don't get ill. What causes your illness is what you put into your body. If you microwave yourself with radio wave signals, if you put poisons and pesticides into your body, if you think negative thoughts, if you have a lot of stress, if you don't see the sun, you become ill.
That's it. There's no germs jumping all over and viruses and bacteria or anything like that. And people can look into the book, The Invisible Rainbow. You can also look into the book, Farewell to Virology, which is another one. 10,000 studies on how viruses are fake.
You can also look into the book, Can You Catch a Cold? Which you can, and The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan. It's been debunked so much.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Peptides by big Harma? Made by Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and the rest of them. Same ones that make ivermectin, nicotine, methylene blue, and all the rest of the trends. I'll stick to shilajit. https://cultivateelevate.com/shilajit-tablets-cold-pressed-extract-tablets/ https://t.co/wLuX6AJZuW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses peptides and their rise in popularity on social media, describing them as big pharma products. They claim peptides are essentially the same as big pharma vitamins, just in injectable form, and assert that people are now supporting the same pharmaceutical companies by using peptides rather than taking vaccines. The speaker expresses astonishment that, after 2020, people would inject things into their bodies without knowing what they are putting in, yet peptide injections have become a trending topic across the Internet and social media.
They extend the critique to other substances, stating that methylane blue, ivermectin, and nicotine are also part of the same pattern: if something is trendy on social media, it is backed by big pharma. The speaker asserts that this is what is happening with peptides and that big pharma maintains powerful marketing to influence public perception. They claim that big pharma gets people to believe in certain products and to ignore other concerns, such as “cell phone towers out in front of their house,” while encouraging them to jump on the bandwagon of other products to put into their body.
The speaker argues that peptides represent a broader phenomenon where trendy health products are promoted by big pharma, similar to the way vaccines were promoted in 2020. They state that after 2020, one would think people would avoid injecting anything into their body because they don’t know what they are putting into it, yet the trend continues with peptides and related products. The overall assertion is that big pharma has strong marketing that convinces people to adopt various products and to overlook potential concerns, shaping consumer behavior through trends on social media. The speaker notes that the peptide trend is part of this larger pattern, alongside other substances like methylane blue, ivermectin, and nicotine, all of which are implied to be backed by big pharma when they gain online popularity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Peptides. Peptides have became very popular on social media. People taking peptides and injecting into their body. Those are big pharma products. All they did was they went from big pharma vitamins, which is synthetic things, to now injectable big pharma vitamins.
That's what peptides are. Peptides are just made by big pharma. It's the exact same thing. So people are now just instead of supporting one industry and won't take a vaccine, now they'll put peptides in their body. It's crazy because after 2020, you would think you would think that people would go, you know what?
I'm not gonna inject my body with anything because I don't know what I'm putting into it. But instead, people still are injecting things into their body, and peptides are a big one. And it's trending all over the Internet and I see it all over social media, got the peptides and the peptides and the peptides. You're just supporting the same pharmaceutical companies which called 35,000,000 people during 2020. It's just crazy.
But, yes, the whole peptide thing is quite a rabbit hole. Methylane blue, same exact thing. Ivermectin, nicotine, I mean, you name it. If it's trendy on social media, it's being backed by big pharma. That's what it is.
Big pharma has great marketing and they get people to believe in things and they get people not to look at the cell phone towers out in front of their house and they get them to get on the bandwagon of other products to put into their body.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Dragons blood healing scars? Indeedly. Organic coconut oil and dragons blood on the selected area daily. Everything is reversible.😚 https://cultivateelevate.com/dragons-blood-capsules/ https://t.co/PVxUOobxw5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that applying dragon's blood with coconut oil can reverse scars, and that taking dragon's blood internally will also help. They claim that scars can be reversed and describe this healing as mind-blowing, noting that many people are not exposed to this because there are expensive procedures being marketed instead. The speaker emphasizes that the combination of dragon's blood and oil promotes the regeneration of cells, which they link to stem cell stimulation, suggesting a cellular-level healing process. They describe dragon's blood as remarkable and explain that in Amazon regions, when people get cut, they apply a small amount of dragon's blood with any oil or butter of their choice, and it heals those scars. The speaker comments on the prevalence of surgical options, implying that people might be sold on procedures that involve extensive needle work, characterizing this as goofy and contrasting it with the dragon's blood remedy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do I do for some scars? You can do dragon's blood and coconut oil on those scars, and you will see them reverse. You can also take dragon's blood internally, and that will help as well too. But scars can be reversed. This is mind blowing when you watch scars get healed, and nobody ever talks about that because they wanna sell you a $10,000 procedure.
And instead, when you get into what you see with dragon's blood and coconut oil, you see the regeneration of cells which actually relates to stem cells. Stimulation of cells. So yeah, dragon's blood is remarkable. That's why when they get cut out on the Amazon, they put a little bit of dragon's blood on there with any type of oil of their choice or butter of their choice Guess what? It heals those scars.
But once again, you know, you couldn't sell somebody a surgery where you stick fifty thousand needles in their face. So goofy. Like think about that, like it's just it's so goofy.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Raw organic peanuts? Safe. But peanut oil in the vaxxines and peanuts sprayed with pesticides not so much Book the peanut allergic epidemic https://t.co/Cn0rG9tc3l
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses peanut butter and genetics of public guidance around it. They claim peanut butter and peanuts are loaded with copper, and that this is why people are told to stay away from them. They also state that peanuts are high in zinc and label peanuts as a complete “superfood.” The speaker asserts that there is a broader narrative about mold and toxicity that leads to avoidance, but argues that whenever something is repeatedly advised to be “stay away,” one should consider using it.
Further, the speaker mentions uranium glass and copper cups as items people are told to avoid, suggesting the need to “check it out” and experimentar with them to see how one feels. They advise trying organic peanut butter from Azure and report personally eating about a half a jar per day. The speaker uses this personal consumption as a counterexample to the claim that peanut butter is toxic.
They imply there were toxins used to make people allergic to peanuts, though they state this as a part of what “they forgot to say about that whole thing.” The speaker reinforces the idea that peanuts are high in copper and zinc and insists that peanut butter is a “complete superfood.” The closing example stresses that if the alleged toxicity were true, the speaker would have been affected or “gone a long time ago,” given their consumption of organic peanuts.
Overall, the speaker presents a contrarian view that peanut butter’s copper and zinc content, along with a supposed history of toxins and allergies, should prompt skepticism toward avoidance messages and encourage personal experimentation with organic peanut products, specifically citing Azure as a brand and advocating substantial daily intake. The argument centers on re-evaluating conventional guidance and endorsing personal dietary experimentation with peanuts and peanut butter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, if you get into peanut butter, you know the whole thing with peanut butter, they tell you to avoid the peanut butter. Peanut butter is loaded with copper. Peanuts are loaded with copper. That's why they tell people to stay away. Also helps protect you from all these cell phone nonsense that they keep putting up.
Peanuts. Now they don't tell you that they were sticking people with toxins which were making them allergic to peanuts. That's the one part they forgot to say about that whole thing. But peanuts are high in copper. They're also high in zinc.
They're also a complete superfood. But they'll tell you it's the mold. You gotta stay away. Gotta stay away. Anytime they tell you to stay away from something, you should probably be using it.
For example, uranium glass and copper cups Tell you to stay away? Probably should check it out. Probably try it out a little bit. See how you feel with organic peanut butter from Azure. I eat about a half a jar a day.
And if that was the case, that it was allegedly as toxic as we were told, I would have been gone a long time ago. Take a perfect example. Get yourself organic peanuts.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Shopping at target in 2026? Video from 2021. Still holds truth today https://t.co/KyI0d18ZlQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses LED lights and a supposed IoT (Internet of Things) capability. It states that on 04/09/2019, Target confirmed they had provided Internet of Things lighting. IoT lighting means everything is connected and data can be collected from ongoing activities. The example given is that if you walk into Target with your phone, the lights will sync up to your phone to obtain data about what you’re purchasing and what you’re doing. The narration links this event to the period just before 2020, suggesting it occurred prior to the surge in shopping and alleged shortages that year.
The speaker then asserts that these LED lights have microscopic cameras in them so they can watch people from every angle. The claim is that other stores, such as Whole Foods, are using similar technology in price tags that can scan and see who is buying items to collect data. The main takeaway presented is that if you bring LED lights into your home, the same type of technology claimed to be in these stores could be in the LED lights you bring into your house.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So on another topic related to LED lights, we wanna talk about this one. And I think this is really important to be aware of. And it basically states that in 04/09/2019, which is just before all the nonsense began in 2020, Target finally confirms that they have provided Internet of things lighting. Now what is Internet of things? Internet of things is basically where everything is connected, and they can get the data from everything that's going on.
So for example, if you walk in with your phone to Target, the lights will actually sync up to your phone so that they can get data and information on what you're purchasing and what you're doing. Now it's just so happens that this happened just before 2020 when all of the stuff happened when people were shopping like crazy and they were buying up everything and there were supposedly shortages and everything else. But Target was basically announcing this. Not only that, these LED lights have microscopic cameras in them so that they can watch people from every single angle. You see other, food stores actually doing this basically in the little price tag such as at Whole Foods.
In the price tag, there's a little camera in there so it can actually scan and see who's buying things so that they can collect data. So it's important to be aware of this because if you bring LED lights also into your home, the same type of technology that's in these stores are also in the LED lights in which you're bringing into your house.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Raw eggs? Instantly healing https://t.co/1UpEQt3gfr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that raw eggs are very beneficial and that there is a push to avoid eating them raw. They criticize labels that say avoid raw eggs and claim people are misinformed by health influencers who tell you to eat only the yolk; they assert there are many beautiful minerals and nutrients in the raw egg and compare it to pearl powder, which they say also benefits the eyes. They state the whole egg should be consumed, not just the yolk.
They recommend consuming about two to three raw eggs per day, depending on the day. If someone experiences restlessness or nerves that are “all jacked up,” raw eggs can be very beneficial. They explain that nerves being overactive is due to over-stimulation from technology.
The solution offered is to crack open an organic, cage-free, pasture-raised, whole egg and drink it, specifically noting eggs from Arizona.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Raw eggs are actually very beneficial. And what they do is they scare you into not believing that you should eat raw eggs. There's a little label that's on all the packages. Avoid it raw, cook it, microwave it, zap it, strip it, use the Rockefeller nonsense. But they don't tell you to eat the whole raw egg.
A lot of health influencers out there will tell you to just eat the yolk. They won't tell you to eat the whole egg which makes no sense because nature provides you with everything. There are so many beautiful minerals in the raw egg and so many beautiful nutrients that are very beneficial to your body. And it's just like pearl powder, same exact thing. Pearl feeds the eyes, so do so do raw eggs.
So what I do, I have about two a day, two to three a day depending on the day, But if you're having any type of restlessness or your nerves are all jacked up, raw eggs can actually be very beneficial. This is a very simple solution. The reason your nerves are all jacked up is because of the over stimulation from the technology in which we are using. It is over stimulating your body. So if you need to calm your central nervous system, what you're gonna do is you're gonna crack open a organic, cage free, pasture raised, the whole entire thing egg.
These are beautiful eggs from here in Arizona and what you're gonna do is you're gonna drink it. Just like that.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Creatine? Made from salt (not meat) 🍖 Creatine is made in a petridish for pennies on the dollar. Aminos, vitamins, protein powders, collagen peptides = same chemical process. Eat some raw eggs, raw milk, or raw meat. https://t.co/e1bTsFhCBR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says creatine is made in a lab from two chemicals placed in a chamber and heated and pressurized until they turn into liquid, with zero meat involved. When people say it worked, he claims it's because it's a form of salt. He adds that instead of eating something from Bill Gates, he would choose red raw meat or raw eggs, and suggests to think about it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some people always ask me, what do you think about creatine? Did you know it's made in a lab? From two chemicals are put into a chamber heated and pressurized until they turn into liquid. There is zero meat involved. When people say it worked, it's because it's a form of salt.
Isn't that funny? So instead of eating something from Bill Gates, I would do red raw meat or raw eggs. Something to think about.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Wisdom teeth removal 🤔🤔 big $$ insurance kickbacks... Each tooth is connected to a meridian line. Pastuerized foods = non straight teeth. Meanwhile fact checkers said meridian lines are fake lol.🌱 https://t.co/q9rZQ99zIt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recalls having wisdom teeth removed at age 20 and mentions an insurance company offering a $5,000 reward for removing wisdom teeth. They claim to have learned that wisdom teeth are connected to the heart and that there is no reason to remove them. They state that wisdom teeth are pulled out so they could get a “from the” and then mess with the meridian line, and that wisdom teeth are connected to the brain and the heart. They assert that when people get their wisdom teeth removed, they often start developing heart issues, implying a causal link to the procedure. The speaker argues that the meridians of the wisdom teeth connect not only to the brain but also to the heart, so removing them disrupts the body’s pathways. They claim the dentist industry is a break off of the industry, that they fluoridate mouths, take teeth out, and x-ray people, and that all teeth are meridian lines; messing with those meridian lines messes with the body’s pathways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I actually had my wisdom teeth removed when I was 20. I had no idea. The insurance company had a $5,000 reward for removing my wisdom teeth. And then I learned about how your wisdom teeth are connect to your heart. Well, there's actually no reason to remove the wisdom teeth.
They actually just pull them out so they could get a from the and then mess with your meridian line, which if you think of wisdom, you think of your brain, and then the the wisdom teeth are also connected to your heart. So a lot of times when people get their wisdom teeth removed, they actually start developing heart issues. You see how this goes? The meridians of the wisdom teeth are connected not only to the brain but also to the heart. So then people start developing heart issues and then can't figure it out, but it was because they had a procedure in which was never supposed to happen, never needed to happen.
And remember, the dentist industry is a break off of the industry. They're fluoridating people's mouths, taking teeth out of them, x raying them, and all of your teeth are meridian lines. So if you mess with those meridian lines, you mess with all the pathways of the body.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Root canals? Quite the rabbit hole. Gum issues can be resolved with coconut oil pulling and dragons blood, while teeth issues can be resolved with pearl and coconut oil. https://cultivateelevate.com https://t.co/rFfMWI9NiA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses dental treatment considerations and alternative remedies. She suggests that if someone is told they need a root canal, they should "look up the documentary, The Root Cause," which is described as a documentary on root canals and what happens afterwards after a person gets a root canal and then they have an infection sitting in their mouth and then they develop all these problems. She advises that if someone is being told to get a root canal, they might want to obtain "25 opinions from a bunch of holistic dentists before you do anything with that."
She mentions gum health remedies, recommending "a little bit of dragon's blood and coconut oil on those gums" as something that can help heal the gums.
The documentary The Root Cause is described as having been banned on Netflix and then banned on YouTube, prompting the question of why they don’t want people watching that. The reasoning offered is that when insurance checks off for a root canal, they "make a lot of money," and then when the person has health issues down the road, they "make a lot of money." She emphasizes the importance of being aware of that.
Regarding dental issues, she reiterates home remedies: coconut oil and pearl, claiming that pearl will help mineralize the teeth and then feed the teeth because the teeth need to be fed.
Key points include:
- If told you need a root canal, consider seeking numerous opinions from holistic dentists (she suggests 25).
- The Root Cause is a documentary about root canals and subsequent problems, with claims of infections after root canals.
- The documentary was banned on Netflix and YouTube, with the assertion that dentists and insurance profits are a motive for suppression.
- For gum issues, dragon's blood with coconut oil is proposed as a healing remedy.
- For teeth, coconut oil and pearl powder are proposed: coconut oil as a general remedy, and pearl powder to mineralize and feed the teeth.
The overall message emphasizes caution about root canals, promotes holistic perspectives, and offers specific home remedies for gums and teeth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would pearl powder help if someone's had a told they need a root canal? If someone is told that they didn't need a root canal, they should look up the documentary, The Root Cause. That is a documentary on root canals and what happens afterwards after a person gets a root canal and then they have an infection sitting in their mouth and then they develop all these problems. So if someone is telling you to get a root canal, you might want to get 25 opinions from a bunch of holistic dentists before you do anything with that. If you're having any gum issues, you can put a little bit of dragon's blood and coconut oil on those gums and that can help heal the gums.
But that documentary, the root cause was banned on Netflix and then banned in on YouTube, which you would wonder why they don't want people watching that. Because when they check their insurance off for a root canal, they make a lot of money. And then when the person has health issues down the road, guess what they do? They make a lot of money. So it's important to be aware of that.
And if you're having any teeth issues, can do coconut oil, you can do pearl. That will help mineralize the teeth and then feed the teeth because the teeth need to be fed.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Cell towers immune from lawsuits? Like vaxxines 👀 https://t.co/366KclUJWQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 notes an interesting image: in beautiful nature, people will build a fortress to protect a cell phone tower. They remind that in 1996, Bill Clinton passed an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits. The speaker asserts that if this act leads to brain cancer or a tumor or any type of illness, one cannot sue for damages. They compare this to vaccines. The speaker describes this as “pretty crazy” and something to think about. They then claim, “And now you know what caused the pandemic.” They state that while people were locked in their houses, cell phone towers were going up all over the place. A map is mentioned to illustrate this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's interesting how in the beautiful nature they will build a fortress to protect a cell phone tower. And if you didn't know, in 1996, Bill Clinton passed an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits. So if this gives you brain cancer or a tumor or just you get any type of illness, guess what? Can't sue for any damages. Kinda like vaccines.
Isn't that pretty crazy? Something to think about. And now you know what caused the pandemic. While people were locked in their houses, cell phone towers were going up all over the place. Here's a map to show it.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Eye health tips: Pearl powder, Eye exercises daily (looking to the left, right, up and down), Raw eggs, Removing LEDS from the home, and spending time in the sun. 🌞🌞 Book: Light as medicine Jacob Liberman written by an eye doc. https://cultivateelevate.com https://t.co/Wfc1gaeAg2
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been taking Pearl Powder for about two months, but I'm still having a little issues wearing my glasses. What else should I do? Little eye exercises if you're not doing them. If you don't train the eyes, then they also get weak as well. So a little bit of eye circles, very beneficial.
Because what happens is we are looking at screens all day and just scrolling up and down and up and down, and we're never looking to the right. We're never looking to the left. We're never looking up. We're never looking down. We're looking just straight ahead on a scrolling screen.
And what happens is those eye muscles get weak. So you can combine that with pearl powder. You can also do raw eggs. There's another one to combine with pearl powder. You can also get rid of LEDs out of your house.
If you got too many LEDs in your house, they could be impeding your ability to heal with the pearl powder because think about it, while you're trying to feed the eyes, you turn on the lights at nighttime and you're blinded because LEDs are linked to cataracts. So that is another big one. Most people don't realize those LEDs, that's why the government gives them to people. So those would be a couple of tips and you can look into the book Light as Medicine by Jacob Liberman. He was an eye professional who wrote the book about how light heals.
So spending time in the sun, very beneficial for your eyes. Too much time indoors, that's just makes your eyes get weak, that's what it does.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been taking Pearl Powder for about two months, but I'm still having a little issues wearing my glasses. What else should I do? Little eye exercises if you're not doing them. If you don't train the eyes, then they also get weak as well. So a little bit of eye circles, very beneficial.
Because what happens is is we are looking at screens all day and just scrolling up and down and up and down, and we're never looking to the right. We're never looking to the left. We're never looking up. We're never looking down. We're looking just straight ahead on a scrolling screen.
And what happens is is those eye muscles get weak. So you can combine that with pearl powder. You can also do raw eggs. There's another one to combine with pearl powder. You can also get rid of LEDs out of your house.
If you got too many LEDs in your house, they could be impeding your ability to heal with the pearl powder because think about it, while you're trying to feed the eyes, you turn on the lights at nighttime and you're blinded because LEDs are linked to cataracts. So that is another big one. Most people don't realize those LEDs, that's why the government gives them to people. So those would be a couple of tips and you can look into the book Light as Medicine by Jacob Liberman. He was an eye professional who wrote the book about how light heals.
So spending time in the sun, very beneficial for your eyes. Too much time indoors, that's just makes your eyes get weak, that's what it does.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Shilajit solution for anemia, hormonal balance, and hairloss🙂 Feed thy cells: https://cultivateelevate.com/shilajit-tablets-cold-pressed-extract-tablets/#product-reviews https://t.co/ziHyjY0hC4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses iron imbalances labeled as anemia, asserting it is a copper imbalance, and critiques the conventional emphasis on iron supplements, noting they can cause organ damage if overused. They promote a natural solution called Chillshot, sharing an anecdote: a friend has been giving her Aunt Chill a shot for the last year, and the Aunt no longer needs the IV iron she had been on for twelve years. The speaker argues this illustrates how natural solutions are overlooked in favor of conventional treatments.
They also claim that fluoride in the public water supply and WiFi Bluetooth can lower red blood cells. Returning to Chillshot, they say it also helps with hair loss, especially when hormones are disrupted, and that Chillshot has some of the most studies for a natural remedy. The product is described as balancing hormones and aiding menopause, premenopause, and people taking DIM, suggesting that starting to use Chillazade balances hormones. The message emphasizes natural healing from the earth and restoring balance through Chillazade, implying that it is a natural alternative to conventional medical approaches.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today we're gonna hit on iron imbalances known as anemia, and it's really a copper imbalance, but, you know, we'll go with that. So Google says iron supplements, you should take those, but don't take too much because they can cause damage to your organs. Let's go with a natural solution. So a friend reached out that she's been giving her Aunt Chill a shot for the last year, and she no longer has to take the IV iron that she's been on for twelve years. Think of how crazy this is.
This is what they do to people. They don't give people natural solutions. Sholzhot simple natural solution. They also don't tell people what the cause of anemia is and what's causing these problems. Fluoride, check that, in the public water supply and WiFi Bluetooth can actually lower the red blood cells.
Important to know. But back on the Chillshot because it also helps with hair loss, I think is really important when your hormones are messed up, your hair starts falling out. Chilli Jot can help with that. And Chilli Jot has some of the most studies for a natural remedy. Check these.
And it can also help balance your hormones. Menopause, premenopause, even people taking DIM Start using Chillazade, hormones are balanced. So there are solutions. There's natural ways, and Chillazade just comes from the earth. All you're doing is eating beautiful mother nature to heal and restore balance.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
World fair? Superbowl? Energy harvesting events. Same story on repeat by Bill Cooper. NFL was a non profit since it's creation like universities and hospitals... Why does the term "football" come up 1181 times in the the tiny hat files? Might want to ask questions https://t.co/FLbAVaA9Dn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker compares the World Fair and the Super Bowl, claiming they are the same thing on repeat and that the NFL has not paid taxes for the last hundred years while they profited from the people. Referring to Bill Cooper, the speaker explains this as the Roman circus: one player on one team earning $6,000,000 a year. The emperor, when the people question policies and become restless, sends them to the circus, builds a giant coliseum, and begins to throw Christians to the lions, while also staging great chariot races, football games, and basketball games to keep the masses preoccupied with trivialities. The point is that this keeps people from learning the truth or becoming smart enough to notice manipulation, preventing them from question the emperor. The speaker notes salaries of seven-figure sums for athletes as part of the circus. He adds that there are men who know nothing beyond who plays third base for the Mets, and they think that is a great accomplishment. People meet, pat each other on the back, bond, go to cocktails, and talk about what this guy who plays third base for the Mets did in last night’s game.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So someone asked, what do you think of the World Fair aka the Super Bowl? It's the same thing on repeat. See the building right there? Same thing. Also, it's interesting that the NFL wasn't paying any taxes for the last, like, one hundred years that they made money off the people.
And someone's gonna ask why? Well, Bill Cooper will explain how it's the Roman circus. I'll repeat. One player on one team, $6,000,000 a year. Can you believe this?
And why is that? It's the Roman circus. What does the emperor do when the people become and when the people are asking questions and when the people don't like the policies of the emperor? He sends them to the circus. He creates a circus.
He builds a giant coliseum, and he begins to throw the Christians to the lions. And he has great chariot races and football games and basketball games, all to keep the idiots preoccupied with things that don't mean anything in the scheme of the entire world so that they don't have the time to learn what the truth is, so they don't ever get smart enough to learn how they're being manipulated, so they don't ever question the emperor. That's why they pay a player on a football team or a baseball team a million or 2,000,000 or $3,000,000 a year. It is the Roman circus. I know men who don't know anything in the world except who plays third base for the Mets, and they think that's a great accomplishment.
And they meet and pat each other on the back and bond and go have cocktails cocktails and talk about what this guy that plays third base for the Mets did in last night's game.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Moles = toxins? https://cultivateelevate.com/freshwater-pearl-powder-200grams/ https://t.co/4uxtDZCjkn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a sequence of beliefs and reactions about moles on the skin. They claim they were fact-checked after previously stating that moles are an accumulation of toxins in the skin region, and that claim was deemed not true. They recount telling people they could apply a mixture of organic coconut oil or castor oil with a little pearl directly on the mole, which would cause the mole to break apart and disintegrate. The speaker argues that fact-checkers opposed the idea of toxins in the skin and suggested it is a tactic to sell petroleum-based chemicals to keep people returning to professionals, implying that moles are simply a buildup of toxins and can be completely removed, including in areas not exposed to the sun.
The speaker asserts that moles appear in areas not exposed to the sun due to toxins accumulating in the skin, and maintains that toxins are responsible for spots on the skin, which remain there. They claim that applying pearl with coconut oil or castor oil directly to the mole will cause it to break apart. If moles were not an accumulation of toxins, the speaker argues, they wouldn’t break apart with this treatment, and there wouldn’t be a fact-check criticizing the toxins claim.
Additionally, the speaker mentions having been fact-checked many times and notes one particular fact-checker who allegedly won an Emmy Award for fact-checking, describing him as “the guy who fact checked my page” and noting that their page has been repeatedly targeted by fact-checks, which the speaker characterizes as comical nonsense. The overall tone presents a confrontation with fact-checking and a defense of the toxin-based explanation and at-home remedy narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Somebody's talking about moles. Oh, I talked about moles before. I actually got fact checked. This is great. I got fact checked for talking about how moles are an accumulation of toxins in the skin region, and they said that that is not true.
Now remember fact check always tells you what's true and what's false and they came after my page in 2024 when I started telling people they could take a little bit of organic coconut oil or castor oil with a little bit of pearl, put it on the mole, and the mole would actually just break apart and disintegrate. And so the fact checkers came out and started saying, you can't go around telling people that there's toxins in their skin because what do they want to do? They want to sell people a whole bunch of petroleum based chemicals to rub all over their skin so that they can keep coming back to the professional every single time. They don't wanna tell people that the moles are just a buildup of toxins and can be completely removed. That's why people are gaining them.
They're gaining them in areas that aren't exposed to the sun, which is funny, but because there's toxins being built up in the skin. And that's all it is. You get all these spots, know, people get spots on their skin and just toxins building up in that and they have to stay there. That's what it is. They're staying there to keep those toxins, and you take a little bit of pearl and a little coconut oil or castor, you put it right on that mole, because it'll break apart.
So if it wasn't an accumulation of toxins, it wouldn't break apart. And then also they wouldn't come in with the fact check to say that the moles aren't an accumulation of toxins. And that's the thing, I've got fact checked so many times. It was the best the one time I looked up the fact checker, he actually won an Emmy Award for fact checking. An Emmy award.
Imagine winning an Emmy for fact checking people's pages. That's the guy who fact checked my page. So my page has been hit so many times with that and everything else. It's just it's comical how much nonsense we face. That's what it is.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
cloudbuster by trevor james constable - book - https://ia802305.us.archive.org/3/items/loom-of-the-future/LOOM%20OF%20THE%20FUTURE%20.pdf https://t.co/VT3xVOtLvS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The excerpt discusses a line of devices associated with counteracting daily weather modification by altering atmospheric conditions. It references Trevor James Constable and Wilhelm Reich, who are described as the innovators behind the Cloudbuster, a apparatus purported to counteract weather modification taking place in the skies. A notable credential linked to Constable is that he worked for the U.S. Navy, and, in addition, helped the state of California “clean up the skies” and get rid of smog using devices like this. The claim is made that California knows how to restore cleaner skies with these kinds of tools.
According to the account, the devices are shown “here” and are said to be synchronized to a running water source. The mechanism described involves changing the etheric fields and the etheric waves of the earth, with the ether described as moving continuously throughout the planet. The narrative states that the devices can “dam up the ether,” as Constable would do, which would lead to rain. In other words, by manipulating the etheric flow, the devices are claimed to induce precipitation.
Beyond rain, the text asserts additional effects: the devices could cause plants to grow faster and could clear up areas affected by smog and pollution, as well as toxins and chemicals that have been released into the sky. The overall proposition presented is that these weather-modification countermeasures operate by influencing etheric energy, using synchronization with a water source, to produce environmental and agricultural benefits. The content links the Cloudbuster to a broader effort to address atmospheric contamination and weather manipulation, highlighting a historical claim about military and state usage, as well as potential environmental improvements attributed to the technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are all different types of devices in which can be built to counter the modification that takes place on a daily basis. And this was Trevor James Constable and Wilhelm Reich who were creating the Cloudbuster to counter the weather modification that's taking place in our skies. And it's interesting because Trevor James Constable worked for the US Navy and also got rid of all the smog in California using these devices. Okay? So California knows how to clean up the skies.
Isn't that funny? This guy worked for the US Navy and also informed the state of California how to clean up the skies and get rid of all the smog using devices like this. And these devices here were just synced up to a running water source. And what they would do is they would change the etheric fields and the etheric waves of the earth. So the ether is moving all the time throughout the earth.
And what they would do is they would dam up the ether, that's whichever dreams constable would do over here, so that it would begin to rain. Or you can also make plants grow faster and clear up the areas of all the smog and pollution and toxins and chemicals that they would put up in the sky.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
What is dragons blood? Tree sap that heals the gums, skin, pulls out metals, and regenerates the body. https://cultivateelevate.com/dragons-blood-capsules/ #cultivateelevate #dragonsblood https://t.co/oDQkbkahTu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss dragon's blood, a resin from the Draco tree (the dragon tree), which bleeds red when cut. It is not from dragons, but from the tree; the red sap is what’s referred to as dragon’s blood.
Speaker 1 explains its purported benefits:
- It heals the skin and is effective at removing heavy metals from the body.
- People with severe eczema (skin covered head to toe) have seen improvements with dragon's blood.
- Gum health improves when coconut oil and dragon's blood are rubbed on the gums, with reports of gum regeneration and dentists noting positive patient responses.
- Regarding heavy metals, it is claimed to detoxify and support the brain, skin, inflammation, and pain relief.
An anecdote is shared: a woman used four dragon's blood doses daily and reported that her arthritis inflammation is 99% gone. The speaker emphasizes the idea of human self-regeneration when given the right substances, suggesting dragon's blood is a powerful natural aid.
Speaker 1 also compares its antioxidant value to other foods, stating dragon's blood has an antioxidant value of almost 3,000,000, far higher than blueberries (~10,000) and chaga mushrooms (~50,000), placing it on a completely different level.
The discussion notes benefits for pets as well:
- It can be added to raw pet food for issues like hot spots.
- Cats will lick it, indicating animal acceptance, and the natural healing properties are extended to animals too.
The conversation frames dragon's blood as one of the “super foods” revealed by the speakers, suggesting its potential transformative healing properties, comparable in impact to other well-known natural products like pearl powder. The overall tone is enthusiastic about dragon's blood as a natural remedy with broad applications for skin, dental health, inflammation, detoxification, and even animal care.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But what is dragon's blood? Because people hear dragon's blood, and they wonder what the heck is that.
Speaker 1: So dragon's blood is from the Draco tree. There's a dragon tree. People can look up. It's a really cool tree from the Atlantean times. And there is a tree sap that comes up that.
And when the tree is cut, it bleeds like blood. So that's the whole reason for dragon's blood. It's not from dragons, but it is from trees. So people are aware, but when they would cut this tree, the tree sap was red. And that red, think of what it does for your body.
So like you said, it heals your skin. It's really good at pulling heavy metals out. We had tons of people who had like horrible eczema, horrible eczema. Their skin was covered from head to toe all the way, and their hands were covered and it was really, really bad. Dragon's blood helped with that.
We had people with gum issues. You know, their gums are becoming recessive because they're missing nutrients. People would take coconut oil and Dragon's blood, and they would rub it on their gums, and their gums would begin to regenerate. We had dentists reaching out saying, don't know what you're cooking up over there, but it's working and our patients are loving it. And then when it goes to the whole heavy metals thing, you know, pulling toxins out, helping the brain, helping the skin, even inflammation and pain.
A You lot of people like I had a lady yesterday, she said she was doing four dragon's bloods a day, and she said her inflammation of her arthritis is 99% gone. So this is what I've started to realize is we are like again, self regenerating beings, and we just need the right things so that we can begin to heal. And dragon's blood, when you get into the antioxidant value of dragon's blood, it's almost 3,000,000. It is one of the highest antioxidant foods on the earth, with blueberries being at about 10,000 and chaga mushroom being at about 50,000. You have dragon's blood at almost 3,000,000.
So it is on a whole another level. And it's been really good for pets too. You know, people have the hot spots with their pets. They can add it to their raw pet food, you know, and also cats. Cats will lick it too as well, which animals, you know, they know, they always know.
But once again, nature just gives you everything to heal. It gives you the most natural things to heal. And this is just one of the super foods that I discovered where I was like, wow, this is if this does what it does, like pearl powder, like you said, then this is gonna be crazy. You know? And it has pretty much just gone bananas.