reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @CultivateElevat
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
UFOS? Technology by a 3 letter agency stolen from Germany to push for project blue beam. 👽 Area 51 sells a lot of merchandise https://www.buzzsprout.com/2439588/episodes/19087154 https://t.co/jgLLjoXSIm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Henry Steven argues that Germany possessed flying saucers from 1931 to 1939. He connects this to the broader era of UFO sightings, claiming that what people interpreted as aliens or extraterrestrial incursions were actually German technology. He asserts that this German technology was stolen by the United States and the Russians, who then began reproducing it.
Steven references a book he cites, which he says states there is no proof of aliens ever found outside the government. He notes that the pictures, crashes, and Roswell incident are all government-related. He emphasizes that there is “no culture, no alien technology” uncovered by anyone, and that there is “simply no actual evidence” linking to extraterrestrial sources. He uses this to underscore his point about the prominence of alien narratives.
He further claims that the widespread fascination with aliens accompanies real-world covert activities, pointing to scientists who go missing and to the use of so-called alien technology. He mentions MK Ultra and CIA involvement, suggesting that alien narratives are part of a broader scheme involving brainwashing and media manipulation, including War of the Worlds. He states that the alien mythology is a form of manipulation or distraction.
Steven ties these ideas into a broader historical arc: in the 1920s there were War of the Worlds-style operations, then in the 1930s Germany developed flying saucers, and later the United States and the Soviet Union allegedly acquired the technology and staged alien invasions. He presents this as the current situation, implying that modern alien imagery and events are manufactured or orchestrated by intelligence agencies.
Overall, the narrative presented by Steven blends claims about early German aviation tech, confederated theft of technology by major powers, and a conspiracy framework in which alien phenomena are used as tools for government control and mass psychology. He consistently asserts that genuine evidence of extraterrestrial sources does not exist outside government channels, while attributing the spectacle of alien culture and related phenomena to deliberate manipulation by intelligence agencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very, very juicy one. So Germany's flying saucers by Henry Steven right here. So when they go into the whole aliens, you know, and the UFOs and Stephen Greer and Gaia and Blackrock and Roswell. Yes. Germany's flying saucer right there.
So what happens is is most people don't know is Germany had flying saucers in 1931 to 1939. So when all of these incidents occurred where they were saying that we were seeing flying saucers, remember that whole thing? Well, that was Germany. Germany had the technology and then it was stolen by America and the Russians, and then they started reproducing things. Now let me read you a part of book in here because we gotta read some real good stuff.
So this book goes into talking about how there was no proof of aliens ever found outside of the government. Okay? No proof of aliens found outside of the government. Those pictures, those crashes, that Roswell, government. Right?
No culture, no alien technology has been uncovered by anyone. There is simply no actual evidence of anything linking to extraterrestrial sources. That's what's funny. It also goes into how much attention the whole alien thing gets. Right?
With all these scientists going missing and then the nuclear scientists being taken out and they're using alien technology, and then you can pump magazines and war of the world and brainwashing MK Ultra CIA right there. Okay? That's all it is. All the alien stuff is just MK Ultra CIA. They've been doing War of the World since the nineteen twenties, then you have the nineteen thirties with Germany having the flying saucers, and then you have the Americans and the Russians taking the technology and then staging alien invasions.
That's what's going on right now.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Cell phone in the pocket or bra? Turn off wifi, bluetooth, and put it on Airplane mode. Not worth microwaving your organs. Not to mention more microwaves = less males overtime. how to hardwire your cell phone: https://odysee.com/@CultivateElevate:e2/removing5gandwifi:d https://t.co/kHaw47W807
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that microwaves from wireless devices are causing widespread cancer and other illnesses. Key points include:
- Women often keep their cell phones in front pockets, and men keep them in pant pockets; the speaker claims these placements cause cancers—prostate cancer for men and colon cancer for women—because of microwaving of the organs.
- The cell phone is described as created by Raytheon (the Department of Defense), and studies allegedly showed that exposure to microwaves led to cancer and various illnesses.
- The claim is made that if phones are not on airplane mode and WiFi/Bluetooth are not off, the phone constantly updates and pings the microwave frequency to that area, leading to tumors and lumps.
- The speaker links wireless technology to the pandemic, claiming that the rollout of 5G in 2020, with phones upgraded and towers installed in front of homes, was the root cause of the pandemic; Laura is cited as saying it also causes infertility.
- The speaker references the book Zapping of America, stating that when men were exposed to microwaves (and females as well), there was a higher chance of delivering female babies. The claim continues that men are vanishing and females are ballooning as microwave exposure increases with more cell phones and towers, i.e., more wireless technology.
- The Invisible Rainbow is cited as discussing wireless exposure as the root cause of these health issues, implying that this topic is not commonly discussed.
- The overall narrative connects personal device usage and wireless infrastructure to a broad pattern of cancers (prostate, colon), infertility, skewed sex ratios, and population changes, framing these as direct outcomes of microwave exposure from modern wireless technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So a lot of ladies, for example, will put their cell phone right here and guess what they come down with? The big c right here. A lot of men will keep their phone in their pants in their pants pocket, and guess what they'll come down with? The prostate cancer. And all these men, they can't figure out where they're getting prostate cancer from.
Guess what? You got microwaves in your pants. That's what you got. Okay? Same with some ladies.
They'll put it in their back pocket, right in their back pocket. Guess what they come down with? Colon cancer. You're microwaving your organs the entire time that you have your cell phone in your pocket. The cell phone like I said was created by Raytheon.
That is the Department of Defense. They noticed that when they did studies where they were having people exposed to microwaves, they were coming down with cancer and illnesses and all kinds of issues. So when you think about it, when people have these items close to them and they're not on airplane mode, they don't have the WiFi off and the Bluetooth, guess what? That phone is constantly updating and constantly pinging the microwave frequency to that area. And so when all these men are coming down with prostate cancer and these ladies are coming down with the the B cancer and then all these people in their pants and they can't figure it out and they're getting all these tumors and lumps and cysts, and you kinda start to connect the dots.
You get to the wireless technology. And that's what the book, the invisible rainbow goes into, talking about how nobody ever talks about that, and that was the root cause of the pandemic. 2020 was caused by the rollout of five g. People got upgrades on their phone, and they got cell phone towers installed in front of their house. And Laura just said it also causes infertility.
Yes. This was a crazy one. In the book Zapping of America, they talked about when men were exposed to microwaves and females as well, they had more of a chance of delivering delivering the females had more of a chance of delivering a female baby. So the men were vanishing and still have been vanishing to this day. Because the more microwaves that have been put out and the more cell phones and the more cell phone towers, the more wireless and all this other stuff, the more females continue to just kinda balloon rather than males.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Tiny hats 🎩 fund/own the KKK and slave trade. Got it. 🧠🧠 https://t.co/EtSqaTxvN2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a new book that makes provocative claims about Jewish influence. Key points include:
- Christopher Columbus and the slave trade are framed with imagery of “tiny hats” associated with Jews, suggesting that slaves who resisted were targeted by a “malicious setup.”
- The claim that the largest number of slaves were sent into New York through the seventeenth century by people described as “tiny hats.”
- The idea that there were “tiny hat mayors of the South” in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, with a proliferation of cities listed as led by these figures.
- A claim that Jews “owned” 2% of the population and controlled both the slave ships and the banking system, in addition to politicians.
- The assertion that the funding of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is connected to these same groups, described as “tiny hats.”
- The claim that the KKK was actually led by or associated with Jews, described as “the tiny hats,” and that Masons are the same group under different names, with people changing names to avoid recognition.
- A reference to the Rothschilds as the “kingpin of everything,” with a claim that they were previously known as the Bowers and changed their names to fit into the slave trade network.
Overall, the speaker connects archival-era racial and criminal activities to a conspiratorial narrative centered on Jewish identity, suggesting a continuous, concealed influence across slavery, banking, political leadership, the KKK, and fraternal organizations such as the Masons, culminating in the assertion that the Rothschilds are the central figures behind these networks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I picked up a new book that people need to look into, and this is pretty mind blowing. That's what it is. So Christopher Columbus, tiny hat right there. All the slave ships, tiny hats right there. And if any of the slaves decided to go against the tiny hats, they actually had a malicious setup to attack them and take them out.
And the largest amount of slaves were sent into New York through the seventeen hundreds by the tiny hats. Now this is where it gets crazy. So this is tiny hat mayors of the South. Look at all of those cities. And these are all tiny hat mayors of the eighteen hundreds.
This is just crazy. Look at all these. Yep. 2% of the population, they say. And on top of it, they also owned all the banks.
So they owned the slave ships and the banking system at the same time and the politicians. And then it gets deeper when you found out who funded the KKK. It's just it's too wild. It's always not talked about. Then it gets deeper when you find out that the KKK was actually the tiny hats right there.
Masons. Masons are the same exact people. Tiny hats. Always just different names. They're always changing their names, you don't know who is who.
And if we look back, we can see who the kingpin of everything is. Rothschild's right there. They used to be called the Bowers, then they changed their names so that they could fit in and run the slave route. Interesting.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Hair Loss solutions: Antennas* 1. Swapping Wifi for Ethernet cords 2. Eating shilajit, Pearl, and Raw eggs to feed the hair. 3. Wood Comb instead of plastic 4. Chlorine water filter 5. Make your own soap https://cultivateelevate.com/ https://t.co/DpdM0K75VZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses hair loss and various remedies and beliefs. He mentions raw eggs and pearl powder as possible helps for silky hair. He recommends a wood comb as beneficial and claims that using plastic on the head creates static, which he says contributes to hair loss. He advises removing WiFi or wireless frequencies from the home, stating that hair follicles act as antennas and can cause hair to fall out due to these frequencies. He also suggests using a chlorine water filter, explaining that chlorine goes to the scalp and dries out the hair follicle, causing them to break and fall apart.
He asserts that hair loss is easy to fix, emphasizing that hair strength depends on diet: eating the right foods makes hair strong, while eating the wrong foods makes hair weak and feeble. He states that the body is meant to have hair. He compares hair to antennas that pick up on things, such as the oils of the skin, and says they are meant to detect things and signal if something is wrong. He notes that when someone finds something energetic, their hairs start to rise or they get goosebumps, describing goosebumps as a reaction where hair follicles on the arms rise and “pick up like antennas.”
He argues that if there is no hair in certain areas, one’s “spidey sensors” disconnect, suggesting a sensory impairment. He adds a provocative thought that, in theory, one could influence society to become docile by programming people to get rid of all their hair.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Said here about hair loss. I've talked about that one before. If you want any silky hair, what you need to do is you need to do some raw eggs. You can also do some. You can do some pearl powder.
You can get yourself a wood comb. That's real good. A nice wood comb. Because if you're putting plastic on your head, you're building up a whole bunch of static which makes you lose your hair. You also wanna get rid of WiFi or any type of frequencies, wireless frequencies because your hairs are antennas.
So if you have WiFi or that type of nonsense in your house, your hairs are antennas and they begin to fall out. And then also, you can get yourself a chlorine water filter because that chlorine is going right to the scalp and it's drying out the hair follicle and making them break and fall apart. But hair loss is really easy to fix. I mean, that's the thing. If you eat the right foods, your hair is strong.
If you eat the wrong foods, your hair is weak and feeble. And that's the whole thing is they teach they try to teach people to eat all these fake foods and then they wonder why they got no hair. Your body is meant to have hair. Think of hair as antennas, you know, picking up on things like the the the the oils of your skin, they're meant to pick up on things. They tell you if something is wrong.
That's why kinda when somebody fit finds something energetic, their hairs start to raise or they get goosebumps. Right? They get goosebumps. They're like, oh my gosh. I got goosebumps because all of these hair follicles that are all right here begin to raise and all pick up like antennas.
So if you have no hair in these areas or whatever it may be, your spidey sensors kinda disconnect. So it's something to kinda think about. You know, if you wanted to if you wanted to kinda like, you know, make society kinda docile, you could kinda maybe program them to get rid of all their hair.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim apricot seeds heal the big C, citing World Without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin. I say the FDA was created in 1934 to go after natural remedies, mention radium water, then apricot seeds, and that they’re blind to vaccines (Murder by Injection references).
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Apricot Seeds heal the big C. Source - World without cancer the story of b17 by G Edward Griffin. 🎈The FDA was created in 1934 to go after natural remedies. 1st one radium water then came the apricot seeds. Somehow they are blind to vaxxines. Book: Murder by Injection rings a 🛎 https://t.co/FKlJry60zi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that apricot seeds are dangerous because they contain cyanide, a claim he attributes to the FDA in the 1970s scaring people away from eating them. He asserts that the same FDA tells people to take 62 vaccines, while also condemning nature, pointing to the apricot seed as “nature” that is dangerous. He notes that apple seeds, plum seeds, and cherry seeds also contain cyanide, and claims this cyanide dissolves cancer cells because cancer cells are “crying out for help” and are fed by the apricot, which leads to cancer beginning to “poop.” He asks the audience to see why the FDA “made that up,” suggesting the FDA came around in 1934 when people were drinking radium water and becoming overstimulated, and then went after “other natural remedies, like apricot seeds.” He remarks on the irony of the bitter apricot seed being the source of healing, while someone supposedly asks where to get apricot seeds and mentions RNC as a supplier with the seeds described as “amazing” and bitter.
He contrasts almonds: now they are sweet and allegedly increase dopamine, whereas the bitter almond is claimed to have healing properties. He states that “the bitter is what has the healing properties for the body,” implying that the sweetness of modern almonds corresponds to a loss of those healing properties. He claims the government altered the supply by reducing bitter apricot trees and replacing them with sweet apricot trees. He concludes with a general, sweeping assertion that “Government, 20% of the GDP is the med…,” implying government involvement in the medical industry or health narrative, though the sentence is incomplete in the transcript.
Overall, the speaker presents a narrative in which apricot seeds contain cyanide that can target cancer cells, critiques the FDA’s historical stance on natural remedies and radium water, contrasts bitter versus sweet almonds in terms of healing properties and dopamine effects, and alleges government manipulation of apricot tree varieties to favor sweet over bitter varieties, tying these claims to a broader statement about government influence on medicine and GDP.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See that apricot? That bitter right there? Nobody eats the apricot seeds anymore. You know why they don't eat the apricot seeds anymore? Because the FDA in the nineteen seventies scared people to say that if they eat apricot seeds, they're gonna get cyanide poisoning.
Okay? Yeah. The same ones who tell you to take 62 vaccines, those are the same ones who tell you that nature yeah. Nature right there. You see that nature?
That's an apricot seed. That's nature. It's dangerous. It's also interesting too because apple seeds have cyanide in them. Plum seeds have cyanide in them.
Cherry seeds have have cyanide in them. And that cyanide, guess what it does? Dissolves those cancer cells. That's what it comes down to because the cancer cells are just crying out for help and then they get fed by the apricot and then the cancer begins to poop. You see why the FDA said that?
Did you see why the FDA made that up? The FDA came around in 1934 when people were drinking radium water and they're getting too jacked up with energy. First thing they went after was radium water, Then they went after all the other natural remedies, like apricot seeds. Oh my gosh. This dangerous apricot seed.
Nom nom nom nom nom. It's too funny. And someone's gonna ask where to get where to get your apricot seeds. RNC. They got amazing apricot seeds, and they're bitter.
This is the thing. All of the almonds now are sweet. They are sweet, and they're jacking up your dopamine. The bitter is what has the healing properties for the body. So when you get into the bitter, you heal this illness right here.
See that one right there? The bitter is what is healing that illness and that is why the almonds have the sweet flavor now instead of the bitter. So what the government did was they cut down most of the bitter apricot trees, switched them out with sweet apricot trees. Government, 20% of the GDP is the med
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
All this talk about aliens....👽 Is it UFOS from germany with radium or the US government messing with our minds? Book: Hitler's Flying Saucers: A Guide to German Flying Discs of the Second World War https://t.co/jq0CsI2goL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Today we're gonna talk about the whole UFO alien thing. You see that right there? You see the German flying saucer right there? Let me read this to you. This book is a guide to the German flying discs. Yes. The flying saucers were created during World War two, in case you didn't be aware. And also, there has been no proof that there's ever been any aliens. Nope alien crashes by anyone except for inside and outside of the government. Same with Roswell. That's after they took the technology from the Germans. No alien bodies have ever been found. No culture. No alien technology has ever been uncovered by anyone except for the government. And here's Victor Schauberger's work in Austrian who worked for Germany, who created the first flying saucer right there made out of copper, and it was taken by the US military. And it's funny because even the Italians knew. Right? Old story says Italian about the flying saucers. German flying saucers. And here's just another one. German. And then the Soviets, after they got the technology, they started saying they have saucers, but it was a reality, just the Germans. So once The US Military got ahold of the technology, then they started publishing all the stuff in the tiny hat newspapers. And then next, they're gonna say there's an alien invasion. You get it?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today, we're gonna talk about the whole UFO alien thing. You see that right there? You see the German flying saucer right there? Let me read this to you. This book is a guide to the German flying discs.
Yes. The flying saucers were created during World War two, in case you didn't be aware. And also, there has been no proof that there's ever been any aliens. Nope alien crashes by anyone except for inside and outside of the government. Same with Roswell.
That's after they took the technology from the Germans. No alien bodies have ever been found. No culture. No alien technology has ever been uncovered by anyone except for the government. And here's Victor Schauberger's work in Austrian who worked for Germany, who created the first flying saucer right there made out of copper, and it was taken by the US military.
And it's funny because even the Italians knew. Right? Old story says Italian about the flying saucers. German flying saucers. And here's just another one.
German. And then the Soviets, after they got the technology, they started saying they have saucers, but it was a reality, just the Germans. So once The US Military got ahold of the technology, then they started publishing all the stuff in the tiny hat newspapers. And then next, they're gonna say there's an alien invasion. You get it?
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a thread claiming UFO disclosure is promoted by Gaia, Steven Greer, and Netflix, backed by BlackRock. War of the Worlds: MK Ultra. 1943 Germany invents a flying saucer; 1947 Roswell by the govt; 1997 Phoenix Lights by the govt; 2026 staged invasion.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
👽UFO disclosure: Gaia , Steven Greer, & Netflix promote this narrative - blackrock shareholders. 🌱War of the worlds: MK ultra experiment 🌱1943: Germany invents flying saucer 🌱1947: Roswell done by the govt 🌱1997: Phoenix Lights done by the govt 🌱2026 Staged govt invasion https://t.co/TDIOrWD6ya
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sarah’s question about ET disclosure leads to a historical arc. First, War of the Worlds, a famous book from about 1910, and then the radio broadcast that aliens were invading to scare people and see how they would react, marking the start of the phenomenon.
Moving forward to the 1940s, Victor Schauberger creates the flying saucer. He shipped into America, they take his technology, they ship it back, and they off them. Then in the 1960s, three-letter agencies are creating flying saucers and flying them all over the place, starting the UFO movement.
Jumping ahead to 2023 and 2024, there are many whistleblowers exposing the UFO disclosure. The belief asserted is that all of this ET reality is actually our own technology, and that this technology has been around for a long period of time. Therefore, with the whole ET disclosure, the point is to keep you consumed.
The speaker concludes with a sequence of conspiratorial expectations: there are aliens coming, and they’ll implement Project Blue Beam, then they’ll say they have you as a savior. Following that would be a new world order in which people band together, pay climate taxes and carbon taxes, and then are corralled into a fifteen-minute smart city.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sarah says, what is your opinion on the ET disclosure? This is an interesting one. Let's go back in time. So you have War of the Worlds, which was a a famous book that came out in about 1910, and then they broadcasted on the radio that aliens were invading so that they could scare people and see what they could do to them and see how they would react. So that's the start of it.
Then you fast forward to nineteen forties. You have Victor Schauberger who creates the flying saucer. He shipped into America. They take his technology. They ship them back, and they off them.
And then all of a sudden, have nineteen sixties. You have three letter agencies creating flying saucers and flying them all over the place and starting the UFO movement. Now you fast forward to 2023 and 2024, and you have all these whistleblowers who are exposing the UFO disclosure and all of the ET when reality, it's our own technology. All of this technology has been around for a long period of time. So with this whole ET disclosure, it's just to keep you consumed.
That's pretty much what it comes down to. There's aliens coming, and they're gonna do project blue beam, and then they're gonna say we got you as a savior. And then all of a sudden, we have a new world order that you guys can all band together, pay climate taxes and carbon taxes, and then you guys can all get corralled like this into a fifteen minute smart city.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Cysts, Tumors, and Lack of iodine 🍒 Book - The iodine crisis. Commercial non organic flour contains bromide to block iodine. Similar to chlorine in the pool. 👉Pearl powder, Raw eggs, Shellfish, Oysters, Raw milk, Raw butter, Dulce Seaweed, lugols http://Cultivateelevate.com https://t.co/EQidtTJyjp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Cysts are caused by the lack of iodine. If a person is suffering from cysts, they are lacking iodine. There's too much bromide in the food, and there's a great book called the iodine crisis which goes into this. But anybody who's suffering from cysts or tumors, you just need iodine.
Pearl powder has iodine, but there are other sources you can do like kelp, and there's a bunch of different brands too which also promote iodine, but iodine is the main root cause of people having cysts or tumors. Because if you think about it, if you are missing iodine, you start to develop this this group of cells which are all connected and all malnourished, and then they start to multiply. Especially ladies. Ladies need more iodine than males. Because if you think of the cycle every single month, minerals are constantly being removed, so they need more iodine.
And it's just a very simple solution. You can take iodine and just rub it on your chest and that will help it go away. And it's just these are simple things that if you're missing these minerals, which iodine is such a crucial one, your brain does not function without iodine. I mean, people used to carry iodine in a talisman and put it on their chest so that they always had iodine. Iodine is crucial for the body, for the brain, for this area, for the lady parts, for the male parts, for everything, for your IQ.
They've actually shown that people with low iodine levels have a lower IQ and I wonder what competes with iodine. Bromide, which is the counter that they put in all the food.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Said how do you think cysts are caused? Cysts are caused by the lack of iodine. If a person is suffering from cysts, they are lacking iodine. There's too much bromide in the food, and there's a great book called the iodine crisis which goes into this. But anybody who's suffering from cysts or tumors, you just need iodine.
Pearl powder has iodine, but there are other sources you can do like kelp, and there's a bunch of different brands too which also promote iodine, but iodine is the main root cause of people having cysts or tumors. Because if you think about it, if you are missing iodine, you start to develop this this group of cells which are all connected and all malnourished, and then they start to multiply. Especially ladies. Ladies need more iodine than males. Because if you think of the cycle every single month, minerals are constantly being removed, so they need more iodine.
And it's just a very simple solution. You can take iodine and just rub it on your chest and that will help it go away. And it's just these are simple things that if you're missing these minerals, which iodine is such a crucial one, your brain does not function without iodine. I mean, people used to carry iodine in a talisman and put it on their chest so that they always had iodine. Iodine is crucial for the body, for the brain, for this area, for the lady parts, for the male parts, for everything, for your IQ.
They've actually shown that people with low iodine levels have a lower IQ and I wonder what competes with iodine. Bromide, which is the counter that they put in all the food.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Tobacco and the tiny hats 🎩 same ones who own the medikal system and processed foods 💊💊💊 https://t.co/tVrgki7AJC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript references a collection of old books and discusses tobacco, noting that Bernard McFadden’s work includes Columbus’ encounters with tobacco and the claim that Columbus considered the tobacco users to be the devil. It also mentions Henry Ford and asserts a connection to Columbus, including a claim about “tiny hats” and five tiny hats associated with Columbus and the people who came to America.
Key claims include:
- Luis d. Torres is identified as the first to discover the use of tobacco, who settled in Cuba and is described as the “father of the tiny hat control of the tobacco business that exists today in 2026.”
- The “tiny hats” are said to own the entire tobacco industry.
- Tobacco is described as having become a natural tonic.
- The tobacco market’s popularity is attributed to rapid addiction, leading to widespread bans in every country as the tiny hats allegedly profited greatly.
- Economic figures are given: the sale of 2,000,000,000 cigarettes in 1900 rose to 40,000,000,000 cigarettes in 1920, with the implication that the tiny hats were banking on this growth.
- The nicotine used is claimed to be “made by Big Pharma” as synthetic nicotine.
- It is stated that tobacco was so addictive that people could quit drinking before they could quit cigarettes.
- Before doctors were paid to tell people to smoke during pregnancy, doctors are described as having realized tobacco was poison and that the habit was taking over the country, with the tiny hats “banking” on the narrative.
- The line “Nicotine blood” is mentioned, suggesting a focus on nicotine as a central element in the narrative.
Overall, the transcript links tobacco’s rise, addiction, and industry profits to a conspiratorial claim about “tiny hats” controlling the tobacco business, with historical references to Columbus, Luis d. Torres, Henry Ford, and Bernard McFadden, and it juxtaposes doctors’ historical attitudes toward tobacco with later incentives to promote smoking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I like to collect old books, truth about tobacco, Bernard McFadden, goes into talking about Columbus, saw the first people using tobacco and considered them the devil. It's interesting because Columbus was a tiny hat. And if you didn't know that, right here in Henry Ford goes right into here, talks about Columbus and the tiny hats who came over to America. Oh, it goes deeper. Associated with Columbus and the five tiny hats, these people right here, Luis d Torres was the first man assured, the first one to discover the use of tobacco.
He settled in Cuba and may have said to be the father of the tiny hat control of the tobacco business that exists today in 2026. So it's funny too because the tiny hats own the entire tobacco industry. Right here. So guess what it became? It became a natural tonic, they say.
What's also interesting about the whole tobacco thing is it became so popular because people got so addicted so fast that they had to start banning it in every country. Tiny hats were making lots of money. And someone's like, what are you talking about? They're making lots of money. Well, check this out.
From the sale of 2,000,000,000 in 1900 cigarettes to 40,000,000,000 in 1920. Tiny hats banking. Then always people go on about the nicotine, which was made by Big Pharma. That's a fun one to go down to, synthetic nicotine made by Big Pharma. And tobacco was so addictive that people could actually quit drinking before they could quit cigarettes.
That's kinda interesting. And it's interesting because before they started paying doctors to tell them to smoke cigarettes while they were pregnant and pushing that narrative onto the people, the doctors at the time actually realized that it was poison, and this habit was taking over the whole country, and the tiny hats were just banking. Just banking on people believing the narrative. Nicotine blood. Look at that.
reSee.it AI Summary
Mammograms are toxic; I’d explore thermography, a holistic doctor, or fire your doctor. The system allegedly uses a “make believe” PCR test to declare illness to push radiation/chemo, then ramps it up. I cite Murder by Injection, Eustace Mullins.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Mammograms? Toxic. Look into thermography, a holistic doc, or firing your doc.. Not to mention the medikal system uses a make believe pcr test to say you have an illness to sell radiation/kemo. They crank it up and say today you have it. Book Murder by Injection Eustace Mullins https://t.co/e9s9lTcmkx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes medical screening and procedures for women, claiming that mammograms radiate the breast area and cause the very illness they are trying to detect. They describe mammograms as a torturous process and advocate for alternatives like thermography. They argue that “all the things they do to ladies” include torture of the private parts, naming pap tests and pap smears as part of this mistreatment. The speaker asserts there is a “demonic system” that tortures women by entering areas that supposedly do not need to be examined, leading to the discovery of cells thought to be ill, followed by radiation, chemotherapy, and surgeries such as removing ovaries or the entire uterus.
They claim a PCR test can be used to say someone has an illness they do not have, and after such a determination, surgery is performed, only to have professionals later realize they were wrong. The speaker contends that even when the uterus has been removed, the mistake remains. They reference the book Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins to argue there is a “monopoly health care system” that is not about health but profits, describing it as a monopoly of “demonic entities” poisoning the people and reducing the population.
Additionally, the speaker asserts a claim about medical malpractice, stating that over one million people die each year from medical malpractice. They present the overall narrative as a conspiracy-like critique of modern healthcare, tying together screening, diagnostic tests, surgical interventions, and the influence of supposed malignant forces behind the healthcare system. The speaker emphasizes that the book Murder by Injection explains the monopoly health care system as a mechanism of population control, rather than a system focused on health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mammograms, that's what they're doing to ladies. What they're doing is they're taking this area and they're radiating it. Okay? Giving them the illness that they are trying to allegedly find. That's the whole point of the mammogram.
And they smash the lady parts, which causes damage, and then they end up with the illness that they're trying to detect. So when you get into the whole thing with the mammogram and people trying to figure out that whole thing, that is just a torturous thing. People can look into a I think it's a thermogram instead or but it's just a different different way of doing something. But mammograms, yeah. I mean, here's the thing.
All the things they do to ladies, I mean, I can name quite a lot that they do to ladies. Okay? They torture ladies and their private parts all the time. They torture women with the pap test and the pap smears and all this. This is the thing.
You have a you have a demonic system which is torturing women and going in places which they don't even need to be or belong. That's pretty much what it comes down to. And these systems, they go in there, they poke the lady, and they're like, oh, we found these cells that were under the influence of an illness, and now we're gonna have to radiate you. And now we have to chemo you. Now we're gonna have to pull out your ovaries.
Now we're gonna have to take out your whole uterus. Do you understand this? Like, this is what's crazy. And here's the nuts thing. They can use a PCR test to say that you have an illness that you don't.
Okay? And then once they say that you have the illness that you don't, they do the surgery. And then they're like, oh my gosh. Oh my gosh. We were actually wrong.
But we pulled out your uterus and anyway. I mean, this is what we're dealing with, and that is why I said if people have not read murder by injection by Eustace Mullins, you will understand this monopoly health care system, which is not about health. What a word. Health care. They don't care about health.
They care about profits. So and that's what this book goes into that it is a monopoly of demonic entities who are poisoning the people and taking out the population. How many people do you think they take out with medical, malpractice? Over one million people die of medical malpractice every single year.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Grapefruit and the 💊. Big harma can’t exist with nature so they fear you away from it. https://t.co/ZWp6JVvJKi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker notes that doctors caution against eating grapefruit while on medication, claiming grapefruit counters all medication and heals many illnesses. They argue the bitter component is beneficial and helps with blood, the brain, and the stomach. They warn against mixing grapefruit with medications and suggest doing a simple search on the health benefits of grapefruit (on Google or Yandex) to explore more.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I always think about how the doctors tell you not to eat grapefruit when you're on medication. You know why? Because grapefruit counters all the medication and heals your body from almost every illness. The bitter in the grapefruit is very beneficial. Helps with your blood, helps with your brain, helps with your stomach, helps with everything.
So, yeah, that's kinda why they tell you, don't be mixing and matching because then you're gonna get off those pills. You know? And a simple search is just health benefits of grapefruit in Google or Yandex and check these out. Pretty wild,
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Origin of down syndrome? Book the zapping of America. Quite a govt coverup https://t.co/a1G0lHYjmG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a passage from a book titled The Zapping of America: Microwaves, Their Deadly Risk, and Their Cover Up, describing a "deep" issue related to Down syndrome. The core claim presented is that Down syndrome has appeared with unusual frequency among the offspring of airline pilots, and that the FAA and medical experts have been silent about this observation, as have people working in the aviation environment more broadly. The speaker states that this elevated incidence of Down syndrome among children of airline pilots has been suggested as a fact in the excerpt.
A specific investigation is mentioned: a Fort Rucker study proposed to determine the exact extent of birth defects, including Down syndrome, within this population. The study was proposed in the nineteen seventies but was opposed and subsequently dropped. The speaker indicates a motive for the suppression or blocking of the study, suggesting that the military and the airlines did not want this information public.
Further, the speaker recounts that officials at the National Airlines Pilot Associations were against the study and reportedly told local councils not to proceed with it. Additionally, it is claimed that the medical consultants for the National Association were very opposed to the study. The overall narrative presented implies a deliberate resistance to investigating birth defects, including Down syndrome, among children of airline pilots, with the claim that such opposition came from both aviation authorities and medical advisory bodies connected to the airlines.
In sum, the passage alleges that Down syndrome among offspring of airline pilots has been unusually high, that there was a proposed Fort Rucker birth-defect study in the 1970s that was opposed and dropped, and that opposition to the study came from the National Airlines Pilot Associations and their medical consultants, who allegedly urged local councils not to proceed. The speaker frames these events as part of a broader pattern of silence by the FAA and medical experts regarding Down syndrome and other health concerns in aviation environments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today, we're gonna read a little snippet from this book, the zapping of America microwaves, their deadly risk, and their cover up, and this is a deep one. Department of defense made the microwave. Raytheon, who also made the cell phone. Let's talk about it. So check this.
This is about Down syndrome. They can never seem to figure out where Down syndrome comes from. FAA and medical experts have been silent about Down syndrome among offspring of airline pilots as they have about cancer and cataracts and people working in the aviation environment. Fact is is that Down syndrome among the children of airline pilots has been unusually high. In Fort Rucker, a study to determine the exact extent of birth defects was proposed and opposed and then dropped in the nineteen seventies.
Why would the military and the airlines not wanna tell this to the people? Oh, here's why. I was later given to understand that officials at the National Airlines Pilot Associations were against the study and that they told the local councils to not go ahead with it. I also heard that the medical consultants for the National Association was very opposed to the study. Isn't that interesting?
reSee.it AI Summary
I note claims that chemo is pushed for a 6% commission, and that the doc omits alternatives like soursop, apricot seeds, reishi, sun, avoiding wifi, and a healthy lifestyle. It also states medicine accounts for 20% of GDP. Source: Peter Glidden’s The MD Emperor Has No Clothes.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Kemo for cancer? 6% commision check. Thus the doc doesn't say eat soursop, apricot seeds, reishi, sit in the sun, eliminate wifi, and have a healthy lifestyle. Also, the medikal system is 20% the GDP. Follow the 💰💰 Book source: the MD emperor has no clothes peter glidden https://t.co/QvxUatWNbg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the book The MD Emperor Has No Clothes by Peter Glidden, describing it as a phenomenal resource. They assert that when patients receive a cancer diagnosis and undergo a PCR test, they are then told they must undergo chemotherapy or radiation. According to the speaker, in the book Peter Glidden explains that the professional receives a 6% commission for recommending chemotherapy. They claim this leads to about $100,000 being charged to the patient’s insurance, which the speaker views as a significant incentive for doctors to push chemo and radiation.
The speaker contends that professionals tell patients to pursue chemo and radiation largely because of the commission from Big Pharma, rather than offering alternatives or focusing on overall health. They allege that doctors do not inform patients about natural or alternative options, listing items such as soursop, sun exposure, reishi, apricot seeds, and dietary corrections as potential aids that could address the body’s signals for help. The implication is that the medical system prioritizes medication and procedures over nutritional or lifestyle approaches.
A central claim echoed in the talk is that the medical system in the United States is financially driven: 20% of the country’s GDP is spent on healthcare. The speaker emphasizes “20% of the GDP of America” to illustrate how the system operates financially, suggesting that this economic framework contributes to the continued use of vaccines, chemotherapy, radiation, “poisonous pills,” and misdiagnoses. They argue that these financial incentives are why certain treatments persist, and why systemic changes are unlikely within the current framework.
Overall, the speaker asserts that the U.S. medical system is a money-driven enterprise, with substantial financial incentives tied to specific treatments like chemotherapy, which are presented as standard responses to cancer diagnoses. The discussion centers on challenging the mainstream approach by highlighting alleged commissions, insurance costs, and the availability of alternative health information and practices that they claim are typically overlooked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a great one. The MD Emperor Has No Clothes by Peter Glidden. This is a phenomenal book. So what people don't know is when they go to get the big c diagnosis, okay, and they did the PCR test to lie to them, then they go and say, well, now we're gonna have to give you chemo or radiation. And in this book, Peter Glynn talked about how the professional gets a 6% commission check for telling you to do chemo.
6%. They charge a $100,000 usually to your insurance. So that's a big chunk of change. So now you see why all the professionals tell people to go get the chemo and the radiation because they're getting a big commission check from Big Pharma. They don't tell people about soursop.
They don't tell people about sitting out in the sun. They don't tell people about reishi. They don't tell people about apricot seeds. They don't tell them about being healthy and just correcting their diet because their body is crying out for help. They tell them chemo and radiation.
6% commission check. So this is one book that every person needs to look into. And this guy, when he explained that about how they're getting a 6% commission check, it blew my mind because it made me realize that this system is just for the money. That's it. And so people are aware.
Okay? The medical system in The US is 20% of the GDP. Okay? 20%. 20.
Two zero. Right there. Two zero. 20% of the GDP of America. Okay?
So that's why they don't get rid of any of this stuff. Because think about that. 20% of the GDP is them poisoning the people, whether it be vaccines, whether it be chemo, whether it be radiation, whether it be poisonous pills, whether it be misdiagnosis. Oh, we didn't know. We messed up, but we'll cut you anyways.
20% of the GDP of The United States is the medical system.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Eye healing exercises: they are a muscle 💪 https://t.co/4oQuyhwe0H
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how eye muscles weaken without training and explains several exercises to strengthen them, noting that our screens encourage up–down scrolling rather than left–right movement. The key idea is that if you do not move your eyes to the left or right, they become weaker, whereas moving them in different directions strengthens the muscles.
One exercise described is turning and stretching the eyes far to the left, then far to the right. The speaker emphasizes that the eye is a muscle: if it is not activated, it gets weaker. Another exercise is the traditional eye roll, where you look up, then around, and then close your eyes because you’re over it. This is presented as another eye exercise.
A third exercise involves going in a circle with the eyes. The speaker notes that going in a circle is training the eyes, and that closing the eyes and moving in a circle can be painful because the eye muscles have become tight from lack of use.
The discussion also touches on astigmatism and lazy eye, described as connections that result from a weak muscle in the eye. The claim is that these conditions are related to a weakened eye muscle and can result from not training the muscle.
Additionally, the speaker mentions a technique: closing the eyes tightly, then opening them, repeatedly, which will cause tearing. It is noted that when people tear, their eyesight begins to heal, and after a good cry, some people report they can see better, with McFadden contributing to the observation that tearing is associated with improved vision.
Throughout, the speaker attributes these insights to McFadden, asserting that this line of reasoning connects eye muscle weakness, specific exercises, and transient improvements in vision linked to tearing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is just eye exercises moving it left to right and up and down because if you do not train your eyes, if you do not move them to the left, if you do not move them to the right, if you do not move them up and down, they do not get stronger. They get weaker. And this is the whole thing with our screens. Our screens are are designed so that we scroll up and down the entire time. We don't look left.
We don't look right. We look up and down. So you can imagine what that's doing to your eyes all the time, just seeing the same direction and never looking left and right. So this was one exercise. So it says turn and stretch the eyes far to the left.
Turn and stretch the eyes far to the right. It's a muscle. When you do not activate the muscle, the muscle gets weaker. That's what it comes down to. Then you have the traditional eye roll.
That's what I love to say with that. The traditional eye roll where you look up and then you look around and then you close your eyes because you're just over it. Right? So this was another eye exercise right there. Another eye exercise as as well too.
Going in a circle. This is very important because going in a circle is training the eyes. Try closing your eyes and going in an eye circle. It will be painful. I guarantee it because the fact that your eyes have became weaker because those muscles are tight.
And that's usually what, like, the astigmatism situation. Astigmatism or lazy eye, all of these connections, it's just a weak muscle right here. That that's all it is. So if you don't train it, then it becomes like a lazy eye, or you get into astigmatism, which is just the shortening of the muscle. And this is another one for people to do.
You just close your eyes real hard, and you open them, and then you close your eyes real hard, and you open them, and you'll notice that you'll begin to tear. And what McFadden was talking about was when people would tear, their eyesight would begin to heal. And it's interesting because after a person has a good cry, then they start to have better vision. They're like, wow. I can see better.
So McFadden was on to something.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Eye docs trying to debunk pearl powder? The proof is in the pudding. https://cultivateelevate.com/search.php?search_query=pearl§ion=product Books: Take off your glasses and see, light as medicine by jacob liberman, and strengthening your eyes by Bernarr Macfadden https://t.co/whbBepafpz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that eye doctors are trying to debunk his videos now, claiming pearl powder cannot heal the eyes because it would reduce their clientele. Speaker 1 responds, saying, “I promise you it’s a lie and you sir, you should be ashamed of yourself.”
Speaker 0 cites claims about pearl powder healing eyes. He references Doctor Wang, who used pearl powder with 28 patients and found that sixty-six percent recovered from cataracts after one month. He then presents other anecdotes: someone had a prescription for twenty-five years; after using pearl powder, their vision shifted from negative 5.5 to negative 4.75. Another person reports that after stopping prescribed pills, pearl powder began working. Regarding astigmatism, another person says they have been taking Pearl capsules for two months at age 50, and their astigmatism is almost gone with improved vision. He notes an 88-year-old using pearl powder who experienced cataracts going away and a thirty percent reduction in floaters. He asserts that professionals are trying to keep their patients for life, implying the anecdotal results are real while professionals deny them.
Speaker 0 then says the proof is in the pudding, and he offers sources to look into for eye healing. He lists Light as Medicine of the Future by Jacob Liberman, noting Liberman is an eye doctor who wrote it. He mentions another Liberman work, Take Off Your Glasses and See, explaining that Liberman realized his patients were getting worse wearing glasses. He also cites Strengthening of the Eyes by Bernard McFadden, and references concepts like sungazing and “the things they haven’t told you.” He ends with, “Have a great day!”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I thought this was hilarious. I have eye doctors trying to debunk my videos now. They're not dancing on TikTok anymore. Now they're trying to talk about how pearl powder can't heal the eyes because that would get rid of their clientele. Right?
Speaker 1: I promise you it's a lie and you sir, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Speaker 0: So in the video she says that pearl powder is make believe and woo woo and we should trust the professional. Doctor. Wang with her 28 patients used pearl powder for cataracts. After one month she found that sixty six percent of her patients recovered from cataracts. How about another one?
I've had the same prescription for twenty five years before using Pearl Powder. It went from negative 5.5 to negative 4.75. How about another one? After I stopped using the pills that were prescribed to me, my Pearl powder began working. Interesting, What about astigmatism?
I've been taking Pearl capsules for two months. I'm 50 years old. I went to the eye professional, my astigmatism is almost gone and my vision has improved. Wow! It's almost like they want to keep their patients for life.
Now someone will say, well those people might be a little younger. 88 years old using Pearl powder, having cataracts go away, and floaters decrease by 30%. Pearl. So I would say that these professionals are just trying to keep their patience, right? Because they're saying that my things are make believe, but in reality the proof is in the pudding.
And I'm gonna leave you with some books you can look into of how you can heal your eyes as well too. You can look into Light as Medicine of the Future by Jacob Liberman. That was an eye doctor who wrote this one. Here, he also wrote Take off your glasses and see because he realized his patients were getting worse and worse wearing glasses. Who would guess?
And also strengthening of the eyes by Bernard McFadden, you can get into sungazing, and the things they haven't told you. Have a great day!
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Who doesn’t enjoy peanuts 🥜? https://t.co/bU2Ps36hx0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses claims about peanuts, vaccines, and Pfizer. The speaker asserts that in the 1960s, peanut oil was put into vaccines, and that when injected, people would become allergic to peanuts. The speaker names Pfizer as the company behind both the vaccine claim and the ownership of the EpiPen for peanut allergies, stating that Pfizer “owns the EpiPen for the peanut allergies” and that they also control the schools’ required equipment and supplies related to peanut allergies.
The discussion then shifts to alternative explanations for peanut allergies. The speaker suggests that if peanut oil didn’t cause the allergies, the allergy could be due to peanuts being processed with pesticides or chemicals, as peanuts are in the ground when grown. They propose that pesticide exposure could be the culprit and note that many people who react to peanuts might be reacting to pesticides rather than peanut oil itself.
Next, the speaker argues that peanut processing contributes to allergies, noting that peanut butters are typically boiled and roasted, meaning they are cooked twice before consumption, implying they are not raw peanuts. The speaker mentions Virginia as a place that grows raw peanuts in the shell and claims these raw peanuts are “absolutely beautiful.”
The speaker then extols the purported health benefits of peanuts, claiming they are good for the prostate, ovaries, brain, testosterone, and estrogen, and that they aid digestion by moving food through the stomach. They extend these claims to cancer, asserting that peanuts can help with prostate cancer, breast cancer, and various intestinal cancers.
Overall, the transcript blends allegations about a vaccine-induced peanut allergy linked to Pfizer and the EpiPen with hypotheses about pesticide exposure and peanut processing as allergy causes, and concludes with asserted health benefits and cancer-related claims associated with peanuts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see that right there? That's a peanut. Do you know why people are allergic to peanuts? Because in the nineteen sixties they put peanut oil into the vaccines. Yes, that was Pfizer.
They put peanut oil into the vaccines so that when a person was injected with the peanut oil they would become allergic. Guess who owns the EpiPen for the peanut allergies? Pfizer, actually. In this book, it explains about how Pfizer owns the EpiPen for the peanut allergies. So not only did they inject the people to make them allergic, then they also own the solution that all the schools need to carry and all the things that need to go with that.
That's Pfizer. So people are aware. Now what's also interesting is a lot of people go, well, when I eat peanuts, I have allergic reactions. So if it wasn't the peanut oil that made you allergic, it's the fact that that peanut has been processed with some sort of pesticides or chemicals or sprayed with pesticides because it is in the ground when it grows. But that's the other thing.
You might be allergic to the pesticides. Now if you're not allergic to the pesticides and you haven't had a peanut injection or vaccine into your body, the last culprit is the processing of the peanut. Most peanut butters have already been boiled and they've been roasted, which means that they've been cooked two times before you go to eat them, so they are not in their raw peanut form right here. And if you do want raw peanuts, you should look into Virginia. Virginia grows all the raw peanuts in the shell and they're absolutely beautiful.
But if you notice the peanut right in there is really good for the prostate, ovaries, for the brain, for your testosterone, for your estrogen. It's great for you pushing food through your stomach because you've got too much build up inside your stomach. It is phenomenal. And when you get into all of the, you know, the big C, we'll say, all the different cancers, you see that it can help with prostate, it can help with breast cancer, it can help with all of these different body parts such as the intestinal cancers. That was the peanut.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Rabies; scam since 1885 ✅ https://t.co/nDxWZG6VbC
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker asserts that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep veterinarians in business.
- If a vet recommends rabies shots, the speaker says you should fire them, alleging the shots promote poison to immunize and then cause a debilitating disease, creating a lifetime patient.
- The speaker claims there are no rabid dogs roaming about, and that rabies is fabricated.
- They describe the origin of rabies studies as involving rabid dogs kept in cages that went nuts, with the vaccine being placed in the dogs’ heads after they died, and claim this demonstrated the vaccine’s effectiveness.
- The speaker asserts that today dogs are still injected for rabies to poison the dogs and create lifelong patients.
- Two books are cited as debunking this view: The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean.
- The speaker generalizes that professionals, including vets and doctors, are there to keep you as a patient for life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is another one too, the whole rabies thing. There has never been a single animal with rabies. They just inject the animal so that they can keep the vets in business. If your vet tells you you need rabies shots for your animal, you should fire them. All they're doing is promoting poison so they can inject your animal, then your animal can come down with a debilitating disease, and then they have a patient for life.
That is all rabies is. There's no rabid dogs running around, and they're gonna get you in anything else. The first studies done on rabid dogs, rabid dogs, were dogs that were locked in cages and went completely nuts. And then the guy who created the rabies vaccine stuck it in the dog's head and said that the rabies vaccine worked after the dogs died. That is rabies.
And to this day, they are still injecting dogs for rabies rabies, fake illness, to poison the dogs to have patience for life. It is truly sick and twisted is what it is. And the book, The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan debunks that one, and the book, The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean debunks that one. The vets do the same thing as the doctors. Just like all these professionals, they are there to keep you as a patient for life.
That's what I'm gonna say about
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Why i don't use Airpods, Bluetooth, Wireless. 2.4ghz on bluetooth 2.4ghz on microwaves. Always stick to wires. Also, Go to Settings > Screen Time > Content & Privacy Restrictions > Allowed Apps and toggle off Health. This app scans you 24/7. Tutorials: https://odysee.com/@CultivateElevate:e2/removing5gandwifi:d https://t.co/1UVglCMpf0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The speaker discusses AirPods and describes them as connected to a broader conspiracy discussed at the World Economic Forum (WEF). The central claim is that brainwave data collection can be used by ear devices, such as AirPods, which would be used by the boss to make you more productive and help authorities fight crime. This is framed as reminiscent of the movie Minority Report. The speaker notes having posted in 2020 about patents that are placed into AirPods to scan brainwaves and pick up on all vitals while wearing them.
The claim is that AirPods do more than play audio; they allegedly monitor brain activity and vital signs. The speaker states that these capabilities enable brainwave scanning and monitoring while the user is wearing AirPods, tying this to productivity enhancement and law enforcement objectives. The narrative ties these potential uses to a broader surveillance or control framework, implying a link between wearables and oversight by authorities, with the Minority Report reference serving to illustrate the anticipatory policing concept.
In addition to data collection, the speaker asserts that AirPods also microwave the mind, alleging the existence of microwave technology placed on the cortex that cooks the brain. This claim is presented as a mechanism by which memory loss occurs, and it is connected to the use of AirPods as the vector for such effects. The speaker uses strong language to describe the impact, suggesting significant cognitive harm as a result of the technology.
The overall message urges listeners to discontinue use of AirPods, recommending that they “get rid of them” and instead “listen to all the beautiful sounds around you.” The rhetoric positions AirPods as dangerous devices that extend beyond audio functionality into brain and health concerns, backed by references to patents and a WEF discussion, and culminates in a precautionary directive to avoid their use altogether.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I want to bring forward this one. I think this is a really important. This is about AirPods. Right? And I have never been for AirPods, will before AirPods, any of that, but check this.
This was at the W E F speaking. Convention. They explain how brainwave data collection can be used by your ear pods, which will be used by the boss to make you more productive and help authorities fight crime. That sounds like the movie minority report. And it's interesting because I posted back in 2020 about the patents in which are placed into AirPods so that they can scan your brainwaves and pick up on all your vitals while you're wearing them.
Not only that but they also microwave your mind. That's why people are suffering from so much memory loss. They have this microwave technology placed on the cortex, and it's cooking the brain. So if you have air AirPods, just get rid of them. Don't use them, and just listen to all the beautiful sounds around you.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Eye pressure solutions>? Pearl powder, eye exercises, sunshine, and eye bathes.🍒 https://cultivateelevate.com/search.php?search_query=pearl§ion=product https://t.co/1U4zUlMwS3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses glaucoma and a proposed approach involving pearl powder. The key points conveyed are as follows: pearl powder is suggested as a potential aid for glaucoma, which is described as a condition related to pressure within the eye. The recommendation given is to consume half a teaspoon of pearl powder per day. This daily amount is specified as something you would be taking into your regimen.
In addition to the pearl powder, Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of incorporating eye exercises. The combination of pearl powder intake with these eye exercises is presented as important, with the eye exercises being described as essential for helping to reduce or relieve the pressure on the eyes.
Speaker 0 then elaborates on the nature of glaucoma, summarizing it by stating that glaucoma is really just pressure. The reasoning provided for this pressure involves lifestyle and environmental factors: the eyes are strained because one has been indoors all the time, with a lack of sunshine, and a lack of feeding and training for the eyes. This description links the development of pressure in the eyes to a sedentary indoor lifestyle and insufficient exposure to natural light and eye-use activity.
The consequence of this pressure, according to Speaker 0, is the development of headaches and a range of other unspecified issues. The overall explanation presented is that the core issue behind glaucoma is pressure, and the preventative or mitigative measures proposed are consuming pearl powder on a daily basis and performing eye exercises to alleviate the eye pressure.
In summary, the approach proposed by Speaker 0 for addressing glaucoma involves two components: (1) daily consumption of half a teaspoon of pearl powder, and (2) consistent engagement in eye exercises. The underlying rationale ties glaucoma to ocular pressure, which purportedly arises from indoor living conditions that fail to provide sunshine, nourishment for the eyes, and regular training, leading to pressure-related symptoms such as headaches and other related problems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about glaucoma? You could do pearl powder. We've talked about that one. We've done many talks about pearl powder and glaucoma assisting with a glaucoma. Glaucoma is pressure.
So What you want to do is you want to use a half a teaspoon of pro powder a day. You would be consuming that. And then also combine that with the eye exercises. Because the eye exercises are very important so that you can get that pressure off the eyes because glaucoma is really just pressure. Think about it.
Your eyes are straining so hard because you've been indoors all the time. You have no sunshine. You're not out in the sun. You're not feeding the eyes. You're not training the eyes.
And then what happens is you develop this pressure, then you get headaches, and you get all kinds of things that come with it. That's what it is.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Mistletoe benefits: 🍒 People call mistletoe a parasite which is funny. The fear as usual. The bitter properties heal. Cancer is the body crying out for help. Other solutions: Grapefruit, Apricot seeds, Soursop, and Turkey Tail. Location: toms thumb, Arizona. https://t.co/IYL8jB9fT0
Video Transcript AI Summary
At Tom's Thumb, at the top there is mistletoe. Mistletoe is used to heal cancer, described as the body crying out for help. You eat a couple little berries, and it heals the body. It is one of the highest antioxidant foods right there, mistletoe. And it's all over nature. Check into it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So right up here, you see we are at Tom's Thumb right now. And at the top of here, got mistletoe. And mistletoe, they use it to heal cancer, which is really just your body crying out for help. And what you do, you eat a couple little berries, and it heals the body. One of the highest antioxidant foods right there, mistletoe.
And it's all over nature. Check into it.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Tanning beds? Govt tries to get rid of anything healthy. Like the sun and raw milk too. If you go tanning use a stand up bed with tallow or organic shea butter. Coco chanel was the first person to push the art of tanning, but the govt didnt like her either. https://t.co/LfigKxLAB3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues in favor of using a tanning bed, citing sources and reasoning to support its benefits. They reference the book Light Medicine of the Future by Jacob Liberman, asserting that UV lights are beneficial and that the tanning bed’s benefits have been downplayed by government action designed to scare people away from tanning bed use. According to the speaker, the tanning bed actually provides the beneficial UV spectrums, and this is presented as a key point: the tanning bed can deliver UV exposure that is advantageous rather than harmful.
The speaker suggests a practical preparation before tanning, recommending a little bit of tallow on the skin or organic shea butter. They advocate using a standing-up tanning bed and describe it as “your best bet” for achieving the desired effects. The advice is framed as especially relevant for someone living in a cold, miserable environment, where stepping into a tanning bed for a tanning session is presented as a way to improve mood and well-being.
A nostalgic cultural reference is included to illustrate a lifestyle pattern, recalling the phrase “gym tan laundry” from the TV show Jersey Shore. The speaker connects this sequence—going to the gym, then tanning, then doing laundry—as an example of a recognizable routine that ties exercise, sun exposure, and routine activities together in a way that highlights a perceived relationship between physical activity and tanning.
The speaker contends that the government targeted tanning beds after recognizing their healing potential, implying that the initial motive behind government actions was to deter what the tanning bed could achieve in terms of health benefits. They extend this claim to a general pattern: governments intervene against things that would make people healthy, using a causal frame that links sun exposure and tanning beds with overall health improvements.
Sunlight, in this view, is presented as healing, with an emphasis on a very brief exposure time—“five to ten minutes a week” or “something simple.” The overarching message is that a small, simple amount of UV exposure can yield health benefits, and that tanning beds are a practical and effective means to obtain that exposure, especially in colder climates where natural sunlight may be limited.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you suggest of using a tanning bed? That's funny because in the book, Light Medicine of the Future by Jacob Liberman, UV lights are beneficial. The whole reason that they came after tanning with the government was to scare people away from getting into a tanning bed, but the tanning bed actually gives you the beneficial UV spectrums. And you could do a little bit of tallow on your skin or organic shea butter, and you can go in a stand up bed, and that would be your best bet. If you live in a place that's cold and it's just, I would say, misery and you're over it, I would say to go into a tanning bed and do a little stand up tan, and you probably will feel good.
Think about back in the day, gym tan laundry. You guys remember that Jersey Shore, gym tan laundry. You go to the gym, then you go tanning, then you do some laundry. There's a connection right there. The whole reason the government went after the tanning beds was because the creator of the tanning bed realized that they could heal multiple illnesses with a tanning bed.
So the government only goes after things that make you healthy. So if it's not the tanning bed, it's the sun. You see how all this kinda goes? Because remember, sunlight heals. It only takes, like, five to ten minutes a week.
Something simple. Just a little something.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Rabies is fake: but govt fact check says no no lol https://t.co/4y9kxTcVaK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses rabies and vaccines in a conspiratorial frame, arguing that rabies is fake and that the treatment and vaccine are worse than the disease. They state that the vaccine is claimed to be mandatory, but argue that mandating is “voluntary to a service” and that the true situation is a game where “mandatory” only applies once you agree to it.
They claim the test for rabies is the same as used during the pandemic, asserting that “the fruit came up positive for an illness,” and suggest that this demonstrates that “we’ve been lied to,” with implications that vets benefit from the situation.
The speaker recounts an historical diagnostic method: in the early nineteen hundreds, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool to determine if an animal had rabies. They describe a procedure where, if a person was bitten by a suspected dog, “the brain tissue of the dog was injected into the two rabbits,” and “If the two rabbits died, rabies was proven.” They present this as the science behind rabies diagnosis.
They then criticize the vaccine’s safety, claiming “that vaccine comes with a lot of side effects.” They cite an example case: “38 dogs and cats took the new vaccine that was made out by Merck,” and claim that these subjects “started having seizures, aggression, and death,” concluding with the statement that the vaccine is portrayed as “Safe and effective” by others.
On a path to alternatives, the speaker says you could find a holistic vet who will give a medical exemption so you don’t have to receive the vaccine, or you could simply say no. They claim that if a vet “doesn’t wanna play ball,” you can make them sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to your animal after taking the injection, and predict that the vet “won’t sign it.”
The segment ends with a provocative note encouraging skepticism about viruses, followed by the assertion that if you are unvaccinated and the virus enters your community, the virus will … (the clip ends here with an incomplete thought, implying a cautionary consequence).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I thought this was hilarious that I got fact checked for talking about how rabies is fake. Yes. Check that. And someone's gonna say, what do you mean it's made up? I submit that rabies is nonexistent, and the treatment for rabies, the vaccine, is worse than the disease.
In my experience, nothing stronger than mild soap and a little water can actually heal the wounds rather than the vaccine. Now someone's gonna say, but they told me that the rabies vaccine is mandatory. See that right there? Let me read you this. Mandate, meaning voluntary to a service.
Only mandatory once you agree to it. Do you see the game? And someone's gonna ask, what was the test for rabies? It's the same test they used for the pandemic when they said that fruit came up positive for an illness. And I think we're starting to see that we've been lied to, and this keeps the vets in business.
If you haven't understood that by now, check this. In the early nineteen hundreds, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool to see if an animal had rabies. If a person was bitten by a suspected dog, the brain tissue of the dog was injected into the two rabbits. If the two rabbits died, rabies was proven. Do you see this is the science?
And that vaccine comes with a lot of side effects if you didn't know. Check this out. 38 dogs and cats took the new vaccine that was made out by Merck, and what happened is they started having seizures, aggression, and death. Yes. Safe and effective, they'll tell you.
Now on the bright news, you could find a holistic vet who will give you a medical exemption, and then you don't have to get any of this garbage, or you could just say no. And if your vet doesn't wanna play ball, you can make them sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to your animal after taking this injection. I guarantee they won't sign it. So on that note, let me leave you with a clip if you still believe in the viruses are gonna get you. If you are unvaccinated and the virus comes into your community, the virus will
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
1902 vintage bulbs. Last 120 years Mazda, neon, argon gas, and rare incandescents https://t.co/nEXecp0Bto
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker showcases several vintage and specialty bulbs to illustrate variations in gas content, color spectrum, and tactile properties. First, a 120-year-old bulb is displayed, described as a 250-watt bulb from 1902. The speaker notes the color spectrum evident in this bulb and then highlights its gas composition: an argon gas bulb from 1902. The purple hue and the spectrum are emphasized, with the observation that it exhibits high levels of ultraviolet and infrared light. A striking safety point is mentioned: the bulb can be touched and remains cold to the touch.
Next, the AeroLux bulb is introduced, identified as a neon bulb. The speaker calls attention to the orange glow and the associated color spectrum, labeling it as fascinating. Once again, the neon bulb is described as touch-safe, with the speaker reiterating that nothing happens when the bulb is touched.
The sequence continues with another neon bulb, this time described as a smaller version that shares a similar color spectrum. The bulb is likened to a tiny flame, and, consistent with the previous neon example, it can be touched without causing harm or heat.
Finally, frosted incandescent lighting is presented. The speaker notes that it also shows the same color spectrum, drawing attention to the uniformity of the color characteristics across these different bulb types. The commentary concludes with an observation about the frosted incandescent bulb, though the sentence is cut off.
Across these examples, the speaker emphasizes how different technologies—archaic and modern neon, argon gas, and frosted incandescent—produce distinct visual colors while maintaining safe handling in terms of heat, highlighting the surprising safety and visual similarities in the light’s spectrum despite differing internal mechanisms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is cool. This is a 120 year old bulb. That's the color spectrum. So this is a 250 watt bulb from '19 o two. Interesting.
So this is a 19 o two argon gas bulb and pretty cool with that gas. Look at that purple. And then look at that color spectrum, high in UV and infrared. I also forgot to mention you can just touch the bulb. There's no heat.
It's cold. And then this is called the AeroLux bulb, which is neon. Look at that orange. And then there's the color spectrum. Pretty fascinating.
Also, with neon, you can just touch it. Nothing happens. And then I got one more neon bulb to show you, a little tiny one, similar color spectrum. Look at this. It's like a little fire, and it's funny because you can just touch it.
Nothing happens. And then frosted incandescence, same color spectrum. It's interesting how the fro
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Lead paint? Why it was banned https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bQFsH__Yzg https://t.co/D3z7MyQKI0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: What's interesting too what you're saying about the frequencies over the last fifty years, they've been trying to get rid of lead paint, and the lead paint will not let a lot of those waves go through the walls.
Speaker 1: And, yeah, it's interesting because 1970 '1, first cell phone rolls out to the general public. So this is 1971.
Speaker 0: The bag phone? Is that the one with the bag or something?
Speaker 1: Yes. You get, like, a big mobile phone that they were giving people. Now the military in the book, Zapped, was explaining they already had a cell phone in 1947. Cell have already been here for a long time. That's people who think this stuff is new has been here.
So 1947, military cell phone. 1971, general public has a cell phone. 1974 to 1975, you have lead paint being banned. And so if you think about it, when you need to use this technology now that you're now giving to the public and you're gonna now sell them, you need to get rid of the thing that can get the barriers.
Speaker 0: Because your phone would not work in a house with lead paint. Yes.
Speaker 1: This is why when people buy older homes, they're like, I got no service. So you got the paint, right? Which is blocking one thing. And then you got the pipes, which are copper or lead. So you have a complete Faraday cage.
So this is why in today, 2026, so people are aware, this is why the government is out there trying to pay people to get them to get rid of their copper pipes or their lead pipes or whatever else. They had this whole petition where they're paying people to switch them to plastic. Why would you switch them to plastic? So you can get those waves to go in their house, and then you could watch them. And this has been all shown.
This is why I have no wireless. I have nothing. I have no Alexa. No Wi Fi.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's interesting too what you're saying about the frequencies over the last fifty years, they've been trying to get rid of lead paint, and the lead paint will not let a lot of those waves go through the walls.
Speaker 1: And, yeah, it's interesting because 1970 '1, first cell phone rolls out to the general public. So this is 1971.
Speaker 0: The bag phone? Is that the one with the bag or something?
Speaker 1: Yes. You get, like, a big mobile phone that they were giving people. Now the military in the book, Zapped, was explaining they already had a cell phone in 1947. Cell have already been here for a long time. That's people who think this stuff is new has been here.
So 1947, military cell phone. 1971, general public has a cell phone. 1974 to 1975, you have lead paint being banned. And so if you think about it, when you need to use this technology now that you're now giving to the public and you're gonna now sell them, you need to get rid of the thing that can get the barriers.
Speaker 0: Because your phone would not work in a house with lead paint. Yes.
Speaker 1: This is why when people buy older homes, they're like, I got no service. So you got the paint, right? Which is blocking one thing. And then you got the pipes, which are copper or lead. So you have a complete Faraday cage.
So this is why in today, 2026, so people are aware, this is why the government is out there trying to pay people to get them to get rid of their copper pipes or their lead pipes or whatever else. They had this whole petition where they're paying people to switch them to plastic. Why would you switch them to plastic? So you can get those waves to go in their house, and then you could watch them. And this has been all shown.
This is why I have no wireless. I have nothing. I have no Alexa. No Wi Fi.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Reversing cavities? organic Coconut oil and pearl Reversing the gums? organic Coconut oil and dragons blood. Reversing the lies? organic coconut oil pulling, organic diet, and firing your rockefeller dentist. https://cultivateelevate.com/ https://t.co/i5xLYD1bHW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The question is how you reverse a cavity without undergoing a root canal. The statement given is that you "just do a little coconut oil and burl powder." The underlying idea presented is that cavities essentially arise because teeth are either not being nourished, or because they’re starting to fall apart due to diet. In other words, the development of cavities is attributed to a lack of nourishment to the teeth or to dietary factors that cause deterioration. This is presented as the basic explanation for what leads to a whole cavity situation.
The discussion then extends to the concept of root canals and mouth infections. It is claimed that if you have a root canal treatment or infections in the mouth, applying coconut oil and dragon's blood to the area can help. The assertion is that this combination can assist with the condition of the area where the infection or root canal issue is present. Additionally, it is stated that this approach can contribute to the regeneration of the gums. In other words, coconut oil and dragon's blood are described as having benefits for both infected areas and gum regeneration, according to the speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How can you reverse a cavity without doing a root canal? You just do a little coconut oil and burl powder. Your cavities are just basically your teeth are either not being nourished, number one, or they're just starting to fall apart from your diet. It's pretty much what it is. So that's what develops a whole cavity situation.
Now the whole root canal or that whole thing, or if you have infections in the mouth, can do coconut oil and dragon's blood on that area, and that can help that with also the regeneration of the gums.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Cloudbusters: to counter the weather nonsense. Seems google is censoring http://archive.org now a days. Book: https://archive.org/details/loom-of-the-future-trevor-constable-thomas-brown https://t.co/rUwQw7DNRz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses devices built to counter weather modification occurring daily, referencing Trevor James Constable and Wilhelm Reich and their Cloudbuster as a means to counter such weather manipulation. It notes that Trevor James Constable worked for the US Navy and also helped California rid the skies of smog using these devices, suggesting that California knows how to clean up the skies. It states that the devices shown were synchronized to a running water source. The mechanism described is that they would change the etheric fields and the etheric waves of the earth, with the ether moving continuously throughout the earth. The claim is that they would dam up the ether, as Constable did, so that it would begin to rain. It is also claimed that these devices could make plants grow faster and clear up areas polluted by smog, toxins, and chemicals that are in the sky.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are all different types of devices in which can be built to counter the modification that takes place on a daily basis. And this was Trevor James Constable and Wilhelm Reich who were creating the Cloudbuster to counter the weather modification that's taking place in our skies. And it's interesting because Trevor James Constable worked for the US Navy and also got rid of all the smog in California using these devices. Okay? So California knows how to clean up the skies.
Isn't that funny? This guy worked for the US Navy and also informed the state of California how to clean up the skies and get rid of all the smog using devices like this. And these devices here were just synced up to a running water source. And what they would do is they would change the etheric fields and the etheric waves of the earth. So the ether is moving all the time throughout the earth.
And what they would do is they would dam up the ether, that's whichever dreams constable would do over here, so that it would begin to rain. Or you can also make plants grow faster and clear up the areas of all the smog and pollution and toxins and chemicals that they would put up in the sky.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Tell me about ww2 Matt: here’s some eustace Mullins 👇 https://t.co/iGZd6K6Oea
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses why Youssef Mullins was attacked by the media, which is described as being owned by “the tiny hats.” They refer to a “secret holocaust by Youssef Mullins” and say Mullins explained something interesting.
The claim is that at the beginning of World War II, the Poles were attacked, and the attackers were said to be the Germans, but the speaker asserts that it was the Tiny Hats who did the attacking. They allege that 10,000 Poles were shot and that the Germans were blamed, but the Tiny Hats were responsible. The speaker says diaries and notes were found showing this to be true, and that the trials revealed the Germans had to admit fault even though they didn’t do it. They also claim that the Soviets admitted that they did it in front of the US government.
The speaker contends this context explains why Eustace Mullins (mentioned as Youssef Mullins) was attacked when considering all the work he did. They add that the gas chambers were “make believe,” and that Mullins presented all of this in front of Congress and won.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I always wondered why Youssef Mullins was attacked by the media, which is owned by the tiny hats. Now it's interesting in the secret holocaust by Youssef Mullins. He explained something really interesting right here. In the beginning of World War two, the Polish were attacked. Remember that whole entire thing?
Well, look who it was to attack by. The Tiny Hats. And it's interesting because 10,000 Poles were shot, and they said it was the Germans, but in reality, it was the Tiny Hats. And someone's gonna say, well, I never heard about that. Yeah.
Because you never read the diaries. All the diaries and notes that they found showing that this was true. And then it gets deeper during the trials where the Germans had to admit fault even though they didn't do it. This was interesting. And it says that the Soviets admitted that they did it.
This was in front of the US government. So this is why Eustace Mullen was attacked when you really think about all the work that he did. Also, when you find out that the gas chambers, that was all make believe. And this guy presented all that in front of congress and won. So something to think about.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Cataracts and wireless tech: interesting how the DOD knew this https://cultivateelevate.com https://t.co/eidoVA1zgm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a distinction between cataracts at the front of the eye and cataracts “in the back of the eye.” They claim that while a cloudy eye is commonly associated with cataracts at the front, radar, microwaves, and wireless technology can cause cataracts behind the eye. They mention pearl powder as something that reverses cataracts and attributes this reversal to dehydration or cooking effects in the eye caused by microwaves, suggesting the pearl powder hydrates the eye and reverses damage.
They explain that a microwave heats up your blood and heats up the eye, “cooks the water,” and therefore they advise not using microwaves in the home because there is “no reason” to use them. They state doctors discussed this when radar and microwaves and wireless technologies were being used, claiming these technologies were “cooking” the back of the eye. The speaker asserts that microwaves work by penetrating deep into the body and causing damage that cannot be seen but occurs at the back of the eye.
The speaker references a presentation to the US military, noting that many military personnel working on radar developed cataracts behind the eye. They claim there were lawsuits from military members and that the VA and government were trying not to pay out.
The overall point made is that eyesight may not improve or may worsen over time due to microwaves or wireless technology, which the speaker links to cataracts behind the eye. They frame these claims as evidence that exposure to microwaves has a connection to back-of-eye cataracts, and they highlight the response of military personnel to this issue, including lawsuits and governmental dispute over compensation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See is in the front of the eye. People get a cloudy eye. But with radar, microwaves, and wireless technology, people get a cataract in the back of the eye. And it's funny because we've talked about pearl powder reversing cataracts, and it goes with the dehydration or cooking of the eye that happens from the microwaves. The pearl actually is what's reversing that damage and hydrating the eye.
Because a microwave heats up your blood, heats up the eye, and cooks the water. This is why you shouldn't use microwaves. Like, there's no reason to use a microwave in your home. And there were doctors who were talking about this when radar was going out, when the microwaves, the wireless, all of that. It was cooking the back of the eye.
And that's how these microwaves work. They work by going deep in the body, the damage. You can't see it, but it's happening at the back. And this was presented to the US military that a lot of their military members working on radar were coming down with cataracts behind the eye. And it got so crazy that The US military members sued the military because they were all coming down with cataracts, and the VA and the government were trying not to pay out.
So think about that. When you think about your eyesight, why your eyesight is potentially not getting better or getting worse over time, microwaves or wireless technology can actually cause that, and it's linked to cataracts in the back of the eye.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Microwave sickness: The root cause of the pandemic. Book: The Zapping of America a deep one raytheon microwaves and cell signals. Both are the same frequency. Tutorial on how to disable all of it: https://odysee.com/@CultivateElevate:e2/removing5gandwifi:d https://t.co/h67cYn6QXj
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that microwave sickness, not pathogens or contaminated water, was the root cause of the pandemic, specifically naming 5G rollout as the culprit. According to the speaker, people received upgrades to their phones and had a cell tower installed in front of their homes, and this, he claims, equated to the pandemic itself.
He references “zapping of America” to describe neurological and systemic symptoms associated with microwave exposure, listing heaviness in the head, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, insomnia, partial memory loss, cardiovascular issues, slow heartbeat, reduced blood pressure, and heart pains. He links these symptoms to microwave sickness and cites that the Soviets observed similar dangers with wireless technology in the 1950s, while American doctors dismissed those concerns, calling them Soviet or not credible. This dismissal, he contends, allowed wireless frequencies to be intensified to extreme levels.
The speaker argues that health issues in America have risen because electricity and wireless frequencies are at a “level 10,000,” whereas other countries regulate to a “level five,” implying that higher electromagnetic frequencies lead to illness across populations. He repeats the idea that increasing electromagnetic frequencies on Earth is directly linked to widespread sickness.
He also references Laura and makes an analogy to the Spanish flu, specifically the Kansas flu, claiming there was a radio on a Kansas military base that made people sick, using it to support the claim that wireless transmission or exposure contributed to disease. Based on these assertions, the speaker states a personal stance that his house has no wireless technology, implying a preventive or precautionary measure against exposure.
Overall, the speaker presents a narrative that attributes the pandemic to the rollout of 5G and associated wireless infrastructure, framing microwave sickness as the real illness experienced by the population, supported by cited historical observations, unnamed references, and a critique of conventional medical and scientific responses. The argument emphasizes a direct causal link between elevated electromagnetic frequencies and widespread health problems, arguing that higher exposure correlates with greater illness and that other nations’ more conservative frequency practices mitigate these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me get into microwave sickness, which was the root cause of the pandemic so people are aware. It wasn't snake venom in the water. It wasn't germs aka the COVID jumping all over. It was the rollout of five g is what it was. The pandemic was caused by five g.
People got upgrades on their phone, and they got upgrades of a cell phone tower put in front of their house. That was the pandemic. So people are aware. Now let me read you this from the zapping of America, and let me ask you if this sounds like the COVID that you were told about. Neurological complaints, heaviness in the head, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, insomnia, partial loss of memory, cardiovascular issues, slow heartbeat, reduced blood pressure, and heart pains.
Microwave sickness. That's what people were suffering from. This is what the Soviets saw in the nineteen fifties. They understood the dangers that comes with wireless technology. But here in America, the doctors were like, oh, they're just Soviets.
They don't know what they're talking about. So let's just keep cranking up everything to like level 10,000. And that's basically where we are today. This is why health issues in America keep going through the roof because the electricity and the wireless frequencies are at level 10,000 while other countries, it's at level five. Because they understood that when you increase the electromagnetic frequencies on the earth in the region, everybody gets sick.
It's super simple. And Laura said, just like the Spanish flu. Yes, the Kansas flu because there was a radio in the Kansas military base which made the people sick. So this is why I always talk about why my house has no wireless
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Snake venom nonsense: a pcr test for venom testing… while distracting the people from the 5g towers https://t.co/tQYq45IEWy
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, referred to as Snake venom guy, argues that the notion of snake venom being present in water is nonsense. They claim that there is no snake venom in the water. They recount a separate anecdote about a man who has been bitten by rattlesnakes 200 times and is now immune to snake venom. The speaker emphasizes that they are not advising others to go out and test this, but they present this as a factual point about immunity.
Regarding exposure to venom, the speaker explains a sequence: if someone were exposed to venom in water (the alleged scenario), that exposure would result in immunity. They further claim that drinking snake venom has no effect, and that venom only becomes dangerous when it enters the bloodstream. The speaker likens the entry of venom into the blood to the way a vaccine operates, implying that venom only poses a danger once it reaches the blood.
The speaker reiterates that there is no snake venom in the water. They also make a broader assertion about the snake venom topic by asserting that the person who discusses this venom story “works for the nicotine companies.” They describe these nicotine companies as “big tobacco in the pharmaceuticals.” In their framing, nicotine products are repeatedly mentioned, with the speaker underscoring “Every time, nicotine, nicotine, nicotine, all the nicotine products, pharmaceutical companies, and big tobacco.”
In summary, the speaker disputes the presence of snake venom in water, asserts that a person bitten by rattlesnakes 200 times has become immune, and claims that exposure or consumption of venom would not be dangerous unless it enters the bloodstream, where it would act similarly to a vaccine. They conclude by connecting the individual involved in the venom discussion to nicotine companies, describing those entities as a fusion of big tobacco and pharmaceutical interests, repeatedly highlighting nicotine products in association with pharmaceutical companies and big tobacco.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Snake venom guy? Yeah. The snake venom guy is just a bunch of nonsense. There's no snake venom in the water. And here's the thing.
Let me explain something. There's a guy who's gotten bitten by rattlesnakes 200 times. He is now immune. I'm not saying for people to go out there just so you are aware. He is now immune from snake venom.
So here's the other thing. When a person is exposed to it, right, so let's say there was the snake venom in the water that was allegedly said. If you were exposed to it, you would be immune to it. But also too when you drink snake venom, nothing happens. It's only until you're stuck.
Right? And the snake venom goes into your blood just like a vaccine. That's the only danger. But there's no snake venom in the water, and that guy works for the nicotine companies, which are just big tobacco in the pharmaceuticals. Every time, nicotine, nicotine, nicotine, all the nicotine products, pharmaceutical companies, and big tobacco.
Every single one of them.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Nicotine backed by... and the "natural" patches are another rabbit hole: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN104738809A/en If you decide you want tobacco…Grow your own heirloom organic tobacco and lastly snake venom is tested with a pcr test 💰all comical https://t.co/Ns5p0i28kS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker traces a chain of purported corporate ownership and endorsements around nicotine products to suggest a broader conspiracy. They claim Rugby nicotine patches are owned by the Harvard Drug Group and a Major Pharmaceutical Company, which in turn is owned by Cardinal Health. They further allege that Cardinal Health is owned by investors Vanguard and BlackRock, implying doctors promoting Vanguard and BlackRock connections.
They quote a Big Tobacco assertion: nicotine gum prescribed by doctors and endorsed by pharmacies led some people to conclude that nicotine must not all be bad for them. The speaker questions the source of nicotine receptor studies, showing a dot on an electric eel and asking whether it relates to eels, tomatoes, or eggplants, suggesting the presented science is dubious or misused.
The speaker asserts multiple companies produce nicotine gums, naming Johnson & Johnson, Philip Morris, and GSK, and notes vaccine-related companies (“Vaxx companies”) in the context of the discussion. They claim that Big Pharma and Big Tobacco products were used to suppress radio-wave sickness, which they attribute to a pandemic and to initiatives like Operation Warp Speed.
The speaker presents images or statements as evidence of a pre-pandemic vs. post-pandemic difference, claiming: before the pandemic there was no cell phone tone, after there was one; no spike proteins, no snake venom, no viruses, and then “new technology upgraded throughout the country and throughout the world, poisoning the people.”
They reference books such as The Invisible Rainbow, Zapping of America, Getting Rid of five g, Getting Rid of WiFi, Wireless Technology, LEDs, and Smart Meters as sources for the claim that wireless technology causes illness, and they advocate “eating some raw eggs” as part of the solution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today we're gonna go into the whole nicotine thing pushed by a doctor and this is just comical. Check this, Rugby nicotine patches. Let's see who makes those. So I typed in who owns Rugby and I found the Harvard Drug Group and Major Pharmaceutical Company. Who would guess?
Oh, and it gets even deeper. Who owns the major pharmaceutical company? Cardinal Health. So this is a company and a company and a company. So then I decided to type in who owns Cardinal Health, and you find the investors Vanguard and BlackRock.
Oh, it's too good. So we see that a doc was promoting Vanguard and BlackRock. Isn't that wild? Now check this. This is a quote from Big Tobacco.
The fact that nicotine gum was prescribed by their docs and endorsed by the pharmacy led some people to conclude that nicotine must not all be bad for them. Do you see that? Oh, it gets even better when people are like, Well, heard about the nicotine receptors. Do you see that dot right there? That's on an electric eel.
This is the study where it comes from. So are we electric eels? Are tomatoes electric eels? Are eggplants electric eels? What is that dot?
I can make up anything. Now someone will say, don't you use that company? I use other companies. Who are made nicotine gums? Johnson and Johnson, Philip Morris, GSK.
The Vaxx companies make those. Isn't that wild? So all those Big Pharma and Big Tobacco products we're doing were just suppressing your radio wave sickness, which was caused by this. This was the whole pandemic right here. This was Operation Warp Speed, just so people are aware.
And here's just some more evidence. This is before the pandemic. No cell phone tone. This is after. No spike proteins.
No snake venom. No viruses. No nothing. Just new technology upgraded throughout the country and throughout the world, poisoning the people. And it's funny because the real truth is always censored like solutions.
The book, The Invisible Rainbow, Zapping of America, Getting Rid of five g, Getting Rid of WiFi, Wireless Technology, LEDs, Smart Meter, those are what's causing people to be sick and eat some raw eggs. You know?
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Regenerating gums? Dragons blood and coconut oil applied to the gums. Also, you can take dragons blood internally to pull out metals and cleanse the blood. The same topical combo can be used on bug bites. Nature keeps giving. https://cultivateelevate.com/dragons-blood-capsules/#product-reviews https://t.co/xMoSHuBIWL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The speaker describes using Dragon's Blood with coconut oil on the gums to address recessed gums, claiming that the gums will regenerate. They mention a first order of Dragon's Blood and say, “Recessive gums, dragon Dragon's Blood and coconut oil. Put it on the gums, and the gums will regenerate.” They also claim that Dragon's Blood, when used with coconut oil, can heal bites and stings, stating, “if you have any bites, you know, a tick, a wasp, a bee sting, a scorpion sting, you can put a little bit of Dragon's Blood and coconut oil on there and that will also heal that too.” The speaker asserts the broader point that “nature will give us to bring into our body and put on our body to heal without side effects,” describing it as “remarkable.”
The speaker contends that if dentists were talking about regenerating gums, they wouldn’t be able to sell procedures, implying that such regeneration would undercut procedures. They assert a broader claim about professional healthcare: “every time you go to a professional, they never give you an actual solution. They always give you a treatment or they give you a pill or they give you a surgery. They never actually give you something to actually fix the issue that you're having.” The speaker contrasts this with their view of natural remedies as a genuine fix rather than a temporary treatment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Somebody said I got my first order of Dragon's Blood. Going to use it with coconut oil on my gums. There you go. Recessive gums, dragon Dragon's Blood and coconut oil. Put it on the gums, and the gums will regenerate.
Obviously, there's no money in telling people they can regenerate their gums, but Dragon's Blood works wonders for that. Also, if you have any bites, you know, a tick, a wasp, a bee sting, a scorpion sting, you can put a little bit of Dragon's Blood and coconut oil on there and that will also heal that too. It is fascinating what nature will give us to bring into our body and put on our body to heal without side effects. Isn't that remarkable? Like obviously if dentists were talking about that you could regenerate your gums, they wouldn't be able to sell you procedures.
And this is the thing, every time you go to a professional, they never give you an actual solution. They always give you a treatment or they give you a pill or they give you a surgery. They never actually give you something to actually fix the issue that you're having. That's what's wild.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Caterpillars or parasites? What's the difference? One was told to be dangerous because the rockefeller medical establishment said so. Detoxing metals: Wormwood, Raw Eggs, Dragons blood, Cilantro, Shilajit, Sea Moss, and Raw dairy. https://t.co/VzKzGQTr2y
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 notes a contrast: people are afraid of parasites, yet caterpillars are worms too and nobody is afraid of them. They suggest this is something to think about. They state that the body makes parasites, and when there are too many heavy metals in the body, the body will make worms. Therefore, they argue, one should be afraid of the metals put into the body—like pesticides, vaccines, toxins, and related substances.
They claim that people will take dewormers made by Rockefeller-founded pharmaceutical companies to destroy the worms, and question what these dewormers actually do, asserting that they destroy your own body. They remark that it’s wild to think about these things and that the dewormers’ origin isn’t commonly known, mentioning Rockefeller and “Great Public school.”
The speaker contends that Rockefeller-created synthetic dewormers are sold as poison to destroy worms, while making the worm seem dangerous when, in reality, it’s one’s own habits being the issue. They then reference doctor Joel Weinstock, claiming he was healing diseases with parasites, adding this as something to think about.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's funny how people are so afraid of parasites, but then you got caterpillars, which are worms too, but nobody's afraid of that. Something to kinda think about. Also, your body makes parasites. When you have too many heavy metals in your body, the body will make the worms. So you should be afraid of the metals that you put into your body like pesticides, vaccines, you know, toxins, things like that.
And the real crazy part is people will take dewormers that are made by the Rockefellers pharmaceutical companies to destroy the worms. What do you think they do? They destroy your own body. It's just wild when you think about things. You didn't know that's where the dewormers came from, the Rockefellers, Great Public school.
They also created the synthetic dewormers. They sell you the poison, and they make this worm look like the danger when in reality it's your own habits. Then you get into doctor Joel Weinstock who was healing diseases with parasites. Something to kind of think about, you know?
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Some books to read 📕 https://t.co/dvs2R9YYoW
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The International by Henry Ford: “Henry Ford talks about how these people own all the school systems. That's why you haven't read this one. This one goes into how we have unlimited oil.”
- This one: “goes into how radiation is actually beneficial, like radium.”
- These go into raw diets: “raw diets and why you should eat raw, also why animals should eat raw and not cooked garbage.”
- World Without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin: (no additional description provided beyond the title in the transcript, included here as the referenced work).
- Story of B-17 and apricot seeds: “Story of b 17 and apricot seeds. Obviously, chemo is what they normally give people instead of giving them apricots.”
- Invisible Rainbow: “Invisible rainbow, how Wi Fi and wireless technology is the main culprit of all the pandemics. Obviously, they're not gonna tell you that. They make up fake viruses.”
- Can You Catch a Cold? by Daniel Roitos: “Can you catch a cold? Daniel Roitos. Great one.”
- Dirty Electricity: (listed as part of the same set, with the implication that it is a book relevant to the discussion).
- The peanut allergy epidemic: (listed as a book/topic in the discussion).
- All the allergies coming from the vaccines: “All the allergies coming from the vaccines. That's one they'll never tell anybody.”
- The deliberate dumbing down of America: “And the deliberate dumbing down of America. All ties back to now.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's hit on a couple books. The International by Henry Ford. If you haven't read this one, Henry Ford talks about how these people own all the school systems. That's why you haven't read this one. This one goes into how we have unlimited oil.
That's a fun one. This This one goes into how radiation is actually beneficial, like radium. Fun fun fact. These go into raw diets and why you should eat raw, also why animals should eat raw and not cooked garbage. World without cancer by g Edward Griffin.
Story of b 17 and apricot seeds. Obviously, chemo is what they normally give people instead of giving them apricots. Invisible rainbow, how Wi Fi and wireless technology is the main culprit of all the pandemics. Obviously, they're not gonna tell you that. They make up fake viruses.
Can you catch a cold? Daniel Roitos. Great one. And dirty electricity. And then the peanut allergy epidemic.
All the allergies coming from the vaccines. That's one they'll never tell anybody. And the deliberate dumbing down of America. All ties back to now.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Kids can't focus? It's the lights. Plus fake foods. Lead shielding was used by Dr John Ott to counter the radiowaves coming off fluorescents. Same frequencies as wifi.🌞 https://odysee.com/@CultivateElevate:e2/removing5gandwifi:d https://t.co/ESeDusDU10
Video Transcript AI Summary
When kids have focus issues in school and no one can figure out why they can’t focus, the lights above their heads are the cause. Doctor John Ott put shielding over the lights because they had fluorescent bulbs at that time in the school, and once he shielded the lights, the children began to be able to focus. The lights are what is making the children not be able to focus.
It is suggested that not only are they wasting eighteen years of their life in a Rockefeller prison school, but also the lights are making them not be able to pay attention at the same time. What Doctor John Ott did was put shielding over the lights; he noticed that the children could focus. Kids shouldn’t even be learning in a prison system if you think about it. Kids should be outside in nature learning in nature. You could have a board. You could bring it outside. You could have a little sun. They can run around. Once they run around, then you can sit and teach. That’s how school should be. It shouldn’t be where they’re locked in a prison system getting forced vaccines and all this garbage.
This is presented as a phenomenal book by Doctor John Ott: Light Radiation in You, and I highly recommend it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When kids are having focus issues in school and nobody can sit seem to figure out why the kids can't focus, it's the lights, everybody. It's the lights above their heads. It was interesting. Doctor John Ott put shielding over the lights cause they had fluorescent bulbs at that time in the school. And once he put the shielding over the lights, the children began to be able to focus because the lights are what is making the children not be able to focus.
Who would guess that not only are they wasting eighteen years of their life in a Rockefeller prison school, but also the lights are making them not be able to pay attention at the same time. So what doctor John Ott did was he put shielding over the lights he noticed that the children could focus. Kids shouldn't even be learning in in a prison system if you think about it. Kids should be outside in nature learning in nature. You could have a board.
You could bring it outside. You could have a little sun. They can run around. Once they run around, then you can sit and teach. That's how school should be.
It shouldn't be where they're locked in a prison system getting forced vaccines and all this garbage. It makes absolutely no sense. But this is a phenomenal book by doctor John Nutt. Light radiation in you, and I highly recommend it.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Who makes nicotine? Big tobacco and big harma which deflects the people from 5g cell tower.. it’s quite a playbook https://t.co/4iwXTJekT5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that nicotine products, pharmaceutical companies, and big tobacco all contribute to widespread addiction, stating that every nicotine product is addictive. They claim tobacco companies shifted away from selling cigarettes—partly due to lawsuits and warnings about smoking during pregnancy—and pivoted to nicotine instead. They assert that these companies realized involving doctors with nicotine would accelerate sales, allowing nicotine products to be sold broadly. The speaker describes the entire nicotine situation as central to the issue. They suggest that when people say they love nicotine, they are also loving pharmaceuticals and big tobacco. They critique public attention, implying a contrast between focusing on nicotine and ignoring other modern technologies, such as cell phone towers or phone upgrades, while noting people are “busy chewing nicotine like a pharmaceutical Muppet.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every time. Nicotine. Nicotine. Nicotine. All the nicotine products, pharmaceutical companies, and big tobacco.
Every single one of them. Every single nicotine product out there, people are addicted. They're all hooked up on nicotine. You're on a drug. The tobacco companies realized that they couldn't sell cigarettes anymore because the lawsuits were coming out, and they were telling people to smoke them while they were pregnant.
So guess what they pivoted to? Nicotine. And then they realized that if they get doctors involved with with nicotine, they could sell them even faster. They could sell nicotine products left and right. So that's the whole nicotine.
So when people are like, oh, I love my nicotine, you love pharmaceuticals and you love big tobacco. It it's it's once again, you do not look at the cell phone tower that has been put in front of your house or the upgrade to your phone, but you're busy chewing nicotine like a pharmaceutical Muppet.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
New lyme vaxxine? Same playbook on repeat. Vax you, give you a faulty test, lie to you about tics, scare you away from nature, and then sell you another vax. End the nonsense. Books: Peanut allergy epidemic, The contagion myth, and The poisoned needle. https://t.co/pquk0f2vbx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says: Today’s discussion covers the Lyme situation and claims about vaccines. The claim is that you were injected with gelatin as a child through vaccines, which made you allergic to ticks. Ticks are said to not cause disease, just to be aware. A PubMed article is cited about the association between tick bites, allergic reactions, and gelatin-containing vaccines causing the allergic reaction. Some people insist they didn’t get vaccines with gelatin, but Speaker 0 argues childhood vaccines actually contain it.
Speaker 0 claims that the vaccine intended to save you is new, yet there was a past version that resulted in many lawsuits, implying a repeated pattern. The discussion then shifts to Lyme disease: if someone has Lyme, they allegedly had a PCR test that amplified the results to tell them they had an illness to sell a treatment and induce fear of ticks.
Speaker 0 lists symptoms claimed to be Lyme disease: fevers, chills, headaches, fatigue, muscle aches, swollen lymph nodes, and facial palsy. These are described as side effects of vaccines as well. Even someone who says they didn’t take any vaccines is asked about exposure to wireless technology at home (microwaving), and pesticide exposure, which are claimed to cause the same symptoms.
Speaker 0 references books on related topics: Peanut Allergy Epidemic, Contagion Myth, and The Poison Needle. The overarching claim is that “almost all illnesses result from vaccines, wireless, and pesticides.”
Speaker 0 offers a supposed remedy: for any bug bite, use dragon’s blood and coconut oil, saying it heals ticks bites, wasps, spiders, bees quickly. The statement is presented as an example of why people were allergic to peanuts, tying vaccine use to broader allergy development.
Speaker 0 concludes by reiterating the pattern: you get vaccinated, you become allergic to ticks; you get vaccinated, you become allergic to peanuts; the same mechanism is claimed to be at play.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today we're gonna hit on the whole Lyme situation, you were injected with gelatin as a child through the vaccines, made you allergic to ticks. But ticks do not cause disease, just so you are aware. Let's talk about it. So there's a great PubMed article about the association between tick bites, so allergic reactions, and the gelatin containing vaccines causing the allergic reaction. Now someone's gonna say, I didn't get any vaccines with well, pork, actually, and you did.
The childhood vaccines are actually the ones that have this in it. Now what's more wild is they're saying that this vaccine they have to save you is new even though they had one in the past, and it resulted in a whole bunch of lawsuits. Same thing on repeat. Now here's where it gets even better. People go, well, I have Lyme.
Well, you did a PCR test. What they did was they amplified the results, and then they told you you had an illness so they can sell you a treatment and put you in fear of ticks. Now someone says I have Lyme disease because I have these symptoms: fevers, chills, headaches, fatigue, muscle aches, swollen lymph nodes, and facial palsy. Those are all side effects of vaccines as well too. Someone said I didn't take any vaccines.
Well, do you have wireless technology in your house, which is microwaving you? Do you consume pesticides? They can cause the same symptoms. There's also some great books on the topic, peanut allergy epidemic, so you know where the peanut allergy came from, the contagion myth, and the poison needle. Pretty much all illnesses result from vaccines, wireless, and pesticides.
That's it. Also, solution is dragon's blood and coconut oil on any bug bites. Tick bites, wasps, spiders, bees, the whole entire thing. Heals them pretty quick. I'll just leave it right here as another example of why people were allergic to peanuts.
So they get you with the vax, now you're allergic to ticks. Get you with the vax, now you're allergic to peanuts. Same thing.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Trump? Americans are foolish for not fighting for the tiny hats? 📕Here's a book the US govt burned (Your country at war Charles Lindberg)... and Nukes are fake. ☢️☢️ https://t.co/vN69qXutiE
Video Transcript AI Summary
"What do you say to Americans? Think that's why. Go to war. They're foolish."
"So I think it's pretty wild that Trump says that Americans are foolish for not wanting to go to war. Yeah. Who wants to be in debt, right, and fight for the tiny hats? Now here is a book, Your Country at War by Charles Lindbergh. This book was burned by the US government in 1919."
"Why would they burn this book? Well, it tells the truth about all these wars."
"The war is about one thing. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."
"And if you want two great books on how nukes are fake, this is a great one. Hiroshima revisited by Michael Palmer, the evidence that Nate Palm and most of her guests helped fake the atomic bombings. Yes. Fake. Fake."
"Keyword fake. Death object exploding the nuclear weapons. Hoax, Akio Nacatini. Yes. You've been lied to."
"In order to, attack countries and put in banking systems."
"Israel would have been gone, extinguished. Israel would be would have been wiped off the face of the earth and"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you say to Americans? Think that's why. Go to war. They're foolish.
Speaker 1: So I think it's pretty wild that Trump says that Americans are foolish for not wanting to go to war. Yeah. Who wants to be in debt, right, and fight for the tiny hats? Now here is a book, Your Country at War by Charles Lindbergh. This book was burned by the US government in 1919.
Why would they burn this book? Well, it tells the truth about all these wars.
Speaker 0: The war is about one thing. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: And if you want two great books on how nukes are fake, this is a great one. Hiroshima revisited by Michael Palmer, the evidence that Nate Palm and most of her guests helped fake the atomic bombings. Yes. Fake. Fake.
Keyword fake. Death object exploding the nuclear weapons. Hoax, Akio Nacatini. Yes. You've been lied to.
In order to, attack countries and put in banking systems.
Speaker 0: Israel would have been gone, extinguished. Israel would be would have been wiped off the face of the earth and
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Moles and Toxins. In 2024 I was fact checked for saying moles are the accumulations of toxins which could be resolved with organic castor/coconut oil and pearl powder. I guess the toxic skin care industry didn't like that one. 😂 https://cultivateelevate.com/search.php?search_query=pearl§ion=product https://t.co/npod9HyAa8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses prior claims about moles and toxins. They mention being fact-checked in 2024 after saying moles are an accumulation of toxins in the skin region. The speaker notes that the fact-checkers told them this is not true, yet recounts continuing to claim that moles involve toxin buildup and are removable, which they say led to additional scrutiny of their page.
The speaker recalls advising people that applying a small amount of organic coconut oil or castor oil with a little pearl directly to a mole would cause the mole to disintegrate and break apart. They state that fact-checkers challenged the idea that toxins accumulate in the skin and cause mole formation, implying that removing moles by topical treatment should not be suggested because it would undermine the professional market for petroleum-based products.
According to the speaker, the motivation behind the fact-checks is to prevent spreading the notion that moles are toxin-related and easily removable, as such a belief could reduce demand for professional services and products. They claim that toxins accumulate in skin areas, including spots on the skin that are not exposed to the sun, and that these moles stay to retain the toxins. The speaker reiterates that applying pearl with coconut oil or castor oil to the mole will cause it to break apart, reinforcing the toxin-build-up theory as the mechanism behind mole formation.
The speaker emphasizes the frequency of fact-checking their content and shares a personal anecdote about discovering that the fact-checker who evaluated their page had won an Emmy Award for fact-checking. They remark on the prevalence of the fact-checking efforts and describe the situation as comical, framing it as ongoing opposition or “nonsense” faced by their content and audience. The overall narrative centers on defending the claim that moles are related to toxin buildup and can be removed with specific natural remedies, while contrasting this with the fact-checking and the asserted professional or commercial incentives behind suppressing such claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Somebody's talking about moles. Oh, I talked about moles before. I actually got fact checked. This is great. I got fact checked for talking about how moles are an accumulation of toxins in the skin region, and they said that that is not true.
Now remember fact check always tells you what's true and what's false and they came after my page in 2024 when I started telling people they could take a little bit of organic coconut oil or castor oil with a little bit of pearl, put it on the mole, and the mole would actually just break apart and disintegrate. And so the fact checkers came out and started saying, you can't go around telling people that there's toxins in their skin because what do they want to do? They want to sell people a whole bunch of petroleum based chemicals to rub all over their skin so that they can keep coming back to the professional every single time. They don't wanna tell people that the moles are just a buildup of toxins and can be completely removed. That's why people are gaining them.
They're gaining them in areas that aren't exposed to the sun, which is funny, but because there's toxins being built up in the skin. And that's all it is. You get all these spots, know, people get spots on their skin and just toxins building up in that and they have to stay there. That's what it is. They're staying there to keep those toxins, and you take a little bit of pearl and a little coconut oil or castor, you put it right on that mole, because it'll break apart.
So if it wasn't an accumulation of toxins, it wouldn't break apart. And then also they wouldn't come in with the fact check to say that the moles aren't an accumulation of toxins. And that's the thing, I've got fact checked so many times. It was the best the one time I looked up the fact checker, he actually won an Emmy Award for fact checking. An Emmy award.
Imagine winning an Emmy for fact checking people's pages. That's the guy who fact checked my page. So my page has been hit so many times with that and everything else. It's just it's comical how much nonsense we face. That's what it is.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Nukes are fake as the moon landing, but then they couldn’t waste all that 💰 https://t.co/1G2KsL6MMZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker promotes two books arguing nukes are fake. Hiroshima Revisited by Michael Palmer is highlighted. The evidence is said to show that Nate Palm and Mostert Gas helped fake the atomic bombings. The material repeatedly emphasizes that this is fake, a hoax. The phrases “Death object exploding the nuclear weapons,” “Hoax,” “Akio,” and “Nacatini” appear as part of the claims. It is stated: “Yes. You've been lied to. In order to attack countries and put in banking systems.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if you want two great books on how nukes are fake, this is a great one. Hiroshima Revisited by Michael Palmer. The evidence that Nate Palm and Mostert Gas helped fake the atomic bombings. Yes. Fake.
Fake. Keyword fake. Death object exploding the nuclear weapons. Hoax. Akio.
Nacatini. Yes. You've been lied to. In order to attack countries and put in banking systems.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Moon landing? I’ll sell you a timeshare on the moon 👀 https://t.co/fby5RUgPud
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker jokes that the “rocket going to the moon” is actually just the sun being blocked, and then says, “If you think we’re going to the moon, I’ll sell you a time share for $49.” They suggest someone could be the first on the moon because “we never went,” citing a book titled We Never Went to the Moon by Bill Casing, which allegedly explains how there are no stars. The speaker questions, “If you were on the moon, wouldn’t you see the stars,” calling this funny, and references “your little setup here who filmed all this.”
They claim that “they failed every single time they were trying to go to the moon,” noting failures “like, 55 times in a row,” but assert that “this time they decided to make it.” Buzz Aldrin is said to have admitted “we never went to the moon,” which the speaker finds humorous. They critique the footage on grounds of lighting and reflections, stating, “The lighting’s all off. The reflections are wrong.” They argue that the footsteps are just “sands in the desert of Utah and Arizona,” or “Mercury, Nevada, actually, if I wanna be specific.”
Finally, they conclude that “if you believe we went to the moon, I got a time share to sell you.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that's the rocket going to the moon. Oh, wait. No. That's just them blocking out the sun. If you think we're going to the moon, I'll sell you a time share for $49.
You could be the first person on the moon. That's because we never went. And there's a great book on this called we never went to the moon by Bill Casing, and he explains how there's no stars. If you were on the moon, wouldn't you see the stars, which is funny. Then you got your little setup here who filmed all this.
And what's funny is they failed every single time they were trying to go to the moon. They failed, like, 55 times in a row, but allegedly, this time they decided to make it. And Buzz Aldrin even admitted we never went to the moon, which is funny. The lighting's all off. The reflections are wrong.
The footsteps are just sands in the desert of Utah and Arizona. Mercury, Nevada, actually, if I wanna be specific. But, yeah, if you believe we went to the moon, I got a time share to sell you.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
When someone tells me radium is toxic.. to the profits of big harma .👇govt owns all the radium hot springs https://t.co/UG4xtszLOR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a book that is 800 pages long, focusing on how illnesses were healed with radium, including cancer (referred to as “the big c”), lupus, and autoimmune conditions. They point out that radium is connected to hot springs, which makes those springs hot. The speaker notes that wealthy people used to sit in hot springs precisely because of the benefits associated with radium, uranium, and thorium present in those waters.
In essence, the speaker describes the book as containing 800 pages of studies documenting illnesses being healed with radium in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, specifically from the 1900s to the 1920s, with a focus on cancer. They imply that the radium-related healing properties were a central theme across these studies.
The speaker then poses a question: do you think the incidence of cancer has increased because people are no longer receiving the radioactive nutrients they once obtained? They suggest that changes to our terrain have occurred, including the elimination of various factors, and they note that people used to drink from uranium glass regularly, which would have imparted radioactive properties.
By presenting these ideas, the speaker connects historical practices involving radioactive materials and hot springs to debates about the modern prevalence of cancer, proposing that the removal of radioactive exposure (via the environment and everyday items like uranium glass) could influence how diseases develop or are perceived to develop.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This book is 800 pages long on how they were healing all of the big c with radium. How they were healing lupus. How they were healing autoimmune. And it's interesting because radium is connected to to the hot springs. That's what makes them hot.
So if you think about it, that's why all the very wealthy people used to go sit in the hot springs. There's the benefits of radium and uranium and thorium in those hot springs. So, basically, in a nutshell, because if I do open this book, it will begin to fall apart. 800 pages of studies, and I'll try to open a little bit. 800 pages of studies of all these illnesses being healed with radio in the nineteen hundreds to the nineteen twenties and those being the big c specifically.
Now here's a question too. Do you think that the illness with the big c has gone through the roof because people are no longer getting the radioactive nutrient that they once got? Think about it. They have changed our terrain a lot. They've gotten rid of a lot of things, and people used to drink out of uranium glass all the time, which has that radioactive property.
So if you get rid of the radioactive property that the people used to get all the time, then you can start to think about how the diseases would begin to change too.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
radium water ☢️ detoxes the vax. Thus why the govt said stay away 🧠 https://t.co/phMCgGNG69
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a 1920s radium water bottle called the Revigorator, noting that radium ore is inside the clay of the bottle and that it was used to heal people. He emphasizes the bottle’s enormous size, saying, “this thing is just mammoth,” and that it’s a challenge to hold it. He demonstrates by saying, “watch this… You can hear that. Right there,” implying a loud or notable sound associated with the device, and references the water as radioactive, stating, “So this is radioactive water.” He mentions that the government would tell people this is dangerous if you do this, followed by the assertion, “Yeah. You've been duped.” He describes his personal journey, claiming that he has learned that “we have been lied to about the benefits of radium.” Regarding the effects of radium water, he asserts that “when you drink a little bit of radium water, what happens is you feel real calm, you feel real zen, you feel real focused in, and the world is just a peaceful place.” He concludes by prompting the audience to consider this perspective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This this is a nineteen twenties radium water bottle. It's called the Revigorator. There is radium ore inside this, inside the clay. But it's interesting because they were healing people with this right here. And this thing is just mammoth.
Like, it's really it's a challenge to hold this right now. So watch this. Ready? You can hear that. Right there.
So that is as radioactive as it gets. That's at 45 up to 90. You guys can see that water right there? So this is radioactive water. And now the government would tell you this is dangerous if you do this.
Yeah. You've been duped. That's what it is. I have gone on this whole journey understanding that we have been lied to about the benefits of radium. And it's interesting because when you drink a little bit of radium water, what happens is you feel real calm, you feel real zen, you feel real focused in, and the world is just a peaceful place.
So think about that.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Regrowing teeth? 😬Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to stimulate regeneration in the jawbone and teeth by University of Alberta by Dr. Tarek El-Bialy. Deep dive. ☑️Natural teeth healing and toothpaste: Pearl and Coconut oil. https://cultivateelevate.com/search.php?search_query=pearl§ion=product https://t.co/n6CAlBuV3c
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mac discusses regenerating new teeth and mentions a guy up in Canada who is regenerating teeth with frequency. He notes that accidently, when applying ultrasound, the lower incisor began to grow. He adds that this is the first to try the treatment on humans, and that after twenty minutes a day, new teeth started to grow in a month. He emphasizes that this is a big deal, and explains that a lot of technology comes into the limelight, so authorities allegedly put a kibosh on the plan once the man started going public about regenerating teeth, fearing it would put every dentist out of business. He mentions invention secrecy to hide such discoveries. Mac recalls that people have used pearl powder for chipped teeth with some regeneration, but asserts that frequency plays a role. He also claims that putting fluoride in the mouth burns holes in teeth and asserts that dentists don’t want to tell you that. He concludes by saying he will look into the Canadian fellow who was regenerating teeth with frequencies because it’s a pretty cool development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mac, can you please talk about regenerating new teeth? I've talked about there's a guy up in Canada who is regenerating teeth with frequency.
Speaker 1: Accidentally, when I applied the ultrasound, I found the lower incisor grow grow grow.
Speaker 2: Is the first to try the treatment on humans. After twenty minutes a day, new teeth started to grow in a month.
Speaker 0: So that's kind of a big deal. Obviously, they put a kibosh on his whole plan when he started going public talking about how he was gonna regenerate people's teeth because he was about to put every dentist out of business. And this is the thing, a lot of technology comes into the limelight and they're like, oh, no. Invention secrecy act. We gotta hide that so that you don't know about that.
Now we have had people with pearl powder. They've had a chipped tooth and they've had some little bit of regeneration from that, but when it gets into it, frequency plays a role. And putting fluoride in your mouth just burns holes in your teeth. Obviously, the dentist doesn't wanna tell you that, but, yeah, I will look into the Canadian fellow who was regenerating teeth with frequencies because it's a pretty cool
Speaker 1: one.
Speaker 0: That's what it is.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Radium : govt says stay away while the govt owns all the hot springs. Think about it 🧠🧠 https://t.co/mdrG92xUvl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: This book is 800 pages long on how they were healing all of the big c with radium. How they were healing lupus. How they were healing autoimmune. And it's interesting because radium is connected to to the hot springs. That's what makes them hot.
So if you think about it, that's why all the very wealthy people used to go sit in the hot springs. There's the benefits of radium and uranium and thorium in those hot springs. So, basically, in a nutshell, because if I do open this book, it will begin to fall apart. 800 pages of studies, and I'll try to open a little bit. 800 pages of studies of all these illnesses being healed with radio in the nineteen hundreds to the nineteen twenties and those being the big c specifically.
Now here's a question too. Do you think that the illness with the big c has gone through the roof because people are no longer getting the radioactive nutrient that they once got? Think about it. They have changed our terrain a lot. They've gotten rid of a lot of things, and people used to drink out of uranium glass all the time, which has that radioactive property.
So if you get rid of the radioactive property that the people used to get all the time, then you can start to think about how the diseases would begin to change too.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This book is 800 pages long on how they were healing all of the big c with radium. How they were healing lupus. How they were healing autoimmune. And it's interesting because radium is connected to to the hot springs. That's what makes them hot.
So if you think about it, that's why all the very wealthy people used to go sit in the hot springs. There's the benefits of radium and uranium and thorium in those hot springs. So, basically, in a nutshell, because if I do open this book, it will begin to fall apart. 800 pages of studies, and I'll try to open a little bit. 800 pages of studies of all these illnesses being healed with radio in the nineteen hundreds to the nineteen twenties and those being the big c specifically.
Now here's a question too. Do you think that the illness with the big c has gone through the roof because people are no longer getting the radioactive nutrient that they once got? Think about it. They have changed our terrain a lot. They've gotten rid of a lot of things, and people used to drink out of uranium glass all the time, which has that radioactive property.
So if you get rid of the radioactive property that the people used to get all the time, then you can start to think about how the diseases would begin to change too.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
The DNA scam. Like RNA, Genes, MRNA, GMOS, Paternity tests, Criminal forensics, Genetic testing, and kovid. Land of make believe. 📖 https://t.co/oNejswG7yc
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the DNA X-ray picture and related genetic science are part of a long-standing scam. They claim the “first X-ray” of DNA was actually done on salt, not on human DNA, and question how anyone can describe DNA as a double helix when the initial X-ray picture came from salt. They assert that identifying a criminal’s DNA, conducting PCR to amplify it, and declaring guilt are all part of a deception. The speaker clusters DNA, paternity testing, COVID testing, and claims of genetic diseases as examples of a broader fabrication, describing society as living in a “land of make believe.”
They extend the critique to spike protein, calling it “made up” and alleging it is another sales tactic, specifically noting pine tea as part of the marketing. The speaker contends that everything from viruses to RNA to DNA to spike proteins to shedding and other related narratives are stories built upon one another, and that once you understand that viruses are fake, all the related stories collapse. The metaphor used is that of an “adapter to the adapter to the adapter,” implying a chain of manufactured explanations designed to support these claims.
The speaker also remarks that some misinformation or odd trends appear in everyday products, citing “gluten free nail polish” as a stylized example, and suggests they are compelled to sign off and stop engaging with the topic, indicating a sense of overwhelm or inability to continue discussing it.
Key claims highlighted include: the first DNA X-ray was done on salt; the DNA double helix concept is therefore questionable; PCR and DNA-based guilt (criminal identification, paternity tests, and disease diagnoses) are part of a fraudulent framework; spike protein and related virus narratives are not genuine; many biological concepts are fabricated and rely on a chain of misleading stories; and there are odd, unrelated trends in products (such as gluten free nail polish) used to illustrate the pervasiveness of misinformation. The speaker signals an abrupt exit from the discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about the X-ray picture of DNA, an epic history scam? Yes. That is one of the largest scams to ever perpetrate humanity. The X-ray of the DNA, the first picture of the DNA that they've been selling the people was done on salt. You can look it up.
Go to Google and type in the first x-ray done on DNA. It was done on salt. So how can you how can you tell people that, you know, their their DNA is a double helix that's spiraling and whatever else when you x rayed salt? You didn't even get it from a human. You didn't even get the picture from a human.
You actually just got it from salt. So yes, when they tell you DNA, they found the DNA of the criminal. Right? They found the DNA of the criminal. Yeah.
They used a PCR test. They amplified it, and then they said you're guilty. So the whole DNA thing, they just they just make it up. Same with paternity testing, same with the COVID, same with, you know, you've got this genetic disease, you've got that disease. We live in the land of make believe, my friends.
That's what it is. We live in the land of make believe. And somebody said, can you talk about spike protein? That's made up too. That's another one.
That's to sell you some pine tea. Like, that's that's all spike protein, sell you pine tea. More made up make believe nonsense. This is the thing. They make up so many things from viruses to RNA to DNA to spike proteins to shedding to this is gonna get you to this.
It's a story on a story on a story on a story. But when you understand that viruses are fake, all of the other stories all fall apart too. Right? Because you understood the first one, so then you understand all the rest. It's like the adapter to the adapter to the adapter to the adapter.
That's what it is. Somebody said I saw gluten free nail polish. Honestly, I have to sign off. I can't I can't do it. I I can't do it anymore.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Radium water experiments with the radium ore Revigator. Results in structured water and apples that don't age. Big reason govt said stay away.💧 https://t.co/Ez1Pkfidnp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes purchasing a “radioactive water bottle” and tests its effects by filling the jar with water, drinking from it the next day, and noting survival. They mention also placing apples inside the bottle and eating them daily, claiming they are still alive and pointing out the apples’ involvement as part of the routine. A leak is observed in the bottle, causing water to spill out, leaving only a portion of liquid remaining.
They decide to drink the remaining water and report their experience after consuming about half of it, describing the substance as “pretty powerful.” The speaker notes that it is hard to explain what it does, but states that they feel very focused and that the music feels really good. This impression is linked to a warning or caution, as they add that this is “probably why they told people to stay away from it.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I bought this radioactive water bottle. Check this. Put some water in it, drink out of it, and will I live? So it says I should fill the jar and then drink out of it the next day. So I'm gonna put this water in here, and we're gonna see if I survive this radioactive water.
So what I've also been doing is I've been taking apples, and I've been putting them in here and then eating them daily. And I'm still alive. Isn't that magical? So if you see, I put the water in there, and it comes with this 96. Well, this is the only problem with this is it's got a leak, now all my water's spilling out.
Oh, crazy. So this is what I got left. I'm gonna drink it. Let's see how I feel. I would say after drinking about half of this, this stuff is pretty powerful.
It's hard to explain what it does, but you feel very focused, and the music feels really good. It's probably why they told people to stay away from it.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Radium water 💧 drink it ? https://odysee.com/@CultivateElevate:e2/Radium-water%2C-cordyceps%2C-and-radiation-lies:2 https://t.co/Y8aPNL8WLz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a large radium water bottle called the revigorator, which contains radium ore inside clay. He asserts that the government tells people radium is toxic, but claims this device was used to heal people. He demonstrates the device’s radioactivity, noting it is “as radioactive as it gets” and showing measurements of “45 up to 90.” He points out that there is water inside the jug, visible as liquid in the container, and labels the contents “radioactive water.”
He asserts the government would tell you this is dangerous if you do this, and counters with, “You’ve been duped,” recounting his journey of believing there were lies about the benefits of radium. He shares experiential claims about drinking radium water, stating that it makes you feel calm, real zen, real focused, and that the world feels like a peaceful place.
The speaker connects radium water to a broader claim about turning ordinary water into spring water, describing radium water as related to hot springs. He explicitly states that radium water is “uranium water” and also mentions “thorium,” implying that the composition or effect includes these elements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nineteen twenties, radium water bottle is what this is. It's called the revigorator, and there is radium ore inside this, inside the clay. And they'll tell you it's toxic because it's you know, that's the government. That's what they love to tell you. But it's interesting because they were healing people with this right here.
And this thing is just mammoth. Like, it's really it's a challenge to hold this right now. So what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna put this right here, and I'm gonna show you how radioactive this is right here. So watch this. Ready?
You can hear that. Right there. So that is as radioactive as it gets. That's at 45 up to 90. Okay?
So this is radioactive water right here. And I will show it that there is water in there right there. You see that? If you guys can see that water right there. So this is radioactive water.
And now the government would tell you this is dangerous if you do this. Yeah. You've been duped. That's what it is. I have gone on this whole journey understanding that we have been lied to about the benefits of radium.
And it's interesting because when you drink a little bit of radium water, what happens is you feel real calm, you feel real zen, you feel real focused in, and the world is just a peaceful place. So think about that. And it's interesting because they talked about radium water would when you put water in this jug right here, it would turn the water into spring water. All those hot springs, that's what radium water is. It's uranium water.
It's thorium.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Books not taught in the school system. I wonder why 👀 https://t.co/HhGUOfggk3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker runs through a list of books and related claims, presenting each as something worth reading for its controversial or alternative perspectives.
- The International by Henry Ford: The speaker notes, “If you haven't read this one, Henry Ford talks about how these people own all the school systems.” This is linked to the idea that this ownership explains why certain information isn’t widely read, followed by a claim about unlimited oil being discussed in the same work or in related material.
- Radiation and radium: The speaker mentions that this title “goes into how radiation is actually beneficial, like radium,” presenting it as a fun fact within the material.
- Raw diets and animals: The speaker references content that “goes into raw diets and why you should eat raw, also why animals should eat raw and not cooked garbage,” framing it as a key takeaway from the discussed sources.
- World Without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin: The speaker cites this book as part of the referenced readings.
- Story of B-17 and apricot seeds: The speaker highlights this title, noting the comparison to conventional cancer treatments. Specifically, “Obviously, chemo is what they normally give people instead of giving them apricots.”
- Invisible Rainbow: The speaker summarizes this work as addressing how “Wi Fi and wireless technology is the main culprit of all the pandemics,” adding, “Obviously, they're not gonna tell you that,” and asserting, “They make up fake viruses.”
- Can you catch a cold? Daniel Roitos: The speaker lists this as another recommended or discussed book.
- Dirty electricity: Included among the cited readings or topics.
- The peanut allergy epidemic: The speaker references this issue as part of the broader discussion on health and science.
- Allergies and vaccines: The speaker claims, “All the allergies coming from the vaccines,” presenting it as a point these sources emphasize that “they’ll never tell anybody.”
- Deliberate dumbing down of America: The speaker ends with this title, tying it all together with the idea that “All ties back to now.”
Overall, the speaker is cataloging a set of books and claims that challenge mainstream science and public health narratives, emphasizing themes such as influence over institutions, unconventional views on radiation and diet, alternative cancer treatments, and supposed links between wireless tech, pandemics, vaccines, and societal decline. The list juxtaposes provocative assertions with specific book titles and authors to underscore a common thread of skepticism toward established institutions and scientific consensus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's hit on a couple books. The International by Henry Ford. If you haven't read this one, Henry Ford talks about how these people own all the school systems. That's why you haven't read this one. This one goes into how we have unlimited oil.
That's a fun one. This one goes into how radiation is actually beneficial, like radium. Fun fun fact. These go into raw diets and why you should eat raw, also why animals should eat raw and not cooked garbage. World without cancer by g Edward Griffin.
Story of b 17 and apricot seeds. Obviously, chemo is what they normally give people instead of giving them apricots. Invisible rainbow, how Wi Fi and wireless technology is the main culprit of all the pandemics. Obviously, they're not gonna tell you that. They make up fake viruses.
Can you catch a cold? Daniel Roitos. Great one. And dirty electricity. And then the peanut allergy epidemic.
All the allergies coming from the vaccines. That's one they'll never tell anybody. And the deliberate dumbing down of America. All ties back to now.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Gas price manipulation: Even the ex-shah of Iran said the same thing, but the govt would never do that.....😶 https://t.co/mejJjjkQE3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses gas prices, claiming they are wrecking the farmers and questions whether gas should be at this price. He attributes the oil shortage to a War with Iran, which he says was caused by “the tiny hats and the president.” He then says he checked a government website that breaks down petroleum coming in and going out, noting that “down below, you see that there’s actually more coming in now than there was a year ago.” He asks why prices are higher and suggests that someone might be lying about something, noting a discrepancy with claims that refining is insufficient.
Speaker 0 continues by referencing the 1970s and stating that they “pulled the exact same playbook,” and he intends to have the audience hear a quote from “the Shah of Iran” about gas lines. He recalls: “Have you seen the lines of cars stretching for blocks, in some cases for miles, waiting to get gas… And you cannot you have imported more oil than any time in the past. Well, not recently, we haven't. You have?” He then remarks, “So after that video, we can see that there’s really no shortage and the gas prices are just being jacked up on purpose.” He asks who’s pulling the strings and answers, “the tiny hats,” asserting that the tiny hats “control the banks, control all of these things, manipulate the numbers, and then kinda screw the people.” He concludes by urging readers to notice the connection to Iran and says it’s “interesting,” leaving the audience to think about it, and ends with a reference to a 1976 water car.
Speaker 2 introduces a tangential topic about Stan Meyer’s invention, the water fuel cell, which “takes the place of his old gas tank.” He explains that the water fuel cell “breaks down water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen,” and that hydrogen is used to run his dune buggy.
Speaker 1 adds a note about what to use for the fuel cell: “I don't care if you use rain water, well water, city water, ocean water. If you don't have any fresh water, go ahead and use snow.” If there is no snow available, he suggests using salt water, claiming there is “no adverse effect to the fuel cell.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we're gonna hit on these gas prices which are wrecking the farmers. And do you believe that the gas should be this price? Let's talk about it. Now what they're saying is this that the war with Iran, which was caused by the tiny hats and the president, is causing the oil shortage. That's what they're telling us.
So I decided to go on to this government website, which says the stats of what's actually happening, and it's pretty interesting. And what this website does is it breaks down how much petroleum is coming in, how much going out. And what's interesting is down below, you see that there's actually more coming in now than there was a year ago. So why are the prices higher? Then someone might say, well, they're not refining as much.
Right? A year ago? Today. More today. So it seems somebody's lying about something.
Now back in the nineteen seventies, they pulled the exact same playbook, and I'm gonna have you hear a quote from the Shah of Iran.
Speaker 1: Have you seen the lines of cars stretching for blocks, in some cases for miles, waiting to get gas seen the pictures And you cannot you have imported more oil than any time in the past. Well, not recently, we haven't. You have?
Speaker 0: So after that video, we can see that there's really no shortage and the gas prices are just being jacked up on purpose. And who's pulling the strings? Well, the shot actually explains it as well too. Right here, the tiny hats. Tiny hats control the banks, control all of these things, manipulate the numbers, and then kinda screw the people.
Do you kinda see about this? Why they're evading Iran? Interesting. Something to kinda think about. Let me leave you with the water car from 1976.
Speaker 2: Water has always been considered a precious commodity, but Stan Meyer's invention may make it even more valuable. He has developed what's called a water fuel cell. It has taken the place of his old gas tank. The water fuel cell breaks down water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen. Hydrogen The is used to run his dune buggy.
Speaker 1: I don't care if you use rain water, well water, city water, ocean water. If you don't have any fresh water, go ahead and use snow. If you don't have any snow available to you, then use salt water because there's no adverse effect to the fuel cell.